Pharmacy

AML cells

Image by Lance Liotta

The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).

SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.

SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.

SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

SL-401 research

At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.

Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.

With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.

Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.

Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR.  Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.

And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.

The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.

Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).

Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.

Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).

The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.

Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:

1. BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
2. AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
3. Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.

About orphan designation

In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

AML cells

Image by Lance Liotta

The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).

SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.

SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.

SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

SL-401 research

At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.

Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.

With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.

Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.

Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR.  Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.

And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.

The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.

Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).

Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.

Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).

The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.

Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:

1. BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
2. AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
3. Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.

About orphan designation

In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

AML cells

Image by Lance Liotta

The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).

SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.

SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.

SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

SL-401 research

At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.

Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.

With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.

Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.

Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR.  Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.

And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.

The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.

Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).

Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.

Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).

The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.

Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:

1. BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
2. AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
3. Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.

About orphan designation

In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Panobinostat (Farydak)

Photo courtesy of Novartis

The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory

multiple myeloma (MM).

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).

The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.

PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year.  Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.

The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.

The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).

Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).

The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).

Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.

The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.

Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.

Panobinostat (Farydak)

Photo courtesy of Novartis

The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory

multiple myeloma (MM).

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).

The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.

PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year.  Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.

The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.

The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).

Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).

The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).

Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.

The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.

Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.

Panobinostat (Farydak)

Photo courtesy of Novartis

The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory

multiple myeloma (MM).

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).

The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.

PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year.  Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.

The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.

The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).

Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).

The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).

Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.

The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.

Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.

Thrombus

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).

The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.

The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.

After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.

The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.

Trial results

The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.

Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.

At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).

Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).

The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).

Thrombus

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).

The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.

The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.

After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.

The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.

Trial results

The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.

Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.

At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).

Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).

The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).

Thrombus

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).

The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.

The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.

After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.

The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.

Trial results

The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.

Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.

At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).

Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).

The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).

Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).

The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder).  The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.

Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.

This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.

Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.

Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).

*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.

Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).

*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.

The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.

For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.

Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).

Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).

The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder).  The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.

Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.

This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.

Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.

Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).

*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.

Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).

*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.

The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.

For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.

Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).

Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).

The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder).  The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.

Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.

This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.

Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.

Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).

*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.

Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).

*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.

The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.

For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.

Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.

Monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.

About ACE910

ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.

ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.

ACE910 research

Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.

At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).

Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.

The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.

Efficacy

Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:

*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.

Safety

There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.

There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.

Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.

Monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.

About ACE910

ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.

ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.

ACE910 research

Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.

At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).

Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.

The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.

Efficacy

Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:

*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.

Safety

There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.

There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.

Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.

Monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.

About ACE910

ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.

ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.

ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.

ACE910 research

Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.

At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).

Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.

The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.

Efficacy

Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:

*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.

Safety

There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.

There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.

Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved rolapitant (Varubi) for use in adult cancer patients receiving initial and repeat courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Rolapitant is to be used in combination with other antiemetic agents to prevent delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Tesaro, Inc., the company developing rolapitant, plans to launch the drug in the fourth quarter of this year.

Rolapitant is a selective and competitive antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK-1) receptors, with a plasma half-life of approximately 7 days. Activation of NK-1 receptors plays a central role in CINV, particularly in the delayed phase (the 25- to 120-hour period after chemotherapy administration).

Rolapitant comes in tablet form. The recommended dose is 180 mg, given approximately 1 to 2 hours prior to chemotherapy administration in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. No dosage adjustment is required for dexamethasone when administering rolapitant.

Rolapitant inhibits the CYP2D6 enzyme, so it is contraindicated with the use of thioridazine, a drug metabolized by the CYP2D6 enzyme. Use of these drugs together may increase the amount of thioridazine in the blood and cause an abnormal heart rhythm that can be serious.

Rolapitant clinical trials

Results from three phase 3 trials suggested that rolapitant (at 180 mg) in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone was more effective than the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone on their own (active control).

The 3-drug combination demonstrated a significant reduction in episodes of vomiting or use of rescue medication during the 25- to 120-hour period following administration of highly emetogenic and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.

In addition, patients who received rolapitant reported experiencing less nausea that interfered with normal daily life and fewer episodes of vomiting or retching over multiple cycles of chemotherapy.

Highly emetogenic chemotherapy

The clinical profile of rolapitant in cisplatin-based, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) was confirmed in two phase 3 studies: HEC1 and HEC2. Results from these trials were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

Both trials met their primary endpoint of complete response (CR) and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control.

In HEC1, 264 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 262 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 72.7% and 58.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

In HEC2, 271 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 273 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 70.1% and 61.9%, respectively (P=0.043).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were neutropenia (9% rolapitant and 8% control), hiccups (5% and 4%), and abdominal pain (3% and 2%).

Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Researchers conducted another phase 3 trial to compare the rolapitant combination with active control in 1332 patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Results from this trial were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

This trial met its primary endpoint of CR and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 71.3% and 61.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were decreased appetite (9% rolapitant and 7% control), neutropenia (7% and 6%), dizziness (6% and 4%), dyspepsia (4% and 2%), urinary tract infection (4% and 3%), stomatitis (4% and 2%), and anemia (3% and 2%).

The full prescribing information for rolapitant is available at www.varubirx.com.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved rolapitant (Varubi) for use in adult cancer patients receiving initial and repeat courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Rolapitant is to be used in combination with other antiemetic agents to prevent delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Tesaro, Inc., the company developing rolapitant, plans to launch the drug in the fourth quarter of this year.

Rolapitant is a selective and competitive antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK-1) receptors, with a plasma half-life of approximately 7 days. Activation of NK-1 receptors plays a central role in CINV, particularly in the delayed phase (the 25- to 120-hour period after chemotherapy administration).

Rolapitant comes in tablet form. The recommended dose is 180 mg, given approximately 1 to 2 hours prior to chemotherapy administration in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. No dosage adjustment is required for dexamethasone when administering rolapitant.

Rolapitant inhibits the CYP2D6 enzyme, so it is contraindicated with the use of thioridazine, a drug metabolized by the CYP2D6 enzyme. Use of these drugs together may increase the amount of thioridazine in the blood and cause an abnormal heart rhythm that can be serious.

Rolapitant clinical trials

Results from three phase 3 trials suggested that rolapitant (at 180 mg) in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone was more effective than the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone on their own (active control).

The 3-drug combination demonstrated a significant reduction in episodes of vomiting or use of rescue medication during the 25- to 120-hour period following administration of highly emetogenic and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.

In addition, patients who received rolapitant reported experiencing less nausea that interfered with normal daily life and fewer episodes of vomiting or retching over multiple cycles of chemotherapy.

Highly emetogenic chemotherapy

The clinical profile of rolapitant in cisplatin-based, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) was confirmed in two phase 3 studies: HEC1 and HEC2. Results from these trials were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

Both trials met their primary endpoint of complete response (CR) and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control.

In HEC1, 264 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 262 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 72.7% and 58.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

In HEC2, 271 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 273 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 70.1% and 61.9%, respectively (P=0.043).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were neutropenia (9% rolapitant and 8% control), hiccups (5% and 4%), and abdominal pain (3% and 2%).

Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Researchers conducted another phase 3 trial to compare the rolapitant combination with active control in 1332 patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Results from this trial were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

This trial met its primary endpoint of CR and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 71.3% and 61.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were decreased appetite (9% rolapitant and 7% control), neutropenia (7% and 6%), dizziness (6% and 4%), dyspepsia (4% and 2%), urinary tract infection (4% and 3%), stomatitis (4% and 2%), and anemia (3% and 2%).

The full prescribing information for rolapitant is available at www.varubirx.com.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved rolapitant (Varubi) for use in adult cancer patients receiving initial and repeat courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Rolapitant is to be used in combination with other antiemetic agents to prevent delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Tesaro, Inc., the company developing rolapitant, plans to launch the drug in the fourth quarter of this year.

Rolapitant is a selective and competitive antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK-1) receptors, with a plasma half-life of approximately 7 days. Activation of NK-1 receptors plays a central role in CINV, particularly in the delayed phase (the 25- to 120-hour period after chemotherapy administration).

Rolapitant comes in tablet form. The recommended dose is 180 mg, given approximately 1 to 2 hours prior to chemotherapy administration in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. No dosage adjustment is required for dexamethasone when administering rolapitant.

Rolapitant inhibits the CYP2D6 enzyme, so it is contraindicated with the use of thioridazine, a drug metabolized by the CYP2D6 enzyme. Use of these drugs together may increase the amount of thioridazine in the blood and cause an abnormal heart rhythm that can be serious.

Rolapitant clinical trials

Results from three phase 3 trials suggested that rolapitant (at 180 mg) in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone was more effective than the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone on their own (active control).

The 3-drug combination demonstrated a significant reduction in episodes of vomiting or use of rescue medication during the 25- to 120-hour period following administration of highly emetogenic and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.

In addition, patients who received rolapitant reported experiencing less nausea that interfered with normal daily life and fewer episodes of vomiting or retching over multiple cycles of chemotherapy.

Highly emetogenic chemotherapy

The clinical profile of rolapitant in cisplatin-based, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) was confirmed in two phase 3 studies: HEC1 and HEC2. Results from these trials were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

Both trials met their primary endpoint of complete response (CR) and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control.

In HEC1, 264 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 262 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 72.7% and 58.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

In HEC2, 271 patients received the rolapitant combination, and 273 received active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 70.1% and 61.9%, respectively (P=0.043).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were neutropenia (9% rolapitant and 8% control), hiccups (5% and 4%), and abdominal pain (3% and 2%).

Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Researchers conducted another phase 3 trial to compare the rolapitant combination with active control in 1332 patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Results from this trial were recently published in The Lancet Oncology.

This trial met its primary endpoint of CR and demonstrated statistical superiority of the rolapitant combination compared to active control. The proportion of patients achieving a CR was 71.3% and 61.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

The most common adverse events (≥3%) were decreased appetite (9% rolapitant and 7% control), neutropenia (7% and 6%), dizziness (6% and 4%), dyspepsia (4% and 2%), urinary tract infection (4% and 3%), stomatitis (4% and 2%), and anemia (3% and 2%).

The full prescribing information for rolapitant is available at www.varubirx.com.

Red blood cells

The European Commission has approved eltrombopag (Revolade) for the treatment of adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who were either refractory to prior immunosuppressive therapy or heavily pretreated and are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Eltrombopag is the first therapy approved in the European Union (EU) for this patient population.

The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

Trials of eltrombopag in SAA

The European Commission’s approval is based primarily on results of a phase 2 pilot study (NCT00922883) conducted by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health.

Results from the ongoing study were published in NEJM in 2012 and Blood in 2013. The trial has enrolled 43 patients with SAA who had an insufficient response to at least 1 prior immunosuppressive therapy and who had a platelet count of 30 x 10⁹/L or less.

At baseline, the median platelet count was 20 x 10⁹/L, hemoglobin was 8.4 g/dL, the absolute neutrophil count was 0.58 x 10⁹/L, and absolute reticulocyte count was 24.3 x 10⁹/L.

Patients had a median age of 45 (range, 17 to 77), and 56% were male. The majority of patients (84%) had received at least 2 prior immunosuppressive therapies.

Patients received eltrombopag at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The dose increased over 2-week periods to a maximum of 150 mg once daily.

The study’s primary endpoint was hematologic response, which was initially assessed after 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment was discontinued after 16 weeks in patients who did not exhibit a hematologic response.

Forty percent of patients (n=17) experienced a hematologic response in at least 1 lineage—platelets, red blood cells (RBCs), or white blood cells—after week 12.

In the extension phase of the study, 8 patients achieved a multilineage response. Four of these patients subsequently tapered off treatment and maintained the response. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 7.2 to 10.6 months).

Ninety-one percent of patients were platelet-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require platelet transfusions for a median of 200 days (range, 8 to 1096 days).

Eighty-six percent of patients were RBC-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require RBC transfusions for a median of 208 days (range, 15 to 1082 days).

The most common adverse events (≥20%) associated with eltrombopag were nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), cough (23%), diarrhea (21%), and headache (21%).

Patients were also evaluated for cytogenetic abnormalities. Eight patients had a new cytogenetic abnormality after treatment, including 5 patients who had complex changes in chromosome 7.

Patients who develop new cytogenetic abnormalities while on eltrombopag may need to be taken off treatment.

About eltrombopag

Eltrombopag is already approved to treat SAA in the US and Canada. The drug recently gained approval in the US to treat children age 1 and older who have chronic immune thrombocytopenia and have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

Eltrombopag is approved in more than 100 countries to treat adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of other treatments.

The drug is approved in more than 45 countries for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C to allow them to initiate and maintain interferon-based therapy.

Eltrombopag is marketed under the brand name Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more details on the drug, see the European Medicines Agency’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Red blood cells

The European Commission has approved eltrombopag (Revolade) for the treatment of adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who were either refractory to prior immunosuppressive therapy or heavily pretreated and are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Eltrombopag is the first therapy approved in the European Union (EU) for this patient population.

The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

Trials of eltrombopag in SAA

The European Commission’s approval is based primarily on results of a phase 2 pilot study (NCT00922883) conducted by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health.

Results from the ongoing study were published in NEJM in 2012 and Blood in 2013. The trial has enrolled 43 patients with SAA who had an insufficient response to at least 1 prior immunosuppressive therapy and who had a platelet count of 30 x 10⁹/L or less.

At baseline, the median platelet count was 20 x 10⁹/L, hemoglobin was 8.4 g/dL, the absolute neutrophil count was 0.58 x 10⁹/L, and absolute reticulocyte count was 24.3 x 10⁹/L.

Patients had a median age of 45 (range, 17 to 77), and 56% were male. The majority of patients (84%) had received at least 2 prior immunosuppressive therapies.

Patients received eltrombopag at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The dose increased over 2-week periods to a maximum of 150 mg once daily.

The study’s primary endpoint was hematologic response, which was initially assessed after 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment was discontinued after 16 weeks in patients who did not exhibit a hematologic response.

Forty percent of patients (n=17) experienced a hematologic response in at least 1 lineage—platelets, red blood cells (RBCs), or white blood cells—after week 12.

In the extension phase of the study, 8 patients achieved a multilineage response. Four of these patients subsequently tapered off treatment and maintained the response. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 7.2 to 10.6 months).

Ninety-one percent of patients were platelet-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require platelet transfusions for a median of 200 days (range, 8 to 1096 days).

Eighty-six percent of patients were RBC-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require RBC transfusions for a median of 208 days (range, 15 to 1082 days).

The most common adverse events (≥20%) associated with eltrombopag were nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), cough (23%), diarrhea (21%), and headache (21%).

Patients were also evaluated for cytogenetic abnormalities. Eight patients had a new cytogenetic abnormality after treatment, including 5 patients who had complex changes in chromosome 7.

Patients who develop new cytogenetic abnormalities while on eltrombopag may need to be taken off treatment.

About eltrombopag

Eltrombopag is already approved to treat SAA in the US and Canada. The drug recently gained approval in the US to treat children age 1 and older who have chronic immune thrombocytopenia and have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

Eltrombopag is approved in more than 100 countries to treat adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of other treatments.

The drug is approved in more than 45 countries for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C to allow them to initiate and maintain interferon-based therapy.

Eltrombopag is marketed under the brand name Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more details on the drug, see the European Medicines Agency’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Red blood cells

The European Commission has approved eltrombopag (Revolade) for the treatment of adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who were either refractory to prior immunosuppressive therapy or heavily pretreated and are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Eltrombopag is the first therapy approved in the European Union (EU) for this patient population.

The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

Trials of eltrombopag in SAA

The European Commission’s approval is based primarily on results of a phase 2 pilot study (NCT00922883) conducted by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health.

Results from the ongoing study were published in NEJM in 2012 and Blood in 2013. The trial has enrolled 43 patients with SAA who had an insufficient response to at least 1 prior immunosuppressive therapy and who had a platelet count of 30 x 10⁹/L or less.

At baseline, the median platelet count was 20 x 10⁹/L, hemoglobin was 8.4 g/dL, the absolute neutrophil count was 0.58 x 10⁹/L, and absolute reticulocyte count was 24.3 x 10⁹/L.

Patients had a median age of 45 (range, 17 to 77), and 56% were male. The majority of patients (84%) had received at least 2 prior immunosuppressive therapies.

Patients received eltrombopag at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The dose increased over 2-week periods to a maximum of 150 mg once daily.

The study’s primary endpoint was hematologic response, which was initially assessed after 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment was discontinued after 16 weeks in patients who did not exhibit a hematologic response.

Forty percent of patients (n=17) experienced a hematologic response in at least 1 lineage—platelets, red blood cells (RBCs), or white blood cells—after week 12.

In the extension phase of the study, 8 patients achieved a multilineage response. Four of these patients subsequently tapered off treatment and maintained the response. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 7.2 to 10.6 months).

Ninety-one percent of patients were platelet-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require platelet transfusions for a median of 200 days (range, 8 to 1096 days).

Eighty-six percent of patients were RBC-transfusion-dependent at baseline. Patients who responded to eltrombopag did not require RBC transfusions for a median of 208 days (range, 15 to 1082 days).

The most common adverse events (≥20%) associated with eltrombopag were nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), cough (23%), diarrhea (21%), and headache (21%).

Patients were also evaluated for cytogenetic abnormalities. Eight patients had a new cytogenetic abnormality after treatment, including 5 patients who had complex changes in chromosome 7.

Patients who develop new cytogenetic abnormalities while on eltrombopag may need to be taken off treatment.

About eltrombopag

Eltrombopag is already approved to treat SAA in the US and Canada. The drug recently gained approval in the US to treat children age 1 and older who have chronic immune thrombocytopenia and have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

Eltrombopag is approved in more than 100 countries to treat adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of other treatments.

The drug is approved in more than 45 countries for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C to allow them to initiate and maintain interferon-based therapy.

Eltrombopag is marketed under the brand name Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more details on the drug, see the European Medicines Agency’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Eltrombopag tablets

Photo courtesy of GSK

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an expanded use for eltrombopag (Promacta) to include children 1 year of age and older with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

The updated label also includes a new oral suspension formulation of eltrombopag designed for younger children who may not be able to swallow tablets.

Eltrombopag was previously approved by the FDA in a tablet formulation in June 2015 for ITP patients ages 6 and older and in 2008 for use in adults with ITP.

The label expansion of eltrombopag was based on data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the phase 2 PETIT trial and the phase 3 PETIT2 trial.

PETIT trials: Efficacy

The PETIT trial included 67 ITP patients stratified by age cohort (12-17 years, 6-11 years, and 1-5 years). They were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 7 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher at least once between days 8 and 43 of the randomized period of the study.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—62.2%—compared to 31.8% in the placebo arm (P=0.011).

The PETIT2 trial enrolled 92 patients with chronic ITP who were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 13 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher for at least 6 out of 8 weeks, between weeks 5 and 12 of the randomized period.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—41.3%—compared to 3.4% of patients in the placebo arm (P<0.001).

PETIT trials: Safety

For both trials, there were 107 eltrombopag-treated patients evaluable for safety.

The most common adverse events that occurred more frequently in the eltrombopag arms than the placebo arms were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, cough, diarrhea, pyrexia, rhinitis, abdominal pain, oropharyngeal pain, toothache, increased ALT or AST, rash, and rhinorrhea.

Serious adverse events were reported in 8% of patients during the randomized part of both trials, although no serious adverse event occurred in more than 1 patient (1%).

An ALT elevation of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal occurred in 5% of eltrombopag-treated patients. Of those patients, 2% had ALT increases of at least 5 times the upper limit of normal.

There were no deaths or thromboembolic events during either study.

Prescribing information

The recommended dose and schedule of eltrombopag for pediatric patients age 6 and older is 50 mg daily or 25 mg daily of the tablet formulation for patients with East Asian ancestry. The recommended dose for all patients age 1 to 5 years is 25 mg daily of the powder for oral suspension formulation.

Eltrombopag is marketed as Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more information on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Eltrombopag tablets

Photo courtesy of GSK

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an expanded use for eltrombopag (Promacta) to include children 1 year of age and older with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

The updated label also includes a new oral suspension formulation of eltrombopag designed for younger children who may not be able to swallow tablets.

Eltrombopag was previously approved by the FDA in a tablet formulation in June 2015 for ITP patients ages 6 and older and in 2008 for use in adults with ITP.

The label expansion of eltrombopag was based on data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the phase 2 PETIT trial and the phase 3 PETIT2 trial.

PETIT trials: Efficacy

The PETIT trial included 67 ITP patients stratified by age cohort (12-17 years, 6-11 years, and 1-5 years). They were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 7 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher at least once between days 8 and 43 of the randomized period of the study.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—62.2%—compared to 31.8% in the placebo arm (P=0.011).

The PETIT2 trial enrolled 92 patients with chronic ITP who were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 13 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher for at least 6 out of 8 weeks, between weeks 5 and 12 of the randomized period.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—41.3%—compared to 3.4% of patients in the placebo arm (P<0.001).

PETIT trials: Safety

For both trials, there were 107 eltrombopag-treated patients evaluable for safety.

The most common adverse events that occurred more frequently in the eltrombopag arms than the placebo arms were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, cough, diarrhea, pyrexia, rhinitis, abdominal pain, oropharyngeal pain, toothache, increased ALT or AST, rash, and rhinorrhea.

Serious adverse events were reported in 8% of patients during the randomized part of both trials, although no serious adverse event occurred in more than 1 patient (1%).

An ALT elevation of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal occurred in 5% of eltrombopag-treated patients. Of those patients, 2% had ALT increases of at least 5 times the upper limit of normal.

There were no deaths or thromboembolic events during either study.

Prescribing information

The recommended dose and schedule of eltrombopag for pediatric patients age 6 and older is 50 mg daily or 25 mg daily of the tablet formulation for patients with East Asian ancestry. The recommended dose for all patients age 1 to 5 years is 25 mg daily of the powder for oral suspension formulation.

Eltrombopag is marketed as Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more information on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Eltrombopag tablets

Photo courtesy of GSK

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an expanded use for eltrombopag (Promacta) to include children 1 year of age and older with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

The updated label also includes a new oral suspension formulation of eltrombopag designed for younger children who may not be able to swallow tablets.

Eltrombopag was previously approved by the FDA in a tablet formulation in June 2015 for ITP patients ages 6 and older and in 2008 for use in adults with ITP.

The label expansion of eltrombopag was based on data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the phase 2 PETIT trial and the phase 3 PETIT2 trial.

PETIT trials: Efficacy

The PETIT trial included 67 ITP patients stratified by age cohort (12-17 years, 6-11 years, and 1-5 years). They were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 7 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher at least once between days 8 and 43 of the randomized period of the study.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—62.2%—compared to 31.8% in the placebo arm (P=0.011).

The PETIT2 trial enrolled 92 patients with chronic ITP who were randomized (2:1) to receive eltrombopag or placebo for 13 weeks. The eltrombopag dose was titrated to a target platelet count of 50-200 x 10⁹/L.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved platelet counts of 50 x 10⁹/L or higher for at least 6 out of 8 weeks, between weeks 5 and 12 of the randomized period.

Significantly more patients in the eltrombopag arm met this endpoint—41.3%—compared to 3.4% of patients in the placebo arm (P<0.001).

PETIT trials: Safety

For both trials, there were 107 eltrombopag-treated patients evaluable for safety.

The most common adverse events that occurred more frequently in the eltrombopag arms than the placebo arms were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, cough, diarrhea, pyrexia, rhinitis, abdominal pain, oropharyngeal pain, toothache, increased ALT or AST, rash, and rhinorrhea.

Serious adverse events were reported in 8% of patients during the randomized part of both trials, although no serious adverse event occurred in more than 1 patient (1%).

An ALT elevation of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal occurred in 5% of eltrombopag-treated patients. Of those patients, 2% had ALT increases of at least 5 times the upper limit of normal.

There were no deaths or thromboembolic events during either study.

Prescribing information

The recommended dose and schedule of eltrombopag for pediatric patients age 6 and older is 50 mg daily or 25 mg daily of the tablet formulation for patients with East Asian ancestry. The recommended dose for all patients age 1 to 5 years is 25 mg daily of the powder for oral suspension formulation.

Eltrombopag is marketed as Promacta in the US and Revolade in most other countries. For more information on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Clostridium difficile spores

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation to SER-109 for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults.

SER-109 is a microbiome therapeutic designed to treat recurrent CDI by correcting dysbiosis of the human microbiome.

In a single dose of 4 capsules, SER-109 re-introduces an ecology of purified bacterial spores that should restore the microbiome to a healthy state, allowing it to carry out key biological functions, including resisting Clostridium difficile.

“SER-109 is intended to re-introduce essential bacteria that restore the body’s natural resistance to CDI by re-establishing the ecology of the colonic microbiome,” explained Roger Pomerantz, MD, of Seres Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing SER-109.

“Because we’re focused on treating the underlying cause of the disease, we believe we have the potential to break the cycle of recurrent CDI and have a significant impact for patients.”

SER-109 is currently being investigated in a phase 2 trial. In addition to orphan designation, SER-109 has breakthrough designation from the FDA.

Trials of SER-109

Researchers reported phase 1/2 results with SER-109 at the 2014 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

The study had 2 cohorts containing 15 patients each. Patients were between 18 and 90 years old, had 3 or more laboratory-confirmed CDI episodes over 1 year, had a life expectancy greater than 3 months, and were able to give informed consent.

Patients in cohort 1 received a mean SER-109 dose of 1.5 x 10⁹ spores, and those in cohort 2 received a mean dose of 1 x 10⁸ spores. SER-109 was deemed effective if patients did not have a CDI recurrence in the 8-week period after they received SER-109.

In cohort 1, 87% of patients (13/15) achieved the efficacy endpoint. Two patients had transient, self-limited diarrhea with a positive C difficile test, but both reached the week 8 endpoint without needing antibiotic therapy for CDI. Thus, in cohort 1, the clinical cure rate was 100%.

In cohort 2, 93% of patients (14/15) reached the 8-week endpoint CDI-free. One patient failed per protocol.

The researchers said there were no drug-related serious adverse events in this trial.

Seres Therapeutics is currently conducting a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ECOSPOR) to assess the efficacy and safety of SER-109 in preventing recurrent CDI. The company expects results from this study to be available mid-2016.

About orphan and breakthrough designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

Orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US marketing exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of a drug candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition.

The benefits of breakthrough designation include the same benefits as fast track designation—priority review of a new drug application, rolling review, etc.—plus an organizational commitment involving the FDA’s senior managers with more intensive guidance from the FDA.

Clostridium difficile spores

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation to SER-109 for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults.

SER-109 is a microbiome therapeutic designed to treat recurrent CDI by correcting dysbiosis of the human microbiome.

In a single dose of 4 capsules, SER-109 re-introduces an ecology of purified bacterial spores that should restore the microbiome to a healthy state, allowing it to carry out key biological functions, including resisting Clostridium difficile.

“SER-109 is intended to re-introduce essential bacteria that restore the body’s natural resistance to CDI by re-establishing the ecology of the colonic microbiome,” explained Roger Pomerantz, MD, of Seres Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing SER-109.

“Because we’re focused on treating the underlying cause of the disease, we believe we have the potential to break the cycle of recurrent CDI and have a significant impact for patients.”

SER-109 is currently being investigated in a phase 2 trial. In addition to orphan designation, SER-109 has breakthrough designation from the FDA.

Trials of SER-109

Researchers reported phase 1/2 results with SER-109 at the 2014 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

The study had 2 cohorts containing 15 patients each. Patients were between 18 and 90 years old, had 3 or more laboratory-confirmed CDI episodes over 1 year, had a life expectancy greater than 3 months, and were able to give informed consent.

Patients in cohort 1 received a mean SER-109 dose of 1.5 x 10⁹ spores, and those in cohort 2 received a mean dose of 1 x 10⁸ spores. SER-109 was deemed effective if patients did not have a CDI recurrence in the 8-week period after they received SER-109.

In cohort 1, 87% of patients (13/15) achieved the efficacy endpoint. Two patients had transient, self-limited diarrhea with a positive C difficile test, but both reached the week 8 endpoint without needing antibiotic therapy for CDI. Thus, in cohort 1, the clinical cure rate was 100%.

In cohort 2, 93% of patients (14/15) reached the 8-week endpoint CDI-free. One patient failed per protocol.

The researchers said there were no drug-related serious adverse events in this trial.

Seres Therapeutics is currently conducting a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ECOSPOR) to assess the efficacy and safety of SER-109 in preventing recurrent CDI. The company expects results from this study to be available mid-2016.

About orphan and breakthrough designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

Orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US marketing exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of a drug candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition.

The benefits of breakthrough designation include the same benefits as fast track designation—priority review of a new drug application, rolling review, etc.—plus an organizational commitment involving the FDA’s senior managers with more intensive guidance from the FDA.

Clostridium difficile spores

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation to SER-109 for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults.

SER-109 is a microbiome therapeutic designed to treat recurrent CDI by correcting dysbiosis of the human microbiome.

In a single dose of 4 capsules, SER-109 re-introduces an ecology of purified bacterial spores that should restore the microbiome to a healthy state, allowing it to carry out key biological functions, including resisting Clostridium difficile.

“SER-109 is intended to re-introduce essential bacteria that restore the body’s natural resistance to CDI by re-establishing the ecology of the colonic microbiome,” explained Roger Pomerantz, MD, of Seres Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing SER-109.

“Because we’re focused on treating the underlying cause of the disease, we believe we have the potential to break the cycle of recurrent CDI and have a significant impact for patients.”

SER-109 is currently being investigated in a phase 2 trial. In addition to orphan designation, SER-109 has breakthrough designation from the FDA.

Trials of SER-109

Researchers reported phase 1/2 results with SER-109 at the 2014 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

The study had 2 cohorts containing 15 patients each. Patients were between 18 and 90 years old, had 3 or more laboratory-confirmed CDI episodes over 1 year, had a life expectancy greater than 3 months, and were able to give informed consent.

Patients in cohort 1 received a mean SER-109 dose of 1.5 x 10⁹ spores, and those in cohort 2 received a mean dose of 1 x 10⁸ spores. SER-109 was deemed effective if patients did not have a CDI recurrence in the 8-week period after they received SER-109.

In cohort 1, 87% of patients (13/15) achieved the efficacy endpoint. Two patients had transient, self-limited diarrhea with a positive C difficile test, but both reached the week 8 endpoint without needing antibiotic therapy for CDI. Thus, in cohort 1, the clinical cure rate was 100%.

In cohort 2, 93% of patients (14/15) reached the 8-week endpoint CDI-free. One patient failed per protocol.

The researchers said there were no drug-related serious adverse events in this trial.

Seres Therapeutics is currently conducting a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ECOSPOR) to assess the efficacy and safety of SER-109 in preventing recurrent CDI. The company expects results from this study to be available mid-2016.

About orphan and breakthrough designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.

Orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US marketing exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of a drug candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition.

The benefits of breakthrough designation include the same benefits as fast track designation—priority review of a new drug application, rolling review, etc.—plus an organizational commitment involving the FDA’s senior managers with more intensive guidance from the FDA.