Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:58
Display Headline
Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution
Background The incidence of rectal cancer increases with age, and older patients are more likely to have other chronic conditions that can affect outcome and tolerability of treatment.

 

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the influence of age and comorbidities in the management of rectal cancer.

 

Methods 59 patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III rectal cancer who were treated during a 3-year period were included in the study. Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the patients were divided into 2 groups based on their CCI scores: Fit (score of 0-1 points) and Vulnerable (score of ≥ 2). Primary endpoint was survival at 1 and 3 years.

 

Results The sample included 43 patients (72.9%) in the Fit group and 16 patients (27.1%) in the Vulnerable group. The most common comorbidities were myocardial infarction, diabetes, and chronic lung disease. One-year survival the same between the groups (P = .330), but 3-year survival was lower in the Vulnerable group patients (83.7% vs 56.3%, respectively; P = .040). The rates of neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy use and low anterior resection performance were the same between the groups. Colostomy closure was achieved more frequently in the Fit group compared with the Vulnerable group (83.3% vs 55.6%; P = .083). There was no difference in mean disease-free survival, grade 3-4 toxicity, and dose reduction between the groups.

 

Conclusions Comorbidity assessment should always be included in standard oncological management of elderly patients. Fit patients can be managed with standard treatment and may benefit from a conventional, more aggressive approach in their therapy. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
8-13
Legacy Keywords
rectal cancer, Charlson Comorbidity index, CCI
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background The incidence of rectal cancer increases with age, and older patients are more likely to have other chronic conditions that can affect outcome and tolerability of treatment.

 

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the influence of age and comorbidities in the management of rectal cancer.

 

Methods 59 patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III rectal cancer who were treated during a 3-year period were included in the study. Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the patients were divided into 2 groups based on their CCI scores: Fit (score of 0-1 points) and Vulnerable (score of ≥ 2). Primary endpoint was survival at 1 and 3 years.

 

Results The sample included 43 patients (72.9%) in the Fit group and 16 patients (27.1%) in the Vulnerable group. The most common comorbidities were myocardial infarction, diabetes, and chronic lung disease. One-year survival the same between the groups (P = .330), but 3-year survival was lower in the Vulnerable group patients (83.7% vs 56.3%, respectively; P = .040). The rates of neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy use and low anterior resection performance were the same between the groups. Colostomy closure was achieved more frequently in the Fit group compared with the Vulnerable group (83.3% vs 55.6%; P = .083). There was no difference in mean disease-free survival, grade 3-4 toxicity, and dose reduction between the groups.

 

Conclusions Comorbidity assessment should always be included in standard oncological management of elderly patients. Fit patients can be managed with standard treatment and may benefit from a conventional, more aggressive approach in their therapy. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background The incidence of rectal cancer increases with age, and older patients are more likely to have other chronic conditions that can affect outcome and tolerability of treatment.

 

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the influence of age and comorbidities in the management of rectal cancer.

 

Methods 59 patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III rectal cancer who were treated during a 3-year period were included in the study. Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the patients were divided into 2 groups based on their CCI scores: Fit (score of 0-1 points) and Vulnerable (score of ≥ 2). Primary endpoint was survival at 1 and 3 years.

 

Results The sample included 43 patients (72.9%) in the Fit group and 16 patients (27.1%) in the Vulnerable group. The most common comorbidities were myocardial infarction, diabetes, and chronic lung disease. One-year survival the same between the groups (P = .330), but 3-year survival was lower in the Vulnerable group patients (83.7% vs 56.3%, respectively; P = .040). The rates of neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy use and low anterior resection performance were the same between the groups. Colostomy closure was achieved more frequently in the Fit group compared with the Vulnerable group (83.3% vs 55.6%; P = .083). There was no difference in mean disease-free survival, grade 3-4 toxicity, and dose reduction between the groups.

 

Conclusions Comorbidity assessment should always be included in standard oncological management of elderly patients. Fit patients can be managed with standard treatment and may benefit from a conventional, more aggressive approach in their therapy. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
8-13
Page Number
8-13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution
Display Headline
Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution
Legacy Keywords
rectal cancer, Charlson Comorbidity index, CCI
Legacy Keywords
rectal cancer, Charlson Comorbidity index, CCI
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2015;13:8-13
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Use of atropine-diphenoxylate compared with hyoscyamine to decrease rates of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:58
Display Headline
Use of atropine-diphenoxylate compared with hyoscyamine to decrease rates of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome
Background Cholinergic syndrome is a well established acute adverse reaction associated with irinotecan. Cholinergic side effects can be ameliorated or prevented with anticholinergic agents. To date, no formal studies have compared atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine as premedications for prophylaxis of the cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan infusion.

 

Objective To compare the incidence of cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan using atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication.

 

Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized, cohort study of adult patients treated with atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication before receiving irinotecan. For all irinotecan infusions, intravenous atropine was administered for patients experiencing any cholinergic reaction.

 

Results A total of 532 irinotecan cycles (354 cycles for atropine-diphenoxylate group; 178 cycles for hyoscyamine group) were analyzed in 80 patients. Overall incidence of cholinergic syndrome did not differ between atropine-diphenoxylate (8.2%) and hyoscyamine (9.0%) groups (P = .76). The incidence of cholinergic syndrome after the first cycle of irinotecan was similar between the 2 arms, atropine-diphenoxylate (14.6%) and hyoscyamine (10.7%), with P = .74. The most common cholinergic symptoms documented were abdominal pain or cramping, and diarrhea.

 

Limitations This study was subjected to vulnerabilities to bias and random error because of its observational retrospective design and small number of participants.

 

Conclusions Lack of difference in the incidence of cholinergic syndrome observed in irinotecan-treated patients suggests atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine may both be effective prophylactic options. The findings support the need for a larger, randomized study to assess and compare these agents with other potential premedications such as scopolamine and atropine in prevention of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome.

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
3-7
Legacy Keywords
atropine-diphenoxylate, hyoscyamine, irinotecan, cholinergic syndrome
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Cholinergic syndrome is a well established acute adverse reaction associated with irinotecan. Cholinergic side effects can be ameliorated or prevented with anticholinergic agents. To date, no formal studies have compared atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine as premedications for prophylaxis of the cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan infusion.

 

Objective To compare the incidence of cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan using atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication.

 

Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized, cohort study of adult patients treated with atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication before receiving irinotecan. For all irinotecan infusions, intravenous atropine was administered for patients experiencing any cholinergic reaction.

 

Results A total of 532 irinotecan cycles (354 cycles for atropine-diphenoxylate group; 178 cycles for hyoscyamine group) were analyzed in 80 patients. Overall incidence of cholinergic syndrome did not differ between atropine-diphenoxylate (8.2%) and hyoscyamine (9.0%) groups (P = .76). The incidence of cholinergic syndrome after the first cycle of irinotecan was similar between the 2 arms, atropine-diphenoxylate (14.6%) and hyoscyamine (10.7%), with P = .74. The most common cholinergic symptoms documented were abdominal pain or cramping, and diarrhea.

 

Limitations This study was subjected to vulnerabilities to bias and random error because of its observational retrospective design and small number of participants.

 

Conclusions Lack of difference in the incidence of cholinergic syndrome observed in irinotecan-treated patients suggests atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine may both be effective prophylactic options. The findings support the need for a larger, randomized study to assess and compare these agents with other potential premedications such as scopolamine and atropine in prevention of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome.

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Cholinergic syndrome is a well established acute adverse reaction associated with irinotecan. Cholinergic side effects can be ameliorated or prevented with anticholinergic agents. To date, no formal studies have compared atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine as premedications for prophylaxis of the cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan infusion.

 

Objective To compare the incidence of cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan using atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication.

 

Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized, cohort study of adult patients treated with atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication before receiving irinotecan. For all irinotecan infusions, intravenous atropine was administered for patients experiencing any cholinergic reaction.

 

Results A total of 532 irinotecan cycles (354 cycles for atropine-diphenoxylate group; 178 cycles for hyoscyamine group) were analyzed in 80 patients. Overall incidence of cholinergic syndrome did not differ between atropine-diphenoxylate (8.2%) and hyoscyamine (9.0%) groups (P = .76). The incidence of cholinergic syndrome after the first cycle of irinotecan was similar between the 2 arms, atropine-diphenoxylate (14.6%) and hyoscyamine (10.7%), with P = .74. The most common cholinergic symptoms documented were abdominal pain or cramping, and diarrhea.

 

Limitations This study was subjected to vulnerabilities to bias and random error because of its observational retrospective design and small number of participants.

 

Conclusions Lack of difference in the incidence of cholinergic syndrome observed in irinotecan-treated patients suggests atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine may both be effective prophylactic options. The findings support the need for a larger, randomized study to assess and compare these agents with other potential premedications such as scopolamine and atropine in prevention of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome.

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
3-7
Page Number
3-7
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Use of atropine-diphenoxylate compared with hyoscyamine to decrease rates of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome
Display Headline
Use of atropine-diphenoxylate compared with hyoscyamine to decrease rates of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome
Legacy Keywords
atropine-diphenoxylate, hyoscyamine, irinotecan, cholinergic syndrome
Legacy Keywords
atropine-diphenoxylate, hyoscyamine, irinotecan, cholinergic syndrome
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2015;13:3-7
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:10
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.

 

Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.

 

Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.

 

Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).

 

Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.

 

Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.

 

Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
14-21
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.

 

Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.

 

Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.

 

Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).

 

Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.

 

Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.

 

Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer commonly experience significant changes in quality of life (QoL) and levels of symptom distress. It is not known if a telehealth intervention would mitigate these changes.

 

Objective To evaluate the impact of a telehealth intervention on QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing initial treatment for head and neck cancers.

 

Methods A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact on QoL and symptom distress of telehealth intervention and standard care was conducted with 80 patients (45 treatment, 35 control) who had been diagnosed with head or neck cancer and were receiving 1 or more treatment modalities. Treatment group participants responded daily to symptom management algorithms using a simple telehealth messaging device. QoL was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale (FACT-HN) and symptom burden by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Control group participants completed assessments while they received routine care.

 

Results In the posttreatment phase, the telehealth participants had significantly better scores than the controls for physical well-being (20.6 vs 17.0, P = .02) and trial outcome index (59.9 vs. 50.2, P = .04) on the FACT-HN, and total scores on the MSAS (0.9 vs. 1.2, P = .04).

 

Limitations The moderate sample size of 80 patients limits the power to measure more subtle impacts of the intervention.

 

Conclusions Using telehealth to provide support to patients with head and neck cancer during the acute phase of treatment improved some aspects of posttreatment QoL and symptom burden.

 

Funding Supported in part by NIH R21CA115345 from the National Cancer Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
14-21
Page Number
14-21
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Display Headline
Impact of a telehealth intervention on quality of life and symptom distress in patients with head and neck cancer
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Legacy Keywords
telehealth, quality of life, QoL, symptom distress, head and neck cancer, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-HN
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2015;13:14-21
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Beneficial effects of animal-assisted visits on quality of life during multimodal radiation-chemotherapy regimens

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:10
Display Headline
Beneficial effects of animal-assisted visits on quality of life during multimodal radiation-chemotherapy regimens
Objective To test the efficacy of AAVs in improving the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving combined chemotherapy-radiation therapy.

 

Methods 42 patients consented to daily AAVs during the time they received therapy for head and neck cancer. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G) was administered at baseline, week 3, and week 7 (at the end of therapy), and the Satisfaction With The AAV Intervention instrument, an 18-item scale adapted from the Pet Attitude Scale.

 

Results 37 patients completed at least baseline and 1 follow-up assessment for a single group analysis of change over time. Means for FACT-G subscales showed significant declines in Physical Well-Being (PWB, P < .001) and Functional Well-Being (FWB, P = .003). In contrast, Social Well-Being increased (SWB, P = .03). Controlling for declines in PWB at each time point, increases in Emotional Well-Being (EWB) were also significant (P = .004).

 

Limitations Scheduling and patient preference prevented conducting a randomized trial.

 

Conclusion FACT-G analysis showed significant increase in SWB and EWB despite high symptom burden and clinically evident and expected declines in PWB and FWB. Mean scores for satisfaction related to psychological symptoms, liking animals/pets, and contact with animals were consistently higher than neutral score or Unsure (all P < .001). Satisfaction related to physical symptoms was not significantly different from neutral. Though self-selected for an affinity to pets, patients endorsed a high level of satisfaction, which supports the usefulness of the intervention.

 

Funding Grant from the Good Dog Foundation and Pfizer Animal Health (now Zoetis Animal Health) 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
22-26
Legacy Keywords
animal-assisted visit, AAV, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-G, multimodal radiation-chemotherapy
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Objective To test the efficacy of AAVs in improving the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving combined chemotherapy-radiation therapy.

 

Methods 42 patients consented to daily AAVs during the time they received therapy for head and neck cancer. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G) was administered at baseline, week 3, and week 7 (at the end of therapy), and the Satisfaction With The AAV Intervention instrument, an 18-item scale adapted from the Pet Attitude Scale.

 

Results 37 patients completed at least baseline and 1 follow-up assessment for a single group analysis of change over time. Means for FACT-G subscales showed significant declines in Physical Well-Being (PWB, P < .001) and Functional Well-Being (FWB, P = .003). In contrast, Social Well-Being increased (SWB, P = .03). Controlling for declines in PWB at each time point, increases in Emotional Well-Being (EWB) were also significant (P = .004).

 

Limitations Scheduling and patient preference prevented conducting a randomized trial.

 

Conclusion FACT-G analysis showed significant increase in SWB and EWB despite high symptom burden and clinically evident and expected declines in PWB and FWB. Mean scores for satisfaction related to psychological symptoms, liking animals/pets, and contact with animals were consistently higher than neutral score or Unsure (all P < .001). Satisfaction related to physical symptoms was not significantly different from neutral. Though self-selected for an affinity to pets, patients endorsed a high level of satisfaction, which supports the usefulness of the intervention.

 

Funding Grant from the Good Dog Foundation and Pfizer Animal Health (now Zoetis Animal Health) 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Objective To test the efficacy of AAVs in improving the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving combined chemotherapy-radiation therapy.

 

Methods 42 patients consented to daily AAVs during the time they received therapy for head and neck cancer. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G) was administered at baseline, week 3, and week 7 (at the end of therapy), and the Satisfaction With The AAV Intervention instrument, an 18-item scale adapted from the Pet Attitude Scale.

 

Results 37 patients completed at least baseline and 1 follow-up assessment for a single group analysis of change over time. Means for FACT-G subscales showed significant declines in Physical Well-Being (PWB, P < .001) and Functional Well-Being (FWB, P = .003). In contrast, Social Well-Being increased (SWB, P = .03). Controlling for declines in PWB at each time point, increases in Emotional Well-Being (EWB) were also significant (P = .004).

 

Limitations Scheduling and patient preference prevented conducting a randomized trial.

 

Conclusion FACT-G analysis showed significant increase in SWB and EWB despite high symptom burden and clinically evident and expected declines in PWB and FWB. Mean scores for satisfaction related to psychological symptoms, liking animals/pets, and contact with animals were consistently higher than neutral score or Unsure (all P < .001). Satisfaction related to physical symptoms was not significantly different from neutral. Though self-selected for an affinity to pets, patients endorsed a high level of satisfaction, which supports the usefulness of the intervention.

 

Funding Grant from the Good Dog Foundation and Pfizer Animal Health (now Zoetis Animal Health) 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 13(1)
Page Number
22-26
Page Number
22-26
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Beneficial effects of animal-assisted visits on quality of life during multimodal radiation-chemotherapy regimens
Display Headline
Beneficial effects of animal-assisted visits on quality of life during multimodal radiation-chemotherapy regimens
Legacy Keywords
animal-assisted visit, AAV, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-G, multimodal radiation-chemotherapy
Legacy Keywords
animal-assisted visit, AAV, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-G, multimodal radiation-chemotherapy
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2015;13:22-26
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Predictors of resolution in navigated patients with abnormal cancer screening tests

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 18:06
Display Headline
Predictors of resolution in navigated patients with abnormal cancer screening tests
Background Patient navigation has been effective in improving cancer care, yet little is known about what predicts timely outcomes in navigated patients.

Objective To identify predictors of resolution of abnormal cancer screening tests in patients who received navigation.

Methods We examined data on patients with abnormal breast (n = 256) or cervical (n = 150) screening tests or symptoms who received navigation as part of the Ohio Patient Navigator Research Program during 2007-2010. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify predictors of time to resolution (ie, when a patient’s clinical abnormality or abnormal screening test was determined to be a benign condition or a cancer diagnosis).

Results The median time to resolution was 183 days for navigated patients with breast abnormalities and 172 days for navigated patients with cervical abnormalities. In patients with breast abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) or higher perceived stress (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98) had slower resolution. Among patients with cervical abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation had slower resolution (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91). Patients with cervical abnormalities had faster resolution if they had private health insurance, but this effect was present only in younger women (interaction P = .003).

Limitations Unknown generalizability of results because patients were female and from clinics in central Ohio.

Conclusions Several variables predicted whether patient navigation led to faster resolution, and predictors differed somewhat by disease site. Results will be useful in improving current patient navigation programs and designing future programs.

Funding American Cancer Society and the National Institutes of Health 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
439-445
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, cervical cancer, patient navigator
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Patient navigation has been effective in improving cancer care, yet little is known about what predicts timely outcomes in navigated patients.

Objective To identify predictors of resolution of abnormal cancer screening tests in patients who received navigation.

Methods We examined data on patients with abnormal breast (n = 256) or cervical (n = 150) screening tests or symptoms who received navigation as part of the Ohio Patient Navigator Research Program during 2007-2010. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify predictors of time to resolution (ie, when a patient’s clinical abnormality or abnormal screening test was determined to be a benign condition or a cancer diagnosis).

Results The median time to resolution was 183 days for navigated patients with breast abnormalities and 172 days for navigated patients with cervical abnormalities. In patients with breast abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) or higher perceived stress (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98) had slower resolution. Among patients with cervical abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation had slower resolution (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91). Patients with cervical abnormalities had faster resolution if they had private health insurance, but this effect was present only in younger women (interaction P = .003).

Limitations Unknown generalizability of results because patients were female and from clinics in central Ohio.

Conclusions Several variables predicted whether patient navigation led to faster resolution, and predictors differed somewhat by disease site. Results will be useful in improving current patient navigation programs and designing future programs.

Funding American Cancer Society and the National Institutes of Health 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Patient navigation has been effective in improving cancer care, yet little is known about what predicts timely outcomes in navigated patients.

Objective To identify predictors of resolution of abnormal cancer screening tests in patients who received navigation.

Methods We examined data on patients with abnormal breast (n = 256) or cervical (n = 150) screening tests or symptoms who received navigation as part of the Ohio Patient Navigator Research Program during 2007-2010. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify predictors of time to resolution (ie, when a patient’s clinical abnormality or abnormal screening test was determined to be a benign condition or a cancer diagnosis).

Results The median time to resolution was 183 days for navigated patients with breast abnormalities and 172 days for navigated patients with cervical abnormalities. In patients with breast abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) or higher perceived stress (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98) had slower resolution. Among patients with cervical abnormalities, those who reported at least 1 barrier to care during navigation had slower resolution (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91). Patients with cervical abnormalities had faster resolution if they had private health insurance, but this effect was present only in younger women (interaction P = .003).

Limitations Unknown generalizability of results because patients were female and from clinics in central Ohio.

Conclusions Several variables predicted whether patient navigation led to faster resolution, and predictors differed somewhat by disease site. Results will be useful in improving current patient navigation programs and designing future programs.

Funding American Cancer Society and the National Institutes of Health 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Page Number
439-445
Page Number
439-445
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Predictors of resolution in navigated patients with abnormal cancer screening tests
Display Headline
Predictors of resolution in navigated patients with abnormal cancer screening tests
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, cervical cancer, patient navigator
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, cervical cancer, patient navigator
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:431-438
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Information and communication needs of Chinese American breast cancer patients: perspectives on survivorship care planning

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 18:06
Display Headline
Information and communication needs of Chinese American breast cancer patients: perspectives on survivorship care planning
Background The existing knowledge on the survivorship experiences of Chinese American breast cancer survivors (CABCS) has arisen largely from aggregated data across multiethnic or multicancer studies that have focused on quality of life. Little is known about Chinese American perspectives and preferences for survivorship care.

Objective To examine the experiences of CABCS to better understand their information and communication needs and their preferences for survivorship care plans (SCPs).

Methods 16 CABCS, aged 37-72 years, were recruited through community-based organizations in the Northeast United States to participate in one-on-one telephone interviews about their breast cancer survivorship experience. The semistructured interviews were conducted in Mandarin, Cantonese, or English. Two investigators transcribed and translated the audio recordings into English and analyzed the interview transcripts using established methods of qualitative content analysis.

Results Three main themes were identified through analysis of interview transcripts: the need for evidence-based and culturally and linguistically appropriate health information; the role of language or communication barriers and culture in accessing care and communicating with providers; and preferences for SCP elements and format.

Limitations The sample may not be representative of the entire population of CABCS.

Conclusions The findings provide insight into the information and communication needs and SCP preferences of CABCS. Understanding the cultural nuances that underlie these needs and preferences is critical for improving CABCS’s quality of life after treatment for cancer. SCPs that incorporate Chinese-language resources and address the unique cultural needs of this population should be developed and they should include information about diet and nutrition as well as traditional Chinese medicine.

Funding This work was supported in part by the NIH-NCI’s Community Network Program Center, ACCHDC (U54CA153513, PI: Dr Grace Ma) and P30 CA06927. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
439-445
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, information needs, communication needs, Chinese American, survivor care plan
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background The existing knowledge on the survivorship experiences of Chinese American breast cancer survivors (CABCS) has arisen largely from aggregated data across multiethnic or multicancer studies that have focused on quality of life. Little is known about Chinese American perspectives and preferences for survivorship care.

Objective To examine the experiences of CABCS to better understand their information and communication needs and their preferences for survivorship care plans (SCPs).

Methods 16 CABCS, aged 37-72 years, were recruited through community-based organizations in the Northeast United States to participate in one-on-one telephone interviews about their breast cancer survivorship experience. The semistructured interviews were conducted in Mandarin, Cantonese, or English. Two investigators transcribed and translated the audio recordings into English and analyzed the interview transcripts using established methods of qualitative content analysis.

Results Three main themes were identified through analysis of interview transcripts: the need for evidence-based and culturally and linguistically appropriate health information; the role of language or communication barriers and culture in accessing care and communicating with providers; and preferences for SCP elements and format.

Limitations The sample may not be representative of the entire population of CABCS.

Conclusions The findings provide insight into the information and communication needs and SCP preferences of CABCS. Understanding the cultural nuances that underlie these needs and preferences is critical for improving CABCS’s quality of life after treatment for cancer. SCPs that incorporate Chinese-language resources and address the unique cultural needs of this population should be developed and they should include information about diet and nutrition as well as traditional Chinese medicine.

Funding This work was supported in part by the NIH-NCI’s Community Network Program Center, ACCHDC (U54CA153513, PI: Dr Grace Ma) and P30 CA06927. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background The existing knowledge on the survivorship experiences of Chinese American breast cancer survivors (CABCS) has arisen largely from aggregated data across multiethnic or multicancer studies that have focused on quality of life. Little is known about Chinese American perspectives and preferences for survivorship care.

Objective To examine the experiences of CABCS to better understand their information and communication needs and their preferences for survivorship care plans (SCPs).

Methods 16 CABCS, aged 37-72 years, were recruited through community-based organizations in the Northeast United States to participate in one-on-one telephone interviews about their breast cancer survivorship experience. The semistructured interviews were conducted in Mandarin, Cantonese, or English. Two investigators transcribed and translated the audio recordings into English and analyzed the interview transcripts using established methods of qualitative content analysis.

Results Three main themes were identified through analysis of interview transcripts: the need for evidence-based and culturally and linguistically appropriate health information; the role of language or communication barriers and culture in accessing care and communicating with providers; and preferences for SCP elements and format.

Limitations The sample may not be representative of the entire population of CABCS.

Conclusions The findings provide insight into the information and communication needs and SCP preferences of CABCS. Understanding the cultural nuances that underlie these needs and preferences is critical for improving CABCS’s quality of life after treatment for cancer. SCPs that incorporate Chinese-language resources and address the unique cultural needs of this population should be developed and they should include information about diet and nutrition as well as traditional Chinese medicine.

Funding This work was supported in part by the NIH-NCI’s Community Network Program Center, ACCHDC (U54CA153513, PI: Dr Grace Ma) and P30 CA06927. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Page Number
439-445
Page Number
439-445
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Information and communication needs of Chinese American breast cancer patients: perspectives on survivorship care planning
Display Headline
Information and communication needs of Chinese American breast cancer patients: perspectives on survivorship care planning
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, information needs, communication needs, Chinese American, survivor care plan
Legacy Keywords
breast cancer, information needs, communication needs, Chinese American, survivor care plan
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:439-445
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

A feasibility study of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer actively receiving second-line chemotherapy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:58
Display Headline
A feasibility study of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer actively receiving second-line chemotherapy
Background Randomized controlled trials support the use of dignity therapy (DT) in palliative care patients late in the course of their disease, but little is known about the feasibility of DT earlier in the course in patients with incurable malignant disease who are still receiving chemotherapy.

Objectives To assess the feasibility of DT relatively early in the disease trajectory (primary endpoint) and the effect on death acceptance, distress, symptoms, quality of life, peacefulness, and advanced care planning (secondary outcome endpoint).

Methods Stage IV colorectal cancer patients who progressed on first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received DT over 2 visits and had outcome measures assessed pre-DT, immediately post-DT and 1 month post-DT.

Results 15 of 17 patients (88%) who were approached enrolled in the study. Most of the patients who completed DT reported being satisfied and felt it was helpful, that it increased their sense of meaning, that it would be helpful to their family, and that it increased their sense of dignity, their sense of purpose, and their will to live.

Limitations This is a small study that lacks power for statistical significance of findings. There is no control group for comparison.

Conclusions DT is a highly feasible, satisfying, and meaningful intervention for advanced colorectal cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy earlier in the course of their and may result in an understanding of disease and goals of care at the end of life. Larger feasibility and exploratory studies are warranted in advanced cancer patients.

Funding American Cancer Society (ACS-IRG 93-037-15)

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
446-453
Legacy Keywords
colorectal cancer, dignity therapy, quality of life, QoL, advanced care planning

Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Randomized controlled trials support the use of dignity therapy (DT) in palliative care patients late in the course of their disease, but little is known about the feasibility of DT earlier in the course in patients with incurable malignant disease who are still receiving chemotherapy.

Objectives To assess the feasibility of DT relatively early in the disease trajectory (primary endpoint) and the effect on death acceptance, distress, symptoms, quality of life, peacefulness, and advanced care planning (secondary outcome endpoint).

Methods Stage IV colorectal cancer patients who progressed on first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received DT over 2 visits and had outcome measures assessed pre-DT, immediately post-DT and 1 month post-DT.

Results 15 of 17 patients (88%) who were approached enrolled in the study. Most of the patients who completed DT reported being satisfied and felt it was helpful, that it increased their sense of meaning, that it would be helpful to their family, and that it increased their sense of dignity, their sense of purpose, and their will to live.

Limitations This is a small study that lacks power for statistical significance of findings. There is no control group for comparison.

Conclusions DT is a highly feasible, satisfying, and meaningful intervention for advanced colorectal cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy earlier in the course of their and may result in an understanding of disease and goals of care at the end of life. Larger feasibility and exploratory studies are warranted in advanced cancer patients.

Funding American Cancer Society (ACS-IRG 93-037-15)

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Randomized controlled trials support the use of dignity therapy (DT) in palliative care patients late in the course of their disease, but little is known about the feasibility of DT earlier in the course in patients with incurable malignant disease who are still receiving chemotherapy.

Objectives To assess the feasibility of DT relatively early in the disease trajectory (primary endpoint) and the effect on death acceptance, distress, symptoms, quality of life, peacefulness, and advanced care planning (secondary outcome endpoint).

Methods Stage IV colorectal cancer patients who progressed on first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received DT over 2 visits and had outcome measures assessed pre-DT, immediately post-DT and 1 month post-DT.

Results 15 of 17 patients (88%) who were approached enrolled in the study. Most of the patients who completed DT reported being satisfied and felt it was helpful, that it increased their sense of meaning, that it would be helpful to their family, and that it increased their sense of dignity, their sense of purpose, and their will to live.

Limitations This is a small study that lacks power for statistical significance of findings. There is no control group for comparison.

Conclusions DT is a highly feasible, satisfying, and meaningful intervention for advanced colorectal cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy earlier in the course of their and may result in an understanding of disease and goals of care at the end of life. Larger feasibility and exploratory studies are warranted in advanced cancer patients.

Funding American Cancer Society (ACS-IRG 93-037-15)

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(12)
Page Number
446-453
Page Number
446-453
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A feasibility study of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer actively receiving second-line chemotherapy
Display Headline
A feasibility study of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer actively receiving second-line chemotherapy
Legacy Keywords
colorectal cancer, dignity therapy, quality of life, QoL, advanced care planning

Legacy Keywords
colorectal cancer, dignity therapy, quality of life, QoL, advanced care planning

Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:446-453
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Quality of life and symptoms after stereotactic body radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer patients

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:10
Display Headline
Quality of life and symptoms after stereotactic body radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer patients
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged in recent years as a clinically viable treatment option for early-stage non-small- cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Comprehensive assessment of quality of life (QoL) after SBRT is relatively sparse.

Objective To describe QoL and symptoms in a small, prospective cohort of early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Methods 19 NSCLC patients who were medically unfit for surgery or chose not to undergo surgery were included in the study. All of the patients were treated with SBRT between 2009 and 2013 at a single comprehensive cancer center. Patients completed a baseline assessment of functional and cognitive status, symptoms, psychological distress, and overall QoL. Questionnaires were repeated at 6 and 12 weeks after accrual.

Results There were no significant differences in all outcomes across the 3 evaluation time points. Overall QoL scores were moderate, and the lowest score was observed for the functional well-being domain. The most severe symptoms at baseline were pain, lack of energy, cough, nervousness, difficulty sleeping, shortness of breath, and worry. Severity scores for pain, lack of energy, and cough increased, whereas nervousness, difficulty sleeping, and worry decreased at the 12 week evaluation.

Limitations Small sample size and lack of sufficient diversity in the cohort. Conclusions QoL scores remained relatively stable across time. Anxiety improved after SBRT, whereas symptoms such as generalized pain, lack of energy, and cough worsened. The findings suggest that SBRT is overall a well-tolerated treatment with no significant decrement in patient-centered outcomes.

Funding/sponsorship This research was supported by grant 5 P01 CA136396-02 (PI: Ferrell) from the National Cancer Institute.



Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
407-414
Legacy Keywords
quality of life, QoL, stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT, lung cancer




Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged in recent years as a clinically viable treatment option for early-stage non-small- cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Comprehensive assessment of quality of life (QoL) after SBRT is relatively sparse.

Objective To describe QoL and symptoms in a small, prospective cohort of early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Methods 19 NSCLC patients who were medically unfit for surgery or chose not to undergo surgery were included in the study. All of the patients were treated with SBRT between 2009 and 2013 at a single comprehensive cancer center. Patients completed a baseline assessment of functional and cognitive status, symptoms, psychological distress, and overall QoL. Questionnaires were repeated at 6 and 12 weeks after accrual.

Results There were no significant differences in all outcomes across the 3 evaluation time points. Overall QoL scores were moderate, and the lowest score was observed for the functional well-being domain. The most severe symptoms at baseline were pain, lack of energy, cough, nervousness, difficulty sleeping, shortness of breath, and worry. Severity scores for pain, lack of energy, and cough increased, whereas nervousness, difficulty sleeping, and worry decreased at the 12 week evaluation.

Limitations Small sample size and lack of sufficient diversity in the cohort. Conclusions QoL scores remained relatively stable across time. Anxiety improved after SBRT, whereas symptoms such as generalized pain, lack of energy, and cough worsened. The findings suggest that SBRT is overall a well-tolerated treatment with no significant decrement in patient-centered outcomes.

Funding/sponsorship This research was supported by grant 5 P01 CA136396-02 (PI: Ferrell) from the National Cancer Institute.



Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged in recent years as a clinically viable treatment option for early-stage non-small- cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Comprehensive assessment of quality of life (QoL) after SBRT is relatively sparse.

Objective To describe QoL and symptoms in a small, prospective cohort of early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Methods 19 NSCLC patients who were medically unfit for surgery or chose not to undergo surgery were included in the study. All of the patients were treated with SBRT between 2009 and 2013 at a single comprehensive cancer center. Patients completed a baseline assessment of functional and cognitive status, symptoms, psychological distress, and overall QoL. Questionnaires were repeated at 6 and 12 weeks after accrual.

Results There were no significant differences in all outcomes across the 3 evaluation time points. Overall QoL scores were moderate, and the lowest score was observed for the functional well-being domain. The most severe symptoms at baseline were pain, lack of energy, cough, nervousness, difficulty sleeping, shortness of breath, and worry. Severity scores for pain, lack of energy, and cough increased, whereas nervousness, difficulty sleeping, and worry decreased at the 12 week evaluation.

Limitations Small sample size and lack of sufficient diversity in the cohort. Conclusions QoL scores remained relatively stable across time. Anxiety improved after SBRT, whereas symptoms such as generalized pain, lack of energy, and cough worsened. The findings suggest that SBRT is overall a well-tolerated treatment with no significant decrement in patient-centered outcomes.

Funding/sponsorship This research was supported by grant 5 P01 CA136396-02 (PI: Ferrell) from the National Cancer Institute.



Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Page Number
407-414
Page Number
407-414
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Quality of life and symptoms after stereotactic body radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer patients
Display Headline
Quality of life and symptoms after stereotactic body radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer patients
Legacy Keywords
quality of life, QoL, stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT, lung cancer




Legacy Keywords
quality of life, QoL, stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT, lung cancer




Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:407-414
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and impact on quality of life 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:58
Display Headline
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and impact on quality of life 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy

Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of cytostatics. With improved survival among cancer patients, CIPN may have a major impact on quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors.

Objective To determine the occurrence of CIPN induced by oxaliplatin and taxanes and its impact on QoL median 6 months after chemotherapy.

Methods All patients who received their last treatment with oxaliplatin or taxanes in 2 consecutive years in the Máxima Medical Centre, the Netherlands, were eligible for the study. Neurotoxicity and its effect on QoL was assessed with the recently developed Chemotherapy Induced Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (CINQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) median 6 months after cessation of therapy.

Results Of the 58 eligible patients, 43 (74.1%) completed the questionnaire. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy, most of the patients experienced neurotoxicity in the upper and lower extremities (78.8% and 89.7%, respectively). Overall, the most-reported complaints included numbness and tingling in hands as well as feet, suffering from cold feet, and trouble distinguishing objects in the hands. Housekeeping difficulties were reported in 12.8% of patients, and 20.5% of patients became more dependent on others because of the neurotoxicity. Overall, QoL was negatively affected by the impact of CIPN in 48.6% of patients.

Limitations Due to the small sample size selection bias cannot be ruled out and no data about CIPN during treatment were available. Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Funding Floortje Mols was supported by a VENI grant (#451-10-041) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague, The Netherlands. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
401-406
Legacy Keywords
peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, CIPN, n quality of life, QoL
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of cytostatics. With improved survival among cancer patients, CIPN may have a major impact on quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors.

Objective To determine the occurrence of CIPN induced by oxaliplatin and taxanes and its impact on QoL median 6 months after chemotherapy.

Methods All patients who received their last treatment with oxaliplatin or taxanes in 2 consecutive years in the Máxima Medical Centre, the Netherlands, were eligible for the study. Neurotoxicity and its effect on QoL was assessed with the recently developed Chemotherapy Induced Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (CINQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) median 6 months after cessation of therapy.

Results Of the 58 eligible patients, 43 (74.1%) completed the questionnaire. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy, most of the patients experienced neurotoxicity in the upper and lower extremities (78.8% and 89.7%, respectively). Overall, the most-reported complaints included numbness and tingling in hands as well as feet, suffering from cold feet, and trouble distinguishing objects in the hands. Housekeeping difficulties were reported in 12.8% of patients, and 20.5% of patients became more dependent on others because of the neurotoxicity. Overall, QoL was negatively affected by the impact of CIPN in 48.6% of patients.

Limitations Due to the small sample size selection bias cannot be ruled out and no data about CIPN during treatment were available. Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Funding Floortje Mols was supported by a VENI grant (#451-10-041) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague, The Netherlands. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of cytostatics. With improved survival among cancer patients, CIPN may have a major impact on quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors.

Objective To determine the occurrence of CIPN induced by oxaliplatin and taxanes and its impact on QoL median 6 months after chemotherapy.

Methods All patients who received their last treatment with oxaliplatin or taxanes in 2 consecutive years in the Máxima Medical Centre, the Netherlands, were eligible for the study. Neurotoxicity and its effect on QoL was assessed with the recently developed Chemotherapy Induced Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (CINQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) median 6 months after cessation of therapy.

Results Of the 58 eligible patients, 43 (74.1%) completed the questionnaire. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy, most of the patients experienced neurotoxicity in the upper and lower extremities (78.8% and 89.7%, respectively). Overall, the most-reported complaints included numbness and tingling in hands as well as feet, suffering from cold feet, and trouble distinguishing objects in the hands. Housekeeping difficulties were reported in 12.8% of patients, and 20.5% of patients became more dependent on others because of the neurotoxicity. Overall, QoL was negatively affected by the impact of CIPN in 48.6% of patients.

Limitations Due to the small sample size selection bias cannot be ruled out and no data about CIPN during treatment were available. Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Conclusions After a median follow-up of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy with oxaliplatin or taxanes, CIPN is common and leads to impairment in patient QoL. More research is needed to assess the impact of neurotoxicity on QoL.

Funding Floortje Mols was supported by a VENI grant (#451-10-041) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague, The Netherlands. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Page Number
401-406
Page Number
401-406
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and impact on quality of life 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy
Display Headline
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and impact on quality of life 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy
Legacy Keywords
peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, CIPN, n quality of life, QoL
Legacy Keywords
peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, CIPN, n quality of life, QoL
Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12(11):401-406
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Impact of aprepitant on emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival in a population-based cohort of head and neck cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:10
Display Headline
Impact of aprepitant on emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival in a population-based cohort of head and neck cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy
Background Standard care for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients consists of high-dose cisplatin with radiation to prolong recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, poorly controlled emesis can compromise optimal dose intensity (DI) and affect disease control.

Objective To evaluate the impact of aprepitant on emesis control, DI, and RFS.

Methods HNC patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate RFS in aprepitant users. To control for selection bias, a propensity score analysis was conducted.

Results A total of 192 HNC patients were included: 141 received aprepitant prophylaxis. The aprepitant-treated and untreated groups were comparable in mean age (56.3 vs 58.1 years), male gender (82.3% vs 86.3%), tumor location, and number of metastatic sites. However, more patients in the aprepitant group than in the untreated group had surgically resectable disease (31.2% vs 15.7%, respectively) and better performance status (ECOG 0/1, 87.9% vs 76.4%). Less emesis was reported in the aprepitant group (21.3% vs 28.0%). Patients in the treated group were also more likely to complete 3 cycles of high-dose cisplatin (OR, 2.3; P = .03). The propensity score adjusted Cox regression analysis suggested a reduced risk of disease recurrence in patients who received aprepitant (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17- 1.28).

Limitations Potential confounders such as other diseases or treatments that may have influenced the presence of nausea/emesis symptoms.

Conclusion Aprepitant contributed to improved emesis control, enhanced DI, and better adherence to cisplatin chemotherapy.

Funding/sponsorship The British Columbia Cancer Foundation and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
394-400
Legacy Keywords
aprepitant, emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival, head and neck cancer, cisplatin chemotherapy

Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Background Standard care for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients consists of high-dose cisplatin with radiation to prolong recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, poorly controlled emesis can compromise optimal dose intensity (DI) and affect disease control.

Objective To evaluate the impact of aprepitant on emesis control, DI, and RFS.

Methods HNC patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate RFS in aprepitant users. To control for selection bias, a propensity score analysis was conducted.

Results A total of 192 HNC patients were included: 141 received aprepitant prophylaxis. The aprepitant-treated and untreated groups were comparable in mean age (56.3 vs 58.1 years), male gender (82.3% vs 86.3%), tumor location, and number of metastatic sites. However, more patients in the aprepitant group than in the untreated group had surgically resectable disease (31.2% vs 15.7%, respectively) and better performance status (ECOG 0/1, 87.9% vs 76.4%). Less emesis was reported in the aprepitant group (21.3% vs 28.0%). Patients in the treated group were also more likely to complete 3 cycles of high-dose cisplatin (OR, 2.3; P = .03). The propensity score adjusted Cox regression analysis suggested a reduced risk of disease recurrence in patients who received aprepitant (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17- 1.28).

Limitations Potential confounders such as other diseases or treatments that may have influenced the presence of nausea/emesis symptoms.

Conclusion Aprepitant contributed to improved emesis control, enhanced DI, and better adherence to cisplatin chemotherapy.

Funding/sponsorship The British Columbia Cancer Foundation and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Background Standard care for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients consists of high-dose cisplatin with radiation to prolong recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, poorly controlled emesis can compromise optimal dose intensity (DI) and affect disease control.

Objective To evaluate the impact of aprepitant on emesis control, DI, and RFS.

Methods HNC patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate RFS in aprepitant users. To control for selection bias, a propensity score analysis was conducted.

Results A total of 192 HNC patients were included: 141 received aprepitant prophylaxis. The aprepitant-treated and untreated groups were comparable in mean age (56.3 vs 58.1 years), male gender (82.3% vs 86.3%), tumor location, and number of metastatic sites. However, more patients in the aprepitant group than in the untreated group had surgically resectable disease (31.2% vs 15.7%, respectively) and better performance status (ECOG 0/1, 87.9% vs 76.4%). Less emesis was reported in the aprepitant group (21.3% vs 28.0%). Patients in the treated group were also more likely to complete 3 cycles of high-dose cisplatin (OR, 2.3; P = .03). The propensity score adjusted Cox regression analysis suggested a reduced risk of disease recurrence in patients who received aprepitant (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17- 1.28).

Limitations Potential confounders such as other diseases or treatments that may have influenced the presence of nausea/emesis symptoms.

Conclusion Aprepitant contributed to improved emesis control, enhanced DI, and better adherence to cisplatin chemotherapy.

Funding/sponsorship The British Columbia Cancer Foundation and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute. 

 

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

 

Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Issue
The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology - 12(11)
Page Number
394-400
Page Number
394-400
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Impact of aprepitant on emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival in a population-based cohort of head and neck cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy
Display Headline
Impact of aprepitant on emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival in a population-based cohort of head and neck cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy
Legacy Keywords
aprepitant, emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival, head and neck cancer, cisplatin chemotherapy

Legacy Keywords
aprepitant, emesis control, dose intensity, and recurrence-free survival, head and neck cancer, cisplatin chemotherapy

Sections
Citation Override
JCSO 2014;12:394-400
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media