Cutis

The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.¹ Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.²

The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.^3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.^5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.⁸ Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.

Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis

Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.⁹

Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.^9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.¹¹

A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.¹² Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.¹⁰

Babesiosis

The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.¹³ Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.¹⁴ Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.¹⁵ Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.¹³

The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.¹⁶ Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.¹³ Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.^10,16

A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).¹⁷ Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.¹⁸ Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.¹⁰

Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.¹⁰ Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.¹⁹

Powassan Virus

Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.^6,20,21

Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.²¹ The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.²²

Tick-borne Encephalitis

Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.^23,24

Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.^25,26

In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.²⁷ Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.²⁸

Borrelia miyamotoi Disease

Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 2011⁷ and was identified as a pathogen in both North America²⁹ and Europe in 2013.³⁰ Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.^31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.^29,30

The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.³¹ If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.³²

Tick Paralysis

Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.³³ Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.^8,33

Conclusion

Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.

The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.¹ Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.²

The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.^3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.^5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.⁸ Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.

Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis

Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.⁹

Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.^9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.¹¹

A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.¹² Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.¹⁰

Babesiosis

The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.¹³ Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.¹⁴ Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.¹⁵ Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.¹³

The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.¹⁶ Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.¹³ Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.^10,16

A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).¹⁷ Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.¹⁸ Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.¹⁰

Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.¹⁰ Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.¹⁹

Powassan Virus

Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.^6,20,21

Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.²¹ The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.²²

Tick-borne Encephalitis

Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.^23,24

Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.^25,26

In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.²⁷ Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.²⁸

Borrelia miyamotoi Disease

Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 2011⁷ and was identified as a pathogen in both North America²⁹ and Europe in 2013.³⁰ Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.^31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.^29,30

The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.³¹ If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.³²

Tick Paralysis

Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.³³ Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.^8,33

Conclusion

Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.

The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.¹ Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.²

The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.^3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.^5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.⁸ Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.

Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis

Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.⁹

Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.^9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.¹¹

A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.¹² Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.¹⁰

Babesiosis

The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.¹³ Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.¹⁴ Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.¹⁵ Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.¹³

The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.¹⁶ Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.¹³ Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.^10,16

A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).¹⁷ Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.¹⁸ Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.¹⁰

Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.¹⁰ Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.¹⁹

Powassan Virus

Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.^6,20,21

Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.²¹ The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.²²

Tick-borne Encephalitis

Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.^23,24

Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.^25,26

In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.²⁷ Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.²⁸

Borrelia miyamotoi Disease

Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 2011⁷ and was identified as a pathogen in both North America²⁹ and Europe in 2013.³⁰ Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.^31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.^29,30

The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.³¹ If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.³²

Tick Paralysis

Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.³³ Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.^8,33

Conclusion

Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, rapidly growing, aggressive neoplasm with a generally poor prognosis. The cells of origin are highly anaplastic and share structural and immunohistochemical features with various neuroectodermally derived cells. Although Merkel cells, which are slow-acting cutaneous mechanoreceptors located in the basal layer of the epidermis, and MCC share immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features, there is limited evidence of a direct histogenetic relationship between the two.^1,2 Additionally, some extracutaneous neuroendocrine tumors have features similar to MCC; therefore, although it may be more accurate and perhaps more practical to describe these lesions as primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the skin, the term MCC is more commonly used both in the literature and in clinical practice.^1,2

Merkel cell carcinoma typically presents in the head and neck region in white patients older than 70 years of age and in the immunocompromised population.^3-6 The mean age of diagnosis is 76 years for women and 74 years for men.⁷ The incidence of MCC in the United States tripled over a 15-year period, and there are approximately 1500 new cases of MCC diagnosed each year, making it about 40 times less common than melanoma.⁸ The 5-year survival rate for patients without lymph node involvement is 75%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with distant metastases is 25%.⁹

Merkel cell carcinoma is thought to develop through 1 of 2 distinct pathways. In a virally mediated pathway, which represents at least 80% of cases, the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) monoclonally integrates into the host genome and promotes oncogenesis via altered p53 and retinoblastoma protein expression.^10-12 The remainder of cases are believed to develop via a nonvirally mediated pathway in which genetic anomalies, immune status, and environmental factors influence oncogenesis.^10-13

Due to the similarity between MCC and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, especially small-cell lung carcinomas, immunohistochemistry is important in making the diagnosis. Cytokeratin 20 and neuron-specific enolase positivity and thyroid transcription factor 1 negativity are the most useful markers in identifying MCC.

Regression of MCC is a very rare and poorly understood event. A 2010 review of the literature described 22 cases of spontaneous regression.¹⁴ We report a rare case of rapid and complete regression of MCC following punch biopsy in a 96-year-old woman.

Case Report

A 96-year-old woman presented with a rapidly enlarging lesion overlying the suprasternal notch of 8 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). The lesion consisted of a 5.0×4.5-cm, friable, erythematous, flesh-colored nodule with ulceration and heavy crusting. Surrounding the nodule was an erythematous to violaceous patch extending to the anterior chest and bilateral supraclavicular area. No cervical or clavicular lymphadenopathy was observed. According to the patient’s caregiver, the lesion originated as a small, erythematous, scaly macule that rapidly increased in size over an 8-week period to a maximum of 5.0×4.5 cm at presentation. The lesion bled on 2 or 3 occasions during the 8-week period and was controlled with a warm compress. The patient’s caregiver had treated the lesion with topical tea tree oil (for malodor) and antibiotic ointment as needed. The clinical differential diagnosis included squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, amelanotic melanoma, cutaneous metastasis of a primary visceral malignancy, basal cell carcinoma, and MCC. Biopsy of the lesion was recommended at this time but the patient’s family declined.

A 4-mm punch biopsy was obtained at a follow-up visit 4 weeks later (12 weeks after the reported onset of the lesion). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed a small-cell neoplasm with stippled nuclei and scant cytoplasm forming a nested and somewhat trabecular pattern. Mitotic activity, apoptosis, and nuclear molding also were present (Figure 2). The tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 20 with a dotlike, paranuclear pattern (Figure 3). Staining for CAM 5.2 also was positive. Cytokeratin 5/6, human melanoma black 45, and leukocyte common antigen were negative. The immunophenotyping of the lymphocytic response to the tumor showed that the majority of intratumoral lymphocytes were CD8 positive (Figure 4). CD4-positive lymphocytes were predominantly seen at the periphery of the tumor nests without tumor infiltration (Figure 5). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of MCC was made. The patient’s family declined treatment based on her advanced age and current health status, which included advanced dementia.

Two weeks after the punch biopsy, the lesion had noticeably decreased in size and lost its dome-shaped appearance. Within 8 weeks after biopsy (20 weeks since the lesion first appeared), the lesion had completely resolved (Figure 6). The patient was lost to follow-up months later, but no recurrence of the lesion was reported.

Comment

Spontaneous regression is not unique to MCC, as this phenomenon also has been reported in keratoacanthoma, lymphoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma.¹⁵ Complete spontaneous regression is defined as occurring in the absence of therapy that is intended to have a treatment effect.^15,16 Spontaneous regression is estimated to occur in malignant neoplasms at a rate of 1 case per 60,000 to 100,000 (approximately 0.0013% of all malignant neoplasms).¹⁷ Considering the reported prevalence of MCC and the number of cases that have been known to regress, the estimated incidence of complete spontaneous regression may be as high as 1.5%.¹⁴ Though spontaneous regression of MCC is more prevalent than expected, it still is considered a rare phenomenon. A 2010 review of the literature yielded 22 cases of complete spontaneous regression of MCC.¹⁴ No recurrences have been observed; however, follow-up was relatively short in some cases.

In a unique report by Bertolotti et al,¹⁸ a patient with MCC on the nasal tip presented 4 weeks after biopsy with complete spontaneous regression of the tumor, which was associated with bilateral cervical lymph node involvement as noted by hypermetabolic uptake on positron emission tomography scanning. The patient underwent radiation therapy and was disease free at 12 months’ follow-up.¹⁸

Complete spontaneous regression has been described in MCC patients with local disease, regional recurrences, and metastatic disease.¹⁹ In all reviewed cases, the regression is a fairly quick phenomenon occurring over the course of 1 to 5 months.^16,19,20,21 Our patient presented with advanced age and a tumor location characteristic of MCC. In our search of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, regression, and spontaneous regression, all but 1 case of MCC regression involved tumors that were located on the head.¹⁴

The histopathologic features observed in our case, specifically intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells, were similar to the findings in other reported cases. In one series of 2 cases, the one case showed scar tissue with a moderate, predominantly T-lymphocytic infiltrate and no tumor cells, and the second showed cellular proliferation in the deep dermis with dense lymphocytic infiltrates primarily composed of CD3-positive T cells.¹⁴ Other studies of regression of both localized and metastatic MCC demonstrated infiltration by CD4-positive, CD8-positive, and CD3-positive lymphocytes and foamy macrophages.^21-23

The discovery of the MCV was one of the most important advances in elucidating the pathogenesis of MCC.^10,24-26 Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA has been detected in a majority of MCC cases.^25,27 Viral integration has been shown to take place early, prior to tumor clonal expansion.¹⁰ Importantly, not all cases of MCC show MCV infection, and MCV infection is not exclusive to MCC.²⁸ Merkel cell polyomavirus is considered to be part of the normal human flora, and asymptomatic infection is quite common.²⁹ It has been identified in 80% of adults older than 50 years of age and, interestingly, in 35% of children by 13 years of age or younger.^30,31 It remains unclear what role the presence of MCV plays in determining MCC prognosis. Several reports have demonstrated lower disease-specific mortality associated with MCV-positive MCC.^32-35 In contrast, Schrama et al³⁶ correlated the MCV status of 174 MCC tumors and found no difference in clinical behavior or prognosis between MCV-positive and MCV-negative MCCs.

Immunosuppression also may play a role in the development of MCC.^5,25 There is increased prevalence of MCC in the human immunodeficiency virus–positive population, as well as in organ-transplant recipients and patients with leukemia. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia seems to be the most frequent neoplasia associated with development of MCC.³⁷

The mechanism of MCC regression remains unclear, but many investigators emphasize the importance of T-cell–mediated immunity.^{16,21-23,38,39} Apoptosis also has been shown to play an important role.⁴⁰ Our case showed tumor-infiltrating CD8-positive lymphocytes and CD4-positive lymphocytes present predominantly at the periphery of the tumor, with close proximity to the tumor nests but with no tumor infiltration (Figure 3). This distribution was consistently present in multiple sections of the tumor. These findings are consistent with prior reports of both CD4-positive and CD8-positive T lymphocytes associated with MCC regression. Our findings confirm that immune response may play an important role in spontaneous regression of MCC.

There is much speculation regarding the initial biopsy of an MCC lesion (or other traumatic event) and its role in tumor regression. Koba et al⁴¹ examined the effect of biopsy on CD8-positive lymphocytic infiltration of MCC tumor cells and found that biopsy does not commonly alter intratumoral CD8-positive infiltration. These findings suggest trauma does not directly induce immunologic recognition of this cancer.

Conclusion

We report a case of complete spontaneous regression of a localized MCC following a punch biopsy. The histopathology showed a brisk T-lymphocyte response with intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells. The age and clinical profile of our patient as well as the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor regression are similar to other reported cases. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of MCC regression, and a better understanding of this fascinating phenomenon could help in development of new immunotherapeutic approaches.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, rapidly growing, aggressive neoplasm with a generally poor prognosis. The cells of origin are highly anaplastic and share structural and immunohistochemical features with various neuroectodermally derived cells. Although Merkel cells, which are slow-acting cutaneous mechanoreceptors located in the basal layer of the epidermis, and MCC share immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features, there is limited evidence of a direct histogenetic relationship between the two.^1,2 Additionally, some extracutaneous neuroendocrine tumors have features similar to MCC; therefore, although it may be more accurate and perhaps more practical to describe these lesions as primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the skin, the term MCC is more commonly used both in the literature and in clinical practice.^1,2

Merkel cell carcinoma typically presents in the head and neck region in white patients older than 70 years of age and in the immunocompromised population.^3-6 The mean age of diagnosis is 76 years for women and 74 years for men.⁷ The incidence of MCC in the United States tripled over a 15-year period, and there are approximately 1500 new cases of MCC diagnosed each year, making it about 40 times less common than melanoma.⁸ The 5-year survival rate for patients without lymph node involvement is 75%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with distant metastases is 25%.⁹

Merkel cell carcinoma is thought to develop through 1 of 2 distinct pathways. In a virally mediated pathway, which represents at least 80% of cases, the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) monoclonally integrates into the host genome and promotes oncogenesis via altered p53 and retinoblastoma protein expression.^10-12 The remainder of cases are believed to develop via a nonvirally mediated pathway in which genetic anomalies, immune status, and environmental factors influence oncogenesis.^10-13

Due to the similarity between MCC and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, especially small-cell lung carcinomas, immunohistochemistry is important in making the diagnosis. Cytokeratin 20 and neuron-specific enolase positivity and thyroid transcription factor 1 negativity are the most useful markers in identifying MCC.

Regression of MCC is a very rare and poorly understood event. A 2010 review of the literature described 22 cases of spontaneous regression.¹⁴ We report a rare case of rapid and complete regression of MCC following punch biopsy in a 96-year-old woman.

Case Report

A 96-year-old woman presented with a rapidly enlarging lesion overlying the suprasternal notch of 8 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). The lesion consisted of a 5.0×4.5-cm, friable, erythematous, flesh-colored nodule with ulceration and heavy crusting. Surrounding the nodule was an erythematous to violaceous patch extending to the anterior chest and bilateral supraclavicular area. No cervical or clavicular lymphadenopathy was observed. According to the patient’s caregiver, the lesion originated as a small, erythematous, scaly macule that rapidly increased in size over an 8-week period to a maximum of 5.0×4.5 cm at presentation. The lesion bled on 2 or 3 occasions during the 8-week period and was controlled with a warm compress. The patient’s caregiver had treated the lesion with topical tea tree oil (for malodor) and antibiotic ointment as needed. The clinical differential diagnosis included squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, amelanotic melanoma, cutaneous metastasis of a primary visceral malignancy, basal cell carcinoma, and MCC. Biopsy of the lesion was recommended at this time but the patient’s family declined.

A 4-mm punch biopsy was obtained at a follow-up visit 4 weeks later (12 weeks after the reported onset of the lesion). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed a small-cell neoplasm with stippled nuclei and scant cytoplasm forming a nested and somewhat trabecular pattern. Mitotic activity, apoptosis, and nuclear molding also were present (Figure 2). The tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 20 with a dotlike, paranuclear pattern (Figure 3). Staining for CAM 5.2 also was positive. Cytokeratin 5/6, human melanoma black 45, and leukocyte common antigen were negative. The immunophenotyping of the lymphocytic response to the tumor showed that the majority of intratumoral lymphocytes were CD8 positive (Figure 4). CD4-positive lymphocytes were predominantly seen at the periphery of the tumor nests without tumor infiltration (Figure 5). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of MCC was made. The patient’s family declined treatment based on her advanced age and current health status, which included advanced dementia.

Two weeks after the punch biopsy, the lesion had noticeably decreased in size and lost its dome-shaped appearance. Within 8 weeks after biopsy (20 weeks since the lesion first appeared), the lesion had completely resolved (Figure 6). The patient was lost to follow-up months later, but no recurrence of the lesion was reported.

Comment

Spontaneous regression is not unique to MCC, as this phenomenon also has been reported in keratoacanthoma, lymphoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma.¹⁵ Complete spontaneous regression is defined as occurring in the absence of therapy that is intended to have a treatment effect.^15,16 Spontaneous regression is estimated to occur in malignant neoplasms at a rate of 1 case per 60,000 to 100,000 (approximately 0.0013% of all malignant neoplasms).¹⁷ Considering the reported prevalence of MCC and the number of cases that have been known to regress, the estimated incidence of complete spontaneous regression may be as high as 1.5%.¹⁴ Though spontaneous regression of MCC is more prevalent than expected, it still is considered a rare phenomenon. A 2010 review of the literature yielded 22 cases of complete spontaneous regression of MCC.¹⁴ No recurrences have been observed; however, follow-up was relatively short in some cases.

In a unique report by Bertolotti et al,¹⁸ a patient with MCC on the nasal tip presented 4 weeks after biopsy with complete spontaneous regression of the tumor, which was associated with bilateral cervical lymph node involvement as noted by hypermetabolic uptake on positron emission tomography scanning. The patient underwent radiation therapy and was disease free at 12 months’ follow-up.¹⁸

Complete spontaneous regression has been described in MCC patients with local disease, regional recurrences, and metastatic disease.¹⁹ In all reviewed cases, the regression is a fairly quick phenomenon occurring over the course of 1 to 5 months.^16,19,20,21 Our patient presented with advanced age and a tumor location characteristic of MCC. In our search of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, regression, and spontaneous regression, all but 1 case of MCC regression involved tumors that were located on the head.¹⁴

The histopathologic features observed in our case, specifically intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells, were similar to the findings in other reported cases. In one series of 2 cases, the one case showed scar tissue with a moderate, predominantly T-lymphocytic infiltrate and no tumor cells, and the second showed cellular proliferation in the deep dermis with dense lymphocytic infiltrates primarily composed of CD3-positive T cells.¹⁴ Other studies of regression of both localized and metastatic MCC demonstrated infiltration by CD4-positive, CD8-positive, and CD3-positive lymphocytes and foamy macrophages.^21-23

The discovery of the MCV was one of the most important advances in elucidating the pathogenesis of MCC.^10,24-26 Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA has been detected in a majority of MCC cases.^25,27 Viral integration has been shown to take place early, prior to tumor clonal expansion.¹⁰ Importantly, not all cases of MCC show MCV infection, and MCV infection is not exclusive to MCC.²⁸ Merkel cell polyomavirus is considered to be part of the normal human flora, and asymptomatic infection is quite common.²⁹ It has been identified in 80% of adults older than 50 years of age and, interestingly, in 35% of children by 13 years of age or younger.^30,31 It remains unclear what role the presence of MCV plays in determining MCC prognosis. Several reports have demonstrated lower disease-specific mortality associated with MCV-positive MCC.^32-35 In contrast, Schrama et al³⁶ correlated the MCV status of 174 MCC tumors and found no difference in clinical behavior or prognosis between MCV-positive and MCV-negative MCCs.

Immunosuppression also may play a role in the development of MCC.^5,25 There is increased prevalence of MCC in the human immunodeficiency virus–positive population, as well as in organ-transplant recipients and patients with leukemia. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia seems to be the most frequent neoplasia associated with development of MCC.³⁷

The mechanism of MCC regression remains unclear, but many investigators emphasize the importance of T-cell–mediated immunity.^{16,21-23,38,39} Apoptosis also has been shown to play an important role.⁴⁰ Our case showed tumor-infiltrating CD8-positive lymphocytes and CD4-positive lymphocytes present predominantly at the periphery of the tumor, with close proximity to the tumor nests but with no tumor infiltration (Figure 3). This distribution was consistently present in multiple sections of the tumor. These findings are consistent with prior reports of both CD4-positive and CD8-positive T lymphocytes associated with MCC regression. Our findings confirm that immune response may play an important role in spontaneous regression of MCC.

There is much speculation regarding the initial biopsy of an MCC lesion (or other traumatic event) and its role in tumor regression. Koba et al⁴¹ examined the effect of biopsy on CD8-positive lymphocytic infiltration of MCC tumor cells and found that biopsy does not commonly alter intratumoral CD8-positive infiltration. These findings suggest trauma does not directly induce immunologic recognition of this cancer.

Conclusion

We report a case of complete spontaneous regression of a localized MCC following a punch biopsy. The histopathology showed a brisk T-lymphocyte response with intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells. The age and clinical profile of our patient as well as the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor regression are similar to other reported cases. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of MCC regression, and a better understanding of this fascinating phenomenon could help in development of new immunotherapeutic approaches.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, rapidly growing, aggressive neoplasm with a generally poor prognosis. The cells of origin are highly anaplastic and share structural and immunohistochemical features with various neuroectodermally derived cells. Although Merkel cells, which are slow-acting cutaneous mechanoreceptors located in the basal layer of the epidermis, and MCC share immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features, there is limited evidence of a direct histogenetic relationship between the two.^1,2 Additionally, some extracutaneous neuroendocrine tumors have features similar to MCC; therefore, although it may be more accurate and perhaps more practical to describe these lesions as primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the skin, the term MCC is more commonly used both in the literature and in clinical practice.^1,2

Merkel cell carcinoma typically presents in the head and neck region in white patients older than 70 years of age and in the immunocompromised population.^3-6 The mean age of diagnosis is 76 years for women and 74 years for men.⁷ The incidence of MCC in the United States tripled over a 15-year period, and there are approximately 1500 new cases of MCC diagnosed each year, making it about 40 times less common than melanoma.⁸ The 5-year survival rate for patients without lymph node involvement is 75%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with distant metastases is 25%.⁹

Merkel cell carcinoma is thought to develop through 1 of 2 distinct pathways. In a virally mediated pathway, which represents at least 80% of cases, the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) monoclonally integrates into the host genome and promotes oncogenesis via altered p53 and retinoblastoma protein expression.^10-12 The remainder of cases are believed to develop via a nonvirally mediated pathway in which genetic anomalies, immune status, and environmental factors influence oncogenesis.^10-13

Due to the similarity between MCC and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, especially small-cell lung carcinomas, immunohistochemistry is important in making the diagnosis. Cytokeratin 20 and neuron-specific enolase positivity and thyroid transcription factor 1 negativity are the most useful markers in identifying MCC.

Regression of MCC is a very rare and poorly understood event. A 2010 review of the literature described 22 cases of spontaneous regression.¹⁴ We report a rare case of rapid and complete regression of MCC following punch biopsy in a 96-year-old woman.

Case Report

A 96-year-old woman presented with a rapidly enlarging lesion overlying the suprasternal notch of 8 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). The lesion consisted of a 5.0×4.5-cm, friable, erythematous, flesh-colored nodule with ulceration and heavy crusting. Surrounding the nodule was an erythematous to violaceous patch extending to the anterior chest and bilateral supraclavicular area. No cervical or clavicular lymphadenopathy was observed. According to the patient’s caregiver, the lesion originated as a small, erythematous, scaly macule that rapidly increased in size over an 8-week period to a maximum of 5.0×4.5 cm at presentation. The lesion bled on 2 or 3 occasions during the 8-week period and was controlled with a warm compress. The patient’s caregiver had treated the lesion with topical tea tree oil (for malodor) and antibiotic ointment as needed. The clinical differential diagnosis included squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, amelanotic melanoma, cutaneous metastasis of a primary visceral malignancy, basal cell carcinoma, and MCC. Biopsy of the lesion was recommended at this time but the patient’s family declined.

A 4-mm punch biopsy was obtained at a follow-up visit 4 weeks later (12 weeks after the reported onset of the lesion). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed a small-cell neoplasm with stippled nuclei and scant cytoplasm forming a nested and somewhat trabecular pattern. Mitotic activity, apoptosis, and nuclear molding also were present (Figure 2). The tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 20 with a dotlike, paranuclear pattern (Figure 3). Staining for CAM 5.2 also was positive. Cytokeratin 5/6, human melanoma black 45, and leukocyte common antigen were negative. The immunophenotyping of the lymphocytic response to the tumor showed that the majority of intratumoral lymphocytes were CD8 positive (Figure 4). CD4-positive lymphocytes were predominantly seen at the periphery of the tumor nests without tumor infiltration (Figure 5). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of MCC was made. The patient’s family declined treatment based on her advanced age and current health status, which included advanced dementia.

Two weeks after the punch biopsy, the lesion had noticeably decreased in size and lost its dome-shaped appearance. Within 8 weeks after biopsy (20 weeks since the lesion first appeared), the lesion had completely resolved (Figure 6). The patient was lost to follow-up months later, but no recurrence of the lesion was reported.

Comment

Spontaneous regression is not unique to MCC, as this phenomenon also has been reported in keratoacanthoma, lymphoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma.¹⁵ Complete spontaneous regression is defined as occurring in the absence of therapy that is intended to have a treatment effect.^15,16 Spontaneous regression is estimated to occur in malignant neoplasms at a rate of 1 case per 60,000 to 100,000 (approximately 0.0013% of all malignant neoplasms).¹⁷ Considering the reported prevalence of MCC and the number of cases that have been known to regress, the estimated incidence of complete spontaneous regression may be as high as 1.5%.¹⁴ Though spontaneous regression of MCC is more prevalent than expected, it still is considered a rare phenomenon. A 2010 review of the literature yielded 22 cases of complete spontaneous regression of MCC.¹⁴ No recurrences have been observed; however, follow-up was relatively short in some cases.

In a unique report by Bertolotti et al,¹⁸ a patient with MCC on the nasal tip presented 4 weeks after biopsy with complete spontaneous regression of the tumor, which was associated with bilateral cervical lymph node involvement as noted by hypermetabolic uptake on positron emission tomography scanning. The patient underwent radiation therapy and was disease free at 12 months’ follow-up.¹⁸

Complete spontaneous regression has been described in MCC patients with local disease, regional recurrences, and metastatic disease.¹⁹ In all reviewed cases, the regression is a fairly quick phenomenon occurring over the course of 1 to 5 months.^16,19,20,21 Our patient presented with advanced age and a tumor location characteristic of MCC. In our search of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, regression, and spontaneous regression, all but 1 case of MCC regression involved tumors that were located on the head.¹⁴

The histopathologic features observed in our case, specifically intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells, were similar to the findings in other reported cases. In one series of 2 cases, the one case showed scar tissue with a moderate, predominantly T-lymphocytic infiltrate and no tumor cells, and the second showed cellular proliferation in the deep dermis with dense lymphocytic infiltrates primarily composed of CD3-positive T cells.¹⁴ Other studies of regression of both localized and metastatic MCC demonstrated infiltration by CD4-positive, CD8-positive, and CD3-positive lymphocytes and foamy macrophages.^21-23

The discovery of the MCV was one of the most important advances in elucidating the pathogenesis of MCC.^10,24-26 Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA has been detected in a majority of MCC cases.^25,27 Viral integration has been shown to take place early, prior to tumor clonal expansion.¹⁰ Importantly, not all cases of MCC show MCV infection, and MCV infection is not exclusive to MCC.²⁸ Merkel cell polyomavirus is considered to be part of the normal human flora, and asymptomatic infection is quite common.²⁹ It has been identified in 80% of adults older than 50 years of age and, interestingly, in 35% of children by 13 years of age or younger.^30,31 It remains unclear what role the presence of MCV plays in determining MCC prognosis. Several reports have demonstrated lower disease-specific mortality associated with MCV-positive MCC.^32-35 In contrast, Schrama et al³⁶ correlated the MCV status of 174 MCC tumors and found no difference in clinical behavior or prognosis between MCV-positive and MCV-negative MCCs.

Immunosuppression also may play a role in the development of MCC.^5,25 There is increased prevalence of MCC in the human immunodeficiency virus–positive population, as well as in organ-transplant recipients and patients with leukemia. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia seems to be the most frequent neoplasia associated with development of MCC.³⁷

The mechanism of MCC regression remains unclear, but many investigators emphasize the importance of T-cell–mediated immunity.^{16,21-23,38,39} Apoptosis also has been shown to play an important role.⁴⁰ Our case showed tumor-infiltrating CD8-positive lymphocytes and CD4-positive lymphocytes present predominantly at the periphery of the tumor, with close proximity to the tumor nests but with no tumor infiltration (Figure 3). This distribution was consistently present in multiple sections of the tumor. These findings are consistent with prior reports of both CD4-positive and CD8-positive T lymphocytes associated with MCC regression. Our findings confirm that immune response may play an important role in spontaneous regression of MCC.

There is much speculation regarding the initial biopsy of an MCC lesion (or other traumatic event) and its role in tumor regression. Koba et al⁴¹ examined the effect of biopsy on CD8-positive lymphocytic infiltration of MCC tumor cells and found that biopsy does not commonly alter intratumoral CD8-positive infiltration. These findings suggest trauma does not directly induce immunologic recognition of this cancer.

Conclusion

We report a case of complete spontaneous regression of a localized MCC following a punch biopsy. The histopathology showed a brisk T-lymphocyte response with intratumoral CD8-positive cytotoxic lymphocytes and peritumoral CD4-positive cells. The age and clinical profile of our patient as well as the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor regression are similar to other reported cases. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of MCC regression, and a better understanding of this fascinating phenomenon could help in development of new immunotherapeutic approaches.

Progressive macular hypomelanosis (PMH) is a noninflammatory skin disorder characterized by ill-defined, nummular, hypopigmented, and nonscaly macules. Historically, various names have been used to describe this entity. Several of these terms, including cutis trunci variata and nummular and confluent hypomelanosis of the trunk, reflected its predominantly truncal distribution.^1,2 Less frequently, involvement on the neck, buttocks, and arms and legs has been noted.^1,2 A lack of facial involvement previously has been highlighted as a key clinical feature of PMH.³

Progressive macular hypomelanosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Hypopigmented diseases commonly considered in the differential include those caused by fungi and yeasts (eg, tinea versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis), inflammatory skin disorders (eg, pityriasis alba, postinflammatory dyschromia), and mycosis fungoides (MF) as well as leprosy.

The hypopigmented macules of PMH have nonspecific histopathologic findings; lesional skin often shows minimal alterations as compared to normal skin. A sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate often is observed,^4,5 and at times, a decrease in epidermal melanin content can be detected.^1-3,6,7

We report 4 cases with considerable facial involvement of hypopigmented macules that were determined to be consistent with PMH. We propose that characteristic macules that are not clinically or histopathologically consistent with other disease entities are compatible with a diagnosis of PMH, regardless of the distribution. A diagnosis of PMH should be considered in the differential when there are suggestive facial lesions in addition to truncal lesions.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 40-year-old man presented with hypopigmented macules on the face (Figure 1), trunk, chest, arms, and legs of 2 years’ duration. The lesions were asymptomatic and had started on the forehead as hypopigmented macules, then progressed to the trunk, arms, and legs. The patient denied any prior rash, injury, or hyperpigmentation associated with the distribution of the lesions.

A rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test was conducted to rule out secondary syphilis and was nonreactive. During a series of clinical encounters over several months, a total of 5 biopsies of lesions on the face and back were performed. All specimens contained mild mononuclear perivascular inflammation (Figure 2). In some foci, staining for Melan-A revealed a decrease in epidermal melanocytes (Figure 3). Periodic acid–Schiff staining performed on one section revealed a few pityriasis spores but no hyphal elements, suggesting colonization rather than infection.

The patient initially was started on tacrolimus ointment 0.1% once daily and narrowband UVB phototherapy twice weekly for 3 months without benefit. A diagnosis of tinea versicolor was revisited and the patient was switched to ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing, and ketoconazole cream 2% was applied twice daily to the affected areas for 2 months without notable improvement. Once-weekly 150-mg pulse doses of oral fluconazole for 8 weeks were started but proved equally ineffective. Antibiotic therapy aimed at eradicating Propionibacterium acnes was considered following a provisional diagnosis of PMH after the patient failed 5 months of therapy for tinea versicolor.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented with hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules on the face, trunk, chest, and arms of several months’ duration. The patient initially noted hypopigmentation on the face that gradually spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash or hyperpigmentation in the affected areas. At the initial visit to our clinic, a potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation of the face and back was positive for tinea versicolor. The patient was treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly for several weeks on the scalp, face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and 2 total doses of oral fluconazole 150 mg taken 1 week apart.

Three months later the patient returned with no improvement of the existing lesions and with progression of the disease to previously uninvolved areas of the trunk, arms, and legs. Biopsy of a facial lesion was performed, and laboratory studies including RPR, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and antinuclear antibody tests were conducted to screen for possible systemic disease. Microscopic analysis of the biopsied facial lesion revealed a sparse perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and plasma cells but no evidence of yeast or hyphal elements. Melan-A staining did not reveal a decreased number of epidermal melanocytes. All laboratory studies were negative or within normal limits. Desonide ointment 0.05% was prescribed to relieve the patient’s occasional pruritus. Although the patient’s symptoms resolved, the hypopigmented macules continued to progress, making a diagnosis of PMH more likely given the lack of improvement on treatment for tinea versicolor. Pimecrolimus cream 1% was started with discontinuation of desonide for steroid-sparing therapy.

Patient 3
A 63-year-old man presented with progressive nonscaly and asymptomatic hypopigmented macules on the face, trunk, abdomen, and back of 5 years’ duration. He first noted lesions on the abdomen and they subsequently spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash, hyperpigmentation, or other lesions in the involved areas.

One year prior to the current presentation, KOH scrapings from the lesions performed by an outside physician were negative. During his initial visit to our clinic, an abdominal biopsy was performed, and histopathologic analysis showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration; however, the patient denied any prior history of rash or injury in the distribution of the lesions that would correlate with the histopathologic findings of postinflammatory pigmentation. Because the histopathologic findings showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, additional stains including Melan-A were not performed.

The patient was provisionally treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and ketoconazole cream 2% twice daily to the affected areas. After several months on this regimen, the patient did not report any improvement. An abdominal skin biopsy was again performed and revealed similar histopathology. Periodic acid–Schiff staining was negative for fungus. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin lotion.

Patient 4
A 45-year-old woman presented with hypopigmented, nonscaly macules on the face, neck, chest, trunk, and back. She first noted the lesions on the face and trunk more than 8 years prior, and they subsequently progressed. Potassium hydroxide scrapings performed on the lesions at the current presentation were negative, and a skin biopsy from the neck revealed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, although the patient had no history of rash or injury in the areas in which the lesions were distributed.

Fontana-Masson and Melan-A staining of the skin biopsy of the neck revealed a normal distribution of melanocytes and pigment at the dermoepidermal junction. An RPR test was nonreactive. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin phosphate lotion 1%.

Comment

The 4 cases of PMH reported here showed extensive facial involvement in addition to the characteristic hypopigmented lesions on the trunk, arms, and legs. It is unclear why the lesions in these patients had a predominantly facial distribution. Involvement of the face in PMH has not been commonly reported in the literature. Martínez-Martínez et al³ reported 12 PMH patients with lesions only presenting in lumbar and abdominal distributions. Kim et al⁸ presented a series of 23 PMH patients treated with narrowband UVB in whom 56% (9/16) saw repigmentation in 90% of the lesions following treatment. The most commonly affected area was the lower back, followed by the abdomen, upper back, chest, sacral region, flank, and shoulders, respectively.⁸ In a review by Relyveld et al,¹ PMH is described as a predominantly truncal disease that can occasionally extend to the neck, face, and proximal arms and legs; however, no specific cases were reported.

Previous case series have reported PMH primarily in adolescents and young adults, with mean ages ranging from 26 to 30 years.^1,3 The 4 patients reported here were older, ranging in age from 40 to 65 years. This discrepancy in age may contribute to the facial distribution encountered in this patient population; however, given the small number of patients in our case series, such extrapolation is premature. Most recently, Westerhof et al⁶ demonstrated a relationship between the presence of P acnes, a common skin commensal of the face, and the hypopigmented macules of PMH. The investigators suggested that some strains of P acnes produce a factor that is yet to be identified that interferes with melanogenesis. The response of PMH lesions to topical treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, and phototherapy has lent credence to the potential etiologic role of P acnes in this condition.^9,10 The interplay between age, PMH distribution, and P acnes requires further investigation.

The biopsies in our 4 patients were consistent with the nonspecific histopathologic characteristics of PMH lesions. Biopsies in all 4 patients revealed a sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, and in 2 of the cases, postinflammatory pigmentary alteration was noted. Such changes often are described in PMH lesions.^4,5 In other cases detailed in the literature, lesional and nonlesional skin often are indistinguishable on hematoxylin and eosin staining.¹¹ In the 3 patients for whom we performed additional immunohistochemical studies, results were mixed: Melan-A staining revealed a decreased number of melanocytes in Patient 1 but not in Patients 2 or 4. Many reported cases in the literature have not demonstrated a decrease in melanocyte density but instead show a decrease in melanin content in lesional skin.^1-3,6,7 Although additional stains performed in Patient 4 revealed neither a decrease in the number of melanocytes nor a decrease in the melanin content, such histopathologic findings of PMH often are subtle. Additional stains were not performed in Patient 3. More studies are needed to characterize the immunohistochemical staining patterns of lesional skin in patients with PMH.

Tinea versicolor, pityriasis alba, mycosis fungoides, sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis typically are included in the differential diagnosis for PMH. Tinea versicolor traditionally is diagnosed based on the combination of irregular hypopigmented or hyperpigmented scaly macules and a KOH preparation that is positive for hyphae and spores. Similar to PMH, tinea versicolor is most often found on the trunk, but unusual cases have been reported involving the face.¹²

Patient 2 reflected how it can be difficult diagnostically to distinguish between tinea versicolor and PMH. Although this patient initially had a KOH scraping suggestive for tinea versicolor, adequate treatment with oral fluconazole and ketoconazole shampoo did not result in improvement. The hypopigmented lesions in this patient continued to progress despite therapy. Additionally, his hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules were more clinically consistent with the characteristic description of lesion configuration in PMH than with the irregular, more sharply defined, asymmetric, and scaly spots of tinea versicolor. Furthermore, the inflammatory findings on biopsy favored a diagnosis of PMH.

Pityriasis alba, most frequently presents on the face in the form of hypopigmented, sometimes slightly scaly macules but also can occur on the body. It usually occurs in younger patients who often have an atopic diathesis. Histologic findings generally are nonspecific, but discrete eczematous changes can sometimes be appreciated in the epidermis and dermis. None of our patients had histories suggestive of an atopic diathesis or lesion distributions typical of pityriasis alba. Histologic findings also were more consistent with PMH than pityriasis alba.

A diagnosis of patch-stage hypopigmented MF should also be entertained in patients with hypopigmented macules, as it can appear similar to the lesions of PMH. Hypopigmented MF often is associated with subtle atrophy, scaling, poikiloderma, and erythema. These features were not present in the 4 cases presented here. Histologically, atypical lymphocytes with prominent epidermotropism and tagging of the epidermis by large lymphocytic infiltrates are seen in cases of hypopigmented MF. These findings were not present in biopsies from our patients.

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis are other systemic diseases associated with hypopigmented lesions. Histologically, noncaseasting granulomas in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue would favor a diagnosis of sarcoidosis over PMH. In patients who live in endemic areas, a diagnosis of leprosy for an anesthetic hypopigmented lesion would be higher in the differential. Finally, it is important to rule out secondary syphilis when diagnosing PMH. Known as the great imitator, secondary syphilis may present in a patient in the form of hypopigmented macules. Patients 1, 2, and 4 had nonreactive RPR tests; unfortunately, RPR was not checked in Patient 3. He denied all risk factors for syphilis.

Various topical and oral treatments were prescribed for each patient, but so far none have been unequivocally effective. In the literature, there are reports supporting the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents targeting P acnes.^9,10 One case report noted improvement in a patient with PMH after isotretinoin use.¹³ Phototherapy also has been reported to improve PMH in several case reports^4-8; however, consistent response to these therapies has not been documented. Unfortunately for patients with a diagnosis of PMH, a lack of effective treatment options often exists.

This series of 4 cases highlights the importance of considering PMH in the differential of hypopigmented macules, even when they appear predominantly on the face.

Progressive macular hypomelanosis (PMH) is a noninflammatory skin disorder characterized by ill-defined, nummular, hypopigmented, and nonscaly macules. Historically, various names have been used to describe this entity. Several of these terms, including cutis trunci variata and nummular and confluent hypomelanosis of the trunk, reflected its predominantly truncal distribution.^1,2 Less frequently, involvement on the neck, buttocks, and arms and legs has been noted.^1,2 A lack of facial involvement previously has been highlighted as a key clinical feature of PMH.³

Progressive macular hypomelanosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Hypopigmented diseases commonly considered in the differential include those caused by fungi and yeasts (eg, tinea versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis), inflammatory skin disorders (eg, pityriasis alba, postinflammatory dyschromia), and mycosis fungoides (MF) as well as leprosy.

The hypopigmented macules of PMH have nonspecific histopathologic findings; lesional skin often shows minimal alterations as compared to normal skin. A sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate often is observed,^4,5 and at times, a decrease in epidermal melanin content can be detected.^1-3,6,7

We report 4 cases with considerable facial involvement of hypopigmented macules that were determined to be consistent with PMH. We propose that characteristic macules that are not clinically or histopathologically consistent with other disease entities are compatible with a diagnosis of PMH, regardless of the distribution. A diagnosis of PMH should be considered in the differential when there are suggestive facial lesions in addition to truncal lesions.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 40-year-old man presented with hypopigmented macules on the face (Figure 1), trunk, chest, arms, and legs of 2 years’ duration. The lesions were asymptomatic and had started on the forehead as hypopigmented macules, then progressed to the trunk, arms, and legs. The patient denied any prior rash, injury, or hyperpigmentation associated with the distribution of the lesions.

A rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test was conducted to rule out secondary syphilis and was nonreactive. During a series of clinical encounters over several months, a total of 5 biopsies of lesions on the face and back were performed. All specimens contained mild mononuclear perivascular inflammation (Figure 2). In some foci, staining for Melan-A revealed a decrease in epidermal melanocytes (Figure 3). Periodic acid–Schiff staining performed on one section revealed a few pityriasis spores but no hyphal elements, suggesting colonization rather than infection.

The patient initially was started on tacrolimus ointment 0.1% once daily and narrowband UVB phototherapy twice weekly for 3 months without benefit. A diagnosis of tinea versicolor was revisited and the patient was switched to ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing, and ketoconazole cream 2% was applied twice daily to the affected areas for 2 months without notable improvement. Once-weekly 150-mg pulse doses of oral fluconazole for 8 weeks were started but proved equally ineffective. Antibiotic therapy aimed at eradicating Propionibacterium acnes was considered following a provisional diagnosis of PMH after the patient failed 5 months of therapy for tinea versicolor.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented with hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules on the face, trunk, chest, and arms of several months’ duration. The patient initially noted hypopigmentation on the face that gradually spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash or hyperpigmentation in the affected areas. At the initial visit to our clinic, a potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation of the face and back was positive for tinea versicolor. The patient was treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly for several weeks on the scalp, face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and 2 total doses of oral fluconazole 150 mg taken 1 week apart.

Three months later the patient returned with no improvement of the existing lesions and with progression of the disease to previously uninvolved areas of the trunk, arms, and legs. Biopsy of a facial lesion was performed, and laboratory studies including RPR, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and antinuclear antibody tests were conducted to screen for possible systemic disease. Microscopic analysis of the biopsied facial lesion revealed a sparse perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and plasma cells but no evidence of yeast or hyphal elements. Melan-A staining did not reveal a decreased number of epidermal melanocytes. All laboratory studies were negative or within normal limits. Desonide ointment 0.05% was prescribed to relieve the patient’s occasional pruritus. Although the patient’s symptoms resolved, the hypopigmented macules continued to progress, making a diagnosis of PMH more likely given the lack of improvement on treatment for tinea versicolor. Pimecrolimus cream 1% was started with discontinuation of desonide for steroid-sparing therapy.

Patient 3
A 63-year-old man presented with progressive nonscaly and asymptomatic hypopigmented macules on the face, trunk, abdomen, and back of 5 years’ duration. He first noted lesions on the abdomen and they subsequently spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash, hyperpigmentation, or other lesions in the involved areas.

One year prior to the current presentation, KOH scrapings from the lesions performed by an outside physician were negative. During his initial visit to our clinic, an abdominal biopsy was performed, and histopathologic analysis showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration; however, the patient denied any prior history of rash or injury in the distribution of the lesions that would correlate with the histopathologic findings of postinflammatory pigmentation. Because the histopathologic findings showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, additional stains including Melan-A were not performed.

The patient was provisionally treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and ketoconazole cream 2% twice daily to the affected areas. After several months on this regimen, the patient did not report any improvement. An abdominal skin biopsy was again performed and revealed similar histopathology. Periodic acid–Schiff staining was negative for fungus. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin lotion.

Patient 4
A 45-year-old woman presented with hypopigmented, nonscaly macules on the face, neck, chest, trunk, and back. She first noted the lesions on the face and trunk more than 8 years prior, and they subsequently progressed. Potassium hydroxide scrapings performed on the lesions at the current presentation were negative, and a skin biopsy from the neck revealed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, although the patient had no history of rash or injury in the areas in which the lesions were distributed.

Fontana-Masson and Melan-A staining of the skin biopsy of the neck revealed a normal distribution of melanocytes and pigment at the dermoepidermal junction. An RPR test was nonreactive. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin phosphate lotion 1%.

Comment

The 4 cases of PMH reported here showed extensive facial involvement in addition to the characteristic hypopigmented lesions on the trunk, arms, and legs. It is unclear why the lesions in these patients had a predominantly facial distribution. Involvement of the face in PMH has not been commonly reported in the literature. Martínez-Martínez et al³ reported 12 PMH patients with lesions only presenting in lumbar and abdominal distributions. Kim et al⁸ presented a series of 23 PMH patients treated with narrowband UVB in whom 56% (9/16) saw repigmentation in 90% of the lesions following treatment. The most commonly affected area was the lower back, followed by the abdomen, upper back, chest, sacral region, flank, and shoulders, respectively.⁸ In a review by Relyveld et al,¹ PMH is described as a predominantly truncal disease that can occasionally extend to the neck, face, and proximal arms and legs; however, no specific cases were reported.

Previous case series have reported PMH primarily in adolescents and young adults, with mean ages ranging from 26 to 30 years.^1,3 The 4 patients reported here were older, ranging in age from 40 to 65 years. This discrepancy in age may contribute to the facial distribution encountered in this patient population; however, given the small number of patients in our case series, such extrapolation is premature. Most recently, Westerhof et al⁶ demonstrated a relationship between the presence of P acnes, a common skin commensal of the face, and the hypopigmented macules of PMH. The investigators suggested that some strains of P acnes produce a factor that is yet to be identified that interferes with melanogenesis. The response of PMH lesions to topical treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, and phototherapy has lent credence to the potential etiologic role of P acnes in this condition.^9,10 The interplay between age, PMH distribution, and P acnes requires further investigation.

The biopsies in our 4 patients were consistent with the nonspecific histopathologic characteristics of PMH lesions. Biopsies in all 4 patients revealed a sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, and in 2 of the cases, postinflammatory pigmentary alteration was noted. Such changes often are described in PMH lesions.^4,5 In other cases detailed in the literature, lesional and nonlesional skin often are indistinguishable on hematoxylin and eosin staining.¹¹ In the 3 patients for whom we performed additional immunohistochemical studies, results were mixed: Melan-A staining revealed a decreased number of melanocytes in Patient 1 but not in Patients 2 or 4. Many reported cases in the literature have not demonstrated a decrease in melanocyte density but instead show a decrease in melanin content in lesional skin.^1-3,6,7 Although additional stains performed in Patient 4 revealed neither a decrease in the number of melanocytes nor a decrease in the melanin content, such histopathologic findings of PMH often are subtle. Additional stains were not performed in Patient 3. More studies are needed to characterize the immunohistochemical staining patterns of lesional skin in patients with PMH.

Tinea versicolor, pityriasis alba, mycosis fungoides, sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis typically are included in the differential diagnosis for PMH. Tinea versicolor traditionally is diagnosed based on the combination of irregular hypopigmented or hyperpigmented scaly macules and a KOH preparation that is positive for hyphae and spores. Similar to PMH, tinea versicolor is most often found on the trunk, but unusual cases have been reported involving the face.¹²

Patient 2 reflected how it can be difficult diagnostically to distinguish between tinea versicolor and PMH. Although this patient initially had a KOH scraping suggestive for tinea versicolor, adequate treatment with oral fluconazole and ketoconazole shampoo did not result in improvement. The hypopigmented lesions in this patient continued to progress despite therapy. Additionally, his hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules were more clinically consistent with the characteristic description of lesion configuration in PMH than with the irregular, more sharply defined, asymmetric, and scaly spots of tinea versicolor. Furthermore, the inflammatory findings on biopsy favored a diagnosis of PMH.

Pityriasis alba, most frequently presents on the face in the form of hypopigmented, sometimes slightly scaly macules but also can occur on the body. It usually occurs in younger patients who often have an atopic diathesis. Histologic findings generally are nonspecific, but discrete eczematous changes can sometimes be appreciated in the epidermis and dermis. None of our patients had histories suggestive of an atopic diathesis or lesion distributions typical of pityriasis alba. Histologic findings also were more consistent with PMH than pityriasis alba.

A diagnosis of patch-stage hypopigmented MF should also be entertained in patients with hypopigmented macules, as it can appear similar to the lesions of PMH. Hypopigmented MF often is associated with subtle atrophy, scaling, poikiloderma, and erythema. These features were not present in the 4 cases presented here. Histologically, atypical lymphocytes with prominent epidermotropism and tagging of the epidermis by large lymphocytic infiltrates are seen in cases of hypopigmented MF. These findings were not present in biopsies from our patients.

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis are other systemic diseases associated with hypopigmented lesions. Histologically, noncaseasting granulomas in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue would favor a diagnosis of sarcoidosis over PMH. In patients who live in endemic areas, a diagnosis of leprosy for an anesthetic hypopigmented lesion would be higher in the differential. Finally, it is important to rule out secondary syphilis when diagnosing PMH. Known as the great imitator, secondary syphilis may present in a patient in the form of hypopigmented macules. Patients 1, 2, and 4 had nonreactive RPR tests; unfortunately, RPR was not checked in Patient 3. He denied all risk factors for syphilis.

Various topical and oral treatments were prescribed for each patient, but so far none have been unequivocally effective. In the literature, there are reports supporting the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents targeting P acnes.^9,10 One case report noted improvement in a patient with PMH after isotretinoin use.¹³ Phototherapy also has been reported to improve PMH in several case reports^4-8; however, consistent response to these therapies has not been documented. Unfortunately for patients with a diagnosis of PMH, a lack of effective treatment options often exists.

This series of 4 cases highlights the importance of considering PMH in the differential of hypopigmented macules, even when they appear predominantly on the face.

Progressive macular hypomelanosis (PMH) is a noninflammatory skin disorder characterized by ill-defined, nummular, hypopigmented, and nonscaly macules. Historically, various names have been used to describe this entity. Several of these terms, including cutis trunci variata and nummular and confluent hypomelanosis of the trunk, reflected its predominantly truncal distribution.^1,2 Less frequently, involvement on the neck, buttocks, and arms and legs has been noted.^1,2 A lack of facial involvement previously has been highlighted as a key clinical feature of PMH.³

Progressive macular hypomelanosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Hypopigmented diseases commonly considered in the differential include those caused by fungi and yeasts (eg, tinea versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis), inflammatory skin disorders (eg, pityriasis alba, postinflammatory dyschromia), and mycosis fungoides (MF) as well as leprosy.

The hypopigmented macules of PMH have nonspecific histopathologic findings; lesional skin often shows minimal alterations as compared to normal skin. A sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate often is observed,^4,5 and at times, a decrease in epidermal melanin content can be detected.^1-3,6,7

We report 4 cases with considerable facial involvement of hypopigmented macules that were determined to be consistent with PMH. We propose that characteristic macules that are not clinically or histopathologically consistent with other disease entities are compatible with a diagnosis of PMH, regardless of the distribution. A diagnosis of PMH should be considered in the differential when there are suggestive facial lesions in addition to truncal lesions.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 40-year-old man presented with hypopigmented macules on the face (Figure 1), trunk, chest, arms, and legs of 2 years’ duration. The lesions were asymptomatic and had started on the forehead as hypopigmented macules, then progressed to the trunk, arms, and legs. The patient denied any prior rash, injury, or hyperpigmentation associated with the distribution of the lesions.

A rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test was conducted to rule out secondary syphilis and was nonreactive. During a series of clinical encounters over several months, a total of 5 biopsies of lesions on the face and back were performed. All specimens contained mild mononuclear perivascular inflammation (Figure 2). In some foci, staining for Melan-A revealed a decrease in epidermal melanocytes (Figure 3). Periodic acid–Schiff staining performed on one section revealed a few pityriasis spores but no hyphal elements, suggesting colonization rather than infection.

The patient initially was started on tacrolimus ointment 0.1% once daily and narrowband UVB phototherapy twice weekly for 3 months without benefit. A diagnosis of tinea versicolor was revisited and the patient was switched to ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing, and ketoconazole cream 2% was applied twice daily to the affected areas for 2 months without notable improvement. Once-weekly 150-mg pulse doses of oral fluconazole for 8 weeks were started but proved equally ineffective. Antibiotic therapy aimed at eradicating Propionibacterium acnes was considered following a provisional diagnosis of PMH after the patient failed 5 months of therapy for tinea versicolor.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man presented with hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules on the face, trunk, chest, and arms of several months’ duration. The patient initially noted hypopigmentation on the face that gradually spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash or hyperpigmentation in the affected areas. At the initial visit to our clinic, a potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation of the face and back was positive for tinea versicolor. The patient was treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly for several weeks on the scalp, face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and 2 total doses of oral fluconazole 150 mg taken 1 week apart.

Three months later the patient returned with no improvement of the existing lesions and with progression of the disease to previously uninvolved areas of the trunk, arms, and legs. Biopsy of a facial lesion was performed, and laboratory studies including RPR, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and antinuclear antibody tests were conducted to screen for possible systemic disease. Microscopic analysis of the biopsied facial lesion revealed a sparse perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and plasma cells but no evidence of yeast or hyphal elements. Melan-A staining did not reveal a decreased number of epidermal melanocytes. All laboratory studies were negative or within normal limits. Desonide ointment 0.05% was prescribed to relieve the patient’s occasional pruritus. Although the patient’s symptoms resolved, the hypopigmented macules continued to progress, making a diagnosis of PMH more likely given the lack of improvement on treatment for tinea versicolor. Pimecrolimus cream 1% was started with discontinuation of desonide for steroid-sparing therapy.

Patient 3
A 63-year-old man presented with progressive nonscaly and asymptomatic hypopigmented macules on the face, trunk, abdomen, and back of 5 years’ duration. He first noted lesions on the abdomen and they subsequently spread to the rest of the body. The patient denied any prior rash, hyperpigmentation, or other lesions in the involved areas.

One year prior to the current presentation, KOH scrapings from the lesions performed by an outside physician were negative. During his initial visit to our clinic, an abdominal biopsy was performed, and histopathologic analysis showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration; however, the patient denied any prior history of rash or injury in the distribution of the lesions that would correlate with the histopathologic findings of postinflammatory pigmentation. Because the histopathologic findings showed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, additional stains including Melan-A were not performed.

The patient was provisionally treated with ketoconazole shampoo 1% two to 3 times weekly on the face, trunk, arms, and legs for 10 to 15 minutes prior to rinsing and ketoconazole cream 2% twice daily to the affected areas. After several months on this regimen, the patient did not report any improvement. An abdominal skin biopsy was again performed and revealed similar histopathology. Periodic acid–Schiff staining was negative for fungus. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin lotion.

Patient 4
A 45-year-old woman presented with hypopigmented, nonscaly macules on the face, neck, chest, trunk, and back. She first noted the lesions on the face and trunk more than 8 years prior, and they subsequently progressed. Potassium hydroxide scrapings performed on the lesions at the current presentation were negative, and a skin biopsy from the neck revealed postinflammatory pigmentary alteration, although the patient had no history of rash or injury in the areas in which the lesions were distributed.

Fontana-Masson and Melan-A staining of the skin biopsy of the neck revealed a normal distribution of melanocytes and pigment at the dermoepidermal junction. An RPR test was nonreactive. A diagnosis of PMH was made, and the patient was started on benzoyl peroxide wash 5% and clindamycin phosphate lotion 1%.

Comment

The 4 cases of PMH reported here showed extensive facial involvement in addition to the characteristic hypopigmented lesions on the trunk, arms, and legs. It is unclear why the lesions in these patients had a predominantly facial distribution. Involvement of the face in PMH has not been commonly reported in the literature. Martínez-Martínez et al³ reported 12 PMH patients with lesions only presenting in lumbar and abdominal distributions. Kim et al⁸ presented a series of 23 PMH patients treated with narrowband UVB in whom 56% (9/16) saw repigmentation in 90% of the lesions following treatment. The most commonly affected area was the lower back, followed by the abdomen, upper back, chest, sacral region, flank, and shoulders, respectively.⁸ In a review by Relyveld et al,¹ PMH is described as a predominantly truncal disease that can occasionally extend to the neck, face, and proximal arms and legs; however, no specific cases were reported.

Previous case series have reported PMH primarily in adolescents and young adults, with mean ages ranging from 26 to 30 years.^1,3 The 4 patients reported here were older, ranging in age from 40 to 65 years. This discrepancy in age may contribute to the facial distribution encountered in this patient population; however, given the small number of patients in our case series, such extrapolation is premature. Most recently, Westerhof et al⁶ demonstrated a relationship between the presence of P acnes, a common skin commensal of the face, and the hypopigmented macules of PMH. The investigators suggested that some strains of P acnes produce a factor that is yet to be identified that interferes with melanogenesis. The response of PMH lesions to topical treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, and phototherapy has lent credence to the potential etiologic role of P acnes in this condition.^9,10 The interplay between age, PMH distribution, and P acnes requires further investigation.

The biopsies in our 4 patients were consistent with the nonspecific histopathologic characteristics of PMH lesions. Biopsies in all 4 patients revealed a sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, and in 2 of the cases, postinflammatory pigmentary alteration was noted. Such changes often are described in PMH lesions.^4,5 In other cases detailed in the literature, lesional and nonlesional skin often are indistinguishable on hematoxylin and eosin staining.¹¹ In the 3 patients for whom we performed additional immunohistochemical studies, results were mixed: Melan-A staining revealed a decreased number of melanocytes in Patient 1 but not in Patients 2 or 4. Many reported cases in the literature have not demonstrated a decrease in melanocyte density but instead show a decrease in melanin content in lesional skin.^1-3,6,7 Although additional stains performed in Patient 4 revealed neither a decrease in the number of melanocytes nor a decrease in the melanin content, such histopathologic findings of PMH often are subtle. Additional stains were not performed in Patient 3. More studies are needed to characterize the immunohistochemical staining patterns of lesional skin in patients with PMH.

Tinea versicolor, pityriasis alba, mycosis fungoides, sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis typically are included in the differential diagnosis for PMH. Tinea versicolor traditionally is diagnosed based on the combination of irregular hypopigmented or hyperpigmented scaly macules and a KOH preparation that is positive for hyphae and spores. Similar to PMH, tinea versicolor is most often found on the trunk, but unusual cases have been reported involving the face.¹²

Patient 2 reflected how it can be difficult diagnostically to distinguish between tinea versicolor and PMH. Although this patient initially had a KOH scraping suggestive for tinea versicolor, adequate treatment with oral fluconazole and ketoconazole shampoo did not result in improvement. The hypopigmented lesions in this patient continued to progress despite therapy. Additionally, his hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules were more clinically consistent with the characteristic description of lesion configuration in PMH than with the irregular, more sharply defined, asymmetric, and scaly spots of tinea versicolor. Furthermore, the inflammatory findings on biopsy favored a diagnosis of PMH.

Pityriasis alba, most frequently presents on the face in the form of hypopigmented, sometimes slightly scaly macules but also can occur on the body. It usually occurs in younger patients who often have an atopic diathesis. Histologic findings generally are nonspecific, but discrete eczematous changes can sometimes be appreciated in the epidermis and dermis. None of our patients had histories suggestive of an atopic diathesis or lesion distributions typical of pityriasis alba. Histologic findings also were more consistent with PMH than pityriasis alba.

A diagnosis of patch-stage hypopigmented MF should also be entertained in patients with hypopigmented macules, as it can appear similar to the lesions of PMH. Hypopigmented MF often is associated with subtle atrophy, scaling, poikiloderma, and erythema. These features were not present in the 4 cases presented here. Histologically, atypical lymphocytes with prominent epidermotropism and tagging of the epidermis by large lymphocytic infiltrates are seen in cases of hypopigmented MF. These findings were not present in biopsies from our patients.

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis are other systemic diseases associated with hypopigmented lesions. Histologically, noncaseasting granulomas in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue would favor a diagnosis of sarcoidosis over PMH. In patients who live in endemic areas, a diagnosis of leprosy for an anesthetic hypopigmented lesion would be higher in the differential. Finally, it is important to rule out secondary syphilis when diagnosing PMH. Known as the great imitator, secondary syphilis may present in a patient in the form of hypopigmented macules. Patients 1, 2, and 4 had nonreactive RPR tests; unfortunately, RPR was not checked in Patient 3. He denied all risk factors for syphilis.

Various topical and oral treatments were prescribed for each patient, but so far none have been unequivocally effective. In the literature, there are reports supporting the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents targeting P acnes.^9,10 One case report noted improvement in a patient with PMH after isotretinoin use.¹³ Phototherapy also has been reported to improve PMH in several case reports^4-8; however, consistent response to these therapies has not been documented. Unfortunately for patients with a diagnosis of PMH, a lack of effective treatment options often exists.

This series of 4 cases highlights the importance of considering PMH in the differential of hypopigmented macules, even when they appear predominantly on the face.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man was admitted to the general medicine service at our institution for treatment of a diffuse macular eruption and hemorrhagic bullae 12 days after undergoing left-knee revision arthroplasty during which a cement spacer impregnated with vancomycin and tobramycin was placed. At the time of the surgery, the patient also received intravenous (IV) vancomycin and oral ciprofloxacin, which were continued postoperatively until his hospital presentation. The patient was recovering well until postoperative day 7, when he developed painful swelling and erythema surrounding the surgical wound on the left knee. Concerned that his symptoms indicated a flare of gout, he restarted a former allopurinol prescription from an outside physician after 2 years of nonuse. The skin changes progressed distally on the left leg over the next 48 hours. By postoperative day 10, he had developed serosanguinous blisters on the left knee (Figure 1A) and oral mucosa (Figure 1B), as well as erythematous nodules on the bilateral palms. He presented to our institution for emergent care on postoperative day 12 following progression of the eruption to the inguinal region (Figure 2A), buttocks (Figure 2B), and abdominal region.

Due to concerns about a potential drug reaction, the IV vancomycin, oral ciprofloxacin, and oral allopurinol were discontinued on hospital admission. A dermatology consultation (D.A.D., J.A.Z., E.T.) was obtained, and a punch biopsy from a lesion on the left thigh revealed a neutrophil-rich subepidermal bulla with scattered eosinophils (Figure 3A). Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated linear IgA (Figure 3B) and C3 deposition along the dermoepidermal junction, which confirmed a diagnosis of drug-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Vancomycin was suspected as the causative agent.¹ An initial vancomycin trough level drawn 48 hours after discontinuation (postoperative day 13) was still therapeutic at 14 µg/mL (reference range, 10–20 µg/mL in adults). This was substantially higher than the predicted value of 3 µg/mL based on renal excretion. Similarly, 5 additional serum levels obtained during the patient’s hospital course were greater than those predicted, and follow-up trough levels remained detectable at 1 µg/mL 2 weeks after discontinuation.

Oral prednisone 60 mg once daily and oral dapsone 25 mg once daily were initiated on hospital days 4 and 6 (postoperative days 15 and 17), respectively. A 6-week course of oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg twice daily and daptomycin 8 mg/kg once daily was initiated for bacterial coverage on hospital day 5 (postoperative day 16). Topical triamcinolone and an anesthetic mouthwash also were used to treat the mucosal involvement. The lesions stabilized on the third day of steroid therapy, and the patient was discharged 7 days after hospital admission (postoperative day 18). Dapsone was rapidly increased to 100 mg once daily over the next week for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. An increase in prednisone to 80 mg once daily was required 3 days after the patient was discharged due to worsening oral lesions. Five days after discharge, the patient was readmitted to the hospital for 3 days due to acute kidney injury (AKI) in which his baseline creatinine level tripled. The cause of renal impairment was unknown, resulting in empiric discontinuation of dapsone on postoperative day 27. Prophylaxis for P jirovecii pneumonia was replaced with once-monthly inhaled pentamidine. Prednisone was tapered 20 days after the original presentation (postoperative day 32) following gradual improvement of both the skin and oral lesions. At dermatology follow-up 2 weeks later, doxycycline 100 mg twice daily was added for residual inflammation of the left leg. A deep vein thrombosis was discovered in the left leg 10 days later, and 3 months of anticoagulation therapy was initiated with discontinuation of the doxycycline. The patient continued to have renal insufficiency several weeks after dapsone discontinuation and developed prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with bilateral thenar atrophy. He did not experience any skin eruptions or relapses in the weeks following prednisone cessation and underwent successful removal of the cement spacer with full left-knee reconstruction 4 months after his initial presentation to our institution. At 9-month dermatology follow-up, the LABD remained in remission.

Comment

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis is a well-documented autoimmune mucocutaneous disorder characterized by linear IgA deposits at the dermoepidermal junction. The development of autoantibodies to antigens within the basement membrane zone leads to both cellular and humoral immune responses that facilitate the subepidermal blistering rash in LABD.^2,3 Linear IgA bullous dermatosis affects all ages and races with a bimodal epidemiology. The adult form typically appears after 60 years of age, whereas the childhood form (chronic bullous disease of childhood) appears between 6 months and 6 years of age.³ Medications—particularly vancomycin—are responsible for a substantial portion of cases.^1-4 In one review, vancomycin was implicated in almost half (22/52 [42.3%]) of drug-related cases of LABD.⁴ Other associated medications include captopril, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, phenytoin, and diclo-fenac.^3,4 Vancomycin-associated LABD has a substantially shorter time to onset of symptoms, with a mean of 8.6 days compared to 63.8 days for other causative agents.⁴Resolution of symptoms also occurs more quickly, with remission occurring in 66.7% (16/24) of cases at a mean time of 13 days compared to a 39.2% (11/28) resolution rate with a mean time of 18.9 days following discontinuation of other implicated medications.⁴ While idiopathic LABD involves the mucous membranes in up to 80% of cases, drug-induced LABD is less commonly associated with mucosal lesions. In an earlier systematic review from 1966 to 2002, 32% (7/22) of reported cases of vancomycin-induced LABD were reported to have mucosal involvement.^5,6 In 2012, one group found that most published cases of drug-induced LABD do not use standardized algorithms, such as the Naranjo algorithm, to definitively tie LABD onset to medication use.⁴ The Naranjo algorithm, devised in 1981, consists of 10 questions that determine the probability of adverse drug reactions.⁷ In our case, a Naranjo score of 5 suggested a probable adverse drug reaction due to vancomycin use; however, we cannot completely exclude ciprofloxacin in our case in light of a case report of LABD in the setting of IV vancomycin and ciprofloxacin use.⁸ In our patient, ciprofloxacin had a Naranjo score of 2, which suggested a possible adverse drug reaction. Allopurinol, which does not have any published association with LABD, also had a Naranjo score of 2 in our patient.

The initial treatment of drug-induced LABD is immediate discontinuation of the suspected agent(s) and supportive care.⁹ Although future avoidance of vancomycin is recommended in patients with a history of LABD, there are reported cases of successful rechallenges.^4,10 The early removal of our patient’s cement spacer was discouraged by both the orthopedics and infectious disease consultation services due to potential complications as well as the patient’s gradual improvement during his hospital course.

Dapsone is considered the standard systemic treatment for LABD. Sulfapyridine is an alternative to dapsone, or a combination of these 2 drugs may be used. Corticosteroids can be added to each of these regimens to achieve remission, as in our case.² Although dapsone was discontinued in the setting of the patient’s AKI, the vancomycin in the dual-eluting spacer was more likely the culprit. A review of 544 postoperative outcomes following the use of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (AICS) during 2-stage arthroplasty displayed an 8- to 10-fold increase in the development of AKIs compared to the rate of AKIs following primary joint arthroplasty.¹⁰ While our patient’s AKI was not attributed to dapsone, his prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with resultant bilateral thenar atrophy was a rare complication of dapsone use. While dapsone-associated neuropathy has been reported in daily dosages of as low as 75 mg, it typically is seen in doses of at least 300 mg per day and in larger cumulative dosages.¹¹

Despite having a well-characterized vancomycin-induced LABD in the setting of known vancomycin exposure, our patient’s case was particularly challenging given the continued presence of the vancomycin-impregnated cement spacer (VICS) in the left knee, resulting in vancomycin levels at admission and during subsequent measurements over 2 weeks that were all several-fold higher than the renal clearance predicted.

Vancomycin-associated LABD does not appear to be dose dependent and has been reported at both subtherapeutic^1-3 and supratherapeutic levels,^5-9 whereas toxicity reactions are more common at supratherapeutic levels.⁹ The literature on AICS use suggests that drug elution occurs at relatively unpredictable rates based on a variety of factors, including the type of cement used and the initial antibiotic concentration.^12,13 Furthermore, the addition of tobramycin to VICSs has been found to increase the rate of vancomycin delivery through a phenomenon known as passive opportunism.¹⁴

As AICS devices allow for the delivery of higher concentrations of antibiotics to a localized area, systemic complications are considered rare but have been reported.¹³ Our report describes a rare case of LABD in the setting of a VICS. One clinical aspect of our case that supports the implication of VICS as the cause of the patient’s LABD is the concentration of bullae overlying the incision site on the left knee. A case of a desquamating rash in a patient with an implanted VICS has been documented in which the early lesions were localized to the surgical leg, as in our case.¹⁵ Unlike our case, there was a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome following previous vancomycin exposure. A case of a gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer causing allergic dermatitis that was most prominent in the surgical leg also has been reported.¹⁶ An isomorphic phenomenon (Köbner phenomenon) has been suggested in the setting of vancomycin-induced LABD lesions that intensified at a site of adhesive tape application,¹⁷ but the Köbner phenomenon did not appear to be a major factor in our patient. The removal of the patient’s cement spacer was performed to prevent development of a chronic autoimmune response or autoreactivity state against the skin basement membrane zone structural antigen.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man was admitted to the general medicine service at our institution for treatment of a diffuse macular eruption and hemorrhagic bullae 12 days after undergoing left-knee revision arthroplasty during which a cement spacer impregnated with vancomycin and tobramycin was placed. At the time of the surgery, the patient also received intravenous (IV) vancomycin and oral ciprofloxacin, which were continued postoperatively until his hospital presentation. The patient was recovering well until postoperative day 7, when he developed painful swelling and erythema surrounding the surgical wound on the left knee. Concerned that his symptoms indicated a flare of gout, he restarted a former allopurinol prescription from an outside physician after 2 years of nonuse. The skin changes progressed distally on the left leg over the next 48 hours. By postoperative day 10, he had developed serosanguinous blisters on the left knee (Figure 1A) and oral mucosa (Figure 1B), as well as erythematous nodules on the bilateral palms. He presented to our institution for emergent care on postoperative day 12 following progression of the eruption to the inguinal region (Figure 2A), buttocks (Figure 2B), and abdominal region.

Due to concerns about a potential drug reaction, the IV vancomycin, oral ciprofloxacin, and oral allopurinol were discontinued on hospital admission. A dermatology consultation (D.A.D., J.A.Z., E.T.) was obtained, and a punch biopsy from a lesion on the left thigh revealed a neutrophil-rich subepidermal bulla with scattered eosinophils (Figure 3A). Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated linear IgA (Figure 3B) and C3 deposition along the dermoepidermal junction, which confirmed a diagnosis of drug-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Vancomycin was suspected as the causative agent.¹ An initial vancomycin trough level drawn 48 hours after discontinuation (postoperative day 13) was still therapeutic at 14 µg/mL (reference range, 10–20 µg/mL in adults). This was substantially higher than the predicted value of 3 µg/mL based on renal excretion. Similarly, 5 additional serum levels obtained during the patient’s hospital course were greater than those predicted, and follow-up trough levels remained detectable at 1 µg/mL 2 weeks after discontinuation.

Oral prednisone 60 mg once daily and oral dapsone 25 mg once daily were initiated on hospital days 4 and 6 (postoperative days 15 and 17), respectively. A 6-week course of oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg twice daily and daptomycin 8 mg/kg once daily was initiated for bacterial coverage on hospital day 5 (postoperative day 16). Topical triamcinolone and an anesthetic mouthwash also were used to treat the mucosal involvement. The lesions stabilized on the third day of steroid therapy, and the patient was discharged 7 days after hospital admission (postoperative day 18). Dapsone was rapidly increased to 100 mg once daily over the next week for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. An increase in prednisone to 80 mg once daily was required 3 days after the patient was discharged due to worsening oral lesions. Five days after discharge, the patient was readmitted to the hospital for 3 days due to acute kidney injury (AKI) in which his baseline creatinine level tripled. The cause of renal impairment was unknown, resulting in empiric discontinuation of dapsone on postoperative day 27. Prophylaxis for P jirovecii pneumonia was replaced with once-monthly inhaled pentamidine. Prednisone was tapered 20 days after the original presentation (postoperative day 32) following gradual improvement of both the skin and oral lesions. At dermatology follow-up 2 weeks later, doxycycline 100 mg twice daily was added for residual inflammation of the left leg. A deep vein thrombosis was discovered in the left leg 10 days later, and 3 months of anticoagulation therapy was initiated with discontinuation of the doxycycline. The patient continued to have renal insufficiency several weeks after dapsone discontinuation and developed prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with bilateral thenar atrophy. He did not experience any skin eruptions or relapses in the weeks following prednisone cessation and underwent successful removal of the cement spacer with full left-knee reconstruction 4 months after his initial presentation to our institution. At 9-month dermatology follow-up, the LABD remained in remission.

Comment

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis is a well-documented autoimmune mucocutaneous disorder characterized by linear IgA deposits at the dermoepidermal junction. The development of autoantibodies to antigens within the basement membrane zone leads to both cellular and humoral immune responses that facilitate the subepidermal blistering rash in LABD.^2,3 Linear IgA bullous dermatosis affects all ages and races with a bimodal epidemiology. The adult form typically appears after 60 years of age, whereas the childhood form (chronic bullous disease of childhood) appears between 6 months and 6 years of age.³ Medications—particularly vancomycin—are responsible for a substantial portion of cases.^1-4 In one review, vancomycin was implicated in almost half (22/52 [42.3%]) of drug-related cases of LABD.⁴ Other associated medications include captopril, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, phenytoin, and diclo-fenac.^3,4 Vancomycin-associated LABD has a substantially shorter time to onset of symptoms, with a mean of 8.6 days compared to 63.8 days for other causative agents.⁴Resolution of symptoms also occurs more quickly, with remission occurring in 66.7% (16/24) of cases at a mean time of 13 days compared to a 39.2% (11/28) resolution rate with a mean time of 18.9 days following discontinuation of other implicated medications.⁴ While idiopathic LABD involves the mucous membranes in up to 80% of cases, drug-induced LABD is less commonly associated with mucosal lesions. In an earlier systematic review from 1966 to 2002, 32% (7/22) of reported cases of vancomycin-induced LABD were reported to have mucosal involvement.^5,6 In 2012, one group found that most published cases of drug-induced LABD do not use standardized algorithms, such as the Naranjo algorithm, to definitively tie LABD onset to medication use.⁴ The Naranjo algorithm, devised in 1981, consists of 10 questions that determine the probability of adverse drug reactions.⁷ In our case, a Naranjo score of 5 suggested a probable adverse drug reaction due to vancomycin use; however, we cannot completely exclude ciprofloxacin in our case in light of a case report of LABD in the setting of IV vancomycin and ciprofloxacin use.⁸ In our patient, ciprofloxacin had a Naranjo score of 2, which suggested a possible adverse drug reaction. Allopurinol, which does not have any published association with LABD, also had a Naranjo score of 2 in our patient.

The initial treatment of drug-induced LABD is immediate discontinuation of the suspected agent(s) and supportive care.⁹ Although future avoidance of vancomycin is recommended in patients with a history of LABD, there are reported cases of successful rechallenges.^4,10 The early removal of our patient’s cement spacer was discouraged by both the orthopedics and infectious disease consultation services due to potential complications as well as the patient’s gradual improvement during his hospital course.

Dapsone is considered the standard systemic treatment for LABD. Sulfapyridine is an alternative to dapsone, or a combination of these 2 drugs may be used. Corticosteroids can be added to each of these regimens to achieve remission, as in our case.² Although dapsone was discontinued in the setting of the patient’s AKI, the vancomycin in the dual-eluting spacer was more likely the culprit. A review of 544 postoperative outcomes following the use of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (AICS) during 2-stage arthroplasty displayed an 8- to 10-fold increase in the development of AKIs compared to the rate of AKIs following primary joint arthroplasty.¹⁰ While our patient’s AKI was not attributed to dapsone, his prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with resultant bilateral thenar atrophy was a rare complication of dapsone use. While dapsone-associated neuropathy has been reported in daily dosages of as low as 75 mg, it typically is seen in doses of at least 300 mg per day and in larger cumulative dosages.¹¹

Despite having a well-characterized vancomycin-induced LABD in the setting of known vancomycin exposure, our patient’s case was particularly challenging given the continued presence of the vancomycin-impregnated cement spacer (VICS) in the left knee, resulting in vancomycin levels at admission and during subsequent measurements over 2 weeks that were all several-fold higher than the renal clearance predicted.

Vancomycin-associated LABD does not appear to be dose dependent and has been reported at both subtherapeutic^1-3 and supratherapeutic levels,^5-9 whereas toxicity reactions are more common at supratherapeutic levels.⁹ The literature on AICS use suggests that drug elution occurs at relatively unpredictable rates based on a variety of factors, including the type of cement used and the initial antibiotic concentration.^12,13 Furthermore, the addition of tobramycin to VICSs has been found to increase the rate of vancomycin delivery through a phenomenon known as passive opportunism.¹⁴

As AICS devices allow for the delivery of higher concentrations of antibiotics to a localized area, systemic complications are considered rare but have been reported.¹³ Our report describes a rare case of LABD in the setting of a VICS. One clinical aspect of our case that supports the implication of VICS as the cause of the patient’s LABD is the concentration of bullae overlying the incision site on the left knee. A case of a desquamating rash in a patient with an implanted VICS has been documented in which the early lesions were localized to the surgical leg, as in our case.¹⁵ Unlike our case, there was a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome following previous vancomycin exposure. A case of a gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer causing allergic dermatitis that was most prominent in the surgical leg also has been reported.¹⁶ An isomorphic phenomenon (Köbner phenomenon) has been suggested in the setting of vancomycin-induced LABD lesions that intensified at a site of adhesive tape application,¹⁷ but the Köbner phenomenon did not appear to be a major factor in our patient. The removal of the patient’s cement spacer was performed to prevent development of a chronic autoimmune response or autoreactivity state against the skin basement membrane zone structural antigen.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man was admitted to the general medicine service at our institution for treatment of a diffuse macular eruption and hemorrhagic bullae 12 days after undergoing left-knee revision arthroplasty during which a cement spacer impregnated with vancomycin and tobramycin was placed. At the time of the surgery, the patient also received intravenous (IV) vancomycin and oral ciprofloxacin, which were continued postoperatively until his hospital presentation. The patient was recovering well until postoperative day 7, when he developed painful swelling and erythema surrounding the surgical wound on the left knee. Concerned that his symptoms indicated a flare of gout, he restarted a former allopurinol prescription from an outside physician after 2 years of nonuse. The skin changes progressed distally on the left leg over the next 48 hours. By postoperative day 10, he had developed serosanguinous blisters on the left knee (Figure 1A) and oral mucosa (Figure 1B), as well as erythematous nodules on the bilateral palms. He presented to our institution for emergent care on postoperative day 12 following progression of the eruption to the inguinal region (Figure 2A), buttocks (Figure 2B), and abdominal region.

Due to concerns about a potential drug reaction, the IV vancomycin, oral ciprofloxacin, and oral allopurinol were discontinued on hospital admission. A dermatology consultation (D.A.D., J.A.Z., E.T.) was obtained, and a punch biopsy from a lesion on the left thigh revealed a neutrophil-rich subepidermal bulla with scattered eosinophils (Figure 3A). Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated linear IgA (Figure 3B) and C3 deposition along the dermoepidermal junction, which confirmed a diagnosis of drug-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Vancomycin was suspected as the causative agent.¹ An initial vancomycin trough level drawn 48 hours after discontinuation (postoperative day 13) was still therapeutic at 14 µg/mL (reference range, 10–20 µg/mL in adults). This was substantially higher than the predicted value of 3 µg/mL based on renal excretion. Similarly, 5 additional serum levels obtained during the patient’s hospital course were greater than those predicted, and follow-up trough levels remained detectable at 1 µg/mL 2 weeks after discontinuation.

Oral prednisone 60 mg once daily and oral dapsone 25 mg once daily were initiated on hospital days 4 and 6 (postoperative days 15 and 17), respectively. A 6-week course of oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg twice daily and daptomycin 8 mg/kg once daily was initiated for bacterial coverage on hospital day 5 (postoperative day 16). Topical triamcinolone and an anesthetic mouthwash also were used to treat the mucosal involvement. The lesions stabilized on the third day of steroid therapy, and the patient was discharged 7 days after hospital admission (postoperative day 18). Dapsone was rapidly increased to 100 mg once daily over the next week for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. An increase in prednisone to 80 mg once daily was required 3 days after the patient was discharged due to worsening oral lesions. Five days after discharge, the patient was readmitted to the hospital for 3 days due to acute kidney injury (AKI) in which his baseline creatinine level tripled. The cause of renal impairment was unknown, resulting in empiric discontinuation of dapsone on postoperative day 27. Prophylaxis for P jirovecii pneumonia was replaced with once-monthly inhaled pentamidine. Prednisone was tapered 20 days after the original presentation (postoperative day 32) following gradual improvement of both the skin and oral lesions. At dermatology follow-up 2 weeks later, doxycycline 100 mg twice daily was added for residual inflammation of the left leg. A deep vein thrombosis was discovered in the left leg 10 days later, and 3 months of anticoagulation therapy was initiated with discontinuation of the doxycycline. The patient continued to have renal insufficiency several weeks after dapsone discontinuation and developed prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with bilateral thenar atrophy. He did not experience any skin eruptions or relapses in the weeks following prednisone cessation and underwent successful removal of the cement spacer with full left-knee reconstruction 4 months after his initial presentation to our institution. At 9-month dermatology follow-up, the LABD remained in remission.

Comment

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis is a well-documented autoimmune mucocutaneous disorder characterized by linear IgA deposits at the dermoepidermal junction. The development of autoantibodies to antigens within the basement membrane zone leads to both cellular and humoral immune responses that facilitate the subepidermal blistering rash in LABD.^2,3 Linear IgA bullous dermatosis affects all ages and races with a bimodal epidemiology. The adult form typically appears after 60 years of age, whereas the childhood form (chronic bullous disease of childhood) appears between 6 months and 6 years of age.³ Medications—particularly vancomycin—are responsible for a substantial portion of cases.^1-4 In one review, vancomycin was implicated in almost half (22/52 [42.3%]) of drug-related cases of LABD.⁴ Other associated medications include captopril, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, phenytoin, and diclo-fenac.^3,4 Vancomycin-associated LABD has a substantially shorter time to onset of symptoms, with a mean of 8.6 days compared to 63.8 days for other causative agents.⁴Resolution of symptoms also occurs more quickly, with remission occurring in 66.7% (16/24) of cases at a mean time of 13 days compared to a 39.2% (11/28) resolution rate with a mean time of 18.9 days following discontinuation of other implicated medications.⁴ While idiopathic LABD involves the mucous membranes in up to 80% of cases, drug-induced LABD is less commonly associated with mucosal lesions. In an earlier systematic review from 1966 to 2002, 32% (7/22) of reported cases of vancomycin-induced LABD were reported to have mucosal involvement.^5,6 In 2012, one group found that most published cases of drug-induced LABD do not use standardized algorithms, such as the Naranjo algorithm, to definitively tie LABD onset to medication use.⁴ The Naranjo algorithm, devised in 1981, consists of 10 questions that determine the probability of adverse drug reactions.⁷ In our case, a Naranjo score of 5 suggested a probable adverse drug reaction due to vancomycin use; however, we cannot completely exclude ciprofloxacin in our case in light of a case report of LABD in the setting of IV vancomycin and ciprofloxacin use.⁸ In our patient, ciprofloxacin had a Naranjo score of 2, which suggested a possible adverse drug reaction. Allopurinol, which does not have any published association with LABD, also had a Naranjo score of 2 in our patient.

The initial treatment of drug-induced LABD is immediate discontinuation of the suspected agent(s) and supportive care.⁹ Although future avoidance of vancomycin is recommended in patients with a history of LABD, there are reported cases of successful rechallenges.^4,10 The early removal of our patient’s cement spacer was discouraged by both the orthopedics and infectious disease consultation services due to potential complications as well as the patient’s gradual improvement during his hospital course.

Dapsone is considered the standard systemic treatment for LABD. Sulfapyridine is an alternative to dapsone, or a combination of these 2 drugs may be used. Corticosteroids can be added to each of these regimens to achieve remission, as in our case.² Although dapsone was discontinued in the setting of the patient’s AKI, the vancomycin in the dual-eluting spacer was more likely the culprit. A review of 544 postoperative outcomes following the use of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (AICS) during 2-stage arthroplasty displayed an 8- to 10-fold increase in the development of AKIs compared to the rate of AKIs following primary joint arthroplasty.¹⁰ While our patient’s AKI was not attributed to dapsone, his prominent peripheral motor neuropathy with resultant bilateral thenar atrophy was a rare complication of dapsone use. While dapsone-associated neuropathy has been reported in daily dosages of as low as 75 mg, it typically is seen in doses of at least 300 mg per day and in larger cumulative dosages.¹¹

Despite having a well-characterized vancomycin-induced LABD in the setting of known vancomycin exposure, our patient’s case was particularly challenging given the continued presence of the vancomycin-impregnated cement spacer (VICS) in the left knee, resulting in vancomycin levels at admission and during subsequent measurements over 2 weeks that were all several-fold higher than the renal clearance predicted.

Vancomycin-associated LABD does not appear to be dose dependent and has been reported at both subtherapeutic^1-3 and supratherapeutic levels,^5-9 whereas toxicity reactions are more common at supratherapeutic levels.⁹ The literature on AICS use suggests that drug elution occurs at relatively unpredictable rates based on a variety of factors, including the type of cement used and the initial antibiotic concentration.^12,13 Furthermore, the addition of tobramycin to VICSs has been found to increase the rate of vancomycin delivery through a phenomenon known as passive opportunism.¹⁴

As AICS devices allow for the delivery of higher concentrations of antibiotics to a localized area, systemic complications are considered rare but have been reported.¹³ Our report describes a rare case of LABD in the setting of a VICS. One clinical aspect of our case that supports the implication of VICS as the cause of the patient’s LABD is the concentration of bullae overlying the incision site on the left knee. A case of a desquamating rash in a patient with an implanted VICS has been documented in which the early lesions were localized to the surgical leg, as in our case.¹⁵ Unlike our case, there was a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome following previous vancomycin exposure. A case of a gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer causing allergic dermatitis that was most prominent in the surgical leg also has been reported.¹⁶ An isomorphic phenomenon (Köbner phenomenon) has been suggested in the setting of vancomycin-induced LABD lesions that intensified at a site of adhesive tape application,¹⁷ but the Köbner phenomenon did not appear to be a major factor in our patient. The removal of the patient’s cement spacer was performed to prevent development of a chronic autoimmune response or autoreactivity state against the skin basement membrane zone structural antigen.

In today’s society there is a ubiquitous pressure to lose weight, reduce fat, and rejuvenate the skin that stems not only from images of idealized bodies in the media but also from our growing knowledge of the detrimental effects of obesity. Along with diet and exercise, it has become popular to use noninvasive devices to attain these goals by means of body contouring—the optimization of the definition, smoothness, and shape of the human physique.¹ In fact, body contouring currently is the fastest-growing area of cosmetic dermatology.²

Previously, body contouring primarily involved invasive procedures (eg, liposuction) that are associated with various adverse effects, financial costs, and lengthy downtime.³ More recently, a growing demand for safer and less painful procedures for adipose tissue reduction and skin tightening have led to the development of several novel modalities for noninvasive body contouring. Although the results achieved using these new technologies may be less dramatic than invasive techniques and are not immediate, they do not carry the risks and adverse effects that are associated with surgical procedures and therefore are increasingly requested by cosmetic patients.^4,5 New noninvasive techniques primarily target the physical properties of fat, resulting in an efflux of triglycerides from fat cells, causing either reduced size, necrosis, or apoptosis of adipocytes.^3,6 Of these modalities, cold-induced adipocyte apoptosis has been commercially available the longest and has been the most researched; however, other noninvasive body contouring techniques have been increasingly explored by researchers since the first reports of human adipose tissue explants exhibiting features of apoptosis after heat injury became available.^7,8

There currently are 4 leading modalities used for noninvasive body contouring: cryolipolysis, radiofrequency (RF), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and laser therapy (Table). Although no procedure has yet been accepted as the gold standard, investigators are working to determine which technique is the most effective.⁹ In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques to help dermatologists choose appropriate modalities for their cosmetic patients.

Cryolipolysis

Cryolipolysis is unique in that it employs the principle that lipid-rich adipocytes are more susceptible to freezing than surrounding water-rich cells, allowing selective apoptosis while preserving the adjacent structures. As macrophages digest the apoptotic adipocytes, patients experience a decrease in subcutaneous fat volume over the subsequent 2 to 3 months.^10-13 Cryolipolysis has been gaining popularity since 2010, when it was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for fat reduction in the flank areas; it was later approved for the abdomen in 2012, thighs in 2014, and submental area in 2015.¹⁴ Most recently, cryolipolysis was approved for fat reduction in the arms, back, and buttocks in 2016.

The most popular cryolipolysis device applies suction to the treatment area and vacuums the tissue between 2 cooling panels for 30 to 60 minutes.⁹ Clinical studies investigating the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis have reported a high degree of patient satisfaction with the procedure and only minimal side effects.^4,6,15,16 Common complications of cryolipolysis include erythema, swelling, and sensitivity at the treatment site followed by a lesser incidence of pain, tingling, and bruising, all of which generally resolve within a few weeks of treatment.⁶ With the removal of adipocytes, there has been concern regarding elevations in blood lipid levels and liver enzymes; however, these laboratory values have been reported to remain within normal limits during and after cryolipolysis.^17,18 Of note, patients should be advised of the risk of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, a rare side effect of cryolipolysis in which a large, demarcated, tender fat mass develops at the treatment site 2 to 3 months after treatment, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 20,000.¹⁹ However, the incidence of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia may be underestimated, as a single practice reported an incidence of 0.47% in 422 cryolipolysis treatments.²⁰ This complication has not been associated with any of the heat-induced fat reduction modalities.

Cryolipolysis has been found to be safe for all skin types with no reported pigmentary changes.¹⁶ It should not be performed in patients with cold-induced conditions (eg, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria) or in those with severe varicose veins or atopic dermatitis.^21,22 Patients benefitting most from this procedure are those who require only small or moderate amounts of adipose tissue and cellulite removal with separate fat bulges.^12,17 Interestingly, cryolipolysis also has been used off label to treat pseudogynecomastia in male patients.²³

Radiofrequency

Radiofrequency has become an important and frequently used modality in cosmetic dermatology.²⁴ This modality differs from cryolipolysis in that it relies on exploiting the difference in water content and impedance between tissues: the skin has low impedance, whereas fat tissue has high impedance. Radiofrequency induces thermal injury to targeted tissue layers, rather than the cold-induced damage seen in cryolipolysis, through devices that focus thermal energy on tissues with high impedance, inducing apoptosis of cells in the subcutaneous adipose tissue with minimal risk of damaging the epidermis, dermis, and muscle.^9,25 Ultimately, thermal exposure to 43°C to 45°C over several minutes results in a delayed adipocyte death response.⁴ In addition to adipocyte death, RF has been shown to cause denaturation of collagen fibrils, leading to subsequent remodeling, neocollagenesis, and skin tightening.²⁶

Radiofrequency devices can be broadly classified as monopolar or bipolar.^24,27 Bipolar devices generally require more frequent treatments, whereas monopolar devices tend to require fewer treatment sessions with superior circumference and fat reduction.²⁸

Overall, RF devices have a favorable side effect profile. The most common side effects are erythema and edema at the treatment site lasting less than 24 hours after the procedure.²⁵ The absence of complications such as abdominal discomfort, erythema, and burning during treatment have been reported,²⁷ with the exception of 1 case of hyperesthesia on the abdomen that lasted for 3 days after a treatment session.⁵ Although RF has beneficial effects on circumference reduction in the abdomen and thighs and can improve the appearance of cellulite, an increase in body weight may occur during treatment. When a localized area of fat such as the thigh is targeted for treatment but the remaining fat cells in the body are not affected, the remaining cells can continue to grow and expand; for instance, although fat cells destroyed with RF will not continue to expand, fat cells in untreated areas may continue to grow due to continued weight gain (eg, from excessive eating), leading to overall weight gain. Thus, patients must understand that weight gain is not an indication of treatment failure after RF or any other method of irreversible fat destruction.⁵

High-intensity Focused Ultrasound

High-intensity focused ultrasound recently was introduced as a new treatment modality for body contouring, specifically for skin tightening and rejuvenation.⁵ The mechanism of HIFU is similar to that of RF in that it also relies on heat to cause adipocyte apoptosis; however, it utilizes acoustic energy rather than electric energy. High-intensity focused ultrasound devices can deliver energy to the deep dermis, subdermal connective tissue, and fibromuscular layers in precise microcoagulation zones without damage to the epidermis. The focused energy induces a high temperature (>65°C) within 1 to 3 seconds, causing cell protein coagulation in the targeted area. In addition to its thermal effects, HIFU induces a mechanical effect that disrupts cell membranes immediately, which contributes to the coagulation necrosis process, further promoting necrosis and apoptosis. The effects of these devices can be visualized, as there always is a sharp demarcation between the targeted and untargeted tissue.²⁹ Additionally, microcoagulation is thought to cause gradual skin tightening through collagen contraction and remodeling.³⁰

High-intensity focused ultrasound first received FDA approval for eyebrow lifting and has been used safely and effectively to treat facial and neck skin in a variety of skin types as well as to improve the clinical appearance of the abdomen and thighs.³¹ This technique is best suited for patients with mild to moderate laxity of the skin or soft tissue who have a body mass index less than 30 kg/m² and are seeking mild body contouring.³² The ideal patient is young with normal wound healing, since the clinical response to treatment is partly dependent on new collagen synthesis.³³ Older patients with extensive photoaging or severe skin laxity are not good candidates for HIFU.

There are a variety of available HIFU devices,³⁴ which utilize special transducers that direct ultrasound energy to a small focal point in the subcutaneous tissues that harmlessly passes through the skin.³⁵ By using newly developed transducers with different energy outputs and focal depths, dermatologists can tailor HIFU treatment to meet the unique physical characteristics of each patient.³¹

Adverse effects of HIFU are limited to transient pain in most patients and occasional erythema and ecchymosis in some cases.³¹ In general, most adverse effects resolve spontaneously within 4 weeks and all by 12 weeks posttreatment. Studies also have reported hard subcutaneous nodules, discomfort, burning sensation, mild blisters, and one case of purpuric lesions, all at the treatment site.^36-39 There is no evidence that HIFU can cause abnormalities in serum lipids or liver function tests.

Lasers

Laser technology is a rapidly growing modality in noninvasive body contouring. A novel device recently emerged as the first and only FDA-cleared hyperthermic laser for fat reduction and noninvasive body contouring of the abdomen, flanks, back, inner and outer thighs, and submental area.^40,41 The device is a 1060-nm diode laser that uses thermal energy to destroy adipose tissue, leading to permanent reduction in stubborn fat without surgery or downtime through the use of a flat, nonsuction applicator that is designed for consistent, natural-looking results. The device includes a contact cooling system that helps to limit thermal discomfort and prevent damage to the surface of the skin during the procedure. Initial improvement can be seen as quickly as 6 weeks posttreatment, and optimal results usually occur in as few as 12 weeks. This device was found to have an excellent safety profile and was well tolerated among patients, with only mild pain reported.^42,43

Prior to the development of this new 1060-nm diode laser, the initial application of lasers for noninvasive body contouring involved low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also known as cold laser therapy.⁴⁰ One device has 5 rotating diode laser heads that work at a wavelength of 635 nm. Treatment sessions last up to 30 minutes, and 6 to 8 sessions are required to obtain optimal results. Low-level laser therapy is a unique modality that is not based on thermal tissue damage, but rather on producing transient microscopic pores in adipocytes that allow lipids to leak out, leading to fat reduction.³⁴ Because LLLT causes immediate emptying of targeted adipocytes, results are noticeable as soon as treatment is completed; however, there is no necrosis or apoptosis of adipocytes, so the recurrence of fat deposition is believed to be greater when compared to the other modalities. Because the results are temporary, long-term or permanent results should not be expected with LLLT. Depending on the patient’s goals, the temporary nature of the results can be either an advantage or disadvantage: some may prefer immediate results despite gradual diminishment over subsequent months, whereas others may prefer results that progressively increase over time and are more permanent, as seen with cryolipolysis, HIFU, and RF.³

Complications of LLLT generally are fewer and more mild than with all other body contouring procedures, with several studies reporting no adverse effects.^44-48 Others reported swelling or erythema at the treatment area, pain or tingling during treatment, and increased urination, all of which were temporary and resolved spontaneously.⁴⁹ Additionally, although the lipids released from treatment are cleared through the lymphatic system, LLLT has not been shown to increase serum lipid levels.⁵⁰

Conclusion

The field of noninvasive body contouring is undoubtedly growing and will likely continue to rise in popularity as the efficacy and safety of these treatments improve. Although the available technologies vary by mechanism and side effect profiles, several devices have been revealed to be safe and effective in reducing subcutaneous fat tissue and improving skin laxity.¹ However, additional studies are needed to evaluate these devices in a standardized manner, especially considering the high costs associated with treatment.³² Current studies investigating these devices vary in treatment protocol, treatment area, number and timing of follow-up sessions, and outcome measures, making it challenging to compare the results objectively.³ Dermatologists offering body contouring treatments need to be intimately familiar with the available devices and determine which treatment is appropriate for each patient in order to provide the highest quality care. Most importantly, patients and physicians must discuss individual goals when choosing a body-contouring method in order to maximize patient satisfaction.

In today’s society there is a ubiquitous pressure to lose weight, reduce fat, and rejuvenate the skin that stems not only from images of idealized bodies in the media but also from our growing knowledge of the detrimental effects of obesity. Along with diet and exercise, it has become popular to use noninvasive devices to attain these goals by means of body contouring—the optimization of the definition, smoothness, and shape of the human physique.¹ In fact, body contouring currently is the fastest-growing area of cosmetic dermatology.²

Previously, body contouring primarily involved invasive procedures (eg, liposuction) that are associated with various adverse effects, financial costs, and lengthy downtime.³ More recently, a growing demand for safer and less painful procedures for adipose tissue reduction and skin tightening have led to the development of several novel modalities for noninvasive body contouring. Although the results achieved using these new technologies may be less dramatic than invasive techniques and are not immediate, they do not carry the risks and adverse effects that are associated with surgical procedures and therefore are increasingly requested by cosmetic patients.^4,5 New noninvasive techniques primarily target the physical properties of fat, resulting in an efflux of triglycerides from fat cells, causing either reduced size, necrosis, or apoptosis of adipocytes.^3,6 Of these modalities, cold-induced adipocyte apoptosis has been commercially available the longest and has been the most researched; however, other noninvasive body contouring techniques have been increasingly explored by researchers since the first reports of human adipose tissue explants exhibiting features of apoptosis after heat injury became available.^7,8

There currently are 4 leading modalities used for noninvasive body contouring: cryolipolysis, radiofrequency (RF), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and laser therapy (Table). Although no procedure has yet been accepted as the gold standard, investigators are working to determine which technique is the most effective.⁹ In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques to help dermatologists choose appropriate modalities for their cosmetic patients.

Cryolipolysis

Cryolipolysis is unique in that it employs the principle that lipid-rich adipocytes are more susceptible to freezing than surrounding water-rich cells, allowing selective apoptosis while preserving the adjacent structures. As macrophages digest the apoptotic adipocytes, patients experience a decrease in subcutaneous fat volume over the subsequent 2 to 3 months.^10-13 Cryolipolysis has been gaining popularity since 2010, when it was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for fat reduction in the flank areas; it was later approved for the abdomen in 2012, thighs in 2014, and submental area in 2015.¹⁴ Most recently, cryolipolysis was approved for fat reduction in the arms, back, and buttocks in 2016.

The most popular cryolipolysis device applies suction to the treatment area and vacuums the tissue between 2 cooling panels for 30 to 60 minutes.⁹ Clinical studies investigating the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis have reported a high degree of patient satisfaction with the procedure and only minimal side effects.^4,6,15,16 Common complications of cryolipolysis include erythema, swelling, and sensitivity at the treatment site followed by a lesser incidence of pain, tingling, and bruising, all of which generally resolve within a few weeks of treatment.⁶ With the removal of adipocytes, there has been concern regarding elevations in blood lipid levels and liver enzymes; however, these laboratory values have been reported to remain within normal limits during and after cryolipolysis.^17,18 Of note, patients should be advised of the risk of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, a rare side effect of cryolipolysis in which a large, demarcated, tender fat mass develops at the treatment site 2 to 3 months after treatment, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 20,000.¹⁹ However, the incidence of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia may be underestimated, as a single practice reported an incidence of 0.47% in 422 cryolipolysis treatments.²⁰ This complication has not been associated with any of the heat-induced fat reduction modalities.

Cryolipolysis has been found to be safe for all skin types with no reported pigmentary changes.¹⁶ It should not be performed in patients with cold-induced conditions (eg, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria) or in those with severe varicose veins or atopic dermatitis.^21,22 Patients benefitting most from this procedure are those who require only small or moderate amounts of adipose tissue and cellulite removal with separate fat bulges.^12,17 Interestingly, cryolipolysis also has been used off label to treat pseudogynecomastia in male patients.²³

Radiofrequency

Radiofrequency has become an important and frequently used modality in cosmetic dermatology.²⁴ This modality differs from cryolipolysis in that it relies on exploiting the difference in water content and impedance between tissues: the skin has low impedance, whereas fat tissue has high impedance. Radiofrequency induces thermal injury to targeted tissue layers, rather than the cold-induced damage seen in cryolipolysis, through devices that focus thermal energy on tissues with high impedance, inducing apoptosis of cells in the subcutaneous adipose tissue with minimal risk of damaging the epidermis, dermis, and muscle.^9,25 Ultimately, thermal exposure to 43°C to 45°C over several minutes results in a delayed adipocyte death response.⁴ In addition to adipocyte death, RF has been shown to cause denaturation of collagen fibrils, leading to subsequent remodeling, neocollagenesis, and skin tightening.²⁶

Radiofrequency devices can be broadly classified as monopolar or bipolar.^24,27 Bipolar devices generally require more frequent treatments, whereas monopolar devices tend to require fewer treatment sessions with superior circumference and fat reduction.²⁸

Overall, RF devices have a favorable side effect profile. The most common side effects are erythema and edema at the treatment site lasting less than 24 hours after the procedure.²⁵ The absence of complications such as abdominal discomfort, erythema, and burning during treatment have been reported,²⁷ with the exception of 1 case of hyperesthesia on the abdomen that lasted for 3 days after a treatment session.⁵ Although RF has beneficial effects on circumference reduction in the abdomen and thighs and can improve the appearance of cellulite, an increase in body weight may occur during treatment. When a localized area of fat such as the thigh is targeted for treatment but the remaining fat cells in the body are not affected, the remaining cells can continue to grow and expand; for instance, although fat cells destroyed with RF will not continue to expand, fat cells in untreated areas may continue to grow due to continued weight gain (eg, from excessive eating), leading to overall weight gain. Thus, patients must understand that weight gain is not an indication of treatment failure after RF or any other method of irreversible fat destruction.⁵

High-intensity Focused Ultrasound

High-intensity focused ultrasound recently was introduced as a new treatment modality for body contouring, specifically for skin tightening and rejuvenation.⁵ The mechanism of HIFU is similar to that of RF in that it also relies on heat to cause adipocyte apoptosis; however, it utilizes acoustic energy rather than electric energy. High-intensity focused ultrasound devices can deliver energy to the deep dermis, subdermal connective tissue, and fibromuscular layers in precise microcoagulation zones without damage to the epidermis. The focused energy induces a high temperature (>65°C) within 1 to 3 seconds, causing cell protein coagulation in the targeted area. In addition to its thermal effects, HIFU induces a mechanical effect that disrupts cell membranes immediately, which contributes to the coagulation necrosis process, further promoting necrosis and apoptosis. The effects of these devices can be visualized, as there always is a sharp demarcation between the targeted and untargeted tissue.²⁹ Additionally, microcoagulation is thought to cause gradual skin tightening through collagen contraction and remodeling.³⁰

High-intensity focused ultrasound first received FDA approval for eyebrow lifting and has been used safely and effectively to treat facial and neck skin in a variety of skin types as well as to improve the clinical appearance of the abdomen and thighs.³¹ This technique is best suited for patients with mild to moderate laxity of the skin or soft tissue who have a body mass index less than 30 kg/m² and are seeking mild body contouring.³² The ideal patient is young with normal wound healing, since the clinical response to treatment is partly dependent on new collagen synthesis.³³ Older patients with extensive photoaging or severe skin laxity are not good candidates for HIFU.

There are a variety of available HIFU devices,³⁴ which utilize special transducers that direct ultrasound energy to a small focal point in the subcutaneous tissues that harmlessly passes through the skin.³⁵ By using newly developed transducers with different energy outputs and focal depths, dermatologists can tailor HIFU treatment to meet the unique physical characteristics of each patient.³¹

Adverse effects of HIFU are limited to transient pain in most patients and occasional erythema and ecchymosis in some cases.³¹ In general, most adverse effects resolve spontaneously within 4 weeks and all by 12 weeks posttreatment. Studies also have reported hard subcutaneous nodules, discomfort, burning sensation, mild blisters, and one case of purpuric lesions, all at the treatment site.^36-39 There is no evidence that HIFU can cause abnormalities in serum lipids or liver function tests.

Lasers

Laser technology is a rapidly growing modality in noninvasive body contouring. A novel device recently emerged as the first and only FDA-cleared hyperthermic laser for fat reduction and noninvasive body contouring of the abdomen, flanks, back, inner and outer thighs, and submental area.^40,41 The device is a 1060-nm diode laser that uses thermal energy to destroy adipose tissue, leading to permanent reduction in stubborn fat without surgery or downtime through the use of a flat, nonsuction applicator that is designed for consistent, natural-looking results. The device includes a contact cooling system that helps to limit thermal discomfort and prevent damage to the surface of the skin during the procedure. Initial improvement can be seen as quickly as 6 weeks posttreatment, and optimal results usually occur in as few as 12 weeks. This device was found to have an excellent safety profile and was well tolerated among patients, with only mild pain reported.^42,43

Prior to the development of this new 1060-nm diode laser, the initial application of lasers for noninvasive body contouring involved low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also known as cold laser therapy.⁴⁰ One device has 5 rotating diode laser heads that work at a wavelength of 635 nm. Treatment sessions last up to 30 minutes, and 6 to 8 sessions are required to obtain optimal results. Low-level laser therapy is a unique modality that is not based on thermal tissue damage, but rather on producing transient microscopic pores in adipocytes that allow lipids to leak out, leading to fat reduction.³⁴ Because LLLT causes immediate emptying of targeted adipocytes, results are noticeable as soon as treatment is completed; however, there is no necrosis or apoptosis of adipocytes, so the recurrence of fat deposition is believed to be greater when compared to the other modalities. Because the results are temporary, long-term or permanent results should not be expected with LLLT. Depending on the patient’s goals, the temporary nature of the results can be either an advantage or disadvantage: some may prefer immediate results despite gradual diminishment over subsequent months, whereas others may prefer results that progressively increase over time and are more permanent, as seen with cryolipolysis, HIFU, and RF.³

Complications of LLLT generally are fewer and more mild than with all other body contouring procedures, with several studies reporting no adverse effects.^44-48 Others reported swelling or erythema at the treatment area, pain or tingling during treatment, and increased urination, all of which were temporary and resolved spontaneously.⁴⁹ Additionally, although the lipids released from treatment are cleared through the lymphatic system, LLLT has not been shown to increase serum lipid levels.⁵⁰

Conclusion

The field of noninvasive body contouring is undoubtedly growing and will likely continue to rise in popularity as the efficacy and safety of these treatments improve. Although the available technologies vary by mechanism and side effect profiles, several devices have been revealed to be safe and effective in reducing subcutaneous fat tissue and improving skin laxity.¹ However, additional studies are needed to evaluate these devices in a standardized manner, especially considering the high costs associated with treatment.³² Current studies investigating these devices vary in treatment protocol, treatment area, number and timing of follow-up sessions, and outcome measures, making it challenging to compare the results objectively.³ Dermatologists offering body contouring treatments need to be intimately familiar with the available devices and determine which treatment is appropriate for each patient in order to provide the highest quality care. Most importantly, patients and physicians must discuss individual goals when choosing a body-contouring method in order to maximize patient satisfaction.

In today’s society there is a ubiquitous pressure to lose weight, reduce fat, and rejuvenate the skin that stems not only from images of idealized bodies in the media but also from our growing knowledge of the detrimental effects of obesity. Along with diet and exercise, it has become popular to use noninvasive devices to attain these goals by means of body contouring—the optimization of the definition, smoothness, and shape of the human physique.¹ In fact, body contouring currently is the fastest-growing area of cosmetic dermatology.²

Previously, body contouring primarily involved invasive procedures (eg, liposuction) that are associated with various adverse effects, financial costs, and lengthy downtime.³ More recently, a growing demand for safer and less painful procedures for adipose tissue reduction and skin tightening have led to the development of several novel modalities for noninvasive body contouring. Although the results achieved using these new technologies may be less dramatic than invasive techniques and are not immediate, they do not carry the risks and adverse effects that are associated with surgical procedures and therefore are increasingly requested by cosmetic patients.^4,5 New noninvasive techniques primarily target the physical properties of fat, resulting in an efflux of triglycerides from fat cells, causing either reduced size, necrosis, or apoptosis of adipocytes.^3,6 Of these modalities, cold-induced adipocyte apoptosis has been commercially available the longest and has been the most researched; however, other noninvasive body contouring techniques have been increasingly explored by researchers since the first reports of human adipose tissue explants exhibiting features of apoptosis after heat injury became available.^7,8

There currently are 4 leading modalities used for noninvasive body contouring: cryolipolysis, radiofrequency (RF), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and laser therapy (Table). Although no procedure has yet been accepted as the gold standard, investigators are working to determine which technique is the most effective.⁹ In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques to help dermatologists choose appropriate modalities for their cosmetic patients.

Cryolipolysis

Cryolipolysis is unique in that it employs the principle that lipid-rich adipocytes are more susceptible to freezing than surrounding water-rich cells, allowing selective apoptosis while preserving the adjacent structures. As macrophages digest the apoptotic adipocytes, patients experience a decrease in subcutaneous fat volume over the subsequent 2 to 3 months.^10-13 Cryolipolysis has been gaining popularity since 2010, when it was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for fat reduction in the flank areas; it was later approved for the abdomen in 2012, thighs in 2014, and submental area in 2015.¹⁴ Most recently, cryolipolysis was approved for fat reduction in the arms, back, and buttocks in 2016.

The most popular cryolipolysis device applies suction to the treatment area and vacuums the tissue between 2 cooling panels for 30 to 60 minutes.⁹ Clinical studies investigating the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis have reported a high degree of patient satisfaction with the procedure and only minimal side effects.^4,6,15,16 Common complications of cryolipolysis include erythema, swelling, and sensitivity at the treatment site followed by a lesser incidence of pain, tingling, and bruising, all of which generally resolve within a few weeks of treatment.⁶ With the removal of adipocytes, there has been concern regarding elevations in blood lipid levels and liver enzymes; however, these laboratory values have been reported to remain within normal limits during and after cryolipolysis.^17,18 Of note, patients should be advised of the risk of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, a rare side effect of cryolipolysis in which a large, demarcated, tender fat mass develops at the treatment site 2 to 3 months after treatment, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 20,000.¹⁹ However, the incidence of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia may be underestimated, as a single practice reported an incidence of 0.47% in 422 cryolipolysis treatments.²⁰ This complication has not been associated with any of the heat-induced fat reduction modalities.

Cryolipolysis has been found to be safe for all skin types with no reported pigmentary changes.¹⁶ It should not be performed in patients with cold-induced conditions (eg, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria) or in those with severe varicose veins or atopic dermatitis.^21,22 Patients benefitting most from this procedure are those who require only small or moderate amounts of adipose tissue and cellulite removal with separate fat bulges.^12,17 Interestingly, cryolipolysis also has been used off label to treat pseudogynecomastia in male patients.²³

Radiofrequency

Radiofrequency has become an important and frequently used modality in cosmetic dermatology.²⁴ This modality differs from cryolipolysis in that it relies on exploiting the difference in water content and impedance between tissues: the skin has low impedance, whereas fat tissue has high impedance. Radiofrequency induces thermal injury to targeted tissue layers, rather than the cold-induced damage seen in cryolipolysis, through devices that focus thermal energy on tissues with high impedance, inducing apoptosis of cells in the subcutaneous adipose tissue with minimal risk of damaging the epidermis, dermis, and muscle.^9,25 Ultimately, thermal exposure to 43°C to 45°C over several minutes results in a delayed adipocyte death response.⁴ In addition to adipocyte death, RF has been shown to cause denaturation of collagen fibrils, leading to subsequent remodeling, neocollagenesis, and skin tightening.²⁶

Radiofrequency devices can be broadly classified as monopolar or bipolar.^24,27 Bipolar devices generally require more frequent treatments, whereas monopolar devices tend to require fewer treatment sessions with superior circumference and fat reduction.²⁸

Overall, RF devices have a favorable side effect profile. The most common side effects are erythema and edema at the treatment site lasting less than 24 hours after the procedure.²⁵ The absence of complications such as abdominal discomfort, erythema, and burning during treatment have been reported,²⁷ with the exception of 1 case of hyperesthesia on the abdomen that lasted for 3 days after a treatment session.⁵ Although RF has beneficial effects on circumference reduction in the abdomen and thighs and can improve the appearance of cellulite, an increase in body weight may occur during treatment. When a localized area of fat such as the thigh is targeted for treatment but the remaining fat cells in the body are not affected, the remaining cells can continue to grow and expand; for instance, although fat cells destroyed with RF will not continue to expand, fat cells in untreated areas may continue to grow due to continued weight gain (eg, from excessive eating), leading to overall weight gain. Thus, patients must understand that weight gain is not an indication of treatment failure after RF or any other method of irreversible fat destruction.⁵

High-intensity Focused Ultrasound

High-intensity focused ultrasound recently was introduced as a new treatment modality for body contouring, specifically for skin tightening and rejuvenation.⁵ The mechanism of HIFU is similar to that of RF in that it also relies on heat to cause adipocyte apoptosis; however, it utilizes acoustic energy rather than electric energy. High-intensity focused ultrasound devices can deliver energy to the deep dermis, subdermal connective tissue, and fibromuscular layers in precise microcoagulation zones without damage to the epidermis. The focused energy induces a high temperature (>65°C) within 1 to 3 seconds, causing cell protein coagulation in the targeted area. In addition to its thermal effects, HIFU induces a mechanical effect that disrupts cell membranes immediately, which contributes to the coagulation necrosis process, further promoting necrosis and apoptosis. The effects of these devices can be visualized, as there always is a sharp demarcation between the targeted and untargeted tissue.²⁹ Additionally, microcoagulation is thought to cause gradual skin tightening through collagen contraction and remodeling.³⁰

High-intensity focused ultrasound first received FDA approval for eyebrow lifting and has been used safely and effectively to treat facial and neck skin in a variety of skin types as well as to improve the clinical appearance of the abdomen and thighs.³¹ This technique is best suited for patients with mild to moderate laxity of the skin or soft tissue who have a body mass index less than 30 kg/m² and are seeking mild body contouring.³² The ideal patient is young with normal wound healing, since the clinical response to treatment is partly dependent on new collagen synthesis.³³ Older patients with extensive photoaging or severe skin laxity are not good candidates for HIFU.

There are a variety of available HIFU devices,³⁴ which utilize special transducers that direct ultrasound energy to a small focal point in the subcutaneous tissues that harmlessly passes through the skin.³⁵ By using newly developed transducers with different energy outputs and focal depths, dermatologists can tailor HIFU treatment to meet the unique physical characteristics of each patient.³¹

Adverse effects of HIFU are limited to transient pain in most patients and occasional erythema and ecchymosis in some cases.³¹ In general, most adverse effects resolve spontaneously within 4 weeks and all by 12 weeks posttreatment. Studies also have reported hard subcutaneous nodules, discomfort, burning sensation, mild blisters, and one case of purpuric lesions, all at the treatment site.^36-39 There is no evidence that HIFU can cause abnormalities in serum lipids or liver function tests.

Lasers

Laser technology is a rapidly growing modality in noninvasive body contouring. A novel device recently emerged as the first and only FDA-cleared hyperthermic laser for fat reduction and noninvasive body contouring of the abdomen, flanks, back, inner and outer thighs, and submental area.^40,41 The device is a 1060-nm diode laser that uses thermal energy to destroy adipose tissue, leading to permanent reduction in stubborn fat without surgery or downtime through the use of a flat, nonsuction applicator that is designed for consistent, natural-looking results. The device includes a contact cooling system that helps to limit thermal discomfort and prevent damage to the surface of the skin during the procedure. Initial improvement can be seen as quickly as 6 weeks posttreatment, and optimal results usually occur in as few as 12 weeks. This device was found to have an excellent safety profile and was well tolerated among patients, with only mild pain reported.^42,43

Prior to the development of this new 1060-nm diode laser, the initial application of lasers for noninvasive body contouring involved low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also known as cold laser therapy.⁴⁰ One device has 5 rotating diode laser heads that work at a wavelength of 635 nm. Treatment sessions last up to 30 minutes, and 6 to 8 sessions are required to obtain optimal results. Low-level laser therapy is a unique modality that is not based on thermal tissue damage, but rather on producing transient microscopic pores in adipocytes that allow lipids to leak out, leading to fat reduction.³⁴ Because LLLT causes immediate emptying of targeted adipocytes, results are noticeable as soon as treatment is completed; however, there is no necrosis or apoptosis of adipocytes, so the recurrence of fat deposition is believed to be greater when compared to the other modalities. Because the results are temporary, long-term or permanent results should not be expected with LLLT. Depending on the patient’s goals, the temporary nature of the results can be either an advantage or disadvantage: some may prefer immediate results despite gradual diminishment over subsequent months, whereas others may prefer results that progressively increase over time and are more permanent, as seen with cryolipolysis, HIFU, and RF.³

Complications of LLLT generally are fewer and more mild than with all other body contouring procedures, with several studies reporting no adverse effects.^44-48 Others reported swelling or erythema at the treatment area, pain or tingling during treatment, and increased urination, all of which were temporary and resolved spontaneously.⁴⁹ Additionally, although the lipids released from treatment are cleared through the lymphatic system, LLLT has not been shown to increase serum lipid levels.⁵⁰

Conclusion

The field of noninvasive body contouring is undoubtedly growing and will likely continue to rise in popularity as the efficacy and safety of these treatments improve. Although the available technologies vary by mechanism and side effect profiles, several devices have been revealed to be safe and effective in reducing subcutaneous fat tissue and improving skin laxity.¹ However, additional studies are needed to evaluate these devices in a standardized manner, especially considering the high costs associated with treatment.³² Current studies investigating these devices vary in treatment protocol, treatment area, number and timing of follow-up sessions, and outcome measures, making it challenging to compare the results objectively.³ Dermatologists offering body contouring treatments need to be intimately familiar with the available devices and determine which treatment is appropriate for each patient in order to provide the highest quality care. Most importantly, patients and physicians must discuss individual goals when choosing a body-contouring method in order to maximize patient satisfaction.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy (PPP), also known as impetigo herpetiformis, is a relatively rare cutaneous disorder of pregnancy wherein lesions typically appear in the third trimester and resolve after delivery; however, lesions may persist through the postpartum period. Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy may be considered a fifth dermatosis of pregnancy, alongside the classic dermatoses of atopic eruption of pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, and pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy.¹

As PPP is a rare disease, its effects on maternal-fetal health outcomes and management remain to be elucidated. Though maternal mortality is rare in PPP, it is a unique dermatosis of pregnancy because it may be associated with severe systemic maternal symptoms.² Fetal morbidity and mortality are less predictable in PPP, with reported cases of stillbirth, fetal anomalies, and neonatal death thought to be due largely to placental insufficiency, even with control of symptoms.^1,3 Given the risk of serious harm to the fetus, reporting of cases and discussion of PPP management is critical.

Case Report

An otherwise healthy 29-year-old G2P1 woman at 32 weeks’ gestation presented to our emergency department with a 1-week history of a pruritic, burning rash that started on the thighs then spread diffusely. She denied any similar rash in her prior pregnancy. She was not currently taking any medications except for prenatal vitamins and denied any systemic symptoms. The patient’s obstetrician initiated treatment with methylprednisolone 50 mg once daily for the rash 3 days prior to the current presentation, which had not seemed to help. On physical examination, edematous pink plaques studded with 1- to 2-mm collarettes of scaling and sparse 1-mm pustules involving the arms, chest, abdomen, back, groin, buttocks, and legs were noted. The plaques on the back and inner thighs had a peripheral rim of desquamative scaling. There were pink macules on the palms, and superficial desquamation was noted on the lips. The oral mucosa was otherwise spared (Figure 1).

Biopsy specimens from the left arm revealed discrete subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis (Figure 2). The papillary dermis showed a sparse infiltrate of neutrophils with many marginated neutrophils within vessels. Direct immunofluorescence was negative for human IgG, IgA, IgM, complement component 3, and fibrinogen. Laboratory workup revealed leukocytosis of 21.5×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L) with neutrophilic predominance of 73.6% (reference range, 56%), an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 40 mm/h (reference range, 0–20 mm/h), and a mild hypocalcemia of 8.6 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). The patient was started on methylprednisone 40 mg once daily with a plan to taper the dose by 8 mg every 5 days.

At 35 weeks’ gestation, the patient continued to report pruritus and burning in the areas where the rash had developed. The morphology of the rash had changed considerably, as she now had prominent, annular, pink plaques with central clearing, trailing scaling, and a border of subtle pustules on the legs. There also were rings of desquamative scaling on the palms. During follow-up at 37 weeks’ gestation, the back, chest, and abdomen were improved from the initial presentation, and annular pink plaques with central clearing were noted on the legs (Figure 3). Given the clinical and histopathologic findings, a diagnosis of PPP was made. It was recommended that she undergo increased fetal surveillance with close obstetric follow-up. Weekly office visits with obstetrics and twice-weekly Doppler ultrasounds and fetal nonstress tests were deemed appropriate management. The patient was scheduled for induction at 39 weeks’ gestation given the risk for potential harm to the fetus. She was maintained on low-dose methylprednisolone 4 mg once daily for the duration of the pregnancy. The patient continued to have gradual improvement of the rash at the low treatment dose.

Following induction at 39 weeks’ gestation, the patient vaginally delivered a healthy, 6-lb male neonate at an outside hospital. She reported that the burning sensation improved within hours of delivery, and systemic steroids were stopped after delivery. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks postpartum, considerable improvement of the rash was noted with no evidence of pustules. Fading pink patches with a superficial scaling were noted on the back, chest, abdomen, arms, legs (Figure 4), and fingertips. The patient was counseled that PPP could recur in subsequent pregnancies and that she should be aware of the potential risks to the fetus.

Comment

In our patient, the diagnosis of PPP was supported by the presence of erythematous, coalescent plaques with small pustules at the margins and central erosions as well as the histologic findings of subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis and a sparse neutrophilic infiltrate into the dermis. Laboratory studies showing leukocytosis and an elevated ESR, which are often seen in PPP, also were noted.

The typical presentation of PPP is characterized by lesions that initially develop in skin folds with centrifugal spread.³ The lesions usually begin as erythematous plaques with a pustular ring with a central erosion. The face, palms, and soles of the feet typically are spared with occasional involvement of oral and esophageal mucosae. Biopsy findings typically include spongiform pustules with neutrophil invasion into the epidermis. Typical laboratory findings include electrolyte derangements with elevated ESR and leukocytosis.¹

Diagnosis of PPP is critical given the potential for associated fetal morbidity and mortality.⁴ Anticipatory guidance for the patient also is necessary, as PPP can recur with subsequent pregnancies or even use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Notably, a patient with recurrences of PPP with each of 9 pregnancies also experienced a recurrence when taking a combination estrogen/progesterone OCP, but not with an estrogen-only diethylstilbestrol OCP.⁵ Although the pathophysiology is not entirely understood, the development of PPP is thought to be related to the hormonal changes that occur in the third trimester, most notably due to elevated progesterone levels.² The presence of progesterone in OCPs and recurrences associated with their use supports this altered hormonal state, contributing to the underlying pathophysiology of PPP.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy can occur in women without any personal or family history of psoriasis, and as such, it is unclear whether PPP is a separate entity or a hormonally induced variation of generalized pustular psoriasis. Recent evidence included reports of women with PPP who had a mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist, leading to a relative abundance of IL-36 inflammatory cytokines.⁶As the cytokine profile during pregnancy is physiologically altered to favor a T helper 2–cell state, the altered expression of cytokines is believed to trigger an inflammatory response conducive to the development of PPP.² This mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist also is found in individuals with generalized pustular psoriasis, suggesting an overlap of disease etiology related to these cytokine interactions.^2,7,8

The mainstay of treatment for PPP is oral corticosteroids. Cases of PPP that are unresponsive to systemic steroids have been documented, requiring treatment with cyclosporine.⁹ Antitumor necrosis factors also have been used safely during pregnancy.¹⁰ Narrowband UVB phototherapy also has been proposed as a treatment alternative for patients who do not respond to oral corticosteroids.¹¹

Conclusion

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy is a rare dermatosis of pregnancy that, unlike most other common dermatoses of pregnancy, is associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Diagnosis and management of PPP are critical to ensure the best care and outcomes for the patient and fetus and for a successful delivery of a healthy neonate. Our patient with PPP presented with involvement of the body, palms, and oral mucosa in the absence of systemic symptoms. Close follow-up and comanagement with the patient’s obstetrician ensured safe outcomes for the patient and the neonate.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy (PPP), also known as impetigo herpetiformis, is a relatively rare cutaneous disorder of pregnancy wherein lesions typically appear in the third trimester and resolve after delivery; however, lesions may persist through the postpartum period. Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy may be considered a fifth dermatosis of pregnancy, alongside the classic dermatoses of atopic eruption of pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, and pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy.¹

As PPP is a rare disease, its effects on maternal-fetal health outcomes and management remain to be elucidated. Though maternal mortality is rare in PPP, it is a unique dermatosis of pregnancy because it may be associated with severe systemic maternal symptoms.² Fetal morbidity and mortality are less predictable in PPP, with reported cases of stillbirth, fetal anomalies, and neonatal death thought to be due largely to placental insufficiency, even with control of symptoms.^1,3 Given the risk of serious harm to the fetus, reporting of cases and discussion of PPP management is critical.

Case Report

An otherwise healthy 29-year-old G2P1 woman at 32 weeks’ gestation presented to our emergency department with a 1-week history of a pruritic, burning rash that started on the thighs then spread diffusely. She denied any similar rash in her prior pregnancy. She was not currently taking any medications except for prenatal vitamins and denied any systemic symptoms. The patient’s obstetrician initiated treatment with methylprednisolone 50 mg once daily for the rash 3 days prior to the current presentation, which had not seemed to help. On physical examination, edematous pink plaques studded with 1- to 2-mm collarettes of scaling and sparse 1-mm pustules involving the arms, chest, abdomen, back, groin, buttocks, and legs were noted. The plaques on the back and inner thighs had a peripheral rim of desquamative scaling. There were pink macules on the palms, and superficial desquamation was noted on the lips. The oral mucosa was otherwise spared (Figure 1).

Biopsy specimens from the left arm revealed discrete subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis (Figure 2). The papillary dermis showed a sparse infiltrate of neutrophils with many marginated neutrophils within vessels. Direct immunofluorescence was negative for human IgG, IgA, IgM, complement component 3, and fibrinogen. Laboratory workup revealed leukocytosis of 21.5×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L) with neutrophilic predominance of 73.6% (reference range, 56%), an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 40 mm/h (reference range, 0–20 mm/h), and a mild hypocalcemia of 8.6 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). The patient was started on methylprednisone 40 mg once daily with a plan to taper the dose by 8 mg every 5 days.

At 35 weeks’ gestation, the patient continued to report pruritus and burning in the areas where the rash had developed. The morphology of the rash had changed considerably, as she now had prominent, annular, pink plaques with central clearing, trailing scaling, and a border of subtle pustules on the legs. There also were rings of desquamative scaling on the palms. During follow-up at 37 weeks’ gestation, the back, chest, and abdomen were improved from the initial presentation, and annular pink plaques with central clearing were noted on the legs (Figure 3). Given the clinical and histopathologic findings, a diagnosis of PPP was made. It was recommended that she undergo increased fetal surveillance with close obstetric follow-up. Weekly office visits with obstetrics and twice-weekly Doppler ultrasounds and fetal nonstress tests were deemed appropriate management. The patient was scheduled for induction at 39 weeks’ gestation given the risk for potential harm to the fetus. She was maintained on low-dose methylprednisolone 4 mg once daily for the duration of the pregnancy. The patient continued to have gradual improvement of the rash at the low treatment dose.

Following induction at 39 weeks’ gestation, the patient vaginally delivered a healthy, 6-lb male neonate at an outside hospital. She reported that the burning sensation improved within hours of delivery, and systemic steroids were stopped after delivery. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks postpartum, considerable improvement of the rash was noted with no evidence of pustules. Fading pink patches with a superficial scaling were noted on the back, chest, abdomen, arms, legs (Figure 4), and fingertips. The patient was counseled that PPP could recur in subsequent pregnancies and that she should be aware of the potential risks to the fetus.

Comment

In our patient, the diagnosis of PPP was supported by the presence of erythematous, coalescent plaques with small pustules at the margins and central erosions as well as the histologic findings of subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis and a sparse neutrophilic infiltrate into the dermis. Laboratory studies showing leukocytosis and an elevated ESR, which are often seen in PPP, also were noted.

The typical presentation of PPP is characterized by lesions that initially develop in skin folds with centrifugal spread.³ The lesions usually begin as erythematous plaques with a pustular ring with a central erosion. The face, palms, and soles of the feet typically are spared with occasional involvement of oral and esophageal mucosae. Biopsy findings typically include spongiform pustules with neutrophil invasion into the epidermis. Typical laboratory findings include electrolyte derangements with elevated ESR and leukocytosis.¹

Diagnosis of PPP is critical given the potential for associated fetal morbidity and mortality.⁴ Anticipatory guidance for the patient also is necessary, as PPP can recur with subsequent pregnancies or even use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Notably, a patient with recurrences of PPP with each of 9 pregnancies also experienced a recurrence when taking a combination estrogen/progesterone OCP, but not with an estrogen-only diethylstilbestrol OCP.⁵ Although the pathophysiology is not entirely understood, the development of PPP is thought to be related to the hormonal changes that occur in the third trimester, most notably due to elevated progesterone levels.² The presence of progesterone in OCPs and recurrences associated with their use supports this altered hormonal state, contributing to the underlying pathophysiology of PPP.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy can occur in women without any personal or family history of psoriasis, and as such, it is unclear whether PPP is a separate entity or a hormonally induced variation of generalized pustular psoriasis. Recent evidence included reports of women with PPP who had a mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist, leading to a relative abundance of IL-36 inflammatory cytokines.⁶As the cytokine profile during pregnancy is physiologically altered to favor a T helper 2–cell state, the altered expression of cytokines is believed to trigger an inflammatory response conducive to the development of PPP.² This mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist also is found in individuals with generalized pustular psoriasis, suggesting an overlap of disease etiology related to these cytokine interactions.^2,7,8

The mainstay of treatment for PPP is oral corticosteroids. Cases of PPP that are unresponsive to systemic steroids have been documented, requiring treatment with cyclosporine.⁹ Antitumor necrosis factors also have been used safely during pregnancy.¹⁰ Narrowband UVB phototherapy also has been proposed as a treatment alternative for patients who do not respond to oral corticosteroids.¹¹

Conclusion

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy is a rare dermatosis of pregnancy that, unlike most other common dermatoses of pregnancy, is associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Diagnosis and management of PPP are critical to ensure the best care and outcomes for the patient and fetus and for a successful delivery of a healthy neonate. Our patient with PPP presented with involvement of the body, palms, and oral mucosa in the absence of systemic symptoms. Close follow-up and comanagement with the patient’s obstetrician ensured safe outcomes for the patient and the neonate.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy (PPP), also known as impetigo herpetiformis, is a relatively rare cutaneous disorder of pregnancy wherein lesions typically appear in the third trimester and resolve after delivery; however, lesions may persist through the postpartum period. Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy may be considered a fifth dermatosis of pregnancy, alongside the classic dermatoses of atopic eruption of pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, and pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy.¹

As PPP is a rare disease, its effects on maternal-fetal health outcomes and management remain to be elucidated. Though maternal mortality is rare in PPP, it is a unique dermatosis of pregnancy because it may be associated with severe systemic maternal symptoms.² Fetal morbidity and mortality are less predictable in PPP, with reported cases of stillbirth, fetal anomalies, and neonatal death thought to be due largely to placental insufficiency, even with control of symptoms.^1,3 Given the risk of serious harm to the fetus, reporting of cases and discussion of PPP management is critical.

Case Report

An otherwise healthy 29-year-old G2P1 woman at 32 weeks’ gestation presented to our emergency department with a 1-week history of a pruritic, burning rash that started on the thighs then spread diffusely. She denied any similar rash in her prior pregnancy. She was not currently taking any medications except for prenatal vitamins and denied any systemic symptoms. The patient’s obstetrician initiated treatment with methylprednisolone 50 mg once daily for the rash 3 days prior to the current presentation, which had not seemed to help. On physical examination, edematous pink plaques studded with 1- to 2-mm collarettes of scaling and sparse 1-mm pustules involving the arms, chest, abdomen, back, groin, buttocks, and legs were noted. The plaques on the back and inner thighs had a peripheral rim of desquamative scaling. There were pink macules on the palms, and superficial desquamation was noted on the lips. The oral mucosa was otherwise spared (Figure 1).

Biopsy specimens from the left arm revealed discrete subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis (Figure 2). The papillary dermis showed a sparse infiltrate of neutrophils with many marginated neutrophils within vessels. Direct immunofluorescence was negative for human IgG, IgA, IgM, complement component 3, and fibrinogen. Laboratory workup revealed leukocytosis of 21.5×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L) with neutrophilic predominance of 73.6% (reference range, 56%), an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 40 mm/h (reference range, 0–20 mm/h), and a mild hypocalcemia of 8.6 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). The patient was started on methylprednisone 40 mg once daily with a plan to taper the dose by 8 mg every 5 days.

At 35 weeks’ gestation, the patient continued to report pruritus and burning in the areas where the rash had developed. The morphology of the rash had changed considerably, as she now had prominent, annular, pink plaques with central clearing, trailing scaling, and a border of subtle pustules on the legs. There also were rings of desquamative scaling on the palms. During follow-up at 37 weeks’ gestation, the back, chest, and abdomen were improved from the initial presentation, and annular pink plaques with central clearing were noted on the legs (Figure 3). Given the clinical and histopathologic findings, a diagnosis of PPP was made. It was recommended that she undergo increased fetal surveillance with close obstetric follow-up. Weekly office visits with obstetrics and twice-weekly Doppler ultrasounds and fetal nonstress tests were deemed appropriate management. The patient was scheduled for induction at 39 weeks’ gestation given the risk for potential harm to the fetus. She was maintained on low-dose methylprednisolone 4 mg once daily for the duration of the pregnancy. The patient continued to have gradual improvement of the rash at the low treatment dose.

Following induction at 39 weeks’ gestation, the patient vaginally delivered a healthy, 6-lb male neonate at an outside hospital. She reported that the burning sensation improved within hours of delivery, and systemic steroids were stopped after delivery. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks postpartum, considerable improvement of the rash was noted with no evidence of pustules. Fading pink patches with a superficial scaling were noted on the back, chest, abdomen, arms, legs (Figure 4), and fingertips. The patient was counseled that PPP could recur in subsequent pregnancies and that she should be aware of the potential risks to the fetus.

Comment

In our patient, the diagnosis of PPP was supported by the presence of erythematous, coalescent plaques with small pustules at the margins and central erosions as well as the histologic findings of subcorneal pustules with mild acanthosis of the epidermis with spongiosis and a sparse neutrophilic infiltrate into the dermis. Laboratory studies showing leukocytosis and an elevated ESR, which are often seen in PPP, also were noted.

The typical presentation of PPP is characterized by lesions that initially develop in skin folds with centrifugal spread.³ The lesions usually begin as erythematous plaques with a pustular ring with a central erosion. The face, palms, and soles of the feet typically are spared with occasional involvement of oral and esophageal mucosae. Biopsy findings typically include spongiform pustules with neutrophil invasion into the epidermis. Typical laboratory findings include electrolyte derangements with elevated ESR and leukocytosis.¹

Diagnosis of PPP is critical given the potential for associated fetal morbidity and mortality.⁴ Anticipatory guidance for the patient also is necessary, as PPP can recur with subsequent pregnancies or even use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Notably, a patient with recurrences of PPP with each of 9 pregnancies also experienced a recurrence when taking a combination estrogen/progesterone OCP, but not with an estrogen-only diethylstilbestrol OCP.⁵ Although the pathophysiology is not entirely understood, the development of PPP is thought to be related to the hormonal changes that occur in the third trimester, most notably due to elevated progesterone levels.² The presence of progesterone in OCPs and recurrences associated with their use supports this altered hormonal state, contributing to the underlying pathophysiology of PPP.

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy can occur in women without any personal or family history of psoriasis, and as such, it is unclear whether PPP is a separate entity or a hormonally induced variation of generalized pustular psoriasis. Recent evidence included reports of women with PPP who had a mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist, leading to a relative abundance of IL-36 inflammatory cytokines.⁶As the cytokine profile during pregnancy is physiologically altered to favor a T helper 2–cell state, the altered expression of cytokines is believed to trigger an inflammatory response conducive to the development of PPP.² This mutation in the IL-36 receptor antagonist also is found in individuals with generalized pustular psoriasis, suggesting an overlap of disease etiology related to these cytokine interactions.^2,7,8

The mainstay of treatment for PPP is oral corticosteroids. Cases of PPP that are unresponsive to systemic steroids have been documented, requiring treatment with cyclosporine.⁹ Antitumor necrosis factors also have been used safely during pregnancy.¹⁰ Narrowband UVB phototherapy also has been proposed as a treatment alternative for patients who do not respond to oral corticosteroids.¹¹

Conclusion

Pustular psoriasis of pregnancy is a rare dermatosis of pregnancy that, unlike most other common dermatoses of pregnancy, is associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Diagnosis and management of PPP are critical to ensure the best care and outcomes for the patient and fetus and for a successful delivery of a healthy neonate. Our patient with PPP presented with involvement of the body, palms, and oral mucosa in the absence of systemic symptoms. Close follow-up and comanagement with the patient’s obstetrician ensured safe outcomes for the patient and the neonate.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare malignant tumor of vascular endothelial cells that has the propensity to arise in various clinical settings. This tumor predominantly occurs in the head and neck region in elderly patients, but it also has been reported to develop postradiotherapy or in the setting of chronic lymphedema in the extremities.^1-3 In all settings, the diagnosis carries a very poor prognosis with a high likelihood of local recurrence and rapid dissemination. The mortality rate typically is 80% or higher.^2,4-6

Making the correct clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma may be difficult given the variety of patient symptoms and clinical appearances that can be demonstrated on presentation. Lesions can appear as bluish or violaceous plaques, macules, or nodules, and ulceration may be present in some advanced cases.^5,7 Clinical misdiagnosis is common, as cutaneous angiosarcomas may be mistaken for infectious processes, benign vascular malformations, and other cutaneous malignancies.¹ Biopsy often is delayed given the initial benign appearance of the lesions, and this frequently results in aggressive and extensive disease at the time of diagnosis, which is unfortunate given that small tumor size has been shown to be one of the only favorable prognostic indicators in cutaneous angiosarcoma.^1,2,6,8

Microscopically, diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma can present a challenge, as the histology varies between a well-differentiated vascular neoplasm and a considerably anaplastic and poorly differentiated malignancy. On low power, some areas may appear as benign hemangiomas with other areas showing frank sarcomatous features.⁹ As a result, these tumors can be mistaken for a variety of other diseases including melanomas, carcinomas, or other vascular tumors.^6,8,9 Previously, electron microscopy has been utilized on undifferentiated tumors to help distinguish cutaneous angiosarcomas from other potential diagnoses. The atypical tumor cells of cutaneous angiosarcoma display common features of endothelial cells (eg, pinocytotic vesicles, tubulated bodies).⁷ Historically, it has been noted that the histologic findings and tumor grade provide little evidence regarding the aggressiveness of the tumor, and all cutaneous angiosarcoma diagnoses receive a poor prognosis.^6,8

Classically, the histologic findings of cutaneous angiosarcoma include a highly infiltrative neoplasm forming irregular vascular channels that penetrate through the cutaneous soft tissues and frequently extend into the subcutaneous fat. The vascular spaces are lined by hyperchromatic endothelial cells with varying degrees of atypia.^1,2,4,6,7,10 Occasionally, prominent endothelial cells lining a papillary structure within the lumen of the neoformed vessel may also be observed. Currently, immunohistochemical staining for MYC, Ki-67, D2-40, and various other markers complement the histologic findings to aid in the diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma.^11,12 An additional diagnostic clue that has been described in cases of postirradiation cutaneous angiosarcoma shows free-floating or tufted pleomorphic spindle cells within the vascular lumen (Figure). This finding has been described as “fish in the creek.”¹¹ In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency and subsequent diagnostic utility of the fish-in-the-creek finding in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Methods

A natural language search of our institutional archives over a 20-year period (1997–2017) using the term angiosarcoma was performed. Fifteen cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma were identified. Fifteen additional benign and malignant vascular tumors with cutaneous angiosarcoma in the histologic differential diagnosis were selected from the archives over a similar time frame. The additional lesions included Kaposi sarcoma (n=3), atypical vascular lesion (n=6), atypical hemangioma (n=1), tufted angioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (n=1), sinusoidal hemangioma (n=1), and angiofibroma (n=1). The pathologists were blinded to the original diagnosis of each case and were instructed to evaluate the histology slides for the sole feature of free-floating intraluminal spindle cells or spindle cells tufting off the endothelium. Epithelial cells lining papillae found within the vessel lumen were not counted as a positive finding, as they do not fit the criteria described for the histologic pattern of fish in the creek. Following microscopic evaluation, the original diagnoses were reassigned to their respective cases to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this feature.

Results

The histologic pattern of fish in the creek was identified in all 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma and was absent in the other 15 malignancies examined in this study. This finding shows the potential for the fish-in-the-creek pattern to be used as an additional diagnostic tool for dermatopathologists.

Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that proves difficult to diagnose both clinically and histologically as well as to treat effectively.^1,5-8 Our results indicate that fish in the creek may be a useful and salient histologic feature in cutaneous angiosarcoma. It is important to recognize, however, that this finding should not be the sole feature upon which a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma is made, as it requires corroboration with positivity of MYC and D2-40 as well as a high Ki-67 proliferation index (>20%).^11,12 Finding a fish-in-the-creek pattern should prompt dermatopathologists to consider a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma in the appropriate clinical and histologic settings.

The chief limitation of this study was the small sample size, with only 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma available in the last 20 years at our institution. The limited sample size did not allow us to make claims on sensitivity and specificity regarding this histologic feature; however, with a larger sample size, the true diagnostic potential could be elucidated. Although the pathologists were blinded to the original diagnoses as they examined it for fish in the creek, it is possible they were able to make the correct diagnosis based on other histopathologic clues and therefore were biased.

Although the fish-in-the-creek pattern is present in cutaneous angiosarcoma, there may be other mimickers to consider. Intraluminal papillary projections lined by endothelial cells may be sectioned in a manner imitating this finding.³ In such a case, these endothelial cells must be differentiated from the free-floating or tufted spindle cells in order to have a positive finding for fish in the creek. There can be confusion if the biopsy cuts through a section of spindled cells, resulting in difficulty differentiating cutaneous angiosarcoma from other spindle tumors such as spindle cell melanoma or spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma.⁶ In such cases, immunohistochemistry may be helpful, as spindle cell melanoma would stain positive for S100 and SOX10 and spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma would stain positive for p63 and cytokeratin.

Various treatment strategies for cutaneous angiosarcoma have been employed, with the majority still resulting in poor outcomes.^2,4-6 The recommended treatment is radical surgical excision of the primary tumor with lymph node clearance if possible. Following excision, the patient should undergo high-dose, wide-field radiotherapy to the region.^5,8 Cutaneous angiosarcomas also have the ability to spread extensively through the dermis and can result in subclinical or clinically obvious widespread disease with multifocal or satellite lesions present. Distant metastases occur most frequently in the cervical lymph nodes and lungs.⁷ In cases where the disease is too extensive for surgery, palliative radiation monotherapy can be used.^5,6

As atypical vascular lesions are considered to be a precursor to cutaneous angiosarcoma, it is important to note that the fish-in-the-creek feature was absent in all 6 of the atypical vascular lesions observed in the study. The differentiation generally is made based on MYC, which is present in cutaneous angiosarcomas and absent in atypical vascular lesions.¹⁰ The feature of fish in the creek may now be an additional clue for dermatopathologists to differentiate between angiosarcomas and other similar-appearing tumors.

Conclusion

Our study aimed to highlight an important histologic feature of cutaneous angiosarcomas that can aid in the diagnosis of this deceptive malignancy. Our findings warrant further study of the fish-in-the-creek histologic pattern in a larger sample size to determine its success as a diagnostic tool for cutaneous angiosarcomas. As noted previously, tumor grade does not impact survival outcome, but small tumor size has been one of the only features found to result in a more favorable prognosis.^1,6,8 Future studies to identify a correlation between the histologic finding of fish in the creek and disease outcome in cutaneous angiosarcoma may be helpful to determine if these histologic findings provide prognostic significance in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare malignant tumor of vascular endothelial cells that has the propensity to arise in various clinical settings. This tumor predominantly occurs in the head and neck region in elderly patients, but it also has been reported to develop postradiotherapy or in the setting of chronic lymphedema in the extremities.^1-3 In all settings, the diagnosis carries a very poor prognosis with a high likelihood of local recurrence and rapid dissemination. The mortality rate typically is 80% or higher.^2,4-6

Making the correct clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma may be difficult given the variety of patient symptoms and clinical appearances that can be demonstrated on presentation. Lesions can appear as bluish or violaceous plaques, macules, or nodules, and ulceration may be present in some advanced cases.^5,7 Clinical misdiagnosis is common, as cutaneous angiosarcomas may be mistaken for infectious processes, benign vascular malformations, and other cutaneous malignancies.¹ Biopsy often is delayed given the initial benign appearance of the lesions, and this frequently results in aggressive and extensive disease at the time of diagnosis, which is unfortunate given that small tumor size has been shown to be one of the only favorable prognostic indicators in cutaneous angiosarcoma.^1,2,6,8

Microscopically, diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma can present a challenge, as the histology varies between a well-differentiated vascular neoplasm and a considerably anaplastic and poorly differentiated malignancy. On low power, some areas may appear as benign hemangiomas with other areas showing frank sarcomatous features.⁹ As a result, these tumors can be mistaken for a variety of other diseases including melanomas, carcinomas, or other vascular tumors.^6,8,9 Previously, electron microscopy has been utilized on undifferentiated tumors to help distinguish cutaneous angiosarcomas from other potential diagnoses. The atypical tumor cells of cutaneous angiosarcoma display common features of endothelial cells (eg, pinocytotic vesicles, tubulated bodies).⁷ Historically, it has been noted that the histologic findings and tumor grade provide little evidence regarding the aggressiveness of the tumor, and all cutaneous angiosarcoma diagnoses receive a poor prognosis.^6,8

Classically, the histologic findings of cutaneous angiosarcoma include a highly infiltrative neoplasm forming irregular vascular channels that penetrate through the cutaneous soft tissues and frequently extend into the subcutaneous fat. The vascular spaces are lined by hyperchromatic endothelial cells with varying degrees of atypia.^1,2,4,6,7,10 Occasionally, prominent endothelial cells lining a papillary structure within the lumen of the neoformed vessel may also be observed. Currently, immunohistochemical staining for MYC, Ki-67, D2-40, and various other markers complement the histologic findings to aid in the diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma.^11,12 An additional diagnostic clue that has been described in cases of postirradiation cutaneous angiosarcoma shows free-floating or tufted pleomorphic spindle cells within the vascular lumen (Figure). This finding has been described as “fish in the creek.”¹¹ In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency and subsequent diagnostic utility of the fish-in-the-creek finding in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Methods

A natural language search of our institutional archives over a 20-year period (1997–2017) using the term angiosarcoma was performed. Fifteen cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma were identified. Fifteen additional benign and malignant vascular tumors with cutaneous angiosarcoma in the histologic differential diagnosis were selected from the archives over a similar time frame. The additional lesions included Kaposi sarcoma (n=3), atypical vascular lesion (n=6), atypical hemangioma (n=1), tufted angioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (n=1), sinusoidal hemangioma (n=1), and angiofibroma (n=1). The pathologists were blinded to the original diagnosis of each case and were instructed to evaluate the histology slides for the sole feature of free-floating intraluminal spindle cells or spindle cells tufting off the endothelium. Epithelial cells lining papillae found within the vessel lumen were not counted as a positive finding, as they do not fit the criteria described for the histologic pattern of fish in the creek. Following microscopic evaluation, the original diagnoses were reassigned to their respective cases to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this feature.

Results

The histologic pattern of fish in the creek was identified in all 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma and was absent in the other 15 malignancies examined in this study. This finding shows the potential for the fish-in-the-creek pattern to be used as an additional diagnostic tool for dermatopathologists.

Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that proves difficult to diagnose both clinically and histologically as well as to treat effectively.^1,5-8 Our results indicate that fish in the creek may be a useful and salient histologic feature in cutaneous angiosarcoma. It is important to recognize, however, that this finding should not be the sole feature upon which a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma is made, as it requires corroboration with positivity of MYC and D2-40 as well as a high Ki-67 proliferation index (>20%).^11,12 Finding a fish-in-the-creek pattern should prompt dermatopathologists to consider a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma in the appropriate clinical and histologic settings.

The chief limitation of this study was the small sample size, with only 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma available in the last 20 years at our institution. The limited sample size did not allow us to make claims on sensitivity and specificity regarding this histologic feature; however, with a larger sample size, the true diagnostic potential could be elucidated. Although the pathologists were blinded to the original diagnoses as they examined it for fish in the creek, it is possible they were able to make the correct diagnosis based on other histopathologic clues and therefore were biased.

Although the fish-in-the-creek pattern is present in cutaneous angiosarcoma, there may be other mimickers to consider. Intraluminal papillary projections lined by endothelial cells may be sectioned in a manner imitating this finding.³ In such a case, these endothelial cells must be differentiated from the free-floating or tufted spindle cells in order to have a positive finding for fish in the creek. There can be confusion if the biopsy cuts through a section of spindled cells, resulting in difficulty differentiating cutaneous angiosarcoma from other spindle tumors such as spindle cell melanoma or spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma.⁶ In such cases, immunohistochemistry may be helpful, as spindle cell melanoma would stain positive for S100 and SOX10 and spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma would stain positive for p63 and cytokeratin.

Various treatment strategies for cutaneous angiosarcoma have been employed, with the majority still resulting in poor outcomes.^2,4-6 The recommended treatment is radical surgical excision of the primary tumor with lymph node clearance if possible. Following excision, the patient should undergo high-dose, wide-field radiotherapy to the region.^5,8 Cutaneous angiosarcomas also have the ability to spread extensively through the dermis and can result in subclinical or clinically obvious widespread disease with multifocal or satellite lesions present. Distant metastases occur most frequently in the cervical lymph nodes and lungs.⁷ In cases where the disease is too extensive for surgery, palliative radiation monotherapy can be used.^5,6

As atypical vascular lesions are considered to be a precursor to cutaneous angiosarcoma, it is important to note that the fish-in-the-creek feature was absent in all 6 of the atypical vascular lesions observed in the study. The differentiation generally is made based on MYC, which is present in cutaneous angiosarcomas and absent in atypical vascular lesions.¹⁰ The feature of fish in the creek may now be an additional clue for dermatopathologists to differentiate between angiosarcomas and other similar-appearing tumors.

Conclusion

Our study aimed to highlight an important histologic feature of cutaneous angiosarcomas that can aid in the diagnosis of this deceptive malignancy. Our findings warrant further study of the fish-in-the-creek histologic pattern in a larger sample size to determine its success as a diagnostic tool for cutaneous angiosarcomas. As noted previously, tumor grade does not impact survival outcome, but small tumor size has been one of the only features found to result in a more favorable prognosis.^1,6,8 Future studies to identify a correlation between the histologic finding of fish in the creek and disease outcome in cutaneous angiosarcoma may be helpful to determine if these histologic findings provide prognostic significance in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare malignant tumor of vascular endothelial cells that has the propensity to arise in various clinical settings. This tumor predominantly occurs in the head and neck region in elderly patients, but it also has been reported to develop postradiotherapy or in the setting of chronic lymphedema in the extremities.^1-3 In all settings, the diagnosis carries a very poor prognosis with a high likelihood of local recurrence and rapid dissemination. The mortality rate typically is 80% or higher.^2,4-6

Making the correct clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma may be difficult given the variety of patient symptoms and clinical appearances that can be demonstrated on presentation. Lesions can appear as bluish or violaceous plaques, macules, or nodules, and ulceration may be present in some advanced cases.^5,7 Clinical misdiagnosis is common, as cutaneous angiosarcomas may be mistaken for infectious processes, benign vascular malformations, and other cutaneous malignancies.¹ Biopsy often is delayed given the initial benign appearance of the lesions, and this frequently results in aggressive and extensive disease at the time of diagnosis, which is unfortunate given that small tumor size has been shown to be one of the only favorable prognostic indicators in cutaneous angiosarcoma.^1,2,6,8

Microscopically, diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma can present a challenge, as the histology varies between a well-differentiated vascular neoplasm and a considerably anaplastic and poorly differentiated malignancy. On low power, some areas may appear as benign hemangiomas with other areas showing frank sarcomatous features.⁹ As a result, these tumors can be mistaken for a variety of other diseases including melanomas, carcinomas, or other vascular tumors.^6,8,9 Previously, electron microscopy has been utilized on undifferentiated tumors to help distinguish cutaneous angiosarcomas from other potential diagnoses. The atypical tumor cells of cutaneous angiosarcoma display common features of endothelial cells (eg, pinocytotic vesicles, tubulated bodies).⁷ Historically, it has been noted that the histologic findings and tumor grade provide little evidence regarding the aggressiveness of the tumor, and all cutaneous angiosarcoma diagnoses receive a poor prognosis.^6,8

Classically, the histologic findings of cutaneous angiosarcoma include a highly infiltrative neoplasm forming irregular vascular channels that penetrate through the cutaneous soft tissues and frequently extend into the subcutaneous fat. The vascular spaces are lined by hyperchromatic endothelial cells with varying degrees of atypia.^1,2,4,6,7,10 Occasionally, prominent endothelial cells lining a papillary structure within the lumen of the neoformed vessel may also be observed. Currently, immunohistochemical staining for MYC, Ki-67, D2-40, and various other markers complement the histologic findings to aid in the diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma.^11,12 An additional diagnostic clue that has been described in cases of postirradiation cutaneous angiosarcoma shows free-floating or tufted pleomorphic spindle cells within the vascular lumen (Figure). This finding has been described as “fish in the creek.”¹¹ In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency and subsequent diagnostic utility of the fish-in-the-creek finding in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Methods

A natural language search of our institutional archives over a 20-year period (1997–2017) using the term angiosarcoma was performed. Fifteen cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma were identified. Fifteen additional benign and malignant vascular tumors with cutaneous angiosarcoma in the histologic differential diagnosis were selected from the archives over a similar time frame. The additional lesions included Kaposi sarcoma (n=3), atypical vascular lesion (n=6), atypical hemangioma (n=1), tufted angioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioma (n=1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (n=1), sinusoidal hemangioma (n=1), and angiofibroma (n=1). The pathologists were blinded to the original diagnosis of each case and were instructed to evaluate the histology slides for the sole feature of free-floating intraluminal spindle cells or spindle cells tufting off the endothelium. Epithelial cells lining papillae found within the vessel lumen were not counted as a positive finding, as they do not fit the criteria described for the histologic pattern of fish in the creek. Following microscopic evaluation, the original diagnoses were reassigned to their respective cases to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this feature.

Results

The histologic pattern of fish in the creek was identified in all 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma and was absent in the other 15 malignancies examined in this study. This finding shows the potential for the fish-in-the-creek pattern to be used as an additional diagnostic tool for dermatopathologists.

Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that proves difficult to diagnose both clinically and histologically as well as to treat effectively.^1,5-8 Our results indicate that fish in the creek may be a useful and salient histologic feature in cutaneous angiosarcoma. It is important to recognize, however, that this finding should not be the sole feature upon which a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma is made, as it requires corroboration with positivity of MYC and D2-40 as well as a high Ki-67 proliferation index (>20%).^11,12 Finding a fish-in-the-creek pattern should prompt dermatopathologists to consider a diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma in the appropriate clinical and histologic settings.

The chief limitation of this study was the small sample size, with only 15 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma available in the last 20 years at our institution. The limited sample size did not allow us to make claims on sensitivity and specificity regarding this histologic feature; however, with a larger sample size, the true diagnostic potential could be elucidated. Although the pathologists were blinded to the original diagnoses as they examined it for fish in the creek, it is possible they were able to make the correct diagnosis based on other histopathologic clues and therefore were biased.

Although the fish-in-the-creek pattern is present in cutaneous angiosarcoma, there may be other mimickers to consider. Intraluminal papillary projections lined by endothelial cells may be sectioned in a manner imitating this finding.³ In such a case, these endothelial cells must be differentiated from the free-floating or tufted spindle cells in order to have a positive finding for fish in the creek. There can be confusion if the biopsy cuts through a section of spindled cells, resulting in difficulty differentiating cutaneous angiosarcoma from other spindle tumors such as spindle cell melanoma or spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma.⁶ In such cases, immunohistochemistry may be helpful, as spindle cell melanoma would stain positive for S100 and SOX10 and spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma would stain positive for p63 and cytokeratin.

Various treatment strategies for cutaneous angiosarcoma have been employed, with the majority still resulting in poor outcomes.^2,4-6 The recommended treatment is radical surgical excision of the primary tumor with lymph node clearance if possible. Following excision, the patient should undergo high-dose, wide-field radiotherapy to the region.^5,8 Cutaneous angiosarcomas also have the ability to spread extensively through the dermis and can result in subclinical or clinically obvious widespread disease with multifocal or satellite lesions present. Distant metastases occur most frequently in the cervical lymph nodes and lungs.⁷ In cases where the disease is too extensive for surgery, palliative radiation monotherapy can be used.^5,6

As atypical vascular lesions are considered to be a precursor to cutaneous angiosarcoma, it is important to note that the fish-in-the-creek feature was absent in all 6 of the atypical vascular lesions observed in the study. The differentiation generally is made based on MYC, which is present in cutaneous angiosarcomas and absent in atypical vascular lesions.¹⁰ The feature of fish in the creek may now be an additional clue for dermatopathologists to differentiate between angiosarcomas and other similar-appearing tumors.

Conclusion

Our study aimed to highlight an important histologic feature of cutaneous angiosarcomas that can aid in the diagnosis of this deceptive malignancy. Our findings warrant further study of the fish-in-the-creek histologic pattern in a larger sample size to determine its success as a diagnostic tool for cutaneous angiosarcomas. As noted previously, tumor grade does not impact survival outcome, but small tumor size has been one of the only features found to result in a more favorable prognosis.^1,6,8 Future studies to identify a correlation between the histologic finding of fish in the creek and disease outcome in cutaneous angiosarcoma may be helpful to determine if these histologic findings provide prognostic significance in cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Myth: Children eventually outgrow atopic dermatitis and therefore do not need treatment

The negative impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on quality of life in the pediatric population often prompts parents/guardians to inquire about whether a child with AD will ever outgrow their disease. If remission is expected as the child gets older, many may question if it is necessary to pursue treatment or just let the disease run its course. Although AD often is reported to resolve soon after the first decade of life, symptoms can persist well into the second decade and beyond, suggesting that AD may be a lifelong disease with periods of waxing and waning symptoms that require persistent treatment throughout the patient’s life.

A 2014 study included 7157 children with AD (mean age of disease onset, 1.7 years) who were enrolled in the Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry (PEER) program between the ages of 2 and 17 years with measurement of disease activity at regular 6-month intervals for up to 5 years. The study results indicated that more than 80% of patients at every age (age range, 2–26 years) had symptoms of AD and/or were using medication to treat their disease, and the majority (64%) of patients had never reported a 6-month period during which they achieved clearance of symptoms without medication. At the age of 20 years, 50% of patients reported at least 1 lifetime 6-month period during which they were both symptom and treatment free. In another study of adolescents with AD who also had AD in childhood (N=82), 48% of patients remained in the same AD severity grades and 13% deteriorated from childhood to adolescence; only 39% of patients showed improvement in disease severity from childhood to adolescence. The findings of these reports are contradictory to conventional clinical teaching, which indicates that AD generally resolves by age 12 in 50% to 70% of children.

Even though some children with AD may experience periods of disease clearance, these findings often do not persist and should not be confused with a permanent remission. Most patients require continued treatment with medications to achieve relief of symptoms. Therefore, physicians should not assure parents/guardians that a child can outgrow AD; rather, they should educate pediatric patients and their caregivers about the potentially lifelong disease course and encourage early intervention to mitigate symptoms and manage comorbidities as the patient ages.

Myth: Children eventually outgrow atopic dermatitis and therefore do not need treatment

The negative impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on quality of life in the pediatric population often prompts parents/guardians to inquire about whether a child with AD will ever outgrow their disease. If remission is expected as the child gets older, many may question if it is necessary to pursue treatment or just let the disease run its course. Although AD often is reported to resolve soon after the first decade of life, symptoms can persist well into the second decade and beyond, suggesting that AD may be a lifelong disease with periods of waxing and waning symptoms that require persistent treatment throughout the patient’s life.

A 2014 study included 7157 children with AD (mean age of disease onset, 1.7 years) who were enrolled in the Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry (PEER) program between the ages of 2 and 17 years with measurement of disease activity at regular 6-month intervals for up to 5 years. The study results indicated that more than 80% of patients at every age (age range, 2–26 years) had symptoms of AD and/or were using medication to treat their disease, and the majority (64%) of patients had never reported a 6-month period during which they achieved clearance of symptoms without medication. At the age of 20 years, 50% of patients reported at least 1 lifetime 6-month period during which they were both symptom and treatment free. In another study of adolescents with AD who also had AD in childhood (N=82), 48% of patients remained in the same AD severity grades and 13% deteriorated from childhood to adolescence; only 39% of patients showed improvement in disease severity from childhood to adolescence. The findings of these reports are contradictory to conventional clinical teaching, which indicates that AD generally resolves by age 12 in 50% to 70% of children.

Even though some children with AD may experience periods of disease clearance, these findings often do not persist and should not be confused with a permanent remission. Most patients require continued treatment with medications to achieve relief of symptoms. Therefore, physicians should not assure parents/guardians that a child can outgrow AD; rather, they should educate pediatric patients and their caregivers about the potentially lifelong disease course and encourage early intervention to mitigate symptoms and manage comorbidities as the patient ages.

Myth: Children eventually outgrow atopic dermatitis and therefore do not need treatment

The negative impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on quality of life in the pediatric population often prompts parents/guardians to inquire about whether a child with AD will ever outgrow their disease. If remission is expected as the child gets older, many may question if it is necessary to pursue treatment or just let the disease run its course. Although AD often is reported to resolve soon after the first decade of life, symptoms can persist well into the second decade and beyond, suggesting that AD may be a lifelong disease with periods of waxing and waning symptoms that require persistent treatment throughout the patient’s life.

A 2014 study included 7157 children with AD (mean age of disease onset, 1.7 years) who were enrolled in the Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry (PEER) program between the ages of 2 and 17 years with measurement of disease activity at regular 6-month intervals for up to 5 years. The study results indicated that more than 80% of patients at every age (age range, 2–26 years) had symptoms of AD and/or were using medication to treat their disease, and the majority (64%) of patients had never reported a 6-month period during which they achieved clearance of symptoms without medication. At the age of 20 years, 50% of patients reported at least 1 lifetime 6-month period during which they were both symptom and treatment free. In another study of adolescents with AD who also had AD in childhood (N=82), 48% of patients remained in the same AD severity grades and 13% deteriorated from childhood to adolescence; only 39% of patients showed improvement in disease severity from childhood to adolescence. The findings of these reports are contradictory to conventional clinical teaching, which indicates that AD generally resolves by age 12 in 50% to 70% of children.

Even though some children with AD may experience periods of disease clearance, these findings often do not persist and should not be confused with a permanent remission. Most patients require continued treatment with medications to achieve relief of symptoms. Therefore, physicians should not assure parents/guardians that a child can outgrow AD; rather, they should educate pediatric patients and their caregivers about the potentially lifelong disease course and encourage early intervention to mitigate symptoms and manage comorbidities as the patient ages.

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.¹ The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).²

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.³

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.⁴ Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.⁵ Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.⁶

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.⁷ Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.⁸ Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.⁹

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.¹⁰

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.^11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.¹³ Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,^14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.¹⁶ The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.¹⁷

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.¹⁸ Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.¹⁹ Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.²⁰

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).²¹ The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.¹ The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).²

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.³

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.⁴ Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.⁵ Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.⁶

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.⁷ Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.⁸ Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.⁹

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.¹⁰

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.^11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.¹³ Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,^14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.¹⁶ The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.¹⁷

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.¹⁸ Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.¹⁹ Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.²⁰

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).²¹ The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.¹ The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).²

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.³

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.⁴ Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.⁵ Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.⁶

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.⁷ Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.⁸ Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.⁹

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.¹⁰

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.^11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.¹³ Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,^14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.¹⁶ The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.¹⁷

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.¹⁸ Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.¹⁹ Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.²⁰

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).²¹ The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

Cutaneous melanoma is a considerable public health concern. In the United States, an estimated 87,110 cases were diagnosed in 2017, and more than 9000 deaths are expected as result of this disease in 2018.¹ Early diagnosis of melanoma is associated with favorable survival rates (5-year overall survival rates for melanoma in situ and stage IA melanoma, 99% and 97%, respectively).² In contrast, the prognosis for advanced-stage melanoma is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 16% for patients with stage IV disease. Therefore, early detection is critical to reducing mortality in melanoma patients.³

The term Hispanic refers to a panethnic category primarily encompassing Mexican-Americans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans, as well as individuals from the Caribbean and Central and South America. These populations are diverse in birth origin, primary language, acculturation, distinct ethnic traditions, education level, and occupation. Hispanics in the United States are heterogeneous in many dimensions related to health risks, health care use, and health outcomes.⁴ Genetic predisposition, lifestyle risks, and access to and use of health care services can shape melanoma diagnosis, treatment, and progression across Hispanic populations differently than in other populations.

In this review, the epidemiology and clinical presentation of melanoma in US Hispanics is summarized, and recommendations for a research agenda to advance understanding of this disease in the most rapidly growing segment of the US population is provided.

Melanoma Incidence, Presentation, and Outcomes in US Hispanics

In the period from 2008 to 2012, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics (4.6 per 100,00 men and 4.2 per 100,00 women) was lower than in NHWs.⁵ Garnett et al⁵ reported a decline in melanoma incidence in US Hispanics between 2003 and 2012—an observation that stands in contrast to state-level studies in California and Florida, in which small but substantial increases in melanoma incidence among Hispanics were reported.^6,7 The rising incidence of melanomas thicker than 1.5 mm at presentation among Hispanic men living in California is particularly worrisome.⁶ Discrepancies in incidence trends might reflect changes in incidence over time or differences in state-level registry reporting of melanoma.⁵

Despite a lower overall incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics, those who do develop the disease are 2.4 times more likely (age-adjusted odds ratio) to present with stage III disease (confidence interval, 1.89-3.05)⁸ and are 3.64 times more likely to develop distant metastases (confidence interval, 2.65-5.0) than NHWs.^3,7,9-13 Disparities also exist in the diagnosis of childhood melanoma: Hispanic children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of melanoma are 3 times more likely to present with advanced disease than NHW counterparts.¹⁴ Survival analyses by age and stage show considerably lower survival among Hispanic patients compared to NHW patients with stage I and II disease. In part, worse survival outcomes among Hispanics are the result of the pattern of more advanced disease at presentation.^8,14,15

Late presentation for evaluation of melanomas in Hispanics has been attributed to a number of variables, including a lack of skin cancer awareness and knowledge,^9,16 a lower rate of self- and physician-performed skin examinations,¹⁰ differences in tumor biology,⁹ and socioeconomic forces.^7,17

In a previous study investigating the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis in Hispanic men in California, Texas, and Florida, several key findings emerged.¹⁷ First, residency in a census tract with a high density of immigrants (California, Texas) and a high composition of Hispanics (California, Florida) was an important predictor of a late-stage melanoma diagnosis in fully adjusted models. Additionally, the strength of association between measures of socioeconomic status (ie, poverty and education) and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis was attenuated in multivariate models when enclaves and availability of primary care resources were taken into account. Hispanic melanoma cases in areas with a low density of primary care physicians had an increased likelihood of late-stage diagnosis in California and Texas. The probability of late-stage diagnosis was concentrated in specific regions along the United States–Mexico border, in south central California, and along the southeastern coast of Florida. Lastly, in Texas, Hispanic men aged 18 to 34 years and 35 to 49 years were at an increased risk of late-stage melanoma diagnosis compared to men 65 years and older.¹⁷

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Melanoma in Hispanic Patients

Among Hispanics, white Hispanics comprise the majority of melanoma cases.⁵ Median age at diagnosis is younger in Hispanics compared to whites.^5,6 Hispanic men typically are older (median age, 61 years) than Hispanic women (median age, 52 years) at diagnosis.⁵ Similar to what is seen in NHWs, young Hispanic women experience a higher melanoma incidence than young Hispanic men.⁵ Among older Hispanics, melanoma is more common in men.^5,8

Melanomas located on the lower extremities and hips are more prevalent in Hispanics than in NHWs.^5,8,18 Among Hispanics, there are age- and sex-based variations in the anatomic location of primary tumors: in Hispanic men, truncal tumors predominate, and in Hispanic women, tumors of the lower extremities are most common across all age groups.⁵ The incidence of melanomas located in the head and neck region increases with age for both Hispanic men and women.

For melanomas in which the histologic type is known, superficial spreading melanoma is the most common subtype among Hispanics.^5,17,19 Acral lentiginous melanomas and nodular melanomas are more common among Hispanics than among NHWs.^5,17,19

The observation that Hispanics with melanoma are more prone to lower-extremity tumors and nodular and acral lentiginous melanoma subtypes than NHWs suggests that UV exposure history may be of less importance in this population. Although numerous studies have explored melanoma risk factors in NHWs, there is a striking paucity of such studies in Hispanics. For example, there are conflicting data regarding the role of UV exposure in melanoma risk among Hispanics. Hu et al²⁰ found that UV index and latitude correlated with melanoma risk in this population, whereas Eide et al²¹ found no association between UV exposure and melanoma incidence in Hispanics. A prospective study involving a multiethnic cohort (of whom 40 of the 107 participants were Hispanic) found no clear association between a history of sunburn and melanoma risk in Hispanics.¹⁸

Strategies for Reducing Disparities in Outcomes

Our knowledge of melanoma epidemiology in Hispanics derives mainly from secondary analyses of state-level and national cancer registry data sets.^{5-8,13-15,17,19,20} These administrative data sources often are limited by missing data (eg, tumor thickness, histologic subtype) or lack important patient-level information (eg, self-identified race and ethnicity, health insurance status). Additionally, the manner in which data are collected and integrated into research varies; for example, socioeconomic measures often are reported as either area-based or composite measures. Thus, there is a need to improve the consistency of reporting on demographic and socioeconomic measures across studies. Polite et al²² recommended standardization of reporting criteria and that a standard set of demographic and socioeconomic status measures be included in clinical registries and research protocols.²² Researchers should strive to collect self-reported information on race and ethnicity, as well as the most granular level of detail on health insurance status, ancestry, and immigration status.

The host phenotypic characteristics of melanoma in NHWs are well understood, but the biological and environmental determinants of melanoma risk in Hispanics and other minorities are unknown. For example, fair complexion, red hair, blue eyes, increased freckling density, and the presence of numerous dysplastic and common melanocytic nevi indicate a propensity toward cutaneous melanoma.^23,24 However, the relevance of such risk factors in Hispanics is unknown and has not been widely investigated in this patient population. Park et al¹⁸ found that a person’s sunburn susceptibility phenotype (defined as hair and eye color, ability to tan, and skin reaction to sunlight) was associated with an increased risk of melanoma among nonwhite, multiracial individuals. However, this study was limited by a small number of minority cases, which included only 40 Hispanic participants with melanoma.¹⁸ There is a need for rigorous observational studies to clearly define the phenotypic characteristics, sun-exposure behavior patterns, and genetic contributors to melanoma genesis in Hispanics.

The biologic determinants of postdiagnosis survival in Hispanics with melanoma are not well understood. It is unknown if genetic predisposition modifies melanoma risk in Hispanics. For example, the frequency of BRAF gene mutation or other driver mutations in US Hispanics has been understudied. It is important to know if mutation frequency patterns differ in Hispanics patients compared to NHWs because this knowledge could have considerable implications for treatment. Several recommendations should be considered to address these knowledge gaps. First, there is a need for development or enhancement of melanoma biorepositories, which should include tumor and nontumor specimens from a diverse sample of melanoma patients. Additionally, multi-institutional and multidisciplinary consortiums need to be created in order to amass a number of Hispanic melanoma patients to identify genetic, biologic, and behavioral risk factors specific to this subgroup of patients. The AMBER Consortium, which focuses on breast cancer epidemiology and risk in black women, is a model for the type of consortium needed for the study of melanoma in Hispanics.²⁵ Lastly, community engagement will be central to developing sustainable recruitment and data-collection efforts.²⁶ Involvement of key stakeholders will provide an in-depth assessment of community needs as well as real-time feedback on the process and practicality of research questions. Buy-in from affected communities also may facilitate dissemination of research findings to affected communities.

Conclusion

Hispanics are more likely to present with an advanced stages of disease and have higher melanoma-specific mortality rates than NHWs. Regrettably, a huge knowledge gap exists regarding contributors and solutions to melanoma disparities among this fast-growing, understudied segment of the US population. Accordingly, critical research is needed to address the most pressing questions regarding melanoma risk and poor outcomes among Hispanics to foster implementation of interventional efforts in prevention, early detection, and treatment. A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary approach across multiple levels is needed to eliminate disparate outcomes. Although melanoma is relatively uncommon among Hispanics, studies of melanoma in Hispanics (given their diverse genetic ancestry and migration) provide a unique backdrop against which researchers can explicate melanoma etiology—thus benefiting Hispanics and non-Hispanics alike.

Cutaneous melanoma is a considerable public health concern. In the United States, an estimated 87,110 cases were diagnosed in 2017, and more than 9000 deaths are expected as result of this disease in 2018.¹ Early diagnosis of melanoma is associated with favorable survival rates (5-year overall survival rates for melanoma in situ and stage IA melanoma, 99% and 97%, respectively).² In contrast, the prognosis for advanced-stage melanoma is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 16% for patients with stage IV disease. Therefore, early detection is critical to reducing mortality in melanoma patients.³

The term Hispanic refers to a panethnic category primarily encompassing Mexican-Americans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans, as well as individuals from the Caribbean and Central and South America. These populations are diverse in birth origin, primary language, acculturation, distinct ethnic traditions, education level, and occupation. Hispanics in the United States are heterogeneous in many dimensions related to health risks, health care use, and health outcomes.⁴ Genetic predisposition, lifestyle risks, and access to and use of health care services can shape melanoma diagnosis, treatment, and progression across Hispanic populations differently than in other populations.

In this review, the epidemiology and clinical presentation of melanoma in US Hispanics is summarized, and recommendations for a research agenda to advance understanding of this disease in the most rapidly growing segment of the US population is provided.

Melanoma Incidence, Presentation, and Outcomes in US Hispanics

In the period from 2008 to 2012, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics (4.6 per 100,00 men and 4.2 per 100,00 women) was lower than in NHWs.⁵ Garnett et al⁵ reported a decline in melanoma incidence in US Hispanics between 2003 and 2012—an observation that stands in contrast to state-level studies in California and Florida, in which small but substantial increases in melanoma incidence among Hispanics were reported.^6,7 The rising incidence of melanomas thicker than 1.5 mm at presentation among Hispanic men living in California is particularly worrisome.⁶ Discrepancies in incidence trends might reflect changes in incidence over time or differences in state-level registry reporting of melanoma.⁵

Despite a lower overall incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics, those who do develop the disease are 2.4 times more likely (age-adjusted odds ratio) to present with stage III disease (confidence interval, 1.89-3.05)⁸ and are 3.64 times more likely to develop distant metastases (confidence interval, 2.65-5.0) than NHWs.^3,7,9-13 Disparities also exist in the diagnosis of childhood melanoma: Hispanic children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of melanoma are 3 times more likely to present with advanced disease than NHW counterparts.¹⁴ Survival analyses by age and stage show considerably lower survival among Hispanic patients compared to NHW patients with stage I and II disease. In part, worse survival outcomes among Hispanics are the result of the pattern of more advanced disease at presentation.^8,14,15

Late presentation for evaluation of melanomas in Hispanics has been attributed to a number of variables, including a lack of skin cancer awareness and knowledge,^9,16 a lower rate of self- and physician-performed skin examinations,¹⁰ differences in tumor biology,⁹ and socioeconomic forces.^7,17

In a previous study investigating the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis in Hispanic men in California, Texas, and Florida, several key findings emerged.¹⁷ First, residency in a census tract with a high density of immigrants (California, Texas) and a high composition of Hispanics (California, Florida) was an important predictor of a late-stage melanoma diagnosis in fully adjusted models. Additionally, the strength of association between measures of socioeconomic status (ie, poverty and education) and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis was attenuated in multivariate models when enclaves and availability of primary care resources were taken into account. Hispanic melanoma cases in areas with a low density of primary care physicians had an increased likelihood of late-stage diagnosis in California and Texas. The probability of late-stage diagnosis was concentrated in specific regions along the United States–Mexico border, in south central California, and along the southeastern coast of Florida. Lastly, in Texas, Hispanic men aged 18 to 34 years and 35 to 49 years were at an increased risk of late-stage melanoma diagnosis compared to men 65 years and older.¹⁷

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Melanoma in Hispanic Patients

Among Hispanics, white Hispanics comprise the majority of melanoma cases.⁵ Median age at diagnosis is younger in Hispanics compared to whites.^5,6 Hispanic men typically are older (median age, 61 years) than Hispanic women (median age, 52 years) at diagnosis.⁵ Similar to what is seen in NHWs, young Hispanic women experience a higher melanoma incidence than young Hispanic men.⁵ Among older Hispanics, melanoma is more common in men.^5,8

Melanomas located on the lower extremities and hips are more prevalent in Hispanics than in NHWs.^5,8,18 Among Hispanics, there are age- and sex-based variations in the anatomic location of primary tumors: in Hispanic men, truncal tumors predominate, and in Hispanic women, tumors of the lower extremities are most common across all age groups.⁵ The incidence of melanomas located in the head and neck region increases with age for both Hispanic men and women.

For melanomas in which the histologic type is known, superficial spreading melanoma is the most common subtype among Hispanics.^5,17,19 Acral lentiginous melanomas and nodular melanomas are more common among Hispanics than among NHWs.^5,17,19

The observation that Hispanics with melanoma are more prone to lower-extremity tumors and nodular and acral lentiginous melanoma subtypes than NHWs suggests that UV exposure history may be of less importance in this population. Although numerous studies have explored melanoma risk factors in NHWs, there is a striking paucity of such studies in Hispanics. For example, there are conflicting data regarding the role of UV exposure in melanoma risk among Hispanics. Hu et al²⁰ found that UV index and latitude correlated with melanoma risk in this population, whereas Eide et al²¹ found no association between UV exposure and melanoma incidence in Hispanics. A prospective study involving a multiethnic cohort (of whom 40 of the 107 participants were Hispanic) found no clear association between a history of sunburn and melanoma risk in Hispanics.¹⁸

Strategies for Reducing Disparities in Outcomes

Our knowledge of melanoma epidemiology in Hispanics derives mainly from secondary analyses of state-level and national cancer registry data sets.^{5-8,13-15,17,19,20} These administrative data sources often are limited by missing data (eg, tumor thickness, histologic subtype) or lack important patient-level information (eg, self-identified race and ethnicity, health insurance status). Additionally, the manner in which data are collected and integrated into research varies; for example, socioeconomic measures often are reported as either area-based or composite measures. Thus, there is a need to improve the consistency of reporting on demographic and socioeconomic measures across studies. Polite et al²² recommended standardization of reporting criteria and that a standard set of demographic and socioeconomic status measures be included in clinical registries and research protocols.²² Researchers should strive to collect self-reported information on race and ethnicity, as well as the most granular level of detail on health insurance status, ancestry, and immigration status.

The host phenotypic characteristics of melanoma in NHWs are well understood, but the biological and environmental determinants of melanoma risk in Hispanics and other minorities are unknown. For example, fair complexion, red hair, blue eyes, increased freckling density, and the presence of numerous dysplastic and common melanocytic nevi indicate a propensity toward cutaneous melanoma.^23,24 However, the relevance of such risk factors in Hispanics is unknown and has not been widely investigated in this patient population. Park et al¹⁸ found that a person’s sunburn susceptibility phenotype (defined as hair and eye color, ability to tan, and skin reaction to sunlight) was associated with an increased risk of melanoma among nonwhite, multiracial individuals. However, this study was limited by a small number of minority cases, which included only 40 Hispanic participants with melanoma.¹⁸ There is a need for rigorous observational studies to clearly define the phenotypic characteristics, sun-exposure behavior patterns, and genetic contributors to melanoma genesis in Hispanics.

The biologic determinants of postdiagnosis survival in Hispanics with melanoma are not well understood. It is unknown if genetic predisposition modifies melanoma risk in Hispanics. For example, the frequency of BRAF gene mutation or other driver mutations in US Hispanics has been understudied. It is important to know if mutation frequency patterns differ in Hispanics patients compared to NHWs because this knowledge could have considerable implications for treatment. Several recommendations should be considered to address these knowledge gaps. First, there is a need for development or enhancement of melanoma biorepositories, which should include tumor and nontumor specimens from a diverse sample of melanoma patients. Additionally, multi-institutional and multidisciplinary consortiums need to be created in order to amass a number of Hispanic melanoma patients to identify genetic, biologic, and behavioral risk factors specific to this subgroup of patients. The AMBER Consortium, which focuses on breast cancer epidemiology and risk in black women, is a model for the type of consortium needed for the study of melanoma in Hispanics.²⁵ Lastly, community engagement will be central to developing sustainable recruitment and data-collection efforts.²⁶ Involvement of key stakeholders will provide an in-depth assessment of community needs as well as real-time feedback on the process and practicality of research questions. Buy-in from affected communities also may facilitate dissemination of research findings to affected communities.

Conclusion

Hispanics are more likely to present with an advanced stages of disease and have higher melanoma-specific mortality rates than NHWs. Regrettably, a huge knowledge gap exists regarding contributors and solutions to melanoma disparities among this fast-growing, understudied segment of the US population. Accordingly, critical research is needed to address the most pressing questions regarding melanoma risk and poor outcomes among Hispanics to foster implementation of interventional efforts in prevention, early detection, and treatment. A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary approach across multiple levels is needed to eliminate disparate outcomes. Although melanoma is relatively uncommon among Hispanics, studies of melanoma in Hispanics (given their diverse genetic ancestry and migration) provide a unique backdrop against which researchers can explicate melanoma etiology—thus benefiting Hispanics and non-Hispanics alike.

Cutaneous melanoma is a considerable public health concern. In the United States, an estimated 87,110 cases were diagnosed in 2017, and more than 9000 deaths are expected as result of this disease in 2018.¹ Early diagnosis of melanoma is associated with favorable survival rates (5-year overall survival rates for melanoma in situ and stage IA melanoma, 99% and 97%, respectively).² In contrast, the prognosis for advanced-stage melanoma is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 16% for patients with stage IV disease. Therefore, early detection is critical to reducing mortality in melanoma patients.³

The term Hispanic refers to a panethnic category primarily encompassing Mexican-Americans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans, as well as individuals from the Caribbean and Central and South America. These populations are diverse in birth origin, primary language, acculturation, distinct ethnic traditions, education level, and occupation. Hispanics in the United States are heterogeneous in many dimensions related to health risks, health care use, and health outcomes.⁴ Genetic predisposition, lifestyle risks, and access to and use of health care services can shape melanoma diagnosis, treatment, and progression across Hispanic populations differently than in other populations.

In this review, the epidemiology and clinical presentation of melanoma in US Hispanics is summarized, and recommendations for a research agenda to advance understanding of this disease in the most rapidly growing segment of the US population is provided.

Melanoma Incidence, Presentation, and Outcomes in US Hispanics

In the period from 2008 to 2012, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics (4.6 per 100,00 men and 4.2 per 100,00 women) was lower than in NHWs.⁵ Garnett et al⁵ reported a decline in melanoma incidence in US Hispanics between 2003 and 2012—an observation that stands in contrast to state-level studies in California and Florida, in which small but substantial increases in melanoma incidence among Hispanics were reported.^6,7 The rising incidence of melanomas thicker than 1.5 mm at presentation among Hispanic men living in California is particularly worrisome.⁶ Discrepancies in incidence trends might reflect changes in incidence over time or differences in state-level registry reporting of melanoma.⁵

Despite a lower overall incidence of melanoma in US Hispanics, those who do develop the disease are 2.4 times more likely (age-adjusted odds ratio) to present with stage III disease (confidence interval, 1.89-3.05)⁸ and are 3.64 times more likely to develop distant metastases (confidence interval, 2.65-5.0) than NHWs.^3,7,9-13 Disparities also exist in the diagnosis of childhood melanoma: Hispanic children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of melanoma are 3 times more likely to present with advanced disease than NHW counterparts.¹⁴ Survival analyses by age and stage show considerably lower survival among Hispanic patients compared to NHW patients with stage I and II disease. In part, worse survival outcomes among Hispanics are the result of the pattern of more advanced disease at presentation.^8,14,15

Late presentation for evaluation of melanomas in Hispanics has been attributed to a number of variables, including a lack of skin cancer awareness and knowledge,^9,16 a lower rate of self- and physician-performed skin examinations,¹⁰ differences in tumor biology,⁹ and socioeconomic forces.^7,17

In a previous study investigating the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis in Hispanic men in California, Texas, and Florida, several key findings emerged.¹⁷ First, residency in a census tract with a high density of immigrants (California, Texas) and a high composition of Hispanics (California, Florida) was an important predictor of a late-stage melanoma diagnosis in fully adjusted models. Additionally, the strength of association between measures of socioeconomic status (ie, poverty and education) and tumor stage at melanoma diagnosis was attenuated in multivariate models when enclaves and availability of primary care resources were taken into account. Hispanic melanoma cases in areas with a low density of primary care physicians had an increased likelihood of late-stage diagnosis in California and Texas. The probability of late-stage diagnosis was concentrated in specific regions along the United States–Mexico border, in south central California, and along the southeastern coast of Florida. Lastly, in Texas, Hispanic men aged 18 to 34 years and 35 to 49 years were at an increased risk of late-stage melanoma diagnosis compared to men 65 years and older.¹⁷

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Melanoma in Hispanic Patients

Among Hispanics, white Hispanics comprise the majority of melanoma cases.⁵ Median age at diagnosis is younger in Hispanics compared to whites.^5,6 Hispanic men typically are older (median age, 61 years) than Hispanic women (median age, 52 years) at diagnosis.⁵ Similar to what is seen in NHWs, young Hispanic women experience a higher melanoma incidence than young Hispanic men.⁵ Among older Hispanics, melanoma is more common in men.^5,8

Melanomas located on the lower extremities and hips are more prevalent in Hispanics than in NHWs.^5,8,18 Among Hispanics, there are age- and sex-based variations in the anatomic location of primary tumors: in Hispanic men, truncal tumors predominate, and in Hispanic women, tumors of the lower extremities are most common across all age groups.⁵ The incidence of melanomas located in the head and neck region increases with age for both Hispanic men and women.

For melanomas in which the histologic type is known, superficial spreading melanoma is the most common subtype among Hispanics.^5,17,19 Acral lentiginous melanomas and nodular melanomas are more common among Hispanics than among NHWs.^5,17,19

The observation that Hispanics with melanoma are more prone to lower-extremity tumors and nodular and acral lentiginous melanoma subtypes than NHWs suggests that UV exposure history may be of less importance in this population. Although numerous studies have explored melanoma risk factors in NHWs, there is a striking paucity of such studies in Hispanics. For example, there are conflicting data regarding the role of UV exposure in melanoma risk among Hispanics. Hu et al²⁰ found that UV index and latitude correlated with melanoma risk in this population, whereas Eide et al²¹ found no association between UV exposure and melanoma incidence in Hispanics. A prospective study involving a multiethnic cohort (of whom 40 of the 107 participants were Hispanic) found no clear association between a history of sunburn and melanoma risk in Hispanics.¹⁸

Strategies for Reducing Disparities in Outcomes

Our knowledge of melanoma epidemiology in Hispanics derives mainly from secondary analyses of state-level and national cancer registry data sets.^{5-8,13-15,17,19,20} These administrative data sources often are limited by missing data (eg, tumor thickness, histologic subtype) or lack important patient-level information (eg, self-identified race and ethnicity, health insurance status). Additionally, the manner in which data are collected and integrated into research varies; for example, socioeconomic measures often are reported as either area-based or composite measures. Thus, there is a need to improve the consistency of reporting on demographic and socioeconomic measures across studies. Polite et al²² recommended standardization of reporting criteria and that a standard set of demographic and socioeconomic status measures be included in clinical registries and research protocols.²² Researchers should strive to collect self-reported information on race and ethnicity, as well as the most granular level of detail on health insurance status, ancestry, and immigration status.

The host phenotypic characteristics of melanoma in NHWs are well understood, but the biological and environmental determinants of melanoma risk in Hispanics and other minorities are unknown. For example, fair complexion, red hair, blue eyes, increased freckling density, and the presence of numerous dysplastic and common melanocytic nevi indicate a propensity toward cutaneous melanoma.^23,24 However, the relevance of such risk factors in Hispanics is unknown and has not been widely investigated in this patient population. Park et al¹⁸ found that a person’s sunburn susceptibility phenotype (defined as hair and eye color, ability to tan, and skin reaction to sunlight) was associated with an increased risk of melanoma among nonwhite, multiracial individuals. However, this study was limited by a small number of minority cases, which included only 40 Hispanic participants with melanoma.¹⁸ There is a need for rigorous observational studies to clearly define the phenotypic characteristics, sun-exposure behavior patterns, and genetic contributors to melanoma genesis in Hispanics.

The biologic determinants of postdiagnosis survival in Hispanics with melanoma are not well understood. It is unknown if genetic predisposition modifies melanoma risk in Hispanics. For example, the frequency of BRAF gene mutation or other driver mutations in US Hispanics has been understudied. It is important to know if mutation frequency patterns differ in Hispanics patients compared to NHWs because this knowledge could have considerable implications for treatment. Several recommendations should be considered to address these knowledge gaps. First, there is a need for development or enhancement of melanoma biorepositories, which should include tumor and nontumor specimens from a diverse sample of melanoma patients. Additionally, multi-institutional and multidisciplinary consortiums need to be created in order to amass a number of Hispanic melanoma patients to identify genetic, biologic, and behavioral risk factors specific to this subgroup of patients. The AMBER Consortium, which focuses on breast cancer epidemiology and risk in black women, is a model for the type of consortium needed for the study of melanoma in Hispanics.²⁵ Lastly, community engagement will be central to developing sustainable recruitment and data-collection efforts.²⁶ Involvement of key stakeholders will provide an in-depth assessment of community needs as well as real-time feedback on the process and practicality of research questions. Buy-in from affected communities also may facilitate dissemination of research findings to affected communities.

Conclusion

Hispanics are more likely to present with an advanced stages of disease and have higher melanoma-specific mortality rates than NHWs. Regrettably, a huge knowledge gap exists regarding contributors and solutions to melanoma disparities among this fast-growing, understudied segment of the US population. Accordingly, critical research is needed to address the most pressing questions regarding melanoma risk and poor outcomes among Hispanics to foster implementation of interventional efforts in prevention, early detection, and treatment. A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary approach across multiple levels is needed to eliminate disparate outcomes. Although melanoma is relatively uncommon among Hispanics, studies of melanoma in Hispanics (given their diverse genetic ancestry and migration) provide a unique backdrop against which researchers can explicate melanoma etiology—thus benefiting Hispanics and non-Hispanics alike.