Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica)

Photo courtesy of Janssen

Health Canada has approved the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) as a first-line treatment for patients with active chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

This is the fourth approval for ibrutinib in Canada. The drug is now approved for use in all CLL patients, patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (conditional approval).

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

The latest approval of ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial

(PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and

simultaneously published in NEJM.

RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.

Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.

Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).

Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five

patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.

The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.

The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).

Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica)

Photo courtesy of Janssen

Health Canada has approved the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) as a first-line treatment for patients with active chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

This is the fourth approval for ibrutinib in Canada. The drug is now approved for use in all CLL patients, patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (conditional approval).

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

The latest approval of ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial

(PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and

simultaneously published in NEJM.

RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.

Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.

Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).

Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five

patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.

The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.

The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).

Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica)

Photo courtesy of Janssen

Health Canada has approved the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) as a first-line treatment for patients with active chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

This is the fourth approval for ibrutinib in Canada. The drug is now approved for use in all CLL patients, patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (conditional approval).

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

The latest approval of ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial

(PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and

simultaneously published in NEJM.

RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.

Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.

Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.

Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).

Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five

patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.

The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.

The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).

Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).

Preparing for radiation

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Radiologists who graduated from medical school after 1940 do not have an increased risk of dying from radiation-related causes such as cancers, according to a study published in Radiology.

However, the study suggested that male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had a higher risk of death from certain cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers said these findings point to the success of efforts to reduce occupational radiation doses over the past several decades.

The team noted that female radiologists did not have an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cancer-related mortality, regardless of when they graduated from medical school.

However, the small number of women in this study prevented the researchers from studying the subjects’ mortality rates in detail. And very few female radiologists worked during the early period of the study, when radiation exposures were likely highest.

To conduct this study, the researchers analyzed records from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, a database established in 1906 that has grown to include current and historical data for more than 1.4 million physicians, residents, and medical students in the US.

The team compared cancer incidence and mortality rates between 43,763 radiologists and 64,990 psychiatrists who graduated from medical school between 1916 and 2006. Psychiatrists were chosen as a comparison group because they are unlikely to have had occupational radiation exposure.

“Our most important finding is that radiologists have lower death rates from all causes of death combined, compared to psychiatrists, and had similar risks of cancer deaths overall,” said study author Martha Linet, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

Results in males

The researchers found that, among male subjects who graduated after 1940, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower for the radiologists than the psychiatrists (relative risk [RR]=0.94; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.97), and the risk of death from cancer was similar (RR=1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.07).

In contrast, male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had higher mortality rates from certain cancers.

They had a higher risk of skin cancer mortality (RR=6.38; 95% CI: 1.75, 23.20) that was driven by an excess of melanoma (RR=8.75; 95% CI: 1.89, 40.53).

They had an increased risk of death from all myeloid leukemias (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.05) that was driven by acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (RR=4.68; 95% CI: 0.91, 24.18).

And they had an increased risk of death from lymphomas (RR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.31, 3.86) that was driven by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR=2.69; 95% CI: 1.33, 5.45).

The researchers also found an increased risk of cerebrovascular deaths in the male radiologists who graduated before 1940 (RR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.01).

The team said the reduced health risks for more recent radiology graduates are likely due to developments and improvements in radiation protection and monitoring, along with improvements in equipment safety.

“Most of the findings of increased risk were in the earlier radiologists,” Dr Linet noted. “We do feel there is evidence that decreases in dose in the United States and other countries seem to have paid off, reducing risks in recent graduates.”

Results in females

The researchers said there were no clear increases in mortality in the female radiologists compared with the female psychiatrists.

The risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the radiologists, as was the risk of death from circulatory diseases, but the risk of cancer-related mortality was similar between the radiologists and the psychiatrists.

However, the researchers said the relatively small number of female deaths in this study prevented detailed investigation. Only 2% of female radiologists (208/8851) and 3% of female psychiatrists (524/17,493) died, compared to 12% of male radiologists (4260/43,763) and 16% of male psychiatrists (7815/47,443).

Preparing for radiation

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Radiologists who graduated from medical school after 1940 do not have an increased risk of dying from radiation-related causes such as cancers, according to a study published in Radiology.

However, the study suggested that male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had a higher risk of death from certain cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers said these findings point to the success of efforts to reduce occupational radiation doses over the past several decades.

The team noted that female radiologists did not have an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cancer-related mortality, regardless of when they graduated from medical school.

However, the small number of women in this study prevented the researchers from studying the subjects’ mortality rates in detail. And very few female radiologists worked during the early period of the study, when radiation exposures were likely highest.

To conduct this study, the researchers analyzed records from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, a database established in 1906 that has grown to include current and historical data for more than 1.4 million physicians, residents, and medical students in the US.

The team compared cancer incidence and mortality rates between 43,763 radiologists and 64,990 psychiatrists who graduated from medical school between 1916 and 2006. Psychiatrists were chosen as a comparison group because they are unlikely to have had occupational radiation exposure.

“Our most important finding is that radiologists have lower death rates from all causes of death combined, compared to psychiatrists, and had similar risks of cancer deaths overall,” said study author Martha Linet, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

Results in males

The researchers found that, among male subjects who graduated after 1940, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower for the radiologists than the psychiatrists (relative risk [RR]=0.94; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.97), and the risk of death from cancer was similar (RR=1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.07).

In contrast, male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had higher mortality rates from certain cancers.

They had a higher risk of skin cancer mortality (RR=6.38; 95% CI: 1.75, 23.20) that was driven by an excess of melanoma (RR=8.75; 95% CI: 1.89, 40.53).

They had an increased risk of death from all myeloid leukemias (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.05) that was driven by acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (RR=4.68; 95% CI: 0.91, 24.18).

And they had an increased risk of death from lymphomas (RR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.31, 3.86) that was driven by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR=2.69; 95% CI: 1.33, 5.45).

The researchers also found an increased risk of cerebrovascular deaths in the male radiologists who graduated before 1940 (RR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.01).

The team said the reduced health risks for more recent radiology graduates are likely due to developments and improvements in radiation protection and monitoring, along with improvements in equipment safety.

“Most of the findings of increased risk were in the earlier radiologists,” Dr Linet noted. “We do feel there is evidence that decreases in dose in the United States and other countries seem to have paid off, reducing risks in recent graduates.”

Results in females

The researchers said there were no clear increases in mortality in the female radiologists compared with the female psychiatrists.

The risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the radiologists, as was the risk of death from circulatory diseases, but the risk of cancer-related mortality was similar between the radiologists and the psychiatrists.

However, the researchers said the relatively small number of female deaths in this study prevented detailed investigation. Only 2% of female radiologists (208/8851) and 3% of female psychiatrists (524/17,493) died, compared to 12% of male radiologists (4260/43,763) and 16% of male psychiatrists (7815/47,443).

Preparing for radiation

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Radiologists who graduated from medical school after 1940 do not have an increased risk of dying from radiation-related causes such as cancers, according to a study published in Radiology.

However, the study suggested that male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had a higher risk of death from certain cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers said these findings point to the success of efforts to reduce occupational radiation doses over the past several decades.

The team noted that female radiologists did not have an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cancer-related mortality, regardless of when they graduated from medical school.

However, the small number of women in this study prevented the researchers from studying the subjects’ mortality rates in detail. And very few female radiologists worked during the early period of the study, when radiation exposures were likely highest.

To conduct this study, the researchers analyzed records from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, a database established in 1906 that has grown to include current and historical data for more than 1.4 million physicians, residents, and medical students in the US.

The team compared cancer incidence and mortality rates between 43,763 radiologists and 64,990 psychiatrists who graduated from medical school between 1916 and 2006. Psychiatrists were chosen as a comparison group because they are unlikely to have had occupational radiation exposure.

“Our most important finding is that radiologists have lower death rates from all causes of death combined, compared to psychiatrists, and had similar risks of cancer deaths overall,” said study author Martha Linet, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

Results in males

The researchers found that, among male subjects who graduated after 1940, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower for the radiologists than the psychiatrists (relative risk [RR]=0.94; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.97), and the risk of death from cancer was similar (RR=1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.07).

In contrast, male radiologists who graduated before 1940 had higher mortality rates from certain cancers.

They had a higher risk of skin cancer mortality (RR=6.38; 95% CI: 1.75, 23.20) that was driven by an excess of melanoma (RR=8.75; 95% CI: 1.89, 40.53).

They had an increased risk of death from all myeloid leukemias (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.05) that was driven by acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (RR=4.68; 95% CI: 0.91, 24.18).

And they had an increased risk of death from lymphomas (RR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.31, 3.86) that was driven by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR=2.69; 95% CI: 1.33, 5.45).

The researchers also found an increased risk of cerebrovascular deaths in the male radiologists who graduated before 1940 (RR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.01).

The team said the reduced health risks for more recent radiology graduates are likely due to developments and improvements in radiation protection and monitoring, along with improvements in equipment safety.

“Most of the findings of increased risk were in the earlier radiologists,” Dr Linet noted. “We do feel there is evidence that decreases in dose in the United States and other countries seem to have paid off, reducing risks in recent graduates.”

Results in females

The researchers said there were no clear increases in mortality in the female radiologists compared with the female psychiatrists.

The risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the radiologists, as was the risk of death from circulatory diseases, but the risk of cancer-related mortality was similar between the radiologists and the psychiatrists.

However, the researchers said the relatively small number of female deaths in this study prevented detailed investigation. Only 2% of female radiologists (208/8851) and 3% of female psychiatrists (524/17,493) died, compared to 12% of male radiologists (4260/43,763) and 16% of male psychiatrists (7815/47,443).

Lab mice

Photo by Aaron Logan

KOLOA, HAWAII—Preclinical research suggests that ARQ 531, a reversible Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, might prove effective against ibrutinib-resistant hematologic malignancies.

The study showed that ARQ 531 inhibits wild-type BTK and the ibrutinib-resistant BTK-C481S mutant with similar potency.

The compound also suppressed proliferation of hematologic cancer cells in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in a mouse model of B-cell lymphoma.

Researchers disclosed these results in a poster presentation at the 2016 Pan Pacific Lymphoma Conference. The research was supported by ArQule Inc., the company developing ARQ 531.

The researchers first demonstrated that ARQ 531 enacts biochemical inhibition of both wild-type and C481S-mutant BTK at sub-nanomolar levels and cellular inhibition in C481S-mutant BTK cells that are resistant to ibrutinib.

The team then tested ARQ 531 in a range of cell lines encompassing a variety of leukemias and lymphomas, as well as multiple myeloma.

They found that ARQ 531 can inhibit proliferation in many types of hematologic cancer cells, but it “potently inhibits” cell lines that are addicted to BCR, PI3K/AKT, and Notch signaling pathways.

The researchers also tested ARQ 531 in the BTK-driven TMD8 xenograft mouse model (B-cell lymphoma). They said the compound demonstrated strong target and pathway inhibition, with sustained tumor growth inhibition.

The team noted that ARQ 531 exhibits a distinct kinase selectivity profile, with strong inhibitory activity against several key oncogenic drivers from TEC, Trk, and Src family kinases. And the compound inhibits the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways.

The researchers said these results support further investigation of ARQ 531, particularly in the setting of ibrutinib resistance.

It is currently estimated that about 10% of patients treated with ibrutinib develop resistance, and more than 80% of these patients present with the C481S mutation.

“We are beginning to see increasing resistance to ibrutinib, which is creating the need for a BTK inhibitor, like ARQ 531, that targets the C481S mutation,” said Brian Schwartz, head of research and development and chief medical officer at ArQule.

“The preclinical profile of ARQ 531 as a potent and reversible inhibitor of wild-type and mutant BTK presents the potential for a first-in-class and best-in-class molecule. We are working toward completing GLP [good laboratory practice] toxicology studies and filing an IND [investigational new drug application] in early 2017.”

Lab mice

Photo by Aaron Logan

KOLOA, HAWAII—Preclinical research suggests that ARQ 531, a reversible Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, might prove effective against ibrutinib-resistant hematologic malignancies.

The study showed that ARQ 531 inhibits wild-type BTK and the ibrutinib-resistant BTK-C481S mutant with similar potency.

The compound also suppressed proliferation of hematologic cancer cells in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in a mouse model of B-cell lymphoma.

Researchers disclosed these results in a poster presentation at the 2016 Pan Pacific Lymphoma Conference. The research was supported by ArQule Inc., the company developing ARQ 531.

The researchers first demonstrated that ARQ 531 enacts biochemical inhibition of both wild-type and C481S-mutant BTK at sub-nanomolar levels and cellular inhibition in C481S-mutant BTK cells that are resistant to ibrutinib.

The team then tested ARQ 531 in a range of cell lines encompassing a variety of leukemias and lymphomas, as well as multiple myeloma.

They found that ARQ 531 can inhibit proliferation in many types of hematologic cancer cells, but it “potently inhibits” cell lines that are addicted to BCR, PI3K/AKT, and Notch signaling pathways.

The researchers also tested ARQ 531 in the BTK-driven TMD8 xenograft mouse model (B-cell lymphoma). They said the compound demonstrated strong target and pathway inhibition, with sustained tumor growth inhibition.

The team noted that ARQ 531 exhibits a distinct kinase selectivity profile, with strong inhibitory activity against several key oncogenic drivers from TEC, Trk, and Src family kinases. And the compound inhibits the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways.

The researchers said these results support further investigation of ARQ 531, particularly in the setting of ibrutinib resistance.

It is currently estimated that about 10% of patients treated with ibrutinib develop resistance, and more than 80% of these patients present with the C481S mutation.

“We are beginning to see increasing resistance to ibrutinib, which is creating the need for a BTK inhibitor, like ARQ 531, that targets the C481S mutation,” said Brian Schwartz, head of research and development and chief medical officer at ArQule.

“The preclinical profile of ARQ 531 as a potent and reversible inhibitor of wild-type and mutant BTK presents the potential for a first-in-class and best-in-class molecule. We are working toward completing GLP [good laboratory practice] toxicology studies and filing an IND [investigational new drug application] in early 2017.”

Lab mice

Photo by Aaron Logan

KOLOA, HAWAII—Preclinical research suggests that ARQ 531, a reversible Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, might prove effective against ibrutinib-resistant hematologic malignancies.

The study showed that ARQ 531 inhibits wild-type BTK and the ibrutinib-resistant BTK-C481S mutant with similar potency.

The compound also suppressed proliferation of hematologic cancer cells in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in a mouse model of B-cell lymphoma.

Researchers disclosed these results in a poster presentation at the 2016 Pan Pacific Lymphoma Conference. The research was supported by ArQule Inc., the company developing ARQ 531.

The researchers first demonstrated that ARQ 531 enacts biochemical inhibition of both wild-type and C481S-mutant BTK at sub-nanomolar levels and cellular inhibition in C481S-mutant BTK cells that are resistant to ibrutinib.

The team then tested ARQ 531 in a range of cell lines encompassing a variety of leukemias and lymphomas, as well as multiple myeloma.

They found that ARQ 531 can inhibit proliferation in many types of hematologic cancer cells, but it “potently inhibits” cell lines that are addicted to BCR, PI3K/AKT, and Notch signaling pathways.

The researchers also tested ARQ 531 in the BTK-driven TMD8 xenograft mouse model (B-cell lymphoma). They said the compound demonstrated strong target and pathway inhibition, with sustained tumor growth inhibition.

The team noted that ARQ 531 exhibits a distinct kinase selectivity profile, with strong inhibitory activity against several key oncogenic drivers from TEC, Trk, and Src family kinases. And the compound inhibits the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways.

The researchers said these results support further investigation of ARQ 531, particularly in the setting of ibrutinib resistance.

It is currently estimated that about 10% of patients treated with ibrutinib develop resistance, and more than 80% of these patients present with the C481S mutation.

“We are beginning to see increasing resistance to ibrutinib, which is creating the need for a BTK inhibitor, like ARQ 531, that targets the C481S mutation,” said Brian Schwartz, head of research and development and chief medical officer at ArQule.

“The preclinical profile of ARQ 531 as a potent and reversible inhibitor of wild-type and mutant BTK presents the potential for a first-in-class and best-in-class molecule. We are working toward completing GLP [good laboratory practice] toxicology studies and filing an IND [investigational new drug application] in early 2017.”

White blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has decided not to approve Novartis’s application for a biosimilar of Amgen’s Neulasta, also known by the generic name pegfilgrastim.

The FDA issued a complete response letter for the pegfilgrastim biosimilar last month.

Novartis has not provided details about the agency’s decision or the contents of the letter, but the company said it is working with the FDA to answer its questions about the drug.

Novartis was seeking approval for its pegfilgrastim biosimilar for the same indication as Amgen’s Neulasta.

Neulasta is a leukocyte growth factor that is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia.
• To increase survival in patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation.

Neulasta is not FDA-approved for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

White blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has decided not to approve Novartis’s application for a biosimilar of Amgen’s Neulasta, also known by the generic name pegfilgrastim.

The FDA issued a complete response letter for the pegfilgrastim biosimilar last month.

Novartis has not provided details about the agency’s decision or the contents of the letter, but the company said it is working with the FDA to answer its questions about the drug.

Novartis was seeking approval for its pegfilgrastim biosimilar for the same indication as Amgen’s Neulasta.

Neulasta is a leukocyte growth factor that is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia.
• To increase survival in patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation.

Neulasta is not FDA-approved for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

White blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has decided not to approve Novartis’s application for a biosimilar of Amgen’s Neulasta, also known by the generic name pegfilgrastim.

The FDA issued a complete response letter for the pegfilgrastim biosimilar last month.

Novartis has not provided details about the agency’s decision or the contents of the letter, but the company said it is working with the FDA to answer its questions about the drug.

Novartis was seeking approval for its pegfilgrastim biosimilar for the same indication as Amgen’s Neulasta.

Neulasta is a leukocyte growth factor that is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia.
• To increase survival in patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation.

Neulasta is not FDA-approved for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Apoptotic cells

A new study has shed light on the process leukemia cells use to evade apoptosis and revealed drugs that can fight this process.

Investigators found that leukemia cells expel a molecule that starts apoptosis, but antimalarial drugs and antifungal drugs can halt this process and force the leukemia cells to self-destruct.

Alexandre Chigaev, PhD, of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, and his colleagues described these discoveries in Oncotarget.

The investigators theorized that leukemia cells might evade death by regulating 3’-5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which is associated with pro-apoptotic signaling.

The team thought leukemic cells might possess mechanisms that efflux cAMP from the cytoplasm, thereby protecting them from apoptosis.

In studying VLA-4—an adhesion molecule that keeps each cell in its niche—the investigators discovered that cAMP reduces VLA-4’s adhesive properties, allowing cells to detach.

“That’s how we stumbled upon it,” Dr Chigaev said. “Cyclic AMP reduces cell adhesion, and maybe that’s one of the mechanisms by which [leukemic] cells leave bone marrow niches.”

The investigators then confirmed that cAMP starts apoptosis in leukemia cells. And they showed that leukemia cells could efflux cAMP, but normal blood cells could not.

The team substantiated their findings by testing several drugs that block cAMP efflux.

The drugs, which are all approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, are used to fight malaria or fungal infections. They include artesunate, dihydroartemisinin, clioquinol, cryptotanshinone, parthenolide, and patulin.

The investigators found these drugs successfully decreased cAMP efflux and induced apoptosis in a model of acute myeloid leukemia, in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines, and in samples from patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

On the other hand, the drugs did not affect peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

“This particular mechanism of action has not been reported for these drugs,” Dr Chigaev said. “And the idea that cells can have this apoptotic escape, or apoptotic evasion, through cyclic AMP pumping, that’s new. It’s never been reported previously.”

Dr Chigaev and his colleagues noted that repurposing already-approved drugs could greatly shorten the approval process to use them for leukemia.

Since the drugs were tested on cells from leukemia patients, the team hopes to continue seeing promising results. They have begun animal studies in preparation for clinical trials.

Apoptotic cells

A new study has shed light on the process leukemia cells use to evade apoptosis and revealed drugs that can fight this process.

Investigators found that leukemia cells expel a molecule that starts apoptosis, but antimalarial drugs and antifungal drugs can halt this process and force the leukemia cells to self-destruct.

Alexandre Chigaev, PhD, of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, and his colleagues described these discoveries in Oncotarget.

The investigators theorized that leukemia cells might evade death by regulating 3’-5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which is associated with pro-apoptotic signaling.

The team thought leukemic cells might possess mechanisms that efflux cAMP from the cytoplasm, thereby protecting them from apoptosis.

In studying VLA-4—an adhesion molecule that keeps each cell in its niche—the investigators discovered that cAMP reduces VLA-4’s adhesive properties, allowing cells to detach.

“That’s how we stumbled upon it,” Dr Chigaev said. “Cyclic AMP reduces cell adhesion, and maybe that’s one of the mechanisms by which [leukemic] cells leave bone marrow niches.”

The investigators then confirmed that cAMP starts apoptosis in leukemia cells. And they showed that leukemia cells could efflux cAMP, but normal blood cells could not.

The team substantiated their findings by testing several drugs that block cAMP efflux.

The drugs, which are all approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, are used to fight malaria or fungal infections. They include artesunate, dihydroartemisinin, clioquinol, cryptotanshinone, parthenolide, and patulin.

The investigators found these drugs successfully decreased cAMP efflux and induced apoptosis in a model of acute myeloid leukemia, in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines, and in samples from patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

On the other hand, the drugs did not affect peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

“This particular mechanism of action has not been reported for these drugs,” Dr Chigaev said. “And the idea that cells can have this apoptotic escape, or apoptotic evasion, through cyclic AMP pumping, that’s new. It’s never been reported previously.”

Dr Chigaev and his colleagues noted that repurposing already-approved drugs could greatly shorten the approval process to use them for leukemia.

Since the drugs were tested on cells from leukemia patients, the team hopes to continue seeing promising results. They have begun animal studies in preparation for clinical trials.

Apoptotic cells

A new study has shed light on the process leukemia cells use to evade apoptosis and revealed drugs that can fight this process.

Investigators found that leukemia cells expel a molecule that starts apoptosis, but antimalarial drugs and antifungal drugs can halt this process and force the leukemia cells to self-destruct.

Alexandre Chigaev, PhD, of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, and his colleagues described these discoveries in Oncotarget.

The investigators theorized that leukemia cells might evade death by regulating 3’-5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which is associated with pro-apoptotic signaling.

The team thought leukemic cells might possess mechanisms that efflux cAMP from the cytoplasm, thereby protecting them from apoptosis.

In studying VLA-4—an adhesion molecule that keeps each cell in its niche—the investigators discovered that cAMP reduces VLA-4’s adhesive properties, allowing cells to detach.

“That’s how we stumbled upon it,” Dr Chigaev said. “Cyclic AMP reduces cell adhesion, and maybe that’s one of the mechanisms by which [leukemic] cells leave bone marrow niches.”

The investigators then confirmed that cAMP starts apoptosis in leukemia cells. And they showed that leukemia cells could efflux cAMP, but normal blood cells could not.

The team substantiated their findings by testing several drugs that block cAMP efflux.

The drugs, which are all approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, are used to fight malaria or fungal infections. They include artesunate, dihydroartemisinin, clioquinol, cryptotanshinone, parthenolide, and patulin.

The investigators found these drugs successfully decreased cAMP efflux and induced apoptosis in a model of acute myeloid leukemia, in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines, and in samples from patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

On the other hand, the drugs did not affect peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

“This particular mechanism of action has not been reported for these drugs,” Dr Chigaev said. “And the idea that cells can have this apoptotic escape, or apoptotic evasion, through cyclic AMP pumping, that’s new. It’s never been reported previously.”

Dr Chigaev and his colleagues noted that repurposing already-approved drugs could greatly shorten the approval process to use them for leukemia.

Since the drugs were tested on cells from leukemia patients, the team hopes to continue seeing promising results. They have begun animal studies in preparation for clinical trials.

Doctor consults with cancer

patient and her father

Photo by Rhoda Baer

In a survey of advanced cancer patients and their oncologists, differing opinions about prognosis were common.

And the vast majority of patients didn’t know their doctors held different opinions about how long the patients might live.

Results of the survey were published in JAMA Oncology.

“We’ve discovered 2 important things happening between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer,” said study author Ronald M. Epstein, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York.

“First, some patients might know the doctor’s prognosis estimate, but the patient chooses to disagree, often because they believe other sources. And, second, some patients think that their doctor agrees with their opinion about prognosis but, in fact, the doctor doesn’t.”

Dr Epstein and his colleagues surveyed 236 patients with stage 3 or 4 cancer. According to medical evidence, fewer than 5% of these patients would be expected to live for 5 years.

The 38 oncologists who treated these patients were also surveyed. The doctors were asked,“What do you believe are the chances that this patient will live for 2 years or more?” And the patients were asked, “What do you believe are the chances that you will live for 2 years or more?”

Additional survey questions gauged whether patients knew their prognosis opinions differed from their doctors and to what extent treatment options were discussed in the context of life expectancy.

Among the 236 patients, 68% rated their survival prognosis differently than their oncologists, and 89% of these patients did not realize their opinions differed from their oncologists. In nearly all cases (96%), the patients were more optimistic than their doctors.

“Of course, it’s only possible for doctors to provide a ball-park estimate about life expectancy, and some people do beat the odds,” Dr Epstein noted. “But when a patient with very advanced cancer says that he has a 90% to 100% chance of being alive in 2 years and his oncologist believes that chance is more like 10%, there’s a problem.”

The challenge, according to Dr Epstein and his colleagues, is that talking about a cancer prognosis is not a straightforward exchange of information. It occurs in the context of fear, confusion, and uncertainty.

The researchers said prognosis should be addressed in several conversations about personal values and treatment goals. When doctor-patient communication is poor, it can result in mutual regret about end-of-life circumstances.

For example, nearly all of the patients surveyed said they wanted to be involved in treatment decisions. And 70% said they preferred supportive care at the end of their lives as opposed to aggressive therapy. However, as the researchers pointed out, making an informed decision requires knowing when death is approaching.

“When people think they’ll live a very long time with cancer, despite evidence to the contrary, they may end up taking more aggressive chemotherapy and agreeing to be placed on ventilators or dialysis, paradoxically reducing their quality of life, keeping them from enjoying time with family, and sometimes even shortening their lives,” Dr Epstein said. “So it’s very important for doctors and patients to be on the same page.”

Doctor consults with cancer

patient and her father

Photo by Rhoda Baer

In a survey of advanced cancer patients and their oncologists, differing opinions about prognosis were common.

And the vast majority of patients didn’t know their doctors held different opinions about how long the patients might live.

Results of the survey were published in JAMA Oncology.

“We’ve discovered 2 important things happening between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer,” said study author Ronald M. Epstein, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York.

“First, some patients might know the doctor’s prognosis estimate, but the patient chooses to disagree, often because they believe other sources. And, second, some patients think that their doctor agrees with their opinion about prognosis but, in fact, the doctor doesn’t.”

Dr Epstein and his colleagues surveyed 236 patients with stage 3 or 4 cancer. According to medical evidence, fewer than 5% of these patients would be expected to live for 5 years.

The 38 oncologists who treated these patients were also surveyed. The doctors were asked,“What do you believe are the chances that this patient will live for 2 years or more?” And the patients were asked, “What do you believe are the chances that you will live for 2 years or more?”

Additional survey questions gauged whether patients knew their prognosis opinions differed from their doctors and to what extent treatment options were discussed in the context of life expectancy.

Among the 236 patients, 68% rated their survival prognosis differently than their oncologists, and 89% of these patients did not realize their opinions differed from their oncologists. In nearly all cases (96%), the patients were more optimistic than their doctors.

“Of course, it’s only possible for doctors to provide a ball-park estimate about life expectancy, and some people do beat the odds,” Dr Epstein noted. “But when a patient with very advanced cancer says that he has a 90% to 100% chance of being alive in 2 years and his oncologist believes that chance is more like 10%, there’s a problem.”

The challenge, according to Dr Epstein and his colleagues, is that talking about a cancer prognosis is not a straightforward exchange of information. It occurs in the context of fear, confusion, and uncertainty.

The researchers said prognosis should be addressed in several conversations about personal values and treatment goals. When doctor-patient communication is poor, it can result in mutual regret about end-of-life circumstances.

For example, nearly all of the patients surveyed said they wanted to be involved in treatment decisions. And 70% said they preferred supportive care at the end of their lives as opposed to aggressive therapy. However, as the researchers pointed out, making an informed decision requires knowing when death is approaching.

“When people think they’ll live a very long time with cancer, despite evidence to the contrary, they may end up taking more aggressive chemotherapy and agreeing to be placed on ventilators or dialysis, paradoxically reducing their quality of life, keeping them from enjoying time with family, and sometimes even shortening their lives,” Dr Epstein said. “So it’s very important for doctors and patients to be on the same page.”

Doctor consults with cancer

patient and her father

Photo by Rhoda Baer

In a survey of advanced cancer patients and their oncologists, differing opinions about prognosis were common.

And the vast majority of patients didn’t know their doctors held different opinions about how long the patients might live.

Results of the survey were published in JAMA Oncology.

“We’ve discovered 2 important things happening between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer,” said study author Ronald M. Epstein, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York.

“First, some patients might know the doctor’s prognosis estimate, but the patient chooses to disagree, often because they believe other sources. And, second, some patients think that their doctor agrees with their opinion about prognosis but, in fact, the doctor doesn’t.”

Dr Epstein and his colleagues surveyed 236 patients with stage 3 or 4 cancer. According to medical evidence, fewer than 5% of these patients would be expected to live for 5 years.

The 38 oncologists who treated these patients were also surveyed. The doctors were asked,“What do you believe are the chances that this patient will live for 2 years or more?” And the patients were asked, “What do you believe are the chances that you will live for 2 years or more?”

Additional survey questions gauged whether patients knew their prognosis opinions differed from their doctors and to what extent treatment options were discussed in the context of life expectancy.

Among the 236 patients, 68% rated their survival prognosis differently than their oncologists, and 89% of these patients did not realize their opinions differed from their oncologists. In nearly all cases (96%), the patients were more optimistic than their doctors.

“Of course, it’s only possible for doctors to provide a ball-park estimate about life expectancy, and some people do beat the odds,” Dr Epstein noted. “But when a patient with very advanced cancer says that he has a 90% to 100% chance of being alive in 2 years and his oncologist believes that chance is more like 10%, there’s a problem.”

The challenge, according to Dr Epstein and his colleagues, is that talking about a cancer prognosis is not a straightforward exchange of information. It occurs in the context of fear, confusion, and uncertainty.

The researchers said prognosis should be addressed in several conversations about personal values and treatment goals. When doctor-patient communication is poor, it can result in mutual regret about end-of-life circumstances.

For example, nearly all of the patients surveyed said they wanted to be involved in treatment decisions. And 70% said they preferred supportive care at the end of their lives as opposed to aggressive therapy. However, as the researchers pointed out, making an informed decision requires knowing when death is approaching.

“When people think they’ll live a very long time with cancer, despite evidence to the contrary, they may end up taking more aggressive chemotherapy and agreeing to be placed on ventilators or dialysis, paradoxically reducing their quality of life, keeping them from enjoying time with family, and sometimes even shortening their lives,” Dr Epstein said. “So it’s very important for doctors and patients to be on the same page.”

Woman on a scale

A study of more than 400 women suggests that losing weight can reduce levels of cancer-promoting proteins in the blood.

Overweight or obese women who lost weight over a 12-month period—through diet alone or both diet and exercise—significantly lowered their levels of proteins that play a role in angiogenesis.

Researchers say this finding suggests that losing weight might help reduce the risk of developing certain cancers.

“We know that being overweight and having a sedentary lifestyle is associated with an increase in risk for developing certain types of cancer,” said Catherine Duggan, PhD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington.

“However, we don’t know exactly why. We wanted to investigate how levels of some biomarkers associated with angiogenesis were altered when overweight, sedentary, postmenopausal women enrolled in a research study lost weight and/or became physically active over the course of a year.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues described this investigation in Cancer Research.

The team studied 439 women who were postmenopausal and overweight or obese but were otherwise healthy and ranged in age from 50 to 75.

The women were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms:

• A diet arm, in which women restricted their calorie intake to no more than 2000 kcal per day that included less than 30% of fat calories
• An aerobic exercise arm, in which women performed 45 minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise 5 days a week
• A combined diet and exercise arm
• A control arm.

The researchers collected blood samples at baseline and at 12 months, measuring levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins VEGF, PAI-1, and PEDF.

They also measured weight loss at 12 months and found that women in all 3 intervention arms had a significantly higher mean weight loss than women in the control arm.

The mean weight loss was 0.8% of body weight for women in the control arm, 2.4% for women in the exercise arm (P=0.03), 8.5% for women in the diet arm (P<0.001), and 10.8% for women in the diet and exercise arm (P<0.001).

Compared with women in the control arm, those in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly lower levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins at 12 months. However, such effects were not apparent among women in the exercise-only arm.

Specifically, women in the diet and exercise arm had a significantly greater reduction in PAI-1 at 12 months than women in the control arm (-19.3% and +3.48%, respectively, P<0.0001).

Women in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly greater reductions in PEDF than controls (-9.20%, -9.90%, and +0.18%, respectively, both P<0.0001).

And women in the diet-only arm (-8.25%, P=0.0005) and the diet and exercise arm (-9.98%, P<0.0001) had significantly greater reductions in VEGF than controls (-1.21%).

The researchers also observed a linear trend in the reductions. So the more weight loss the women experienced, the greater the reduction in angiogenesis-related protein levels.

“Our study shows that weight loss is a safe and effective method of improving the angiogenic profile in healthy individuals,” Dr Duggan said. “We were surprised by the magnitude of change in these biomarkers with weight loss.”

“While we can’t say for certain that reducing the circulating levels of angiogenic factors through weight loss would impact the growth of tumors, it is possible that they might be associated with a less favorable milieu for tumor growth and proliferation.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues said limitations of this study include the fact that the researchers only measured 3 angiogenic factors and did not measure them in adipose or other tissues.

Woman on a scale

A study of more than 400 women suggests that losing weight can reduce levels of cancer-promoting proteins in the blood.

Overweight or obese women who lost weight over a 12-month period—through diet alone or both diet and exercise—significantly lowered their levels of proteins that play a role in angiogenesis.

Researchers say this finding suggests that losing weight might help reduce the risk of developing certain cancers.

“We know that being overweight and having a sedentary lifestyle is associated with an increase in risk for developing certain types of cancer,” said Catherine Duggan, PhD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington.

“However, we don’t know exactly why. We wanted to investigate how levels of some biomarkers associated with angiogenesis were altered when overweight, sedentary, postmenopausal women enrolled in a research study lost weight and/or became physically active over the course of a year.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues described this investigation in Cancer Research.

The team studied 439 women who were postmenopausal and overweight or obese but were otherwise healthy and ranged in age from 50 to 75.

The women were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms:

• A diet arm, in which women restricted their calorie intake to no more than 2000 kcal per day that included less than 30% of fat calories
• An aerobic exercise arm, in which women performed 45 minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise 5 days a week
• A combined diet and exercise arm
• A control arm.

The researchers collected blood samples at baseline and at 12 months, measuring levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins VEGF, PAI-1, and PEDF.

They also measured weight loss at 12 months and found that women in all 3 intervention arms had a significantly higher mean weight loss than women in the control arm.

The mean weight loss was 0.8% of body weight for women in the control arm, 2.4% for women in the exercise arm (P=0.03), 8.5% for women in the diet arm (P<0.001), and 10.8% for women in the diet and exercise arm (P<0.001).

Compared with women in the control arm, those in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly lower levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins at 12 months. However, such effects were not apparent among women in the exercise-only arm.

Specifically, women in the diet and exercise arm had a significantly greater reduction in PAI-1 at 12 months than women in the control arm (-19.3% and +3.48%, respectively, P<0.0001).

Women in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly greater reductions in PEDF than controls (-9.20%, -9.90%, and +0.18%, respectively, both P<0.0001).

And women in the diet-only arm (-8.25%, P=0.0005) and the diet and exercise arm (-9.98%, P<0.0001) had significantly greater reductions in VEGF than controls (-1.21%).

The researchers also observed a linear trend in the reductions. So the more weight loss the women experienced, the greater the reduction in angiogenesis-related protein levels.

“Our study shows that weight loss is a safe and effective method of improving the angiogenic profile in healthy individuals,” Dr Duggan said. “We were surprised by the magnitude of change in these biomarkers with weight loss.”

“While we can’t say for certain that reducing the circulating levels of angiogenic factors through weight loss would impact the growth of tumors, it is possible that they might be associated with a less favorable milieu for tumor growth and proliferation.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues said limitations of this study include the fact that the researchers only measured 3 angiogenic factors and did not measure them in adipose or other tissues.

Woman on a scale

A study of more than 400 women suggests that losing weight can reduce levels of cancer-promoting proteins in the blood.

Overweight or obese women who lost weight over a 12-month period—through diet alone or both diet and exercise—significantly lowered their levels of proteins that play a role in angiogenesis.

Researchers say this finding suggests that losing weight might help reduce the risk of developing certain cancers.

“We know that being overweight and having a sedentary lifestyle is associated with an increase in risk for developing certain types of cancer,” said Catherine Duggan, PhD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington.

“However, we don’t know exactly why. We wanted to investigate how levels of some biomarkers associated with angiogenesis were altered when overweight, sedentary, postmenopausal women enrolled in a research study lost weight and/or became physically active over the course of a year.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues described this investigation in Cancer Research.

The team studied 439 women who were postmenopausal and overweight or obese but were otherwise healthy and ranged in age from 50 to 75.

The women were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms:

• A diet arm, in which women restricted their calorie intake to no more than 2000 kcal per day that included less than 30% of fat calories
• An aerobic exercise arm, in which women performed 45 minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise 5 days a week
• A combined diet and exercise arm
• A control arm.

The researchers collected blood samples at baseline and at 12 months, measuring levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins VEGF, PAI-1, and PEDF.

They also measured weight loss at 12 months and found that women in all 3 intervention arms had a significantly higher mean weight loss than women in the control arm.

The mean weight loss was 0.8% of body weight for women in the control arm, 2.4% for women in the exercise arm (P=0.03), 8.5% for women in the diet arm (P<0.001), and 10.8% for women in the diet and exercise arm (P<0.001).

Compared with women in the control arm, those in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly lower levels of the angiogenesis-related proteins at 12 months. However, such effects were not apparent among women in the exercise-only arm.

Specifically, women in the diet and exercise arm had a significantly greater reduction in PAI-1 at 12 months than women in the control arm (-19.3% and +3.48%, respectively, P<0.0001).

Women in the diet-only arm and the diet and exercise arm had significantly greater reductions in PEDF than controls (-9.20%, -9.90%, and +0.18%, respectively, both P<0.0001).

And women in the diet-only arm (-8.25%, P=0.0005) and the diet and exercise arm (-9.98%, P<0.0001) had significantly greater reductions in VEGF than controls (-1.21%).

The researchers also observed a linear trend in the reductions. So the more weight loss the women experienced, the greater the reduction in angiogenesis-related protein levels.

“Our study shows that weight loss is a safe and effective method of improving the angiogenic profile in healthy individuals,” Dr Duggan said. “We were surprised by the magnitude of change in these biomarkers with weight loss.”

“While we can’t say for certain that reducing the circulating levels of angiogenic factors through weight loss would impact the growth of tumors, it is possible that they might be associated with a less favorable milieu for tumor growth and proliferation.”

Dr Duggan and her colleagues said limitations of this study include the fact that the researchers only measured 3 angiogenic factors and did not measure them in adipose or other tissues.

Researcher at a computer

Photo by Darren Baker

An international competition has produced models that can help predict outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

For the competition, known as the DREAM 9 challenge, 31 teams of computational researchers attempted to predict outcomes using data from hundreds of patients with AML.

DREAM, which stands for Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods, is a platform for crowd-sourced studies that focus on developing computational tools to solve biomedical problems.

Essentially, it’s a competition that serves as a large, long-standing, international scientific collaboration.

“We used DREAM as a way to get general insight into making more accurate predictive models of clinical outcomes,” said Amina Qutub, PhD, of Rice University in Houston, Texas.

She and her colleagues described this effort in PLOS Computational Biology.

For the DREAM 9 challenge, each team was presented with training data from 191 AML patients, which included demographic information, such as age and gender, and more complex proteomic and phosphoprotein data that describes signaling protein pathways believed to play a role in AML.

The teams were also presented with a test set of 100 AML patients and were asked to predict response to therapy, remission duration, or overall survival for these patients.

The top-performing models—by Team EvoMed of Arizona State University and Team Chipmunks of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research—were able to predict patient response to therapy with an accuracy of close to 80%.

Both of these models were impacted by the perturbation of PIK3CA and NPM1, which singles out these proteins as candidates for further study, according to researchers.

Another discovery resulting from this competition was that, overall, the 31 models were not as effective for predicting outcomes in patients classified as “resistant to therapy” than for responsive patients.

The median model prediction accuracy was 42% for resistant patients and 73% for responsive patients.

Researcher at a computer

Photo by Darren Baker

An international competition has produced models that can help predict outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

For the competition, known as the DREAM 9 challenge, 31 teams of computational researchers attempted to predict outcomes using data from hundreds of patients with AML.

DREAM, which stands for Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods, is a platform for crowd-sourced studies that focus on developing computational tools to solve biomedical problems.

Essentially, it’s a competition that serves as a large, long-standing, international scientific collaboration.

“We used DREAM as a way to get general insight into making more accurate predictive models of clinical outcomes,” said Amina Qutub, PhD, of Rice University in Houston, Texas.

She and her colleagues described this effort in PLOS Computational Biology.

For the DREAM 9 challenge, each team was presented with training data from 191 AML patients, which included demographic information, such as age and gender, and more complex proteomic and phosphoprotein data that describes signaling protein pathways believed to play a role in AML.

The teams were also presented with a test set of 100 AML patients and were asked to predict response to therapy, remission duration, or overall survival for these patients.

The top-performing models—by Team EvoMed of Arizona State University and Team Chipmunks of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research—were able to predict patient response to therapy with an accuracy of close to 80%.

Both of these models were impacted by the perturbation of PIK3CA and NPM1, which singles out these proteins as candidates for further study, according to researchers.

Another discovery resulting from this competition was that, overall, the 31 models were not as effective for predicting outcomes in patients classified as “resistant to therapy” than for responsive patients.

The median model prediction accuracy was 42% for resistant patients and 73% for responsive patients.

Researcher at a computer

Photo by Darren Baker

An international competition has produced models that can help predict outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

For the competition, known as the DREAM 9 challenge, 31 teams of computational researchers attempted to predict outcomes using data from hundreds of patients with AML.

DREAM, which stands for Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods, is a platform for crowd-sourced studies that focus on developing computational tools to solve biomedical problems.

Essentially, it’s a competition that serves as a large, long-standing, international scientific collaboration.

“We used DREAM as a way to get general insight into making more accurate predictive models of clinical outcomes,” said Amina Qutub, PhD, of Rice University in Houston, Texas.

She and her colleagues described this effort in PLOS Computational Biology.

For the DREAM 9 challenge, each team was presented with training data from 191 AML patients, which included demographic information, such as age and gender, and more complex proteomic and phosphoprotein data that describes signaling protein pathways believed to play a role in AML.

The teams were also presented with a test set of 100 AML patients and were asked to predict response to therapy, remission duration, or overall survival for these patients.

The top-performing models—by Team EvoMed of Arizona State University and Team Chipmunks of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research—were able to predict patient response to therapy with an accuracy of close to 80%.

Both of these models were impacted by the perturbation of PIK3CA and NPM1, which singles out these proteins as candidates for further study, according to researchers.

Another discovery resulting from this competition was that, overall, the 31 models were not as effective for predicting outcomes in patients classified as “resistant to therapy” than for responsive patients.

The median model prediction accuracy was 42% for resistant patients and 73% for responsive patients.

T cells

Image from NIAID

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has removed the clinical hold on the phase 2 ROCKET trial, a study of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy JCAR015 in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The trial will continue with a revised protocol, under which patients will receive only cyclophosphamide as conditioning.

The ROCKET trial was placed on hold after 3 patients died of cerebral edema.

Juno Therapeutics, the company developing JCAR015, believes the deaths were likely a result of adding fludarabine to the conditioning regimen.

Patients initially received conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone, but investigators decided to add fludarabine in hopes of increasing efficacy. Adding fludarabine to conditioning had been shown to increase the efficacy of 2 other CAR T-cell therapies, JCAR014 and JCAR017, in phase 1/2 trials.

However, in the ROCKET trial, the addition of fludarabine was associated with an increase in the incidence of severe neurotoxicity and the 3 deaths from cerebral edema.

Although other factors may have contributed to the deaths, Juno said fludarabine was the most likely culprit. So the company asked the FDA if it could continue the ROCKET trial using conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone.

In response, the FDA requested that Juno submit a revised patient informed consent form, revised investigator brochure, revised trial protocol, and a copy of a presentation the company made to the FDA.

The FDA said it would review these documents within 30 days of receiving them, but the review only took a few days. The agency agreed to lift the clinical hold and allow the trial to proceed with the revised protocol.

ROCKET is not the first trial of JCAR015 to be placed on clinical hold. The phase 1 trial of the therapy was placed on hold in 2014, after 2 patients died of cytokine release syndrome.

That hold was lifted following changes to enrollment criteria and dosing. Results from this trial were presented at ASCO 2015 and ASCO 2016.

T cells

Image from NIAID

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has removed the clinical hold on the phase 2 ROCKET trial, a study of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy JCAR015 in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The trial will continue with a revised protocol, under which patients will receive only cyclophosphamide as conditioning.

The ROCKET trial was placed on hold after 3 patients died of cerebral edema.

Juno Therapeutics, the company developing JCAR015, believes the deaths were likely a result of adding fludarabine to the conditioning regimen.

Patients initially received conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone, but investigators decided to add fludarabine in hopes of increasing efficacy. Adding fludarabine to conditioning had been shown to increase the efficacy of 2 other CAR T-cell therapies, JCAR014 and JCAR017, in phase 1/2 trials.

However, in the ROCKET trial, the addition of fludarabine was associated with an increase in the incidence of severe neurotoxicity and the 3 deaths from cerebral edema.

Although other factors may have contributed to the deaths, Juno said fludarabine was the most likely culprit. So the company asked the FDA if it could continue the ROCKET trial using conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone.

In response, the FDA requested that Juno submit a revised patient informed consent form, revised investigator brochure, revised trial protocol, and a copy of a presentation the company made to the FDA.

The FDA said it would review these documents within 30 days of receiving them, but the review only took a few days. The agency agreed to lift the clinical hold and allow the trial to proceed with the revised protocol.

ROCKET is not the first trial of JCAR015 to be placed on clinical hold. The phase 1 trial of the therapy was placed on hold in 2014, after 2 patients died of cytokine release syndrome.

That hold was lifted following changes to enrollment criteria and dosing. Results from this trial were presented at ASCO 2015 and ASCO 2016.

T cells

Image from NIAID

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has removed the clinical hold on the phase 2 ROCKET trial, a study of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy JCAR015 in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The trial will continue with a revised protocol, under which patients will receive only cyclophosphamide as conditioning.

The ROCKET trial was placed on hold after 3 patients died of cerebral edema.

Juno Therapeutics, the company developing JCAR015, believes the deaths were likely a result of adding fludarabine to the conditioning regimen.

Patients initially received conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone, but investigators decided to add fludarabine in hopes of increasing efficacy. Adding fludarabine to conditioning had been shown to increase the efficacy of 2 other CAR T-cell therapies, JCAR014 and JCAR017, in phase 1/2 trials.

However, in the ROCKET trial, the addition of fludarabine was associated with an increase in the incidence of severe neurotoxicity and the 3 deaths from cerebral edema.

Although other factors may have contributed to the deaths, Juno said fludarabine was the most likely culprit. So the company asked the FDA if it could continue the ROCKET trial using conditioning with cyclophosphamide alone.

In response, the FDA requested that Juno submit a revised patient informed consent form, revised investigator brochure, revised trial protocol, and a copy of a presentation the company made to the FDA.

The FDA said it would review these documents within 30 days of receiving them, but the review only took a few days. The agency agreed to lift the clinical hold and allow the trial to proceed with the revised protocol.

ROCKET is not the first trial of JCAR015 to be placed on clinical hold. The phase 1 trial of the therapy was placed on hold in 2014, after 2 patients died of cytokine release syndrome.

That hold was lifted following changes to enrollment criteria and dosing. Results from this trial were presented at ASCO 2015 and ASCO 2016.

Lab mouse

New research suggests the cell of origin controls the aggressiveness and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) driven by MLL-AF9.

Using a mouse model, investigators found that MLL-AF9 expression in long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) causes invasive, chemoresistant AML that expresses genes related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

The researchers also found these genes were associated with poor survival in humans with AML.

“The prognosis thus depends on the particular hematopoietic stem or precursor cells in which the genetic alteration occurs and what genes are expressed,” said Antoine Peters, PhD, of Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland.

Dr Peters and his colleagues related these findings in Cancer Cell.

The investigators compared the results of MLL-AF9 expression in long-term HSCs and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs) in vitro. They found that colonies derived from long-term HSCs exhibited a greater capacity to migrate and expressed genes known to be involved in cell migration and tissue invasion.

With in vivo experiments, the researchers found that long-term HSCs were more potent in inducing AML than GMPs. Twenty percent of long-term HSC-derived AMLs proved especially aggressive, exhibiting extensive tissue infiltration, resistance to chemotherapy, and the expression of EMT genes such as EVI1, ERG, and ZEB1.

The investigators then tested the function of EMT-related transcription factors in leukemic cell migration and invasion. And they found that knocking down ZEB1 significantly reduced leukemic blast invasion.

Next, the researchers classified mouse and human leukemias according to EVI1/Evi1 and ERG/Erg expression and compared transcriptional profiles between species.

This revealed 111 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^highERG^high AML and Evi1^highErg^high iMLL-AF9 long-term-HSC-early AML. These genes were dubbed ‘‘cluster I.’’

The investigators also identified 40 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^lowERG^low AML samples and in iMLL-AF9 GMP-derived AML. These were called ‘‘cluster II.’’

Finally, the team evaluated how the 2 gene clusters related to overall survival in patients with 11q23+ AML.

Patients with high expression of cluster I genes tended to have poor survival rates, while patients with high levels of cluster II genes had variable survival rates and a propensity for poor outcomes if they had co-expression of a “substantial fraction” of cluster I genes.

The researchers noted that many cluster I genes are implicated in cell migration, invasion, EMT, and inflammation.

“The expression of genes such as EVI1, ERG, or ZEB1 now allows us to classify patients into different groups according to prognosis and, if necessary, to adapt treatment,” said Jürg Schwaller, MD, of University Children’s Hospital and University of Basel in Switzerland.

“Our findings should also enable us to develop new, more personalized therapies for these patients.”

Lab mouse

New research suggests the cell of origin controls the aggressiveness and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) driven by MLL-AF9.

Using a mouse model, investigators found that MLL-AF9 expression in long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) causes invasive, chemoresistant AML that expresses genes related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

The researchers also found these genes were associated with poor survival in humans with AML.

“The prognosis thus depends on the particular hematopoietic stem or precursor cells in which the genetic alteration occurs and what genes are expressed,” said Antoine Peters, PhD, of Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland.

Dr Peters and his colleagues related these findings in Cancer Cell.

The investigators compared the results of MLL-AF9 expression in long-term HSCs and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs) in vitro. They found that colonies derived from long-term HSCs exhibited a greater capacity to migrate and expressed genes known to be involved in cell migration and tissue invasion.

With in vivo experiments, the researchers found that long-term HSCs were more potent in inducing AML than GMPs. Twenty percent of long-term HSC-derived AMLs proved especially aggressive, exhibiting extensive tissue infiltration, resistance to chemotherapy, and the expression of EMT genes such as EVI1, ERG, and ZEB1.

The investigators then tested the function of EMT-related transcription factors in leukemic cell migration and invasion. And they found that knocking down ZEB1 significantly reduced leukemic blast invasion.

Next, the researchers classified mouse and human leukemias according to EVI1/Evi1 and ERG/Erg expression and compared transcriptional profiles between species.

This revealed 111 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^highERG^high AML and Evi1^highErg^high iMLL-AF9 long-term-HSC-early AML. These genes were dubbed ‘‘cluster I.’’

The investigators also identified 40 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^lowERG^low AML samples and in iMLL-AF9 GMP-derived AML. These were called ‘‘cluster II.’’

Finally, the team evaluated how the 2 gene clusters related to overall survival in patients with 11q23+ AML.

Patients with high expression of cluster I genes tended to have poor survival rates, while patients with high levels of cluster II genes had variable survival rates and a propensity for poor outcomes if they had co-expression of a “substantial fraction” of cluster I genes.

The researchers noted that many cluster I genes are implicated in cell migration, invasion, EMT, and inflammation.

“The expression of genes such as EVI1, ERG, or ZEB1 now allows us to classify patients into different groups according to prognosis and, if necessary, to adapt treatment,” said Jürg Schwaller, MD, of University Children’s Hospital and University of Basel in Switzerland.

“Our findings should also enable us to develop new, more personalized therapies for these patients.”

Lab mouse

New research suggests the cell of origin controls the aggressiveness and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) driven by MLL-AF9.

Using a mouse model, investigators found that MLL-AF9 expression in long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) causes invasive, chemoresistant AML that expresses genes related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

The researchers also found these genes were associated with poor survival in humans with AML.

“The prognosis thus depends on the particular hematopoietic stem or precursor cells in which the genetic alteration occurs and what genes are expressed,” said Antoine Peters, PhD, of Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland.

Dr Peters and his colleagues related these findings in Cancer Cell.

The investigators compared the results of MLL-AF9 expression in long-term HSCs and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs) in vitro. They found that colonies derived from long-term HSCs exhibited a greater capacity to migrate and expressed genes known to be involved in cell migration and tissue invasion.

With in vivo experiments, the researchers found that long-term HSCs were more potent in inducing AML than GMPs. Twenty percent of long-term HSC-derived AMLs proved especially aggressive, exhibiting extensive tissue infiltration, resistance to chemotherapy, and the expression of EMT genes such as EVI1, ERG, and ZEB1.

The investigators then tested the function of EMT-related transcription factors in leukemic cell migration and invasion. And they found that knocking down ZEB1 significantly reduced leukemic blast invasion.

Next, the researchers classified mouse and human leukemias according to EVI1/Evi1 and ERG/Erg expression and compared transcriptional profiles between species.

This revealed 111 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^highERG^high AML and Evi1^highErg^high iMLL-AF9 long-term-HSC-early AML. These genes were dubbed ‘‘cluster I.’’

The investigators also identified 40 genes that were more highly expressed in EVI1^lowERG^low AML samples and in iMLL-AF9 GMP-derived AML. These were called ‘‘cluster II.’’

Finally, the team evaluated how the 2 gene clusters related to overall survival in patients with 11q23+ AML.

Patients with high expression of cluster I genes tended to have poor survival rates, while patients with high levels of cluster II genes had variable survival rates and a propensity for poor outcomes if they had co-expression of a “substantial fraction” of cluster I genes.

The researchers noted that many cluster I genes are implicated in cell migration, invasion, EMT, and inflammation.

“The expression of genes such as EVI1, ERG, or ZEB1 now allows us to classify patients into different groups according to prognosis and, if necessary, to adapt treatment,” said Jürg Schwaller, MD, of University Children’s Hospital and University of Basel in Switzerland.

“Our findings should also enable us to develop new, more personalized therapies for these patients.”