SAN DIEGO – A process intended to optimize blood management led to a 30% reduction in blood use and a savings of $2 million, results from a single-center study showed.

“Blood is a limited resource and we have a responsibility as a health care provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations,” lead study author Barbara J. Martin, RN, said in a press release. The study was presented in a poster session at the American College of Surgeons/National Surgical Quality Improvement Program National Conference.

ksena32/ThinkStock

In an effort to evaluate how they could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion, Ms. Martin and her colleagues at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn., first changed provider orders to support a single unit order and then follow-up order for more blood if necessary. The previous process was to order two units of blood, which was at times more blood than was needed. “The data on restrictive transfusion has been out for years documenting that patients have better outcomes with a more restrictive transfusion strategy,” Ms. Martin, of the Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Improvement, said in the press release. “We were looking at whether we could guide providers to treat symptomatic anemia with a single unit of blood rather than the usual two units.”

The researchers enhanced the Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system to allow blood ordering practices to be based on a specific assessment of each case rather than on a standard order of two units. As a result, red blood cell transfusions at Vanderbilt declined from 675 units per 1,000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1,000 discharges in 2015, a decrease of more than 30%.

In an effort to reduce inefficiencies in the way blood is ordered, transported, and stored, Ms. Martin and her multidisciplinary team developed the following guidelines for perioperative handling:

• When more than one unit of blood is ordered, it is sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube.

• Coolers are reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

• A specific staff member is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank.

• Individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review; aggregate data are reported monthly.

After implementation of these practices, fewer than 80 units of blood were wasted at Vanderbilt in 2015, a drop from 300 in 2011. Collectively, the blood management strategies resulted in a savings of $2 million. Ms. Martin said that such guidelines can be implemented at other medical centers, but “you have to prioritize what your initiatives are. At Vanderbilt we had a lot of opportunities with blood transfusion and blood wastage and we made huge gains. Any incremental improvement would take additional resources.”

The researchers reported having no relevant disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – A process intended to optimize blood management led to a 30% reduction in blood use and a savings of $2 million, results from a single-center study showed.

“Blood is a limited resource and we have a responsibility as a health care provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations,” lead study author Barbara J. Martin, RN, said in a press release. The study was presented in a poster session at the American College of Surgeons/National Surgical Quality Improvement Program National Conference.

ksena32/ThinkStock

In an effort to evaluate how they could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion, Ms. Martin and her colleagues at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn., first changed provider orders to support a single unit order and then follow-up order for more blood if necessary. The previous process was to order two units of blood, which was at times more blood than was needed. “The data on restrictive transfusion has been out for years documenting that patients have better outcomes with a more restrictive transfusion strategy,” Ms. Martin, of the Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Improvement, said in the press release. “We were looking at whether we could guide providers to treat symptomatic anemia with a single unit of blood rather than the usual two units.”

The researchers enhanced the Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system to allow blood ordering practices to be based on a specific assessment of each case rather than on a standard order of two units. As a result, red blood cell transfusions at Vanderbilt declined from 675 units per 1,000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1,000 discharges in 2015, a decrease of more than 30%.

In an effort to reduce inefficiencies in the way blood is ordered, transported, and stored, Ms. Martin and her multidisciplinary team developed the following guidelines for perioperative handling:

• When more than one unit of blood is ordered, it is sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube.

• Coolers are reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

• A specific staff member is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank.

• Individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review; aggregate data are reported monthly.

After implementation of these practices, fewer than 80 units of blood were wasted at Vanderbilt in 2015, a drop from 300 in 2011. Collectively, the blood management strategies resulted in a savings of $2 million. Ms. Martin said that such guidelines can be implemented at other medical centers, but “you have to prioritize what your initiatives are. At Vanderbilt we had a lot of opportunities with blood transfusion and blood wastage and we made huge gains. Any incremental improvement would take additional resources.”

The researchers reported having no relevant disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – A process intended to optimize blood management led to a 30% reduction in blood use and a savings of $2 million, results from a single-center study showed.

“Blood is a limited resource and we have a responsibility as a health care provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations,” lead study author Barbara J. Martin, RN, said in a press release. The study was presented in a poster session at the American College of Surgeons/National Surgical Quality Improvement Program National Conference.

ksena32/ThinkStock

In an effort to evaluate how they could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion, Ms. Martin and her colleagues at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn., first changed provider orders to support a single unit order and then follow-up order for more blood if necessary. The previous process was to order two units of blood, which was at times more blood than was needed. “The data on restrictive transfusion has been out for years documenting that patients have better outcomes with a more restrictive transfusion strategy,” Ms. Martin, of the Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Improvement, said in the press release. “We were looking at whether we could guide providers to treat symptomatic anemia with a single unit of blood rather than the usual two units.”

The researchers enhanced the Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system to allow blood ordering practices to be based on a specific assessment of each case rather than on a standard order of two units. As a result, red blood cell transfusions at Vanderbilt declined from 675 units per 1,000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1,000 discharges in 2015, a decrease of more than 30%.

In an effort to reduce inefficiencies in the way blood is ordered, transported, and stored, Ms. Martin and her multidisciplinary team developed the following guidelines for perioperative handling:

• When more than one unit of blood is ordered, it is sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube.

• Coolers are reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

• A specific staff member is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank.

• Individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review; aggregate data are reported monthly.

After implementation of these practices, fewer than 80 units of blood were wasted at Vanderbilt in 2015, a drop from 300 in 2011. Collectively, the blood management strategies resulted in a savings of $2 million. Ms. Martin said that such guidelines can be implemented at other medical centers, but “you have to prioritize what your initiatives are. At Vanderbilt we had a lot of opportunities with blood transfusion and blood wastage and we made huge gains. Any incremental improvement would take additional resources.”

The researchers reported having no relevant disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

CHICAGO - A study examining the genes of more than 120,000 people from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas has offered the clearest picture yet of the genes that drive type 2 diabetes.

The study, published July 11 in the journal Nature, puts to rest a decades-long debate over the genetics that influence the risk of diabetes, which affects one in 10 people over the course of their lifetime.

And it has identified more than a dozen specific genes directly involved in the development of type 2 diabetes that might serve as potential drug targets.

"There was a whole furious debate that arose about this," said Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, one of more than 300 scientists collaborating on the work.

Prior studies turned up more than 80 spots in the genome associated with the development of adult-onset diabetes, but most of these genetic errors were common, meaning they occurred frequently in the population, and they explained only a small fraction of disease risk.

These discoveries were based on genome-wide association studies or GWAS, which used gene chips that scan thousands of genes at a time. Researchers used these to scan DNA from large populations of individuals with a specific disease and compare them with DNA from similar groups of healthy people.

Critics, including geneticist Dr. David Goldstein at Columbia University, argued that such studies were a waste of resources because they only found common variants that explained just a small fraction of the risk for disease.

He said the really important drivers of common diseases such as diabetes and schizophrenia were more likely to be found in extremely rare genes, those occurring in individuals or in families, not those shared by large populations of people.

Goldstein "argued very persuasively that it was all about rare variants and we were all going down the wrong road looking at the common ones," Collins said in a telephone interview.

The new study took a deeper look, using next-generation sequencing to search the entire genetic code of 2,657 people with and without diabetes to assess the contribution of both rare and common genes driving diabetes.

They also sequenced all of the protein-making genes in 12,940 people, and used statistical methods to estimate risk in another 111,548 people with less complete DNA data.

They found that, indeed, most of the genetic risk for type 2 diabetes is caused by common mistakes in the genetic code, with each mistake contributing only a small portion of an individual's risk for developing the disease.

"What this study says quite definitively for diabetes is the vast majority of hereditary risk variants are in fact these common ones, and the rare ones, while they pop up here and there, are a much smaller contribution," Collins said.

The study also turned up more than a dozen examples where variants alter the way proteins are made, suggesting that these gene variants have some direct impact on the development of type 2 diabetes.

"These represent promising avenues for efforts to design new ways to treat or prevent the disease," said Mark McCarthy, a senior author of the study from Oxford University.

All of the data will be made publicly available online through the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a public-private partnership between the NIH, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10 drug companies and several nonprofits.

Goldstein said the work was "a careful, solid investigation" that does not change his view much overall, adding that it was time to "quit arguing."

"What I care about now is finding the exact variants that infer risk, and understanding how they do so," he said.

SOURCE: http://go.nature.com/29DlL5i

Nature 2016.

CHICAGO - A study examining the genes of more than 120,000 people from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas has offered the clearest picture yet of the genes that drive type 2 diabetes.

The study, published July 11 in the journal Nature, puts to rest a decades-long debate over the genetics that influence the risk of diabetes, which affects one in 10 people over the course of their lifetime.

And it has identified more than a dozen specific genes directly involved in the development of type 2 diabetes that might serve as potential drug targets.

"There was a whole furious debate that arose about this," said Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, one of more than 300 scientists collaborating on the work.

Prior studies turned up more than 80 spots in the genome associated with the development of adult-onset diabetes, but most of these genetic errors were common, meaning they occurred frequently in the population, and they explained only a small fraction of disease risk.

These discoveries were based on genome-wide association studies or GWAS, which used gene chips that scan thousands of genes at a time. Researchers used these to scan DNA from large populations of individuals with a specific disease and compare them with DNA from similar groups of healthy people.

Critics, including geneticist Dr. David Goldstein at Columbia University, argued that such studies were a waste of resources because they only found common variants that explained just a small fraction of the risk for disease.

He said the really important drivers of common diseases such as diabetes and schizophrenia were more likely to be found in extremely rare genes, those occurring in individuals or in families, not those shared by large populations of people.

Goldstein "argued very persuasively that it was all about rare variants and we were all going down the wrong road looking at the common ones," Collins said in a telephone interview.

The new study took a deeper look, using next-generation sequencing to search the entire genetic code of 2,657 people with and without diabetes to assess the contribution of both rare and common genes driving diabetes.

They also sequenced all of the protein-making genes in 12,940 people, and used statistical methods to estimate risk in another 111,548 people with less complete DNA data.

They found that, indeed, most of the genetic risk for type 2 diabetes is caused by common mistakes in the genetic code, with each mistake contributing only a small portion of an individual's risk for developing the disease.

"What this study says quite definitively for diabetes is the vast majority of hereditary risk variants are in fact these common ones, and the rare ones, while they pop up here and there, are a much smaller contribution," Collins said.

The study also turned up more than a dozen examples where variants alter the way proteins are made, suggesting that these gene variants have some direct impact on the development of type 2 diabetes.

"These represent promising avenues for efforts to design new ways to treat or prevent the disease," said Mark McCarthy, a senior author of the study from Oxford University.

All of the data will be made publicly available online through the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a public-private partnership between the NIH, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10 drug companies and several nonprofits.

Goldstein said the work was "a careful, solid investigation" that does not change his view much overall, adding that it was time to "quit arguing."

"What I care about now is finding the exact variants that infer risk, and understanding how they do so," he said.

SOURCE: http://go.nature.com/29DlL5i

Nature 2016.

CHICAGO - A study examining the genes of more than 120,000 people from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas has offered the clearest picture yet of the genes that drive type 2 diabetes.

The study, published July 11 in the journal Nature, puts to rest a decades-long debate over the genetics that influence the risk of diabetes, which affects one in 10 people over the course of their lifetime.

And it has identified more than a dozen specific genes directly involved in the development of type 2 diabetes that might serve as potential drug targets.

"There was a whole furious debate that arose about this," said Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, one of more than 300 scientists collaborating on the work.

Prior studies turned up more than 80 spots in the genome associated with the development of adult-onset diabetes, but most of these genetic errors were common, meaning they occurred frequently in the population, and they explained only a small fraction of disease risk.

These discoveries were based on genome-wide association studies or GWAS, which used gene chips that scan thousands of genes at a time. Researchers used these to scan DNA from large populations of individuals with a specific disease and compare them with DNA from similar groups of healthy people.

Critics, including geneticist Dr. David Goldstein at Columbia University, argued that such studies were a waste of resources because they only found common variants that explained just a small fraction of the risk for disease.

He said the really important drivers of common diseases such as diabetes and schizophrenia were more likely to be found in extremely rare genes, those occurring in individuals or in families, not those shared by large populations of people.

Goldstein "argued very persuasively that it was all about rare variants and we were all going down the wrong road looking at the common ones," Collins said in a telephone interview.

The new study took a deeper look, using next-generation sequencing to search the entire genetic code of 2,657 people with and without diabetes to assess the contribution of both rare and common genes driving diabetes.

They also sequenced all of the protein-making genes in 12,940 people, and used statistical methods to estimate risk in another 111,548 people with less complete DNA data.

They found that, indeed, most of the genetic risk for type 2 diabetes is caused by common mistakes in the genetic code, with each mistake contributing only a small portion of an individual's risk for developing the disease.

"What this study says quite definitively for diabetes is the vast majority of hereditary risk variants are in fact these common ones, and the rare ones, while they pop up here and there, are a much smaller contribution," Collins said.

The study also turned up more than a dozen examples where variants alter the way proteins are made, suggesting that these gene variants have some direct impact on the development of type 2 diabetes.

"These represent promising avenues for efforts to design new ways to treat or prevent the disease," said Mark McCarthy, a senior author of the study from Oxford University.

All of the data will be made publicly available online through the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a public-private partnership between the NIH, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10 drug companies and several nonprofits.

Goldstein said the work was "a careful, solid investigation" that does not change his view much overall, adding that it was time to "quit arguing."

"What I care about now is finding the exact variants that infer risk, and understanding how they do so," he said.

SOURCE: http://go.nature.com/29DlL5i

Nature 2016.

October 20-22, 2016
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL

Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann

Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich

Course Overview
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease (VHD).

Focusing on interactivity and practical decision-making, this unique conference will engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies using real-world cases. Its renowned faculty will include experts on the cutting edge of clinically relevant VHD data.

The interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision-making with medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care, taking into account that constantly changing management tools can impact the surgical team. There will be breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.

Target Audience
Cardiologists, interventional cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, internists, nurses, physician assistants and health care professionals involved in VHD evaluation, diagnosis and/or management.

More Information

Registration/Housing

October 20-22, 2016
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL

Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann

Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich

Course Overview
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease (VHD).

Focusing on interactivity and practical decision-making, this unique conference will engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies using real-world cases. Its renowned faculty will include experts on the cutting edge of clinically relevant VHD data.

The interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision-making with medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care, taking into account that constantly changing management tools can impact the surgical team. There will be breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.

Target Audience
Cardiologists, interventional cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, internists, nurses, physician assistants and health care professionals involved in VHD evaluation, diagnosis and/or management.

More Information

Registration/Housing

October 20-22, 2016
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL

Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann

Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich

Course Overview
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease (VHD).

Focusing on interactivity and practical decision-making, this unique conference will engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies using real-world cases. Its renowned faculty will include experts on the cutting edge of clinically relevant VHD data.

The interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision-making with medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care, taking into account that constantly changing management tools can impact the surgical team. There will be breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.

Target Audience
Cardiologists, interventional cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, internists, nurses, physician assistants and health care professionals involved in VHD evaluation, diagnosis and/or management.

More Information

Registration/Housing

October 20-22, 2016
Hyatt Regency O’Hare
Chicago, IL

Program Directors
David H. Harpole, Jr
Marco A. Zenati

This course is an intensive, interactive training program for cardiothoracic surgeons across all subspecialties. It will permit them to acquire the critical skills necessary for effective clinical trial design and implementation. The course is particularly suited for professionals who are planning to apply for clinical trial funding, allowing them to better understand the complex nature of preparing and submitting clinical trial proposals.

Invited faculty includes currently funded clinical trial leading investigators and experts in the field of biostatistics and health sciences research. The program will offer a process in which the clinical trial protocol development can be streamlined. Interactive features will include hands-on focus groups and mock study sessions.

Register Today! Space available for only 40 participants.

Registration/Housing/Preliminary Program

October 20-22, 2016
Hyatt Regency O’Hare
Chicago, IL

Program Directors
David H. Harpole, Jr
Marco A. Zenati

This course is an intensive, interactive training program for cardiothoracic surgeons across all subspecialties. It will permit them to acquire the critical skills necessary for effective clinical trial design and implementation. The course is particularly suited for professionals who are planning to apply for clinical trial funding, allowing them to better understand the complex nature of preparing and submitting clinical trial proposals.

Invited faculty includes currently funded clinical trial leading investigators and experts in the field of biostatistics and health sciences research. The program will offer a process in which the clinical trial protocol development can be streamlined. Interactive features will include hands-on focus groups and mock study sessions.

Register Today! Space available for only 40 participants.

Registration/Housing/Preliminary Program

October 20-22, 2016
Hyatt Regency O’Hare
Chicago, IL

Program Directors
David H. Harpole, Jr
Marco A. Zenati

This course is an intensive, interactive training program for cardiothoracic surgeons across all subspecialties. It will permit them to acquire the critical skills necessary for effective clinical trial design and implementation. The course is particularly suited for professionals who are planning to apply for clinical trial funding, allowing them to better understand the complex nature of preparing and submitting clinical trial proposals.

Invited faculty includes currently funded clinical trial leading investigators and experts in the field of biostatistics and health sciences research. The program will offer a process in which the clinical trial protocol development can be streamlined. Interactive features will include hands-on focus groups and mock study sessions.

Register Today! Space available for only 40 participants.

Registration/Housing/Preliminary Program

SAN DIEGO – Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer waited about 38 days, on average, from the initial concerning imaging test to initiation of treatment, according to a study analyzing health care transit times at a single community hospital.

“Ovarian cancer is such a hard disease to diagnose early,” Christopher J. LaFargue, MD, lead study author, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. “Once it’s diagnosed, it’s imperative that women get in to see the gynecologic oncologist [and] make sure their treatment care isn’t lagged for any reason.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

In an effort to characterize the length of time between critical points in the care of women with ovarian cancer and determine the impact of patient demographics, Dr. LaFargue and his associates retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 45 women who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at Long Beach (Calif.) Memorial Medical Center between January 2012 and May 2015.

They examined patient demographics, including preoperative CA-125. Time points of interest were first concerning imaging test, first gynecologic oncology appointment, initiation of treatment, and adjuvant therapy. They used univariate analyses to determine associations between specific patient demographics and the time intervals of interest.

Dr. LaFargue, a resident in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine, reported that the mean age of patients was 61 years, and the mean driving distance to the hospital from the patients’ home was 11 miles. More than half of the patients were white (58%) and 62% of patients were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. Preoperative CA-125 exceeded 200 U/mL in 62% of patients. Medicare enrollees with supplemental insurance made up less than half of the group (44%).

The researchers found that the average time from initial concerning imaging to start of treatment was about 38 days. The average time from initial imaging to the first office visit with a gynecologic oncologist was about 18 days. The time from that appointment to initial treatment was 19 days, on average. The time from the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval cytoreductive surgery was 103 days, on average.

The only factor that significantly impacted transit time was a patient’s CA-125 level. Those who had a level of 200 U/mL or greater were more likely to receive surgery or treatment quicker, compared with those who had a CA-125 level less than 200 U/mL. No other statistically significant associations between patient demographics and length of time intervals were observed.

“It would have been nice to have seen a correlation with insurance status,” Dr. LaFargue said. “That’s kind of what we were hoping for, because then you can make an argument with insurance payers that patients who have Medicare aren’t getting treated as quickly as those who have a PPO, for example.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its small sample size, lack of outcomes data, and the fact that it was conducted in a community hospital setting.

Dr. LaFargue reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer waited about 38 days, on average, from the initial concerning imaging test to initiation of treatment, according to a study analyzing health care transit times at a single community hospital.

“Ovarian cancer is such a hard disease to diagnose early,” Christopher J. LaFargue, MD, lead study author, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. “Once it’s diagnosed, it’s imperative that women get in to see the gynecologic oncologist [and] make sure their treatment care isn’t lagged for any reason.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

In an effort to characterize the length of time between critical points in the care of women with ovarian cancer and determine the impact of patient demographics, Dr. LaFargue and his associates retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 45 women who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at Long Beach (Calif.) Memorial Medical Center between January 2012 and May 2015.

They examined patient demographics, including preoperative CA-125. Time points of interest were first concerning imaging test, first gynecologic oncology appointment, initiation of treatment, and adjuvant therapy. They used univariate analyses to determine associations between specific patient demographics and the time intervals of interest.

Dr. LaFargue, a resident in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine, reported that the mean age of patients was 61 years, and the mean driving distance to the hospital from the patients’ home was 11 miles. More than half of the patients were white (58%) and 62% of patients were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. Preoperative CA-125 exceeded 200 U/mL in 62% of patients. Medicare enrollees with supplemental insurance made up less than half of the group (44%).

The researchers found that the average time from initial concerning imaging to start of treatment was about 38 days. The average time from initial imaging to the first office visit with a gynecologic oncologist was about 18 days. The time from that appointment to initial treatment was 19 days, on average. The time from the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval cytoreductive surgery was 103 days, on average.

The only factor that significantly impacted transit time was a patient’s CA-125 level. Those who had a level of 200 U/mL or greater were more likely to receive surgery or treatment quicker, compared with those who had a CA-125 level less than 200 U/mL. No other statistically significant associations between patient demographics and length of time intervals were observed.

“It would have been nice to have seen a correlation with insurance status,” Dr. LaFargue said. “That’s kind of what we were hoping for, because then you can make an argument with insurance payers that patients who have Medicare aren’t getting treated as quickly as those who have a PPO, for example.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its small sample size, lack of outcomes data, and the fact that it was conducted in a community hospital setting.

Dr. LaFargue reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer waited about 38 days, on average, from the initial concerning imaging test to initiation of treatment, according to a study analyzing health care transit times at a single community hospital.

“Ovarian cancer is such a hard disease to diagnose early,” Christopher J. LaFargue, MD, lead study author, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. “Once it’s diagnosed, it’s imperative that women get in to see the gynecologic oncologist [and] make sure their treatment care isn’t lagged for any reason.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

In an effort to characterize the length of time between critical points in the care of women with ovarian cancer and determine the impact of patient demographics, Dr. LaFargue and his associates retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 45 women who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at Long Beach (Calif.) Memorial Medical Center between January 2012 and May 2015.

They examined patient demographics, including preoperative CA-125. Time points of interest were first concerning imaging test, first gynecologic oncology appointment, initiation of treatment, and adjuvant therapy. They used univariate analyses to determine associations between specific patient demographics and the time intervals of interest.

Dr. LaFargue, a resident in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine, reported that the mean age of patients was 61 years, and the mean driving distance to the hospital from the patients’ home was 11 miles. More than half of the patients were white (58%) and 62% of patients were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. Preoperative CA-125 exceeded 200 U/mL in 62% of patients. Medicare enrollees with supplemental insurance made up less than half of the group (44%).

The researchers found that the average time from initial concerning imaging to start of treatment was about 38 days. The average time from initial imaging to the first office visit with a gynecologic oncologist was about 18 days. The time from that appointment to initial treatment was 19 days, on average. The time from the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval cytoreductive surgery was 103 days, on average.

The only factor that significantly impacted transit time was a patient’s CA-125 level. Those who had a level of 200 U/mL or greater were more likely to receive surgery or treatment quicker, compared with those who had a CA-125 level less than 200 U/mL. No other statistically significant associations between patient demographics and length of time intervals were observed.

“It would have been nice to have seen a correlation with insurance status,” Dr. LaFargue said. “That’s kind of what we were hoping for, because then you can make an argument with insurance payers that patients who have Medicare aren’t getting treated as quickly as those who have a PPO, for example.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its small sample size, lack of outcomes data, and the fact that it was conducted in a community hospital setting.

Dr. LaFargue reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

Medicaid status did not significantly affect costs for children who were hospitalized because of asthma, according to Jeffrey H. Silber, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 17,739 matched pairs of children with and without Medicaid who were hospitalized because of asthma, the median cost for Medicaid patients was $4,263; for non-Medicaid patients, it was $4,160. The median difference in cost between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients was $84, and the mean difference in cost was $49.

Both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients had similar lengths of stay, with a median of 1 day for both groups. Intensive care unit use was similar, with 10.1% of Medicaid patients visiting the ICU, compared with 10.6% of non-Medicaid patients.

“Our study should serve to provide potential benchmarks for use and reimbursement standards, with implications for care and payment even when children are hospitalized outside the [Pediatric Hospital Information System],” the investigators wrote.

Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0371).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

Medicaid status did not significantly affect costs for children who were hospitalized because of asthma, according to Jeffrey H. Silber, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 17,739 matched pairs of children with and without Medicaid who were hospitalized because of asthma, the median cost for Medicaid patients was $4,263; for non-Medicaid patients, it was $4,160. The median difference in cost between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients was $84, and the mean difference in cost was $49.

Both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients had similar lengths of stay, with a median of 1 day for both groups. Intensive care unit use was similar, with 10.1% of Medicaid patients visiting the ICU, compared with 10.6% of non-Medicaid patients.

“Our study should serve to provide potential benchmarks for use and reimbursement standards, with implications for care and payment even when children are hospitalized outside the [Pediatric Hospital Information System],” the investigators wrote.

Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0371).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

Medicaid status did not significantly affect costs for children who were hospitalized because of asthma, according to Jeffrey H. Silber, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 17,739 matched pairs of children with and without Medicaid who were hospitalized because of asthma, the median cost for Medicaid patients was $4,263; for non-Medicaid patients, it was $4,160. The median difference in cost between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients was $84, and the mean difference in cost was $49.

Both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients had similar lengths of stay, with a median of 1 day for both groups. Intensive care unit use was similar, with 10.1% of Medicaid patients visiting the ICU, compared with 10.6% of non-Medicaid patients.

“Our study should serve to provide potential benchmarks for use and reimbursement standards, with implications for care and payment even when children are hospitalized outside the [Pediatric Hospital Information System],” the investigators wrote.

Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0371).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy with drain placement appears optimal, compared with the reconstituting procedure, for experienced surgeons seeking a “bailout” operation in both open and minimally invasive cholecystectomy where the critical view of safety (CVS) is not easily attainable, according to a report written on behalf of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force 2015.

The rise in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with an increase in the rate of bile duct injury, most commonly when secure ductal identification using CVS is not possible because of an inflamed hepatocystic triangle occluding the cystic duct, cystic artery, and cystic plate. In such cases, a safe and effective bailout technique (one not requiring a second operation) must be decided upon in preference to simply closing and proceeding to a later open procedure, according to Steven M. Strasberg, MD, of Washington University in Saint Louis and his colleagues (J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:89-96).

In order to clarify the two most common and effective “partial cholecystectomy” procedures being performed, Dr. Strasburg and his colleagues have suggested the use of the term “subtotal” in place of “partial” and the terms “fenestrating” vs. “reconstituting,” to define whether there is an open or closed gallbladder remnant, respectively, after the procedure.

In subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, except for a tip at the lowest portion that acts as a shield to protect against inadvertently entering the hepatocystic triangle, according to the authors. There is no sealed lumen remaining, thus the cystic duct requires closure. The cystic duct may be closed from the inside with a purse-string suture. Attempts to ligate the cystic duct outside the gallbladder may injure the common bile duct and can potentially result in fistulas.

In subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, but the lowest portion of the gallbladder is closed with sutures or staples and reconstitutes an intact lumen in which stones may be re-formed, which can in turn require reoperation.

“Whether the subtotal cholecystectomy is ‘fenestrating’ or ‘reconstituting’ depends on whether the lowest part of the gallbladder is left open (fenestrating) or closed (reconstituting) and not on the amount of gallbladder that is left attached to the liver,” according to the authors.

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is most likely done when an open approach is used, whereas subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomies are probably easier to do laparoscopically and are preferred by surgeons doing minimally invasive procedures, they said.

Despite the fact that there have been no head-to-head comparisons of fenestrating vs. reconstituting techniques, the authors said they prefer the fenestrating method, although the technique chosen may be based on the experience of the surgeon, they noted.

“The principle is that a subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is a standard operation that should be used liberally when surgeons encounter difficulty getting to the CVS,” the authors wrote. “We believe that clarification of the procedures and what they are called will help to choose which type of procedure to select, and it will also facilitate the performance of clinical studies in this area,“ they concluded.

The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

A transcript of an interactive discussion of this paper and topic is available online (www.journalacs.org/RAS-ACS-discussion-2016).

mlesney@frontlinemedcom.com

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy with drain placement appears optimal, compared with the reconstituting procedure, for experienced surgeons seeking a “bailout” operation in both open and minimally invasive cholecystectomy where the critical view of safety (CVS) is not easily attainable, according to a report written on behalf of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force 2015.

The rise in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with an increase in the rate of bile duct injury, most commonly when secure ductal identification using CVS is not possible because of an inflamed hepatocystic triangle occluding the cystic duct, cystic artery, and cystic plate. In such cases, a safe and effective bailout technique (one not requiring a second operation) must be decided upon in preference to simply closing and proceeding to a later open procedure, according to Steven M. Strasberg, MD, of Washington University in Saint Louis and his colleagues (J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:89-96).

In order to clarify the two most common and effective “partial cholecystectomy” procedures being performed, Dr. Strasburg and his colleagues have suggested the use of the term “subtotal” in place of “partial” and the terms “fenestrating” vs. “reconstituting,” to define whether there is an open or closed gallbladder remnant, respectively, after the procedure.

In subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, except for a tip at the lowest portion that acts as a shield to protect against inadvertently entering the hepatocystic triangle, according to the authors. There is no sealed lumen remaining, thus the cystic duct requires closure. The cystic duct may be closed from the inside with a purse-string suture. Attempts to ligate the cystic duct outside the gallbladder may injure the common bile duct and can potentially result in fistulas.

In subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, but the lowest portion of the gallbladder is closed with sutures or staples and reconstitutes an intact lumen in which stones may be re-formed, which can in turn require reoperation.

“Whether the subtotal cholecystectomy is ‘fenestrating’ or ‘reconstituting’ depends on whether the lowest part of the gallbladder is left open (fenestrating) or closed (reconstituting) and not on the amount of gallbladder that is left attached to the liver,” according to the authors.

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is most likely done when an open approach is used, whereas subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomies are probably easier to do laparoscopically and are preferred by surgeons doing minimally invasive procedures, they said.

Despite the fact that there have been no head-to-head comparisons of fenestrating vs. reconstituting techniques, the authors said they prefer the fenestrating method, although the technique chosen may be based on the experience of the surgeon, they noted.

“The principle is that a subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is a standard operation that should be used liberally when surgeons encounter difficulty getting to the CVS,” the authors wrote. “We believe that clarification of the procedures and what they are called will help to choose which type of procedure to select, and it will also facilitate the performance of clinical studies in this area,“ they concluded.

The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

A transcript of an interactive discussion of this paper and topic is available online (www.journalacs.org/RAS-ACS-discussion-2016).

mlesney@frontlinemedcom.com

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy with drain placement appears optimal, compared with the reconstituting procedure, for experienced surgeons seeking a “bailout” operation in both open and minimally invasive cholecystectomy where the critical view of safety (CVS) is not easily attainable, according to a report written on behalf of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force 2015.

The rise in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with an increase in the rate of bile duct injury, most commonly when secure ductal identification using CVS is not possible because of an inflamed hepatocystic triangle occluding the cystic duct, cystic artery, and cystic plate. In such cases, a safe and effective bailout technique (one not requiring a second operation) must be decided upon in preference to simply closing and proceeding to a later open procedure, according to Steven M. Strasberg, MD, of Washington University in Saint Louis and his colleagues (J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:89-96).

In order to clarify the two most common and effective “partial cholecystectomy” procedures being performed, Dr. Strasburg and his colleagues have suggested the use of the term “subtotal” in place of “partial” and the terms “fenestrating” vs. “reconstituting,” to define whether there is an open or closed gallbladder remnant, respectively, after the procedure.

In subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, except for a tip at the lowest portion that acts as a shield to protect against inadvertently entering the hepatocystic triangle, according to the authors. There is no sealed lumen remaining, thus the cystic duct requires closure. The cystic duct may be closed from the inside with a purse-string suture. Attempts to ligate the cystic duct outside the gallbladder may injure the common bile duct and can potentially result in fistulas.

In subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, the free peritonealized portion of the gallbladder is excised, but the lowest portion of the gallbladder is closed with sutures or staples and reconstitutes an intact lumen in which stones may be re-formed, which can in turn require reoperation.

“Whether the subtotal cholecystectomy is ‘fenestrating’ or ‘reconstituting’ depends on whether the lowest part of the gallbladder is left open (fenestrating) or closed (reconstituting) and not on the amount of gallbladder that is left attached to the liver,” according to the authors.

Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is most likely done when an open approach is used, whereas subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomies are probably easier to do laparoscopically and are preferred by surgeons doing minimally invasive procedures, they said.

Despite the fact that there have been no head-to-head comparisons of fenestrating vs. reconstituting techniques, the authors said they prefer the fenestrating method, although the technique chosen may be based on the experience of the surgeon, they noted.

“The principle is that a subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is a standard operation that should be used liberally when surgeons encounter difficulty getting to the CVS,” the authors wrote. “We believe that clarification of the procedures and what they are called will help to choose which type of procedure to select, and it will also facilitate the performance of clinical studies in this area,“ they concluded.

The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

A transcript of an interactive discussion of this paper and topic is available online (www.journalacs.org/RAS-ACS-discussion-2016).

mlesney@frontlinemedcom.com

Complementary and alternative medicine has a definite adjunctive and even at times primary role in the medical management of patients. Its prevalence in the United States is estimated to be 38% and it is used to treat dermatologic conditions in 6% of patients (Harris et al; Smith et al). Acupuncture, a component of traditional Chinese medicine, has a prevalence of 0.6% to 1.4% and is used to treat 0.6% of dermatologic conditions (Smith et al; Cooper et al).

Acupuncture involves stimulation of specific points usually located along meridians. The source of stimulation on the skin can be elicited using needle points, pressure, or heat. Diseases disturb the body’s vital energy (qi), and stimulation along the appropriate meridian channel achieves balance and cures disease by restoring the normal circulation of the body’s qi.

Ma and Sivamani (J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21:520-529) performed a systematic review of articles indexed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register using acupuncture therapy or acupuncture and skin diseases or dermatology as search terms to synthesize the evidence on the use of acupuncture as a primary treatment modality for dermatologic conditions. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria; of them, 17 showed statistically significant improvements (P<.05) in outcome measures. Specifically, acupuncture improved the outcome measures in the treatment of several dermatologic conditions including chloasma, dermatitis, facial elasticity, hyperhidrosis, pruritus, and urticaria.

What’s the issue?

Patients often have insight into potential available therapies for their medical problems. Hence, it is not unexpected that individuals with dermatologic conditions may not only be aware of complementary and alternative medicine approaches, such as acupuncture, but also seek dermatologists who can provide them with these possible therapeutic options. Although the frequency and duration of acupuncture treatments may not allow it to be a practical modality for all individuals, this treatment appears to be effective for reducing the severity of itch in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Should dermatologists incorporate acupuncture into their therapeutic armamentarium? Should national dermatology meetings provide courses on acupuncture technique? Should dermatology residency programs add competency in acupuncture management to their curriculum?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Complementary and alternative medicine has a definite adjunctive and even at times primary role in the medical management of patients. Its prevalence in the United States is estimated to be 38% and it is used to treat dermatologic conditions in 6% of patients (Harris et al; Smith et al). Acupuncture, a component of traditional Chinese medicine, has a prevalence of 0.6% to 1.4% and is used to treat 0.6% of dermatologic conditions (Smith et al; Cooper et al).

Acupuncture involves stimulation of specific points usually located along meridians. The source of stimulation on the skin can be elicited using needle points, pressure, or heat. Diseases disturb the body’s vital energy (qi), and stimulation along the appropriate meridian channel achieves balance and cures disease by restoring the normal circulation of the body’s qi.

Ma and Sivamani (J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21:520-529) performed a systematic review of articles indexed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register using acupuncture therapy or acupuncture and skin diseases or dermatology as search terms to synthesize the evidence on the use of acupuncture as a primary treatment modality for dermatologic conditions. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria; of them, 17 showed statistically significant improvements (P<.05) in outcome measures. Specifically, acupuncture improved the outcome measures in the treatment of several dermatologic conditions including chloasma, dermatitis, facial elasticity, hyperhidrosis, pruritus, and urticaria.

What’s the issue?

Patients often have insight into potential available therapies for their medical problems. Hence, it is not unexpected that individuals with dermatologic conditions may not only be aware of complementary and alternative medicine approaches, such as acupuncture, but also seek dermatologists who can provide them with these possible therapeutic options. Although the frequency and duration of acupuncture treatments may not allow it to be a practical modality for all individuals, this treatment appears to be effective for reducing the severity of itch in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Should dermatologists incorporate acupuncture into their therapeutic armamentarium? Should national dermatology meetings provide courses on acupuncture technique? Should dermatology residency programs add competency in acupuncture management to their curriculum?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Complementary and alternative medicine has a definite adjunctive and even at times primary role in the medical management of patients. Its prevalence in the United States is estimated to be 38% and it is used to treat dermatologic conditions in 6% of patients (Harris et al; Smith et al). Acupuncture, a component of traditional Chinese medicine, has a prevalence of 0.6% to 1.4% and is used to treat 0.6% of dermatologic conditions (Smith et al; Cooper et al).

Acupuncture involves stimulation of specific points usually located along meridians. The source of stimulation on the skin can be elicited using needle points, pressure, or heat. Diseases disturb the body’s vital energy (qi), and stimulation along the appropriate meridian channel achieves balance and cures disease by restoring the normal circulation of the body’s qi.

Ma and Sivamani (J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21:520-529) performed a systematic review of articles indexed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register using acupuncture therapy or acupuncture and skin diseases or dermatology as search terms to synthesize the evidence on the use of acupuncture as a primary treatment modality for dermatologic conditions. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria; of them, 17 showed statistically significant improvements (P<.05) in outcome measures. Specifically, acupuncture improved the outcome measures in the treatment of several dermatologic conditions including chloasma, dermatitis, facial elasticity, hyperhidrosis, pruritus, and urticaria.

What’s the issue?

Patients often have insight into potential available therapies for their medical problems. Hence, it is not unexpected that individuals with dermatologic conditions may not only be aware of complementary and alternative medicine approaches, such as acupuncture, but also seek dermatologists who can provide them with these possible therapeutic options. Although the frequency and duration of acupuncture treatments may not allow it to be a practical modality for all individuals, this treatment appears to be effective for reducing the severity of itch in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Should dermatologists incorporate acupuncture into their therapeutic armamentarium? Should national dermatology meetings provide courses on acupuncture technique? Should dermatology residency programs add competency in acupuncture management to their curriculum?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – Indoor tanning is a significant contributor to the U.S. skin cancer epidemic and represents a 100% preventable source of exposure to these cancers. Understanding exactly who is using indoor tanning – and why – can provide insight and leverage to help change behavior, according to Cindy Firkins Smith, MD, adjunct professor of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Dr. Smith noted that the typical indoor tanning bed user is female and between 17 and 30 years old. Other aspects of her lifestyle may be unhealthy; for example, she may smoke cigarettes, have an unhealthy pattern of alcohol consumption, and make unhealthy food choices (Cancer Causes Control 2006 June. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-0453-9). She also is likely to watch beauty-focused reality TV shows (J Am Acad Dermatol 2013 May. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.055) and is likely to objectify her own body, seeing it as something to be viewed and judged (Arch Dermatol 2009 Sep 1. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.190).

©Vidmantas Goldbergas/Thinkstock

Tanning is a behavior that provides relaxation and positive emotions, and she receives support for this behavior from family and friends. “Tanning often starts with mom, which is one reason that parental permission legislation doesn’t work,” she said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Dr. Smith said that up to 30 million people tan indoors every year. Rates of tanning for teenage girls are very high: up to 40% of American teenagers use indoor tanning, and 20%-30% of all 18- to 29-year-olds have used a tanning bed in the previous year (Jama Dermatol 2014 April doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896).

The ubiquity of tanning salons contributes to the problem, said Dr. Smith. “More is not better; in the largest U.S. cities, tanning salons outnumber [both] Starbucks and McDonald’s,” she said, noting that studies have shown that both proximity to tanning salons and the low cost of tanning encourage their use (Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar 36[3]:243-6).

A 2015 study surveyed 125 colleges, finding that 48% had indoor tanning facilities in their campus or off-campus housing. College cash cards were acceptable payment at 14.4% of colleges, and 96% of off-campus housing facilities that offered tanning provided it as a free “perk” to residents (JAMA Dermatol 2015 Jan. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3590).

Further, some data suggest that tanning really can be addictive for some patients. Ultraviolet light exposure has been shown to “light up” pleasure centers in PET-CT studies, and some frequent tanners report relaxation and pleasure from tanning as well as craving and feelings of withdrawal when they miss sessions. Dr. Smith said she does not hesitate to refer teen patients to mental health providers if there are concerns about mood and depression.

Having an understanding of patient motivations to tan can help in getting patients to take steps toward change, said Dr. Smith. “What can we do? We can actually do a lot. We have a lot more influence than we think we do.”

At the level of the individual patient, just opening up a conversation can make a big difference. “We assume we know why teenagers go to a tanning booth. But do we? When you notice a young woman who’s been to a tanning booth, ask why,” using a nonjudgmental approach to begin a dialogue about the near-term and long-term dangers of tanning. A positive approach is key, noted Dr. Smith. “Focusing on the benefits of avoiding UV tanning is more effective than a heavy reliance on scare tactics,” she said. Also, “multiple interventions work better.”

Before-and-after photos of celebrities whose appearance has been affected by photoaging can be effective. Another tactic with a more positive spin is to share images of celebrities who have chosen not to tan and who celebrate their fair skin. These conversations are particularly important at prom time, peak tanning season for many young women, said Dr. Smith. She has a portfolio of photos showing fair-skinned women wearing high-contrast gowns, which she says are more flattering for pale skin than white or nude colors.

For patients who still want that tan look, “Tanning for reasons of appearance can be satisfied with sunless tanners,” said Dr. Smith. The most common ingredient in sunless tanners is dihydroxyacetone (DHA), which was approved in the 1970s for topical use. However, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2011 about spray tanning, noting that the “industry has not provided safety data to FDA in order for the agency to consider approving it for … ‘misting’ from tanning booths.” The FDA’s specific concern had to do with the unknown safety of ingestion, inhalation, and mucous membrane exposure that can result from spray tanning.

Moving to the legislative and policy level, change can be achieved when stakeholders band together to “ban the tan,” said Dr. Smith. “The best way to do it is with a village. It really takes a lot of people to do this.”

There are solid epidemiologic and economic reasons to focus on the skin cancer epidemic, said Dr. Smith. Skin cancer is now the most common cancer in the United States, and more new cases “are diagnosed each year than breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers combined,” she said. Of nonmelanoma skin cancers, 90% are thought to be UV-related, and “the vast majority of mutations found in melanoma are caused by UV radiation.”

Skin cancers cost the United States over $8 billion annually, and although promising new immunotherapies are extending the lives of those with melanoma, these treatments cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. “This type of treatment is unaffordable for our system,” said Dr. Smith.

Progress is being made, she said, despite industry opposition. Individual states have regulated or banned tanning for minors, and at the federal level, tanning beds are now considered by the FDA to be Class II (moderate-risk) medical devices, a step up from their previous classification as the lowest-risk Class I devices, “The same as a tongue blade,” she said.

Dr. Smith had no relevant financial disclosures.

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – Indoor tanning is a significant contributor to the U.S. skin cancer epidemic and represents a 100% preventable source of exposure to these cancers. Understanding exactly who is using indoor tanning – and why – can provide insight and leverage to help change behavior, according to Cindy Firkins Smith, MD, adjunct professor of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Dr. Smith noted that the typical indoor tanning bed user is female and between 17 and 30 years old. Other aspects of her lifestyle may be unhealthy; for example, she may smoke cigarettes, have an unhealthy pattern of alcohol consumption, and make unhealthy food choices (Cancer Causes Control 2006 June. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-0453-9). She also is likely to watch beauty-focused reality TV shows (J Am Acad Dermatol 2013 May. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.055) and is likely to objectify her own body, seeing it as something to be viewed and judged (Arch Dermatol 2009 Sep 1. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.190).

©Vidmantas Goldbergas/Thinkstock

Tanning is a behavior that provides relaxation and positive emotions, and she receives support for this behavior from family and friends. “Tanning often starts with mom, which is one reason that parental permission legislation doesn’t work,” she said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Dr. Smith said that up to 30 million people tan indoors every year. Rates of tanning for teenage girls are very high: up to 40% of American teenagers use indoor tanning, and 20%-30% of all 18- to 29-year-olds have used a tanning bed in the previous year (Jama Dermatol 2014 April doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896).

The ubiquity of tanning salons contributes to the problem, said Dr. Smith. “More is not better; in the largest U.S. cities, tanning salons outnumber [both] Starbucks and McDonald’s,” she said, noting that studies have shown that both proximity to tanning salons and the low cost of tanning encourage their use (Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar 36[3]:243-6).

A 2015 study surveyed 125 colleges, finding that 48% had indoor tanning facilities in their campus or off-campus housing. College cash cards were acceptable payment at 14.4% of colleges, and 96% of off-campus housing facilities that offered tanning provided it as a free “perk” to residents (JAMA Dermatol 2015 Jan. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3590).

Further, some data suggest that tanning really can be addictive for some patients. Ultraviolet light exposure has been shown to “light up” pleasure centers in PET-CT studies, and some frequent tanners report relaxation and pleasure from tanning as well as craving and feelings of withdrawal when they miss sessions. Dr. Smith said she does not hesitate to refer teen patients to mental health providers if there are concerns about mood and depression.

Having an understanding of patient motivations to tan can help in getting patients to take steps toward change, said Dr. Smith. “What can we do? We can actually do a lot. We have a lot more influence than we think we do.”

At the level of the individual patient, just opening up a conversation can make a big difference. “We assume we know why teenagers go to a tanning booth. But do we? When you notice a young woman who’s been to a tanning booth, ask why,” using a nonjudgmental approach to begin a dialogue about the near-term and long-term dangers of tanning. A positive approach is key, noted Dr. Smith. “Focusing on the benefits of avoiding UV tanning is more effective than a heavy reliance on scare tactics,” she said. Also, “multiple interventions work better.”

Before-and-after photos of celebrities whose appearance has been affected by photoaging can be effective. Another tactic with a more positive spin is to share images of celebrities who have chosen not to tan and who celebrate their fair skin. These conversations are particularly important at prom time, peak tanning season for many young women, said Dr. Smith. She has a portfolio of photos showing fair-skinned women wearing high-contrast gowns, which she says are more flattering for pale skin than white or nude colors.

For patients who still want that tan look, “Tanning for reasons of appearance can be satisfied with sunless tanners,” said Dr. Smith. The most common ingredient in sunless tanners is dihydroxyacetone (DHA), which was approved in the 1970s for topical use. However, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2011 about spray tanning, noting that the “industry has not provided safety data to FDA in order for the agency to consider approving it for … ‘misting’ from tanning booths.” The FDA’s specific concern had to do with the unknown safety of ingestion, inhalation, and mucous membrane exposure that can result from spray tanning.

Moving to the legislative and policy level, change can be achieved when stakeholders band together to “ban the tan,” said Dr. Smith. “The best way to do it is with a village. It really takes a lot of people to do this.”

There are solid epidemiologic and economic reasons to focus on the skin cancer epidemic, said Dr. Smith. Skin cancer is now the most common cancer in the United States, and more new cases “are diagnosed each year than breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers combined,” she said. Of nonmelanoma skin cancers, 90% are thought to be UV-related, and “the vast majority of mutations found in melanoma are caused by UV radiation.”

Skin cancers cost the United States over $8 billion annually, and although promising new immunotherapies are extending the lives of those with melanoma, these treatments cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. “This type of treatment is unaffordable for our system,” said Dr. Smith.

Progress is being made, she said, despite industry opposition. Individual states have regulated or banned tanning for minors, and at the federal level, tanning beds are now considered by the FDA to be Class II (moderate-risk) medical devices, a step up from their previous classification as the lowest-risk Class I devices, “The same as a tongue blade,” she said.

Dr. Smith had no relevant financial disclosures.

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – Indoor tanning is a significant contributor to the U.S. skin cancer epidemic and represents a 100% preventable source of exposure to these cancers. Understanding exactly who is using indoor tanning – and why – can provide insight and leverage to help change behavior, according to Cindy Firkins Smith, MD, adjunct professor of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Dr. Smith noted that the typical indoor tanning bed user is female and between 17 and 30 years old. Other aspects of her lifestyle may be unhealthy; for example, she may smoke cigarettes, have an unhealthy pattern of alcohol consumption, and make unhealthy food choices (Cancer Causes Control 2006 June. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-0453-9). She also is likely to watch beauty-focused reality TV shows (J Am Acad Dermatol 2013 May. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.055) and is likely to objectify her own body, seeing it as something to be viewed and judged (Arch Dermatol 2009 Sep 1. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.190).

©Vidmantas Goldbergas/Thinkstock

Tanning is a behavior that provides relaxation and positive emotions, and she receives support for this behavior from family and friends. “Tanning often starts with mom, which is one reason that parental permission legislation doesn’t work,” she said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Dr. Smith said that up to 30 million people tan indoors every year. Rates of tanning for teenage girls are very high: up to 40% of American teenagers use indoor tanning, and 20%-30% of all 18- to 29-year-olds have used a tanning bed in the previous year (Jama Dermatol 2014 April doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896).

The ubiquity of tanning salons contributes to the problem, said Dr. Smith. “More is not better; in the largest U.S. cities, tanning salons outnumber [both] Starbucks and McDonald’s,” she said, noting that studies have shown that both proximity to tanning salons and the low cost of tanning encourage their use (Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar 36[3]:243-6).

A 2015 study surveyed 125 colleges, finding that 48% had indoor tanning facilities in their campus or off-campus housing. College cash cards were acceptable payment at 14.4% of colleges, and 96% of off-campus housing facilities that offered tanning provided it as a free “perk” to residents (JAMA Dermatol 2015 Jan. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3590).

Further, some data suggest that tanning really can be addictive for some patients. Ultraviolet light exposure has been shown to “light up” pleasure centers in PET-CT studies, and some frequent tanners report relaxation and pleasure from tanning as well as craving and feelings of withdrawal when they miss sessions. Dr. Smith said she does not hesitate to refer teen patients to mental health providers if there are concerns about mood and depression.

Having an understanding of patient motivations to tan can help in getting patients to take steps toward change, said Dr. Smith. “What can we do? We can actually do a lot. We have a lot more influence than we think we do.”

At the level of the individual patient, just opening up a conversation can make a big difference. “We assume we know why teenagers go to a tanning booth. But do we? When you notice a young woman who’s been to a tanning booth, ask why,” using a nonjudgmental approach to begin a dialogue about the near-term and long-term dangers of tanning. A positive approach is key, noted Dr. Smith. “Focusing on the benefits of avoiding UV tanning is more effective than a heavy reliance on scare tactics,” she said. Also, “multiple interventions work better.”

Before-and-after photos of celebrities whose appearance has been affected by photoaging can be effective. Another tactic with a more positive spin is to share images of celebrities who have chosen not to tan and who celebrate their fair skin. These conversations are particularly important at prom time, peak tanning season for many young women, said Dr. Smith. She has a portfolio of photos showing fair-skinned women wearing high-contrast gowns, which she says are more flattering for pale skin than white or nude colors.

For patients who still want that tan look, “Tanning for reasons of appearance can be satisfied with sunless tanners,” said Dr. Smith. The most common ingredient in sunless tanners is dihydroxyacetone (DHA), which was approved in the 1970s for topical use. However, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2011 about spray tanning, noting that the “industry has not provided safety data to FDA in order for the agency to consider approving it for … ‘misting’ from tanning booths.” The FDA’s specific concern had to do with the unknown safety of ingestion, inhalation, and mucous membrane exposure that can result from spray tanning.

Moving to the legislative and policy level, change can be achieved when stakeholders band together to “ban the tan,” said Dr. Smith. “The best way to do it is with a village. It really takes a lot of people to do this.”

There are solid epidemiologic and economic reasons to focus on the skin cancer epidemic, said Dr. Smith. Skin cancer is now the most common cancer in the United States, and more new cases “are diagnosed each year than breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers combined,” she said. Of nonmelanoma skin cancers, 90% are thought to be UV-related, and “the vast majority of mutations found in melanoma are caused by UV radiation.”

Skin cancers cost the United States over $8 billion annually, and although promising new immunotherapies are extending the lives of those with melanoma, these treatments cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. “This type of treatment is unaffordable for our system,” said Dr. Smith.

Progress is being made, she said, despite industry opposition. Individual states have regulated or banned tanning for minors, and at the federal level, tanning beds are now considered by the FDA to be Class II (moderate-risk) medical devices, a step up from their previous classification as the lowest-risk Class I devices, “The same as a tongue blade,” she said.

Dr. Smith had no relevant financial disclosures.

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @karioakes

Talk about sex with patients and their families, and have ongoing, age-appropriate discussions over the course of a patient’s development, urges an updated clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Citing gaps in school-based sexuality education programs nationally, the report calls on you to do more to ensure patients have adequate information about preventing teen pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases.

The report will be seen as good news by pediatricians and others, lead author and chairperson of the AAP Committee on Adolescence, Cora Collette Breuner, MD, said in an interview.

“Pediatricians, parents, and school administrators have been asking for this updated information,” Dr. Breuner said. “Pediatricians want more clarification, more resources, and more evidence for what they are already doing.”

The report, Sexuality Education for Children and Adolescents, is published online and is free to the general public. It is the AAP’s first update on sexuality education since 2001, and includes lists of resources specifically for clinicians, parents, and schools.

“We found that only one out of three adolescent patients receive any information on sexuality from their pediatrician, and if they did, the conversation lasted less than 40 seconds,” Dr. Breuner said, citing a review of health maintenance visits. Dr. Breuneris also a professor of adolescent medicine at the Seattle Children’s Hospital.

Even if less than a minute is all that you have to devote to discussing sexual health with a patient, Dr. Breuner said it’s well worth it, in part because it can help prevent teens from turning to often unreliable sources of information on the Internet, and because it can help fill the gap for teens whose families don’t want to address the topic, or whose schools do not offer programs to address it.

“The conversations should cover a range of aspects of sexual health, including healthy sexual development, interpersonal and consensual relationships, affection, intimacy, and body image,” Dr. Breuner said. “The research shows that just talking about abstinence is not enough.”

Such conversations also should address sexual anatomy and reproduction, sexually transmitted infections, sexual orientation, gender identity, abstinence, contraception, and reproductive rights and responsibilities, according to the report.

The report cites a meta-analysis finding that parents who were trained on how to effectively communicate about sex with their adolescents had better conversations on the subject than parents who were not. Such conversations correlated with a delay in teen sexual debut and an increased use of contraception and condoms.

Talking with young persons about their sexuality is also a way to help screen them for depression and suicidality, Dr. Breuner said. “These issues can often be uncovered when talking with kids about sexuality, particularly with those who are questioning their sexual identity.”

The report also suggests pediatricians discuss issues of physical, cognitive, and psychosexual development with parents of young children during well visits over time.

Earlier this year, in conjunction with the North American Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the AAP issued its first clinical guidance on addressing sexual health in adolescents with special needs (Pediatrics. 2006. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1115).

Neither Dr. Breuner nor the authors of the clinical report had any relevant financial disclosures.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @whitneymcknight

Talk about sex with patients and their families, and have ongoing, age-appropriate discussions over the course of a patient’s development, urges an updated clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Citing gaps in school-based sexuality education programs nationally, the report calls on you to do more to ensure patients have adequate information about preventing teen pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases.

The report will be seen as good news by pediatricians and others, lead author and chairperson of the AAP Committee on Adolescence, Cora Collette Breuner, MD, said in an interview.

“Pediatricians, parents, and school administrators have been asking for this updated information,” Dr. Breuner said. “Pediatricians want more clarification, more resources, and more evidence for what they are already doing.”

The report, Sexuality Education for Children and Adolescents, is published online and is free to the general public. It is the AAP’s first update on sexuality education since 2001, and includes lists of resources specifically for clinicians, parents, and schools.

“We found that only one out of three adolescent patients receive any information on sexuality from their pediatrician, and if they did, the conversation lasted less than 40 seconds,” Dr. Breuner said, citing a review of health maintenance visits. Dr. Breuneris also a professor of adolescent medicine at the Seattle Children’s Hospital.

Even if less than a minute is all that you have to devote to discussing sexual health with a patient, Dr. Breuner said it’s well worth it, in part because it can help prevent teens from turning to often unreliable sources of information on the Internet, and because it can help fill the gap for teens whose families don’t want to address the topic, or whose schools do not offer programs to address it.

“The conversations should cover a range of aspects of sexual health, including healthy sexual development, interpersonal and consensual relationships, affection, intimacy, and body image,” Dr. Breuner said. “The research shows that just talking about abstinence is not enough.”

Such conversations also should address sexual anatomy and reproduction, sexually transmitted infections, sexual orientation, gender identity, abstinence, contraception, and reproductive rights and responsibilities, according to the report.

The report cites a meta-analysis finding that parents who were trained on how to effectively communicate about sex with their adolescents had better conversations on the subject than parents who were not. Such conversations correlated with a delay in teen sexual debut and an increased use of contraception and condoms.

Talking with young persons about their sexuality is also a way to help screen them for depression and suicidality, Dr. Breuner said. “These issues can often be uncovered when talking with kids about sexuality, particularly with those who are questioning their sexual identity.”

The report also suggests pediatricians discuss issues of physical, cognitive, and psychosexual development with parents of young children during well visits over time.

Earlier this year, in conjunction with the North American Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the AAP issued its first clinical guidance on addressing sexual health in adolescents with special needs (Pediatrics. 2006. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1115).

Neither Dr. Breuner nor the authors of the clinical report had any relevant financial disclosures.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @whitneymcknight

Talk about sex with patients and their families, and have ongoing, age-appropriate discussions over the course of a patient’s development, urges an updated clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Citing gaps in school-based sexuality education programs nationally, the report calls on you to do more to ensure patients have adequate information about preventing teen pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases.

The report will be seen as good news by pediatricians and others, lead author and chairperson of the AAP Committee on Adolescence, Cora Collette Breuner, MD, said in an interview.

“Pediatricians, parents, and school administrators have been asking for this updated information,” Dr. Breuner said. “Pediatricians want more clarification, more resources, and more evidence for what they are already doing.”

The report, Sexuality Education for Children and Adolescents, is published online and is free to the general public. It is the AAP’s first update on sexuality education since 2001, and includes lists of resources specifically for clinicians, parents, and schools.

“We found that only one out of three adolescent patients receive any information on sexuality from their pediatrician, and if they did, the conversation lasted less than 40 seconds,” Dr. Breuner said, citing a review of health maintenance visits. Dr. Breuneris also a professor of adolescent medicine at the Seattle Children’s Hospital.

Even if less than a minute is all that you have to devote to discussing sexual health with a patient, Dr. Breuner said it’s well worth it, in part because it can help prevent teens from turning to often unreliable sources of information on the Internet, and because it can help fill the gap for teens whose families don’t want to address the topic, or whose schools do not offer programs to address it.

“The conversations should cover a range of aspects of sexual health, including healthy sexual development, interpersonal and consensual relationships, affection, intimacy, and body image,” Dr. Breuner said. “The research shows that just talking about abstinence is not enough.”

Such conversations also should address sexual anatomy and reproduction, sexually transmitted infections, sexual orientation, gender identity, abstinence, contraception, and reproductive rights and responsibilities, according to the report.

The report cites a meta-analysis finding that parents who were trained on how to effectively communicate about sex with their adolescents had better conversations on the subject than parents who were not. Such conversations correlated with a delay in teen sexual debut and an increased use of contraception and condoms.

Talking with young persons about their sexuality is also a way to help screen them for depression and suicidality, Dr. Breuner said. “These issues can often be uncovered when talking with kids about sexuality, particularly with those who are questioning their sexual identity.”

The report also suggests pediatricians discuss issues of physical, cognitive, and psychosexual development with parents of young children during well visits over time.

Earlier this year, in conjunction with the North American Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the AAP issued its first clinical guidance on addressing sexual health in adolescents with special needs (Pediatrics. 2006. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1115).

Neither Dr. Breuner nor the authors of the clinical report had any relevant financial disclosures.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @whitneymcknight