User login
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:10
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.
Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.
Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.
Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).
Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.
Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.
Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
14-21
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.
Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.
Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.
Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).
Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.
Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.
Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.
Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.
Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.
Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).
Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.
Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.
Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
14-21
Page Number
14-21
Article Type
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2015;13:14-21
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media
Document