LayerRx Mapping ID
614
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Reverse Chronological Sort
Medscape Lead Concept
29

WCD: Look for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis in kids

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
WCD: Look for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis in kids

VANCOUVER – Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor–induced psoriasiform dermatitis can occur in pediatric patients after any length of treatment, with documented cases emerging after the very first dose and as late as 63 months into anti-TNF therapy, Dr. Amy S. Paller said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Histopathologically, this medication-induced condition is psoriasis. But it tends to follow a distinctive pattern, favoring the scalp, dorsal hands and feet, nails, and periorificial skin. Palmoplantar pustulosis is not uncommon. The lesions are often secondarily infected with Staphylococcus aureus, according to Dr. Paller, professor and chair of the department of dermatology and professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University in Chicago.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Amy S. Paller

The phenomenon was first described in adults. But in the past several years, as the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has gained increasing traction for treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatologic diseases, the dermatologic disorder has become better characterized in youths. In a retrospective study at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ont., 17 of 172 (10%) infliximab-treated patients with Crohn’s disease developed new-onset psoriasis and another (0.6%) experienced worsening of preexisting psoriasis after anywhere from 1 to 25 infusions. Most patients responded well to topical steroids; however, three discontinued the biologic because of this complication (J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 May;56[5]:512-8).

It’s now clear that the emergence of TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis does not adversely affect the response of a patient’s inflammatory bowel disease or juvenile arthritis to the biologic. Also, the risk of recurrent psoriatic eruption is not reduced by concurrent methotrexate.

Researchers find TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis to be an intriguing puzzle because of its paradoxical nature. After all, the TNF inhibitors are a highly effective treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The leading theory as to the underlying basis for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is that it may have a genetic basis, Dr. Paller noted.

The McMaster group found that their pediatric Crohn’s disease patients who developed psoriasis in conjunction with infliximab (Remicade) therapy were more likely than disease-matched controls to be homozygous for one of several specific polymorphisms in the interleukin-23R gene. And investigators at the University of Helsinki have reported that children with inflammatory bowel disease who developed psoriasiform dermatitis while on infliximab only rarely possessed the HLA-Cw*0602 genotype, which is commonly associated with psoriasis (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Aug;20[8]:1309-15).

The possibility of streptococcal or staphylococcal infection serving as a trigger for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is also being explored, according to Dr. Paller.

She has received research funding from LEO Pharma and Amgen and serves as a consultant to AbbVie.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis, psoriasis
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

VANCOUVER – Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor–induced psoriasiform dermatitis can occur in pediatric patients after any length of treatment, with documented cases emerging after the very first dose and as late as 63 months into anti-TNF therapy, Dr. Amy S. Paller said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Histopathologically, this medication-induced condition is psoriasis. But it tends to follow a distinctive pattern, favoring the scalp, dorsal hands and feet, nails, and periorificial skin. Palmoplantar pustulosis is not uncommon. The lesions are often secondarily infected with Staphylococcus aureus, according to Dr. Paller, professor and chair of the department of dermatology and professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University in Chicago.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Amy S. Paller

The phenomenon was first described in adults. But in the past several years, as the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has gained increasing traction for treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatologic diseases, the dermatologic disorder has become better characterized in youths. In a retrospective study at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ont., 17 of 172 (10%) infliximab-treated patients with Crohn’s disease developed new-onset psoriasis and another (0.6%) experienced worsening of preexisting psoriasis after anywhere from 1 to 25 infusions. Most patients responded well to topical steroids; however, three discontinued the biologic because of this complication (J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 May;56[5]:512-8).

It’s now clear that the emergence of TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis does not adversely affect the response of a patient’s inflammatory bowel disease or juvenile arthritis to the biologic. Also, the risk of recurrent psoriatic eruption is not reduced by concurrent methotrexate.

Researchers find TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis to be an intriguing puzzle because of its paradoxical nature. After all, the TNF inhibitors are a highly effective treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The leading theory as to the underlying basis for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is that it may have a genetic basis, Dr. Paller noted.

The McMaster group found that their pediatric Crohn’s disease patients who developed psoriasis in conjunction with infliximab (Remicade) therapy were more likely than disease-matched controls to be homozygous for one of several specific polymorphisms in the interleukin-23R gene. And investigators at the University of Helsinki have reported that children with inflammatory bowel disease who developed psoriasiform dermatitis while on infliximab only rarely possessed the HLA-Cw*0602 genotype, which is commonly associated with psoriasis (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Aug;20[8]:1309-15).

The possibility of streptococcal or staphylococcal infection serving as a trigger for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is also being explored, according to Dr. Paller.

She has received research funding from LEO Pharma and Amgen and serves as a consultant to AbbVie.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor–induced psoriasiform dermatitis can occur in pediatric patients after any length of treatment, with documented cases emerging after the very first dose and as late as 63 months into anti-TNF therapy, Dr. Amy S. Paller said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Histopathologically, this medication-induced condition is psoriasis. But it tends to follow a distinctive pattern, favoring the scalp, dorsal hands and feet, nails, and periorificial skin. Palmoplantar pustulosis is not uncommon. The lesions are often secondarily infected with Staphylococcus aureus, according to Dr. Paller, professor and chair of the department of dermatology and professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University in Chicago.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Amy S. Paller

The phenomenon was first described in adults. But in the past several years, as the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has gained increasing traction for treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatologic diseases, the dermatologic disorder has become better characterized in youths. In a retrospective study at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ont., 17 of 172 (10%) infliximab-treated patients with Crohn’s disease developed new-onset psoriasis and another (0.6%) experienced worsening of preexisting psoriasis after anywhere from 1 to 25 infusions. Most patients responded well to topical steroids; however, three discontinued the biologic because of this complication (J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 May;56[5]:512-8).

It’s now clear that the emergence of TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis does not adversely affect the response of a patient’s inflammatory bowel disease or juvenile arthritis to the biologic. Also, the risk of recurrent psoriatic eruption is not reduced by concurrent methotrexate.

Researchers find TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis to be an intriguing puzzle because of its paradoxical nature. After all, the TNF inhibitors are a highly effective treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The leading theory as to the underlying basis for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is that it may have a genetic basis, Dr. Paller noted.

The McMaster group found that their pediatric Crohn’s disease patients who developed psoriasis in conjunction with infliximab (Remicade) therapy were more likely than disease-matched controls to be homozygous for one of several specific polymorphisms in the interleukin-23R gene. And investigators at the University of Helsinki have reported that children with inflammatory bowel disease who developed psoriasiform dermatitis while on infliximab only rarely possessed the HLA-Cw*0602 genotype, which is commonly associated with psoriasis (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Aug;20[8]:1309-15).

The possibility of streptococcal or staphylococcal infection serving as a trigger for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis is also being explored, according to Dr. Paller.

She has received research funding from LEO Pharma and Amgen and serves as a consultant to AbbVie.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
WCD: Look for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis in kids
Display Headline
WCD: Look for TNF inhibitor–induced psoriasis in kids
Legacy Keywords
TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis, psoriasis
Legacy Keywords
TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis, psoriasis
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM WCD 2015

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Nail psoriasis therapies lack supporting evidence

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
Nail psoriasis therapies lack supporting evidence

VANCOUVER – Evidence-based therapy for nail psoriasis is in a sorry state because of a lack of consensus on a reliable nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials, according to a coauthor of the Cochrane systematic review of interventions for nail psoriasis.

“The last 12 randomized clinical trials used 21 ways of scoring the results of treatment, so comparing the studies means comparing apples to oranges. Which is the most effective treatment? What should we advise our patients? We don’t know. Comparison is impossible,” Dr. Marcel C. Pasch said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Marcel C. Pasch

The Cochrane report (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;1:CD007633) deemed the evidence for topical therapies as “inconclusive and weak,” even though topicals are the treatment mainstay for this localized expression of psoriasis. Indeed, Dr. Pasch and his coauthors found that no topical therapy has been shown effective in improving nail psoriasis. The Cochrane group concluded that just five therapies rise to the standard of being evidence based in terms of efficacy: the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors infliximab (Remicade) and golimumab (Simponi), superficial radiation therapy, Grenz rays, and electron beam therapy. All five are strikingly impractical for use in clinical practice.

“The findings are quite disappointing because nobody sends a patient with psoriasis to the radiotherapist, and while giving an anti-TNF biologic only for the nails will be effective, at least in my country it won’t be reimbursed,” wrote Dr. Pasch, a dermatologist at Radboud University Nijmegen (the Netherlands) Medical Centre.

The presence and severity of nail psoriasis is unrelated to the severity of cutaneous psoriasis. Moreover, nail psoriasis without cutaneous involvement occurs in 5%-10% of psoriasis patients.

Since publication of the Cochrane systematic review, 12 new randomized controlled trials of treatments for nail psoriasis have appeared. Six focused on biologics: the anti-TNF agents certolizumab (Cimzia), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira); the anti–interleukin-12/23 agent ustekinumab (Stelara); and the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukiumab (Cosentyx). Dr. Pasch said in his opinion all five biologics were supported by convincing studies and now can be added to the short list of evidence-based nail psoriasis therapies.

Of the six recent studies of topical therapies, two provided persuasive evidence of efficacy, in his view: tacrolimus ointment and indigo naturalis extract in oil (Lindioil), a variant of a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, which at this time isn’t commercially available.

In contrast, studies of clobetasol nail lacquer, pulsed dye laser therapy, a nail lacquer based upon chitin from crab shells, and a study of calcitriol ointment versus betamethasone dipropionate ointment failed to be convincing either because of methodologic problems or lack of efficacy, he continued.

These 12 recent randomized clinical trials utilized 21 different nail psoriasis scoring systems.

“Which scoring system is best? The answer is, we don’t know,” Dr. Pasch said.

He and his coinvestigators compared eight different scoring systems in a prospective study and concluded that the Nijmegen–Nail Psoriasis Activity Index Tool (N-NAIL), which Dr. Pasch helped develop, best reflected the clinical severity of nail psoriasis (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun;70[6]:1061-6).

However, he added that at present there is no validated scoring system for nail psoriasis. And creation of a single validated scoring system that researchers can agree on as the standard is a prerequisite for making major advances in the treatment of nail psoriasis, in Dr. Pasch’s view.

He is so convinced of this that he has created an organization whose goal is to achieve consensus on one reliable, validated nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials. At the World Congress of Dermatology, he invited stakeholders – including academic and community dermatologists, patient organizations, and the pharmaceutical industry – to join (www.nailinitiative.org).

Session chair Dr. Peter van de Kerkhof, chairman of dermatology at Radboud University, said he sees the NAPSI (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index) being used in lots of clinical trials in psoriasis. What’s wrong with building a consensus around NAPSI? he asked.

“The problem is not the NAPSI score,” Dr. Pasch replied. “The problem is that in each trial a modified NAPSI score is used, but they are all modified in different ways. We have the single-hand NAPSI, the eight-finger NAPSI, the 10-finger NAPSI, the target NAPSI. The NAPSI doesn’t exist anymore.”

He reported receiving research grants from Pfizer and Janssen-Cilag.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
nail psoriasis, Cochrane, N-NAIL
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

VANCOUVER – Evidence-based therapy for nail psoriasis is in a sorry state because of a lack of consensus on a reliable nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials, according to a coauthor of the Cochrane systematic review of interventions for nail psoriasis.

“The last 12 randomized clinical trials used 21 ways of scoring the results of treatment, so comparing the studies means comparing apples to oranges. Which is the most effective treatment? What should we advise our patients? We don’t know. Comparison is impossible,” Dr. Marcel C. Pasch said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Marcel C. Pasch

The Cochrane report (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;1:CD007633) deemed the evidence for topical therapies as “inconclusive and weak,” even though topicals are the treatment mainstay for this localized expression of psoriasis. Indeed, Dr. Pasch and his coauthors found that no topical therapy has been shown effective in improving nail psoriasis. The Cochrane group concluded that just five therapies rise to the standard of being evidence based in terms of efficacy: the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors infliximab (Remicade) and golimumab (Simponi), superficial radiation therapy, Grenz rays, and electron beam therapy. All five are strikingly impractical for use in clinical practice.

“The findings are quite disappointing because nobody sends a patient with psoriasis to the radiotherapist, and while giving an anti-TNF biologic only for the nails will be effective, at least in my country it won’t be reimbursed,” wrote Dr. Pasch, a dermatologist at Radboud University Nijmegen (the Netherlands) Medical Centre.

The presence and severity of nail psoriasis is unrelated to the severity of cutaneous psoriasis. Moreover, nail psoriasis without cutaneous involvement occurs in 5%-10% of psoriasis patients.

Since publication of the Cochrane systematic review, 12 new randomized controlled trials of treatments for nail psoriasis have appeared. Six focused on biologics: the anti-TNF agents certolizumab (Cimzia), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira); the anti–interleukin-12/23 agent ustekinumab (Stelara); and the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukiumab (Cosentyx). Dr. Pasch said in his opinion all five biologics were supported by convincing studies and now can be added to the short list of evidence-based nail psoriasis therapies.

Of the six recent studies of topical therapies, two provided persuasive evidence of efficacy, in his view: tacrolimus ointment and indigo naturalis extract in oil (Lindioil), a variant of a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, which at this time isn’t commercially available.

In contrast, studies of clobetasol nail lacquer, pulsed dye laser therapy, a nail lacquer based upon chitin from crab shells, and a study of calcitriol ointment versus betamethasone dipropionate ointment failed to be convincing either because of methodologic problems or lack of efficacy, he continued.

These 12 recent randomized clinical trials utilized 21 different nail psoriasis scoring systems.

“Which scoring system is best? The answer is, we don’t know,” Dr. Pasch said.

He and his coinvestigators compared eight different scoring systems in a prospective study and concluded that the Nijmegen–Nail Psoriasis Activity Index Tool (N-NAIL), which Dr. Pasch helped develop, best reflected the clinical severity of nail psoriasis (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun;70[6]:1061-6).

However, he added that at present there is no validated scoring system for nail psoriasis. And creation of a single validated scoring system that researchers can agree on as the standard is a prerequisite for making major advances in the treatment of nail psoriasis, in Dr. Pasch’s view.

He is so convinced of this that he has created an organization whose goal is to achieve consensus on one reliable, validated nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials. At the World Congress of Dermatology, he invited stakeholders – including academic and community dermatologists, patient organizations, and the pharmaceutical industry – to join (www.nailinitiative.org).

Session chair Dr. Peter van de Kerkhof, chairman of dermatology at Radboud University, said he sees the NAPSI (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index) being used in lots of clinical trials in psoriasis. What’s wrong with building a consensus around NAPSI? he asked.

“The problem is not the NAPSI score,” Dr. Pasch replied. “The problem is that in each trial a modified NAPSI score is used, but they are all modified in different ways. We have the single-hand NAPSI, the eight-finger NAPSI, the 10-finger NAPSI, the target NAPSI. The NAPSI doesn’t exist anymore.”

He reported receiving research grants from Pfizer and Janssen-Cilag.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Evidence-based therapy for nail psoriasis is in a sorry state because of a lack of consensus on a reliable nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials, according to a coauthor of the Cochrane systematic review of interventions for nail psoriasis.

“The last 12 randomized clinical trials used 21 ways of scoring the results of treatment, so comparing the studies means comparing apples to oranges. Which is the most effective treatment? What should we advise our patients? We don’t know. Comparison is impossible,” Dr. Marcel C. Pasch said at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Marcel C. Pasch

The Cochrane report (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;1:CD007633) deemed the evidence for topical therapies as “inconclusive and weak,” even though topicals are the treatment mainstay for this localized expression of psoriasis. Indeed, Dr. Pasch and his coauthors found that no topical therapy has been shown effective in improving nail psoriasis. The Cochrane group concluded that just five therapies rise to the standard of being evidence based in terms of efficacy: the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors infliximab (Remicade) and golimumab (Simponi), superficial radiation therapy, Grenz rays, and electron beam therapy. All five are strikingly impractical for use in clinical practice.

“The findings are quite disappointing because nobody sends a patient with psoriasis to the radiotherapist, and while giving an anti-TNF biologic only for the nails will be effective, at least in my country it won’t be reimbursed,” wrote Dr. Pasch, a dermatologist at Radboud University Nijmegen (the Netherlands) Medical Centre.

The presence and severity of nail psoriasis is unrelated to the severity of cutaneous psoriasis. Moreover, nail psoriasis without cutaneous involvement occurs in 5%-10% of psoriasis patients.

Since publication of the Cochrane systematic review, 12 new randomized controlled trials of treatments for nail psoriasis have appeared. Six focused on biologics: the anti-TNF agents certolizumab (Cimzia), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira); the anti–interleukin-12/23 agent ustekinumab (Stelara); and the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukiumab (Cosentyx). Dr. Pasch said in his opinion all five biologics were supported by convincing studies and now can be added to the short list of evidence-based nail psoriasis therapies.

Of the six recent studies of topical therapies, two provided persuasive evidence of efficacy, in his view: tacrolimus ointment and indigo naturalis extract in oil (Lindioil), a variant of a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, which at this time isn’t commercially available.

In contrast, studies of clobetasol nail lacquer, pulsed dye laser therapy, a nail lacquer based upon chitin from crab shells, and a study of calcitriol ointment versus betamethasone dipropionate ointment failed to be convincing either because of methodologic problems or lack of efficacy, he continued.

These 12 recent randomized clinical trials utilized 21 different nail psoriasis scoring systems.

“Which scoring system is best? The answer is, we don’t know,” Dr. Pasch said.

He and his coinvestigators compared eight different scoring systems in a prospective study and concluded that the Nijmegen–Nail Psoriasis Activity Index Tool (N-NAIL), which Dr. Pasch helped develop, best reflected the clinical severity of nail psoriasis (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun;70[6]:1061-6).

However, he added that at present there is no validated scoring system for nail psoriasis. And creation of a single validated scoring system that researchers can agree on as the standard is a prerequisite for making major advances in the treatment of nail psoriasis, in Dr. Pasch’s view.

He is so convinced of this that he has created an organization whose goal is to achieve consensus on one reliable, validated nail psoriasis scoring system for use in clinical trials. At the World Congress of Dermatology, he invited stakeholders – including academic and community dermatologists, patient organizations, and the pharmaceutical industry – to join (www.nailinitiative.org).

Session chair Dr. Peter van de Kerkhof, chairman of dermatology at Radboud University, said he sees the NAPSI (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index) being used in lots of clinical trials in psoriasis. What’s wrong with building a consensus around NAPSI? he asked.

“The problem is not the NAPSI score,” Dr. Pasch replied. “The problem is that in each trial a modified NAPSI score is used, but they are all modified in different ways. We have the single-hand NAPSI, the eight-finger NAPSI, the 10-finger NAPSI, the target NAPSI. The NAPSI doesn’t exist anymore.”

He reported receiving research grants from Pfizer and Janssen-Cilag.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Nail psoriasis therapies lack supporting evidence
Display Headline
Nail psoriasis therapies lack supporting evidence
Legacy Keywords
nail psoriasis, Cochrane, N-NAIL
Legacy Keywords
nail psoriasis, Cochrane, N-NAIL
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM WCD 2015

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Psoriasis patients more likely to have type D personalities

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
Psoriasis patients more likely to have type D personalities

Incidence of type D personality was significantly more common in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, compared with a healthy control group, according to Dr. Alejandro Molina-Leyva of Hospital Torrecardenas, Almeria, Spain, and his associates.

People with type D, or distressed, personality tend to be more worried and irritable, and tend to display more negative emotions than do others. Of the 90 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis included in the study, 39% had type D personality, compared with 24% of the 82 members of the control group. The odds ratio for psoriasis patients developing type D personality was 2.1.

©Waldemarus/thinkstockphotos.com

Psoriasis patients with type D personalities had significantly worse general, sexual, and psoriasis-related health-related quality of life, compared with psoriasis patients without type D personality. In addition, type D personality psoriasis patients were much more likely to experience anxiety or depression than were healthy people with type D personality, with an OR of 3.2.

“It may be that the higher prevalence of type D personality in moderate to severe psoriasis is, at least in part, the result of accumulated psychic damage over years of evolution of the disease. It is important to conduct prospective studies with incident cases of psoriasis to clarify the relationship between type D personality and psoriasis,” the investigators noted.

Find the full study here in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (doi: 10.1111/jdv.12960).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, type D personalities, anxiety, depression
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Incidence of type D personality was significantly more common in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, compared with a healthy control group, according to Dr. Alejandro Molina-Leyva of Hospital Torrecardenas, Almeria, Spain, and his associates.

People with type D, or distressed, personality tend to be more worried and irritable, and tend to display more negative emotions than do others. Of the 90 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis included in the study, 39% had type D personality, compared with 24% of the 82 members of the control group. The odds ratio for psoriasis patients developing type D personality was 2.1.

©Waldemarus/thinkstockphotos.com

Psoriasis patients with type D personalities had significantly worse general, sexual, and psoriasis-related health-related quality of life, compared with psoriasis patients without type D personality. In addition, type D personality psoriasis patients were much more likely to experience anxiety or depression than were healthy people with type D personality, with an OR of 3.2.

“It may be that the higher prevalence of type D personality in moderate to severe psoriasis is, at least in part, the result of accumulated psychic damage over years of evolution of the disease. It is important to conduct prospective studies with incident cases of psoriasis to clarify the relationship between type D personality and psoriasis,” the investigators noted.

Find the full study here in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (doi: 10.1111/jdv.12960).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

Incidence of type D personality was significantly more common in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, compared with a healthy control group, according to Dr. Alejandro Molina-Leyva of Hospital Torrecardenas, Almeria, Spain, and his associates.

People with type D, or distressed, personality tend to be more worried and irritable, and tend to display more negative emotions than do others. Of the 90 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis included in the study, 39% had type D personality, compared with 24% of the 82 members of the control group. The odds ratio for psoriasis patients developing type D personality was 2.1.

©Waldemarus/thinkstockphotos.com

Psoriasis patients with type D personalities had significantly worse general, sexual, and psoriasis-related health-related quality of life, compared with psoriasis patients without type D personality. In addition, type D personality psoriasis patients were much more likely to experience anxiety or depression than were healthy people with type D personality, with an OR of 3.2.

“It may be that the higher prevalence of type D personality in moderate to severe psoriasis is, at least in part, the result of accumulated psychic damage over years of evolution of the disease. It is important to conduct prospective studies with incident cases of psoriasis to clarify the relationship between type D personality and psoriasis,” the investigators noted.

Find the full study here in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (doi: 10.1111/jdv.12960).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriasis patients more likely to have type D personalities
Display Headline
Psoriasis patients more likely to have type D personalities
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, type D personalities, anxiety, depression
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, type D personalities, anxiety, depression
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Psoriasis and acne worse in winter, milder in summer

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 11:17
Display Headline
Psoriasis and acne worse in winter, milder in summer

Psoriasis and acne appear to be susceptible to seasonal variations of clearing and worsening, with an analysis revealing both conditions maintained a significant trend of summer clearing and winter worsening, according to a research letter published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Using Physician’s Global Assessment scales for psoriasis and acne, Dr. Vanessa Lindsay Pascoe and Dr. Alexandra Boer Kimball, both of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, collected data from 5,468 psoriasis patients and 9,301 acne patients between June 2011 and May 2014 in the New England area. Among the psoriasis patient group, 16% were seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 31% in the winter, and 28% in the spring. The trend was similar for acne patients, with 18% seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 28% in the winter, and 29% in the spring. There were no significant seasonal differences in age or sex for either group.

©olavs/thinkstockphotos.com

The percentage of psoriasis patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the summer at 20.4%, while the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 40.5%. For acne, the percentage of patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the fall at 17.5%, and the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 45.9%. Fewer psoriasis and acne patients presented to the clinic in the summer, which the researchers suggested could be due to disease improvement.

“Although the climate of the Northeastern United States may not generalize to regions with less seasonal variation, providers may consider seasonal adjustment of acne plans as they have traditionally done for psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “For example, they may wait until after winter to taper a systemic antibiotic for acne, just as some providers may wait until spring to change systemic psoriasis treatments.”

Read the full article in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

mbock@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Acne, psoriasis, winter, autumn, clearing, worsening, seasonal
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Psoriasis and acne appear to be susceptible to seasonal variations of clearing and worsening, with an analysis revealing both conditions maintained a significant trend of summer clearing and winter worsening, according to a research letter published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Using Physician’s Global Assessment scales for psoriasis and acne, Dr. Vanessa Lindsay Pascoe and Dr. Alexandra Boer Kimball, both of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, collected data from 5,468 psoriasis patients and 9,301 acne patients between June 2011 and May 2014 in the New England area. Among the psoriasis patient group, 16% were seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 31% in the winter, and 28% in the spring. The trend was similar for acne patients, with 18% seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 28% in the winter, and 29% in the spring. There were no significant seasonal differences in age or sex for either group.

©olavs/thinkstockphotos.com

The percentage of psoriasis patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the summer at 20.4%, while the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 40.5%. For acne, the percentage of patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the fall at 17.5%, and the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 45.9%. Fewer psoriasis and acne patients presented to the clinic in the summer, which the researchers suggested could be due to disease improvement.

“Although the climate of the Northeastern United States may not generalize to regions with less seasonal variation, providers may consider seasonal adjustment of acne plans as they have traditionally done for psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “For example, they may wait until after winter to taper a systemic antibiotic for acne, just as some providers may wait until spring to change systemic psoriasis treatments.”

Read the full article in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

mbock@frontlinemedcom.com

Psoriasis and acne appear to be susceptible to seasonal variations of clearing and worsening, with an analysis revealing both conditions maintained a significant trend of summer clearing and winter worsening, according to a research letter published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Using Physician’s Global Assessment scales for psoriasis and acne, Dr. Vanessa Lindsay Pascoe and Dr. Alexandra Boer Kimball, both of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, collected data from 5,468 psoriasis patients and 9,301 acne patients between June 2011 and May 2014 in the New England area. Among the psoriasis patient group, 16% were seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 31% in the winter, and 28% in the spring. The trend was similar for acne patients, with 18% seen in the summer, 25% in the fall, 28% in the winter, and 29% in the spring. There were no significant seasonal differences in age or sex for either group.

©olavs/thinkstockphotos.com

The percentage of psoriasis patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the summer at 20.4%, while the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 40.5%. For acne, the percentage of patients with clear/almost clear disease was highest in the fall at 17.5%, and the percentage of patients with moderate/severe disease was highest in the winter at 45.9%. Fewer psoriasis and acne patients presented to the clinic in the summer, which the researchers suggested could be due to disease improvement.

“Although the climate of the Northeastern United States may not generalize to regions with less seasonal variation, providers may consider seasonal adjustment of acne plans as they have traditionally done for psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “For example, they may wait until after winter to taper a systemic antibiotic for acne, just as some providers may wait until spring to change systemic psoriasis treatments.”

Read the full article in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

mbock@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriasis and acne worse in winter, milder in summer
Display Headline
Psoriasis and acne worse in winter, milder in summer
Legacy Keywords
Acne, psoriasis, winter, autumn, clearing, worsening, seasonal
Legacy Keywords
Acne, psoriasis, winter, autumn, clearing, worsening, seasonal
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Interviews with psoriasis patients reveal disease hardships

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
Interviews with psoriasis patients reveal disease hardships

Interviewing patients who live with psoriasis can reveal important information not included in psoriasis severity measures, according to Dr. David Pariser of Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and his associates.

More than 90% of 101 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with and without psoriatic arthritis, reported emotional and social impacts to their lives. Social impacts included avoiding/changing activities, relationships, or trying new things. Emotional impacts included a sense of anger, frustration, embarrassment, and self-consciousness; a lowered sense of self-esteem was common. Patients reported impacts in family, professional, social, and educational areas.

Dr. David Pariser

Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis tended to report both symptoms and well-being complications more often, with 77% reporting physical impacts and 34% reporting educational impacts, compared with 38% and 17%, respectively, for those with psoriasis only.

The study data “provide practitioners with deep insight into how patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are suffering, regardless of whether the concerns are elucidated during patient visits. The burdens in patients’ lives support the use of effective treatment; indeed, patients expressed how they value physicians who are knowledgeable about psoriasis and who will try various therapies,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment (doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1044492).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, social, emotional hardships
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Interviewing patients who live with psoriasis can reveal important information not included in psoriasis severity measures, according to Dr. David Pariser of Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and his associates.

More than 90% of 101 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with and without psoriatic arthritis, reported emotional and social impacts to their lives. Social impacts included avoiding/changing activities, relationships, or trying new things. Emotional impacts included a sense of anger, frustration, embarrassment, and self-consciousness; a lowered sense of self-esteem was common. Patients reported impacts in family, professional, social, and educational areas.

Dr. David Pariser

Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis tended to report both symptoms and well-being complications more often, with 77% reporting physical impacts and 34% reporting educational impacts, compared with 38% and 17%, respectively, for those with psoriasis only.

The study data “provide practitioners with deep insight into how patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are suffering, regardless of whether the concerns are elucidated during patient visits. The burdens in patients’ lives support the use of effective treatment; indeed, patients expressed how they value physicians who are knowledgeable about psoriasis and who will try various therapies,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment (doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1044492).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

Interviewing patients who live with psoriasis can reveal important information not included in psoriasis severity measures, according to Dr. David Pariser of Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and his associates.

More than 90% of 101 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with and without psoriatic arthritis, reported emotional and social impacts to their lives. Social impacts included avoiding/changing activities, relationships, or trying new things. Emotional impacts included a sense of anger, frustration, embarrassment, and self-consciousness; a lowered sense of self-esteem was common. Patients reported impacts in family, professional, social, and educational areas.

Dr. David Pariser

Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis tended to report both symptoms and well-being complications more often, with 77% reporting physical impacts and 34% reporting educational impacts, compared with 38% and 17%, respectively, for those with psoriasis only.

The study data “provide practitioners with deep insight into how patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are suffering, regardless of whether the concerns are elucidated during patient visits. The burdens in patients’ lives support the use of effective treatment; indeed, patients expressed how they value physicians who are knowledgeable about psoriasis and who will try various therapies,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment (doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1044492).

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Interviews with psoriasis patients reveal disease hardships
Display Headline
Interviews with psoriasis patients reveal disease hardships
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, social, emotional hardships
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, social, emotional hardships
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Psoriasis and herpes are most stigmatized dermatologic conditions

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 11:17
Display Headline
Psoriasis and herpes are most stigmatized dermatologic conditions

Attitudes toward psoriasis and herpes are significantly more stigmatizing than are perceptions of other dermatologic conditions, reported Dr. Jessica M. Donigan and her associates from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

In a survey of 56 adults without any skin conditions aside from typical teenage acne, investigators used an image-based questionnaire to assess attitudes toward psoriasis, compared with other skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, vitiligo, rosacea, herpes labialis, warts, and tinea versicolor. At least 48% of respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, although significantly more were upset by images of herpes. Additionally, about 61% believed psoriasis had an infectious cause, with 41% of participants thinking psoriasis lesions looked contagious because of scale, color, and size, the authors reported.

Courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, as shown here.

A total of 39% of respondents thought herpes was the most-bothersome skin disease, compared with 30% for psoriasis, although this difference was not significant (P = .42). As many as 86% said they would feel pity if they saw a person with psoriasis, which was significantly greater for any of the other dermatologic conditions except acne, the investigators said.

The findings suggest that “misconceptions of infection and contagion, and feelings of pity cause psoriasis to be as bothersome as herpes labialis,” Dr. Donigan and her colleagues said.

Additionally, despite participants perceiving the two conditions as similarly bothersome, psoriasis may “have a greater overall impact on quality of life because of its continuity and chronicity,” they said. “Because of its potential lifelong impact, it is important to familiarize the public with psoriasis to aid in destigmatization.”

Read the full report in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, herpes, stigma
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Attitudes toward psoriasis and herpes are significantly more stigmatizing than are perceptions of other dermatologic conditions, reported Dr. Jessica M. Donigan and her associates from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

In a survey of 56 adults without any skin conditions aside from typical teenage acne, investigators used an image-based questionnaire to assess attitudes toward psoriasis, compared with other skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, vitiligo, rosacea, herpes labialis, warts, and tinea versicolor. At least 48% of respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, although significantly more were upset by images of herpes. Additionally, about 61% believed psoriasis had an infectious cause, with 41% of participants thinking psoriasis lesions looked contagious because of scale, color, and size, the authors reported.

Courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, as shown here.

A total of 39% of respondents thought herpes was the most-bothersome skin disease, compared with 30% for psoriasis, although this difference was not significant (P = .42). As many as 86% said they would feel pity if they saw a person with psoriasis, which was significantly greater for any of the other dermatologic conditions except acne, the investigators said.

The findings suggest that “misconceptions of infection and contagion, and feelings of pity cause psoriasis to be as bothersome as herpes labialis,” Dr. Donigan and her colleagues said.

Additionally, despite participants perceiving the two conditions as similarly bothersome, psoriasis may “have a greater overall impact on quality of life because of its continuity and chronicity,” they said. “Because of its potential lifelong impact, it is important to familiarize the public with psoriasis to aid in destigmatization.”

Read the full report in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Attitudes toward psoriasis and herpes are significantly more stigmatizing than are perceptions of other dermatologic conditions, reported Dr. Jessica M. Donigan and her associates from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

In a survey of 56 adults without any skin conditions aside from typical teenage acne, investigators used an image-based questionnaire to assess attitudes toward psoriasis, compared with other skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, vitiligo, rosacea, herpes labialis, warts, and tinea versicolor. At least 48% of respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, although significantly more were upset by images of herpes. Additionally, about 61% believed psoriasis had an infectious cause, with 41% of participants thinking psoriasis lesions looked contagious because of scale, color, and size, the authors reported.

Courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Respondents reported feeling upset by images of psoriasis, as shown here.

A total of 39% of respondents thought herpes was the most-bothersome skin disease, compared with 30% for psoriasis, although this difference was not significant (P = .42). As many as 86% said they would feel pity if they saw a person with psoriasis, which was significantly greater for any of the other dermatologic conditions except acne, the investigators said.

The findings suggest that “misconceptions of infection and contagion, and feelings of pity cause psoriasis to be as bothersome as herpes labialis,” Dr. Donigan and her colleagues said.

Additionally, despite participants perceiving the two conditions as similarly bothersome, psoriasis may “have a greater overall impact on quality of life because of its continuity and chronicity,” they said. “Because of its potential lifelong impact, it is important to familiarize the public with psoriasis to aid in destigmatization.”

Read the full report in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriasis and herpes are most stigmatized dermatologic conditions
Display Headline
Psoriasis and herpes are most stigmatized dermatologic conditions
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, herpes, stigma
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, herpes, stigma
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Higher risk of arrhythmia in psoriasis patients

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
Higher risk of arrhythmia in psoriasis patients

Patients with psoriasis are at increased risk of arrhythmia, with the risk even greater for younger patients and those with psoriatic arthritis, according to a population-based cohort study conducted in Taiwan.

Dr. Hsien-Yi Chiu of National Taiwan University and Wei-Lun Chang of National Yang-Ming University, both in Taipei, and their colleagues, looked at records from 40,637 patients diagnosed with psoriasis and 162,548 age- and sex-matched controls without psoriasis, over a mean follow-up of about 6 years, for the incidence of arrhythmias over a mean of 6 years.

© Schlegelfotos/iStockphoto

In an article published in the September issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the investigators reported that those patients with psoriasis were at a significantly higher risk of developing arrhythmia, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.39). Increased risk for patients with mild disease (aHR,1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.41) was comparable to that of patients with severe disease (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.39) and more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with psoriatic arthritis (aHR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74). Younger patients, between aged 20 and 39 years, were at a higher risk (aHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54) than older patients in the cohort (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73:429-38).

Although previous studies have shown severe psoriasis to be associated with a nearly 60% increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond traditional risk factors, less is known about arrhythmias specifically. “Inflammation may contribute to the alteration of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology, such as dysregulation of ion channel function, leading to increased risk of arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that limitations of their study were the potential surveillance bias for psoriasis patients due to increased hospital visits, and the fact that alcohol and tobacco use was not captured in the patient data. Treatment with systemic therapies may lower cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients, they added, which may have explained why the arrhythmia risk among patients with severe disease was similar to those with mild disease.

The findings indicate “that psoriasis can be added to future risk-stratification scores for arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote, adding that patients with psoriasis, “especially young patients and those with PsA [psoriatic arthritis] , should be more closely screened for various types of arrhythmia,” with the hope of earlier intervention leading to reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

References

Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Patients with psoriasis are at increased risk of arrhythmia, with the risk even greater for younger patients and those with psoriatic arthritis, according to a population-based cohort study conducted in Taiwan.

Dr. Hsien-Yi Chiu of National Taiwan University and Wei-Lun Chang of National Yang-Ming University, both in Taipei, and their colleagues, looked at records from 40,637 patients diagnosed with psoriasis and 162,548 age- and sex-matched controls without psoriasis, over a mean follow-up of about 6 years, for the incidence of arrhythmias over a mean of 6 years.

© Schlegelfotos/iStockphoto

In an article published in the September issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the investigators reported that those patients with psoriasis were at a significantly higher risk of developing arrhythmia, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.39). Increased risk for patients with mild disease (aHR,1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.41) was comparable to that of patients with severe disease (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.39) and more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with psoriatic arthritis (aHR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74). Younger patients, between aged 20 and 39 years, were at a higher risk (aHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54) than older patients in the cohort (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73:429-38).

Although previous studies have shown severe psoriasis to be associated with a nearly 60% increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond traditional risk factors, less is known about arrhythmias specifically. “Inflammation may contribute to the alteration of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology, such as dysregulation of ion channel function, leading to increased risk of arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that limitations of their study were the potential surveillance bias for psoriasis patients due to increased hospital visits, and the fact that alcohol and tobacco use was not captured in the patient data. Treatment with systemic therapies may lower cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients, they added, which may have explained why the arrhythmia risk among patients with severe disease was similar to those with mild disease.

The findings indicate “that psoriasis can be added to future risk-stratification scores for arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote, adding that patients with psoriasis, “especially young patients and those with PsA [psoriatic arthritis] , should be more closely screened for various types of arrhythmia,” with the hope of earlier intervention leading to reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Patients with psoriasis are at increased risk of arrhythmia, with the risk even greater for younger patients and those with psoriatic arthritis, according to a population-based cohort study conducted in Taiwan.

Dr. Hsien-Yi Chiu of National Taiwan University and Wei-Lun Chang of National Yang-Ming University, both in Taipei, and their colleagues, looked at records from 40,637 patients diagnosed with psoriasis and 162,548 age- and sex-matched controls without psoriasis, over a mean follow-up of about 6 years, for the incidence of arrhythmias over a mean of 6 years.

© Schlegelfotos/iStockphoto

In an article published in the September issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the investigators reported that those patients with psoriasis were at a significantly higher risk of developing arrhythmia, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.39). Increased risk for patients with mild disease (aHR,1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.41) was comparable to that of patients with severe disease (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.39) and more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with psoriatic arthritis (aHR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74). Younger patients, between aged 20 and 39 years, were at a higher risk (aHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54) than older patients in the cohort (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73:429-38).

Although previous studies have shown severe psoriasis to be associated with a nearly 60% increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond traditional risk factors, less is known about arrhythmias specifically. “Inflammation may contribute to the alteration of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology, such as dysregulation of ion channel function, leading to increased risk of arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that limitations of their study were the potential surveillance bias for psoriasis patients due to increased hospital visits, and the fact that alcohol and tobacco use was not captured in the patient data. Treatment with systemic therapies may lower cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients, they added, which may have explained why the arrhythmia risk among patients with severe disease was similar to those with mild disease.

The findings indicate “that psoriasis can be added to future risk-stratification scores for arrhythmia,” the investigators wrote, adding that patients with psoriasis, “especially young patients and those with PsA [psoriatic arthritis] , should be more closely screened for various types of arrhythmia,” with the hope of earlier intervention leading to reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Higher risk of arrhythmia in psoriasis patients
Display Headline
Higher risk of arrhythmia in psoriasis patients
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis are at an increased risk of developing arrhythmias compared to those without psoriasis.

Major finding: After researchers adjusted for medical history and medication use, patients with psoriasis were at increased risk of overall arrhythmia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.39).

Data source: A retrospective cohort study using data from almost 41,000 psoriasis patients identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, and almost 163,000 age and sex-matched cohorts from the same database

Disclosures: Study was institutionally funded. Dr. Chiu, Ms. Chang, and three other authors had no disclosures; one author disclosed having conducted clinical trials, or having received honoraria from several companies, including Pfizer and Novartis, and having received speaking fees from AbbVie.

Celiac disease ‘as common as psoriasis’

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 11:17
Display Headline
Celiac disease ‘as common as psoriasis’

PARK CITY, UTAH – Dr. John J. Zone first began to study gluten sensitivity in 1977, an interest that left some of his clinician colleagues wondering why.

“Everybody told me I was crazy – that this was extremely rare. So I always say I was gluten when gluten wasn’t cool,” Dr. Zone, professor and chairman of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, told attendees at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association.

Dr. John J. Zone

These days, it’s hard to shop in a food market without noticing all the gluten-free foods available, from pizza dough to beer. Many restaurants also serve gluten-free dishes. But is it hype, or is gluten sensitivity that common? Five percent of people in the United States “will say they are gluten sensitive,” he said. “In fact, 1% of Caucasians actually have celiac disease and 1% of Caucasians have gluten sensitivity that can be documented by challenge but don’t have celiac disease, while 3% have nothing.”

Gluten is a group of proteins contained in wheat, barley, and rye that is insoluble in water. Dr. Zone described celiac disease as a “spectrum of disease” characterized by inflammation of the small intestinal mucosa that occurs with the ingestion of gluten. The condition improves when gluten is removed from the diet. From a genetic standpoint, having a predisposition to express human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 is required for a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). An estimated 20%-25% of whites “have that HLA background, but it is rare in Asians,” he said. “The receptors coded by HLA genes are essential for the processing of the gliadin antigen in CD.”

The hallmark for CD is a blood test for immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, which are detectable in patients with untreated disease. “You should be able to get that test for $50 or $60 in any laboratory in the country,” Dr. Zone said. “It’s about 98% reliable. You also want to do a total serum IgA to rule out IgA-deficiency.”

CD clusters with other autoimmune disorders such as Addison’s disease, autoimmune thyroiditis, atrophic gastritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, myasthenia gravis, and vitiligo. It’s also common in Down syndrome. “Many patients with histological inflammation have atypical intestinal symptoms or none at all,” he said. “Clinical studies have shown that only 15%-20% of CD patients identified by serology and confirmed by biopsy have classical symptoms of diarrhea and malabsorption.” The presenting symptom in patients with celiac disease may be limited to only aphthous stomatitis, eczema, alopecia areata, psoriasis, or diabetes, along with fatigue or anemia.

Researchers who analyzed the prevalence of CD in the United States estimated the risk to be 1:133 among individuals deemed not to be at risk, 1:56 in symptomatic patients, 1:39 in second-degree relatives, and 1:22 in first-degree relatives (Arch Intern Med. 2003;163[3]:286-92.). “We tested 2,100 people in Utah and found the prevalence among first-degree relatives was 1:12,” Dr. Zone said. “The point is that CD is common, not rare. It’s as common as psoriasis. It profoundly affects the immune system, which is the modulator of inflammatory skin disease.”

Dr. Zone reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Celiac disease
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

PARK CITY, UTAH – Dr. John J. Zone first began to study gluten sensitivity in 1977, an interest that left some of his clinician colleagues wondering why.

“Everybody told me I was crazy – that this was extremely rare. So I always say I was gluten when gluten wasn’t cool,” Dr. Zone, professor and chairman of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, told attendees at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association.

Dr. John J. Zone

These days, it’s hard to shop in a food market without noticing all the gluten-free foods available, from pizza dough to beer. Many restaurants also serve gluten-free dishes. But is it hype, or is gluten sensitivity that common? Five percent of people in the United States “will say they are gluten sensitive,” he said. “In fact, 1% of Caucasians actually have celiac disease and 1% of Caucasians have gluten sensitivity that can be documented by challenge but don’t have celiac disease, while 3% have nothing.”

Gluten is a group of proteins contained in wheat, barley, and rye that is insoluble in water. Dr. Zone described celiac disease as a “spectrum of disease” characterized by inflammation of the small intestinal mucosa that occurs with the ingestion of gluten. The condition improves when gluten is removed from the diet. From a genetic standpoint, having a predisposition to express human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 is required for a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). An estimated 20%-25% of whites “have that HLA background, but it is rare in Asians,” he said. “The receptors coded by HLA genes are essential for the processing of the gliadin antigen in CD.”

The hallmark for CD is a blood test for immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, which are detectable in patients with untreated disease. “You should be able to get that test for $50 or $60 in any laboratory in the country,” Dr. Zone said. “It’s about 98% reliable. You also want to do a total serum IgA to rule out IgA-deficiency.”

CD clusters with other autoimmune disorders such as Addison’s disease, autoimmune thyroiditis, atrophic gastritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, myasthenia gravis, and vitiligo. It’s also common in Down syndrome. “Many patients with histological inflammation have atypical intestinal symptoms or none at all,” he said. “Clinical studies have shown that only 15%-20% of CD patients identified by serology and confirmed by biopsy have classical symptoms of diarrhea and malabsorption.” The presenting symptom in patients with celiac disease may be limited to only aphthous stomatitis, eczema, alopecia areata, psoriasis, or diabetes, along with fatigue or anemia.

Researchers who analyzed the prevalence of CD in the United States estimated the risk to be 1:133 among individuals deemed not to be at risk, 1:56 in symptomatic patients, 1:39 in second-degree relatives, and 1:22 in first-degree relatives (Arch Intern Med. 2003;163[3]:286-92.). “We tested 2,100 people in Utah and found the prevalence among first-degree relatives was 1:12,” Dr. Zone said. “The point is that CD is common, not rare. It’s as common as psoriasis. It profoundly affects the immune system, which is the modulator of inflammatory skin disease.”

Dr. Zone reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

PARK CITY, UTAH – Dr. John J. Zone first began to study gluten sensitivity in 1977, an interest that left some of his clinician colleagues wondering why.

“Everybody told me I was crazy – that this was extremely rare. So I always say I was gluten when gluten wasn’t cool,” Dr. Zone, professor and chairman of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, told attendees at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association.

Dr. John J. Zone

These days, it’s hard to shop in a food market without noticing all the gluten-free foods available, from pizza dough to beer. Many restaurants also serve gluten-free dishes. But is it hype, or is gluten sensitivity that common? Five percent of people in the United States “will say they are gluten sensitive,” he said. “In fact, 1% of Caucasians actually have celiac disease and 1% of Caucasians have gluten sensitivity that can be documented by challenge but don’t have celiac disease, while 3% have nothing.”

Gluten is a group of proteins contained in wheat, barley, and rye that is insoluble in water. Dr. Zone described celiac disease as a “spectrum of disease” characterized by inflammation of the small intestinal mucosa that occurs with the ingestion of gluten. The condition improves when gluten is removed from the diet. From a genetic standpoint, having a predisposition to express human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 is required for a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). An estimated 20%-25% of whites “have that HLA background, but it is rare in Asians,” he said. “The receptors coded by HLA genes are essential for the processing of the gliadin antigen in CD.”

The hallmark for CD is a blood test for immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, which are detectable in patients with untreated disease. “You should be able to get that test for $50 or $60 in any laboratory in the country,” Dr. Zone said. “It’s about 98% reliable. You also want to do a total serum IgA to rule out IgA-deficiency.”

CD clusters with other autoimmune disorders such as Addison’s disease, autoimmune thyroiditis, atrophic gastritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, myasthenia gravis, and vitiligo. It’s also common in Down syndrome. “Many patients with histological inflammation have atypical intestinal symptoms or none at all,” he said. “Clinical studies have shown that only 15%-20% of CD patients identified by serology and confirmed by biopsy have classical symptoms of diarrhea and malabsorption.” The presenting symptom in patients with celiac disease may be limited to only aphthous stomatitis, eczema, alopecia areata, psoriasis, or diabetes, along with fatigue or anemia.

Researchers who analyzed the prevalence of CD in the United States estimated the risk to be 1:133 among individuals deemed not to be at risk, 1:56 in symptomatic patients, 1:39 in second-degree relatives, and 1:22 in first-degree relatives (Arch Intern Med. 2003;163[3]:286-92.). “We tested 2,100 people in Utah and found the prevalence among first-degree relatives was 1:12,” Dr. Zone said. “The point is that CD is common, not rare. It’s as common as psoriasis. It profoundly affects the immune system, which is the modulator of inflammatory skin disease.”

Dr. Zone reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Celiac disease ‘as common as psoriasis’
Display Headline
Celiac disease ‘as common as psoriasis’
Legacy Keywords
Celiac disease
Legacy Keywords
Celiac disease
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PDA 2015

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Simple screening tool can help detect psoriatic arthritis

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 17:02
Display Headline
Simple screening tool can help detect psoriatic arthritis

PARK CITY, UTAH – Since most people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) develop psoriasis before joint symptoms, it’s helpful to have a simple screening test for the condition.

One of Dr. Philip Mease’s favorite PsA screening tools is the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Test (PEST), which was first described at the 2009 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and consists of five simple questions. They are: Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)? Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis? Do your fingernails or toes have holes or pits? Have you had pain in your heel? Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason? (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27:469-74).

Dr. Philip Mease

“Just these five simple questions, or trying to remember a few of them, can help you in your review of systems,” Dr. Mease, director of arthritis research at Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “I think patients appreciate it when you look beyond the skin in your questioning. These can pick up [PsA] with a high sensitivity and specificity” of 0.92 and 0.78, respectively.

He went on to discuss current PsA treatment approaches. According to an evidence review that he and his associates in GRAPPA published in 2009, biologics (anti–tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) as a group were found to be effective in all five domains of the disease: peripheral arthritis, skin and nail disease, axial disease, dactylitis, and enthesitis, while the oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were effective for peripheral arthritis and skin and nail disease.

Other treatments that were found effective are: psoralen and UVA/UVB for skin and nail disease, physiotherapy for axial disease, intra-articular steroids for peripheral arthritis, and NSAIDs for peripheral arthritis and axial disease (J Rheum. 2009;33:1417-21). “Patients with mild disease can be tried on NSAIDs, especially in a patient with monoarticular disease, but for the most part we need to move on to using systemic medication,” he said. Updated recommendations from GRAPPA include new data regarding ustekinumab, apremilast, and secukinumab, as well as data on comorbidities (J Rheumatol. 2015;42[6]:1052-5).

According to Dr. Mease, controlled trials of DMARDs in PsA patients have yielded treatment effects that range from marginal in the joints to marginal or none at all in the skin. Data from the Methotrexate in Psoriatic Arthritis trial conducted in the United Kingdom and published in 2012 showed no evidence that methotrexate improves inflammatory synovitis in active PsA (Rheumatol. 2012;51:1368-77).

“There were issues with this trial, including the fact that it took 5 years to enroll patients, and many dropped out, so I don’t think it’s a very reliable study,” said Dr. Mease, who is also a professor of medicine in the division of rheumatology at the University of Washington, Seattle. “Currently, Amgen is in the process of starting a trial in which the goal is to enroll 840 subjects with early PsA who are being randomized to methotrexate alone, Enbrel alone, or Enbrel plus methotrexate. This, I think, is going to give us a better answer about the effectiveness of methotrexate. It will also teach us about whether there’s a value in combining an anti-TNF inhibitor with methotrexate. We still don’t know the answer to that question.”

The most recent data on methotrexate come from an open-label trial known as TICOPA, which used a tight control treatment paradigm through 48 weeks of treatment. A subanalysis of 188 patients treated with methotrexate through 12 weeks was presented at the 2015 meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism. It revealed that 41% of patients achieved an ACR 20, 22% achieved minimal disease activity, 62% experienced an improvement in dactylitis, and 25% experienced an improvement in enthesitis.

“So we have a few data suggesting that methotrexate may be modestly effective in treating PsA,” Dr. Mease said. “We often will start with methotrexate unless the patient has really aggressive disease activity. If they get some effect from the drug but not enough, we’ll often add a biologic agent but often keep some methotrexate in the background, even at 10 mg per week, in order to reduce immunogenicity from a biologic.”

Dr. Mease disclosed that he has received research grants, consultation fees, and/or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

PARK CITY, UTAH – Since most people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) develop psoriasis before joint symptoms, it’s helpful to have a simple screening test for the condition.

One of Dr. Philip Mease’s favorite PsA screening tools is the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Test (PEST), which was first described at the 2009 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and consists of five simple questions. They are: Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)? Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis? Do your fingernails or toes have holes or pits? Have you had pain in your heel? Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason? (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27:469-74).

Dr. Philip Mease

“Just these five simple questions, or trying to remember a few of them, can help you in your review of systems,” Dr. Mease, director of arthritis research at Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “I think patients appreciate it when you look beyond the skin in your questioning. These can pick up [PsA] with a high sensitivity and specificity” of 0.92 and 0.78, respectively.

He went on to discuss current PsA treatment approaches. According to an evidence review that he and his associates in GRAPPA published in 2009, biologics (anti–tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) as a group were found to be effective in all five domains of the disease: peripheral arthritis, skin and nail disease, axial disease, dactylitis, and enthesitis, while the oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were effective for peripheral arthritis and skin and nail disease.

Other treatments that were found effective are: psoralen and UVA/UVB for skin and nail disease, physiotherapy for axial disease, intra-articular steroids for peripheral arthritis, and NSAIDs for peripheral arthritis and axial disease (J Rheum. 2009;33:1417-21). “Patients with mild disease can be tried on NSAIDs, especially in a patient with monoarticular disease, but for the most part we need to move on to using systemic medication,” he said. Updated recommendations from GRAPPA include new data regarding ustekinumab, apremilast, and secukinumab, as well as data on comorbidities (J Rheumatol. 2015;42[6]:1052-5).

According to Dr. Mease, controlled trials of DMARDs in PsA patients have yielded treatment effects that range from marginal in the joints to marginal or none at all in the skin. Data from the Methotrexate in Psoriatic Arthritis trial conducted in the United Kingdom and published in 2012 showed no evidence that methotrexate improves inflammatory synovitis in active PsA (Rheumatol. 2012;51:1368-77).

“There were issues with this trial, including the fact that it took 5 years to enroll patients, and many dropped out, so I don’t think it’s a very reliable study,” said Dr. Mease, who is also a professor of medicine in the division of rheumatology at the University of Washington, Seattle. “Currently, Amgen is in the process of starting a trial in which the goal is to enroll 840 subjects with early PsA who are being randomized to methotrexate alone, Enbrel alone, or Enbrel plus methotrexate. This, I think, is going to give us a better answer about the effectiveness of methotrexate. It will also teach us about whether there’s a value in combining an anti-TNF inhibitor with methotrexate. We still don’t know the answer to that question.”

The most recent data on methotrexate come from an open-label trial known as TICOPA, which used a tight control treatment paradigm through 48 weeks of treatment. A subanalysis of 188 patients treated with methotrexate through 12 weeks was presented at the 2015 meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism. It revealed that 41% of patients achieved an ACR 20, 22% achieved minimal disease activity, 62% experienced an improvement in dactylitis, and 25% experienced an improvement in enthesitis.

“So we have a few data suggesting that methotrexate may be modestly effective in treating PsA,” Dr. Mease said. “We often will start with methotrexate unless the patient has really aggressive disease activity. If they get some effect from the drug but not enough, we’ll often add a biologic agent but often keep some methotrexate in the background, even at 10 mg per week, in order to reduce immunogenicity from a biologic.”

Dr. Mease disclosed that he has received research grants, consultation fees, and/or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

PARK CITY, UTAH – Since most people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) develop psoriasis before joint symptoms, it’s helpful to have a simple screening test for the condition.

One of Dr. Philip Mease’s favorite PsA screening tools is the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Test (PEST), which was first described at the 2009 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and consists of five simple questions. They are: Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)? Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis? Do your fingernails or toes have holes or pits? Have you had pain in your heel? Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason? (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27:469-74).

Dr. Philip Mease

“Just these five simple questions, or trying to remember a few of them, can help you in your review of systems,” Dr. Mease, director of arthritis research at Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “I think patients appreciate it when you look beyond the skin in your questioning. These can pick up [PsA] with a high sensitivity and specificity” of 0.92 and 0.78, respectively.

He went on to discuss current PsA treatment approaches. According to an evidence review that he and his associates in GRAPPA published in 2009, biologics (anti–tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) as a group were found to be effective in all five domains of the disease: peripheral arthritis, skin and nail disease, axial disease, dactylitis, and enthesitis, while the oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were effective for peripheral arthritis and skin and nail disease.

Other treatments that were found effective are: psoralen and UVA/UVB for skin and nail disease, physiotherapy for axial disease, intra-articular steroids for peripheral arthritis, and NSAIDs for peripheral arthritis and axial disease (J Rheum. 2009;33:1417-21). “Patients with mild disease can be tried on NSAIDs, especially in a patient with monoarticular disease, but for the most part we need to move on to using systemic medication,” he said. Updated recommendations from GRAPPA include new data regarding ustekinumab, apremilast, and secukinumab, as well as data on comorbidities (J Rheumatol. 2015;42[6]:1052-5).

According to Dr. Mease, controlled trials of DMARDs in PsA patients have yielded treatment effects that range from marginal in the joints to marginal or none at all in the skin. Data from the Methotrexate in Psoriatic Arthritis trial conducted in the United Kingdom and published in 2012 showed no evidence that methotrexate improves inflammatory synovitis in active PsA (Rheumatol. 2012;51:1368-77).

“There were issues with this trial, including the fact that it took 5 years to enroll patients, and many dropped out, so I don’t think it’s a very reliable study,” said Dr. Mease, who is also a professor of medicine in the division of rheumatology at the University of Washington, Seattle. “Currently, Amgen is in the process of starting a trial in which the goal is to enroll 840 subjects with early PsA who are being randomized to methotrexate alone, Enbrel alone, or Enbrel plus methotrexate. This, I think, is going to give us a better answer about the effectiveness of methotrexate. It will also teach us about whether there’s a value in combining an anti-TNF inhibitor with methotrexate. We still don’t know the answer to that question.”

The most recent data on methotrexate come from an open-label trial known as TICOPA, which used a tight control treatment paradigm through 48 weeks of treatment. A subanalysis of 188 patients treated with methotrexate through 12 weeks was presented at the 2015 meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism. It revealed that 41% of patients achieved an ACR 20, 22% achieved minimal disease activity, 62% experienced an improvement in dactylitis, and 25% experienced an improvement in enthesitis.

“So we have a few data suggesting that methotrexate may be modestly effective in treating PsA,” Dr. Mease said. “We often will start with methotrexate unless the patient has really aggressive disease activity. If they get some effect from the drug but not enough, we’ll often add a biologic agent but often keep some methotrexate in the background, even at 10 mg per week, in order to reduce immunogenicity from a biologic.”

Dr. Mease disclosed that he has received research grants, consultation fees, and/or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

dbrunk@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Simple screening tool can help detect psoriatic arthritis
Display Headline
Simple screening tool can help detect psoriatic arthritis
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS AT PDA 2015

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Maintaining Adherence to Psoriasis Treatments

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Maintaining Adherence to Psoriasis Treatments

Adherence to psoriasis therapies, especially topical therapy, is remarkably poor. Dr. Steven Feldman discusses the patient-physician relationship and ways that physicians can help patients so they're not fearful of taking their medications. He discusses follow-up with patients and special considerations for patients with scalp psoriasis.

The psoriasis audiocast series is created in collaboration with Cutis® and the National Psoriasis Foundation®.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Feldman is Professor of Dermatology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Feldman is Professor of Dermatology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Feldman is Professor of Dermatology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Related Articles

Adherence to psoriasis therapies, especially topical therapy, is remarkably poor. Dr. Steven Feldman discusses the patient-physician relationship and ways that physicians can help patients so they're not fearful of taking their medications. He discusses follow-up with patients and special considerations for patients with scalp psoriasis.

The psoriasis audiocast series is created in collaboration with Cutis® and the National Psoriasis Foundation®.

Adherence to psoriasis therapies, especially topical therapy, is remarkably poor. Dr. Steven Feldman discusses the patient-physician relationship and ways that physicians can help patients so they're not fearful of taking their medications. He discusses follow-up with patients and special considerations for patients with scalp psoriasis.

The psoriasis audiocast series is created in collaboration with Cutis® and the National Psoriasis Foundation®.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Maintaining Adherence to Psoriasis Treatments
Display Headline
Maintaining Adherence to Psoriasis Treatments
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica