Postoperative adjuvant TACE efficacy in HCC depends on micronecrosis state

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) offers a favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with micronecrosis but limited efficacy against HCC without micronecrosis.

Major finding: Adjuvant TACE significantly improved the overall survival (OS; P  =  .004) and disease-free survival (DFS; P  =  .034) of patients with micronecrosis but led to a nonsignificant difference in the OS (P  =  .430) and DFS (P  =  .131) of patients without micronecrosis.

Study details: This retrospective study propensity score-matched patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC with (n = 328) or without (n = 438) micronecrosis, with each group comprising patients who did or did not (1:1) receive adjuvant TACE after liver resection.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China and others. No information on conflicts of interest was available.

Source: Wang Y, Ge H, Hu M, et al. Histological tumor micronecrosis in resected specimens after R0 hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinomas is a factor in determining adjuvant TACE: A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106852 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106852.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) offers a favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with micronecrosis but limited efficacy against HCC without micronecrosis.

Major finding: Adjuvant TACE significantly improved the overall survival (OS; P  =  .004) and disease-free survival (DFS; P  =  .034) of patients with micronecrosis but led to a nonsignificant difference in the OS (P  =  .430) and DFS (P  =  .131) of patients without micronecrosis.

Study details: This retrospective study propensity score-matched patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC with (n = 328) or without (n = 438) micronecrosis, with each group comprising patients who did or did not (1:1) receive adjuvant TACE after liver resection.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China and others. No information on conflicts of interest was available.

Source: Wang Y, Ge H, Hu M, et al. Histological tumor micronecrosis in resected specimens after R0 hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinomas is a factor in determining adjuvant TACE: A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106852 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106852.

Key clinical point: Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) offers a favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with micronecrosis but limited efficacy against HCC without micronecrosis.

Major finding: Adjuvant TACE significantly improved the overall survival (OS; P  =  .004) and disease-free survival (DFS; P  =  .034) of patients with micronecrosis but led to a nonsignificant difference in the OS (P  =  .430) and DFS (P  =  .131) of patients without micronecrosis.

Study details: This retrospective study propensity score-matched patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC with (n = 328) or without (n = 438) micronecrosis, with each group comprising patients who did or did not (1:1) receive adjuvant TACE after liver resection.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China and others. No information on conflicts of interest was available.

Source: Wang Y, Ge H, Hu M, et al. Histological tumor micronecrosis in resected specimens after R0 hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinomas is a factor in determining adjuvant TACE: A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106852 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106852.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

Unresectable HCC: Atezolizumab+bevacizumab more effective in patients with good liver function

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade 1 or 2a show better therapeutic response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATE+BEV) treatment than those with uHCC and mALBI grade 2b or 3.

Major finding: Patients with mALBI grade 1+2a vs mALBI grade 2b+3 had a significantly higher objective response rate (26.2% vs 3.4%; P  =  .02) and longer median progression-free survival (10.5 vs 3.0 months; hazard ratio 2.086; P < .01) with ATE+BEV.

Study details: This retrospective observational study included 71 patients who received ATE+BEV for uHCC and had an mALBI grade of 1+2a (n = 42) or 2b+3 (n = 29).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tomonari T et al. Initial therapeutic results of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the importance of hepatic functional reserve. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 14). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5145

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade 1 or 2a show better therapeutic response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATE+BEV) treatment than those with uHCC and mALBI grade 2b or 3.

Major finding: Patients with mALBI grade 1+2a vs mALBI grade 2b+3 had a significantly higher objective response rate (26.2% vs 3.4%; P  =  .02) and longer median progression-free survival (10.5 vs 3.0 months; hazard ratio 2.086; P < .01) with ATE+BEV.

Study details: This retrospective observational study included 71 patients who received ATE+BEV for uHCC and had an mALBI grade of 1+2a (n = 42) or 2b+3 (n = 29).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tomonari T et al. Initial therapeutic results of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the importance of hepatic functional reserve. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 14). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5145

 

Key clinical point: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade 1 or 2a show better therapeutic response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATE+BEV) treatment than those with uHCC and mALBI grade 2b or 3.

Major finding: Patients with mALBI grade 1+2a vs mALBI grade 2b+3 had a significantly higher objective response rate (26.2% vs 3.4%; P  =  .02) and longer median progression-free survival (10.5 vs 3.0 months; hazard ratio 2.086; P < .01) with ATE+BEV.

Study details: This retrospective observational study included 71 patients who received ATE+BEV for uHCC and had an mALBI grade of 1+2a (n = 42) or 2b+3 (n = 29).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tomonari T et al. Initial therapeutic results of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the importance of hepatic functional reserve. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 14). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5145

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

Advanced HCC with macroscopic PVTT: Hepatectomy offers better survival than sorafenib

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Hepatectomy offers greater survival benefits than sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Major finding: Patients who underwent hepatectomy vs received sorafenib had a significantly longer median survival time (15.1 vs 4.5 months; hazard ratio 1.704; P  =  .0446).

Study details: This study propensity score-matched patients with advanced HCC and macroscopic PVTT invaded into an ipsilateral first-order portal branch or main trunk/contralateral portal vein who underwent hepatectomy (n = 36) with those who received sorafenib (n = 36).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. Some authors reported receiving grants or personal fees from various sources.

Source: Komatsu S et al. Hepatectomy versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus: A bi-institutional propensity-matched cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 (Sep 1). Doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1236

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Hepatectomy offers greater survival benefits than sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Major finding: Patients who underwent hepatectomy vs received sorafenib had a significantly longer median survival time (15.1 vs 4.5 months; hazard ratio 1.704; P  =  .0446).

Study details: This study propensity score-matched patients with advanced HCC and macroscopic PVTT invaded into an ipsilateral first-order portal branch or main trunk/contralateral portal vein who underwent hepatectomy (n = 36) with those who received sorafenib (n = 36).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. Some authors reported receiving grants or personal fees from various sources.

Source: Komatsu S et al. Hepatectomy versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus: A bi-institutional propensity-matched cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 (Sep 1). Doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1236

Key clinical point: Hepatectomy offers greater survival benefits than sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Major finding: Patients who underwent hepatectomy vs received sorafenib had a significantly longer median survival time (15.1 vs 4.5 months; hazard ratio 1.704; P  =  .0446).

Study details: This study propensity score-matched patients with advanced HCC and macroscopic PVTT invaded into an ipsilateral first-order portal branch or main trunk/contralateral portal vein who underwent hepatectomy (n = 36) with those who received sorafenib (n = 36).

Disclosures: No source of funding was reported. Some authors reported receiving grants or personal fees from various sources.

Source: Komatsu S et al. Hepatectomy versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus: A bi-institutional propensity-matched cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 (Sep 1). Doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1236

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

Transradial vs transfemoral access for TACE improves patient satisfaction in HCC

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) via transradial access (TRA) leads to improved patient satisfaction along with similar procedural variables and safety compared with TACE via transfemoral access (TFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: In the TACE-TRA vs TACE-TFA group a significantly higher proportion of patients preferred the current access for their next procedure (90.8% vs 24.6%; P < .001), although between-group procedural variables (such as procedure time and length of hospital stay; all P > .05) and the incidence and severity of adverse events (all P > .05) were similar.

Study details: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial included 130 patients with HCC who underwent TACE for the first time either via TRA (n = 65) or TFA (n = 65).

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of the Cancer Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang X et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access without closure device for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized trial. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Aug 26). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09038-1

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) via transradial access (TRA) leads to improved patient satisfaction along with similar procedural variables and safety compared with TACE via transfemoral access (TFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: In the TACE-TRA vs TACE-TFA group a significantly higher proportion of patients preferred the current access for their next procedure (90.8% vs 24.6%; P < .001), although between-group procedural variables (such as procedure time and length of hospital stay; all P > .05) and the incidence and severity of adverse events (all P > .05) were similar.

Study details: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial included 130 patients with HCC who underwent TACE for the first time either via TRA (n = 65) or TFA (n = 65).

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of the Cancer Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang X et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access without closure device for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized trial. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Aug 26). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09038-1

 

Key clinical point: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) via transradial access (TRA) leads to improved patient satisfaction along with similar procedural variables and safety compared with TACE via transfemoral access (TFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: In the TACE-TRA vs TACE-TFA group a significantly higher proportion of patients preferred the current access for their next procedure (90.8% vs 24.6%; P < .001), although between-group procedural variables (such as procedure time and length of hospital stay; all P > .05) and the incidence and severity of adverse events (all P > .05) were similar.

Study details: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial included 130 patients with HCC who underwent TACE for the first time either via TRA (n = 65) or TFA (n = 65).

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of the Cancer Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang X et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access without closure device for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized trial. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Aug 26). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09038-1

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

CP-A to CP-B progression after lenvatinib initiation in HCC should not halt therapy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib may continue to benefit patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) despite liver function deterioration to Child-Pugh class B (CP-B) after therapy initiation.

Major finding: CP-B vs CP-A patients receiving lenvatinib had a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.7 months (95% CI 1.8-7.4) vs 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.6-10.3) vs 13.3 months (95% CI 11.6-16.1), respectively. CP-B patients receiving sorafenib had a median PFS and OS of only 0.5 months (95% CI 0.1-3.6) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-6.1, respectively. Lenvatinib showed no new safety signals in CP-B patients.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included patients with uHCC from the REFLECT trial whose liver function deteriorated to CP-B or remained CP-A within 8 weeks of randomization to lenvatinib (CP-B: n = 60; CP-A: n = 413) or sorafenib (CP-B: n = 47; CP-A: n = 427).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eisai Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) LLC. Some authors declared serving as speakers, consultants, or advisors for various organizations, including Eisai and MSD.

Source: Huynh J et al. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed to Child-Pugh B liver function. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221116608 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1177/17588359221116608

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib may continue to benefit patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) despite liver function deterioration to Child-Pugh class B (CP-B) after therapy initiation.

Major finding: CP-B vs CP-A patients receiving lenvatinib had a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.7 months (95% CI 1.8-7.4) vs 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.6-10.3) vs 13.3 months (95% CI 11.6-16.1), respectively. CP-B patients receiving sorafenib had a median PFS and OS of only 0.5 months (95% CI 0.1-3.6) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-6.1, respectively. Lenvatinib showed no new safety signals in CP-B patients.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included patients with uHCC from the REFLECT trial whose liver function deteriorated to CP-B or remained CP-A within 8 weeks of randomization to lenvatinib (CP-B: n = 60; CP-A: n = 413) or sorafenib (CP-B: n = 47; CP-A: n = 427).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eisai Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) LLC. Some authors declared serving as speakers, consultants, or advisors for various organizations, including Eisai and MSD.

Source: Huynh J et al. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed to Child-Pugh B liver function. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221116608 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1177/17588359221116608

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib may continue to benefit patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) despite liver function deterioration to Child-Pugh class B (CP-B) after therapy initiation.

Major finding: CP-B vs CP-A patients receiving lenvatinib had a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.7 months (95% CI 1.8-7.4) vs 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.6-10.3) vs 13.3 months (95% CI 11.6-16.1), respectively. CP-B patients receiving sorafenib had a median PFS and OS of only 0.5 months (95% CI 0.1-3.6) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-6.1, respectively. Lenvatinib showed no new safety signals in CP-B patients.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included patients with uHCC from the REFLECT trial whose liver function deteriorated to CP-B or remained CP-A within 8 weeks of randomization to lenvatinib (CP-B: n = 60; CP-A: n = 413) or sorafenib (CP-B: n = 47; CP-A: n = 427).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eisai Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) LLC. Some authors declared serving as speakers, consultants, or advisors for various organizations, including Eisai and MSD.

Source: Huynh J et al. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed to Child-Pugh B liver function. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221116608 (Aug 24). Doi: 10.1177/17588359221116608

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

Sintilimab plus IBI305: A promising treatment option for advanced HCC

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: Sintilimab plus IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) exhibits a promising efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the overall response rate was 34.0% (95% CI 20.0%-48.0%) and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.5 months (95% CI 8.3-12.7 months) and 20.2 months (95% CI 16.1-24.3 months), respectively. The grade 3-5 adverse event rate was 20.0%.

Study details: Findings are from a single-center phase 1b clinical trial that included 50 patients with advanced HCC who received sintilimab plus IBI305 every 3 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the Non-profit Central Research Institution Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang W et al. Serum concentration of CD137 and tumor infiltration by M1 macrophages predict the response to sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(16):3499-3508 (Aug 15). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3972

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Sintilimab plus IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) exhibits a promising efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the overall response rate was 34.0% (95% CI 20.0%-48.0%) and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.5 months (95% CI 8.3-12.7 months) and 20.2 months (95% CI 16.1-24.3 months), respectively. The grade 3-5 adverse event rate was 20.0%.

Study details: Findings are from a single-center phase 1b clinical trial that included 50 patients with advanced HCC who received sintilimab plus IBI305 every 3 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the Non-profit Central Research Institution Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang W et al. Serum concentration of CD137 and tumor infiltration by M1 macrophages predict the response to sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(16):3499-3508 (Aug 15). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3972

 

Key clinical point: Sintilimab plus IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) exhibits a promising efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the overall response rate was 34.0% (95% CI 20.0%-48.0%) and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.5 months (95% CI 8.3-12.7 months) and 20.2 months (95% CI 16.1-24.3 months), respectively. The grade 3-5 adverse event rate was 20.0%.

Study details: Findings are from a single-center phase 1b clinical trial that included 50 patients with advanced HCC who received sintilimab plus IBI305 every 3 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the Non-profit Central Research Institution Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang W et al. Serum concentration of CD137 and tumor infiltration by M1 macrophages predict the response to sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(16):3499-3508 (Aug 15). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3972

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]

Risk factors for postoperative arm lymphedema in breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:23

Key clinical point: Several preoperative and postoperative factors predict the risk for arm lymphedema in patients who undergo breast cancer (BC) surgery.

Major finding: Young age (<60 years; P < .001), high body mass index (P < .001), advanced preoperative T and N classifications (P ≤ .01), total mastectomy (P < .001), axillary dissection (P < .001), and collagen disease (P = .024) were the preoperative risk factors for lymphedema. Postoperative bleeding (P   =   .017), chemotherapy (P < .001), and radiotherapy (P < .001) were among the postoperative risk factors for lymphedema.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide retrospective cohort study including 84,022 women who underwent BC surgery, of which 1547 patients received treatments for lymphedema.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and other sources. N Michihata declared serving as an employee at The University of Tokyo.

Source: Konishi T et al. Risk factors for arm lymphedema following breast cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide database study of 84,022 patients. Breast Cancer. 2022 (Aug 23). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01395-5.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Several preoperative and postoperative factors predict the risk for arm lymphedema in patients who undergo breast cancer (BC) surgery.

Major finding: Young age (<60 years; P < .001), high body mass index (P < .001), advanced preoperative T and N classifications (P ≤ .01), total mastectomy (P < .001), axillary dissection (P < .001), and collagen disease (P = .024) were the preoperative risk factors for lymphedema. Postoperative bleeding (P   =   .017), chemotherapy (P < .001), and radiotherapy (P < .001) were among the postoperative risk factors for lymphedema.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide retrospective cohort study including 84,022 women who underwent BC surgery, of which 1547 patients received treatments for lymphedema.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and other sources. N Michihata declared serving as an employee at The University of Tokyo.

Source: Konishi T et al. Risk factors for arm lymphedema following breast cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide database study of 84,022 patients. Breast Cancer. 2022 (Aug 23). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01395-5.

 

Key clinical point: Several preoperative and postoperative factors predict the risk for arm lymphedema in patients who undergo breast cancer (BC) surgery.

Major finding: Young age (<60 years; P < .001), high body mass index (P < .001), advanced preoperative T and N classifications (P ≤ .01), total mastectomy (P < .001), axillary dissection (P < .001), and collagen disease (P = .024) were the preoperative risk factors for lymphedema. Postoperative bleeding (P   =   .017), chemotherapy (P < .001), and radiotherapy (P < .001) were among the postoperative risk factors for lymphedema.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide retrospective cohort study including 84,022 women who underwent BC surgery, of which 1547 patients received treatments for lymphedema.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and other sources. N Michihata declared serving as an employee at The University of Tokyo.

Source: Konishi T et al. Risk factors for arm lymphedema following breast cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide database study of 84,022 patients. Breast Cancer. 2022 (Aug 23). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01395-5.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer October 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
329444.1
Activity ID
77844
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Kadcyla [ 3564 ]

LetCOH as effective as cCOH for fertility preservation in nonmetastatic BC

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:23

Key clinical point: Letrozole-associated controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (LetCOH) was as effective as conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (cCOH) for fertility preservation (FP) and minimized the risk for supraphysiologic estrogen exposure; however, more patients in the LetCOH group relapsed.

Major finding: In the LetCOH vs cCOH group, estradiol peak at the ovulation trigger was lower, but oocyte maturation rates were significantly higher (P < .001), and the final number of mature oocytes collected was comparable (P   =   .281). Disease recurrence occurred in 17% and 7.2% of patients in the LetCOH and cCOH groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 97 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer (BC) who were ≤ 40 years old and had undergone FP with LetCOH (n = 41) or cCOH (n = 56) before receiving chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. I Demeestere declared receiving honoraria and support and serving as a consultant or advisor for several sources outside this work.

Source: Goldrat O et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without letrozole for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:134-141 (Aug 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.017

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Letrozole-associated controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (LetCOH) was as effective as conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (cCOH) for fertility preservation (FP) and minimized the risk for supraphysiologic estrogen exposure; however, more patients in the LetCOH group relapsed.

Major finding: In the LetCOH vs cCOH group, estradiol peak at the ovulation trigger was lower, but oocyte maturation rates were significantly higher (P < .001), and the final number of mature oocytes collected was comparable (P   =   .281). Disease recurrence occurred in 17% and 7.2% of patients in the LetCOH and cCOH groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 97 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer (BC) who were ≤ 40 years old and had undergone FP with LetCOH (n = 41) or cCOH (n = 56) before receiving chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. I Demeestere declared receiving honoraria and support and serving as a consultant or advisor for several sources outside this work.

Source: Goldrat O et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without letrozole for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:134-141 (Aug 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.017

Key clinical point: Letrozole-associated controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (LetCOH) was as effective as conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (cCOH) for fertility preservation (FP) and minimized the risk for supraphysiologic estrogen exposure; however, more patients in the LetCOH group relapsed.

Major finding: In the LetCOH vs cCOH group, estradiol peak at the ovulation trigger was lower, but oocyte maturation rates were significantly higher (P < .001), and the final number of mature oocytes collected was comparable (P   =   .281). Disease recurrence occurred in 17% and 7.2% of patients in the LetCOH and cCOH groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 97 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer (BC) who were ≤ 40 years old and had undergone FP with LetCOH (n = 41) or cCOH (n = 56) before receiving chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. I Demeestere declared receiving honoraria and support and serving as a consultant or advisor for several sources outside this work.

Source: Goldrat O et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without letrozole for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:134-141 (Aug 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.017

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer October 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
329444.1
Activity ID
77844
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Kadcyla [ 3564 ]

Fertility preservation safe in young women with BC

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:23

Key clinical point: Women who were diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) at a young age and underwent fertility preservation (FP) did not experience any increased risk for disease-specific mortality or relapse.

Major finding: Compared with women who did not undergo FP, disease-specific mortality was similar in women who underwent hormonal FP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.32-1.09) and nonhormonal FP (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.20-1.29). Hormonal (aHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.49-1.37) and nonhormonal (aHR 0.75; 95% CI 0.35-1.62) FP were associated with similar relapse or death rates in a subcohort of 723 women with complete relapse information.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of a population-based nationwide cohort study including 1275 women of reproductive age (18-44 years old) who were diagnosed with BC, of which 425 women received hormonal (n = 367) or nonhormonal (n = 58) FP treatment.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and other sources. Prof. Bergh declared receiving grants and personal fees from several sources.

Source: Marklund A et al. Relapse rates and disease-specific mortality following procedures for fertility preservation at time of breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA Oncol. 2022 (Aug 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3677

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Women who were diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) at a young age and underwent fertility preservation (FP) did not experience any increased risk for disease-specific mortality or relapse.

Major finding: Compared with women who did not undergo FP, disease-specific mortality was similar in women who underwent hormonal FP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.32-1.09) and nonhormonal FP (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.20-1.29). Hormonal (aHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.49-1.37) and nonhormonal (aHR 0.75; 95% CI 0.35-1.62) FP were associated with similar relapse or death rates in a subcohort of 723 women with complete relapse information.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of a population-based nationwide cohort study including 1275 women of reproductive age (18-44 years old) who were diagnosed with BC, of which 425 women received hormonal (n = 367) or nonhormonal (n = 58) FP treatment.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and other sources. Prof. Bergh declared receiving grants and personal fees from several sources.

Source: Marklund A et al. Relapse rates and disease-specific mortality following procedures for fertility preservation at time of breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA Oncol. 2022 (Aug 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3677

 

Key clinical point: Women who were diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) at a young age and underwent fertility preservation (FP) did not experience any increased risk for disease-specific mortality or relapse.

Major finding: Compared with women who did not undergo FP, disease-specific mortality was similar in women who underwent hormonal FP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.32-1.09) and nonhormonal FP (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.20-1.29). Hormonal (aHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.49-1.37) and nonhormonal (aHR 0.75; 95% CI 0.35-1.62) FP were associated with similar relapse or death rates in a subcohort of 723 women with complete relapse information.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of a population-based nationwide cohort study including 1275 women of reproductive age (18-44 years old) who were diagnosed with BC, of which 425 women received hormonal (n = 367) or nonhormonal (n = 58) FP treatment.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and other sources. Prof. Bergh declared receiving grants and personal fees from several sources.

Source: Marklund A et al. Relapse rates and disease-specific mortality following procedures for fertility preservation at time of breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA Oncol. 2022 (Aug 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3677

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer October 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
329444.1
Activity ID
77844
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Kadcyla [ 3564 ]

ER+/HER2+ BC: HER2-enriched subtype predicts poor response to AI therapy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:23

Key clinical point: In estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (ER+/HER2+) breast cancer (BC), HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors were more likely to respond poorly to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy and pose an increased risk for disease recurrence.

Major finding: AI-treated HER2-E tumors were associated with poorer Ki67 response and higher Ki67 expression level at 2-weeks timepoint compared with luminal A and B tumors (odds ratio 1.52-12.31; false discovery rate < 0.0001). HER2-E subtype was an independent predictor of shorter time to recurrence (hazard ratio 2.55; P   =   .022).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 POETIC trial including 342 patients with early ER+/HER2+ BC who were assigned to 2 weeks of perisurgical AI (n = 237) or no AI (n = 105).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Cancer Research UK. Some authors declared holding or filing patents or receiving grants, nonfinancial support, consulting fees, honoraria, or research funding from several sources.

Source: Bergamino MA et al. HER2-enriched subtype and novel molecular subgroups drive aromatase inhibitor resistance and an increased risk of relapse in early ER+/HER2+ breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2022;83:104205 (Aug 16). Doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104205

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (ER+/HER2+) breast cancer (BC), HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors were more likely to respond poorly to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy and pose an increased risk for disease recurrence.

Major finding: AI-treated HER2-E tumors were associated with poorer Ki67 response and higher Ki67 expression level at 2-weeks timepoint compared with luminal A and B tumors (odds ratio 1.52-12.31; false discovery rate < 0.0001). HER2-E subtype was an independent predictor of shorter time to recurrence (hazard ratio 2.55; P   =   .022).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 POETIC trial including 342 patients with early ER+/HER2+ BC who were assigned to 2 weeks of perisurgical AI (n = 237) or no AI (n = 105).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Cancer Research UK. Some authors declared holding or filing patents or receiving grants, nonfinancial support, consulting fees, honoraria, or research funding from several sources.

Source: Bergamino MA et al. HER2-enriched subtype and novel molecular subgroups drive aromatase inhibitor resistance and an increased risk of relapse in early ER+/HER2+ breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2022;83:104205 (Aug 16). Doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104205

Key clinical point: In estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (ER+/HER2+) breast cancer (BC), HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors were more likely to respond poorly to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy and pose an increased risk for disease recurrence.

Major finding: AI-treated HER2-E tumors were associated with poorer Ki67 response and higher Ki67 expression level at 2-weeks timepoint compared with luminal A and B tumors (odds ratio 1.52-12.31; false discovery rate < 0.0001). HER2-E subtype was an independent predictor of shorter time to recurrence (hazard ratio 2.55; P   =   .022).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 POETIC trial including 342 patients with early ER+/HER2+ BC who were assigned to 2 weeks of perisurgical AI (n = 237) or no AI (n = 105).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Cancer Research UK. Some authors declared holding or filing patents or receiving grants, nonfinancial support, consulting fees, honoraria, or research funding from several sources.

Source: Bergamino MA et al. HER2-enriched subtype and novel molecular subgroups drive aromatase inhibitor resistance and an increased risk of relapse in early ER+/HER2+ breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2022;83:104205 (Aug 16). Doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104205

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer October 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
329444.1
Activity ID
77844
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Kadcyla [ 3564 ]