LayerRx Mapping ID
395
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Medscape Lead Concept
5000033

AML immune profiles correlate with relapse-free survival

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:17

– Immune-enriched acute myeloid leukemias might be amenable to immunotherapy that is tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, according to findings from a pan-cancer analysis of bone marrow samples.

The analysis, performed with 3D biology technology and an RNA pan-cancer immune profiling panel to characterize bone marrow specimens from 46 children and 28 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), identified heterogeneous immune profiles that correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, PhD, reported at the ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium.

The specimens, including 63 from nonpromyelocytic de novo AML, 7 from AML in children with complete remission, 3 from adults with secondary AML, and 1 from an adult with treatment-related AML, were analyzed with the nCounter system from NanoString Technologies, and were visualized via digital spatial profiling, said Dr. Vadakekolathu of Nottingham Trent University in England.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Jayakumar Vadakekolathu


The investigators identified two distinct immune gene expression profiles (GEPs) that were largely age-differentiated: Cluster A (myeloid-enriched specimens) included 26 children and 8 adults, and cluster B (myeloid-depleted specimens) included 9 children and 18 adults. These GEPs predicted clinical outcome; relapse free survival was 2.2 months in cluster A versus 18.3 months in cluster B (hazard ratio, 2.58) and overall survival was 6.3 months in cluster A, compared with 22.4 months in cluster B (HR, 2.39), Dr. Vadakekolathu reported.

The findings could have implications for the development of new treatment strategies, he said, noting that AML is a highly heterogeneous disease in terms of genetics, clinical manifestations, and outcome.



“Prognosis is determined by cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, as well as by response to chemotherapy. De novo AML is cured in roughly 70% of children, 35%-40% of adults, and 5%-15% of elderly patients,” he said. Some patients with AML fail to respond to induction chemotherapy, and others eventually relapse despite the lack of adverse risk factors, he added.

The general therapeutic strategy in patients with AML has not changed substantially in more than 30 years, he said.

“High degrees of molecular complexity in AML present a considerable challenge in clinical implementation, and there is an urgent need to discover better biomarkers to identify high-risk patients before starting chemotherapy, which would enable testing of investigational therapeutic strategies in clinical trials,” he said.

In an effort to identify immune gene signatures across the spectrum of AML genotypes and to correlate transcriptomic and proteomic profiles with patient outcomes, he and his colleagues used a pediatric cohort from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (median age at diagnosis of 10 years), and an adult cohort from the Technical University of Dresden, Germany (median age at diagnosis, 55.5 years). Bone marrow samples were collected and analyzed at diagnosis.

Hierarchical clustering identified the two distinct clusters. The immune-enriched cluster A had heightened expression of T cells, natural killer cells, and cytotoxic cells, and also expressed CD8A, IFNG, FOXP3, the cell chemoattractants CXCL9 and CXCL10, and inhibitory molecules including IDO1 and the immune checkpoints LAG3, CTLA4, and PD-L1. The immune-depleted cluster B overexpressed genes associated with mast cell functions and CD8 T-cell exhaustion, and showed low expression of T-cell and B-cell genes.

Further analysis of 10 of the inflamed samples from patients with newly diagnosed AML was performed with digital spatial profiling (DSP) to visualize in situ leukemia–immune system interactions, Dr. Vadakekolathu said.

Surface antigens CD123 and CD3 were used as a visualization marker for leukemia cells and to identify bone marrow-infiltrating T cells, respectively. Protein quantification showed a higher concentration of CD3 counts in T-cell-rich versus T-cell-poor areas, and protein expression profiles showed strong correlations with various immunologically relevant molecules. The co-localization of CD8 T cells with FoxP3 Treg cells and PD-L1- and VISTA-expressing cell types evident on DSP represents an immune landscape consistent with the establishment of adaptive immune resistance mechanisms of immune escape, he noted.

The findings suggest immune enriched AMLs might be amenable to combination immunotherapies tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, such as IDO1 inhibitors and checkpoint blockade, Dr. Vadakekolathu said. “Immune gene expression profiles of AML might support rapid prediction of patient outcomes, discovery of novel immune biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and development of integrated patient stratifications,” he said.

This study was supported by grants from the Roger Counter Foundation and the Qatar National Research Fund. Dr. Vadakekolathu reported having no disclosures. Some authors reported employment or other financial relationships with NanoString Technologies.

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. ASCO-SITC Abstract 50

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Immune-enriched acute myeloid leukemias might be amenable to immunotherapy that is tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, according to findings from a pan-cancer analysis of bone marrow samples.

The analysis, performed with 3D biology technology and an RNA pan-cancer immune profiling panel to characterize bone marrow specimens from 46 children and 28 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), identified heterogeneous immune profiles that correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, PhD, reported at the ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium.

The specimens, including 63 from nonpromyelocytic de novo AML, 7 from AML in children with complete remission, 3 from adults with secondary AML, and 1 from an adult with treatment-related AML, were analyzed with the nCounter system from NanoString Technologies, and were visualized via digital spatial profiling, said Dr. Vadakekolathu of Nottingham Trent University in England.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Jayakumar Vadakekolathu


The investigators identified two distinct immune gene expression profiles (GEPs) that were largely age-differentiated: Cluster A (myeloid-enriched specimens) included 26 children and 8 adults, and cluster B (myeloid-depleted specimens) included 9 children and 18 adults. These GEPs predicted clinical outcome; relapse free survival was 2.2 months in cluster A versus 18.3 months in cluster B (hazard ratio, 2.58) and overall survival was 6.3 months in cluster A, compared with 22.4 months in cluster B (HR, 2.39), Dr. Vadakekolathu reported.

The findings could have implications for the development of new treatment strategies, he said, noting that AML is a highly heterogeneous disease in terms of genetics, clinical manifestations, and outcome.



“Prognosis is determined by cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, as well as by response to chemotherapy. De novo AML is cured in roughly 70% of children, 35%-40% of adults, and 5%-15% of elderly patients,” he said. Some patients with AML fail to respond to induction chemotherapy, and others eventually relapse despite the lack of adverse risk factors, he added.

The general therapeutic strategy in patients with AML has not changed substantially in more than 30 years, he said.

“High degrees of molecular complexity in AML present a considerable challenge in clinical implementation, and there is an urgent need to discover better biomarkers to identify high-risk patients before starting chemotherapy, which would enable testing of investigational therapeutic strategies in clinical trials,” he said.

In an effort to identify immune gene signatures across the spectrum of AML genotypes and to correlate transcriptomic and proteomic profiles with patient outcomes, he and his colleagues used a pediatric cohort from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (median age at diagnosis of 10 years), and an adult cohort from the Technical University of Dresden, Germany (median age at diagnosis, 55.5 years). Bone marrow samples were collected and analyzed at diagnosis.

Hierarchical clustering identified the two distinct clusters. The immune-enriched cluster A had heightened expression of T cells, natural killer cells, and cytotoxic cells, and also expressed CD8A, IFNG, FOXP3, the cell chemoattractants CXCL9 and CXCL10, and inhibitory molecules including IDO1 and the immune checkpoints LAG3, CTLA4, and PD-L1. The immune-depleted cluster B overexpressed genes associated with mast cell functions and CD8 T-cell exhaustion, and showed low expression of T-cell and B-cell genes.

Further analysis of 10 of the inflamed samples from patients with newly diagnosed AML was performed with digital spatial profiling (DSP) to visualize in situ leukemia–immune system interactions, Dr. Vadakekolathu said.

Surface antigens CD123 and CD3 were used as a visualization marker for leukemia cells and to identify bone marrow-infiltrating T cells, respectively. Protein quantification showed a higher concentration of CD3 counts in T-cell-rich versus T-cell-poor areas, and protein expression profiles showed strong correlations with various immunologically relevant molecules. The co-localization of CD8 T cells with FoxP3 Treg cells and PD-L1- and VISTA-expressing cell types evident on DSP represents an immune landscape consistent with the establishment of adaptive immune resistance mechanisms of immune escape, he noted.

The findings suggest immune enriched AMLs might be amenable to combination immunotherapies tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, such as IDO1 inhibitors and checkpoint blockade, Dr. Vadakekolathu said. “Immune gene expression profiles of AML might support rapid prediction of patient outcomes, discovery of novel immune biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and development of integrated patient stratifications,” he said.

This study was supported by grants from the Roger Counter Foundation and the Qatar National Research Fund. Dr. Vadakekolathu reported having no disclosures. Some authors reported employment or other financial relationships with NanoString Technologies.

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. ASCO-SITC Abstract 50

– Immune-enriched acute myeloid leukemias might be amenable to immunotherapy that is tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, according to findings from a pan-cancer analysis of bone marrow samples.

The analysis, performed with 3D biology technology and an RNA pan-cancer immune profiling panel to characterize bone marrow specimens from 46 children and 28 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), identified heterogeneous immune profiles that correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, PhD, reported at the ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium.

The specimens, including 63 from nonpromyelocytic de novo AML, 7 from AML in children with complete remission, 3 from adults with secondary AML, and 1 from an adult with treatment-related AML, were analyzed with the nCounter system from NanoString Technologies, and were visualized via digital spatial profiling, said Dr. Vadakekolathu of Nottingham Trent University in England.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Jayakumar Vadakekolathu


The investigators identified two distinct immune gene expression profiles (GEPs) that were largely age-differentiated: Cluster A (myeloid-enriched specimens) included 26 children and 8 adults, and cluster B (myeloid-depleted specimens) included 9 children and 18 adults. These GEPs predicted clinical outcome; relapse free survival was 2.2 months in cluster A versus 18.3 months in cluster B (hazard ratio, 2.58) and overall survival was 6.3 months in cluster A, compared with 22.4 months in cluster B (HR, 2.39), Dr. Vadakekolathu reported.

The findings could have implications for the development of new treatment strategies, he said, noting that AML is a highly heterogeneous disease in terms of genetics, clinical manifestations, and outcome.



“Prognosis is determined by cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, as well as by response to chemotherapy. De novo AML is cured in roughly 70% of children, 35%-40% of adults, and 5%-15% of elderly patients,” he said. Some patients with AML fail to respond to induction chemotherapy, and others eventually relapse despite the lack of adverse risk factors, he added.

The general therapeutic strategy in patients with AML has not changed substantially in more than 30 years, he said.

“High degrees of molecular complexity in AML present a considerable challenge in clinical implementation, and there is an urgent need to discover better biomarkers to identify high-risk patients before starting chemotherapy, which would enable testing of investigational therapeutic strategies in clinical trials,” he said.

In an effort to identify immune gene signatures across the spectrum of AML genotypes and to correlate transcriptomic and proteomic profiles with patient outcomes, he and his colleagues used a pediatric cohort from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (median age at diagnosis of 10 years), and an adult cohort from the Technical University of Dresden, Germany (median age at diagnosis, 55.5 years). Bone marrow samples were collected and analyzed at diagnosis.

Hierarchical clustering identified the two distinct clusters. The immune-enriched cluster A had heightened expression of T cells, natural killer cells, and cytotoxic cells, and also expressed CD8A, IFNG, FOXP3, the cell chemoattractants CXCL9 and CXCL10, and inhibitory molecules including IDO1 and the immune checkpoints LAG3, CTLA4, and PD-L1. The immune-depleted cluster B overexpressed genes associated with mast cell functions and CD8 T-cell exhaustion, and showed low expression of T-cell and B-cell genes.

Further analysis of 10 of the inflamed samples from patients with newly diagnosed AML was performed with digital spatial profiling (DSP) to visualize in situ leukemia–immune system interactions, Dr. Vadakekolathu said.

Surface antigens CD123 and CD3 were used as a visualization marker for leukemia cells and to identify bone marrow-infiltrating T cells, respectively. Protein quantification showed a higher concentration of CD3 counts in T-cell-rich versus T-cell-poor areas, and protein expression profiles showed strong correlations with various immunologically relevant molecules. The co-localization of CD8 T cells with FoxP3 Treg cells and PD-L1- and VISTA-expressing cell types evident on DSP represents an immune landscape consistent with the establishment of adaptive immune resistance mechanisms of immune escape, he noted.

The findings suggest immune enriched AMLs might be amenable to combination immunotherapies tailored to the bone marrow tumor microenvironment, such as IDO1 inhibitors and checkpoint blockade, Dr. Vadakekolathu said. “Immune gene expression profiles of AML might support rapid prediction of patient outcomes, discovery of novel immune biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and development of integrated patient stratifications,” he said.

This study was supported by grants from the Roger Counter Foundation and the Qatar National Research Fund. Dr. Vadakekolathu reported having no disclosures. Some authors reported employment or other financial relationships with NanoString Technologies.

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. ASCO-SITC Abstract 50

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE CLINICAL IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY SYMPOSIUM

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Immune profiles of AML bone marrow samples correlated with relapse-free and overall survival.

Major finding: Relapse-free survival was 2.2 months in a cluster of myeloid-enriched specimens, compared with 18.3 months in a cluster of myeloid-depleted specimens (hazard ratio, 2.58).

Study details: A pan-cancer analysis of bone marrow specimens from 74 patients.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Roger Counter Foundation and the Qatar National Research Fund. Dr. Vadakekolathu reported having no disclosures. Some authors reported employment and other financial relationships with NanoString Technologies.

Source: Rutella S et al. ASCO-SITC Abstract 50.

Disqus Comments
Default

CAR T cells produce longest survival in low disease burden ALL patients

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:17

 

Among patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received an infusion of 19-28z CAR T cells, patients with low disease burden had better survival outcomes and fewer toxic effects than did patients with a high disease burden, according to long-term follow-up results of a phase 1 study.

Median overall survival for B-cell ALL patients with low disease burden was 20.1 months, compared with 12.4 months for those with a high disease burden (P = .02), and 12.9 months for the entire cohort, according to results published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The 12.9-month overall survival for the full study cohort “compares favorably” to results from another recently reported clinical trial showing overall survival of 7.7 months for adult B-cell ALL patients treated with blinatumomab, an anti–CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager, wrote Jae H. Park, MD, of the Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his coauthors.

The CAR T-cell and blinatumomab results cannot be directly compared owing to the differences in study design, patient characteristics, and posttreatment consolidation, but “the observation of patients with durable remissions in these two studies highlights the potential of CD19-targeted immunotherapies,” Dr. Park and his colleagues wrote in their report.

The phase 1 trial by Dr. Park and his colleagues included 53 adults with relapsed B-cell ALL who received a single infusion of 19-28z CAR T-cell therapy manufactured at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

After the infusion, 41% of patients with high disease burden (at least 5% bone marrow blasts or extramedullary disease) experienced severe cytokine release syndrome, compared with 5% of those with low disease burden, according to the report.

Likewise, neurotoxic effects were seen in 59% of high disease burden B-ALL patients, compared with 14% of those with low disease burden, the investigators reported.

Low disease burden was associated with a higher rate of complete remission, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. However, low disease burden patients not only had improved overall survival, as noted, but also had a significantly longer event-free survival versus high disease burden patients (10.6 and 5.3 months, respectively; P = .01).

Robust expansion of CAR T cells in vivo was a good predictor of short-term response and toxic effects but did not correlate with longer-term efficacy, according to the researchers. Instead, the ratio of peak CAR T-cell expansion to tumor burden correlated significantly with event-free and overall survival.

That finding “raises the hypothesis that an effective ratio of CAR T cells to target CD19+ leukemia cells is more likely to occur in patients with a low disease burden than in those with a high disease burden, despite a smaller number of expanded T cells in patients with a low disease burden,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, Juno Therapeutics, and others. Several study authors reported ties to Juno Therapeutics and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Park JH et al. N Engl J Med 2018 Feb 1;378:449-59.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Among patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received an infusion of 19-28z CAR T cells, patients with low disease burden had better survival outcomes and fewer toxic effects than did patients with a high disease burden, according to long-term follow-up results of a phase 1 study.

Median overall survival for B-cell ALL patients with low disease burden was 20.1 months, compared with 12.4 months for those with a high disease burden (P = .02), and 12.9 months for the entire cohort, according to results published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The 12.9-month overall survival for the full study cohort “compares favorably” to results from another recently reported clinical trial showing overall survival of 7.7 months for adult B-cell ALL patients treated with blinatumomab, an anti–CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager, wrote Jae H. Park, MD, of the Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his coauthors.

The CAR T-cell and blinatumomab results cannot be directly compared owing to the differences in study design, patient characteristics, and posttreatment consolidation, but “the observation of patients with durable remissions in these two studies highlights the potential of CD19-targeted immunotherapies,” Dr. Park and his colleagues wrote in their report.

The phase 1 trial by Dr. Park and his colleagues included 53 adults with relapsed B-cell ALL who received a single infusion of 19-28z CAR T-cell therapy manufactured at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

After the infusion, 41% of patients with high disease burden (at least 5% bone marrow blasts or extramedullary disease) experienced severe cytokine release syndrome, compared with 5% of those with low disease burden, according to the report.

Likewise, neurotoxic effects were seen in 59% of high disease burden B-ALL patients, compared with 14% of those with low disease burden, the investigators reported.

Low disease burden was associated with a higher rate of complete remission, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. However, low disease burden patients not only had improved overall survival, as noted, but also had a significantly longer event-free survival versus high disease burden patients (10.6 and 5.3 months, respectively; P = .01).

Robust expansion of CAR T cells in vivo was a good predictor of short-term response and toxic effects but did not correlate with longer-term efficacy, according to the researchers. Instead, the ratio of peak CAR T-cell expansion to tumor burden correlated significantly with event-free and overall survival.

That finding “raises the hypothesis that an effective ratio of CAR T cells to target CD19+ leukemia cells is more likely to occur in patients with a low disease burden than in those with a high disease burden, despite a smaller number of expanded T cells in patients with a low disease burden,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, Juno Therapeutics, and others. Several study authors reported ties to Juno Therapeutics and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Park JH et al. N Engl J Med 2018 Feb 1;378:449-59.

 

Among patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received an infusion of 19-28z CAR T cells, patients with low disease burden had better survival outcomes and fewer toxic effects than did patients with a high disease burden, according to long-term follow-up results of a phase 1 study.

Median overall survival for B-cell ALL patients with low disease burden was 20.1 months, compared with 12.4 months for those with a high disease burden (P = .02), and 12.9 months for the entire cohort, according to results published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The 12.9-month overall survival for the full study cohort “compares favorably” to results from another recently reported clinical trial showing overall survival of 7.7 months for adult B-cell ALL patients treated with blinatumomab, an anti–CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager, wrote Jae H. Park, MD, of the Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his coauthors.

The CAR T-cell and blinatumomab results cannot be directly compared owing to the differences in study design, patient characteristics, and posttreatment consolidation, but “the observation of patients with durable remissions in these two studies highlights the potential of CD19-targeted immunotherapies,” Dr. Park and his colleagues wrote in their report.

The phase 1 trial by Dr. Park and his colleagues included 53 adults with relapsed B-cell ALL who received a single infusion of 19-28z CAR T-cell therapy manufactured at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

After the infusion, 41% of patients with high disease burden (at least 5% bone marrow blasts or extramedullary disease) experienced severe cytokine release syndrome, compared with 5% of those with low disease burden, according to the report.

Likewise, neurotoxic effects were seen in 59% of high disease burden B-ALL patients, compared with 14% of those with low disease burden, the investigators reported.

Low disease burden was associated with a higher rate of complete remission, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. However, low disease burden patients not only had improved overall survival, as noted, but also had a significantly longer event-free survival versus high disease burden patients (10.6 and 5.3 months, respectively; P = .01).

Robust expansion of CAR T cells in vivo was a good predictor of short-term response and toxic effects but did not correlate with longer-term efficacy, according to the researchers. Instead, the ratio of peak CAR T-cell expansion to tumor burden correlated significantly with event-free and overall survival.

That finding “raises the hypothesis that an effective ratio of CAR T cells to target CD19+ leukemia cells is more likely to occur in patients with a low disease burden than in those with a high disease burden, despite a smaller number of expanded T cells in patients with a low disease burden,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, Juno Therapeutics, and others. Several study authors reported ties to Juno Therapeutics and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Park JH et al. N Engl J Med 2018 Feb 1;378:449-59.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Lower disease burden was linked to better survival in B-cell ALL patients treated with 19-28z CD19 CAR T cells.

Major finding: Median overall survival for patients with low disease burden was 20.1 months, compared with 12.4 months for those with a high disease burden (P = .02).

Study details: A long-term follow-up of a phase 1 trial including 53 adults with relapsed B-cell ALL.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, Juno Therapeutics, and others. Several study authors reported ties to Juno Therapeutics and other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Park JH et al. N Engl J Med 2018 Feb 1;378:449-59.

Disqus Comments
Default

Combination immunotherapy is active in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:50

 

– Combination immunotherapy is efficacious for treating metastatic colorectal cancer that is deficient in mismatch repair (dMMR), giving rise to high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), according to the first report of results for the full cohort of the CheckMate-142 trial.

“Approximately 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have a deficiency in the DNA mismatch repair system. These patients benefit less from conventional chemotherapy than other patients,” lead investigator Thierry André, MD, chief of Medical Oncology at the Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, said at the 2018 GI Cancers Symposium.

Dr. Thierry André
In the nonrandomized phase 2 trial, patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer were split into a 119-patient combination cohort given both nivolumab (Opdivo), which targets the receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1), and ipilimumab (Yervoy), which targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), and a 74-patient monotherapy cohort given nivolumab alone.

Initial results for the latter cohort established a durable clinical benefit of nivolumab monotherapy, according to Dr. André. “It’s clear that there is a rationale to combine nivolumab and ipilimumab because they act synergistically to promote T-cell antitumor activity. Therefore, combination could further improve results,” he said.

With median follow-up of 13.4 months, 55% of patients had a response to the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, according to results reported at the symposium and simultaneously published (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20:JCO2017769901). Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached.

In addition, comparison with the nivolumab monotherapy cohort, albeit in nonrandomized fashion, suggested that addition of ipilimumab netted better outcomes.

“Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represents a promising new treatment option for patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer,” Dr. André summarized. The results “are really very unusual in metastatic colorectal cancer, and we have a test, MSI, to select this population. It’s really a new hope for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This is the largest study to date of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor combination in MSI-H colon cancer,” noted invited discussant Zsofia K. Stadler, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. Taken together, the results are promising.

“Is this sufficient evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with anti–PD-1? No. This trial was not intended for comparison or to show superiority,” she maintained. “This will require a large randomized comparison as has been done, for example, in melanoma. Even then, cost and value become important factors in the decision of whom to select for combination therapy.”

Dr. Zsofia K. Stadler
Rates of treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations due to such events with the combination were generally lower than those previously seen in other cancers, according to Dr. Stadler. Nonetheless, there is some added toxicity in going from monotherapy to combination therapy.

“Further studies are clearly needed to identify those particular subgroups of patients who may benefit from combination therapies, so can we predict which MSI-H patients may progress on monotherapy, and whether we can salvage patients on monotherapy who are not responding and are having progression of disease,” she concluded. “Those are important questions that need to be addressed.”
 

Study details

In CheckMate-142, the 55% overall response rate with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab consisted of complete response in 3.4% of patients and partial response in 51.3%, Dr. André reported at the symposium, sponsored by the American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. (The overall rate with nivolumab monotherapy at the same median follow-up was 31%, all partial responses.) The disease control rate was 80% with combination therapy (69% with monotherapy).

The combination achieved a similar response rate regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and BRAF and KRAS mutational status. It was 71% in patients with a history of Lynch syndrome and 48% in those without such history.

The 12-month rates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 71% and 85%, respectively. “The PFS curve shows a plateau,” Dr. André pointed out. “This is a curve we dream about having in the first line. It’s very unusual to have that with a medical therapy in advanced disease.” (The corresponding rates with nivolumab monotherapy were 50% and 73%.)

Patients had significant, clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in quality of life with combination immunotherapy out to 91 weeks. “In my experience, this is really the first time I have had a very large number of patients going back to work in this very advanced disease,” he commented.

“No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were reported,” Dr. André noted. The rate of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 32% with the combination therapy (20% with monotherapy). The rate of events leading to discontinuation was 13% (7% with monotherapy).
 

 

 

Long-term outcomes with monotherapy

In a related presentation, Michael J. Overman, MD, an associate professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported long-term outcomes with nivolumab monotherapy on CheckMate-142 according to prior lines of therapy.

Patients given monotherapy were classified as more heavily pretreated (at least three prior therapies, including a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) and less heavily pretreated (at most two prior therapies, usually excluding irinotecan).

Dr. Michael J. Overman
Results for the entire monotherapy cohort now at a median 21 months of follow-up showed an overall response rate of 34% and a disease control rate of 62%, Dr. Overman reported. These compared with 32% and 64%, respectively, at the original 13 months of follow-up (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1182-91).

“Deepening of response was shown with further follow-up,” he noted; in particular, the rate of complete response increased from 3% to 9%. “This is primarily related to partial responses that have converted to complete responses with additional time.” Median duration of response was not reached.

The overall response rate was 26% in the more heavily pretreated group and 52% in the less heavily pretreated group, although confidence intervals overlapped. The disease control rate was 55% and 81%, respectively.

Both progression-free and overall survival curves for the entire monotherapy cohort showed a plateau. The 12-month rates were 44% (also 44% at 18 months) and 72% (67% at 18 months), respectively.

The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 20%. “No new signals were seen with this longer follow-up,” Dr. Overman noted.

“Nivolumab continued to provide durable clinical benefit with long-term follow-up in previously treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. “Durable clinical benefit with deepening of response was observed regardless of prior chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan,” he summarized. “These results support ongoing evaluation of nivolumab-based therapy in the first-line setting in patients with deficient–mismatch repair colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This secondary analysis is of interest, but this is an unplanned retrospective subgroup analysis of this data,” commented Dr. Stadler, the discussant. “I think the take-home message here is that both the heavily pretreated and not-so-heavily pretreated groups have clinical benefit from this therapy. Certainly, longer-term follow-up continues to support the use of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated dMMR colorectal cancer.”

The findings for the whole nivolumab monotherapy cohort generally mirror those seen with pembrolizumab (Keytruda), another anti–PD-1 antibody, in this patient population, except for a shorter time to response with the former, she noted. “This suggests that both nivolumab and pembrolizumab are reasonable monotherapies in metastatic MSI-H colorectal cancer.”

“Evaluation of anti–PD-1 therapies in the first-line setting is certainly warranted,” Dr. Stadler concluded. “In fact, the KEYNOTE-177 trial is a phase 3 randomized study of pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for mismatch repair–deficient colorectal cancer that is already investigating this question and that is nearing completion of accrual.”

Dr. Andre disclosed that he receives honoraria from Baxter, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, and Xbiotech; that he has a consulting or advisory role with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HalioDX, MSD Oncology, Mundipharma, Roche/Genentech, and Servier; and that he receives travel expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Overman disclosed that he has a consulting or advisory role with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merrimack, and Roche/Genentech, and receives research funding Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche. The trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

SOURCES: André T et al. GI Cancers Symposium Abstract 553, Overman MJ et al. GI Cancer Symposium Abstract 554.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Combination immunotherapy is efficacious for treating metastatic colorectal cancer that is deficient in mismatch repair (dMMR), giving rise to high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), according to the first report of results for the full cohort of the CheckMate-142 trial.

“Approximately 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have a deficiency in the DNA mismatch repair system. These patients benefit less from conventional chemotherapy than other patients,” lead investigator Thierry André, MD, chief of Medical Oncology at the Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, said at the 2018 GI Cancers Symposium.

Dr. Thierry André
In the nonrandomized phase 2 trial, patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer were split into a 119-patient combination cohort given both nivolumab (Opdivo), which targets the receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1), and ipilimumab (Yervoy), which targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), and a 74-patient monotherapy cohort given nivolumab alone.

Initial results for the latter cohort established a durable clinical benefit of nivolumab monotherapy, according to Dr. André. “It’s clear that there is a rationale to combine nivolumab and ipilimumab because they act synergistically to promote T-cell antitumor activity. Therefore, combination could further improve results,” he said.

With median follow-up of 13.4 months, 55% of patients had a response to the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, according to results reported at the symposium and simultaneously published (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20:JCO2017769901). Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached.

In addition, comparison with the nivolumab monotherapy cohort, albeit in nonrandomized fashion, suggested that addition of ipilimumab netted better outcomes.

“Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represents a promising new treatment option for patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer,” Dr. André summarized. The results “are really very unusual in metastatic colorectal cancer, and we have a test, MSI, to select this population. It’s really a new hope for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This is the largest study to date of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor combination in MSI-H colon cancer,” noted invited discussant Zsofia K. Stadler, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. Taken together, the results are promising.

“Is this sufficient evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with anti–PD-1? No. This trial was not intended for comparison or to show superiority,” she maintained. “This will require a large randomized comparison as has been done, for example, in melanoma. Even then, cost and value become important factors in the decision of whom to select for combination therapy.”

Dr. Zsofia K. Stadler
Rates of treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations due to such events with the combination were generally lower than those previously seen in other cancers, according to Dr. Stadler. Nonetheless, there is some added toxicity in going from monotherapy to combination therapy.

“Further studies are clearly needed to identify those particular subgroups of patients who may benefit from combination therapies, so can we predict which MSI-H patients may progress on monotherapy, and whether we can salvage patients on monotherapy who are not responding and are having progression of disease,” she concluded. “Those are important questions that need to be addressed.”
 

Study details

In CheckMate-142, the 55% overall response rate with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab consisted of complete response in 3.4% of patients and partial response in 51.3%, Dr. André reported at the symposium, sponsored by the American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. (The overall rate with nivolumab monotherapy at the same median follow-up was 31%, all partial responses.) The disease control rate was 80% with combination therapy (69% with monotherapy).

The combination achieved a similar response rate regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and BRAF and KRAS mutational status. It was 71% in patients with a history of Lynch syndrome and 48% in those without such history.

The 12-month rates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 71% and 85%, respectively. “The PFS curve shows a plateau,” Dr. André pointed out. “This is a curve we dream about having in the first line. It’s very unusual to have that with a medical therapy in advanced disease.” (The corresponding rates with nivolumab monotherapy were 50% and 73%.)

Patients had significant, clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in quality of life with combination immunotherapy out to 91 weeks. “In my experience, this is really the first time I have had a very large number of patients going back to work in this very advanced disease,” he commented.

“No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were reported,” Dr. André noted. The rate of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 32% with the combination therapy (20% with monotherapy). The rate of events leading to discontinuation was 13% (7% with monotherapy).
 

 

 

Long-term outcomes with monotherapy

In a related presentation, Michael J. Overman, MD, an associate professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported long-term outcomes with nivolumab monotherapy on CheckMate-142 according to prior lines of therapy.

Patients given monotherapy were classified as more heavily pretreated (at least three prior therapies, including a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) and less heavily pretreated (at most two prior therapies, usually excluding irinotecan).

Dr. Michael J. Overman
Results for the entire monotherapy cohort now at a median 21 months of follow-up showed an overall response rate of 34% and a disease control rate of 62%, Dr. Overman reported. These compared with 32% and 64%, respectively, at the original 13 months of follow-up (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1182-91).

“Deepening of response was shown with further follow-up,” he noted; in particular, the rate of complete response increased from 3% to 9%. “This is primarily related to partial responses that have converted to complete responses with additional time.” Median duration of response was not reached.

The overall response rate was 26% in the more heavily pretreated group and 52% in the less heavily pretreated group, although confidence intervals overlapped. The disease control rate was 55% and 81%, respectively.

Both progression-free and overall survival curves for the entire monotherapy cohort showed a plateau. The 12-month rates were 44% (also 44% at 18 months) and 72% (67% at 18 months), respectively.

The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 20%. “No new signals were seen with this longer follow-up,” Dr. Overman noted.

“Nivolumab continued to provide durable clinical benefit with long-term follow-up in previously treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. “Durable clinical benefit with deepening of response was observed regardless of prior chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan,” he summarized. “These results support ongoing evaluation of nivolumab-based therapy in the first-line setting in patients with deficient–mismatch repair colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This secondary analysis is of interest, but this is an unplanned retrospective subgroup analysis of this data,” commented Dr. Stadler, the discussant. “I think the take-home message here is that both the heavily pretreated and not-so-heavily pretreated groups have clinical benefit from this therapy. Certainly, longer-term follow-up continues to support the use of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated dMMR colorectal cancer.”

The findings for the whole nivolumab monotherapy cohort generally mirror those seen with pembrolizumab (Keytruda), another anti–PD-1 antibody, in this patient population, except for a shorter time to response with the former, she noted. “This suggests that both nivolumab and pembrolizumab are reasonable monotherapies in metastatic MSI-H colorectal cancer.”

“Evaluation of anti–PD-1 therapies in the first-line setting is certainly warranted,” Dr. Stadler concluded. “In fact, the KEYNOTE-177 trial is a phase 3 randomized study of pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for mismatch repair–deficient colorectal cancer that is already investigating this question and that is nearing completion of accrual.”

Dr. Andre disclosed that he receives honoraria from Baxter, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, and Xbiotech; that he has a consulting or advisory role with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HalioDX, MSD Oncology, Mundipharma, Roche/Genentech, and Servier; and that he receives travel expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Overman disclosed that he has a consulting or advisory role with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merrimack, and Roche/Genentech, and receives research funding Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche. The trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

SOURCES: André T et al. GI Cancers Symposium Abstract 553, Overman MJ et al. GI Cancer Symposium Abstract 554.

 

– Combination immunotherapy is efficacious for treating metastatic colorectal cancer that is deficient in mismatch repair (dMMR), giving rise to high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), according to the first report of results for the full cohort of the CheckMate-142 trial.

“Approximately 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have a deficiency in the DNA mismatch repair system. These patients benefit less from conventional chemotherapy than other patients,” lead investigator Thierry André, MD, chief of Medical Oncology at the Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, said at the 2018 GI Cancers Symposium.

Dr. Thierry André
In the nonrandomized phase 2 trial, patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer were split into a 119-patient combination cohort given both nivolumab (Opdivo), which targets the receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1), and ipilimumab (Yervoy), which targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), and a 74-patient monotherapy cohort given nivolumab alone.

Initial results for the latter cohort established a durable clinical benefit of nivolumab monotherapy, according to Dr. André. “It’s clear that there is a rationale to combine nivolumab and ipilimumab because they act synergistically to promote T-cell antitumor activity. Therefore, combination could further improve results,” he said.

With median follow-up of 13.4 months, 55% of patients had a response to the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, according to results reported at the symposium and simultaneously published (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20:JCO2017769901). Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached.

In addition, comparison with the nivolumab monotherapy cohort, albeit in nonrandomized fashion, suggested that addition of ipilimumab netted better outcomes.

“Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represents a promising new treatment option for patients with previously treated dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer,” Dr. André summarized. The results “are really very unusual in metastatic colorectal cancer, and we have a test, MSI, to select this population. It’s really a new hope for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This is the largest study to date of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor combination in MSI-H colon cancer,” noted invited discussant Zsofia K. Stadler, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. Taken together, the results are promising.

“Is this sufficient evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with anti–PD-1? No. This trial was not intended for comparison or to show superiority,” she maintained. “This will require a large randomized comparison as has been done, for example, in melanoma. Even then, cost and value become important factors in the decision of whom to select for combination therapy.”

Dr. Zsofia K. Stadler
Rates of treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations due to such events with the combination were generally lower than those previously seen in other cancers, according to Dr. Stadler. Nonetheless, there is some added toxicity in going from monotherapy to combination therapy.

“Further studies are clearly needed to identify those particular subgroups of patients who may benefit from combination therapies, so can we predict which MSI-H patients may progress on monotherapy, and whether we can salvage patients on monotherapy who are not responding and are having progression of disease,” she concluded. “Those are important questions that need to be addressed.”
 

Study details

In CheckMate-142, the 55% overall response rate with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab consisted of complete response in 3.4% of patients and partial response in 51.3%, Dr. André reported at the symposium, sponsored by the American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. (The overall rate with nivolumab monotherapy at the same median follow-up was 31%, all partial responses.) The disease control rate was 80% with combination therapy (69% with monotherapy).

The combination achieved a similar response rate regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and BRAF and KRAS mutational status. It was 71% in patients with a history of Lynch syndrome and 48% in those without such history.

The 12-month rates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 71% and 85%, respectively. “The PFS curve shows a plateau,” Dr. André pointed out. “This is a curve we dream about having in the first line. It’s very unusual to have that with a medical therapy in advanced disease.” (The corresponding rates with nivolumab monotherapy were 50% and 73%.)

Patients had significant, clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in quality of life with combination immunotherapy out to 91 weeks. “In my experience, this is really the first time I have had a very large number of patients going back to work in this very advanced disease,” he commented.

“No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were reported,” Dr. André noted. The rate of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 32% with the combination therapy (20% with monotherapy). The rate of events leading to discontinuation was 13% (7% with monotherapy).
 

 

 

Long-term outcomes with monotherapy

In a related presentation, Michael J. Overman, MD, an associate professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported long-term outcomes with nivolumab monotherapy on CheckMate-142 according to prior lines of therapy.

Patients given monotherapy were classified as more heavily pretreated (at least three prior therapies, including a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) and less heavily pretreated (at most two prior therapies, usually excluding irinotecan).

Dr. Michael J. Overman
Results for the entire monotherapy cohort now at a median 21 months of follow-up showed an overall response rate of 34% and a disease control rate of 62%, Dr. Overman reported. These compared with 32% and 64%, respectively, at the original 13 months of follow-up (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1182-91).

“Deepening of response was shown with further follow-up,” he noted; in particular, the rate of complete response increased from 3% to 9%. “This is primarily related to partial responses that have converted to complete responses with additional time.” Median duration of response was not reached.

The overall response rate was 26% in the more heavily pretreated group and 52% in the less heavily pretreated group, although confidence intervals overlapped. The disease control rate was 55% and 81%, respectively.

Both progression-free and overall survival curves for the entire monotherapy cohort showed a plateau. The 12-month rates were 44% (also 44% at 18 months) and 72% (67% at 18 months), respectively.

The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 20%. “No new signals were seen with this longer follow-up,” Dr. Overman noted.

“Nivolumab continued to provide durable clinical benefit with long-term follow-up in previously treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. “Durable clinical benefit with deepening of response was observed regardless of prior chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan,” he summarized. “These results support ongoing evaluation of nivolumab-based therapy in the first-line setting in patients with deficient–mismatch repair colorectal cancer.”
 

Findings in context

“This secondary analysis is of interest, but this is an unplanned retrospective subgroup analysis of this data,” commented Dr. Stadler, the discussant. “I think the take-home message here is that both the heavily pretreated and not-so-heavily pretreated groups have clinical benefit from this therapy. Certainly, longer-term follow-up continues to support the use of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated dMMR colorectal cancer.”

The findings for the whole nivolumab monotherapy cohort generally mirror those seen with pembrolizumab (Keytruda), another anti–PD-1 antibody, in this patient population, except for a shorter time to response with the former, she noted. “This suggests that both nivolumab and pembrolizumab are reasonable monotherapies in metastatic MSI-H colorectal cancer.”

“Evaluation of anti–PD-1 therapies in the first-line setting is certainly warranted,” Dr. Stadler concluded. “In fact, the KEYNOTE-177 trial is a phase 3 randomized study of pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for mismatch repair–deficient colorectal cancer that is already investigating this question and that is nearing completion of accrual.”

Dr. Andre disclosed that he receives honoraria from Baxter, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, and Xbiotech; that he has a consulting or advisory role with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HalioDX, MSD Oncology, Mundipharma, Roche/Genentech, and Servier; and that he receives travel expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Overman disclosed that he has a consulting or advisory role with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merrimack, and Roche/Genentech, and receives research funding Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche. The trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

SOURCES: André T et al. GI Cancers Symposium Abstract 553, Overman MJ et al. GI Cancer Symposium Abstract 554.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE 2018 GI CANCERS SYMPOSIUM

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Dual immunotherapy has good activity against dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer.

Major finding: The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab yielded an overall response rate of 55% and a disease control rate of 80%. Nivolumab monotherapy yielded similar benefit regardless of prior lines of treatment.

Data source: A nonrandomized phase 2 trial among patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer: 119 received both nivolumab and ipilimumab and 74 received nivolumab alone (CheckMate-142).

Disclosures: Dr. Andre disclosed that he receives honoraria from Baxter, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, and Xbiotech; that he has a consulting or advisory role with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HalioDX, MSD Oncology, Mundipharma, Roche/Genentech, and Servier; and that he receives travel expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Overman disclosed that he has a consulting or advisory role with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merrimack, and Roche/Genentech, and receives research funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche. The trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Source: André T et al. GI Cancers Symposium Abstract 553, Overman MJ et al. GI Cancer Symposium Abstract 554.

Disqus Comments
Default

Gene therapy moves from promise to reality

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:20

After decades of hype, dashed hopes, and setbacks, gene therapy has finally arrived and is poised to transform the treatment paradigm for many diseases, according to Cynthia E. Dunbar, MD, senior investigator at the Hematology Branch of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of the National Institutes of Health.

Hematologists can expect more developments that build on current successes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and gene therapy advances for hemophilia, as well as emerging advances in gene editing techniques including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach, Dr. Dunbar said in an interview.

Courtesy National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
“I think what is happening right now is sort of a critical mass of successes in studies with really unequivocally positive outcomes,” Dr. Dunbar said. “We’ve seen clinical improvements in some common cancers with CAR T cells, but also a range of rare diseases, such as immunodeficiencies and spinal muscular atrophy, as well as promise in diseases like sickle cell anemia.”

That’s on top of a small number of regulatory approvals in the United States and Europe, she said. “Along with that, there’s a lot of interest and now involvement from biotechnology companies and even large pharmaceutical companies. I think all those factors really have to come together to create this kind of acceleration, and I’ve never seen anything like this previously.”

Dr. Dunbar – a former editor in chief of the journal Blood – and her colleagues recently published a review of current developments and emerging gene therapy technologies in the journal Science (2018 Jan 12. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4672).

“We really felt it was the right time to write the article,” she said.
 

Milestones

A new approach to cancer treatment was ushered in on Aug. 30, 2017, with the Food and Drug Administration approval of tisagenlecleucel, the first-ever gene therapy available in the United States. The CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy is indicated for treatment of certain pediatric or young adult patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is refractory or in second or later relapse.

Soon afterward, FDA approved another CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel, for adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

“It’s a very interesting time for immunotherapies in general,” Dr. Dunbar said. “There’s a huge number of options in terms of PD-1 inhibitors and other pharmacologics or antibodies that allow the patient’s own immune system to attack tumors. CAR T-cell therapy is an obvious step beyond that, in terms of arming your own T cells to very specifically target tumor cells.”

But randomized trials or meta-analyses may be necessary to determine the place of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment armamentarium for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphoma given their cost and the availability of other therapeutic options, Dr. Dunbar suggested.

“Gene therapies have a large upfront cost, but if they’re truly curative and a one-time treatment, then they may in the long run be much cheaper than doing failed multiple transplants or needing monoclonal antibody infusion every 2 weeks for the rest of your life,” she said.

Another major success story still in the works, according to Dr. Dunbar, is the treatment of hemophilia A and B with gene therapy approaches. The positive data include a recent report showing that transgene-derived factor IX coagulant activity allowed for the termination of baseline prophylaxis, and the near elimination of bleeding and factor use, in patients with hemophilia B (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377[23]:2215-27).

While gene therapy for hemophilia A has been more challenging, another recent report nevertheless demonstrated sustained normalization of factor VIII activity level with a single intravenous infusion of adeno-associated virus serotype 5 vector encoding a B-domain–deleted human factor VIII (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377[26]:2519-30).

“The proof-of-principle was already there in hemophilia B,” Dr. Dunbar said. “It really was just a question of figuring out a way to package and deliver a Factor VIII that would work in the constraints of an AAV [adeno-associated virus] vector.”

Meanwhile, myeloma trials of CAR T-cell therapy seem very promising so far, but the challenge in that disease could be finding a place for gene therapy in a “much more diverse treatment landscape” that includes multiple effective regimens, according to Dr. Dunbar.
 

Future trends, challenges

Looking forward, gene editing with methods including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach have the potential to revolutionize treatment in HIV, b-thalassemia, and sickle cell disease, she said.

Notably, genome editing approaches to treat sickle cell anemia are likely to move forward in the near future, according to Dr. Dunbar, following reports validating an erythroid enhancer of human BCL11A as a target for reinduction of fetal hemoglobin (Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527[7577]:192-7).

But all of this gene therapy development creates an educational challenge for frontline clinicians, even if the administration of CAR T-cell therapy and other advanced treatments is limited to highly specialized centers.

“There’s a lot of training that needs to go on with hematologists, oncologists, and other doctors about how to care for these patients after these treatments, in terms of what to look for and how to intervene early to prevent, for instance, severe toxicity from cytokine release syndrome,” Dr. Dunbar said.

Dr. Dunbar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

After decades of hype, dashed hopes, and setbacks, gene therapy has finally arrived and is poised to transform the treatment paradigm for many diseases, according to Cynthia E. Dunbar, MD, senior investigator at the Hematology Branch of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of the National Institutes of Health.

Hematologists can expect more developments that build on current successes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and gene therapy advances for hemophilia, as well as emerging advances in gene editing techniques including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach, Dr. Dunbar said in an interview.

Courtesy National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
“I think what is happening right now is sort of a critical mass of successes in studies with really unequivocally positive outcomes,” Dr. Dunbar said. “We’ve seen clinical improvements in some common cancers with CAR T cells, but also a range of rare diseases, such as immunodeficiencies and spinal muscular atrophy, as well as promise in diseases like sickle cell anemia.”

That’s on top of a small number of regulatory approvals in the United States and Europe, she said. “Along with that, there’s a lot of interest and now involvement from biotechnology companies and even large pharmaceutical companies. I think all those factors really have to come together to create this kind of acceleration, and I’ve never seen anything like this previously.”

Dr. Dunbar – a former editor in chief of the journal Blood – and her colleagues recently published a review of current developments and emerging gene therapy technologies in the journal Science (2018 Jan 12. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4672).

“We really felt it was the right time to write the article,” she said.
 

Milestones

A new approach to cancer treatment was ushered in on Aug. 30, 2017, with the Food and Drug Administration approval of tisagenlecleucel, the first-ever gene therapy available in the United States. The CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy is indicated for treatment of certain pediatric or young adult patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is refractory or in second or later relapse.

Soon afterward, FDA approved another CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel, for adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

“It’s a very interesting time for immunotherapies in general,” Dr. Dunbar said. “There’s a huge number of options in terms of PD-1 inhibitors and other pharmacologics or antibodies that allow the patient’s own immune system to attack tumors. CAR T-cell therapy is an obvious step beyond that, in terms of arming your own T cells to very specifically target tumor cells.”

But randomized trials or meta-analyses may be necessary to determine the place of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment armamentarium for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphoma given their cost and the availability of other therapeutic options, Dr. Dunbar suggested.

“Gene therapies have a large upfront cost, but if they’re truly curative and a one-time treatment, then they may in the long run be much cheaper than doing failed multiple transplants or needing monoclonal antibody infusion every 2 weeks for the rest of your life,” she said.

Another major success story still in the works, according to Dr. Dunbar, is the treatment of hemophilia A and B with gene therapy approaches. The positive data include a recent report showing that transgene-derived factor IX coagulant activity allowed for the termination of baseline prophylaxis, and the near elimination of bleeding and factor use, in patients with hemophilia B (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377[23]:2215-27).

While gene therapy for hemophilia A has been more challenging, another recent report nevertheless demonstrated sustained normalization of factor VIII activity level with a single intravenous infusion of adeno-associated virus serotype 5 vector encoding a B-domain–deleted human factor VIII (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377[26]:2519-30).

“The proof-of-principle was already there in hemophilia B,” Dr. Dunbar said. “It really was just a question of figuring out a way to package and deliver a Factor VIII that would work in the constraints of an AAV [adeno-associated virus] vector.”

Meanwhile, myeloma trials of CAR T-cell therapy seem very promising so far, but the challenge in that disease could be finding a place for gene therapy in a “much more diverse treatment landscape” that includes multiple effective regimens, according to Dr. Dunbar.
 

Future trends, challenges

Looking forward, gene editing with methods including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach have the potential to revolutionize treatment in HIV, b-thalassemia, and sickle cell disease, she said.

Notably, genome editing approaches to treat sickle cell anemia are likely to move forward in the near future, according to Dr. Dunbar, following reports validating an erythroid enhancer of human BCL11A as a target for reinduction of fetal hemoglobin (Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527[7577]:192-7).

But all of this gene therapy development creates an educational challenge for frontline clinicians, even if the administration of CAR T-cell therapy and other advanced treatments is limited to highly specialized centers.

“There’s a lot of training that needs to go on with hematologists, oncologists, and other doctors about how to care for these patients after these treatments, in terms of what to look for and how to intervene early to prevent, for instance, severe toxicity from cytokine release syndrome,” Dr. Dunbar said.

Dr. Dunbar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

After decades of hype, dashed hopes, and setbacks, gene therapy has finally arrived and is poised to transform the treatment paradigm for many diseases, according to Cynthia E. Dunbar, MD, senior investigator at the Hematology Branch of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of the National Institutes of Health.

Hematologists can expect more developments that build on current successes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and gene therapy advances for hemophilia, as well as emerging advances in gene editing techniques including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach, Dr. Dunbar said in an interview.

Courtesy National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
“I think what is happening right now is sort of a critical mass of successes in studies with really unequivocally positive outcomes,” Dr. Dunbar said. “We’ve seen clinical improvements in some common cancers with CAR T cells, but also a range of rare diseases, such as immunodeficiencies and spinal muscular atrophy, as well as promise in diseases like sickle cell anemia.”

That’s on top of a small number of regulatory approvals in the United States and Europe, she said. “Along with that, there’s a lot of interest and now involvement from biotechnology companies and even large pharmaceutical companies. I think all those factors really have to come together to create this kind of acceleration, and I’ve never seen anything like this previously.”

Dr. Dunbar – a former editor in chief of the journal Blood – and her colleagues recently published a review of current developments and emerging gene therapy technologies in the journal Science (2018 Jan 12. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4672).

“We really felt it was the right time to write the article,” she said.
 

Milestones

A new approach to cancer treatment was ushered in on Aug. 30, 2017, with the Food and Drug Administration approval of tisagenlecleucel, the first-ever gene therapy available in the United States. The CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy is indicated for treatment of certain pediatric or young adult patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is refractory or in second or later relapse.

Soon afterward, FDA approved another CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel, for adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

“It’s a very interesting time for immunotherapies in general,” Dr. Dunbar said. “There’s a huge number of options in terms of PD-1 inhibitors and other pharmacologics or antibodies that allow the patient’s own immune system to attack tumors. CAR T-cell therapy is an obvious step beyond that, in terms of arming your own T cells to very specifically target tumor cells.”

But randomized trials or meta-analyses may be necessary to determine the place of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment armamentarium for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphoma given their cost and the availability of other therapeutic options, Dr. Dunbar suggested.

“Gene therapies have a large upfront cost, but if they’re truly curative and a one-time treatment, then they may in the long run be much cheaper than doing failed multiple transplants or needing monoclonal antibody infusion every 2 weeks for the rest of your life,” she said.

Another major success story still in the works, according to Dr. Dunbar, is the treatment of hemophilia A and B with gene therapy approaches. The positive data include a recent report showing that transgene-derived factor IX coagulant activity allowed for the termination of baseline prophylaxis, and the near elimination of bleeding and factor use, in patients with hemophilia B (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377[23]:2215-27).

While gene therapy for hemophilia A has been more challenging, another recent report nevertheless demonstrated sustained normalization of factor VIII activity level with a single intravenous infusion of adeno-associated virus serotype 5 vector encoding a B-domain–deleted human factor VIII (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377[26]:2519-30).

“The proof-of-principle was already there in hemophilia B,” Dr. Dunbar said. “It really was just a question of figuring out a way to package and deliver a Factor VIII that would work in the constraints of an AAV [adeno-associated virus] vector.”

Meanwhile, myeloma trials of CAR T-cell therapy seem very promising so far, but the challenge in that disease could be finding a place for gene therapy in a “much more diverse treatment landscape” that includes multiple effective regimens, according to Dr. Dunbar.
 

Future trends, challenges

Looking forward, gene editing with methods including the CRISPR/Cas9 approach have the potential to revolutionize treatment in HIV, b-thalassemia, and sickle cell disease, she said.

Notably, genome editing approaches to treat sickle cell anemia are likely to move forward in the near future, according to Dr. Dunbar, following reports validating an erythroid enhancer of human BCL11A as a target for reinduction of fetal hemoglobin (Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527[7577]:192-7).

But all of this gene therapy development creates an educational challenge for frontline clinicians, even if the administration of CAR T-cell therapy and other advanced treatments is limited to highly specialized centers.

“There’s a lot of training that needs to go on with hematologists, oncologists, and other doctors about how to care for these patients after these treatments, in terms of what to look for and how to intervene early to prevent, for instance, severe toxicity from cytokine release syndrome,” Dr. Dunbar said.

Dr. Dunbar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Phase 1 study: Human IL-10 plus checkpoint blockade looks promising in RCC, NSCLC

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 13:46

 

– Pegylated human interleukin-10 in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy is well tolerated and shows promise for the treatment of both renal cell carcinoma and non–small cell lung cancer, according to findings from a phase 1 study.

The IL-10 product, AM0010 (pegilodecakin), was shown to be well tolerated as monotherapy, and was evaluated in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy in the two expansion cohorts included in the current analysis, Martin Oft, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Of 34 evaluable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients included in one expansion cohort, 15 (44%) had an objective response at a median follow-up of 27 months, and two of those had a complete response (CR), Dr. Oft of ARMO BioSciences, Redwood City, Calif. reported.

In contrast, only 4 of 16 evaluable patients who received AM0010 monotherapy (25%) had an objective response, he said.

In eight patients who received AM0010 + pembrolizumab (Keytruda), the objective response rate was 50%, and both patients who had a complete response were in that group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7 months. In 26 who received AM0010 + nivolumab (Opdivo), 11 had an objective response, but neither the complete response nor PFS rates had been reached in patients in that group, he noted.

The responses were durable.

“In fact, we had one patient who stopped treatment after a year in [complete remission] and is now 1 year in total remission without any further treatment,” he said.

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) also experienced some benefit from the combination therapy. Objective responses were observed in 11 of 27 evaluable NSCLC patients (41%) who were treated with AM0010 and an anti–PD-1(9 of 22 [41%] who received AM0010 and nivolumab, and 2 of 5 [40%] who received AM0010 and pembrolizumab).

Progression-free survival was not reached in this cohort.

An analysis by PD-L1 status showed that 33% of NSCLC patients with PD-L1 levels less than 1% achieved a response, 67% of those with PD-L1 levels of 1%-49% achieved a response, and 80% of those with PD-L1 levels of 50% or greater achieved a response, he said, adding that the responses were very durable in all three groups.

Of note, NSCLC patients with liver metastasis have been shown in prior trials to have a lower overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibition, but in this trial, 7 of 9 patients with NSCLC metastasis to the liver had a partial response (PR), Dr. Oft said.

The RCC and NSCLC patients had a median of 1 and 2 prior therapies, respectively.

AM0010 was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 or 20 mcg/kg daily, pembrolizumab was given intravenously at 2mg/kg every 3 weeks, and nivolumab was given intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks.

Treatment-related adverse events included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue, and all were reversible and transient, Dr. Oft said, noting that grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mostly absent in patients receiving the lower dose; thus the recommended phase 2 dose is 10 mcg/kg.

“It’s important to note that three of those six patients [receiving the lower dose] in fact had a PR or CR so this lower dose did not come at the expense of efficacy,” he added.

The mechanistic rationale for combining AM0010 and anti-PD1 for the treatment of cancer patients lies in the fact that IL‐10 has anti‐inflammatory functions and stimulates the cytotoxicity and proliferation of antigen-activated CD8+ T cells. T cell receptor–mediated activation of CD8+ T cells elevates IL‐10 receptors and PD‐1, Dr. Oft explained.

The robust efficacy data and the observed CD8+ T cell activation seen in these expansion cohorts is promising and encourages the continued study of AM0010 in combination with PD-1 inhibition, he concluded, noting that larger studies are planned for the coming year.

Dr. Oft is a founder and employee of ARMO BioSciences, which sponsored this study.

SOURCE: Naing A et al. SITC Abstract 012.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Pegylated human interleukin-10 in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy is well tolerated and shows promise for the treatment of both renal cell carcinoma and non–small cell lung cancer, according to findings from a phase 1 study.

The IL-10 product, AM0010 (pegilodecakin), was shown to be well tolerated as monotherapy, and was evaluated in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy in the two expansion cohorts included in the current analysis, Martin Oft, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Of 34 evaluable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients included in one expansion cohort, 15 (44%) had an objective response at a median follow-up of 27 months, and two of those had a complete response (CR), Dr. Oft of ARMO BioSciences, Redwood City, Calif. reported.

In contrast, only 4 of 16 evaluable patients who received AM0010 monotherapy (25%) had an objective response, he said.

In eight patients who received AM0010 + pembrolizumab (Keytruda), the objective response rate was 50%, and both patients who had a complete response were in that group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7 months. In 26 who received AM0010 + nivolumab (Opdivo), 11 had an objective response, but neither the complete response nor PFS rates had been reached in patients in that group, he noted.

The responses were durable.

“In fact, we had one patient who stopped treatment after a year in [complete remission] and is now 1 year in total remission without any further treatment,” he said.

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) also experienced some benefit from the combination therapy. Objective responses were observed in 11 of 27 evaluable NSCLC patients (41%) who were treated with AM0010 and an anti–PD-1(9 of 22 [41%] who received AM0010 and nivolumab, and 2 of 5 [40%] who received AM0010 and pembrolizumab).

Progression-free survival was not reached in this cohort.

An analysis by PD-L1 status showed that 33% of NSCLC patients with PD-L1 levels less than 1% achieved a response, 67% of those with PD-L1 levels of 1%-49% achieved a response, and 80% of those with PD-L1 levels of 50% or greater achieved a response, he said, adding that the responses were very durable in all three groups.

Of note, NSCLC patients with liver metastasis have been shown in prior trials to have a lower overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibition, but in this trial, 7 of 9 patients with NSCLC metastasis to the liver had a partial response (PR), Dr. Oft said.

The RCC and NSCLC patients had a median of 1 and 2 prior therapies, respectively.

AM0010 was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 or 20 mcg/kg daily, pembrolizumab was given intravenously at 2mg/kg every 3 weeks, and nivolumab was given intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks.

Treatment-related adverse events included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue, and all were reversible and transient, Dr. Oft said, noting that grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mostly absent in patients receiving the lower dose; thus the recommended phase 2 dose is 10 mcg/kg.

“It’s important to note that three of those six patients [receiving the lower dose] in fact had a PR or CR so this lower dose did not come at the expense of efficacy,” he added.

The mechanistic rationale for combining AM0010 and anti-PD1 for the treatment of cancer patients lies in the fact that IL‐10 has anti‐inflammatory functions and stimulates the cytotoxicity and proliferation of antigen-activated CD8+ T cells. T cell receptor–mediated activation of CD8+ T cells elevates IL‐10 receptors and PD‐1, Dr. Oft explained.

The robust efficacy data and the observed CD8+ T cell activation seen in these expansion cohorts is promising and encourages the continued study of AM0010 in combination with PD-1 inhibition, he concluded, noting that larger studies are planned for the coming year.

Dr. Oft is a founder and employee of ARMO BioSciences, which sponsored this study.

SOURCE: Naing A et al. SITC Abstract 012.

 

– Pegylated human interleukin-10 in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy is well tolerated and shows promise for the treatment of both renal cell carcinoma and non–small cell lung cancer, according to findings from a phase 1 study.

The IL-10 product, AM0010 (pegilodecakin), was shown to be well tolerated as monotherapy, and was evaluated in combination with anti–PD-1 therapy in the two expansion cohorts included in the current analysis, Martin Oft, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Of 34 evaluable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients included in one expansion cohort, 15 (44%) had an objective response at a median follow-up of 27 months, and two of those had a complete response (CR), Dr. Oft of ARMO BioSciences, Redwood City, Calif. reported.

In contrast, only 4 of 16 evaluable patients who received AM0010 monotherapy (25%) had an objective response, he said.

In eight patients who received AM0010 + pembrolizumab (Keytruda), the objective response rate was 50%, and both patients who had a complete response were in that group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7 months. In 26 who received AM0010 + nivolumab (Opdivo), 11 had an objective response, but neither the complete response nor PFS rates had been reached in patients in that group, he noted.

The responses were durable.

“In fact, we had one patient who stopped treatment after a year in [complete remission] and is now 1 year in total remission without any further treatment,” he said.

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) also experienced some benefit from the combination therapy. Objective responses were observed in 11 of 27 evaluable NSCLC patients (41%) who were treated with AM0010 and an anti–PD-1(9 of 22 [41%] who received AM0010 and nivolumab, and 2 of 5 [40%] who received AM0010 and pembrolizumab).

Progression-free survival was not reached in this cohort.

An analysis by PD-L1 status showed that 33% of NSCLC patients with PD-L1 levels less than 1% achieved a response, 67% of those with PD-L1 levels of 1%-49% achieved a response, and 80% of those with PD-L1 levels of 50% or greater achieved a response, he said, adding that the responses were very durable in all three groups.

Of note, NSCLC patients with liver metastasis have been shown in prior trials to have a lower overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibition, but in this trial, 7 of 9 patients with NSCLC metastasis to the liver had a partial response (PR), Dr. Oft said.

The RCC and NSCLC patients had a median of 1 and 2 prior therapies, respectively.

AM0010 was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 or 20 mcg/kg daily, pembrolizumab was given intravenously at 2mg/kg every 3 weeks, and nivolumab was given intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks.

Treatment-related adverse events included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue, and all were reversible and transient, Dr. Oft said, noting that grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mostly absent in patients receiving the lower dose; thus the recommended phase 2 dose is 10 mcg/kg.

“It’s important to note that three of those six patients [receiving the lower dose] in fact had a PR or CR so this lower dose did not come at the expense of efficacy,” he added.

The mechanistic rationale for combining AM0010 and anti-PD1 for the treatment of cancer patients lies in the fact that IL‐10 has anti‐inflammatory functions and stimulates the cytotoxicity and proliferation of antigen-activated CD8+ T cells. T cell receptor–mediated activation of CD8+ T cells elevates IL‐10 receptors and PD‐1, Dr. Oft explained.

The robust efficacy data and the observed CD8+ T cell activation seen in these expansion cohorts is promising and encourages the continued study of AM0010 in combination with PD-1 inhibition, he concluded, noting that larger studies are planned for the coming year.

Dr. Oft is a founder and employee of ARMO BioSciences, which sponsored this study.

SOURCE: Naing A et al. SITC Abstract 012.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM SITC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: IL-10 + anti-PD-1 therapy shows promise for RCC and NSCLC.

Major finding: 15 of 34 RCC patients had an objective response and two of those had a complete response.

Study details: Expansion cohorts including 64 patients from a phase 1 study.

Disclosures: Dr. Oft is a founder and employee of ARMO BioSciences, which sponsored this study.

Source: A. Naing et al. SITC 2017 Abstract 012.

Disqus Comments
Default

Updated ZUMA-1 data show durable CAR-T responses in B-cell lymphomas

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 01/17/2023 - 11:16

– More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sattva S. Neelapu

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 106 cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sattva S. Neelapu

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 106 cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

 

 

– More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sattva S. Neelapu

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 106 cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ASH 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point:. CAR-T cell therapy is showing good efficacy against large B-cell lymphomas refractory to other therapies.

Major finding: The objective response rate was 82%, including 58% complete responses at a median of 15.4 months of follow-up.

Data source: Update analysis of phase 1 and 2 data from the ZUMA-1 trial in 108 patients with large B-cell lymphomas.

Disclosures: ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

Source: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

DNA vaccine + PD-1 blockade shows promise in mCRPC

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 13:44

– Combining programmed death (PD)-1 blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a novel DNA vaccine safely enhanced antitumor immune responses in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients in a randomized clinical study.

Dr. Douglas G. McNeel

Of 26 patients with mCRPC who were evaluable for response, 13 received treatment with an investigational DNA vaccine (pTVG-HP) that encodes prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and concurrent PD-1 blockade, and 13 received sequential vaccination and PD-1 blockade. No difference was seen between the groups with respect to progression-free survival at 6 months, but of eight patients in the concurrent therapy arm who had measurable disease, one experienced a partial response and two experienced a reduction in tumor volume, Douglas G. McNeel, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

“We did not see objective responses in [six patients with measurable disease in the sequential treatment arm], said Dr. McNeel, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses, which may be a more sensitive marker, were also more common in the concurrent treatment group; 8 of 13 patients in that group had a PSA decline from baseline, and 4 of those had a decline of greater than 25% from baseline, whereas only 1 of the 13 patients in the sequential treatment arm experienced any decline in PSA vs. baseline, Dr. McNeel said.

Responses to the vaccine’s target antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, were seen in both arms, but only those who received the combined treatment and who had evidence of immune response experienced PSA decline, he added.

Pre- and postvaccination biopsies of metastatic sites showed that concurrent treatment, compared with sequential treatment, elicited tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, PD-L1 expression in tumors, and changes associated with CD8+ T-cell activation, he said, adding that immunization with concurrent PD-1 blockade also elicits changes in proliferation detected by (18F) fluorothymidine PET/CT.

“We’ve been interested in vaccines for cancer, because we know that having the right kind of T cells in the tumor microenvironment is associated with better long-term outcomes,” Dr. McNeel said, noting that the ability of vaccines to activate T cells and augment cytolytic T cells, in particular, should have anticancer activity.

However, the clinical activity of single-agent tumor vaccines has been underwhelming, he noted.

PAP has been a focus in vaccine development, because it is essentially restricted to prostate tissue in humans. A nearly identical prostate-specific rat homologue was used in early studies, and PAP permits evaluation of serum PSA as an independent assessment of response in human trials, he explained.

“It’s the same target as the sipuleucel-T vaccine,” he said, referring to a Food and Drug Administration–approved vaccine for prostate cancer(Provenge).

Two prior phase 1/2 trials looking at DNA vaccine encoding PAP in patients with early biochemically recurrent prostate cancer showed that PAP-specific T-cell immune responses were elicited and that no significant adverse events occurred.

In both trials, the development of persistent PAP-specific, interferon-gamma–secreting T cells was associated with favorable change in PSA doubling time (suggesting a possible impact on the disease), and with PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (suggesting a potential mechanism of resistance), he said.

Laboratory studies helped identify mechanisms of immune resistance following DNA immunization, he said, explaining that immunization elicits T cells secreting interferon-gamma, which leads to an increase in PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.

Encoding epitopes with increased major histocompatibility complex class 1 affinity elicited CD+ t cells with increased and persistent PD-1 expression, and blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 with vaccination led to improved antitumor responses, he said.

The findings led to the new model focused on timing of PD-1 blockade with vaccine T-cell activation studied in the current trial.

It was hypothesized that PD-1 blockade at the time of T-cell activation with vaccination would be more effective than was blockade of PD-1-regulated T cells previously elicited with vaccination.

Study subjects had mCRPC and evidence of disease progression. Previous treatment with abiraterone(Zytiga), enzalutamide(Xtandi), or chemotherapy, was allowed, but patients with prior sipuleucel-T vaccine exposure were excluded.

Patients in the concurrent treatment arm received both the vaccine and PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab (Keytruda)over 12 weeks, and those in the sequential therapy arm received vaccination first followed by PD-1 blockade, each for 12 weeks.

Both approaches were well tolerated.

“Essentially, we saw nothing that was unexpected,” Dr. McNeel said.

Adverse events greater than grade 2 included fatigue in one patient, diarrhea in one patient, and autoimmune hepatitis in one patient. No patients discontinued treatment from toxicity, he noted.

One death occurred during follow-up in a patient who had evidence of progression and refused further follow-up, therefore it could not be determined if the death was related to treatment.

The current findings, which are notable in part because PD-1 pathway inhibitors have demonstrated little clinical activity when used as single agents for prostate cancer and which expand upon data presented in a scientific poster at SITC 2016, demonstrate that combining this blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a DNA vaccine is safe and can augment tumor-specific T cells – as detectable within the peripheral blood and by imaging – and can result in objective antitumor changes.

“To summarize, plasmid DNA vaccines can elicit antigen-specific CD8+ T cells; immunization can increase PD-L1 expression on tumor cells – and we’ve demonstrated, in mice anyway, that this is mediated by the T cells elicited with immunization; PD-1 expression increases on CD8+ T cells following vaccination; and we think this is an opportunity to use checkpoint blockade at the point of vaccination to improve antitumor responses,” Dr. McNeel said.

“So we can look at this as PD-1 blockade to improve the effect of vaccination, but we can also look at it the other way around, and that is that anti-tumor vaccines can elicit the tumor-specific CD8+ T cells needed to enable PD-1 blockade to work,” he said. “ I think this has implications for the choice of vaccine approach, the antigen, and the timing of PD-1 blockade.”

Based on these results, an expansion arm has been opened to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of combination treatment beyond 12 weeks, and future studies will look at the combination of two different vaccines to improve antitumor response, he said.

Dr. McNeel disclosed financial relationships (intellectual property rights/patent holder, consultant, ownership interest) with Madison Vaccines Inc. The study is funded by a 2014 Movember PCF Challenge Award and Madison Vaccines.

SOURCE: McNeel D et al., J Immunother Cancer. 2017 5(Suppl 2):86 Abstract O11.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

– Combining programmed death (PD)-1 blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a novel DNA vaccine safely enhanced antitumor immune responses in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients in a randomized clinical study.

Dr. Douglas G. McNeel

Of 26 patients with mCRPC who were evaluable for response, 13 received treatment with an investigational DNA vaccine (pTVG-HP) that encodes prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and concurrent PD-1 blockade, and 13 received sequential vaccination and PD-1 blockade. No difference was seen between the groups with respect to progression-free survival at 6 months, but of eight patients in the concurrent therapy arm who had measurable disease, one experienced a partial response and two experienced a reduction in tumor volume, Douglas G. McNeel, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

“We did not see objective responses in [six patients with measurable disease in the sequential treatment arm], said Dr. McNeel, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses, which may be a more sensitive marker, were also more common in the concurrent treatment group; 8 of 13 patients in that group had a PSA decline from baseline, and 4 of those had a decline of greater than 25% from baseline, whereas only 1 of the 13 patients in the sequential treatment arm experienced any decline in PSA vs. baseline, Dr. McNeel said.

Responses to the vaccine’s target antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, were seen in both arms, but only those who received the combined treatment and who had evidence of immune response experienced PSA decline, he added.

Pre- and postvaccination biopsies of metastatic sites showed that concurrent treatment, compared with sequential treatment, elicited tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, PD-L1 expression in tumors, and changes associated with CD8+ T-cell activation, he said, adding that immunization with concurrent PD-1 blockade also elicits changes in proliferation detected by (18F) fluorothymidine PET/CT.

“We’ve been interested in vaccines for cancer, because we know that having the right kind of T cells in the tumor microenvironment is associated with better long-term outcomes,” Dr. McNeel said, noting that the ability of vaccines to activate T cells and augment cytolytic T cells, in particular, should have anticancer activity.

However, the clinical activity of single-agent tumor vaccines has been underwhelming, he noted.

PAP has been a focus in vaccine development, because it is essentially restricted to prostate tissue in humans. A nearly identical prostate-specific rat homologue was used in early studies, and PAP permits evaluation of serum PSA as an independent assessment of response in human trials, he explained.

“It’s the same target as the sipuleucel-T vaccine,” he said, referring to a Food and Drug Administration–approved vaccine for prostate cancer(Provenge).

Two prior phase 1/2 trials looking at DNA vaccine encoding PAP in patients with early biochemically recurrent prostate cancer showed that PAP-specific T-cell immune responses were elicited and that no significant adverse events occurred.

In both trials, the development of persistent PAP-specific, interferon-gamma–secreting T cells was associated with favorable change in PSA doubling time (suggesting a possible impact on the disease), and with PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (suggesting a potential mechanism of resistance), he said.

Laboratory studies helped identify mechanisms of immune resistance following DNA immunization, he said, explaining that immunization elicits T cells secreting interferon-gamma, which leads to an increase in PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.

Encoding epitopes with increased major histocompatibility complex class 1 affinity elicited CD+ t cells with increased and persistent PD-1 expression, and blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 with vaccination led to improved antitumor responses, he said.

The findings led to the new model focused on timing of PD-1 blockade with vaccine T-cell activation studied in the current trial.

It was hypothesized that PD-1 blockade at the time of T-cell activation with vaccination would be more effective than was blockade of PD-1-regulated T cells previously elicited with vaccination.

Study subjects had mCRPC and evidence of disease progression. Previous treatment with abiraterone(Zytiga), enzalutamide(Xtandi), or chemotherapy, was allowed, but patients with prior sipuleucel-T vaccine exposure were excluded.

Patients in the concurrent treatment arm received both the vaccine and PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab (Keytruda)over 12 weeks, and those in the sequential therapy arm received vaccination first followed by PD-1 blockade, each for 12 weeks.

Both approaches were well tolerated.

“Essentially, we saw nothing that was unexpected,” Dr. McNeel said.

Adverse events greater than grade 2 included fatigue in one patient, diarrhea in one patient, and autoimmune hepatitis in one patient. No patients discontinued treatment from toxicity, he noted.

One death occurred during follow-up in a patient who had evidence of progression and refused further follow-up, therefore it could not be determined if the death was related to treatment.

The current findings, which are notable in part because PD-1 pathway inhibitors have demonstrated little clinical activity when used as single agents for prostate cancer and which expand upon data presented in a scientific poster at SITC 2016, demonstrate that combining this blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a DNA vaccine is safe and can augment tumor-specific T cells – as detectable within the peripheral blood and by imaging – and can result in objective antitumor changes.

“To summarize, plasmid DNA vaccines can elicit antigen-specific CD8+ T cells; immunization can increase PD-L1 expression on tumor cells – and we’ve demonstrated, in mice anyway, that this is mediated by the T cells elicited with immunization; PD-1 expression increases on CD8+ T cells following vaccination; and we think this is an opportunity to use checkpoint blockade at the point of vaccination to improve antitumor responses,” Dr. McNeel said.

“So we can look at this as PD-1 blockade to improve the effect of vaccination, but we can also look at it the other way around, and that is that anti-tumor vaccines can elicit the tumor-specific CD8+ T cells needed to enable PD-1 blockade to work,” he said. “ I think this has implications for the choice of vaccine approach, the antigen, and the timing of PD-1 blockade.”

Based on these results, an expansion arm has been opened to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of combination treatment beyond 12 weeks, and future studies will look at the combination of two different vaccines to improve antitumor response, he said.

Dr. McNeel disclosed financial relationships (intellectual property rights/patent holder, consultant, ownership interest) with Madison Vaccines Inc. The study is funded by a 2014 Movember PCF Challenge Award and Madison Vaccines.

SOURCE: McNeel D et al., J Immunother Cancer. 2017 5(Suppl 2):86 Abstract O11.

 

 

– Combining programmed death (PD)-1 blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a novel DNA vaccine safely enhanced antitumor immune responses in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients in a randomized clinical study.

Dr. Douglas G. McNeel

Of 26 patients with mCRPC who were evaluable for response, 13 received treatment with an investigational DNA vaccine (pTVG-HP) that encodes prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and concurrent PD-1 blockade, and 13 received sequential vaccination and PD-1 blockade. No difference was seen between the groups with respect to progression-free survival at 6 months, but of eight patients in the concurrent therapy arm who had measurable disease, one experienced a partial response and two experienced a reduction in tumor volume, Douglas G. McNeel, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

“We did not see objective responses in [six patients with measurable disease in the sequential treatment arm], said Dr. McNeel, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses, which may be a more sensitive marker, were also more common in the concurrent treatment group; 8 of 13 patients in that group had a PSA decline from baseline, and 4 of those had a decline of greater than 25% from baseline, whereas only 1 of the 13 patients in the sequential treatment arm experienced any decline in PSA vs. baseline, Dr. McNeel said.

Responses to the vaccine’s target antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, were seen in both arms, but only those who received the combined treatment and who had evidence of immune response experienced PSA decline, he added.

Pre- and postvaccination biopsies of metastatic sites showed that concurrent treatment, compared with sequential treatment, elicited tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, PD-L1 expression in tumors, and changes associated with CD8+ T-cell activation, he said, adding that immunization with concurrent PD-1 blockade also elicits changes in proliferation detected by (18F) fluorothymidine PET/CT.

“We’ve been interested in vaccines for cancer, because we know that having the right kind of T cells in the tumor microenvironment is associated with better long-term outcomes,” Dr. McNeel said, noting that the ability of vaccines to activate T cells and augment cytolytic T cells, in particular, should have anticancer activity.

However, the clinical activity of single-agent tumor vaccines has been underwhelming, he noted.

PAP has been a focus in vaccine development, because it is essentially restricted to prostate tissue in humans. A nearly identical prostate-specific rat homologue was used in early studies, and PAP permits evaluation of serum PSA as an independent assessment of response in human trials, he explained.

“It’s the same target as the sipuleucel-T vaccine,” he said, referring to a Food and Drug Administration–approved vaccine for prostate cancer(Provenge).

Two prior phase 1/2 trials looking at DNA vaccine encoding PAP in patients with early biochemically recurrent prostate cancer showed that PAP-specific T-cell immune responses were elicited and that no significant adverse events occurred.

In both trials, the development of persistent PAP-specific, interferon-gamma–secreting T cells was associated with favorable change in PSA doubling time (suggesting a possible impact on the disease), and with PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (suggesting a potential mechanism of resistance), he said.

Laboratory studies helped identify mechanisms of immune resistance following DNA immunization, he said, explaining that immunization elicits T cells secreting interferon-gamma, which leads to an increase in PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.

Encoding epitopes with increased major histocompatibility complex class 1 affinity elicited CD+ t cells with increased and persistent PD-1 expression, and blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 with vaccination led to improved antitumor responses, he said.

The findings led to the new model focused on timing of PD-1 blockade with vaccine T-cell activation studied in the current trial.

It was hypothesized that PD-1 blockade at the time of T-cell activation with vaccination would be more effective than was blockade of PD-1-regulated T cells previously elicited with vaccination.

Study subjects had mCRPC and evidence of disease progression. Previous treatment with abiraterone(Zytiga), enzalutamide(Xtandi), or chemotherapy, was allowed, but patients with prior sipuleucel-T vaccine exposure were excluded.

Patients in the concurrent treatment arm received both the vaccine and PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab (Keytruda)over 12 weeks, and those in the sequential therapy arm received vaccination first followed by PD-1 blockade, each for 12 weeks.

Both approaches were well tolerated.

“Essentially, we saw nothing that was unexpected,” Dr. McNeel said.

Adverse events greater than grade 2 included fatigue in one patient, diarrhea in one patient, and autoimmune hepatitis in one patient. No patients discontinued treatment from toxicity, he noted.

One death occurred during follow-up in a patient who had evidence of progression and refused further follow-up, therefore it could not be determined if the death was related to treatment.

The current findings, which are notable in part because PD-1 pathway inhibitors have demonstrated little clinical activity when used as single agents for prostate cancer and which expand upon data presented in a scientific poster at SITC 2016, demonstrate that combining this blockade with tumor-targeted T-cell activation by a DNA vaccine is safe and can augment tumor-specific T cells – as detectable within the peripheral blood and by imaging – and can result in objective antitumor changes.

“To summarize, plasmid DNA vaccines can elicit antigen-specific CD8+ T cells; immunization can increase PD-L1 expression on tumor cells – and we’ve demonstrated, in mice anyway, that this is mediated by the T cells elicited with immunization; PD-1 expression increases on CD8+ T cells following vaccination; and we think this is an opportunity to use checkpoint blockade at the point of vaccination to improve antitumor responses,” Dr. McNeel said.

“So we can look at this as PD-1 blockade to improve the effect of vaccination, but we can also look at it the other way around, and that is that anti-tumor vaccines can elicit the tumor-specific CD8+ T cells needed to enable PD-1 blockade to work,” he said. “ I think this has implications for the choice of vaccine approach, the antigen, and the timing of PD-1 blockade.”

Based on these results, an expansion arm has been opened to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of combination treatment beyond 12 weeks, and future studies will look at the combination of two different vaccines to improve antitumor response, he said.

Dr. McNeel disclosed financial relationships (intellectual property rights/patent holder, consultant, ownership interest) with Madison Vaccines Inc. The study is funded by a 2014 Movember PCF Challenge Award and Madison Vaccines.

SOURCE: McNeel D et al., J Immunother Cancer. 2017 5(Suppl 2):86 Abstract O11.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM SITC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Concurrent PD-1 blockade enhanced DNA vaccine activity in mCRPC.

Major finding: A partial response and tumor volume reduction occurred in one and two patients, respectively.

Study details: A randomized clinical study of 26 patients.

Disclosures: Dr. McNeel disclosed financial relationships (intellectual property rights/patent holder, consultant, ownership interest) with Madison Vaccines. The study is funded by a 2014 Movember PCF Challenge Award and Madison Vaccines.

Source: Douglas McNeel D et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Nov; 5(Suppl 2):86 Abstract O11.

Disqus Comments
Default

Nivolumab may extend survival in HCC patients

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:51

 

– A multinational clinical trial has found that the metastatic cancer agent nivolumab can improve long-term survival and durable tumor responses in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) whether or not they’ve had previous treatment with a chemotherapy agent already approved for advanced primary liver cancer, a principal investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

“Nivolumab has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy across etiologies in sorafenib-naive and -experienced patients with extended follow-up,” Bruno Sangro, MD, of the University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, said in reporting results of the CheckMate-040 trial. “The median overall survival is 15 and 15.6 months in patients who were sorafenib-experienced in both the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts.”

Dr. Bruno Sangro


The dose-escalation cohort received 0.1 to 10 mg/kg of nivolumab (Opdivo) while the dose-expansion group received a steady dose of 3 mg/kg. In all, 262 patients participated in the trial, 80 of whom had never been on sorafenib (Nexavar) therapy. The survival outcome in these subgroups, Dr. Sangro said, “really speaks for the consistency and the robustness of the results.”

Trial participants had inoperable, usually metastatic HCC, with Child-Pugh scores up to and including 7 in the escalation group or up to and including 6 in the expansion group. Most of them were progressing to treatment with one or more prior systemic therapies, including sorafenib. Their aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase scores were in the upper limits of normal, and bilirubin was less than or equal to 3 mg/dL. If they had hepatitis B (HBV), their viral load had to be less than 100 IU/mL and they had to be on effective antiviral therapy. Any history of hepatic encephalopathy or clinically significant ascites and an active HBV and hepatitis C (HCV) coinfection were grounds for exclusion.

“Most patients had to discontinue nivolumab because of disease progression,” Dr. Sangro noted, so that only 36 patients, or 14%, were continuing treatment at the time of this analysis. Thirteen patients in the total population that discontinued nivolumab did so because of toxicity, he said.

“Around 20% of patients achieved an objective remission that included complete responses in all subgroups of patients; 15% of progressors and 23% of sorafenib-intolerant patients had an objective response,” Dr. Sangro said. In terms of overall response, about half of all patients in the sorafenib-experienced subgroups had a complete or partial response or stable disease: 51% in the dose-escalation subgroup and 54% in the dose-expansion subgroup.

Although tumor responses were associated with declines in alpha-fetoprotein levels, “it’s unlikely that these biomarkers will be useful either for monitoring or selecting patients for treatment,” he added. “Indeed, baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels were comparable between responders and nonresponders to nivolumab” Dr. Sangro said.

“We also showed there was some impact on HCV viral kinetics in infected individuals,” Dr. Sangro noted. “The overall safety profile for the HCC population is consistent with other tumor types in which nivolumab is approved; these include patients who are infected with hepatitis B or C viruses.”

The study showed that 36% (19/53) of HCV infected patients had a greater than 1 log decrease in viral load. No signs of additional antiviral activity were detected among HBV-infected patients already on effective antiviral treatment: only 5% (3/59) posted a up to 1 log decrease in HB surface antigen levels, and 11% (7/64) of patients had increases in viral load. “These increases occurred in the setting of low-level viremia.” Dr. Sangro said. “They were asymptomatic and [nivolumab] did not result in changes in hepatic parameters or other serious adverse events.”

With regard to adverse events (AEs), 77% of all patients had some treatment-related AEs, ranging from fatigue to rash to dry mouth to increased lab levels, but only 20% were grade 3 or 4, and 88% of those resolved in an average of 8 weeks, Dr. Sangro said.

More research into nivolumab for HCC is needed, Dr. Sangro said. “Ongoing and future studies in patients with advanced tumors will evaluate nivolumab in the first-line setting or in combination with other agents,” he said.

Dr. Sangro disclosed relationships with Bayer Schering Pharma, Onxeo, Astra Zeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Bristol-Myers Squibb funded the trial, and Chrysalis Medical Communications assisted in reporting the study results.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– A multinational clinical trial has found that the metastatic cancer agent nivolumab can improve long-term survival and durable tumor responses in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) whether or not they’ve had previous treatment with a chemotherapy agent already approved for advanced primary liver cancer, a principal investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

“Nivolumab has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy across etiologies in sorafenib-naive and -experienced patients with extended follow-up,” Bruno Sangro, MD, of the University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, said in reporting results of the CheckMate-040 trial. “The median overall survival is 15 and 15.6 months in patients who were sorafenib-experienced in both the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts.”

Dr. Bruno Sangro


The dose-escalation cohort received 0.1 to 10 mg/kg of nivolumab (Opdivo) while the dose-expansion group received a steady dose of 3 mg/kg. In all, 262 patients participated in the trial, 80 of whom had never been on sorafenib (Nexavar) therapy. The survival outcome in these subgroups, Dr. Sangro said, “really speaks for the consistency and the robustness of the results.”

Trial participants had inoperable, usually metastatic HCC, with Child-Pugh scores up to and including 7 in the escalation group or up to and including 6 in the expansion group. Most of them were progressing to treatment with one or more prior systemic therapies, including sorafenib. Their aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase scores were in the upper limits of normal, and bilirubin was less than or equal to 3 mg/dL. If they had hepatitis B (HBV), their viral load had to be less than 100 IU/mL and they had to be on effective antiviral therapy. Any history of hepatic encephalopathy or clinically significant ascites and an active HBV and hepatitis C (HCV) coinfection were grounds for exclusion.

“Most patients had to discontinue nivolumab because of disease progression,” Dr. Sangro noted, so that only 36 patients, or 14%, were continuing treatment at the time of this analysis. Thirteen patients in the total population that discontinued nivolumab did so because of toxicity, he said.

“Around 20% of patients achieved an objective remission that included complete responses in all subgroups of patients; 15% of progressors and 23% of sorafenib-intolerant patients had an objective response,” Dr. Sangro said. In terms of overall response, about half of all patients in the sorafenib-experienced subgroups had a complete or partial response or stable disease: 51% in the dose-escalation subgroup and 54% in the dose-expansion subgroup.

Although tumor responses were associated with declines in alpha-fetoprotein levels, “it’s unlikely that these biomarkers will be useful either for monitoring or selecting patients for treatment,” he added. “Indeed, baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels were comparable between responders and nonresponders to nivolumab” Dr. Sangro said.

“We also showed there was some impact on HCV viral kinetics in infected individuals,” Dr. Sangro noted. “The overall safety profile for the HCC population is consistent with other tumor types in which nivolumab is approved; these include patients who are infected with hepatitis B or C viruses.”

The study showed that 36% (19/53) of HCV infected patients had a greater than 1 log decrease in viral load. No signs of additional antiviral activity were detected among HBV-infected patients already on effective antiviral treatment: only 5% (3/59) posted a up to 1 log decrease in HB surface antigen levels, and 11% (7/64) of patients had increases in viral load. “These increases occurred in the setting of low-level viremia.” Dr. Sangro said. “They were asymptomatic and [nivolumab] did not result in changes in hepatic parameters or other serious adverse events.”

With regard to adverse events (AEs), 77% of all patients had some treatment-related AEs, ranging from fatigue to rash to dry mouth to increased lab levels, but only 20% were grade 3 or 4, and 88% of those resolved in an average of 8 weeks, Dr. Sangro said.

More research into nivolumab for HCC is needed, Dr. Sangro said. “Ongoing and future studies in patients with advanced tumors will evaluate nivolumab in the first-line setting or in combination with other agents,” he said.

Dr. Sangro disclosed relationships with Bayer Schering Pharma, Onxeo, Astra Zeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Bristol-Myers Squibb funded the trial, and Chrysalis Medical Communications assisted in reporting the study results.

 

– A multinational clinical trial has found that the metastatic cancer agent nivolumab can improve long-term survival and durable tumor responses in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) whether or not they’ve had previous treatment with a chemotherapy agent already approved for advanced primary liver cancer, a principal investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

“Nivolumab has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy across etiologies in sorafenib-naive and -experienced patients with extended follow-up,” Bruno Sangro, MD, of the University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, said in reporting results of the CheckMate-040 trial. “The median overall survival is 15 and 15.6 months in patients who were sorafenib-experienced in both the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts.”

Dr. Bruno Sangro


The dose-escalation cohort received 0.1 to 10 mg/kg of nivolumab (Opdivo) while the dose-expansion group received a steady dose of 3 mg/kg. In all, 262 patients participated in the trial, 80 of whom had never been on sorafenib (Nexavar) therapy. The survival outcome in these subgroups, Dr. Sangro said, “really speaks for the consistency and the robustness of the results.”

Trial participants had inoperable, usually metastatic HCC, with Child-Pugh scores up to and including 7 in the escalation group or up to and including 6 in the expansion group. Most of them were progressing to treatment with one or more prior systemic therapies, including sorafenib. Their aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase scores were in the upper limits of normal, and bilirubin was less than or equal to 3 mg/dL. If they had hepatitis B (HBV), their viral load had to be less than 100 IU/mL and they had to be on effective antiviral therapy. Any history of hepatic encephalopathy or clinically significant ascites and an active HBV and hepatitis C (HCV) coinfection were grounds for exclusion.

“Most patients had to discontinue nivolumab because of disease progression,” Dr. Sangro noted, so that only 36 patients, or 14%, were continuing treatment at the time of this analysis. Thirteen patients in the total population that discontinued nivolumab did so because of toxicity, he said.

“Around 20% of patients achieved an objective remission that included complete responses in all subgroups of patients; 15% of progressors and 23% of sorafenib-intolerant patients had an objective response,” Dr. Sangro said. In terms of overall response, about half of all patients in the sorafenib-experienced subgroups had a complete or partial response or stable disease: 51% in the dose-escalation subgroup and 54% in the dose-expansion subgroup.

Although tumor responses were associated with declines in alpha-fetoprotein levels, “it’s unlikely that these biomarkers will be useful either for monitoring or selecting patients for treatment,” he added. “Indeed, baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels were comparable between responders and nonresponders to nivolumab” Dr. Sangro said.

“We also showed there was some impact on HCV viral kinetics in infected individuals,” Dr. Sangro noted. “The overall safety profile for the HCC population is consistent with other tumor types in which nivolumab is approved; these include patients who are infected with hepatitis B or C viruses.”

The study showed that 36% (19/53) of HCV infected patients had a greater than 1 log decrease in viral load. No signs of additional antiviral activity were detected among HBV-infected patients already on effective antiviral treatment: only 5% (3/59) posted a up to 1 log decrease in HB surface antigen levels, and 11% (7/64) of patients had increases in viral load. “These increases occurred in the setting of low-level viremia.” Dr. Sangro said. “They were asymptomatic and [nivolumab] did not result in changes in hepatic parameters or other serious adverse events.”

With regard to adverse events (AEs), 77% of all patients had some treatment-related AEs, ranging from fatigue to rash to dry mouth to increased lab levels, but only 20% were grade 3 or 4, and 88% of those resolved in an average of 8 weeks, Dr. Sangro said.

More research into nivolumab for HCC is needed, Dr. Sangro said. “Ongoing and future studies in patients with advanced tumors will evaluate nivolumab in the first-line setting or in combination with other agents,” he said.

Dr. Sangro disclosed relationships with Bayer Schering Pharma, Onxeo, Astra Zeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Bristol-Myers Squibb funded the trial, and Chrysalis Medical Communications assisted in reporting the study results.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT THE LIVER MEETING 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Nivolumab demonstrated long-term survival, durable tumor responses, and manageable overall and hepatic safety profiles, regardless of prior sorafenib treatment, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Major finding: The 18-month overall survival rate was 57% in sorafenib-naive patients and 46% (dose-escalation) and 44% (dose-expansion) in sorafenib-experienced patients.

Data source: CheckMate-040 phase 1/2 dose-escalation and -expansion trial of 262 patients.

Disclosures: Dr. Sangro disclosed relationships with Bayer Schering Pharma, Onxeo, Astra Zeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Bristol-Myers Squibb funded the trial, and Chrysalis Medical Communications assisted in reporting the study results.

Disqus Comments
Default

Checkmate 214: Upfront nivo/ipi bests TKI in advanced RCC

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 13:41

– A combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors was superior to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib (Sutent) in first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), investigators reported

Median overall survival (OS) among 425 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk treatment-naive advanced/metastatic clear-cell RCC treated with the combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) was not reached after 32 months of follow-up. In contrast, the median OS for 422 patients treated with sunitinib was 26 months, reported Bernard Escudier, MD from the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

Dr. Bernard Escudier
Investigators previously had reported that progression-free survival (PFS), which, together with overall response rate (ORR), constituted the other coprimary endpoint, also favored the checkpoint inhibitors, with a median of 11.6 months versus 8.4 months for sunitinib (P = .0331), he reported at the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress.

Similarly tipping the balance toward the combination, the ORR was 42%, compared with 27% in the sunitinib group (P less than .0001).

“These results support the use of nivo/ipi [nivolumab/ipilimumab] as a new first-line standard of care option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Dr. Escudier said at a briefing prior to presenting the data in a presidential symposium.

Patients with treatment-naive advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC with measurable disease, a Karnofsky Performance Score of at least 70%, and tumor tissue available for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) typing were enrolled in Checkmate 214, .

The patients were stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic score and by region (U.S. versus Canada/Europe versus the rest of the world) and then randomly assigned to receive either 3 mg/kg nivolumab and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses then 3 mg/kg nivolumab every other week or to receive 50 mg oral sunitinib once daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle. Patients remained on treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The results for the coprimary endpoints are noted above.

Duration of response trended toward superior with the checkpoint inhibitor duo. At 2-year follow-up, the median duration of response was not reached with nivo/ipi, vs. 18.2 months with sunitinib. In all, 72% of patients on the combination had an ongoing response at 2 years, compared with 63% of patients on the TKI, but the upper level of the confidence interval in both trial arms had not been reached at the time of the data cutoff, so statistical significance of the difference in duration cannot be determined.

For the secondary endpoints of overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included 550 patients assigned to nivo/ipi and 546 to sunitinib, the ORR was 39% for patients assigned to the checkpoint inhibitors, compared with 32% for sunitinib (P = .0191). The median respective PFS numbers, however, were virtually identical at 12.4 vs. 12.3 months.

The median OS in the intention-to-treat population was not reached with the combination, versus 32.9 months with the TKI (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0003).

In the intermediate- or poor-risk population, PFS was significantly better with nivo/ipi among patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of cells but not in patients with lower levels of PD-L1 expression.

There were more adverse events leading to discontinuation among patients on the dual checkpoint inhibitors at 22% vs. 12% with sunitinib. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events in the combination group were fatigue and diarrhea in 4% each and rash and nausea in 2% each, while incidences of pruritus, hypothyroidism, vomiting, and hypertension occurred in fewer than 1% of patients.

In the sunitinib group, the most common grade 3 or greater events were hypertension in 16%, fatigue in 9%, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in 9%, stomatitis in 3%, mucosal inflammation in 3%, and vomiting in 2%. Nausea, decreased appetite, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia occurred in 1% or fewer of patients in this arm.

Dr. Maria de Santis
There were seven treatment-related deaths in the combination group and four in the sunitinib group.

“The combination, I think, is really beneficial, because with immunotherapy we have seen that patients who respond usually have long-term benefit, and in this case high-response rate seems to be important and translates into a long-term for patients,” commented Maria de Santis, MD, from the University of Warwick, U.K., who was an invited discussant at the briefing.

“This data is clearly important and practice changing, and it challenges the former standard of care with TKI monotherapy treatment,” she added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; Dr. Escudier disclosed honoraria from BMS. Dr. de Santis did not disclose potential conflicts of interest.
 

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– A combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors was superior to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib (Sutent) in first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), investigators reported

Median overall survival (OS) among 425 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk treatment-naive advanced/metastatic clear-cell RCC treated with the combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) was not reached after 32 months of follow-up. In contrast, the median OS for 422 patients treated with sunitinib was 26 months, reported Bernard Escudier, MD from the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

Dr. Bernard Escudier
Investigators previously had reported that progression-free survival (PFS), which, together with overall response rate (ORR), constituted the other coprimary endpoint, also favored the checkpoint inhibitors, with a median of 11.6 months versus 8.4 months for sunitinib (P = .0331), he reported at the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress.

Similarly tipping the balance toward the combination, the ORR was 42%, compared with 27% in the sunitinib group (P less than .0001).

“These results support the use of nivo/ipi [nivolumab/ipilimumab] as a new first-line standard of care option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Dr. Escudier said at a briefing prior to presenting the data in a presidential symposium.

Patients with treatment-naive advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC with measurable disease, a Karnofsky Performance Score of at least 70%, and tumor tissue available for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) typing were enrolled in Checkmate 214, .

The patients were stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic score and by region (U.S. versus Canada/Europe versus the rest of the world) and then randomly assigned to receive either 3 mg/kg nivolumab and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses then 3 mg/kg nivolumab every other week or to receive 50 mg oral sunitinib once daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle. Patients remained on treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The results for the coprimary endpoints are noted above.

Duration of response trended toward superior with the checkpoint inhibitor duo. At 2-year follow-up, the median duration of response was not reached with nivo/ipi, vs. 18.2 months with sunitinib. In all, 72% of patients on the combination had an ongoing response at 2 years, compared with 63% of patients on the TKI, but the upper level of the confidence interval in both trial arms had not been reached at the time of the data cutoff, so statistical significance of the difference in duration cannot be determined.

For the secondary endpoints of overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included 550 patients assigned to nivo/ipi and 546 to sunitinib, the ORR was 39% for patients assigned to the checkpoint inhibitors, compared with 32% for sunitinib (P = .0191). The median respective PFS numbers, however, were virtually identical at 12.4 vs. 12.3 months.

The median OS in the intention-to-treat population was not reached with the combination, versus 32.9 months with the TKI (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0003).

In the intermediate- or poor-risk population, PFS was significantly better with nivo/ipi among patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of cells but not in patients with lower levels of PD-L1 expression.

There were more adverse events leading to discontinuation among patients on the dual checkpoint inhibitors at 22% vs. 12% with sunitinib. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events in the combination group were fatigue and diarrhea in 4% each and rash and nausea in 2% each, while incidences of pruritus, hypothyroidism, vomiting, and hypertension occurred in fewer than 1% of patients.

In the sunitinib group, the most common grade 3 or greater events were hypertension in 16%, fatigue in 9%, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in 9%, stomatitis in 3%, mucosal inflammation in 3%, and vomiting in 2%. Nausea, decreased appetite, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia occurred in 1% or fewer of patients in this arm.

Dr. Maria de Santis
There were seven treatment-related deaths in the combination group and four in the sunitinib group.

“The combination, I think, is really beneficial, because with immunotherapy we have seen that patients who respond usually have long-term benefit, and in this case high-response rate seems to be important and translates into a long-term for patients,” commented Maria de Santis, MD, from the University of Warwick, U.K., who was an invited discussant at the briefing.

“This data is clearly important and practice changing, and it challenges the former standard of care with TKI monotherapy treatment,” she added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; Dr. Escudier disclosed honoraria from BMS. Dr. de Santis did not disclose potential conflicts of interest.
 

 

 

– A combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors was superior to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib (Sutent) in first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), investigators reported

Median overall survival (OS) among 425 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk treatment-naive advanced/metastatic clear-cell RCC treated with the combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) was not reached after 32 months of follow-up. In contrast, the median OS for 422 patients treated with sunitinib was 26 months, reported Bernard Escudier, MD from the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

Dr. Bernard Escudier
Investigators previously had reported that progression-free survival (PFS), which, together with overall response rate (ORR), constituted the other coprimary endpoint, also favored the checkpoint inhibitors, with a median of 11.6 months versus 8.4 months for sunitinib (P = .0331), he reported at the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress.

Similarly tipping the balance toward the combination, the ORR was 42%, compared with 27% in the sunitinib group (P less than .0001).

“These results support the use of nivo/ipi [nivolumab/ipilimumab] as a new first-line standard of care option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Dr. Escudier said at a briefing prior to presenting the data in a presidential symposium.

Patients with treatment-naive advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC with measurable disease, a Karnofsky Performance Score of at least 70%, and tumor tissue available for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) typing were enrolled in Checkmate 214, .

The patients were stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic score and by region (U.S. versus Canada/Europe versus the rest of the world) and then randomly assigned to receive either 3 mg/kg nivolumab and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses then 3 mg/kg nivolumab every other week or to receive 50 mg oral sunitinib once daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle. Patients remained on treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The results for the coprimary endpoints are noted above.

Duration of response trended toward superior with the checkpoint inhibitor duo. At 2-year follow-up, the median duration of response was not reached with nivo/ipi, vs. 18.2 months with sunitinib. In all, 72% of patients on the combination had an ongoing response at 2 years, compared with 63% of patients on the TKI, but the upper level of the confidence interval in both trial arms had not been reached at the time of the data cutoff, so statistical significance of the difference in duration cannot be determined.

For the secondary endpoints of overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included 550 patients assigned to nivo/ipi and 546 to sunitinib, the ORR was 39% for patients assigned to the checkpoint inhibitors, compared with 32% for sunitinib (P = .0191). The median respective PFS numbers, however, were virtually identical at 12.4 vs. 12.3 months.

The median OS in the intention-to-treat population was not reached with the combination, versus 32.9 months with the TKI (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0003).

In the intermediate- or poor-risk population, PFS was significantly better with nivo/ipi among patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of cells but not in patients with lower levels of PD-L1 expression.

There were more adverse events leading to discontinuation among patients on the dual checkpoint inhibitors at 22% vs. 12% with sunitinib. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events in the combination group were fatigue and diarrhea in 4% each and rash and nausea in 2% each, while incidences of pruritus, hypothyroidism, vomiting, and hypertension occurred in fewer than 1% of patients.

In the sunitinib group, the most common grade 3 or greater events were hypertension in 16%, fatigue in 9%, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in 9%, stomatitis in 3%, mucosal inflammation in 3%, and vomiting in 2%. Nausea, decreased appetite, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia occurred in 1% or fewer of patients in this arm.

Dr. Maria de Santis
There were seven treatment-related deaths in the combination group and four in the sunitinib group.

“The combination, I think, is really beneficial, because with immunotherapy we have seen that patients who respond usually have long-term benefit, and in this case high-response rate seems to be important and translates into a long-term for patients,” commented Maria de Santis, MD, from the University of Warwick, U.K., who was an invited discussant at the briefing.

“This data is clearly important and practice changing, and it challenges the former standard of care with TKI monotherapy treatment,” she added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; Dr. Escudier disclosed honoraria from BMS. Dr. de Santis did not disclose potential conflicts of interest.
 

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT ESMO 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The combination of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab was efficacious in frontline therapyfor advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Major finding: The trial met its coprimary endpoints of overall response rate and progression-free survival, as well as its secondary endpoint of overall survival.

Data source: Randomized open-label study in 1096 patients with advanced/metastatic RCC, including 847 with intermediate- to poor-risk disease.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; Dr. Escudier disclosed honoraria from BMS. Dr. de Santis did not disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Disqus Comments
Default

CRP may predict survival after immunotherapy for lung cancer

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 13:40

 

– A baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level above 50 mg/L independently predicted worse overall survival after immunotherapy in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer in a retrospective study.

In 99 patients treated with nivolumab after a first-line platinum doublet, the median baseline CRP level was 22 mg/L. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, 50% of patients were alive, and, based on univariate and multivariate analysis, both liver involvement and having a CRP level greater than 50 mg/L were significantly associated with inferior overall survival after immunotherapy.

The median overall survival after immunotherapy was 9.3 months versus 2.7 months with a CRP level of 50 mg/L or less versus above 50 mg/L, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C., reported at the Chicago Multidisciplinary Symposium in Thoracic Oncology.

Notably, significant increases in CRP level, compared with baseline, were seen at the time of grade 2 to grade 4 immune-related adverse events, which occurred in 38.4% of patients. This is a hypothesis-generating finding in that it suggests there is dysregulation of the immune system, in the context of immune checkpoint blockade, that leads to a more proinflammatory state, which ultimately leads to immune-related adverse events, Dr. Naqash said.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 65 years who were treated during April 2015-March 2017. Most were white (64.7%), were male (64.6%), and had non–small cell lung cancer (88%). Most had stage IV disease (70.7%), and the most common site for metastases was the bones (35.4%) and the liver (24.2%). Patients’ CRP levels were measured at anti-PD-1–treatment initiation and serially with subsequent doses.

The findings are important because the identification of predictive biomarkers in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy could provide valuable insights into underlying mechanisms regulating patient responses, elucidate resistance mechanisms, and help with optimal selection of patients for treatment with and development of patient-tailored treatment, Dr. Naqash said, noting that identifying such biomarkers has thus far been a challenge.

However, this study is limited by its retrospective design and limited follow-up; the findings require validation in prospective lung cancer trials, he concluded.

Dr. Naqash reported having no disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– A baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level above 50 mg/L independently predicted worse overall survival after immunotherapy in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer in a retrospective study.

In 99 patients treated with nivolumab after a first-line platinum doublet, the median baseline CRP level was 22 mg/L. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, 50% of patients were alive, and, based on univariate and multivariate analysis, both liver involvement and having a CRP level greater than 50 mg/L were significantly associated with inferior overall survival after immunotherapy.

The median overall survival after immunotherapy was 9.3 months versus 2.7 months with a CRP level of 50 mg/L or less versus above 50 mg/L, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C., reported at the Chicago Multidisciplinary Symposium in Thoracic Oncology.

Notably, significant increases in CRP level, compared with baseline, were seen at the time of grade 2 to grade 4 immune-related adverse events, which occurred in 38.4% of patients. This is a hypothesis-generating finding in that it suggests there is dysregulation of the immune system, in the context of immune checkpoint blockade, that leads to a more proinflammatory state, which ultimately leads to immune-related adverse events, Dr. Naqash said.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 65 years who were treated during April 2015-March 2017. Most were white (64.7%), were male (64.6%), and had non–small cell lung cancer (88%). Most had stage IV disease (70.7%), and the most common site for metastases was the bones (35.4%) and the liver (24.2%). Patients’ CRP levels were measured at anti-PD-1–treatment initiation and serially with subsequent doses.

The findings are important because the identification of predictive biomarkers in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy could provide valuable insights into underlying mechanisms regulating patient responses, elucidate resistance mechanisms, and help with optimal selection of patients for treatment with and development of patient-tailored treatment, Dr. Naqash said, noting that identifying such biomarkers has thus far been a challenge.

However, this study is limited by its retrospective design and limited follow-up; the findings require validation in prospective lung cancer trials, he concluded.

Dr. Naqash reported having no disclosures.

 

– A baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level above 50 mg/L independently predicted worse overall survival after immunotherapy in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer in a retrospective study.

In 99 patients treated with nivolumab after a first-line platinum doublet, the median baseline CRP level was 22 mg/L. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, 50% of patients were alive, and, based on univariate and multivariate analysis, both liver involvement and having a CRP level greater than 50 mg/L were significantly associated with inferior overall survival after immunotherapy.

The median overall survival after immunotherapy was 9.3 months versus 2.7 months with a CRP level of 50 mg/L or less versus above 50 mg/L, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C., reported at the Chicago Multidisciplinary Symposium in Thoracic Oncology.

Notably, significant increases in CRP level, compared with baseline, were seen at the time of grade 2 to grade 4 immune-related adverse events, which occurred in 38.4% of patients. This is a hypothesis-generating finding in that it suggests there is dysregulation of the immune system, in the context of immune checkpoint blockade, that leads to a more proinflammatory state, which ultimately leads to immune-related adverse events, Dr. Naqash said.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 65 years who were treated during April 2015-March 2017. Most were white (64.7%), were male (64.6%), and had non–small cell lung cancer (88%). Most had stage IV disease (70.7%), and the most common site for metastases was the bones (35.4%) and the liver (24.2%). Patients’ CRP levels were measured at anti-PD-1–treatment initiation and serially with subsequent doses.

The findings are important because the identification of predictive biomarkers in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy could provide valuable insights into underlying mechanisms regulating patient responses, elucidate resistance mechanisms, and help with optimal selection of patients for treatment with and development of patient-tailored treatment, Dr. Naqash said, noting that identifying such biomarkers has thus far been a challenge.

However, this study is limited by its retrospective design and limited follow-up; the findings require validation in prospective lung cancer trials, he concluded.

Dr. Naqash reported having no disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT A SYMPOSIUM IN THORACIC ONCOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Baseline CRP above 50 mg/L independently predicted worse overall survival after immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer patients in a retrospective study.

Major finding: Median overall survival after immunotherapy: 9.3 months vs. 2.7 months with CRP of 50 mg/L or less vs. above 50 mg/L.

Data source: A retrospective study of 99 patients.

Disclosures: Dr. Naqash reported having no disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default