Cutis

Major changes in continuing board certification are occurring across medical specialties. On January 6, 2020, the American Board of Dermatology (ABD) launches its new web-based longitudinal assessment program called CertLink (https://abderm.mycertlink.org/).¹ This new platform is designed to eventually replace the sit-down, high-stakes, once-every-10-year medical knowledge examination that dermatologists take to remain board certified. With this alternative, every participating dermatologist will receive a batch of 13 web-based questions every quarter that he/she may answer at a convenient time and place. Questions are answered one at a time or in batches, depending on the test taker’s preference, and can be completed on home or office computers (and eventually on smartphones). Participating in this type of testing does not require shutting down practice, traveling to a test center, or paying for expensive board review courses. CertLink is designed to be convenient, affordable, and relevant to an individual’s practice.

How did the ABD arrive at CertLink?

The ABD launched its original Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program in 2006. Since then, newly board-certified dermatologists, recertifying dermatologists with time-limited certificates, and time-unlimited dermatologists who volunteered to participate in MOC have experienced the dermatology MOC program. In its first 10 years, the program was met with very mixed reviews. The program was designed to assess and promote competence in a 4-part framework, including professionalism; commitment to lifelong learning and self-assessment; demonstration of knowledge, judgment, and skills; and improvement in medical practice. All 4 are areas of rational pursuit for medical professionals seeking to perform and maintain the highest quality patient care possible. But there were problems. First iterations are rarely perfect, and dermatology MOC was no exception.

At the onset, the ABD chose to oversee the MOC requirements and remained hands off in the delivery of education, relying instead on other organizations to fulfill the ABD’s requirements. Unfortunately, with limited educational offerings available, many diplomates paid notable registration fees for each qualifying MOC activity. Quality improvement activities were a relatively new experience for dermatologists and were time consuming. Required medical record reviews were onerous, often requiring more than 35 data points to be collected per medical record reviewed. The limited number and limited diversity of educational offerings also created circumstances in which the material covered was not maximally relevant to many participants. When paying to answer questions about patient populations or procedure types never encountered by the dermatologist who purchased the particular MOC activity, many asked the question “How does this make me a better doctor?” They were right to ask.

Cost, time commitment to participate in MOC, and relevance to practice were 3 key areas of concern for many dermatologists. In response to internal and external MOC feedback, in 2015 the ABD took a hard look at its 10-year experience with MOC. While contemplating its next strategies, the ABD temporarily put its component 4—practice improvement—requirements on hold. After much review, the ABD decided to take over a notable portion of the education delivery. Its goal was to provide education that would fulfill MOC requirements in a more affordable, relevant, quicker, and easier manner.

First, the ABD made the decision to assume a more notable role as educator, in part to offer qualifying activities at no additional cost to diplomates. By taking on the role as educator, 3 major changes resulted: the way ABD approached quality improvement activities, partnership to initiate a question-of-the-week self-assessment program, and initiation of a longitudinal assessment strategy that resulted in this month’s launch of CertLink.

The ABD revolutionized its quality improvement requirements with the launch of its practice improvement modules made available through its website.² These modules utilize recently published clinical practice gaps in 5 dermatology subspecialty domains to fulfill the practice improvement requirements. Participants read a brief synopsis of the supporting literature explaining practice improvement recommendations found in the module. Next, they find 5 patients in their practice with the condition, medication, or process in question and review whether they provided the care supported by the best available evidence. No module requires more than 5 medical records to review, and no more than 3 questions are answered per medical record review. If review confirms that the care was appropriate, no further action is needed. If a care gap is identified, then participants implement changes and later remeasure practice to detect any change. This certification activity was incredibly popular with the thousands of diplomates who have participated thus far; more than 97% stated the modules were relevant to practice, 98% stated they would recommend the modules to fellow dermatologists, and nearly 25% reported the module helped to change their practice for the better (unpublished data, July 2019). Relevance had been restored.

The ABD worked closely with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) to develop new education for weekly self-assessment. The ABD created the content and delivered to the AAD the first year of material for what would become the most successful and popular dermatology CME activity in history: the AAD Question of the Week (QOW). Thousands of dermatologists are registered to receive the QOW, with very active weekly participation. Participants receive 1 self-assessment point and 0.25 CME credits for each attempted question, right or wrong. This quizzing tool also was educational, with explanation of right answers and wrong choices included. The average amount of time spent answering each question was approximately 40 seconds. American Academy of Dermatology members can participate in its QOW as a member benefit. Self-assessment is no longer a time- consuming or costly process.

What will be part of CertLink?

In addition to standard multiple-choice questions, there are many interesting elements to the CertLink program, such as article-based questions. At the beginning of each year, dermatologists select 8 articles from a list of those hosted by CertLink. These are recently published articles, chosen for their meaningfulness to practicing dermatologists. Each subsequent quarter, 2 of these articles are issued to the diplomate to read at his/her leisure. Once ready, participants launch and answer 2 questions about the key points of each article. The article-based questions were designed to help the practicing dermatologist stay up-to-date and relevant in personally chosen areas.

Diplomates are offered a chance to learn from any question that was missed, with explanations or resources provided to help them understand why the correct answer is correct. In this new learn-to-competence model, diplomates are not penalized the first time they answer a particular question incorrectly. Each is provided an opportunity to learn through the explanations given, and then in a future quarter, the dermatologist is given a second chance to answer a similarly themed question, with only that second chance counting toward his/her overall score.

Another unique aspect of CertLink is the allowance of time off from assessment. The ABD recognizes that life happens, and that intermittent time off from career-long assessment will be necessary to accommodate life events, including but not limited to maternity leave, other medical leave, or mental health breaks. Diplomates may take off up to 1 quarter of testing each year to accommodate such life events. Those who need extra time (beyond 1 quarter per year) would need to communicate directly with ABD to request. Those who continue to answer questions throughout the year will have their lowest-performing quarter dropped, to maximize fairness to all. Only the top 3 quarters of CertLink test performance will be counted each year when making certification status decisions. Those who take 1 quarter off will have their other 3 quarters counted toward their scoring.

How will CertLink measure performance?

At the onset of CertLink, there is no predetermined passing score. It will take a few years for the ABD psychometricians to determine an acceptable performance. Questions are written not to be tricky but rather to assess patient issues the dermatologist is likely to encounter in practice. Article-based questions are designed to assess the key points of important recent articles to advance the dermatologist’s practice.

Final Thoughts

In the end, the ABD approach to the new area of continuing certification centers on strategies to be relevant, inexpensive, and minimally disruptive to practice, and to teach to competence and advance practice by bringing forward articles that address key recent literature. We think it is a much better approach to dermatology continuing certification.

Major changes in continuing board certification are occurring across medical specialties. On January 6, 2020, the American Board of Dermatology (ABD) launches its new web-based longitudinal assessment program called CertLink (https://abderm.mycertlink.org/).¹ This new platform is designed to eventually replace the sit-down, high-stakes, once-every-10-year medical knowledge examination that dermatologists take to remain board certified. With this alternative, every participating dermatologist will receive a batch of 13 web-based questions every quarter that he/she may answer at a convenient time and place. Questions are answered one at a time or in batches, depending on the test taker’s preference, and can be completed on home or office computers (and eventually on smartphones). Participating in this type of testing does not require shutting down practice, traveling to a test center, or paying for expensive board review courses. CertLink is designed to be convenient, affordable, and relevant to an individual’s practice.

How did the ABD arrive at CertLink?

The ABD launched its original Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program in 2006. Since then, newly board-certified dermatologists, recertifying dermatologists with time-limited certificates, and time-unlimited dermatologists who volunteered to participate in MOC have experienced the dermatology MOC program. In its first 10 years, the program was met with very mixed reviews. The program was designed to assess and promote competence in a 4-part framework, including professionalism; commitment to lifelong learning and self-assessment; demonstration of knowledge, judgment, and skills; and improvement in medical practice. All 4 are areas of rational pursuit for medical professionals seeking to perform and maintain the highest quality patient care possible. But there were problems. First iterations are rarely perfect, and dermatology MOC was no exception.

At the onset, the ABD chose to oversee the MOC requirements and remained hands off in the delivery of education, relying instead on other organizations to fulfill the ABD’s requirements. Unfortunately, with limited educational offerings available, many diplomates paid notable registration fees for each qualifying MOC activity. Quality improvement activities were a relatively new experience for dermatologists and were time consuming. Required medical record reviews were onerous, often requiring more than 35 data points to be collected per medical record reviewed. The limited number and limited diversity of educational offerings also created circumstances in which the material covered was not maximally relevant to many participants. When paying to answer questions about patient populations or procedure types never encountered by the dermatologist who purchased the particular MOC activity, many asked the question “How does this make me a better doctor?” They were right to ask.

Cost, time commitment to participate in MOC, and relevance to practice were 3 key areas of concern for many dermatologists. In response to internal and external MOC feedback, in 2015 the ABD took a hard look at its 10-year experience with MOC. While contemplating its next strategies, the ABD temporarily put its component 4—practice improvement—requirements on hold. After much review, the ABD decided to take over a notable portion of the education delivery. Its goal was to provide education that would fulfill MOC requirements in a more affordable, relevant, quicker, and easier manner.

First, the ABD made the decision to assume a more notable role as educator, in part to offer qualifying activities at no additional cost to diplomates. By taking on the role as educator, 3 major changes resulted: the way ABD approached quality improvement activities, partnership to initiate a question-of-the-week self-assessment program, and initiation of a longitudinal assessment strategy that resulted in this month’s launch of CertLink.

The ABD revolutionized its quality improvement requirements with the launch of its practice improvement modules made available through its website.² These modules utilize recently published clinical practice gaps in 5 dermatology subspecialty domains to fulfill the practice improvement requirements. Participants read a brief synopsis of the supporting literature explaining practice improvement recommendations found in the module. Next, they find 5 patients in their practice with the condition, medication, or process in question and review whether they provided the care supported by the best available evidence. No module requires more than 5 medical records to review, and no more than 3 questions are answered per medical record review. If review confirms that the care was appropriate, no further action is needed. If a care gap is identified, then participants implement changes and later remeasure practice to detect any change. This certification activity was incredibly popular with the thousands of diplomates who have participated thus far; more than 97% stated the modules were relevant to practice, 98% stated they would recommend the modules to fellow dermatologists, and nearly 25% reported the module helped to change their practice for the better (unpublished data, July 2019). Relevance had been restored.

The ABD worked closely with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) to develop new education for weekly self-assessment. The ABD created the content and delivered to the AAD the first year of material for what would become the most successful and popular dermatology CME activity in history: the AAD Question of the Week (QOW). Thousands of dermatologists are registered to receive the QOW, with very active weekly participation. Participants receive 1 self-assessment point and 0.25 CME credits for each attempted question, right or wrong. This quizzing tool also was educational, with explanation of right answers and wrong choices included. The average amount of time spent answering each question was approximately 40 seconds. American Academy of Dermatology members can participate in its QOW as a member benefit. Self-assessment is no longer a time- consuming or costly process.

What will be part of CertLink?

In addition to standard multiple-choice questions, there are many interesting elements to the CertLink program, such as article-based questions. At the beginning of each year, dermatologists select 8 articles from a list of those hosted by CertLink. These are recently published articles, chosen for their meaningfulness to practicing dermatologists. Each subsequent quarter, 2 of these articles are issued to the diplomate to read at his/her leisure. Once ready, participants launch and answer 2 questions about the key points of each article. The article-based questions were designed to help the practicing dermatologist stay up-to-date and relevant in personally chosen areas.

Diplomates are offered a chance to learn from any question that was missed, with explanations or resources provided to help them understand why the correct answer is correct. In this new learn-to-competence model, diplomates are not penalized the first time they answer a particular question incorrectly. Each is provided an opportunity to learn through the explanations given, and then in a future quarter, the dermatologist is given a second chance to answer a similarly themed question, with only that second chance counting toward his/her overall score.

Another unique aspect of CertLink is the allowance of time off from assessment. The ABD recognizes that life happens, and that intermittent time off from career-long assessment will be necessary to accommodate life events, including but not limited to maternity leave, other medical leave, or mental health breaks. Diplomates may take off up to 1 quarter of testing each year to accommodate such life events. Those who need extra time (beyond 1 quarter per year) would need to communicate directly with ABD to request. Those who continue to answer questions throughout the year will have their lowest-performing quarter dropped, to maximize fairness to all. Only the top 3 quarters of CertLink test performance will be counted each year when making certification status decisions. Those who take 1 quarter off will have their other 3 quarters counted toward their scoring.

How will CertLink measure performance?

At the onset of CertLink, there is no predetermined passing score. It will take a few years for the ABD psychometricians to determine an acceptable performance. Questions are written not to be tricky but rather to assess patient issues the dermatologist is likely to encounter in practice. Article-based questions are designed to assess the key points of important recent articles to advance the dermatologist’s practice.

Final Thoughts

In the end, the ABD approach to the new area of continuing certification centers on strategies to be relevant, inexpensive, and minimally disruptive to practice, and to teach to competence and advance practice by bringing forward articles that address key recent literature. We think it is a much better approach to dermatology continuing certification.

Major changes in continuing board certification are occurring across medical specialties. On January 6, 2020, the American Board of Dermatology (ABD) launches its new web-based longitudinal assessment program called CertLink (https://abderm.mycertlink.org/).¹ This new platform is designed to eventually replace the sit-down, high-stakes, once-every-10-year medical knowledge examination that dermatologists take to remain board certified. With this alternative, every participating dermatologist will receive a batch of 13 web-based questions every quarter that he/she may answer at a convenient time and place. Questions are answered one at a time or in batches, depending on the test taker’s preference, and can be completed on home or office computers (and eventually on smartphones). Participating in this type of testing does not require shutting down practice, traveling to a test center, or paying for expensive board review courses. CertLink is designed to be convenient, affordable, and relevant to an individual’s practice.

How did the ABD arrive at CertLink?

The ABD launched its original Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program in 2006. Since then, newly board-certified dermatologists, recertifying dermatologists with time-limited certificates, and time-unlimited dermatologists who volunteered to participate in MOC have experienced the dermatology MOC program. In its first 10 years, the program was met with very mixed reviews. The program was designed to assess and promote competence in a 4-part framework, including professionalism; commitment to lifelong learning and self-assessment; demonstration of knowledge, judgment, and skills; and improvement in medical practice. All 4 are areas of rational pursuit for medical professionals seeking to perform and maintain the highest quality patient care possible. But there were problems. First iterations are rarely perfect, and dermatology MOC was no exception.

At the onset, the ABD chose to oversee the MOC requirements and remained hands off in the delivery of education, relying instead on other organizations to fulfill the ABD’s requirements. Unfortunately, with limited educational offerings available, many diplomates paid notable registration fees for each qualifying MOC activity. Quality improvement activities were a relatively new experience for dermatologists and were time consuming. Required medical record reviews were onerous, often requiring more than 35 data points to be collected per medical record reviewed. The limited number and limited diversity of educational offerings also created circumstances in which the material covered was not maximally relevant to many participants. When paying to answer questions about patient populations or procedure types never encountered by the dermatologist who purchased the particular MOC activity, many asked the question “How does this make me a better doctor?” They were right to ask.

Cost, time commitment to participate in MOC, and relevance to practice were 3 key areas of concern for many dermatologists. In response to internal and external MOC feedback, in 2015 the ABD took a hard look at its 10-year experience with MOC. While contemplating its next strategies, the ABD temporarily put its component 4—practice improvement—requirements on hold. After much review, the ABD decided to take over a notable portion of the education delivery. Its goal was to provide education that would fulfill MOC requirements in a more affordable, relevant, quicker, and easier manner.

First, the ABD made the decision to assume a more notable role as educator, in part to offer qualifying activities at no additional cost to diplomates. By taking on the role as educator, 3 major changes resulted: the way ABD approached quality improvement activities, partnership to initiate a question-of-the-week self-assessment program, and initiation of a longitudinal assessment strategy that resulted in this month’s launch of CertLink.

The ABD revolutionized its quality improvement requirements with the launch of its practice improvement modules made available through its website.² These modules utilize recently published clinical practice gaps in 5 dermatology subspecialty domains to fulfill the practice improvement requirements. Participants read a brief synopsis of the supporting literature explaining practice improvement recommendations found in the module. Next, they find 5 patients in their practice with the condition, medication, or process in question and review whether they provided the care supported by the best available evidence. No module requires more than 5 medical records to review, and no more than 3 questions are answered per medical record review. If review confirms that the care was appropriate, no further action is needed. If a care gap is identified, then participants implement changes and later remeasure practice to detect any change. This certification activity was incredibly popular with the thousands of diplomates who have participated thus far; more than 97% stated the modules were relevant to practice, 98% stated they would recommend the modules to fellow dermatologists, and nearly 25% reported the module helped to change their practice for the better (unpublished data, July 2019). Relevance had been restored.

The ABD worked closely with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) to develop new education for weekly self-assessment. The ABD created the content and delivered to the AAD the first year of material for what would become the most successful and popular dermatology CME activity in history: the AAD Question of the Week (QOW). Thousands of dermatologists are registered to receive the QOW, with very active weekly participation. Participants receive 1 self-assessment point and 0.25 CME credits for each attempted question, right or wrong. This quizzing tool also was educational, with explanation of right answers and wrong choices included. The average amount of time spent answering each question was approximately 40 seconds. American Academy of Dermatology members can participate in its QOW as a member benefit. Self-assessment is no longer a time- consuming or costly process.

What will be part of CertLink?

In addition to standard multiple-choice questions, there are many interesting elements to the CertLink program, such as article-based questions. At the beginning of each year, dermatologists select 8 articles from a list of those hosted by CertLink. These are recently published articles, chosen for their meaningfulness to practicing dermatologists. Each subsequent quarter, 2 of these articles are issued to the diplomate to read at his/her leisure. Once ready, participants launch and answer 2 questions about the key points of each article. The article-based questions were designed to help the practicing dermatologist stay up-to-date and relevant in personally chosen areas.

Diplomates are offered a chance to learn from any question that was missed, with explanations or resources provided to help them understand why the correct answer is correct. In this new learn-to-competence model, diplomates are not penalized the first time they answer a particular question incorrectly. Each is provided an opportunity to learn through the explanations given, and then in a future quarter, the dermatologist is given a second chance to answer a similarly themed question, with only that second chance counting toward his/her overall score.

Another unique aspect of CertLink is the allowance of time off from assessment. The ABD recognizes that life happens, and that intermittent time off from career-long assessment will be necessary to accommodate life events, including but not limited to maternity leave, other medical leave, or mental health breaks. Diplomates may take off up to 1 quarter of testing each year to accommodate such life events. Those who need extra time (beyond 1 quarter per year) would need to communicate directly with ABD to request. Those who continue to answer questions throughout the year will have their lowest-performing quarter dropped, to maximize fairness to all. Only the top 3 quarters of CertLink test performance will be counted each year when making certification status decisions. Those who take 1 quarter off will have their other 3 quarters counted toward their scoring.

How will CertLink measure performance?

At the onset of CertLink, there is no predetermined passing score. It will take a few years for the ABD psychometricians to determine an acceptable performance. Questions are written not to be tricky but rather to assess patient issues the dermatologist is likely to encounter in practice. Article-based questions are designed to assess the key points of important recent articles to advance the dermatologist’s practice.

Final Thoughts

In the end, the ABD approach to the new area of continuing certification centers on strategies to be relevant, inexpensive, and minimally disruptive to practice, and to teach to competence and advance practice by bringing forward articles that address key recent literature. We think it is a much better approach to dermatology continuing certification.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is a key co-stimulatory receptor expressed on activated T cells that negatively regulates T-cell activation.^1-3 It exerts its effects in part by the prevention of IL-2 transcription and inhibition of cell-cycle progression.⁴ Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 also is expressed by a subset of CD25⁺CD4⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs), where it plays a role in immune tolerance.⁵ Blockade has demonstrated antitumor activity as well as immune activation, and CTLA-4 dysregulation has been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as alopecia areata (AA).⁶

Ipilimumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 and one of a growing class of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for metastatic melanoma. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have shown an improved survival effect of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma,^7-10 with 3-year survival rates ranging from 20.8% to 46.5%.^10,11 The US Food and Drug Administration approved ipilimumab in 2011 for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma.¹² The most common toxicities of ipilimumab are immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), which represent loss of tolerance to self-antigens.¹³ Immune-related adverse effects occur in 64.2% of patients,¹⁴ with severe or life-threatening irAEs in 17.8% of patients.¹⁴ Rates of irAEs appear dose dependent but consistent across increased doses.¹⁵ Cutaneous irAEs occur in more than 47% of patients¹⁶ and commonly manifest as pruritus with or without a diffuse morbilliform rash,^10,17 though less common skin reactions, including vitiligo, vasculitis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been documented.^9,18

Generalized AA and its more widespread variant, alopecia universalis, have been reported as adverse effects of ipilimumab monotherapy in 2 prior cases in the English-language literature (Table).^17,19 Alopecia areata also has been attributed to combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.^20,21 We report a case of AA attributable to ipilimumab monotherapy that was localized exclusively to the scalp and remote in onset following treatment.

Case Report

An 88-year-old man with pT3bpN3 nodular melanoma of the back demonstrated multiple lung metastases by positron emission tomography–computed tomography. Lactate dehydrogenase was within reference range, and his Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (fully active). One month later, he was started on ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses. At approximately week 6, his course was complicated by mild fatigue, a faintly erythematous morbilliform rash, and mild pruritus, with laboratory evidence of subclinical hyperthyroidism. Follow-up positron emission tomography–computed tomography at the conclusion of treatment demonstrated complete regression of previously noted hypermetabolic foci. His symptoms and subclinical hyperthyroidism resolved several months later.

Seventeen months after completion of ipilimumab therapy (at age 90 years), the patient’s barber noted new-onset hair loss on the right occipital scalp. Physical examination demonstrated a well-circumscribed patch of nonscarring alopecia (approximately 6 cm) that was clinically consistent with AA (Figure). There were no associated symptoms or other involved areas of hair loss. He denied any personal or family history of AA. The patient’s melanoma has remained in remission to date.

Comment

This case is unique in that AA was localized to a single circumscribed patch on the scalp and occurred nearly 1.5 years after treatment with ipilimumab, which may indicate a robust blockade of CTLA-4 given the remote development of autoimmunity in the setting of persistent remission of melanoma. Although the appearance of AA may be coincidental, onset at 90 years of age would be unusual. The mean age of onset of AA has been reported between 25.2 and 36.3 years,^22,23 and its incidence in men older than 60 years is only 6.4 per 100,000 person-years.²⁴

Although AA is a rare irAE of CTLA-4 blockade, the disease has been increasingly linked to CTLA-4 dysregulation in both animal models and humans.^6,25,26 A genome-wide association study of 1054 patients with AA and 3278 controls implicated several genes controlling activation and proliferation of Tregs, including CTLA-4.²⁷ More specifically, single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 gene were found to be associated with AA in a study of 1196 unrelated patients and 1280 controls,²⁸ and Megiorni et al²⁹ identified a single-nucleotide polymorphism of CTLA-4, CT60, as a contributory genetic determinant of AA in Italian patients.

Given the role of CTLA-4 dysregulation in the pathogenesis of AA, the very low rates of AA in ipilimumab are somewhat surprising, which may represent a reporting bias. Alternatively, there may be sufficient Treg activity to prevent high rates of AA at a lower ipilimumab dose of 3 mg/kg but insufficient activity to prevent development of other irAEs. With US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab at a higher dose of 10 mg/kg for use as adjuvant therapy for stage III melanomas,¹² less common cutaneous irAEs such as AA may be seen with increased frequency. Clinicians planning ipilimumab therapy should discuss this side effect and other potential irAEs with their patients before initiation of treatment.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is a key co-stimulatory receptor expressed on activated T cells that negatively regulates T-cell activation.^1-3 It exerts its effects in part by the prevention of IL-2 transcription and inhibition of cell-cycle progression.⁴ Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 also is expressed by a subset of CD25⁺CD4⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs), where it plays a role in immune tolerance.⁵ Blockade has demonstrated antitumor activity as well as immune activation, and CTLA-4 dysregulation has been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as alopecia areata (AA).⁶

Ipilimumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 and one of a growing class of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for metastatic melanoma. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have shown an improved survival effect of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma,^7-10 with 3-year survival rates ranging from 20.8% to 46.5%.^10,11 The US Food and Drug Administration approved ipilimumab in 2011 for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma.¹² The most common toxicities of ipilimumab are immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), which represent loss of tolerance to self-antigens.¹³ Immune-related adverse effects occur in 64.2% of patients,¹⁴ with severe or life-threatening irAEs in 17.8% of patients.¹⁴ Rates of irAEs appear dose dependent but consistent across increased doses.¹⁵ Cutaneous irAEs occur in more than 47% of patients¹⁶ and commonly manifest as pruritus with or without a diffuse morbilliform rash,^10,17 though less common skin reactions, including vitiligo, vasculitis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been documented.^9,18

Generalized AA and its more widespread variant, alopecia universalis, have been reported as adverse effects of ipilimumab monotherapy in 2 prior cases in the English-language literature (Table).^17,19 Alopecia areata also has been attributed to combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.^20,21 We report a case of AA attributable to ipilimumab monotherapy that was localized exclusively to the scalp and remote in onset following treatment.

Case Report

An 88-year-old man with pT3bpN3 nodular melanoma of the back demonstrated multiple lung metastases by positron emission tomography–computed tomography. Lactate dehydrogenase was within reference range, and his Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (fully active). One month later, he was started on ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses. At approximately week 6, his course was complicated by mild fatigue, a faintly erythematous morbilliform rash, and mild pruritus, with laboratory evidence of subclinical hyperthyroidism. Follow-up positron emission tomography–computed tomography at the conclusion of treatment demonstrated complete regression of previously noted hypermetabolic foci. His symptoms and subclinical hyperthyroidism resolved several months later.

Seventeen months after completion of ipilimumab therapy (at age 90 years), the patient’s barber noted new-onset hair loss on the right occipital scalp. Physical examination demonstrated a well-circumscribed patch of nonscarring alopecia (approximately 6 cm) that was clinically consistent with AA (Figure). There were no associated symptoms or other involved areas of hair loss. He denied any personal or family history of AA. The patient’s melanoma has remained in remission to date.

Comment

This case is unique in that AA was localized to a single circumscribed patch on the scalp and occurred nearly 1.5 years after treatment with ipilimumab, which may indicate a robust blockade of CTLA-4 given the remote development of autoimmunity in the setting of persistent remission of melanoma. Although the appearance of AA may be coincidental, onset at 90 years of age would be unusual. The mean age of onset of AA has been reported between 25.2 and 36.3 years,^22,23 and its incidence in men older than 60 years is only 6.4 per 100,000 person-years.²⁴

Although AA is a rare irAE of CTLA-4 blockade, the disease has been increasingly linked to CTLA-4 dysregulation in both animal models and humans.^6,25,26 A genome-wide association study of 1054 patients with AA and 3278 controls implicated several genes controlling activation and proliferation of Tregs, including CTLA-4.²⁷ More specifically, single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 gene were found to be associated with AA in a study of 1196 unrelated patients and 1280 controls,²⁸ and Megiorni et al²⁹ identified a single-nucleotide polymorphism of CTLA-4, CT60, as a contributory genetic determinant of AA in Italian patients.

Given the role of CTLA-4 dysregulation in the pathogenesis of AA, the very low rates of AA in ipilimumab are somewhat surprising, which may represent a reporting bias. Alternatively, there may be sufficient Treg activity to prevent high rates of AA at a lower ipilimumab dose of 3 mg/kg but insufficient activity to prevent development of other irAEs. With US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab at a higher dose of 10 mg/kg for use as adjuvant therapy for stage III melanomas,¹² less common cutaneous irAEs such as AA may be seen with increased frequency. Clinicians planning ipilimumab therapy should discuss this side effect and other potential irAEs with their patients before initiation of treatment.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is a key co-stimulatory receptor expressed on activated T cells that negatively regulates T-cell activation.^1-3 It exerts its effects in part by the prevention of IL-2 transcription and inhibition of cell-cycle progression.⁴ Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 also is expressed by a subset of CD25⁺CD4⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs), where it plays a role in immune tolerance.⁵ Blockade has demonstrated antitumor activity as well as immune activation, and CTLA-4 dysregulation has been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as alopecia areata (AA).⁶

Ipilimumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 and one of a growing class of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for metastatic melanoma. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have shown an improved survival effect of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma,^7-10 with 3-year survival rates ranging from 20.8% to 46.5%.^10,11 The US Food and Drug Administration approved ipilimumab in 2011 for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma.¹² The most common toxicities of ipilimumab are immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), which represent loss of tolerance to self-antigens.¹³ Immune-related adverse effects occur in 64.2% of patients,¹⁴ with severe or life-threatening irAEs in 17.8% of patients.¹⁴ Rates of irAEs appear dose dependent but consistent across increased doses.¹⁵ Cutaneous irAEs occur in more than 47% of patients¹⁶ and commonly manifest as pruritus with or without a diffuse morbilliform rash,^10,17 though less common skin reactions, including vitiligo, vasculitis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been documented.^9,18

Generalized AA and its more widespread variant, alopecia universalis, have been reported as adverse effects of ipilimumab monotherapy in 2 prior cases in the English-language literature (Table).^17,19 Alopecia areata also has been attributed to combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.^20,21 We report a case of AA attributable to ipilimumab monotherapy that was localized exclusively to the scalp and remote in onset following treatment.

Case Report

An 88-year-old man with pT3bpN3 nodular melanoma of the back demonstrated multiple lung metastases by positron emission tomography–computed tomography. Lactate dehydrogenase was within reference range, and his Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (fully active). One month later, he was started on ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses. At approximately week 6, his course was complicated by mild fatigue, a faintly erythematous morbilliform rash, and mild pruritus, with laboratory evidence of subclinical hyperthyroidism. Follow-up positron emission tomography–computed tomography at the conclusion of treatment demonstrated complete regression of previously noted hypermetabolic foci. His symptoms and subclinical hyperthyroidism resolved several months later.

Seventeen months after completion of ipilimumab therapy (at age 90 years), the patient’s barber noted new-onset hair loss on the right occipital scalp. Physical examination demonstrated a well-circumscribed patch of nonscarring alopecia (approximately 6 cm) that was clinically consistent with AA (Figure). There were no associated symptoms or other involved areas of hair loss. He denied any personal or family history of AA. The patient’s melanoma has remained in remission to date.

Comment

This case is unique in that AA was localized to a single circumscribed patch on the scalp and occurred nearly 1.5 years after treatment with ipilimumab, which may indicate a robust blockade of CTLA-4 given the remote development of autoimmunity in the setting of persistent remission of melanoma. Although the appearance of AA may be coincidental, onset at 90 years of age would be unusual. The mean age of onset of AA has been reported between 25.2 and 36.3 years,^22,23 and its incidence in men older than 60 years is only 6.4 per 100,000 person-years.²⁴

Although AA is a rare irAE of CTLA-4 blockade, the disease has been increasingly linked to CTLA-4 dysregulation in both animal models and humans.^6,25,26 A genome-wide association study of 1054 patients with AA and 3278 controls implicated several genes controlling activation and proliferation of Tregs, including CTLA-4.²⁷ More specifically, single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 gene were found to be associated with AA in a study of 1196 unrelated patients and 1280 controls,²⁸ and Megiorni et al²⁹ identified a single-nucleotide polymorphism of CTLA-4, CT60, as a contributory genetic determinant of AA in Italian patients.

Given the role of CTLA-4 dysregulation in the pathogenesis of AA, the very low rates of AA in ipilimumab are somewhat surprising, which may represent a reporting bias. Alternatively, there may be sufficient Treg activity to prevent high rates of AA at a lower ipilimumab dose of 3 mg/kg but insufficient activity to prevent development of other irAEs. With US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab at a higher dose of 10 mg/kg for use as adjuvant therapy for stage III melanomas,¹² less common cutaneous irAEs such as AA may be seen with increased frequency. Clinicians planning ipilimumab therapy should discuss this side effect and other potential irAEs with their patients before initiation of treatment.

From chemical sunscreen to the measles outbreak and drug approvals to product recalls, dermatology experienced its share of firsts and controversies in 2019.

Chemical Sunscreen Controversies

Controversial concerns about the effects of chemical sunscreen on coral reefs took an unprecedented turn in the United States this last year. On February 5, 2019, an ordinance was passed in Key West, Florida, prohibiting the sale of sunscreen containing the organic UV filters oxybenzone and/or octinoxate within city limits.¹ On June 25, 2019, a similar law that also included octocrylene was passed in the US Virgin Islands.² In so doing, these areas joined Hawaii, the Republic of Palau, and parts of Mexico in restricting chemical sunscreen sales.¹ Although the Key West ordinance is set to take effect in January 2021, opponents, including dermatologists who believe it will discourage sunscreen use, currently are trying to overturn the ban.³ In the US Virgin Islands, part of the ban went into effect in September 2019, with the rest of the ban set to start in March 2020.² Companies have started to follow suit. On August 1, 2019, CVS Pharmacy announced that, by the end of 2020, it will remove oxybenzone and octinoxate from some of its store-brand chemical sunscreens.⁴

On February 26, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed that there are insufficient data to determine if 12 organic UV filters—including the aforementioned oxybenzone, octinoxate, and octocrylene—are generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE).⁵ Although these ingredients were listed as GRASE by the FDA in 2011, the rise in sunscreen use since then, as well as changes in sunscreen formulations, prompted the FDA to ask manufacturers to perform additional studies on safety parameters such as systemic absorption.^5,6 One study conducted by the FDA itself was published in May 2019 and showed that maximal use of 4 sunscreens resulted in systemic absorption of 4 organic UV filters above 0.5 ng/mL, the FDA’s threshold for requiring nonclinical toxicology assessment. The study authors concluded that “further studies [are needed] to determine the clinical significance of these findings. [But] These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.”⁷ Some in the industry have suggested it may take at least 5 years to generate all the data the FDA has requested.⁶

End of the New York City Measles Outbreak

On September 3, 2019, New York City’s largest measles outbreak in nearly 30 years was declared over. This announcement reflected the fact that 2 incubation periods for measles—42 days—had passed since the last measles patient was considered contagious. In total, there were 654 cases of measles and 52 associated hospitalizations, including 16 admissions to the intensive care unit. Most patients were younger than 18 years and unvaccinated.⁸

The outbreak began in October 2018 after Orthodox Jewish children from Brooklyn became infected while visiting Israel and imported the measles virus upon their return home.^8,9 All 5 boroughs in New York City were ultimately affected, although 4 zip codes in Williamsburg, a neighborhood in Brooklyn with an undervaccinated Orthodox Jewish community, accounted for 72% of cases.^8,10 As part of a $6 million effort to stop the outbreak, an emergency order was placed on these 4 zip codes, posing potential fines on people living or working there if they were unvaccinated.⁸ In addition, a bill was passed and signed into law in New York State that eliminated religious exemptions for immunizations.¹¹ In collaboration with Jewish leaders, these efforts increased the administration of measles-mumps-rubella vaccines by 41% compared with the year before in Williamsburg and Borough Park, another heavily Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn.⁸

Drug Approvals for Pediatric Dermatology

On March 11, 2019, the IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor dupilumab became the third biologic with a pediatric dermatology indication when the FDA extended its approval to adolescents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.¹² The FDA approval was based on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 42% (34/82) of adolescents treated with dupilumab monotherapy every other week achieved 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16 compared with 8% (7/85) in the placebo group (P<.001).¹³

In October 2019, trifarotene cream and minocycline foam were approved by the FDA for the treatment of acne in patients 9 years and older.^14,15 As such, both became the first acne therapies to include patients as young as 9 years in their studies and indication—a milestone, considering the fact that children have historically been excluded from clinical trials.¹⁶ The 2 topical treatments also are noteworthy for being first in class: trifarotene cream is the only topical retinoid to selectively target the retinoic acid receptor γ and to have been studied specifically for both facial and truncal acne,^14,17 and minocycline foam is the first topical tetracycline.¹⁵

Drug Approvals for Rare Dermatologic Diseases

On July 19, 2019, apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, became the first medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with oral ulcers due to Behçet disease, a rare multisystem inflammatory disease.¹⁸ The FDA approval was based on a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which 53% (55/104) of patients receiving apremilast monotherapy were ulcer free at week 12 compared to 22% (23/103) receiving placebo (P<.0001)(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02307513).¹⁹

On October 8, 2019, afamelanotide was approved by the FDA to increase pain-free light exposure in adults with erythropoietic protoporphyria, a rare metabolic disorder associated with photosensitivity.²⁰ A melanocortin receptor agonist, afamelanotide is believed to confer photoprotection by increasing the production of eumelanin in the epidermis. The FDA approval was based on 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, both of which found that patients given afamelanotide spent significantly more time in direct sunlight without pain compared to patients in the placebo group (P=.005 and P=.04).²¹

Recalls of Popular Skin Products

On July 5, 2019, Neutrogena recalled its cult-favorite Light Therapy Acne Mask. The recall was driven by rare reports of transient visual side effects due to insufficient eye protection from the mask’s light-emitting diodes.^22,23 Reported in association with 0.02% of masks sold at the time of the recall, these side effects included eye pain, irritation, tearing, blurry vision, seeing spots, and changes in color vision.²⁴ In addition, a risk for potentially irreversible eye injury from the mask was cited in people taking photosensitizing medications, such as doxycycline, and people with certain underlying eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and ocular albinism.^22,24,25

Following decades of asbestos-related controversy, 1 lot of the iconic Johnson’s Baby Powder was recalled for the first time on October 18, 2019, after the FDA found subtrace levels of asbestos in 1 of the lot’s bottles.²⁶ After the recall, Johnson & Johnson reported that 2 third-party laboratories did not ultimately find asbestos when they tested the bottle of interest as well as other bottles from the recalled lot. Three of 5 samples prepared in 1 room by the third-party laboratories initially did test positive for asbestos, but this result was attributed to the room’s air conditioner, which was found to be contaminated with asbestos. When the same samples were prepared in another room, no asbestos was detected.²⁷ The FDA maintained there was “no indication of cross-contamination” when they originally tested the implicated bottle.²⁸

From chemical sunscreen to the measles outbreak and drug approvals to product recalls, dermatology experienced its share of firsts and controversies in 2019.

Chemical Sunscreen Controversies

Controversial concerns about the effects of chemical sunscreen on coral reefs took an unprecedented turn in the United States this last year. On February 5, 2019, an ordinance was passed in Key West, Florida, prohibiting the sale of sunscreen containing the organic UV filters oxybenzone and/or octinoxate within city limits.¹ On June 25, 2019, a similar law that also included octocrylene was passed in the US Virgin Islands.² In so doing, these areas joined Hawaii, the Republic of Palau, and parts of Mexico in restricting chemical sunscreen sales.¹ Although the Key West ordinance is set to take effect in January 2021, opponents, including dermatologists who believe it will discourage sunscreen use, currently are trying to overturn the ban.³ In the US Virgin Islands, part of the ban went into effect in September 2019, with the rest of the ban set to start in March 2020.² Companies have started to follow suit. On August 1, 2019, CVS Pharmacy announced that, by the end of 2020, it will remove oxybenzone and octinoxate from some of its store-brand chemical sunscreens.⁴

On February 26, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed that there are insufficient data to determine if 12 organic UV filters—including the aforementioned oxybenzone, octinoxate, and octocrylene—are generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE).⁵ Although these ingredients were listed as GRASE by the FDA in 2011, the rise in sunscreen use since then, as well as changes in sunscreen formulations, prompted the FDA to ask manufacturers to perform additional studies on safety parameters such as systemic absorption.^5,6 One study conducted by the FDA itself was published in May 2019 and showed that maximal use of 4 sunscreens resulted in systemic absorption of 4 organic UV filters above 0.5 ng/mL, the FDA’s threshold for requiring nonclinical toxicology assessment. The study authors concluded that “further studies [are needed] to determine the clinical significance of these findings. [But] These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.”⁷ Some in the industry have suggested it may take at least 5 years to generate all the data the FDA has requested.⁶

End of the New York City Measles Outbreak

On September 3, 2019, New York City’s largest measles outbreak in nearly 30 years was declared over. This announcement reflected the fact that 2 incubation periods for measles—42 days—had passed since the last measles patient was considered contagious. In total, there were 654 cases of measles and 52 associated hospitalizations, including 16 admissions to the intensive care unit. Most patients were younger than 18 years and unvaccinated.⁸

The outbreak began in October 2018 after Orthodox Jewish children from Brooklyn became infected while visiting Israel and imported the measles virus upon their return home.^8,9 All 5 boroughs in New York City were ultimately affected, although 4 zip codes in Williamsburg, a neighborhood in Brooklyn with an undervaccinated Orthodox Jewish community, accounted for 72% of cases.^8,10 As part of a $6 million effort to stop the outbreak, an emergency order was placed on these 4 zip codes, posing potential fines on people living or working there if they were unvaccinated.⁸ In addition, a bill was passed and signed into law in New York State that eliminated religious exemptions for immunizations.¹¹ In collaboration with Jewish leaders, these efforts increased the administration of measles-mumps-rubella vaccines by 41% compared with the year before in Williamsburg and Borough Park, another heavily Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn.⁸

Drug Approvals for Pediatric Dermatology

On March 11, 2019, the IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor dupilumab became the third biologic with a pediatric dermatology indication when the FDA extended its approval to adolescents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.¹² The FDA approval was based on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 42% (34/82) of adolescents treated with dupilumab monotherapy every other week achieved 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16 compared with 8% (7/85) in the placebo group (P<.001).¹³

In October 2019, trifarotene cream and minocycline foam were approved by the FDA for the treatment of acne in patients 9 years and older.^14,15 As such, both became the first acne therapies to include patients as young as 9 years in their studies and indication—a milestone, considering the fact that children have historically been excluded from clinical trials.¹⁶ The 2 topical treatments also are noteworthy for being first in class: trifarotene cream is the only topical retinoid to selectively target the retinoic acid receptor γ and to have been studied specifically for both facial and truncal acne,^14,17 and minocycline foam is the first topical tetracycline.¹⁵

Drug Approvals for Rare Dermatologic Diseases

On July 19, 2019, apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, became the first medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with oral ulcers due to Behçet disease, a rare multisystem inflammatory disease.¹⁸ The FDA approval was based on a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which 53% (55/104) of patients receiving apremilast monotherapy were ulcer free at week 12 compared to 22% (23/103) receiving placebo (P<.0001)(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02307513).¹⁹

On October 8, 2019, afamelanotide was approved by the FDA to increase pain-free light exposure in adults with erythropoietic protoporphyria, a rare metabolic disorder associated with photosensitivity.²⁰ A melanocortin receptor agonist, afamelanotide is believed to confer photoprotection by increasing the production of eumelanin in the epidermis. The FDA approval was based on 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, both of which found that patients given afamelanotide spent significantly more time in direct sunlight without pain compared to patients in the placebo group (P=.005 and P=.04).²¹

Recalls of Popular Skin Products

On July 5, 2019, Neutrogena recalled its cult-favorite Light Therapy Acne Mask. The recall was driven by rare reports of transient visual side effects due to insufficient eye protection from the mask’s light-emitting diodes.^22,23 Reported in association with 0.02% of masks sold at the time of the recall, these side effects included eye pain, irritation, tearing, blurry vision, seeing spots, and changes in color vision.²⁴ In addition, a risk for potentially irreversible eye injury from the mask was cited in people taking photosensitizing medications, such as doxycycline, and people with certain underlying eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and ocular albinism.^22,24,25

Following decades of asbestos-related controversy, 1 lot of the iconic Johnson’s Baby Powder was recalled for the first time on October 18, 2019, after the FDA found subtrace levels of asbestos in 1 of the lot’s bottles.²⁶ After the recall, Johnson & Johnson reported that 2 third-party laboratories did not ultimately find asbestos when they tested the bottle of interest as well as other bottles from the recalled lot. Three of 5 samples prepared in 1 room by the third-party laboratories initially did test positive for asbestos, but this result was attributed to the room’s air conditioner, which was found to be contaminated with asbestos. When the same samples were prepared in another room, no asbestos was detected.²⁷ The FDA maintained there was “no indication of cross-contamination” when they originally tested the implicated bottle.²⁸

From chemical sunscreen to the measles outbreak and drug approvals to product recalls, dermatology experienced its share of firsts and controversies in 2019.

Chemical Sunscreen Controversies

Controversial concerns about the effects of chemical sunscreen on coral reefs took an unprecedented turn in the United States this last year. On February 5, 2019, an ordinance was passed in Key West, Florida, prohibiting the sale of sunscreen containing the organic UV filters oxybenzone and/or octinoxate within city limits.¹ On June 25, 2019, a similar law that also included octocrylene was passed in the US Virgin Islands.² In so doing, these areas joined Hawaii, the Republic of Palau, and parts of Mexico in restricting chemical sunscreen sales.¹ Although the Key West ordinance is set to take effect in January 2021, opponents, including dermatologists who believe it will discourage sunscreen use, currently are trying to overturn the ban.³ In the US Virgin Islands, part of the ban went into effect in September 2019, with the rest of the ban set to start in March 2020.² Companies have started to follow suit. On August 1, 2019, CVS Pharmacy announced that, by the end of 2020, it will remove oxybenzone and octinoxate from some of its store-brand chemical sunscreens.⁴

On February 26, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed that there are insufficient data to determine if 12 organic UV filters—including the aforementioned oxybenzone, octinoxate, and octocrylene—are generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE).⁵ Although these ingredients were listed as GRASE by the FDA in 2011, the rise in sunscreen use since then, as well as changes in sunscreen formulations, prompted the FDA to ask manufacturers to perform additional studies on safety parameters such as systemic absorption.^5,6 One study conducted by the FDA itself was published in May 2019 and showed that maximal use of 4 sunscreens resulted in systemic absorption of 4 organic UV filters above 0.5 ng/mL, the FDA’s threshold for requiring nonclinical toxicology assessment. The study authors concluded that “further studies [are needed] to determine the clinical significance of these findings. [But] These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.”⁷ Some in the industry have suggested it may take at least 5 years to generate all the data the FDA has requested.⁶

End of the New York City Measles Outbreak

On September 3, 2019, New York City’s largest measles outbreak in nearly 30 years was declared over. This announcement reflected the fact that 2 incubation periods for measles—42 days—had passed since the last measles patient was considered contagious. In total, there were 654 cases of measles and 52 associated hospitalizations, including 16 admissions to the intensive care unit. Most patients were younger than 18 years and unvaccinated.⁸

The outbreak began in October 2018 after Orthodox Jewish children from Brooklyn became infected while visiting Israel and imported the measles virus upon their return home.^8,9 All 5 boroughs in New York City were ultimately affected, although 4 zip codes in Williamsburg, a neighborhood in Brooklyn with an undervaccinated Orthodox Jewish community, accounted for 72% of cases.^8,10 As part of a $6 million effort to stop the outbreak, an emergency order was placed on these 4 zip codes, posing potential fines on people living or working there if they were unvaccinated.⁸ In addition, a bill was passed and signed into law in New York State that eliminated religious exemptions for immunizations.¹¹ In collaboration with Jewish leaders, these efforts increased the administration of measles-mumps-rubella vaccines by 41% compared with the year before in Williamsburg and Borough Park, another heavily Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn.⁸

Drug Approvals for Pediatric Dermatology

On March 11, 2019, the IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor dupilumab became the third biologic with a pediatric dermatology indication when the FDA extended its approval to adolescents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.¹² The FDA approval was based on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 42% (34/82) of adolescents treated with dupilumab monotherapy every other week achieved 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16 compared with 8% (7/85) in the placebo group (P<.001).¹³

In October 2019, trifarotene cream and minocycline foam were approved by the FDA for the treatment of acne in patients 9 years and older.^14,15 As such, both became the first acne therapies to include patients as young as 9 years in their studies and indication—a milestone, considering the fact that children have historically been excluded from clinical trials.¹⁶ The 2 topical treatments also are noteworthy for being first in class: trifarotene cream is the only topical retinoid to selectively target the retinoic acid receptor γ and to have been studied specifically for both facial and truncal acne,^14,17 and minocycline foam is the first topical tetracycline.¹⁵

Drug Approvals for Rare Dermatologic Diseases

On July 19, 2019, apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, became the first medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with oral ulcers due to Behçet disease, a rare multisystem inflammatory disease.¹⁸ The FDA approval was based on a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which 53% (55/104) of patients receiving apremilast monotherapy were ulcer free at week 12 compared to 22% (23/103) receiving placebo (P<.0001)(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02307513).¹⁹

On October 8, 2019, afamelanotide was approved by the FDA to increase pain-free light exposure in adults with erythropoietic protoporphyria, a rare metabolic disorder associated with photosensitivity.²⁰ A melanocortin receptor agonist, afamelanotide is believed to confer photoprotection by increasing the production of eumelanin in the epidermis. The FDA approval was based on 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, both of which found that patients given afamelanotide spent significantly more time in direct sunlight without pain compared to patients in the placebo group (P=.005 and P=.04).²¹

Recalls of Popular Skin Products

On July 5, 2019, Neutrogena recalled its cult-favorite Light Therapy Acne Mask. The recall was driven by rare reports of transient visual side effects due to insufficient eye protection from the mask’s light-emitting diodes.^22,23 Reported in association with 0.02% of masks sold at the time of the recall, these side effects included eye pain, irritation, tearing, blurry vision, seeing spots, and changes in color vision.²⁴ In addition, a risk for potentially irreversible eye injury from the mask was cited in people taking photosensitizing medications, such as doxycycline, and people with certain underlying eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and ocular albinism.^22,24,25

Following decades of asbestos-related controversy, 1 lot of the iconic Johnson’s Baby Powder was recalled for the first time on October 18, 2019, after the FDA found subtrace levels of asbestos in 1 of the lot’s bottles.²⁶ After the recall, Johnson & Johnson reported that 2 third-party laboratories did not ultimately find asbestos when they tested the bottle of interest as well as other bottles from the recalled lot. Three of 5 samples prepared in 1 room by the third-party laboratories initially did test positive for asbestos, but this result was attributed to the room’s air conditioner, which was found to be contaminated with asbestos. When the same samples were prepared in another room, no asbestos was detected.²⁷ The FDA maintained there was “no indication of cross-contamination” when they originally tested the implicated bottle.²⁸

The Diagnosis: Steatocystoma Multiplex 

The punch biopsy of an abdominal lesion demonstrated a folded cyst wall with a wavy eosinophilic cuticle (Figure), characteristics consistent with steatocystoma multiplex (SM).  

Also known as eruptive steatocystoma, SM consists of numerous flesh-colored, dome-shaped papules and nodules that most commonly arise during adolescence, with a median age of onset of 26 years.¹ These hamartomatous nevoid malformations arise in areas with well-developed pilosebaceous units, such as the upper extremities, neck, axillae, and trunk.^1,2 They occur less commonly on the scalp, face, and acral surfaces.^2-5 The lesions range in size from 2 to 30 mm⁶ and usually are asymptomatic.¹ Occasionally, steatocystomas become tender or can rupture.⁷ 

Steatocystoma multiplex may arise sporadically or may be inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion. Mutations in exon 1 of the keratin 17 gene, KRT17, have been identified in autosomal-dominant SM.^6,8KRT17 mutations also are responsible for pachyonychia congenita type 2, which is associated with SM.⁹ Some patients with pachyonychia congenita type 2 who have prominent SM and mild nail findings may be misdiagnosed as having pure SM.² 

The histopathologic features of SM were described in a study by Cho and colleagues¹ of 64 patients. Steatocystomas have cyst walls that may be either intricately folded or round/oval, comprised of an average of 4.9 epithelial cell layers. In most cases, the cyst wall contains sebaceous lobules. In all cases, an acellular eosinophilic cuticle was present, and no granular layer was seen. Few vellus hairs may be observed in the cystic cavity.¹ 

The differential diagnosis of SM includes eruptive vellus hair cysts, lipomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, and Gardner syndrome. Some have suggested that eruptive vellus hair cysts and SM exist on a disease spectrum because of their similar clinical presentation.¹⁰ In contrast to SM, however, eruptive vellus hair cysts originate in the infundibulum of the hair shaft rather than the sebaceous duct, and more numerous vellus hair shafts are seen on histopathology.¹ 

Various treatment modalities have been described, including isotretinoin for inflamed lesions,¹¹ cryotherapy for noninflamed lesions,¹¹ aspiration of lesions smallerthan 1 cm,¹² and electrocautery combined with topical retinoids.¹³ Laser treatment has been described, with a 1450-nm diode laser used to target the abnormal sebaceous glands and a 1550-nm fractionated erbium-doped fiber laser used to target the dermal cysts.¹⁴ Carbon dioxide lasers also may be used to open the cyst for drainage.¹⁵ Surgical excision or mini-incision also may be performed.^16,17  
 
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Garth Fraga, MD (Kansas City, Kansas), for his assistance with interpretation of the dermatopathology in this case.  

The Diagnosis: Steatocystoma Multiplex 

The punch biopsy of an abdominal lesion demonstrated a folded cyst wall with a wavy eosinophilic cuticle (Figure), characteristics consistent with steatocystoma multiplex (SM).  

Also known as eruptive steatocystoma, SM consists of numerous flesh-colored, dome-shaped papules and nodules that most commonly arise during adolescence, with a median age of onset of 26 years.¹ These hamartomatous nevoid malformations arise in areas with well-developed pilosebaceous units, such as the upper extremities, neck, axillae, and trunk.^1,2 They occur less commonly on the scalp, face, and acral surfaces.^2-5 The lesions range in size from 2 to 30 mm⁶ and usually are asymptomatic.¹ Occasionally, steatocystomas become tender or can rupture.⁷ 

Steatocystoma multiplex may arise sporadically or may be inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion. Mutations in exon 1 of the keratin 17 gene, KRT17, have been identified in autosomal-dominant SM.^6,8KRT17 mutations also are responsible for pachyonychia congenita type 2, which is associated with SM.⁹ Some patients with pachyonychia congenita type 2 who have prominent SM and mild nail findings may be misdiagnosed as having pure SM.² 

The histopathologic features of SM were described in a study by Cho and colleagues¹ of 64 patients. Steatocystomas have cyst walls that may be either intricately folded or round/oval, comprised of an average of 4.9 epithelial cell layers. In most cases, the cyst wall contains sebaceous lobules. In all cases, an acellular eosinophilic cuticle was present, and no granular layer was seen. Few vellus hairs may be observed in the cystic cavity.¹ 

The differential diagnosis of SM includes eruptive vellus hair cysts, lipomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, and Gardner syndrome. Some have suggested that eruptive vellus hair cysts and SM exist on a disease spectrum because of their similar clinical presentation.¹⁰ In contrast to SM, however, eruptive vellus hair cysts originate in the infundibulum of the hair shaft rather than the sebaceous duct, and more numerous vellus hair shafts are seen on histopathology.¹ 

Various treatment modalities have been described, including isotretinoin for inflamed lesions,¹¹ cryotherapy for noninflamed lesions,¹¹ aspiration of lesions smallerthan 1 cm,¹² and electrocautery combined with topical retinoids.¹³ Laser treatment has been described, with a 1450-nm diode laser used to target the abnormal sebaceous glands and a 1550-nm fractionated erbium-doped fiber laser used to target the dermal cysts.¹⁴ Carbon dioxide lasers also may be used to open the cyst for drainage.¹⁵ Surgical excision or mini-incision also may be performed.^16,17  
 
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Garth Fraga, MD (Kansas City, Kansas), for his assistance with interpretation of the dermatopathology in this case.  

The Diagnosis: Steatocystoma Multiplex 

The punch biopsy of an abdominal lesion demonstrated a folded cyst wall with a wavy eosinophilic cuticle (Figure), characteristics consistent with steatocystoma multiplex (SM).  

Also known as eruptive steatocystoma, SM consists of numerous flesh-colored, dome-shaped papules and nodules that most commonly arise during adolescence, with a median age of onset of 26 years.¹ These hamartomatous nevoid malformations arise in areas with well-developed pilosebaceous units, such as the upper extremities, neck, axillae, and trunk.^1,2 They occur less commonly on the scalp, face, and acral surfaces.^2-5 The lesions range in size from 2 to 30 mm⁶ and usually are asymptomatic.¹ Occasionally, steatocystomas become tender or can rupture.⁷ 

Steatocystoma multiplex may arise sporadically or may be inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion. Mutations in exon 1 of the keratin 17 gene, KRT17, have been identified in autosomal-dominant SM.^6,8KRT17 mutations also are responsible for pachyonychia congenita type 2, which is associated with SM.⁹ Some patients with pachyonychia congenita type 2 who have prominent SM and mild nail findings may be misdiagnosed as having pure SM.² 

The histopathologic features of SM were described in a study by Cho and colleagues¹ of 64 patients. Steatocystomas have cyst walls that may be either intricately folded or round/oval, comprised of an average of 4.9 epithelial cell layers. In most cases, the cyst wall contains sebaceous lobules. In all cases, an acellular eosinophilic cuticle was present, and no granular layer was seen. Few vellus hairs may be observed in the cystic cavity.¹ 

The differential diagnosis of SM includes eruptive vellus hair cysts, lipomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, and Gardner syndrome. Some have suggested that eruptive vellus hair cysts and SM exist on a disease spectrum because of their similar clinical presentation.¹⁰ In contrast to SM, however, eruptive vellus hair cysts originate in the infundibulum of the hair shaft rather than the sebaceous duct, and more numerous vellus hair shafts are seen on histopathology.¹ 

Various treatment modalities have been described, including isotretinoin for inflamed lesions,¹¹ cryotherapy for noninflamed lesions,¹¹ aspiration of lesions smallerthan 1 cm,¹² and electrocautery combined with topical retinoids.¹³ Laser treatment has been described, with a 1450-nm diode laser used to target the abnormal sebaceous glands and a 1550-nm fractionated erbium-doped fiber laser used to target the dermal cysts.¹⁴ Carbon dioxide lasers also may be used to open the cyst for drainage.¹⁵ Surgical excision or mini-incision also may be performed.^16,17  
 
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Garth Fraga, MD (Kansas City, Kansas), for his assistance with interpretation of the dermatopathology in this case.  

Blastomycosis is a systemic fungal infection that is endemic in the South Central, Midwest, and southeastern regions of the United States, as well as in provinces of Canada bordering the Great Lakes. After inhalation of Blastomyces dermatitidis spores, which are taken up by bronchopulmonary macrophages, there is an approximate 30- to 45-day incubation period. The initial response at the infected site is suppurative, which progresses to granuloma formation. Blastomyces dermatitidis most commonly infects the lungs, followed by the skin, bones, prostate, and central nervous system (CNS). Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent.

We present the case of a 38-year-old man with a medical history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and AIDS who reported a 3- to 4-week history of respiratory and cutaneous symptoms. Initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis; however, after laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment for syphilis, further investigation revealed a diagnosis of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis.

Case Report

A 38-year-old man with a medical history of HIV infection and AIDS presented to the emergency department at a medical center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a cough; chest discomfort; and concomitant nonpainful, mildly pruritic papules and plaques of 3 to 4 weeks’ duration that initially appeared on the face and ears and spread to the trunk, arms, palms, legs, and feet. He had a nonpainful ulcer on the glans penis. Symptoms began while he was living in Atlanta, Georgia, before relocating to Minneapolis. A chest radiograph was negative.

The initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis. Intramuscular penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million U) weekly for 3 weeks was initiated by the primary care team based on clinical suspicion alone without laboratory evidence of a positive rapid plasma reagin or VDRL test. Because laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment did not support syphilis, dermatology consultation was requested.

The patient had a history of crack cocaine abuse. He reported sexual activity with a single female partner while living in a halfway house in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area. Physical examination showed an age-appropriate man in no acute distress who was alert and oriented. He had well-demarcated papules and plaques on the forehead, ears, nose, cutaneous and mucosal lips, chest, back, arms, legs, palms, and soles. Many of the facial papules were pink, nonscaly, and concentrated around the nose and mouth; some were umbilicated (Figure 1). Trunk and extensor papules and plaques were well demarcated, oval, and scaly; some had erosions centrally and were excoriated. Palmar papules were round and had peripheral brown hyperpigmentation and central scale (Figure 2). A 1-cm, shallow, nontender, oval ulceration withraised borders was located on the glans penis under the foreskin (Figure 3).

A rapid plasma reagin test was nonreactive; a fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test was negative. Chest radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalogram were normal. In addition, spinal fluid drawn from a tap was negative on India ink and Gram stain preparations and was negative for cryptococcal antigen. In addition, spinal fluid was negative for fungal and bacterial growth, as were blood cultures.

Abnormal tests included a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot test for HIV, with an absolute CD4 count of 6 cells/mL and a viral load more than 100,000 copies/mL. Urine histoplasmosis antigen was markedly elevated. A potassium hydroxide preparation was performed on the skin of the right forearm, revealing broad-based budding yeast, later confirmed on skin and sputum cultures to be B dermatitidis.

Punch biopsy from the upper back revealed a mixed acute and granulomatous infiltrate with numerous yeast forms (Figure 4A) that were highlighted by Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver (Figure 4B) and periodic acid–Schiff (Figure 4C) stains.

Comment

Diagnosis
Our patient had an interesting and dramatic presentation of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis that was initially considered to be secondary syphilis because of involvement of the palms and soles and the presence of the painless penile ulcer. In addition, the initial skin biopsy finding was considered morphologically consistent with Cryptococcus neoformans based on positive Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver and periodic acid–Schiff stains and an equivocal mucicarmine stain. However, the potassium hydroxide preparation of skin and positive urine histoplasmosis antigen strongly suggested blastomycosis, which was confirmed by culture of B dermatitidis. The urine histoplasmosis antigen can cross-react with B dermatitidis and other mycoses (eg, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Penicillium marneffei); however, because the treatment of either of these mycoses is similar, the value of the test remains high.¹

Skin tests and serologic markers are useful epidemiologic tools but are of inadequate sensitivity and specificity to be diagnostic for B dermatitidis. Diagnosis depends on direct examination of tissue or isolation of the fungus in culture.²

Source of Infection
The probable occult source of cutaneous infection was the lungs, given the natural history of disseminated blastomycosis; the history of cough and chest discomfort; the widespread nature of skin lesions; and the ultimate growth of rare yeast forms in sputum. Cutaneous infection generally is from disseminated disease and rarely from direct inoculation.

Unlike many other systemic dimorphic mycoses, blastomycosis usually occurs in healthy hosts and is frequently associated with point-source outbreak. Immunosuppressed patients typically develop infection following exposure to the organism, but reactivation also can occur. Blastomycosis is uncommon among HIV-infected individuals and is not recognized as an AIDS-defining illness.

In a review from Canada of 133 patients with blastomycosis, nearly half had an underlying medical condition but not one typically associated with marked immunosuppression.³ Only 2 of 133 patients had HIV infection. Overall mortality was 6.3%, and the average duration of symptoms before diagnosis was less in those who died vs those who survived the disease.³ In the setting of AIDS or other marked immunosuppression, disease usually is more severe, with multiple-system involvement, including the CNS, and can progress rapidly to death.²

Treatment
Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent. There are no randomized, blinded trials comparing antifungal agents, and data on the treatment of blastomycosis in patients infected with HIV are limited. Amphotericin B 3 mg/kg every 24 hours is recommended in life-threatening systemic disease and CNS disease as well as in patients with immune suppression, including AIDS.⁴ In a retrospective study of 326 patients with blastomycosis, those receiving amphotericin B had a cure rate of 86.5% with a relapse rate of 3.9%; patients receiving ketoconazole had a cure rate of 81.7% with a relapse rate of 14%.⁴ Although data are limited, chronic suppressive therapy generally is recommended in patients with HIV who have been treated for blastomycosis. Fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole are all used as chronic suppressive therapy; however, given the higher relapse rate observed with ketoconazole, itraconazole is preferred. Because neither ketoconazole nor itraconazole penetrates the blood-brain barrier, these drugs are not recommended in cases of CNS involvement. Patients with CNS disease or intolerance to itraconazole should be treated with fluconazole for chronic suppression.³

Blastomycosis is a systemic fungal infection that is endemic in the South Central, Midwest, and southeastern regions of the United States, as well as in provinces of Canada bordering the Great Lakes. After inhalation of Blastomyces dermatitidis spores, which are taken up by bronchopulmonary macrophages, there is an approximate 30- to 45-day incubation period. The initial response at the infected site is suppurative, which progresses to granuloma formation. Blastomyces dermatitidis most commonly infects the lungs, followed by the skin, bones, prostate, and central nervous system (CNS). Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent.

We present the case of a 38-year-old man with a medical history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and AIDS who reported a 3- to 4-week history of respiratory and cutaneous symptoms. Initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis; however, after laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment for syphilis, further investigation revealed a diagnosis of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis.

Case Report

A 38-year-old man with a medical history of HIV infection and AIDS presented to the emergency department at a medical center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a cough; chest discomfort; and concomitant nonpainful, mildly pruritic papules and plaques of 3 to 4 weeks’ duration that initially appeared on the face and ears and spread to the trunk, arms, palms, legs, and feet. He had a nonpainful ulcer on the glans penis. Symptoms began while he was living in Atlanta, Georgia, before relocating to Minneapolis. A chest radiograph was negative.

The initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis. Intramuscular penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million U) weekly for 3 weeks was initiated by the primary care team based on clinical suspicion alone without laboratory evidence of a positive rapid plasma reagin or VDRL test. Because laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment did not support syphilis, dermatology consultation was requested.

The patient had a history of crack cocaine abuse. He reported sexual activity with a single female partner while living in a halfway house in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area. Physical examination showed an age-appropriate man in no acute distress who was alert and oriented. He had well-demarcated papules and plaques on the forehead, ears, nose, cutaneous and mucosal lips, chest, back, arms, legs, palms, and soles. Many of the facial papules were pink, nonscaly, and concentrated around the nose and mouth; some were umbilicated (Figure 1). Trunk and extensor papules and plaques were well demarcated, oval, and scaly; some had erosions centrally and were excoriated. Palmar papules were round and had peripheral brown hyperpigmentation and central scale (Figure 2). A 1-cm, shallow, nontender, oval ulceration withraised borders was located on the glans penis under the foreskin (Figure 3).

A rapid plasma reagin test was nonreactive; a fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test was negative. Chest radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalogram were normal. In addition, spinal fluid drawn from a tap was negative on India ink and Gram stain preparations and was negative for cryptococcal antigen. In addition, spinal fluid was negative for fungal and bacterial growth, as were blood cultures.

Abnormal tests included a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot test for HIV, with an absolute CD4 count of 6 cells/mL and a viral load more than 100,000 copies/mL. Urine histoplasmosis antigen was markedly elevated. A potassium hydroxide preparation was performed on the skin of the right forearm, revealing broad-based budding yeast, later confirmed on skin and sputum cultures to be B dermatitidis.

Punch biopsy from the upper back revealed a mixed acute and granulomatous infiltrate with numerous yeast forms (Figure 4A) that were highlighted by Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver (Figure 4B) and periodic acid–Schiff (Figure 4C) stains.

Comment

Diagnosis
Our patient had an interesting and dramatic presentation of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis that was initially considered to be secondary syphilis because of involvement of the palms and soles and the presence of the painless penile ulcer. In addition, the initial skin biopsy finding was considered morphologically consistent with Cryptococcus neoformans based on positive Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver and periodic acid–Schiff stains and an equivocal mucicarmine stain. However, the potassium hydroxide preparation of skin and positive urine histoplasmosis antigen strongly suggested blastomycosis, which was confirmed by culture of B dermatitidis. The urine histoplasmosis antigen can cross-react with B dermatitidis and other mycoses (eg, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Penicillium marneffei); however, because the treatment of either of these mycoses is similar, the value of the test remains high.¹

Skin tests and serologic markers are useful epidemiologic tools but are of inadequate sensitivity and specificity to be diagnostic for B dermatitidis. Diagnosis depends on direct examination of tissue or isolation of the fungus in culture.²

Source of Infection
The probable occult source of cutaneous infection was the lungs, given the natural history of disseminated blastomycosis; the history of cough and chest discomfort; the widespread nature of skin lesions; and the ultimate growth of rare yeast forms in sputum. Cutaneous infection generally is from disseminated disease and rarely from direct inoculation.

Unlike many other systemic dimorphic mycoses, blastomycosis usually occurs in healthy hosts and is frequently associated with point-source outbreak. Immunosuppressed patients typically develop infection following exposure to the organism, but reactivation also can occur. Blastomycosis is uncommon among HIV-infected individuals and is not recognized as an AIDS-defining illness.

In a review from Canada of 133 patients with blastomycosis, nearly half had an underlying medical condition but not one typically associated with marked immunosuppression.³ Only 2 of 133 patients had HIV infection. Overall mortality was 6.3%, and the average duration of symptoms before diagnosis was less in those who died vs those who survived the disease.³ In the setting of AIDS or other marked immunosuppression, disease usually is more severe, with multiple-system involvement, including the CNS, and can progress rapidly to death.²

Treatment
Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent. There are no randomized, blinded trials comparing antifungal agents, and data on the treatment of blastomycosis in patients infected with HIV are limited. Amphotericin B 3 mg/kg every 24 hours is recommended in life-threatening systemic disease and CNS disease as well as in patients with immune suppression, including AIDS.⁴ In a retrospective study of 326 patients with blastomycosis, those receiving amphotericin B had a cure rate of 86.5% with a relapse rate of 3.9%; patients receiving ketoconazole had a cure rate of 81.7% with a relapse rate of 14%.⁴ Although data are limited, chronic suppressive therapy generally is recommended in patients with HIV who have been treated for blastomycosis. Fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole are all used as chronic suppressive therapy; however, given the higher relapse rate observed with ketoconazole, itraconazole is preferred. Because neither ketoconazole nor itraconazole penetrates the blood-brain barrier, these drugs are not recommended in cases of CNS involvement. Patients with CNS disease or intolerance to itraconazole should be treated with fluconazole for chronic suppression.³

Blastomycosis is a systemic fungal infection that is endemic in the South Central, Midwest, and southeastern regions of the United States, as well as in provinces of Canada bordering the Great Lakes. After inhalation of Blastomyces dermatitidis spores, which are taken up by bronchopulmonary macrophages, there is an approximate 30- to 45-day incubation period. The initial response at the infected site is suppurative, which progresses to granuloma formation. Blastomyces dermatitidis most commonly infects the lungs, followed by the skin, bones, prostate, and central nervous system (CNS). Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent.

We present the case of a 38-year-old man with a medical history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and AIDS who reported a 3- to 4-week history of respiratory and cutaneous symptoms. Initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis; however, after laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment for syphilis, further investigation revealed a diagnosis of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis.

Case Report

A 38-year-old man with a medical history of HIV infection and AIDS presented to the emergency department at a medical center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a cough; chest discomfort; and concomitant nonpainful, mildly pruritic papules and plaques of 3 to 4 weeks’ duration that initially appeared on the face and ears and spread to the trunk, arms, palms, legs, and feet. He had a nonpainful ulcer on the glans penis. Symptoms began while he was living in Atlanta, Georgia, before relocating to Minneapolis. A chest radiograph was negative.

The initial clinical impression favored secondary syphilis. Intramuscular penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million U) weekly for 3 weeks was initiated by the primary care team based on clinical suspicion alone without laboratory evidence of a positive rapid plasma reagin or VDRL test. Because laboratory evaluation and lack of response to treatment did not support syphilis, dermatology consultation was requested.

The patient had a history of crack cocaine abuse. He reported sexual activity with a single female partner while living in a halfway house in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area. Physical examination showed an age-appropriate man in no acute distress who was alert and oriented. He had well-demarcated papules and plaques on the forehead, ears, nose, cutaneous and mucosal lips, chest, back, arms, legs, palms, and soles. Many of the facial papules were pink, nonscaly, and concentrated around the nose and mouth; some were umbilicated (Figure 1). Trunk and extensor papules and plaques were well demarcated, oval, and scaly; some had erosions centrally and were excoriated. Palmar papules were round and had peripheral brown hyperpigmentation and central scale (Figure 2). A 1-cm, shallow, nontender, oval ulceration withraised borders was located on the glans penis under the foreskin (Figure 3).

A rapid plasma reagin test was nonreactive; a fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test was negative. Chest radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalogram were normal. In addition, spinal fluid drawn from a tap was negative on India ink and Gram stain preparations and was negative for cryptococcal antigen. In addition, spinal fluid was negative for fungal and bacterial growth, as were blood cultures.

Abnormal tests included a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot test for HIV, with an absolute CD4 count of 6 cells/mL and a viral load more than 100,000 copies/mL. Urine histoplasmosis antigen was markedly elevated. A potassium hydroxide preparation was performed on the skin of the right forearm, revealing broad-based budding yeast, later confirmed on skin and sputum cultures to be B dermatitidis.

Punch biopsy from the upper back revealed a mixed acute and granulomatous infiltrate with numerous yeast forms (Figure 4A) that were highlighted by Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver (Figure 4B) and periodic acid–Schiff (Figure 4C) stains.

Comment

Diagnosis
Our patient had an interesting and dramatic presentation of widespread cutaneous North American blastomycosis that was initially considered to be secondary syphilis because of involvement of the palms and soles and the presence of the painless penile ulcer. In addition, the initial skin biopsy finding was considered morphologically consistent with Cryptococcus neoformans based on positive Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver and periodic acid–Schiff stains and an equivocal mucicarmine stain. However, the potassium hydroxide preparation of skin and positive urine histoplasmosis antigen strongly suggested blastomycosis, which was confirmed by culture of B dermatitidis. The urine histoplasmosis antigen can cross-react with B dermatitidis and other mycoses (eg, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Penicillium marneffei); however, because the treatment of either of these mycoses is similar, the value of the test remains high.¹

Skin tests and serologic markers are useful epidemiologic tools but are of inadequate sensitivity and specificity to be diagnostic for B dermatitidis. Diagnosis depends on direct examination of tissue or isolation of the fungus in culture.²

Source of Infection
The probable occult source of cutaneous infection was the lungs, given the natural history of disseminated blastomycosis; the history of cough and chest discomfort; the widespread nature of skin lesions; and the ultimate growth of rare yeast forms in sputum. Cutaneous infection generally is from disseminated disease and rarely from direct inoculation.

Unlike many other systemic dimorphic mycoses, blastomycosis usually occurs in healthy hosts and is frequently associated with point-source outbreak. Immunosuppressed patients typically develop infection following exposure to the organism, but reactivation also can occur. Blastomycosis is uncommon among HIV-infected individuals and is not recognized as an AIDS-defining illness.

In a review from Canada of 133 patients with blastomycosis, nearly half had an underlying medical condition but not one typically associated with marked immunosuppression.³ Only 2 of 133 patients had HIV infection. Overall mortality was 6.3%, and the average duration of symptoms before diagnosis was less in those who died vs those who survived the disease.³ In the setting of AIDS or other marked immunosuppression, disease usually is more severe, with multiple-system involvement, including the CNS, and can progress rapidly to death.²

Treatment
Therapy for blastomycosis is determined by the severity of the clinical presentation and consideration of the toxicities of the antifungal agent. There are no randomized, blinded trials comparing antifungal agents, and data on the treatment of blastomycosis in patients infected with HIV are limited. Amphotericin B 3 mg/kg every 24 hours is recommended in life-threatening systemic disease and CNS disease as well as in patients with immune suppression, including AIDS.⁴ In a retrospective study of 326 patients with blastomycosis, those receiving amphotericin B had a cure rate of 86.5% with a relapse rate of 3.9%; patients receiving ketoconazole had a cure rate of 81.7% with a relapse rate of 14%.⁴ Although data are limited, chronic suppressive therapy generally is recommended in patients with HIV who have been treated for blastomycosis. Fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole are all used as chronic suppressive therapy; however, given the higher relapse rate observed with ketoconazole, itraconazole is preferred. Because neither ketoconazole nor itraconazole penetrates the blood-brain barrier, these drugs are not recommended in cases of CNS involvement. Patients with CNS disease or intolerance to itraconazole should be treated with fluconazole for chronic suppression.³

The Diagnosis: Scleromyxedema 

Scleromyxedema is a rare skin disorder characterized by a diffuse eruption of small waxy papules that are linearly arranged and closely spaced together. As the papular lesions coalesce, the skin thickens. Firm induration of the skin is widespread and--unlike the distribution in scleroderma and scleredema--amplified over the facial convexities, especially the glabella and ears. Histopathology reveals the classic triad of mucin accumulation, proliferation of fibroblasts, and collagen deposition with associated fibrotic changes.¹ 

In this case, the patient exhibited the characteristic doughnut sign over the second interphalangeal joint of the right hand due to thickening and dimpling of the skin (quiz image). Histopathology from the right second finger showed the dermis with a spindled histiocytic infiltrate, fibroblasts, fibrosis, and increased interstitial mucin deposition highlighted with colloidal iron stain (Figures 1 and 2). Multinucleated giant cells also were seen in the dermis (Figure 3), and a Shikata orcein stain illustrated decreased elastic fibers (stained black) in the superficial dermis within areas of increased collagen deposition (Figure 4).  

Scleromyxedema is strongly associated with a monoclonal gammopathy, which is generally mild and, in almost 80% of cases, related to λ IgG. However, the clinical implications are unclear.^2,3 Scleromyxedema also is accompanied by systemic features, most commonly dysphagia, myalgias, and arthralgias, which distinguishes it from other cutaneous mucinoses. Notable morbidity and mortality are associated with involvement of the central nervous system, which can manifest as encephalopathy, seizures, or coma. Mucin deposition may be found in the myocardium and the coronary and pulmonary vasculature, resulting in rare cases of cardiac and pulmonary disease.^4,5  

Clinically, scleroderma also demonstrates progressive generalized skin tightening. Histopathology reveals hyalinization and thickening of the connective tissue of the deep dermis, subcutaneous fat, and muscular fascia. These changes are accompanied by a perivascular and focal interstitial lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate with prominent myofibroblast proliferation. In this case, the normal nail fold capillaries and absence of Raynaud phenomenon help to distinguish the diagnosis from scleroderma. In limited scleroderma, common findings include calcinosis, esophageal dysmotility, telangiectasia, and pulmonary hypertension, while systemic sclerosis can involve the internal organs, with the greatest morbidity stemming from interstitial lung disease.^3,6,7  

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is another disorder of skin thickening that involves the extremities and trunk. It is a rare complication of exposure to gadolinium contrast media in patients with advanced renal disease and those undergoing dialysis; use of gadolinium is now strictly avoided in patients with at least moderately impaired glomerular filtration rate.⁸ Although nephrogenic systemic fibrosis histologically looks similar to scleromyxedema, it involves deeper tissues. There is fibrosis with haphazard collagen bundle deposition in the deep dermis and subcutaneous septa. Fibroblasts and histiocytes are increased between the collagen bundles, with surrounding edema and mucin buildup. Multinucleated giant cells may or may not be present.⁹ 

Patients with scleredema present with nonpitting edema and dermal hardening over the neck, face, upper trunk, and arms. Lesional skin appears shiny and indurated. The skin is characteristically difficult to wrinkle, and the face may appear expressionless. Skin biopsy will show a thickened reticular dermis with mucin deposition and eccrine glands appearing in the upper third or mid dermis. Fibroblasts are normal in number. Scleredema generally is associated with poorly controlled diabetes, a monoclonal gammopathy, or as the aftermath of an acute infection, especially streptococcal pharyngitis. The condition may develop at any age, though nearly 50% of cases occur in children and adolescents.^3,10  

Interstitial granuloma annulare (GA) is a common, benign, and self-limiting dermatosis. Distinct from other skin-thickening disorders, GA is composed of smooth annular papules and plaques that do not result in skin hardening. Although GA may manifest in a generalized distribution, it is more frequently localized to the distal extremities.¹¹ The presence of an inflammatory infiltrate surrounded by abundant mucin and collagen resembles scleromyxedema. However, GA is distinguished by palisading granulomas of histiocytes, fibroblasts, and lymphocytes lining a necrobiotic center of collagen, mucin, and fibrin.¹² 

This patient's skin showed an immediate and marked response to intravenous immunoglobulin with dramatic softening. Such a response is well reported in the literature, and intravenous immunoglobulin is considered first-line therapy for scleromyxedema, typically in conjunction with steroids.⁵ Other immunosuppressive agents have been employed with reported efficacy, as have several treatments used for multiple myeloma, including thalidomide and lenalidomide.  

Although spontaneous improvement infrequently occurs, a chronic progressive course is far more common with scleromyxedema. Studies are ongoing to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of scleromyxedema, scleroderma, and similar disorders to uncover the triggers that provoke the underlying dysregulation of dermal fibroblast activation and proliferation, which could offer a more precise target for effective treatments.^5,13-15

The Diagnosis: Scleromyxedema 

Scleromyxedema is a rare skin disorder characterized by a diffuse eruption of small waxy papules that are linearly arranged and closely spaced together. As the papular lesions coalesce, the skin thickens. Firm induration of the skin is widespread and--unlike the distribution in scleroderma and scleredema--amplified over the facial convexities, especially the glabella and ears. Histopathology reveals the classic triad of mucin accumulation, proliferation of fibroblasts, and collagen deposition with associated fibrotic changes.¹ 

In this case, the patient exhibited the characteristic doughnut sign over the second interphalangeal joint of the right hand due to thickening and dimpling of the skin (quiz image). Histopathology from the right second finger showed the dermis with a spindled histiocytic infiltrate, fibroblasts, fibrosis, and increased interstitial mucin deposition highlighted with colloidal iron stain (Figures 1 and 2). Multinucleated giant cells also were seen in the dermis (Figure 3), and a Shikata orcein stain illustrated decreased elastic fibers (stained black) in the superficial dermis within areas of increased collagen deposition (Figure 4).  

Scleromyxedema is strongly associated with a monoclonal gammopathy, which is generally mild and, in almost 80% of cases, related to λ IgG. However, the clinical implications are unclear.^2,3 Scleromyxedema also is accompanied by systemic features, most commonly dysphagia, myalgias, and arthralgias, which distinguishes it from other cutaneous mucinoses. Notable morbidity and mortality are associated with involvement of the central nervous system, which can manifest as encephalopathy, seizures, or coma. Mucin deposition may be found in the myocardium and the coronary and pulmonary vasculature, resulting in rare cases of cardiac and pulmonary disease.^4,5  

Clinically, scleroderma also demonstrates progressive generalized skin tightening. Histopathology reveals hyalinization and thickening of the connective tissue of the deep dermis, subcutaneous fat, and muscular fascia. These changes are accompanied by a perivascular and focal interstitial lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate with prominent myofibroblast proliferation. In this case, the normal nail fold capillaries and absence of Raynaud phenomenon help to distinguish the diagnosis from scleroderma. In limited scleroderma, common findings include calcinosis, esophageal dysmotility, telangiectasia, and pulmonary hypertension, while systemic sclerosis can involve the internal organs, with the greatest morbidity stemming from interstitial lung disease.^3,6,7  

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is another disorder of skin thickening that involves the extremities and trunk. It is a rare complication of exposure to gadolinium contrast media in patients with advanced renal disease and those undergoing dialysis; use of gadolinium is now strictly avoided in patients with at least moderately impaired glomerular filtration rate.⁸ Although nephrogenic systemic fibrosis histologically looks similar to scleromyxedema, it involves deeper tissues. There is fibrosis with haphazard collagen bundle deposition in the deep dermis and subcutaneous septa. Fibroblasts and histiocytes are increased between the collagen bundles, with surrounding edema and mucin buildup. Multinucleated giant cells may or may not be present.⁹ 

Patients with scleredema present with nonpitting edema and dermal hardening over the neck, face, upper trunk, and arms. Lesional skin appears shiny and indurated. The skin is characteristically difficult to wrinkle, and the face may appear expressionless. Skin biopsy will show a thickened reticular dermis with mucin deposition and eccrine glands appearing in the upper third or mid dermis. Fibroblasts are normal in number. Scleredema generally is associated with poorly controlled diabetes, a monoclonal gammopathy, or as the aftermath of an acute infection, especially streptococcal pharyngitis. The condition may develop at any age, though nearly 50% of cases occur in children and adolescents.^3,10  

Interstitial granuloma annulare (GA) is a common, benign, and self-limiting dermatosis. Distinct from other skin-thickening disorders, GA is composed of smooth annular papules and plaques that do not result in skin hardening. Although GA may manifest in a generalized distribution, it is more frequently localized to the distal extremities.¹¹ The presence of an inflammatory infiltrate surrounded by abundant mucin and collagen resembles scleromyxedema. However, GA is distinguished by palisading granulomas of histiocytes, fibroblasts, and lymphocytes lining a necrobiotic center of collagen, mucin, and fibrin.¹² 

This patient's skin showed an immediate and marked response to intravenous immunoglobulin with dramatic softening. Such a response is well reported in the literature, and intravenous immunoglobulin is considered first-line therapy for scleromyxedema, typically in conjunction with steroids.⁵ Other immunosuppressive agents have been employed with reported efficacy, as have several treatments used for multiple myeloma, including thalidomide and lenalidomide.  

Although spontaneous improvement infrequently occurs, a chronic progressive course is far more common with scleromyxedema. Studies are ongoing to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of scleromyxedema, scleroderma, and similar disorders to uncover the triggers that provoke the underlying dysregulation of dermal fibroblast activation and proliferation, which could offer a more precise target for effective treatments.^5,13-15

The Diagnosis: Scleromyxedema 

Scleromyxedema is a rare skin disorder characterized by a diffuse eruption of small waxy papules that are linearly arranged and closely spaced together. As the papular lesions coalesce, the skin thickens. Firm induration of the skin is widespread and--unlike the distribution in scleroderma and scleredema--amplified over the facial convexities, especially the glabella and ears. Histopathology reveals the classic triad of mucin accumulation, proliferation of fibroblasts, and collagen deposition with associated fibrotic changes.¹ 

In this case, the patient exhibited the characteristic doughnut sign over the second interphalangeal joint of the right hand due to thickening and dimpling of the skin (quiz image). Histopathology from the right second finger showed the dermis with a spindled histiocytic infiltrate, fibroblasts, fibrosis, and increased interstitial mucin deposition highlighted with colloidal iron stain (Figures 1 and 2). Multinucleated giant cells also were seen in the dermis (Figure 3), and a Shikata orcein stain illustrated decreased elastic fibers (stained black) in the superficial dermis within areas of increased collagen deposition (Figure 4).  

Scleromyxedema is strongly associated with a monoclonal gammopathy, which is generally mild and, in almost 80% of cases, related to λ IgG. However, the clinical implications are unclear.^2,3 Scleromyxedema also is accompanied by systemic features, most commonly dysphagia, myalgias, and arthralgias, which distinguishes it from other cutaneous mucinoses. Notable morbidity and mortality are associated with involvement of the central nervous system, which can manifest as encephalopathy, seizures, or coma. Mucin deposition may be found in the myocardium and the coronary and pulmonary vasculature, resulting in rare cases of cardiac and pulmonary disease.^4,5  

Clinically, scleroderma also demonstrates progressive generalized skin tightening. Histopathology reveals hyalinization and thickening of the connective tissue of the deep dermis, subcutaneous fat, and muscular fascia. These changes are accompanied by a perivascular and focal interstitial lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate with prominent myofibroblast proliferation. In this case, the normal nail fold capillaries and absence of Raynaud phenomenon help to distinguish the diagnosis from scleroderma. In limited scleroderma, common findings include calcinosis, esophageal dysmotility, telangiectasia, and pulmonary hypertension, while systemic sclerosis can involve the internal organs, with the greatest morbidity stemming from interstitial lung disease.^3,6,7  

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is another disorder of skin thickening that involves the extremities and trunk. It is a rare complication of exposure to gadolinium contrast media in patients with advanced renal disease and those undergoing dialysis; use of gadolinium is now strictly avoided in patients with at least moderately impaired glomerular filtration rate.⁸ Although nephrogenic systemic fibrosis histologically looks similar to scleromyxedema, it involves deeper tissues. There is fibrosis with haphazard collagen bundle deposition in the deep dermis and subcutaneous septa. Fibroblasts and histiocytes are increased between the collagen bundles, with surrounding edema and mucin buildup. Multinucleated giant cells may or may not be present.⁹ 

Patients with scleredema present with nonpitting edema and dermal hardening over the neck, face, upper trunk, and arms. Lesional skin appears shiny and indurated. The skin is characteristically difficult to wrinkle, and the face may appear expressionless. Skin biopsy will show a thickened reticular dermis with mucin deposition and eccrine glands appearing in the upper third or mid dermis. Fibroblasts are normal in number. Scleredema generally is associated with poorly controlled diabetes, a monoclonal gammopathy, or as the aftermath of an acute infection, especially streptococcal pharyngitis. The condition may develop at any age, though nearly 50% of cases occur in children and adolescents.^3,10  

Interstitial granuloma annulare (GA) is a common, benign, and self-limiting dermatosis. Distinct from other skin-thickening disorders, GA is composed of smooth annular papules and plaques that do not result in skin hardening. Although GA may manifest in a generalized distribution, it is more frequently localized to the distal extremities.¹¹ The presence of an inflammatory infiltrate surrounded by abundant mucin and collagen resembles scleromyxedema. However, GA is distinguished by palisading granulomas of histiocytes, fibroblasts, and lymphocytes lining a necrobiotic center of collagen, mucin, and fibrin.¹² 

This patient's skin showed an immediate and marked response to intravenous immunoglobulin with dramatic softening. Such a response is well reported in the literature, and intravenous immunoglobulin is considered first-line therapy for scleromyxedema, typically in conjunction with steroids.⁵ Other immunosuppressive agents have been employed with reported efficacy, as have several treatments used for multiple myeloma, including thalidomide and lenalidomide.  

Although spontaneous improvement infrequently occurs, a chronic progressive course is far more common with scleromyxedema. Studies are ongoing to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of scleromyxedema, scleroderma, and similar disorders to uncover the triggers that provoke the underlying dysregulation of dermal fibroblast activation and proliferation, which could offer a more precise target for effective treatments.^5,13-15

The Diagnosis: Lichenoid Reaction With Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia 

A shave biopsy of the left ankle and a punch biopsy of the left medial calf were performed and sent for histologic examination and acid-fast stain. Bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial tissue cultures also were sent for testing. The findings from direct examination were negative, and tissue cultures exhibited no growth. The shave and punch biopsies and histology revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) with keratinocyte necrosis, satellitosis, and areas of acute folliculitis (Figure 1). A lichenoid hypersensitivity mixed infiltrate that included histiocytes admixed with anthracotic and red-orange pigment, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and rare eosinophils was noted in the dermis. Given these clinical and histopathologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with red-pigment tattoo lichenoid reaction with PEH.  

Tattoo-related inflammatory reactions can manifest clinically as allergic contact dermatitis, photodermatitis, infection, malignancy, foreign body granulomas, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions with myriad associated histopathologic patterns including spongiotic, psoriasiform, granulomatous, and lichenoid (as seen in our patient). Lichenoid tattoo reactions are the most common histopathologic variants of delayed hypersensitivity seen, mostly with cinnabar or red dye.¹ However, there is a paucity of cases in the literature of PEH following tattooing with red dye. Interestingly, lichenoid tissue reaction accompanies PEH in all reported cases.²  

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia can mimic squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma (KA) both clinically and histologically. All 3 conditions may exhibit epithelial hyperplasia with prominent dilated hyperplastic infundibula. In a case series of 11 presumed KAs within tattoos, Fraga and Prossick² reported 82% (9/11) of the lesions were located strictly in areas with red pigment, and many were associated with a lichenoid tissue reaction. Kazlouskaya and Junkins-Hopkins³ previously described cases of KAs in tattoos that may represent PEH.  

When treating lesions with this histologic appearance, consider the clinical and histologic overlap between KAs and PEH. Our patient was managed with clobetasol ointment 0.05% under occlusion followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with notable improvement of the verrucous plaques on the left lateral malleolus (Figure 2). He also noted near resolution of the papules on the pretibial shin and complete resolution of all associated pruritus and burning. Calcineurin inhibitors, photochemotherapy, CO₂ laser, excimer laser, and surgical removal with interval grafting also were considered.  

It is important to recognize PEH in the differential of eruptions occurring within tattoos to avoid unnecessary invasive surgical procedures such as complete surgical excision of a KA to avoid malignant transformation. 

The Diagnosis: Lichenoid Reaction With Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia 

A shave biopsy of the left ankle and a punch biopsy of the left medial calf were performed and sent for histologic examination and acid-fast stain. Bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial tissue cultures also were sent for testing. The findings from direct examination were negative, and tissue cultures exhibited no growth. The shave and punch biopsies and histology revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) with keratinocyte necrosis, satellitosis, and areas of acute folliculitis (Figure 1). A lichenoid hypersensitivity mixed infiltrate that included histiocytes admixed with anthracotic and red-orange pigment, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and rare eosinophils was noted in the dermis. Given these clinical and histopathologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with red-pigment tattoo lichenoid reaction with PEH.  

Tattoo-related inflammatory reactions can manifest clinically as allergic contact dermatitis, photodermatitis, infection, malignancy, foreign body granulomas, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions with myriad associated histopathologic patterns including spongiotic, psoriasiform, granulomatous, and lichenoid (as seen in our patient). Lichenoid tattoo reactions are the most common histopathologic variants of delayed hypersensitivity seen, mostly with cinnabar or red dye.¹ However, there is a paucity of cases in the literature of PEH following tattooing with red dye. Interestingly, lichenoid tissue reaction accompanies PEH in all reported cases.²  

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia can mimic squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma (KA) both clinically and histologically. All 3 conditions may exhibit epithelial hyperplasia with prominent dilated hyperplastic infundibula. In a case series of 11 presumed KAs within tattoos, Fraga and Prossick² reported 82% (9/11) of the lesions were located strictly in areas with red pigment, and many were associated with a lichenoid tissue reaction. Kazlouskaya and Junkins-Hopkins³ previously described cases of KAs in tattoos that may represent PEH.  

When treating lesions with this histologic appearance, consider the clinical and histologic overlap between KAs and PEH. Our patient was managed with clobetasol ointment 0.05% under occlusion followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with notable improvement of the verrucous plaques on the left lateral malleolus (Figure 2). He also noted near resolution of the papules on the pretibial shin and complete resolution of all associated pruritus and burning. Calcineurin inhibitors, photochemotherapy, CO₂ laser, excimer laser, and surgical removal with interval grafting also were considered.  

It is important to recognize PEH in the differential of eruptions occurring within tattoos to avoid unnecessary invasive surgical procedures such as complete surgical excision of a KA to avoid malignant transformation. 

The Diagnosis: Lichenoid Reaction With Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia 

A shave biopsy of the left ankle and a punch biopsy of the left medial calf were performed and sent for histologic examination and acid-fast stain. Bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial tissue cultures also were sent for testing. The findings from direct examination were negative, and tissue cultures exhibited no growth. The shave and punch biopsies and histology revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) with keratinocyte necrosis, satellitosis, and areas of acute folliculitis (Figure 1). A lichenoid hypersensitivity mixed infiltrate that included histiocytes admixed with anthracotic and red-orange pigment, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and rare eosinophils was noted in the dermis. Given these clinical and histopathologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with red-pigment tattoo lichenoid reaction with PEH.  

Tattoo-related inflammatory reactions can manifest clinically as allergic contact dermatitis, photodermatitis, infection, malignancy, foreign body granulomas, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions with myriad associated histopathologic patterns including spongiotic, psoriasiform, granulomatous, and lichenoid (as seen in our patient). Lichenoid tattoo reactions are the most common histopathologic variants of delayed hypersensitivity seen, mostly with cinnabar or red dye.¹ However, there is a paucity of cases in the literature of PEH following tattooing with red dye. Interestingly, lichenoid tissue reaction accompanies PEH in all reported cases.²  

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia can mimic squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma (KA) both clinically and histologically. All 3 conditions may exhibit epithelial hyperplasia with prominent dilated hyperplastic infundibula. In a case series of 11 presumed KAs within tattoos, Fraga and Prossick² reported 82% (9/11) of the lesions were located strictly in areas with red pigment, and many were associated with a lichenoid tissue reaction. Kazlouskaya and Junkins-Hopkins³ previously described cases of KAs in tattoos that may represent PEH.  

When treating lesions with this histologic appearance, consider the clinical and histologic overlap between KAs and PEH. Our patient was managed with clobetasol ointment 0.05% under occlusion followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with notable improvement of the verrucous plaques on the left lateral malleolus (Figure 2). He also noted near resolution of the papules on the pretibial shin and complete resolution of all associated pruritus and burning. Calcineurin inhibitors, photochemotherapy, CO₂ laser, excimer laser, and surgical removal with interval grafting also were considered.  

It is important to recognize PEH in the differential of eruptions occurring within tattoos to avoid unnecessary invasive surgical procedures such as complete surgical excision of a KA to avoid malignant transformation. 

To the Editor:

A 76-year-old woman with venous insufficiency presented with numerous thick, hyperkeratotic, confluent papules and plaques involving both legs and thighs as well as the lower back. She initially developed lesions on the distal legs, which progressed to involve the thighs and lower back, slowly enlarging over 7 years (Figure 1). The eruption was associated with pruritus and was profoundly malodorous. The patient had been unsuccessfully treated with triamcinolone ointment, bleach baths, and several courses of oral antibiotics. Her history was remarkable for marked venous insufficiency and mild anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 11.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.5 g/dL). She had no other abnormalities on a comprehensive blood test, basic metabolic panel, or liver function test.

A punch biopsy specimen from the left lower back was obtained and demonstrated papillomatous psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with broad parakeratosis, few intracorneal neutrophils, hypogranulosis, and suprapapillary thinning (Figure 2). She was initially treated with oral methotrexate (20 mg weekly), resulting in partial improvement of plaques and complete resolution of pruritus and malodor. After 15 months of treatment with methotrexate, low-dose methotrexate (10 mg weekly) in combination with acitretin 25 mg daily was started, resulting in further improvement of hyperkeratosis (Figure 3). The patient also was given a compounded corticosteroid ointment containing liquor carbonis detergens, salicylic acid, and fluocinonide ointment, achieving minor additional benefit. Comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, and liver function tests were obtained quarterly. Hemoglobin levels remained low, similar to baseline (11.3–12.5 g/dL), while all other values were within reference range. The patient tolerated treatment well, reporting mild dryness of lips on review of systems, which was attributed to acitretin and was treated with emollients.

The etiology of this entity is unknown. An association with diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, lymphatic circulation disorders, and immunosuppression has been proposed. Others have reported repeated trauma as contributing to the pathogenesis.¹ For our patient, trauma secondary to scratching, long-standing venous insufficiency, and neglect likely contributed to the development of verrucous plaques.

The diagnosis of verrucous psoriasis can be challenging because of its similarity to several other entities, including verruca vulgaris; epidermal nevus; and squamous cell carcinoma, particularly verrucous carcinoma.^4,6,7 The diagnosis has been less challenging in areas where prior typical psoriatic lesions evolved into a verrucous morphology. Our patient presented a diagnostic challenge and draws attention to this unique variant of psoriasis that could easily be misdiagnosed and lead to inappropriate treatment.

Verrucous psoriasis can be recalcitrant to therapy. Although studies addressing treatment modalities are lacking, several recommendations can be derived from case reports and our patient. The use of topical therapies, including topical corticosteroids (eg, fluocinonide, clobetasol, halobetasol), keratolytic agents (eg, urea, salicylic acid), and calcipotriene, provide only minimal improvement when used as monotherapy.¹ Better success has been reported with systemic therapies, mainly methotrexate and acitretin, with anecdotal reports favoring the use of oral retinoids.^1,6 Conversely, biologic medications such as etanercept, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and infliximab have only provided a partial response.¹ Combination therapies including intralesional triamcinolone plus methotrexate⁴ or methotrexate plus acitretin, as in our patient, seem to provide additional benefit. Methotrexate and acitretin combination therapy has traditionally been avoided because of the risk for hepatotoxicity. However, a case series has demonstrated a moderate safety profile with concurrent use of these drugs in treatment-resistant psoriasis.⁸ In our case, clinical response was most pronounced with combination therapy of methotrexate 10 mg weekly and acitretin 25 mg daily. Thus, strong consideration should be given for combination methotrexate-acitretin therapy in patients with recalcitrant verrucous psoriasis who lack comorbid conditions.

We present a case of verrucous psoriasis, a variant of psoriasis characterized by hypertrophic plaques. We propose that venous insufficiency and long-standing untreated disease was instrumental to the development of these lesions. Furthermore, retinoids, particularly in combination with methotrexate, provided the most benefit for our patient.

Acknowledgment
We thank Stephen Somach, MD (Cleveland, Ohio), for his help interpreting the microscopic findings in our biopsy specimen. He received no compensation.

To the Editor:

A 76-year-old woman with venous insufficiency presented with numerous thick, hyperkeratotic, confluent papules and plaques involving both legs and thighs as well as the lower back. She initially developed lesions on the distal legs, which progressed to involve the thighs and lower back, slowly enlarging over 7 years (Figure 1). The eruption was associated with pruritus and was profoundly malodorous. The patient had been unsuccessfully treated with triamcinolone ointment, bleach baths, and several courses of oral antibiotics. Her history was remarkable for marked venous insufficiency and mild anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 11.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.5 g/dL). She had no other abnormalities on a comprehensive blood test, basic metabolic panel, or liver function test.

A punch biopsy specimen from the left lower back was obtained and demonstrated papillomatous psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with broad parakeratosis, few intracorneal neutrophils, hypogranulosis, and suprapapillary thinning (Figure 2). She was initially treated with oral methotrexate (20 mg weekly), resulting in partial improvement of plaques and complete resolution of pruritus and malodor. After 15 months of treatment with methotrexate, low-dose methotrexate (10 mg weekly) in combination with acitretin 25 mg daily was started, resulting in further improvement of hyperkeratosis (Figure 3). The patient also was given a compounded corticosteroid ointment containing liquor carbonis detergens, salicylic acid, and fluocinonide ointment, achieving minor additional benefit. Comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, and liver function tests were obtained quarterly. Hemoglobin levels remained low, similar to baseline (11.3–12.5 g/dL), while all other values were within reference range. The patient tolerated treatment well, reporting mild dryness of lips on review of systems, which was attributed to acitretin and was treated with emollients.

The etiology of this entity is unknown. An association with diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, lymphatic circulation disorders, and immunosuppression has been proposed. Others have reported repeated trauma as contributing to the pathogenesis.¹ For our patient, trauma secondary to scratching, long-standing venous insufficiency, and neglect likely contributed to the development of verrucous plaques.

The diagnosis of verrucous psoriasis can be challenging because of its similarity to several other entities, including verruca vulgaris; epidermal nevus; and squamous cell carcinoma, particularly verrucous carcinoma.^4,6,7 The diagnosis has been less challenging in areas where prior typical psoriatic lesions evolved into a verrucous morphology. Our patient presented a diagnostic challenge and draws attention to this unique variant of psoriasis that could easily be misdiagnosed and lead to inappropriate treatment.

Verrucous psoriasis can be recalcitrant to therapy. Although studies addressing treatment modalities are lacking, several recommendations can be derived from case reports and our patient. The use of topical therapies, including topical corticosteroids (eg, fluocinonide, clobetasol, halobetasol), keratolytic agents (eg, urea, salicylic acid), and calcipotriene, provide only minimal improvement when used as monotherapy.¹ Better success has been reported with systemic therapies, mainly methotrexate and acitretin, with anecdotal reports favoring the use of oral retinoids.^1,6 Conversely, biologic medications such as etanercept, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and infliximab have only provided a partial response.¹ Combination therapies including intralesional triamcinolone plus methotrexate⁴ or methotrexate plus acitretin, as in our patient, seem to provide additional benefit. Methotrexate and acitretin combination therapy has traditionally been avoided because of the risk for hepatotoxicity. However, a case series has demonstrated a moderate safety profile with concurrent use of these drugs in treatment-resistant psoriasis.⁸ In our case, clinical response was most pronounced with combination therapy of methotrexate 10 mg weekly and acitretin 25 mg daily. Thus, strong consideration should be given for combination methotrexate-acitretin therapy in patients with recalcitrant verrucous psoriasis who lack comorbid conditions.

We present a case of verrucous psoriasis, a variant of psoriasis characterized by hypertrophic plaques. We propose that venous insufficiency and long-standing untreated disease was instrumental to the development of these lesions. Furthermore, retinoids, particularly in combination with methotrexate, provided the most benefit for our patient.

Acknowledgment
We thank Stephen Somach, MD (Cleveland, Ohio), for his help interpreting the microscopic findings in our biopsy specimen. He received no compensation.

To the Editor:

A 76-year-old woman with venous insufficiency presented with numerous thick, hyperkeratotic, confluent papules and plaques involving both legs and thighs as well as the lower back. She initially developed lesions on the distal legs, which progressed to involve the thighs and lower back, slowly enlarging over 7 years (Figure 1). The eruption was associated with pruritus and was profoundly malodorous. The patient had been unsuccessfully treated with triamcinolone ointment, bleach baths, and several courses of oral antibiotics. Her history was remarkable for marked venous insufficiency and mild anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 11.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.5 g/dL). She had no other abnormalities on a comprehensive blood test, basic metabolic panel, or liver function test.

A punch biopsy specimen from the left lower back was obtained and demonstrated papillomatous psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with broad parakeratosis, few intracorneal neutrophils, hypogranulosis, and suprapapillary thinning (Figure 2). She was initially treated with oral methotrexate (20 mg weekly), resulting in partial improvement of plaques and complete resolution of pruritus and malodor. After 15 months of treatment with methotrexate, low-dose methotrexate (10 mg weekly) in combination with acitretin 25 mg daily was started, resulting in further improvement of hyperkeratosis (Figure 3). The patient also was given a compounded corticosteroid ointment containing liquor carbonis detergens, salicylic acid, and fluocinonide ointment, achieving minor additional benefit. Comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, and liver function tests were obtained quarterly. Hemoglobin levels remained low, similar to baseline (11.3–12.5 g/dL), while all other values were within reference range. The patient tolerated treatment well, reporting mild dryness of lips on review of systems, which was attributed to acitretin and was treated with emollients.

The etiology of this entity is unknown. An association with diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, lymphatic circulation disorders, and immunosuppression has been proposed. Others have reported repeated trauma as contributing to the pathogenesis.¹ For our patient, trauma secondary to scratching, long-standing venous insufficiency, and neglect likely contributed to the development of verrucous plaques.

The diagnosis of verrucous psoriasis can be challenging because of its similarity to several other entities, including verruca vulgaris; epidermal nevus; and squamous cell carcinoma, particularly verrucous carcinoma.^4,6,7 The diagnosis has been less challenging in areas where prior typical psoriatic lesions evolved into a verrucous morphology. Our patient presented a diagnostic challenge and draws attention to this unique variant of psoriasis that could easily be misdiagnosed and lead to inappropriate treatment.

Verrucous psoriasis can be recalcitrant to therapy. Although studies addressing treatment modalities are lacking, several recommendations can be derived from case reports and our patient. The use of topical therapies, including topical corticosteroids (eg, fluocinonide, clobetasol, halobetasol), keratolytic agents (eg, urea, salicylic acid), and calcipotriene, provide only minimal improvement when used as monotherapy.¹ Better success has been reported with systemic therapies, mainly methotrexate and acitretin, with anecdotal reports favoring the use of oral retinoids.^1,6 Conversely, biologic medications such as etanercept, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and infliximab have only provided a partial response.¹ Combination therapies including intralesional triamcinolone plus methotrexate⁴ or methotrexate plus acitretin, as in our patient, seem to provide additional benefit. Methotrexate and acitretin combination therapy has traditionally been avoided because of the risk for hepatotoxicity. However, a case series has demonstrated a moderate safety profile with concurrent use of these drugs in treatment-resistant psoriasis.⁸ In our case, clinical response was most pronounced with combination therapy of methotrexate 10 mg weekly and acitretin 25 mg daily. Thus, strong consideration should be given for combination methotrexate-acitretin therapy in patients with recalcitrant verrucous psoriasis who lack comorbid conditions.

We present a case of verrucous psoriasis, a variant of psoriasis characterized by hypertrophic plaques. We propose that venous insufficiency and long-standing untreated disease was instrumental to the development of these lesions. Furthermore, retinoids, particularly in combination with methotrexate, provided the most benefit for our patient.

Acknowledgment
We thank Stephen Somach, MD (Cleveland, Ohio), for his help interpreting the microscopic findings in our biopsy specimen. He received no compensation.

To the Editor:

Port-wine stains (PWSs) are the most common type of vascular malformations. Patients rarely develop cancers in the overlying skin. However, we describe a case of melanoma in situ occurring within a long-standing facial PWS.

A 60-year-old white man with a history of a large unilateral facial PWS covering the right ear, lateral cheek, jaw, and neck presented to clinic with a new dark lesion on the right ear that had been growing for a few weeks or more. His PWS had been previously treated intermittently with a pulsed dye laser (PDL) for decades with variable improvement. He had not undergone any laser procedures in the last 8 months but wanted to restart treatment with the PDL. Upon further discussion, he reported a new darker area on the right earlobe that was growing. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer and was otherwise healthy. Physical examination revealed a large red vascular patch encompassing the ear, cheek, chin, and lateral neck. Within the PWS there was a black and dark brown patch with irregular borders on the right earlobe (Figure 1A). A shave biopsy was performed for histopathologic examination. The biopsy showed a confluent proliferation of atypical melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction extending down adnexal structures (Figure 2A) that stained positive for MART-1/Melan-A (Figure 2B). In the dermis, solar elastosis and prominent dilated and thin-walled vessels were present. These findings were consistent with a melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, overlying a capillary malformation.

Port-wine stains are congenital vascular malformations that affect approximately 0.3% of individuals.¹ Most are located on the head and neck along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Cases are thought to occur sporadically, with recent evidence for somatic GNAQ mutations in both nonsyndromic cases and in Sturge-Weber syndrome.² These lesions become progressively larger with time due to dilation of the capillary proliferation.³ Melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, usually affects white men in the sixth and seventh decades of life. It commonly arises on skin with chronic sun damage, particularly on the head and neck.⁴

Although uncommon, skin cancers have been known to arise in PWSs. Reports of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) have been published, but to date, there are no reports of melanoma or melanoma in situ arising in a PWS. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanoma and port wine stain, squamous cell carcinoma and port wine stain, and basal cell carcinoma and port wine stain, fewer than 30 cases of BCCs in a PWS and only 4 cases of SCCs in a PWS have been documented, with 1 patient developing multiple BCCs and SCCs.^1,5 Most BCCs (approximately 75%) and SCCs have been associated with historical treatments used to treat PWS before the development of laser therapy, such as grenz rays, topical thorium X, and other radiotherapy techniques.^5,6 Interestingly, our patient’s PWS had only been treated with a PDL. Other risk factors for skin cancer in a PWS include sun exposure and smoking.⁵ There is no evidence that a PDL contributes to the development of skin cancer, but radiotherapy is a major factor.⁷

Treatment of these skin cancers is no different, with both Mohs micrographic surgery and standard excision used when appropriate. Despite the vascular nature of the lesion, there is only a minimal increase in bleeding risk.³ Most reports indicate no increase in perioperative bleeding.^5,7 One case documented a hematoma developing postoperatively.⁶

This case of melanoma in situ arising in a PWS expands the range of skin cancer types known to arise in these malformations. Because of the potential for skin cancer to develop in a PWS, it is important to routinely examine these vascular proliferations.

To the Editor:

Port-wine stains (PWSs) are the most common type of vascular malformations. Patients rarely develop cancers in the overlying skin. However, we describe a case of melanoma in situ occurring within a long-standing facial PWS.

A 60-year-old white man with a history of a large unilateral facial PWS covering the right ear, lateral cheek, jaw, and neck presented to clinic with a new dark lesion on the right ear that had been growing for a few weeks or more. His PWS had been previously treated intermittently with a pulsed dye laser (PDL) for decades with variable improvement. He had not undergone any laser procedures in the last 8 months but wanted to restart treatment with the PDL. Upon further discussion, he reported a new darker area on the right earlobe that was growing. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer and was otherwise healthy. Physical examination revealed a large red vascular patch encompassing the ear, cheek, chin, and lateral neck. Within the PWS there was a black and dark brown patch with irregular borders on the right earlobe (Figure 1A). A shave biopsy was performed for histopathologic examination. The biopsy showed a confluent proliferation of atypical melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction extending down adnexal structures (Figure 2A) that stained positive for MART-1/Melan-A (Figure 2B). In the dermis, solar elastosis and prominent dilated and thin-walled vessels were present. These findings were consistent with a melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, overlying a capillary malformation.

Port-wine stains are congenital vascular malformations that affect approximately 0.3% of individuals.¹ Most are located on the head and neck along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Cases are thought to occur sporadically, with recent evidence for somatic GNAQ mutations in both nonsyndromic cases and in Sturge-Weber syndrome.² These lesions become progressively larger with time due to dilation of the capillary proliferation.³ Melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, usually affects white men in the sixth and seventh decades of life. It commonly arises on skin with chronic sun damage, particularly on the head and neck.⁴

Although uncommon, skin cancers have been known to arise in PWSs. Reports of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) have been published, but to date, there are no reports of melanoma or melanoma in situ arising in a PWS. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanoma and port wine stain, squamous cell carcinoma and port wine stain, and basal cell carcinoma and port wine stain, fewer than 30 cases of BCCs in a PWS and only 4 cases of SCCs in a PWS have been documented, with 1 patient developing multiple BCCs and SCCs.^1,5 Most BCCs (approximately 75%) and SCCs have been associated with historical treatments used to treat PWS before the development of laser therapy, such as grenz rays, topical thorium X, and other radiotherapy techniques.^5,6 Interestingly, our patient’s PWS had only been treated with a PDL. Other risk factors for skin cancer in a PWS include sun exposure and smoking.⁵ There is no evidence that a PDL contributes to the development of skin cancer, but radiotherapy is a major factor.⁷

Treatment of these skin cancers is no different, with both Mohs micrographic surgery and standard excision used when appropriate. Despite the vascular nature of the lesion, there is only a minimal increase in bleeding risk.³ Most reports indicate no increase in perioperative bleeding.^5,7 One case documented a hematoma developing postoperatively.⁶

This case of melanoma in situ arising in a PWS expands the range of skin cancer types known to arise in these malformations. Because of the potential for skin cancer to develop in a PWS, it is important to routinely examine these vascular proliferations.

To the Editor:

Port-wine stains (PWSs) are the most common type of vascular malformations. Patients rarely develop cancers in the overlying skin. However, we describe a case of melanoma in situ occurring within a long-standing facial PWS.

A 60-year-old white man with a history of a large unilateral facial PWS covering the right ear, lateral cheek, jaw, and neck presented to clinic with a new dark lesion on the right ear that had been growing for a few weeks or more. His PWS had been previously treated intermittently with a pulsed dye laser (PDL) for decades with variable improvement. He had not undergone any laser procedures in the last 8 months but wanted to restart treatment with the PDL. Upon further discussion, he reported a new darker area on the right earlobe that was growing. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer and was otherwise healthy. Physical examination revealed a large red vascular patch encompassing the ear, cheek, chin, and lateral neck. Within the PWS there was a black and dark brown patch with irregular borders on the right earlobe (Figure 1A). A shave biopsy was performed for histopathologic examination. The biopsy showed a confluent proliferation of atypical melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction extending down adnexal structures (Figure 2A) that stained positive for MART-1/Melan-A (Figure 2B). In the dermis, solar elastosis and prominent dilated and thin-walled vessels were present. These findings were consistent with a melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, overlying a capillary malformation.

Port-wine stains are congenital vascular malformations that affect approximately 0.3% of individuals.¹ Most are located on the head and neck along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Cases are thought to occur sporadically, with recent evidence for somatic GNAQ mutations in both nonsyndromic cases and in Sturge-Weber syndrome.² These lesions become progressively larger with time due to dilation of the capillary proliferation.³ Melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type, usually affects white men in the sixth and seventh decades of life. It commonly arises on skin with chronic sun damage, particularly on the head and neck.⁴

Although uncommon, skin cancers have been known to arise in PWSs. Reports of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) have been published, but to date, there are no reports of melanoma or melanoma in situ arising in a PWS. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanoma and port wine stain, squamous cell carcinoma and port wine stain, and basal cell carcinoma and port wine stain, fewer than 30 cases of BCCs in a PWS and only 4 cases of SCCs in a PWS have been documented, with 1 patient developing multiple BCCs and SCCs.^1,5 Most BCCs (approximately 75%) and SCCs have been associated with historical treatments used to treat PWS before the development of laser therapy, such as grenz rays, topical thorium X, and other radiotherapy techniques.^5,6 Interestingly, our patient’s PWS had only been treated with a PDL. Other risk factors for skin cancer in a PWS include sun exposure and smoking.⁵ There is no evidence that a PDL contributes to the development of skin cancer, but radiotherapy is a major factor.⁷

Treatment of these skin cancers is no different, with both Mohs micrographic surgery and standard excision used when appropriate. Despite the vascular nature of the lesion, there is only a minimal increase in bleeding risk.³ Most reports indicate no increase in perioperative bleeding.^5,7 One case documented a hematoma developing postoperatively.⁶

This case of melanoma in situ arising in a PWS expands the range of skin cancer types known to arise in these malformations. Because of the potential for skin cancer to develop in a PWS, it is important to routinely examine these vascular proliferations.