User login
Teletriage cut dermatology wait times ninefold for patients at a free clinic
PORTLAND – For uninsured patients with limited health care access, a teledermatology triage protocol cut average appointment wait times by ninefold, and usually provided adequate dermatologic care without the need for in-person follow-up, Peter B. Chansky reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.
“In our study, teledermatology was sufficient to triage 70% of cases, which significantly reduced time to evaluation, increased the availability of in-person appointments, and provided a new chance for volunteer dermatologists to serve disadvantaged populations that do not have access to specialty providers,” Mr. Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said during an oral presentation of his poster.
Puentes de Salud is a nonprofit, multidisciplinary health care clinic that serves uninsured Latino immigrants in southern Philadelphia, explained Mr. Chansky, who conducted the study under the mentorship of Jules B. Lipoff, MD, of the department of dermatology, at the University of Pennsylvania. Volunteer dermatologists hold a clinic at Puentes de Salud once per month, but patients’ need substantially outpaces supply, which has fueled long wait times and delays in care.
To test an alternative, the volunteer dermatologists created a “teletriage” system for primary care providers to turn to first, before attempting to schedule in-person dermatology appointments at Puentes de Salud. The results were striking: Teledermatology cut average wait times by a factor of 9.3, and patients who typically had gone months with unevaluated skin lesions waited an average of 1.4 days (standard deviation, 3.1 days) for a teledermatology consult, instead of 13.4 days (SD, 1.9 days) for an in-person appointment (P less than .0001).
Just as notably, teledermatologists changed or expanded on 70% of primary care providers’ diagnoses and altered their treatment plans 95% of the time. “Teledermatology also reclaimed 18% of monthly in-person clinic appointments for patients who needed face-to-face consultation,” Mr. Chansky said. “Access to dermatologic care is especially limited among uninsured patients, and using teledermatology to triage patients in a volunteer free clinic has never been evaluated,” he noted.
The analysis included 60 teletriage referrals from nurses and physicians over 2.5 years. Patients were usually male, averaged 32 years in age, and reported an average symptom duration of 15 months. Most lesions had not previously been treated. Cases were usually inflammatory in nature (45%), while 18% were neoplastic, 17% were infectious, and 8% were pigmented lesions. Lesions were usually located on visible areas of skin, including the face, hands, and arms.
This protocol relied on volunteer dermatologists, but teletriage repeatedly has been shown to provide effective dermatologic care in a variety of health care settings, Mr. Chansky noted. “Teledermatology is an accurate, cost-effective, and efficient tool for improving access to dermatologic care,” he added.
Mr. Chansky did not acknowledge external funding sources and had no conflicts of interest.
PORTLAND – For uninsured patients with limited health care access, a teledermatology triage protocol cut average appointment wait times by ninefold, and usually provided adequate dermatologic care without the need for in-person follow-up, Peter B. Chansky reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.
“In our study, teledermatology was sufficient to triage 70% of cases, which significantly reduced time to evaluation, increased the availability of in-person appointments, and provided a new chance for volunteer dermatologists to serve disadvantaged populations that do not have access to specialty providers,” Mr. Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said during an oral presentation of his poster.
Puentes de Salud is a nonprofit, multidisciplinary health care clinic that serves uninsured Latino immigrants in southern Philadelphia, explained Mr. Chansky, who conducted the study under the mentorship of Jules B. Lipoff, MD, of the department of dermatology, at the University of Pennsylvania. Volunteer dermatologists hold a clinic at Puentes de Salud once per month, but patients’ need substantially outpaces supply, which has fueled long wait times and delays in care.
To test an alternative, the volunteer dermatologists created a “teletriage” system for primary care providers to turn to first, before attempting to schedule in-person dermatology appointments at Puentes de Salud. The results were striking: Teledermatology cut average wait times by a factor of 9.3, and patients who typically had gone months with unevaluated skin lesions waited an average of 1.4 days (standard deviation, 3.1 days) for a teledermatology consult, instead of 13.4 days (SD, 1.9 days) for an in-person appointment (P less than .0001).
Just as notably, teledermatologists changed or expanded on 70% of primary care providers’ diagnoses and altered their treatment plans 95% of the time. “Teledermatology also reclaimed 18% of monthly in-person clinic appointments for patients who needed face-to-face consultation,” Mr. Chansky said. “Access to dermatologic care is especially limited among uninsured patients, and using teledermatology to triage patients in a volunteer free clinic has never been evaluated,” he noted.
The analysis included 60 teletriage referrals from nurses and physicians over 2.5 years. Patients were usually male, averaged 32 years in age, and reported an average symptom duration of 15 months. Most lesions had not previously been treated. Cases were usually inflammatory in nature (45%), while 18% were neoplastic, 17% were infectious, and 8% were pigmented lesions. Lesions were usually located on visible areas of skin, including the face, hands, and arms.
This protocol relied on volunteer dermatologists, but teletriage repeatedly has been shown to provide effective dermatologic care in a variety of health care settings, Mr. Chansky noted. “Teledermatology is an accurate, cost-effective, and efficient tool for improving access to dermatologic care,” he added.
Mr. Chansky did not acknowledge external funding sources and had no conflicts of interest.
PORTLAND – For uninsured patients with limited health care access, a teledermatology triage protocol cut average appointment wait times by ninefold, and usually provided adequate dermatologic care without the need for in-person follow-up, Peter B. Chansky reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.
“In our study, teledermatology was sufficient to triage 70% of cases, which significantly reduced time to evaluation, increased the availability of in-person appointments, and provided a new chance for volunteer dermatologists to serve disadvantaged populations that do not have access to specialty providers,” Mr. Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said during an oral presentation of his poster.
Puentes de Salud is a nonprofit, multidisciplinary health care clinic that serves uninsured Latino immigrants in southern Philadelphia, explained Mr. Chansky, who conducted the study under the mentorship of Jules B. Lipoff, MD, of the department of dermatology, at the University of Pennsylvania. Volunteer dermatologists hold a clinic at Puentes de Salud once per month, but patients’ need substantially outpaces supply, which has fueled long wait times and delays in care.
To test an alternative, the volunteer dermatologists created a “teletriage” system for primary care providers to turn to first, before attempting to schedule in-person dermatology appointments at Puentes de Salud. The results were striking: Teledermatology cut average wait times by a factor of 9.3, and patients who typically had gone months with unevaluated skin lesions waited an average of 1.4 days (standard deviation, 3.1 days) for a teledermatology consult, instead of 13.4 days (SD, 1.9 days) for an in-person appointment (P less than .0001).
Just as notably, teledermatologists changed or expanded on 70% of primary care providers’ diagnoses and altered their treatment plans 95% of the time. “Teledermatology also reclaimed 18% of monthly in-person clinic appointments for patients who needed face-to-face consultation,” Mr. Chansky said. “Access to dermatologic care is especially limited among uninsured patients, and using teledermatology to triage patients in a volunteer free clinic has never been evaluated,” he noted.
The analysis included 60 teletriage referrals from nurses and physicians over 2.5 years. Patients were usually male, averaged 32 years in age, and reported an average symptom duration of 15 months. Most lesions had not previously been treated. Cases were usually inflammatory in nature (45%), while 18% were neoplastic, 17% were infectious, and 8% were pigmented lesions. Lesions were usually located on visible areas of skin, including the face, hands, and arms.
This protocol relied on volunteer dermatologists, but teletriage repeatedly has been shown to provide effective dermatologic care in a variety of health care settings, Mr. Chansky noted. “Teledermatology is an accurate, cost-effective, and efficient tool for improving access to dermatologic care,” he added.
Mr. Chansky did not acknowledge external funding sources and had no conflicts of interest.
AT SID 2017
Key clinical point: For uninsured patients with limited health care access, teledermatology triage protocol can significantly cut appointment wait times and usually obviates the need for in-person follow-up.
Major finding: Teledermatology triage cut average appointment wait times by a factor of 9.3, and 70% of patients did not need additional in-person care.
Data source: An analysis of 60 referrals to teletriage over 2.5 years, among patients seen at a free clinic in Philadelphia.
Disclosures: Mr. Chansky did not acknowledge external funding sources, and had no conflicts of interest.
6MWTs improved following online pulmonary rehab
WASHINGTON – An online pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not inferior to an in-person program, according to study findings presented at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society, Tuesday.
In a walking test conducted after all patients completed a 7-week program, participants in the online program, on average, increased their 6MWT (6-minute walking test) score by 23.8 m (P = .098) from baseline; this amount of improvement is much greater than the noninferiority threshold for this study. COPD assessment, hospital anxiety, respiratory function, and modified medical research council dyspnea scores of patients who participated in the online program were also not inferior to the scores of patients who participated in the in-person program.
If found to be a viable option, online options for COPD patients could be useful for treatment in those who would otherwise not have access to in-person rehabilitation sessions, said Tom Wilkinson, MD, PhD, of the University of Southhampton (England), in his presentation.
“The challenges for patients with COPD are quite real; there are factors which are limiting the access of treatments ... in the way of geography of where our patients live,” said Dr. Wilkinson. “[Also] some patients may be housebound or have social anxiety but would benefit from using programs more regularly.”
The study’s 90 participants were assigned to participate either in an online program designed as an in-home guide for pulmonary rehabilitation or in pulmonary rehabilitation sessions at a local facility, after a baseline 6-minute walking test, according to Dr. Wilkinson.
The average age of patients participating in the face-to-face program was 71 years, while the average age for the online group was 69 years. Both groups were predominantly male and former smokers.
Investigators designed the online program to mimic face-to-face sessions by integrating advice on exercises, and information about a patient’s condition, into the program. While the online program included five sessions per week of either exercise or education, the program for patients in the control group involved two facility sessions per week.
Dr. Wilkinson said the online form of rehabilitation used in this study would not only benefit patients, but would help hospitals financially.
An online application could be a helpful supplement for facilities that do not have the resources to hire additional workers or do not have the proper facility to conduct these sessions, he added.
Attendees expressed concern that the learning curve of an online platform could make participating in the program difficult for COPD patients.
Dr. Wilkinson said he and his team had taken that potential learning curve into account when designing the program, by including digital literacy programs and a service hotline.
This study was funded by a grant awarded through the U.K. small business research initiative. The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @eaztweets
WASHINGTON – An online pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not inferior to an in-person program, according to study findings presented at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society, Tuesday.
In a walking test conducted after all patients completed a 7-week program, participants in the online program, on average, increased their 6MWT (6-minute walking test) score by 23.8 m (P = .098) from baseline; this amount of improvement is much greater than the noninferiority threshold for this study. COPD assessment, hospital anxiety, respiratory function, and modified medical research council dyspnea scores of patients who participated in the online program were also not inferior to the scores of patients who participated in the in-person program.
If found to be a viable option, online options for COPD patients could be useful for treatment in those who would otherwise not have access to in-person rehabilitation sessions, said Tom Wilkinson, MD, PhD, of the University of Southhampton (England), in his presentation.
“The challenges for patients with COPD are quite real; there are factors which are limiting the access of treatments ... in the way of geography of where our patients live,” said Dr. Wilkinson. “[Also] some patients may be housebound or have social anxiety but would benefit from using programs more regularly.”
The study’s 90 participants were assigned to participate either in an online program designed as an in-home guide for pulmonary rehabilitation or in pulmonary rehabilitation sessions at a local facility, after a baseline 6-minute walking test, according to Dr. Wilkinson.
The average age of patients participating in the face-to-face program was 71 years, while the average age for the online group was 69 years. Both groups were predominantly male and former smokers.
Investigators designed the online program to mimic face-to-face sessions by integrating advice on exercises, and information about a patient’s condition, into the program. While the online program included five sessions per week of either exercise or education, the program for patients in the control group involved two facility sessions per week.
Dr. Wilkinson said the online form of rehabilitation used in this study would not only benefit patients, but would help hospitals financially.
An online application could be a helpful supplement for facilities that do not have the resources to hire additional workers or do not have the proper facility to conduct these sessions, he added.
Attendees expressed concern that the learning curve of an online platform could make participating in the program difficult for COPD patients.
Dr. Wilkinson said he and his team had taken that potential learning curve into account when designing the program, by including digital literacy programs and a service hotline.
This study was funded by a grant awarded through the U.K. small business research initiative. The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @eaztweets
WASHINGTON – An online pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not inferior to an in-person program, according to study findings presented at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society, Tuesday.
In a walking test conducted after all patients completed a 7-week program, participants in the online program, on average, increased their 6MWT (6-minute walking test) score by 23.8 m (P = .098) from baseline; this amount of improvement is much greater than the noninferiority threshold for this study. COPD assessment, hospital anxiety, respiratory function, and modified medical research council dyspnea scores of patients who participated in the online program were also not inferior to the scores of patients who participated in the in-person program.
If found to be a viable option, online options for COPD patients could be useful for treatment in those who would otherwise not have access to in-person rehabilitation sessions, said Tom Wilkinson, MD, PhD, of the University of Southhampton (England), in his presentation.
“The challenges for patients with COPD are quite real; there are factors which are limiting the access of treatments ... in the way of geography of where our patients live,” said Dr. Wilkinson. “[Also] some patients may be housebound or have social anxiety but would benefit from using programs more regularly.”
The study’s 90 participants were assigned to participate either in an online program designed as an in-home guide for pulmonary rehabilitation or in pulmonary rehabilitation sessions at a local facility, after a baseline 6-minute walking test, according to Dr. Wilkinson.
The average age of patients participating in the face-to-face program was 71 years, while the average age for the online group was 69 years. Both groups were predominantly male and former smokers.
Investigators designed the online program to mimic face-to-face sessions by integrating advice on exercises, and information about a patient’s condition, into the program. While the online program included five sessions per week of either exercise or education, the program for patients in the control group involved two facility sessions per week.
Dr. Wilkinson said the online form of rehabilitation used in this study would not only benefit patients, but would help hospitals financially.
An online application could be a helpful supplement for facilities that do not have the resources to hire additional workers or do not have the proper facility to conduct these sessions, he added.
Attendees expressed concern that the learning curve of an online platform could make participating in the program difficult for COPD patients.
Dr. Wilkinson said he and his team had taken that potential learning curve into account when designing the program, by including digital literacy programs and a service hotline.
This study was funded by a grant awarded through the U.K. small business research initiative. The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @eaztweets
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The 6-minute walking test scores for patients participating in an online pulmonary rehabilitation program improved by 23.8 m, on average (P = .098).
Data source: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial of 90 patients conducted through the Portsmouth Hospital.
Disclosures: This study was funded by a grant awarded through the U.K. small business research initiative. Investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Inpatient prenatal yoga found feasible for high-risk women
AT ACOG 2017
SAN DIEGO – Inpatient prenatal yoga is a feasible and acceptable intervention for high-risk women admitted to the hospital, results from a single-center study suggested.
“We know that outside of obstetrics, yoga is beneficial to stress relief, musculoskeletal pain, and sleep quality,” Veronica Demtchouk, MD, said in an interview at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “Inpatient high-risk obstetrics patients have very limited physical activity that they feel is safe to do.”
In an effort to investigate the feasibility of establishing an inpatient prenatal yoga program, the researchers recruited 40 women with anticipated admission to the antepartum service for at least 72 hours and who received medical clearance from their primary obstetrician. One of the medical center’s nurse practitioners, who is also a certified yoga instructor, taught a 30-minute prenatal yoga session once a week in a waiting room.
“It was a large enough space; we moved away the furniture and did the yoga sessions there,” Dr. Demtchouk said.
Study participants completed a questionnaire after each yoga session and at hospital discharge, while 14 nurses completed questionnaires regarding patient care and patient satisfaction. Of the 40 patients, 16 completed one or more yoga sessions; 24 did not participate because of scheduling conflicts with ultrasound or fetal testing, change in clinical status, lack of interest on the day of the session, and delivery or discharge prior to the yoga session.
Of the 16 study participants, 8 reported a decreased level of stress, 4 reported better sleep, 4 reported applying the yoga techniques outside of class, and 3 reported decreased pain/discomfort.
“Not a single woman complained or was displeased with the yoga sessions,” Dr. Demtchouk said. “The biggest challenge was the timing of the yoga session. It was just once a week, which limited the number of women who could attend.”
Of the 14 nurses who completed questionnaires, all viewed yoga as beneficial to their patients, none found it disruptive to providing patient care, and all indicated they would recommend an inpatient prenatal yoga program to other hospitals with an antepartum service.
“I think having several sessions throughout the week is essential for having adequate patient participation,” Dr. Demtchouk added. “It’s essential to have the nurses on board with it.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
AT ACOG 2017
SAN DIEGO – Inpatient prenatal yoga is a feasible and acceptable intervention for high-risk women admitted to the hospital, results from a single-center study suggested.
“We know that outside of obstetrics, yoga is beneficial to stress relief, musculoskeletal pain, and sleep quality,” Veronica Demtchouk, MD, said in an interview at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “Inpatient high-risk obstetrics patients have very limited physical activity that they feel is safe to do.”
In an effort to investigate the feasibility of establishing an inpatient prenatal yoga program, the researchers recruited 40 women with anticipated admission to the antepartum service for at least 72 hours and who received medical clearance from their primary obstetrician. One of the medical center’s nurse practitioners, who is also a certified yoga instructor, taught a 30-minute prenatal yoga session once a week in a waiting room.
“It was a large enough space; we moved away the furniture and did the yoga sessions there,” Dr. Demtchouk said.
Study participants completed a questionnaire after each yoga session and at hospital discharge, while 14 nurses completed questionnaires regarding patient care and patient satisfaction. Of the 40 patients, 16 completed one or more yoga sessions; 24 did not participate because of scheduling conflicts with ultrasound or fetal testing, change in clinical status, lack of interest on the day of the session, and delivery or discharge prior to the yoga session.
Of the 16 study participants, 8 reported a decreased level of stress, 4 reported better sleep, 4 reported applying the yoga techniques outside of class, and 3 reported decreased pain/discomfort.
“Not a single woman complained or was displeased with the yoga sessions,” Dr. Demtchouk said. “The biggest challenge was the timing of the yoga session. It was just once a week, which limited the number of women who could attend.”
Of the 14 nurses who completed questionnaires, all viewed yoga as beneficial to their patients, none found it disruptive to providing patient care, and all indicated they would recommend an inpatient prenatal yoga program to other hospitals with an antepartum service.
“I think having several sessions throughout the week is essential for having adequate patient participation,” Dr. Demtchouk added. “It’s essential to have the nurses on board with it.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
AT ACOG 2017
SAN DIEGO – Inpatient prenatal yoga is a feasible and acceptable intervention for high-risk women admitted to the hospital, results from a single-center study suggested.
“We know that outside of obstetrics, yoga is beneficial to stress relief, musculoskeletal pain, and sleep quality,” Veronica Demtchouk, MD, said in an interview at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “Inpatient high-risk obstetrics patients have very limited physical activity that they feel is safe to do.”
In an effort to investigate the feasibility of establishing an inpatient prenatal yoga program, the researchers recruited 40 women with anticipated admission to the antepartum service for at least 72 hours and who received medical clearance from their primary obstetrician. One of the medical center’s nurse practitioners, who is also a certified yoga instructor, taught a 30-minute prenatal yoga session once a week in a waiting room.
“It was a large enough space; we moved away the furniture and did the yoga sessions there,” Dr. Demtchouk said.
Study participants completed a questionnaire after each yoga session and at hospital discharge, while 14 nurses completed questionnaires regarding patient care and patient satisfaction. Of the 40 patients, 16 completed one or more yoga sessions; 24 did not participate because of scheduling conflicts with ultrasound or fetal testing, change in clinical status, lack of interest on the day of the session, and delivery or discharge prior to the yoga session.
Of the 16 study participants, 8 reported a decreased level of stress, 4 reported better sleep, 4 reported applying the yoga techniques outside of class, and 3 reported decreased pain/discomfort.
“Not a single woman complained or was displeased with the yoga sessions,” Dr. Demtchouk said. “The biggest challenge was the timing of the yoga session. It was just once a week, which limited the number of women who could attend.”
Of the 14 nurses who completed questionnaires, all viewed yoga as beneficial to their patients, none found it disruptive to providing patient care, and all indicated they would recommend an inpatient prenatal yoga program to other hospitals with an antepartum service.
“I think having several sessions throughout the week is essential for having adequate patient participation,” Dr. Demtchouk added. “It’s essential to have the nurses on board with it.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Of the 16 study participants, 8 reported a decreased level of stress, 4 reported better sleep, 4 reported applying the yoga techniques outside of class, and 3 reported decreased pain/discomfort.
Data source: A feasibility study of 16 hospitalized high-risk pregnant women.
Disclosures: Dr. Demtchouk reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
AAP advises against giving fruit juice to children under 1 year
according to a 2017 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Committee on Nutrition.
In addition, no more than 4 ounces of fruit juice per day should be given to toddlers aged 1-3 years, and no more than 4-6 ounces to children aged 4-6 years. For children aged 7-18 years, fruit juice intake should be limited to 8 ounces (Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139[6]:e20170967).
In fact, the AAP recommends that human milk be the only nutrient for infants up to 6 months of age, or a prepared infant formula for mothers who cannot breastfeed or choose not to breastfeed their infants. In a study of 168 children aged either 2 years or 5 years, consumption of 12 fluid ounces or more per day of fruit juice was associated with short stature and with obesity (Pediatrics. 1997 Jan;99[1]:15-22).
If toddlers are given fruit juice, it should be in a cup rather that a bottle, sippy cup, or box of juice that they can carry around for long periods. Also, infants and toddlers should not be put to bed with a bottle of fruit juice, according to the statement. Prolonged exposure of the teeth to the sugars in juice can result in dental caries.
Fruit juice is sometime erroneously used instead of oral electrolyte solutions to rehydrate infants and young children with gastroenteritis or diarrhea, but the high carbohydrate content of fruit juice “may exceed the intestine’s ability to absorb carbohydrate, resulting in carbohydrate malabsorption. Carbohydrate malabsorption causes osmotic diarrhea, increasing the severity of the diarrhea already present,” according to the statement. Also, if fruit juice is used to replace fluid losses in infants, it may cause hyponatremia.
There are several medical conditions in which it is prudent to determine how much fruit juice is being consumed:
- Overnutrition or undernutrition.
- Chronic diarrhea, excessive flatulence, abdominal pain, and bloating.
- Dental caries.
- Poor or excessive weight gain.
Fruit juice is viewed by parents as nutritious, but toddlers and young children should be encouraged to eat whole fruit instead.
“We know that excessive fruit juice can lead to excessive weight gain and tooth decay,” coauthor Steven A. Abrams, MD, of the University of Texas, Austin, said in a press release. “Pediatricians have a lot of information to share with families on how to provide the proper balance of fresh fruit within their child’s diet.”
The authors said they had no relevant financial conflicts.
The AAP’s new policy statement regarding limiting juice consumption has potential to make a big difference in the prevention of two largely preventable diseases – obesity and dental caries. Recognizing that obesity and dental caries are silent epidemics in the United States, and that overconsumption of sugar is a common risk factor for both of these diseases, the AAP’s new policy statement is overdue. Fruit juice has as much sugar as soda drinks, yet parents feel it is a healthy drink alternative because juice comes from fruit. Parents often introduce juice to their children at a very young age and serve them more juice than is needed. Also, young children commonly consume juice in a sippy cup or bottle, which can lead to dental decay, because the frequent sipping of the juice fuels the acid-producing bacteria that contribute to enamel erosion.
As pediatricians, my colleagues and I are challenged to help children maintain a healthy weight and healthy mouths, and we have long battled the early introduction and overconsumption of juice. Medical and dental health care professionals, along with public health programs, can rally around this new policy statement.
Patricia Braun, MD, is a professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and a practicing pediatrician at Denver Health. She had no conflicts of interest.
The AAP’s new policy statement regarding limiting juice consumption has potential to make a big difference in the prevention of two largely preventable diseases – obesity and dental caries. Recognizing that obesity and dental caries are silent epidemics in the United States, and that overconsumption of sugar is a common risk factor for both of these diseases, the AAP’s new policy statement is overdue. Fruit juice has as much sugar as soda drinks, yet parents feel it is a healthy drink alternative because juice comes from fruit. Parents often introduce juice to their children at a very young age and serve them more juice than is needed. Also, young children commonly consume juice in a sippy cup or bottle, which can lead to dental decay, because the frequent sipping of the juice fuels the acid-producing bacteria that contribute to enamel erosion.
As pediatricians, my colleagues and I are challenged to help children maintain a healthy weight and healthy mouths, and we have long battled the early introduction and overconsumption of juice. Medical and dental health care professionals, along with public health programs, can rally around this new policy statement.
Patricia Braun, MD, is a professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and a practicing pediatrician at Denver Health. She had no conflicts of interest.
The AAP’s new policy statement regarding limiting juice consumption has potential to make a big difference in the prevention of two largely preventable diseases – obesity and dental caries. Recognizing that obesity and dental caries are silent epidemics in the United States, and that overconsumption of sugar is a common risk factor for both of these diseases, the AAP’s new policy statement is overdue. Fruit juice has as much sugar as soda drinks, yet parents feel it is a healthy drink alternative because juice comes from fruit. Parents often introduce juice to their children at a very young age and serve them more juice than is needed. Also, young children commonly consume juice in a sippy cup or bottle, which can lead to dental decay, because the frequent sipping of the juice fuels the acid-producing bacteria that contribute to enamel erosion.
As pediatricians, my colleagues and I are challenged to help children maintain a healthy weight and healthy mouths, and we have long battled the early introduction and overconsumption of juice. Medical and dental health care professionals, along with public health programs, can rally around this new policy statement.
Patricia Braun, MD, is a professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and a practicing pediatrician at Denver Health. She had no conflicts of interest.
according to a 2017 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Committee on Nutrition.
In addition, no more than 4 ounces of fruit juice per day should be given to toddlers aged 1-3 years, and no more than 4-6 ounces to children aged 4-6 years. For children aged 7-18 years, fruit juice intake should be limited to 8 ounces (Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139[6]:e20170967).
In fact, the AAP recommends that human milk be the only nutrient for infants up to 6 months of age, or a prepared infant formula for mothers who cannot breastfeed or choose not to breastfeed their infants. In a study of 168 children aged either 2 years or 5 years, consumption of 12 fluid ounces or more per day of fruit juice was associated with short stature and with obesity (Pediatrics. 1997 Jan;99[1]:15-22).
If toddlers are given fruit juice, it should be in a cup rather that a bottle, sippy cup, or box of juice that they can carry around for long periods. Also, infants and toddlers should not be put to bed with a bottle of fruit juice, according to the statement. Prolonged exposure of the teeth to the sugars in juice can result in dental caries.
Fruit juice is sometime erroneously used instead of oral electrolyte solutions to rehydrate infants and young children with gastroenteritis or diarrhea, but the high carbohydrate content of fruit juice “may exceed the intestine’s ability to absorb carbohydrate, resulting in carbohydrate malabsorption. Carbohydrate malabsorption causes osmotic diarrhea, increasing the severity of the diarrhea already present,” according to the statement. Also, if fruit juice is used to replace fluid losses in infants, it may cause hyponatremia.
There are several medical conditions in which it is prudent to determine how much fruit juice is being consumed:
- Overnutrition or undernutrition.
- Chronic diarrhea, excessive flatulence, abdominal pain, and bloating.
- Dental caries.
- Poor or excessive weight gain.
Fruit juice is viewed by parents as nutritious, but toddlers and young children should be encouraged to eat whole fruit instead.
“We know that excessive fruit juice can lead to excessive weight gain and tooth decay,” coauthor Steven A. Abrams, MD, of the University of Texas, Austin, said in a press release. “Pediatricians have a lot of information to share with families on how to provide the proper balance of fresh fruit within their child’s diet.”
The authors said they had no relevant financial conflicts.
according to a 2017 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Committee on Nutrition.
In addition, no more than 4 ounces of fruit juice per day should be given to toddlers aged 1-3 years, and no more than 4-6 ounces to children aged 4-6 years. For children aged 7-18 years, fruit juice intake should be limited to 8 ounces (Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139[6]:e20170967).
In fact, the AAP recommends that human milk be the only nutrient for infants up to 6 months of age, or a prepared infant formula for mothers who cannot breastfeed or choose not to breastfeed their infants. In a study of 168 children aged either 2 years or 5 years, consumption of 12 fluid ounces or more per day of fruit juice was associated with short stature and with obesity (Pediatrics. 1997 Jan;99[1]:15-22).
If toddlers are given fruit juice, it should be in a cup rather that a bottle, sippy cup, or box of juice that they can carry around for long periods. Also, infants and toddlers should not be put to bed with a bottle of fruit juice, according to the statement. Prolonged exposure of the teeth to the sugars in juice can result in dental caries.
Fruit juice is sometime erroneously used instead of oral electrolyte solutions to rehydrate infants and young children with gastroenteritis or diarrhea, but the high carbohydrate content of fruit juice “may exceed the intestine’s ability to absorb carbohydrate, resulting in carbohydrate malabsorption. Carbohydrate malabsorption causes osmotic diarrhea, increasing the severity of the diarrhea already present,” according to the statement. Also, if fruit juice is used to replace fluid losses in infants, it may cause hyponatremia.
There are several medical conditions in which it is prudent to determine how much fruit juice is being consumed:
- Overnutrition or undernutrition.
- Chronic diarrhea, excessive flatulence, abdominal pain, and bloating.
- Dental caries.
- Poor or excessive weight gain.
Fruit juice is viewed by parents as nutritious, but toddlers and young children should be encouraged to eat whole fruit instead.
“We know that excessive fruit juice can lead to excessive weight gain and tooth decay,” coauthor Steven A. Abrams, MD, of the University of Texas, Austin, said in a press release. “Pediatricians have a lot of information to share with families on how to provide the proper balance of fresh fruit within their child’s diet.”
The authors said they had no relevant financial conflicts.
Making sense of MACRA: MIPS and Advanced APMs
Several months into 2017, physicians around the country are preparing for the first benchmark year of MACRA, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. Passed in 2015, MACRA is the bipartisan health care law responsible for eliminating the Sustainable Growth Rate and it promises to continue to fundamentally alter the way providers are paid. This year determines reimbursement in 2019.
Under the law, physicians must report performance under one of two pathways: MIPS, the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, or participation in a qualified Advanced Alternative Payment Model, or Advanced APM. The first, MIPS, replaces the Physician Quality Reporting System, Meaningful Use and the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier and is the track most providers can expect to follow, at least initially, because most will not meet the requirements for Advanced APMs.1,2
This is especially true for hospitalists, most of whom are not yet participating in qualifying alternative payment models.2
The MIPS track is budget neutral, which means for every physician or physician group that receives a boost in reimbursement, another will receive a cut. Others will receive a neutral adjustment. All physicians see an annual 0.5% increase in payment between 2016 and 2019 and MIPS clinicians receive a 0.25% annual boost starting in 2026. Providers participating in Advanced APMs will also receive an annual 5% payment bonus between 2019 and 2024, and a 0.75% annual increase in payments beginning in 2026.1
Both pathways are complex and will affect different clinicians in unique ways, particularly hospitalists.
Some health policy experts, like Robert Berenson, MD, FACP, Institute Fellow of the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, say MACRA could actually drive more hospitalists into employment to avoid the costs associated with complying with the law.
Regardless, there is much about MACRA that hospitalists should familiarize themselves with this year. The CMS has announced 2018 will also be a transition year and, as such, additional rules are forthcoming.
Here is what to know for now:
MIPS
All providers who receive Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments and do not participate in an Advanced APM will fall into MIPS, and reporting applies to all patients, not just Medicare beneficiaries.3 There are, however, exemptions: providers in their first year of Medicare, those billing Medicare Part B less than $30,000 annually, and those who see 100 or fewer Medicare patients.4
Under MIPS, physicians are scored on a scale of 1 to 100 based on performance across four weighted categories: Quality (60%), Advancing Care Information (25%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Cost (not included for 2017). Hospitalists who provide 75% or more of their services in hospital inpatient or outpatient settings, or in the emergency department, are exempt from Advancing Care Information, which replaced meaningful use. As a result, the Quality category will make up 85% of the overall score in 2017.
The CMS also announced added flexibility for 2017 with regard to reporting under MIPS, intended to give providers who need it extra time to prepare.5 Physicians and physician groups can report for a full year, starting January 1, 2017, or report for just 90 days, to be eligible for a positive payment adjustment. To avoid a negative adjustment, they can simply submit more than one quality measure, improvement activity, or advancing care information measure (for those not exempt). Or, providers can choose to report nothing and incur a negative 4% payment.
The approach to MIPS in 2017 will vary widely among SHM members, said Joshua Boswell, SHM’s director of government relations.
“Some are looking to do just the bare minimum, not because of their lack of readiness, but for at least this year, to avoid the time, resources, and cost associated with reporting.” he said. “Other groups are considering jumping in with both feet and fully reporting, their thinking being that they can’t lose, and if there is money on the table for high performers, they might as well go for it.”
For 2017, providers who score 70 or more points are eligible for a performance bonus, drawn from a $500 million pool set aside by CMS. The minimum point threshold defined by CMS is three, which a clinician can earn by submitting just one of the six required quality measures.4
“We’re working to ensure the program is structured so that providers can confidently report on just the measures applicable to them, even if it’s fewer than six,” he said. To ensure physicians are not penalized or disadvantaged for being unable to report the required number of measures, Dr. Greeno said CMS is working to develop a validation test, though it has not yet released details.
The measures most applicable to hospitalists include two related to heart failure (ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker for left ventricular systolic dysfunction [LVSD] and beta-blocker for LVSD), one stroke measure (DC on antithrombotic therapy), advance care planning, prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (central venous catheter insertion protocol), documentation of current medications and appropriate treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh expects hospitalists will shine in the improvement activities category. “It’s part of our DNA,” she said. “Improvement activities... have become part of the core responsibilities for many of us within hospitalist groups, hospitals, and health systems.”
In 2017, CMS requires providers to report four improvement activities, which include: implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs, connecting patients to community chronic-disease management programs, and integrating pharmacists into a patient care team. Dr. Afsarmanesh suggests hospitalists visit SHM’s Quality and Innovation guide for ideas, implementation toolkits, and more.
In the cost category, “for the most part, hospitalists aren’t acquainted with cost and there is not a lot of cost transparency around what we do... In general, medical care needs to be discussed between physicians and patients so they can weigh the cost-benefit,” she said, which includes not just dollars and cents, but the impact associated with procedures, like radiation exposure from a CT scan.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh acknowledges this is challenging, given the overall lack of cost transparency in the American health care system. “It is disjointed and we don’t have any other system where the professionals who do the work are so far-removed from the actual cost,” she said. “The good thing is, I think we are heading toward an era of more cost-conscious practice.”
In addition, hospitalists are poised to help with overall cost-reduction in the hospital. “I could imagine something relevant around readmissions and total cost,” said Dr. Patel. “But risk-adjustment is key.”
This category will increase to 30% of a provider’s or group’s overall score by payment year 2021, CMS says. It will be determined using claims data to calculate per capita costs for all attributed beneficiaries and a Medicare Spending per Beneficiary measure. The CMS also says it is finalizing 10 episode-based measures determined to be reliable and that will be made available to providers in feedback reports starting in 2018.4
Clinicians may report MIPS data as individual providers (a single National Provider Identifier tied to a single Tax Identification Number) by sending data for each category through electronic health records, registries, or qualified clinical data registries. Quality data may be reported through Medicare claims.
Hospitalists who report through a group will receive a single payment adjustment based on the group’s performance, using group-level data for each category. Groups can submit using the same mechanisms as individual providers, or through a CMS web interface (though groups must register by June 30, 2017).5
The SHM has also asked CMS to consider allowing employed hospitalists to align with and report with their facilities, though Dr. Greeno says this should be voluntary since not every hospitalist may be interested in reporting through their hospital. Dr. Greeno says CMS is “very interested and receptive” to how it could be done.
“We are trying to create the incentive for everybody to provide care at lower costs,” Dr. Greeno said. “There are two goals: Create alignment, and decrease the reporting burden on hospitalist groups.”
Additionally, CMS recognizes the potential burden MIPS imposes on small practices and is working to allow individuals and groups of 10 or fewer clinicians to combine to create virtual groups. This option is not available in 2017.4
The CMS has also authorized $100 million, dispersed over 5 years, for certain organizations to provide technical assistance to MIPS providers with fewer than 15 clinicians, in rural areas and those in health professional shortage areas.4
According to Modern Healthcare, projections by CMS, released last May, show that 87% of solo practitioners and 70% of physician groups with two to nine providers will see their reimbursement rates fall in 2019. Meanwhile, 55% of groups with 25 to 99 providers and 81% of those with 100 or more clinicians will see an increase in reimbursement.7
“I think it’s going to be pretty tough unless you’re big enough to commit the resources you need to do it right,” Dr. Greeno said. “If I was just a really small group with very little overhead, no infrastructure to support, I’d consider taking the penalty and just living with it because I don’t have many costs and just pay my own salary. But it’s still a hard road.”
Dr. Afsarmanesh says SHM continues to look across the board and advocate for all its members.
In 2019, physicians reporting under MIPS will see up to a 4% increase and as low as a 4% decrease in reimbursement. This rises to plus-or-minus 5% in 2020, 7% in 2021 and 9% thereafter.2
Dr. Patel and many others say it appears to be the intention of CMS to move providers toward alternative payment models. A January 2015 news release from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a goal of tying 50% of Medicare payments to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) by the end of 2018 (it’s worth noting this was pre-MACRA, and not all ACOs qualify as Advanced APMs).8
“The awkwardness and clunkiness of MIPS needs to be addressed in order to make it successful because many people will be in MIPS,” Dr. Patel said. “I think it’s the intention to move people into Advanced APMs, but how long it takes to get to that point – 3-5 years, it could be 10 – physicians have to thrive in MIPS in order to live.”
One of the most important things, she and Dr. Berenson said, is adequately capturing the quality and scope of the care physicians provide.
“I know hospitalists complain how little their care is reflected in HCAHPS (the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) and the quality measures they have now, and readmission rates don’t reflect what doctors do inside the hospital. My colleagues are telling me they want something better,” Dr. Patel said.
Advanced APMs
Physicians who participate in Advanced APMs are exempt from MIPS. Advanced APMs must use Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) and take on a minimum amount of risk. For 2017 and 2018, providers must risk losing the lesser of 3% of their total Medicare expenditures or 8% of their revenue.9 They are paid based on the parameters of their particular model.
Additionally, for the 2019 payment year, 25% of a provider’s or group’s Medicare payments or 20% of their patients must be through the Advanced APM. This increases to 50% of payments and 35% of patients for 2021 and 2022, and in 2023, to 75% of payments and 50% of patients.
In 2017, APMs that meet the criteria for Advanced include: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus, Next Generation ACO Model, Shared Savings Program Tracks 2 and 3, Comprehensive Joint Replacement Payment Model Track 1, the Vermont Medicare ACO Initiative, and the Oncology Care Model. (APMs that do not qualify must report under MIPS.)5
The CMS also says that services provided at critical access hospitals, rural health clinics, and federally qualified health centers may qualify using patient counts, and medical home models and the Medicaid Medical Home Model may also be considered Advanced APMs using financial criteria.4
At this time, SHM is unable to quantify the number of hospitalists participating in Advanced APMs, and some, Dr. Greeno said, may not know whether they are part of an Advanced APM.
Currently, BPCI (Bundled Payments for Care Improvement) is the only alternative payment model in which hospitalists can directly take risk, Dr. Greeno says, but it does not yet qualify as an Advanced APM. However, that could change.
Prior to the passage of MACRA, Brandeis University worked with CMS to create the Episode Grouper for Medicare (EGM), software that converts claims data into episodes of care based on a patient’s condition or conditions or procedures. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has since proposed an alternative payment model, called ACS-Brandeis, that would use the diagnostic grouper to take into account all of the work done by every provider on any episode admitted to the hospital and use algorithms to decide who affected a particular patient’s care.
“Anyone who takes care of the patient can take risk or gain share if the episode initiator allows them,” said Dr. Greeno.
For example, if a patient is admitted for surgery, but has an internist on their case because they have diabetes and heart failure, and they also have an anesthesiologist and an infectious disease specialist, everybody has an impact on their care and makes decisions about the resources used on the case. The risk associated with the case is effectively divided.
The ACS submitted the proposal to PTAC (the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee) in 2016 and SHM submitted a letter of support.
“In this model, everybody’s taking risk and everybody has the opportunity to gain share if the patient is managed well,” said Dr. Greeno. “It’s a very complicated, very complex model... Theoretically, everybody on that case should be optimally engaged – that’s the beauty of it – but we don’t know if it will work.”
The SHM got involved at the request of ACS, because it would not apply solely to surgical patients. Dr. Greeno says ACS asked SHM to look at common surgical diagnoses and review every medical scenario that could come to pass, from heart failure and pneumonia to infection.
“There’s bundles within bundles, medical bundles within surgical bundles,” he said. “It’s fascinating and it’s daunting but it is truly a big data approach to episodes of care. We’re thrilled to be invited and ACS was very enthusiastic about our involvement.”
Dr. Patel, who sits on PTAC, is heartened by the amount of physician-led innovation taking place. “Proposals are coming directly from doctors; they are telling us what they want,” she said.
For Dr. Greeno, this captures the intent of MACRA: “There is going to be a continual increase in the sophistication of models, and hopefully toward ones that are better and better and create the right incentives for everyone involved in the health care system.”
References
1. S. Findlay. Medicare’s new physician payment system. http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=156. Published April 21, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
2. The Society of Hospital Medicine. Medicare physician payments are changing. http://www.macraforhm.org/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
3. A. Maciejowski. MACRA: What’s really in the final rule. http://blog.ncqa.org/macra-whats-really-in-the-final-rule/. Blog post published November 15, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
4. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program executive summary. https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_Executive_Summary_of_Final_Rule.pdf. Published Oct. 14, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
5. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program: Modernizing Medicare to provide better care and smarter spending for a healthier America. https://qpp.cms.gov/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
6. D. Barkholz. Potential MACRA byproduct: physician consolidation. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160630/NEWS/160639995. Published June 30, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
7. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Better, smarter, healthier: In historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursement from volume to value. http://wayback.archive-it.org/3926/20170127185400/https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2015/01/26/better-smarter-healthier-in-historic-announcement-hhs-sets-clear-goals-and-timeline-for-shifting-medicare-reimbursements-from-volume-to-value.html. Published January 26, 2015. Accessed March 6, 2017.
8. B. Wynne. MACRA Final Rule: CMS strikes a balance; will docs hang on? http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/10/17/macra-final-rule-cms-strikes-a-balance-will-docs-hang-on/. Published October 17, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
9. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Documents for Public Comment: Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee. Proposal for a Physician-Focused Payment Model: CAS-Brandeis Advanced Alternative Payment Model, American College of Surgeons. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/253406/TheACSBrandeisAdvancedAPM-ACS.pdf. Published December 13, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
Several months into 2017, physicians around the country are preparing for the first benchmark year of MACRA, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. Passed in 2015, MACRA is the bipartisan health care law responsible for eliminating the Sustainable Growth Rate and it promises to continue to fundamentally alter the way providers are paid. This year determines reimbursement in 2019.
Under the law, physicians must report performance under one of two pathways: MIPS, the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, or participation in a qualified Advanced Alternative Payment Model, or Advanced APM. The first, MIPS, replaces the Physician Quality Reporting System, Meaningful Use and the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier and is the track most providers can expect to follow, at least initially, because most will not meet the requirements for Advanced APMs.1,2
This is especially true for hospitalists, most of whom are not yet participating in qualifying alternative payment models.2
The MIPS track is budget neutral, which means for every physician or physician group that receives a boost in reimbursement, another will receive a cut. Others will receive a neutral adjustment. All physicians see an annual 0.5% increase in payment between 2016 and 2019 and MIPS clinicians receive a 0.25% annual boost starting in 2026. Providers participating in Advanced APMs will also receive an annual 5% payment bonus between 2019 and 2024, and a 0.75% annual increase in payments beginning in 2026.1
Both pathways are complex and will affect different clinicians in unique ways, particularly hospitalists.
Some health policy experts, like Robert Berenson, MD, FACP, Institute Fellow of the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, say MACRA could actually drive more hospitalists into employment to avoid the costs associated with complying with the law.
Regardless, there is much about MACRA that hospitalists should familiarize themselves with this year. The CMS has announced 2018 will also be a transition year and, as such, additional rules are forthcoming.
Here is what to know for now:
MIPS
All providers who receive Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments and do not participate in an Advanced APM will fall into MIPS, and reporting applies to all patients, not just Medicare beneficiaries.3 There are, however, exemptions: providers in their first year of Medicare, those billing Medicare Part B less than $30,000 annually, and those who see 100 or fewer Medicare patients.4
Under MIPS, physicians are scored on a scale of 1 to 100 based on performance across four weighted categories: Quality (60%), Advancing Care Information (25%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Cost (not included for 2017). Hospitalists who provide 75% or more of their services in hospital inpatient or outpatient settings, or in the emergency department, are exempt from Advancing Care Information, which replaced meaningful use. As a result, the Quality category will make up 85% of the overall score in 2017.
The CMS also announced added flexibility for 2017 with regard to reporting under MIPS, intended to give providers who need it extra time to prepare.5 Physicians and physician groups can report for a full year, starting January 1, 2017, or report for just 90 days, to be eligible for a positive payment adjustment. To avoid a negative adjustment, they can simply submit more than one quality measure, improvement activity, or advancing care information measure (for those not exempt). Or, providers can choose to report nothing and incur a negative 4% payment.
The approach to MIPS in 2017 will vary widely among SHM members, said Joshua Boswell, SHM’s director of government relations.
“Some are looking to do just the bare minimum, not because of their lack of readiness, but for at least this year, to avoid the time, resources, and cost associated with reporting.” he said. “Other groups are considering jumping in with both feet and fully reporting, their thinking being that they can’t lose, and if there is money on the table for high performers, they might as well go for it.”
For 2017, providers who score 70 or more points are eligible for a performance bonus, drawn from a $500 million pool set aside by CMS. The minimum point threshold defined by CMS is three, which a clinician can earn by submitting just one of the six required quality measures.4
“We’re working to ensure the program is structured so that providers can confidently report on just the measures applicable to them, even if it’s fewer than six,” he said. To ensure physicians are not penalized or disadvantaged for being unable to report the required number of measures, Dr. Greeno said CMS is working to develop a validation test, though it has not yet released details.
The measures most applicable to hospitalists include two related to heart failure (ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker for left ventricular systolic dysfunction [LVSD] and beta-blocker for LVSD), one stroke measure (DC on antithrombotic therapy), advance care planning, prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (central venous catheter insertion protocol), documentation of current medications and appropriate treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh expects hospitalists will shine in the improvement activities category. “It’s part of our DNA,” she said. “Improvement activities... have become part of the core responsibilities for many of us within hospitalist groups, hospitals, and health systems.”
In 2017, CMS requires providers to report four improvement activities, which include: implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs, connecting patients to community chronic-disease management programs, and integrating pharmacists into a patient care team. Dr. Afsarmanesh suggests hospitalists visit SHM’s Quality and Innovation guide for ideas, implementation toolkits, and more.
In the cost category, “for the most part, hospitalists aren’t acquainted with cost and there is not a lot of cost transparency around what we do... In general, medical care needs to be discussed between physicians and patients so they can weigh the cost-benefit,” she said, which includes not just dollars and cents, but the impact associated with procedures, like radiation exposure from a CT scan.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh acknowledges this is challenging, given the overall lack of cost transparency in the American health care system. “It is disjointed and we don’t have any other system where the professionals who do the work are so far-removed from the actual cost,” she said. “The good thing is, I think we are heading toward an era of more cost-conscious practice.”
In addition, hospitalists are poised to help with overall cost-reduction in the hospital. “I could imagine something relevant around readmissions and total cost,” said Dr. Patel. “But risk-adjustment is key.”
This category will increase to 30% of a provider’s or group’s overall score by payment year 2021, CMS says. It will be determined using claims data to calculate per capita costs for all attributed beneficiaries and a Medicare Spending per Beneficiary measure. The CMS also says it is finalizing 10 episode-based measures determined to be reliable and that will be made available to providers in feedback reports starting in 2018.4
Clinicians may report MIPS data as individual providers (a single National Provider Identifier tied to a single Tax Identification Number) by sending data for each category through electronic health records, registries, or qualified clinical data registries. Quality data may be reported through Medicare claims.
Hospitalists who report through a group will receive a single payment adjustment based on the group’s performance, using group-level data for each category. Groups can submit using the same mechanisms as individual providers, or through a CMS web interface (though groups must register by June 30, 2017).5
The SHM has also asked CMS to consider allowing employed hospitalists to align with and report with their facilities, though Dr. Greeno says this should be voluntary since not every hospitalist may be interested in reporting through their hospital. Dr. Greeno says CMS is “very interested and receptive” to how it could be done.
“We are trying to create the incentive for everybody to provide care at lower costs,” Dr. Greeno said. “There are two goals: Create alignment, and decrease the reporting burden on hospitalist groups.”
Additionally, CMS recognizes the potential burden MIPS imposes on small practices and is working to allow individuals and groups of 10 or fewer clinicians to combine to create virtual groups. This option is not available in 2017.4
The CMS has also authorized $100 million, dispersed over 5 years, for certain organizations to provide technical assistance to MIPS providers with fewer than 15 clinicians, in rural areas and those in health professional shortage areas.4
According to Modern Healthcare, projections by CMS, released last May, show that 87% of solo practitioners and 70% of physician groups with two to nine providers will see their reimbursement rates fall in 2019. Meanwhile, 55% of groups with 25 to 99 providers and 81% of those with 100 or more clinicians will see an increase in reimbursement.7
“I think it’s going to be pretty tough unless you’re big enough to commit the resources you need to do it right,” Dr. Greeno said. “If I was just a really small group with very little overhead, no infrastructure to support, I’d consider taking the penalty and just living with it because I don’t have many costs and just pay my own salary. But it’s still a hard road.”
Dr. Afsarmanesh says SHM continues to look across the board and advocate for all its members.
In 2019, physicians reporting under MIPS will see up to a 4% increase and as low as a 4% decrease in reimbursement. This rises to plus-or-minus 5% in 2020, 7% in 2021 and 9% thereafter.2
Dr. Patel and many others say it appears to be the intention of CMS to move providers toward alternative payment models. A January 2015 news release from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a goal of tying 50% of Medicare payments to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) by the end of 2018 (it’s worth noting this was pre-MACRA, and not all ACOs qualify as Advanced APMs).8
“The awkwardness and clunkiness of MIPS needs to be addressed in order to make it successful because many people will be in MIPS,” Dr. Patel said. “I think it’s the intention to move people into Advanced APMs, but how long it takes to get to that point – 3-5 years, it could be 10 – physicians have to thrive in MIPS in order to live.”
One of the most important things, she and Dr. Berenson said, is adequately capturing the quality and scope of the care physicians provide.
“I know hospitalists complain how little their care is reflected in HCAHPS (the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) and the quality measures they have now, and readmission rates don’t reflect what doctors do inside the hospital. My colleagues are telling me they want something better,” Dr. Patel said.
Advanced APMs
Physicians who participate in Advanced APMs are exempt from MIPS. Advanced APMs must use Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) and take on a minimum amount of risk. For 2017 and 2018, providers must risk losing the lesser of 3% of their total Medicare expenditures or 8% of their revenue.9 They are paid based on the parameters of their particular model.
Additionally, for the 2019 payment year, 25% of a provider’s or group’s Medicare payments or 20% of their patients must be through the Advanced APM. This increases to 50% of payments and 35% of patients for 2021 and 2022, and in 2023, to 75% of payments and 50% of patients.
In 2017, APMs that meet the criteria for Advanced include: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus, Next Generation ACO Model, Shared Savings Program Tracks 2 and 3, Comprehensive Joint Replacement Payment Model Track 1, the Vermont Medicare ACO Initiative, and the Oncology Care Model. (APMs that do not qualify must report under MIPS.)5
The CMS also says that services provided at critical access hospitals, rural health clinics, and federally qualified health centers may qualify using patient counts, and medical home models and the Medicaid Medical Home Model may also be considered Advanced APMs using financial criteria.4
At this time, SHM is unable to quantify the number of hospitalists participating in Advanced APMs, and some, Dr. Greeno said, may not know whether they are part of an Advanced APM.
Currently, BPCI (Bundled Payments for Care Improvement) is the only alternative payment model in which hospitalists can directly take risk, Dr. Greeno says, but it does not yet qualify as an Advanced APM. However, that could change.
Prior to the passage of MACRA, Brandeis University worked with CMS to create the Episode Grouper for Medicare (EGM), software that converts claims data into episodes of care based on a patient’s condition or conditions or procedures. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has since proposed an alternative payment model, called ACS-Brandeis, that would use the diagnostic grouper to take into account all of the work done by every provider on any episode admitted to the hospital and use algorithms to decide who affected a particular patient’s care.
“Anyone who takes care of the patient can take risk or gain share if the episode initiator allows them,” said Dr. Greeno.
For example, if a patient is admitted for surgery, but has an internist on their case because they have diabetes and heart failure, and they also have an anesthesiologist and an infectious disease specialist, everybody has an impact on their care and makes decisions about the resources used on the case. The risk associated with the case is effectively divided.
The ACS submitted the proposal to PTAC (the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee) in 2016 and SHM submitted a letter of support.
“In this model, everybody’s taking risk and everybody has the opportunity to gain share if the patient is managed well,” said Dr. Greeno. “It’s a very complicated, very complex model... Theoretically, everybody on that case should be optimally engaged – that’s the beauty of it – but we don’t know if it will work.”
The SHM got involved at the request of ACS, because it would not apply solely to surgical patients. Dr. Greeno says ACS asked SHM to look at common surgical diagnoses and review every medical scenario that could come to pass, from heart failure and pneumonia to infection.
“There’s bundles within bundles, medical bundles within surgical bundles,” he said. “It’s fascinating and it’s daunting but it is truly a big data approach to episodes of care. We’re thrilled to be invited and ACS was very enthusiastic about our involvement.”
Dr. Patel, who sits on PTAC, is heartened by the amount of physician-led innovation taking place. “Proposals are coming directly from doctors; they are telling us what they want,” she said.
For Dr. Greeno, this captures the intent of MACRA: “There is going to be a continual increase in the sophistication of models, and hopefully toward ones that are better and better and create the right incentives for everyone involved in the health care system.”
References
1. S. Findlay. Medicare’s new physician payment system. http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=156. Published April 21, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
2. The Society of Hospital Medicine. Medicare physician payments are changing. http://www.macraforhm.org/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
3. A. Maciejowski. MACRA: What’s really in the final rule. http://blog.ncqa.org/macra-whats-really-in-the-final-rule/. Blog post published November 15, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
4. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program executive summary. https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_Executive_Summary_of_Final_Rule.pdf. Published Oct. 14, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
5. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program: Modernizing Medicare to provide better care and smarter spending for a healthier America. https://qpp.cms.gov/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
6. D. Barkholz. Potential MACRA byproduct: physician consolidation. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160630/NEWS/160639995. Published June 30, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
7. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Better, smarter, healthier: In historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursement from volume to value. http://wayback.archive-it.org/3926/20170127185400/https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2015/01/26/better-smarter-healthier-in-historic-announcement-hhs-sets-clear-goals-and-timeline-for-shifting-medicare-reimbursements-from-volume-to-value.html. Published January 26, 2015. Accessed March 6, 2017.
8. B. Wynne. MACRA Final Rule: CMS strikes a balance; will docs hang on? http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/10/17/macra-final-rule-cms-strikes-a-balance-will-docs-hang-on/. Published October 17, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
9. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Documents for Public Comment: Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee. Proposal for a Physician-Focused Payment Model: CAS-Brandeis Advanced Alternative Payment Model, American College of Surgeons. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/253406/TheACSBrandeisAdvancedAPM-ACS.pdf. Published December 13, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
Several months into 2017, physicians around the country are preparing for the first benchmark year of MACRA, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. Passed in 2015, MACRA is the bipartisan health care law responsible for eliminating the Sustainable Growth Rate and it promises to continue to fundamentally alter the way providers are paid. This year determines reimbursement in 2019.
Under the law, physicians must report performance under one of two pathways: MIPS, the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, or participation in a qualified Advanced Alternative Payment Model, or Advanced APM. The first, MIPS, replaces the Physician Quality Reporting System, Meaningful Use and the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier and is the track most providers can expect to follow, at least initially, because most will not meet the requirements for Advanced APMs.1,2
This is especially true for hospitalists, most of whom are not yet participating in qualifying alternative payment models.2
The MIPS track is budget neutral, which means for every physician or physician group that receives a boost in reimbursement, another will receive a cut. Others will receive a neutral adjustment. All physicians see an annual 0.5% increase in payment between 2016 and 2019 and MIPS clinicians receive a 0.25% annual boost starting in 2026. Providers participating in Advanced APMs will also receive an annual 5% payment bonus between 2019 and 2024, and a 0.75% annual increase in payments beginning in 2026.1
Both pathways are complex and will affect different clinicians in unique ways, particularly hospitalists.
Some health policy experts, like Robert Berenson, MD, FACP, Institute Fellow of the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, say MACRA could actually drive more hospitalists into employment to avoid the costs associated with complying with the law.
Regardless, there is much about MACRA that hospitalists should familiarize themselves with this year. The CMS has announced 2018 will also be a transition year and, as such, additional rules are forthcoming.
Here is what to know for now:
MIPS
All providers who receive Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payments and do not participate in an Advanced APM will fall into MIPS, and reporting applies to all patients, not just Medicare beneficiaries.3 There are, however, exemptions: providers in their first year of Medicare, those billing Medicare Part B less than $30,000 annually, and those who see 100 or fewer Medicare patients.4
Under MIPS, physicians are scored on a scale of 1 to 100 based on performance across four weighted categories: Quality (60%), Advancing Care Information (25%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Cost (not included for 2017). Hospitalists who provide 75% or more of their services in hospital inpatient or outpatient settings, or in the emergency department, are exempt from Advancing Care Information, which replaced meaningful use. As a result, the Quality category will make up 85% of the overall score in 2017.
The CMS also announced added flexibility for 2017 with regard to reporting under MIPS, intended to give providers who need it extra time to prepare.5 Physicians and physician groups can report for a full year, starting January 1, 2017, or report for just 90 days, to be eligible for a positive payment adjustment. To avoid a negative adjustment, they can simply submit more than one quality measure, improvement activity, or advancing care information measure (for those not exempt). Or, providers can choose to report nothing and incur a negative 4% payment.
The approach to MIPS in 2017 will vary widely among SHM members, said Joshua Boswell, SHM’s director of government relations.
“Some are looking to do just the bare minimum, not because of their lack of readiness, but for at least this year, to avoid the time, resources, and cost associated with reporting.” he said. “Other groups are considering jumping in with both feet and fully reporting, their thinking being that they can’t lose, and if there is money on the table for high performers, they might as well go for it.”
For 2017, providers who score 70 or more points are eligible for a performance bonus, drawn from a $500 million pool set aside by CMS. The minimum point threshold defined by CMS is three, which a clinician can earn by submitting just one of the six required quality measures.4
“We’re working to ensure the program is structured so that providers can confidently report on just the measures applicable to them, even if it’s fewer than six,” he said. To ensure physicians are not penalized or disadvantaged for being unable to report the required number of measures, Dr. Greeno said CMS is working to develop a validation test, though it has not yet released details.
The measures most applicable to hospitalists include two related to heart failure (ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker for left ventricular systolic dysfunction [LVSD] and beta-blocker for LVSD), one stroke measure (DC on antithrombotic therapy), advance care planning, prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (central venous catheter insertion protocol), documentation of current medications and appropriate treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh expects hospitalists will shine in the improvement activities category. “It’s part of our DNA,” she said. “Improvement activities... have become part of the core responsibilities for many of us within hospitalist groups, hospitals, and health systems.”
In 2017, CMS requires providers to report four improvement activities, which include: implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs, connecting patients to community chronic-disease management programs, and integrating pharmacists into a patient care team. Dr. Afsarmanesh suggests hospitalists visit SHM’s Quality and Innovation guide for ideas, implementation toolkits, and more.
In the cost category, “for the most part, hospitalists aren’t acquainted with cost and there is not a lot of cost transparency around what we do... In general, medical care needs to be discussed between physicians and patients so they can weigh the cost-benefit,” she said, which includes not just dollars and cents, but the impact associated with procedures, like radiation exposure from a CT scan.
However, Dr. Afsarmanesh acknowledges this is challenging, given the overall lack of cost transparency in the American health care system. “It is disjointed and we don’t have any other system where the professionals who do the work are so far-removed from the actual cost,” she said. “The good thing is, I think we are heading toward an era of more cost-conscious practice.”
In addition, hospitalists are poised to help with overall cost-reduction in the hospital. “I could imagine something relevant around readmissions and total cost,” said Dr. Patel. “But risk-adjustment is key.”
This category will increase to 30% of a provider’s or group’s overall score by payment year 2021, CMS says. It will be determined using claims data to calculate per capita costs for all attributed beneficiaries and a Medicare Spending per Beneficiary measure. The CMS also says it is finalizing 10 episode-based measures determined to be reliable and that will be made available to providers in feedback reports starting in 2018.4
Clinicians may report MIPS data as individual providers (a single National Provider Identifier tied to a single Tax Identification Number) by sending data for each category through electronic health records, registries, or qualified clinical data registries. Quality data may be reported through Medicare claims.
Hospitalists who report through a group will receive a single payment adjustment based on the group’s performance, using group-level data for each category. Groups can submit using the same mechanisms as individual providers, or through a CMS web interface (though groups must register by June 30, 2017).5
The SHM has also asked CMS to consider allowing employed hospitalists to align with and report with their facilities, though Dr. Greeno says this should be voluntary since not every hospitalist may be interested in reporting through their hospital. Dr. Greeno says CMS is “very interested and receptive” to how it could be done.
“We are trying to create the incentive for everybody to provide care at lower costs,” Dr. Greeno said. “There are two goals: Create alignment, and decrease the reporting burden on hospitalist groups.”
Additionally, CMS recognizes the potential burden MIPS imposes on small practices and is working to allow individuals and groups of 10 or fewer clinicians to combine to create virtual groups. This option is not available in 2017.4
The CMS has also authorized $100 million, dispersed over 5 years, for certain organizations to provide technical assistance to MIPS providers with fewer than 15 clinicians, in rural areas and those in health professional shortage areas.4
According to Modern Healthcare, projections by CMS, released last May, show that 87% of solo practitioners and 70% of physician groups with two to nine providers will see their reimbursement rates fall in 2019. Meanwhile, 55% of groups with 25 to 99 providers and 81% of those with 100 or more clinicians will see an increase in reimbursement.7
“I think it’s going to be pretty tough unless you’re big enough to commit the resources you need to do it right,” Dr. Greeno said. “If I was just a really small group with very little overhead, no infrastructure to support, I’d consider taking the penalty and just living with it because I don’t have many costs and just pay my own salary. But it’s still a hard road.”
Dr. Afsarmanesh says SHM continues to look across the board and advocate for all its members.
In 2019, physicians reporting under MIPS will see up to a 4% increase and as low as a 4% decrease in reimbursement. This rises to plus-or-minus 5% in 2020, 7% in 2021 and 9% thereafter.2
Dr. Patel and many others say it appears to be the intention of CMS to move providers toward alternative payment models. A January 2015 news release from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a goal of tying 50% of Medicare payments to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) by the end of 2018 (it’s worth noting this was pre-MACRA, and not all ACOs qualify as Advanced APMs).8
“The awkwardness and clunkiness of MIPS needs to be addressed in order to make it successful because many people will be in MIPS,” Dr. Patel said. “I think it’s the intention to move people into Advanced APMs, but how long it takes to get to that point – 3-5 years, it could be 10 – physicians have to thrive in MIPS in order to live.”
One of the most important things, she and Dr. Berenson said, is adequately capturing the quality and scope of the care physicians provide.
“I know hospitalists complain how little their care is reflected in HCAHPS (the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) and the quality measures they have now, and readmission rates don’t reflect what doctors do inside the hospital. My colleagues are telling me they want something better,” Dr. Patel said.
Advanced APMs
Physicians who participate in Advanced APMs are exempt from MIPS. Advanced APMs must use Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) and take on a minimum amount of risk. For 2017 and 2018, providers must risk losing the lesser of 3% of their total Medicare expenditures or 8% of their revenue.9 They are paid based on the parameters of their particular model.
Additionally, for the 2019 payment year, 25% of a provider’s or group’s Medicare payments or 20% of their patients must be through the Advanced APM. This increases to 50% of payments and 35% of patients for 2021 and 2022, and in 2023, to 75% of payments and 50% of patients.
In 2017, APMs that meet the criteria for Advanced include: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus, Next Generation ACO Model, Shared Savings Program Tracks 2 and 3, Comprehensive Joint Replacement Payment Model Track 1, the Vermont Medicare ACO Initiative, and the Oncology Care Model. (APMs that do not qualify must report under MIPS.)5
The CMS also says that services provided at critical access hospitals, rural health clinics, and federally qualified health centers may qualify using patient counts, and medical home models and the Medicaid Medical Home Model may also be considered Advanced APMs using financial criteria.4
At this time, SHM is unable to quantify the number of hospitalists participating in Advanced APMs, and some, Dr. Greeno said, may not know whether they are part of an Advanced APM.
Currently, BPCI (Bundled Payments for Care Improvement) is the only alternative payment model in which hospitalists can directly take risk, Dr. Greeno says, but it does not yet qualify as an Advanced APM. However, that could change.
Prior to the passage of MACRA, Brandeis University worked with CMS to create the Episode Grouper for Medicare (EGM), software that converts claims data into episodes of care based on a patient’s condition or conditions or procedures. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has since proposed an alternative payment model, called ACS-Brandeis, that would use the diagnostic grouper to take into account all of the work done by every provider on any episode admitted to the hospital and use algorithms to decide who affected a particular patient’s care.
“Anyone who takes care of the patient can take risk or gain share if the episode initiator allows them,” said Dr. Greeno.
For example, if a patient is admitted for surgery, but has an internist on their case because they have diabetes and heart failure, and they also have an anesthesiologist and an infectious disease specialist, everybody has an impact on their care and makes decisions about the resources used on the case. The risk associated with the case is effectively divided.
The ACS submitted the proposal to PTAC (the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee) in 2016 and SHM submitted a letter of support.
“In this model, everybody’s taking risk and everybody has the opportunity to gain share if the patient is managed well,” said Dr. Greeno. “It’s a very complicated, very complex model... Theoretically, everybody on that case should be optimally engaged – that’s the beauty of it – but we don’t know if it will work.”
The SHM got involved at the request of ACS, because it would not apply solely to surgical patients. Dr. Greeno says ACS asked SHM to look at common surgical diagnoses and review every medical scenario that could come to pass, from heart failure and pneumonia to infection.
“There’s bundles within bundles, medical bundles within surgical bundles,” he said. “It’s fascinating and it’s daunting but it is truly a big data approach to episodes of care. We’re thrilled to be invited and ACS was very enthusiastic about our involvement.”
Dr. Patel, who sits on PTAC, is heartened by the amount of physician-led innovation taking place. “Proposals are coming directly from doctors; they are telling us what they want,” she said.
For Dr. Greeno, this captures the intent of MACRA: “There is going to be a continual increase in the sophistication of models, and hopefully toward ones that are better and better and create the right incentives for everyone involved in the health care system.”
References
1. S. Findlay. Medicare’s new physician payment system. http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=156. Published April 21, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
2. The Society of Hospital Medicine. Medicare physician payments are changing. http://www.macraforhm.org/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
3. A. Maciejowski. MACRA: What’s really in the final rule. http://blog.ncqa.org/macra-whats-really-in-the-final-rule/. Blog post published November 15, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
4. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program executive summary. https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_Executive_Summary_of_Final_Rule.pdf. Published Oct. 14, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
5. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program: Modernizing Medicare to provide better care and smarter spending for a healthier America. https://qpp.cms.gov/. Accessed March 6, 2017.
6. D. Barkholz. Potential MACRA byproduct: physician consolidation. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160630/NEWS/160639995. Published June 30, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
7. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Better, smarter, healthier: In historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursement from volume to value. http://wayback.archive-it.org/3926/20170127185400/https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2015/01/26/better-smarter-healthier-in-historic-announcement-hhs-sets-clear-goals-and-timeline-for-shifting-medicare-reimbursements-from-volume-to-value.html. Published January 26, 2015. Accessed March 6, 2017.
8. B. Wynne. MACRA Final Rule: CMS strikes a balance; will docs hang on? http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/10/17/macra-final-rule-cms-strikes-a-balance-will-docs-hang-on/. Published October 17, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
9. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Documents for Public Comment: Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee. Proposal for a Physician-Focused Payment Model: CAS-Brandeis Advanced Alternative Payment Model, American College of Surgeons. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/253406/TheACSBrandeisAdvancedAPM-ACS.pdf. Published December 13, 2016. Accessed March 6, 2017.
VIDEO: Surgeon case volume linked to mitral valve repair outcomes
BOSTON – Individual surgeon case volume is a significant factor in degenerative mitral valve repair rates and overall patient survival, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
The analysis, which reviewed the outcomes of 38,128 adult patients, found that higher surgeon volume of mitral cases is associated with better degenerative mitral repair rates and higher survival. In this video, Ralph Damiano Jr., MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses the threshold of mitral cases that led to better repair rates and how further cardiac surgical subspecialization could improve outcomes in patients with degenerative mitral disease.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
allegros@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @legal_med
BOSTON – Individual surgeon case volume is a significant factor in degenerative mitral valve repair rates and overall patient survival, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
The analysis, which reviewed the outcomes of 38,128 adult patients, found that higher surgeon volume of mitral cases is associated with better degenerative mitral repair rates and higher survival. In this video, Ralph Damiano Jr., MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses the threshold of mitral cases that led to better repair rates and how further cardiac surgical subspecialization could improve outcomes in patients with degenerative mitral disease.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
allegros@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @legal_med
BOSTON – Individual surgeon case volume is a significant factor in degenerative mitral valve repair rates and overall patient survival, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
The analysis, which reviewed the outcomes of 38,128 adult patients, found that higher surgeon volume of mitral cases is associated with better degenerative mitral repair rates and higher survival. In this video, Ralph Damiano Jr., MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses the threshold of mitral cases that led to better repair rates and how further cardiac surgical subspecialization could improve outcomes in patients with degenerative mitral disease.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
allegros@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @legal_med
AT THE AATS ANNUAL MEETING
HCV incidence in young women doubled 2006-2014
The incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in reproductive-age women has doubled between 2006 and 2014 while the number of acute cases increased more than threefold, according to data published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Researchers analyzed data from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) from 2006 to 2014 and the Quest Diagnostics Health Trends national database from 2011 to 2014, finding 425,322 women with confirmed HCV infection, 40.4% of whom were aged 15-44 years.
Around half of all acute infections were in non-Hispanic white women, and of the 2,069 women with available risk information, 63% acknowledged injection drug use (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M16-2350).
The analysis also found 1,859 cases of hepatitis C infection in children aged 2-13 years. According to the Quest data, the proportion of children with current hepatitis C infection was 3.2-fold higher in children aged 2-3 years than in those aged 12-13 years.
Commenting on this age difference, Kathleen N. Ly, MPH, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and her coauthors noted that it may have been the result of decreased testing over time in children already known to have chronic hepatitis C infection, or could be caused by spontaneous remission of infection, which is more common in infants and children than in adults.
The rate of infection among pregnant women tested for hepatitis C virus between 2011 and 2014 was 0.73%, which the authors calculated would mean that overall, 29,000 women with hepatitis C virus infection gave birth during that period across the United States. Based on data from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, which found a likely mother-to-child transmission rate of 5.8/100 live births, they estimated that 1,700 infants were born with hepatitis C infection during that period.
“In contrast, only about 200 childhood cases per year are reported to the NNDSS, which may suggest a need for wider screening for HCV in pregnant women and their infants, as is recommended for HIV and hepatitis B virus,” the authors wrote. “However, recommendations for screening in pregnant women and clearer testing guidelines for infants born to HCV-infected mothers do not exist at this time.”
The study was supported by the CDC. One author was an employee of Quest Diagnostics, but no other conflicts of interest were declared.
AGA Resource
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c.
Recognizing hepatitis C infection in pregnant women and neonates is possible, and clinical trials of antiviral therapy may show safety and efficacy in pregnant women and in children. Rather than silence, HCV infection calls out for public health action directed at all aspects of the epidemic, including consideration of screening pregnant women. At the very least, screening of pregnant women for HCV infection risk factors, as well as risk-based testing, requires more emphasis. Another issue in need of attention is the lack of authoritative, consensus-based recommendations for the identification, testing, and case management of newborns of infected mothers.
Much work lies ahead to eradicate HCV, starting with resources for public health surveillance to monitor incidence and prevalence and to fully characterize the infection in the population. Strategies to effectively prevent or cure infection in reproductive-age women and their sexual and needle-sharing partners are critical.
Alfred DeMaria Jr., MD, is from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M17-0927). No conflicts of interest were declared.
Recognizing hepatitis C infection in pregnant women and neonates is possible, and clinical trials of antiviral therapy may show safety and efficacy in pregnant women and in children. Rather than silence, HCV infection calls out for public health action directed at all aspects of the epidemic, including consideration of screening pregnant women. At the very least, screening of pregnant women for HCV infection risk factors, as well as risk-based testing, requires more emphasis. Another issue in need of attention is the lack of authoritative, consensus-based recommendations for the identification, testing, and case management of newborns of infected mothers.
Much work lies ahead to eradicate HCV, starting with resources for public health surveillance to monitor incidence and prevalence and to fully characterize the infection in the population. Strategies to effectively prevent or cure infection in reproductive-age women and their sexual and needle-sharing partners are critical.
Alfred DeMaria Jr., MD, is from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M17-0927). No conflicts of interest were declared.
Recognizing hepatitis C infection in pregnant women and neonates is possible, and clinical trials of antiviral therapy may show safety and efficacy in pregnant women and in children. Rather than silence, HCV infection calls out for public health action directed at all aspects of the epidemic, including consideration of screening pregnant women. At the very least, screening of pregnant women for HCV infection risk factors, as well as risk-based testing, requires more emphasis. Another issue in need of attention is the lack of authoritative, consensus-based recommendations for the identification, testing, and case management of newborns of infected mothers.
Much work lies ahead to eradicate HCV, starting with resources for public health surveillance to monitor incidence and prevalence and to fully characterize the infection in the population. Strategies to effectively prevent or cure infection in reproductive-age women and their sexual and needle-sharing partners are critical.
Alfred DeMaria Jr., MD, is from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M17-0927). No conflicts of interest were declared.
The incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in reproductive-age women has doubled between 2006 and 2014 while the number of acute cases increased more than threefold, according to data published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Researchers analyzed data from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) from 2006 to 2014 and the Quest Diagnostics Health Trends national database from 2011 to 2014, finding 425,322 women with confirmed HCV infection, 40.4% of whom were aged 15-44 years.
Around half of all acute infections were in non-Hispanic white women, and of the 2,069 women with available risk information, 63% acknowledged injection drug use (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M16-2350).
The analysis also found 1,859 cases of hepatitis C infection in children aged 2-13 years. According to the Quest data, the proportion of children with current hepatitis C infection was 3.2-fold higher in children aged 2-3 years than in those aged 12-13 years.
Commenting on this age difference, Kathleen N. Ly, MPH, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and her coauthors noted that it may have been the result of decreased testing over time in children already known to have chronic hepatitis C infection, or could be caused by spontaneous remission of infection, which is more common in infants and children than in adults.
The rate of infection among pregnant women tested for hepatitis C virus between 2011 and 2014 was 0.73%, which the authors calculated would mean that overall, 29,000 women with hepatitis C virus infection gave birth during that period across the United States. Based on data from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, which found a likely mother-to-child transmission rate of 5.8/100 live births, they estimated that 1,700 infants were born with hepatitis C infection during that period.
“In contrast, only about 200 childhood cases per year are reported to the NNDSS, which may suggest a need for wider screening for HCV in pregnant women and their infants, as is recommended for HIV and hepatitis B virus,” the authors wrote. “However, recommendations for screening in pregnant women and clearer testing guidelines for infants born to HCV-infected mothers do not exist at this time.”
The study was supported by the CDC. One author was an employee of Quest Diagnostics, but no other conflicts of interest were declared.
AGA Resource
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c.
The incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in reproductive-age women has doubled between 2006 and 2014 while the number of acute cases increased more than threefold, according to data published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Researchers analyzed data from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) from 2006 to 2014 and the Quest Diagnostics Health Trends national database from 2011 to 2014, finding 425,322 women with confirmed HCV infection, 40.4% of whom were aged 15-44 years.
Around half of all acute infections were in non-Hispanic white women, and of the 2,069 women with available risk information, 63% acknowledged injection drug use (Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.7326/M16-2350).
The analysis also found 1,859 cases of hepatitis C infection in children aged 2-13 years. According to the Quest data, the proportion of children with current hepatitis C infection was 3.2-fold higher in children aged 2-3 years than in those aged 12-13 years.
Commenting on this age difference, Kathleen N. Ly, MPH, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and her coauthors noted that it may have been the result of decreased testing over time in children already known to have chronic hepatitis C infection, or could be caused by spontaneous remission of infection, which is more common in infants and children than in adults.
The rate of infection among pregnant women tested for hepatitis C virus between 2011 and 2014 was 0.73%, which the authors calculated would mean that overall, 29,000 women with hepatitis C virus infection gave birth during that period across the United States. Based on data from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, which found a likely mother-to-child transmission rate of 5.8/100 live births, they estimated that 1,700 infants were born with hepatitis C infection during that period.
“In contrast, only about 200 childhood cases per year are reported to the NNDSS, which may suggest a need for wider screening for HCV in pregnant women and their infants, as is recommended for HIV and hepatitis B virus,” the authors wrote. “However, recommendations for screening in pregnant women and clearer testing guidelines for infants born to HCV-infected mothers do not exist at this time.”
The study was supported by the CDC. One author was an employee of Quest Diagnostics, but no other conflicts of interest were declared.
AGA Resource
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c.
FROM ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Stage IV sarcoidosis differs in blacks and whites
WASHINGTON – , a finding with potentially important implications for prognosis and management.
Systematic assessment of 349 American patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis – 264 whites and 85 blacks – showed that black patients had nearly double the prevalence of advanced, end-stage, Scadding stage IV fibrosis in their lungs, with a 19% rate among whites and a 34% rate among blacks, confirming that blacks generally have worse sarcoidosis, Andy Levy, MD, said at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society.
Honeycomb scar is associated with more restrictive disease, characterized by reduced total lung capacity and reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, features seen in these black stage IV patients, said Dr. Levy, a pulmonologist at National Jewish Health in Denver. Bronchovascular distortion, the more common scar pattern seen in the white patients, results in more obstructive symptoms, such as a reduced ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by forced vital capacity, which Dr. Levy reported as a characteristic of the white GRADS patients.
Even though the pulmonary fibrosis was end-stage in all the black and white stage IV patients examined, “where the scar occurs may depend on genetics or environment, and may affect how the disease manifests. We don’t fully know what it means yet,” Dr. Levy said in an interview. “There is this difference in the sarcoidosis of some black patients compared with white patients that needs further investigation to figure out why the scar is different.”
The different distribution of lung fibrosis in blacks and whites “could have huge implications for prognosis and management,” said Laura Koth, MD, a pulmonologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco, and lead investigator for the study reported by Dr. Levy.
The GRADS data collection also showed that a significantly higher percentage of black patients had most recently received prednisone treatment for their sarcoidosis, 45% compared with 29% in whites, Dr. Levy reported. Ideally most sarcoidosis patients would be on a steroid-sparing regimen, such as methotrexate. The excess prednisone treatment the black patients received confirmed prior reports of treatment disparities by race among American sarcoidosis patients, he said.
GRADS includes patients enrolled at seven U.S. research centers. The study’s primary goal is to try to identify “genomic signatures” that link with the clinical phenotypes identified through spirometry, bronchoscopy, CT scans, and physical examinations, Dr. Koth explained. The investigators plan to enroll more patients into the program to validate the findings, she said. “This is an early stage, but we have seen some signals we want to follow-up.”
GRADS is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Levy and Dr. Koth had no relevant financial disclosures.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
WASHINGTON – , a finding with potentially important implications for prognosis and management.
Systematic assessment of 349 American patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis – 264 whites and 85 blacks – showed that black patients had nearly double the prevalence of advanced, end-stage, Scadding stage IV fibrosis in their lungs, with a 19% rate among whites and a 34% rate among blacks, confirming that blacks generally have worse sarcoidosis, Andy Levy, MD, said at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society.
Honeycomb scar is associated with more restrictive disease, characterized by reduced total lung capacity and reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, features seen in these black stage IV patients, said Dr. Levy, a pulmonologist at National Jewish Health in Denver. Bronchovascular distortion, the more common scar pattern seen in the white patients, results in more obstructive symptoms, such as a reduced ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by forced vital capacity, which Dr. Levy reported as a characteristic of the white GRADS patients.
Even though the pulmonary fibrosis was end-stage in all the black and white stage IV patients examined, “where the scar occurs may depend on genetics or environment, and may affect how the disease manifests. We don’t fully know what it means yet,” Dr. Levy said in an interview. “There is this difference in the sarcoidosis of some black patients compared with white patients that needs further investigation to figure out why the scar is different.”
The different distribution of lung fibrosis in blacks and whites “could have huge implications for prognosis and management,” said Laura Koth, MD, a pulmonologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco, and lead investigator for the study reported by Dr. Levy.
The GRADS data collection also showed that a significantly higher percentage of black patients had most recently received prednisone treatment for their sarcoidosis, 45% compared with 29% in whites, Dr. Levy reported. Ideally most sarcoidosis patients would be on a steroid-sparing regimen, such as methotrexate. The excess prednisone treatment the black patients received confirmed prior reports of treatment disparities by race among American sarcoidosis patients, he said.
GRADS includes patients enrolled at seven U.S. research centers. The study’s primary goal is to try to identify “genomic signatures” that link with the clinical phenotypes identified through spirometry, bronchoscopy, CT scans, and physical examinations, Dr. Koth explained. The investigators plan to enroll more patients into the program to validate the findings, she said. “This is an early stage, but we have seen some signals we want to follow-up.”
GRADS is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Levy and Dr. Koth had no relevant financial disclosures.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
WASHINGTON – , a finding with potentially important implications for prognosis and management.
Systematic assessment of 349 American patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis – 264 whites and 85 blacks – showed that black patients had nearly double the prevalence of advanced, end-stage, Scadding stage IV fibrosis in their lungs, with a 19% rate among whites and a 34% rate among blacks, confirming that blacks generally have worse sarcoidosis, Andy Levy, MD, said at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society.
Honeycomb scar is associated with more restrictive disease, characterized by reduced total lung capacity and reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, features seen in these black stage IV patients, said Dr. Levy, a pulmonologist at National Jewish Health in Denver. Bronchovascular distortion, the more common scar pattern seen in the white patients, results in more obstructive symptoms, such as a reduced ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by forced vital capacity, which Dr. Levy reported as a characteristic of the white GRADS patients.
Even though the pulmonary fibrosis was end-stage in all the black and white stage IV patients examined, “where the scar occurs may depend on genetics or environment, and may affect how the disease manifests. We don’t fully know what it means yet,” Dr. Levy said in an interview. “There is this difference in the sarcoidosis of some black patients compared with white patients that needs further investigation to figure out why the scar is different.”
The different distribution of lung fibrosis in blacks and whites “could have huge implications for prognosis and management,” said Laura Koth, MD, a pulmonologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco, and lead investigator for the study reported by Dr. Levy.
The GRADS data collection also showed that a significantly higher percentage of black patients had most recently received prednisone treatment for their sarcoidosis, 45% compared with 29% in whites, Dr. Levy reported. Ideally most sarcoidosis patients would be on a steroid-sparing regimen, such as methotrexate. The excess prednisone treatment the black patients received confirmed prior reports of treatment disparities by race among American sarcoidosis patients, he said.
GRADS includes patients enrolled at seven U.S. research centers. The study’s primary goal is to try to identify “genomic signatures” that link with the clinical phenotypes identified through spirometry, bronchoscopy, CT scans, and physical examinations, Dr. Koth explained. The investigators plan to enroll more patients into the program to validate the findings, she said. “This is an early stage, but we have seen some signals we want to follow-up.”
GRADS is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Levy and Dr. Koth had no relevant financial disclosures.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT ATS 2017
Key clinical point: A restrictive, “honeycomb” fibrotic scar was more common in black patients with stage IV sarcoidosis than in white stage IV patients, who more often had obstructive bronchovascular distortion.
Major finding: Honeycomb lung fibrosis occurred in 19% of black sarcoidosis patients and in 4% of white sarcoidosis patients.
Data source: GRADS, which enrolled 349 sarcoidosis patients at seven U.S. centers.
Disclosures: GRADS is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Levy and Dr. Koth had no relevant financial disclosures.
Hot Threads in ACS Communities
Here are the top discussion threads in ACS Communities this week. (All of these threads are from the General Surgery community except where indicated.) 
- Texas SB 1148 The MOC Bill
- Low back pain (Women Surgeons)
- Domestic volunteerism
- Hour limits for staff/attending surgeons?
- Health Care Reform
- A day on Capitol Hill
- Reactions to the “Replacement” of our Surgeon General?
- Any input on this article?
- Another tough case
- Rectal prolapse (Colon and Rectal Surgery)
To join communities, log in to ACS Communities at http://acscommunities.facs.org/home, go to “Browse All Communities” near the top of any page, and click the blue “Join” button next to the community you’d like to join. If you have any questions, please send them to acscommunities@facs.org.
Here are the top discussion threads in ACS Communities this week. (All of these threads are from the General Surgery community except where indicated.)
- Texas SB 1148 The MOC Bill
- Low back pain (Women Surgeons)
- Domestic volunteerism
- Hour limits for staff/attending surgeons?
- Health Care Reform
- A day on Capitol Hill
- Reactions to the “Replacement” of our Surgeon General?
- Any input on this article?
- Another tough case
- Rectal prolapse (Colon and Rectal Surgery)
To join communities, log in to ACS Communities at http://acscommunities.facs.org/home, go to “Browse All Communities” near the top of any page, and click the blue “Join” button next to the community you’d like to join. If you have any questions, please send them to acscommunities@facs.org.
Here are the top discussion threads in ACS Communities this week. (All of these threads are from the General Surgery community except where indicated.)
- Texas SB 1148 The MOC Bill
- Low back pain (Women Surgeons)
- Domestic volunteerism
- Hour limits for staff/attending surgeons?
- Health Care Reform
- A day on Capitol Hill
- Reactions to the “Replacement” of our Surgeon General?
- Any input on this article?
- Another tough case
- Rectal prolapse (Colon and Rectal Surgery)
To join communities, log in to ACS Communities at http://acscommunities.facs.org/home, go to “Browse All Communities” near the top of any page, and click the blue “Join” button next to the community you’d like to join. If you have any questions, please send them to acscommunities@facs.org.
Nurse practitioner urges advocacy for HPV vaccination
"IT IS TIME FOR HPV VACCINATION TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF ROUTINE PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE"
BARBARA S. LEVY, MD (MARCH 2017)
Nurse practitioner urges advocacy for HPV vaccination
I could not agree more with Dr. Levy's view on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. I am a Doctor of Nursing Practice student and improving HPV vaccination rates in adolescents is the focus of my research project for the next year. Based on the current literature, the most significant factors for increasing vaccination rates are patient education and provider recommendation. As the article mentions, "special" attention should not be given to the HPV vaccine, because this raises questions with families presenting to the office for routine well-child care. There have been many missed opportunities for vaccination of our young people over the past 10 years. As a result, we will continue to see increases in HPV-related cancers. We have a vaccine that has the potential to significantly decrease these cases, but it is underutilized. The recent recommendation of a 2-dose series (before the age of 15) should make completing the series easier. I urge all providers to be better advocates for their patients and make appropriate changes to their current practice in order to reduce the significant burden this disease carries.
Tiffany Edwards, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC
Seaford, Delaware
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
"IT IS TIME FOR HPV VACCINATION TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF ROUTINE PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE"
BARBARA S. LEVY, MD (MARCH 2017)
Nurse practitioner urges advocacy for HPV vaccination
I could not agree more with Dr. Levy's view on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. I am a Doctor of Nursing Practice student and improving HPV vaccination rates in adolescents is the focus of my research project for the next year. Based on the current literature, the most significant factors for increasing vaccination rates are patient education and provider recommendation. As the article mentions, "special" attention should not be given to the HPV vaccine, because this raises questions with families presenting to the office for routine well-child care. There have been many missed opportunities for vaccination of our young people over the past 10 years. As a result, we will continue to see increases in HPV-related cancers. We have a vaccine that has the potential to significantly decrease these cases, but it is underutilized. The recent recommendation of a 2-dose series (before the age of 15) should make completing the series easier. I urge all providers to be better advocates for their patients and make appropriate changes to their current practice in order to reduce the significant burden this disease carries.
Tiffany Edwards, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC
Seaford, Delaware
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
"IT IS TIME FOR HPV VACCINATION TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF ROUTINE PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE"
BARBARA S. LEVY, MD (MARCH 2017)
Nurse practitioner urges advocacy for HPV vaccination
I could not agree more with Dr. Levy's view on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. I am a Doctor of Nursing Practice student and improving HPV vaccination rates in adolescents is the focus of my research project for the next year. Based on the current literature, the most significant factors for increasing vaccination rates are patient education and provider recommendation. As the article mentions, "special" attention should not be given to the HPV vaccine, because this raises questions with families presenting to the office for routine well-child care. There have been many missed opportunities for vaccination of our young people over the past 10 years. As a result, we will continue to see increases in HPV-related cancers. We have a vaccine that has the potential to significantly decrease these cases, but it is underutilized. The recent recommendation of a 2-dose series (before the age of 15) should make completing the series easier. I urge all providers to be better advocates for their patients and make appropriate changes to their current practice in order to reduce the significant burden this disease carries.
Tiffany Edwards, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC
Seaford, Delaware
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
