User login
Mr. W, age 50, presents to the psychiatry clinic with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. At his first interview, he says he spends every waking hour obsessing over whether or not he does things “right.” These thoughts force him to compulsively check and recheck everything he does, from simple body movements to complex computer tasks.
He has a history of OCD since age 8, with intermittent episodes of major depression. He reports that several years ago, he had a “miraculous” response to clomipramine for several weeks but has not responded to any other medication. Nevertheless, he continues taking clomipramine, 50 mg/d, hoping that it “might eventually do some good.” He adds that when he tried to increase the dose, he suffered from “terrible constipation” despite regular use of a methylcellulose fiber supplement.
The psychiatrist discontinues clomipramine and starts Mr. W on duloxetine, 90 mg/d. At the next visit, Mr. W complains that his constipation is much worse, so the psychiatrist decreases duloxetine to 60 mg/d, which eventually provides some relief. Because Mr. W has minimal response to duloxetine after 6 months, the psychiatrist adds olanzapine. Although this agent is anticholinergic, the patient had responded to a previous trial of this antipsychotic. Soon after, Mr. W experiences severe constipation.
Psychiatric patients face a host of potential causes of constipation, including:
- use of psychotropics and other medications
- decreased eating or physical activity as a result of depression or another psychiatric disorder
- medical comorbidities that decrease gastrointestinal (GI) motility.
Constipation carries a tremendous cost in terms of resources and quality of life.1-7 This condition also can make patients stop taking medications. You can help patients avoid the discomfort and quality-of-life consequences by promptly diagnosing constipation and following a 5-step treatment algorithm that has shown value in our clinical practice.
- 2 or more of the following
- Loose stools are rarely present unless the patient takes a laxative
- Patient does not meet criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
* Must be present during ≥25% of defecations
Source: Reference 8
What to look for
When evaluating a patient who complains of constipation, first determine what he or she means by “constipation.” Do not rely on frequency of bowel movements as the only criterion for diagnosis. Under Rome Committee for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders guidelines for diagnosis of chronic (or functional) constipation, patients who move their bowels daily may meet criteria for chronic constipation if they experience straining, incomplete evacuation, or other symptoms (Box 1).8
Many patients who complain of constipation have daily, regular bowel movements that produce hard, difficult-to-pass stool or require straining or manual maneuvers. Take a careful history including:
- stool frequency and quality
- straining
- manual maneuvers (disimpaction or manual pelvic floor support)
- sensation of blockage or incomplete evacuation.
‘Alarm’ symptoms. For psychiatrists, the most important part of the Rome guidelines are the “alarm” symptoms:
- age ≥50 years
- family history of colon cancer or polyps
- family history of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease)
- rectal bleeding, anemia
- weight loss >10 pounds
- new onset of chronic constipation without apparent cause in an elderly patient
- severe, persistent constipation refractory to conservative management.9
Table 1
Colorectal cancer screening recommendations*
Test | Frequency |
---|---|
Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) | Annually |
Sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
FOBT and sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
Double contrast barium enema | Every 5 years |
Colonoscopy | Every 10 years |
* For patients age=50. For higher-risk patients, it is reasonable to begin screening at a younger age | |
Source: Reference 10 |
Determining the cause
Common causes of constipation include altered visceral sensitivity, decreased GI motility, alterations in pelvic and anorectal musculature, and alterations in the enteric nervous system. Systemic causes are less common and include electrolyte abnormalities (hypercalcemia and hypokalemia) and endocrine disorders (hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus).
Some patients’ constipation is caused by involuntarily contracting the pelvic floor muscles or suppressing the urge to defecate (Box 2).1,11,12 Suspect this in patients who strain repeatedly to pass soft or liquid stool.
Medication side effects are probably the most common constipation cause psychiatrists will encounter. Many psychotropics have anticholinergic effects that decrease GI motility and cause constipation. The most commonly implicated drugs are:
- older tricyclic antidepressants (such as amitriptyline)
- antipsychotics.
Outlet obstruction, caused by inappropriately contracting posterior pelvic floor muscles during defecatory effort, is the cause of 5% to 10% of constipation cases.1 Patients are not aware of this pelvic floor incoordination. Often, they will give a history of straining even for soft or liquid stool.
Consider outlet obstruction in women with history of multiple vaginal childbirths or pelvic or gynecologic surgery, particularly if they fail to respond to usual measures to treat constipation. For adequate relief, these patients often require anorectal biofeedback, which teaches them to relax the posterior pelvic floor.11,12
Habitually suppressing the gastrocolic reflex—the urge to defecate after eating—causes some patients difficulty moving their bowels. Counsel these patients to sit on the toilet for several minutes after the morning meal to relearn this behavior. Some may need several weeks of daily enema or glycerine suppository use to retrain themselves to have bowel movements after the morning meal.
Other psychiatric-related causes. Patients with depression may experience decreased stool output because of a lack of food intake or physical activity. These causes may be effectively addressed by treating the depression.
Give special consideration to patients with eating disorders and those who routinely use laxatives. A patient who is not eating will not produce the same amount of stool as one who eats regularly.
Constipated patients may require escalating doses of laxatives to obtain symptom relief; this does not constitute laxative abuse but rather tachyphylaxis. Chronic laxative use has not been shown to permanently decrease colonic motility,14 but patients who use laxatives chronically may have altered expectations of what is normal.
CASE CONTINUED: Recurring symptoms
After discontinuing Mr. W’s olanzapine and duloxetine, the psychiatrist prescribes polyethylene glycol solution (MiraLax) and instructs Mr. W to increase his daily fluid and fiber intake. Although the solution works well, Mr. W complains of the cost. He then resumes methyl cellulose and starts taking magnesium hydroxide chewable tablets (Milk of Magnesia) every 2 to 4 days as needed for constipation.
The psychiatrist prescribes mirtazapine for OCD symptoms, but soon stops this regimen because Mr. W complains of worsening constipation. Next Mr. W is started on fluvoxamine, which he had tried briefly many years before. The dosage is gradually titrated to 150 mg/d. Although Mr. W’s OCD improves somewhat, he complains of agitation and once again of worsening constipation.
Treatment algorithm
To minimize trial and error, we use a stepwise approach to treating constipation (Algorithm).8,11,15 Although many standard recommendations have not been evaluated in large randomized controlled trials, they are supported by decades of observed actions among clinicians and thus remain valuable.
Multiple nonprescription agents are available to treat constipation, including:
- bulking agents (fiber supplements)
- lubricating agents
- stool softening agents
- stimulant and osmotic laxatives (Table 2).8
Steps 1 & 2. When initial attempts at increasing physical activity, fluid, and dietary fiber fail to yield a response, fiber supplements are commonly used as a second step in managing constipation. We advocate beginning with a supplement that contains psyllium—such as Fiber-all or Metamucil—because psyllium has been shown to increase stool frequency. Supplements that contain methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (such as Equalactin and Mitrolan), or bran have either not shown efficacy or have not been studied rigorously enough to merit recommendation.10 Some patients respond to other fiber products, but start a fibernaïve patient with a psyllium-containing supplement.
Fiber supplements may cause increased gas and bloating, so start at a low dose and gradually increase over several weeks to mitigate these side effects.
In our experience, patients usually have tried bisacodyl before seeking treatment for constipation. Although bisacodyl may be effective for some patients, others may need something stronger. Many gastroenterologists prefer prescribing osmotic or prescription laxatives.
Step 4. Osmotic laxatives generally are liquids, including magnesium hydroxide, polyethylene glycol solution, and the prescription agent lactulose. Magnesium hydroxide is inexpensive and can be taken chronically.
Algorithm
A stepwise approach to managing constipation
Step 1 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Increase activity or daily walking | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients; exercise is associated with decreased orocecal transit time15 |
Increase fluid intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
Increase dietary fiber intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
↓ | |
Step 2 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Fiber supplements | Psyllium compounds may be superior to methylcellulose, polycarbophil, and bran11 |
↓ | |
Step 3 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative pills | Senna compounds are derived from plants |
↓ | |
Step 4 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative solutions | Milk of Magnesia is very inexpensive |
↓ | |
Step 5 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Prescription laxatives | Lubiprostone causes fetal loss in animals; tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug protocol |
Table 2
Commonly used laxatives: Mechanisms of action
Category | Agents |
---|---|
Bulk-forming | Methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (Equalactin, Mitrolan, others), psyllium (Fiberall, Metamucil, others) |
Lubricating | Glycerin (Sani-Supp), magnesium hydroxide and mineral oil (Magnolax), mineral oil (Fleet Mineral Oil, Zymenol, others) |
Stool softener | Docusate sodium (Colace) |
Osmotic | Magnesium hydroxide (Milk of Magnesia), polyethylene glycol (MiraLax), lactulose* (Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others), lubiprostone* (Amitiza) |
Stimulant | Bisacodyl (Correctol, Dulcolax, others), castor oil (Alphamul, Emulsoil, others), senna/sennosides (Ex-Lax, Senokot, others), sodium bicarbonate and potassium bitartrate (Ceo-Two evacuant) |
* Available by prescription only | |
Source: Reference 8 |
Prescription medications
Tegaserod is a partial 5-HT4 agonist and stimulator of GI motility and secretion. It also decreases visceral sensitivity.16 Tegaserod’s manufacturer voluntarily withdrew the drug from the market because it may increase risk of cardiovascular ischemic events, including angina, heart attack, and stroke. Tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug (IND) protocol that includes obtaining approval from a local institutional review board. We recommend that psychiatrists should not prescribe tegaserod but refer patients to experienced gastroenterologists or other GI specialists.
Lubiprostone is a selective chloride channel activator that works only in the gut and results in net fluid excretion and increased stool frequency. The molecule is a prostaglandin derivative and is poorly absorbed.17
Because lubiprostone has been shown to cause fetal loss in animals (at the equivalent of 2 and 6 times the recommended human dose), women of reproductive age should use contraception while taking lubiprostone and carefully consider the risks and benefits of lubiprostone use during pregnancy.
CASE CONTINUED: Finding an effective strategy
The psychiatrist prescribes lubiprostone, 24 mcg bid, but Mr. W once again complains of the expense and says the drug does not work well. He quickly returns to his intermittent use of magnesium hydroxide tablets and occasionally takes bisacodyl tablets.
To address Mr. W’s OCD, the psychiatrist adds risperidone, 0.5 mg bid, to Mr. W’s regimen. He has a modest response in OCD symptoms—30% of his day is now symptom- free— without worsening his constipation.
Probiotics and prebiotics
Emerging therapies for constipation include probiotics and prebiotics, which attempt to alter the gut flora and milieu. The primary bacterial agents are Lactobacillus species and Bifidobacterium species. At least one probiotic Bifidobacterium product—Activia—is being marketed in the United States as a fortified yogurt.
Investigational medications. Renzapride is a 5HT4 receptor agonist and 5HT3 receptor antagonist that has shown promise in a pilot study18 and is in phase III trials. Linaclotide is a peptide that activates chloride and bicarbonate secretion in the gut and may reduce visceral hypersensitivity. It too has shown promise in a pilot study.19
Related resources
- Rome Foundation. Functional gastrointestinal disorders. www.romecriteria.org.
- Bleser S, Brunton S, Carmichael B, et al. Management of chronic constipation: recommendations from a consensus panel. J Fam Pract 2005;54(8):691-8.
- Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clomipramine • Anafranil
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Duloxetine • Cymbalta
- Fluvoxamine • Luvox
- Lactulose • Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others
- Lubiprostone • Amitiza
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Thioridazine • Mellaril
- Tegaserod • Zelnorm
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project was partially supported by grant number 5 T32 HS013852 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
1. Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(12):3530-40.
2. Choung RS, Locke GR, 3rd, Schleck CD, et al. Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: a population-based study 1988-2003. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26(11-12):1521-8.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUPnet). Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov. Accessed March 19, 2008.
4. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34(4):606-11.
5. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32(1):1-8.
6. Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, et al. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23(5):461-76.
7. Donald IP, Smith RG, Cruikshank JG, et al. A study of constipation in the elderly living at home. Gerontology 1985;31(2):112-8.
8. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130(5):1480-91.
9. American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;(100 suppl 1):S1-4.
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Colorectal cancer screening. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal. Accessed March 19, 2008.
11. Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, et al. Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation. Gut 1998;42(4):517-21.
12. Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie NR, et al. Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback. Gut 1991;32(10):1175-9.
13. Richelson E. Receptor pharmacology of neuroleptics: relation to clinical effects. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;(60 suppl 10):5-14.
14. Muller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(1):232-42.
15. Keeling WF, Harris A, Martin BJ. Orocecal transit during mild exercise in women. J Appl Physiol 1990;68(4):1350-3.
16. Tegaserod [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals; 2006.
17. Amitiza [package insert]. Bethesda, MD: Sucampo Pharmaceuticals; 2007.
18. Tack J, Middleton SJ, Horne MC, et al. Pilot study of the efficacy of renzapride on gastrointestinal motility and symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23(11):1655-65.
19. Andresen V, Camilleri M, Busciglio IA, et al. Effect of 5 days linaclotide on transit and bowel function in females with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2007;133(3):761-8.
Mr. W, age 50, presents to the psychiatry clinic with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. At his first interview, he says he spends every waking hour obsessing over whether or not he does things “right.” These thoughts force him to compulsively check and recheck everything he does, from simple body movements to complex computer tasks.
He has a history of OCD since age 8, with intermittent episodes of major depression. He reports that several years ago, he had a “miraculous” response to clomipramine for several weeks but has not responded to any other medication. Nevertheless, he continues taking clomipramine, 50 mg/d, hoping that it “might eventually do some good.” He adds that when he tried to increase the dose, he suffered from “terrible constipation” despite regular use of a methylcellulose fiber supplement.
The psychiatrist discontinues clomipramine and starts Mr. W on duloxetine, 90 mg/d. At the next visit, Mr. W complains that his constipation is much worse, so the psychiatrist decreases duloxetine to 60 mg/d, which eventually provides some relief. Because Mr. W has minimal response to duloxetine after 6 months, the psychiatrist adds olanzapine. Although this agent is anticholinergic, the patient had responded to a previous trial of this antipsychotic. Soon after, Mr. W experiences severe constipation.
Psychiatric patients face a host of potential causes of constipation, including:
- use of psychotropics and other medications
- decreased eating or physical activity as a result of depression or another psychiatric disorder
- medical comorbidities that decrease gastrointestinal (GI) motility.
Constipation carries a tremendous cost in terms of resources and quality of life.1-7 This condition also can make patients stop taking medications. You can help patients avoid the discomfort and quality-of-life consequences by promptly diagnosing constipation and following a 5-step treatment algorithm that has shown value in our clinical practice.
- 2 or more of the following
- Loose stools are rarely present unless the patient takes a laxative
- Patient does not meet criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
* Must be present during ≥25% of defecations
Source: Reference 8
What to look for
When evaluating a patient who complains of constipation, first determine what he or she means by “constipation.” Do not rely on frequency of bowel movements as the only criterion for diagnosis. Under Rome Committee for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders guidelines for diagnosis of chronic (or functional) constipation, patients who move their bowels daily may meet criteria for chronic constipation if they experience straining, incomplete evacuation, or other symptoms (Box 1).8
Many patients who complain of constipation have daily, regular bowel movements that produce hard, difficult-to-pass stool or require straining or manual maneuvers. Take a careful history including:
- stool frequency and quality
- straining
- manual maneuvers (disimpaction or manual pelvic floor support)
- sensation of blockage or incomplete evacuation.
‘Alarm’ symptoms. For psychiatrists, the most important part of the Rome guidelines are the “alarm” symptoms:
- age ≥50 years
- family history of colon cancer or polyps
- family history of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease)
- rectal bleeding, anemia
- weight loss >10 pounds
- new onset of chronic constipation without apparent cause in an elderly patient
- severe, persistent constipation refractory to conservative management.9
Table 1
Colorectal cancer screening recommendations*
Test | Frequency |
---|---|
Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) | Annually |
Sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
FOBT and sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
Double contrast barium enema | Every 5 years |
Colonoscopy | Every 10 years |
* For patients age=50. For higher-risk patients, it is reasonable to begin screening at a younger age | |
Source: Reference 10 |
Determining the cause
Common causes of constipation include altered visceral sensitivity, decreased GI motility, alterations in pelvic and anorectal musculature, and alterations in the enteric nervous system. Systemic causes are less common and include electrolyte abnormalities (hypercalcemia and hypokalemia) and endocrine disorders (hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus).
Some patients’ constipation is caused by involuntarily contracting the pelvic floor muscles or suppressing the urge to defecate (Box 2).1,11,12 Suspect this in patients who strain repeatedly to pass soft or liquid stool.
Medication side effects are probably the most common constipation cause psychiatrists will encounter. Many psychotropics have anticholinergic effects that decrease GI motility and cause constipation. The most commonly implicated drugs are:
- older tricyclic antidepressants (such as amitriptyline)
- antipsychotics.
Outlet obstruction, caused by inappropriately contracting posterior pelvic floor muscles during defecatory effort, is the cause of 5% to 10% of constipation cases.1 Patients are not aware of this pelvic floor incoordination. Often, they will give a history of straining even for soft or liquid stool.
Consider outlet obstruction in women with history of multiple vaginal childbirths or pelvic or gynecologic surgery, particularly if they fail to respond to usual measures to treat constipation. For adequate relief, these patients often require anorectal biofeedback, which teaches them to relax the posterior pelvic floor.11,12
Habitually suppressing the gastrocolic reflex—the urge to defecate after eating—causes some patients difficulty moving their bowels. Counsel these patients to sit on the toilet for several minutes after the morning meal to relearn this behavior. Some may need several weeks of daily enema or glycerine suppository use to retrain themselves to have bowel movements after the morning meal.
Other psychiatric-related causes. Patients with depression may experience decreased stool output because of a lack of food intake or physical activity. These causes may be effectively addressed by treating the depression.
Give special consideration to patients with eating disorders and those who routinely use laxatives. A patient who is not eating will not produce the same amount of stool as one who eats regularly.
Constipated patients may require escalating doses of laxatives to obtain symptom relief; this does not constitute laxative abuse but rather tachyphylaxis. Chronic laxative use has not been shown to permanently decrease colonic motility,14 but patients who use laxatives chronically may have altered expectations of what is normal.
CASE CONTINUED: Recurring symptoms
After discontinuing Mr. W’s olanzapine and duloxetine, the psychiatrist prescribes polyethylene glycol solution (MiraLax) and instructs Mr. W to increase his daily fluid and fiber intake. Although the solution works well, Mr. W complains of the cost. He then resumes methyl cellulose and starts taking magnesium hydroxide chewable tablets (Milk of Magnesia) every 2 to 4 days as needed for constipation.
The psychiatrist prescribes mirtazapine for OCD symptoms, but soon stops this regimen because Mr. W complains of worsening constipation. Next Mr. W is started on fluvoxamine, which he had tried briefly many years before. The dosage is gradually titrated to 150 mg/d. Although Mr. W’s OCD improves somewhat, he complains of agitation and once again of worsening constipation.
Treatment algorithm
To minimize trial and error, we use a stepwise approach to treating constipation (Algorithm).8,11,15 Although many standard recommendations have not been evaluated in large randomized controlled trials, they are supported by decades of observed actions among clinicians and thus remain valuable.
Multiple nonprescription agents are available to treat constipation, including:
- bulking agents (fiber supplements)
- lubricating agents
- stool softening agents
- stimulant and osmotic laxatives (Table 2).8
Steps 1 & 2. When initial attempts at increasing physical activity, fluid, and dietary fiber fail to yield a response, fiber supplements are commonly used as a second step in managing constipation. We advocate beginning with a supplement that contains psyllium—such as Fiber-all or Metamucil—because psyllium has been shown to increase stool frequency. Supplements that contain methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (such as Equalactin and Mitrolan), or bran have either not shown efficacy or have not been studied rigorously enough to merit recommendation.10 Some patients respond to other fiber products, but start a fibernaïve patient with a psyllium-containing supplement.
Fiber supplements may cause increased gas and bloating, so start at a low dose and gradually increase over several weeks to mitigate these side effects.
In our experience, patients usually have tried bisacodyl before seeking treatment for constipation. Although bisacodyl may be effective for some patients, others may need something stronger. Many gastroenterologists prefer prescribing osmotic or prescription laxatives.
Step 4. Osmotic laxatives generally are liquids, including magnesium hydroxide, polyethylene glycol solution, and the prescription agent lactulose. Magnesium hydroxide is inexpensive and can be taken chronically.
Algorithm
A stepwise approach to managing constipation
Step 1 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Increase activity or daily walking | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients; exercise is associated with decreased orocecal transit time15 |
Increase fluid intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
Increase dietary fiber intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
↓ | |
Step 2 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Fiber supplements | Psyllium compounds may be superior to methylcellulose, polycarbophil, and bran11 |
↓ | |
Step 3 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative pills | Senna compounds are derived from plants |
↓ | |
Step 4 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative solutions | Milk of Magnesia is very inexpensive |
↓ | |
Step 5 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Prescription laxatives | Lubiprostone causes fetal loss in animals; tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug protocol |
Table 2
Commonly used laxatives: Mechanisms of action
Category | Agents |
---|---|
Bulk-forming | Methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (Equalactin, Mitrolan, others), psyllium (Fiberall, Metamucil, others) |
Lubricating | Glycerin (Sani-Supp), magnesium hydroxide and mineral oil (Magnolax), mineral oil (Fleet Mineral Oil, Zymenol, others) |
Stool softener | Docusate sodium (Colace) |
Osmotic | Magnesium hydroxide (Milk of Magnesia), polyethylene glycol (MiraLax), lactulose* (Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others), lubiprostone* (Amitiza) |
Stimulant | Bisacodyl (Correctol, Dulcolax, others), castor oil (Alphamul, Emulsoil, others), senna/sennosides (Ex-Lax, Senokot, others), sodium bicarbonate and potassium bitartrate (Ceo-Two evacuant) |
* Available by prescription only | |
Source: Reference 8 |
Prescription medications
Tegaserod is a partial 5-HT4 agonist and stimulator of GI motility and secretion. It also decreases visceral sensitivity.16 Tegaserod’s manufacturer voluntarily withdrew the drug from the market because it may increase risk of cardiovascular ischemic events, including angina, heart attack, and stroke. Tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug (IND) protocol that includes obtaining approval from a local institutional review board. We recommend that psychiatrists should not prescribe tegaserod but refer patients to experienced gastroenterologists or other GI specialists.
Lubiprostone is a selective chloride channel activator that works only in the gut and results in net fluid excretion and increased stool frequency. The molecule is a prostaglandin derivative and is poorly absorbed.17
Because lubiprostone has been shown to cause fetal loss in animals (at the equivalent of 2 and 6 times the recommended human dose), women of reproductive age should use contraception while taking lubiprostone and carefully consider the risks and benefits of lubiprostone use during pregnancy.
CASE CONTINUED: Finding an effective strategy
The psychiatrist prescribes lubiprostone, 24 mcg bid, but Mr. W once again complains of the expense and says the drug does not work well. He quickly returns to his intermittent use of magnesium hydroxide tablets and occasionally takes bisacodyl tablets.
To address Mr. W’s OCD, the psychiatrist adds risperidone, 0.5 mg bid, to Mr. W’s regimen. He has a modest response in OCD symptoms—30% of his day is now symptom- free— without worsening his constipation.
Probiotics and prebiotics
Emerging therapies for constipation include probiotics and prebiotics, which attempt to alter the gut flora and milieu. The primary bacterial agents are Lactobacillus species and Bifidobacterium species. At least one probiotic Bifidobacterium product—Activia—is being marketed in the United States as a fortified yogurt.
Investigational medications. Renzapride is a 5HT4 receptor agonist and 5HT3 receptor antagonist that has shown promise in a pilot study18 and is in phase III trials. Linaclotide is a peptide that activates chloride and bicarbonate secretion in the gut and may reduce visceral hypersensitivity. It too has shown promise in a pilot study.19
Related resources
- Rome Foundation. Functional gastrointestinal disorders. www.romecriteria.org.
- Bleser S, Brunton S, Carmichael B, et al. Management of chronic constipation: recommendations from a consensus panel. J Fam Pract 2005;54(8):691-8.
- Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clomipramine • Anafranil
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Duloxetine • Cymbalta
- Fluvoxamine • Luvox
- Lactulose • Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others
- Lubiprostone • Amitiza
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Thioridazine • Mellaril
- Tegaserod • Zelnorm
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project was partially supported by grant number 5 T32 HS013852 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Mr. W, age 50, presents to the psychiatry clinic with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. At his first interview, he says he spends every waking hour obsessing over whether or not he does things “right.” These thoughts force him to compulsively check and recheck everything he does, from simple body movements to complex computer tasks.
He has a history of OCD since age 8, with intermittent episodes of major depression. He reports that several years ago, he had a “miraculous” response to clomipramine for several weeks but has not responded to any other medication. Nevertheless, he continues taking clomipramine, 50 mg/d, hoping that it “might eventually do some good.” He adds that when he tried to increase the dose, he suffered from “terrible constipation” despite regular use of a methylcellulose fiber supplement.
The psychiatrist discontinues clomipramine and starts Mr. W on duloxetine, 90 mg/d. At the next visit, Mr. W complains that his constipation is much worse, so the psychiatrist decreases duloxetine to 60 mg/d, which eventually provides some relief. Because Mr. W has minimal response to duloxetine after 6 months, the psychiatrist adds olanzapine. Although this agent is anticholinergic, the patient had responded to a previous trial of this antipsychotic. Soon after, Mr. W experiences severe constipation.
Psychiatric patients face a host of potential causes of constipation, including:
- use of psychotropics and other medications
- decreased eating or physical activity as a result of depression or another psychiatric disorder
- medical comorbidities that decrease gastrointestinal (GI) motility.
Constipation carries a tremendous cost in terms of resources and quality of life.1-7 This condition also can make patients stop taking medications. You can help patients avoid the discomfort and quality-of-life consequences by promptly diagnosing constipation and following a 5-step treatment algorithm that has shown value in our clinical practice.
- 2 or more of the following
- Loose stools are rarely present unless the patient takes a laxative
- Patient does not meet criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
* Must be present during ≥25% of defecations
Source: Reference 8
What to look for
When evaluating a patient who complains of constipation, first determine what he or she means by “constipation.” Do not rely on frequency of bowel movements as the only criterion for diagnosis. Under Rome Committee for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders guidelines for diagnosis of chronic (or functional) constipation, patients who move their bowels daily may meet criteria for chronic constipation if they experience straining, incomplete evacuation, or other symptoms (Box 1).8
Many patients who complain of constipation have daily, regular bowel movements that produce hard, difficult-to-pass stool or require straining or manual maneuvers. Take a careful history including:
- stool frequency and quality
- straining
- manual maneuvers (disimpaction or manual pelvic floor support)
- sensation of blockage or incomplete evacuation.
‘Alarm’ symptoms. For psychiatrists, the most important part of the Rome guidelines are the “alarm” symptoms:
- age ≥50 years
- family history of colon cancer or polyps
- family history of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease)
- rectal bleeding, anemia
- weight loss >10 pounds
- new onset of chronic constipation without apparent cause in an elderly patient
- severe, persistent constipation refractory to conservative management.9
Table 1
Colorectal cancer screening recommendations*
Test | Frequency |
---|---|
Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) | Annually |
Sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
FOBT and sigmoidoscopy | Every 5 years |
Double contrast barium enema | Every 5 years |
Colonoscopy | Every 10 years |
* For patients age=50. For higher-risk patients, it is reasonable to begin screening at a younger age | |
Source: Reference 10 |
Determining the cause
Common causes of constipation include altered visceral sensitivity, decreased GI motility, alterations in pelvic and anorectal musculature, and alterations in the enteric nervous system. Systemic causes are less common and include electrolyte abnormalities (hypercalcemia and hypokalemia) and endocrine disorders (hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus).
Some patients’ constipation is caused by involuntarily contracting the pelvic floor muscles or suppressing the urge to defecate (Box 2).1,11,12 Suspect this in patients who strain repeatedly to pass soft or liquid stool.
Medication side effects are probably the most common constipation cause psychiatrists will encounter. Many psychotropics have anticholinergic effects that decrease GI motility and cause constipation. The most commonly implicated drugs are:
- older tricyclic antidepressants (such as amitriptyline)
- antipsychotics.
Outlet obstruction, caused by inappropriately contracting posterior pelvic floor muscles during defecatory effort, is the cause of 5% to 10% of constipation cases.1 Patients are not aware of this pelvic floor incoordination. Often, they will give a history of straining even for soft or liquid stool.
Consider outlet obstruction in women with history of multiple vaginal childbirths or pelvic or gynecologic surgery, particularly if they fail to respond to usual measures to treat constipation. For adequate relief, these patients often require anorectal biofeedback, which teaches them to relax the posterior pelvic floor.11,12
Habitually suppressing the gastrocolic reflex—the urge to defecate after eating—causes some patients difficulty moving their bowels. Counsel these patients to sit on the toilet for several minutes after the morning meal to relearn this behavior. Some may need several weeks of daily enema or glycerine suppository use to retrain themselves to have bowel movements after the morning meal.
Other psychiatric-related causes. Patients with depression may experience decreased stool output because of a lack of food intake or physical activity. These causes may be effectively addressed by treating the depression.
Give special consideration to patients with eating disorders and those who routinely use laxatives. A patient who is not eating will not produce the same amount of stool as one who eats regularly.
Constipated patients may require escalating doses of laxatives to obtain symptom relief; this does not constitute laxative abuse but rather tachyphylaxis. Chronic laxative use has not been shown to permanently decrease colonic motility,14 but patients who use laxatives chronically may have altered expectations of what is normal.
CASE CONTINUED: Recurring symptoms
After discontinuing Mr. W’s olanzapine and duloxetine, the psychiatrist prescribes polyethylene glycol solution (MiraLax) and instructs Mr. W to increase his daily fluid and fiber intake. Although the solution works well, Mr. W complains of the cost. He then resumes methyl cellulose and starts taking magnesium hydroxide chewable tablets (Milk of Magnesia) every 2 to 4 days as needed for constipation.
The psychiatrist prescribes mirtazapine for OCD symptoms, but soon stops this regimen because Mr. W complains of worsening constipation. Next Mr. W is started on fluvoxamine, which he had tried briefly many years before. The dosage is gradually titrated to 150 mg/d. Although Mr. W’s OCD improves somewhat, he complains of agitation and once again of worsening constipation.
Treatment algorithm
To minimize trial and error, we use a stepwise approach to treating constipation (Algorithm).8,11,15 Although many standard recommendations have not been evaluated in large randomized controlled trials, they are supported by decades of observed actions among clinicians and thus remain valuable.
Multiple nonprescription agents are available to treat constipation, including:
- bulking agents (fiber supplements)
- lubricating agents
- stool softening agents
- stimulant and osmotic laxatives (Table 2).8
Steps 1 & 2. When initial attempts at increasing physical activity, fluid, and dietary fiber fail to yield a response, fiber supplements are commonly used as a second step in managing constipation. We advocate beginning with a supplement that contains psyllium—such as Fiber-all or Metamucil—because psyllium has been shown to increase stool frequency. Supplements that contain methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (such as Equalactin and Mitrolan), or bran have either not shown efficacy or have not been studied rigorously enough to merit recommendation.10 Some patients respond to other fiber products, but start a fibernaïve patient with a psyllium-containing supplement.
Fiber supplements may cause increased gas and bloating, so start at a low dose and gradually increase over several weeks to mitigate these side effects.
In our experience, patients usually have tried bisacodyl before seeking treatment for constipation. Although bisacodyl may be effective for some patients, others may need something stronger. Many gastroenterologists prefer prescribing osmotic or prescription laxatives.
Step 4. Osmotic laxatives generally are liquids, including magnesium hydroxide, polyethylene glycol solution, and the prescription agent lactulose. Magnesium hydroxide is inexpensive and can be taken chronically.
Algorithm
A stepwise approach to managing constipation
Step 1 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Increase activity or daily walking | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients; exercise is associated with decreased orocecal transit time15 |
Increase fluid intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
Increase dietary fiber intake | Not rigorously studied in constipated patients8 |
↓ | |
Step 2 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Fiber supplements | Psyllium compounds may be superior to methylcellulose, polycarbophil, and bran11 |
↓ | |
Step 3 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative pills | Senna compounds are derived from plants |
↓ | |
Step 4 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Over-the-counter laxative solutions | Milk of Magnesia is very inexpensive |
↓ | |
Step 5 | |
Recommendation | Comments |
Prescription laxatives | Lubiprostone causes fetal loss in animals; tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug protocol |
Table 2
Commonly used laxatives: Mechanisms of action
Category | Agents |
---|---|
Bulk-forming | Methylcellulose (Citrucel), polycarbophil (Equalactin, Mitrolan, others), psyllium (Fiberall, Metamucil, others) |
Lubricating | Glycerin (Sani-Supp), magnesium hydroxide and mineral oil (Magnolax), mineral oil (Fleet Mineral Oil, Zymenol, others) |
Stool softener | Docusate sodium (Colace) |
Osmotic | Magnesium hydroxide (Milk of Magnesia), polyethylene glycol (MiraLax), lactulose* (Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others), lubiprostone* (Amitiza) |
Stimulant | Bisacodyl (Correctol, Dulcolax, others), castor oil (Alphamul, Emulsoil, others), senna/sennosides (Ex-Lax, Senokot, others), sodium bicarbonate and potassium bitartrate (Ceo-Two evacuant) |
* Available by prescription only | |
Source: Reference 8 |
Prescription medications
Tegaserod is a partial 5-HT4 agonist and stimulator of GI motility and secretion. It also decreases visceral sensitivity.16 Tegaserod’s manufacturer voluntarily withdrew the drug from the market because it may increase risk of cardiovascular ischemic events, including angina, heart attack, and stroke. Tegaserod is available only under a treatment investigational new drug (IND) protocol that includes obtaining approval from a local institutional review board. We recommend that psychiatrists should not prescribe tegaserod but refer patients to experienced gastroenterologists or other GI specialists.
Lubiprostone is a selective chloride channel activator that works only in the gut and results in net fluid excretion and increased stool frequency. The molecule is a prostaglandin derivative and is poorly absorbed.17
Because lubiprostone has been shown to cause fetal loss in animals (at the equivalent of 2 and 6 times the recommended human dose), women of reproductive age should use contraception while taking lubiprostone and carefully consider the risks and benefits of lubiprostone use during pregnancy.
CASE CONTINUED: Finding an effective strategy
The psychiatrist prescribes lubiprostone, 24 mcg bid, but Mr. W once again complains of the expense and says the drug does not work well. He quickly returns to his intermittent use of magnesium hydroxide tablets and occasionally takes bisacodyl tablets.
To address Mr. W’s OCD, the psychiatrist adds risperidone, 0.5 mg bid, to Mr. W’s regimen. He has a modest response in OCD symptoms—30% of his day is now symptom- free— without worsening his constipation.
Probiotics and prebiotics
Emerging therapies for constipation include probiotics and prebiotics, which attempt to alter the gut flora and milieu. The primary bacterial agents are Lactobacillus species and Bifidobacterium species. At least one probiotic Bifidobacterium product—Activia—is being marketed in the United States as a fortified yogurt.
Investigational medications. Renzapride is a 5HT4 receptor agonist and 5HT3 receptor antagonist that has shown promise in a pilot study18 and is in phase III trials. Linaclotide is a peptide that activates chloride and bicarbonate secretion in the gut and may reduce visceral hypersensitivity. It too has shown promise in a pilot study.19
Related resources
- Rome Foundation. Functional gastrointestinal disorders. www.romecriteria.org.
- Bleser S, Brunton S, Carmichael B, et al. Management of chronic constipation: recommendations from a consensus panel. J Fam Pract 2005;54(8):691-8.
- Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clomipramine • Anafranil
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Duloxetine • Cymbalta
- Fluvoxamine • Luvox
- Lactulose • Cholac Syrup, Constulose, others
- Lubiprostone • Amitiza
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Thioridazine • Mellaril
- Tegaserod • Zelnorm
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project was partially supported by grant number 5 T32 HS013852 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
1. Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(12):3530-40.
2. Choung RS, Locke GR, 3rd, Schleck CD, et al. Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: a population-based study 1988-2003. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26(11-12):1521-8.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUPnet). Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov. Accessed March 19, 2008.
4. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34(4):606-11.
5. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32(1):1-8.
6. Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, et al. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23(5):461-76.
7. Donald IP, Smith RG, Cruikshank JG, et al. A study of constipation in the elderly living at home. Gerontology 1985;31(2):112-8.
8. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130(5):1480-91.
9. American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;(100 suppl 1):S1-4.
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Colorectal cancer screening. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal. Accessed March 19, 2008.
11. Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, et al. Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation. Gut 1998;42(4):517-21.
12. Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie NR, et al. Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback. Gut 1991;32(10):1175-9.
13. Richelson E. Receptor pharmacology of neuroleptics: relation to clinical effects. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;(60 suppl 10):5-14.
14. Muller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(1):232-42.
15. Keeling WF, Harris A, Martin BJ. Orocecal transit during mild exercise in women. J Appl Physiol 1990;68(4):1350-3.
16. Tegaserod [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals; 2006.
17. Amitiza [package insert]. Bethesda, MD: Sucampo Pharmaceuticals; 2007.
18. Tack J, Middleton SJ, Horne MC, et al. Pilot study of the efficacy of renzapride on gastrointestinal motility and symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23(11):1655-65.
19. Andresen V, Camilleri M, Busciglio IA, et al. Effect of 5 days linaclotide on transit and bowel function in females with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2007;133(3):761-8.
1. Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(12):3530-40.
2. Choung RS, Locke GR, 3rd, Schleck CD, et al. Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: a population-based study 1988-2003. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26(11-12):1521-8.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUPnet). Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov. Accessed March 19, 2008.
4. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34(4):606-11.
5. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32(1):1-8.
6. Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, et al. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23(5):461-76.
7. Donald IP, Smith RG, Cruikshank JG, et al. A study of constipation in the elderly living at home. Gerontology 1985;31(2):112-8.
8. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130(5):1480-91.
9. American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;(100 suppl 1):S1-4.
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Colorectal cancer screening. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal. Accessed March 19, 2008.
11. Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, et al. Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation. Gut 1998;42(4):517-21.
12. Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie NR, et al. Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback. Gut 1991;32(10):1175-9.
13. Richelson E. Receptor pharmacology of neuroleptics: relation to clinical effects. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;(60 suppl 10):5-14.
14. Muller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(1):232-42.
15. Keeling WF, Harris A, Martin BJ. Orocecal transit during mild exercise in women. J Appl Physiol 1990;68(4):1350-3.
16. Tegaserod [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals; 2006.
17. Amitiza [package insert]. Bethesda, MD: Sucampo Pharmaceuticals; 2007.
18. Tack J, Middleton SJ, Horne MC, et al. Pilot study of the efficacy of renzapride on gastrointestinal motility and symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23(11):1655-65.
19. Andresen V, Camilleri M, Busciglio IA, et al. Effect of 5 days linaclotide on transit and bowel function in females with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2007;133(3):761-8.