ACC looks to build inclusive, bully-free cardiology workplaces



The American College of Cardiology has issued a new health policy statement directed at eliminating the bias, discrimination, bullying, and harassment that hamstrings the delivery of quality cardiovascular care.

“We pay a lot of attention, of course, to our patients and patient care issues but our ability to care optimally for patients is limited if the workforce is handicapped in any way,” said Pamela S. Douglas, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., who cochaired the writing committee.

The document is the second in the ACC’s diversity inclusion initiative, following the 2019 report on equal compensation and opportunity in cardiology, but the foundation for the work actually started 5 years ago, she told this news organization.

Dr. Pamela Douglas, professor of research in cardiovascular diseases at Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Dr. Pamela Douglas

“Unfortunately, COVID and other world events have created a climate in the United States where people don’t treat each other terribly well,” Dr. Douglas said. “It’s divisive and confrontational often, when it should be collaborative. So this document, at this time, was serendipitous but wonderful timing.”

The 2022 ACC Health Policy Statement on Building Respect, Civility, and Inclusion in the Cardiovascular Workforce was published online March 17 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

The 63-page document provides 12 principles for building a better workplace, starting with the belief that civil behavior and respect are inherent in its core values of teamwork, collaboration, and professionalism.

The ACC calls on all organizations and individuals involved in providing cardiovascular care, education, or research to recognize the “ubiquity” of uncivil behavior and the continuum of bias, discrimination, bullying, and harassment (BDBH) that characterize it.

Some of the recommendations they offer to eliminate these behaviors include:

  • Creating institutional policies and resources to ensure hiring decisions, evaluations, and departmental/program/center reviews are objective.
  • Including assessments of personal behaviors related to respect and civility in performance reviews.
  • Establishing confidential, fair, and transparent mechanisms for reporting and investigating individuals and/or departments suspected of BDBH.
  • Adopting longitudinal metrics and accurate data collection to track progress and inform future policy and interventions.
  • Encouraging independent evaluation of institutional culture and efforts to reduce BDBH.
  • Celebrating those who promote and achieve excellence in reducing BDBH.

Patients behaving badly

What’s new, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, is the number of patients who themselves engage in disrespectful and uncivil behavior, observed Dr. Douglas.

“As physicians, it was the patient’s always right. So you work to do backflips to accommodate the patient,” she said. “But when the patient says: I don’t want to be treated by anybody that comes from outside the United States, that’s not our society anymore. And that has to be addressed and dealt with.”

The policy statement features a suite of online tools and resources including 15 case examples and 30 sample policies from institutions that have been anonymized and some provide an action framework for addressing this type of patient behavior, Dr. Douglas said. An individual, for example, can ask the patient why they made the remark, explaining that the provider is qualified and someone they’d like to have care for their own family. If it was a trainee on the receiving end, it’s fair for them to go back to their supervisor, mentor, or training director.

“They should back you up and explain to the patient that it’s not who we are at this hospital and that they’re happy to provide care, but they are part of the hospital and need to obey the rules and environment in this hospital,” she said.

Writing committee cochair Michael J. Mack, MD, of Baylor Scott & White Health, Plano, Tex., told tthis news organization that “one of the concepts that I hadn’t heard before that resonated with me was the term ‘upstander’ – that you can’t just be a bystander and watch this happen and do nothing. If you’re witness to this in the workplace, if it’s gender bias or racial bias, you need to get involved and reach out to that individual and see what you can do to help and be a reporter of it.”


Recommended Reading

Raise a glass to speed up the brain’s aging process
MDedge Cardiology
Women still missing from CV clinical trial leadership
MDedge Cardiology
Can a tool help overcome barriers to diabetes medication cost?
MDedge Cardiology
Which companies aren’t exiting Russia? Big pharma
MDedge Cardiology
Cardiologist pleads guilty to abusive sexual contact
MDedge Cardiology
Inside insulin (Part 2): Approaching a cure for type 1 diabetes?
MDedge Cardiology
Selling your practice
MDedge Cardiology
Study: Majority of research on homeopathic remedies unpublished or unregistered
MDedge Cardiology
Cardiologists say rights to maternity leave violated
MDedge Cardiology
‘It’s about transparency’: Indiana law prohibits misleading medical titles
MDedge Cardiology