Assessment of Automated vs Conventional Blood Pressure Measurements in a Veterans Affairs Clinical Practice Setting

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Assessment of Automated vs Conventional Blood Pressure Measurements in a Veterans Affairs Clinical Practice Setting

Hypertension remains one of the most important modifiable risk factors for the prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events. According to a population-based study, 25% of CV events (CV death, heart disease, coronary revascularization, stroke, or heart failure) are attributable to hypertension.1 Recent guidelines have emphasized the importance of accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in facilitating appropriate hypertension diagnosis and management.2-4

Currently, there are different BP measurement methods endorsed by practice guidelines. These include conventional in-office measurement, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM), and automated office BP (AOBP) measurement.2-4 AOBP device protocols vary but generally involve devices automatically taking multiple BP measurements while the patient is unattended. These measurements are then presented as a single averaged reading, with individual BP values available for review by the clinician.

Researchers have found that AOBP measurements have a greater association with ABPM values and can mitigate the white coat effect observed in a substantial proportion of patients during in-clinic BP measurement.5 A meta-analysis found that the use of AOBP was associated with a 10.5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP (SBP) compared with traditional office-based BP assessments.5 Similarly, a separate meta-analysis found that AOBP SBP measures were on average 14.5 mm Hg lower than routine office or research setting values.6 In addition, CV risk outcomes data support the use of AOBP to screen and manage patients with hypertension. The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) study used AOBP values to determine the risk for CV events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke) in community-based patients aged ≥ 65 years.7 The study showed a significantly higher risk of CV events in patients with an SBP of 135 to 144 mm Hg and a diastolic BP (DBP) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Therefore, the CHAP study researchers suggested an AOBP target of < 135/85 mm Hg to decrease the risk of CV events.7The landmark SPRINT trial, which was a major contributor to the development of BP target recommendations in guidelines, utilized AOBP to classify hypertension and guide management.2-4,8 SPRINT ultimately showed that intensive BP-lowering treatment (to SBP < 120 mm Hg) was associated with a 25% reduction in major CV events and a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality.8 Other evaluations found a close association between AOBP values and left ventricular mass index and carotid artery wall thickness as surrogate markers for end-organ damage.9,10 These data show AOBP as a reliable method to guide antihypertensive therapy interventions in the clinical setting.

Considering these proposed advantages, the 2017 Canadian guidelines for hypertension management recommend AOBP as the preferred method for clinic-based BP measurement, and the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension blood pressure guidelines recommend the use of AOBP when feasible.3,4 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults also discusses AOBP as a method to minimize potential confounders in BP values.2

This study evaluated the difference between AOBP and conventional in-office BP measurements obtained during cardiology clinic visits at the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center (WPBVAMC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of AOBP measurements was performed at the WPBVAMC cardiology clinic between May 26, 2017, and February 19, 2019. These AOBP measurements were taken at the discretion of a nurse or other clinician after initial, conventional BP measurements had been taken as part of clinic check-in procedures. No formal protocols dictated the use or timing of AOBP measurements. Similarly, the AOBP results were factored into clinical care decisions.

Clinicians at the cardiology clinic used AOBP averages that were derived using the BpTRU BPM-100 (BpTRU Medical Devices) meter, which averaged 5 BP readings taken at 1-minute intervals. Clinicians selected cuff size based on manufacturer recommendations. The testing was done with the patient seated alone in either a nursing triage area or a clinic office.

Data collected during the retrospective review included the clinician associated with the visit, the patient’s physical location and accompaniment status during AOBP measurement, conventionally measured BP and heart rates, and AOBP-derived BP and heart rate averages. Differences in BP values were compared with the paired t test, while binary comparisons were conducted through the McNemar test. Data collection and analysis were performed using Microsoft Excel.

During data collection, all information was stored in a secure drive accessible only to the investigators. The project was approved by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Research and Development Committee as a nonresearch activity in accordance with Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05; thus, institutional review board approval was not required.

RESULTS

Ninety-five nonconsecutive patients were included in the analysis. AOBP measurements were taken with the patient sitting alone in either a clinic office (n = 83) or nursing triage area (n = 12). Most patients were coming in for follow-up appointments; 13 patients (14%) had appointments related to a 24-hour ABPM session.

The mean SBP and DBP values were lower for the AOBP measurements vs the conventional BP measurements (mean SBP difference, 14.6 mm Hg; P < .001; mean DBP difference, 3.5 mm Hg; P = .0002) (Table). There were no appreciable differences in heart rates. The white coat effect was suggested based on an SBP reduction of > 20 mm Hg from conventional to AOBP measurements in 22 patients (23%), a DBP reduction of > 10 mm Hg in 21 patients (22%), and a reduction in both values in 8 patients (8%).

FDP04212464_T1

A controlled BP (< 130/80 mm Hg) was more common in the AOBP group than in the conventional group (22% vs 7%, respectively; P =.001).2 Review of conventional BP measurements indicated that 11 patients had systolic readings ≥ 180 mm Hg, 2 had diastolic readings ≥ 110 mm Hg, and 1 had a reading that was ≥ 180/110 mm Hg. AOBP measurements indicated that these 14 patients had SBP readings < 180 mm Hg and DBP readings < 110 mm Hg. The use of AOBP measurements may have mitigated unnecessary emergency room visits for these patients.

On review of clinic notes and actions associated with episodes of AOBP testing during routine follow-up clinic appointments, AOBP was determined to be useful with regard to clinical decision-making for 65 (79%) patients. Impacts of AOBP inclusion vs conventional BP assessments included clinician notation of AOBP, support for making changes that would have been considered based on conventional BP assessment. AOBP results gave support to forgoing a therapeutic intervention (ie, therapy addition or intensification) that may have been pursued based on conventional BP measurements in 25 of 82 patients (30%). These data suggest that AOBP readings can be useful and actionable by clinicians.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study add to the growing evidence regarding AOBP use, application, and advantages in clinical practice. In this evaluation, the mean difference in SBP and DBP was 14.6 mm Hg and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively, from the conventional office measurements to the AOBP measurements. This difference is similar to that reported by the CAMBO trial and other evaluations, where the use of AOBP measurements corresponded to a reduction in SBP of between 10 and 20 mm Hg vs conventional measures.5,11-18

These findings showed a significantly higher percentage of controlled BP values (< 130/80 mm Hg) with AOBP values compared with conventional office measurements. The data supported the decision to defer antihypertensive therapy intervention in 30% of patients. Without AOBP data, patients may have been classified as uncontrolled, prompting therapy addition or intensification that could increase the risk of adverse events. Additionally, 14 patients would have met the criteria for hypertensive urgency under the guidelines at that time.2 With the use of AOBP readings, none of these patients were identified as having a hypertensive urgency, and they avoided an acute care referral or urgent intervention.

The discrepancy between AOBP and conventional office BP measurements suggested a white coat effect based on SBP and DBP readings in 22 (23%) and 21 (22%) patients, respectively. Practice guidelines recommend ABPM to mitigate a potential white coat effect.2-4 However, ABPM can be inconvenient for patients, as they need to travel to and from the clinic for fitting and removal (assuming that a facility has the device available for patient use). In addition, some patients may find it uncomfortable. Based on the correlation between AOBP and awake ABPM values, AOBP represents a feasible way to identify a white coat effect.

AOBP monitoring does not appear to be affected by the type of practice setting, as it has been evaluated in a variety of locations, including community-based pharmacies, primary care offices, and waiting rooms.12,19-22 However, potential AOBP implementation challenges may include office space constraints, clinician perception that it will delay workflow, and device cost. Costs associated with an AOBP meter vary widely based on device and procurement source, but have been estimated to range from $650 to > $2000.23 Published reports have described how to overcome AOBP implementation barriers.24,25

Limitations

The results of this evaluation should be interpreted cautiously due to several limitations. First, the retrospective study was conducted at a single clinic that may not be representative of other Veterans Health Administration or community-based populations. In addition, patient data such as age, sex, and body mass index were not available. AOBP measurements were obtained at the discretion of the clinician and not according to a prespecified protocol.

Conclusions

This analysis showed AOBP measurement leads to a greater percentage of controlled BP values compared with conventional office BP measurement, positioning it as a way to reduce BP misclassification, prevent potentially unnecessary therapeutic interventions, and mitigate the white coat effect.

References
  1. Cheng S, Claggett B, Correia AW, et al. Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation. 2014;130:820-828. doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008506
  2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269-1324. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066
  3. Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2017 guidelines for diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(5):557-576. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.005
  4. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
  5. Pappaccogli M, Di Monaco S, Perlo E, et al. Comparison of automated office blood pressure with office and out-off-office measurement techniques. Hypertension. 2019;73(2):481-490. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12079
  6. Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension - a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:351-362. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551
  7. Kaczorowski J, Chambers LW, Karwalajtys T, et al. Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP): a community cluster-randomised trial among elderly Canadians. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):537-544. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.005
  8. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103-2116. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
  9. Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, et al. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(6):661-666. doi:10.1038/ajh.2011.38
  10. Campbell NRC, McKay DW, Conradson H, et al. Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima-medial thickness in male firefighters. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(7):588-590. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002190
  11. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286. doi:10.1136/bmj.d286
  12. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):18. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-5-18
  13. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens. 2009;27(2):280-286. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831b9e6b
  14. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(3):108-111. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832c5167
  15. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13(6):333-338. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283104247
  16. Myers MG. A proposed algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using automated office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2010;28(4):703-708. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328335d091
  17. Godwin M, Birtwhistle R, Delva D, et al. Manual and automated office measurements in relation to awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Fam Pract. 2011;28(1):110-117. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmq067
  18. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Chessman M, Kiss A. Can sphygmomanometers designed for self-measurement of blood pressure in the home be used in office practice? Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(6):300-304. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e328340d128
  19. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2016 Canadian hypertension education program guidelines for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(5):569-588. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066
  20. Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure - 15 years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(8):721-724. doi:10.1111/jch.12820
  21. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(2):127-132.
  22. Armstrong D, Matangi M, Brouillard D, Myers MG. Automated office blood pressure - being alone and not location is what matters most. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20(4):204-208. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000133
  23. Yarows SA. What is the Cost of Measuring a Blood Pressure? Ann Clin Hypertens. 2018;2:59-66. doi:10.29328/journal.ach.1001012
  24. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458-1465. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
  25. Doane J, Buu J, Penrod MJ, et al. Measuring and managing blood pressure in a primary care setting: a pragmatic implementation study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(3):375-388. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Daniela Valencia, PharmDa,b; Augustus Hough, PharmDa; Stephanie Kaiser, PharmDa,c

Author affiliations
aWest Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
bMiami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
cOrlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent
This project was overseen by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center Research and Development Committee which determined that the quality analysis project was exempt from institutional review board evaluation.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Correspondence: Augustus Hough (augustus.hough@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 10. doi:10.12788/fp.0650

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
464-467
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Daniela Valencia, PharmDa,b; Augustus Hough, PharmDa; Stephanie Kaiser, PharmDa,c

Author affiliations
aWest Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
bMiami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
cOrlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent
This project was overseen by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center Research and Development Committee which determined that the quality analysis project was exempt from institutional review board evaluation.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Correspondence: Augustus Hough (augustus.hough@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 10. doi:10.12788/fp.0650

Author and Disclosure Information

Daniela Valencia, PharmDa,b; Augustus Hough, PharmDa; Stephanie Kaiser, PharmDa,c

Author affiliations
aWest Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
bMiami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida
cOrlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent
This project was overseen by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center Research and Development Committee which determined that the quality analysis project was exempt from institutional review board evaluation.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Correspondence: Augustus Hough (augustus.hough@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 10. doi:10.12788/fp.0650

Article PDF
Article PDF

Hypertension remains one of the most important modifiable risk factors for the prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events. According to a population-based study, 25% of CV events (CV death, heart disease, coronary revascularization, stroke, or heart failure) are attributable to hypertension.1 Recent guidelines have emphasized the importance of accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in facilitating appropriate hypertension diagnosis and management.2-4

Currently, there are different BP measurement methods endorsed by practice guidelines. These include conventional in-office measurement, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM), and automated office BP (AOBP) measurement.2-4 AOBP device protocols vary but generally involve devices automatically taking multiple BP measurements while the patient is unattended. These measurements are then presented as a single averaged reading, with individual BP values available for review by the clinician.

Researchers have found that AOBP measurements have a greater association with ABPM values and can mitigate the white coat effect observed in a substantial proportion of patients during in-clinic BP measurement.5 A meta-analysis found that the use of AOBP was associated with a 10.5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP (SBP) compared with traditional office-based BP assessments.5 Similarly, a separate meta-analysis found that AOBP SBP measures were on average 14.5 mm Hg lower than routine office or research setting values.6 In addition, CV risk outcomes data support the use of AOBP to screen and manage patients with hypertension. The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) study used AOBP values to determine the risk for CV events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke) in community-based patients aged ≥ 65 years.7 The study showed a significantly higher risk of CV events in patients with an SBP of 135 to 144 mm Hg and a diastolic BP (DBP) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Therefore, the CHAP study researchers suggested an AOBP target of < 135/85 mm Hg to decrease the risk of CV events.7The landmark SPRINT trial, which was a major contributor to the development of BP target recommendations in guidelines, utilized AOBP to classify hypertension and guide management.2-4,8 SPRINT ultimately showed that intensive BP-lowering treatment (to SBP < 120 mm Hg) was associated with a 25% reduction in major CV events and a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality.8 Other evaluations found a close association between AOBP values and left ventricular mass index and carotid artery wall thickness as surrogate markers for end-organ damage.9,10 These data show AOBP as a reliable method to guide antihypertensive therapy interventions in the clinical setting.

Considering these proposed advantages, the 2017 Canadian guidelines for hypertension management recommend AOBP as the preferred method for clinic-based BP measurement, and the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension blood pressure guidelines recommend the use of AOBP when feasible.3,4 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults also discusses AOBP as a method to minimize potential confounders in BP values.2

This study evaluated the difference between AOBP and conventional in-office BP measurements obtained during cardiology clinic visits at the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center (WPBVAMC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of AOBP measurements was performed at the WPBVAMC cardiology clinic between May 26, 2017, and February 19, 2019. These AOBP measurements were taken at the discretion of a nurse or other clinician after initial, conventional BP measurements had been taken as part of clinic check-in procedures. No formal protocols dictated the use or timing of AOBP measurements. Similarly, the AOBP results were factored into clinical care decisions.

Clinicians at the cardiology clinic used AOBP averages that were derived using the BpTRU BPM-100 (BpTRU Medical Devices) meter, which averaged 5 BP readings taken at 1-minute intervals. Clinicians selected cuff size based on manufacturer recommendations. The testing was done with the patient seated alone in either a nursing triage area or a clinic office.

Data collected during the retrospective review included the clinician associated with the visit, the patient’s physical location and accompaniment status during AOBP measurement, conventionally measured BP and heart rates, and AOBP-derived BP and heart rate averages. Differences in BP values were compared with the paired t test, while binary comparisons were conducted through the McNemar test. Data collection and analysis were performed using Microsoft Excel.

During data collection, all information was stored in a secure drive accessible only to the investigators. The project was approved by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Research and Development Committee as a nonresearch activity in accordance with Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05; thus, institutional review board approval was not required.

RESULTS

Ninety-five nonconsecutive patients were included in the analysis. AOBP measurements were taken with the patient sitting alone in either a clinic office (n = 83) or nursing triage area (n = 12). Most patients were coming in for follow-up appointments; 13 patients (14%) had appointments related to a 24-hour ABPM session.

The mean SBP and DBP values were lower for the AOBP measurements vs the conventional BP measurements (mean SBP difference, 14.6 mm Hg; P < .001; mean DBP difference, 3.5 mm Hg; P = .0002) (Table). There were no appreciable differences in heart rates. The white coat effect was suggested based on an SBP reduction of > 20 mm Hg from conventional to AOBP measurements in 22 patients (23%), a DBP reduction of > 10 mm Hg in 21 patients (22%), and a reduction in both values in 8 patients (8%).

FDP04212464_T1

A controlled BP (< 130/80 mm Hg) was more common in the AOBP group than in the conventional group (22% vs 7%, respectively; P =.001).2 Review of conventional BP measurements indicated that 11 patients had systolic readings ≥ 180 mm Hg, 2 had diastolic readings ≥ 110 mm Hg, and 1 had a reading that was ≥ 180/110 mm Hg. AOBP measurements indicated that these 14 patients had SBP readings < 180 mm Hg and DBP readings < 110 mm Hg. The use of AOBP measurements may have mitigated unnecessary emergency room visits for these patients.

On review of clinic notes and actions associated with episodes of AOBP testing during routine follow-up clinic appointments, AOBP was determined to be useful with regard to clinical decision-making for 65 (79%) patients. Impacts of AOBP inclusion vs conventional BP assessments included clinician notation of AOBP, support for making changes that would have been considered based on conventional BP assessment. AOBP results gave support to forgoing a therapeutic intervention (ie, therapy addition or intensification) that may have been pursued based on conventional BP measurements in 25 of 82 patients (30%). These data suggest that AOBP readings can be useful and actionable by clinicians.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study add to the growing evidence regarding AOBP use, application, and advantages in clinical practice. In this evaluation, the mean difference in SBP and DBP was 14.6 mm Hg and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively, from the conventional office measurements to the AOBP measurements. This difference is similar to that reported by the CAMBO trial and other evaluations, where the use of AOBP measurements corresponded to a reduction in SBP of between 10 and 20 mm Hg vs conventional measures.5,11-18

These findings showed a significantly higher percentage of controlled BP values (< 130/80 mm Hg) with AOBP values compared with conventional office measurements. The data supported the decision to defer antihypertensive therapy intervention in 30% of patients. Without AOBP data, patients may have been classified as uncontrolled, prompting therapy addition or intensification that could increase the risk of adverse events. Additionally, 14 patients would have met the criteria for hypertensive urgency under the guidelines at that time.2 With the use of AOBP readings, none of these patients were identified as having a hypertensive urgency, and they avoided an acute care referral or urgent intervention.

The discrepancy between AOBP and conventional office BP measurements suggested a white coat effect based on SBP and DBP readings in 22 (23%) and 21 (22%) patients, respectively. Practice guidelines recommend ABPM to mitigate a potential white coat effect.2-4 However, ABPM can be inconvenient for patients, as they need to travel to and from the clinic for fitting and removal (assuming that a facility has the device available for patient use). In addition, some patients may find it uncomfortable. Based on the correlation between AOBP and awake ABPM values, AOBP represents a feasible way to identify a white coat effect.

AOBP monitoring does not appear to be affected by the type of practice setting, as it has been evaluated in a variety of locations, including community-based pharmacies, primary care offices, and waiting rooms.12,19-22 However, potential AOBP implementation challenges may include office space constraints, clinician perception that it will delay workflow, and device cost. Costs associated with an AOBP meter vary widely based on device and procurement source, but have been estimated to range from $650 to > $2000.23 Published reports have described how to overcome AOBP implementation barriers.24,25

Limitations

The results of this evaluation should be interpreted cautiously due to several limitations. First, the retrospective study was conducted at a single clinic that may not be representative of other Veterans Health Administration or community-based populations. In addition, patient data such as age, sex, and body mass index were not available. AOBP measurements were obtained at the discretion of the clinician and not according to a prespecified protocol.

Conclusions

This analysis showed AOBP measurement leads to a greater percentage of controlled BP values compared with conventional office BP measurement, positioning it as a way to reduce BP misclassification, prevent potentially unnecessary therapeutic interventions, and mitigate the white coat effect.

Hypertension remains one of the most important modifiable risk factors for the prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events. According to a population-based study, 25% of CV events (CV death, heart disease, coronary revascularization, stroke, or heart failure) are attributable to hypertension.1 Recent guidelines have emphasized the importance of accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in facilitating appropriate hypertension diagnosis and management.2-4

Currently, there are different BP measurement methods endorsed by practice guidelines. These include conventional in-office measurement, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM), and automated office BP (AOBP) measurement.2-4 AOBP device protocols vary but generally involve devices automatically taking multiple BP measurements while the patient is unattended. These measurements are then presented as a single averaged reading, with individual BP values available for review by the clinician.

Researchers have found that AOBP measurements have a greater association with ABPM values and can mitigate the white coat effect observed in a substantial proportion of patients during in-clinic BP measurement.5 A meta-analysis found that the use of AOBP was associated with a 10.5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP (SBP) compared with traditional office-based BP assessments.5 Similarly, a separate meta-analysis found that AOBP SBP measures were on average 14.5 mm Hg lower than routine office or research setting values.6 In addition, CV risk outcomes data support the use of AOBP to screen and manage patients with hypertension. The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) study used AOBP values to determine the risk for CV events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke) in community-based patients aged ≥ 65 years.7 The study showed a significantly higher risk of CV events in patients with an SBP of 135 to 144 mm Hg and a diastolic BP (DBP) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Therefore, the CHAP study researchers suggested an AOBP target of < 135/85 mm Hg to decrease the risk of CV events.7The landmark SPRINT trial, which was a major contributor to the development of BP target recommendations in guidelines, utilized AOBP to classify hypertension and guide management.2-4,8 SPRINT ultimately showed that intensive BP-lowering treatment (to SBP < 120 mm Hg) was associated with a 25% reduction in major CV events and a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality.8 Other evaluations found a close association between AOBP values and left ventricular mass index and carotid artery wall thickness as surrogate markers for end-organ damage.9,10 These data show AOBP as a reliable method to guide antihypertensive therapy interventions in the clinical setting.

Considering these proposed advantages, the 2017 Canadian guidelines for hypertension management recommend AOBP as the preferred method for clinic-based BP measurement, and the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension blood pressure guidelines recommend the use of AOBP when feasible.3,4 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults also discusses AOBP as a method to minimize potential confounders in BP values.2

This study evaluated the difference between AOBP and conventional in-office BP measurements obtained during cardiology clinic visits at the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center (WPBVAMC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of AOBP measurements was performed at the WPBVAMC cardiology clinic between May 26, 2017, and February 19, 2019. These AOBP measurements were taken at the discretion of a nurse or other clinician after initial, conventional BP measurements had been taken as part of clinic check-in procedures. No formal protocols dictated the use or timing of AOBP measurements. Similarly, the AOBP results were factored into clinical care decisions.

Clinicians at the cardiology clinic used AOBP averages that were derived using the BpTRU BPM-100 (BpTRU Medical Devices) meter, which averaged 5 BP readings taken at 1-minute intervals. Clinicians selected cuff size based on manufacturer recommendations. The testing was done with the patient seated alone in either a nursing triage area or a clinic office.

Data collected during the retrospective review included the clinician associated with the visit, the patient’s physical location and accompaniment status during AOBP measurement, conventionally measured BP and heart rates, and AOBP-derived BP and heart rate averages. Differences in BP values were compared with the paired t test, while binary comparisons were conducted through the McNemar test. Data collection and analysis were performed using Microsoft Excel.

During data collection, all information was stored in a secure drive accessible only to the investigators. The project was approved by the West Palm Beach Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Research and Development Committee as a nonresearch activity in accordance with Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05; thus, institutional review board approval was not required.

RESULTS

Ninety-five nonconsecutive patients were included in the analysis. AOBP measurements were taken with the patient sitting alone in either a clinic office (n = 83) or nursing triage area (n = 12). Most patients were coming in for follow-up appointments; 13 patients (14%) had appointments related to a 24-hour ABPM session.

The mean SBP and DBP values were lower for the AOBP measurements vs the conventional BP measurements (mean SBP difference, 14.6 mm Hg; P < .001; mean DBP difference, 3.5 mm Hg; P = .0002) (Table). There were no appreciable differences in heart rates. The white coat effect was suggested based on an SBP reduction of > 20 mm Hg from conventional to AOBP measurements in 22 patients (23%), a DBP reduction of > 10 mm Hg in 21 patients (22%), and a reduction in both values in 8 patients (8%).

FDP04212464_T1

A controlled BP (< 130/80 mm Hg) was more common in the AOBP group than in the conventional group (22% vs 7%, respectively; P =.001).2 Review of conventional BP measurements indicated that 11 patients had systolic readings ≥ 180 mm Hg, 2 had diastolic readings ≥ 110 mm Hg, and 1 had a reading that was ≥ 180/110 mm Hg. AOBP measurements indicated that these 14 patients had SBP readings < 180 mm Hg and DBP readings < 110 mm Hg. The use of AOBP measurements may have mitigated unnecessary emergency room visits for these patients.

On review of clinic notes and actions associated with episodes of AOBP testing during routine follow-up clinic appointments, AOBP was determined to be useful with regard to clinical decision-making for 65 (79%) patients. Impacts of AOBP inclusion vs conventional BP assessments included clinician notation of AOBP, support for making changes that would have been considered based on conventional BP assessment. AOBP results gave support to forgoing a therapeutic intervention (ie, therapy addition or intensification) that may have been pursued based on conventional BP measurements in 25 of 82 patients (30%). These data suggest that AOBP readings can be useful and actionable by clinicians.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study add to the growing evidence regarding AOBP use, application, and advantages in clinical practice. In this evaluation, the mean difference in SBP and DBP was 14.6 mm Hg and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively, from the conventional office measurements to the AOBP measurements. This difference is similar to that reported by the CAMBO trial and other evaluations, where the use of AOBP measurements corresponded to a reduction in SBP of between 10 and 20 mm Hg vs conventional measures.5,11-18

These findings showed a significantly higher percentage of controlled BP values (< 130/80 mm Hg) with AOBP values compared with conventional office measurements. The data supported the decision to defer antihypertensive therapy intervention in 30% of patients. Without AOBP data, patients may have been classified as uncontrolled, prompting therapy addition or intensification that could increase the risk of adverse events. Additionally, 14 patients would have met the criteria for hypertensive urgency under the guidelines at that time.2 With the use of AOBP readings, none of these patients were identified as having a hypertensive urgency, and they avoided an acute care referral or urgent intervention.

The discrepancy between AOBP and conventional office BP measurements suggested a white coat effect based on SBP and DBP readings in 22 (23%) and 21 (22%) patients, respectively. Practice guidelines recommend ABPM to mitigate a potential white coat effect.2-4 However, ABPM can be inconvenient for patients, as they need to travel to and from the clinic for fitting and removal (assuming that a facility has the device available for patient use). In addition, some patients may find it uncomfortable. Based on the correlation between AOBP and awake ABPM values, AOBP represents a feasible way to identify a white coat effect.

AOBP monitoring does not appear to be affected by the type of practice setting, as it has been evaluated in a variety of locations, including community-based pharmacies, primary care offices, and waiting rooms.12,19-22 However, potential AOBP implementation challenges may include office space constraints, clinician perception that it will delay workflow, and device cost. Costs associated with an AOBP meter vary widely based on device and procurement source, but have been estimated to range from $650 to > $2000.23 Published reports have described how to overcome AOBP implementation barriers.24,25

Limitations

The results of this evaluation should be interpreted cautiously due to several limitations. First, the retrospective study was conducted at a single clinic that may not be representative of other Veterans Health Administration or community-based populations. In addition, patient data such as age, sex, and body mass index were not available. AOBP measurements were obtained at the discretion of the clinician and not according to a prespecified protocol.

Conclusions

This analysis showed AOBP measurement leads to a greater percentage of controlled BP values compared with conventional office BP measurement, positioning it as a way to reduce BP misclassification, prevent potentially unnecessary therapeutic interventions, and mitigate the white coat effect.

References
  1. Cheng S, Claggett B, Correia AW, et al. Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation. 2014;130:820-828. doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008506
  2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269-1324. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066
  3. Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2017 guidelines for diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(5):557-576. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.005
  4. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
  5. Pappaccogli M, Di Monaco S, Perlo E, et al. Comparison of automated office blood pressure with office and out-off-office measurement techniques. Hypertension. 2019;73(2):481-490. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12079
  6. Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension - a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:351-362. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551
  7. Kaczorowski J, Chambers LW, Karwalajtys T, et al. Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP): a community cluster-randomised trial among elderly Canadians. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):537-544. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.005
  8. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103-2116. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
  9. Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, et al. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(6):661-666. doi:10.1038/ajh.2011.38
  10. Campbell NRC, McKay DW, Conradson H, et al. Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima-medial thickness in male firefighters. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(7):588-590. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002190
  11. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286. doi:10.1136/bmj.d286
  12. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):18. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-5-18
  13. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens. 2009;27(2):280-286. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831b9e6b
  14. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(3):108-111. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832c5167
  15. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13(6):333-338. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283104247
  16. Myers MG. A proposed algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using automated office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2010;28(4):703-708. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328335d091
  17. Godwin M, Birtwhistle R, Delva D, et al. Manual and automated office measurements in relation to awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Fam Pract. 2011;28(1):110-117. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmq067
  18. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Chessman M, Kiss A. Can sphygmomanometers designed for self-measurement of blood pressure in the home be used in office practice? Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(6):300-304. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e328340d128
  19. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2016 Canadian hypertension education program guidelines for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(5):569-588. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066
  20. Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure - 15 years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(8):721-724. doi:10.1111/jch.12820
  21. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(2):127-132.
  22. Armstrong D, Matangi M, Brouillard D, Myers MG. Automated office blood pressure - being alone and not location is what matters most. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20(4):204-208. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000133
  23. Yarows SA. What is the Cost of Measuring a Blood Pressure? Ann Clin Hypertens. 2018;2:59-66. doi:10.29328/journal.ach.1001012
  24. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458-1465. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
  25. Doane J, Buu J, Penrod MJ, et al. Measuring and managing blood pressure in a primary care setting: a pragmatic implementation study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(3):375-388. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450
References
  1. Cheng S, Claggett B, Correia AW, et al. Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation. 2014;130:820-828. doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008506
  2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269-1324. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066
  3. Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2017 guidelines for diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(5):557-576. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.005
  4. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
  5. Pappaccogli M, Di Monaco S, Perlo E, et al. Comparison of automated office blood pressure with office and out-off-office measurement techniques. Hypertension. 2019;73(2):481-490. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12079
  6. Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension - a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:351-362. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551
  7. Kaczorowski J, Chambers LW, Karwalajtys T, et al. Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP): a community cluster-randomised trial among elderly Canadians. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):537-544. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.005
  8. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103-2116. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
  9. Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, et al. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(6):661-666. doi:10.1038/ajh.2011.38
  10. Campbell NRC, McKay DW, Conradson H, et al. Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima-medial thickness in male firefighters. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(7):588-590. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002190
  11. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286. doi:10.1136/bmj.d286
  12. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):18. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-5-18
  13. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens. 2009;27(2):280-286. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831b9e6b
  14. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(3):108-111. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832c5167
  15. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13(6):333-338. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283104247
  16. Myers MG. A proposed algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using automated office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2010;28(4):703-708. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328335d091
  17. Godwin M, Birtwhistle R, Delva D, et al. Manual and automated office measurements in relation to awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Fam Pract. 2011;28(1):110-117. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmq067
  18. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Chessman M, Kiss A. Can sphygmomanometers designed for self-measurement of blood pressure in the home be used in office practice? Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(6):300-304. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e328340d128
  19. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2016 Canadian hypertension education program guidelines for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(5):569-588. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066
  20. Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure - 15 years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(8):721-724. doi:10.1111/jch.12820
  21. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(2):127-132.
  22. Armstrong D, Matangi M, Brouillard D, Myers MG. Automated office blood pressure - being alone and not location is what matters most. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20(4):204-208. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000133
  23. Yarows SA. What is the Cost of Measuring a Blood Pressure? Ann Clin Hypertens. 2018;2:59-66. doi:10.29328/journal.ach.1001012
  24. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458-1465. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
  25. Doane J, Buu J, Penrod MJ, et al. Measuring and managing blood pressure in a primary care setting: a pragmatic implementation study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(3):375-388. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Page Number
464-467
Page Number
464-467
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Assessment of Automated vs Conventional Blood Pressure Measurements in a Veterans Affairs Clinical Practice Setting

Display Headline

Assessment of Automated vs Conventional Blood Pressure Measurements in a Veterans Affairs Clinical Practice Setting

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

Anticoagulation Stewardship Efforts Via Indication Reviews at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Anticoagulation Stewardship Efforts Via Indication Reviews at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Due to the underlying mechanism of atrial fibrillation (Afib), clots can form within the left atrial appendage. Clots that become dislodged may lead to ischemic stroke and possibly death. The 2023 guidelines for atrial fibrillation from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend anticoagulation therapy for patients with an Afib diagnosis and a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, stroke/vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and female sex) score pertinent for ≥ 1 non–sex-related factor (score ≥ 2 for women; ≥ 1 for men) to prevent stroke-related complications. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a 9-point scoring tool based on comorbidities and conditions that increase risk of stroke in patients with Afib. Each value correlates to an annualized stroke risk percentage that increases as the score increases.

In clinical practice, patients meeting these thresholds are indicated for anticoagulation and are considered for indefinite use unless ≥ 1 of the following conditions are present: bleeding risk outweighs the stroke prevention benefit, Afib is episodic (< 48 hours) or a nonpharmacologic intervention, such as a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device is present.1

In patients with a diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation is used to treat the current thrombosis and prevent embolization that can ultimately lead to death. The 2021 guideline for VTE from the American College of Chest Physicians identifies certain risk factors that increase risk for VTE and categorizes them as transient or persistent. Transient risk factors include hospitalization > 3 days, major trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel > 8 hours. Persistent risk factors include malignancy, thrombophilia, and certain medications.

The guideline recommends therapy durations based on event frequency, the presence and classification of provoking risk factors, and bleeding risk. As the risk of recurrent thrombosis and other potential complications is greatest in the first 3 to 6 months after a diagnosed event, at least 3 months anticoagulation therapy is recommended following VTE diagnosis. At the 3-month mark, all regimens are suggested to be re-evaluated and considered for extended treatment duration if the event was unprovoked, recurrent, secondary to a persistent risk factor, or low bleed risk.2Anticoagulation is an important guideline-recommended pharmacologic intervention for various disease states, although its use is not without risks. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has classified oral anticoagulants as high-alert medications. This designation was made because anticoagulant medications have the potential to cause harm when used or omitted in error and lead to life-threatening bleed or thrombotic complications.3Anticoagulation stewardship ensures that anticoagulation therapy is appropriately initiated, maintained, and discontinued when indicated. Because of the potential for harm, anticoagulation stewardship is an important part of Afib and VTE management. Pharmacists can help verify and evaluate anticoagulation therapies. Research suggests that pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship efforts may play a role in ensuring safer patient outcomes.4The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) study was to implement pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship practices at Veterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System (VAPHCS) to identify veterans with Afib not currently on anticoagulation, as well as to identify veterans with a history of VTE events who have completed a sufficient treatment duration.

Methods

Anticoagulation stewardship efforts were implemented in 2 cohorts of patients: those with Afib who may be indicated to initiate anticoagulation, and those with a history of VTE events who may be indicated to consider anticoagulation discontinuation. Patient records were reviewed using a standardized note template, and recommendations to either initiate or discontinue anticoagulation therapy were documented. The VAPHCS Research Service reviewed this study and determined that it was not research and was exempt from institutional review board review.

Atrial Fibrillation Cohort

A population health dashboard created by the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Targeting the uNTreated: a focus on health care disparities (SPAFF-TNT-D) national VA study team was used to identify veterans at VAPHCS with a diagnosis of Afib without an active VA prescription for an anticoagulant. The dashboard filtered and produced data points from the medical record that correlated to the components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. All veterans identified by the dashboard with scores of 7 or 8 were included. No patients had a score of 9. Comprehensive chart reviews of available VA and non–VA-provided care records were conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template designed by the SPAFF-TNT-D team (eAppendix 1) was used to document findings within the electronic health record (EHR). If anticoagulation was deemed to be indicated, the assigned primary care practitioner (PCP) as listed in the EHR was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of prescribing anticoagulation.

Venous Thromboembolism Cohort

VAPHCS pharmacy informatics pulled data that included veterans with documented VTE and an active VA anticoagulant prescription between November 2022 and November 2023. Veterans were reviewed in chronological order based on when the anticoagulant prescription was written. All veterans were included until an equal number of charts were reviewed in both the Afib and VTE cohorts. Comprehensive chart review of available VA- and non–VA-provided care records was conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template as designed by the investigators (eAppendix 2) was used to document findings within the EHR. If the duration of anticoagulation therapy was deemed sufficient, the assigned anticoagulation clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of discontinuing anticoagulation.

EHR reviews were conducted in October and November 2023 and lasted about 10 to 20 minutes per patient. To evaluate completeness and accuracy of the documented findings within the EHR, both investigators reviewed and cosigned the completed note template and verified the correct PCP was alerted to the recommendation for appropriate continuity of care. Results were reviewed in March 2024.

Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with Afib who were recommended to start anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes evaluated included the number of interventions completed, action taken by PCPs in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending initiation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Venous thromboembolism cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with a history of VTE events recommended to discontinue anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes included number of interventions completed, action taken by the anticoagulation CPP in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Analysis

Sample size was determined by the inclusion criteria and was not designed to attain statistical power. Data embedded in the Afib cohort standardized note template, also known as health factors, were later used for data analysis. Recommendations in the VTE cohort were manually tracked and recorded by the investigators. Results for this study were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 114 veterans were reviewed and included in this study: 57 in each cohort. Seven recommendations were made regarding anticoagulation initiation for patients with Afib and 7 were made for anticoagulation discontinuation for patients with VTE (Table 1).

FDP04211410_T1

In the Afib cohort, 1 veteran was successfully initiated on anticoagulation therapy and 1 veteran was deemed appropriate for initiation of anticoagulation but was not reachable. Of the 5 recommendations with no action taken, 4 PCPs acknowledged the alert with no further documentation, and 1 PCP deferred the decision to cardiology with no further documentation. In the VTE cohort, 3 veterans successfully discontinued anticoagulation therapy and 2 veterans were further evaluated by the anticoagulation CPP and deemed appropriate to continue therapy based on potential for malignancy. Of the 2 recommendations with no action taken, 1 anticoagulation CPP acknowledged the alert with no further documentation and 1 anticoagulation CPP suggested further evaluation by PCP with no further documentation.

In the Afib cohort, a nonpharmacologic approach was defined as documentation of a LAAO device. An inaccurate diagnosis was defined as an Afib diagnosis being used in a previous visit, although there was no further confirmation of diagnosis via chart review. Veterans classified as already being on anticoagulation had documentation of non–VA-written anticoagulant prescriptions or receiving a supply of anticoagulants from a facility such as a nursing home. Anticoagulation was defined as unfavorable if a documented risk/benefit conversation was found via EHR review. Anticoagulation was defined as not indicated if the Afib was documented as transient, episodic, or historical (Table 2).

FDP04211410_T2

In the VTE cohort, no recommendations for discontinuation were made for veterans indicated to continue anticoagulation due to a concurrent Afib diagnosis. Chronic or recurrent events were defined as documentation of multiple VTE events and associated dates in the EHR. Persistent risk factors included malignancy or medications contributing to hypercoagulable states. Thrombophilia was defined as having documentation of a diagnosis in the EHR. An unprovoked event was defined as VTE without any documented transient risk factors (eg, hospitalization, trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel). Anticoagulation had already been discontinued in 1 veteran after the data were collected but before chart review occurred (Table 3).

FDP04211410_T3

Discussion

Pharmacy-led indication reviews resulted in appropriate recommendations for anticoagulation use in veterans with Afib and a history of VTE events. Overall, 12.3% of chart reviews in each cohort resulted in a recommendation being made, which was similar to the rate found by Koolian et al.5 In that study, 10% of recommendations were related to initiation or interruption of anticoagulation. This recommendation category consisted of several subcategories, including “suggesting therapeutic anticoagulation when none is currently ordered” and “suggesting anticoagulation cessation if no longer indicated,” but specific numerical prevalence was not provided.5

Online dashboard use allowed for greater population health management and identification of veterans with Afib who were not on active anticoagulation, providing opportunities to prevent stroke-related complications. Wang et al completed a similarly designed study that included a population health tool to identify patients with Afib who were not on anticoagulation and implemented pharmacist-led chart review and facilitation of recommendations to the responsible clinician. This study reviewed 1727 patients and recommended initiation of anticoagulation therapy for 75 (4.3%).6 The current study had a higher percentage of patients with recommendations for changes despite its smaller size.

Evaluating the duration of therapy for anticoagulation in veterans with a history of VTE events provided an opportunity to reduce unnecessary exposure to anticoagulation and minimize bleeding risks. Using a chart review process and standardized note template enabled the documentation of pertinent information that could be readily reviewed by the PCP. This process is a step toward ensuring VAPHCS PCPs provide guideline-recommended care and actively prevent stroke and bleeding complications. Adoption of this process into the current VAPHCS Anticoagulation Clinic workflow for review of veterans with either Afib or VTE could lead to more EHRs being reviewed and recommendations made, ultimately improving patient outcomes. 

Therapeutic interventions based on the recommendations were completed for 1 of 7 veterans (14%) and 3 of 7 veterans (43%) in the Afib and VTE cohorts, respectively. The prevalence of completed interventions in this anticoagulation stewardship study was higher than those in Wang et al, who found only 9% of their recommendations resulted in PCPs considering action related to anticoagulation, and only 4% were successfully initiated.6

In the Afib cohort, veterans identified by the dashboard with a CHA2DS2-VASc of 7 or 8 were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that patients with the highest stroke risk were sufficiently evaluated and started on anticoagulation as needed to reduce stroke-related complications. In contrast, because these veterans had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, they may have already been evaluated for anticoagulation in the past and had a documented rationale for not being placed on anticoagulation (LAAO device placement was the most common rationale). Focusing on veterans with a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score such as 1 for men or 2 for women could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations. Although stroke risk may be lower in this population compared with those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, guideline-recommended anticoagulation use may be missed for these patients. 

In the VTE cohort, veterans with an anticoagulant prescription written 12 months before data collection were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that anticoagulation therapy met guideline recommendations of at least 3 months, with potential for extended duration upon further evaluation by a provider at that time. Based on collected results, most veterans were already reevaluated and had documented reasons why anticoagulation was still indicated; concurrent Afib was most common followed by chronic or recurrent VTE. Reviewing veterans with more recent prescriptions just over the recommended 3-month duration could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations to be made. It is more likely that by 3 months another PCP had not already weighed in on the duration of therapy, and the anticoagulation CPP could ensure a thorough review is conducted with guideline-based recommendations.

Most published literature on anticoagulation stewardship efforts is focused on inpatient management and policy changes, or concentrate on attributes of therapy such as appropriate dosing and drug interactions. This study highlighted that gaps in care related to anticoagulation use and discontinuation are present in the VAPHCS population and can be appropriately addressed via pharmacist-led indication reviews. Future studies designed to focus on initiating anticoagulation where appropriate, and discontinuing where a sufficient treatment period has been completed, are warranted to minimize this gap in care and allow health systems to work toward process changes to ensure safe and optimized care is provided for the patients they serve.

Limitations

In the Afib cohort, 5 of 7 recommendations (71%) had no further action taken by the PCP, which may represent a barrier to care. In contrast, 2 of 7 recommendations (29%) had no further action in the VTE cohort. It is possible that the difference can be attributed to the anticoagulation CPP receiving VTE alerts and PCPs receiving Afib alerts. The anticoagulation CPP was familiar with this QI study and may have better understood the purpose of the chart review and the need to provide a timely response. PCPs may have been less likely to take action because they were unfamiliar with the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and standardized note template or overwhelmed by too many EHR alerts.

The lack of PCP response to a virtual alert or message also was observed by Wang et al, whereas Koolian et al reported higher intervention completion rates, with verbal recommendations being made to the responsible clinicians. To further ensure these pertinent recommendations for anticoagulation initiation in veterans with Afib are properly reviewed and evaluated, future research could include intentional follow-up with the PCP regarding the alert, PCP-specific education about the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and the role of the standardized note template, and collaboration with PCPs to identify alternative ways to relay recommendations in a way that would ensure the completion of appropriate and timely review.

Conclusions

This study identified gaps in care related to anticoagulation needs in the VAPHCS veteran population. Utilizing a standardized indication review process allows pharmacists to evaluate anticoagulant use for both appropriate indication and duration of therapy. Providing recommendations via chart review notes and alerting respective PCPs and CPPs results in veterans receiving safe and optimized care regarding their anticoagulation needs.

References
  1. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149:e1-e156. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
  2. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160:e545-e608. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.055
  3. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). List of high-alert medications in community/ambulatory care settings. ISMP. September 30, 2021. Accessed September 11, 2025. https://home.ecri.org/blogs/ismp-resources/high-alert-medications-in-community-ambulatory-care-settings
  4. Burnett AE, Barnes GD. A call to action for anticoagulation stewardship. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12757. doi:10.1002/rth2.12757
  5. Koolian M, Wiseman D, Mantzanis H, et al. Anticoagulation stewardship: descriptive analysis of a novel approach to appropriate anticoagulant prescription. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12758. doi:10.1002/rth2.12758
  6. Wang SV, Rogers JR, Jin Y, et al. Stepped-wedge randomised trial to evaluate population health intervention designed to increase appropriate anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:835-842. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009367
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Alexandra Brown, PharmDa; Annie Tam, PharmDa

Correspondence: Alexandra Brown (Alexandra.brown2@va.gov)

Author affiliations aVeterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System, Arizona

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Fed Pract. 2025;42(11). Published online November 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0648

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
410-415
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Alexandra Brown, PharmDa; Annie Tam, PharmDa

Correspondence: Alexandra Brown (Alexandra.brown2@va.gov)

Author affiliations aVeterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System, Arizona

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Fed Pract. 2025;42(11). Published online November 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0648

Author and Disclosure Information

Alexandra Brown, PharmDa; Annie Tam, PharmDa

Correspondence: Alexandra Brown (Alexandra.brown2@va.gov)

Author affiliations aVeterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System, Arizona

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Fed Pract. 2025;42(11). Published online November 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0648

Article PDF
Article PDF

Due to the underlying mechanism of atrial fibrillation (Afib), clots can form within the left atrial appendage. Clots that become dislodged may lead to ischemic stroke and possibly death. The 2023 guidelines for atrial fibrillation from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend anticoagulation therapy for patients with an Afib diagnosis and a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, stroke/vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and female sex) score pertinent for ≥ 1 non–sex-related factor (score ≥ 2 for women; ≥ 1 for men) to prevent stroke-related complications. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a 9-point scoring tool based on comorbidities and conditions that increase risk of stroke in patients with Afib. Each value correlates to an annualized stroke risk percentage that increases as the score increases.

In clinical practice, patients meeting these thresholds are indicated for anticoagulation and are considered for indefinite use unless ≥ 1 of the following conditions are present: bleeding risk outweighs the stroke prevention benefit, Afib is episodic (< 48 hours) or a nonpharmacologic intervention, such as a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device is present.1

In patients with a diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation is used to treat the current thrombosis and prevent embolization that can ultimately lead to death. The 2021 guideline for VTE from the American College of Chest Physicians identifies certain risk factors that increase risk for VTE and categorizes them as transient or persistent. Transient risk factors include hospitalization > 3 days, major trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel > 8 hours. Persistent risk factors include malignancy, thrombophilia, and certain medications.

The guideline recommends therapy durations based on event frequency, the presence and classification of provoking risk factors, and bleeding risk. As the risk of recurrent thrombosis and other potential complications is greatest in the first 3 to 6 months after a diagnosed event, at least 3 months anticoagulation therapy is recommended following VTE diagnosis. At the 3-month mark, all regimens are suggested to be re-evaluated and considered for extended treatment duration if the event was unprovoked, recurrent, secondary to a persistent risk factor, or low bleed risk.2Anticoagulation is an important guideline-recommended pharmacologic intervention for various disease states, although its use is not without risks. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has classified oral anticoagulants as high-alert medications. This designation was made because anticoagulant medications have the potential to cause harm when used or omitted in error and lead to life-threatening bleed or thrombotic complications.3Anticoagulation stewardship ensures that anticoagulation therapy is appropriately initiated, maintained, and discontinued when indicated. Because of the potential for harm, anticoagulation stewardship is an important part of Afib and VTE management. Pharmacists can help verify and evaluate anticoagulation therapies. Research suggests that pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship efforts may play a role in ensuring safer patient outcomes.4The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) study was to implement pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship practices at Veterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System (VAPHCS) to identify veterans with Afib not currently on anticoagulation, as well as to identify veterans with a history of VTE events who have completed a sufficient treatment duration.

Methods

Anticoagulation stewardship efforts were implemented in 2 cohorts of patients: those with Afib who may be indicated to initiate anticoagulation, and those with a history of VTE events who may be indicated to consider anticoagulation discontinuation. Patient records were reviewed using a standardized note template, and recommendations to either initiate or discontinue anticoagulation therapy were documented. The VAPHCS Research Service reviewed this study and determined that it was not research and was exempt from institutional review board review.

Atrial Fibrillation Cohort

A population health dashboard created by the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Targeting the uNTreated: a focus on health care disparities (SPAFF-TNT-D) national VA study team was used to identify veterans at VAPHCS with a diagnosis of Afib without an active VA prescription for an anticoagulant. The dashboard filtered and produced data points from the medical record that correlated to the components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. All veterans identified by the dashboard with scores of 7 or 8 were included. No patients had a score of 9. Comprehensive chart reviews of available VA and non–VA-provided care records were conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template designed by the SPAFF-TNT-D team (eAppendix 1) was used to document findings within the electronic health record (EHR). If anticoagulation was deemed to be indicated, the assigned primary care practitioner (PCP) as listed in the EHR was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of prescribing anticoagulation.

Venous Thromboembolism Cohort

VAPHCS pharmacy informatics pulled data that included veterans with documented VTE and an active VA anticoagulant prescription between November 2022 and November 2023. Veterans were reviewed in chronological order based on when the anticoagulant prescription was written. All veterans were included until an equal number of charts were reviewed in both the Afib and VTE cohorts. Comprehensive chart review of available VA- and non–VA-provided care records was conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template as designed by the investigators (eAppendix 2) was used to document findings within the EHR. If the duration of anticoagulation therapy was deemed sufficient, the assigned anticoagulation clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of discontinuing anticoagulation.

EHR reviews were conducted in October and November 2023 and lasted about 10 to 20 minutes per patient. To evaluate completeness and accuracy of the documented findings within the EHR, both investigators reviewed and cosigned the completed note template and verified the correct PCP was alerted to the recommendation for appropriate continuity of care. Results were reviewed in March 2024.

Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with Afib who were recommended to start anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes evaluated included the number of interventions completed, action taken by PCPs in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending initiation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Venous thromboembolism cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with a history of VTE events recommended to discontinue anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes included number of interventions completed, action taken by the anticoagulation CPP in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Analysis

Sample size was determined by the inclusion criteria and was not designed to attain statistical power. Data embedded in the Afib cohort standardized note template, also known as health factors, were later used for data analysis. Recommendations in the VTE cohort were manually tracked and recorded by the investigators. Results for this study were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 114 veterans were reviewed and included in this study: 57 in each cohort. Seven recommendations were made regarding anticoagulation initiation for patients with Afib and 7 were made for anticoagulation discontinuation for patients with VTE (Table 1).

FDP04211410_T1

In the Afib cohort, 1 veteran was successfully initiated on anticoagulation therapy and 1 veteran was deemed appropriate for initiation of anticoagulation but was not reachable. Of the 5 recommendations with no action taken, 4 PCPs acknowledged the alert with no further documentation, and 1 PCP deferred the decision to cardiology with no further documentation. In the VTE cohort, 3 veterans successfully discontinued anticoagulation therapy and 2 veterans were further evaluated by the anticoagulation CPP and deemed appropriate to continue therapy based on potential for malignancy. Of the 2 recommendations with no action taken, 1 anticoagulation CPP acknowledged the alert with no further documentation and 1 anticoagulation CPP suggested further evaluation by PCP with no further documentation.

In the Afib cohort, a nonpharmacologic approach was defined as documentation of a LAAO device. An inaccurate diagnosis was defined as an Afib diagnosis being used in a previous visit, although there was no further confirmation of diagnosis via chart review. Veterans classified as already being on anticoagulation had documentation of non–VA-written anticoagulant prescriptions or receiving a supply of anticoagulants from a facility such as a nursing home. Anticoagulation was defined as unfavorable if a documented risk/benefit conversation was found via EHR review. Anticoagulation was defined as not indicated if the Afib was documented as transient, episodic, or historical (Table 2).

FDP04211410_T2

In the VTE cohort, no recommendations for discontinuation were made for veterans indicated to continue anticoagulation due to a concurrent Afib diagnosis. Chronic or recurrent events were defined as documentation of multiple VTE events and associated dates in the EHR. Persistent risk factors included malignancy or medications contributing to hypercoagulable states. Thrombophilia was defined as having documentation of a diagnosis in the EHR. An unprovoked event was defined as VTE without any documented transient risk factors (eg, hospitalization, trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel). Anticoagulation had already been discontinued in 1 veteran after the data were collected but before chart review occurred (Table 3).

FDP04211410_T3

Discussion

Pharmacy-led indication reviews resulted in appropriate recommendations for anticoagulation use in veterans with Afib and a history of VTE events. Overall, 12.3% of chart reviews in each cohort resulted in a recommendation being made, which was similar to the rate found by Koolian et al.5 In that study, 10% of recommendations were related to initiation or interruption of anticoagulation. This recommendation category consisted of several subcategories, including “suggesting therapeutic anticoagulation when none is currently ordered” and “suggesting anticoagulation cessation if no longer indicated,” but specific numerical prevalence was not provided.5

Online dashboard use allowed for greater population health management and identification of veterans with Afib who were not on active anticoagulation, providing opportunities to prevent stroke-related complications. Wang et al completed a similarly designed study that included a population health tool to identify patients with Afib who were not on anticoagulation and implemented pharmacist-led chart review and facilitation of recommendations to the responsible clinician. This study reviewed 1727 patients and recommended initiation of anticoagulation therapy for 75 (4.3%).6 The current study had a higher percentage of patients with recommendations for changes despite its smaller size.

Evaluating the duration of therapy for anticoagulation in veterans with a history of VTE events provided an opportunity to reduce unnecessary exposure to anticoagulation and minimize bleeding risks. Using a chart review process and standardized note template enabled the documentation of pertinent information that could be readily reviewed by the PCP. This process is a step toward ensuring VAPHCS PCPs provide guideline-recommended care and actively prevent stroke and bleeding complications. Adoption of this process into the current VAPHCS Anticoagulation Clinic workflow for review of veterans with either Afib or VTE could lead to more EHRs being reviewed and recommendations made, ultimately improving patient outcomes. 

Therapeutic interventions based on the recommendations were completed for 1 of 7 veterans (14%) and 3 of 7 veterans (43%) in the Afib and VTE cohorts, respectively. The prevalence of completed interventions in this anticoagulation stewardship study was higher than those in Wang et al, who found only 9% of their recommendations resulted in PCPs considering action related to anticoagulation, and only 4% were successfully initiated.6

In the Afib cohort, veterans identified by the dashboard with a CHA2DS2-VASc of 7 or 8 were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that patients with the highest stroke risk were sufficiently evaluated and started on anticoagulation as needed to reduce stroke-related complications. In contrast, because these veterans had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, they may have already been evaluated for anticoagulation in the past and had a documented rationale for not being placed on anticoagulation (LAAO device placement was the most common rationale). Focusing on veterans with a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score such as 1 for men or 2 for women could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations. Although stroke risk may be lower in this population compared with those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, guideline-recommended anticoagulation use may be missed for these patients. 

In the VTE cohort, veterans with an anticoagulant prescription written 12 months before data collection were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that anticoagulation therapy met guideline recommendations of at least 3 months, with potential for extended duration upon further evaluation by a provider at that time. Based on collected results, most veterans were already reevaluated and had documented reasons why anticoagulation was still indicated; concurrent Afib was most common followed by chronic or recurrent VTE. Reviewing veterans with more recent prescriptions just over the recommended 3-month duration could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations to be made. It is more likely that by 3 months another PCP had not already weighed in on the duration of therapy, and the anticoagulation CPP could ensure a thorough review is conducted with guideline-based recommendations.

Most published literature on anticoagulation stewardship efforts is focused on inpatient management and policy changes, or concentrate on attributes of therapy such as appropriate dosing and drug interactions. This study highlighted that gaps in care related to anticoagulation use and discontinuation are present in the VAPHCS population and can be appropriately addressed via pharmacist-led indication reviews. Future studies designed to focus on initiating anticoagulation where appropriate, and discontinuing where a sufficient treatment period has been completed, are warranted to minimize this gap in care and allow health systems to work toward process changes to ensure safe and optimized care is provided for the patients they serve.

Limitations

In the Afib cohort, 5 of 7 recommendations (71%) had no further action taken by the PCP, which may represent a barrier to care. In contrast, 2 of 7 recommendations (29%) had no further action in the VTE cohort. It is possible that the difference can be attributed to the anticoagulation CPP receiving VTE alerts and PCPs receiving Afib alerts. The anticoagulation CPP was familiar with this QI study and may have better understood the purpose of the chart review and the need to provide a timely response. PCPs may have been less likely to take action because they were unfamiliar with the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and standardized note template or overwhelmed by too many EHR alerts.

The lack of PCP response to a virtual alert or message also was observed by Wang et al, whereas Koolian et al reported higher intervention completion rates, with verbal recommendations being made to the responsible clinicians. To further ensure these pertinent recommendations for anticoagulation initiation in veterans with Afib are properly reviewed and evaluated, future research could include intentional follow-up with the PCP regarding the alert, PCP-specific education about the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and the role of the standardized note template, and collaboration with PCPs to identify alternative ways to relay recommendations in a way that would ensure the completion of appropriate and timely review.

Conclusions

This study identified gaps in care related to anticoagulation needs in the VAPHCS veteran population. Utilizing a standardized indication review process allows pharmacists to evaluate anticoagulant use for both appropriate indication and duration of therapy. Providing recommendations via chart review notes and alerting respective PCPs and CPPs results in veterans receiving safe and optimized care regarding their anticoagulation needs.

Due to the underlying mechanism of atrial fibrillation (Afib), clots can form within the left atrial appendage. Clots that become dislodged may lead to ischemic stroke and possibly death. The 2023 guidelines for atrial fibrillation from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend anticoagulation therapy for patients with an Afib diagnosis and a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, stroke/vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and female sex) score pertinent for ≥ 1 non–sex-related factor (score ≥ 2 for women; ≥ 1 for men) to prevent stroke-related complications. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a 9-point scoring tool based on comorbidities and conditions that increase risk of stroke in patients with Afib. Each value correlates to an annualized stroke risk percentage that increases as the score increases.

In clinical practice, patients meeting these thresholds are indicated for anticoagulation and are considered for indefinite use unless ≥ 1 of the following conditions are present: bleeding risk outweighs the stroke prevention benefit, Afib is episodic (< 48 hours) or a nonpharmacologic intervention, such as a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device is present.1

In patients with a diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation is used to treat the current thrombosis and prevent embolization that can ultimately lead to death. The 2021 guideline for VTE from the American College of Chest Physicians identifies certain risk factors that increase risk for VTE and categorizes them as transient or persistent. Transient risk factors include hospitalization > 3 days, major trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel > 8 hours. Persistent risk factors include malignancy, thrombophilia, and certain medications.

The guideline recommends therapy durations based on event frequency, the presence and classification of provoking risk factors, and bleeding risk. As the risk of recurrent thrombosis and other potential complications is greatest in the first 3 to 6 months after a diagnosed event, at least 3 months anticoagulation therapy is recommended following VTE diagnosis. At the 3-month mark, all regimens are suggested to be re-evaluated and considered for extended treatment duration if the event was unprovoked, recurrent, secondary to a persistent risk factor, or low bleed risk.2Anticoagulation is an important guideline-recommended pharmacologic intervention for various disease states, although its use is not without risks. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has classified oral anticoagulants as high-alert medications. This designation was made because anticoagulant medications have the potential to cause harm when used or omitted in error and lead to life-threatening bleed or thrombotic complications.3Anticoagulation stewardship ensures that anticoagulation therapy is appropriately initiated, maintained, and discontinued when indicated. Because of the potential for harm, anticoagulation stewardship is an important part of Afib and VTE management. Pharmacists can help verify and evaluate anticoagulation therapies. Research suggests that pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship efforts may play a role in ensuring safer patient outcomes.4The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) study was to implement pharmacist-led anticoagulation stewardship practices at Veterans Affairs Phoenix Health Care System (VAPHCS) to identify veterans with Afib not currently on anticoagulation, as well as to identify veterans with a history of VTE events who have completed a sufficient treatment duration.

Methods

Anticoagulation stewardship efforts were implemented in 2 cohorts of patients: those with Afib who may be indicated to initiate anticoagulation, and those with a history of VTE events who may be indicated to consider anticoagulation discontinuation. Patient records were reviewed using a standardized note template, and recommendations to either initiate or discontinue anticoagulation therapy were documented. The VAPHCS Research Service reviewed this study and determined that it was not research and was exempt from institutional review board review.

Atrial Fibrillation Cohort

A population health dashboard created by the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Targeting the uNTreated: a focus on health care disparities (SPAFF-TNT-D) national VA study team was used to identify veterans at VAPHCS with a diagnosis of Afib without an active VA prescription for an anticoagulant. The dashboard filtered and produced data points from the medical record that correlated to the components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. All veterans identified by the dashboard with scores of 7 or 8 were included. No patients had a score of 9. Comprehensive chart reviews of available VA and non–VA-provided care records were conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template designed by the SPAFF-TNT-D team (eAppendix 1) was used to document findings within the electronic health record (EHR). If anticoagulation was deemed to be indicated, the assigned primary care practitioner (PCP) as listed in the EHR was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of prescribing anticoagulation.

Venous Thromboembolism Cohort

VAPHCS pharmacy informatics pulled data that included veterans with documented VTE and an active VA anticoagulant prescription between November 2022 and November 2023. Veterans were reviewed in chronological order based on when the anticoagulant prescription was written. All veterans were included until an equal number of charts were reviewed in both the Afib and VTE cohorts. Comprehensive chart review of available VA- and non–VA-provided care records was conducted by the investigators, and a standardized note template as designed by the investigators (eAppendix 2) was used to document findings within the EHR. If the duration of anticoagulation therapy was deemed sufficient, the assigned anticoagulation clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) was alerted to the note by the investigators for further evaluation and consideration of discontinuing anticoagulation.

EHR reviews were conducted in October and November 2023 and lasted about 10 to 20 minutes per patient. To evaluate completeness and accuracy of the documented findings within the EHR, both investigators reviewed and cosigned the completed note template and verified the correct PCP was alerted to the recommendation for appropriate continuity of care. Results were reviewed in March 2024.

Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with Afib who were recommended to start anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes evaluated included the number of interventions completed, action taken by PCPs in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending initiation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Venous thromboembolism cohort. The primary outcome was the number of veterans with a history of VTE events recommended to discontinue anticoagulation therapy. Additional outcomes included number of interventions completed, action taken by the anticoagulation CPP in response to the provided recommendation, and reasons provided by the investigators for not recommending discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy in specific veteran cases.

Analysis

Sample size was determined by the inclusion criteria and was not designed to attain statistical power. Data embedded in the Afib cohort standardized note template, also known as health factors, were later used for data analysis. Recommendations in the VTE cohort were manually tracked and recorded by the investigators. Results for this study were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 114 veterans were reviewed and included in this study: 57 in each cohort. Seven recommendations were made regarding anticoagulation initiation for patients with Afib and 7 were made for anticoagulation discontinuation for patients with VTE (Table 1).

FDP04211410_T1

In the Afib cohort, 1 veteran was successfully initiated on anticoagulation therapy and 1 veteran was deemed appropriate for initiation of anticoagulation but was not reachable. Of the 5 recommendations with no action taken, 4 PCPs acknowledged the alert with no further documentation, and 1 PCP deferred the decision to cardiology with no further documentation. In the VTE cohort, 3 veterans successfully discontinued anticoagulation therapy and 2 veterans were further evaluated by the anticoagulation CPP and deemed appropriate to continue therapy based on potential for malignancy. Of the 2 recommendations with no action taken, 1 anticoagulation CPP acknowledged the alert with no further documentation and 1 anticoagulation CPP suggested further evaluation by PCP with no further documentation.

In the Afib cohort, a nonpharmacologic approach was defined as documentation of a LAAO device. An inaccurate diagnosis was defined as an Afib diagnosis being used in a previous visit, although there was no further confirmation of diagnosis via chart review. Veterans classified as already being on anticoagulation had documentation of non–VA-written anticoagulant prescriptions or receiving a supply of anticoagulants from a facility such as a nursing home. Anticoagulation was defined as unfavorable if a documented risk/benefit conversation was found via EHR review. Anticoagulation was defined as not indicated if the Afib was documented as transient, episodic, or historical (Table 2).

FDP04211410_T2

In the VTE cohort, no recommendations for discontinuation were made for veterans indicated to continue anticoagulation due to a concurrent Afib diagnosis. Chronic or recurrent events were defined as documentation of multiple VTE events and associated dates in the EHR. Persistent risk factors included malignancy or medications contributing to hypercoagulable states. Thrombophilia was defined as having documentation of a diagnosis in the EHR. An unprovoked event was defined as VTE without any documented transient risk factors (eg, hospitalization, trauma, surgery, cast immobilization, hormone therapy, pregnancy, or prolonged travel). Anticoagulation had already been discontinued in 1 veteran after the data were collected but before chart review occurred (Table 3).

FDP04211410_T3

Discussion

Pharmacy-led indication reviews resulted in appropriate recommendations for anticoagulation use in veterans with Afib and a history of VTE events. Overall, 12.3% of chart reviews in each cohort resulted in a recommendation being made, which was similar to the rate found by Koolian et al.5 In that study, 10% of recommendations were related to initiation or interruption of anticoagulation. This recommendation category consisted of several subcategories, including “suggesting therapeutic anticoagulation when none is currently ordered” and “suggesting anticoagulation cessation if no longer indicated,” but specific numerical prevalence was not provided.5

Online dashboard use allowed for greater population health management and identification of veterans with Afib who were not on active anticoagulation, providing opportunities to prevent stroke-related complications. Wang et al completed a similarly designed study that included a population health tool to identify patients with Afib who were not on anticoagulation and implemented pharmacist-led chart review and facilitation of recommendations to the responsible clinician. This study reviewed 1727 patients and recommended initiation of anticoagulation therapy for 75 (4.3%).6 The current study had a higher percentage of patients with recommendations for changes despite its smaller size.

Evaluating the duration of therapy for anticoagulation in veterans with a history of VTE events provided an opportunity to reduce unnecessary exposure to anticoagulation and minimize bleeding risks. Using a chart review process and standardized note template enabled the documentation of pertinent information that could be readily reviewed by the PCP. This process is a step toward ensuring VAPHCS PCPs provide guideline-recommended care and actively prevent stroke and bleeding complications. Adoption of this process into the current VAPHCS Anticoagulation Clinic workflow for review of veterans with either Afib or VTE could lead to more EHRs being reviewed and recommendations made, ultimately improving patient outcomes. 

Therapeutic interventions based on the recommendations were completed for 1 of 7 veterans (14%) and 3 of 7 veterans (43%) in the Afib and VTE cohorts, respectively. The prevalence of completed interventions in this anticoagulation stewardship study was higher than those in Wang et al, who found only 9% of their recommendations resulted in PCPs considering action related to anticoagulation, and only 4% were successfully initiated.6

In the Afib cohort, veterans identified by the dashboard with a CHA2DS2-VASc of 7 or 8 were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that patients with the highest stroke risk were sufficiently evaluated and started on anticoagulation as needed to reduce stroke-related complications. In contrast, because these veterans had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, they may have already been evaluated for anticoagulation in the past and had a documented rationale for not being placed on anticoagulation (LAAO device placement was the most common rationale). Focusing on veterans with a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score such as 1 for men or 2 for women could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations. Although stroke risk may be lower in this population compared with those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, guideline-recommended anticoagulation use may be missed for these patients. 

In the VTE cohort, veterans with an anticoagulant prescription written 12 months before data collection were prioritized for review. Reviewing these veterans ensured that anticoagulation therapy met guideline recommendations of at least 3 months, with potential for extended duration upon further evaluation by a provider at that time. Based on collected results, most veterans were already reevaluated and had documented reasons why anticoagulation was still indicated; concurrent Afib was most common followed by chronic or recurrent VTE. Reviewing veterans with more recent prescriptions just over the recommended 3-month duration could potentially include more opportunities for recommendations to be made. It is more likely that by 3 months another PCP had not already weighed in on the duration of therapy, and the anticoagulation CPP could ensure a thorough review is conducted with guideline-based recommendations.

Most published literature on anticoagulation stewardship efforts is focused on inpatient management and policy changes, or concentrate on attributes of therapy such as appropriate dosing and drug interactions. This study highlighted that gaps in care related to anticoagulation use and discontinuation are present in the VAPHCS population and can be appropriately addressed via pharmacist-led indication reviews. Future studies designed to focus on initiating anticoagulation where appropriate, and discontinuing where a sufficient treatment period has been completed, are warranted to minimize this gap in care and allow health systems to work toward process changes to ensure safe and optimized care is provided for the patients they serve.

Limitations

In the Afib cohort, 5 of 7 recommendations (71%) had no further action taken by the PCP, which may represent a barrier to care. In contrast, 2 of 7 recommendations (29%) had no further action in the VTE cohort. It is possible that the difference can be attributed to the anticoagulation CPP receiving VTE alerts and PCPs receiving Afib alerts. The anticoagulation CPP was familiar with this QI study and may have better understood the purpose of the chart review and the need to provide a timely response. PCPs may have been less likely to take action because they were unfamiliar with the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and standardized note template or overwhelmed by too many EHR alerts.

The lack of PCP response to a virtual alert or message also was observed by Wang et al, whereas Koolian et al reported higher intervention completion rates, with verbal recommendations being made to the responsible clinicians. To further ensure these pertinent recommendations for anticoagulation initiation in veterans with Afib are properly reviewed and evaluated, future research could include intentional follow-up with the PCP regarding the alert, PCP-specific education about the anticoagulation stewardship initiative and the role of the standardized note template, and collaboration with PCPs to identify alternative ways to relay recommendations in a way that would ensure the completion of appropriate and timely review.

Conclusions

This study identified gaps in care related to anticoagulation needs in the VAPHCS veteran population. Utilizing a standardized indication review process allows pharmacists to evaluate anticoagulant use for both appropriate indication and duration of therapy. Providing recommendations via chart review notes and alerting respective PCPs and CPPs results in veterans receiving safe and optimized care regarding their anticoagulation needs.

References
  1. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149:e1-e156. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
  2. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160:e545-e608. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.055
  3. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). List of high-alert medications in community/ambulatory care settings. ISMP. September 30, 2021. Accessed September 11, 2025. https://home.ecri.org/blogs/ismp-resources/high-alert-medications-in-community-ambulatory-care-settings
  4. Burnett AE, Barnes GD. A call to action for anticoagulation stewardship. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12757. doi:10.1002/rth2.12757
  5. Koolian M, Wiseman D, Mantzanis H, et al. Anticoagulation stewardship: descriptive analysis of a novel approach to appropriate anticoagulant prescription. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12758. doi:10.1002/rth2.12758
  6. Wang SV, Rogers JR, Jin Y, et al. Stepped-wedge randomised trial to evaluate population health intervention designed to increase appropriate anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:835-842. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009367
References
  1. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149:e1-e156. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
  2. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160:e545-e608. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.055
  3. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). List of high-alert medications in community/ambulatory care settings. ISMP. September 30, 2021. Accessed September 11, 2025. https://home.ecri.org/blogs/ismp-resources/high-alert-medications-in-community-ambulatory-care-settings
  4. Burnett AE, Barnes GD. A call to action for anticoagulation stewardship. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12757. doi:10.1002/rth2.12757
  5. Koolian M, Wiseman D, Mantzanis H, et al. Anticoagulation stewardship: descriptive analysis of a novel approach to appropriate anticoagulant prescription. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12758. doi:10.1002/rth2.12758
  6. Wang SV, Rogers JR, Jin Y, et al. Stepped-wedge randomised trial to evaluate population health intervention designed to increase appropriate anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:835-842. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009367
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(11)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(11)
Page Number
410-415
Page Number
410-415
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Anticoagulation Stewardship Efforts Via Indication Reviews at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Display Headline

Anticoagulation Stewardship Efforts Via Indication Reviews at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date
Media Files

Three Anomalies and a Complication: Ruptured Noncoronary Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm, Atrial Septal Aneurysm, and Patent Foramen Ovale

Article Type
Changed
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
33-35
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Page Number
33-35
Page Number
33-35
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Case Series of Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis at VA New York Harbor Healthcare-Brooklyn

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Case Series of Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis at VA New York Harbor Healthcare-Brooklyn

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is caused by the misfolding of the TTR protein, which results in aggregation of amyloid fibrils that deposit in the myocardium and causes restrictive cardiomyopathy. Though it remains underdiagnosed, ATTR-CM is increasingly being recognized as a cause of heart failure in geriatric patients.1 There are 2 categories of ATTRCM: wild-type ATTR-CM (wtATTR-CM), in which there is no mutation in the TTR gene, and hereditary ATTR-CM (hATTR-CM), in which a mutation is present in the TTR gene. Research has shown that wtATTR-CM accounted for as many as 30% of cases of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients aged > 75 years.2 A significant percentage of the veteran patient population consists of older males. Given their age, these patients are at greater risk for ATTR diagnosis.3

Identifying red flags for patients within this population may allow clinicians to make earlier diagnoses and improve outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose ATTR because many early signs and symptoms are extracardiac, which leads to delayed diagnoses and worse outcomes. This article describes 8 cases of ATTR-CM within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn (VANYHHSB).

Methods

This retrospective case series was reviewed and approved by the VANYHHSB Institutional Review Board where it was conducted. Patients diagnosed with ATTR between 2017 and 2024 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Eleven patients were identified; 3 were excluded due to insufficient medical records. The remaining 8 patient records were retrospectively reviewed and included.

Case 1

A 67-year-old male with a history of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) presented following a syncopal episode. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, first-degree atrioventricular block, and a bifascicular block. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed moderate asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and biatrial enlargement with an ejection fraction (EF) > 55%. The patient was discharged with a loop recorder and an outpatient follow-up appointment scheduled. One month later, he presented with worsening dyspnea on exertion with clinical signs of hypervolemia. A repeat TTE showed global LV wall thickening, moderately reduced LV systolic function (EF 40%), and moderate pulmonary hypertension. Given these findings, the patient underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), which suggested an infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis evaluation, technetium-99m (99mTC) pyrophosphate imaging, and a fat pad biopsy were unrevealing. An endomyocardial biopsy was performed with electron microscopy, which confirmed amyloidosis. Genetic testing was negative, and the patient began taking tafamidis. There were no later admissions for decompensated HF; however, the patient developed atrial fibrillation (AF) and an interval TTE demonstrated no improvement in his EF. He died at age 73 years.

Case 2

A 78-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with lightheadedness. Initial ECG showed rate-controlled AF and TTE revealed a moderately thickened LV wall with normal LV size, mild left atrial enlargement, and an EF of 65%. The patient was discharged with a scheduled outpatient CMR appointment; however, he defaulted from follow-up. Two years later, he presented with recurrent syncopal episodes and physical examination was consistent with hypervolemia. Repeat TTE revealed moderate LVH, biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 55%. An inpatient CMR was suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis, and a pyrophosphate scan was diagnostic for ATTR. The patient started taking tafamidis, but continued to have recurrent admissions for HF exacerbation. He died at age 81 years.

Case 3

A 71-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with exertional dyspnea. The initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and left axis deviation. Subsequent TTE revealed severe LVH, mildly reduced LV cavity size, moderate to severe biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 25% to 30%. Outpatient 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging suggested cardiac amyloidosis, and laboratory testing showed no evidence of monoclonal proteins. The patient was started on tafamidis for ATTR. At 2-year follow-up, he had new AF and to date has had no further hospitalizations for acute decompensated HF.

Case 4

A 92-year-old male with a history of AF and bilateral CTS presented with lightheadedness. An ECG revealed AF with a slowed ventricular response. Subsequent Holter monitoring demonstrated pauses exceeding 3 seconds, and a permanent pacemaker was recommended. During his preoperative evaluation, TTE revealed severe concentric LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 50% to 55%. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for amyloidosis and the patient started taking tafamidis. Recurrent hospital admissions for decompensated HF complicated his progression. The patient died at age 95 years.

Case 5

A 72-year-old male with a history of bilateral CTS and cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. An ECG revealed a normal sinus rhythm. A TTE found severely reduced systolic function with an EF ≤ 25%, mild concentric LVH, grade 3 diastolic dysfunction, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and moderate pulmonary hypertension (Figure 1). He was started on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF, which included sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol succinate, and empagliflozin. The patient’s dyspnea improved, and a workup for nonischemic cardiomyopathy was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging 1 year after his initial presentation was positive, leading to ATTR-CM diagnosis. The patient started taking tafamidis and he has since had a stable progression and continued to demonstrate good exercise tolerance with no hospitalizations. His most recent TTE indicated an EF of 40% to 45%.

eAmyloidosis-eF1
FIGURE 1. Transthoracic echocardiogram
(parasternal long axis view) of patient 5
demonstrating concentric left ventricular
hypertrophy with a speckled myocardium
and dilated left atrium.

Case 6

A 76-year-old male with a history of paroxysmal AF status after multiple ablations, bilateral CTS, and severe cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. The patient’s ECG showed normal sinus rhythm and left axis deviation with concern for left anterior hemiblock. A TTE revealed moderate LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction with preserved EF. Before completing the workup for underlying cardiomyopathy, the patient underwent an interventional radiology procedure for an angiomyolipoma, and his postoperative course was complicated by pulmonary edema, requiring admission to the coronary care unit for diuresis. A repeat TTE revealed a reduced EF of 35%, and he was discharged on GDMT. No monoclonal protein was seen in the serum or urine. The patient’s progression was complicated by recurrent admissions for acute decompensated HF and supraventricular tachycardia despite being on amiodarone, which led to a delay in obtaining 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging. Due to hypotension, the patient was unable to tolerate GDMT. He eventually underwent 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging that confirmed ATTR-CM and was started on tafamidis. One year following initial presentation, the patient’s EF progressively declined to 20% to 25%, and he died shortly after discharge to subacute rehabilitation.

Case 7

A 95-year-old male with a history of longstanding persistent AF and bilateral CTS presented with dyspnea on exertion, bendopnea, and worsening bilateral pedal edema for a week. An ECG showed AF with a controlled ventricular response and low-voltage QRS waves (Figure 2). A TTE showed biatrial enlargement, LVH, and preserved EF > 55%. He started taking furosemide and was discharged with a diagnosis of HFpEF. The patient missed cardiology follow-up and presented 1 year later with decompensated HF. An amyloidosis workup was recommended, but due to intermittent periods of being lost to follow-up, the patient did not pursue this workup until 3 years after his initial presentation when 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging confirmed ATTR-CM. The patient declined tafamidis and continued to be followed by the cardiology team. His HF is managed with furosemide as needed due to intolerance to GDMT.

eAmyloidosis-eF2
FIGURE 2. Electrocardiogram of patient 7
demonstrating atrial fibrillation with controlled
ventricular response and low-voltage QRS.

Case 8

A 74-year-old male with history of bilateral CTS presented with right-sided chest pain associated with shortness of breath, diaphoresis, dizziness, and worsening abdominal pain. He was found to have inferior wall myocardial infarction on ECG with later percutaneous coronary intervention to the left circumflex. His hospital course was complicated by decompensated HF (EF 45% to 50%) and AF with rapid ventricular response. He was treated and discharged with follow-up visits scheduled in the cardiology clinic. Multiple attempts were made to place him on GDMT; however, the patient was unable to tolerate these medications due to recurrent admissions for syncope. During a cardiology clinic visit 3 years after his initial presentation, an amyloidosis workup was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for ATTR-CM, and he started taking tafamidis. Before this diagnosis, ECG indicated low-voltage QRS complexes. His progression has since been complicated by admissions for decompensated HF, recurrent episodes of AF requiring atrioventricular node ablation, and biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation after failed attempts at electrical cardioversion. He continued to follow up in the HF clinic.

Discussion

ATTR-CM is an underdiagnosed cause of cardiomyopathy, particularly in older adults. TTR is a transport protein produced in the liver, and misfolding can occur due to age-related instability of the wild-type protein (wtATTR) or pathologic variants in the TTR (hATTR). The misfolding leads to restrictive physiology, HF (often with preserved EF) arrhythmias, and conduction system disease.1 It is likely that the predominantly older male veteran population would be predisposed to wtATTR cardiomyopathy given that misfolding in the condition is believed to be age-related.

Current criteria for ATTR diagnosis require a combination of clinical suspicion, imaging, laboratory testing, and, in some cases, tissue biopsy confirmation and genetic testing.1,4,5 The diagnostic algorithm is as follows:

Clinical suspicion. Consider ATTR in patients with unexplained HFpEF, LV wall thickness ≥ 12 to 14 mm, discordance between ECG voltage and wall thickness, or associated extracardiac manifestations such as CTS, lumbar spinal stenosis, or peripheral/ autonomic neuropathy.

Exclusion of AL amyloidosis. Bone scintigraphy alone cannot distinguish between AL amyloidosis and ATTR, so patients with suspected amyloid cardiomyopathy should undergo serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis and serum free light chain assay to rule out a monoclonal gammopathy as seen in AL amyloidosis.

Cardiac scintigraphy. Once AL amyloidosis is excluded, a positive 99mTC-labeled boneavid tracer image (such as a pyrophosphate scan) with grade 2 or grade 3 myocardial uptake is diagnostic of ATTR.

Tissue biopsy. If there is monoclonal gammopathy or equivocal imaging, tissue biopsy (eg, endomyocardial) with Congo red staining and amyloid typing by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry is necessary.

Genetic testing. Once ATTR is confirmed, genetic testing distinguishes hATTR from wtATTR, which impacts management and determines the need to screen family members.

Currently, there are 3 therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat ATTR-CM: tafamidis, acoramidis, and vutrisiran.6-8 Tafamidis and acoramidis stabilize the TTR tetramer, preventing amyloid formation. Vutrisiran uses RNA interference to silence the gene that produces TTR. Tafamidis has been found to improve cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR-CM. In the ATTR-ACT trial, it reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM and New York Heart Association class I-III symptoms.6 There are other disease-modifying therapies, such the TTR gene silencers inotersen and patisiran; however, these are only FDA-approved for hATTR polyneuropathy and not for ATTRCM; ongoing trials are evaluating their cardiac efficacy.

The mean age of ATTR-CM diagnosis in the patients described in this case series was 79 years, which is older than the mean age of 74 years reported in prior research.4 All patients were male, and the most common presenting symptom was dyspnea on exertion. Table 1 outlines baseline characteristics and associated comorbidities of patients in this case series. The patients presented with many red-flag signs of ATTR-CM (Figure 3). Among them included syncope (4 of 8 patients), spinal stenosis (2 of 8 patients), arrhythmia (7 of 8 patients), heart failure (7 of 8 patients), and bilateral CTS (all patients).

eAmyloidosis-eT1a
eAmyloidosis-eF3
FIGURE 3. Frequency of transthyretin
amyloidosis red-flag signs identified.

Bilateral CTS was diagnosed in all patients before their diagnosis of ATTR-CM. Patient 7 had a diagnosis of CTS 9 years before his ATTR-CM diagnosis, underscoring a subtle, yet important extracardiac sign that may increase clinical suspicion for ATTR-CM. Previous research found that the probability of having CTS is highest 5 to 9 years prior to the development of cardiomyopathy. Its presence is also a prognostic marker in ATTR, independent of cardiac involvement.9 The median interval between CTS diagnosis and cardiomyopathy diagnosis was 5 years in this series.

Although screening criteria for ATTR have been proposed, none have been incorporated into formal guidelines.10,11 We propose that a baseline ECG and screening TTE be obtained in any patient aged > 65 years with cardiac risk equivalents such as hypertension and diabetes, presenting with ≥ 1 extracardiac red-flag signs, such as bilateral CTS and spinal stenosis. This will likely facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ATTR-CM, leading to earlier treatment initiation and better patient outcomes. This initiative can be started in the primary care setting and facilitates early cardiology referral. This recommendation is based on literature supporting clinical patterns and observations the authors have made in clinical practice.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was a comorbidity present in 50% of the patients described in this case series. The literature describing this association is sparse; however, a prospective observational study reported that disorders of sleep inclusive of OSA are frequent in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.12 A theory behind this association is that amyloid deposits in the upper airway tissues lead to airway narrowing. 13 More research is needed to further assess the relationship between OSA and cardiac amyloidosis, particularly with respect to the timing of OSA prior to the development of cardiomyopathy as it may be a potential early sign for clinicians to acknowledge.

An important observation from this case series is the variability in the timing of tafamidis initiation relative to symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis of ATTR-CM (Table 2). Although tafamidis has been found to slow disease progression, several patients in this series began treatment at advanced stages or years after the onset of cardiac symptoms, potentially limiting its clinical benefit.

eAmyloidosis-eT2

For example, patient 1 was diagnosed with ATTR 2 years before tafamidis became available on the market and was initially treated with diflunisal. Patients who started tafamidis earlier in the disease course (eg, patients 3 and 5) appeared to have better long-term outcomes, including an absence of heart failure hospitalizations after initiation. In contrast, patients with delayed treatment initiation (eg, patients 2, 6, and 8) experienced ongoing decompensations or early mortality. Patient 7 declined tafamidis, underscoring challenges in medication uptake among older adults. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare the effectiveness of tafamidis with other recently FDA-approved therapies, such as acoramidis and vutrisiran, particularly in terms of cardiovascular outcomes.

AF was the most common arrhythmia observed in these patients and may occur years before the development of HF symptoms in the setting of ATTR-CM. Due to inherent conduction system disease, AF in this population may have a controlled or slow ventricular response, as observed in patient 4. Patients with atrial fibrillation and cardiac amyloidosis should receive anticoagulation regardless of CHA2DS2- VASc score due to their high risk of intracardiac thrombus formation.4

Limitations

This case series lacked genetic testing following a confirmed ATTR-CM diagnosis. Although much of the treatment is the same regardless of the presence of a TTR mutation, knowing the specific subtype of ATTR-CM has implications for prognosis and for screening family members.

Conclusions

Following analysis of 8 patients diagnosed with ATTR, this case series could serve as a blueprint for research into ATTR in veterans. In clinical practice, following military service, veterans may not be routinely seen by an outpatient physician and may present with sequelae of advanced stages of ATTR. Early identification of red-flag symptoms can lead to a higher clinical suspicion, prompting early diagnostic evaluation and treatment initiation and ultimately mitigating adverse outcomes. Future research that includes genetic testing for those with confirmed ATTR-CM may prove useful as a foundation for detailed and informed discussions with patients and their families regarding prognosis and, if indicated, screening for family members.

References
  1. Kittleson MM, Maurer MS, Ambardekar AV, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e7-e22. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000792
  2. Dharmarajan K, Maurer MS. Transthyretin cardiac amyloidoses in older North Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:765-774. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03868.x
  3. Nativi-Nicolau J, Redd A, Kelly N, et al. Increasing number of amyloidosis diagnosis in the Veterans Affairs populations. J Card Fail. 2019;25:S96.
  4. Ruberg FL, Grogan M, Hanna M, et al. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2872-2891. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.003
  5. Gillmore JD, Maurer, Falk RH, et al. Nonbiopsy diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Circulation. 2016;133:2404-2412. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612
  6. Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, et al. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007-1016. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805689
  7. Gillmore JD, Judge DP, Cappelli F, et al. Efficacy and safety of acoramidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:132-142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2305434
  8. Fontana M, Berk JL, Gillmore JD, et al. Vutrisiran in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:33-44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2409134
  9. Milandri A, Farioli A, Gagliardi C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in cardiac amyloidosis: implications for early diagnosis and prognostic role across the spectrum of aetiologies. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:507-515. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1742
  10. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1554-1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
  11. Brito D, Albrecht FC, de Arenaza DP, et al. World Heart Federation consensus on transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Glob Heart. 2023;18:59. doi:10.5334/gh.1262
  12. Bodez D, Guellich A, Kharoubi M, et al. Prevalence, severity, and prognostic value of sleep apnea syndromes in cardiac amyloidosis. Sleep. 2016;39:1333-1341. doi:10.5665/sleep.5958
  13. Colaco B, Colaco C, Lipford M. A forgotten problem: sleep-disordered breathing in amyloidosis. Chest. 2016;150:1293A. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.08.1407
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Wayne-Andrew Palmer, MBBSa; Elizabeth L. Allison, MDa; Keston Rattan, MBBSa; Selin Unal, MDa; Cristina A. Mitre, MDb

Author affiliations
aSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
bVeterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent This case series was approved by the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System research and development committee institutional review board. This was deemed to be of minimal risk, and a waiver of patient consent was approved.

Correspondence: Wayne-Andrew Palmer (drwaynepalmer91@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2026;43(6):e0720. Published online June 19. doi:10.12788/fp.0720

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 43(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
1-7
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Wayne-Andrew Palmer, MBBSa; Elizabeth L. Allison, MDa; Keston Rattan, MBBSa; Selin Unal, MDa; Cristina A. Mitre, MDb

Author affiliations
aSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
bVeterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent This case series was approved by the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System research and development committee institutional review board. This was deemed to be of minimal risk, and a waiver of patient consent was approved.

Correspondence: Wayne-Andrew Palmer (drwaynepalmer91@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2026;43(6):e0720. Published online June 19. doi:10.12788/fp.0720

Author and Disclosure Information

Wayne-Andrew Palmer, MBBSa; Elizabeth L. Allison, MDa; Keston Rattan, MBBSa; Selin Unal, MDa; Cristina A. Mitre, MDb

Author affiliations
aSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
bVeterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn

Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent This case series was approved by the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System research and development committee institutional review board. This was deemed to be of minimal risk, and a waiver of patient consent was approved.

Correspondence: Wayne-Andrew Palmer (drwaynepalmer91@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2026;43(6):e0720. Published online June 19. doi:10.12788/fp.0720

Article PDF
Article PDF

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is caused by the misfolding of the TTR protein, which results in aggregation of amyloid fibrils that deposit in the myocardium and causes restrictive cardiomyopathy. Though it remains underdiagnosed, ATTR-CM is increasingly being recognized as a cause of heart failure in geriatric patients.1 There are 2 categories of ATTRCM: wild-type ATTR-CM (wtATTR-CM), in which there is no mutation in the TTR gene, and hereditary ATTR-CM (hATTR-CM), in which a mutation is present in the TTR gene. Research has shown that wtATTR-CM accounted for as many as 30% of cases of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients aged > 75 years.2 A significant percentage of the veteran patient population consists of older males. Given their age, these patients are at greater risk for ATTR diagnosis.3

Identifying red flags for patients within this population may allow clinicians to make earlier diagnoses and improve outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose ATTR because many early signs and symptoms are extracardiac, which leads to delayed diagnoses and worse outcomes. This article describes 8 cases of ATTR-CM within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn (VANYHHSB).

Methods

This retrospective case series was reviewed and approved by the VANYHHSB Institutional Review Board where it was conducted. Patients diagnosed with ATTR between 2017 and 2024 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Eleven patients were identified; 3 were excluded due to insufficient medical records. The remaining 8 patient records were retrospectively reviewed and included.

Case 1

A 67-year-old male with a history of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) presented following a syncopal episode. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, first-degree atrioventricular block, and a bifascicular block. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed moderate asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and biatrial enlargement with an ejection fraction (EF) > 55%. The patient was discharged with a loop recorder and an outpatient follow-up appointment scheduled. One month later, he presented with worsening dyspnea on exertion with clinical signs of hypervolemia. A repeat TTE showed global LV wall thickening, moderately reduced LV systolic function (EF 40%), and moderate pulmonary hypertension. Given these findings, the patient underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), which suggested an infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis evaluation, technetium-99m (99mTC) pyrophosphate imaging, and a fat pad biopsy were unrevealing. An endomyocardial biopsy was performed with electron microscopy, which confirmed amyloidosis. Genetic testing was negative, and the patient began taking tafamidis. There were no later admissions for decompensated HF; however, the patient developed atrial fibrillation (AF) and an interval TTE demonstrated no improvement in his EF. He died at age 73 years.

Case 2

A 78-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with lightheadedness. Initial ECG showed rate-controlled AF and TTE revealed a moderately thickened LV wall with normal LV size, mild left atrial enlargement, and an EF of 65%. The patient was discharged with a scheduled outpatient CMR appointment; however, he defaulted from follow-up. Two years later, he presented with recurrent syncopal episodes and physical examination was consistent with hypervolemia. Repeat TTE revealed moderate LVH, biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 55%. An inpatient CMR was suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis, and a pyrophosphate scan was diagnostic for ATTR. The patient started taking tafamidis, but continued to have recurrent admissions for HF exacerbation. He died at age 81 years.

Case 3

A 71-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with exertional dyspnea. The initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and left axis deviation. Subsequent TTE revealed severe LVH, mildly reduced LV cavity size, moderate to severe biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 25% to 30%. Outpatient 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging suggested cardiac amyloidosis, and laboratory testing showed no evidence of monoclonal proteins. The patient was started on tafamidis for ATTR. At 2-year follow-up, he had new AF and to date has had no further hospitalizations for acute decompensated HF.

Case 4

A 92-year-old male with a history of AF and bilateral CTS presented with lightheadedness. An ECG revealed AF with a slowed ventricular response. Subsequent Holter monitoring demonstrated pauses exceeding 3 seconds, and a permanent pacemaker was recommended. During his preoperative evaluation, TTE revealed severe concentric LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 50% to 55%. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for amyloidosis and the patient started taking tafamidis. Recurrent hospital admissions for decompensated HF complicated his progression. The patient died at age 95 years.

Case 5

A 72-year-old male with a history of bilateral CTS and cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. An ECG revealed a normal sinus rhythm. A TTE found severely reduced systolic function with an EF ≤ 25%, mild concentric LVH, grade 3 diastolic dysfunction, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and moderate pulmonary hypertension (Figure 1). He was started on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF, which included sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol succinate, and empagliflozin. The patient’s dyspnea improved, and a workup for nonischemic cardiomyopathy was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging 1 year after his initial presentation was positive, leading to ATTR-CM diagnosis. The patient started taking tafamidis and he has since had a stable progression and continued to demonstrate good exercise tolerance with no hospitalizations. His most recent TTE indicated an EF of 40% to 45%.

eAmyloidosis-eF1
FIGURE 1. Transthoracic echocardiogram
(parasternal long axis view) of patient 5
demonstrating concentric left ventricular
hypertrophy with a speckled myocardium
and dilated left atrium.

Case 6

A 76-year-old male with a history of paroxysmal AF status after multiple ablations, bilateral CTS, and severe cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. The patient’s ECG showed normal sinus rhythm and left axis deviation with concern for left anterior hemiblock. A TTE revealed moderate LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction with preserved EF. Before completing the workup for underlying cardiomyopathy, the patient underwent an interventional radiology procedure for an angiomyolipoma, and his postoperative course was complicated by pulmonary edema, requiring admission to the coronary care unit for diuresis. A repeat TTE revealed a reduced EF of 35%, and he was discharged on GDMT. No monoclonal protein was seen in the serum or urine. The patient’s progression was complicated by recurrent admissions for acute decompensated HF and supraventricular tachycardia despite being on amiodarone, which led to a delay in obtaining 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging. Due to hypotension, the patient was unable to tolerate GDMT. He eventually underwent 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging that confirmed ATTR-CM and was started on tafamidis. One year following initial presentation, the patient’s EF progressively declined to 20% to 25%, and he died shortly after discharge to subacute rehabilitation.

Case 7

A 95-year-old male with a history of longstanding persistent AF and bilateral CTS presented with dyspnea on exertion, bendopnea, and worsening bilateral pedal edema for a week. An ECG showed AF with a controlled ventricular response and low-voltage QRS waves (Figure 2). A TTE showed biatrial enlargement, LVH, and preserved EF > 55%. He started taking furosemide and was discharged with a diagnosis of HFpEF. The patient missed cardiology follow-up and presented 1 year later with decompensated HF. An amyloidosis workup was recommended, but due to intermittent periods of being lost to follow-up, the patient did not pursue this workup until 3 years after his initial presentation when 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging confirmed ATTR-CM. The patient declined tafamidis and continued to be followed by the cardiology team. His HF is managed with furosemide as needed due to intolerance to GDMT.

eAmyloidosis-eF2
FIGURE 2. Electrocardiogram of patient 7
demonstrating atrial fibrillation with controlled
ventricular response and low-voltage QRS.

Case 8

A 74-year-old male with history of bilateral CTS presented with right-sided chest pain associated with shortness of breath, diaphoresis, dizziness, and worsening abdominal pain. He was found to have inferior wall myocardial infarction on ECG with later percutaneous coronary intervention to the left circumflex. His hospital course was complicated by decompensated HF (EF 45% to 50%) and AF with rapid ventricular response. He was treated and discharged with follow-up visits scheduled in the cardiology clinic. Multiple attempts were made to place him on GDMT; however, the patient was unable to tolerate these medications due to recurrent admissions for syncope. During a cardiology clinic visit 3 years after his initial presentation, an amyloidosis workup was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for ATTR-CM, and he started taking tafamidis. Before this diagnosis, ECG indicated low-voltage QRS complexes. His progression has since been complicated by admissions for decompensated HF, recurrent episodes of AF requiring atrioventricular node ablation, and biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation after failed attempts at electrical cardioversion. He continued to follow up in the HF clinic.

Discussion

ATTR-CM is an underdiagnosed cause of cardiomyopathy, particularly in older adults. TTR is a transport protein produced in the liver, and misfolding can occur due to age-related instability of the wild-type protein (wtATTR) or pathologic variants in the TTR (hATTR). The misfolding leads to restrictive physiology, HF (often with preserved EF) arrhythmias, and conduction system disease.1 It is likely that the predominantly older male veteran population would be predisposed to wtATTR cardiomyopathy given that misfolding in the condition is believed to be age-related.

Current criteria for ATTR diagnosis require a combination of clinical suspicion, imaging, laboratory testing, and, in some cases, tissue biopsy confirmation and genetic testing.1,4,5 The diagnostic algorithm is as follows:

Clinical suspicion. Consider ATTR in patients with unexplained HFpEF, LV wall thickness ≥ 12 to 14 mm, discordance between ECG voltage and wall thickness, or associated extracardiac manifestations such as CTS, lumbar spinal stenosis, or peripheral/ autonomic neuropathy.

Exclusion of AL amyloidosis. Bone scintigraphy alone cannot distinguish between AL amyloidosis and ATTR, so patients with suspected amyloid cardiomyopathy should undergo serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis and serum free light chain assay to rule out a monoclonal gammopathy as seen in AL amyloidosis.

Cardiac scintigraphy. Once AL amyloidosis is excluded, a positive 99mTC-labeled boneavid tracer image (such as a pyrophosphate scan) with grade 2 or grade 3 myocardial uptake is diagnostic of ATTR.

Tissue biopsy. If there is monoclonal gammopathy or equivocal imaging, tissue biopsy (eg, endomyocardial) with Congo red staining and amyloid typing by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry is necessary.

Genetic testing. Once ATTR is confirmed, genetic testing distinguishes hATTR from wtATTR, which impacts management and determines the need to screen family members.

Currently, there are 3 therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat ATTR-CM: tafamidis, acoramidis, and vutrisiran.6-8 Tafamidis and acoramidis stabilize the TTR tetramer, preventing amyloid formation. Vutrisiran uses RNA interference to silence the gene that produces TTR. Tafamidis has been found to improve cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR-CM. In the ATTR-ACT trial, it reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM and New York Heart Association class I-III symptoms.6 There are other disease-modifying therapies, such the TTR gene silencers inotersen and patisiran; however, these are only FDA-approved for hATTR polyneuropathy and not for ATTRCM; ongoing trials are evaluating their cardiac efficacy.

The mean age of ATTR-CM diagnosis in the patients described in this case series was 79 years, which is older than the mean age of 74 years reported in prior research.4 All patients were male, and the most common presenting symptom was dyspnea on exertion. Table 1 outlines baseline characteristics and associated comorbidities of patients in this case series. The patients presented with many red-flag signs of ATTR-CM (Figure 3). Among them included syncope (4 of 8 patients), spinal stenosis (2 of 8 patients), arrhythmia (7 of 8 patients), heart failure (7 of 8 patients), and bilateral CTS (all patients).

eAmyloidosis-eT1a
eAmyloidosis-eF3
FIGURE 3. Frequency of transthyretin
amyloidosis red-flag signs identified.

Bilateral CTS was diagnosed in all patients before their diagnosis of ATTR-CM. Patient 7 had a diagnosis of CTS 9 years before his ATTR-CM diagnosis, underscoring a subtle, yet important extracardiac sign that may increase clinical suspicion for ATTR-CM. Previous research found that the probability of having CTS is highest 5 to 9 years prior to the development of cardiomyopathy. Its presence is also a prognostic marker in ATTR, independent of cardiac involvement.9 The median interval between CTS diagnosis and cardiomyopathy diagnosis was 5 years in this series.

Although screening criteria for ATTR have been proposed, none have been incorporated into formal guidelines.10,11 We propose that a baseline ECG and screening TTE be obtained in any patient aged > 65 years with cardiac risk equivalents such as hypertension and diabetes, presenting with ≥ 1 extracardiac red-flag signs, such as bilateral CTS and spinal stenosis. This will likely facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ATTR-CM, leading to earlier treatment initiation and better patient outcomes. This initiative can be started in the primary care setting and facilitates early cardiology referral. This recommendation is based on literature supporting clinical patterns and observations the authors have made in clinical practice.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was a comorbidity present in 50% of the patients described in this case series. The literature describing this association is sparse; however, a prospective observational study reported that disorders of sleep inclusive of OSA are frequent in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.12 A theory behind this association is that amyloid deposits in the upper airway tissues lead to airway narrowing. 13 More research is needed to further assess the relationship between OSA and cardiac amyloidosis, particularly with respect to the timing of OSA prior to the development of cardiomyopathy as it may be a potential early sign for clinicians to acknowledge.

An important observation from this case series is the variability in the timing of tafamidis initiation relative to symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis of ATTR-CM (Table 2). Although tafamidis has been found to slow disease progression, several patients in this series began treatment at advanced stages or years after the onset of cardiac symptoms, potentially limiting its clinical benefit.

eAmyloidosis-eT2

For example, patient 1 was diagnosed with ATTR 2 years before tafamidis became available on the market and was initially treated with diflunisal. Patients who started tafamidis earlier in the disease course (eg, patients 3 and 5) appeared to have better long-term outcomes, including an absence of heart failure hospitalizations after initiation. In contrast, patients with delayed treatment initiation (eg, patients 2, 6, and 8) experienced ongoing decompensations or early mortality. Patient 7 declined tafamidis, underscoring challenges in medication uptake among older adults. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare the effectiveness of tafamidis with other recently FDA-approved therapies, such as acoramidis and vutrisiran, particularly in terms of cardiovascular outcomes.

AF was the most common arrhythmia observed in these patients and may occur years before the development of HF symptoms in the setting of ATTR-CM. Due to inherent conduction system disease, AF in this population may have a controlled or slow ventricular response, as observed in patient 4. Patients with atrial fibrillation and cardiac amyloidosis should receive anticoagulation regardless of CHA2DS2- VASc score due to their high risk of intracardiac thrombus formation.4

Limitations

This case series lacked genetic testing following a confirmed ATTR-CM diagnosis. Although much of the treatment is the same regardless of the presence of a TTR mutation, knowing the specific subtype of ATTR-CM has implications for prognosis and for screening family members.

Conclusions

Following analysis of 8 patients diagnosed with ATTR, this case series could serve as a blueprint for research into ATTR in veterans. In clinical practice, following military service, veterans may not be routinely seen by an outpatient physician and may present with sequelae of advanced stages of ATTR. Early identification of red-flag symptoms can lead to a higher clinical suspicion, prompting early diagnostic evaluation and treatment initiation and ultimately mitigating adverse outcomes. Future research that includes genetic testing for those with confirmed ATTR-CM may prove useful as a foundation for detailed and informed discussions with patients and their families regarding prognosis and, if indicated, screening for family members.

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is caused by the misfolding of the TTR protein, which results in aggregation of amyloid fibrils that deposit in the myocardium and causes restrictive cardiomyopathy. Though it remains underdiagnosed, ATTR-CM is increasingly being recognized as a cause of heart failure in geriatric patients.1 There are 2 categories of ATTRCM: wild-type ATTR-CM (wtATTR-CM), in which there is no mutation in the TTR gene, and hereditary ATTR-CM (hATTR-CM), in which a mutation is present in the TTR gene. Research has shown that wtATTR-CM accounted for as many as 30% of cases of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients aged > 75 years.2 A significant percentage of the veteran patient population consists of older males. Given their age, these patients are at greater risk for ATTR diagnosis.3

Identifying red flags for patients within this population may allow clinicians to make earlier diagnoses and improve outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose ATTR because many early signs and symptoms are extracardiac, which leads to delayed diagnoses and worse outcomes. This article describes 8 cases of ATTR-CM within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn (VANYHHSB).

Methods

This retrospective case series was reviewed and approved by the VANYHHSB Institutional Review Board where it was conducted. Patients diagnosed with ATTR between 2017 and 2024 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Eleven patients were identified; 3 were excluded due to insufficient medical records. The remaining 8 patient records were retrospectively reviewed and included.

Case 1

A 67-year-old male with a history of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) presented following a syncopal episode. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, first-degree atrioventricular block, and a bifascicular block. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed moderate asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and biatrial enlargement with an ejection fraction (EF) > 55%. The patient was discharged with a loop recorder and an outpatient follow-up appointment scheduled. One month later, he presented with worsening dyspnea on exertion with clinical signs of hypervolemia. A repeat TTE showed global LV wall thickening, moderately reduced LV systolic function (EF 40%), and moderate pulmonary hypertension. Given these findings, the patient underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), which suggested an infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis evaluation, technetium-99m (99mTC) pyrophosphate imaging, and a fat pad biopsy were unrevealing. An endomyocardial biopsy was performed with electron microscopy, which confirmed amyloidosis. Genetic testing was negative, and the patient began taking tafamidis. There were no later admissions for decompensated HF; however, the patient developed atrial fibrillation (AF) and an interval TTE demonstrated no improvement in his EF. He died at age 73 years.

Case 2

A 78-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with lightheadedness. Initial ECG showed rate-controlled AF and TTE revealed a moderately thickened LV wall with normal LV size, mild left atrial enlargement, and an EF of 65%. The patient was discharged with a scheduled outpatient CMR appointment; however, he defaulted from follow-up. Two years later, he presented with recurrent syncopal episodes and physical examination was consistent with hypervolemia. Repeat TTE revealed moderate LVH, biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 55%. An inpatient CMR was suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis, and a pyrophosphate scan was diagnostic for ATTR. The patient started taking tafamidis, but continued to have recurrent admissions for HF exacerbation. He died at age 81 years.

Case 3

A 71-year-old male with a history of CTS presented with exertional dyspnea. The initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and left axis deviation. Subsequent TTE revealed severe LVH, mildly reduced LV cavity size, moderate to severe biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 25% to 30%. Outpatient 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging suggested cardiac amyloidosis, and laboratory testing showed no evidence of monoclonal proteins. The patient was started on tafamidis for ATTR. At 2-year follow-up, he had new AF and to date has had no further hospitalizations for acute decompensated HF.

Case 4

A 92-year-old male with a history of AF and bilateral CTS presented with lightheadedness. An ECG revealed AF with a slowed ventricular response. Subsequent Holter monitoring demonstrated pauses exceeding 3 seconds, and a permanent pacemaker was recommended. During his preoperative evaluation, TTE revealed severe concentric LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and an EF of 50% to 55%. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for amyloidosis and the patient started taking tafamidis. Recurrent hospital admissions for decompensated HF complicated his progression. The patient died at age 95 years.

Case 5

A 72-year-old male with a history of bilateral CTS and cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. An ECG revealed a normal sinus rhythm. A TTE found severely reduced systolic function with an EF ≤ 25%, mild concentric LVH, grade 3 diastolic dysfunction, mild-tomoderate biatrial enlargement, and moderate pulmonary hypertension (Figure 1). He was started on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF, which included sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol succinate, and empagliflozin. The patient’s dyspnea improved, and a workup for nonischemic cardiomyopathy was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging 1 year after his initial presentation was positive, leading to ATTR-CM diagnosis. The patient started taking tafamidis and he has since had a stable progression and continued to demonstrate good exercise tolerance with no hospitalizations. His most recent TTE indicated an EF of 40% to 45%.

eAmyloidosis-eF1
FIGURE 1. Transthoracic echocardiogram
(parasternal long axis view) of patient 5
demonstrating concentric left ventricular
hypertrophy with a speckled myocardium
and dilated left atrium.

Case 6

A 76-year-old male with a history of paroxysmal AF status after multiple ablations, bilateral CTS, and severe cervical spinal stenosis presented with dyspnea on exertion. The patient’s ECG showed normal sinus rhythm and left axis deviation with concern for left anterior hemiblock. A TTE revealed moderate LVH with a speckled appearance of the myocardium and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction with preserved EF. Before completing the workup for underlying cardiomyopathy, the patient underwent an interventional radiology procedure for an angiomyolipoma, and his postoperative course was complicated by pulmonary edema, requiring admission to the coronary care unit for diuresis. A repeat TTE revealed a reduced EF of 35%, and he was discharged on GDMT. No monoclonal protein was seen in the serum or urine. The patient’s progression was complicated by recurrent admissions for acute decompensated HF and supraventricular tachycardia despite being on amiodarone, which led to a delay in obtaining 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging. Due to hypotension, the patient was unable to tolerate GDMT. He eventually underwent 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging that confirmed ATTR-CM and was started on tafamidis. One year following initial presentation, the patient’s EF progressively declined to 20% to 25%, and he died shortly after discharge to subacute rehabilitation.

Case 7

A 95-year-old male with a history of longstanding persistent AF and bilateral CTS presented with dyspnea on exertion, bendopnea, and worsening bilateral pedal edema for a week. An ECG showed AF with a controlled ventricular response and low-voltage QRS waves (Figure 2). A TTE showed biatrial enlargement, LVH, and preserved EF > 55%. He started taking furosemide and was discharged with a diagnosis of HFpEF. The patient missed cardiology follow-up and presented 1 year later with decompensated HF. An amyloidosis workup was recommended, but due to intermittent periods of being lost to follow-up, the patient did not pursue this workup until 3 years after his initial presentation when 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging confirmed ATTR-CM. The patient declined tafamidis and continued to be followed by the cardiology team. His HF is managed with furosemide as needed due to intolerance to GDMT.

eAmyloidosis-eF2
FIGURE 2. Electrocardiogram of patient 7
demonstrating atrial fibrillation with controlled
ventricular response and low-voltage QRS.

Case 8

A 74-year-old male with history of bilateral CTS presented with right-sided chest pain associated with shortness of breath, diaphoresis, dizziness, and worsening abdominal pain. He was found to have inferior wall myocardial infarction on ECG with later percutaneous coronary intervention to the left circumflex. His hospital course was complicated by decompensated HF (EF 45% to 50%) and AF with rapid ventricular response. He was treated and discharged with follow-up visits scheduled in the cardiology clinic. Multiple attempts were made to place him on GDMT; however, the patient was unable to tolerate these medications due to recurrent admissions for syncope. During a cardiology clinic visit 3 years after his initial presentation, an amyloidosis workup was initiated. 99mTC pyrophosphate imaging was positive for ATTR-CM, and he started taking tafamidis. Before this diagnosis, ECG indicated low-voltage QRS complexes. His progression has since been complicated by admissions for decompensated HF, recurrent episodes of AF requiring atrioventricular node ablation, and biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation after failed attempts at electrical cardioversion. He continued to follow up in the HF clinic.

Discussion

ATTR-CM is an underdiagnosed cause of cardiomyopathy, particularly in older adults. TTR is a transport protein produced in the liver, and misfolding can occur due to age-related instability of the wild-type protein (wtATTR) or pathologic variants in the TTR (hATTR). The misfolding leads to restrictive physiology, HF (often with preserved EF) arrhythmias, and conduction system disease.1 It is likely that the predominantly older male veteran population would be predisposed to wtATTR cardiomyopathy given that misfolding in the condition is believed to be age-related.

Current criteria for ATTR diagnosis require a combination of clinical suspicion, imaging, laboratory testing, and, in some cases, tissue biopsy confirmation and genetic testing.1,4,5 The diagnostic algorithm is as follows:

Clinical suspicion. Consider ATTR in patients with unexplained HFpEF, LV wall thickness ≥ 12 to 14 mm, discordance between ECG voltage and wall thickness, or associated extracardiac manifestations such as CTS, lumbar spinal stenosis, or peripheral/ autonomic neuropathy.

Exclusion of AL amyloidosis. Bone scintigraphy alone cannot distinguish between AL amyloidosis and ATTR, so patients with suspected amyloid cardiomyopathy should undergo serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis and serum free light chain assay to rule out a monoclonal gammopathy as seen in AL amyloidosis.

Cardiac scintigraphy. Once AL amyloidosis is excluded, a positive 99mTC-labeled boneavid tracer image (such as a pyrophosphate scan) with grade 2 or grade 3 myocardial uptake is diagnostic of ATTR.

Tissue biopsy. If there is monoclonal gammopathy or equivocal imaging, tissue biopsy (eg, endomyocardial) with Congo red staining and amyloid typing by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry is necessary.

Genetic testing. Once ATTR is confirmed, genetic testing distinguishes hATTR from wtATTR, which impacts management and determines the need to screen family members.

Currently, there are 3 therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat ATTR-CM: tafamidis, acoramidis, and vutrisiran.6-8 Tafamidis and acoramidis stabilize the TTR tetramer, preventing amyloid formation. Vutrisiran uses RNA interference to silence the gene that produces TTR. Tafamidis has been found to improve cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR-CM. In the ATTR-ACT trial, it reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM and New York Heart Association class I-III symptoms.6 There are other disease-modifying therapies, such the TTR gene silencers inotersen and patisiran; however, these are only FDA-approved for hATTR polyneuropathy and not for ATTRCM; ongoing trials are evaluating their cardiac efficacy.

The mean age of ATTR-CM diagnosis in the patients described in this case series was 79 years, which is older than the mean age of 74 years reported in prior research.4 All patients were male, and the most common presenting symptom was dyspnea on exertion. Table 1 outlines baseline characteristics and associated comorbidities of patients in this case series. The patients presented with many red-flag signs of ATTR-CM (Figure 3). Among them included syncope (4 of 8 patients), spinal stenosis (2 of 8 patients), arrhythmia (7 of 8 patients), heart failure (7 of 8 patients), and bilateral CTS (all patients).

eAmyloidosis-eT1a
eAmyloidosis-eF3
FIGURE 3. Frequency of transthyretin
amyloidosis red-flag signs identified.

Bilateral CTS was diagnosed in all patients before their diagnosis of ATTR-CM. Patient 7 had a diagnosis of CTS 9 years before his ATTR-CM diagnosis, underscoring a subtle, yet important extracardiac sign that may increase clinical suspicion for ATTR-CM. Previous research found that the probability of having CTS is highest 5 to 9 years prior to the development of cardiomyopathy. Its presence is also a prognostic marker in ATTR, independent of cardiac involvement.9 The median interval between CTS diagnosis and cardiomyopathy diagnosis was 5 years in this series.

Although screening criteria for ATTR have been proposed, none have been incorporated into formal guidelines.10,11 We propose that a baseline ECG and screening TTE be obtained in any patient aged > 65 years with cardiac risk equivalents such as hypertension and diabetes, presenting with ≥ 1 extracardiac red-flag signs, such as bilateral CTS and spinal stenosis. This will likely facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ATTR-CM, leading to earlier treatment initiation and better patient outcomes. This initiative can be started in the primary care setting and facilitates early cardiology referral. This recommendation is based on literature supporting clinical patterns and observations the authors have made in clinical practice.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was a comorbidity present in 50% of the patients described in this case series. The literature describing this association is sparse; however, a prospective observational study reported that disorders of sleep inclusive of OSA are frequent in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.12 A theory behind this association is that amyloid deposits in the upper airway tissues lead to airway narrowing. 13 More research is needed to further assess the relationship between OSA and cardiac amyloidosis, particularly with respect to the timing of OSA prior to the development of cardiomyopathy as it may be a potential early sign for clinicians to acknowledge.

An important observation from this case series is the variability in the timing of tafamidis initiation relative to symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis of ATTR-CM (Table 2). Although tafamidis has been found to slow disease progression, several patients in this series began treatment at advanced stages or years after the onset of cardiac symptoms, potentially limiting its clinical benefit.

eAmyloidosis-eT2

For example, patient 1 was diagnosed with ATTR 2 years before tafamidis became available on the market and was initially treated with diflunisal. Patients who started tafamidis earlier in the disease course (eg, patients 3 and 5) appeared to have better long-term outcomes, including an absence of heart failure hospitalizations after initiation. In contrast, patients with delayed treatment initiation (eg, patients 2, 6, and 8) experienced ongoing decompensations or early mortality. Patient 7 declined tafamidis, underscoring challenges in medication uptake among older adults. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare the effectiveness of tafamidis with other recently FDA-approved therapies, such as acoramidis and vutrisiran, particularly in terms of cardiovascular outcomes.

AF was the most common arrhythmia observed in these patients and may occur years before the development of HF symptoms in the setting of ATTR-CM. Due to inherent conduction system disease, AF in this population may have a controlled or slow ventricular response, as observed in patient 4. Patients with atrial fibrillation and cardiac amyloidosis should receive anticoagulation regardless of CHA2DS2- VASc score due to their high risk of intracardiac thrombus formation.4

Limitations

This case series lacked genetic testing following a confirmed ATTR-CM diagnosis. Although much of the treatment is the same regardless of the presence of a TTR mutation, knowing the specific subtype of ATTR-CM has implications for prognosis and for screening family members.

Conclusions

Following analysis of 8 patients diagnosed with ATTR, this case series could serve as a blueprint for research into ATTR in veterans. In clinical practice, following military service, veterans may not be routinely seen by an outpatient physician and may present with sequelae of advanced stages of ATTR. Early identification of red-flag symptoms can lead to a higher clinical suspicion, prompting early diagnostic evaluation and treatment initiation and ultimately mitigating adverse outcomes. Future research that includes genetic testing for those with confirmed ATTR-CM may prove useful as a foundation for detailed and informed discussions with patients and their families regarding prognosis and, if indicated, screening for family members.

References
  1. Kittleson MM, Maurer MS, Ambardekar AV, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e7-e22. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000792
  2. Dharmarajan K, Maurer MS. Transthyretin cardiac amyloidoses in older North Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:765-774. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03868.x
  3. Nativi-Nicolau J, Redd A, Kelly N, et al. Increasing number of amyloidosis diagnosis in the Veterans Affairs populations. J Card Fail. 2019;25:S96.
  4. Ruberg FL, Grogan M, Hanna M, et al. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2872-2891. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.003
  5. Gillmore JD, Maurer, Falk RH, et al. Nonbiopsy diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Circulation. 2016;133:2404-2412. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612
  6. Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, et al. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007-1016. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805689
  7. Gillmore JD, Judge DP, Cappelli F, et al. Efficacy and safety of acoramidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:132-142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2305434
  8. Fontana M, Berk JL, Gillmore JD, et al. Vutrisiran in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:33-44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2409134
  9. Milandri A, Farioli A, Gagliardi C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in cardiac amyloidosis: implications for early diagnosis and prognostic role across the spectrum of aetiologies. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:507-515. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1742
  10. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1554-1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
  11. Brito D, Albrecht FC, de Arenaza DP, et al. World Heart Federation consensus on transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Glob Heart. 2023;18:59. doi:10.5334/gh.1262
  12. Bodez D, Guellich A, Kharoubi M, et al. Prevalence, severity, and prognostic value of sleep apnea syndromes in cardiac amyloidosis. Sleep. 2016;39:1333-1341. doi:10.5665/sleep.5958
  13. Colaco B, Colaco C, Lipford M. A forgotten problem: sleep-disordered breathing in amyloidosis. Chest. 2016;150:1293A. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.08.1407
References
  1. Kittleson MM, Maurer MS, Ambardekar AV, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e7-e22. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000792
  2. Dharmarajan K, Maurer MS. Transthyretin cardiac amyloidoses in older North Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:765-774. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03868.x
  3. Nativi-Nicolau J, Redd A, Kelly N, et al. Increasing number of amyloidosis diagnosis in the Veterans Affairs populations. J Card Fail. 2019;25:S96.
  4. Ruberg FL, Grogan M, Hanna M, et al. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2872-2891. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.003
  5. Gillmore JD, Maurer, Falk RH, et al. Nonbiopsy diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Circulation. 2016;133:2404-2412. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612
  6. Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, et al. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007-1016. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805689
  7. Gillmore JD, Judge DP, Cappelli F, et al. Efficacy and safety of acoramidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:132-142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2305434
  8. Fontana M, Berk JL, Gillmore JD, et al. Vutrisiran in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:33-44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2409134
  9. Milandri A, Farioli A, Gagliardi C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in cardiac amyloidosis: implications for early diagnosis and prognostic role across the spectrum of aetiologies. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:507-515. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1742
  10. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1554-1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
  11. Brito D, Albrecht FC, de Arenaza DP, et al. World Heart Federation consensus on transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Glob Heart. 2023;18:59. doi:10.5334/gh.1262
  12. Bodez D, Guellich A, Kharoubi M, et al. Prevalence, severity, and prognostic value of sleep apnea syndromes in cardiac amyloidosis. Sleep. 2016;39:1333-1341. doi:10.5665/sleep.5958
  13. Colaco B, Colaco C, Lipford M. A forgotten problem: sleep-disordered breathing in amyloidosis. Chest. 2016;150:1293A. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.08.1407
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 43(6)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 43(6)
Page Number
1-7
Page Number
1-7
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Case Series of Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis at VA New York Harbor Healthcare-Brooklyn

Display Headline

Case Series of Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis at VA New York Harbor Healthcare-Brooklyn

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

Why Does the Heart Rarely Develop Cancer?

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Why Does the Heart Rarely Develop Cancer?

The heart is one of the organs least likely to develop cancer, a long-standing biologic puzzle that may now have an explanation. A study published in Science found that the mechanical load generated by the beating heart suppresses tumor cell proliferation through a molecular pathway that alters gene expression, raising the possibility of new therapeutic targets.

Mechanical Protection

Tumors that originate directly in the myocardium are exceptionally rare, occurring in < 1% of autopsies. Even cardiac metastases, which have been reported in up to 18% of autopsies, are often small, asymptomatic, and incidentally discovered. Although this phenomenon has long been recognized, its biologic basis remains unclear.

The heart is notable for its limited capacity for regeneration. After birth, cardiomyocytes stop dividing and subsequently renew at a rate of about 1% per year. However, when the mechanical load is reduced, such as in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices, cardiomyocytes once again show signs of proliferation.

This observation prompted researchers to investigate whether the same mechanical load that restrains normal cardiac cells might also suppress cancer growth.

More Load, Less Growth

To investigate this question, researchers introduced two genetic alterations commonly found in human cancers, activation of the KRAS oncogene and loss of the TP53, into the liver, skeletal muscle, and hearts of mice. Tumors developed in multiple organs, but not in the heart.

The researchers then used a heterotopic heart transplant model in which a donor mouse’s heart is surgically connected to the neck (cervical) or abdominal vessels of a recipient mouse. The transplanted heart remained perfused but lost its normal mechanical loading (constant beating).

When researchers injected lung adenocarcinoma cells into 2 different hearts of the same animal, they observed entirely different outcomes. The cancer cells did not grow in the native mechanically loaded heart. However, the same cells grew rapidly and extensively in the mechanically unloaded transplanted heart.

Tumor cells had replaced nearly all normal tissue in the unloaded heart, whereas they occupied only approximately 20% of the ventricle in the native heart in 14 days. This difference could not be explained by differences in the initial tumor engraftment or cell death. Instead, the findings pointed to substantial differences in tumor cell proliferation.

Similar results were observed in bioengineered cardiac tissues exposed to varying degrees of mechanical stress. Tumor cells proliferated under conditions of low mechanical load but ceased proliferating as the mechanical load increased. Tumor growth was lowest in regions exposed to the greatest mechanical stimulation of cardiomyocytes in vitro.

However, the possibility of metabolic competition between cardiac and tumor cells for nutrition was ruled out.

From Mechanics to Genes

Next, we examined the influence of mechanical forces on tumor cell behavior.

Gene expression analyses of both human cardiac metastases and mouse tumor cells showed that mechanical stimulation altered chromatin accessibility through the activation of genes involved in chromatin remodeling. These changes promoted the expression of genes that suppress cell division.

The study also identified Nesprin-2, a part of the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex, which acts as a physical bridge. It is a multitasking protein that connects the cell’s outer structural network (cytoskeleton) to its inner genetic storage (nucleus) and appears to play a significant role in converting mechanical signals into changes in gene expression.

When Nesprin-2 was inactivated, cancer cells resumed proliferation despite exposure to a mechanical load, both in engineered tissues and animal models.

“Collectively, these results shed light on the role of mechanical forces in protecting the heart from cancer and may pave the way to cancer therapies based on mechanical stimulation,” concluded the authors.

An Actively Protected Organ

Speaking with Univadis Italy, part of the Medscape Professional Network, Giorgio Scita, PhD, director of the Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Migration research unit at AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology and professor of general pathology at the University of Milan in Milan, Italy, said, “The study addressed a simple but fundamental question: Why is the heart largely resistant to cancer despite being highly vascularized and continuously exposed to circulating tumor cells?

These findings suggest that the heartbeat itself creates a mechanical environment that is hostile to tumor growth. The compressive forces generated by rhythmic myocardial contraction are sensed by cancer cells and translated into biochemical signals that limit their proliferation.

In this view, the heart is not simply an organ that is unfavorable for cancer growth but a tissue actively protected by its own mechanical forces.”

Speaking with Univadis Italy, Serena Zacchigna, PhD, study coauthor and head of the Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy, said, “Until now, however, attention had focused primarily on signals from the extracellular matrix, such as tissue stiffness. Our study adds a new element: even forces generated directly by the movement of an organ — in this case, cardiac contraction — can influence the growth of cancer cells.”

Beyond the Heart

Scita said the findings have implications that extend well beyond the heart.

“The most significant aspect is that this work identifies tissue mechanics as an active regulator of tumor behavior,” he said. Stiffness, compression, tension, and confinement are not merely consequences of tumor growth, but factors capable of influencing proliferation, invasion, and dormancy.

The concept may apply to many solid tumors. Scita noted that cancer cells growing in confined environments, such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, are exposed to substantial mechanical constraints. Understanding why some tumor cells remain susceptible to these forces whereas others evade them and become invasive remains a major unanswered question in cancer biology.

Research on these mechanisms is expanding internationally and in Italy as well. One example is the AIRC “5 per mille” (5 per thousand) research programs on metastatic disease, which includes projects designed to clarify how the mechanical properties of tumor tissue influence cancer initiation, metastatic spread, and disease progression.

Therapeutic Potential

According to Zacchigna, these findings open 2 principal avenues for future research.

“The first focuses on mechanical stimulation itself. In collaboration with engineers at the University of Siena, including a group led by Domenico Prattichizzo, researchers are developing wearable robotic devices designed to mimic the heartbeat and deliver mechanical stimulation to superficial solid tumors such as certain skin cancers.

The second approach is pharmacology. Researchers are investigating whether epigenetic therapies capable of modifying chromatin remodeling can reproduce the effects of cardiac contraction and suppress tumor cell proliferation.

However, Zacchigna cautioned that this work remains at an early experimental phase.”

However, before therapeutic applications can be pursued, important mechanistic questions remain unanswered.

Zacchigna noted that although the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex and Nesprin-2 are involved in signal transduction leading to chromatin reorganization and activation of cell cycle inhibitory loci, the molecular intermediates involved have yet to be fully defined.

Researchers also need to determine which genes are most critical, whether the mechanism operates across different tumor types, and whether it can be safely manipulated for therapeutic purposes.

In an accompanying commentary published in Science, Wyatt G. Paltzer, PhD, and James F. Martin, MD, from the Department of Integrative Physiology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, noted that the findings suggest enhancing LINC complex activity could potentially suppress tumor growth.

However, because the complex has broad biologic functions, it may prove difficult to target therapeutically. The authors suggested that future studies should focus on identifying proteins that interact with Nesprin-2 or other components of the LINC complex and play a more specific role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.

Looking Ahead

Despite these challenges, Scita said that the study’s conceptual significance is already clear.

“Even if therapeutic applications remain years away, the findings suggest that cancer may one day be targeted by altering how tumor cells perceive and interpret physical forces.”

Scita and Zacchigna reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

This story was translated from Univadis Italy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics

The heart is one of the organs least likely to develop cancer, a long-standing biologic puzzle that may now have an explanation. A study published in Science found that the mechanical load generated by the beating heart suppresses tumor cell proliferation through a molecular pathway that alters gene expression, raising the possibility of new therapeutic targets.

Mechanical Protection

Tumors that originate directly in the myocardium are exceptionally rare, occurring in < 1% of autopsies. Even cardiac metastases, which have been reported in up to 18% of autopsies, are often small, asymptomatic, and incidentally discovered. Although this phenomenon has long been recognized, its biologic basis remains unclear.

The heart is notable for its limited capacity for regeneration. After birth, cardiomyocytes stop dividing and subsequently renew at a rate of about 1% per year. However, when the mechanical load is reduced, such as in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices, cardiomyocytes once again show signs of proliferation.

This observation prompted researchers to investigate whether the same mechanical load that restrains normal cardiac cells might also suppress cancer growth.

More Load, Less Growth

To investigate this question, researchers introduced two genetic alterations commonly found in human cancers, activation of the KRAS oncogene and loss of the TP53, into the liver, skeletal muscle, and hearts of mice. Tumors developed in multiple organs, but not in the heart.

The researchers then used a heterotopic heart transplant model in which a donor mouse’s heart is surgically connected to the neck (cervical) or abdominal vessels of a recipient mouse. The transplanted heart remained perfused but lost its normal mechanical loading (constant beating).

When researchers injected lung adenocarcinoma cells into 2 different hearts of the same animal, they observed entirely different outcomes. The cancer cells did not grow in the native mechanically loaded heart. However, the same cells grew rapidly and extensively in the mechanically unloaded transplanted heart.

Tumor cells had replaced nearly all normal tissue in the unloaded heart, whereas they occupied only approximately 20% of the ventricle in the native heart in 14 days. This difference could not be explained by differences in the initial tumor engraftment or cell death. Instead, the findings pointed to substantial differences in tumor cell proliferation.

Similar results were observed in bioengineered cardiac tissues exposed to varying degrees of mechanical stress. Tumor cells proliferated under conditions of low mechanical load but ceased proliferating as the mechanical load increased. Tumor growth was lowest in regions exposed to the greatest mechanical stimulation of cardiomyocytes in vitro.

However, the possibility of metabolic competition between cardiac and tumor cells for nutrition was ruled out.

From Mechanics to Genes

Next, we examined the influence of mechanical forces on tumor cell behavior.

Gene expression analyses of both human cardiac metastases and mouse tumor cells showed that mechanical stimulation altered chromatin accessibility through the activation of genes involved in chromatin remodeling. These changes promoted the expression of genes that suppress cell division.

The study also identified Nesprin-2, a part of the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex, which acts as a physical bridge. It is a multitasking protein that connects the cell’s outer structural network (cytoskeleton) to its inner genetic storage (nucleus) and appears to play a significant role in converting mechanical signals into changes in gene expression.

When Nesprin-2 was inactivated, cancer cells resumed proliferation despite exposure to a mechanical load, both in engineered tissues and animal models.

“Collectively, these results shed light on the role of mechanical forces in protecting the heart from cancer and may pave the way to cancer therapies based on mechanical stimulation,” concluded the authors.

An Actively Protected Organ

Speaking with Univadis Italy, part of the Medscape Professional Network, Giorgio Scita, PhD, director of the Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Migration research unit at AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology and professor of general pathology at the University of Milan in Milan, Italy, said, “The study addressed a simple but fundamental question: Why is the heart largely resistant to cancer despite being highly vascularized and continuously exposed to circulating tumor cells?

These findings suggest that the heartbeat itself creates a mechanical environment that is hostile to tumor growth. The compressive forces generated by rhythmic myocardial contraction are sensed by cancer cells and translated into biochemical signals that limit their proliferation.

In this view, the heart is not simply an organ that is unfavorable for cancer growth but a tissue actively protected by its own mechanical forces.”

Speaking with Univadis Italy, Serena Zacchigna, PhD, study coauthor and head of the Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy, said, “Until now, however, attention had focused primarily on signals from the extracellular matrix, such as tissue stiffness. Our study adds a new element: even forces generated directly by the movement of an organ — in this case, cardiac contraction — can influence the growth of cancer cells.”

Beyond the Heart

Scita said the findings have implications that extend well beyond the heart.

“The most significant aspect is that this work identifies tissue mechanics as an active regulator of tumor behavior,” he said. Stiffness, compression, tension, and confinement are not merely consequences of tumor growth, but factors capable of influencing proliferation, invasion, and dormancy.

The concept may apply to many solid tumors. Scita noted that cancer cells growing in confined environments, such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, are exposed to substantial mechanical constraints. Understanding why some tumor cells remain susceptible to these forces whereas others evade them and become invasive remains a major unanswered question in cancer biology.

Research on these mechanisms is expanding internationally and in Italy as well. One example is the AIRC “5 per mille” (5 per thousand) research programs on metastatic disease, which includes projects designed to clarify how the mechanical properties of tumor tissue influence cancer initiation, metastatic spread, and disease progression.

Therapeutic Potential

According to Zacchigna, these findings open 2 principal avenues for future research.

“The first focuses on mechanical stimulation itself. In collaboration with engineers at the University of Siena, including a group led by Domenico Prattichizzo, researchers are developing wearable robotic devices designed to mimic the heartbeat and deliver mechanical stimulation to superficial solid tumors such as certain skin cancers.

The second approach is pharmacology. Researchers are investigating whether epigenetic therapies capable of modifying chromatin remodeling can reproduce the effects of cardiac contraction and suppress tumor cell proliferation.

However, Zacchigna cautioned that this work remains at an early experimental phase.”

However, before therapeutic applications can be pursued, important mechanistic questions remain unanswered.

Zacchigna noted that although the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex and Nesprin-2 are involved in signal transduction leading to chromatin reorganization and activation of cell cycle inhibitory loci, the molecular intermediates involved have yet to be fully defined.

Researchers also need to determine which genes are most critical, whether the mechanism operates across different tumor types, and whether it can be safely manipulated for therapeutic purposes.

In an accompanying commentary published in Science, Wyatt G. Paltzer, PhD, and James F. Martin, MD, from the Department of Integrative Physiology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, noted that the findings suggest enhancing LINC complex activity could potentially suppress tumor growth.

However, because the complex has broad biologic functions, it may prove difficult to target therapeutically. The authors suggested that future studies should focus on identifying proteins that interact with Nesprin-2 or other components of the LINC complex and play a more specific role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.

Looking Ahead

Despite these challenges, Scita said that the study’s conceptual significance is already clear.

“Even if therapeutic applications remain years away, the findings suggest that cancer may one day be targeted by altering how tumor cells perceive and interpret physical forces.”

Scita and Zacchigna reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

This story was translated from Univadis Italy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

The heart is one of the organs least likely to develop cancer, a long-standing biologic puzzle that may now have an explanation. A study published in Science found that the mechanical load generated by the beating heart suppresses tumor cell proliferation through a molecular pathway that alters gene expression, raising the possibility of new therapeutic targets.

Mechanical Protection

Tumors that originate directly in the myocardium are exceptionally rare, occurring in < 1% of autopsies. Even cardiac metastases, which have been reported in up to 18% of autopsies, are often small, asymptomatic, and incidentally discovered. Although this phenomenon has long been recognized, its biologic basis remains unclear.

The heart is notable for its limited capacity for regeneration. After birth, cardiomyocytes stop dividing and subsequently renew at a rate of about 1% per year. However, when the mechanical load is reduced, such as in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices, cardiomyocytes once again show signs of proliferation.

This observation prompted researchers to investigate whether the same mechanical load that restrains normal cardiac cells might also suppress cancer growth.

More Load, Less Growth

To investigate this question, researchers introduced two genetic alterations commonly found in human cancers, activation of the KRAS oncogene and loss of the TP53, into the liver, skeletal muscle, and hearts of mice. Tumors developed in multiple organs, but not in the heart.

The researchers then used a heterotopic heart transplant model in which a donor mouse’s heart is surgically connected to the neck (cervical) or abdominal vessels of a recipient mouse. The transplanted heart remained perfused but lost its normal mechanical loading (constant beating).

When researchers injected lung adenocarcinoma cells into 2 different hearts of the same animal, they observed entirely different outcomes. The cancer cells did not grow in the native mechanically loaded heart. However, the same cells grew rapidly and extensively in the mechanically unloaded transplanted heart.

Tumor cells had replaced nearly all normal tissue in the unloaded heart, whereas they occupied only approximately 20% of the ventricle in the native heart in 14 days. This difference could not be explained by differences in the initial tumor engraftment or cell death. Instead, the findings pointed to substantial differences in tumor cell proliferation.

Similar results were observed in bioengineered cardiac tissues exposed to varying degrees of mechanical stress. Tumor cells proliferated under conditions of low mechanical load but ceased proliferating as the mechanical load increased. Tumor growth was lowest in regions exposed to the greatest mechanical stimulation of cardiomyocytes in vitro.

However, the possibility of metabolic competition between cardiac and tumor cells for nutrition was ruled out.

From Mechanics to Genes

Next, we examined the influence of mechanical forces on tumor cell behavior.

Gene expression analyses of both human cardiac metastases and mouse tumor cells showed that mechanical stimulation altered chromatin accessibility through the activation of genes involved in chromatin remodeling. These changes promoted the expression of genes that suppress cell division.

The study also identified Nesprin-2, a part of the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex, which acts as a physical bridge. It is a multitasking protein that connects the cell’s outer structural network (cytoskeleton) to its inner genetic storage (nucleus) and appears to play a significant role in converting mechanical signals into changes in gene expression.

When Nesprin-2 was inactivated, cancer cells resumed proliferation despite exposure to a mechanical load, both in engineered tissues and animal models.

“Collectively, these results shed light on the role of mechanical forces in protecting the heart from cancer and may pave the way to cancer therapies based on mechanical stimulation,” concluded the authors.

An Actively Protected Organ

Speaking with Univadis Italy, part of the Medscape Professional Network, Giorgio Scita, PhD, director of the Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Migration research unit at AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology and professor of general pathology at the University of Milan in Milan, Italy, said, “The study addressed a simple but fundamental question: Why is the heart largely resistant to cancer despite being highly vascularized and continuously exposed to circulating tumor cells?

These findings suggest that the heartbeat itself creates a mechanical environment that is hostile to tumor growth. The compressive forces generated by rhythmic myocardial contraction are sensed by cancer cells and translated into biochemical signals that limit their proliferation.

In this view, the heart is not simply an organ that is unfavorable for cancer growth but a tissue actively protected by its own mechanical forces.”

Speaking with Univadis Italy, Serena Zacchigna, PhD, study coauthor and head of the Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy, said, “Until now, however, attention had focused primarily on signals from the extracellular matrix, such as tissue stiffness. Our study adds a new element: even forces generated directly by the movement of an organ — in this case, cardiac contraction — can influence the growth of cancer cells.”

Beyond the Heart

Scita said the findings have implications that extend well beyond the heart.

“The most significant aspect is that this work identifies tissue mechanics as an active regulator of tumor behavior,” he said. Stiffness, compression, tension, and confinement are not merely consequences of tumor growth, but factors capable of influencing proliferation, invasion, and dormancy.

The concept may apply to many solid tumors. Scita noted that cancer cells growing in confined environments, such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, are exposed to substantial mechanical constraints. Understanding why some tumor cells remain susceptible to these forces whereas others evade them and become invasive remains a major unanswered question in cancer biology.

Research on these mechanisms is expanding internationally and in Italy as well. One example is the AIRC “5 per mille” (5 per thousand) research programs on metastatic disease, which includes projects designed to clarify how the mechanical properties of tumor tissue influence cancer initiation, metastatic spread, and disease progression.

Therapeutic Potential

According to Zacchigna, these findings open 2 principal avenues for future research.

“The first focuses on mechanical stimulation itself. In collaboration with engineers at the University of Siena, including a group led by Domenico Prattichizzo, researchers are developing wearable robotic devices designed to mimic the heartbeat and deliver mechanical stimulation to superficial solid tumors such as certain skin cancers.

The second approach is pharmacology. Researchers are investigating whether epigenetic therapies capable of modifying chromatin remodeling can reproduce the effects of cardiac contraction and suppress tumor cell proliferation.

However, Zacchigna cautioned that this work remains at an early experimental phase.”

However, before therapeutic applications can be pursued, important mechanistic questions remain unanswered.

Zacchigna noted that although the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex and Nesprin-2 are involved in signal transduction leading to chromatin reorganization and activation of cell cycle inhibitory loci, the molecular intermediates involved have yet to be fully defined.

Researchers also need to determine which genes are most critical, whether the mechanism operates across different tumor types, and whether it can be safely manipulated for therapeutic purposes.

In an accompanying commentary published in Science, Wyatt G. Paltzer, PhD, and James F. Martin, MD, from the Department of Integrative Physiology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, noted that the findings suggest enhancing LINC complex activity could potentially suppress tumor growth.

However, because the complex has broad biologic functions, it may prove difficult to target therapeutically. The authors suggested that future studies should focus on identifying proteins that interact with Nesprin-2 or other components of the LINC complex and play a more specific role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.

Looking Ahead

Despite these challenges, Scita said that the study’s conceptual significance is already clear.

“Even if therapeutic applications remain years away, the findings suggest that cancer may one day be targeted by altering how tumor cells perceive and interpret physical forces.”

Scita and Zacchigna reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

This story was translated from Univadis Italy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Why Does the Heart Rarely Develop Cancer?

Display Headline

Why Does the Heart Rarely Develop Cancer?

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

VA Lags on Cardiac Rehabilitation

Article Type
Changed

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains dramatically underused among US veterans, as < 11% of eligible patients attend a single session and usage appears to be declining over time, a recently published retrospective cohort study reported. 

CR use is much lower among eligible patients across the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compared with Medicare (10.4% vs. 28%, respectively), reported researchers at Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale School of Medicine, in JACC: Advances

The overall CR rate in the VA was lower than the 13.2% reported in a 2018 study. And while there was no significant difference in use between men and women, veterans from the poorest neighborhoods were less likely to take advantage of CR compared with veterans from the wealthiest neighborhoods (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; P < .001).

“As providers, the time to act is now,” Merilyn Varghese, MD, MSc, said in an interview with Federal Practitioner. “We need to urgently get more of our veterans to cardiac rehab.”

As Varghese explained, “CR is a preventive intervention that has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce mortality and hospitalizations for patients with specific cardiac conditions.”

Patients may be eligible if they have experienced myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), heart transplant, valve surgery, stable angina, or stable heart failure. 

“CR combines multiple aspects of cardiac care such as exercise training, medication management, and behavioral assessments,” Varghese said. “For example, patients who have had a heart attack may have challenges in getting back to an exercise routine, managing new medications, and adjusting to life after such an event. CR can help bridge the gap between hospital to home.” In-person CR typically includes 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks.  

In 2024, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported that CR reduces all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.74): “These results support the utilization of CR as a critical element in the management of further secondary prevention of CVDs (cardiovascular diseases).”

Examining VA Data

Researchers conducted the 2026 study “to better understand the current landscape of CR among veterans, particularly among women veterans who comprise a significant part of the veteran population but have previously been underrepresented in research,” Varghese said.

“Women veterans also share a different burden of cardiovascular risk factors, so understanding CR participation among both women and men veterans was of particular interest.”

The study tracked 82,496 VA-enrolled veterans eligible for CR from 2021-2023 (3.6% women). Average age of participants were 64.0 years among women and 71.5 years among men. Among women, 58.3% were White, and 31.8% were Black, and 2.24% were Asian. Among men, 71.9% were White, 18.8% were Black, and 2.3% were Asian. 

The rates of CR participation were low among both men (10.4%) and women (10.2%). Older people and Black patients were less likely to take part in CR than younger people and White patients, according to the study. Those who underwent CABG and PCI were more likely to participate in CR compared with those who had heart attacks only.

As for the gap in use between the wealthiest and poorest neighborhoods, Varghese said: “Area deprivation may compound some of the other barriers to CR access, including transportation difficulties, work responsibilities, and out-of-pocket costs.”

How can CR uptake be improved? “A key first step is understanding who can be referred, and second, to spend time discussing the importance of attending with veterans,” Varghese said. “Studies have shown that provider engagement and championing of CR are important positive facilitators that encourage CR participation.

“The VA has been at the forefront of innovation with the home-based CR program that offers veterans a way to attend CR remotely,” she added. “Expanding such novel methods of CR delivery is likely part of the solution to expand CR access.”

Outside Perspective: Make Referrals the Default

Justin Bachmann, MD, MPH, staff physician and research scientist at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, told Federal Practitioner that CR is an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Class I recommended secondary prevention therapy following MI, PCI, and CABG “with strong evidence for reduced cardiovascular mortality and improved function and quality of life.”

Still, CR “has been persistently underused for decades as travel, cost, scheduling, and uneven geographic capacity create real logistical barriers,” said Bachmann, who serves as the medical director of a VA Office of Rural Health home-based CR program. 

Bachmann praised the study methodology and offered this advice to colleagues: “Embed CR referral in the post-MI, post-PCI, and post-CABG order sets so that referral is the default. Scale home-based CR well beyond the roughly 40 sites where it is currently available, and track facility-level referral and enrollment rates as quality measures.”

Preventive cardiology specialist Randal J. Thomas, MD, professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., echoed the importance of physician referral to Federal Practitioner.

“Patients can’t actually participate [directly] in most programs. They must have a physician referral,” he said. “The physician referral and the strength of referral is key. If a physician says, ‘You can go there if you want, but it’s not that important,’ the patients aren’t going to go.”

Outside Perspective: VA Deserves Blame

“The VA lags far behind most medical systems,” according to Quinn R. Pack, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate. “Some of this is probably the patient population—more mental health problems, more smoking, more disease. But I’d squarely put most of this on the VA health system. They haven’t created the systems of care that make attending cardiac rehabilitation easy, reliable, and consistent.”

He noted that that automatic referral combined with a bedside visit by a liaison such as a representative of a CR program can double or triple enrollment.

“When physicians and nurses really encourage patients to go [to CR], these words are powerful,” Pack said. “When a patient enrolls in cardiac rehabilitation, we help them form new habits of exercise.”

 

No study fundings are reported. The Varghese discloses a relationship with the Veterans Health Administration. Other study authors had no disclosures. Bachmann disclosed a relationship with the VA. Pack and Thomas have no disclosures. 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains dramatically underused among US veterans, as < 11% of eligible patients attend a single session and usage appears to be declining over time, a recently published retrospective cohort study reported. 

CR use is much lower among eligible patients across the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compared with Medicare (10.4% vs. 28%, respectively), reported researchers at Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale School of Medicine, in JACC: Advances

The overall CR rate in the VA was lower than the 13.2% reported in a 2018 study. And while there was no significant difference in use between men and women, veterans from the poorest neighborhoods were less likely to take advantage of CR compared with veterans from the wealthiest neighborhoods (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; P < .001).

“As providers, the time to act is now,” Merilyn Varghese, MD, MSc, said in an interview with Federal Practitioner. “We need to urgently get more of our veterans to cardiac rehab.”

As Varghese explained, “CR is a preventive intervention that has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce mortality and hospitalizations for patients with specific cardiac conditions.”

Patients may be eligible if they have experienced myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), heart transplant, valve surgery, stable angina, or stable heart failure. 

“CR combines multiple aspects of cardiac care such as exercise training, medication management, and behavioral assessments,” Varghese said. “For example, patients who have had a heart attack may have challenges in getting back to an exercise routine, managing new medications, and adjusting to life after such an event. CR can help bridge the gap between hospital to home.” In-person CR typically includes 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks.  

In 2024, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported that CR reduces all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.74): “These results support the utilization of CR as a critical element in the management of further secondary prevention of CVDs (cardiovascular diseases).”

Examining VA Data

Researchers conducted the 2026 study “to better understand the current landscape of CR among veterans, particularly among women veterans who comprise a significant part of the veteran population but have previously been underrepresented in research,” Varghese said.

“Women veterans also share a different burden of cardiovascular risk factors, so understanding CR participation among both women and men veterans was of particular interest.”

The study tracked 82,496 VA-enrolled veterans eligible for CR from 2021-2023 (3.6% women). Average age of participants were 64.0 years among women and 71.5 years among men. Among women, 58.3% were White, and 31.8% were Black, and 2.24% were Asian. Among men, 71.9% were White, 18.8% were Black, and 2.3% were Asian. 

The rates of CR participation were low among both men (10.4%) and women (10.2%). Older people and Black patients were less likely to take part in CR than younger people and White patients, according to the study. Those who underwent CABG and PCI were more likely to participate in CR compared with those who had heart attacks only.

As for the gap in use between the wealthiest and poorest neighborhoods, Varghese said: “Area deprivation may compound some of the other barriers to CR access, including transportation difficulties, work responsibilities, and out-of-pocket costs.”

How can CR uptake be improved? “A key first step is understanding who can be referred, and second, to spend time discussing the importance of attending with veterans,” Varghese said. “Studies have shown that provider engagement and championing of CR are important positive facilitators that encourage CR participation.

“The VA has been at the forefront of innovation with the home-based CR program that offers veterans a way to attend CR remotely,” she added. “Expanding such novel methods of CR delivery is likely part of the solution to expand CR access.”

Outside Perspective: Make Referrals the Default

Justin Bachmann, MD, MPH, staff physician and research scientist at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, told Federal Practitioner that CR is an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Class I recommended secondary prevention therapy following MI, PCI, and CABG “with strong evidence for reduced cardiovascular mortality and improved function and quality of life.”

Still, CR “has been persistently underused for decades as travel, cost, scheduling, and uneven geographic capacity create real logistical barriers,” said Bachmann, who serves as the medical director of a VA Office of Rural Health home-based CR program. 

Bachmann praised the study methodology and offered this advice to colleagues: “Embed CR referral in the post-MI, post-PCI, and post-CABG order sets so that referral is the default. Scale home-based CR well beyond the roughly 40 sites where it is currently available, and track facility-level referral and enrollment rates as quality measures.”

Preventive cardiology specialist Randal J. Thomas, MD, professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., echoed the importance of physician referral to Federal Practitioner.

“Patients can’t actually participate [directly] in most programs. They must have a physician referral,” he said. “The physician referral and the strength of referral is key. If a physician says, ‘You can go there if you want, but it’s not that important,’ the patients aren’t going to go.”

Outside Perspective: VA Deserves Blame

“The VA lags far behind most medical systems,” according to Quinn R. Pack, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate. “Some of this is probably the patient population—more mental health problems, more smoking, more disease. But I’d squarely put most of this on the VA health system. They haven’t created the systems of care that make attending cardiac rehabilitation easy, reliable, and consistent.”

He noted that that automatic referral combined with a bedside visit by a liaison such as a representative of a CR program can double or triple enrollment.

“When physicians and nurses really encourage patients to go [to CR], these words are powerful,” Pack said. “When a patient enrolls in cardiac rehabilitation, we help them form new habits of exercise.”

 

No study fundings are reported. The Varghese discloses a relationship with the Veterans Health Administration. Other study authors had no disclosures. Bachmann disclosed a relationship with the VA. Pack and Thomas have no disclosures. 

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains dramatically underused among US veterans, as < 11% of eligible patients attend a single session and usage appears to be declining over time, a recently published retrospective cohort study reported. 

CR use is much lower among eligible patients across the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compared with Medicare (10.4% vs. 28%, respectively), reported researchers at Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale School of Medicine, in JACC: Advances

The overall CR rate in the VA was lower than the 13.2% reported in a 2018 study. And while there was no significant difference in use between men and women, veterans from the poorest neighborhoods were less likely to take advantage of CR compared with veterans from the wealthiest neighborhoods (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; P < .001).

“As providers, the time to act is now,” Merilyn Varghese, MD, MSc, said in an interview with Federal Practitioner. “We need to urgently get more of our veterans to cardiac rehab.”

As Varghese explained, “CR is a preventive intervention that has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce mortality and hospitalizations for patients with specific cardiac conditions.”

Patients may be eligible if they have experienced myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), heart transplant, valve surgery, stable angina, or stable heart failure. 

“CR combines multiple aspects of cardiac care such as exercise training, medication management, and behavioral assessments,” Varghese said. “For example, patients who have had a heart attack may have challenges in getting back to an exercise routine, managing new medications, and adjusting to life after such an event. CR can help bridge the gap between hospital to home.” In-person CR typically includes 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks.  

In 2024, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported that CR reduces all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.74): “These results support the utilization of CR as a critical element in the management of further secondary prevention of CVDs (cardiovascular diseases).”

Examining VA Data

Researchers conducted the 2026 study “to better understand the current landscape of CR among veterans, particularly among women veterans who comprise a significant part of the veteran population but have previously been underrepresented in research,” Varghese said.

“Women veterans also share a different burden of cardiovascular risk factors, so understanding CR participation among both women and men veterans was of particular interest.”

The study tracked 82,496 VA-enrolled veterans eligible for CR from 2021-2023 (3.6% women). Average age of participants were 64.0 years among women and 71.5 years among men. Among women, 58.3% were White, and 31.8% were Black, and 2.24% were Asian. Among men, 71.9% were White, 18.8% were Black, and 2.3% were Asian. 

The rates of CR participation were low among both men (10.4%) and women (10.2%). Older people and Black patients were less likely to take part in CR than younger people and White patients, according to the study. Those who underwent CABG and PCI were more likely to participate in CR compared with those who had heart attacks only.

As for the gap in use between the wealthiest and poorest neighborhoods, Varghese said: “Area deprivation may compound some of the other barriers to CR access, including transportation difficulties, work responsibilities, and out-of-pocket costs.”

How can CR uptake be improved? “A key first step is understanding who can be referred, and second, to spend time discussing the importance of attending with veterans,” Varghese said. “Studies have shown that provider engagement and championing of CR are important positive facilitators that encourage CR participation.

“The VA has been at the forefront of innovation with the home-based CR program that offers veterans a way to attend CR remotely,” she added. “Expanding such novel methods of CR delivery is likely part of the solution to expand CR access.”

Outside Perspective: Make Referrals the Default

Justin Bachmann, MD, MPH, staff physician and research scientist at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, told Federal Practitioner that CR is an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Class I recommended secondary prevention therapy following MI, PCI, and CABG “with strong evidence for reduced cardiovascular mortality and improved function and quality of life.”

Still, CR “has been persistently underused for decades as travel, cost, scheduling, and uneven geographic capacity create real logistical barriers,” said Bachmann, who serves as the medical director of a VA Office of Rural Health home-based CR program. 

Bachmann praised the study methodology and offered this advice to colleagues: “Embed CR referral in the post-MI, post-PCI, and post-CABG order sets so that referral is the default. Scale home-based CR well beyond the roughly 40 sites where it is currently available, and track facility-level referral and enrollment rates as quality measures.”

Preventive cardiology specialist Randal J. Thomas, MD, professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., echoed the importance of physician referral to Federal Practitioner.

“Patients can’t actually participate [directly] in most programs. They must have a physician referral,” he said. “The physician referral and the strength of referral is key. If a physician says, ‘You can go there if you want, but it’s not that important,’ the patients aren’t going to go.”

Outside Perspective: VA Deserves Blame

“The VA lags far behind most medical systems,” according to Quinn R. Pack, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate. “Some of this is probably the patient population—more mental health problems, more smoking, more disease. But I’d squarely put most of this on the VA health system. They haven’t created the systems of care that make attending cardiac rehabilitation easy, reliable, and consistent.”

He noted that that automatic referral combined with a bedside visit by a liaison such as a representative of a CR program can double or triple enrollment.

“When physicians and nurses really encourage patients to go [to CR], these words are powerful,” Pack said. “When a patient enrolls in cardiac rehabilitation, we help them form new habits of exercise.”

 

No study fundings are reported. The Varghese discloses a relationship with the Veterans Health Administration. Other study authors had no disclosures. Bachmann disclosed a relationship with the VA. Pack and Thomas have no disclosures. 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

Lifestyle Habits Can Amplify GLP-1 Heart Protection in T2D

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Lifestyle Habits Can Amplify GLP-1 Heart Protection in T2D

TOPLINE:

Among US veterans with type 2 diabetes (T2D), adherence to 6 to 8 healthy lifestyle factors combined with GLP‑1 receptor agonist (RA) use was associated with a notably lower risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than adherence to three or fewer lifestyle factors without GLP‑1 therapy.

METHODOLOGY:

  • GLP-1 RAs help manage cardiovascular risk in patients with T2D; however, lifestyle change remains the foundation of diabetes care. The long-term combined effect of these drugs together with a healthy lifestyle on MACE is not fully understood.
  • Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 98,261 US veterans with T2D between January 2011 and September 2023, with a follow-up duration of 632,543 person-years, to examine the combined impact of GLP-1 RA use and adherence to eight lifestyle habits on cardiovascular outcomes.
  • The 8 low-risk lifestyle habits assessed were healthy eating, regular physical activity (≥ 7.5 metabolic equivalent hours/week), nonsmoking, restful sleep (7-9 hours/day), no or moderate alcohol intake (absence of frequent heavy drinking), good stress management, strong social connection and support, and no opioid use disorder.
  • GLP‑1 RA use was ascertained from Veterans Health Administration pharmacy records. The primary outcome was MACE, defined as nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Participants adhering to all 8 low-risk lifestyle habits had a 60% lower risk for MACE than those adhering to ≤ 1 (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; P < .0001).
  • All 8 low-risk lifestyle factors were independently associated with a lower risk for MACE, with no opioid use disorder showing the strongest association (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs had a 16% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy and receiving usual care (multivariable-adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs who also adhered to 6 to 8 low-risk lifestyle factors had a 43% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy who adhered to three or fewer lifestyle factors (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71).

IN PRACTICE:

"In a healthcare landscape, in which GLP-1 [RAs] remain costly and access is uneven, the additive benefit of lifestyle adherence highlighted by this study has important implications for health equity, resource allocation, and the long-term sustainability of diabetes care," experts noted in an accompanying editorial.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Xuan-Mai T. Nguyen, MD, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine in Los Angeles. It was published online in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

LIMITATIONS:

The analyses were based on Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data, and healthcare use outside this system was only incompletely captured. The estimation was based on observational data in which lifestyle factors were assessed at baseline. The cohort consisted of predominantly male veterans, which might limit generalizability to other populations.

DISCLOSURES:

The study used data from the Million Veteran Program (MVP) and was supported by Veterans Affairs MVP awards, along with additional support from other sources. One author reported receiving consulting fees, speaker honoraria, meeting/travel support; participation on advisory boards; and ownership of stock or stock options from certain companies in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Another author reported receiving a research grant from a consulting/analysis firm.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

TOPLINE:

Among US veterans with type 2 diabetes (T2D), adherence to 6 to 8 healthy lifestyle factors combined with GLP‑1 receptor agonist (RA) use was associated with a notably lower risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than adherence to three or fewer lifestyle factors without GLP‑1 therapy.

METHODOLOGY:

  • GLP-1 RAs help manage cardiovascular risk in patients with T2D; however, lifestyle change remains the foundation of diabetes care. The long-term combined effect of these drugs together with a healthy lifestyle on MACE is not fully understood.
  • Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 98,261 US veterans with T2D between January 2011 and September 2023, with a follow-up duration of 632,543 person-years, to examine the combined impact of GLP-1 RA use and adherence to eight lifestyle habits on cardiovascular outcomes.
  • The 8 low-risk lifestyle habits assessed were healthy eating, regular physical activity (≥ 7.5 metabolic equivalent hours/week), nonsmoking, restful sleep (7-9 hours/day), no or moderate alcohol intake (absence of frequent heavy drinking), good stress management, strong social connection and support, and no opioid use disorder.
  • GLP‑1 RA use was ascertained from Veterans Health Administration pharmacy records. The primary outcome was MACE, defined as nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Participants adhering to all 8 low-risk lifestyle habits had a 60% lower risk for MACE than those adhering to ≤ 1 (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; P < .0001).
  • All 8 low-risk lifestyle factors were independently associated with a lower risk for MACE, with no opioid use disorder showing the strongest association (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs had a 16% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy and receiving usual care (multivariable-adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs who also adhered to 6 to 8 low-risk lifestyle factors had a 43% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy who adhered to three or fewer lifestyle factors (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71).

IN PRACTICE:

"In a healthcare landscape, in which GLP-1 [RAs] remain costly and access is uneven, the additive benefit of lifestyle adherence highlighted by this study has important implications for health equity, resource allocation, and the long-term sustainability of diabetes care," experts noted in an accompanying editorial.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Xuan-Mai T. Nguyen, MD, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine in Los Angeles. It was published online in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

LIMITATIONS:

The analyses were based on Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data, and healthcare use outside this system was only incompletely captured. The estimation was based on observational data in which lifestyle factors were assessed at baseline. The cohort consisted of predominantly male veterans, which might limit generalizability to other populations.

DISCLOSURES:

The study used data from the Million Veteran Program (MVP) and was supported by Veterans Affairs MVP awards, along with additional support from other sources. One author reported receiving consulting fees, speaker honoraria, meeting/travel support; participation on advisory boards; and ownership of stock or stock options from certain companies in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Another author reported receiving a research grant from a consulting/analysis firm.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

TOPLINE:

Among US veterans with type 2 diabetes (T2D), adherence to 6 to 8 healthy lifestyle factors combined with GLP‑1 receptor agonist (RA) use was associated with a notably lower risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than adherence to three or fewer lifestyle factors without GLP‑1 therapy.

METHODOLOGY:

  • GLP-1 RAs help manage cardiovascular risk in patients with T2D; however, lifestyle change remains the foundation of diabetes care. The long-term combined effect of these drugs together with a healthy lifestyle on MACE is not fully understood.
  • Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 98,261 US veterans with T2D between January 2011 and September 2023, with a follow-up duration of 632,543 person-years, to examine the combined impact of GLP-1 RA use and adherence to eight lifestyle habits on cardiovascular outcomes.
  • The 8 low-risk lifestyle habits assessed were healthy eating, regular physical activity (≥ 7.5 metabolic equivalent hours/week), nonsmoking, restful sleep (7-9 hours/day), no or moderate alcohol intake (absence of frequent heavy drinking), good stress management, strong social connection and support, and no opioid use disorder.
  • GLP‑1 RA use was ascertained from Veterans Health Administration pharmacy records. The primary outcome was MACE, defined as nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Participants adhering to all 8 low-risk lifestyle habits had a 60% lower risk for MACE than those adhering to ≤ 1 (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; P < .0001).
  • All 8 low-risk lifestyle factors were independently associated with a lower risk for MACE, with no opioid use disorder showing the strongest association (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs had a 16% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy and receiving usual care (multivariable-adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92).
  • Participants using GLP-1 RAs who also adhered to 6 to 8 low-risk lifestyle factors had a 43% lower risk for MACE than those not receiving GLP-1 therapy who adhered to three or fewer lifestyle factors (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71).

IN PRACTICE:

"In a healthcare landscape, in which GLP-1 [RAs] remain costly and access is uneven, the additive benefit of lifestyle adherence highlighted by this study has important implications for health equity, resource allocation, and the long-term sustainability of diabetes care," experts noted in an accompanying editorial.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Xuan-Mai T. Nguyen, MD, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine in Los Angeles. It was published online in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

LIMITATIONS:

The analyses were based on Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data, and healthcare use outside this system was only incompletely captured. The estimation was based on observational data in which lifestyle factors were assessed at baseline. The cohort consisted of predominantly male veterans, which might limit generalizability to other populations.

DISCLOSURES:

The study used data from the Million Veteran Program (MVP) and was supported by Veterans Affairs MVP awards, along with additional support from other sources. One author reported receiving consulting fees, speaker honoraria, meeting/travel support; participation on advisory boards; and ownership of stock or stock options from certain companies in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Another author reported receiving a research grant from a consulting/analysis firm.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Lifestyle Habits Can Amplify GLP-1 Heart Protection in T2D

Display Headline

Lifestyle Habits Can Amplify GLP-1 Heart Protection in T2D

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

GLP-1s Lower Risk of SUDs in VA Studies

Article Type
Changed

Two studies published in March by researchers at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System highlight the clinical significance of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) and their impact on reducing substance use disorder (SUD) risks. The studies also explore the impact of GLP-1 discontinuation or interruption on their effectiveness in protection against the cardiovascular events.

In one study, Al-Aly et al assigned 606,434 veterans with type 2 diabetes to 1 of 2 protocols, comparing GLP-1s with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and followed the patients for up to 3 years. Al-Aly et al found that GLP-1s were “consistently associated” with a lower risk of developing SUDs, including those involving alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, and opioids. The findings suggested “potential preventive effects across a broad range of addictive substances.”

In participants with pre-existing SUDs, GLP-1s were also associated with reduced risks of SUD-related emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality, in addition to drug overdoses and suicidal behaviors. A study published in 2025 from the same research group reported that GLP-1s could have a variety of health benefits, including reducing the risk of incident alcohol and cannabis disorders, neurocognitive disorders (such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia), coagulation disorders, cardiometabolic disorders, infectious illnesses and several respiratory conditions, but less was known about the potential for preventing development of opioid use disorder and other SUDs. 

GLP-1s target the brain’s reward pathways and have recently made attention-grabbing headlines regarding celebrity weight loss, with social media boosting public interest. One study, for example, found 100 videos on TikTok with the #Ozempic viewed nearly 70 million times.

Al-Aly et al used SGLT-2 inhibitors as active comparators because “they have no established direct actions on mesolimbic reward circuits in the brain, whereas GLP-1 receptors are present in areas of the brain involved in impulse control and reward signaling.”

The second study found that quitting or pausing GLP-1 treatment for 6 months could have a rebound effect and possibly reverse any progress. Discontinuing GLP-1 treatment is common, with rates ranging from 36% to 81% in the first year. Stopping or interrupting the treatment is often followed by weight regain and a rebound in inflammation, both major drivers in cardiovascular disease risk. 

The study followed 132,551 VA patients using GLP-1s and 201,136 using sulfonylureas from 2017 through 2023. About two-thirds of participants took semaglutide, prescribed as Ozempic to treat diabetes and Wegovy to reduce obesity. A total of 26% of the participants stopped GLP-1 treatment during the follow-up period, with 64% occurring during the first year. Most (67%) treatment interruptions also came in the first year.

Compared with incident use of sulfonylureas, incident use of GLP-1s was associated with a reduced risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Patients who took the GLP-1s without interruption > 3 years experienced an 18% lower risk for heart attack or stroke.  

Cardiovascular benefits accumulated with continuous use over 3 years, but even brief periods of discontinuations or interruptions could progressively erode and ultimately reverse this protection, the researchers found. Discontinuing treatment for half a year was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (incidence risk ratio [IRR], 1.04), while longer gaps were progressively associated with a higher risk of disease (IRR, 1.12 for 1 year; IRR, 1.16 for 2 years of interrupted use, respectively).

Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a study author and Chief of the Research and Education Service at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System, called it “metabolic whiplash.” In an interview, he said it was important to caution patients that these medications “need to be taken for the long haul. This is not something (patients) can take for a month or 2 or 3 and get off of it. It's not going to work like that.”

Publications
Topics
Sections

Two studies published in March by researchers at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System highlight the clinical significance of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) and their impact on reducing substance use disorder (SUD) risks. The studies also explore the impact of GLP-1 discontinuation or interruption on their effectiveness in protection against the cardiovascular events.

In one study, Al-Aly et al assigned 606,434 veterans with type 2 diabetes to 1 of 2 protocols, comparing GLP-1s with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and followed the patients for up to 3 years. Al-Aly et al found that GLP-1s were “consistently associated” with a lower risk of developing SUDs, including those involving alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, and opioids. The findings suggested “potential preventive effects across a broad range of addictive substances.”

In participants with pre-existing SUDs, GLP-1s were also associated with reduced risks of SUD-related emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality, in addition to drug overdoses and suicidal behaviors. A study published in 2025 from the same research group reported that GLP-1s could have a variety of health benefits, including reducing the risk of incident alcohol and cannabis disorders, neurocognitive disorders (such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia), coagulation disorders, cardiometabolic disorders, infectious illnesses and several respiratory conditions, but less was known about the potential for preventing development of opioid use disorder and other SUDs. 

GLP-1s target the brain’s reward pathways and have recently made attention-grabbing headlines regarding celebrity weight loss, with social media boosting public interest. One study, for example, found 100 videos on TikTok with the #Ozempic viewed nearly 70 million times.

Al-Aly et al used SGLT-2 inhibitors as active comparators because “they have no established direct actions on mesolimbic reward circuits in the brain, whereas GLP-1 receptors are present in areas of the brain involved in impulse control and reward signaling.”

The second study found that quitting or pausing GLP-1 treatment for 6 months could have a rebound effect and possibly reverse any progress. Discontinuing GLP-1 treatment is common, with rates ranging from 36% to 81% in the first year. Stopping or interrupting the treatment is often followed by weight regain and a rebound in inflammation, both major drivers in cardiovascular disease risk. 

The study followed 132,551 VA patients using GLP-1s and 201,136 using sulfonylureas from 2017 through 2023. About two-thirds of participants took semaglutide, prescribed as Ozempic to treat diabetes and Wegovy to reduce obesity. A total of 26% of the participants stopped GLP-1 treatment during the follow-up period, with 64% occurring during the first year. Most (67%) treatment interruptions also came in the first year.

Compared with incident use of sulfonylureas, incident use of GLP-1s was associated with a reduced risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Patients who took the GLP-1s without interruption > 3 years experienced an 18% lower risk for heart attack or stroke.  

Cardiovascular benefits accumulated with continuous use over 3 years, but even brief periods of discontinuations or interruptions could progressively erode and ultimately reverse this protection, the researchers found. Discontinuing treatment for half a year was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (incidence risk ratio [IRR], 1.04), while longer gaps were progressively associated with a higher risk of disease (IRR, 1.12 for 1 year; IRR, 1.16 for 2 years of interrupted use, respectively).

Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a study author and Chief of the Research and Education Service at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System, called it “metabolic whiplash.” In an interview, he said it was important to caution patients that these medications “need to be taken for the long haul. This is not something (patients) can take for a month or 2 or 3 and get off of it. It's not going to work like that.”

Two studies published in March by researchers at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System highlight the clinical significance of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) and their impact on reducing substance use disorder (SUD) risks. The studies also explore the impact of GLP-1 discontinuation or interruption on their effectiveness in protection against the cardiovascular events.

In one study, Al-Aly et al assigned 606,434 veterans with type 2 diabetes to 1 of 2 protocols, comparing GLP-1s with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and followed the patients for up to 3 years. Al-Aly et al found that GLP-1s were “consistently associated” with a lower risk of developing SUDs, including those involving alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, and opioids. The findings suggested “potential preventive effects across a broad range of addictive substances.”

In participants with pre-existing SUDs, GLP-1s were also associated with reduced risks of SUD-related emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality, in addition to drug overdoses and suicidal behaviors. A study published in 2025 from the same research group reported that GLP-1s could have a variety of health benefits, including reducing the risk of incident alcohol and cannabis disorders, neurocognitive disorders (such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia), coagulation disorders, cardiometabolic disorders, infectious illnesses and several respiratory conditions, but less was known about the potential for preventing development of opioid use disorder and other SUDs. 

GLP-1s target the brain’s reward pathways and have recently made attention-grabbing headlines regarding celebrity weight loss, with social media boosting public interest. One study, for example, found 100 videos on TikTok with the #Ozempic viewed nearly 70 million times.

Al-Aly et al used SGLT-2 inhibitors as active comparators because “they have no established direct actions on mesolimbic reward circuits in the brain, whereas GLP-1 receptors are present in areas of the brain involved in impulse control and reward signaling.”

The second study found that quitting or pausing GLP-1 treatment for 6 months could have a rebound effect and possibly reverse any progress. Discontinuing GLP-1 treatment is common, with rates ranging from 36% to 81% in the first year. Stopping or interrupting the treatment is often followed by weight regain and a rebound in inflammation, both major drivers in cardiovascular disease risk. 

The study followed 132,551 VA patients using GLP-1s and 201,136 using sulfonylureas from 2017 through 2023. About two-thirds of participants took semaglutide, prescribed as Ozempic to treat diabetes and Wegovy to reduce obesity. A total of 26% of the participants stopped GLP-1 treatment during the follow-up period, with 64% occurring during the first year. Most (67%) treatment interruptions also came in the first year.

Compared with incident use of sulfonylureas, incident use of GLP-1s was associated with a reduced risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Patients who took the GLP-1s without interruption > 3 years experienced an 18% lower risk for heart attack or stroke.  

Cardiovascular benefits accumulated with continuous use over 3 years, but even brief periods of discontinuations or interruptions could progressively erode and ultimately reverse this protection, the researchers found. Discontinuing treatment for half a year was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (incidence risk ratio [IRR], 1.04), while longer gaps were progressively associated with a higher risk of disease (IRR, 1.12 for 1 year; IRR, 1.16 for 2 years of interrupted use, respectively).

Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a study author and Chief of the Research and Education Service at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Healthcare System, called it “metabolic whiplash.” In an interview, he said it was important to caution patients that these medications “need to be taken for the long haul. This is not something (patients) can take for a month or 2 or 3 and get off of it. It's not going to work like that.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

Veterans Face Long Delays in ATTR-CM Diagnosis After HF

Article Type
Changed

TOPLINE:

Veterans received a diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) a median of 490 days after heart failure (HF) diagnosis. Those who had atrial fibrillationcoronary artery disease, or chronic kidney disease experienced longer diagnostic delays, whereas older or Black patients experienced shorter delays.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the US Veterans Health Administration to quantify the time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis and identify predictors of delays in diagnosis.
  • They included veterans with HF and incident ATTR-CM diagnosed between 2016 and 2022; these veterans were identified using an algorithm based on diagnoses and medications.
  • The final analysis included 2557 veterans, with a median age of 80.5 years; 99.5% were men, and 56.3% were White individuals.
  • Assessments captured the time from the first HF diagnosis, the first outpatient prescription for a loop diuretic, and the first hospitalization for HF to the first ATTR-CM diagnosis, along with demographics and comorbidities.
  • The primary outcome was the number of days from incident HF diagnosis to incident ATTR-CM diagnosis; a delay of > 6 months was considered meaningful.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The median time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 490 days. Overall, 65% of veterans experienced diagnostic delays > 6 months, and > 25% had delays longer than 3 years.
  • Factors associated with a shorter time to ATTR-CM diagnosis included Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88) and older age (aOR per 10 years, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73).
  • The likelihood of longer diagnostic delays was higher in patients with coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.64) and chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.15). Those with atrial fibrillation were more likely to have longer delays, although the lower bound of 95% CI was borderline (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.45).
  • Among veterans with prior prescriptions of loop diuretics, the median time from the first prescription to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 835 days. Among those with a prior hospitalization for HF, the median time from hospitalization to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 300 days.

IN PRACTICE:

“This study supports the need for increased testing for ATTR-CM, thorough evaluation of cardiomyopathy etiologies at the time of HF diagnosis, and the need for new interventions that shorten the diagnostic delay in ATTR-CM,” the researchers reported.

SOURCE:

This study was led by Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, MD, MSc, of Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, California. It was published online on JACC .

LIMITATIONS:

The analysis was limited to veterans engaged long enough for diagnoses of both HF and ATTR-CM. The findings may not be generalized to women given the predominantly male cohort. Echocardiography and ATTR subtype or genetic data were unavailable.

DISCLOSURES:

This study received funding from AstraZeneca. Four authors reported being the employees and stockholders of AstraZeneca. Several authors reported receiving research funding, consulting fees, and/or having equity in multiple pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, including Novo Nordisk, Bridge Bio, and Pfizer. Two authors reported receiving support from the American Heart Association, with one of them also receiving support from the National Institutes of Health.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

TOPLINE:

Veterans received a diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) a median of 490 days after heart failure (HF) diagnosis. Those who had atrial fibrillationcoronary artery disease, or chronic kidney disease experienced longer diagnostic delays, whereas older or Black patients experienced shorter delays.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the US Veterans Health Administration to quantify the time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis and identify predictors of delays in diagnosis.
  • They included veterans with HF and incident ATTR-CM diagnosed between 2016 and 2022; these veterans were identified using an algorithm based on diagnoses and medications.
  • The final analysis included 2557 veterans, with a median age of 80.5 years; 99.5% were men, and 56.3% were White individuals.
  • Assessments captured the time from the first HF diagnosis, the first outpatient prescription for a loop diuretic, and the first hospitalization for HF to the first ATTR-CM diagnosis, along with demographics and comorbidities.
  • The primary outcome was the number of days from incident HF diagnosis to incident ATTR-CM diagnosis; a delay of > 6 months was considered meaningful.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The median time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 490 days. Overall, 65% of veterans experienced diagnostic delays > 6 months, and > 25% had delays longer than 3 years.
  • Factors associated with a shorter time to ATTR-CM diagnosis included Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88) and older age (aOR per 10 years, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73).
  • The likelihood of longer diagnostic delays was higher in patients with coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.64) and chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.15). Those with atrial fibrillation were more likely to have longer delays, although the lower bound of 95% CI was borderline (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.45).
  • Among veterans with prior prescriptions of loop diuretics, the median time from the first prescription to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 835 days. Among those with a prior hospitalization for HF, the median time from hospitalization to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 300 days.

IN PRACTICE:

“This study supports the need for increased testing for ATTR-CM, thorough evaluation of cardiomyopathy etiologies at the time of HF diagnosis, and the need for new interventions that shorten the diagnostic delay in ATTR-CM,” the researchers reported.

SOURCE:

This study was led by Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, MD, MSc, of Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, California. It was published online on JACC .

LIMITATIONS:

The analysis was limited to veterans engaged long enough for diagnoses of both HF and ATTR-CM. The findings may not be generalized to women given the predominantly male cohort. Echocardiography and ATTR subtype or genetic data were unavailable.

DISCLOSURES:

This study received funding from AstraZeneca. Four authors reported being the employees and stockholders of AstraZeneca. Several authors reported receiving research funding, consulting fees, and/or having equity in multiple pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, including Novo Nordisk, Bridge Bio, and Pfizer. Two authors reported receiving support from the American Heart Association, with one of them also receiving support from the National Institutes of Health.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

TOPLINE:

Veterans received a diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) a median of 490 days after heart failure (HF) diagnosis. Those who had atrial fibrillationcoronary artery disease, or chronic kidney disease experienced longer diagnostic delays, whereas older or Black patients experienced shorter delays.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the US Veterans Health Administration to quantify the time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis and identify predictors of delays in diagnosis.
  • They included veterans with HF and incident ATTR-CM diagnosed between 2016 and 2022; these veterans were identified using an algorithm based on diagnoses and medications.
  • The final analysis included 2557 veterans, with a median age of 80.5 years; 99.5% were men, and 56.3% were White individuals.
  • Assessments captured the time from the first HF diagnosis, the first outpatient prescription for a loop diuretic, and the first hospitalization for HF to the first ATTR-CM diagnosis, along with demographics and comorbidities.
  • The primary outcome was the number of days from incident HF diagnosis to incident ATTR-CM diagnosis; a delay of > 6 months was considered meaningful.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The median time from HF diagnosis to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 490 days. Overall, 65% of veterans experienced diagnostic delays > 6 months, and > 25% had delays longer than 3 years.
  • Factors associated with a shorter time to ATTR-CM diagnosis included Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88) and older age (aOR per 10 years, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73).
  • The likelihood of longer diagnostic delays was higher in patients with coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.64) and chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.15). Those with atrial fibrillation were more likely to have longer delays, although the lower bound of 95% CI was borderline (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.45).
  • Among veterans with prior prescriptions of loop diuretics, the median time from the first prescription to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 835 days. Among those with a prior hospitalization for HF, the median time from hospitalization to ATTR-CM diagnosis was 300 days.

IN PRACTICE:

“This study supports the need for increased testing for ATTR-CM, thorough evaluation of cardiomyopathy etiologies at the time of HF diagnosis, and the need for new interventions that shorten the diagnostic delay in ATTR-CM,” the researchers reported.

SOURCE:

This study was led by Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, MD, MSc, of Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, California. It was published online on JACC .

LIMITATIONS:

The analysis was limited to veterans engaged long enough for diagnoses of both HF and ATTR-CM. The findings may not be generalized to women given the predominantly male cohort. Echocardiography and ATTR subtype or genetic data were unavailable.

DISCLOSURES:

This study received funding from AstraZeneca. Four authors reported being the employees and stockholders of AstraZeneca. Several authors reported receiving research funding, consulting fees, and/or having equity in multiple pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, including Novo Nordisk, Bridge Bio, and Pfizer. Two authors reported receiving support from the American Heart Association, with one of them also receiving support from the National Institutes of Health.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date

Following the Hyperkalemia Trail: A Case Report of ECG Changes and Treatment Responses

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

Following the Hyperkalemia Trail: A Case Report of ECG Changes and Treatment Responses

Hyperkalemia involves elevated serum potassium levels (> 5.0 mEq/L) and represents an important electrolyte disturbance due to its potentially severe consequences, including cardiac effects that can lead to dysrhythmia and even asystole and death.1,2 In a US Medicare population, the prevalence of hyperkalemia has been estimated at 2.7% and is associated with substantial health care costs.3 The prevalence is even more marked in patients with preexisting conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure.4,5

Hyperkalemia can result from multiple factors, including impaired renal function, adrenal disease, adverse drug reactions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and other medications, and heritable mutations.6 Hyperkalemia poses a considerable clinical risk, associated with adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction and increased mortality in patients with CKD.5,7,8 Electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with hyperkalemia play a vital role in guiding clinical decisions and treatment strategies.9 Understanding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and consequences of hyperkalemia, as well as the significance of ECG changes in its management, is essential for health care practitioners.

Case Presentation

An 81-year-old Hispanic man with a history of hypertension, hypothyroidism, gout, and CKD stage 3B presented to the emergency department with progressive weakness resulting in falls and culminating in an inability to ambulate independently. Additional symptoms included nausea, diarrhea, and myalgia. His vital signs were notable for a pulse of 41 beats/min. The physical examination was remarkable for significant weakness of the bilateral upper extremities, inability to bear his own weight, and bilateral lower extremity edema. His initial ECG upon arrival showed bradycardia with wide QRS, absent P waves, and peaked T waves (Figure 1a). These findings differed from his baseline ECG taken 1 year earlier, which showed sinus rhythm with premature atrial complexes and an old right bundle branch block (Figure 1b).

FDP04212468_F1

Medication review revealed that the patient was currently prescribed 100 mg allopurinol daily, 2.5 mg amlodipine daily, 10 mg atorvastatin at bedtime, 4 mg doxazosin daily, 112 mcg levothyroxine daily, 100 mg losartan daily, 25 mg metoprolol daily, and 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily. The patient had also been taking over-the-counter indomethacin for knee pain.

Based on the ECG results, he was treated with 0.083%/6 mL nebulized albuterol, 4.65 Mq/250 mL saline solution intravenous (IV) calcium gluconate, 10 units IV insulin with concomitant 50%/25 mL IV dextrose and 8.4 g of oral patiromer suspension. IV furosemide was held due to concern for renal function. The decision to proceed with hemodialysis was made. Repeat laboratory tests were performed, and an ECG obtained after treatment initiation but prior to hemodialysis demonstrated improvement of rate and T wave shortening (Figure 1c). The serum potassium level dropped from 9.8 mEq/L to 7.9 mEq/L (reference range, 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) (Table 1).

FDP04212468_T1

In addition to hemodialysis, sodium zirconium 10 g orally 3 times daily was added. Laboratory test results and an ECG was performed after dialysis continued to demonstrate improvement (Figure 1d). The patient’s potassium level decreased to 5.8 mEq/L, with the ECG demonstrating stability of heart rate and further improvement of the PR interval, QRS complex, and T waves.

Despite the established treatment regimen, potassium levels again rose to 6.7 mEq/L, but there were no significant changes in the ECG, and thus no medication changes were made (Figure 1e). Subsequent monitoring demonstrated a further increase in potassium to 7.4 mEq/L, with an ECG demonstrating a return to the baseline of 1 year prior. The patient underwent hemodialysis again and was given oral furosemide 60 mg every 12 hours. The potassium concentration after dialysis decreased to 4.7 mEq/L and remained stable, not going above 5.0 mEq/L on subsequent monitoring. The patient had resolution of all symptoms and was discharged.

Discussion

We have described in detail the presentation of each pathology and mechanisms of each treatment, starting with the patient’s initial condition that brought him to the emergency room—muscle weakness. Skeletal muscle weakness is a common manifestation of hyperkalemia, occurring in 20% to 40% of cases, and is more prevalent in severe elevations of potassium. Rarely, the weakness can progress to flaccid paralysis of the patient’s extremities and, in extreme cases, the diaphragm.

Muscle weakness progression occurs in a manner that resembles Guillain-Barré syndrome, starting in the lower extremities and ascending toward the upper extremities.10 This is known as secondary hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. Hyperkalemia lowers the transmembrane gradient in neurons, leading to neuronal depolarization independent of the degree of hyperkalemia. If the degree of hyperkalemia is large enough, this depolarization inactivates voltage-gated sodium channels, making neurons refractory to excitation. Electromyographical studies have shown reduction in the compounded muscle action potential.11 The transient nature of this paralysis is reflected by rapid correction of weakness and paralysis when the electrolyte disorder is corrected.

The patient in this case also presented with bradycardia. The ECG manifestations of hyperkalemia can include atrial asystole, intraventricular conduction disturbances, peaked T waves, and widened QRS complexes. However, some patients with renal insufficiency may not exhibit ECG changes despite significantly elevated serum potassium levels.12

The severity of hyperkalemia is crucial in determining the associated ECG changes, with levels > 6.0 mEq/L presenting with abnormalities.13 ECG findings alone may not always accurately reflect the severity of hyperkalemia, as up to 60% of patients with potassium levels > 6.0 mEq/L may not show ECG changes.14 Additionally, extreme hyperkalemia can lead to inconsistent ECG findings, making it challenging to rely solely on ECG for diagnosis and monitoring.8 The level of potassium that causes these effects varies widely through patient populations.

The main mechanism by which hyperkalemia affects the heart’s conduction system is through voltage differences across the conduction fibers and eventual steady-state inactivation of sodium channels. This combination of mechanisms shortens the action potential duration, allowing more cardiomyocytes to undergo synchronized depolarization. This amalgamation of cardiomyocytes repolarizing can be reflected on ECGs as peaked T waves. As the action potential decreases, there is a period during which cardiomyocytes are prone to tachyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation.

A reduced action potential may lead to increased rates of depolarization and thus conduction, which in some scenarios may increase heart rate. As the levels of potassium rise, intracellular accumulation impedes the entry of sodium by decreasing the cation gradient across the cell membrane. This effectively slows the sinus nodes and prolongs the QRS by slowing the overall propagation of action potentials. By this mechanism, conduction delays, blocks, or asystole are manifested. The patient in this case showed conduction delays, peaked T waves, and disappearance of P waves when he first arrived.

Hyperkalemia Treatment

Hyperkalemia develops most commonly due to acute or chronic kidney diseases, as was the case with this patient. The patient’s hyperkalemia was also augmented by the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which can directly affect renal function. A properly functioning kidney is responsible for excretion of up to 90% of ingested potassium, while the remainder is excreted through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Definitive treatment of hyperkalemia is mitigated primarily through these 2 organ systems. The treatment also includes transitory mechanisms of potassium reduction. The goal of each method is to preserve the action potential of cardiomyocytes and myocytes. This patient presented with acute symptomatic hyperkalemia and received various medications to acutely, transitorily, and definitively treat it.

Initial therapy included calcium gluconate, which functions to stabilize the myocardial cell membrane. Hyperkalemia decreases the resting membrane action potential of excitable cells and predisposes them to early depolarization and thus dysrhythmias. Calcium decreases the threshold potential across cells and offsets the overall gradient back to near normal levels.15 Calcium can be delivered through calcium gluconate or calcium chloride. Calcium chloride is not preferred because extravasation can cause pain, blistering and tissue ischemia. Central venous access is required, potentially delaying prompt treatment. Calcium acts rapidly after administration—within 1 to 3 minutes—but only lasts 30 to 60 minutes.16 Administration of calcium gluconate can be repeated as often as necessary, but patients must be monitored for adverse effects of calcium such as nausea, abdominal pain, polydipsia, polyuria, muscle weakness, and paresthesia. Care must be taken when patients are taking digoxin, because calcium may potentiate toxicity.17 Although calcium provides immediate benefits it does little to correct the underlying cause; other medications are required to remove potassium from the body.

Two medication classes have been proven to shift potassium intracellularly. The first are β-2 agonists, such as albuterol/levalbuterol, and the second is insulin. Both work through sodium-potassium-ATPase in a direct manner. β-2 agonists stimulate sodium-potassium-ATPase to move more potassium intracellularly, but these effects have been seen only with high doses of albuterol, typically 4× the standard dose of 0.5 mg in nebulized solutions to achieve decreases in potassium of 0.3 to 0.6 mEq/L, although some trials have reported decreases of 0.62 to 0.98 mEq/L.15,18 These potassium-lowering effects of β-2 agonist are modest, but can be seen 20 to 30 minutes after administration and persist up to 1 to 2 hours. β-2 agonists are also readily affected by β blockers, which may reduce or negate the desired effect in hyperkalemia. For these reasons, a β-2 agonist should not be given as monotherapy and should be provided as an adjuvant to more independent therapies such as insulin. Insulin binds to receptors on muscle cells and increases the quantity of sodium-potassium-ATPase and glucose transporters. With this increase in influx pumps, surrounding tissues with higher resting membrane potentials can absorb the potassium load, thereby protecting cardiomyocytes.

Potassium Removal

Three methods are currently available to remove potassium from the body: GI excretion, renal excretion, and direct removal from the bloodstream. Under normal physiologic conditions, the kidneys account for about 90% of the body’s ability to remove potassium. Loop diuretics facilitate the removal of potassium by increasing urine production and have an additional potassium-wasting effect. Although the onset of action of loop diuretics is typically 30 to 60 minutes after oral administration, their effect can last for several hours. In this patient, furosemide was introduced later in the treatment plan to manage recurring hyperkalemia by enhancing renal potassium excretion.

Potassium binders such as patiromer act in the GI tract, effectively reducing serum potassium levels although with a slower onset of action than furosemide, generally taking hours to days to exert its effect. Both medications illustrate a tailored approach to managing potassium levels, adapted to the evolving needs and renal function of the patient. The last method is using hemodialysis—by far the most rapid method to remove potassium, but also the most invasive. The different methods of treating hyperkalemia are summarized in Table 2. This patient required multiple days of hemodialysis to completely correct the electrolyte disorder. Upon discharge, the patient continued oral furosemide 40 mg daily and eventually discontinued hemodialysis due to stable renal function.

FDP04212468_T2

Often, after correcting an inciting event, potassium stores in the body eventually stabilize and do not require additional follow-up. Patients prone to hyperkalemia should be thoroughly educated on medications to avoid (NSAIDs, ACEIs/ARBs, trimethoprim), an adequate low potassium diet, and symptoms that may warrant medical attention.19

Conclusions

This case illustrates the importance of recognizing the spectrum of manifestations of hyperkalemia, which ranged from muscle weakness to cardiac dysrhythmias. Management strategies for the patient included stabilization of cardiac membranes, potassium shifting, and potassium removal, each tailored to the patient’s individual clinical findings.

The case further illustrates the critical role of continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment of therapeutic strategies in response to evolving clinical and laboratory findings. The initial and subsequent ECGs, alongside laboratory tests, were instrumental in guiding the adjustments needed in the treatment regimen, ensuring both the efficacy and safety of the interventions. This proactive approach can mitigate the risk of recurrent hyperkalemia and its complications.

References
  1. Youn JH, McDonough AA. Recent advances in understanding integrative control of potassium homeostasis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:381-401. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163241 2.
  2. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Farrell MW. Hyperkalemia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; September 4, 2023. Accessed October 22, 2025.
  3. Mu F, Betts KA, Woolley JM, et al. Prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36:1333-1341. doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1775072
  4. Loutradis C, Tolika P, Skodra A, et al. Prevalence of hyperkalemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a nested case-control study. Am J Nephrol. 2015;42:351-360. doi:10.1159/000442393
  5. Grodzinsky A, Goyal A, Gosch K, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of hyperkalemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2016;129:858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.03.008
  6. Hunter RW, Bailey MA. Hyperkalemia: pathophysiology, risk factors and consequences. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(suppl 3):iii2-iii11. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz206
  7. Luo J, Brunelli SM, Jensen DE, Yang A. Association between serum potassium and outcomes in patients with reduced kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:90-100. doi:10.2215/CJN.01730215
  8. Montford JR, Linas S. How dangerous is hyperkalemia? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:3155-3165. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016121344
  9. Mattu A, Brady WJ, Robinson DA. Electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:721-729. doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.7344
  10. Kimmons LA, Usery JB. Acute ascending muscle weakness secondary to medication-induced hyperkalemia. Case Rep Med. 2014;2014:789529. doi:10.1155/2014/789529
  11. Naik KR, Saroja AO, Khanpet MS. Reversible electrophysiological abnormalities in acute secondary hyperkalemic paralysis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15:339-343. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.104354
  12. Montague BT, Ouellette JR, Buller GK. Retrospective review of the frequency of ECG changes in hyperkalemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:324-330. doi:10.2215/CJN.04611007
  13. Larivée NL, Michaud JB, More KM, Wilson JA, Tennankore KK. Hyperkalemia: prevalence, predictors and emerging treatments. Cardiol Ther. 2023;12:35-63. doi:10.1007/s40119-022-00289-z
  14. Shingarev R, Allon M. A physiologic-based approach to the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:578-584. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.014
  15. Parham WA, Mehdirad AA, Biermann KM, Fredman CS. Hyperkalemia revisited. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33:40-47.
  16. Ng KE, Lee CS. Updated treatment options in the management of hyperkalemia. U.S. Pharmacist. February 16, 2017. Accessed October 1, 2025. www.uspharmacist.com/article/updated-treatment-options-in-the-management-of-hyperkalemia
  17. Quick G, Bastani B. Prolonged asystolic hyperkalemic cardiac arrest with no neurologic sequelae. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:305-311. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70144-x 18.
  18. Allon M, Dunlay R, Copkney C. Nebulized albuterol for acute hyperkalemia in patients on hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:426-429. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-110-6-42619.
  19. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4 suppl):S117-S314. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Juan Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; Luis Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; William Rodriguez-Cintron, MDa

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Verbal informed consent was provided by the patient in accordance with Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System protocol.

Correspondence: Juan Irizarry-Nieves (juanzarry@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0658

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
468-473
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Juan Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; Luis Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; William Rodriguez-Cintron, MDa

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Verbal informed consent was provided by the patient in accordance with Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System protocol.

Correspondence: Juan Irizarry-Nieves (juanzarry@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0658

Author and Disclosure Information

Juan Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; Luis Irizarry-Nieves, MDa; William Rodriguez-Cintron, MDa

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Verbal informed consent was provided by the patient in accordance with Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System protocol.

Correspondence: Juan Irizarry-Nieves (juanzarry@gmail.com)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(12). Published online December 15. doi:10.12788/fp.0658

Article PDF
Article PDF

Hyperkalemia involves elevated serum potassium levels (> 5.0 mEq/L) and represents an important electrolyte disturbance due to its potentially severe consequences, including cardiac effects that can lead to dysrhythmia and even asystole and death.1,2 In a US Medicare population, the prevalence of hyperkalemia has been estimated at 2.7% and is associated with substantial health care costs.3 The prevalence is even more marked in patients with preexisting conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure.4,5

Hyperkalemia can result from multiple factors, including impaired renal function, adrenal disease, adverse drug reactions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and other medications, and heritable mutations.6 Hyperkalemia poses a considerable clinical risk, associated with adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction and increased mortality in patients with CKD.5,7,8 Electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with hyperkalemia play a vital role in guiding clinical decisions and treatment strategies.9 Understanding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and consequences of hyperkalemia, as well as the significance of ECG changes in its management, is essential for health care practitioners.

Case Presentation

An 81-year-old Hispanic man with a history of hypertension, hypothyroidism, gout, and CKD stage 3B presented to the emergency department with progressive weakness resulting in falls and culminating in an inability to ambulate independently. Additional symptoms included nausea, diarrhea, and myalgia. His vital signs were notable for a pulse of 41 beats/min. The physical examination was remarkable for significant weakness of the bilateral upper extremities, inability to bear his own weight, and bilateral lower extremity edema. His initial ECG upon arrival showed bradycardia with wide QRS, absent P waves, and peaked T waves (Figure 1a). These findings differed from his baseline ECG taken 1 year earlier, which showed sinus rhythm with premature atrial complexes and an old right bundle branch block (Figure 1b).

FDP04212468_F1

Medication review revealed that the patient was currently prescribed 100 mg allopurinol daily, 2.5 mg amlodipine daily, 10 mg atorvastatin at bedtime, 4 mg doxazosin daily, 112 mcg levothyroxine daily, 100 mg losartan daily, 25 mg metoprolol daily, and 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily. The patient had also been taking over-the-counter indomethacin for knee pain.

Based on the ECG results, he was treated with 0.083%/6 mL nebulized albuterol, 4.65 Mq/250 mL saline solution intravenous (IV) calcium gluconate, 10 units IV insulin with concomitant 50%/25 mL IV dextrose and 8.4 g of oral patiromer suspension. IV furosemide was held due to concern for renal function. The decision to proceed with hemodialysis was made. Repeat laboratory tests were performed, and an ECG obtained after treatment initiation but prior to hemodialysis demonstrated improvement of rate and T wave shortening (Figure 1c). The serum potassium level dropped from 9.8 mEq/L to 7.9 mEq/L (reference range, 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) (Table 1).

FDP04212468_T1

In addition to hemodialysis, sodium zirconium 10 g orally 3 times daily was added. Laboratory test results and an ECG was performed after dialysis continued to demonstrate improvement (Figure 1d). The patient’s potassium level decreased to 5.8 mEq/L, with the ECG demonstrating stability of heart rate and further improvement of the PR interval, QRS complex, and T waves.

Despite the established treatment regimen, potassium levels again rose to 6.7 mEq/L, but there were no significant changes in the ECG, and thus no medication changes were made (Figure 1e). Subsequent monitoring demonstrated a further increase in potassium to 7.4 mEq/L, with an ECG demonstrating a return to the baseline of 1 year prior. The patient underwent hemodialysis again and was given oral furosemide 60 mg every 12 hours. The potassium concentration after dialysis decreased to 4.7 mEq/L and remained stable, not going above 5.0 mEq/L on subsequent monitoring. The patient had resolution of all symptoms and was discharged.

Discussion

We have described in detail the presentation of each pathology and mechanisms of each treatment, starting with the patient’s initial condition that brought him to the emergency room—muscle weakness. Skeletal muscle weakness is a common manifestation of hyperkalemia, occurring in 20% to 40% of cases, and is more prevalent in severe elevations of potassium. Rarely, the weakness can progress to flaccid paralysis of the patient’s extremities and, in extreme cases, the diaphragm.

Muscle weakness progression occurs in a manner that resembles Guillain-Barré syndrome, starting in the lower extremities and ascending toward the upper extremities.10 This is known as secondary hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. Hyperkalemia lowers the transmembrane gradient in neurons, leading to neuronal depolarization independent of the degree of hyperkalemia. If the degree of hyperkalemia is large enough, this depolarization inactivates voltage-gated sodium channels, making neurons refractory to excitation. Electromyographical studies have shown reduction in the compounded muscle action potential.11 The transient nature of this paralysis is reflected by rapid correction of weakness and paralysis when the electrolyte disorder is corrected.

The patient in this case also presented with bradycardia. The ECG manifestations of hyperkalemia can include atrial asystole, intraventricular conduction disturbances, peaked T waves, and widened QRS complexes. However, some patients with renal insufficiency may not exhibit ECG changes despite significantly elevated serum potassium levels.12

The severity of hyperkalemia is crucial in determining the associated ECG changes, with levels > 6.0 mEq/L presenting with abnormalities.13 ECG findings alone may not always accurately reflect the severity of hyperkalemia, as up to 60% of patients with potassium levels > 6.0 mEq/L may not show ECG changes.14 Additionally, extreme hyperkalemia can lead to inconsistent ECG findings, making it challenging to rely solely on ECG for diagnosis and monitoring.8 The level of potassium that causes these effects varies widely through patient populations.

The main mechanism by which hyperkalemia affects the heart’s conduction system is through voltage differences across the conduction fibers and eventual steady-state inactivation of sodium channels. This combination of mechanisms shortens the action potential duration, allowing more cardiomyocytes to undergo synchronized depolarization. This amalgamation of cardiomyocytes repolarizing can be reflected on ECGs as peaked T waves. As the action potential decreases, there is a period during which cardiomyocytes are prone to tachyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation.

A reduced action potential may lead to increased rates of depolarization and thus conduction, which in some scenarios may increase heart rate. As the levels of potassium rise, intracellular accumulation impedes the entry of sodium by decreasing the cation gradient across the cell membrane. This effectively slows the sinus nodes and prolongs the QRS by slowing the overall propagation of action potentials. By this mechanism, conduction delays, blocks, or asystole are manifested. The patient in this case showed conduction delays, peaked T waves, and disappearance of P waves when he first arrived.

Hyperkalemia Treatment

Hyperkalemia develops most commonly due to acute or chronic kidney diseases, as was the case with this patient. The patient’s hyperkalemia was also augmented by the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which can directly affect renal function. A properly functioning kidney is responsible for excretion of up to 90% of ingested potassium, while the remainder is excreted through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Definitive treatment of hyperkalemia is mitigated primarily through these 2 organ systems. The treatment also includes transitory mechanisms of potassium reduction. The goal of each method is to preserve the action potential of cardiomyocytes and myocytes. This patient presented with acute symptomatic hyperkalemia and received various medications to acutely, transitorily, and definitively treat it.

Initial therapy included calcium gluconate, which functions to stabilize the myocardial cell membrane. Hyperkalemia decreases the resting membrane action potential of excitable cells and predisposes them to early depolarization and thus dysrhythmias. Calcium decreases the threshold potential across cells and offsets the overall gradient back to near normal levels.15 Calcium can be delivered through calcium gluconate or calcium chloride. Calcium chloride is not preferred because extravasation can cause pain, blistering and tissue ischemia. Central venous access is required, potentially delaying prompt treatment. Calcium acts rapidly after administration—within 1 to 3 minutes—but only lasts 30 to 60 minutes.16 Administration of calcium gluconate can be repeated as often as necessary, but patients must be monitored for adverse effects of calcium such as nausea, abdominal pain, polydipsia, polyuria, muscle weakness, and paresthesia. Care must be taken when patients are taking digoxin, because calcium may potentiate toxicity.17 Although calcium provides immediate benefits it does little to correct the underlying cause; other medications are required to remove potassium from the body.

Two medication classes have been proven to shift potassium intracellularly. The first are β-2 agonists, such as albuterol/levalbuterol, and the second is insulin. Both work through sodium-potassium-ATPase in a direct manner. β-2 agonists stimulate sodium-potassium-ATPase to move more potassium intracellularly, but these effects have been seen only with high doses of albuterol, typically 4× the standard dose of 0.5 mg in nebulized solutions to achieve decreases in potassium of 0.3 to 0.6 mEq/L, although some trials have reported decreases of 0.62 to 0.98 mEq/L.15,18 These potassium-lowering effects of β-2 agonist are modest, but can be seen 20 to 30 minutes after administration and persist up to 1 to 2 hours. β-2 agonists are also readily affected by β blockers, which may reduce or negate the desired effect in hyperkalemia. For these reasons, a β-2 agonist should not be given as monotherapy and should be provided as an adjuvant to more independent therapies such as insulin. Insulin binds to receptors on muscle cells and increases the quantity of sodium-potassium-ATPase and glucose transporters. With this increase in influx pumps, surrounding tissues with higher resting membrane potentials can absorb the potassium load, thereby protecting cardiomyocytes.

Potassium Removal

Three methods are currently available to remove potassium from the body: GI excretion, renal excretion, and direct removal from the bloodstream. Under normal physiologic conditions, the kidneys account for about 90% of the body’s ability to remove potassium. Loop diuretics facilitate the removal of potassium by increasing urine production and have an additional potassium-wasting effect. Although the onset of action of loop diuretics is typically 30 to 60 minutes after oral administration, their effect can last for several hours. In this patient, furosemide was introduced later in the treatment plan to manage recurring hyperkalemia by enhancing renal potassium excretion.

Potassium binders such as patiromer act in the GI tract, effectively reducing serum potassium levels although with a slower onset of action than furosemide, generally taking hours to days to exert its effect. Both medications illustrate a tailored approach to managing potassium levels, adapted to the evolving needs and renal function of the patient. The last method is using hemodialysis—by far the most rapid method to remove potassium, but also the most invasive. The different methods of treating hyperkalemia are summarized in Table 2. This patient required multiple days of hemodialysis to completely correct the electrolyte disorder. Upon discharge, the patient continued oral furosemide 40 mg daily and eventually discontinued hemodialysis due to stable renal function.

FDP04212468_T2

Often, after correcting an inciting event, potassium stores in the body eventually stabilize and do not require additional follow-up. Patients prone to hyperkalemia should be thoroughly educated on medications to avoid (NSAIDs, ACEIs/ARBs, trimethoprim), an adequate low potassium diet, and symptoms that may warrant medical attention.19

Conclusions

This case illustrates the importance of recognizing the spectrum of manifestations of hyperkalemia, which ranged from muscle weakness to cardiac dysrhythmias. Management strategies for the patient included stabilization of cardiac membranes, potassium shifting, and potassium removal, each tailored to the patient’s individual clinical findings.

The case further illustrates the critical role of continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment of therapeutic strategies in response to evolving clinical and laboratory findings. The initial and subsequent ECGs, alongside laboratory tests, were instrumental in guiding the adjustments needed in the treatment regimen, ensuring both the efficacy and safety of the interventions. This proactive approach can mitigate the risk of recurrent hyperkalemia and its complications.

Hyperkalemia involves elevated serum potassium levels (> 5.0 mEq/L) and represents an important electrolyte disturbance due to its potentially severe consequences, including cardiac effects that can lead to dysrhythmia and even asystole and death.1,2 In a US Medicare population, the prevalence of hyperkalemia has been estimated at 2.7% and is associated with substantial health care costs.3 The prevalence is even more marked in patients with preexisting conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure.4,5

Hyperkalemia can result from multiple factors, including impaired renal function, adrenal disease, adverse drug reactions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and other medications, and heritable mutations.6 Hyperkalemia poses a considerable clinical risk, associated with adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction and increased mortality in patients with CKD.5,7,8 Electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with hyperkalemia play a vital role in guiding clinical decisions and treatment strategies.9 Understanding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and consequences of hyperkalemia, as well as the significance of ECG changes in its management, is essential for health care practitioners.

Case Presentation

An 81-year-old Hispanic man with a history of hypertension, hypothyroidism, gout, and CKD stage 3B presented to the emergency department with progressive weakness resulting in falls and culminating in an inability to ambulate independently. Additional symptoms included nausea, diarrhea, and myalgia. His vital signs were notable for a pulse of 41 beats/min. The physical examination was remarkable for significant weakness of the bilateral upper extremities, inability to bear his own weight, and bilateral lower extremity edema. His initial ECG upon arrival showed bradycardia with wide QRS, absent P waves, and peaked T waves (Figure 1a). These findings differed from his baseline ECG taken 1 year earlier, which showed sinus rhythm with premature atrial complexes and an old right bundle branch block (Figure 1b).

FDP04212468_F1

Medication review revealed that the patient was currently prescribed 100 mg allopurinol daily, 2.5 mg amlodipine daily, 10 mg atorvastatin at bedtime, 4 mg doxazosin daily, 112 mcg levothyroxine daily, 100 mg losartan daily, 25 mg metoprolol daily, and 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily. The patient had also been taking over-the-counter indomethacin for knee pain.

Based on the ECG results, he was treated with 0.083%/6 mL nebulized albuterol, 4.65 Mq/250 mL saline solution intravenous (IV) calcium gluconate, 10 units IV insulin with concomitant 50%/25 mL IV dextrose and 8.4 g of oral patiromer suspension. IV furosemide was held due to concern for renal function. The decision to proceed with hemodialysis was made. Repeat laboratory tests were performed, and an ECG obtained after treatment initiation but prior to hemodialysis demonstrated improvement of rate and T wave shortening (Figure 1c). The serum potassium level dropped from 9.8 mEq/L to 7.9 mEq/L (reference range, 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) (Table 1).

FDP04212468_T1

In addition to hemodialysis, sodium zirconium 10 g orally 3 times daily was added. Laboratory test results and an ECG was performed after dialysis continued to demonstrate improvement (Figure 1d). The patient’s potassium level decreased to 5.8 mEq/L, with the ECG demonstrating stability of heart rate and further improvement of the PR interval, QRS complex, and T waves.

Despite the established treatment regimen, potassium levels again rose to 6.7 mEq/L, but there were no significant changes in the ECG, and thus no medication changes were made (Figure 1e). Subsequent monitoring demonstrated a further increase in potassium to 7.4 mEq/L, with an ECG demonstrating a return to the baseline of 1 year prior. The patient underwent hemodialysis again and was given oral furosemide 60 mg every 12 hours. The potassium concentration after dialysis decreased to 4.7 mEq/L and remained stable, not going above 5.0 mEq/L on subsequent monitoring. The patient had resolution of all symptoms and was discharged.

Discussion

We have described in detail the presentation of each pathology and mechanisms of each treatment, starting with the patient’s initial condition that brought him to the emergency room—muscle weakness. Skeletal muscle weakness is a common manifestation of hyperkalemia, occurring in 20% to 40% of cases, and is more prevalent in severe elevations of potassium. Rarely, the weakness can progress to flaccid paralysis of the patient’s extremities and, in extreme cases, the diaphragm.

Muscle weakness progression occurs in a manner that resembles Guillain-Barré syndrome, starting in the lower extremities and ascending toward the upper extremities.10 This is known as secondary hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. Hyperkalemia lowers the transmembrane gradient in neurons, leading to neuronal depolarization independent of the degree of hyperkalemia. If the degree of hyperkalemia is large enough, this depolarization inactivates voltage-gated sodium channels, making neurons refractory to excitation. Electromyographical studies have shown reduction in the compounded muscle action potential.11 The transient nature of this paralysis is reflected by rapid correction of weakness and paralysis when the electrolyte disorder is corrected.

The patient in this case also presented with bradycardia. The ECG manifestations of hyperkalemia can include atrial asystole, intraventricular conduction disturbances, peaked T waves, and widened QRS complexes. However, some patients with renal insufficiency may not exhibit ECG changes despite significantly elevated serum potassium levels.12

The severity of hyperkalemia is crucial in determining the associated ECG changes, with levels > 6.0 mEq/L presenting with abnormalities.13 ECG findings alone may not always accurately reflect the severity of hyperkalemia, as up to 60% of patients with potassium levels > 6.0 mEq/L may not show ECG changes.14 Additionally, extreme hyperkalemia can lead to inconsistent ECG findings, making it challenging to rely solely on ECG for diagnosis and monitoring.8 The level of potassium that causes these effects varies widely through patient populations.

The main mechanism by which hyperkalemia affects the heart’s conduction system is through voltage differences across the conduction fibers and eventual steady-state inactivation of sodium channels. This combination of mechanisms shortens the action potential duration, allowing more cardiomyocytes to undergo synchronized depolarization. This amalgamation of cardiomyocytes repolarizing can be reflected on ECGs as peaked T waves. As the action potential decreases, there is a period during which cardiomyocytes are prone to tachyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation.

A reduced action potential may lead to increased rates of depolarization and thus conduction, which in some scenarios may increase heart rate. As the levels of potassium rise, intracellular accumulation impedes the entry of sodium by decreasing the cation gradient across the cell membrane. This effectively slows the sinus nodes and prolongs the QRS by slowing the overall propagation of action potentials. By this mechanism, conduction delays, blocks, or asystole are manifested. The patient in this case showed conduction delays, peaked T waves, and disappearance of P waves when he first arrived.

Hyperkalemia Treatment

Hyperkalemia develops most commonly due to acute or chronic kidney diseases, as was the case with this patient. The patient’s hyperkalemia was also augmented by the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which can directly affect renal function. A properly functioning kidney is responsible for excretion of up to 90% of ingested potassium, while the remainder is excreted through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Definitive treatment of hyperkalemia is mitigated primarily through these 2 organ systems. The treatment also includes transitory mechanisms of potassium reduction. The goal of each method is to preserve the action potential of cardiomyocytes and myocytes. This patient presented with acute symptomatic hyperkalemia and received various medications to acutely, transitorily, and definitively treat it.

Initial therapy included calcium gluconate, which functions to stabilize the myocardial cell membrane. Hyperkalemia decreases the resting membrane action potential of excitable cells and predisposes them to early depolarization and thus dysrhythmias. Calcium decreases the threshold potential across cells and offsets the overall gradient back to near normal levels.15 Calcium can be delivered through calcium gluconate or calcium chloride. Calcium chloride is not preferred because extravasation can cause pain, blistering and tissue ischemia. Central venous access is required, potentially delaying prompt treatment. Calcium acts rapidly after administration—within 1 to 3 minutes—but only lasts 30 to 60 minutes.16 Administration of calcium gluconate can be repeated as often as necessary, but patients must be monitored for adverse effects of calcium such as nausea, abdominal pain, polydipsia, polyuria, muscle weakness, and paresthesia. Care must be taken when patients are taking digoxin, because calcium may potentiate toxicity.17 Although calcium provides immediate benefits it does little to correct the underlying cause; other medications are required to remove potassium from the body.

Two medication classes have been proven to shift potassium intracellularly. The first are β-2 agonists, such as albuterol/levalbuterol, and the second is insulin. Both work through sodium-potassium-ATPase in a direct manner. β-2 agonists stimulate sodium-potassium-ATPase to move more potassium intracellularly, but these effects have been seen only with high doses of albuterol, typically 4× the standard dose of 0.5 mg in nebulized solutions to achieve decreases in potassium of 0.3 to 0.6 mEq/L, although some trials have reported decreases of 0.62 to 0.98 mEq/L.15,18 These potassium-lowering effects of β-2 agonist are modest, but can be seen 20 to 30 minutes after administration and persist up to 1 to 2 hours. β-2 agonists are also readily affected by β blockers, which may reduce or negate the desired effect in hyperkalemia. For these reasons, a β-2 agonist should not be given as monotherapy and should be provided as an adjuvant to more independent therapies such as insulin. Insulin binds to receptors on muscle cells and increases the quantity of sodium-potassium-ATPase and glucose transporters. With this increase in influx pumps, surrounding tissues with higher resting membrane potentials can absorb the potassium load, thereby protecting cardiomyocytes.

Potassium Removal

Three methods are currently available to remove potassium from the body: GI excretion, renal excretion, and direct removal from the bloodstream. Under normal physiologic conditions, the kidneys account for about 90% of the body’s ability to remove potassium. Loop diuretics facilitate the removal of potassium by increasing urine production and have an additional potassium-wasting effect. Although the onset of action of loop diuretics is typically 30 to 60 minutes after oral administration, their effect can last for several hours. In this patient, furosemide was introduced later in the treatment plan to manage recurring hyperkalemia by enhancing renal potassium excretion.

Potassium binders such as patiromer act in the GI tract, effectively reducing serum potassium levels although with a slower onset of action than furosemide, generally taking hours to days to exert its effect. Both medications illustrate a tailored approach to managing potassium levels, adapted to the evolving needs and renal function of the patient. The last method is using hemodialysis—by far the most rapid method to remove potassium, but also the most invasive. The different methods of treating hyperkalemia are summarized in Table 2. This patient required multiple days of hemodialysis to completely correct the electrolyte disorder. Upon discharge, the patient continued oral furosemide 40 mg daily and eventually discontinued hemodialysis due to stable renal function.

FDP04212468_T2

Often, after correcting an inciting event, potassium stores in the body eventually stabilize and do not require additional follow-up. Patients prone to hyperkalemia should be thoroughly educated on medications to avoid (NSAIDs, ACEIs/ARBs, trimethoprim), an adequate low potassium diet, and symptoms that may warrant medical attention.19

Conclusions

This case illustrates the importance of recognizing the spectrum of manifestations of hyperkalemia, which ranged from muscle weakness to cardiac dysrhythmias. Management strategies for the patient included stabilization of cardiac membranes, potassium shifting, and potassium removal, each tailored to the patient’s individual clinical findings.

The case further illustrates the critical role of continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment of therapeutic strategies in response to evolving clinical and laboratory findings. The initial and subsequent ECGs, alongside laboratory tests, were instrumental in guiding the adjustments needed in the treatment regimen, ensuring both the efficacy and safety of the interventions. This proactive approach can mitigate the risk of recurrent hyperkalemia and its complications.

References
  1. Youn JH, McDonough AA. Recent advances in understanding integrative control of potassium homeostasis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:381-401. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163241 2.
  2. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Farrell MW. Hyperkalemia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; September 4, 2023. Accessed October 22, 2025.
  3. Mu F, Betts KA, Woolley JM, et al. Prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36:1333-1341. doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1775072
  4. Loutradis C, Tolika P, Skodra A, et al. Prevalence of hyperkalemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a nested case-control study. Am J Nephrol. 2015;42:351-360. doi:10.1159/000442393
  5. Grodzinsky A, Goyal A, Gosch K, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of hyperkalemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2016;129:858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.03.008
  6. Hunter RW, Bailey MA. Hyperkalemia: pathophysiology, risk factors and consequences. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(suppl 3):iii2-iii11. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz206
  7. Luo J, Brunelli SM, Jensen DE, Yang A. Association between serum potassium and outcomes in patients with reduced kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:90-100. doi:10.2215/CJN.01730215
  8. Montford JR, Linas S. How dangerous is hyperkalemia? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:3155-3165. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016121344
  9. Mattu A, Brady WJ, Robinson DA. Electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:721-729. doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.7344
  10. Kimmons LA, Usery JB. Acute ascending muscle weakness secondary to medication-induced hyperkalemia. Case Rep Med. 2014;2014:789529. doi:10.1155/2014/789529
  11. Naik KR, Saroja AO, Khanpet MS. Reversible electrophysiological abnormalities in acute secondary hyperkalemic paralysis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15:339-343. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.104354
  12. Montague BT, Ouellette JR, Buller GK. Retrospective review of the frequency of ECG changes in hyperkalemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:324-330. doi:10.2215/CJN.04611007
  13. Larivée NL, Michaud JB, More KM, Wilson JA, Tennankore KK. Hyperkalemia: prevalence, predictors and emerging treatments. Cardiol Ther. 2023;12:35-63. doi:10.1007/s40119-022-00289-z
  14. Shingarev R, Allon M. A physiologic-based approach to the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:578-584. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.014
  15. Parham WA, Mehdirad AA, Biermann KM, Fredman CS. Hyperkalemia revisited. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33:40-47.
  16. Ng KE, Lee CS. Updated treatment options in the management of hyperkalemia. U.S. Pharmacist. February 16, 2017. Accessed October 1, 2025. www.uspharmacist.com/article/updated-treatment-options-in-the-management-of-hyperkalemia
  17. Quick G, Bastani B. Prolonged asystolic hyperkalemic cardiac arrest with no neurologic sequelae. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:305-311. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70144-x 18.
  18. Allon M, Dunlay R, Copkney C. Nebulized albuterol for acute hyperkalemia in patients on hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:426-429. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-110-6-42619.
  19. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4 suppl):S117-S314. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
References
  1. Youn JH, McDonough AA. Recent advances in understanding integrative control of potassium homeostasis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:381-401. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163241 2.
  2. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Farrell MW. Hyperkalemia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; September 4, 2023. Accessed October 22, 2025.
  3. Mu F, Betts KA, Woolley JM, et al. Prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36:1333-1341. doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1775072
  4. Loutradis C, Tolika P, Skodra A, et al. Prevalence of hyperkalemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a nested case-control study. Am J Nephrol. 2015;42:351-360. doi:10.1159/000442393
  5. Grodzinsky A, Goyal A, Gosch K, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of hyperkalemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2016;129:858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.03.008
  6. Hunter RW, Bailey MA. Hyperkalemia: pathophysiology, risk factors and consequences. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(suppl 3):iii2-iii11. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz206
  7. Luo J, Brunelli SM, Jensen DE, Yang A. Association between serum potassium and outcomes in patients with reduced kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:90-100. doi:10.2215/CJN.01730215
  8. Montford JR, Linas S. How dangerous is hyperkalemia? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:3155-3165. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016121344
  9. Mattu A, Brady WJ, Robinson DA. Electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:721-729. doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.7344
  10. Kimmons LA, Usery JB. Acute ascending muscle weakness secondary to medication-induced hyperkalemia. Case Rep Med. 2014;2014:789529. doi:10.1155/2014/789529
  11. Naik KR, Saroja AO, Khanpet MS. Reversible electrophysiological abnormalities in acute secondary hyperkalemic paralysis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15:339-343. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.104354
  12. Montague BT, Ouellette JR, Buller GK. Retrospective review of the frequency of ECG changes in hyperkalemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:324-330. doi:10.2215/CJN.04611007
  13. Larivée NL, Michaud JB, More KM, Wilson JA, Tennankore KK. Hyperkalemia: prevalence, predictors and emerging treatments. Cardiol Ther. 2023;12:35-63. doi:10.1007/s40119-022-00289-z
  14. Shingarev R, Allon M. A physiologic-based approach to the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:578-584. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.014
  15. Parham WA, Mehdirad AA, Biermann KM, Fredman CS. Hyperkalemia revisited. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33:40-47.
  16. Ng KE, Lee CS. Updated treatment options in the management of hyperkalemia. U.S. Pharmacist. February 16, 2017. Accessed October 1, 2025. www.uspharmacist.com/article/updated-treatment-options-in-the-management-of-hyperkalemia
  17. Quick G, Bastani B. Prolonged asystolic hyperkalemic cardiac arrest with no neurologic sequelae. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:305-311. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70144-x 18.
  18. Allon M, Dunlay R, Copkney C. Nebulized albuterol for acute hyperkalemia in patients on hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:426-429. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-110-6-42619.
  19. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4 suppl):S117-S314. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(12)
Page Number
468-473
Page Number
468-473
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Following the Hyperkalemia Trail: A Case Report of ECG Changes and Treatment Responses

Display Headline

Following the Hyperkalemia Trail: A Case Report of ECG Changes and Treatment Responses

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date