Article Type
Article
Changed
Mon, 04/16/2018 - 16:39
Display Headline
Should all patients with chronic kidney disease take a statin?
Author(s)
Dena Rifkin, MD
Mark Sarnak, MD, MS

We think some patients with chronic kidney disease should take a statin, particularly those in stages 1 through 4 (ie, not yet on dialysis1)* who have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels higher than 100 mg/dL. However, few studies have addressed this question.

*Stages of chronic kidney disease1:
Stage 1—kidney damage with normal or high glomerular filtration rate (GFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 2—kidney damage with mildly decreased GFR (60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 3—moderately decreased GFR (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 4—severely decreased GFR (15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 5—kidney failure (GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis)

The answer is murkier in patients on dialysis. Only one study has been done in this population, and it found no benefit from statin therapy. However, we would prescribe a statin for a dialysis patient who had known coronary artery disease and an LDL-C level higher than 100 mg/dL.

RATIONALE FOR STATIN USE: KIDNEY PATIENTS ARE AT RISK

Cardiovascular disease is common among patients with chronic kidney disease. While the risks of cardiovascular disease and death are highest among those requiring dialysis, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease also are associated with cardiovascular disease.2–4

The prevalence of traditional risk factors, particularly diabetes and hypertension, is high in all stages of kidney disease, and dyslipidemia is extremely common. Patients with chronic kidney disease who are not on dialysis tend to have lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and higher levels of triglycerides, lipoprotein remnants, lipoprotein(a), and LDL-C. The lipid profile of dialysis patients is more complex, as malnutrition and inflammation in this population may lead to low cholesterol levels.

Since statins are effective for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in those in the general population with high LDL-C,5 we could expect that the same holds true for patients with chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, if kidney disease were considered a coronary heart disease equivalent, more than 85% of those with stage 3, 4, or 5 disease would qualify for lipid-lowering therapy by LDL-C criteria.6

However, compared with the large body of evidence in those without kidney disease, we have few data on the effect of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in those with kidney disease. Five of seven major trials of statins excluded patients with chronic kidney disease by using a creatinine cutoff or by excluding patients with known kidney disease.7

Renoprotective effects

Besides their cardiovascular effects, statins may slow the progression of kidney disease.

A subgroup analysis of the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) trial8 showed a 12% increase in creatinine clearance in the group receiving atorvastatin (Lipitor) (P = .0001). In comparison, creatinine clearance decreased by 4% in the placebo group.

A subgroup analysis of the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a secondary prevention trial of pravastatin (Pravachol) vs placebo, showed a similar effect for patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline.9

A meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials (39,704 participants) concluded that, compared with no treatment, statins slowed the loss of GFR by a mean of 1.22 mL/min/year (95% confidence interval 0.44–2.0).10

Statins may confer this benefit independently of lipid-lowering. These drugs seem to decrease proteinuria, possibly by improving endothelial function or decreasing inflammation.11 A meta-analysis (1,384 patients) noted that 13 of 15 published studies found an antiproteinuric effect, with a greater effect in those with greater baseline proteinuria.12

The Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients With Progressive Renal Disease Trial (PLANET) will enroll 345 diabetic patients with protein-uria and hypercholesterolemia and examine the effects of rosuvastatin (Crestor) and atorvastatin on proteinuria and GFR.13

 

 

Cardioprotective effects in stages 1–4

Since patients with chronic kidney disease were excluded from most of the major statin trials, the best evidence in those with non-dialysis-dependent disease comes from post hoc analysis of data from the CARE study.14 While this trial excluded patients with more than 2+ proteinuria on dipstick analysis and those with creatinine values greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, 1,711 of the initial 4,159 patients had a creatinine clearance of less than 75 mL/min; the mean creatinine clearance in this subgroup was 61. In this subgroup, pravastatin therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (hazard ratio 0.72, P < 0.05).

Similarly, in the 4,491 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean GFR 55 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the Pravastatin Pooling Project, the hazard of new MI, cardiovascular death, or cardiac intervention was nearly 25% lower in the pravastatin group.15

The ongoing Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP),16 a randomized trial of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin) that enrolled 6,000 people with stages 3 to 4 kidney disease and 3,000 dialysis patients, will help in determining whether statin therapy prevents new vascular events. The study was launched in 2003 and has now completed enrollment. The primary outcome measure will be the time to first vascular event; secondary analyses will address whether statins decrease proteinuria or slow the progression of kidney disease.

Cardioprotective effects in dialysis patients

The only major randomized trial of statins ever conducted in dialysis patients with diabetes, the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D), did not find atorvastatin 20 mg to have any benefit compared with placebo in reducing a composite end point of death from cardiac causes, stroke, and nonfatal MI over a median of 4 years of follow-up, despite a decrease in LDL-C of over 40% in the treatment group.17 Adverse events were similar in the two groups. The lack of a detectable benefit may be due to differences in the cardiovascular milieu in dialysis patients, who may have more advanced disease, with preexisting cardiac remodeling and congestive heart failure, which may not be modified to the same extent by statin therapy. Alternatively, the dose of atorvastatin may have been too low, or 4 years of treatment may not be sufficient to detect a benefit in these patients.

An ongoing prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 3,000 hemodialysis patients, called A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Haemodialysis: an Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA),18 will help to clarify the role of statins in this population.

CONCLUSION

The National Kidney Foundation guidelines1,19 note that people with chronic kidney disease are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and therefore should be treated according to guidelines for treating traditional risk factors in high-risk groups. We believe that those with dyslipidemia who are in stages 1 through 4, particularly those with other risk factors for coronary heart disease, should receive a statin, with an LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL, even though we have few data from large trials focused on this population and even though LDL-C may not be the only reason to consider statin use. The pleiotropic effects of statins on proteinuria and progression of kidney function loss may be of benefit in this population as well, although we would not recommend starting a statin solely for these effects until more data are available.

Despite the negative results of the 4D trial, given the relative safety of statins and the lack of any trial data suggesting harm in patients with chronic kidney disease, in our practice we treat dialysis patients with known cardiovascular disease with a statin, with a target LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL. In dialysis patients without known cardiovascular disease, the use of a statin is even more controversial, and decisions should be made on an individual basis.

Results from the SHARP, AURORA, and PLANET trials, each of which is focused on patients with chronic kidney disease, will help determine whether statins benefit patients at this stage of disease.

References
  1. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39 suppl 1:S1–S266.
  2. Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, et al. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2049–2060.
  3. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 suppl 3:S112–S119.
  4. Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Coresh J, et al. Level of kidney function as a risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. Kidney Int 2003; 63:1121–1129.
  5. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366:1267–1278.
  6. Hyre AD, Fox CS, Astor BC, Cohen AJ, Muntner P. The impact of reclassifying moderate CKD as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent on the number of US adults recommended lipid-lowering treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49:37–45.
  7. Coca SG, Krumholz HM, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Underrepresentation of renal disease in randomized controlled trials of cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2006; 296:1377–1384.
  8. Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, et al. The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:728–734.
  9. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Cole T, Curhan GC Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effect of pravastatin on loss of renal function in people with moderate chronic renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:1605–1613.
  10. Sandhu S, Wiebe N, Fried LF, Tonelli M. Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2006–2016.
  11. Balk EM, Lau J, Goudas LC, et al. Effects of statins on nonlipid serum markers associated with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:670–682.
  12. Douglas K, O’Malley PG, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: the effect of statins on albuminuria. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:117–124.
  13. US National Institutes of Health. Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients with Progressive Renal Disease (PLANET 1). Accessed December 6, 2007. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00296374?order=1.
  14. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Kiberd B, Curhan G Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Trial Investigators. Pravastatin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in persons with mild chronic renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:98–104.
  15. Tonelli M, Isles C, Curhan GC, et al. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2004; 110:1557–1563.
  16. Baigent C, Landry M. Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Kidney Int Suppl 2003; 84:S207–S210.
  17. Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, et al German Diabetes and Dialysis Study Investigators. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:238–248.
  18. Fellstrom BC, Holdaas H, Jardine AG. Why do we need a statin trial in hemodialysis patients? Kidney Int 2003; 84 suppl:S204–S206.
  19. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49 suppl 2:S12–154.
Article PDF
media_eacf271_p118_ccjm75_2.pdf
Author and Disclosure Information

Dena Rifkin, MD
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

Mark Sarnak, MD, MS
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center; Associate Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Address: Dena Rifkin, MD, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111 DRifkin@tufts-nemc.org

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(2)
Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Topics
Vascular
Cardiology
Preventive Care
Endocrinology
Page Number
118-120
Sections
1-Minute Consult
Author(s)
Dena Rifkin, MD
Mark Sarnak, MD, MS
Author(s)
Dena Rifkin, MD
Mark Sarnak, MD, MS
Author and Disclosure Information

Dena Rifkin, MD
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

Mark Sarnak, MD, MS
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center; Associate Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Address: Dena Rifkin, MD, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111 DRifkin@tufts-nemc.org

Author and Disclosure Information

Dena Rifkin, MD
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

Mark Sarnak, MD, MS
Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center; Associate Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Address: Dena Rifkin, MD, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111 DRifkin@tufts-nemc.org

Article PDF
media_eacf271_p118_ccjm75_2.pdf
Article PDF
media_eacf271_p118_ccjm75_2.pdf

We think some patients with chronic kidney disease should take a statin, particularly those in stages 1 through 4 (ie, not yet on dialysis1)* who have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels higher than 100 mg/dL. However, few studies have addressed this question.

*Stages of chronic kidney disease1:
Stage 1—kidney damage with normal or high glomerular filtration rate (GFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 2—kidney damage with mildly decreased GFR (60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 3—moderately decreased GFR (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 4—severely decreased GFR (15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 5—kidney failure (GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis)

The answer is murkier in patients on dialysis. Only one study has been done in this population, and it found no benefit from statin therapy. However, we would prescribe a statin for a dialysis patient who had known coronary artery disease and an LDL-C level higher than 100 mg/dL.

RATIONALE FOR STATIN USE: KIDNEY PATIENTS ARE AT RISK

Cardiovascular disease is common among patients with chronic kidney disease. While the risks of cardiovascular disease and death are highest among those requiring dialysis, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease also are associated with cardiovascular disease.2–4

The prevalence of traditional risk factors, particularly diabetes and hypertension, is high in all stages of kidney disease, and dyslipidemia is extremely common. Patients with chronic kidney disease who are not on dialysis tend to have lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and higher levels of triglycerides, lipoprotein remnants, lipoprotein(a), and LDL-C. The lipid profile of dialysis patients is more complex, as malnutrition and inflammation in this population may lead to low cholesterol levels.

Since statins are effective for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in those in the general population with high LDL-C,5 we could expect that the same holds true for patients with chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, if kidney disease were considered a coronary heart disease equivalent, more than 85% of those with stage 3, 4, or 5 disease would qualify for lipid-lowering therapy by LDL-C criteria.6

However, compared with the large body of evidence in those without kidney disease, we have few data on the effect of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in those with kidney disease. Five of seven major trials of statins excluded patients with chronic kidney disease by using a creatinine cutoff or by excluding patients with known kidney disease.7

Renoprotective effects

Besides their cardiovascular effects, statins may slow the progression of kidney disease.

A subgroup analysis of the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) trial8 showed a 12% increase in creatinine clearance in the group receiving atorvastatin (Lipitor) (P = .0001). In comparison, creatinine clearance decreased by 4% in the placebo group.

A subgroup analysis of the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a secondary prevention trial of pravastatin (Pravachol) vs placebo, showed a similar effect for patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline.9

A meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials (39,704 participants) concluded that, compared with no treatment, statins slowed the loss of GFR by a mean of 1.22 mL/min/year (95% confidence interval 0.44–2.0).10

Statins may confer this benefit independently of lipid-lowering. These drugs seem to decrease proteinuria, possibly by improving endothelial function or decreasing inflammation.11 A meta-analysis (1,384 patients) noted that 13 of 15 published studies found an antiproteinuric effect, with a greater effect in those with greater baseline proteinuria.12

The Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients With Progressive Renal Disease Trial (PLANET) will enroll 345 diabetic patients with protein-uria and hypercholesterolemia and examine the effects of rosuvastatin (Crestor) and atorvastatin on proteinuria and GFR.13

 

 

Cardioprotective effects in stages 1–4

Since patients with chronic kidney disease were excluded from most of the major statin trials, the best evidence in those with non-dialysis-dependent disease comes from post hoc analysis of data from the CARE study.14 While this trial excluded patients with more than 2+ proteinuria on dipstick analysis and those with creatinine values greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, 1,711 of the initial 4,159 patients had a creatinine clearance of less than 75 mL/min; the mean creatinine clearance in this subgroup was 61. In this subgroup, pravastatin therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (hazard ratio 0.72, P < 0.05).

Similarly, in the 4,491 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean GFR 55 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the Pravastatin Pooling Project, the hazard of new MI, cardiovascular death, or cardiac intervention was nearly 25% lower in the pravastatin group.15

The ongoing Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP),16 a randomized trial of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin) that enrolled 6,000 people with stages 3 to 4 kidney disease and 3,000 dialysis patients, will help in determining whether statin therapy prevents new vascular events. The study was launched in 2003 and has now completed enrollment. The primary outcome measure will be the time to first vascular event; secondary analyses will address whether statins decrease proteinuria or slow the progression of kidney disease.

Cardioprotective effects in dialysis patients

The only major randomized trial of statins ever conducted in dialysis patients with diabetes, the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D), did not find atorvastatin 20 mg to have any benefit compared with placebo in reducing a composite end point of death from cardiac causes, stroke, and nonfatal MI over a median of 4 years of follow-up, despite a decrease in LDL-C of over 40% in the treatment group.17 Adverse events were similar in the two groups. The lack of a detectable benefit may be due to differences in the cardiovascular milieu in dialysis patients, who may have more advanced disease, with preexisting cardiac remodeling and congestive heart failure, which may not be modified to the same extent by statin therapy. Alternatively, the dose of atorvastatin may have been too low, or 4 years of treatment may not be sufficient to detect a benefit in these patients.

An ongoing prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 3,000 hemodialysis patients, called A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Haemodialysis: an Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA),18 will help to clarify the role of statins in this population.

CONCLUSION

The National Kidney Foundation guidelines1,19 note that people with chronic kidney disease are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and therefore should be treated according to guidelines for treating traditional risk factors in high-risk groups. We believe that those with dyslipidemia who are in stages 1 through 4, particularly those with other risk factors for coronary heart disease, should receive a statin, with an LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL, even though we have few data from large trials focused on this population and even though LDL-C may not be the only reason to consider statin use. The pleiotropic effects of statins on proteinuria and progression of kidney function loss may be of benefit in this population as well, although we would not recommend starting a statin solely for these effects until more data are available.

Despite the negative results of the 4D trial, given the relative safety of statins and the lack of any trial data suggesting harm in patients with chronic kidney disease, in our practice we treat dialysis patients with known cardiovascular disease with a statin, with a target LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL. In dialysis patients without known cardiovascular disease, the use of a statin is even more controversial, and decisions should be made on an individual basis.

Results from the SHARP, AURORA, and PLANET trials, each of which is focused on patients with chronic kidney disease, will help determine whether statins benefit patients at this stage of disease.

We think some patients with chronic kidney disease should take a statin, particularly those in stages 1 through 4 (ie, not yet on dialysis1)* who have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels higher than 100 mg/dL. However, few studies have addressed this question.

*Stages of chronic kidney disease1:
Stage 1—kidney damage with normal or high glomerular filtration rate (GFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 2—kidney damage with mildly decreased GFR (60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 3—moderately decreased GFR (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 4—severely decreased GFR (15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Stage 5—kidney failure (GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis)

The answer is murkier in patients on dialysis. Only one study has been done in this population, and it found no benefit from statin therapy. However, we would prescribe a statin for a dialysis patient who had known coronary artery disease and an LDL-C level higher than 100 mg/dL.

RATIONALE FOR STATIN USE: KIDNEY PATIENTS ARE AT RISK

Cardiovascular disease is common among patients with chronic kidney disease. While the risks of cardiovascular disease and death are highest among those requiring dialysis, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease also are associated with cardiovascular disease.2–4

The prevalence of traditional risk factors, particularly diabetes and hypertension, is high in all stages of kidney disease, and dyslipidemia is extremely common. Patients with chronic kidney disease who are not on dialysis tend to have lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and higher levels of triglycerides, lipoprotein remnants, lipoprotein(a), and LDL-C. The lipid profile of dialysis patients is more complex, as malnutrition and inflammation in this population may lead to low cholesterol levels.

Since statins are effective for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in those in the general population with high LDL-C,5 we could expect that the same holds true for patients with chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, if kidney disease were considered a coronary heart disease equivalent, more than 85% of those with stage 3, 4, or 5 disease would qualify for lipid-lowering therapy by LDL-C criteria.6

However, compared with the large body of evidence in those without kidney disease, we have few data on the effect of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in those with kidney disease. Five of seven major trials of statins excluded patients with chronic kidney disease by using a creatinine cutoff or by excluding patients with known kidney disease.7

Renoprotective effects

Besides their cardiovascular effects, statins may slow the progression of kidney disease.

A subgroup analysis of the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) trial8 showed a 12% increase in creatinine clearance in the group receiving atorvastatin (Lipitor) (P = .0001). In comparison, creatinine clearance decreased by 4% in the placebo group.

A subgroup analysis of the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a secondary prevention trial of pravastatin (Pravachol) vs placebo, showed a similar effect for patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline.9

A meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials (39,704 participants) concluded that, compared with no treatment, statins slowed the loss of GFR by a mean of 1.22 mL/min/year (95% confidence interval 0.44–2.0).10

Statins may confer this benefit independently of lipid-lowering. These drugs seem to decrease proteinuria, possibly by improving endothelial function or decreasing inflammation.11 A meta-analysis (1,384 patients) noted that 13 of 15 published studies found an antiproteinuric effect, with a greater effect in those with greater baseline proteinuria.12

The Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients With Progressive Renal Disease Trial (PLANET) will enroll 345 diabetic patients with protein-uria and hypercholesterolemia and examine the effects of rosuvastatin (Crestor) and atorvastatin on proteinuria and GFR.13

 

 

Cardioprotective effects in stages 1–4

Since patients with chronic kidney disease were excluded from most of the major statin trials, the best evidence in those with non-dialysis-dependent disease comes from post hoc analysis of data from the CARE study.14 While this trial excluded patients with more than 2+ proteinuria on dipstick analysis and those with creatinine values greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, 1,711 of the initial 4,159 patients had a creatinine clearance of less than 75 mL/min; the mean creatinine clearance in this subgroup was 61. In this subgroup, pravastatin therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (hazard ratio 0.72, P < 0.05).

Similarly, in the 4,491 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean GFR 55 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the Pravastatin Pooling Project, the hazard of new MI, cardiovascular death, or cardiac intervention was nearly 25% lower in the pravastatin group.15

The ongoing Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP),16 a randomized trial of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin) that enrolled 6,000 people with stages 3 to 4 kidney disease and 3,000 dialysis patients, will help in determining whether statin therapy prevents new vascular events. The study was launched in 2003 and has now completed enrollment. The primary outcome measure will be the time to first vascular event; secondary analyses will address whether statins decrease proteinuria or slow the progression of kidney disease.

Cardioprotective effects in dialysis patients

The only major randomized trial of statins ever conducted in dialysis patients with diabetes, the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D), did not find atorvastatin 20 mg to have any benefit compared with placebo in reducing a composite end point of death from cardiac causes, stroke, and nonfatal MI over a median of 4 years of follow-up, despite a decrease in LDL-C of over 40% in the treatment group.17 Adverse events were similar in the two groups. The lack of a detectable benefit may be due to differences in the cardiovascular milieu in dialysis patients, who may have more advanced disease, with preexisting cardiac remodeling and congestive heart failure, which may not be modified to the same extent by statin therapy. Alternatively, the dose of atorvastatin may have been too low, or 4 years of treatment may not be sufficient to detect a benefit in these patients.

An ongoing prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 3,000 hemodialysis patients, called A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Haemodialysis: an Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA),18 will help to clarify the role of statins in this population.

CONCLUSION

The National Kidney Foundation guidelines1,19 note that people with chronic kidney disease are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and therefore should be treated according to guidelines for treating traditional risk factors in high-risk groups. We believe that those with dyslipidemia who are in stages 1 through 4, particularly those with other risk factors for coronary heart disease, should receive a statin, with an LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL, even though we have few data from large trials focused on this population and even though LDL-C may not be the only reason to consider statin use. The pleiotropic effects of statins on proteinuria and progression of kidney function loss may be of benefit in this population as well, although we would not recommend starting a statin solely for these effects until more data are available.

Despite the negative results of the 4D trial, given the relative safety of statins and the lack of any trial data suggesting harm in patients with chronic kidney disease, in our practice we treat dialysis patients with known cardiovascular disease with a statin, with a target LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL. In dialysis patients without known cardiovascular disease, the use of a statin is even more controversial, and decisions should be made on an individual basis.

Results from the SHARP, AURORA, and PLANET trials, each of which is focused on patients with chronic kidney disease, will help determine whether statins benefit patients at this stage of disease.

References
  1. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39 suppl 1:S1–S266.
  2. Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, et al. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2049–2060.
  3. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 suppl 3:S112–S119.
  4. Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Coresh J, et al. Level of kidney function as a risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. Kidney Int 2003; 63:1121–1129.
  5. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366:1267–1278.
  6. Hyre AD, Fox CS, Astor BC, Cohen AJ, Muntner P. The impact of reclassifying moderate CKD as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent on the number of US adults recommended lipid-lowering treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49:37–45.
  7. Coca SG, Krumholz HM, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Underrepresentation of renal disease in randomized controlled trials of cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2006; 296:1377–1384.
  8. Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, et al. The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:728–734.
  9. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Cole T, Curhan GC Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effect of pravastatin on loss of renal function in people with moderate chronic renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:1605–1613.
  10. Sandhu S, Wiebe N, Fried LF, Tonelli M. Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2006–2016.
  11. Balk EM, Lau J, Goudas LC, et al. Effects of statins on nonlipid serum markers associated with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:670–682.
  12. Douglas K, O’Malley PG, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: the effect of statins on albuminuria. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:117–124.
  13. US National Institutes of Health. Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients with Progressive Renal Disease (PLANET 1). Accessed December 6, 2007. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00296374?order=1.
  14. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Kiberd B, Curhan G Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Trial Investigators. Pravastatin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in persons with mild chronic renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:98–104.
  15. Tonelli M, Isles C, Curhan GC, et al. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2004; 110:1557–1563.
  16. Baigent C, Landry M. Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Kidney Int Suppl 2003; 84:S207–S210.
  17. Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, et al German Diabetes and Dialysis Study Investigators. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:238–248.
  18. Fellstrom BC, Holdaas H, Jardine AG. Why do we need a statin trial in hemodialysis patients? Kidney Int 2003; 84 suppl:S204–S206.
  19. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49 suppl 2:S12–154.
References
  1. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39 suppl 1:S1–S266.
  2. Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, et al. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2049–2060.
  3. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 suppl 3:S112–S119.
  4. Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Coresh J, et al. Level of kidney function as a risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. Kidney Int 2003; 63:1121–1129.
  5. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366:1267–1278.
  6. Hyre AD, Fox CS, Astor BC, Cohen AJ, Muntner P. The impact of reclassifying moderate CKD as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent on the number of US adults recommended lipid-lowering treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49:37–45.
  7. Coca SG, Krumholz HM, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Underrepresentation of renal disease in randomized controlled trials of cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2006; 296:1377–1384.
  8. Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, et al. The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:728–734.
  9. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Cole T, Curhan GC Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effect of pravastatin on loss of renal function in people with moderate chronic renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:1605–1613.
  10. Sandhu S, Wiebe N, Fried LF, Tonelli M. Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2006–2016.
  11. Balk EM, Lau J, Goudas LC, et al. Effects of statins on nonlipid serum markers associated with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:670–682.
  12. Douglas K, O’Malley PG, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: the effect of statins on albuminuria. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:117–124.
  13. US National Institutes of Health. Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Diabetic Patients with Progressive Renal Disease (PLANET 1). Accessed December 6, 2007. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00296374?order=1.
  14. Tonelli M, Moye L, Sacks FM, Kiberd B, Curhan G Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Trial Investigators. Pravastatin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in persons with mild chronic renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:98–104.
  15. Tonelli M, Isles C, Curhan GC, et al. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2004; 110:1557–1563.
  16. Baigent C, Landry M. Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Kidney Int Suppl 2003; 84:S207–S210.
  17. Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, et al German Diabetes and Dialysis Study Investigators. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:238–248.
  18. Fellstrom BC, Holdaas H, Jardine AG. Why do we need a statin trial in hemodialysis patients? Kidney Int 2003; 84 suppl:S204–S206.
  19. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49 suppl 2:S12–154.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(2)
Page Number
118-120
Page Number
118-120
Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Topics
Vascular
Cardiology
Preventive Care
Endocrinology
Article Type
Article
Display Headline
Should all patients with chronic kidney disease take a statin?
Display Headline
Should all patients with chronic kidney disease take a statin?
Sections
1-Minute Consult
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media