Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Preexisting osteoporosis is an important risk factor for mortality risk in cancer-free postmenopausal women who go on to develop multiple myeloma, results of a recent analysis suggest.

©eranicle/Thinkstock

High fracture risk was associated with an increased risk of death, independent of other clinical risk factors, in this analysis of postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) data set.

The findings help define osteoporosis as an important prognostic factor associated with mortality in postmenopausal women who develop myeloma, according to study author Ashley E. Rosko, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus, and her colleagues.

“Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in aging adults, and very little is known on how this comorbid condition contributes to outcomes in individuals who develop myeloma,” wrote Dr. Rosko and her coauthors. Their report is in the journal Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia.

The analysis involved 362 women in the WHI data set who developed myeloma and had no history of any cancer at baseline. Women in the WHI were between 50 and 79 years of age and postmenopausal at baseline when originally recruited at 40 U.S. centers between 1993 and 1998.

Dr. Rosko and her colleagues calculated bone health for women in the data set using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), a web-based tool that calculates 10-year probability of hip and other major osteoporotic fractures.

Of the 362 women who developed myeloma, 98 were classified as having high FRAX scores, defined as a 10-year probability of 3% or greater for hip fracture, or 20% or greater for other major osteoporosis-related fractures.

With a median follow-up of 10.5 years, the adjusted risk of death was elevated in women with high FRAX scores, according to investigators, with a covariate-adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.25; P = .044) versus women with low FRAX scores.

Of the 362 patients who developed myeloma, 226 died during the follow-up period. That included 71 women with high FRAX scores, or 72% of that subset; and 155 women with low FRAX scores, or 59% of that subset, investigators reported.

These findings suggest osteoporosis is an “important comorbidity” in women who develop multiple myeloma, Dr. Rosko and her coauthors said in a discussion of the study results.

“Recognizing osteoporosis as a risk factor associated with multiple myeloma mortality is an important prognostic factor in postmenopausal women,” they said.

This investigation was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Rosko AE et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Sep;18(9):597-602.e1.

Preexisting osteoporosis is an important risk factor for mortality risk in cancer-free postmenopausal women who go on to develop multiple myeloma, results of a recent analysis suggest.

©eranicle/Thinkstock

High fracture risk was associated with an increased risk of death, independent of other clinical risk factors, in this analysis of postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) data set.

The findings help define osteoporosis as an important prognostic factor associated with mortality in postmenopausal women who develop myeloma, according to study author Ashley E. Rosko, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus, and her colleagues.

“Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in aging adults, and very little is known on how this comorbid condition contributes to outcomes in individuals who develop myeloma,” wrote Dr. Rosko and her coauthors. Their report is in the journal Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia.

The analysis involved 362 women in the WHI data set who developed myeloma and had no history of any cancer at baseline. Women in the WHI were between 50 and 79 years of age and postmenopausal at baseline when originally recruited at 40 U.S. centers between 1993 and 1998.

Dr. Rosko and her colleagues calculated bone health for women in the data set using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), a web-based tool that calculates 10-year probability of hip and other major osteoporotic fractures.

Of the 362 women who developed myeloma, 98 were classified as having high FRAX scores, defined as a 10-year probability of 3% or greater for hip fracture, or 20% or greater for other major osteoporosis-related fractures.

With a median follow-up of 10.5 years, the adjusted risk of death was elevated in women with high FRAX scores, according to investigators, with a covariate-adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.25; P = .044) versus women with low FRAX scores.

Of the 362 patients who developed myeloma, 226 died during the follow-up period. That included 71 women with high FRAX scores, or 72% of that subset; and 155 women with low FRAX scores, or 59% of that subset, investigators reported.

These findings suggest osteoporosis is an “important comorbidity” in women who develop multiple myeloma, Dr. Rosko and her coauthors said in a discussion of the study results.

“Recognizing osteoporosis as a risk factor associated with multiple myeloma mortality is an important prognostic factor in postmenopausal women,” they said.

This investigation was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Rosko AE et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Sep;18(9):597-602.e1.

Preexisting osteoporosis is an important risk factor for mortality risk in cancer-free postmenopausal women who go on to develop multiple myeloma, results of a recent analysis suggest.

©eranicle/Thinkstock

High fracture risk was associated with an increased risk of death, independent of other clinical risk factors, in this analysis of postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) data set.

The findings help define osteoporosis as an important prognostic factor associated with mortality in postmenopausal women who develop myeloma, according to study author Ashley E. Rosko, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus, and her colleagues.

“Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in aging adults, and very little is known on how this comorbid condition contributes to outcomes in individuals who develop myeloma,” wrote Dr. Rosko and her coauthors. Their report is in the journal Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia.

The analysis involved 362 women in the WHI data set who developed myeloma and had no history of any cancer at baseline. Women in the WHI were between 50 and 79 years of age and postmenopausal at baseline when originally recruited at 40 U.S. centers between 1993 and 1998.

Dr. Rosko and her colleagues calculated bone health for women in the data set using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), a web-based tool that calculates 10-year probability of hip and other major osteoporotic fractures.

Of the 362 women who developed myeloma, 98 were classified as having high FRAX scores, defined as a 10-year probability of 3% or greater for hip fracture, or 20% or greater for other major osteoporosis-related fractures.

With a median follow-up of 10.5 years, the adjusted risk of death was elevated in women with high FRAX scores, according to investigators, with a covariate-adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.25; P = .044) versus women with low FRAX scores.

Of the 362 patients who developed myeloma, 226 died during the follow-up period. That included 71 women with high FRAX scores, or 72% of that subset; and 155 women with low FRAX scores, or 59% of that subset, investigators reported.

These findings suggest osteoporosis is an “important comorbidity” in women who develop multiple myeloma, Dr. Rosko and her coauthors said in a discussion of the study results.

“Recognizing osteoporosis as a risk factor associated with multiple myeloma mortality is an important prognostic factor in postmenopausal women,” they said.

This investigation was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Rosko AE et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Sep;18(9):597-602.e1.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) in England.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that was just approved by the European Commission to treat patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

However, NICE has said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy.

Additionally, the cost of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources.

NICE’s draft guidance points out that there is no standard treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or PMBCL who have received two or more systemic therapies. These patients receive best supportive care, which usually includes salvage chemotherapy.

Results from the ZUMA-1 trial suggest the majority of DLBCL/PMBCL patients given axicabtagene ciloleucel do respond to treatment.

However, there is no direct data comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel with salvage chemotherapy, so the benefit of the CAR T-cell therapy over chemotherapy is unknown.

The draft guidance also notes that axicabtagene ciloleucel meets NICE’s criteria to be considered a life-extending treatment at the end of life.

However, the CAR T-cell therapy cannot be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources. The cost-effectiveness estimates for axicabtagene ciloleucel, compared with salvage chemotherapy, were above £50,000 per year of quality adjusted life gained, the upper limit of the specially extended range of cost-effectiveness for cancer treatments.

Furthermore, axicabtagene ciloleucel does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund. NICE said axicabtagene ciloleucel does not have the plausible potential to be cost effective, which would be necessary for inclusion in the fund while further evidence of the treatment’s longer-term benefits is collected.

“Although promising, there is still much more we need to know about CAR-T, and, unfortunately, in this case, we are not able to recommend axicabtagene ciloleucel for use in the NHS in England at the cost per patient set by Kite Pharma,” said Meindert Boysen, director of the centre for health technology evaluation at NICE.

The consultation period for the draft guidance runs until September 18, 2018.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) in England.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that was just approved by the European Commission to treat patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

However, NICE has said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy.

Additionally, the cost of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources.

NICE’s draft guidance points out that there is no standard treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or PMBCL who have received two or more systemic therapies. These patients receive best supportive care, which usually includes salvage chemotherapy.

Results from the ZUMA-1 trial suggest the majority of DLBCL/PMBCL patients given axicabtagene ciloleucel do respond to treatment.

However, there is no direct data comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel with salvage chemotherapy, so the benefit of the CAR T-cell therapy over chemotherapy is unknown.

The draft guidance also notes that axicabtagene ciloleucel meets NICE’s criteria to be considered a life-extending treatment at the end of life.

However, the CAR T-cell therapy cannot be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources. The cost-effectiveness estimates for axicabtagene ciloleucel, compared with salvage chemotherapy, were above £50,000 per year of quality adjusted life gained, the upper limit of the specially extended range of cost-effectiveness for cancer treatments.

Furthermore, axicabtagene ciloleucel does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund. NICE said axicabtagene ciloleucel does not have the plausible potential to be cost effective, which would be necessary for inclusion in the fund while further evidence of the treatment’s longer-term benefits is collected.

“Although promising, there is still much more we need to know about CAR-T, and, unfortunately, in this case, we are not able to recommend axicabtagene ciloleucel for use in the NHS in England at the cost per patient set by Kite Pharma,” said Meindert Boysen, director of the centre for health technology evaluation at NICE.

The consultation period for the draft guidance runs until September 18, 2018.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) in England.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that was just approved by the European Commission to treat patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

However, NICE has said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy.

Additionally, the cost of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources.

NICE’s draft guidance points out that there is no standard treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or PMBCL who have received two or more systemic therapies. These patients receive best supportive care, which usually includes salvage chemotherapy.

Results from the ZUMA-1 trial suggest the majority of DLBCL/PMBCL patients given axicabtagene ciloleucel do respond to treatment.

However, there is no direct data comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel with salvage chemotherapy, so the benefit of the CAR T-cell therapy over chemotherapy is unknown.

The draft guidance also notes that axicabtagene ciloleucel meets NICE’s criteria to be considered a life-extending treatment at the end of life.

However, the CAR T-cell therapy cannot be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources. The cost-effectiveness estimates for axicabtagene ciloleucel, compared with salvage chemotherapy, were above £50,000 per year of quality adjusted life gained, the upper limit of the specially extended range of cost-effectiveness for cancer treatments.

Furthermore, axicabtagene ciloleucel does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund. NICE said axicabtagene ciloleucel does not have the plausible potential to be cost effective, which would be necessary for inclusion in the fund while further evidence of the treatment’s longer-term benefits is collected.

“Although promising, there is still much more we need to know about CAR-T, and, unfortunately, in this case, we are not able to recommend axicabtagene ciloleucel for use in the NHS in England at the cost per patient set by Kite Pharma,” said Meindert Boysen, director of the centre for health technology evaluation at NICE.

The consultation period for the draft guidance runs until September 18, 2018.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Commission (EC) has approved the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta®) to treat two types of lymphoma.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC’s approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel is supported by data from the ZUMA-1 trial.

Results from this phase 2 trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published simultaneously in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 111 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. There were 101 patients who received axicabtagene ciloleucel—77 with DLBCL, 8 with PMBCL, and 16 with transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

Patients received conditioning with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel.

The objective response rate (ORR) was 82% (n=83), and the complete response (CR) rate was 54% (n=55).

Among the DLBCL patients, the ORR was 82% (63/77), and the CR rate was 49% (38/77). In the patients with PMBCL or TFL, the ORR was 83% (20/24), and the CR rate was 71% (17/24).

With a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients retained their response, and 40% retained a CR.

At 18 months, the overall survival rate was 52%. Most deaths were due to disease progression.

However, 2 patients died of adverse events related to axicabtagene ciloleucel, both cytokine release syndrome.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (78%), anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (31%).

Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome occurred in 13% of patients, and grade 3 or higher neurologic events occurred in 28%.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Commission (EC) has approved the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta®) to treat two types of lymphoma.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC’s approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel is supported by data from the ZUMA-1 trial.

Results from this phase 2 trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published simultaneously in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 111 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. There were 101 patients who received axicabtagene ciloleucel—77 with DLBCL, 8 with PMBCL, and 16 with transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

Patients received conditioning with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel.

The objective response rate (ORR) was 82% (n=83), and the complete response (CR) rate was 54% (n=55).

Among the DLBCL patients, the ORR was 82% (63/77), and the CR rate was 49% (38/77). In the patients with PMBCL or TFL, the ORR was 83% (20/24), and the CR rate was 71% (17/24).

With a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients retained their response, and 40% retained a CR.

At 18 months, the overall survival rate was 52%. Most deaths were due to disease progression.

However, 2 patients died of adverse events related to axicabtagene ciloleucel, both cytokine release syndrome.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (78%), anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (31%).

Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome occurred in 13% of patients, and grade 3 or higher neurologic events occurred in 28%.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Commission (EC) has approved the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta®) to treat two types of lymphoma.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC’s approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel is supported by data from the ZUMA-1 trial.

Results from this phase 2 trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published simultaneously in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 111 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. There were 101 patients who received axicabtagene ciloleucel—77 with DLBCL, 8 with PMBCL, and 16 with transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

Patients received conditioning with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel.

The objective response rate (ORR) was 82% (n=83), and the complete response (CR) rate was 54% (n=55).

Among the DLBCL patients, the ORR was 82% (63/77), and the CR rate was 49% (38/77). In the patients with PMBCL or TFL, the ORR was 83% (20/24), and the CR rate was 71% (17/24).

With a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients retained their response, and 40% retained a CR.

At 18 months, the overall survival rate was 52%. Most deaths were due to disease progression.

However, 2 patients died of adverse events related to axicabtagene ciloleucel, both cytokine release syndrome.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (78%), anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (31%).

Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome occurred in 13% of patients, and grade 3 or higher neurologic events occurred in 28%.

Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.

Nephron/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.

Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.

“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.

In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.

On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).

Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).

In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.

The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.

The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.

Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.

“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.

Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.

Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.

SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.

Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.

Nephron/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.

Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.

“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.

In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.

On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).

Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).

In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.

The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.

The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.

Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.

“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.

Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.

Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.

SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.

Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.

Nephron/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.

Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.

“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.

In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.

On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).

Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).

In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.

The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.

The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.

Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.

“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.

Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.

Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.

SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

jensmith@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

jensmith@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

jensmith@mdedge.com

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission (EC) has granted approval for tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post-transplant, or in second or later relapse.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The EC’s approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.

The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.

JULIET trial

Updated results from JULIET were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so due to disease progression or clinical deterioration. The patients’ median age at baseline was 56 (range, 22-76).

Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached.

At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.

For all infused patients (n=111), the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Fifteen percent of patients received tocilizumab for CRS, including 3% of patients with grade 2 CRS and 50% of patients with grade 3 CRS.

Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

ELIANA trial

Updated results from ELIANA were published in NEJM in February.

The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All 75 patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi.

All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to transplant while in remission. At last follow-up, 4 were still in remission, and 4 had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

All patients experienced at least one AE, and 95% had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The rate of grade 3/4 AEs was 88%, and the rate of related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission (EC) has granted approval for tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post-transplant, or in second or later relapse.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The EC’s approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.

The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.

JULIET trial

Updated results from JULIET were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so due to disease progression or clinical deterioration. The patients’ median age at baseline was 56 (range, 22-76).

Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached.

At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.

For all infused patients (n=111), the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Fifteen percent of patients received tocilizumab for CRS, including 3% of patients with grade 2 CRS and 50% of patients with grade 3 CRS.

Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

ELIANA trial

Updated results from ELIANA were published in NEJM in February.

The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All 75 patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi.

All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to transplant while in remission. At last follow-up, 4 were still in remission, and 4 had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

All patients experienced at least one AE, and 95% had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The rate of grade 3/4 AEs was 88%, and the rate of related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission (EC) has granted approval for tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post-transplant, or in second or later relapse.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.

The EC’s approval extends to all member countries of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.

The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.

JULIET trial

Updated results from JULIET were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so due to disease progression or clinical deterioration. The patients’ median age at baseline was 56 (range, 22-76).

Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached.

At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.

For all infused patients (n=111), the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Fifteen percent of patients received tocilizumab for CRS, including 3% of patients with grade 2 CRS and 50% of patients with grade 3 CRS.

Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

ELIANA trial

Updated results from ELIANA were published in NEJM in February.

The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All 75 patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi.

All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to transplant while in remission. At last follow-up, 4 were still in remission, and 4 had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

All patients experienced at least one AE, and 95% had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The rate of grade 3/4 AEs was 88%, and the rate of related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

This is the ninth FDA approval for ibrutinib and the second approval for the drug in WM.

The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.

Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and simultaneously published in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 150 patients. They received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively.

There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and WM.

In November 2013, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy.

In February 2014, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy. In July 2014, ibrutinib received approval for adult CLL patients with 17p deletion, and, in March 2016, ibrutinib was approved as a frontline CLL treatment.

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

In May 2016, ibrutinib was approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for adults with previously treated CLL/SLL.

In January 2017, ibrutinib was approved for adults with MZL who require systemic therapy and have received at least one prior anti-CD20-based therapy.

In August 2017, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with cGVHD that did not respond to one or more lines of systemic therapy.

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

This is the ninth FDA approval for ibrutinib and the second approval for the drug in WM.

The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.

Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and simultaneously published in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 150 patients. They received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively.

There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and WM.

In November 2013, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy.

In February 2014, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy. In July 2014, ibrutinib received approval for adult CLL patients with 17p deletion, and, in March 2016, ibrutinib was approved as a frontline CLL treatment.

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

In May 2016, ibrutinib was approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for adults with previously treated CLL/SLL.

In January 2017, ibrutinib was approved for adults with MZL who require systemic therapy and have received at least one prior anti-CD20-based therapy.

In August 2017, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with cGVHD that did not respond to one or more lines of systemic therapy.

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

This is the ninth FDA approval for ibrutinib and the second approval for the drug in WM.

The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.

Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and simultaneously published in NEJM.

The trial enrolled 150 patients. They received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively.

There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and WM.

In November 2013, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy.

In February 2014, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy. In July 2014, ibrutinib received approval for adult CLL patients with 17p deletion, and, in March 2016, ibrutinib was approved as a frontline CLL treatment.

Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.

In May 2016, ibrutinib was approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for adults with previously treated CLL/SLL.

In January 2017, ibrutinib was approved for adults with MZL who require systemic therapy and have received at least one prior anti-CD20-based therapy.

In August 2017, ibrutinib was approved to treat adults with cGVHD that did not respond to one or more lines of systemic therapy.

Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

The Food and Drug Administration has granted priority review to elotuzumab (Empliciti) for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is seeking approval for elotuzumab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone to treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

Elotuzumab is already approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to treat multiple myeloma patients who have received between one and three prior therapies.

The elotuzumab application is supported by data from ELOQUENT-3, a randomized, phase 2 study that evaluated the addition of elotuzumab to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Researchers presented findings from this study at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018.

The overall response rate was 53% in the elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (EPd) arm and 26% in the pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pd) arm. The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months in the EPd arm and 4.7 months in the Pd arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; P = .0078), the researchers reported.

The researchers also reported that adverse events in the EPd arm were consistent with expectations based on previous results with elotuzumab and pomalidomide regimens.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. The priority review typically shortens the time to an approval decision by a few months. The agency is expected to make a decision on elotuzumab by Dec. 27, 2018.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie are codeveloping elotuzumab, with Bristol-Myers Squibb solely responsible for commercial activities.

The Food and Drug Administration has granted priority review to elotuzumab (Empliciti) for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is seeking approval for elotuzumab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone to treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

Elotuzumab is already approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to treat multiple myeloma patients who have received between one and three prior therapies.

The elotuzumab application is supported by data from ELOQUENT-3, a randomized, phase 2 study that evaluated the addition of elotuzumab to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Researchers presented findings from this study at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018.

The overall response rate was 53% in the elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (EPd) arm and 26% in the pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pd) arm. The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months in the EPd arm and 4.7 months in the Pd arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; P = .0078), the researchers reported.

The researchers also reported that adverse events in the EPd arm were consistent with expectations based on previous results with elotuzumab and pomalidomide regimens.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. The priority review typically shortens the time to an approval decision by a few months. The agency is expected to make a decision on elotuzumab by Dec. 27, 2018.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie are codeveloping elotuzumab, with Bristol-Myers Squibb solely responsible for commercial activities.

The Food and Drug Administration has granted priority review to elotuzumab (Empliciti) for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is seeking approval for elotuzumab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone to treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

Elotuzumab is already approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to treat multiple myeloma patients who have received between one and three prior therapies.

The elotuzumab application is supported by data from ELOQUENT-3, a randomized, phase 2 study that evaluated the addition of elotuzumab to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Researchers presented findings from this study at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018.

The overall response rate was 53% in the elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (EPd) arm and 26% in the pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pd) arm. The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months in the EPd arm and 4.7 months in the Pd arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; P = .0078), the researchers reported.

The researchers also reported that adverse events in the EPd arm were consistent with expectations based on previous results with elotuzumab and pomalidomide regimens.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. The priority review typically shortens the time to an approval decision by a few months. The agency is expected to make a decision on elotuzumab by Dec. 27, 2018.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie are codeveloping elotuzumab, with Bristol-Myers Squibb solely responsible for commercial activities.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests cancer survivors are just as likely as people without a history of cancer to have complete mental health (CMH), which is defined as “optimal functioning” and the “absence of psychopathology.”

In a study of nearly 11,000 Canadians, 77.5% of cancer survivors and 76.8% of people with no cancer history had CMH.

As for patients who were battling cancer at the time of the study, 66.1% had CMH.

Esme Fuller-Thomson, PhD, and Keri West, both of the University of Toronto in Canada, conducted this research and reported the findings in Aging & Mental Health.

“Cancer patients were doing much better than we had expected,” Dr. Fuller-Thomson said. “Two-thirds met our very stringent criteria for complete mental health . . . . The news for cancer survivors was even better, with three-quarters living in complete mental health, which is a prevalence comparable to that of individuals with no cancer history.”

This study included a nationally representative sample of Canadian community dwellers age 50 and older. Subjects had current cancer (n=438), previous cancer (n=1174), or no cancer history (n=9279).

Data were obtained from Statistics Canada’s 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health.

To meet criteria for CMH, subjects had to have all of the following:

• Absence of mental illness, addictions, and suicidal thoughts in the past year
• Almost daily happiness or life satisfaction in the past month
• Psychosocial well-being.

The prevalence of CMH was 77.5% in cancer survivors and 76.8% in subjects who had never had cancer. Both were significantly higher than the 66.1% prevalence of CMH in current cancer patients (P<0.001).

In a multivariable model adjusted for demographics, current cancer patients had 45% lower odds of CMH compared to subjects with no cancer history (odds ratio [OR]=0.55). The odds of CMH were comparable for cancer survivors and those without a history of cancer (OR=0.98).

The researchers also conducted a multivariable analysis in which they adjusted for “all relevant factors,” which included demographics as well as adverse childhood events, socioeconomic status, health variables, lifetime mental illness, etc.

In this analysis, current cancer patients had 37% lower odds of CMH than subjects with no cancer history (OR=0.63). And cancer survivors had comparable odds of CMH as those with no cancer history (OR=1.06).

The researchers identified several factors that were associated with CMH in the population affected by cancer.

“Among those with former or current cancer, the odds of complete mental health were higher for women, white, married, and older respondents, as well as those with higher income and those who did not have disabling pain nor functional limitations,” West said.

“We found that earlier difficulties cast a long shadow. Those who had been physically abused during their childhood and those who had ever had depression or anxiety disorders were less likely to be in complete mental health.”

West and Dr Fuller-Thomson emphasized that these results are only correlational, and it is impossible to determine causality due to the cross-sectional and observational nature of the study.

The pair also said future longitudinal research is needed to improve understanding of what pathways improve resilience and recovery among cancer patients.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests cancer survivors are just as likely as people without a history of cancer to have complete mental health (CMH), which is defined as “optimal functioning” and the “absence of psychopathology.”

In a study of nearly 11,000 Canadians, 77.5% of cancer survivors and 76.8% of people with no cancer history had CMH.

As for patients who were battling cancer at the time of the study, 66.1% had CMH.

Esme Fuller-Thomson, PhD, and Keri West, both of the University of Toronto in Canada, conducted this research and reported the findings in Aging & Mental Health.

“Cancer patients were doing much better than we had expected,” Dr. Fuller-Thomson said. “Two-thirds met our very stringent criteria for complete mental health . . . . The news for cancer survivors was even better, with three-quarters living in complete mental health, which is a prevalence comparable to that of individuals with no cancer history.”

This study included a nationally representative sample of Canadian community dwellers age 50 and older. Subjects had current cancer (n=438), previous cancer (n=1174), or no cancer history (n=9279).

Data were obtained from Statistics Canada’s 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health.

To meet criteria for CMH, subjects had to have all of the following:

• Absence of mental illness, addictions, and suicidal thoughts in the past year
• Almost daily happiness or life satisfaction in the past month
• Psychosocial well-being.

The prevalence of CMH was 77.5% in cancer survivors and 76.8% in subjects who had never had cancer. Both were significantly higher than the 66.1% prevalence of CMH in current cancer patients (P<0.001).

In a multivariable model adjusted for demographics, current cancer patients had 45% lower odds of CMH compared to subjects with no cancer history (odds ratio [OR]=0.55). The odds of CMH were comparable for cancer survivors and those without a history of cancer (OR=0.98).

The researchers also conducted a multivariable analysis in which they adjusted for “all relevant factors,” which included demographics as well as adverse childhood events, socioeconomic status, health variables, lifetime mental illness, etc.

In this analysis, current cancer patients had 37% lower odds of CMH than subjects with no cancer history (OR=0.63). And cancer survivors had comparable odds of CMH as those with no cancer history (OR=1.06).

The researchers identified several factors that were associated with CMH in the population affected by cancer.

“Among those with former or current cancer, the odds of complete mental health were higher for women, white, married, and older respondents, as well as those with higher income and those who did not have disabling pain nor functional limitations,” West said.

“We found that earlier difficulties cast a long shadow. Those who had been physically abused during their childhood and those who had ever had depression or anxiety disorders were less likely to be in complete mental health.”

West and Dr Fuller-Thomson emphasized that these results are only correlational, and it is impossible to determine causality due to the cross-sectional and observational nature of the study.

The pair also said future longitudinal research is needed to improve understanding of what pathways improve resilience and recovery among cancer patients.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

New research suggests cancer survivors are just as likely as people without a history of cancer to have complete mental health (CMH), which is defined as “optimal functioning” and the “absence of psychopathology.”

In a study of nearly 11,000 Canadians, 77.5% of cancer survivors and 76.8% of people with no cancer history had CMH.

As for patients who were battling cancer at the time of the study, 66.1% had CMH.

Esme Fuller-Thomson, PhD, and Keri West, both of the University of Toronto in Canada, conducted this research and reported the findings in Aging & Mental Health.

“Cancer patients were doing much better than we had expected,” Dr. Fuller-Thomson said. “Two-thirds met our very stringent criteria for complete mental health . . . . The news for cancer survivors was even better, with three-quarters living in complete mental health, which is a prevalence comparable to that of individuals with no cancer history.”

This study included a nationally representative sample of Canadian community dwellers age 50 and older. Subjects had current cancer (n=438), previous cancer (n=1174), or no cancer history (n=9279).

Data were obtained from Statistics Canada’s 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health.

To meet criteria for CMH, subjects had to have all of the following:

• Absence of mental illness, addictions, and suicidal thoughts in the past year
• Almost daily happiness or life satisfaction in the past month
• Psychosocial well-being.

The prevalence of CMH was 77.5% in cancer survivors and 76.8% in subjects who had never had cancer. Both were significantly higher than the 66.1% prevalence of CMH in current cancer patients (P<0.001).

In a multivariable model adjusted for demographics, current cancer patients had 45% lower odds of CMH compared to subjects with no cancer history (odds ratio [OR]=0.55). The odds of CMH were comparable for cancer survivors and those without a history of cancer (OR=0.98).

The researchers also conducted a multivariable analysis in which they adjusted for “all relevant factors,” which included demographics as well as adverse childhood events, socioeconomic status, health variables, lifetime mental illness, etc.

In this analysis, current cancer patients had 37% lower odds of CMH than subjects with no cancer history (OR=0.63). And cancer survivors had comparable odds of CMH as those with no cancer history (OR=1.06).

The researchers identified several factors that were associated with CMH in the population affected by cancer.

“Among those with former or current cancer, the odds of complete mental health were higher for women, white, married, and older respondents, as well as those with higher income and those who did not have disabling pain nor functional limitations,” West said.

“We found that earlier difficulties cast a long shadow. Those who had been physically abused during their childhood and those who had ever had depression or anxiety disorders were less likely to be in complete mental health.”

West and Dr Fuller-Thomson emphasized that these results are only correlational, and it is impossible to determine causality due to the cross-sectional and observational nature of the study.

The pair also said future longitudinal research is needed to improve understanding of what pathways improve resilience and recovery among cancer patients.

Micrograph showing CLL

Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax produces a high overall response rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to research published in The Lancet Oncology.

In an ongoing, phase 2 study, researchers examined the outcomes of this treatment in 66 patients with CLL.

Patients underwent initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, received six cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax for induction, and could receive up to 24 months of maintenance with obinutuzumab and venetoclax.

Efficacy

Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) were treatment-naïve, and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.

At the end of induction, the overall response rate was 95% (60/63), with responses observed in 100% (34/34) of treatment-naive patients and 90% (26/29) of relapsed/refractory patients.

Five patients (8%) achieved complete remission (CR)—3 who were treatment-naïve and 2 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Twenty patients (32%) had a clinical CR or CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery—14 who were treatment-naïve and 6 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Thirty-five patients (56%) had a partial response—17 who were treatment-naïve and 18 with relapsed/refractory disease.

By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival were 100% among treatment-naive patients.

In the relapsed/refractory patients, progression-free survival was 83%, and overall survival was 90%.

Researchers observed minimal residual disease negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% (31/34) of treatment-naive patients and 83% (24/29) of relapsed/refractory patients. (Most patients did not have data for MRD in the bone marrow.)

Study author Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her colleagues described the efficacy of the combination as “encouraging.”

Safety

Safety data were available for all 66 patients. Of the 677 AEs, 427 (63%) were deemed related to study treatment, and 69 of these were serious AEs. Twelve patients had related, serious AEs during debulking, and 23 patients had related, serious AEs during induction.

The most common serious AEs were infections and cytopenias. There were four infections during debulking and 18 infections in 11 patients during induction. The most common infections were pneumonia and sepsis.

There were two cases of neutropenia during debulking and six cases in five patients during induction. There were four cases of thrombocytopenia in three patients during induction.

Other common treatment-related, serious AEs were:

• Infusion-related reactions—six cases during induction
• Coronary artery disorder—one case during debulking and three during induction
• Tumor lysis syndrome —one case during debulking and two during induction
• Neoplasms—two squamous cell carcinomas and one malignant melanoma during induction
• Increased creatinine—two cases during debulking.

Five patients in the relapsed/refractory group died—three of sepsis related to study treatment and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.

“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria, and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.

Micrograph showing CLL

Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax produces a high overall response rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to research published in The Lancet Oncology.

In an ongoing, phase 2 study, researchers examined the outcomes of this treatment in 66 patients with CLL.

Patients underwent initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, received six cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax for induction, and could receive up to 24 months of maintenance with obinutuzumab and venetoclax.

Efficacy

Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) were treatment-naïve, and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.

At the end of induction, the overall response rate was 95% (60/63), with responses observed in 100% (34/34) of treatment-naive patients and 90% (26/29) of relapsed/refractory patients.

Five patients (8%) achieved complete remission (CR)—3 who were treatment-naïve and 2 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Twenty patients (32%) had a clinical CR or CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery—14 who were treatment-naïve and 6 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Thirty-five patients (56%) had a partial response—17 who were treatment-naïve and 18 with relapsed/refractory disease.

By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival were 100% among treatment-naive patients.

In the relapsed/refractory patients, progression-free survival was 83%, and overall survival was 90%.

Researchers observed minimal residual disease negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% (31/34) of treatment-naive patients and 83% (24/29) of relapsed/refractory patients. (Most patients did not have data for MRD in the bone marrow.)

Study author Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her colleagues described the efficacy of the combination as “encouraging.”

Safety

Safety data were available for all 66 patients. Of the 677 AEs, 427 (63%) were deemed related to study treatment, and 69 of these were serious AEs. Twelve patients had related, serious AEs during debulking, and 23 patients had related, serious AEs during induction.

The most common serious AEs were infections and cytopenias. There were four infections during debulking and 18 infections in 11 patients during induction. The most common infections were pneumonia and sepsis.

There were two cases of neutropenia during debulking and six cases in five patients during induction. There were four cases of thrombocytopenia in three patients during induction.

Other common treatment-related, serious AEs were:

• Infusion-related reactions—six cases during induction
• Coronary artery disorder—one case during debulking and three during induction
• Tumor lysis syndrome —one case during debulking and two during induction
• Neoplasms—two squamous cell carcinomas and one malignant melanoma during induction
• Increased creatinine—two cases during debulking.

Five patients in the relapsed/refractory group died—three of sepsis related to study treatment and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.

“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria, and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.

Micrograph showing CLL

Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax produces a high overall response rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to research published in The Lancet Oncology.

In an ongoing, phase 2 study, researchers examined the outcomes of this treatment in 66 patients with CLL.

Patients underwent initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, received six cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax for induction, and could receive up to 24 months of maintenance with obinutuzumab and venetoclax.

Efficacy

Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) were treatment-naïve, and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.

At the end of induction, the overall response rate was 95% (60/63), with responses observed in 100% (34/34) of treatment-naive patients and 90% (26/29) of relapsed/refractory patients.

Five patients (8%) achieved complete remission (CR)—3 who were treatment-naïve and 2 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Twenty patients (32%) had a clinical CR or CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery—14 who were treatment-naïve and 6 with relapsed/refractory disease.

Thirty-five patients (56%) had a partial response—17 who were treatment-naïve and 18 with relapsed/refractory disease.

By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival were 100% among treatment-naive patients.

In the relapsed/refractory patients, progression-free survival was 83%, and overall survival was 90%.

Researchers observed minimal residual disease negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% (31/34) of treatment-naive patients and 83% (24/29) of relapsed/refractory patients. (Most patients did not have data for MRD in the bone marrow.)

Study author Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her colleagues described the efficacy of the combination as “encouraging.”

Safety

Safety data were available for all 66 patients. Of the 677 AEs, 427 (63%) were deemed related to study treatment, and 69 of these were serious AEs. Twelve patients had related, serious AEs during debulking, and 23 patients had related, serious AEs during induction.

The most common serious AEs were infections and cytopenias. There were four infections during debulking and 18 infections in 11 patients during induction. The most common infections were pneumonia and sepsis.

There were two cases of neutropenia during debulking and six cases in five patients during induction. There were four cases of thrombocytopenia in three patients during induction.

Other common treatment-related, serious AEs were:

• Infusion-related reactions—six cases during induction
• Coronary artery disorder—one case during debulking and three during induction
• Tumor lysis syndrome —one case during debulking and two during induction
• Neoplasms—two squamous cell carcinomas and one malignant melanoma during induction
• Increased creatinine—two cases during debulking.

Five patients in the relapsed/refractory group died—three of sepsis related to study treatment and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.

“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria, and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.