Online Question of the Month

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Online Question of the Month
Small Aneurysms - To Treat or Not to Treat?
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
aneurysm
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Small Aneurysms - To Treat or Not to Treat?
Small Aneurysms - To Treat or Not to Treat?
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Online Question of the Month
Display Headline
Online Question of the Month
Legacy Keywords
aneurysm
Legacy Keywords
aneurysm
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

New and Noteworthy Information—February 2014

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:22
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—February 2014

Alcohol consumption may reduce the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and attenuate the effect of smoking, according to research published online ahead of print January 6 in JAMA Neurology. Scientists examined data from the Epidemiological Investigation of MS (EIMS), which included 745 cases and 1,761 controls, and from the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) study, which recruited 5,874 cases and 5,246 controls. In EIMS, women who reported high alcohol consumption (>112 g/week) had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.6 of developing MS, compared with nondrinking women. Men with high alcohol consumption (>168 g/week) in EIMS had an OR of 0.5, compared with nondrinking men. The OR for the comparison in GEMS was 0.7 for women and 0.7 for men. In both studies, the detrimental effect of smoking was more pronounced among nondrinkers.

A lentiviral vector-based gene therapy may be safe and improve motor behavior in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print January 10 in Lancet. In a phase I–II open-label trial, 15 patients received bilateral injections of gene therapy into the putamen and were followed up for 12 months. Participants received a low dose (1.9 × 107 transducing units [TU]), medium dose (4.0 × 107 TU), or a high dose (1 × 108 TU) of gene therapy. Patients reported 51 mild adverse events, three moderate adverse events, and no serious adverse events. The investigators noted a significant improvement in mean Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III motor scores off medication in all patients at six months, compared with baseline.

The FDA has approved a three-times-per-week formulation of Copaxone 40 mg/mL. The new formulation will enable a less-frequent dosing regimen to be administered subcutaneously to patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval is based on data from the Phase III Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration study of more than 1,400 patients. In the trial, investigators found that a 40-mg/mL dose of Copaxone administered subcutaneously three times per week significantly reduced relapse rates at 12 months and demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. In addition to the newly approved dose, daily Copaxone 20 mg/mL will continue to be available. The daily subcutaneous injection was approved in 1996. Both formulations are manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which is headquartered in Jerusalem.

When administered with amitriptyline, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may result in greater reductions in days with headache and in migraine-related disability among young persons with chronic migraine, compared with headache education, according to research published December 25, 2013, in JAMA. In a randomized clinical trial, 135 children (ages 10 to 17) with chronic migraine and a Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Score (PedMIDAS) greater than 20 points were assigned to CBT plus amitriptyline or headache education plus amitriptyline. At the 20-week end point, days with headache were reduced by 11.5 for the CBT plus amitriptyline group, compared with 6.8 for the headache education plus amitriptyline group. The PedMIDAS decreased by 52.7 points for the CBT group and by 38.6 points for the headache education group.

Low levels of vitamin D early in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) are a strong risk factor for long-term disease activity and progression in patients who were primarily treated with interferon beta-1b, according to a study published online January 20 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers compared early and delayed interferon beta-1b treatment in 468 patients with clinically isolated syndrome, measuring serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) at baseline and at six, 12, and 24 months. “A 50-nmol/L (20-ng/mL) increment in average serum 25(OH)D levels within the first 12 months predicted a 57% lower rate of new active lesions, 57% lower relapse rate, 25% lower yearly increase in T2 lesion volume, and 0.41% lower yearly loss in brain volume from months 12 to 60,” stated the study authors.

Excessive alcohol consumption in men was associated with faster cognitive decline, compared with light to moderate alcohol consumption, researchers reported online ahead of print January 15 in Neurology. The findings are based on data from 5,054 men and 2,099 women (mean age, 56) who had their alcohol consumption analyzed three times in the 10 years preceding the first cognitive assessment. In men, the investigators observed no differences in cognitive decline among alcohol abstainers, those who quit using alcohol, and light or moderate alcohol drinkers (<20 g/day). Alcohol consumption ≥36 g/day was associated with faster decline in all cognitive domains, compared with consumption between 0.1 and 19.9 g/day. In women, 10-year abstainers had a faster decline in the global cognitive score and executive function, compared with those drinking between 0.1 and 9.9 g/day of alcohol.

 

 

Vitamin D supplements may reduce pain in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome, according to a study in the February issue of Pain. The randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 women with fibromyalgia syndrome with serum calcifediol levels <32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L), in whom the goal was to achieve serum calcifediol levels between 32 and 48 ng/mL for 20 weeks with an oral cholecalciferol supplement. Re-evaluation was performed in both groups after an additional 24 weeks without cholecalciferol supplementation. The researchers observed a marked reduction in pain during the treatment period in those who received the supplement, and optimization of calcifediol levels had a positive effect on the perception of pain. “This economical therapy with a low side effect profile may well be considered in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome,” the researchers concluded.

A simple on-field blood test may help diagnose sports concussion. Relative and absolute increases in the astroglial protein, serum S100B, can accurately distinguish sports-related concussion from sports-related exertion, according to a study published online January 8 in PLOS One. Serum S100B was measured in 46 collegiate and semiprofessional contact sport athletes at preseason baseline, within three hours of injury, and at days 2, 3, and 7 post–sports-related concussion. Twenty-two athletes had a sports-related concussion, and 17 had S100B testing within three hours postinjury. The mean three-hour post–sports-related concussion S100B level was significantly higher than at preseason baseline, while the mean postexertion S100B level was not significantly different than that from the preseason baseline. S100B levels at postinjury days 2, 3, and 7 were significantly lower than at the three-hour level and were not different than at baseline.

Herpes zoster is an independent risk factor for vascular disease, particularly for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction, in patients affected before age 40, researchers reported online ahead of print January 2 in Neurology. The findings are based on a retrospective cohort of 106,601 cases of herpes zoster and 213,202 controls from a general practice database in the United Kingdom. The investigators found that risk factors for vascular disease were significantly increased in patients with herpes zoster compared with controls. In addition, adjusted hazard ratios for TIA and myocardial infarction, but not stroke, were increased in all patients with herpes zoster. Stroke, TIA, and myocardial infarction were increased in cases in which herpes zoster occurred when the participants were younger than 40.

A study appearing January 22 online in Neurology found that a higher omega-3 index was correlated with larger total normal brain volume and hippocampal volume in postmenopausal women measured eight years later. Researchers assessed RBC eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and MRI brain volumes in 1,111 postmenopausal women from the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater RBC EPA + DHA (omega-3 index) level was correlated with 2.1 cm3 larger brain volume. “DHA was marginally correlated with total brain volume while EPA was less so,” reported the investigators. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater omega-3 index was correlated with greater hippocampal volume. “While normal aging results in overall brain atrophy, lower omega-3 index may signal increased risk of hippocampal atrophy,” wrote the investigators.

Exposure to DDT may increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, particularly in people older than 60, according to a study published online ahead of print January 27 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the level of DDE, the chemical compound produced when DDT breaks down in the body, in the blood of 86 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and 79 controls. Blood levels of DDE were almost four times higher in 74 of the patients with Alzheimer’s disease than in the controls. Patients with APOE4, which greatly increases the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, and high blood levels of DDE exhibited more severe cognitive impairment than patients without the gene. In addition, DDT and DDE apparently increased the amount of a protein associated with plaques believed to be a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

Mortality is higher among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than among Americans without the disease, according to research published online ahead of print December 26, 2013, in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Investigators extracted records from a US commercial health insurance database—the OptumInsight Research database—for 30,402 patients with MS and 89,818 healthy comparators. Patient data were recorded from 1996 to 2009. Annual mortality rates were 899/100,000 among patients with MS and 446/100,000 among comparators. Standardized mortality ratio was 1.70 for patients with MS and 0.80 for the general US population. Kaplan–Meier analysis yielded a median survival from birth that was six years lower among patients with MS than among comparators. The six-year decrement in lifespan is consistent with a decrement found in recent research conducted in Canada, said the investigators.

 

 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), researchers reported in the November 2013 issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings. The investigators evaluated 1,927 patients (ages 70 to 89) enrolled in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Participants received a nurse assessment, neurologic evaluation, and neuropsychologic testing. A consensus panel diagnosed MCI according to standardized criteria. COPD was identified by the review of medical records. A total of 288 patients had COPD. Prevalence of MCI was 27% among patients with COPD and 15% among patients without COPD. The odds ratio for MCI was 1.60 in patients who had had COPD for five years or fewer and 2.10 in patients who had had COPD for more than five years.

—Erik Greb and Colby Stong

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(2)
Publications
Page Number
3,4
Legacy Keywords
neurology, neurosurgery, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Alcohol consumption may reduce the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and attenuate the effect of smoking, according to research published online ahead of print January 6 in JAMA Neurology. Scientists examined data from the Epidemiological Investigation of MS (EIMS), which included 745 cases and 1,761 controls, and from the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) study, which recruited 5,874 cases and 5,246 controls. In EIMS, women who reported high alcohol consumption (>112 g/week) had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.6 of developing MS, compared with nondrinking women. Men with high alcohol consumption (>168 g/week) in EIMS had an OR of 0.5, compared with nondrinking men. The OR for the comparison in GEMS was 0.7 for women and 0.7 for men. In both studies, the detrimental effect of smoking was more pronounced among nondrinkers.

A lentiviral vector-based gene therapy may be safe and improve motor behavior in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print January 10 in Lancet. In a phase I–II open-label trial, 15 patients received bilateral injections of gene therapy into the putamen and were followed up for 12 months. Participants received a low dose (1.9 × 107 transducing units [TU]), medium dose (4.0 × 107 TU), or a high dose (1 × 108 TU) of gene therapy. Patients reported 51 mild adverse events, three moderate adverse events, and no serious adverse events. The investigators noted a significant improvement in mean Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III motor scores off medication in all patients at six months, compared with baseline.

The FDA has approved a three-times-per-week formulation of Copaxone 40 mg/mL. The new formulation will enable a less-frequent dosing regimen to be administered subcutaneously to patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval is based on data from the Phase III Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration study of more than 1,400 patients. In the trial, investigators found that a 40-mg/mL dose of Copaxone administered subcutaneously three times per week significantly reduced relapse rates at 12 months and demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. In addition to the newly approved dose, daily Copaxone 20 mg/mL will continue to be available. The daily subcutaneous injection was approved in 1996. Both formulations are manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which is headquartered in Jerusalem.

When administered with amitriptyline, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may result in greater reductions in days with headache and in migraine-related disability among young persons with chronic migraine, compared with headache education, according to research published December 25, 2013, in JAMA. In a randomized clinical trial, 135 children (ages 10 to 17) with chronic migraine and a Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Score (PedMIDAS) greater than 20 points were assigned to CBT plus amitriptyline or headache education plus amitriptyline. At the 20-week end point, days with headache were reduced by 11.5 for the CBT plus amitriptyline group, compared with 6.8 for the headache education plus amitriptyline group. The PedMIDAS decreased by 52.7 points for the CBT group and by 38.6 points for the headache education group.

Low levels of vitamin D early in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) are a strong risk factor for long-term disease activity and progression in patients who were primarily treated with interferon beta-1b, according to a study published online January 20 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers compared early and delayed interferon beta-1b treatment in 468 patients with clinically isolated syndrome, measuring serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) at baseline and at six, 12, and 24 months. “A 50-nmol/L (20-ng/mL) increment in average serum 25(OH)D levels within the first 12 months predicted a 57% lower rate of new active lesions, 57% lower relapse rate, 25% lower yearly increase in T2 lesion volume, and 0.41% lower yearly loss in brain volume from months 12 to 60,” stated the study authors.

Excessive alcohol consumption in men was associated with faster cognitive decline, compared with light to moderate alcohol consumption, researchers reported online ahead of print January 15 in Neurology. The findings are based on data from 5,054 men and 2,099 women (mean age, 56) who had their alcohol consumption analyzed three times in the 10 years preceding the first cognitive assessment. In men, the investigators observed no differences in cognitive decline among alcohol abstainers, those who quit using alcohol, and light or moderate alcohol drinkers (<20 g/day). Alcohol consumption ≥36 g/day was associated with faster decline in all cognitive domains, compared with consumption between 0.1 and 19.9 g/day. In women, 10-year abstainers had a faster decline in the global cognitive score and executive function, compared with those drinking between 0.1 and 9.9 g/day of alcohol.

 

 

Vitamin D supplements may reduce pain in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome, according to a study in the February issue of Pain. The randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 women with fibromyalgia syndrome with serum calcifediol levels <32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L), in whom the goal was to achieve serum calcifediol levels between 32 and 48 ng/mL for 20 weeks with an oral cholecalciferol supplement. Re-evaluation was performed in both groups after an additional 24 weeks without cholecalciferol supplementation. The researchers observed a marked reduction in pain during the treatment period in those who received the supplement, and optimization of calcifediol levels had a positive effect on the perception of pain. “This economical therapy with a low side effect profile may well be considered in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome,” the researchers concluded.

A simple on-field blood test may help diagnose sports concussion. Relative and absolute increases in the astroglial protein, serum S100B, can accurately distinguish sports-related concussion from sports-related exertion, according to a study published online January 8 in PLOS One. Serum S100B was measured in 46 collegiate and semiprofessional contact sport athletes at preseason baseline, within three hours of injury, and at days 2, 3, and 7 post–sports-related concussion. Twenty-two athletes had a sports-related concussion, and 17 had S100B testing within three hours postinjury. The mean three-hour post–sports-related concussion S100B level was significantly higher than at preseason baseline, while the mean postexertion S100B level was not significantly different than that from the preseason baseline. S100B levels at postinjury days 2, 3, and 7 were significantly lower than at the three-hour level and were not different than at baseline.

Herpes zoster is an independent risk factor for vascular disease, particularly for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction, in patients affected before age 40, researchers reported online ahead of print January 2 in Neurology. The findings are based on a retrospective cohort of 106,601 cases of herpes zoster and 213,202 controls from a general practice database in the United Kingdom. The investigators found that risk factors for vascular disease were significantly increased in patients with herpes zoster compared with controls. In addition, adjusted hazard ratios for TIA and myocardial infarction, but not stroke, were increased in all patients with herpes zoster. Stroke, TIA, and myocardial infarction were increased in cases in which herpes zoster occurred when the participants were younger than 40.

A study appearing January 22 online in Neurology found that a higher omega-3 index was correlated with larger total normal brain volume and hippocampal volume in postmenopausal women measured eight years later. Researchers assessed RBC eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and MRI brain volumes in 1,111 postmenopausal women from the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater RBC EPA + DHA (omega-3 index) level was correlated with 2.1 cm3 larger brain volume. “DHA was marginally correlated with total brain volume while EPA was less so,” reported the investigators. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater omega-3 index was correlated with greater hippocampal volume. “While normal aging results in overall brain atrophy, lower omega-3 index may signal increased risk of hippocampal atrophy,” wrote the investigators.

Exposure to DDT may increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, particularly in people older than 60, according to a study published online ahead of print January 27 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the level of DDE, the chemical compound produced when DDT breaks down in the body, in the blood of 86 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and 79 controls. Blood levels of DDE were almost four times higher in 74 of the patients with Alzheimer’s disease than in the controls. Patients with APOE4, which greatly increases the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, and high blood levels of DDE exhibited more severe cognitive impairment than patients without the gene. In addition, DDT and DDE apparently increased the amount of a protein associated with plaques believed to be a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

Mortality is higher among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than among Americans without the disease, according to research published online ahead of print December 26, 2013, in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Investigators extracted records from a US commercial health insurance database—the OptumInsight Research database—for 30,402 patients with MS and 89,818 healthy comparators. Patient data were recorded from 1996 to 2009. Annual mortality rates were 899/100,000 among patients with MS and 446/100,000 among comparators. Standardized mortality ratio was 1.70 for patients with MS and 0.80 for the general US population. Kaplan–Meier analysis yielded a median survival from birth that was six years lower among patients with MS than among comparators. The six-year decrement in lifespan is consistent with a decrement found in recent research conducted in Canada, said the investigators.

 

 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), researchers reported in the November 2013 issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings. The investigators evaluated 1,927 patients (ages 70 to 89) enrolled in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Participants received a nurse assessment, neurologic evaluation, and neuropsychologic testing. A consensus panel diagnosed MCI according to standardized criteria. COPD was identified by the review of medical records. A total of 288 patients had COPD. Prevalence of MCI was 27% among patients with COPD and 15% among patients without COPD. The odds ratio for MCI was 1.60 in patients who had had COPD for five years or fewer and 2.10 in patients who had had COPD for more than five years.

—Erik Greb and Colby Stong

Alcohol consumption may reduce the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and attenuate the effect of smoking, according to research published online ahead of print January 6 in JAMA Neurology. Scientists examined data from the Epidemiological Investigation of MS (EIMS), which included 745 cases and 1,761 controls, and from the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) study, which recruited 5,874 cases and 5,246 controls. In EIMS, women who reported high alcohol consumption (>112 g/week) had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.6 of developing MS, compared with nondrinking women. Men with high alcohol consumption (>168 g/week) in EIMS had an OR of 0.5, compared with nondrinking men. The OR for the comparison in GEMS was 0.7 for women and 0.7 for men. In both studies, the detrimental effect of smoking was more pronounced among nondrinkers.

A lentiviral vector-based gene therapy may be safe and improve motor behavior in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print January 10 in Lancet. In a phase I–II open-label trial, 15 patients received bilateral injections of gene therapy into the putamen and were followed up for 12 months. Participants received a low dose (1.9 × 107 transducing units [TU]), medium dose (4.0 × 107 TU), or a high dose (1 × 108 TU) of gene therapy. Patients reported 51 mild adverse events, three moderate adverse events, and no serious adverse events. The investigators noted a significant improvement in mean Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III motor scores off medication in all patients at six months, compared with baseline.

The FDA has approved a three-times-per-week formulation of Copaxone 40 mg/mL. The new formulation will enable a less-frequent dosing regimen to be administered subcutaneously to patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval is based on data from the Phase III Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration study of more than 1,400 patients. In the trial, investigators found that a 40-mg/mL dose of Copaxone administered subcutaneously three times per week significantly reduced relapse rates at 12 months and demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. In addition to the newly approved dose, daily Copaxone 20 mg/mL will continue to be available. The daily subcutaneous injection was approved in 1996. Both formulations are manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which is headquartered in Jerusalem.

When administered with amitriptyline, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may result in greater reductions in days with headache and in migraine-related disability among young persons with chronic migraine, compared with headache education, according to research published December 25, 2013, in JAMA. In a randomized clinical trial, 135 children (ages 10 to 17) with chronic migraine and a Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Score (PedMIDAS) greater than 20 points were assigned to CBT plus amitriptyline or headache education plus amitriptyline. At the 20-week end point, days with headache were reduced by 11.5 for the CBT plus amitriptyline group, compared with 6.8 for the headache education plus amitriptyline group. The PedMIDAS decreased by 52.7 points for the CBT group and by 38.6 points for the headache education group.

Low levels of vitamin D early in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) are a strong risk factor for long-term disease activity and progression in patients who were primarily treated with interferon beta-1b, according to a study published online January 20 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers compared early and delayed interferon beta-1b treatment in 468 patients with clinically isolated syndrome, measuring serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) at baseline and at six, 12, and 24 months. “A 50-nmol/L (20-ng/mL) increment in average serum 25(OH)D levels within the first 12 months predicted a 57% lower rate of new active lesions, 57% lower relapse rate, 25% lower yearly increase in T2 lesion volume, and 0.41% lower yearly loss in brain volume from months 12 to 60,” stated the study authors.

Excessive alcohol consumption in men was associated with faster cognitive decline, compared with light to moderate alcohol consumption, researchers reported online ahead of print January 15 in Neurology. The findings are based on data from 5,054 men and 2,099 women (mean age, 56) who had their alcohol consumption analyzed three times in the 10 years preceding the first cognitive assessment. In men, the investigators observed no differences in cognitive decline among alcohol abstainers, those who quit using alcohol, and light or moderate alcohol drinkers (<20 g/day). Alcohol consumption ≥36 g/day was associated with faster decline in all cognitive domains, compared with consumption between 0.1 and 19.9 g/day. In women, 10-year abstainers had a faster decline in the global cognitive score and executive function, compared with those drinking between 0.1 and 9.9 g/day of alcohol.

 

 

Vitamin D supplements may reduce pain in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome, according to a study in the February issue of Pain. The randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 women with fibromyalgia syndrome with serum calcifediol levels <32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L), in whom the goal was to achieve serum calcifediol levels between 32 and 48 ng/mL for 20 weeks with an oral cholecalciferol supplement. Re-evaluation was performed in both groups after an additional 24 weeks without cholecalciferol supplementation. The researchers observed a marked reduction in pain during the treatment period in those who received the supplement, and optimization of calcifediol levels had a positive effect on the perception of pain. “This economical therapy with a low side effect profile may well be considered in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome,” the researchers concluded.

A simple on-field blood test may help diagnose sports concussion. Relative and absolute increases in the astroglial protein, serum S100B, can accurately distinguish sports-related concussion from sports-related exertion, according to a study published online January 8 in PLOS One. Serum S100B was measured in 46 collegiate and semiprofessional contact sport athletes at preseason baseline, within three hours of injury, and at days 2, 3, and 7 post–sports-related concussion. Twenty-two athletes had a sports-related concussion, and 17 had S100B testing within three hours postinjury. The mean three-hour post–sports-related concussion S100B level was significantly higher than at preseason baseline, while the mean postexertion S100B level was not significantly different than that from the preseason baseline. S100B levels at postinjury days 2, 3, and 7 were significantly lower than at the three-hour level and were not different than at baseline.

Herpes zoster is an independent risk factor for vascular disease, particularly for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction, in patients affected before age 40, researchers reported online ahead of print January 2 in Neurology. The findings are based on a retrospective cohort of 106,601 cases of herpes zoster and 213,202 controls from a general practice database in the United Kingdom. The investigators found that risk factors for vascular disease were significantly increased in patients with herpes zoster compared with controls. In addition, adjusted hazard ratios for TIA and myocardial infarction, but not stroke, were increased in all patients with herpes zoster. Stroke, TIA, and myocardial infarction were increased in cases in which herpes zoster occurred when the participants were younger than 40.

A study appearing January 22 online in Neurology found that a higher omega-3 index was correlated with larger total normal brain volume and hippocampal volume in postmenopausal women measured eight years later. Researchers assessed RBC eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and MRI brain volumes in 1,111 postmenopausal women from the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater RBC EPA + DHA (omega-3 index) level was correlated with 2.1 cm3 larger brain volume. “DHA was marginally correlated with total brain volume while EPA was less so,” reported the investigators. In fully adjusted models, a 1-SD greater omega-3 index was correlated with greater hippocampal volume. “While normal aging results in overall brain atrophy, lower omega-3 index may signal increased risk of hippocampal atrophy,” wrote the investigators.

Exposure to DDT may increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, particularly in people older than 60, according to a study published online ahead of print January 27 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the level of DDE, the chemical compound produced when DDT breaks down in the body, in the blood of 86 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and 79 controls. Blood levels of DDE were almost four times higher in 74 of the patients with Alzheimer’s disease than in the controls. Patients with APOE4, which greatly increases the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, and high blood levels of DDE exhibited more severe cognitive impairment than patients without the gene. In addition, DDT and DDE apparently increased the amount of a protein associated with plaques believed to be a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

Mortality is higher among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than among Americans without the disease, according to research published online ahead of print December 26, 2013, in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Investigators extracted records from a US commercial health insurance database—the OptumInsight Research database—for 30,402 patients with MS and 89,818 healthy comparators. Patient data were recorded from 1996 to 2009. Annual mortality rates were 899/100,000 among patients with MS and 446/100,000 among comparators. Standardized mortality ratio was 1.70 for patients with MS and 0.80 for the general US population. Kaplan–Meier analysis yielded a median survival from birth that was six years lower among patients with MS than among comparators. The six-year decrement in lifespan is consistent with a decrement found in recent research conducted in Canada, said the investigators.

 

 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), researchers reported in the November 2013 issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings. The investigators evaluated 1,927 patients (ages 70 to 89) enrolled in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Participants received a nurse assessment, neurologic evaluation, and neuropsychologic testing. A consensus panel diagnosed MCI according to standardized criteria. COPD was identified by the review of medical records. A total of 288 patients had COPD. Prevalence of MCI was 27% among patients with COPD and 15% among patients without COPD. The odds ratio for MCI was 1.60 in patients who had had COPD for five years or fewer and 2.10 in patients who had had COPD for more than five years.

—Erik Greb and Colby Stong

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(2)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(2)
Page Number
3,4
Page Number
3,4
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—February 2014
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—February 2014
Legacy Keywords
neurology, neurosurgery, Neurology Reviews
Legacy Keywords
neurology, neurosurgery, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Regimen shows promise for ENKTL

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/31/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Regimen shows promise for ENKTL

SAN FRANCISCO—Results of a single-center study suggest that a 3-drug regimen may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL).

The combination of pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-Gemox) elicited a high rate of response in this cohort of 60 Chinese patients.

P-Gemox also produced higher survival rates than those previously observed with the EPOCH regimen.

Grade 1/2 myelosuppression occurred in more than half of patients in this study, and nearly three-quarters of patients experienced grade 1/2 nausea. But grade 3/4 adverse events were minimal.

Hui-qiang Huang, MD, PhD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented these results at the 6th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr Huang noted that advanced ENKTL is relatively resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. And although the SMILE and AspaMetDex regimens are effective, they confer relatively severe toxicities and are inconvenient to administer.

“So chemotherapeutic combinations with high efficacy and low toxicities are urgently needed,” he said.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues assessed P-Gemox in 61 patients with ENKTL. Thirty-six patients were newly diagnosed, and 25 had relapsed/refractory disease. Roughly 69% of patients were male, and about 86% were older than 60 years of age.

Overall, 36.1% of patients had stage IE disease, 31.1% had stage IIE, 4.9% had stage IIIE, and 27.9% had stage IVE.

The relapsed/refractory patients had received a range of prior treatment regimens, including CHOP/L-ASP+CHOP, EPOCH, V-EPOCH, ICE, IMVP-16, and SMILE. And 13 patients had received radiotherapy.

For this study, all 61 patients received intravenous gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, intravenous oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on day 1, and intramuscular pegaspargase at 2500 U/m2 on day 1. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Patients with stage IE/IIE disease received 3 cycles followed by radiotherapy (50-56 Gy). Relapsed/refractory patients received 2 to 6 cycles, and those who responded well were recommended for autologous transplant.

Response and subsequent treatment

Sixty patients were evaluable for response. (One patient in the newly diagnosed group was not evaluable).

The overall response rate (ORR) was 90%, with 63.3% of patients achieving a complete response (CR), 26.7% achieving a partial response (PR), and 8.3% maintaining stable disease (SD).

Among newly diagnosed patients, the ORR was 94.3%. CRs occurred in 74.3% of patients, PRs in in 20%, and SD in 5.7%.

And among the relapsed/refractory patients, the ORR was 84%. CRs were seen in 48% of patients, PRs in 36%, and SD in 12%.

“For patients with early stage disease, we found P-Gemox can further improve the outcomes of radiotherapy,” Dr Huang noted.

The treatment also provided a good bridge to transplant. Eight patients underwent transplant after achieving CR. One of these patients died 9 months after the procedure, but the other 7 patients were still in CR at a median of 14.6 months (range, 4.8-19.7 months).

‘Encouraging’ survival

The median follow-up was 29.5 months. The researchers confirmed progressive disease in 18 of the 61 patients—7 in the newly diagnosed group and 11 in the relapsed/refractory group.

Nine patients died of disease progression—1 in the newly diagnosed group and 8 in the relapsed/refractory group.

The 2-year overall survival was 86%, and the 2-year progression-free survival was 75.6%. Both overall and progression-free survival were superior in the newly diagnosed patients (P=0.054 and P=0.004, respectively).

“For the relapsed/refractory cases, considering they had already received a lot of previous treatments, we thought this outcome with P-Gemox is still quite encouraging,” Dr Huang said.

 

 

When the researchers compared overall survival with P-Gemox to previous results observed with EPOCH in newly diagnosed ENKTL patients (Huang et al, Leuk & Lymph 2011), they found P-Gemox was superior.

‘Tolerable’ toxicity

Toxicity with P-Gemox was tolerable and manageable, according to Dr Huang. The main adverse events were nausea and myelosuppression. But the rate of grade 3/4 events was low, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Specifically, the grade 1/2 adverse events included nausea (73.8%), neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (52.4%), hypoprotinemia (52.4%), anemia (52.4%), vomiting (49.2%), prolonged APTT (44.2%), elevated transaminase (34.1%), elevated bilirubin (27.9%), mucositis (24.5%), decreased fibrinogen (23%), elevated BUN (4.9%), intracranial bleeding (1.6%), stomach bleeding (1.6%), pancreatitis (1.6%), and herpes (1.6%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (19.7%), thrombocytopenia (16.4%), hypoprotinemia (1.6%), anemia (1.6%), vomiting (3.2%), elevated transaminase (1.6%), and decreased fibrinogen (1.6%).

“We found that P-Gemox is an effective, safe, and convenient regimen in Chinese patients with ENKTL, both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory,” Dr Huang concluded. “These results provide a basis for subsequent studies.”

Dr Huang and his colleagues also presented the results of this research at the ASH Annual Meeting in December as abstract 642. (Information presented at the T-cell Lymphoma Forum differs from that in the ASH abstract).

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

SAN FRANCISCO—Results of a single-center study suggest that a 3-drug regimen may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL).

The combination of pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-Gemox) elicited a high rate of response in this cohort of 60 Chinese patients.

P-Gemox also produced higher survival rates than those previously observed with the EPOCH regimen.

Grade 1/2 myelosuppression occurred in more than half of patients in this study, and nearly three-quarters of patients experienced grade 1/2 nausea. But grade 3/4 adverse events were minimal.

Hui-qiang Huang, MD, PhD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented these results at the 6th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr Huang noted that advanced ENKTL is relatively resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. And although the SMILE and AspaMetDex regimens are effective, they confer relatively severe toxicities and are inconvenient to administer.

“So chemotherapeutic combinations with high efficacy and low toxicities are urgently needed,” he said.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues assessed P-Gemox in 61 patients with ENKTL. Thirty-six patients were newly diagnosed, and 25 had relapsed/refractory disease. Roughly 69% of patients were male, and about 86% were older than 60 years of age.

Overall, 36.1% of patients had stage IE disease, 31.1% had stage IIE, 4.9% had stage IIIE, and 27.9% had stage IVE.

The relapsed/refractory patients had received a range of prior treatment regimens, including CHOP/L-ASP+CHOP, EPOCH, V-EPOCH, ICE, IMVP-16, and SMILE. And 13 patients had received radiotherapy.

For this study, all 61 patients received intravenous gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, intravenous oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on day 1, and intramuscular pegaspargase at 2500 U/m2 on day 1. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Patients with stage IE/IIE disease received 3 cycles followed by radiotherapy (50-56 Gy). Relapsed/refractory patients received 2 to 6 cycles, and those who responded well were recommended for autologous transplant.

Response and subsequent treatment

Sixty patients were evaluable for response. (One patient in the newly diagnosed group was not evaluable).

The overall response rate (ORR) was 90%, with 63.3% of patients achieving a complete response (CR), 26.7% achieving a partial response (PR), and 8.3% maintaining stable disease (SD).

Among newly diagnosed patients, the ORR was 94.3%. CRs occurred in 74.3% of patients, PRs in in 20%, and SD in 5.7%.

And among the relapsed/refractory patients, the ORR was 84%. CRs were seen in 48% of patients, PRs in 36%, and SD in 12%.

“For patients with early stage disease, we found P-Gemox can further improve the outcomes of radiotherapy,” Dr Huang noted.

The treatment also provided a good bridge to transplant. Eight patients underwent transplant after achieving CR. One of these patients died 9 months after the procedure, but the other 7 patients were still in CR at a median of 14.6 months (range, 4.8-19.7 months).

‘Encouraging’ survival

The median follow-up was 29.5 months. The researchers confirmed progressive disease in 18 of the 61 patients—7 in the newly diagnosed group and 11 in the relapsed/refractory group.

Nine patients died of disease progression—1 in the newly diagnosed group and 8 in the relapsed/refractory group.

The 2-year overall survival was 86%, and the 2-year progression-free survival was 75.6%. Both overall and progression-free survival were superior in the newly diagnosed patients (P=0.054 and P=0.004, respectively).

“For the relapsed/refractory cases, considering they had already received a lot of previous treatments, we thought this outcome with P-Gemox is still quite encouraging,” Dr Huang said.

 

 

When the researchers compared overall survival with P-Gemox to previous results observed with EPOCH in newly diagnosed ENKTL patients (Huang et al, Leuk & Lymph 2011), they found P-Gemox was superior.

‘Tolerable’ toxicity

Toxicity with P-Gemox was tolerable and manageable, according to Dr Huang. The main adverse events were nausea and myelosuppression. But the rate of grade 3/4 events was low, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Specifically, the grade 1/2 adverse events included nausea (73.8%), neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (52.4%), hypoprotinemia (52.4%), anemia (52.4%), vomiting (49.2%), prolonged APTT (44.2%), elevated transaminase (34.1%), elevated bilirubin (27.9%), mucositis (24.5%), decreased fibrinogen (23%), elevated BUN (4.9%), intracranial bleeding (1.6%), stomach bleeding (1.6%), pancreatitis (1.6%), and herpes (1.6%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (19.7%), thrombocytopenia (16.4%), hypoprotinemia (1.6%), anemia (1.6%), vomiting (3.2%), elevated transaminase (1.6%), and decreased fibrinogen (1.6%).

“We found that P-Gemox is an effective, safe, and convenient regimen in Chinese patients with ENKTL, both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory,” Dr Huang concluded. “These results provide a basis for subsequent studies.”

Dr Huang and his colleagues also presented the results of this research at the ASH Annual Meeting in December as abstract 642. (Information presented at the T-cell Lymphoma Forum differs from that in the ASH abstract).

SAN FRANCISCO—Results of a single-center study suggest that a 3-drug regimen may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL).

The combination of pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-Gemox) elicited a high rate of response in this cohort of 60 Chinese patients.

P-Gemox also produced higher survival rates than those previously observed with the EPOCH regimen.

Grade 1/2 myelosuppression occurred in more than half of patients in this study, and nearly three-quarters of patients experienced grade 1/2 nausea. But grade 3/4 adverse events were minimal.

Hui-qiang Huang, MD, PhD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented these results at the 6th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr Huang noted that advanced ENKTL is relatively resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. And although the SMILE and AspaMetDex regimens are effective, they confer relatively severe toxicities and are inconvenient to administer.

“So chemotherapeutic combinations with high efficacy and low toxicities are urgently needed,” he said.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues assessed P-Gemox in 61 patients with ENKTL. Thirty-six patients were newly diagnosed, and 25 had relapsed/refractory disease. Roughly 69% of patients were male, and about 86% were older than 60 years of age.

Overall, 36.1% of patients had stage IE disease, 31.1% had stage IIE, 4.9% had stage IIIE, and 27.9% had stage IVE.

The relapsed/refractory patients had received a range of prior treatment regimens, including CHOP/L-ASP+CHOP, EPOCH, V-EPOCH, ICE, IMVP-16, and SMILE. And 13 patients had received radiotherapy.

For this study, all 61 patients received intravenous gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, intravenous oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on day 1, and intramuscular pegaspargase at 2500 U/m2 on day 1. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Patients with stage IE/IIE disease received 3 cycles followed by radiotherapy (50-56 Gy). Relapsed/refractory patients received 2 to 6 cycles, and those who responded well were recommended for autologous transplant.

Response and subsequent treatment

Sixty patients were evaluable for response. (One patient in the newly diagnosed group was not evaluable).

The overall response rate (ORR) was 90%, with 63.3% of patients achieving a complete response (CR), 26.7% achieving a partial response (PR), and 8.3% maintaining stable disease (SD).

Among newly diagnosed patients, the ORR was 94.3%. CRs occurred in 74.3% of patients, PRs in in 20%, and SD in 5.7%.

And among the relapsed/refractory patients, the ORR was 84%. CRs were seen in 48% of patients, PRs in 36%, and SD in 12%.

“For patients with early stage disease, we found P-Gemox can further improve the outcomes of radiotherapy,” Dr Huang noted.

The treatment also provided a good bridge to transplant. Eight patients underwent transplant after achieving CR. One of these patients died 9 months after the procedure, but the other 7 patients were still in CR at a median of 14.6 months (range, 4.8-19.7 months).

‘Encouraging’ survival

The median follow-up was 29.5 months. The researchers confirmed progressive disease in 18 of the 61 patients—7 in the newly diagnosed group and 11 in the relapsed/refractory group.

Nine patients died of disease progression—1 in the newly diagnosed group and 8 in the relapsed/refractory group.

The 2-year overall survival was 86%, and the 2-year progression-free survival was 75.6%. Both overall and progression-free survival were superior in the newly diagnosed patients (P=0.054 and P=0.004, respectively).

“For the relapsed/refractory cases, considering they had already received a lot of previous treatments, we thought this outcome with P-Gemox is still quite encouraging,” Dr Huang said.

 

 

When the researchers compared overall survival with P-Gemox to previous results observed with EPOCH in newly diagnosed ENKTL patients (Huang et al, Leuk & Lymph 2011), they found P-Gemox was superior.

‘Tolerable’ toxicity

Toxicity with P-Gemox was tolerable and manageable, according to Dr Huang. The main adverse events were nausea and myelosuppression. But the rate of grade 3/4 events was low, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Specifically, the grade 1/2 adverse events included nausea (73.8%), neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (52.4%), hypoprotinemia (52.4%), anemia (52.4%), vomiting (49.2%), prolonged APTT (44.2%), elevated transaminase (34.1%), elevated bilirubin (27.9%), mucositis (24.5%), decreased fibrinogen (23%), elevated BUN (4.9%), intracranial bleeding (1.6%), stomach bleeding (1.6%), pancreatitis (1.6%), and herpes (1.6%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (19.7%), thrombocytopenia (16.4%), hypoprotinemia (1.6%), anemia (1.6%), vomiting (3.2%), elevated transaminase (1.6%), and decreased fibrinogen (1.6%).

“We found that P-Gemox is an effective, safe, and convenient regimen in Chinese patients with ENKTL, both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory,” Dr Huang concluded. “These results provide a basis for subsequent studies.”

Dr Huang and his colleagues also presented the results of this research at the ASH Annual Meeting in December as abstract 642. (Information presented at the T-cell Lymphoma Forum differs from that in the ASH abstract).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Regimen shows promise for ENKTL
Display Headline
Regimen shows promise for ENKTL
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

System allows precise gene editing in monkeys

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/31/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
System allows precise gene editing in monkeys

Cynomolgus monkey

Credit: Yuyu Niu et al.

Although monkeys can be useful as models of human disease, precisely modifying their genes has proven difficult.

Now, investigators say they’ve achieved precise gene modification in monkeys using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

“Our study shows that the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables simultaneous disruption of 2 target genes in 1 step, without producing off-target mutations,” said Jiahao Sha, PhD, of Nanjing Medical University in Nanjing, China.

“Considering that many human diseases are caused by genetic abnormalities, targeted genetic modification in monkeys is invaluable for the generation of human disease models.”

Dr Sha and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a gene-editing tool capable of targeting specific DNA sequences in the genome. Cas9 proteins, which are directed by single-guide RNAs to specific sites in the genome, generate mutations by introducing double-stranded DNA breaks.

Until now, the CRISPR/Cas9 system and other targeted gene-editing techniques were successfully applied to mammals such as mice and rats, but not to primates.

Dr Sha and his colleagues injected messenger RNA encoding Cas9, as well as single-guide RNAs designed to target 3 specific genes, into one-cell-stage embryos of cynomolgus monkeys.

After sequencing DNA from 15 embryos, the team found that 8 of these embryos showed evidence of simultaneous mutations in 2 of the target genes.

The researchers then transferred genetically modified embryos into surrogate females, one of which gave birth to a set of twins. By sequencing the twins’ DNA, the team found mutations in 2 of the target genes.

Moreover, the CRISPR/Cas9 system did not produce mutations at genomic sites that were not targeted. And this suggests the tool will not cause undesirable effects when applied to monkeys.

“With the precise genomic targeting of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we expect that many disease models will be generated in monkeys,” said Weizhi Ji, PhD, of the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research in Kunming, China.

“[This] will significantly advance the development of therapeutic strategies in biomedical research.”

Publications
Topics

Cynomolgus monkey

Credit: Yuyu Niu et al.

Although monkeys can be useful as models of human disease, precisely modifying their genes has proven difficult.

Now, investigators say they’ve achieved precise gene modification in monkeys using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

“Our study shows that the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables simultaneous disruption of 2 target genes in 1 step, without producing off-target mutations,” said Jiahao Sha, PhD, of Nanjing Medical University in Nanjing, China.

“Considering that many human diseases are caused by genetic abnormalities, targeted genetic modification in monkeys is invaluable for the generation of human disease models.”

Dr Sha and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a gene-editing tool capable of targeting specific DNA sequences in the genome. Cas9 proteins, which are directed by single-guide RNAs to specific sites in the genome, generate mutations by introducing double-stranded DNA breaks.

Until now, the CRISPR/Cas9 system and other targeted gene-editing techniques were successfully applied to mammals such as mice and rats, but not to primates.

Dr Sha and his colleagues injected messenger RNA encoding Cas9, as well as single-guide RNAs designed to target 3 specific genes, into one-cell-stage embryos of cynomolgus monkeys.

After sequencing DNA from 15 embryos, the team found that 8 of these embryos showed evidence of simultaneous mutations in 2 of the target genes.

The researchers then transferred genetically modified embryos into surrogate females, one of which gave birth to a set of twins. By sequencing the twins’ DNA, the team found mutations in 2 of the target genes.

Moreover, the CRISPR/Cas9 system did not produce mutations at genomic sites that were not targeted. And this suggests the tool will not cause undesirable effects when applied to monkeys.

“With the precise genomic targeting of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we expect that many disease models will be generated in monkeys,” said Weizhi Ji, PhD, of the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research in Kunming, China.

“[This] will significantly advance the development of therapeutic strategies in biomedical research.”

Cynomolgus monkey

Credit: Yuyu Niu et al.

Although monkeys can be useful as models of human disease, precisely modifying their genes has proven difficult.

Now, investigators say they’ve achieved precise gene modification in monkeys using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

“Our study shows that the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables simultaneous disruption of 2 target genes in 1 step, without producing off-target mutations,” said Jiahao Sha, PhD, of Nanjing Medical University in Nanjing, China.

“Considering that many human diseases are caused by genetic abnormalities, targeted genetic modification in monkeys is invaluable for the generation of human disease models.”

Dr Sha and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a gene-editing tool capable of targeting specific DNA sequences in the genome. Cas9 proteins, which are directed by single-guide RNAs to specific sites in the genome, generate mutations by introducing double-stranded DNA breaks.

Until now, the CRISPR/Cas9 system and other targeted gene-editing techniques were successfully applied to mammals such as mice and rats, but not to primates.

Dr Sha and his colleagues injected messenger RNA encoding Cas9, as well as single-guide RNAs designed to target 3 specific genes, into one-cell-stage embryos of cynomolgus monkeys.

After sequencing DNA from 15 embryos, the team found that 8 of these embryos showed evidence of simultaneous mutations in 2 of the target genes.

The researchers then transferred genetically modified embryos into surrogate females, one of which gave birth to a set of twins. By sequencing the twins’ DNA, the team found mutations in 2 of the target genes.

Moreover, the CRISPR/Cas9 system did not produce mutations at genomic sites that were not targeted. And this suggests the tool will not cause undesirable effects when applied to monkeys.

“With the precise genomic targeting of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we expect that many disease models will be generated in monkeys,” said Weizhi Ji, PhD, of the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research in Kunming, China.

“[This] will significantly advance the development of therapeutic strategies in biomedical research.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
System allows precise gene editing in monkeys
Display Headline
System allows precise gene editing in monkeys
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Inhibitor strengthens RBCs in PNH

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/31/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Inhibitor strengthens RBCs in PNH

Red blood cells

Credit: NHLBI

The apoptosis inhibitor aurin tricarboxylic acid (ATA) is active against paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinemia (PNH), according to research published in PLOS ONE.

PNH is a rare condition in which red blood cells (RBCs) become vulnerable to attacks by the complement immune system and subsequently rupture.

This can lead to complications such as anemia, kidney disease, and fatal thromboses.

PNH results from a lack of 2 proteins that protect RBCs from destruction: decay-accelerating factor (CD55), an inhibitor of alternative pathway C3 convertase, and protectin (CD59), an inhibitor of membrane attack complex (MAC) formation.

Because previous studies suggested that ATA selectively blocks complement activation at the C3 convertase stage and MAC formation at the C9 insertion stage, researchers thought ATA might prove effective against PNH.

First, they compared RBCs from 5 patients with PNH (who were on long-term treatment with eculizumab) to RBCs from healthy individuals.

Despite the eculizumab, the PNH patients’ RBCs were twice as vulnerable to complement-induced lysis as the healthy subjects’ RBCs. And western blot revealed both C3 and C5 convertases on the membranes of patients’ RBCs.

However, when the researchers added ATA to patients’ blood samples, the RBCs were protected from complement attack. In fact, the drug restored the RBCs’ resistance to the same level as normal RBCs.

“Our study suggests that ATA could offer more complete protection as an oral treatment for PNH, while eliminating the need for infusions,” said study author Patrick McGeer, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

“PNH is a disease that may happen to anyone through a chance mutation, and, if nature were to design a perfect fix for this mutation, it would be ATA.”

Dr McGeer added that many diseases are caused or worsened by an overactive complement immune system. So his group’s findings could have implications for conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, macular degeneration, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

He and his colleagues are now proceeding with further testing, and Dr McGeer expects ATA could be available in clinics within a year.

Publications
Topics

Red blood cells

Credit: NHLBI

The apoptosis inhibitor aurin tricarboxylic acid (ATA) is active against paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinemia (PNH), according to research published in PLOS ONE.

PNH is a rare condition in which red blood cells (RBCs) become vulnerable to attacks by the complement immune system and subsequently rupture.

This can lead to complications such as anemia, kidney disease, and fatal thromboses.

PNH results from a lack of 2 proteins that protect RBCs from destruction: decay-accelerating factor (CD55), an inhibitor of alternative pathway C3 convertase, and protectin (CD59), an inhibitor of membrane attack complex (MAC) formation.

Because previous studies suggested that ATA selectively blocks complement activation at the C3 convertase stage and MAC formation at the C9 insertion stage, researchers thought ATA might prove effective against PNH.

First, they compared RBCs from 5 patients with PNH (who were on long-term treatment with eculizumab) to RBCs from healthy individuals.

Despite the eculizumab, the PNH patients’ RBCs were twice as vulnerable to complement-induced lysis as the healthy subjects’ RBCs. And western blot revealed both C3 and C5 convertases on the membranes of patients’ RBCs.

However, when the researchers added ATA to patients’ blood samples, the RBCs were protected from complement attack. In fact, the drug restored the RBCs’ resistance to the same level as normal RBCs.

“Our study suggests that ATA could offer more complete protection as an oral treatment for PNH, while eliminating the need for infusions,” said study author Patrick McGeer, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

“PNH is a disease that may happen to anyone through a chance mutation, and, if nature were to design a perfect fix for this mutation, it would be ATA.”

Dr McGeer added that many diseases are caused or worsened by an overactive complement immune system. So his group’s findings could have implications for conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, macular degeneration, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

He and his colleagues are now proceeding with further testing, and Dr McGeer expects ATA could be available in clinics within a year.

Red blood cells

Credit: NHLBI

The apoptosis inhibitor aurin tricarboxylic acid (ATA) is active against paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinemia (PNH), according to research published in PLOS ONE.

PNH is a rare condition in which red blood cells (RBCs) become vulnerable to attacks by the complement immune system and subsequently rupture.

This can lead to complications such as anemia, kidney disease, and fatal thromboses.

PNH results from a lack of 2 proteins that protect RBCs from destruction: decay-accelerating factor (CD55), an inhibitor of alternative pathway C3 convertase, and protectin (CD59), an inhibitor of membrane attack complex (MAC) formation.

Because previous studies suggested that ATA selectively blocks complement activation at the C3 convertase stage and MAC formation at the C9 insertion stage, researchers thought ATA might prove effective against PNH.

First, they compared RBCs from 5 patients with PNH (who were on long-term treatment with eculizumab) to RBCs from healthy individuals.

Despite the eculizumab, the PNH patients’ RBCs were twice as vulnerable to complement-induced lysis as the healthy subjects’ RBCs. And western blot revealed both C3 and C5 convertases on the membranes of patients’ RBCs.

However, when the researchers added ATA to patients’ blood samples, the RBCs were protected from complement attack. In fact, the drug restored the RBCs’ resistance to the same level as normal RBCs.

“Our study suggests that ATA could offer more complete protection as an oral treatment for PNH, while eliminating the need for infusions,” said study author Patrick McGeer, MD, PhD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

“PNH is a disease that may happen to anyone through a chance mutation, and, if nature were to design a perfect fix for this mutation, it would be ATA.”

Dr McGeer added that many diseases are caused or worsened by an overactive complement immune system. So his group’s findings could have implications for conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, macular degeneration, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

He and his colleagues are now proceeding with further testing, and Dr McGeer expects ATA could be available in clinics within a year.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Inhibitor strengthens RBCs in PNH
Display Headline
Inhibitor strengthens RBCs in PNH
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Measuring Agreement After CICU Handoffs

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 05/21/2017 - 14:38
Display Headline
A tool to measure shared clinical understanding following handoffs to help evaluate handoff quality

Increasing attention has been paid to the need for effective handoffs between healthcare providers since the Joint Commission identified standardized handoff protocols as a National Patient Safety Goal in 2006.1 Aside from adverse consequences for patients, poor handoffs produce provider uncertainty about care plans.[2, 3] Agreement on clinical information after a handoff is critical because a significant proportion of data is not documented in the medical record, leaving providers reliant on verbal communication.[4, 5, 6] Providers may enter the handoff with differing opinions; however, to mitigate the potential safety consequences of discontinuity of care,[7] the goal should be to achieve consensus about proposed courses of action.

Given the recent focus on improving handoffs, rigorous, outcome‐driven measures of handoff quality are clearly needed, but measuring shift‐to‐shift handoff quality has proved challenging.[8, 9] Previous studies of physician handoffs surveyed receivers for satisfaction,[10, 11] compared reported omissions to audio recordings,[3] and developed evaluation tools for receivers to rate handoffs.[12, 13, 14, 15] None directly assess the underlying goal of a handoff: the transfer of understanding from sender to receiver, enabling safe transfer of patient care responsibility.[16] We therefore chose to measure agreement on patient condition and treatment plans following handoff as an indicator of the quality of the shared clinical understanding formed. Advantages of piloting this approach in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) include the relatively homogenous patient population and small number of medical providers. If effective, the strategy of tool development and evaluation could be generalized to different clinical environments and provider groups.

Our aim was to develop and validate a tool to measure the level of shared clinical understanding regarding the condition and treatment plan of a CICU patient after handoff. The tool we designed was the pediatric cardiology Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool (PKAT), a brief, multiple‐item questionnaire focused on key data elements for individual CICU patients. Although variation in provider opinion helps detect diagnostic or treatment errors,[8] the PKAT is based on the assumption that achieving consensus on clinical status and the next steps of care is the goal of the handoff.

METHODS

Setting

The CICU is a 24‐bed medical and surgical unit in a 500‐bed free standing children's hospital. CICU attending physicians work 12‐ or 24‐hour shifts and supervise front line clinicians (including subspecialty fellows, nurse practitioners, and hospitalists, referred to as clinicians in this article) who work day or night shifts. Handoffs occur twice daily, with no significant differences in handoff practices between the 2 times. Attending physicians (referred to as attendings in this article) conduct parallel but separate handoffs from clinicians. All providers work exclusively in the CICU with the exception of fellows, who rotate monthly.

This study was approved by the institutional review board at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All provider subjects provided informed consent. Consent for patient subjects was waived.

Development of the PKAT

We developed the PKAT content domains based on findings from previous studies,[2, 3] unpublished survey data about handoff omissions in our CICU, and CICU attending expert opinion. Pilot testing included 39 attendings and clinicians involved in 60 handoffs representing a wide variety of admissions. Participants were encouraged to share opinions on tool content and design with study staff. The PKAT (see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article) was refined iteratively based on this feedback.

Video Simulation Testing

We used video simulation to test the PKAT for inter‐rater reliability. Nine patient handoff scenarios were written with varying levels of patient complexity and clarity of dialogue. The scenarios were filmed using the same actors and location to minimize variability aside from content. We recruited 10 experienced provider subjects (attendings and senior fellows) to minimize the effect of knowledge deficits. For each simulated handoff, subjects were encouraged to annotate a mock sign‐out sheet, which mimicked the content and format of the CICU sign‐out sheet. After watching all 9 scenarios, subjects completed a PKAT for each handoff from the perspective of the receiver based on the videotape. These standardized conditions allowed for assessment of inter‐rater reliability.

In Situ Testing

We then tested the PKAT in situ in the CICU to assess construct validity. We chose to study the morning handoff because the timing and location are more consistent. We planned to study 90 patient handoffs because the standard practice for testing a new psychometric instrument is to collect 10 observations per item.[17] On study days, 4 providers completed a PKAT for each selected handoff: the sending attending, receiving attending, sending clinician, and receiving clinician.

Study days were scheduled over 2 months to encompass a range of providers. Given the small number of attendings, we did not exclude those who had participated in video simulation testing. On study days, 6 patients were enrolled using stratified sampling to ensure adequate representation of new admissions (ie, admitted within 24 hours). The sending attending received the PKAT forms prior to the handoff. The receiving attending and clinicians received the PKAT after handoff. This difference in administration was due to logistic concerns: sending attendings requested to receive the PKATs earlier because they had to complete all 6 PKATs, whereas other providers completed 3 or fewer per day. Thus, sending attendings could complete the PKAT before or after the handoff, whereas all other participants completed the instrument after the handoff.

To test for construct validity, we gathered data on participating providers and patients, hypothesizing that PKAT agreement levels would decrease in response to less experienced providers or more complex patients. Provider characteristics included previous handoff education and amount of time worked in our CICU. Attending CICU experience was dichotomized into first year versus second or greater year. Clinician experience was dichotomized into first or second month versus third or greater month of CICU service. Each PKAT asked the handoff receiver whether he or she had recently cared for this patient or gathered information prior to handoff (eg, speaking to bedside nurse).

Recorded patient characteristics included age, length of stay, and admission type including neonatal/preoperative observation, postoperative (first 7 days after operation), prolonged postoperative (>7 days after operation), and medical (all others). In recognition of differences in handoffs during the first 24 hours of admission and the right‐skewed length of stay in the CICU, we analyzed length of stay based on the following categories: new admission (<24 hours), days 2 to 7, days 8 to 14, days 15 to 31, and >31 days. Because the number of active medications has been shown to correlate with treatment regimen complexity[18] and physician ratings of illness severity,[19] we recorded this number as a surrogate measure of patient complexity. For analytic purposes, we categorized the number of active medications into quartiles.

Provider subject characteristics and PKAT responses were collected using paper forms and entered into REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture; REDCap Consortium, http://project‐redcap.org).[20] Patient characteristics were entered directly into REDCap.

Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome measure was the PKAT agreement level among providers evaluating the same handoff. For the reliability assessment, we calculated agreement across all providers analyzing the simulation videos, expecting that multiple providers should have high agreement for the same scenarios if the instrument has high inter‐rater reliability. For the validity assessment, we calculated agreement for each individual handoff by item and then calculated average levels of agreement for each item across provider and patient characteristics. We analyzed handoffs between attendings and clinicians separately. For items with mutually exclusive responses, simple yes/no agreement was calculated. For items requiring at least 1 response, agreement was coded when both respondents selected at least 1 response in common. For items that did not require a selection, credit was given if both subjects agreed that none of the conditions were present or if they agreed that at least 1 condition was present. In a secondary analysis, we repeated the analyses with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for correlation in the pair interaction.

Summary statistics were used to describe provider and patient characteristics. Mean rates of agreement with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each item. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare mean results between groups (eg, attendings vs clinicians). A nonparametric test for trend, which is an extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test,[21] was used to compare mean results across ordered categories (eg, length of stay). All tests of significance were at P<0.05 level and 2‐tailed. All statistical analysis was done using Stata 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Provider subject types are represented in Table 1. Handoffs between these 29 individuals resulted in 70 unique sender and receiver combinations with a median of 2 PKATs completed per unique sender‐receiver pair (range, 115). Attendings had lower rates of handoff education than clinicians (11% vs 85% for in situ testing participants, P=0.01). Attendings participating in in situ testing had worked in the CICU for a median of 3 years (range, 116 years). Clinicians participating in in situ testing had a median of 3 months of CICU experience (range, 195 months). Providers were 100% compliant with PKAT completion.

Provider Subject Characteristics for Video Simulation and In Situ Testing
 Simulation Testing, n=10In Situ Testing, n=29
  • NOTE: Clinician types are listed as percentage of total number of clinicians included in each portion of study. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Attending physicians40% (4)31% (9)
Clinicians60% (6)69% (20)
Clinician type  
Cardiology67% (4)35% (7)
Critical care medicine33% (2)25% (5)
CICU nurse practitioner 25% (5)
Anesthesia 5% (1)
Neonatology 5% (1)
Hospitalist 5% (1)

Video Simulation Testing

Inter‐rater agreement is shown in Figure 1. Raters achieved perfect agreement for 8/9 questions on at least 1 scenario, supporting high inter‐rater reliability for these items. Some items had particularly high reliability. For example, on item 3, subjects achieved perfect agreement for 5/9 scenarios, making 1 both the median and maximum value. Because item 7 (barriers to transfer) did not demonstrate high inter‐rater agreement, we excluded it from the in situ analysis.

Figure 1
Inter‐rater agreement by item for 9 video simulations. A proportion of 1 means that all 10 providers agreed on the item for an individual scenario.

In Situ Testing

Characteristics of patients whose handoffs were selected for in situ testing are listed in Table 2. Because some patients were selected on multiple study days, these 90 handoffs represented 58 unique patients. These 58 patients are representative of the CICU population (data not shown). The number of handoffs studied per patient ranged from 1 to 7 (median 1). A total of 19 patients were included in the study more than once; 13 were included twice.

Patient Characteristics for In Situ Handoffs (n=90)
CharacteristicCategoriesPercentage
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Age<1 month30
 112 months34
 112 years28
 1318 years6
 >18 years2
Type of admissionPostnatal observation/preoperative20
 Postoperative29
 Prolonged postoperative (>7 days)33
 Other admission18
CICU days131
 2722
 81410
 153113
 >3123
Active medications<826
 81126
 121826
 >1823

Rates of agreement between handoff pairs, stratified by attending versus clinician, are shown in Table 3. Overall mean levels of agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.87 (median 0.77). Except for the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow question, there were no significant differences in agreement between attendings as compared to clinicians. When this analysis was repeated with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for within‐pair clustering, we obtained qualitatively similar results (data not shown).

Agreement by Item for In Situ Handoffs
PKAT ItemAgreement Level
Attending Physician PairClinician PairPa
Mean95% CIMean95% CI
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PKAT, Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool.

  • P value calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Clinical condition0.710.620.810.780.690.870.31
Cardiovascular plan0.760.670.850.680.580.780.25
Respiratory plan0.670.580.780.760.670.850.26
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.830.750.910.870.800.940.53
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.670.570.770.410.310.51<0.01
Anticoagulation indication0.790.700.870.770.680.860.72
Active cardiovascular issues0.870.800.940.760.670.850.06
Active noncardiovascular issues0.800.720.880.780.690.870.72

Both length of stay and increasing number of medications affected agreement levels for PKAT items (Table 4). Increasing length of stay correlated directly with agreement on cardiovascular plan and ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow and inversely with indication for anticoagulation. Increasing number of medications had an inverse correlation with agreement on indication for anticoagulation, active cardiovascular issues, and active noncardiovascular issues.

Agreement by Item Stratified by Patient Characteristics
ItemCICU LOSNo. of Active Medications
1 Day (n=56)27 Days (n=40)814 Days (n=18)1531 Days (n=24)>31 Days (n=42)Pa8 (n=46)811 (n=46)1218 (n=46)>18 (n=42)Pa
  • NOTE: Each of the 90 patient handoffs is represented twice in this table because the handoff agreement was scored separately for attending physician pairs and clinician pairs. The number of active medications was categorized by quartile for analytic purposes. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay.

  • P value calculated using nonparametric test for trend.[21]

Clinical condition0.750.630.780.830.790.290.710.700.780.790.32
Cardiovascular plan0.590.730.670.790.86<0.010.630.720.630.810.16
Respiratory plan0.680.780.610.830.690.790.670.720.780.690.68
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.930.750.720.960.830.630.720.910.980.790.22
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.450.400.670.750.620.010.460.520.520.670.06
Anticoagulation indication0.890.830.890.670.60<0.010.930.780.760.62<0.01
Active cardiovascular issues0.860.780.720.920.760.520.870.760.540.55<0.01
Active noncardiovascular issues0.860.800.720.750.740.120.830.830.760.52<0.01

In contrast, there were no significant differences in item agreement levels based on provider characteristics, including experience, handoff education, prehandoff preparation, or continuity (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide initial evidence of reliability and validity of scores for a novel tool, the PKAT, designed to assess providers' shared clinical understanding of a pediatric CICU patient's condition and treatment plan. Because this information should be mutually understood following any handoff, we believe this tool or similar agreement assessments could be used to measure handoff quality across a range of clinical settings. Under the standardized conditions of video simulation, experienced CICU providers achieved high levels of agreement on the PKAT, demonstrating inter‐rater reliability. In situ testing results suggest that the PKAT can validly identify differences in understanding between providers for both routine and complex patients.

The achievement of 100% compliance with in situ testing demonstrates that this type of tool can feasibly be used in a real‐time clinical environment. As expected, mean agreement levels in situ were lower than levels achieved in video simulation. By item, mean levels of agreement for attending and clinician pairs were similar.

Our assessment of PKAT validity demonstrated mixed results. On the one hand, PKAT agreement did not vary significantly by any measured provider characteristics. Consistent with the lack of difference between attendings and clinicians, more experienced providers in both groups did not achieve higher levels of agreement. This finding is surprising, and may illustrate that unmeasured provider characteristics, such as content knowledge, obscure the effects of experience or other measured variables on agreement levels. Alternatively, providing the PKAT to the sending attending prior to the handoff, rather than afterward as for the receiving attendings and clinicians, might have artificially lowered attending agreement levels, concealing a difference due to experience.

On the other hand, construct validity of several items was supported by the difference in agreement levels based on patient characteristics. Agreement levels varied on 5/8 questions as patients became more complex, either defined by length of stay or number of medications. These differences show that agreement on PKAT items responds to changes in handoff complexity, a form of construct validity. Furthermore, these findings suggest that handoffs of more chronic or complex patients may require more attention for components prone to disagreement in these settings. Although complexity and longer length of stay are nonmodifiable risk factors, identifying these handoffs as more susceptible to disagreement provides potential targets for intervention.

It is important to move beyond he said/she said evaluations to assess shared understanding after a handoff, because high fidelity transfer of information is necessary for safe transfer of responsibility. The PKAT addresses this key component of handoff quality in a novel fashion. Although high‐fidelity information transfer may correlate with receiving provider satisfaction, this relationship has not yet been explored. Future studies will evaluate the association between receiver evaluations of handoffs and PKAT agreement, as well as the relationship between PKAT performance and subsequent patient outcomes.

Limitations of this approach include the challenges inherent in reducing a complex understanding of a patient to a multiple‐item instrument. Furthermore, PKAT use may influence handoff content due to the Hawthorne effect. Although our analysis rests on the argument that agreement is the goal of a handoff, some differences of opinion within the care team enrich resilience. Regardless, to maintain continuity of care, providers need to reach agreement on the next steps in a patient's care during the handoff. Because we focused only on agreement, this approach does not compare respondents' answers to a verifiable source of truth, if it exists. Therefore, 2 respondents who agree on the wrong answer receive the same score as 2 who agree on the right answer. Other limitations include using the number of medications as a marker of handoff complexity. Finally, conducting this study in a single CICU limits generalizability. However, we believe that all PKAT items are generalizable to other pediatric CICUs, and that several are generalizable to other pediatric intensive care settings. The approach of measuring shared understanding could be generalized more widely with development of items specific to different clinical settings.

Because the PKAT can be completed and scored quickly, it could be used as a real‐time measure of quality improvement interventions such as the introduction of a standardized handoff protocol. Alternatively, provider pairs could use the PKAT as a final handoff safety check to confirm consensus before transfer of responsibility. The concept of measuring shared clinical understanding could be extended to develop similar instruments for different clinical settings.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the CICU providers for their enthusiasm for and participation in this study. The authors also thank Margaret Wolff, MD, Newton Buchanan, and the Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for assistance in filming the video scenarios.

Disclosures: Dr. Bates was supported in part by NICHD/T32 HD060550 and NHLBI/T32 HL07915 grant funding. Dr. Metlay was supported by a Mid‐Career Investigator Award in Patient Oriented Research (K24‐AI073957). The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Files
References
  1. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–497. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480.
  2. Arora V. Communication failures in patient sign‐out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):401407.
  3. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign‐out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):17551760.
  4. Sexton A, Chan C, Elliott M, Stuart J, Jayasuriya R, Crookes P. Nursing handovers: do we really need them? J Nurs Manag. 2004;12(1):3742.
  5. Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, et al. Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team. Injury. 2010;41(5):460464.
  6. McSweeney ME, Landrigan CP, Jiang H, Starmer A, Lightdale JR. Answering questions on call: Pediatric resident physicians' use of handoffs and other resources. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(6):328333.
  7. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign‐out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257266.
  8. Patterson ES, Wears RL. Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):5261.
  9. Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, Chin GSM, Ibrahim JE. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):272276.
  10. Borowitz SM, Waggoner‐Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign‐out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):610.
  11. Salerno SM, Arnett MV, Domanski JP. Standardized Sign‐out reduces intern perception of medical errors on the general internal medicine ward. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(2):121126.
  12. Farnan JM, Paro JAM, Rodriguez RM, et al. Hand‐off education and evaluation: piloting the observed simulated hand‐off experience (OSHE). J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25(2):129134.
  13. Manser T, Foster S, Gisin S, Jaeckel D, Ummenhofer W. Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):15.
  14. Arora VM, Greenstein EA, Woodruff JN, Staisiunas PG, Farnan JM. Implementing peer evaluation of handoffs: associations with experience and workload. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(3):132136.
  15. Horwitz LI, Rand D, Staisiunas P, et al. Development of a handoff evaluation tool for shift‐to‐shift physician handoffs: the handoff CEX. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(4):191200.
  16. Foster S, Manser T. The effects of patient handoff characteristics on subsequent care: a systematic review and areas for future research. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):11051124.
  17. Schwab DP. Construct validity in organizational behavior. In: Cummings LL, Stawe BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1980:343.
  18. George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):13691376.
  19. Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(2):197203.
  20. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377381.
  21. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon‐type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):8790.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(3)
Page Number
142-147
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

Increasing attention has been paid to the need for effective handoffs between healthcare providers since the Joint Commission identified standardized handoff protocols as a National Patient Safety Goal in 2006.1 Aside from adverse consequences for patients, poor handoffs produce provider uncertainty about care plans.[2, 3] Agreement on clinical information after a handoff is critical because a significant proportion of data is not documented in the medical record, leaving providers reliant on verbal communication.[4, 5, 6] Providers may enter the handoff with differing opinions; however, to mitigate the potential safety consequences of discontinuity of care,[7] the goal should be to achieve consensus about proposed courses of action.

Given the recent focus on improving handoffs, rigorous, outcome‐driven measures of handoff quality are clearly needed, but measuring shift‐to‐shift handoff quality has proved challenging.[8, 9] Previous studies of physician handoffs surveyed receivers for satisfaction,[10, 11] compared reported omissions to audio recordings,[3] and developed evaluation tools for receivers to rate handoffs.[12, 13, 14, 15] None directly assess the underlying goal of a handoff: the transfer of understanding from sender to receiver, enabling safe transfer of patient care responsibility.[16] We therefore chose to measure agreement on patient condition and treatment plans following handoff as an indicator of the quality of the shared clinical understanding formed. Advantages of piloting this approach in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) include the relatively homogenous patient population and small number of medical providers. If effective, the strategy of tool development and evaluation could be generalized to different clinical environments and provider groups.

Our aim was to develop and validate a tool to measure the level of shared clinical understanding regarding the condition and treatment plan of a CICU patient after handoff. The tool we designed was the pediatric cardiology Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool (PKAT), a brief, multiple‐item questionnaire focused on key data elements for individual CICU patients. Although variation in provider opinion helps detect diagnostic or treatment errors,[8] the PKAT is based on the assumption that achieving consensus on clinical status and the next steps of care is the goal of the handoff.

METHODS

Setting

The CICU is a 24‐bed medical and surgical unit in a 500‐bed free standing children's hospital. CICU attending physicians work 12‐ or 24‐hour shifts and supervise front line clinicians (including subspecialty fellows, nurse practitioners, and hospitalists, referred to as clinicians in this article) who work day or night shifts. Handoffs occur twice daily, with no significant differences in handoff practices between the 2 times. Attending physicians (referred to as attendings in this article) conduct parallel but separate handoffs from clinicians. All providers work exclusively in the CICU with the exception of fellows, who rotate monthly.

This study was approved by the institutional review board at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All provider subjects provided informed consent. Consent for patient subjects was waived.

Development of the PKAT

We developed the PKAT content domains based on findings from previous studies,[2, 3] unpublished survey data about handoff omissions in our CICU, and CICU attending expert opinion. Pilot testing included 39 attendings and clinicians involved in 60 handoffs representing a wide variety of admissions. Participants were encouraged to share opinions on tool content and design with study staff. The PKAT (see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article) was refined iteratively based on this feedback.

Video Simulation Testing

We used video simulation to test the PKAT for inter‐rater reliability. Nine patient handoff scenarios were written with varying levels of patient complexity and clarity of dialogue. The scenarios were filmed using the same actors and location to minimize variability aside from content. We recruited 10 experienced provider subjects (attendings and senior fellows) to minimize the effect of knowledge deficits. For each simulated handoff, subjects were encouraged to annotate a mock sign‐out sheet, which mimicked the content and format of the CICU sign‐out sheet. After watching all 9 scenarios, subjects completed a PKAT for each handoff from the perspective of the receiver based on the videotape. These standardized conditions allowed for assessment of inter‐rater reliability.

In Situ Testing

We then tested the PKAT in situ in the CICU to assess construct validity. We chose to study the morning handoff because the timing and location are more consistent. We planned to study 90 patient handoffs because the standard practice for testing a new psychometric instrument is to collect 10 observations per item.[17] On study days, 4 providers completed a PKAT for each selected handoff: the sending attending, receiving attending, sending clinician, and receiving clinician.

Study days were scheduled over 2 months to encompass a range of providers. Given the small number of attendings, we did not exclude those who had participated in video simulation testing. On study days, 6 patients were enrolled using stratified sampling to ensure adequate representation of new admissions (ie, admitted within 24 hours). The sending attending received the PKAT forms prior to the handoff. The receiving attending and clinicians received the PKAT after handoff. This difference in administration was due to logistic concerns: sending attendings requested to receive the PKATs earlier because they had to complete all 6 PKATs, whereas other providers completed 3 or fewer per day. Thus, sending attendings could complete the PKAT before or after the handoff, whereas all other participants completed the instrument after the handoff.

To test for construct validity, we gathered data on participating providers and patients, hypothesizing that PKAT agreement levels would decrease in response to less experienced providers or more complex patients. Provider characteristics included previous handoff education and amount of time worked in our CICU. Attending CICU experience was dichotomized into first year versus second or greater year. Clinician experience was dichotomized into first or second month versus third or greater month of CICU service. Each PKAT asked the handoff receiver whether he or she had recently cared for this patient or gathered information prior to handoff (eg, speaking to bedside nurse).

Recorded patient characteristics included age, length of stay, and admission type including neonatal/preoperative observation, postoperative (first 7 days after operation), prolonged postoperative (>7 days after operation), and medical (all others). In recognition of differences in handoffs during the first 24 hours of admission and the right‐skewed length of stay in the CICU, we analyzed length of stay based on the following categories: new admission (<24 hours), days 2 to 7, days 8 to 14, days 15 to 31, and >31 days. Because the number of active medications has been shown to correlate with treatment regimen complexity[18] and physician ratings of illness severity,[19] we recorded this number as a surrogate measure of patient complexity. For analytic purposes, we categorized the number of active medications into quartiles.

Provider subject characteristics and PKAT responses were collected using paper forms and entered into REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture; REDCap Consortium, http://project‐redcap.org).[20] Patient characteristics were entered directly into REDCap.

Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome measure was the PKAT agreement level among providers evaluating the same handoff. For the reliability assessment, we calculated agreement across all providers analyzing the simulation videos, expecting that multiple providers should have high agreement for the same scenarios if the instrument has high inter‐rater reliability. For the validity assessment, we calculated agreement for each individual handoff by item and then calculated average levels of agreement for each item across provider and patient characteristics. We analyzed handoffs between attendings and clinicians separately. For items with mutually exclusive responses, simple yes/no agreement was calculated. For items requiring at least 1 response, agreement was coded when both respondents selected at least 1 response in common. For items that did not require a selection, credit was given if both subjects agreed that none of the conditions were present or if they agreed that at least 1 condition was present. In a secondary analysis, we repeated the analyses with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for correlation in the pair interaction.

Summary statistics were used to describe provider and patient characteristics. Mean rates of agreement with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each item. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare mean results between groups (eg, attendings vs clinicians). A nonparametric test for trend, which is an extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test,[21] was used to compare mean results across ordered categories (eg, length of stay). All tests of significance were at P<0.05 level and 2‐tailed. All statistical analysis was done using Stata 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Provider subject types are represented in Table 1. Handoffs between these 29 individuals resulted in 70 unique sender and receiver combinations with a median of 2 PKATs completed per unique sender‐receiver pair (range, 115). Attendings had lower rates of handoff education than clinicians (11% vs 85% for in situ testing participants, P=0.01). Attendings participating in in situ testing had worked in the CICU for a median of 3 years (range, 116 years). Clinicians participating in in situ testing had a median of 3 months of CICU experience (range, 195 months). Providers were 100% compliant with PKAT completion.

Provider Subject Characteristics for Video Simulation and In Situ Testing
 Simulation Testing, n=10In Situ Testing, n=29
  • NOTE: Clinician types are listed as percentage of total number of clinicians included in each portion of study. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Attending physicians40% (4)31% (9)
Clinicians60% (6)69% (20)
Clinician type  
Cardiology67% (4)35% (7)
Critical care medicine33% (2)25% (5)
CICU nurse practitioner 25% (5)
Anesthesia 5% (1)
Neonatology 5% (1)
Hospitalist 5% (1)

Video Simulation Testing

Inter‐rater agreement is shown in Figure 1. Raters achieved perfect agreement for 8/9 questions on at least 1 scenario, supporting high inter‐rater reliability for these items. Some items had particularly high reliability. For example, on item 3, subjects achieved perfect agreement for 5/9 scenarios, making 1 both the median and maximum value. Because item 7 (barriers to transfer) did not demonstrate high inter‐rater agreement, we excluded it from the in situ analysis.

Figure 1
Inter‐rater agreement by item for 9 video simulations. A proportion of 1 means that all 10 providers agreed on the item for an individual scenario.

In Situ Testing

Characteristics of patients whose handoffs were selected for in situ testing are listed in Table 2. Because some patients were selected on multiple study days, these 90 handoffs represented 58 unique patients. These 58 patients are representative of the CICU population (data not shown). The number of handoffs studied per patient ranged from 1 to 7 (median 1). A total of 19 patients were included in the study more than once; 13 were included twice.

Patient Characteristics for In Situ Handoffs (n=90)
CharacteristicCategoriesPercentage
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Age<1 month30
 112 months34
 112 years28
 1318 years6
 >18 years2
Type of admissionPostnatal observation/preoperative20
 Postoperative29
 Prolonged postoperative (>7 days)33
 Other admission18
CICU days131
 2722
 81410
 153113
 >3123
Active medications<826
 81126
 121826
 >1823

Rates of agreement between handoff pairs, stratified by attending versus clinician, are shown in Table 3. Overall mean levels of agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.87 (median 0.77). Except for the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow question, there were no significant differences in agreement between attendings as compared to clinicians. When this analysis was repeated with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for within‐pair clustering, we obtained qualitatively similar results (data not shown).

Agreement by Item for In Situ Handoffs
PKAT ItemAgreement Level
Attending Physician PairClinician PairPa
Mean95% CIMean95% CI
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PKAT, Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool.

  • P value calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Clinical condition0.710.620.810.780.690.870.31
Cardiovascular plan0.760.670.850.680.580.780.25
Respiratory plan0.670.580.780.760.670.850.26
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.830.750.910.870.800.940.53
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.670.570.770.410.310.51<0.01
Anticoagulation indication0.790.700.870.770.680.860.72
Active cardiovascular issues0.870.800.940.760.670.850.06
Active noncardiovascular issues0.800.720.880.780.690.870.72

Both length of stay and increasing number of medications affected agreement levels for PKAT items (Table 4). Increasing length of stay correlated directly with agreement on cardiovascular plan and ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow and inversely with indication for anticoagulation. Increasing number of medications had an inverse correlation with agreement on indication for anticoagulation, active cardiovascular issues, and active noncardiovascular issues.

Agreement by Item Stratified by Patient Characteristics
ItemCICU LOSNo. of Active Medications
1 Day (n=56)27 Days (n=40)814 Days (n=18)1531 Days (n=24)>31 Days (n=42)Pa8 (n=46)811 (n=46)1218 (n=46)>18 (n=42)Pa
  • NOTE: Each of the 90 patient handoffs is represented twice in this table because the handoff agreement was scored separately for attending physician pairs and clinician pairs. The number of active medications was categorized by quartile for analytic purposes. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay.

  • P value calculated using nonparametric test for trend.[21]

Clinical condition0.750.630.780.830.790.290.710.700.780.790.32
Cardiovascular plan0.590.730.670.790.86<0.010.630.720.630.810.16
Respiratory plan0.680.780.610.830.690.790.670.720.780.690.68
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.930.750.720.960.830.630.720.910.980.790.22
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.450.400.670.750.620.010.460.520.520.670.06
Anticoagulation indication0.890.830.890.670.60<0.010.930.780.760.62<0.01
Active cardiovascular issues0.860.780.720.920.760.520.870.760.540.55<0.01
Active noncardiovascular issues0.860.800.720.750.740.120.830.830.760.52<0.01

In contrast, there were no significant differences in item agreement levels based on provider characteristics, including experience, handoff education, prehandoff preparation, or continuity (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide initial evidence of reliability and validity of scores for a novel tool, the PKAT, designed to assess providers' shared clinical understanding of a pediatric CICU patient's condition and treatment plan. Because this information should be mutually understood following any handoff, we believe this tool or similar agreement assessments could be used to measure handoff quality across a range of clinical settings. Under the standardized conditions of video simulation, experienced CICU providers achieved high levels of agreement on the PKAT, demonstrating inter‐rater reliability. In situ testing results suggest that the PKAT can validly identify differences in understanding between providers for both routine and complex patients.

The achievement of 100% compliance with in situ testing demonstrates that this type of tool can feasibly be used in a real‐time clinical environment. As expected, mean agreement levels in situ were lower than levels achieved in video simulation. By item, mean levels of agreement for attending and clinician pairs were similar.

Our assessment of PKAT validity demonstrated mixed results. On the one hand, PKAT agreement did not vary significantly by any measured provider characteristics. Consistent with the lack of difference between attendings and clinicians, more experienced providers in both groups did not achieve higher levels of agreement. This finding is surprising, and may illustrate that unmeasured provider characteristics, such as content knowledge, obscure the effects of experience or other measured variables on agreement levels. Alternatively, providing the PKAT to the sending attending prior to the handoff, rather than afterward as for the receiving attendings and clinicians, might have artificially lowered attending agreement levels, concealing a difference due to experience.

On the other hand, construct validity of several items was supported by the difference in agreement levels based on patient characteristics. Agreement levels varied on 5/8 questions as patients became more complex, either defined by length of stay or number of medications. These differences show that agreement on PKAT items responds to changes in handoff complexity, a form of construct validity. Furthermore, these findings suggest that handoffs of more chronic or complex patients may require more attention for components prone to disagreement in these settings. Although complexity and longer length of stay are nonmodifiable risk factors, identifying these handoffs as more susceptible to disagreement provides potential targets for intervention.

It is important to move beyond he said/she said evaluations to assess shared understanding after a handoff, because high fidelity transfer of information is necessary for safe transfer of responsibility. The PKAT addresses this key component of handoff quality in a novel fashion. Although high‐fidelity information transfer may correlate with receiving provider satisfaction, this relationship has not yet been explored. Future studies will evaluate the association between receiver evaluations of handoffs and PKAT agreement, as well as the relationship between PKAT performance and subsequent patient outcomes.

Limitations of this approach include the challenges inherent in reducing a complex understanding of a patient to a multiple‐item instrument. Furthermore, PKAT use may influence handoff content due to the Hawthorne effect. Although our analysis rests on the argument that agreement is the goal of a handoff, some differences of opinion within the care team enrich resilience. Regardless, to maintain continuity of care, providers need to reach agreement on the next steps in a patient's care during the handoff. Because we focused only on agreement, this approach does not compare respondents' answers to a verifiable source of truth, if it exists. Therefore, 2 respondents who agree on the wrong answer receive the same score as 2 who agree on the right answer. Other limitations include using the number of medications as a marker of handoff complexity. Finally, conducting this study in a single CICU limits generalizability. However, we believe that all PKAT items are generalizable to other pediatric CICUs, and that several are generalizable to other pediatric intensive care settings. The approach of measuring shared understanding could be generalized more widely with development of items specific to different clinical settings.

Because the PKAT can be completed and scored quickly, it could be used as a real‐time measure of quality improvement interventions such as the introduction of a standardized handoff protocol. Alternatively, provider pairs could use the PKAT as a final handoff safety check to confirm consensus before transfer of responsibility. The concept of measuring shared clinical understanding could be extended to develop similar instruments for different clinical settings.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the CICU providers for their enthusiasm for and participation in this study. The authors also thank Margaret Wolff, MD, Newton Buchanan, and the Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for assistance in filming the video scenarios.

Disclosures: Dr. Bates was supported in part by NICHD/T32 HD060550 and NHLBI/T32 HL07915 grant funding. Dr. Metlay was supported by a Mid‐Career Investigator Award in Patient Oriented Research (K24‐AI073957). The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Increasing attention has been paid to the need for effective handoffs between healthcare providers since the Joint Commission identified standardized handoff protocols as a National Patient Safety Goal in 2006.1 Aside from adverse consequences for patients, poor handoffs produce provider uncertainty about care plans.[2, 3] Agreement on clinical information after a handoff is critical because a significant proportion of data is not documented in the medical record, leaving providers reliant on verbal communication.[4, 5, 6] Providers may enter the handoff with differing opinions; however, to mitigate the potential safety consequences of discontinuity of care,[7] the goal should be to achieve consensus about proposed courses of action.

Given the recent focus on improving handoffs, rigorous, outcome‐driven measures of handoff quality are clearly needed, but measuring shift‐to‐shift handoff quality has proved challenging.[8, 9] Previous studies of physician handoffs surveyed receivers for satisfaction,[10, 11] compared reported omissions to audio recordings,[3] and developed evaluation tools for receivers to rate handoffs.[12, 13, 14, 15] None directly assess the underlying goal of a handoff: the transfer of understanding from sender to receiver, enabling safe transfer of patient care responsibility.[16] We therefore chose to measure agreement on patient condition and treatment plans following handoff as an indicator of the quality of the shared clinical understanding formed. Advantages of piloting this approach in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) include the relatively homogenous patient population and small number of medical providers. If effective, the strategy of tool development and evaluation could be generalized to different clinical environments and provider groups.

Our aim was to develop and validate a tool to measure the level of shared clinical understanding regarding the condition and treatment plan of a CICU patient after handoff. The tool we designed was the pediatric cardiology Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool (PKAT), a brief, multiple‐item questionnaire focused on key data elements for individual CICU patients. Although variation in provider opinion helps detect diagnostic or treatment errors,[8] the PKAT is based on the assumption that achieving consensus on clinical status and the next steps of care is the goal of the handoff.

METHODS

Setting

The CICU is a 24‐bed medical and surgical unit in a 500‐bed free standing children's hospital. CICU attending physicians work 12‐ or 24‐hour shifts and supervise front line clinicians (including subspecialty fellows, nurse practitioners, and hospitalists, referred to as clinicians in this article) who work day or night shifts. Handoffs occur twice daily, with no significant differences in handoff practices between the 2 times. Attending physicians (referred to as attendings in this article) conduct parallel but separate handoffs from clinicians. All providers work exclusively in the CICU with the exception of fellows, who rotate monthly.

This study was approved by the institutional review board at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All provider subjects provided informed consent. Consent for patient subjects was waived.

Development of the PKAT

We developed the PKAT content domains based on findings from previous studies,[2, 3] unpublished survey data about handoff omissions in our CICU, and CICU attending expert opinion. Pilot testing included 39 attendings and clinicians involved in 60 handoffs representing a wide variety of admissions. Participants were encouraged to share opinions on tool content and design with study staff. The PKAT (see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article) was refined iteratively based on this feedback.

Video Simulation Testing

We used video simulation to test the PKAT for inter‐rater reliability. Nine patient handoff scenarios were written with varying levels of patient complexity and clarity of dialogue. The scenarios were filmed using the same actors and location to minimize variability aside from content. We recruited 10 experienced provider subjects (attendings and senior fellows) to minimize the effect of knowledge deficits. For each simulated handoff, subjects were encouraged to annotate a mock sign‐out sheet, which mimicked the content and format of the CICU sign‐out sheet. After watching all 9 scenarios, subjects completed a PKAT for each handoff from the perspective of the receiver based on the videotape. These standardized conditions allowed for assessment of inter‐rater reliability.

In Situ Testing

We then tested the PKAT in situ in the CICU to assess construct validity. We chose to study the morning handoff because the timing and location are more consistent. We planned to study 90 patient handoffs because the standard practice for testing a new psychometric instrument is to collect 10 observations per item.[17] On study days, 4 providers completed a PKAT for each selected handoff: the sending attending, receiving attending, sending clinician, and receiving clinician.

Study days were scheduled over 2 months to encompass a range of providers. Given the small number of attendings, we did not exclude those who had participated in video simulation testing. On study days, 6 patients were enrolled using stratified sampling to ensure adequate representation of new admissions (ie, admitted within 24 hours). The sending attending received the PKAT forms prior to the handoff. The receiving attending and clinicians received the PKAT after handoff. This difference in administration was due to logistic concerns: sending attendings requested to receive the PKATs earlier because they had to complete all 6 PKATs, whereas other providers completed 3 or fewer per day. Thus, sending attendings could complete the PKAT before or after the handoff, whereas all other participants completed the instrument after the handoff.

To test for construct validity, we gathered data on participating providers and patients, hypothesizing that PKAT agreement levels would decrease in response to less experienced providers or more complex patients. Provider characteristics included previous handoff education and amount of time worked in our CICU. Attending CICU experience was dichotomized into first year versus second or greater year. Clinician experience was dichotomized into first or second month versus third or greater month of CICU service. Each PKAT asked the handoff receiver whether he or she had recently cared for this patient or gathered information prior to handoff (eg, speaking to bedside nurse).

Recorded patient characteristics included age, length of stay, and admission type including neonatal/preoperative observation, postoperative (first 7 days after operation), prolonged postoperative (>7 days after operation), and medical (all others). In recognition of differences in handoffs during the first 24 hours of admission and the right‐skewed length of stay in the CICU, we analyzed length of stay based on the following categories: new admission (<24 hours), days 2 to 7, days 8 to 14, days 15 to 31, and >31 days. Because the number of active medications has been shown to correlate with treatment regimen complexity[18] and physician ratings of illness severity,[19] we recorded this number as a surrogate measure of patient complexity. For analytic purposes, we categorized the number of active medications into quartiles.

Provider subject characteristics and PKAT responses were collected using paper forms and entered into REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture; REDCap Consortium, http://project‐redcap.org).[20] Patient characteristics were entered directly into REDCap.

Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome measure was the PKAT agreement level among providers evaluating the same handoff. For the reliability assessment, we calculated agreement across all providers analyzing the simulation videos, expecting that multiple providers should have high agreement for the same scenarios if the instrument has high inter‐rater reliability. For the validity assessment, we calculated agreement for each individual handoff by item and then calculated average levels of agreement for each item across provider and patient characteristics. We analyzed handoffs between attendings and clinicians separately. For items with mutually exclusive responses, simple yes/no agreement was calculated. For items requiring at least 1 response, agreement was coded when both respondents selected at least 1 response in common. For items that did not require a selection, credit was given if both subjects agreed that none of the conditions were present or if they agreed that at least 1 condition was present. In a secondary analysis, we repeated the analyses with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for correlation in the pair interaction.

Summary statistics were used to describe provider and patient characteristics. Mean rates of agreement with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each item. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare mean results between groups (eg, attendings vs clinicians). A nonparametric test for trend, which is an extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test,[21] was used to compare mean results across ordered categories (eg, length of stay). All tests of significance were at P<0.05 level and 2‐tailed. All statistical analysis was done using Stata 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Provider subject types are represented in Table 1. Handoffs between these 29 individuals resulted in 70 unique sender and receiver combinations with a median of 2 PKATs completed per unique sender‐receiver pair (range, 115). Attendings had lower rates of handoff education than clinicians (11% vs 85% for in situ testing participants, P=0.01). Attendings participating in in situ testing had worked in the CICU for a median of 3 years (range, 116 years). Clinicians participating in in situ testing had a median of 3 months of CICU experience (range, 195 months). Providers were 100% compliant with PKAT completion.

Provider Subject Characteristics for Video Simulation and In Situ Testing
 Simulation Testing, n=10In Situ Testing, n=29
  • NOTE: Clinician types are listed as percentage of total number of clinicians included in each portion of study. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Attending physicians40% (4)31% (9)
Clinicians60% (6)69% (20)
Clinician type  
Cardiology67% (4)35% (7)
Critical care medicine33% (2)25% (5)
CICU nurse practitioner 25% (5)
Anesthesia 5% (1)
Neonatology 5% (1)
Hospitalist 5% (1)

Video Simulation Testing

Inter‐rater agreement is shown in Figure 1. Raters achieved perfect agreement for 8/9 questions on at least 1 scenario, supporting high inter‐rater reliability for these items. Some items had particularly high reliability. For example, on item 3, subjects achieved perfect agreement for 5/9 scenarios, making 1 both the median and maximum value. Because item 7 (barriers to transfer) did not demonstrate high inter‐rater agreement, we excluded it from the in situ analysis.

Figure 1
Inter‐rater agreement by item for 9 video simulations. A proportion of 1 means that all 10 providers agreed on the item for an individual scenario.

In Situ Testing

Characteristics of patients whose handoffs were selected for in situ testing are listed in Table 2. Because some patients were selected on multiple study days, these 90 handoffs represented 58 unique patients. These 58 patients are representative of the CICU population (data not shown). The number of handoffs studied per patient ranged from 1 to 7 (median 1). A total of 19 patients were included in the study more than once; 13 were included twice.

Patient Characteristics for In Situ Handoffs (n=90)
CharacteristicCategoriesPercentage
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit.

Age<1 month30
 112 months34
 112 years28
 1318 years6
 >18 years2
Type of admissionPostnatal observation/preoperative20
 Postoperative29
 Prolonged postoperative (>7 days)33
 Other admission18
CICU days131
 2722
 81410
 153113
 >3123
Active medications<826
 81126
 121826
 >1823

Rates of agreement between handoff pairs, stratified by attending versus clinician, are shown in Table 3. Overall mean levels of agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.87 (median 0.77). Except for the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow question, there were no significant differences in agreement between attendings as compared to clinicians. When this analysis was repeated with unique sender‐receiver pair as the unit of analysis to account for within‐pair clustering, we obtained qualitatively similar results (data not shown).

Agreement by Item for In Situ Handoffs
PKAT ItemAgreement Level
Attending Physician PairClinician PairPa
Mean95% CIMean95% CI
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PKAT, Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool.

  • P value calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Clinical condition0.710.620.810.780.690.870.31
Cardiovascular plan0.760.670.850.680.580.780.25
Respiratory plan0.670.580.780.760.670.850.26
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.830.750.910.870.800.940.53
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.670.570.770.410.310.51<0.01
Anticoagulation indication0.790.700.870.770.680.860.72
Active cardiovascular issues0.870.800.940.760.670.850.06
Active noncardiovascular issues0.800.720.880.780.690.870.72

Both length of stay and increasing number of medications affected agreement levels for PKAT items (Table 4). Increasing length of stay correlated directly with agreement on cardiovascular plan and ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow and inversely with indication for anticoagulation. Increasing number of medications had an inverse correlation with agreement on indication for anticoagulation, active cardiovascular issues, and active noncardiovascular issues.

Agreement by Item Stratified by Patient Characteristics
ItemCICU LOSNo. of Active Medications
1 Day (n=56)27 Days (n=40)814 Days (n=18)1531 Days (n=24)>31 Days (n=42)Pa8 (n=46)811 (n=46)1218 (n=46)>18 (n=42)Pa
  • NOTE: Each of the 90 patient handoffs is represented twice in this table because the handoff agreement was scored separately for attending physician pairs and clinician pairs. The number of active medications was categorized by quartile for analytic purposes. Abbreviations: CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay.

  • P value calculated using nonparametric test for trend.[21]

Clinical condition0.750.630.780.830.790.290.710.700.780.790.32
Cardiovascular plan0.590.730.670.790.86<0.010.630.720.630.810.16
Respiratory plan0.680.780.610.830.690.790.670.720.780.690.68
Source of pulmonary blood flow0.930.750.720.960.830.630.720.910.980.790.22
Ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow0.450.400.670.750.620.010.460.520.520.670.06
Anticoagulation indication0.890.830.890.670.60<0.010.930.780.760.62<0.01
Active cardiovascular issues0.860.780.720.920.760.520.870.760.540.55<0.01
Active noncardiovascular issues0.860.800.720.750.740.120.830.830.760.52<0.01

In contrast, there were no significant differences in item agreement levels based on provider characteristics, including experience, handoff education, prehandoff preparation, or continuity (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide initial evidence of reliability and validity of scores for a novel tool, the PKAT, designed to assess providers' shared clinical understanding of a pediatric CICU patient's condition and treatment plan. Because this information should be mutually understood following any handoff, we believe this tool or similar agreement assessments could be used to measure handoff quality across a range of clinical settings. Under the standardized conditions of video simulation, experienced CICU providers achieved high levels of agreement on the PKAT, demonstrating inter‐rater reliability. In situ testing results suggest that the PKAT can validly identify differences in understanding between providers for both routine and complex patients.

The achievement of 100% compliance with in situ testing demonstrates that this type of tool can feasibly be used in a real‐time clinical environment. As expected, mean agreement levels in situ were lower than levels achieved in video simulation. By item, mean levels of agreement for attending and clinician pairs were similar.

Our assessment of PKAT validity demonstrated mixed results. On the one hand, PKAT agreement did not vary significantly by any measured provider characteristics. Consistent with the lack of difference between attendings and clinicians, more experienced providers in both groups did not achieve higher levels of agreement. This finding is surprising, and may illustrate that unmeasured provider characteristics, such as content knowledge, obscure the effects of experience or other measured variables on agreement levels. Alternatively, providing the PKAT to the sending attending prior to the handoff, rather than afterward as for the receiving attendings and clinicians, might have artificially lowered attending agreement levels, concealing a difference due to experience.

On the other hand, construct validity of several items was supported by the difference in agreement levels based on patient characteristics. Agreement levels varied on 5/8 questions as patients became more complex, either defined by length of stay or number of medications. These differences show that agreement on PKAT items responds to changes in handoff complexity, a form of construct validity. Furthermore, these findings suggest that handoffs of more chronic or complex patients may require more attention for components prone to disagreement in these settings. Although complexity and longer length of stay are nonmodifiable risk factors, identifying these handoffs as more susceptible to disagreement provides potential targets for intervention.

It is important to move beyond he said/she said evaluations to assess shared understanding after a handoff, because high fidelity transfer of information is necessary for safe transfer of responsibility. The PKAT addresses this key component of handoff quality in a novel fashion. Although high‐fidelity information transfer may correlate with receiving provider satisfaction, this relationship has not yet been explored. Future studies will evaluate the association between receiver evaluations of handoffs and PKAT agreement, as well as the relationship between PKAT performance and subsequent patient outcomes.

Limitations of this approach include the challenges inherent in reducing a complex understanding of a patient to a multiple‐item instrument. Furthermore, PKAT use may influence handoff content due to the Hawthorne effect. Although our analysis rests on the argument that agreement is the goal of a handoff, some differences of opinion within the care team enrich resilience. Regardless, to maintain continuity of care, providers need to reach agreement on the next steps in a patient's care during the handoff. Because we focused only on agreement, this approach does not compare respondents' answers to a verifiable source of truth, if it exists. Therefore, 2 respondents who agree on the wrong answer receive the same score as 2 who agree on the right answer. Other limitations include using the number of medications as a marker of handoff complexity. Finally, conducting this study in a single CICU limits generalizability. However, we believe that all PKAT items are generalizable to other pediatric CICUs, and that several are generalizable to other pediatric intensive care settings. The approach of measuring shared understanding could be generalized more widely with development of items specific to different clinical settings.

Because the PKAT can be completed and scored quickly, it could be used as a real‐time measure of quality improvement interventions such as the introduction of a standardized handoff protocol. Alternatively, provider pairs could use the PKAT as a final handoff safety check to confirm consensus before transfer of responsibility. The concept of measuring shared clinical understanding could be extended to develop similar instruments for different clinical settings.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the CICU providers for their enthusiasm for and participation in this study. The authors also thank Margaret Wolff, MD, Newton Buchanan, and the Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for assistance in filming the video scenarios.

Disclosures: Dr. Bates was supported in part by NICHD/T32 HD060550 and NHLBI/T32 HL07915 grant funding. Dr. Metlay was supported by a Mid‐Career Investigator Award in Patient Oriented Research (K24‐AI073957). The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References
  1. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–497. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480.
  2. Arora V. Communication failures in patient sign‐out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):401407.
  3. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign‐out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):17551760.
  4. Sexton A, Chan C, Elliott M, Stuart J, Jayasuriya R, Crookes P. Nursing handovers: do we really need them? J Nurs Manag. 2004;12(1):3742.
  5. Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, et al. Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team. Injury. 2010;41(5):460464.
  6. McSweeney ME, Landrigan CP, Jiang H, Starmer A, Lightdale JR. Answering questions on call: Pediatric resident physicians' use of handoffs and other resources. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(6):328333.
  7. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign‐out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257266.
  8. Patterson ES, Wears RL. Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):5261.
  9. Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, Chin GSM, Ibrahim JE. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):272276.
  10. Borowitz SM, Waggoner‐Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign‐out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):610.
  11. Salerno SM, Arnett MV, Domanski JP. Standardized Sign‐out reduces intern perception of medical errors on the general internal medicine ward. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(2):121126.
  12. Farnan JM, Paro JAM, Rodriguez RM, et al. Hand‐off education and evaluation: piloting the observed simulated hand‐off experience (OSHE). J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25(2):129134.
  13. Manser T, Foster S, Gisin S, Jaeckel D, Ummenhofer W. Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):15.
  14. Arora VM, Greenstein EA, Woodruff JN, Staisiunas PG, Farnan JM. Implementing peer evaluation of handoffs: associations with experience and workload. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(3):132136.
  15. Horwitz LI, Rand D, Staisiunas P, et al. Development of a handoff evaluation tool for shift‐to‐shift physician handoffs: the handoff CEX. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(4):191200.
  16. Foster S, Manser T. The effects of patient handoff characteristics on subsequent care: a systematic review and areas for future research. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):11051124.
  17. Schwab DP. Construct validity in organizational behavior. In: Cummings LL, Stawe BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1980:343.
  18. George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):13691376.
  19. Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(2):197203.
  20. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377381.
  21. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon‐type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):8790.
References
  1. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–497. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480.
  2. Arora V. Communication failures in patient sign‐out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):401407.
  3. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign‐out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):17551760.
  4. Sexton A, Chan C, Elliott M, Stuart J, Jayasuriya R, Crookes P. Nursing handovers: do we really need them? J Nurs Manag. 2004;12(1):3742.
  5. Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, et al. Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team. Injury. 2010;41(5):460464.
  6. McSweeney ME, Landrigan CP, Jiang H, Starmer A, Lightdale JR. Answering questions on call: Pediatric resident physicians' use of handoffs and other resources. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(6):328333.
  7. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign‐out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257266.
  8. Patterson ES, Wears RL. Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):5261.
  9. Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, Chin GSM, Ibrahim JE. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):272276.
  10. Borowitz SM, Waggoner‐Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign‐out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):610.
  11. Salerno SM, Arnett MV, Domanski JP. Standardized Sign‐out reduces intern perception of medical errors on the general internal medicine ward. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(2):121126.
  12. Farnan JM, Paro JAM, Rodriguez RM, et al. Hand‐off education and evaluation: piloting the observed simulated hand‐off experience (OSHE). J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25(2):129134.
  13. Manser T, Foster S, Gisin S, Jaeckel D, Ummenhofer W. Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):15.
  14. Arora VM, Greenstein EA, Woodruff JN, Staisiunas PG, Farnan JM. Implementing peer evaluation of handoffs: associations with experience and workload. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(3):132136.
  15. Horwitz LI, Rand D, Staisiunas P, et al. Development of a handoff evaluation tool for shift‐to‐shift physician handoffs: the handoff CEX. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(4):191200.
  16. Foster S, Manser T. The effects of patient handoff characteristics on subsequent care: a systematic review and areas for future research. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):11051124.
  17. Schwab DP. Construct validity in organizational behavior. In: Cummings LL, Stawe BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1980:343.
  18. George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):13691376.
  19. Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(2):197203.
  20. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377381.
  21. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon‐type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):8790.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(3)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(3)
Page Number
142-147
Page Number
142-147
Article Type
Display Headline
A tool to measure shared clinical understanding following handoffs to help evaluate handoff quality
Display Headline
A tool to measure shared clinical understanding following handoffs to help evaluate handoff quality
Sections
Article Source

© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Katherine E. Bates, MD, The Cardiac Center, Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104‐4399; Telephone: 215‐590‐3548; Fax: 215‐590‐5825; E‐mail: bateske1@email.chop.edu
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media
Media Files

Percutaneous closure

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Percutaneous closure

Editor’s Note: I urge readers unfamiliar with the Perclose Proglide® device to pay special attention to the instructions for use and to follow them carefully. The device is relatively simple to use but it is a complex piece of equipment and so it is also easy to misuse it with dire consequences. I suggest that one at least read the section on "Troubleshooting," since preventing some of these problems can be lifesaving.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 1. Access is obtained at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA

The key to successful percutaneous closure is selecting the appropriate site of entry into the common femoral artery (CFA). Using ultrasound (in transverse and longitudinal planes) and fluoroscopy, I gain access at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA (Fig. 1). This is immediately confirmed with an oblique angiogram while pulling the 5F sheath to the ipsilateral side (Fig. 2). This small last maneuver allows me to see exactly where the puncture was and confirms that I will be able to use a closure device.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 2. Confirm while pulling 5F sheath.

If using a sheath larger than 12F, I would dilate the track and cut any skin bridges within the puncture site using 11 blade. Doing this maneuver at the end of the procedure could result in inadvertently cutting the sutures. The Proglide device is then inserted and the sutures deployed as per the instructions for use.

At the end of the case, the sheath is pulled over a nonstiff wire while pulling on the nonrail (blue end) wire in a coaxial fashion. I can’t stress enough the need to be calm and not to pull too hard on the suture. This can result in the suture breaking or being pulled out of the artery. The knot pusher is then used on each suture sequentially. At this point, I tug on the wire to make sure it is "snug" within the arteriotomy. This signifies adequate closure but I also check briefly to ensure that there is no significant bleeding. Then I can go ahead and remove the wire and slide the knot pusher again.

The final step is to advance the knot pusher over the two sutures and cut the suture just under the skin. There is no need to slide the knot pusher all the way down to cut the suture as this may inadvertently cut the knot. Steristrips and Band-Aid are applied and I reverse the heparin after confirming the status of distal pulses

Dr. Mussa is an assistant professor of surgery at New York University School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Publications
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Editor’s Note: I urge readers unfamiliar with the Perclose Proglide® device to pay special attention to the instructions for use and to follow them carefully. The device is relatively simple to use but it is a complex piece of equipment and so it is also easy to misuse it with dire consequences. I suggest that one at least read the section on "Troubleshooting," since preventing some of these problems can be lifesaving.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 1. Access is obtained at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA

The key to successful percutaneous closure is selecting the appropriate site of entry into the common femoral artery (CFA). Using ultrasound (in transverse and longitudinal planes) and fluoroscopy, I gain access at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA (Fig. 1). This is immediately confirmed with an oblique angiogram while pulling the 5F sheath to the ipsilateral side (Fig. 2). This small last maneuver allows me to see exactly where the puncture was and confirms that I will be able to use a closure device.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 2. Confirm while pulling 5F sheath.

If using a sheath larger than 12F, I would dilate the track and cut any skin bridges within the puncture site using 11 blade. Doing this maneuver at the end of the procedure could result in inadvertently cutting the sutures. The Proglide device is then inserted and the sutures deployed as per the instructions for use.

At the end of the case, the sheath is pulled over a nonstiff wire while pulling on the nonrail (blue end) wire in a coaxial fashion. I can’t stress enough the need to be calm and not to pull too hard on the suture. This can result in the suture breaking or being pulled out of the artery. The knot pusher is then used on each suture sequentially. At this point, I tug on the wire to make sure it is "snug" within the arteriotomy. This signifies adequate closure but I also check briefly to ensure that there is no significant bleeding. Then I can go ahead and remove the wire and slide the knot pusher again.

The final step is to advance the knot pusher over the two sutures and cut the suture just under the skin. There is no need to slide the knot pusher all the way down to cut the suture as this may inadvertently cut the knot. Steristrips and Band-Aid are applied and I reverse the heparin after confirming the status of distal pulses

Dr. Mussa is an assistant professor of surgery at New York University School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.

Editor’s Note: I urge readers unfamiliar with the Perclose Proglide® device to pay special attention to the instructions for use and to follow them carefully. The device is relatively simple to use but it is a complex piece of equipment and so it is also easy to misuse it with dire consequences. I suggest that one at least read the section on "Troubleshooting," since preventing some of these problems can be lifesaving.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 1. Access is obtained at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA

The key to successful percutaneous closure is selecting the appropriate site of entry into the common femoral artery (CFA). Using ultrasound (in transverse and longitudinal planes) and fluoroscopy, I gain access at a noncalcified spot 1 cm above the bifurcation of the CFA (Fig. 1). This is immediately confirmed with an oblique angiogram while pulling the 5F sheath to the ipsilateral side (Fig. 2). This small last maneuver allows me to see exactly where the puncture was and confirms that I will be able to use a closure device.

 

Courtesy Dr. Firas F. Musa
Fig. 2. Confirm while pulling 5F sheath.

If using a sheath larger than 12F, I would dilate the track and cut any skin bridges within the puncture site using 11 blade. Doing this maneuver at the end of the procedure could result in inadvertently cutting the sutures. The Proglide device is then inserted and the sutures deployed as per the instructions for use.

At the end of the case, the sheath is pulled over a nonstiff wire while pulling on the nonrail (blue end) wire in a coaxial fashion. I can’t stress enough the need to be calm and not to pull too hard on the suture. This can result in the suture breaking or being pulled out of the artery. The knot pusher is then used on each suture sequentially. At this point, I tug on the wire to make sure it is "snug" within the arteriotomy. This signifies adequate closure but I also check briefly to ensure that there is no significant bleeding. Then I can go ahead and remove the wire and slide the knot pusher again.

The final step is to advance the knot pusher over the two sutures and cut the suture just under the skin. There is no need to slide the knot pusher all the way down to cut the suture as this may inadvertently cut the knot. Steristrips and Band-Aid are applied and I reverse the heparin after confirming the status of distal pulses

Dr. Mussa is an assistant professor of surgery at New York University School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Percutaneous closure
Display Headline
Percutaneous closure
Sections
Disallow All Ads

Predictions for 2014

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:14
Display Headline
Predictions for 2014

Are you prepared to manage the infectious disease challenges you’ll be facing in 2014? Here are my Top 5 predictions for what lies ahead in infectious diseases for the next year with pearls to help you in your practice. The first addresses a series of concerns around influenza. Others target diagnoses you might not have encountered or considered in the past. The last will hopefully improve HPV vaccination rates in your practice.

1. Expect an especially busy influenza season and the possibility that you may encounter patients with life-threatening influenza. We’ve already detected influenza in over 1,000 children at my institution, almost all 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A viruses, which is consistent with the national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We are really just a month into influenza season, and we are seeing a significant number of children admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit with life-threatening disease presentations, and we’ve also seen unusual influenza complications. Talk to your ID colleagues about the potential for intravenous zanamivir in critically ill children who do not respond to oseltamivir. While pulmonary complications of influenza are most common, unusual presentations you may encounter include influenza encephalopathy (altered mental status, seizures, and mutism) and bacterial superinfection (when fever recurs or recrudesces after initial improvement, often 3-5 days into the course, think Staphylococcus aureus or Group A streptococcal disease). The CDC is alerting practitioners to the potential for increased morbidity and mortality in young/middle aged adults so the parents of your patients are at increased risk this year.

Dr. Mary Anne Jackson

• False-negative testing can happen if the sensitivity of the rapid test is low, but a false-negative test can occur if the specimen is collected late in the clinical course. (This is especially true in the adult population in which testing may be negative at just 4-5 days into the course of disease.)

• Recognize that all hospitalized children should be treated with oseltamivir, as well as children who are immunocompromised; have chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, including hemodynamically significant heart disease and asthma; renal disease; metabolic disease, including diabetes; pregnant teens; morbidly obese patients; patients with neuromuscular/neurodevelopmental conditions (especially those with difficulty controlling airway secretions); and children under 2 years of age.

I predict you may be hearing about oseltamivir shortages, but for now this relates to the sporadic difficulty in finding the oseltamivir suspension, in part, because of the lack of early season availability of this product at retail pharmacies, many of which are just getting in their stock. Prescribe the suspension for children aged younger than 1 year and be explicit about the mL dosage that should be dispensed. For children over 1 year of age, capsules can be opened and placed in pudding for those who cannot swallow capsules. Lexicomp Online offers guidelines for easy use of 30-mg, 45-mg and 75-mg capsules for different weight categories. If the suspension is necessary for an infant and is not available, the drug can be compounded by your pharmacy using capsules. You may find some pharmacies are reluctant to compound, so be prepared to contact your local children’s hospital for help. And keep offering vaccine throughout the season to healthy patients!

2. Most practitioners are aware of the importance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as a pathogen that causes bacteremia and musculoskeletal and pulmonary disease in otherwise healthy children. I suspect there is less awareness that, in many locales, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) is being seen just as often, if not slightly more often than MRSA, as a bloodstream pathogen. The inclusion of vancomycin (which covers MRSA) with cefepime should be considered for empiric coverage in the otherwise healthy child with suspected sepsis. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with good gram-negative and gram-positive coverage and also has bactericidal activity against MSSA strains. Clindamycin should be considered as an adjunct to vancomycin and cefepime in those with toxin-mediated disease/toxic shock syndrome. Of course, modification of the empiric regimen should follow identification of the specific pathogen and the site(s) of infection.

3. E. coli remains the most common cause of urinary tract infections in children, but infections caused by multiple drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains are increasingly being seen. Consider infection caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase–producing organisms in children with underlying renal anomalies, especially if they have been previously exposed to third-generation cephalosporins. Most strains are also resistant to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and aminoglycosides as well as to non–carbapenem beta-lactams. Speaking of antibiotic resistance, look for many hospital microbiology laboratories to begin using advanced molecular detection methodology to more quickly identify bacterial and fungal isolates; such methods could reduce the time of identification from over 24 hours with conventional techniques to less than one hour. The use of newer systems to identify microbes and confirm susceptibility testing has the potential to transform care and improve outcomes.

 

 

4. Consider the diagnosis of human parechovirus (HPeV) infection in young febrile infants with sepsis/meningitis presentation but negative bacterial cultures. Detection of HPeV by polymerase chain reaction testing in serum or cerebrospinal fluid is diagnostic. Exclusion of herpes simplex virus and enterovirus disease is key, as similar clinical presentations may be seen. HPeV infections are more commonly noted in late spring and early summer in contrast to enteroviral infections, which tend to occur from July to September.

5. The strength of your vaccine recommendation continues to be the most important factor affecting the parental decision to vaccinate a child. Nowhere is this more obvious than with human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV), where practitioners often simply offer the vaccine rather than recommend it. In terms of teenage vaccines, when practitioners recommend Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine) and meningococcal conjugate vaccine as standard for their patients ("Today your child will receive whooping cough vaccine and the meningitis vaccine."), vaccine uptake is very high. But when it comes to the HPV vaccine, some practitioners feel they first must establish whether the parents are aware of HPV vaccine; then discuss their questions regarding the safety of the vaccine; and finally, explain that the vaccine prevents cancer. Some practitioners offer the option of "thinking about" the vaccine for the next visit, but in such cases, the patient generally leaves without receiving the vaccine. Add HPV vaccine into your standard teen vaccine recommendation and make it a goal to get the first vaccine initiated in all eligible patients. The three-dose HPV vaccine schedule is still recommended, but I predict that simplification of the schedule may occur as early as 2014 in the United States. We’ll keep you posted.

Dr. Jackson is director of the division of infectious disease and associate director of the infectious disease fellowship program at the University of Missouri, Kansas City.


Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
ID Consult, infectious diseases, predictions, influenza, HPV, vaccination
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Are you prepared to manage the infectious disease challenges you’ll be facing in 2014? Here are my Top 5 predictions for what lies ahead in infectious diseases for the next year with pearls to help you in your practice. The first addresses a series of concerns around influenza. Others target diagnoses you might not have encountered or considered in the past. The last will hopefully improve HPV vaccination rates in your practice.

1. Expect an especially busy influenza season and the possibility that you may encounter patients with life-threatening influenza. We’ve already detected influenza in over 1,000 children at my institution, almost all 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A viruses, which is consistent with the national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We are really just a month into influenza season, and we are seeing a significant number of children admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit with life-threatening disease presentations, and we’ve also seen unusual influenza complications. Talk to your ID colleagues about the potential for intravenous zanamivir in critically ill children who do not respond to oseltamivir. While pulmonary complications of influenza are most common, unusual presentations you may encounter include influenza encephalopathy (altered mental status, seizures, and mutism) and bacterial superinfection (when fever recurs or recrudesces after initial improvement, often 3-5 days into the course, think Staphylococcus aureus or Group A streptococcal disease). The CDC is alerting practitioners to the potential for increased morbidity and mortality in young/middle aged adults so the parents of your patients are at increased risk this year.

Dr. Mary Anne Jackson

• False-negative testing can happen if the sensitivity of the rapid test is low, but a false-negative test can occur if the specimen is collected late in the clinical course. (This is especially true in the adult population in which testing may be negative at just 4-5 days into the course of disease.)

• Recognize that all hospitalized children should be treated with oseltamivir, as well as children who are immunocompromised; have chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, including hemodynamically significant heart disease and asthma; renal disease; metabolic disease, including diabetes; pregnant teens; morbidly obese patients; patients with neuromuscular/neurodevelopmental conditions (especially those with difficulty controlling airway secretions); and children under 2 years of age.

I predict you may be hearing about oseltamivir shortages, but for now this relates to the sporadic difficulty in finding the oseltamivir suspension, in part, because of the lack of early season availability of this product at retail pharmacies, many of which are just getting in their stock. Prescribe the suspension for children aged younger than 1 year and be explicit about the mL dosage that should be dispensed. For children over 1 year of age, capsules can be opened and placed in pudding for those who cannot swallow capsules. Lexicomp Online offers guidelines for easy use of 30-mg, 45-mg and 75-mg capsules for different weight categories. If the suspension is necessary for an infant and is not available, the drug can be compounded by your pharmacy using capsules. You may find some pharmacies are reluctant to compound, so be prepared to contact your local children’s hospital for help. And keep offering vaccine throughout the season to healthy patients!

2. Most practitioners are aware of the importance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as a pathogen that causes bacteremia and musculoskeletal and pulmonary disease in otherwise healthy children. I suspect there is less awareness that, in many locales, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) is being seen just as often, if not slightly more often than MRSA, as a bloodstream pathogen. The inclusion of vancomycin (which covers MRSA) with cefepime should be considered for empiric coverage in the otherwise healthy child with suspected sepsis. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with good gram-negative and gram-positive coverage and also has bactericidal activity against MSSA strains. Clindamycin should be considered as an adjunct to vancomycin and cefepime in those with toxin-mediated disease/toxic shock syndrome. Of course, modification of the empiric regimen should follow identification of the specific pathogen and the site(s) of infection.

3. E. coli remains the most common cause of urinary tract infections in children, but infections caused by multiple drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains are increasingly being seen. Consider infection caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase–producing organisms in children with underlying renal anomalies, especially if they have been previously exposed to third-generation cephalosporins. Most strains are also resistant to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and aminoglycosides as well as to non–carbapenem beta-lactams. Speaking of antibiotic resistance, look for many hospital microbiology laboratories to begin using advanced molecular detection methodology to more quickly identify bacterial and fungal isolates; such methods could reduce the time of identification from over 24 hours with conventional techniques to less than one hour. The use of newer systems to identify microbes and confirm susceptibility testing has the potential to transform care and improve outcomes.

 

 

4. Consider the diagnosis of human parechovirus (HPeV) infection in young febrile infants with sepsis/meningitis presentation but negative bacterial cultures. Detection of HPeV by polymerase chain reaction testing in serum or cerebrospinal fluid is diagnostic. Exclusion of herpes simplex virus and enterovirus disease is key, as similar clinical presentations may be seen. HPeV infections are more commonly noted in late spring and early summer in contrast to enteroviral infections, which tend to occur from July to September.

5. The strength of your vaccine recommendation continues to be the most important factor affecting the parental decision to vaccinate a child. Nowhere is this more obvious than with human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV), where practitioners often simply offer the vaccine rather than recommend it. In terms of teenage vaccines, when practitioners recommend Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine) and meningococcal conjugate vaccine as standard for their patients ("Today your child will receive whooping cough vaccine and the meningitis vaccine."), vaccine uptake is very high. But when it comes to the HPV vaccine, some practitioners feel they first must establish whether the parents are aware of HPV vaccine; then discuss their questions regarding the safety of the vaccine; and finally, explain that the vaccine prevents cancer. Some practitioners offer the option of "thinking about" the vaccine for the next visit, but in such cases, the patient generally leaves without receiving the vaccine. Add HPV vaccine into your standard teen vaccine recommendation and make it a goal to get the first vaccine initiated in all eligible patients. The three-dose HPV vaccine schedule is still recommended, but I predict that simplification of the schedule may occur as early as 2014 in the United States. We’ll keep you posted.

Dr. Jackson is director of the division of infectious disease and associate director of the infectious disease fellowship program at the University of Missouri, Kansas City.


Are you prepared to manage the infectious disease challenges you’ll be facing in 2014? Here are my Top 5 predictions for what lies ahead in infectious diseases for the next year with pearls to help you in your practice. The first addresses a series of concerns around influenza. Others target diagnoses you might not have encountered or considered in the past. The last will hopefully improve HPV vaccination rates in your practice.

1. Expect an especially busy influenza season and the possibility that you may encounter patients with life-threatening influenza. We’ve already detected influenza in over 1,000 children at my institution, almost all 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A viruses, which is consistent with the national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We are really just a month into influenza season, and we are seeing a significant number of children admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit with life-threatening disease presentations, and we’ve also seen unusual influenza complications. Talk to your ID colleagues about the potential for intravenous zanamivir in critically ill children who do not respond to oseltamivir. While pulmonary complications of influenza are most common, unusual presentations you may encounter include influenza encephalopathy (altered mental status, seizures, and mutism) and bacterial superinfection (when fever recurs or recrudesces after initial improvement, often 3-5 days into the course, think Staphylococcus aureus or Group A streptococcal disease). The CDC is alerting practitioners to the potential for increased morbidity and mortality in young/middle aged adults so the parents of your patients are at increased risk this year.

Dr. Mary Anne Jackson

• False-negative testing can happen if the sensitivity of the rapid test is low, but a false-negative test can occur if the specimen is collected late in the clinical course. (This is especially true in the adult population in which testing may be negative at just 4-5 days into the course of disease.)

• Recognize that all hospitalized children should be treated with oseltamivir, as well as children who are immunocompromised; have chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, including hemodynamically significant heart disease and asthma; renal disease; metabolic disease, including diabetes; pregnant teens; morbidly obese patients; patients with neuromuscular/neurodevelopmental conditions (especially those with difficulty controlling airway secretions); and children under 2 years of age.

I predict you may be hearing about oseltamivir shortages, but for now this relates to the sporadic difficulty in finding the oseltamivir suspension, in part, because of the lack of early season availability of this product at retail pharmacies, many of which are just getting in their stock. Prescribe the suspension for children aged younger than 1 year and be explicit about the mL dosage that should be dispensed. For children over 1 year of age, capsules can be opened and placed in pudding for those who cannot swallow capsules. Lexicomp Online offers guidelines for easy use of 30-mg, 45-mg and 75-mg capsules for different weight categories. If the suspension is necessary for an infant and is not available, the drug can be compounded by your pharmacy using capsules. You may find some pharmacies are reluctant to compound, so be prepared to contact your local children’s hospital for help. And keep offering vaccine throughout the season to healthy patients!

2. Most practitioners are aware of the importance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as a pathogen that causes bacteremia and musculoskeletal and pulmonary disease in otherwise healthy children. I suspect there is less awareness that, in many locales, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) is being seen just as often, if not slightly more often than MRSA, as a bloodstream pathogen. The inclusion of vancomycin (which covers MRSA) with cefepime should be considered for empiric coverage in the otherwise healthy child with suspected sepsis. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with good gram-negative and gram-positive coverage and also has bactericidal activity against MSSA strains. Clindamycin should be considered as an adjunct to vancomycin and cefepime in those with toxin-mediated disease/toxic shock syndrome. Of course, modification of the empiric regimen should follow identification of the specific pathogen and the site(s) of infection.

3. E. coli remains the most common cause of urinary tract infections in children, but infections caused by multiple drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains are increasingly being seen. Consider infection caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase–producing organisms in children with underlying renal anomalies, especially if they have been previously exposed to third-generation cephalosporins. Most strains are also resistant to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and aminoglycosides as well as to non–carbapenem beta-lactams. Speaking of antibiotic resistance, look for many hospital microbiology laboratories to begin using advanced molecular detection methodology to more quickly identify bacterial and fungal isolates; such methods could reduce the time of identification from over 24 hours with conventional techniques to less than one hour. The use of newer systems to identify microbes and confirm susceptibility testing has the potential to transform care and improve outcomes.

 

 

4. Consider the diagnosis of human parechovirus (HPeV) infection in young febrile infants with sepsis/meningitis presentation but negative bacterial cultures. Detection of HPeV by polymerase chain reaction testing in serum or cerebrospinal fluid is diagnostic. Exclusion of herpes simplex virus and enterovirus disease is key, as similar clinical presentations may be seen. HPeV infections are more commonly noted in late spring and early summer in contrast to enteroviral infections, which tend to occur from July to September.

5. The strength of your vaccine recommendation continues to be the most important factor affecting the parental decision to vaccinate a child. Nowhere is this more obvious than with human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV), where practitioners often simply offer the vaccine rather than recommend it. In terms of teenage vaccines, when practitioners recommend Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine) and meningococcal conjugate vaccine as standard for their patients ("Today your child will receive whooping cough vaccine and the meningitis vaccine."), vaccine uptake is very high. But when it comes to the HPV vaccine, some practitioners feel they first must establish whether the parents are aware of HPV vaccine; then discuss their questions regarding the safety of the vaccine; and finally, explain that the vaccine prevents cancer. Some practitioners offer the option of "thinking about" the vaccine for the next visit, but in such cases, the patient generally leaves without receiving the vaccine. Add HPV vaccine into your standard teen vaccine recommendation and make it a goal to get the first vaccine initiated in all eligible patients. The three-dose HPV vaccine schedule is still recommended, but I predict that simplification of the schedule may occur as early as 2014 in the United States. We’ll keep you posted.

Dr. Jackson is director of the division of infectious disease and associate director of the infectious disease fellowship program at the University of Missouri, Kansas City.


Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Predictions for 2014
Display Headline
Predictions for 2014
Legacy Keywords
ID Consult, infectious diseases, predictions, influenza, HPV, vaccination
Legacy Keywords
ID Consult, infectious diseases, predictions, influenza, HPV, vaccination
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Random acts of readiness in unpredictable times

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Random acts of readiness in unpredictable times

My little girl had outgrown most of her Sunday dresses, so I recently took her to the mall down the street in my quiet, award-winning family-friendly city, just miles outside of Baltimore. She stocked up on a few frilly dresses, then played for a while at the indoor playground. On our way out, we stopped and bought frozen yogurt and greeted friends we knew as they walked by – a typical, uneventful day in Columbia, Md.

Just a few days later, a seemingly ordinary young man entered the mall through the same door I had used, and strolled around unnoticed, lost in a sea of eager shoppers. The rest is history. He entered a store, rifle in hand, and shot and killed two young employees, viciously robbing them, and their loved ones of decades of precious hopes, dreams, and memories. This nightmare occurred right around the time my granddaughter arrived at the Columbia Mall to begin her shift at a children’s clothing store. Fortunately, she was not injured, at least not physically.

The week before, I was saddened to learn that a teaching assistant at my alma mater, Purdue University, ruthlessly slaughtered a fellow student.

Then, I learned that a college student a couple of hours away in Pennsylvania was arrested for possession of weapons of mass destruction.

When will the madness end? It won’t. People seem to be getting more cruel and violent with each passing day.

Whether a mall in the suburbs, a marathon, a movie theater, or a university campus, the number of senseless acts of violence are skyrocketing and, one day, some of us may be called upon to provide emergency care, when we least expect it. Sure, we function well in a hospital environment when the code team, anesthesiologist, and surgeon can be summoned in a matter of seconds, but how many of us are prepared to meet the challenges of a catastrophe in our communities, in our schools, and in our social settings?

If faced with a catastrophic situation, our medical instincts would likely kick in, and we would do whatever is needed to help those in need – stabilize the spine or control the bleeding in trauma victims – but what if we are not sure what to do? What if the 911 operators are overwhelmed by terrified callers fearing for their lives?

The Centers for Disease Control maintains an Emergency Operations Center that can assist health care providers with emergency patient care: 770-488-7100. The CDC’s Clinician Outreach Communication Activity (COCA) works to ensure that clinicians have the up-to-date information they need about emerging health threats. It has posted "Emergency Preparedness: Understanding Physicians’ Concerns and Readiness to Respond," a very informative page full of resources to learn about a variety of scenarios and what we can do. (Some COCA information sessions qualify for continuing education credits.)

Local poison control centers may be of benefit in certain emergency situations as well. The National Capital Poison Center help line – 800-222-1222 – is the telephone number for every poison center in the United States.

This time, the chaos was in my backyard. Next month, God forbid, it may be in yours. No one expects unforeseen emergencies to happen, but knowing where to turn may just make a seemingly impossible situation a little more doable.

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

Author and Disclosure Information

Legacy Keywords
Columbia Mall shooting, emergency, trauma, violence, Teachable Moments
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

My little girl had outgrown most of her Sunday dresses, so I recently took her to the mall down the street in my quiet, award-winning family-friendly city, just miles outside of Baltimore. She stocked up on a few frilly dresses, then played for a while at the indoor playground. On our way out, we stopped and bought frozen yogurt and greeted friends we knew as they walked by – a typical, uneventful day in Columbia, Md.

Just a few days later, a seemingly ordinary young man entered the mall through the same door I had used, and strolled around unnoticed, lost in a sea of eager shoppers. The rest is history. He entered a store, rifle in hand, and shot and killed two young employees, viciously robbing them, and their loved ones of decades of precious hopes, dreams, and memories. This nightmare occurred right around the time my granddaughter arrived at the Columbia Mall to begin her shift at a children’s clothing store. Fortunately, she was not injured, at least not physically.

The week before, I was saddened to learn that a teaching assistant at my alma mater, Purdue University, ruthlessly slaughtered a fellow student.

Then, I learned that a college student a couple of hours away in Pennsylvania was arrested for possession of weapons of mass destruction.

When will the madness end? It won’t. People seem to be getting more cruel and violent with each passing day.

Whether a mall in the suburbs, a marathon, a movie theater, or a university campus, the number of senseless acts of violence are skyrocketing and, one day, some of us may be called upon to provide emergency care, when we least expect it. Sure, we function well in a hospital environment when the code team, anesthesiologist, and surgeon can be summoned in a matter of seconds, but how many of us are prepared to meet the challenges of a catastrophe in our communities, in our schools, and in our social settings?

If faced with a catastrophic situation, our medical instincts would likely kick in, and we would do whatever is needed to help those in need – stabilize the spine or control the bleeding in trauma victims – but what if we are not sure what to do? What if the 911 operators are overwhelmed by terrified callers fearing for their lives?

The Centers for Disease Control maintains an Emergency Operations Center that can assist health care providers with emergency patient care: 770-488-7100. The CDC’s Clinician Outreach Communication Activity (COCA) works to ensure that clinicians have the up-to-date information they need about emerging health threats. It has posted "Emergency Preparedness: Understanding Physicians’ Concerns and Readiness to Respond," a very informative page full of resources to learn about a variety of scenarios and what we can do. (Some COCA information sessions qualify for continuing education credits.)

Local poison control centers may be of benefit in certain emergency situations as well. The National Capital Poison Center help line – 800-222-1222 – is the telephone number for every poison center in the United States.

This time, the chaos was in my backyard. Next month, God forbid, it may be in yours. No one expects unforeseen emergencies to happen, but knowing where to turn may just make a seemingly impossible situation a little more doable.

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

My little girl had outgrown most of her Sunday dresses, so I recently took her to the mall down the street in my quiet, award-winning family-friendly city, just miles outside of Baltimore. She stocked up on a few frilly dresses, then played for a while at the indoor playground. On our way out, we stopped and bought frozen yogurt and greeted friends we knew as they walked by – a typical, uneventful day in Columbia, Md.

Just a few days later, a seemingly ordinary young man entered the mall through the same door I had used, and strolled around unnoticed, lost in a sea of eager shoppers. The rest is history. He entered a store, rifle in hand, and shot and killed two young employees, viciously robbing them, and their loved ones of decades of precious hopes, dreams, and memories. This nightmare occurred right around the time my granddaughter arrived at the Columbia Mall to begin her shift at a children’s clothing store. Fortunately, she was not injured, at least not physically.

The week before, I was saddened to learn that a teaching assistant at my alma mater, Purdue University, ruthlessly slaughtered a fellow student.

Then, I learned that a college student a couple of hours away in Pennsylvania was arrested for possession of weapons of mass destruction.

When will the madness end? It won’t. People seem to be getting more cruel and violent with each passing day.

Whether a mall in the suburbs, a marathon, a movie theater, or a university campus, the number of senseless acts of violence are skyrocketing and, one day, some of us may be called upon to provide emergency care, when we least expect it. Sure, we function well in a hospital environment when the code team, anesthesiologist, and surgeon can be summoned in a matter of seconds, but how many of us are prepared to meet the challenges of a catastrophe in our communities, in our schools, and in our social settings?

If faced with a catastrophic situation, our medical instincts would likely kick in, and we would do whatever is needed to help those in need – stabilize the spine or control the bleeding in trauma victims – but what if we are not sure what to do? What if the 911 operators are overwhelmed by terrified callers fearing for their lives?

The Centers for Disease Control maintains an Emergency Operations Center that can assist health care providers with emergency patient care: 770-488-7100. The CDC’s Clinician Outreach Communication Activity (COCA) works to ensure that clinicians have the up-to-date information they need about emerging health threats. It has posted "Emergency Preparedness: Understanding Physicians’ Concerns and Readiness to Respond," a very informative page full of resources to learn about a variety of scenarios and what we can do. (Some COCA information sessions qualify for continuing education credits.)

Local poison control centers may be of benefit in certain emergency situations as well. The National Capital Poison Center help line – 800-222-1222 – is the telephone number for every poison center in the United States.

This time, the chaos was in my backyard. Next month, God forbid, it may be in yours. No one expects unforeseen emergencies to happen, but knowing where to turn may just make a seemingly impossible situation a little more doable.

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

Article Type
Display Headline
Random acts of readiness in unpredictable times
Display Headline
Random acts of readiness in unpredictable times
Legacy Keywords
Columbia Mall shooting, emergency, trauma, violence, Teachable Moments
Legacy Keywords
Columbia Mall shooting, emergency, trauma, violence, Teachable Moments
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Yes, give more patients statins

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Yes, give more patients statins

The question of whether or not to give more healthy patients statin drugs is one of considerable interest to the public and much debate in both the medical community and the lay press.

In Nov. 12, 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released their long-awaited new guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce the risk of adult atherosclerosis.

This guideline, among other recommendations, guided physicians to expand the number of patients being treated with statin drugs. This ACC/AHA guideline was greeted with many objections in both the medical community and the lay press. Most notable was a Nov. 14 New York Times Op Ed by two respected experts, Dr. John Abramson and Dr. Rita Redberg, entitled "Don’t Give More Patients Statins."

Dr. Frank Veith

Other New York Times articles by Gina Kolata on Nov. 18 and 26 (citing Dr. Paul Ridker, Dr. Nancy Cook, and others) expressed similar reservations about the ACC/AHA guideline recommendation to broaden statin administration. Thus, this guideline and its recommendations are controversial and of great interest and importance to physicians and the public.

The Op Ed by Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg makes the case that the recent ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline is incorrect to advocate expansion of statin usage to more patients because such expansion "will benefit the pharmaceutical industry more than anyone else." They state that the guideline’s authors were not "free of conflicts of interest." In addition, they claim that "18% or more" of statin recipients "experience side effects" and that the increase in statin administration will largely be in "healthy people" who do not benefit and who would be better served by an improved diet and lifestyle.

While the latter is true for everyone, Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg convey the wrong message. Statins are the miracle drug of our era. They have proven repeatedly and dramatically to lower the disabling and common consequences of arteriosclerosis – most prominently heart attacks, strokes, and deaths in patients at risk. Statins avoid these vascular catastrophes not only by lowering bad blood lipids but also by a number of other beneficial effects that stabilize arterial plaques.

They have minimal side effects, most of which are benign. In several controlled studies, the patients who did not receive statins had an incidence of "side effects" equal to those who received them. Serious side effects are rare and manageable. Moreover, healthy patients are healthy only until they get sick. Many individuals over 40 take a daily aspirin. Statins are far more effective than aspirin in preventing heart attacks and strokes which often occur unexpectedly in previously "healthy people."

Clearly it would be worthwhile for such healthy people to take a daily statin pill with few side effects if it would lower their risk of such vascular catastrophes and premature death. In contrast to what is implied in the Abramson–Redberg Op Ed, these drugs are an easy way for people to live longer and live better, and statins cannot be replaced with a healthy life style and diet – although combining the latter with statins is a good thing.

Lastly, regarding the comments about the pharmaceutical industry benefitting and guideline authors’ conflicts of interest, both are less important than patient benefit, which has been demonstrated dramatically and consistently in many controlled statin trials. Moreover, most statins are now generic so the cost for obtaining these miraculous drugs need not be prohibitive, and the guideline’s authors are experts who are eminently qualified to write them.

More patients should be on statin medication.

Dr. Veith is professor of vascular surgery, Langone New York University Medical Center and The Cleveland Clinic. He is an associate medical editor for VASCULAR SPECIALIST. He has no financial conflicts of interest.

The ideas and opinions expressed in VASCULAR SPECIALIST do not necessarily reflect those of the Society or Publisher.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

The question of whether or not to give more healthy patients statin drugs is one of considerable interest to the public and much debate in both the medical community and the lay press.

In Nov. 12, 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released their long-awaited new guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce the risk of adult atherosclerosis.

This guideline, among other recommendations, guided physicians to expand the number of patients being treated with statin drugs. This ACC/AHA guideline was greeted with many objections in both the medical community and the lay press. Most notable was a Nov. 14 New York Times Op Ed by two respected experts, Dr. John Abramson and Dr. Rita Redberg, entitled "Don’t Give More Patients Statins."

Dr. Frank Veith

Other New York Times articles by Gina Kolata on Nov. 18 and 26 (citing Dr. Paul Ridker, Dr. Nancy Cook, and others) expressed similar reservations about the ACC/AHA guideline recommendation to broaden statin administration. Thus, this guideline and its recommendations are controversial and of great interest and importance to physicians and the public.

The Op Ed by Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg makes the case that the recent ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline is incorrect to advocate expansion of statin usage to more patients because such expansion "will benefit the pharmaceutical industry more than anyone else." They state that the guideline’s authors were not "free of conflicts of interest." In addition, they claim that "18% or more" of statin recipients "experience side effects" and that the increase in statin administration will largely be in "healthy people" who do not benefit and who would be better served by an improved diet and lifestyle.

While the latter is true for everyone, Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg convey the wrong message. Statins are the miracle drug of our era. They have proven repeatedly and dramatically to lower the disabling and common consequences of arteriosclerosis – most prominently heart attacks, strokes, and deaths in patients at risk. Statins avoid these vascular catastrophes not only by lowering bad blood lipids but also by a number of other beneficial effects that stabilize arterial plaques.

They have minimal side effects, most of which are benign. In several controlled studies, the patients who did not receive statins had an incidence of "side effects" equal to those who received them. Serious side effects are rare and manageable. Moreover, healthy patients are healthy only until they get sick. Many individuals over 40 take a daily aspirin. Statins are far more effective than aspirin in preventing heart attacks and strokes which often occur unexpectedly in previously "healthy people."

Clearly it would be worthwhile for such healthy people to take a daily statin pill with few side effects if it would lower their risk of such vascular catastrophes and premature death. In contrast to what is implied in the Abramson–Redberg Op Ed, these drugs are an easy way for people to live longer and live better, and statins cannot be replaced with a healthy life style and diet – although combining the latter with statins is a good thing.

Lastly, regarding the comments about the pharmaceutical industry benefitting and guideline authors’ conflicts of interest, both are less important than patient benefit, which has been demonstrated dramatically and consistently in many controlled statin trials. Moreover, most statins are now generic so the cost for obtaining these miraculous drugs need not be prohibitive, and the guideline’s authors are experts who are eminently qualified to write them.

More patients should be on statin medication.

Dr. Veith is professor of vascular surgery, Langone New York University Medical Center and The Cleveland Clinic. He is an associate medical editor for VASCULAR SPECIALIST. He has no financial conflicts of interest.

The ideas and opinions expressed in VASCULAR SPECIALIST do not necessarily reflect those of the Society or Publisher.

The question of whether or not to give more healthy patients statin drugs is one of considerable interest to the public and much debate in both the medical community and the lay press.

In Nov. 12, 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released their long-awaited new guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce the risk of adult atherosclerosis.

This guideline, among other recommendations, guided physicians to expand the number of patients being treated with statin drugs. This ACC/AHA guideline was greeted with many objections in both the medical community and the lay press. Most notable was a Nov. 14 New York Times Op Ed by two respected experts, Dr. John Abramson and Dr. Rita Redberg, entitled "Don’t Give More Patients Statins."

Dr. Frank Veith

Other New York Times articles by Gina Kolata on Nov. 18 and 26 (citing Dr. Paul Ridker, Dr. Nancy Cook, and others) expressed similar reservations about the ACC/AHA guideline recommendation to broaden statin administration. Thus, this guideline and its recommendations are controversial and of great interest and importance to physicians and the public.

The Op Ed by Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg makes the case that the recent ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline is incorrect to advocate expansion of statin usage to more patients because such expansion "will benefit the pharmaceutical industry more than anyone else." They state that the guideline’s authors were not "free of conflicts of interest." In addition, they claim that "18% or more" of statin recipients "experience side effects" and that the increase in statin administration will largely be in "healthy people" who do not benefit and who would be better served by an improved diet and lifestyle.

While the latter is true for everyone, Dr. Abramson and Dr. Redberg convey the wrong message. Statins are the miracle drug of our era. They have proven repeatedly and dramatically to lower the disabling and common consequences of arteriosclerosis – most prominently heart attacks, strokes, and deaths in patients at risk. Statins avoid these vascular catastrophes not only by lowering bad blood lipids but also by a number of other beneficial effects that stabilize arterial plaques.

They have minimal side effects, most of which are benign. In several controlled studies, the patients who did not receive statins had an incidence of "side effects" equal to those who received them. Serious side effects are rare and manageable. Moreover, healthy patients are healthy only until they get sick. Many individuals over 40 take a daily aspirin. Statins are far more effective than aspirin in preventing heart attacks and strokes which often occur unexpectedly in previously "healthy people."

Clearly it would be worthwhile for such healthy people to take a daily statin pill with few side effects if it would lower their risk of such vascular catastrophes and premature death. In contrast to what is implied in the Abramson–Redberg Op Ed, these drugs are an easy way for people to live longer and live better, and statins cannot be replaced with a healthy life style and diet – although combining the latter with statins is a good thing.

Lastly, regarding the comments about the pharmaceutical industry benefitting and guideline authors’ conflicts of interest, both are less important than patient benefit, which has been demonstrated dramatically and consistently in many controlled statin trials. Moreover, most statins are now generic so the cost for obtaining these miraculous drugs need not be prohibitive, and the guideline’s authors are experts who are eminently qualified to write them.

More patients should be on statin medication.

Dr. Veith is professor of vascular surgery, Langone New York University Medical Center and The Cleveland Clinic. He is an associate medical editor for VASCULAR SPECIALIST. He has no financial conflicts of interest.

The ideas and opinions expressed in VASCULAR SPECIALIST do not necessarily reflect those of the Society or Publisher.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Yes, give more patients statins
Display Headline
Yes, give more patients statins
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article