Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Researchers in the lab

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests that heritable mutations in the gene ETV6 can predispose people to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Somatic mutations in ETV6 have previously been implicated in the development of ALL and other hematologic malignancies.

The new study, published in Nature Genetics, has shown that germline mutations in ETV6 are associated with thrombocytopenia, red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis, and predisposition to ALL.

The research began with a family (family 1) that had autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia  (67,000-132,000 platelets/μL), high RBC mean corpuscular volume (MCV,  92.5-101.5 fl), and 2 cases of B-cell-precursor ALL.

“All of them had big red blood cells, low platelet counts, and propensity to bleed,” said study author Christopher Porter, MD, of the University of Colorado Denver.

This familial link to abnormal blood dynamics and predisposition to ALL implied a common genetic denominator. To find it, the researchers performed whole-exome sequencing and found a heterozygous single-nucleotide change in ETV6, c.641C>T, encoding a p.Pro214Leu substitution in the central domain.

The researchers then screened 23 other families with similar phenotypes as the first and identified 2 families with ETV6 mutations.

One family (family 2) had members with platelet counts ranging from 44,000 to 115,000 platelets/μL, RBC MCVs ranging from 88 to 97 fl, and a member with ALL. All affected family members had a c.641C>T mutation identical to the one identified in family 1.

Another family (family 3) had members with platelet counts ranging from 99,000 to 101,000 platelets/μL and RBC MCVs ranging from 93 to 98 fl but no malignancies. Members of this family had a c.1252A>G transition producing a p.Arg418Gly substitution in the DNA-binding domain, with alternative splicing and exon skipping.

The researchers said these mutations partially disrupt ETV6 transcriptional repression in vitro and cause aberrant cytoplasmic localization of both mutant and endogenous ETV6, suggesting a dominant-negative effect. The mutations also impair megakaryocyte development and proplatelet formation in culture.

Dr Porter and his colleagues noted that another team of researchers recently discovered germline missense mutations in ETV6 in 3 unrelated families. Dr Porter’s group hopes future work will show the prevalence of germline mutations in ETV6.

“It’s not common in a general population, but we think it might be much more common in people who develop ALL,” Dr Porter said. “[Our] paper highlights this gene in the development of leukemia. By studying this mutation, we should be able to gather a better understanding of how leukemia develops.”

Researchers in the lab

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests that heritable mutations in the gene ETV6 can predispose people to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Somatic mutations in ETV6 have previously been implicated in the development of ALL and other hematologic malignancies.

The new study, published in Nature Genetics, has shown that germline mutations in ETV6 are associated with thrombocytopenia, red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis, and predisposition to ALL.

The research began with a family (family 1) that had autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia  (67,000-132,000 platelets/μL), high RBC mean corpuscular volume (MCV,  92.5-101.5 fl), and 2 cases of B-cell-precursor ALL.

“All of them had big red blood cells, low platelet counts, and propensity to bleed,” said study author Christopher Porter, MD, of the University of Colorado Denver.

This familial link to abnormal blood dynamics and predisposition to ALL implied a common genetic denominator. To find it, the researchers performed whole-exome sequencing and found a heterozygous single-nucleotide change in ETV6, c.641C>T, encoding a p.Pro214Leu substitution in the central domain.

The researchers then screened 23 other families with similar phenotypes as the first and identified 2 families with ETV6 mutations.

One family (family 2) had members with platelet counts ranging from 44,000 to 115,000 platelets/μL, RBC MCVs ranging from 88 to 97 fl, and a member with ALL. All affected family members had a c.641C>T mutation identical to the one identified in family 1.

Another family (family 3) had members with platelet counts ranging from 99,000 to 101,000 platelets/μL and RBC MCVs ranging from 93 to 98 fl but no malignancies. Members of this family had a c.1252A>G transition producing a p.Arg418Gly substitution in the DNA-binding domain, with alternative splicing and exon skipping.

The researchers said these mutations partially disrupt ETV6 transcriptional repression in vitro and cause aberrant cytoplasmic localization of both mutant and endogenous ETV6, suggesting a dominant-negative effect. The mutations also impair megakaryocyte development and proplatelet formation in culture.

Dr Porter and his colleagues noted that another team of researchers recently discovered germline missense mutations in ETV6 in 3 unrelated families. Dr Porter’s group hopes future work will show the prevalence of germline mutations in ETV6.

“It’s not common in a general population, but we think it might be much more common in people who develop ALL,” Dr Porter said. “[Our] paper highlights this gene in the development of leukemia. By studying this mutation, we should be able to gather a better understanding of how leukemia develops.”

Researchers in the lab

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests that heritable mutations in the gene ETV6 can predispose people to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Somatic mutations in ETV6 have previously been implicated in the development of ALL and other hematologic malignancies.

The new study, published in Nature Genetics, has shown that germline mutations in ETV6 are associated with thrombocytopenia, red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis, and predisposition to ALL.

The research began with a family (family 1) that had autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia  (67,000-132,000 platelets/μL), high RBC mean corpuscular volume (MCV,  92.5-101.5 fl), and 2 cases of B-cell-precursor ALL.

“All of them had big red blood cells, low platelet counts, and propensity to bleed,” said study author Christopher Porter, MD, of the University of Colorado Denver.

This familial link to abnormal blood dynamics and predisposition to ALL implied a common genetic denominator. To find it, the researchers performed whole-exome sequencing and found a heterozygous single-nucleotide change in ETV6, c.641C>T, encoding a p.Pro214Leu substitution in the central domain.

The researchers then screened 23 other families with similar phenotypes as the first and identified 2 families with ETV6 mutations.

One family (family 2) had members with platelet counts ranging from 44,000 to 115,000 platelets/μL, RBC MCVs ranging from 88 to 97 fl, and a member with ALL. All affected family members had a c.641C>T mutation identical to the one identified in family 1.

Another family (family 3) had members with platelet counts ranging from 99,000 to 101,000 platelets/μL and RBC MCVs ranging from 93 to 98 fl but no malignancies. Members of this family had a c.1252A>G transition producing a p.Arg418Gly substitution in the DNA-binding domain, with alternative splicing and exon skipping.

The researchers said these mutations partially disrupt ETV6 transcriptional repression in vitro and cause aberrant cytoplasmic localization of both mutant and endogenous ETV6, suggesting a dominant-negative effect. The mutations also impair megakaryocyte development and proplatelet formation in culture.

Dr Porter and his colleagues noted that another team of researchers recently discovered germline missense mutations in ETV6 in 3 unrelated families. Dr Porter’s group hopes future work will show the prevalence of germline mutations in ETV6.

“It’s not common in a general population, but we think it might be much more common in people who develop ALL,” Dr Porter said. “[Our] paper highlights this gene in the development of leukemia. By studying this mutation, we should be able to gather a better understanding of how leukemia develops.”

Colony of iPSCs

Image by James Thomson

A new study has improved researchers’ understanding of a genetic defect associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and the team hopes this will ultimately help us correct the defect in patients.

The researchers used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to study del(7q), a chromosomal abnormality found in patients with MDS.

This provided the team with new insight into how the deletion contributes to MDS development.

Steven D. Nimer, MD, of the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami in Florida, and his colleagues described this work in Nature Biotechnology.

To determine how del(7q) contributes to MDS development, the researchers isolated hematopoietic cells from a patient with del(7q) and reprogrammed them into iPSCs. These iPSCs recapitulated MDS-associated phenotypes, including impaired hematopoietic differentiation.

The researchers also showed that, by engineering heterozygous chromosome 7q loss, they could recapitulate in normal iPSCs the characteristics they observed in the del(7q) iPSCs.

So the team was not surprised to find that disease phenotypes were rescued when del(7q) iPSC lines acquired a duplicate copy of chromosome 7q material.

The researchers also found that hemizygosity of chromosome 7q reduced the expression of many genes in the chromosome7q-deleted region. But gene expression was restored upon chromosome 7q dosage correction.

“[W]e were able to pinpoint a region on chromosome 7 that is critical and were able to identify candidate genes residing there that may cause this disease,” said study author Eirini Papapetrou, MD, PhD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York.

Focusing on hits residing in this region, 7q32.3–7q36.1, the researchers found 10 genes that were enriched (by >1.5-fold) recurrently.

Further investigation confirmed that 4 of these genes—HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, LUC7L2, and EZH2—could partially rescue the emergence of CD45⁺ hematopoietic progenitors when overexpressed in del(7q) iPSCs.

The researchers conducted additional experiments focusing on EZH2 alone and found that haploinsufficiency of EZH2 decreases cells’ hematopoietic potential.

But it seems the hematopoietic defects caused by chromosome 7q hemizygosity are mediated through the haploinsufficiency of EZH2 in combination with 1 or more additional genes, which might include LUC7L2, HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, and/or other genes.

Colony of iPSCs

Image by James Thomson

A new study has improved researchers’ understanding of a genetic defect associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and the team hopes this will ultimately help us correct the defect in patients.

The researchers used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to study del(7q), a chromosomal abnormality found in patients with MDS.

This provided the team with new insight into how the deletion contributes to MDS development.

Steven D. Nimer, MD, of the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami in Florida, and his colleagues described this work in Nature Biotechnology.

To determine how del(7q) contributes to MDS development, the researchers isolated hematopoietic cells from a patient with del(7q) and reprogrammed them into iPSCs. These iPSCs recapitulated MDS-associated phenotypes, including impaired hematopoietic differentiation.

The researchers also showed that, by engineering heterozygous chromosome 7q loss, they could recapitulate in normal iPSCs the characteristics they observed in the del(7q) iPSCs.

So the team was not surprised to find that disease phenotypes were rescued when del(7q) iPSC lines acquired a duplicate copy of chromosome 7q material.

The researchers also found that hemizygosity of chromosome 7q reduced the expression of many genes in the chromosome7q-deleted region. But gene expression was restored upon chromosome 7q dosage correction.

“[W]e were able to pinpoint a region on chromosome 7 that is critical and were able to identify candidate genes residing there that may cause this disease,” said study author Eirini Papapetrou, MD, PhD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York.

Focusing on hits residing in this region, 7q32.3–7q36.1, the researchers found 10 genes that were enriched (by >1.5-fold) recurrently.

Further investigation confirmed that 4 of these genes—HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, LUC7L2, and EZH2—could partially rescue the emergence of CD45⁺ hematopoietic progenitors when overexpressed in del(7q) iPSCs.

The researchers conducted additional experiments focusing on EZH2 alone and found that haploinsufficiency of EZH2 decreases cells’ hematopoietic potential.

But it seems the hematopoietic defects caused by chromosome 7q hemizygosity are mediated through the haploinsufficiency of EZH2 in combination with 1 or more additional genes, which might include LUC7L2, HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, and/or other genes.

Colony of iPSCs

Image by James Thomson

A new study has improved researchers’ understanding of a genetic defect associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and the team hopes this will ultimately help us correct the defect in patients.

The researchers used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to study del(7q), a chromosomal abnormality found in patients with MDS.

This provided the team with new insight into how the deletion contributes to MDS development.

Steven D. Nimer, MD, of the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami in Florida, and his colleagues described this work in Nature Biotechnology.

To determine how del(7q) contributes to MDS development, the researchers isolated hematopoietic cells from a patient with del(7q) and reprogrammed them into iPSCs. These iPSCs recapitulated MDS-associated phenotypes, including impaired hematopoietic differentiation.

The researchers also showed that, by engineering heterozygous chromosome 7q loss, they could recapitulate in normal iPSCs the characteristics they observed in the del(7q) iPSCs.

So the team was not surprised to find that disease phenotypes were rescued when del(7q) iPSC lines acquired a duplicate copy of chromosome 7q material.

The researchers also found that hemizygosity of chromosome 7q reduced the expression of many genes in the chromosome7q-deleted region. But gene expression was restored upon chromosome 7q dosage correction.

“[W]e were able to pinpoint a region on chromosome 7 that is critical and were able to identify candidate genes residing there that may cause this disease,” said study author Eirini Papapetrou, MD, PhD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York.

Focusing on hits residing in this region, 7q32.3–7q36.1, the researchers found 10 genes that were enriched (by >1.5-fold) recurrently.

Further investigation confirmed that 4 of these genes—HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, LUC7L2, and EZH2—could partially rescue the emergence of CD45⁺ hematopoietic progenitors when overexpressed in del(7q) iPSCs.

The researchers conducted additional experiments focusing on EZH2 alone and found that haploinsufficiency of EZH2 decreases cells’ hematopoietic potential.

But it seems the hematopoietic defects caused by chromosome 7q hemizygosity are mediated through the haploinsufficiency of EZH2 in combination with 1 or more additional genes, which might include LUC7L2, HIPK2, ATP6V0E2, and/or other genes.

Red blood cells

Preclinical research suggests an enzyme found in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is key to maintaining periods of inactivity, thereby decreasing the odds that HSCs will divide too often and acquire mutations or cell damage.

Experiments showed that animals lacking this enzyme, inositol trisphosphate 3-kinase B (Itpkb), experience dangerous HSC activation and ultimately succumb to lethal anemia.

“These HSCs remain active too long and then disappear,” said Karsten Sauer, PhD, of The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California.

“As a consequence, the mice lose their red blood cells and die.”

With this new understanding of Itpkb, Dr Sauer and his colleagues believe they are closer to improving therapies for diseases such as bone marrow failure syndrome, anemia, leukemia, and lymphoma.

The team described their research in Blood.

The group set out to investigate the mechanisms that activate and deactivate HSCs. They focused on Itpkb because it is produced in HSCs, and the enzyme is known to dampen activating signaling in other cells.

“We hypothesized that Itpkb might do the same in HSCs to keep them at rest,” Dr Sauer said. “Moreover, Itpkb is an enzyme whose function can be controlled by small molecules. This might facilitate drug development if our hypothesis were true.”

The researchers started with a strain of mice that lacked the gene to produce Itpkb. As expected, these mice developed hyperactive HSCs. Eventually, the mutant HSCs exhausted themselves and stopped producing progenitor cells, so the mice developed severe anemia and died.

Dr Sauer and his colleagues linked the abnormal behavior of the mutant HSCs to a chain of events at the molecular level.

Itpkb’s job is to attach phosphates to molecules called inositols, which then send messages to other parts of the cell. The researchers found that Itpkb can turn one inositol, IP3, into another inositol known as IP4.

This is significant because IP4 controls cell proliferation, cellular metabolism, and aspects of the immune system. The study showed that IP4 also protects HSCs by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

To confirm this finding, the researchers treated the animals with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. The drug halted the abnormal signaling process and prevented the excessive division of HSCs lacking Itpkb. This supported the notion that Itpkb maintains HSCs’ quiescence by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

Dr Sauer said future research in his lab will focus on studying whether Itpkb has a similar function in human HSCs.

“A major question is whether we can translate our findings into innovative therapies,” he said. “If we can show that Itpkb also keeps human HSCs healthy, this could open avenues to target Itpkb to improve HSC function in bone marrow failure syndromes and immunodeficiencies or to increase the success rates of HSC transplantation therapies for leukemias and lymphomas.”

Red blood cells

Preclinical research suggests an enzyme found in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is key to maintaining periods of inactivity, thereby decreasing the odds that HSCs will divide too often and acquire mutations or cell damage.

Experiments showed that animals lacking this enzyme, inositol trisphosphate 3-kinase B (Itpkb), experience dangerous HSC activation and ultimately succumb to lethal anemia.

“These HSCs remain active too long and then disappear,” said Karsten Sauer, PhD, of The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California.

“As a consequence, the mice lose their red blood cells and die.”

With this new understanding of Itpkb, Dr Sauer and his colleagues believe they are closer to improving therapies for diseases such as bone marrow failure syndrome, anemia, leukemia, and lymphoma.

The team described their research in Blood.

The group set out to investigate the mechanisms that activate and deactivate HSCs. They focused on Itpkb because it is produced in HSCs, and the enzyme is known to dampen activating signaling in other cells.

“We hypothesized that Itpkb might do the same in HSCs to keep them at rest,” Dr Sauer said. “Moreover, Itpkb is an enzyme whose function can be controlled by small molecules. This might facilitate drug development if our hypothesis were true.”

The researchers started with a strain of mice that lacked the gene to produce Itpkb. As expected, these mice developed hyperactive HSCs. Eventually, the mutant HSCs exhausted themselves and stopped producing progenitor cells, so the mice developed severe anemia and died.

Dr Sauer and his colleagues linked the abnormal behavior of the mutant HSCs to a chain of events at the molecular level.

Itpkb’s job is to attach phosphates to molecules called inositols, which then send messages to other parts of the cell. The researchers found that Itpkb can turn one inositol, IP3, into another inositol known as IP4.

This is significant because IP4 controls cell proliferation, cellular metabolism, and aspects of the immune system. The study showed that IP4 also protects HSCs by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

To confirm this finding, the researchers treated the animals with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. The drug halted the abnormal signaling process and prevented the excessive division of HSCs lacking Itpkb. This supported the notion that Itpkb maintains HSCs’ quiescence by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

Dr Sauer said future research in his lab will focus on studying whether Itpkb has a similar function in human HSCs.

“A major question is whether we can translate our findings into innovative therapies,” he said. “If we can show that Itpkb also keeps human HSCs healthy, this could open avenues to target Itpkb to improve HSC function in bone marrow failure syndromes and immunodeficiencies or to increase the success rates of HSC transplantation therapies for leukemias and lymphomas.”

Red blood cells

Preclinical research suggests an enzyme found in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is key to maintaining periods of inactivity, thereby decreasing the odds that HSCs will divide too often and acquire mutations or cell damage.

Experiments showed that animals lacking this enzyme, inositol trisphosphate 3-kinase B (Itpkb), experience dangerous HSC activation and ultimately succumb to lethal anemia.

“These HSCs remain active too long and then disappear,” said Karsten Sauer, PhD, of The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California.

“As a consequence, the mice lose their red blood cells and die.”

With this new understanding of Itpkb, Dr Sauer and his colleagues believe they are closer to improving therapies for diseases such as bone marrow failure syndrome, anemia, leukemia, and lymphoma.

The team described their research in Blood.

The group set out to investigate the mechanisms that activate and deactivate HSCs. They focused on Itpkb because it is produced in HSCs, and the enzyme is known to dampen activating signaling in other cells.

“We hypothesized that Itpkb might do the same in HSCs to keep them at rest,” Dr Sauer said. “Moreover, Itpkb is an enzyme whose function can be controlled by small molecules. This might facilitate drug development if our hypothesis were true.”

The researchers started with a strain of mice that lacked the gene to produce Itpkb. As expected, these mice developed hyperactive HSCs. Eventually, the mutant HSCs exhausted themselves and stopped producing progenitor cells, so the mice developed severe anemia and died.

Dr Sauer and his colleagues linked the abnormal behavior of the mutant HSCs to a chain of events at the molecular level.

Itpkb’s job is to attach phosphates to molecules called inositols, which then send messages to other parts of the cell. The researchers found that Itpkb can turn one inositol, IP3, into another inositol known as IP4.

This is significant because IP4 controls cell proliferation, cellular metabolism, and aspects of the immune system. The study showed that IP4 also protects HSCs by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

To confirm this finding, the researchers treated the animals with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. The drug halted the abnormal signaling process and prevented the excessive division of HSCs lacking Itpkb. This supported the notion that Itpkb maintains HSCs’ quiescence by dampening PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

Dr Sauer said future research in his lab will focus on studying whether Itpkb has a similar function in human HSCs.

“A major question is whether we can translate our findings into innovative therapies,” he said. “If we can show that Itpkb also keeps human HSCs healthy, this could open avenues to target Itpkb to improve HSC function in bone marrow failure syndromes and immunodeficiencies or to increase the success rates of HSC transplantation therapies for leukemias and lymphomas.”

 

 

Farmer spraying pesticide

Photo by John Messina

 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, has found evidence suggesting that 5 organophosphate pesticides may be carcinogenic.

The IARC classified the herbicide glyphosate and the insecticides malathion and diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” to humans and the insecticides tetrachlorvinphos and parathion as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans.

A summary of these findings has been published in The Lancet Oncology.

Glyphosate

For the herbicide glyphosate, the IARC found limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Case-control studies of occupational exposure to glyphosate in the US, Canada, and Sweden showed increased risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

However, the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) showed no significantly increased risk of NHL in subjects exposed to glyphosate.

A study of community residents showed increases in blood markers of chromosomal damage after glyphosate formulations were sprayed nearby. And glyphosate was shown to cause DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative.

In studies of male mice, glyphosate increased the incidence of renal tubule carcinoma and hemangiosarcoma. Glyphosate also increased the incidence of pancreatic islet-cell adenoma in male rats, and a glyphosate formulation promoted skin tumors in mice.

The IARC said glyphosate has the highest global production volume of all herbicides. It is used in agriculture, forestry, urban, and home applications.

Glyphosate has been detected in the air during spraying, in water, and in food. The general population is exposed to the chemical primarily by living near sprayed areas, home use, and diet. But the IARC said the level of exposure observed is generally low.

Malathion

The IARC classified malathion as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL and prostate cancer. Occupational use of malathion was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in a Canadian case-control study and in the AHS.

Studies of occupational exposures in the US, Canada, and Sweden revealed positive associations between malathion and NHL. However, results of the AHS did not show an association between the insecticide and NHL.

Studies showed that malathion induced DNA and chromosomal damage in humans and animals, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative. Results also suggested malathion disrupts hormone pathways.

Experiments in mice showed malathion increased the incidence of hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined). In rats, the insecticide increased the incidence of thyroid carcinoma in males, hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in females, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma after subcutaneous injection in females.

The IARC said malathion is used in “substantial volumes throughout the world” to control insects in agricultural and residential areas.

Workers may be exposed to malathion during the use and production of the product. The general population may be exposed if they live near sprayed areas, use the product at home, or consume food exposed to the chemical.

Diazinon

The IARC classified diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL, leukemia, and lung cancer.

Two multicenter, case-control studies of agricultural exposures suggested a positive association between diazinon and NHL. The AHS showed positive associations with specific subtypes of NHL but no overall increased risk of NHL. The AHS also suggested an increased risk of leukemia and lung cancer in subjects exposed to diazinon.

Evidence suggested that diazinon induced DNA or chromosomal damage in human and mammalian cells in vitro. In vivo, diazinon increased the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and leukemia or lymphoma (combined) in rats, but only in males receiving the low dose in each study.

Diazinon has been used to control insects in agricultural and residential areas. The IARC said production volumes have been relatively low and decreased further after 2006 due to restrictions in the US and the European Union (EU). There was limited information on the use of this pesticide in other countries.

Tetrachlorvinphos

The insecticide tetrachlorvinphos was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals. The IARC said the evidence in humans was inadequate.

However, tetrachlorvinphos was shown to induce hepatocellular tumors (benign or malignant) in mice, renal tubule tumors (benign or malignant) in male mice, and spleen hemangioma in male rats.

Tetrachlorvinphos is banned in the EU. In the US, the insecticide is still used on livestock and pets (in flea collars). The IARC said there was no information available on tetrachlorvinphos use in other countries.

Parathion

The insecticide parathion was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals.

Researchers have observed associations between the insecticide and cancers in several tissues in occupational studies. But the IARC said the evidence that parathion is carcinogenic in humans remains sparse.

Experiments in mice showed that parathion increased the incidence of bronchioloalveolar adenoma and/or carcinoma in males and lymphoma in females. In rats, parathion induced adrenal cortical adenoma or carcinoma (combined), malignant pancreatic tumors, and thyroid follicular cell adenoma in males, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma (after subcutaneous injection in females).

Parathion use has been severely restricted since the 1980s, and all authorized uses of this chemical were cancelled in the EU and the US by 2003.

 

 

Farmer spraying pesticide

Photo by John Messina

 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, has found evidence suggesting that 5 organophosphate pesticides may be carcinogenic.

The IARC classified the herbicide glyphosate and the insecticides malathion and diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” to humans and the insecticides tetrachlorvinphos and parathion as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans.

A summary of these findings has been published in The Lancet Oncology.

Glyphosate

For the herbicide glyphosate, the IARC found limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Case-control studies of occupational exposure to glyphosate in the US, Canada, and Sweden showed increased risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

However, the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) showed no significantly increased risk of NHL in subjects exposed to glyphosate.

A study of community residents showed increases in blood markers of chromosomal damage after glyphosate formulations were sprayed nearby. And glyphosate was shown to cause DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative.

In studies of male mice, glyphosate increased the incidence of renal tubule carcinoma and hemangiosarcoma. Glyphosate also increased the incidence of pancreatic islet-cell adenoma in male rats, and a glyphosate formulation promoted skin tumors in mice.

The IARC said glyphosate has the highest global production volume of all herbicides. It is used in agriculture, forestry, urban, and home applications.

Glyphosate has been detected in the air during spraying, in water, and in food. The general population is exposed to the chemical primarily by living near sprayed areas, home use, and diet. But the IARC said the level of exposure observed is generally low.

Malathion

The IARC classified malathion as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL and prostate cancer. Occupational use of malathion was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in a Canadian case-control study and in the AHS.

Studies of occupational exposures in the US, Canada, and Sweden revealed positive associations between malathion and NHL. However, results of the AHS did not show an association between the insecticide and NHL.

Studies showed that malathion induced DNA and chromosomal damage in humans and animals, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative. Results also suggested malathion disrupts hormone pathways.

Experiments in mice showed malathion increased the incidence of hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined). In rats, the insecticide increased the incidence of thyroid carcinoma in males, hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in females, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma after subcutaneous injection in females.

The IARC said malathion is used in “substantial volumes throughout the world” to control insects in agricultural and residential areas.

Workers may be exposed to malathion during the use and production of the product. The general population may be exposed if they live near sprayed areas, use the product at home, or consume food exposed to the chemical.

Diazinon

The IARC classified diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL, leukemia, and lung cancer.

Two multicenter, case-control studies of agricultural exposures suggested a positive association between diazinon and NHL. The AHS showed positive associations with specific subtypes of NHL but no overall increased risk of NHL. The AHS also suggested an increased risk of leukemia and lung cancer in subjects exposed to diazinon.

Evidence suggested that diazinon induced DNA or chromosomal damage in human and mammalian cells in vitro. In vivo, diazinon increased the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and leukemia or lymphoma (combined) in rats, but only in males receiving the low dose in each study.

Diazinon has been used to control insects in agricultural and residential areas. The IARC said production volumes have been relatively low and decreased further after 2006 due to restrictions in the US and the European Union (EU). There was limited information on the use of this pesticide in other countries.

Tetrachlorvinphos

The insecticide tetrachlorvinphos was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals. The IARC said the evidence in humans was inadequate.

However, tetrachlorvinphos was shown to induce hepatocellular tumors (benign or malignant) in mice, renal tubule tumors (benign or malignant) in male mice, and spleen hemangioma in male rats.

Tetrachlorvinphos is banned in the EU. In the US, the insecticide is still used on livestock and pets (in flea collars). The IARC said there was no information available on tetrachlorvinphos use in other countries.

Parathion

The insecticide parathion was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals.

Researchers have observed associations between the insecticide and cancers in several tissues in occupational studies. But the IARC said the evidence that parathion is carcinogenic in humans remains sparse.

Experiments in mice showed that parathion increased the incidence of bronchioloalveolar adenoma and/or carcinoma in males and lymphoma in females. In rats, parathion induced adrenal cortical adenoma or carcinoma (combined), malignant pancreatic tumors, and thyroid follicular cell adenoma in males, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma (after subcutaneous injection in females).

Parathion use has been severely restricted since the 1980s, and all authorized uses of this chemical were cancelled in the EU and the US by 2003.

 

 

Farmer spraying pesticide

Photo by John Messina

 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, has found evidence suggesting that 5 organophosphate pesticides may be carcinogenic.

The IARC classified the herbicide glyphosate and the insecticides malathion and diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” to humans and the insecticides tetrachlorvinphos and parathion as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans.

A summary of these findings has been published in The Lancet Oncology.

Glyphosate

For the herbicide glyphosate, the IARC found limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Case-control studies of occupational exposure to glyphosate in the US, Canada, and Sweden showed increased risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

However, the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) showed no significantly increased risk of NHL in subjects exposed to glyphosate.

A study of community residents showed increases in blood markers of chromosomal damage after glyphosate formulations were sprayed nearby. And glyphosate was shown to cause DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative.

In studies of male mice, glyphosate increased the incidence of renal tubule carcinoma and hemangiosarcoma. Glyphosate also increased the incidence of pancreatic islet-cell adenoma in male rats, and a glyphosate formulation promoted skin tumors in mice.

The IARC said glyphosate has the highest global production volume of all herbicides. It is used in agriculture, forestry, urban, and home applications.

Glyphosate has been detected in the air during spraying, in water, and in food. The general population is exposed to the chemical primarily by living near sprayed areas, home use, and diet. But the IARC said the level of exposure observed is generally low.

Malathion

The IARC classified malathion as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL and prostate cancer. Occupational use of malathion was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in a Canadian case-control study and in the AHS.

Studies of occupational exposures in the US, Canada, and Sweden revealed positive associations between malathion and NHL. However, results of the AHS did not show an association between the insecticide and NHL.

Studies showed that malathion induced DNA and chromosomal damage in humans and animals, although bacterial mutagenesis tests were negative. Results also suggested malathion disrupts hormone pathways.

Experiments in mice showed malathion increased the incidence of hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined). In rats, the insecticide increased the incidence of thyroid carcinoma in males, hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in females, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma after subcutaneous injection in females.

The IARC said malathion is used in “substantial volumes throughout the world” to control insects in agricultural and residential areas.

Workers may be exposed to malathion during the use and production of the product. The general population may be exposed if they live near sprayed areas, use the product at home, or consume food exposed to the chemical.

Diazinon

The IARC classified diazinon as “probably carcinogenic” for humans based on limited evidence linking the insecticide to NHL, leukemia, and lung cancer.

Two multicenter, case-control studies of agricultural exposures suggested a positive association between diazinon and NHL. The AHS showed positive associations with specific subtypes of NHL but no overall increased risk of NHL. The AHS also suggested an increased risk of leukemia and lung cancer in subjects exposed to diazinon.

Evidence suggested that diazinon induced DNA or chromosomal damage in human and mammalian cells in vitro. In vivo, diazinon increased the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and leukemia or lymphoma (combined) in rats, but only in males receiving the low dose in each study.

Diazinon has been used to control insects in agricultural and residential areas. The IARC said production volumes have been relatively low and decreased further after 2006 due to restrictions in the US and the European Union (EU). There was limited information on the use of this pesticide in other countries.

Tetrachlorvinphos

The insecticide tetrachlorvinphos was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals. The IARC said the evidence in humans was inadequate.

However, tetrachlorvinphos was shown to induce hepatocellular tumors (benign or malignant) in mice, renal tubule tumors (benign or malignant) in male mice, and spleen hemangioma in male rats.

Tetrachlorvinphos is banned in the EU. In the US, the insecticide is still used on livestock and pets (in flea collars). The IARC said there was no information available on tetrachlorvinphos use in other countries.

Parathion

The insecticide parathion was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer in lab animals.

Researchers have observed associations between the insecticide and cancers in several tissues in occupational studies. But the IARC said the evidence that parathion is carcinogenic in humans remains sparse.

Experiments in mice showed that parathion increased the incidence of bronchioloalveolar adenoma and/or carcinoma in males and lymphoma in females. In rats, parathion induced adrenal cortical adenoma or carcinoma (combined), malignant pancreatic tumors, and thyroid follicular cell adenoma in males, and mammary gland adenocarcinoma (after subcutaneous injection in females).

Parathion use has been severely restricted since the 1980s, and all authorized uses of this chemical were cancelled in the EU and the US by 2003.

Bone marrow aspiration

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Based on results of a prospective study, investigators are advocating sequential minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have detectable MRD after remission induction therapy.

The researchers said their findings show that MRD levels during remission induction treatment have important therapeutic indications, even in the context of MRD-guided therapy, as patients with higher MRD levels have  worse outcomes.

Ching-Hon Pui, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described the findings in The Lancet Oncology.

The team analyzed 498 pediatric patients newly diagnosed with ALL, 492 of whom (99%) attained a complete remission following induction therapy and 491 of whom were monitored for MRD.

The researchers first estimated patients’ risk of relapse according to baseline clinical and laboratory features, provisionally classifying them as having a low, standard, or high risk of relapse.

But the investigators also took MRD levels into consideration. They measured MRD on days 19 and 46 of remission induction, on week 7 of maintenance treatment, and on weeks 17, 48, and 120 (the end of treatment).

The team found that 10-year event-free survival (EFS) was significantly worse for patients with 1% or greater MRD levels on day 19, regardless of their initial risk assessment. Ten-year EFS was 64.1% in these patients, compared to 90.7% in patients with lower or no detectable MRD (P<0.001).

Thirteen percent of patients who were deemed low-risk initially and 28% of patients deemed standard-risk initially had 1% or higher MRD levels on day 19. And these levels were associated with worse 10-year EFS.

In the provisional low-risk group, EFS was 69.2% in the high-MRD patients and 95.5% in the low-MRD patients (P<0.001). And in the provisional standard-risk group, 10-year EFS was 65.1% and 82.9%, respectively (P=0.01).

MRD levels at day 46 also appeared to have a bearing on EFS. For patients in the provisional low-risk group who had 1% or higher MRD on day 19 but became MRD-negative on day 46, 10-year EFS was 88.9%, compared to 59.2% for other provisionally low-risk patients who had detectable MRD on day 46 (P=0.02).

MRD levels on days 19 and 46 led to the reclassification of 50 patients from low-risk to a higher risk group that warranted more intensive therapy. The researchers credited the change with boosting survival.

“This analysis shows that MRD-directed therapy clearly contributed to the unprecedented high rates of long-term survival that patients in this study achieved,” Dr Pui said. “MRD proved to be a powerful way to identify high-risk patients who needed more intensive therapy and helped us avoid over-treatment of low-risk patients by reducing their exposure to chemotherapy.”

Still, MRD assessments at days 19 and 46 were not perfect predictors of patient outcomes. Of the patients who were MRD negative after remission induction, MRD re-emerged in 6 patients—4 of the 382 patients studied on week 7, 1 of the 448 studied at week 17, and 1 of the 437 studied at week 48. All but 1 of these patients died despite additional treatment.

On the other hand, relapse occurred in 2 of the 11 patients who had decreasing MRD levels between the end of induction and week 7 of maintenance therapy and were treated with chemotherapy alone.

Taking these results together, the investigators concluded that measuring MRD at days 19 and 46 was sufficient to guide the treatment of most pediatric ALL patients. However, MRD measurements should continue to guide treatment for patients with detectable MRD on day 46.

Bone marrow aspiration

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Based on results of a prospective study, investigators are advocating sequential minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have detectable MRD after remission induction therapy.

The researchers said their findings show that MRD levels during remission induction treatment have important therapeutic indications, even in the context of MRD-guided therapy, as patients with higher MRD levels have  worse outcomes.

Ching-Hon Pui, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described the findings in The Lancet Oncology.

The team analyzed 498 pediatric patients newly diagnosed with ALL, 492 of whom (99%) attained a complete remission following induction therapy and 491 of whom were monitored for MRD.

The researchers first estimated patients’ risk of relapse according to baseline clinical and laboratory features, provisionally classifying them as having a low, standard, or high risk of relapse.

But the investigators also took MRD levels into consideration. They measured MRD on days 19 and 46 of remission induction, on week 7 of maintenance treatment, and on weeks 17, 48, and 120 (the end of treatment).

The team found that 10-year event-free survival (EFS) was significantly worse for patients with 1% or greater MRD levels on day 19, regardless of their initial risk assessment. Ten-year EFS was 64.1% in these patients, compared to 90.7% in patients with lower or no detectable MRD (P<0.001).

Thirteen percent of patients who were deemed low-risk initially and 28% of patients deemed standard-risk initially had 1% or higher MRD levels on day 19. And these levels were associated with worse 10-year EFS.

In the provisional low-risk group, EFS was 69.2% in the high-MRD patients and 95.5% in the low-MRD patients (P<0.001). And in the provisional standard-risk group, 10-year EFS was 65.1% and 82.9%, respectively (P=0.01).

MRD levels at day 46 also appeared to have a bearing on EFS. For patients in the provisional low-risk group who had 1% or higher MRD on day 19 but became MRD-negative on day 46, 10-year EFS was 88.9%, compared to 59.2% for other provisionally low-risk patients who had detectable MRD on day 46 (P=0.02).

MRD levels on days 19 and 46 led to the reclassification of 50 patients from low-risk to a higher risk group that warranted more intensive therapy. The researchers credited the change with boosting survival.

“This analysis shows that MRD-directed therapy clearly contributed to the unprecedented high rates of long-term survival that patients in this study achieved,” Dr Pui said. “MRD proved to be a powerful way to identify high-risk patients who needed more intensive therapy and helped us avoid over-treatment of low-risk patients by reducing their exposure to chemotherapy.”

Still, MRD assessments at days 19 and 46 were not perfect predictors of patient outcomes. Of the patients who were MRD negative after remission induction, MRD re-emerged in 6 patients—4 of the 382 patients studied on week 7, 1 of the 448 studied at week 17, and 1 of the 437 studied at week 48. All but 1 of these patients died despite additional treatment.

On the other hand, relapse occurred in 2 of the 11 patients who had decreasing MRD levels between the end of induction and week 7 of maintenance therapy and were treated with chemotherapy alone.

Taking these results together, the investigators concluded that measuring MRD at days 19 and 46 was sufficient to guide the treatment of most pediatric ALL patients. However, MRD measurements should continue to guide treatment for patients with detectable MRD on day 46.

Bone marrow aspiration

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Based on results of a prospective study, investigators are advocating sequential minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have detectable MRD after remission induction therapy.

The researchers said their findings show that MRD levels during remission induction treatment have important therapeutic indications, even in the context of MRD-guided therapy, as patients with higher MRD levels have  worse outcomes.

Ching-Hon Pui, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described the findings in The Lancet Oncology.

The team analyzed 498 pediatric patients newly diagnosed with ALL, 492 of whom (99%) attained a complete remission following induction therapy and 491 of whom were monitored for MRD.

The researchers first estimated patients’ risk of relapse according to baseline clinical and laboratory features, provisionally classifying them as having a low, standard, or high risk of relapse.

But the investigators also took MRD levels into consideration. They measured MRD on days 19 and 46 of remission induction, on week 7 of maintenance treatment, and on weeks 17, 48, and 120 (the end of treatment).

The team found that 10-year event-free survival (EFS) was significantly worse for patients with 1% or greater MRD levels on day 19, regardless of their initial risk assessment. Ten-year EFS was 64.1% in these patients, compared to 90.7% in patients with lower or no detectable MRD (P<0.001).

Thirteen percent of patients who were deemed low-risk initially and 28% of patients deemed standard-risk initially had 1% or higher MRD levels on day 19. And these levels were associated with worse 10-year EFS.

In the provisional low-risk group, EFS was 69.2% in the high-MRD patients and 95.5% in the low-MRD patients (P<0.001). And in the provisional standard-risk group, 10-year EFS was 65.1% and 82.9%, respectively (P=0.01).

MRD levels at day 46 also appeared to have a bearing on EFS. For patients in the provisional low-risk group who had 1% or higher MRD on day 19 but became MRD-negative on day 46, 10-year EFS was 88.9%, compared to 59.2% for other provisionally low-risk patients who had detectable MRD on day 46 (P=0.02).

MRD levels on days 19 and 46 led to the reclassification of 50 patients from low-risk to a higher risk group that warranted more intensive therapy. The researchers credited the change with boosting survival.

“This analysis shows that MRD-directed therapy clearly contributed to the unprecedented high rates of long-term survival that patients in this study achieved,” Dr Pui said. “MRD proved to be a powerful way to identify high-risk patients who needed more intensive therapy and helped us avoid over-treatment of low-risk patients by reducing their exposure to chemotherapy.”

Still, MRD assessments at days 19 and 46 were not perfect predictors of patient outcomes. Of the patients who were MRD negative after remission induction, MRD re-emerged in 6 patients—4 of the 382 patients studied on week 7, 1 of the 448 studied at week 17, and 1 of the 437 studied at week 48. All but 1 of these patients died despite additional treatment.

On the other hand, relapse occurred in 2 of the 11 patients who had decreasing MRD levels between the end of induction and week 7 of maintenance therapy and were treated with chemotherapy alone.

Taking these results together, the investigators concluded that measuring MRD at days 19 and 46 was sufficient to guide the treatment of most pediatric ALL patients. However, MRD measurements should continue to guide treatment for patients with detectable MRD on day 46.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

In tracing the clonal evolution of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from diagnosis to relapse, researchers discovered that clonal diversity is comparable in both states.

They also identified mutations associated with B-ALL relapse and found that clonal survival is not dependent upon mutation burden.

In most of the cases the researchers analyzed, a single, minor clone survived therapy, acquired additional mutations, and drove disease relapse.

Jinghui Zhang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and her colleagues recounted these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers performed deep, whole-exome sequencing on cell samples from 20 young patients (ages 2 to 19) with relapsed B-ALL. The samples were collected at diagnosis, remission, and relapse.

“[W]e wanted to find out the underlying mechanism leading to cancer relapse,” Dr Zhang said. “When the cancer recurs, is it a completely different cancer, or is it an extension, or change, arising from pre-existing cancer?”

The researchers were able to detect the mutations in both the “rising” and “falling” clones—those that survive therapy and those that don’t—at the different disease stages and pinpoint the mutations that drove the leukemia.

Seven genes were highly likely to be mutated in relapsed disease—NT5C2, CREBBP, WHSC1, TP53, USH2A, NRAS, and IKZF1.

The researchers also characterized how diverse those mutations were at diagnosis and relapse. They found that B-ALL cells were mutating just as wildly and diversely in one phase of disease as in the other.

“This finding was interesting, because most people think that the clone that has the most mutations is more likely to survive therapy and evolve, but that doesn’t seem to be the case,” Dr Zhang said.

In most cases, relapse was driven by a minor subclone that had survived therapy and was present at an extremely low level. The researchers said this finding suggests a need to change the way we assess patients after treatment to determine the likelihood of relapse.

“When we are analyzing for the level of minimum residual disease in monitoring remission in patients, we should not only pay attention to the mutations in the predominant clone,” Dr Zhang said. “We should also be tracking what kinds of mutations exist in the minor subclones.”

Micrograph showing B-ALL

In tracing the clonal evolution of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from diagnosis to relapse, researchers discovered that clonal diversity is comparable in both states.

They also identified mutations associated with B-ALL relapse and found that clonal survival is not dependent upon mutation burden.

In most of the cases the researchers analyzed, a single, minor clone survived therapy, acquired additional mutations, and drove disease relapse.

Jinghui Zhang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and her colleagues recounted these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers performed deep, whole-exome sequencing on cell samples from 20 young patients (ages 2 to 19) with relapsed B-ALL. The samples were collected at diagnosis, remission, and relapse.

“[W]e wanted to find out the underlying mechanism leading to cancer relapse,” Dr Zhang said. “When the cancer recurs, is it a completely different cancer, or is it an extension, or change, arising from pre-existing cancer?”

The researchers were able to detect the mutations in both the “rising” and “falling” clones—those that survive therapy and those that don’t—at the different disease stages and pinpoint the mutations that drove the leukemia.

Seven genes were highly likely to be mutated in relapsed disease—NT5C2, CREBBP, WHSC1, TP53, USH2A, NRAS, and IKZF1.

The researchers also characterized how diverse those mutations were at diagnosis and relapse. They found that B-ALL cells were mutating just as wildly and diversely in one phase of disease as in the other.

“This finding was interesting, because most people think that the clone that has the most mutations is more likely to survive therapy and evolve, but that doesn’t seem to be the case,” Dr Zhang said.

In most cases, relapse was driven by a minor subclone that had survived therapy and was present at an extremely low level. The researchers said this finding suggests a need to change the way we assess patients after treatment to determine the likelihood of relapse.

“When we are analyzing for the level of minimum residual disease in monitoring remission in patients, we should not only pay attention to the mutations in the predominant clone,” Dr Zhang said. “We should also be tracking what kinds of mutations exist in the minor subclones.”

Micrograph showing B-ALL

In tracing the clonal evolution of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from diagnosis to relapse, researchers discovered that clonal diversity is comparable in both states.

They also identified mutations associated with B-ALL relapse and found that clonal survival is not dependent upon mutation burden.

In most of the cases the researchers analyzed, a single, minor clone survived therapy, acquired additional mutations, and drove disease relapse.

Jinghui Zhang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and her colleagues recounted these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers performed deep, whole-exome sequencing on cell samples from 20 young patients (ages 2 to 19) with relapsed B-ALL. The samples were collected at diagnosis, remission, and relapse.

“[W]e wanted to find out the underlying mechanism leading to cancer relapse,” Dr Zhang said. “When the cancer recurs, is it a completely different cancer, or is it an extension, or change, arising from pre-existing cancer?”

The researchers were able to detect the mutations in both the “rising” and “falling” clones—those that survive therapy and those that don’t—at the different disease stages and pinpoint the mutations that drove the leukemia.

Seven genes were highly likely to be mutated in relapsed disease—NT5C2, CREBBP, WHSC1, TP53, USH2A, NRAS, and IKZF1.

The researchers also characterized how diverse those mutations were at diagnosis and relapse. They found that B-ALL cells were mutating just as wildly and diversely in one phase of disease as in the other.

“This finding was interesting, because most people think that the clone that has the most mutations is more likely to survive therapy and evolve, but that doesn’t seem to be the case,” Dr Zhang said.

In most cases, relapse was driven by a minor subclone that had survived therapy and was present at an extremely low level. The researchers said this finding suggests a need to change the way we assess patients after treatment to determine the likelihood of relapse.

“When we are analyzing for the level of minimum residual disease in monitoring remission in patients, we should not only pay attention to the mutations in the predominant clone,” Dr Zhang said. “We should also be tracking what kinds of mutations exist in the minor subclones.”

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

Investigators have reported methods for reprogramming leukemia cells into non-leukemic, macrophage-like cells.

The team reprogrammed cells derived from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by exposing the cells to myeloid differentiation-promoting cytokines or by transient expression of certain transcription factors.

The group described this work in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research began when the investigators were trying to keep patient-derived leukemia cells alive in culture.

“We were throwing everything at them to help them survive,” said Ravindra Majeti, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

Then, James Scott McClellan, MD, PhD, also of Stanford University School of Medicine, mentioned that some of the cells were changing shape and size, morphing into what looked like macrophages.

Dr Majeti concurred with that observation, but the reasons for the changed cells were a mystery. That is, until he remembered an old research paper, which showed that early B-cell mouse progenitor cells could be forced to become macrophages when exposed to certain transcription factors.

So he and his colleagues set out to confirm that they could transform leukemic cells into macrophage-like cells.

The team isolated CD19⁺CD34⁺ blasts from 12 adults with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL and cultured the blasts in the presence of myeloid-differentiation-promoting cytokines. This resulted in CD14^high/CD19^low cells that expressed the surface markers and had the functional properties typical of normal macrophages.

The investigators also cultured B-ALL cells with the myeloid transcription factor C/EBPα or the myeloid/lymphoid transcription factor PU.1. Both factors were able to reprogram blasts into macrophage-like cells.

Experiments in mice revealed that reprogramming the blasts into macrophage-like cells eliminated their leukemogenicity.

And the investigators’ final experiments suggested that myeloid reprogramming occurs, to some degree, in humans. In samples from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL, the team found primary CD14⁺ monocytes/macrophages that had the BCR-ABL1⁺ translocation and clonally recombined VDJ regions.

Dr Majeti and his colleagues said they have reason to hope that, when the leukemic cells become macrophage-like cells, they are not only neutralized but may actually assist in fighting the leukemia.

“Because the macrophage cells came from the cancer cells, they will already carry with them the chemical signals that will identify the cancer cells, making an immune attack against the cancer more likely,” Dr Majeti said.

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

Investigators have reported methods for reprogramming leukemia cells into non-leukemic, macrophage-like cells.

The team reprogrammed cells derived from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by exposing the cells to myeloid differentiation-promoting cytokines or by transient expression of certain transcription factors.

The group described this work in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research began when the investigators were trying to keep patient-derived leukemia cells alive in culture.

“We were throwing everything at them to help them survive,” said Ravindra Majeti, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

Then, James Scott McClellan, MD, PhD, also of Stanford University School of Medicine, mentioned that some of the cells were changing shape and size, morphing into what looked like macrophages.

Dr Majeti concurred with that observation, but the reasons for the changed cells were a mystery. That is, until he remembered an old research paper, which showed that early B-cell mouse progenitor cells could be forced to become macrophages when exposed to certain transcription factors.

So he and his colleagues set out to confirm that they could transform leukemic cells into macrophage-like cells.

The team isolated CD19⁺CD34⁺ blasts from 12 adults with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL and cultured the blasts in the presence of myeloid-differentiation-promoting cytokines. This resulted in CD14^high/CD19^low cells that expressed the surface markers and had the functional properties typical of normal macrophages.

The investigators also cultured B-ALL cells with the myeloid transcription factor C/EBPα or the myeloid/lymphoid transcription factor PU.1. Both factors were able to reprogram blasts into macrophage-like cells.

Experiments in mice revealed that reprogramming the blasts into macrophage-like cells eliminated their leukemogenicity.

And the investigators’ final experiments suggested that myeloid reprogramming occurs, to some degree, in humans. In samples from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL, the team found primary CD14⁺ monocytes/macrophages that had the BCR-ABL1⁺ translocation and clonally recombined VDJ regions.

Dr Majeti and his colleagues said they have reason to hope that, when the leukemic cells become macrophage-like cells, they are not only neutralized but may actually assist in fighting the leukemia.

“Because the macrophage cells came from the cancer cells, they will already carry with them the chemical signals that will identify the cancer cells, making an immune attack against the cancer more likely,” Dr Majeti said.

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

Investigators have reported methods for reprogramming leukemia cells into non-leukemic, macrophage-like cells.

The team reprogrammed cells derived from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by exposing the cells to myeloid differentiation-promoting cytokines or by transient expression of certain transcription factors.

The group described this work in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research began when the investigators were trying to keep patient-derived leukemia cells alive in culture.

“We were throwing everything at them to help them survive,” said Ravindra Majeti, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

Then, James Scott McClellan, MD, PhD, also of Stanford University School of Medicine, mentioned that some of the cells were changing shape and size, morphing into what looked like macrophages.

Dr Majeti concurred with that observation, but the reasons for the changed cells were a mystery. That is, until he remembered an old research paper, which showed that early B-cell mouse progenitor cells could be forced to become macrophages when exposed to certain transcription factors.

So he and his colleagues set out to confirm that they could transform leukemic cells into macrophage-like cells.

The team isolated CD19⁺CD34⁺ blasts from 12 adults with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL and cultured the blasts in the presence of myeloid-differentiation-promoting cytokines. This resulted in CD14^high/CD19^low cells that expressed the surface markers and had the functional properties typical of normal macrophages.

The investigators also cultured B-ALL cells with the myeloid transcription factor C/EBPα or the myeloid/lymphoid transcription factor PU.1. Both factors were able to reprogram blasts into macrophage-like cells.

Experiments in mice revealed that reprogramming the blasts into macrophage-like cells eliminated their leukemogenicity.

And the investigators’ final experiments suggested that myeloid reprogramming occurs, to some degree, in humans. In samples from patients with BCR-ABL1⁺ B-ALL, the team found primary CD14⁺ monocytes/macrophages that had the BCR-ABL1⁺ translocation and clonally recombined VDJ regions.

Dr Majeti and his colleagues said they have reason to hope that, when the leukemic cells become macrophage-like cells, they are not only neutralized but may actually assist in fighting the leukemia.

“Because the macrophage cells came from the cancer cells, they will already carry with them the chemical signals that will identify the cancer cells, making an immune attack against the cancer more likely,” Dr Majeti said.

US dollars

Photo by Petr Kratochvil

Increasingly high prices for cancer drugs are affecting patient care and the overall healthcare system in the US, according to authors of an article in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

The authors noted that the average price of cancer drugs for about a year of therapy increased from $5000 to $10,000 before 2000, and to more than $100,000 by 2012.

Over nearly the same period, the average household income in the US decreased by about 8%.

“Americans with cancer pay 50% to 100% more for the same patented drug than patients in other countries,” said author S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“As oncologists, we have a moral obligation to advocate for affordable cancer drugs for our patients.”

Dr Rajkumar and co-author Hagop Kantarjian, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, rebutted the major arguments the pharmaceutical industry uses to justify the high price of cancer drugs; namely, the expense of conducting research and drug development, the comparative benefits to patients, that market forces will settle prices to reasonable levels, and that price controls on cancer drugs will stifle innovation.

“One of the facts that people do not realize is that cancer drugs, for the most part, are not operating under a free market economy,” Dr Rajkumar said. “The fact that there are 5 approved drugs to treat an incurable cancer does not mean there is competition.”

“Typically, the standard of care is that each drug is used sequentially or in combination, so that each new drug represents a monopoly with exclusivity granted by patent protection for many years.”

Drs Rajkumar and Kantarjian said other reasons for the high cost of cancer drugs include legislation that prevents Medicare from being able to negotiate drug prices and a lack of value-based pricing, which ties the cost of a drug to its relative effectiveness compared to other drugs.

The authors recommended a set of potential solutions to help control and reduce the high cost of cancer drugs in the US. Some of their recommendations are already in practice in other developed countries. Their recommendations include:

• Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices
• Develop cancer treatment pathways/guidelines that incorporate the cost and benefit of cancer drugs
• Allow the Food and Drug Administration or physician panels to recommend target prices based on a drug’s magnitude of benefit (value-based pricing)
• Eliminate “pay-for-delay” strategies in which a pharmaceutical company with a brand name drug shares profits on that drug with a generic drug manufacturer for the remainder of a patent period, effectively eliminating a patent challenge and competition
• Allow the importation of drugs from abroad for personal use
• Allow the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and other cancer advocacy groups to consider cost in their recommendations
• Create patient-driven grassroots movements and organizations to advocate effectively for the interests of patients with cancer to balance advocacy efforts of pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, pharmacy outlets, and hospitals.

Dr Kantarjian has organized a petition, which is available on change.org, asking the federal government to implement these changes.

US dollars

Photo by Petr Kratochvil

Increasingly high prices for cancer drugs are affecting patient care and the overall healthcare system in the US, according to authors of an article in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

The authors noted that the average price of cancer drugs for about a year of therapy increased from $5000 to $10,000 before 2000, and to more than $100,000 by 2012.

Over nearly the same period, the average household income in the US decreased by about 8%.

“Americans with cancer pay 50% to 100% more for the same patented drug than patients in other countries,” said author S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“As oncologists, we have a moral obligation to advocate for affordable cancer drugs for our patients.”

Dr Rajkumar and co-author Hagop Kantarjian, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, rebutted the major arguments the pharmaceutical industry uses to justify the high price of cancer drugs; namely, the expense of conducting research and drug development, the comparative benefits to patients, that market forces will settle prices to reasonable levels, and that price controls on cancer drugs will stifle innovation.

“One of the facts that people do not realize is that cancer drugs, for the most part, are not operating under a free market economy,” Dr Rajkumar said. “The fact that there are 5 approved drugs to treat an incurable cancer does not mean there is competition.”

“Typically, the standard of care is that each drug is used sequentially or in combination, so that each new drug represents a monopoly with exclusivity granted by patent protection for many years.”

Drs Rajkumar and Kantarjian said other reasons for the high cost of cancer drugs include legislation that prevents Medicare from being able to negotiate drug prices and a lack of value-based pricing, which ties the cost of a drug to its relative effectiveness compared to other drugs.

The authors recommended a set of potential solutions to help control and reduce the high cost of cancer drugs in the US. Some of their recommendations are already in practice in other developed countries. Their recommendations include:

• Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices
• Develop cancer treatment pathways/guidelines that incorporate the cost and benefit of cancer drugs
• Allow the Food and Drug Administration or physician panels to recommend target prices based on a drug’s magnitude of benefit (value-based pricing)
• Eliminate “pay-for-delay” strategies in which a pharmaceutical company with a brand name drug shares profits on that drug with a generic drug manufacturer for the remainder of a patent period, effectively eliminating a patent challenge and competition
• Allow the importation of drugs from abroad for personal use
• Allow the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and other cancer advocacy groups to consider cost in their recommendations
• Create patient-driven grassroots movements and organizations to advocate effectively for the interests of patients with cancer to balance advocacy efforts of pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, pharmacy outlets, and hospitals.

Dr Kantarjian has organized a petition, which is available on change.org, asking the federal government to implement these changes.

US dollars

Photo by Petr Kratochvil

Increasingly high prices for cancer drugs are affecting patient care and the overall healthcare system in the US, according to authors of an article in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

The authors noted that the average price of cancer drugs for about a year of therapy increased from $5000 to $10,000 before 2000, and to more than $100,000 by 2012.

Over nearly the same period, the average household income in the US decreased by about 8%.

“Americans with cancer pay 50% to 100% more for the same patented drug than patients in other countries,” said author S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“As oncologists, we have a moral obligation to advocate for affordable cancer drugs for our patients.”

Dr Rajkumar and co-author Hagop Kantarjian, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, rebutted the major arguments the pharmaceutical industry uses to justify the high price of cancer drugs; namely, the expense of conducting research and drug development, the comparative benefits to patients, that market forces will settle prices to reasonable levels, and that price controls on cancer drugs will stifle innovation.

“One of the facts that people do not realize is that cancer drugs, for the most part, are not operating under a free market economy,” Dr Rajkumar said. “The fact that there are 5 approved drugs to treat an incurable cancer does not mean there is competition.”

“Typically, the standard of care is that each drug is used sequentially or in combination, so that each new drug represents a monopoly with exclusivity granted by patent protection for many years.”

Drs Rajkumar and Kantarjian said other reasons for the high cost of cancer drugs include legislation that prevents Medicare from being able to negotiate drug prices and a lack of value-based pricing, which ties the cost of a drug to its relative effectiveness compared to other drugs.

The authors recommended a set of potential solutions to help control and reduce the high cost of cancer drugs in the US. Some of their recommendations are already in practice in other developed countries. Their recommendations include:

• Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices
• Develop cancer treatment pathways/guidelines that incorporate the cost and benefit of cancer drugs
• Allow the Food and Drug Administration or physician panels to recommend target prices based on a drug’s magnitude of benefit (value-based pricing)
• Eliminate “pay-for-delay” strategies in which a pharmaceutical company with a brand name drug shares profits on that drug with a generic drug manufacturer for the remainder of a patent period, effectively eliminating a patent challenge and competition
• Allow the importation of drugs from abroad for personal use
• Allow the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and other cancer advocacy groups to consider cost in their recommendations
• Create patient-driven grassroots movements and organizations to advocate effectively for the interests of patients with cancer to balance advocacy efforts of pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, pharmacy outlets, and hospitals.

Dr Kantarjian has organized a petition, which is available on change.org, asking the federal government to implement these changes.