Torture survivors: What to ask, how to document

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:33
Display Headline
Torture survivors: What to ask, how to document

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Screen for a history of torture if an individual from an immigrant group exhibits signs of depression or post-traumatic stress disorder, complains of unexplained pain, or is known to be seeking asylum. C

Document a report of torture and any associated physical or psychological findings from your examination, and refer the individual for appropriate care. C

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Nearly half of the world’s 200 nations torture their citizens.1 Although survivors have high rates of physical and psychiatric morbidity, and in coming to this country tend to live in highly concentrated refugee groups, physicians rarely discover torture histories.2,3

Torture survivors may avoid speaking of it because they do not understand that treatment is available for their physical, psychiatric, and pain disorders. A lack of detection delays the diagnosis and treatment of the sequelae of torture. It may also affect their future safety: Individuals seeking asylum are deprived of the medical documentation needed to support their petitions.

Your involvement in recording histories and exam findings and in referring patients for specialized care can restore lives. It can also aid in reversing the “invisibility” of torture survivors that perpetuates inadequate clinical education, research, and development of appropriate therapies.

Are you caring for a survivor—and don’t know it? Approximately 500,000 torture survivors live in the United States.4 This equals the number of individuals with Parkinson’s disease and outnumbers those with multiple sclerosis.5,6 Physicians may encounter torture survivors in primary care settings, emergency departments, or while consulting with colleagues about patients who have specialized medical needs. There are no evidence-based guidelines for assessing and treating torture survivors. Most studies are from single institutions and have modest sample sizes. Most use univariate analyses, and the effect of confounding variables is often unexamined. Moreover, the diversity of torture survivors’ cultures limits the generalizability of findings from particular groups.

In this article, we propose an approach—based on studies that address cross-cultural issues or use multicenter, multivariate, meta-analytic methods—that can enable you to better identify survivors of torture, assess and document consequent morbidities, and refer them to appropriate treatment programs. We focus on individuals who were tortured months or years earlier rather than on recently traumatized patients.

Facts that justify targeted screening

Although the number of torture survivors is not so high as to warrant population-wide screening, the prevalence of such victims in easily identified refugee groups does justify screening in this setting. Tortured individuals are more likely to emigrate than are their unmolested fellow nationals.7 Six percent to 12% of immigrants from countries where torture is practiced say they have been tortured.2,3 Torture rates are highest in people seeking political asylum. Twenty percent to 40% of asylum-seeking refugees from Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tibet, and Bhutan report being tortured.7-9 In this context, the lack of data on refugees from countries such as Zimbabwe or Myanmar is not reassuring.

The plight of children. About 4% of torture survivors are children.10,11 Some are street children brutalized by police; some are tortured to terrorize family members; some belonged to “enemy” communities. Investigation is warranted if an immigrant child comes from a country where torture is common and if the child was old enough to be imprisoned or forced to serve as a child soldier before entering a safe refugee camp prior to immigration.12 It is more appropriate to screen such children for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than torture. A meta-analysis found that 11% of refugee children (vs 9% of adults) have PTSD, regardless of whether they were tortured or experienced war or pandemic political violence.10 The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry provides a summary of findings typically seen in children with PTSD.13

How to broach the subject with adults. Screening for torture survivors is reliable and takes little time. You might want to ask a question that mentions torture specifically. For example, you might say: “Some people in your situation have experienced torture. Has that ever happened to you?”2 Other questions could be less direct and follow the legal definition of torture from the Convention Against Torture: “While in captivity, did you ever experience physical or mental suffering that was deliberately and systematically inflicted by a soldier, policeman, or militant, or other person acting with government approval?”14,15 The sensitivity and specificity of screening questions are estimated at 80% and 90%, respectively.8 Patient factors that can dampen sensitivity are shame and stigmatization (especially for survivors of sexual torture) and the trauma-amnestic component of PTSD. Secondary gain with regard to immigration appeals, however, rarely causes overreporting.3

 

 

If a patient answers Yes to a screening question, your responsibility is 2-fold. First, begin compiling a medical record that accurately reflects the patient’s description of torture and the medical findings relevant to those statements. Accurate documentation is important because medical records are used as evidence in hearings to rule on petitions for asylum. Second, refer the patient for proper treatment that can reduce disability, pain, and psychiatric distress.

Assess physical morbidity

Torture survivors’ physical symptoms and signs are as varied16-18 as the methods by which they have been abused.19-21 Let a patient’s complaints and report of the techniques used guide your examination.9,14,15,22,23

Concussive trauma is nearly universally reported. This includes beatings with fists, clubs, and batons. Caning causes horizontal lesions typically on the buttocks and back or sometimes on the backs of the legs. Whipping is typically applied to the back, where it produces downsloping lesions that curl laterally off the trunk.18 Torturers sometimes place layers of cloth over the skin before beatings to minimize incriminating cuts and scars. In men, genital beatings are so common that researchers include them with general beatings rather than categorizing them as sexual torture.24 A third to half of survivors report beatings on the feet, a technique that produces chronic neuralgias and disability from fascial injuries, which can be evaluated by MRI.25-27 Prolonged pain and disability from foot beatings is associated with PTSD. Concussive trauma to ears can produce hearing loss. Deformities or healed fractures may be signs of blunt force trauma. Gunfire into joints leaves bony injuries and metallic fragments.

Suspension, hyperflexion. Many survivors report being suspended by an extremity or digit or forced into positions of extreme hyperflexion, hyperextension, or rotation. A variant of suspension is the use of stress positions such as confinement in a tight box. These techniques often tear ligaments, tendons, nerves, neural plexi, or other soft tissues, or cause subluxations, dislocations (eg, reverse rotation of the shoulder), fractures, or even amputating avulsions.16,28 Careful examination and imaging of joints can detect such bone and soft tissue injuries.

Ligatures, binding, and compression to extremities or genitalia are used to restrain or to cause pain or injury. The long-term sequelae include scars, neuropathies, ligamentous injuries, muscle trauma, and ischemic injuries. Thumbscrews—small vises clamped on fingers, thumbs, or toes—produce destructive compressive fractures and deformities in the distal bones and joints of the fingers or toes.16

Burns, electrical shock, and mutilation by cutting are widely inflicted. Shock is applied to the skin, genitalia, or within body cavities with wires, cattle prods, or electrified grids such as bedsprings. Muscle spasms caused by intra-oral cattle prods can cause jaw dislocations. Intense shocks on the back can cause muscle spasms that result in vertebral compression fractures.16 Although nontherapeutic, biopsies of electrical scars have evidentiary value.18 Teeth are often extracted as a form of mutilation.

Sexual torture is substantially under-reported. Five percent to 15% of male torture survivors report being sexually abused.24,29 Of these, 50% report threats of castration or rape, 33% are raped or forced to perform sex on, or in view of, others, and 10% report genital shocks or mutilation.24,29 Although fewer women than men are tortured, about half of women survivors report sexual torture, usually rape, sometimes in front of family members.30,31 Given the prevalence of rape among female torture survivors, case finding during or before prenatal care may enable a practitioner to desensitize or sedate a woman before using gynecological instruments or techniques like paracervical injections that can trigger PTSD arousal reactions.

Injurious environments. Nearly all torture survivors report being subjected to extremes of heat or cold, a lack of water or food or sanitation or medical care, or crowding, filth, and extreme noise. Some survivors report asphyxia with a dry or wet cloth over the face or by being immersed in water. A few report being given substances that cause dystonia, diarrhea, or loss of consciousness.

Assess psychological morbidity

The distinction between physical and psychological torture is imperfect. Fear of physical violence is a psychological stressor. Psychological torture has physical sequelae such as sexual dysfunction. Psychological torture uses various methods to humiliate, degrade, or cause extreme fear (sham executions, being forced to watch torture), or to isolate or disorient (blindfolding, sleep deprivation) a prisoner.9,15,21 The combination of physical and psychological torture causes severe, chronic psychological morbidity.7 The nature and severity of this morbidity is shaped by the nature of the torture, personal resilience, social supports, stressors in life after torture, and therapy.

 

 

The main psychological sequelae of torture are PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, and chronic pain syndromes. Of torture survivors seeking treatment, 50% to 67% have PTSD, 33% have depression, 10% have generalized anxiety disorders, and another 10% have other psychiatric diagnoses.32,33 Forty percent to 70% of torture survivors have chronic pain or somatoform disorders,7,22,31,34 making it critical that physicians screen for a history of torture with any refugee presenting with recurrent, complex, or unexplained pain.

Many tortured refugees have experienced multiple traumas, including political terror, war, and dislocation. A complex meta-analysis involving 82,000 refugees found that torture is especially correlated with PTSD, whereas stressors such as exposure to conflict and displacement were more strongly associated with depression.35,36

Researchers have not found correlations between the types, severity, or duration of torture (including physical vs psychological techniques) and the severity of post-torture PTSD or depression.7,37 Head trauma received during torture may lead to frontal and temporal cortical thinning that is highly associated with post-torture depression.38 Rape during torture is associated with high levels of chronic distress and sexual dysfunction.30,39,40 Psychological resilience may be somewhat more robust in individuals who expected to be tortured.21

The social situation of resettled refugees affects the severity of psychiatric distress in torture survivors. Two large studies found that refugees were more distressed if they were institutionalized (in camps or compounds as opposed to homes), feared repatriation, were underemployed, or lacked economic opportunities in their new homeland.35,41 Persistent pain or physical disability related to tissue damage or a superimposed somatoform disorder correlates strongly with persistent psychiatric morbidity.42 Although the intensity of PTSD decreases over years, the core symptom complex often endures and may be disabling.32,37,43

How to connect patients with resources

The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (www.IRCT.org) and the Center for Victims of Torture (www.CVT.org) offer links to many torture survivor treatment programs. Other torture treatment centers can be found with Web searches or through international clinics or community organizations serving specific ethnic groups. Treatment programs help clients—many of whom are uninsured and, as non-US nationals, ineligible for public entitlement programs—navigate barriers to getting help. Treatment centers must address language barriers between therapists and clients. One caution: In small ethnic communities, translators may know clients and thereby raise fears of lack

of confidentiality. Treatment options. Standard interventions recommended for torture survivors include physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, especially for flashbacks and disabling social avoidance behaviors that are part of PTSD.7 Narrative exposure therapy, a brief psychotherapy in which the patient repeatedly retells and re-experiences painful events, shows promise.44,45 Psychological care for depression and anxiety, interdisciplinary pain desensitization, psychosocial supports, and assistance with asylum petitions are also important. The lack of validated torture survivor treatments reflects a paucity of research on this issue. It does not mean that standard effective therapies for PTSD or depression are ineffective.32,46 It is reasonable to assume that inadequate treatment of PTSD, depression, and pain disorders magnifies and prolongs the personal, familial, and social cost of torture sequelae.

Following through on medical documentation. About 41,000 people, nearly all from countries where torture is common, sought asylum from persecution in the United States in 2011.47 The United States grants asylum if an otherwise eligible immigrant can establish a “significant possibility” of future persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.48 This is a government determination, not a medical certification. A study of 2400 asylum seekers found that 90% who had medical documentation of past torture were granted asylum, compared with just 37% of those lacking such medical support.49

CORRESPONDENCE Steven H. Miles, MD, Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, 410 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Miles001@umn.edu

References

1. Rejali D. Torture and Democracy. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.

2. Crosby SS, Norredam M, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. Prevalence of torture survivors among foreign-born patients presenting to an urban ambulatory care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:764-768.

3. Eisenman D, Keller A, Kim G. Survivors of torture in a general medical setting: how often have patients been tortured and how often is it missed?. West J Med. 2000;172:301-304.

4. United States Department of Justice. Survivors of politically motivated torture: a large, growing, and invisible population of crime victims. January 2000. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/motivatedtorture/torture.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Parkinson’s disease backgrounder. Available at: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/parkinsons_disease/parkinsons_disease_backgrounder.htm. Accessed March 13, 2012.

6. National Multiple Sclerosis Society.. FAQs about MS. Available at: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-multiple-sclerosis/what-we-know-about-ms/faqs-about-ms/index.aspx#howmany. Accessed March 13, 2012.

7. Quiroga J, Jaranson JM. Politically–motivated torture and its survivors. Torture. 2005;15:1-112.

8. Montgomery E, Foldspang A. Criterion-related validity of screening for exposure to torture. Dan Med Bull. 1994;41:588-591.

9. Masmas TN, Moller E, Buhmanner C, et al. Asylum seekers in Denmark—a study of health status and grade of traumatization of newly arrived asylum seekers. Torture. 2008;18:77-86.

10. Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:1309-1314.

11. Torture in children. Torture. 2009;19(theme issue):64-175.

12. Volpellier M. Physical forensic signs of sexual torture in children. A guideline for non specialized medical examiners. Torture. 2009;19:157-166.

13. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Facts for families. Posttraumatic stress disorder. No. 70. March 2011. Available at: http://aacap.org/cs/root/facts_for_families/posttraumatic_stress_disorder_ptsd. Accessed March 12, 2012.

14. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 1984. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm. Accessed March 8, 2012.

15. Mollica RF. Surviving torture. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:5-7.

16. Vogel H, Schmitz-Engels F, Grillo C. Radiology of torture. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:187-204.

17. Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD. A Radiologic Atlas of Abuse, Torture, Terrorism, and Inflicted Trauma. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2003.

18. Danielsen L, Rasmussen OV. Dermatological findings after alleged torture. Torture. 2006;16:108-127.

19. Domovitch E, Berger PB, Wawer MJ, et al. Human torture: description and sequelae of 104 cases. Can Fam Phys. 1984;30:827-830.

20. Sanders J, Schuman MW, Marbella AM. The epidemiology of torture: a case series of 58 survivors of torture. Forens Sci Int. 2009;189:e1-e7.

21. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C. Torture vs other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:277-285.

22. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Bojholm S, et al. Prevalent musculoskeletal pain as a correlate of previous exposure to torture. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:496-503.

23. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.. Istanbul protocol: manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 2004. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

24. Loncar M, Henigsberg N, Hrabac P. Mental health consequences in men exposed to sexual abuse during the war in Croatia and Bosnia. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25:191-203.

25. Prip K, Persson AL. Clinical findings in men with chronic pain after falanga torture. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:135-141.

26. Edston E. The epidemiology of falanga: incidence among Swedish asylum seekers. Torture. 2009;19:27-32.

27. Amris K, Top-Pedersen ST, Rasmussen OV. Long-term consequences of falanga torture—what do we know and what do we need to know? Torture. 2009;19:33-40.

28. Moreno A, Grodin MA. Torture and its neurological sequelae. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:213-223.

29. Oosterhoff P, Zwanikken P, Ketting E. Sexual torture of men in Croatia and other conflict situations: an open secret. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:68-77.

30. Robertson CL, Halcon L, Savik K, et al. Somali and Oromo refugee women: trauma and associated factors. J Adv Nursing. 2006;56:577-587.

31. Hooberman JB, Rosenfeld B, Lhewa D, et al. Classifying the torture experiences of refugees living in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2007;22:108-123.

32. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Carlsson J, et al. Prevalent pain and pain level among torture survivors: a follow-up study. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53:210-214.

33. McColl H, Higson-Smith C, Gjerding S, et al. Rehabilitation of torture survivors in five countries: common themes and challenges. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010;4:16.

34. Van Ommeren M, de Jong JT, Sharma B, et al. Psychiatric disorders among tortured Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:475-482.

35. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, et al. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:537-549.

36. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C, et al. Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia: association of lack of redress for trauma and posttraumatic stress reactions. JAMA. 2005;294:580-590.

37. Carlsson JM, Olsen DR, Mortensen EL, et al. Mental health and health-related quality of life: a 10-year follow-up of tortured refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:725-731.

38. Mollica RF, Lyoo IK, Chernoff MC, et al. Brain structural abnormalities and mental health sequelae in South Vietnamese ex-political detainees who survived traumatic head injury and torture. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1221-1232.

39. Keller A, Lhewa D, Rosenfeld B, et al. Traumatic experiences and psychological distress in an urban refugee population seeking treatment services. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:188-194.

40. Lunde I, Ortmann J. Prevalence and sequelae of sexual torture. Lancet. 1990;336:289-291.

41. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons. JAMA. 2005;294:602-612.

42. Rasmussen A, Rosenfeld B, Reeves K, et al. The effects of torture-related injuries on long-term psychological distress in a Punjabi Sikh sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:734-740.

43. Lie B. A 3-year follow-up study of psychosocial functioning and general symptoms in settled refugees. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106:415-425.

44. Crumlish N, O’Rourke K. A systematic review of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder among refugees and asylum-seekers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:237-251.

45. Neuner F, Kurreck S, Ruf M, et al. Can asylum-seekers with posttraumatic stress disorder be successfully treated? A randomized controlled pilot study. Cog Behav Ther. 2010;39:81-91.

46. Sjölund BH, Kastrup M, Montgomery E, et al. Rehabilitating torture survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:689-696.

47. US Department of Justice. FY 2011 asylum statistics. Available at: www.justice.gov/eoir/efoia/FY11AsyStats-Current.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2012.

48. US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Questions & answers: credible fear screening. September 4, 2009. Available at: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=897f549bf0683210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f39d3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD. Accessed March 12, 2012.

49. Lustig SL, Kureshi S, Delucchi KL, et al. Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008;10:7-15.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven H. Miles, MD
Miles001@umn.edu

Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi, PhD, LP
Center for Victims of Torture, Minneapolis

The author reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E1-E5
Legacy Keywords
Steven H. Miles;MD; Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi;PhD;LP; history of torture; refugee groups; torture survivors; plight of children; brutalized by police; child soldure;
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven H. Miles, MD
Miles001@umn.edu

Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi, PhD, LP
Center for Victims of Torture, Minneapolis

The author reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Steven H. Miles, MD
Miles001@umn.edu

Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi, PhD, LP
Center for Victims of Torture, Minneapolis

The author reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Screen for a history of torture if an individual from an immigrant group exhibits signs of depression or post-traumatic stress disorder, complains of unexplained pain, or is known to be seeking asylum. C

Document a report of torture and any associated physical or psychological findings from your examination, and refer the individual for appropriate care. C

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Nearly half of the world’s 200 nations torture their citizens.1 Although survivors have high rates of physical and psychiatric morbidity, and in coming to this country tend to live in highly concentrated refugee groups, physicians rarely discover torture histories.2,3

Torture survivors may avoid speaking of it because they do not understand that treatment is available for their physical, psychiatric, and pain disorders. A lack of detection delays the diagnosis and treatment of the sequelae of torture. It may also affect their future safety: Individuals seeking asylum are deprived of the medical documentation needed to support their petitions.

Your involvement in recording histories and exam findings and in referring patients for specialized care can restore lives. It can also aid in reversing the “invisibility” of torture survivors that perpetuates inadequate clinical education, research, and development of appropriate therapies.

Are you caring for a survivor—and don’t know it? Approximately 500,000 torture survivors live in the United States.4 This equals the number of individuals with Parkinson’s disease and outnumbers those with multiple sclerosis.5,6 Physicians may encounter torture survivors in primary care settings, emergency departments, or while consulting with colleagues about patients who have specialized medical needs. There are no evidence-based guidelines for assessing and treating torture survivors. Most studies are from single institutions and have modest sample sizes. Most use univariate analyses, and the effect of confounding variables is often unexamined. Moreover, the diversity of torture survivors’ cultures limits the generalizability of findings from particular groups.

In this article, we propose an approach—based on studies that address cross-cultural issues or use multicenter, multivariate, meta-analytic methods—that can enable you to better identify survivors of torture, assess and document consequent morbidities, and refer them to appropriate treatment programs. We focus on individuals who were tortured months or years earlier rather than on recently traumatized patients.

Facts that justify targeted screening

Although the number of torture survivors is not so high as to warrant population-wide screening, the prevalence of such victims in easily identified refugee groups does justify screening in this setting. Tortured individuals are more likely to emigrate than are their unmolested fellow nationals.7 Six percent to 12% of immigrants from countries where torture is practiced say they have been tortured.2,3 Torture rates are highest in people seeking political asylum. Twenty percent to 40% of asylum-seeking refugees from Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tibet, and Bhutan report being tortured.7-9 In this context, the lack of data on refugees from countries such as Zimbabwe or Myanmar is not reassuring.

The plight of children. About 4% of torture survivors are children.10,11 Some are street children brutalized by police; some are tortured to terrorize family members; some belonged to “enemy” communities. Investigation is warranted if an immigrant child comes from a country where torture is common and if the child was old enough to be imprisoned or forced to serve as a child soldier before entering a safe refugee camp prior to immigration.12 It is more appropriate to screen such children for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than torture. A meta-analysis found that 11% of refugee children (vs 9% of adults) have PTSD, regardless of whether they were tortured or experienced war or pandemic political violence.10 The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry provides a summary of findings typically seen in children with PTSD.13

How to broach the subject with adults. Screening for torture survivors is reliable and takes little time. You might want to ask a question that mentions torture specifically. For example, you might say: “Some people in your situation have experienced torture. Has that ever happened to you?”2 Other questions could be less direct and follow the legal definition of torture from the Convention Against Torture: “While in captivity, did you ever experience physical or mental suffering that was deliberately and systematically inflicted by a soldier, policeman, or militant, or other person acting with government approval?”14,15 The sensitivity and specificity of screening questions are estimated at 80% and 90%, respectively.8 Patient factors that can dampen sensitivity are shame and stigmatization (especially for survivors of sexual torture) and the trauma-amnestic component of PTSD. Secondary gain with regard to immigration appeals, however, rarely causes overreporting.3

 

 

If a patient answers Yes to a screening question, your responsibility is 2-fold. First, begin compiling a medical record that accurately reflects the patient’s description of torture and the medical findings relevant to those statements. Accurate documentation is important because medical records are used as evidence in hearings to rule on petitions for asylum. Second, refer the patient for proper treatment that can reduce disability, pain, and psychiatric distress.

Assess physical morbidity

Torture survivors’ physical symptoms and signs are as varied16-18 as the methods by which they have been abused.19-21 Let a patient’s complaints and report of the techniques used guide your examination.9,14,15,22,23

Concussive trauma is nearly universally reported. This includes beatings with fists, clubs, and batons. Caning causes horizontal lesions typically on the buttocks and back or sometimes on the backs of the legs. Whipping is typically applied to the back, where it produces downsloping lesions that curl laterally off the trunk.18 Torturers sometimes place layers of cloth over the skin before beatings to minimize incriminating cuts and scars. In men, genital beatings are so common that researchers include them with general beatings rather than categorizing them as sexual torture.24 A third to half of survivors report beatings on the feet, a technique that produces chronic neuralgias and disability from fascial injuries, which can be evaluated by MRI.25-27 Prolonged pain and disability from foot beatings is associated with PTSD. Concussive trauma to ears can produce hearing loss. Deformities or healed fractures may be signs of blunt force trauma. Gunfire into joints leaves bony injuries and metallic fragments.

Suspension, hyperflexion. Many survivors report being suspended by an extremity or digit or forced into positions of extreme hyperflexion, hyperextension, or rotation. A variant of suspension is the use of stress positions such as confinement in a tight box. These techniques often tear ligaments, tendons, nerves, neural plexi, or other soft tissues, or cause subluxations, dislocations (eg, reverse rotation of the shoulder), fractures, or even amputating avulsions.16,28 Careful examination and imaging of joints can detect such bone and soft tissue injuries.

Ligatures, binding, and compression to extremities or genitalia are used to restrain or to cause pain or injury. The long-term sequelae include scars, neuropathies, ligamentous injuries, muscle trauma, and ischemic injuries. Thumbscrews—small vises clamped on fingers, thumbs, or toes—produce destructive compressive fractures and deformities in the distal bones and joints of the fingers or toes.16

Burns, electrical shock, and mutilation by cutting are widely inflicted. Shock is applied to the skin, genitalia, or within body cavities with wires, cattle prods, or electrified grids such as bedsprings. Muscle spasms caused by intra-oral cattle prods can cause jaw dislocations. Intense shocks on the back can cause muscle spasms that result in vertebral compression fractures.16 Although nontherapeutic, biopsies of electrical scars have evidentiary value.18 Teeth are often extracted as a form of mutilation.

Sexual torture is substantially under-reported. Five percent to 15% of male torture survivors report being sexually abused.24,29 Of these, 50% report threats of castration or rape, 33% are raped or forced to perform sex on, or in view of, others, and 10% report genital shocks or mutilation.24,29 Although fewer women than men are tortured, about half of women survivors report sexual torture, usually rape, sometimes in front of family members.30,31 Given the prevalence of rape among female torture survivors, case finding during or before prenatal care may enable a practitioner to desensitize or sedate a woman before using gynecological instruments or techniques like paracervical injections that can trigger PTSD arousal reactions.

Injurious environments. Nearly all torture survivors report being subjected to extremes of heat or cold, a lack of water or food or sanitation or medical care, or crowding, filth, and extreme noise. Some survivors report asphyxia with a dry or wet cloth over the face or by being immersed in water. A few report being given substances that cause dystonia, diarrhea, or loss of consciousness.

Assess psychological morbidity

The distinction between physical and psychological torture is imperfect. Fear of physical violence is a psychological stressor. Psychological torture has physical sequelae such as sexual dysfunction. Psychological torture uses various methods to humiliate, degrade, or cause extreme fear (sham executions, being forced to watch torture), or to isolate or disorient (blindfolding, sleep deprivation) a prisoner.9,15,21 The combination of physical and psychological torture causes severe, chronic psychological morbidity.7 The nature and severity of this morbidity is shaped by the nature of the torture, personal resilience, social supports, stressors in life after torture, and therapy.

 

 

The main psychological sequelae of torture are PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, and chronic pain syndromes. Of torture survivors seeking treatment, 50% to 67% have PTSD, 33% have depression, 10% have generalized anxiety disorders, and another 10% have other psychiatric diagnoses.32,33 Forty percent to 70% of torture survivors have chronic pain or somatoform disorders,7,22,31,34 making it critical that physicians screen for a history of torture with any refugee presenting with recurrent, complex, or unexplained pain.

Many tortured refugees have experienced multiple traumas, including political terror, war, and dislocation. A complex meta-analysis involving 82,000 refugees found that torture is especially correlated with PTSD, whereas stressors such as exposure to conflict and displacement were more strongly associated with depression.35,36

Researchers have not found correlations between the types, severity, or duration of torture (including physical vs psychological techniques) and the severity of post-torture PTSD or depression.7,37 Head trauma received during torture may lead to frontal and temporal cortical thinning that is highly associated with post-torture depression.38 Rape during torture is associated with high levels of chronic distress and sexual dysfunction.30,39,40 Psychological resilience may be somewhat more robust in individuals who expected to be tortured.21

The social situation of resettled refugees affects the severity of psychiatric distress in torture survivors. Two large studies found that refugees were more distressed if they were institutionalized (in camps or compounds as opposed to homes), feared repatriation, were underemployed, or lacked economic opportunities in their new homeland.35,41 Persistent pain or physical disability related to tissue damage or a superimposed somatoform disorder correlates strongly with persistent psychiatric morbidity.42 Although the intensity of PTSD decreases over years, the core symptom complex often endures and may be disabling.32,37,43

How to connect patients with resources

The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (www.IRCT.org) and the Center for Victims of Torture (www.CVT.org) offer links to many torture survivor treatment programs. Other torture treatment centers can be found with Web searches or through international clinics or community organizations serving specific ethnic groups. Treatment programs help clients—many of whom are uninsured and, as non-US nationals, ineligible for public entitlement programs—navigate barriers to getting help. Treatment centers must address language barriers between therapists and clients. One caution: In small ethnic communities, translators may know clients and thereby raise fears of lack

of confidentiality. Treatment options. Standard interventions recommended for torture survivors include physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, especially for flashbacks and disabling social avoidance behaviors that are part of PTSD.7 Narrative exposure therapy, a brief psychotherapy in which the patient repeatedly retells and re-experiences painful events, shows promise.44,45 Psychological care for depression and anxiety, interdisciplinary pain desensitization, psychosocial supports, and assistance with asylum petitions are also important. The lack of validated torture survivor treatments reflects a paucity of research on this issue. It does not mean that standard effective therapies for PTSD or depression are ineffective.32,46 It is reasonable to assume that inadequate treatment of PTSD, depression, and pain disorders magnifies and prolongs the personal, familial, and social cost of torture sequelae.

Following through on medical documentation. About 41,000 people, nearly all from countries where torture is common, sought asylum from persecution in the United States in 2011.47 The United States grants asylum if an otherwise eligible immigrant can establish a “significant possibility” of future persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.48 This is a government determination, not a medical certification. A study of 2400 asylum seekers found that 90% who had medical documentation of past torture were granted asylum, compared with just 37% of those lacking such medical support.49

CORRESPONDENCE Steven H. Miles, MD, Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, 410 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Miles001@umn.edu

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Screen for a history of torture if an individual from an immigrant group exhibits signs of depression or post-traumatic stress disorder, complains of unexplained pain, or is known to be seeking asylum. C

Document a report of torture and any associated physical or psychological findings from your examination, and refer the individual for appropriate care. C

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Nearly half of the world’s 200 nations torture their citizens.1 Although survivors have high rates of physical and psychiatric morbidity, and in coming to this country tend to live in highly concentrated refugee groups, physicians rarely discover torture histories.2,3

Torture survivors may avoid speaking of it because they do not understand that treatment is available for their physical, psychiatric, and pain disorders. A lack of detection delays the diagnosis and treatment of the sequelae of torture. It may also affect their future safety: Individuals seeking asylum are deprived of the medical documentation needed to support their petitions.

Your involvement in recording histories and exam findings and in referring patients for specialized care can restore lives. It can also aid in reversing the “invisibility” of torture survivors that perpetuates inadequate clinical education, research, and development of appropriate therapies.

Are you caring for a survivor—and don’t know it? Approximately 500,000 torture survivors live in the United States.4 This equals the number of individuals with Parkinson’s disease and outnumbers those with multiple sclerosis.5,6 Physicians may encounter torture survivors in primary care settings, emergency departments, or while consulting with colleagues about patients who have specialized medical needs. There are no evidence-based guidelines for assessing and treating torture survivors. Most studies are from single institutions and have modest sample sizes. Most use univariate analyses, and the effect of confounding variables is often unexamined. Moreover, the diversity of torture survivors’ cultures limits the generalizability of findings from particular groups.

In this article, we propose an approach—based on studies that address cross-cultural issues or use multicenter, multivariate, meta-analytic methods—that can enable you to better identify survivors of torture, assess and document consequent morbidities, and refer them to appropriate treatment programs. We focus on individuals who were tortured months or years earlier rather than on recently traumatized patients.

Facts that justify targeted screening

Although the number of torture survivors is not so high as to warrant population-wide screening, the prevalence of such victims in easily identified refugee groups does justify screening in this setting. Tortured individuals are more likely to emigrate than are their unmolested fellow nationals.7 Six percent to 12% of immigrants from countries where torture is practiced say they have been tortured.2,3 Torture rates are highest in people seeking political asylum. Twenty percent to 40% of asylum-seeking refugees from Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tibet, and Bhutan report being tortured.7-9 In this context, the lack of data on refugees from countries such as Zimbabwe or Myanmar is not reassuring.

The plight of children. About 4% of torture survivors are children.10,11 Some are street children brutalized by police; some are tortured to terrorize family members; some belonged to “enemy” communities. Investigation is warranted if an immigrant child comes from a country where torture is common and if the child was old enough to be imprisoned or forced to serve as a child soldier before entering a safe refugee camp prior to immigration.12 It is more appropriate to screen such children for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than torture. A meta-analysis found that 11% of refugee children (vs 9% of adults) have PTSD, regardless of whether they were tortured or experienced war or pandemic political violence.10 The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry provides a summary of findings typically seen in children with PTSD.13

How to broach the subject with adults. Screening for torture survivors is reliable and takes little time. You might want to ask a question that mentions torture specifically. For example, you might say: “Some people in your situation have experienced torture. Has that ever happened to you?”2 Other questions could be less direct and follow the legal definition of torture from the Convention Against Torture: “While in captivity, did you ever experience physical or mental suffering that was deliberately and systematically inflicted by a soldier, policeman, or militant, or other person acting with government approval?”14,15 The sensitivity and specificity of screening questions are estimated at 80% and 90%, respectively.8 Patient factors that can dampen sensitivity are shame and stigmatization (especially for survivors of sexual torture) and the trauma-amnestic component of PTSD. Secondary gain with regard to immigration appeals, however, rarely causes overreporting.3

 

 

If a patient answers Yes to a screening question, your responsibility is 2-fold. First, begin compiling a medical record that accurately reflects the patient’s description of torture and the medical findings relevant to those statements. Accurate documentation is important because medical records are used as evidence in hearings to rule on petitions for asylum. Second, refer the patient for proper treatment that can reduce disability, pain, and psychiatric distress.

Assess physical morbidity

Torture survivors’ physical symptoms and signs are as varied16-18 as the methods by which they have been abused.19-21 Let a patient’s complaints and report of the techniques used guide your examination.9,14,15,22,23

Concussive trauma is nearly universally reported. This includes beatings with fists, clubs, and batons. Caning causes horizontal lesions typically on the buttocks and back or sometimes on the backs of the legs. Whipping is typically applied to the back, where it produces downsloping lesions that curl laterally off the trunk.18 Torturers sometimes place layers of cloth over the skin before beatings to minimize incriminating cuts and scars. In men, genital beatings are so common that researchers include them with general beatings rather than categorizing them as sexual torture.24 A third to half of survivors report beatings on the feet, a technique that produces chronic neuralgias and disability from fascial injuries, which can be evaluated by MRI.25-27 Prolonged pain and disability from foot beatings is associated with PTSD. Concussive trauma to ears can produce hearing loss. Deformities or healed fractures may be signs of blunt force trauma. Gunfire into joints leaves bony injuries and metallic fragments.

Suspension, hyperflexion. Many survivors report being suspended by an extremity or digit or forced into positions of extreme hyperflexion, hyperextension, or rotation. A variant of suspension is the use of stress positions such as confinement in a tight box. These techniques often tear ligaments, tendons, nerves, neural plexi, or other soft tissues, or cause subluxations, dislocations (eg, reverse rotation of the shoulder), fractures, or even amputating avulsions.16,28 Careful examination and imaging of joints can detect such bone and soft tissue injuries.

Ligatures, binding, and compression to extremities or genitalia are used to restrain or to cause pain or injury. The long-term sequelae include scars, neuropathies, ligamentous injuries, muscle trauma, and ischemic injuries. Thumbscrews—small vises clamped on fingers, thumbs, or toes—produce destructive compressive fractures and deformities in the distal bones and joints of the fingers or toes.16

Burns, electrical shock, and mutilation by cutting are widely inflicted. Shock is applied to the skin, genitalia, or within body cavities with wires, cattle prods, or electrified grids such as bedsprings. Muscle spasms caused by intra-oral cattle prods can cause jaw dislocations. Intense shocks on the back can cause muscle spasms that result in vertebral compression fractures.16 Although nontherapeutic, biopsies of electrical scars have evidentiary value.18 Teeth are often extracted as a form of mutilation.

Sexual torture is substantially under-reported. Five percent to 15% of male torture survivors report being sexually abused.24,29 Of these, 50% report threats of castration or rape, 33% are raped or forced to perform sex on, or in view of, others, and 10% report genital shocks or mutilation.24,29 Although fewer women than men are tortured, about half of women survivors report sexual torture, usually rape, sometimes in front of family members.30,31 Given the prevalence of rape among female torture survivors, case finding during or before prenatal care may enable a practitioner to desensitize or sedate a woman before using gynecological instruments or techniques like paracervical injections that can trigger PTSD arousal reactions.

Injurious environments. Nearly all torture survivors report being subjected to extremes of heat or cold, a lack of water or food or sanitation or medical care, or crowding, filth, and extreme noise. Some survivors report asphyxia with a dry or wet cloth over the face or by being immersed in water. A few report being given substances that cause dystonia, diarrhea, or loss of consciousness.

Assess psychological morbidity

The distinction between physical and psychological torture is imperfect. Fear of physical violence is a psychological stressor. Psychological torture has physical sequelae such as sexual dysfunction. Psychological torture uses various methods to humiliate, degrade, or cause extreme fear (sham executions, being forced to watch torture), or to isolate or disorient (blindfolding, sleep deprivation) a prisoner.9,15,21 The combination of physical and psychological torture causes severe, chronic psychological morbidity.7 The nature and severity of this morbidity is shaped by the nature of the torture, personal resilience, social supports, stressors in life after torture, and therapy.

 

 

The main psychological sequelae of torture are PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, and chronic pain syndromes. Of torture survivors seeking treatment, 50% to 67% have PTSD, 33% have depression, 10% have generalized anxiety disorders, and another 10% have other psychiatric diagnoses.32,33 Forty percent to 70% of torture survivors have chronic pain or somatoform disorders,7,22,31,34 making it critical that physicians screen for a history of torture with any refugee presenting with recurrent, complex, or unexplained pain.

Many tortured refugees have experienced multiple traumas, including political terror, war, and dislocation. A complex meta-analysis involving 82,000 refugees found that torture is especially correlated with PTSD, whereas stressors such as exposure to conflict and displacement were more strongly associated with depression.35,36

Researchers have not found correlations between the types, severity, or duration of torture (including physical vs psychological techniques) and the severity of post-torture PTSD or depression.7,37 Head trauma received during torture may lead to frontal and temporal cortical thinning that is highly associated with post-torture depression.38 Rape during torture is associated with high levels of chronic distress and sexual dysfunction.30,39,40 Psychological resilience may be somewhat more robust in individuals who expected to be tortured.21

The social situation of resettled refugees affects the severity of psychiatric distress in torture survivors. Two large studies found that refugees were more distressed if they were institutionalized (in camps or compounds as opposed to homes), feared repatriation, were underemployed, or lacked economic opportunities in their new homeland.35,41 Persistent pain or physical disability related to tissue damage or a superimposed somatoform disorder correlates strongly with persistent psychiatric morbidity.42 Although the intensity of PTSD decreases over years, the core symptom complex often endures and may be disabling.32,37,43

How to connect patients with resources

The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (www.IRCT.org) and the Center for Victims of Torture (www.CVT.org) offer links to many torture survivor treatment programs. Other torture treatment centers can be found with Web searches or through international clinics or community organizations serving specific ethnic groups. Treatment programs help clients—many of whom are uninsured and, as non-US nationals, ineligible for public entitlement programs—navigate barriers to getting help. Treatment centers must address language barriers between therapists and clients. One caution: In small ethnic communities, translators may know clients and thereby raise fears of lack

of confidentiality. Treatment options. Standard interventions recommended for torture survivors include physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, especially for flashbacks and disabling social avoidance behaviors that are part of PTSD.7 Narrative exposure therapy, a brief psychotherapy in which the patient repeatedly retells and re-experiences painful events, shows promise.44,45 Psychological care for depression and anxiety, interdisciplinary pain desensitization, psychosocial supports, and assistance with asylum petitions are also important. The lack of validated torture survivor treatments reflects a paucity of research on this issue. It does not mean that standard effective therapies for PTSD or depression are ineffective.32,46 It is reasonable to assume that inadequate treatment of PTSD, depression, and pain disorders magnifies and prolongs the personal, familial, and social cost of torture sequelae.

Following through on medical documentation. About 41,000 people, nearly all from countries where torture is common, sought asylum from persecution in the United States in 2011.47 The United States grants asylum if an otherwise eligible immigrant can establish a “significant possibility” of future persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.48 This is a government determination, not a medical certification. A study of 2400 asylum seekers found that 90% who had medical documentation of past torture were granted asylum, compared with just 37% of those lacking such medical support.49

CORRESPONDENCE Steven H. Miles, MD, Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, 410 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Miles001@umn.edu

References

1. Rejali D. Torture and Democracy. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.

2. Crosby SS, Norredam M, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. Prevalence of torture survivors among foreign-born patients presenting to an urban ambulatory care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:764-768.

3. Eisenman D, Keller A, Kim G. Survivors of torture in a general medical setting: how often have patients been tortured and how often is it missed?. West J Med. 2000;172:301-304.

4. United States Department of Justice. Survivors of politically motivated torture: a large, growing, and invisible population of crime victims. January 2000. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/motivatedtorture/torture.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Parkinson’s disease backgrounder. Available at: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/parkinsons_disease/parkinsons_disease_backgrounder.htm. Accessed March 13, 2012.

6. National Multiple Sclerosis Society.. FAQs about MS. Available at: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-multiple-sclerosis/what-we-know-about-ms/faqs-about-ms/index.aspx#howmany. Accessed March 13, 2012.

7. Quiroga J, Jaranson JM. Politically–motivated torture and its survivors. Torture. 2005;15:1-112.

8. Montgomery E, Foldspang A. Criterion-related validity of screening for exposure to torture. Dan Med Bull. 1994;41:588-591.

9. Masmas TN, Moller E, Buhmanner C, et al. Asylum seekers in Denmark—a study of health status and grade of traumatization of newly arrived asylum seekers. Torture. 2008;18:77-86.

10. Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:1309-1314.

11. Torture in children. Torture. 2009;19(theme issue):64-175.

12. Volpellier M. Physical forensic signs of sexual torture in children. A guideline for non specialized medical examiners. Torture. 2009;19:157-166.

13. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Facts for families. Posttraumatic stress disorder. No. 70. March 2011. Available at: http://aacap.org/cs/root/facts_for_families/posttraumatic_stress_disorder_ptsd. Accessed March 12, 2012.

14. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 1984. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm. Accessed March 8, 2012.

15. Mollica RF. Surviving torture. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:5-7.

16. Vogel H, Schmitz-Engels F, Grillo C. Radiology of torture. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:187-204.

17. Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD. A Radiologic Atlas of Abuse, Torture, Terrorism, and Inflicted Trauma. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2003.

18. Danielsen L, Rasmussen OV. Dermatological findings after alleged torture. Torture. 2006;16:108-127.

19. Domovitch E, Berger PB, Wawer MJ, et al. Human torture: description and sequelae of 104 cases. Can Fam Phys. 1984;30:827-830.

20. Sanders J, Schuman MW, Marbella AM. The epidemiology of torture: a case series of 58 survivors of torture. Forens Sci Int. 2009;189:e1-e7.

21. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C. Torture vs other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:277-285.

22. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Bojholm S, et al. Prevalent musculoskeletal pain as a correlate of previous exposure to torture. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:496-503.

23. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.. Istanbul protocol: manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 2004. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

24. Loncar M, Henigsberg N, Hrabac P. Mental health consequences in men exposed to sexual abuse during the war in Croatia and Bosnia. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25:191-203.

25. Prip K, Persson AL. Clinical findings in men with chronic pain after falanga torture. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:135-141.

26. Edston E. The epidemiology of falanga: incidence among Swedish asylum seekers. Torture. 2009;19:27-32.

27. Amris K, Top-Pedersen ST, Rasmussen OV. Long-term consequences of falanga torture—what do we know and what do we need to know? Torture. 2009;19:33-40.

28. Moreno A, Grodin MA. Torture and its neurological sequelae. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:213-223.

29. Oosterhoff P, Zwanikken P, Ketting E. Sexual torture of men in Croatia and other conflict situations: an open secret. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:68-77.

30. Robertson CL, Halcon L, Savik K, et al. Somali and Oromo refugee women: trauma and associated factors. J Adv Nursing. 2006;56:577-587.

31. Hooberman JB, Rosenfeld B, Lhewa D, et al. Classifying the torture experiences of refugees living in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2007;22:108-123.

32. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Carlsson J, et al. Prevalent pain and pain level among torture survivors: a follow-up study. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53:210-214.

33. McColl H, Higson-Smith C, Gjerding S, et al. Rehabilitation of torture survivors in five countries: common themes and challenges. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010;4:16.

34. Van Ommeren M, de Jong JT, Sharma B, et al. Psychiatric disorders among tortured Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:475-482.

35. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, et al. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:537-549.

36. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C, et al. Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia: association of lack of redress for trauma and posttraumatic stress reactions. JAMA. 2005;294:580-590.

37. Carlsson JM, Olsen DR, Mortensen EL, et al. Mental health and health-related quality of life: a 10-year follow-up of tortured refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:725-731.

38. Mollica RF, Lyoo IK, Chernoff MC, et al. Brain structural abnormalities and mental health sequelae in South Vietnamese ex-political detainees who survived traumatic head injury and torture. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1221-1232.

39. Keller A, Lhewa D, Rosenfeld B, et al. Traumatic experiences and psychological distress in an urban refugee population seeking treatment services. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:188-194.

40. Lunde I, Ortmann J. Prevalence and sequelae of sexual torture. Lancet. 1990;336:289-291.

41. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons. JAMA. 2005;294:602-612.

42. Rasmussen A, Rosenfeld B, Reeves K, et al. The effects of torture-related injuries on long-term psychological distress in a Punjabi Sikh sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:734-740.

43. Lie B. A 3-year follow-up study of psychosocial functioning and general symptoms in settled refugees. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106:415-425.

44. Crumlish N, O’Rourke K. A systematic review of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder among refugees and asylum-seekers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:237-251.

45. Neuner F, Kurreck S, Ruf M, et al. Can asylum-seekers with posttraumatic stress disorder be successfully treated? A randomized controlled pilot study. Cog Behav Ther. 2010;39:81-91.

46. Sjölund BH, Kastrup M, Montgomery E, et al. Rehabilitating torture survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:689-696.

47. US Department of Justice. FY 2011 asylum statistics. Available at: www.justice.gov/eoir/efoia/FY11AsyStats-Current.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2012.

48. US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Questions & answers: credible fear screening. September 4, 2009. Available at: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=897f549bf0683210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f39d3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD. Accessed March 12, 2012.

49. Lustig SL, Kureshi S, Delucchi KL, et al. Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008;10:7-15.

References

1. Rejali D. Torture and Democracy. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.

2. Crosby SS, Norredam M, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. Prevalence of torture survivors among foreign-born patients presenting to an urban ambulatory care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:764-768.

3. Eisenman D, Keller A, Kim G. Survivors of torture in a general medical setting: how often have patients been tortured and how often is it missed?. West J Med. 2000;172:301-304.

4. United States Department of Justice. Survivors of politically motivated torture: a large, growing, and invisible population of crime victims. January 2000. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/motivatedtorture/torture.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Parkinson’s disease backgrounder. Available at: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/parkinsons_disease/parkinsons_disease_backgrounder.htm. Accessed March 13, 2012.

6. National Multiple Sclerosis Society.. FAQs about MS. Available at: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-multiple-sclerosis/what-we-know-about-ms/faqs-about-ms/index.aspx#howmany. Accessed March 13, 2012.

7. Quiroga J, Jaranson JM. Politically–motivated torture and its survivors. Torture. 2005;15:1-112.

8. Montgomery E, Foldspang A. Criterion-related validity of screening for exposure to torture. Dan Med Bull. 1994;41:588-591.

9. Masmas TN, Moller E, Buhmanner C, et al. Asylum seekers in Denmark—a study of health status and grade of traumatization of newly arrived asylum seekers. Torture. 2008;18:77-86.

10. Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:1309-1314.

11. Torture in children. Torture. 2009;19(theme issue):64-175.

12. Volpellier M. Physical forensic signs of sexual torture in children. A guideline for non specialized medical examiners. Torture. 2009;19:157-166.

13. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Facts for families. Posttraumatic stress disorder. No. 70. March 2011. Available at: http://aacap.org/cs/root/facts_for_families/posttraumatic_stress_disorder_ptsd. Accessed March 12, 2012.

14. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 1984. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm. Accessed March 8, 2012.

15. Mollica RF. Surviving torture. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:5-7.

16. Vogel H, Schmitz-Engels F, Grillo C. Radiology of torture. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:187-204.

17. Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD. A Radiologic Atlas of Abuse, Torture, Terrorism, and Inflicted Trauma. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2003.

18. Danielsen L, Rasmussen OV. Dermatological findings after alleged torture. Torture. 2006;16:108-127.

19. Domovitch E, Berger PB, Wawer MJ, et al. Human torture: description and sequelae of 104 cases. Can Fam Phys. 1984;30:827-830.

20. Sanders J, Schuman MW, Marbella AM. The epidemiology of torture: a case series of 58 survivors of torture. Forens Sci Int. 2009;189:e1-e7.

21. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C. Torture vs other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:277-285.

22. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Bojholm S, et al. Prevalent musculoskeletal pain as a correlate of previous exposure to torture. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:496-503.

23. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.. Istanbul protocol: manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 2004. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2012.

24. Loncar M, Henigsberg N, Hrabac P. Mental health consequences in men exposed to sexual abuse during the war in Croatia and Bosnia. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25:191-203.

25. Prip K, Persson AL. Clinical findings in men with chronic pain after falanga torture. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:135-141.

26. Edston E. The epidemiology of falanga: incidence among Swedish asylum seekers. Torture. 2009;19:27-32.

27. Amris K, Top-Pedersen ST, Rasmussen OV. Long-term consequences of falanga torture—what do we know and what do we need to know? Torture. 2009;19:33-40.

28. Moreno A, Grodin MA. Torture and its neurological sequelae. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:213-223.

29. Oosterhoff P, Zwanikken P, Ketting E. Sexual torture of men in Croatia and other conflict situations: an open secret. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:68-77.

30. Robertson CL, Halcon L, Savik K, et al. Somali and Oromo refugee women: trauma and associated factors. J Adv Nursing. 2006;56:577-587.

31. Hooberman JB, Rosenfeld B, Lhewa D, et al. Classifying the torture experiences of refugees living in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2007;22:108-123.

32. Olsen DR, Montgomery E, Carlsson J, et al. Prevalent pain and pain level among torture survivors: a follow-up study. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53:210-214.

33. McColl H, Higson-Smith C, Gjerding S, et al. Rehabilitation of torture survivors in five countries: common themes and challenges. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010;4:16.

34. Van Ommeren M, de Jong JT, Sharma B, et al. Psychiatric disorders among tortured Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:475-482.

35. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, et al. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:537-549.

36. Basoglu M, Livanou M, Crnobaric C, et al. Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia: association of lack of redress for trauma and posttraumatic stress reactions. JAMA. 2005;294:580-590.

37. Carlsson JM, Olsen DR, Mortensen EL, et al. Mental health and health-related quality of life: a 10-year follow-up of tortured refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:725-731.

38. Mollica RF, Lyoo IK, Chernoff MC, et al. Brain structural abnormalities and mental health sequelae in South Vietnamese ex-political detainees who survived traumatic head injury and torture. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1221-1232.

39. Keller A, Lhewa D, Rosenfeld B, et al. Traumatic experiences and psychological distress in an urban refugee population seeking treatment services. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:188-194.

40. Lunde I, Ortmann J. Prevalence and sequelae of sexual torture. Lancet. 1990;336:289-291.

41. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons. JAMA. 2005;294:602-612.

42. Rasmussen A, Rosenfeld B, Reeves K, et al. The effects of torture-related injuries on long-term psychological distress in a Punjabi Sikh sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:734-740.

43. Lie B. A 3-year follow-up study of psychosocial functioning and general symptoms in settled refugees. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106:415-425.

44. Crumlish N, O’Rourke K. A systematic review of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder among refugees and asylum-seekers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:237-251.

45. Neuner F, Kurreck S, Ruf M, et al. Can asylum-seekers with posttraumatic stress disorder be successfully treated? A randomized controlled pilot study. Cog Behav Ther. 2010;39:81-91.

46. Sjölund BH, Kastrup M, Montgomery E, et al. Rehabilitating torture survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:689-696.

47. US Department of Justice. FY 2011 asylum statistics. Available at: www.justice.gov/eoir/efoia/FY11AsyStats-Current.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2012.

48. US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Questions & answers: credible fear screening. September 4, 2009. Available at: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=897f549bf0683210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f39d3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD. Accessed March 12, 2012.

49. Lustig SL, Kureshi S, Delucchi KL, et al. Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008;10:7-15.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(4)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(4)
Page Number
E1-E5
Page Number
E1-E5
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Torture survivors: What to ask, how to document
Display Headline
Torture survivors: What to ask, how to document
Legacy Keywords
Steven H. Miles;MD; Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi;PhD;LP; history of torture; refugee groups; torture survivors; plight of children; brutalized by police; child soldure;
Legacy Keywords
Steven H. Miles;MD; Rosa E. Garcia-Peltoniemi;PhD;LP; history of torture; refugee groups; torture survivors; plight of children; brutalized by police; child soldure;
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media