Video

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Moving hysterectomy and advanced gynecologic procedures to the ambulatory surgical environment is better for patients, surgeons, and the health care system, Richard B. Rosenfield, MD, who is in private practice in Portland, Ore., said at the AAGL Global Congress.

“We’ve been basically proving this model over the last decade by performing advanced laparoscopic surgery in the outpatient environment, and we do this for a number of reasons,” Dr. Rosenfield said in an interview. “The patients get to go home the same day, which they typically enjoy, we avoid the hospital-acquired infections, which is great, and in addition to that, the physicians tend to really appreciate the efficiency of an outpatient center.”

But with the focus on value-based payment under federal health programs, there should also be a greater focus on getting more high-volume surgeons to perform their procedures, he said. The idea is to lower the hospital readmissions, complications, and infections that could arise during procedures by less experienced surgeons and redirect the cost savings toward payments for surgeons with better outcomes, Dr. Rosenfield said. But this should be coupled with training and mentoring for lower-volume surgeons, he said.

Dr. Rosenfield reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Moving hysterectomy and advanced gynecologic procedures to the ambulatory surgical environment is better for patients, surgeons, and the health care system, Richard B. Rosenfield, MD, who is in private practice in Portland, Ore., said at the AAGL Global Congress.

“We’ve been basically proving this model over the last decade by performing advanced laparoscopic surgery in the outpatient environment, and we do this for a number of reasons,” Dr. Rosenfield said in an interview. “The patients get to go home the same day, which they typically enjoy, we avoid the hospital-acquired infections, which is great, and in addition to that, the physicians tend to really appreciate the efficiency of an outpatient center.”

But with the focus on value-based payment under federal health programs, there should also be a greater focus on getting more high-volume surgeons to perform their procedures, he said. The idea is to lower the hospital readmissions, complications, and infections that could arise during procedures by less experienced surgeons and redirect the cost savings toward payments for surgeons with better outcomes, Dr. Rosenfield said. But this should be coupled with training and mentoring for lower-volume surgeons, he said.

Dr. Rosenfield reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Moving hysterectomy and advanced gynecologic procedures to the ambulatory surgical environment is better for patients, surgeons, and the health care system, Richard B. Rosenfield, MD, who is in private practice in Portland, Ore., said at the AAGL Global Congress.

“We’ve been basically proving this model over the last decade by performing advanced laparoscopic surgery in the outpatient environment, and we do this for a number of reasons,” Dr. Rosenfield said in an interview. “The patients get to go home the same day, which they typically enjoy, we avoid the hospital-acquired infections, which is great, and in addition to that, the physicians tend to really appreciate the efficiency of an outpatient center.”

But with the focus on value-based payment under federal health programs, there should also be a greater focus on getting more high-volume surgeons to perform their procedures, he said. The idea is to lower the hospital readmissions, complications, and infections that could arise during procedures by less experienced surgeons and redirect the cost savings toward payments for surgeons with better outcomes, Dr. Rosenfield said. But this should be coupled with training and mentoring for lower-volume surgeons, he said.

Dr. Rosenfield reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Innovative tools for vaginal hysterectomy were in the spotlight during a surgical demonstration at the AAGL Global Congress.

“I think it’s really compelling that we use the technologies that the AAGL is known for investigating and teaching each other,” said Charles Rardin, MD, director of the robotic surgery program at Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, R.I. “It’s nice to see a renewed interest in some newer technologies and applying them to vaginal hysterectomy.”

The presentation of new tools comes as the number of vaginal hysterectomies have decreased and laparoscopic procedures are on the rise. The rate of vaginal hysterectomy in the United States has fallen from 24.8% in 1998 to 16.7% in 2010, according to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Surgeons demonstrated new tools with the intent of showing physicians that the benefits some associate with laparoscopic procedures, such as having easier access or a better sense of the uterus, can be associated with vaginal hysterectomy as well.

Advanced tools, such as a self-retaining retractor and 3-D camera systems, could make it easier to teach students by allowing more mobility and easier visual access, Dr. Rardin said in a video interview.

The tutorial ended with a demonstration of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery tool that allows laparoscopic tools to be introduced through the vaginal pathway.

All the tools exhibited at AAGL are currently available.

Dr. Rardin reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Innovative tools for vaginal hysterectomy were in the spotlight during a surgical demonstration at the AAGL Global Congress.

“I think it’s really compelling that we use the technologies that the AAGL is known for investigating and teaching each other,” said Charles Rardin, MD, director of the robotic surgery program at Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, R.I. “It’s nice to see a renewed interest in some newer technologies and applying them to vaginal hysterectomy.”

The presentation of new tools comes as the number of vaginal hysterectomies have decreased and laparoscopic procedures are on the rise. The rate of vaginal hysterectomy in the United States has fallen from 24.8% in 1998 to 16.7% in 2010, according to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Surgeons demonstrated new tools with the intent of showing physicians that the benefits some associate with laparoscopic procedures, such as having easier access or a better sense of the uterus, can be associated with vaginal hysterectomy as well.

Advanced tools, such as a self-retaining retractor and 3-D camera systems, could make it easier to teach students by allowing more mobility and easier visual access, Dr. Rardin said in a video interview.

The tutorial ended with a demonstration of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery tool that allows laparoscopic tools to be introduced through the vaginal pathway.

All the tools exhibited at AAGL are currently available.

Dr. Rardin reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Innovative tools for vaginal hysterectomy were in the spotlight during a surgical demonstration at the AAGL Global Congress.

“I think it’s really compelling that we use the technologies that the AAGL is known for investigating and teaching each other,” said Charles Rardin, MD, director of the robotic surgery program at Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, R.I. “It’s nice to see a renewed interest in some newer technologies and applying them to vaginal hysterectomy.”

The presentation of new tools comes as the number of vaginal hysterectomies have decreased and laparoscopic procedures are on the rise. The rate of vaginal hysterectomy in the United States has fallen from 24.8% in 1998 to 16.7% in 2010, according to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Surgeons demonstrated new tools with the intent of showing physicians that the benefits some associate with laparoscopic procedures, such as having easier access or a better sense of the uterus, can be associated with vaginal hysterectomy as well.

Advanced tools, such as a self-retaining retractor and 3-D camera systems, could make it easier to teach students by allowing more mobility and easier visual access, Dr. Rardin said in a video interview.

The tutorial ended with a demonstration of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery tool that allows laparoscopic tools to be introduced through the vaginal pathway.

All the tools exhibited at AAGL are currently available.

Dr. Rardin reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @eaztweets

LAS VEGAS – Currently, there are available treatments that are effective in contouring the body, Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Some devices can help patients looking for reductions of trouble spots, such as around the abdomen, and are safe and effective, said Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine. However, they are not a realistic option for obese or overweight patients, he added.

In addition, other treatments can be combined with body sculpting devices to optimize results, particularly when removing fat in the submental area, he noted.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – Currently, there are available treatments that are effective in contouring the body, Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Some devices can help patients looking for reductions of trouble spots, such as around the abdomen, and are safe and effective, said Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine. However, they are not a realistic option for obese or overweight patients, he added.

In addition, other treatments can be combined with body sculpting devices to optimize results, particularly when removing fat in the submental area, he noted.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – Currently, there are available treatments that are effective in contouring the body, Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Some devices can help patients looking for reductions of trouble spots, such as around the abdomen, and are safe and effective, said Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine. However, they are not a realistic option for obese or overweight patients, he added.

In addition, other treatments can be combined with body sculpting devices to optimize results, particularly when removing fat in the submental area, he noted.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – For those starting to use toxins and fillers, “my first advice is to get a good education,” Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

“Know … how to evaluate your patient, know where the problems are, know what the danger zones are, understand your anatomy,” advised Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine.

“In general, the upper face is an easier place to start,” when learning to work with toxins , he noted. Procedures on the upper face, such as the treatment for crow’s feet or a brow lift, can be “a home run,” while the lower face is much more complicated, he said in the video interview.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with companies including Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – For those starting to use toxins and fillers, “my first advice is to get a good education,” Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

“Know … how to evaluate your patient, know where the problems are, know what the danger zones are, understand your anatomy,” advised Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine.

“In general, the upper face is an easier place to start,” when learning to work with toxins , he noted. Procedures on the upper face, such as the treatment for crow’s feet or a brow lift, can be “a home run,” while the lower face is much more complicated, he said in the video interview.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with companies including Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – For those starting to use toxins and fillers, “my first advice is to get a good education,” Christopher B. Zachary, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

“Know … how to evaluate your patient, know where the problems are, know what the danger zones are, understand your anatomy,” advised Dr. Zachary of the University of California, Irvine.

“In general, the upper face is an easier place to start,” when learning to work with toxins , he noted. Procedures on the upper face, such as the treatment for crow’s feet or a brow lift, can be “a home run,” while the lower face is much more complicated, he said in the video interview.

Dr. Zachary disclosed relationships with companies including Solta, Zeltiq, Sciton, DUSA, Zimmer, Cutera, Alma, and Amway.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

SAN DIEGO – Healthy individuals can show signs of spinal and pelvic inflammation on MRI, but these scans can be misleading if relied on to make a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, according to findings from three separate studies at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

“Don’t rely on MRI alone is our message,” said Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, of the University of Amsterdam, who was a coauthor of one of the three studies. “A positive MRI may occur in individuals that are completely healthy. We need to make sure that not too many patients with chronic lower back pain are diagnosed with a disease they don’t have.”

The axial form of spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects the spinal and pelvic joints of an estimated 1.4% of the U.S. population, and the term encompasses the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (0.5% of U.S. population) in which advanced sacroiliitis is seen on conventional radiography, according to the ACR. Axial SpA is particularly common in young people, especially males, in their teens and 20s.

Researchers believe that MRI scans can misleadingly suggest that patients have the condition. “We know that MRI is a sensitive method, but there’s a lack of data regarding its specificity,” Thomas Renson, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University, said at a press conference during the meeting.

Dr. Landewé led a study that compared MRIs of sacroiliac joints in 47 healthy people, 47 axSpA patients matched for gender and age, 47 chronic back pain patients, 7 women with postpartum back pain, and 24 frequent runners. Positive MRIs were common in the axSpA patients (43 of 47), but they were also found in healthy people (11 of 47), chronic back pain patients (3 of 47), frequent runners (3 of 24), and women with postpartum back pain (4 of 7).

In another study, Dr. Renson and his colleagues sought to understand whether a sustained period of intense physical activity affected spinal findings in 22 healthy military recruits who did not have SpA.

However, there was a statistically significant increase of combined structural and inflammatory lesions (P = .038) from baseline to post training.

The findings underscore “the importance of interpretation of imaging in the right clinical context,” Dr. Renson said, since they point to the possibility of an incorrect diagnosis “even in a young, active population.”

Another study, led by Ulrich Weber, MD, of King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark, sought to understand levels of normal low-grade BME in 20 amateur runners (8 men) and 22 professional Danish hockey players (all men). On average, the researchers found signs of BME in 3.1 sacroiliac joint quadrants in the runners before and after they ran a race. Hockey players were scanned at the end of the competitive season and showed signs of BME in an average of 3.6 sacroiliac joint quadrants.

In an interview, Dr. Landewé said the studies point to how common positive MRIs are in healthy people. “It was far higher than we would have thought 10 years ago,” he said.

Are MRIs still useful then? Dr. Weber said MRI scans are still helpful in axSpA diagnoses even though they have major limitations. “The imaging method is the only one that’s halfway reliable,” he said. “These joints are deep in the body, so we have virtually no clinical ways to diagnose this.”

However, Dr. Landewé said, “you should do it only when you have sufficient suspicion of spondyloarthritis” – due to accompanying conditions such as positive family history, acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, or peripheral arthritis – and not just when a patient has chronic back pain.

Dr. Renson reported having no relevant disclosures; two of his coauthors reported extensive disclosures. Dr. Weber and his coauthors reported having no relevant disclosures. Dr. Landewé reported having no relevant disclosures; several of his coauthors reported various disclosures. Funding for the studies was not reported.

SAN DIEGO – Healthy individuals can show signs of spinal and pelvic inflammation on MRI, but these scans can be misleading if relied on to make a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, according to findings from three separate studies at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

“Don’t rely on MRI alone is our message,” said Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, of the University of Amsterdam, who was a coauthor of one of the three studies. “A positive MRI may occur in individuals that are completely healthy. We need to make sure that not too many patients with chronic lower back pain are diagnosed with a disease they don’t have.”

The axial form of spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects the spinal and pelvic joints of an estimated 1.4% of the U.S. population, and the term encompasses the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (0.5% of U.S. population) in which advanced sacroiliitis is seen on conventional radiography, according to the ACR. Axial SpA is particularly common in young people, especially males, in their teens and 20s.

Researchers believe that MRI scans can misleadingly suggest that patients have the condition. “We know that MRI is a sensitive method, but there’s a lack of data regarding its specificity,” Thomas Renson, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University, said at a press conference during the meeting.

Dr. Landewé led a study that compared MRIs of sacroiliac joints in 47 healthy people, 47 axSpA patients matched for gender and age, 47 chronic back pain patients, 7 women with postpartum back pain, and 24 frequent runners. Positive MRIs were common in the axSpA patients (43 of 47), but they were also found in healthy people (11 of 47), chronic back pain patients (3 of 47), frequent runners (3 of 24), and women with postpartum back pain (4 of 7).

In another study, Dr. Renson and his colleagues sought to understand whether a sustained period of intense physical activity affected spinal findings in 22 healthy military recruits who did not have SpA.

However, there was a statistically significant increase of combined structural and inflammatory lesions (P = .038) from baseline to post training.

The findings underscore “the importance of interpretation of imaging in the right clinical context,” Dr. Renson said, since they point to the possibility of an incorrect diagnosis “even in a young, active population.”

Another study, led by Ulrich Weber, MD, of King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark, sought to understand levels of normal low-grade BME in 20 amateur runners (8 men) and 22 professional Danish hockey players (all men). On average, the researchers found signs of BME in 3.1 sacroiliac joint quadrants in the runners before and after they ran a race. Hockey players were scanned at the end of the competitive season and showed signs of BME in an average of 3.6 sacroiliac joint quadrants.

In an interview, Dr. Landewé said the studies point to how common positive MRIs are in healthy people. “It was far higher than we would have thought 10 years ago,” he said.

Are MRIs still useful then? Dr. Weber said MRI scans are still helpful in axSpA diagnoses even though they have major limitations. “The imaging method is the only one that’s halfway reliable,” he said. “These joints are deep in the body, so we have virtually no clinical ways to diagnose this.”

However, Dr. Landewé said, “you should do it only when you have sufficient suspicion of spondyloarthritis” – due to accompanying conditions such as positive family history, acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, or peripheral arthritis – and not just when a patient has chronic back pain.

Dr. Renson reported having no relevant disclosures; two of his coauthors reported extensive disclosures. Dr. Weber and his coauthors reported having no relevant disclosures. Dr. Landewé reported having no relevant disclosures; several of his coauthors reported various disclosures. Funding for the studies was not reported.

SAN DIEGO – Healthy individuals can show signs of spinal and pelvic inflammation on MRI, but these scans can be misleading if relied on to make a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, according to findings from three separate studies at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

“Don’t rely on MRI alone is our message,” said Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, of the University of Amsterdam, who was a coauthor of one of the three studies. “A positive MRI may occur in individuals that are completely healthy. We need to make sure that not too many patients with chronic lower back pain are diagnosed with a disease they don’t have.”

The axial form of spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects the spinal and pelvic joints of an estimated 1.4% of the U.S. population, and the term encompasses the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (0.5% of U.S. population) in which advanced sacroiliitis is seen on conventional radiography, according to the ACR. Axial SpA is particularly common in young people, especially males, in their teens and 20s.

Researchers believe that MRI scans can misleadingly suggest that patients have the condition. “We know that MRI is a sensitive method, but there’s a lack of data regarding its specificity,” Thomas Renson, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University, said at a press conference during the meeting.

Dr. Landewé led a study that compared MRIs of sacroiliac joints in 47 healthy people, 47 axSpA patients matched for gender and age, 47 chronic back pain patients, 7 women with postpartum back pain, and 24 frequent runners. Positive MRIs were common in the axSpA patients (43 of 47), but they were also found in healthy people (11 of 47), chronic back pain patients (3 of 47), frequent runners (3 of 24), and women with postpartum back pain (4 of 7).

In another study, Dr. Renson and his colleagues sought to understand whether a sustained period of intense physical activity affected spinal findings in 22 healthy military recruits who did not have SpA.

However, there was a statistically significant increase of combined structural and inflammatory lesions (P = .038) from baseline to post training.

The findings underscore “the importance of interpretation of imaging in the right clinical context,” Dr. Renson said, since they point to the possibility of an incorrect diagnosis “even in a young, active population.”

Another study, led by Ulrich Weber, MD, of King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark, sought to understand levels of normal low-grade BME in 20 amateur runners (8 men) and 22 professional Danish hockey players (all men). On average, the researchers found signs of BME in 3.1 sacroiliac joint quadrants in the runners before and after they ran a race. Hockey players were scanned at the end of the competitive season and showed signs of BME in an average of 3.6 sacroiliac joint quadrants.

In an interview, Dr. Landewé said the studies point to how common positive MRIs are in healthy people. “It was far higher than we would have thought 10 years ago,” he said.

Are MRIs still useful then? Dr. Weber said MRI scans are still helpful in axSpA diagnoses even though they have major limitations. “The imaging method is the only one that’s halfway reliable,” he said. “These joints are deep in the body, so we have virtually no clinical ways to diagnose this.”

However, Dr. Landewé said, “you should do it only when you have sufficient suspicion of spondyloarthritis” – due to accompanying conditions such as positive family history, acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, or peripheral arthritis – and not just when a patient has chronic back pain.

Dr. Renson reported having no relevant disclosures; two of his coauthors reported extensive disclosures. Dr. Weber and his coauthors reported having no relevant disclosures. Dr. Landewé reported having no relevant disclosures; several of his coauthors reported various disclosures. Funding for the studies was not reported.

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Treatment with dual-antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting with a saphenous vein maintained vein-graft patency better than aspirin alone in a randomized, multicenter trial with 500 patients.

After 1 year of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor (Brilinta) and aspirin, 89% of saphenous-vein grafts remained patent, compared with a 77% patency rate in saphenous-vein grafts in patients treated with aspirin alone, a statistically significant difference for the study’s primary endpoint, Qiang Zhao, MD, said at the American Hart Association scientific sessions. The data, collected at six Chinese centers, also showed a nominal decrease in the combined rate of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke: 2% with DAPT and 5% with aspirin alone. It further showed an increase in major or bypass-related bleeds: 2% with DAPT and none with aspirin alone, reported Dr. Zhao, professor and director of cardiac surgery at Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai, China.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Treatment with dual-antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting with a saphenous vein maintained vein-graft patency better than aspirin alone in a randomized, multicenter trial with 500 patients.

After 1 year of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor (Brilinta) and aspirin, 89% of saphenous-vein grafts remained patent, compared with a 77% patency rate in saphenous-vein grafts in patients treated with aspirin alone, a statistically significant difference for the study’s primary endpoint, Qiang Zhao, MD, said at the American Hart Association scientific sessions. The data, collected at six Chinese centers, also showed a nominal decrease in the combined rate of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke: 2% with DAPT and 5% with aspirin alone. It further showed an increase in major or bypass-related bleeds: 2% with DAPT and none with aspirin alone, reported Dr. Zhao, professor and director of cardiac surgery at Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai, China.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Treatment with dual-antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting with a saphenous vein maintained vein-graft patency better than aspirin alone in a randomized, multicenter trial with 500 patients.

After 1 year of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor (Brilinta) and aspirin, 89% of saphenous-vein grafts remained patent, compared with a 77% patency rate in saphenous-vein grafts in patients treated with aspirin alone, a statistically significant difference for the study’s primary endpoint, Qiang Zhao, MD, said at the American Hart Association scientific sessions. The data, collected at six Chinese centers, also showed a nominal decrease in the combined rate of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke: 2% with DAPT and 5% with aspirin alone. It further showed an increase in major or bypass-related bleeds: 2% with DAPT and none with aspirin alone, reported Dr. Zhao, professor and director of cardiac surgery at Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai, China.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:
 

Measure #130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who had their current medications documented in the medical record, including nonprescription drugs, vitamins, and supplements.

What you need to do: Review and update the patient’s list of current medications, being sure to document all known prescriptions, over-the-counter medications, herbals, and vitamin/mineral/dietary supplements. This list must include the name, dosages, frequency, and route of administration for each drug.

Eligible cases include patients aged 18 years and older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 90839, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 92507, 92508, 92526, 92537, 92538, 92540, 92541, 92542, 92544, 92545, 92547, 92548, 92550, 92557, 92567, 92568, 92570, 92585, 92588, 92626, 96116, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97164, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97168, 97532, 97802, 97803, 97804, 98960, 98961, 98962, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99221, 99222, 99223, 99324, 99325, 99326, 99327, 99328, 99334, 99335, 99336, 99337, 99341, 99342, 99343, 99344, 99345, 99347, 99348, 99349, 99350, 99495, 99496, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0402, G0438, G0439.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8427 indicates that the patient’s medical record was updated with the current medications. Use exception code G8430 if you documented in the medical record that the patient is not eligible for a current list of medications being obtained and reviewed.

CMS has a full list of measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:
 

Measure #130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who had their current medications documented in the medical record, including nonprescription drugs, vitamins, and supplements.

What you need to do: Review and update the patient’s list of current medications, being sure to document all known prescriptions, over-the-counter medications, herbals, and vitamin/mineral/dietary supplements. This list must include the name, dosages, frequency, and route of administration for each drug.

Eligible cases include patients aged 18 years and older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 90839, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 92507, 92508, 92526, 92537, 92538, 92540, 92541, 92542, 92544, 92545, 92547, 92548, 92550, 92557, 92567, 92568, 92570, 92585, 92588, 92626, 96116, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97164, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97168, 97532, 97802, 97803, 97804, 98960, 98961, 98962, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99221, 99222, 99223, 99324, 99325, 99326, 99327, 99328, 99334, 99335, 99336, 99337, 99341, 99342, 99343, 99344, 99345, 99347, 99348, 99349, 99350, 99495, 99496, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0402, G0438, G0439.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8427 indicates that the patient’s medical record was updated with the current medications. Use exception code G8430 if you documented in the medical record that the patient is not eligible for a current list of medications being obtained and reviewed.

CMS has a full list of measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:
 

Measure #130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who had their current medications documented in the medical record, including nonprescription drugs, vitamins, and supplements.

What you need to do: Review and update the patient’s list of current medications, being sure to document all known prescriptions, over-the-counter medications, herbals, and vitamin/mineral/dietary supplements. This list must include the name, dosages, frequency, and route of administration for each drug.

Eligible cases include patients aged 18 years and older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 90839, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 92507, 92508, 92526, 92537, 92538, 92540, 92541, 92542, 92544, 92545, 92547, 92548, 92550, 92557, 92567, 92568, 92570, 92585, 92588, 92626, 96116, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97164, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97168, 97532, 97802, 97803, 97804, 98960, 98961, 98962, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99221, 99222, 99223, 99324, 99325, 99326, 99327, 99328, 99334, 99335, 99336, 99337, 99341, 99342, 99343, 99344, 99345, 99347, 99348, 99349, 99350, 99495, 99496, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0402, G0438, G0439.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8427 indicates that the patient’s medical record was updated with the current medications. Use exception code G8430 if you documented in the medical record that the patient is not eligible for a current list of medications being obtained and reviewed.

CMS has a full list of measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

TORONTO – Catheter-directed thrombolysis of pulmonary embolism using an ultrasound-assisted device led to significantly better outcomes in patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, compared with conventional systemic thrombolytic treatment, in a propensity score–adjusted analysis of nearly 3,400 patients.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) “represents an opportunity to locally treat pulmonary embolism with significant thrombus burden with lower bleeding complications,” Abhishek Mishra, MD, said at the CHEST annual meeting. “I think we are underusing CDT,” said Dr. Mishra, a cardiovascular disease physician at Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital in Sayre, Pa.

Although one CDT device, the EKOS endovascular system that uses ultrasound to facilitate pulmonary embolism (PE) thrombolysis, received Food & Drug Administration approval for U.S. marketing in 2014, the trials that have compared it with systemic thrombolysis have been small, noted Dr. Mishra, and none have looked at whether CDT improves patient survival, compared with standard treatments. The largest report on CDT treatment of PE came from a single-arm, uncontrolled study with 150 patients who received ultrasound-facilitated CDT (JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8[10]:1382-92).

To better document the incremental benefit from CDT, Dr. Mishra and his associates used data collected by the Nationwide Readmissions Database during 2013 and 2014, both before and after a CDT device became available for U.S. use. From among 4,426 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of PE and treated with thrombolytic therapy, they used propensity score matching to compare 2,256 patients treated with systemic thrombolysis with 1,128 matched patients treated with CDT using tissue plasminogen activator.

The analysis showed that in-hospital death was 15% in the systemic patients and 6% in the CDT group, a relative risk reduction of 63%, and 30-day readmissions occurred in 11% of the systemic patients and in 8% of those treated with CDT, a 30% relative risk reduction. Both were statistically significant differences for the study’s two primary endpoints, Dr. Mishra reported at the meeting. Rates of intracerebral hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeds were both numerically lower with CDT, and significantly lower for gastrointestinal bleeds.

The researchers also ran a multivariate analysis on their data that showed CDT was linked with significant relative reductions of about 60% for both in-hospital death and 30-day readmissions, compared with patients on systemic therapy. The results Dr. Mishra reported also appeared in a published report (Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120[9]:1653-61).

These findings help buttress the case for using CDT for at least some PE patients. “The key is which patients need it. What is the best way to stratify patients?” commented Victor F. Tapson, MD, a pulmonologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

“Patients with PE and a normal right ventricle generally don’t need anything more aggressive than anticoagulation, and really sick patients with massive PE need systemic thrombolytics. Intermediate-risk patients” are best suited to CDT, but “the problem is that intermediate-risk patients are heterogeneous,” Dr. Tapson said in a video interview. Future studies should establish a more specific subgroup of intermediate-risk patients who benefit from routinely employed CDT, he suggested.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

TORONTO – Catheter-directed thrombolysis of pulmonary embolism using an ultrasound-assisted device led to significantly better outcomes in patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, compared with conventional systemic thrombolytic treatment, in a propensity score–adjusted analysis of nearly 3,400 patients.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) “represents an opportunity to locally treat pulmonary embolism with significant thrombus burden with lower bleeding complications,” Abhishek Mishra, MD, said at the CHEST annual meeting. “I think we are underusing CDT,” said Dr. Mishra, a cardiovascular disease physician at Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital in Sayre, Pa.

Although one CDT device, the EKOS endovascular system that uses ultrasound to facilitate pulmonary embolism (PE) thrombolysis, received Food & Drug Administration approval for U.S. marketing in 2014, the trials that have compared it with systemic thrombolysis have been small, noted Dr. Mishra, and none have looked at whether CDT improves patient survival, compared with standard treatments. The largest report on CDT treatment of PE came from a single-arm, uncontrolled study with 150 patients who received ultrasound-facilitated CDT (JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8[10]:1382-92).

To better document the incremental benefit from CDT, Dr. Mishra and his associates used data collected by the Nationwide Readmissions Database during 2013 and 2014, both before and after a CDT device became available for U.S. use. From among 4,426 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of PE and treated with thrombolytic therapy, they used propensity score matching to compare 2,256 patients treated with systemic thrombolysis with 1,128 matched patients treated with CDT using tissue plasminogen activator.

The analysis showed that in-hospital death was 15% in the systemic patients and 6% in the CDT group, a relative risk reduction of 63%, and 30-day readmissions occurred in 11% of the systemic patients and in 8% of those treated with CDT, a 30% relative risk reduction. Both were statistically significant differences for the study’s two primary endpoints, Dr. Mishra reported at the meeting. Rates of intracerebral hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeds were both numerically lower with CDT, and significantly lower for gastrointestinal bleeds.

The researchers also ran a multivariate analysis on their data that showed CDT was linked with significant relative reductions of about 60% for both in-hospital death and 30-day readmissions, compared with patients on systemic therapy. The results Dr. Mishra reported also appeared in a published report (Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120[9]:1653-61).

These findings help buttress the case for using CDT for at least some PE patients. “The key is which patients need it. What is the best way to stratify patients?” commented Victor F. Tapson, MD, a pulmonologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

“Patients with PE and a normal right ventricle generally don’t need anything more aggressive than anticoagulation, and really sick patients with massive PE need systemic thrombolytics. Intermediate-risk patients” are best suited to CDT, but “the problem is that intermediate-risk patients are heterogeneous,” Dr. Tapson said in a video interview. Future studies should establish a more specific subgroup of intermediate-risk patients who benefit from routinely employed CDT, he suggested.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

TORONTO – Catheter-directed thrombolysis of pulmonary embolism using an ultrasound-assisted device led to significantly better outcomes in patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, compared with conventional systemic thrombolytic treatment, in a propensity score–adjusted analysis of nearly 3,400 patients.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) “represents an opportunity to locally treat pulmonary embolism with significant thrombus burden with lower bleeding complications,” Abhishek Mishra, MD, said at the CHEST annual meeting. “I think we are underusing CDT,” said Dr. Mishra, a cardiovascular disease physician at Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital in Sayre, Pa.

Although one CDT device, the EKOS endovascular system that uses ultrasound to facilitate pulmonary embolism (PE) thrombolysis, received Food & Drug Administration approval for U.S. marketing in 2014, the trials that have compared it with systemic thrombolysis have been small, noted Dr. Mishra, and none have looked at whether CDT improves patient survival, compared with standard treatments. The largest report on CDT treatment of PE came from a single-arm, uncontrolled study with 150 patients who received ultrasound-facilitated CDT (JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8[10]:1382-92).

To better document the incremental benefit from CDT, Dr. Mishra and his associates used data collected by the Nationwide Readmissions Database during 2013 and 2014, both before and after a CDT device became available for U.S. use. From among 4,426 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of PE and treated with thrombolytic therapy, they used propensity score matching to compare 2,256 patients treated with systemic thrombolysis with 1,128 matched patients treated with CDT using tissue plasminogen activator.

The analysis showed that in-hospital death was 15% in the systemic patients and 6% in the CDT group, a relative risk reduction of 63%, and 30-day readmissions occurred in 11% of the systemic patients and in 8% of those treated with CDT, a 30% relative risk reduction. Both were statistically significant differences for the study’s two primary endpoints, Dr. Mishra reported at the meeting. Rates of intracerebral hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeds were both numerically lower with CDT, and significantly lower for gastrointestinal bleeds.

The researchers also ran a multivariate analysis on their data that showed CDT was linked with significant relative reductions of about 60% for both in-hospital death and 30-day readmissions, compared with patients on systemic therapy. The results Dr. Mishra reported also appeared in a published report (Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120[9]:1653-61).

These findings help buttress the case for using CDT for at least some PE patients. “The key is which patients need it. What is the best way to stratify patients?” commented Victor F. Tapson, MD, a pulmonologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

“Patients with PE and a normal right ventricle generally don’t need anything more aggressive than anticoagulation, and really sick patients with massive PE need systemic thrombolytics. Intermediate-risk patients” are best suited to CDT, but “the problem is that intermediate-risk patients are heterogeneous,” Dr. Tapson said in a video interview. Future studies should establish a more specific subgroup of intermediate-risk patients who benefit from routinely employed CDT, he suggested.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

SAN DIEGO – For the first time, a forthcoming evidence-based guideline for the management of psoriatic arthritis recommends tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologics as first-line therapy.

“Guidelines that have been around for the last several years have been skirting around the fact that there’s really no evidence that methotrexate works for PsA,” Dafna D. Gladman, MD, said during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. “So it’s refreshing and reassuring that when you do an appropriate, evidence-based approach, you finally find the truth in front of you, and you have TNF inhibitors as the first-line treatment. Obviously, they’re not for everybody. There are patients in whom we cannot use TNF inhibitors, either because they don’t like needles, or because they have contraindications to getting these particular needles, but at least we have a recommendation for the use of these drugs as a first-line treatment.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – For the first time, a forthcoming evidence-based guideline for the management of psoriatic arthritis recommends tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologics as first-line therapy.

“Guidelines that have been around for the last several years have been skirting around the fact that there’s really no evidence that methotrexate works for PsA,” Dafna D. Gladman, MD, said during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. “So it’s refreshing and reassuring that when you do an appropriate, evidence-based approach, you finally find the truth in front of you, and you have TNF inhibitors as the first-line treatment. Obviously, they’re not for everybody. There are patients in whom we cannot use TNF inhibitors, either because they don’t like needles, or because they have contraindications to getting these particular needles, but at least we have a recommendation for the use of these drugs as a first-line treatment.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN DIEGO – For the first time, a forthcoming evidence-based guideline for the management of psoriatic arthritis recommends tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologics as first-line therapy.

“Guidelines that have been around for the last several years have been skirting around the fact that there’s really no evidence that methotrexate works for PsA,” Dafna D. Gladman, MD, said during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. “So it’s refreshing and reassuring that when you do an appropriate, evidence-based approach, you finally find the truth in front of you, and you have TNF inhibitors as the first-line treatment. Obviously, they’re not for everybody. There are patients in whom we cannot use TNF inhibitors, either because they don’t like needles, or because they have contraindications to getting these particular needles, but at least we have a recommendation for the use of these drugs as a first-line treatment.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

LAS VEGAS – When treating patients with psoriasis, “it is very important for us to treat the entire patient,” and consider the comorbidities, including depression, associated with psoriasis, Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Depression can be a particular concern for younger patients with more severe psoriasis, said Dr. Sobell of Tufts University, Boston.

When he sees patients aged 18-35 years with significant psoriasis in his practice, he has made it a habit to ask them about depression “and if they’ve ever had thoughts of hurting themselves,” and arranges for mental health follow-up visits for patients about whom he is concerned. “It’s something that’s hard to talk about, but so important,” he said.

Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – When treating patients with psoriasis, “it is very important for us to treat the entire patient,” and consider the comorbidities, including depression, associated with psoriasis, Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Depression can be a particular concern for younger patients with more severe psoriasis, said Dr. Sobell of Tufts University, Boston.

When he sees patients aged 18-35 years with significant psoriasis in his practice, he has made it a habit to ask them about depression “and if they’ve ever had thoughts of hurting themselves,” and arranges for mental health follow-up visits for patients about whom he is concerned. “It’s something that’s hard to talk about, but so important,” he said.

Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

LAS VEGAS – When treating patients with psoriasis, “it is very important for us to treat the entire patient,” and consider the comorbidities, including depression, associated with psoriasis, Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, said in a video interview at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Depression can be a particular concern for younger patients with more severe psoriasis, said Dr. Sobell of Tufts University, Boston.

When he sees patients aged 18-35 years with significant psoriasis in his practice, he has made it a habit to ask them about depression “and if they’ve ever had thoughts of hurting themselves,” and arranges for mental health follow-up visits for patients about whom he is concerned. “It’s something that’s hard to talk about, but so important,” he said.

Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.