User login
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:09
Display Headline
Effects of exercise on disablement process model outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy
Background Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) results in adverse physiologic, metabolic, and functional side effects that may accelerate functional limitations in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Although exercise improves muscular strength and functional performance, the extent to which exercise yields similar improvements in other disablement process outcomes in men on ADT has yet to be systematically evaluated.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(8)
Topics
Page Number
278-292
Legacy Keywords
prostate cancer, androgen-deprivation therapy, ADT, Disablement Process Model, DPM
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) results in adverse physiologic, metabolic, and functional side effects that may accelerate functional limitations in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Although exercise improves muscular strength and functional performance, the extent to which exercise yields similar improvements in other disablement process outcomes in men on ADT has yet to be systematically evaluated.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Background Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) results in adverse physiologic, metabolic, and functional side effects that may accelerate functional limitations in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Although exercise improves muscular strength and functional performance, the extent to which exercise yields similar improvements in other disablement process outcomes in men on ADT has yet to be systematically evaluated.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Objective To explore whether exercise results in comparable improvements in physiologic and structural body system impairment, functional limitation (relating to basic physical or mental actions), and physical disability domain outcomes identified in the Disablement Process Model (DPM) in PC patients who are receiving ADT.
Methods Data from studies of exercise interventions in men on ADT were extracted on impairment, functional limitation, and physical disability domain outcomes. The average of weighted, bias-corrected effect sizes were calculated for each outcome and compared across domains. A total of 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 3 uncontrolled trials) conducted with 684 PC patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results Exercise yielded heterogeneous effect-size improvements in physical impairments, ranging from large improvements in muscular strength (d = .74; 95% CI, .14-1.47) and endurance (d = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), to small improvements in body composition measures (d = .12; 95% CI, -.52-.68).
Conclusions Whereas exercise resulted in meaningful effect-size improvements in functional limitation domain outcomes (d = .39; 95% CI, -.42-1.01), findings from the 4 studies that assessed a physical disability, domain outcomes revealed only small improvements (d = .10; 95% CI, -.44-.43) in these outcomes. Collectively, exercise consistently results in meaningful improvements in physical impairments and functional limitations in basic physical tasks. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the effects of exercise on physical disability domain outcomes, and the results suggest that the effects of exercise on physical disability measures are of a smaller magnitude relative to those observed for impairment and functional limitation domain outcomes.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(8)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(8)
Page Number
278-292
Page Number
278-292
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Effects of exercise on disablement process model outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy
Display Headline
Effects of exercise on disablement process model outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy
Legacy Keywords
prostate cancer, androgen-deprivation therapy, ADT, Disablement Process Model, DPM
Legacy Keywords
prostate cancer, androgen-deprivation therapy, ADT, Disablement Process Model, DPM
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:278-292
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media
Document