Clinical Review

Risk for Deep Fungal Infections During IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitor Therapy for Psoriasis

Author and Disclosure Information

Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease with both skin and joint manifestations. Focused biologics have been developed to target specific cytokines implicated in psoriasis and are becoming increasingly utilized. Recently, the advent of newer biologics, including IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, and IL-23 inhibitors, have garnered interest as promising treatments for psoriasis and other inflammatory conditions. Although IL-17 and IL-23 have been studied in the pathophysiology of psoriasis, they also play a central role in immunologic defenses, including those against fungi. Therefore, use of these interleukin inhibitors may theoretically impair the immune system against deep fungal infections. We reviewed the available literature investigating the risk for invasive fungal infections in patients treated with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis or other inflammatory conditions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including extended trials and clinical trials, were reviewed, and we found that although there was a small number of patients who developed superficial candidiasis, there were no reports of invasive fungal disease. Although these results support the safety and the low risk for deep fungal infection with these biologics, caution is still warranted, as these medications are relatively new. Appropriate screening and management of fungal disease should still be practiced when utilizing these medications in the treatment of psoriasis and other inflammatory conditions.

Practice Points

  • The use of IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis and other inflammatory conditions does not appear to increase the risk for deep fungal infections.
  • Physicians should still be cautiously optimistic in prescribing these medications, as IL-17 and IL-23 play a central role in immunologic defenses, particularly against fungi.
  • A high index of suspicion should be maintained for patients from endemic areas who are being treated with biologics.



Psoriasis is a common chronic, multisystem, inflammatory disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations that affects approximately 2% of the world’s population.1 It occurs in a variety of clinical forms, from a few well-demarcated, erythematous plaques with a silvery scale to involvement of almost the entire body surface area. Beyond the debilitating physical ailments of the disease, psoriasis also may have psychosocial effects on quality of life.2 The pathogenesis of psoriasis is not fully understood but represents a complex multifactorial disease with both immune-mediated and genetic components. Characterized by hyperplasia of epidermal keratinocytes, psoriasis is shown to be mediated by infiltration of T-cell lymphocytes with an increase of various inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α.3 More recently, interactions of helper T cells (TH17) via IL-17 and IL-23 have been supported to play a major role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.4,5

With the growing understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis, focused biologics have been developed to target specific cytokines implicated in the disease process and have been increasingly utilized. Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, including adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept, along with the IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor ustekinumab, have been revolutionary in psoriasis treatment by providing safe and effective long-term therapy; however, there is concern of life-threatening infections with biologics because of the immunosuppressive effects and mechanisms of action.6 Specifically, there have been reported cases of deep fungal infections associated with TNF-α inhibitor use.7

Recently, the advent of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors has garnered notable interest in these biologics as promising treatments for psoriasis. With IL-17 and IL-23 supported to have a major role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, targeting the cytokine is not only logical but also has proven to be effacacious.8-10 Secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab are IL-17 inhibitors that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of psoriasis. Secukinumab and ixekizumab are anti–IL-17A monoclonal antibodies, whereas brodalumab is an anti–IL-17 receptor antibody. Risankizumab, guselkumab, and tildrakizumab are IL-23 inhibitors that also have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of psoriasis. As with older biologics, there is concern over the safety of these inhibitors because of the central role of IL-17 and IL-23 in both innate and adaptive immune responses, particularly against fungi.11 Therefore, use of biologics targeting IL-17 and IL-23 may increase susceptibility to deep fungal infections.

Safety data and discussion of the risk for deep fungal infections from IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, and IL-23 inhibitor use for psoriasis treatment currently are lacking. Given the knowledge gap, we sought to synthesize and review the current evidence on risks for deep fungal infections during biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis, with a focus on IL-17 inhibitor therapies.


A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE from database inception to 2019 (1946-2019) was performed to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including extended trials and clinical trials, for IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, and IL-23 inhibitors approved by the FDA for psoriasis treatment. The following keywords were used: psoriasis or inflammatory disease and secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, or tildrakizumab. Studies were restricted to the English-language literature, and those that did not provide adequate safety data on the specific types of infections that occurred were excluded.

RESULTSIL-17 Inhibitors

Our search yielded RCTs, some including extension trials, and clinical trials of IL-17 inhibitors used for psoriatic disease and other nonpsoriatic conditions (Table).

Risk for Deep Fungal Infection With Secukinumab
The queried studies included 20 RCTs or clinical trials along with extension trials of 3746 patients with psoriasis or other inflammatory conditions, with follow-up ranging from 12 to 52 weeks. In a 3-year extension study of SCULPTURE, Bissonnette et al12 reported no new safety concerns for the 340 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with secukinumab. Common adverse events (AEs) included nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, and headache, but there were no reports of deep fungal infections.12 In a subsequent 5-year analysis of 168 patients that focused on the 300-mg fixed interval treatment with secukinumab, the safety profile remained favorable, with 0 reports of invasive fungal infections.13 A study (FEATURE) of 118 patients with psoriasis treated with a prefilled syringe of 300 or 150 mg of secukinumab also described an acceptable safety profile and reported no deep fungal infections.14 JUNCTURE, another study utilizing autoinjectors, also found that treatment with 300 or 150 mg of secukinumab was well tolerated in 121 patients, with no deep fungal infections.15 Common AEs for both studies included nasopharyngitis and headache.14,15 A 24-week phase 3 study for scalp psoriasis treated with secukinumab also reported 0 deep fungal infections in 51 patients.16 In an RCT comparing secukinumab and ustekinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, Blauvelt et al17 demonstrated that the incidence of serious AEs was comparable between the 2 groups, with no reports of invasive fungal infections in the 334 patients exposed to secukinumab. The CLEAR study, which compared secukinumab and ustekinumab, also found no reported deep fungal disease in the 335 patients exposed to secukinumab.18 Secukinumab exhibited a similar safety profile to ustekinumab in both studies, with common AEs being headache and nasopharyngitis.17,18 The GESTURE study investigated the efficacy of secukinumab in 137 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis and reported a favorable profile with no reports of deep fungal disease.19 In a subanalysis of the phase 3 study ERASURE, secukinumab was shown to have a robust and sustainable efficacy in 58 Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and there were no reports of invasive fungal infections.20 Another subanalysis of 36 Taiwanese patients from the ERASURE study also had similar findings, with no dose relationship observed for AEs.21 In a phase 2 study of 103 patients with psoriasis, Papp et al22 demonstrated AE rates that were similar across different doses of secukinumab—3×150 mg, 3×75 mg, 3×25 mg, and 1×25 mg—and described no incidences of invasive fungal disease. In a phase 2 regimen-finding study of 337 patients conducted by Rich et al,23 the most commonly reported AEs included nasopharyngitis, worsening psoriasis, and upper respiratory tract infections, but there were no reported deep fungal infections.


Recommended Reading

Inside the flawed White House testing scheme that did not protect Trump
MDedge Dermatology
COVID-19 may discourage pediatric flu vaccination
MDedge Dermatology
Minorities bear brunt of pediatric COVID-19 cases
MDedge Dermatology
CDC flips, acknowledges aerosol spread of COVID-19
MDedge Dermatology
Experts assess infection risks for patients on biologics
MDedge Dermatology
FDA posts COVID vaccine guidance amid White House pushback
MDedge Dermatology
CMS gives hospitals 14 weeks to start daily COVID, flu reports
MDedge Dermatology
Review finds mortality rates low in young pregnant women with SJS, TEN
MDedge Dermatology
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy ‘somewhat understandable,’ expert says
MDedge Dermatology
Returning to competition
MDedge Dermatology