The patient was diagnosed with Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) based on clinical presentation of the lesions and associated symptoms of arthralgia and abdominal pain. Urinalysis was obtained and found to be unremarkable, at presentation and follow-up, and treatment with naproxen 5 mg/kg divided into two doses per day was started for pain relief. A prednisone taper starting at 1 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks also was started due to the presence of severe abdominal pain and bullae on exam. The patient was followed with regular urine studies and blood pressure checks for 2 months, and these also were within normal limits.

HSP, also known as anaphylactoid purpura and immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis, is a small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis characterized by the perivascular deposition of IgA1-based immune complexes in the walls of arterioles and postcapillary venules.¹The clinical picture of HSP is palpable purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis, and hematuria 1-2 weeks following an upper respiratory infection. In the vast majority of cases, the condition resolves spontaneously in 4-6 weeks and does not require any specific treatment,² although NSAIDs and systemic corticosteroids can be used for mild-to-moderate and severe pain, respectively.³

HSP is the most common vasculitis in children, with a peak incidence in boys under the age of 5 years. It occurs worldwide, more commonly among whites and Asians, less commonly among blacks, and recent studies from the Czech Republic,⁴ Taiwan,⁵ Spain,⁶ France,⁷ South Korea,⁸ and the United Kingdom⁹ have shown similar incidence rates of 10-20 per 100,000 children. HSP does occur in adults, but is less common, and is known to carry a worse prognosis – in particular, a higher risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. The disease is more commonly seen in winter months,¹ unsurprisingly as upper respiratory tract infections also are more common in these months.¹⁰
 

^Pathogenesis

The exact pathogenesis of HSP is the subject of ongoing investigation and continued controversy. Mutations and polymorphisms in mannose-binding lectin, interleukins 1 and 8, vascular endothelial growth factor, and alpha-1-antitrypsin have been associated with HSP.³ Immunoglobulin A (IgA) normally exists in two heavily glycosylated forms – IgA1 and IgA2. Abnormal glycosylation, particularly undergalactosylation, of IgA1, the predominant form of IgA in serum and mucosal secretions, has been linked to HSP.¹¹ HSP has been associated with group A streptococcal infections, Bartonella henselae (cat scratch fever) and numerous drugs,¹² although no definitive causal or mechanistic explanation has been identified.

Diagnosis

Two major diagnostic criteria for HSP are widely in use, one developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990¹³ and the other by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) in 2005.¹⁴ Both the ACR and EULAR criteria include acute abdominal pain, purpura, and microscopic evidence of vasculitis. Almost all patients with HSP have cutaneous purpura, and many of these patients have palpable purpura, which is pathognomonic of a leukocytoclastic vasculitis, but palpable purpura is not needed for diagnosis. The ACR criteria additionally include age of 20 years or younger, while the EULAR criteria include arthralgias and the presence of hematuria or proteinuria. Ancillary testing usually is not required to make the diagnosis, but when the diagnosis is not clear histopathologic analysis of a skin sample can identify leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Other laboratory studies that may be needed to rule out other conditions, as well as other organ involvement, include a complete blood count, which can be done to rule out thrombocytopenia as a cause of purpura, a metabolic panel, coagulation studies, occult blood test of stool, abdominal imaging, and urinalysis (UA), which can identify proteinuria or hematuria.

Abdominal pain in HSP is believed to be a result of vasculitis of the gastric, mesenteric, and/or colic vasculature. Bleeding from the inflamed vasculature rarely can lead to gross hematochezia, frank melena, or hematemesis. One serious, potential complication of HSP-related mesenteric vasculitis is intussusception, which is otherwise rare in children older than 2 years. Intussusception should be suspected if features of the classic triad of episodic abdominal pain, sausage-shaped abdominal mass, and currant jelly stool are present. Abdominal ultrasound can help to determine whether intussusception is present.

The purpura in HSP presents in waves or crops, and crops last 5-10 days each. Complete resolution takes 4-6 weeks. If biopsy is desired to confirm the diagnosis, it should be done on a lesion less than 24 hours old. This allows for identification of perivascular IgA on histopathology: beyond 24 hours, IgG and IgM also leak out, contributing to a less specific histopathologic picture.

Accurate diagnosis of HSP is important to guide therapy and anticipate potential complications. Wegener’s granulomatosis (A), also known as granulomatosis with polyangiitis, classically involves the upper and lower respiratory tract and the kidneys, leading to a presentation of epistaxis, cough, and hypertension. It occurs more commonly in adults than children. Finkelstein disease (B), also known as acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI), is characterized by the development of petechial, urticarial, or targetoid plaques over 24-48 hours with tender edema and fever in children aged less than 2 years. Unlike HSP, AHEI typically does not involve the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, or joints. Biopsy of skin lesions of AHEI reveals IgA deposition and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, leading some authors to consider it a closely related entity to HSP. Microscopic polyangiitis (D) is an uncommon pauci-immune vasculitis similar to Wegener’s granulomatosis, but lacking granulomas. It presents typically in the 5th decade of life with fever, fatigue, weight loss, and renal involvement. IgA nephropathy (E), also known as synpharyngitic nephritis and Berger disease, is less likely than HSP to cause a rash, joint pain, or abdominal pain. The nomenclature of HSP (whose alternate name is IgA vasculitis) reflects the multi-organ nature of HSP in comparison to IgA nephropathy, which is more likely to be limited to the kidneys.
 

Treatment

Aside from intussusception and renal disease, which may result from HSP, treatment is not typically required for HSP as it resolves spontaneously. Patients with significant arthralgias are likely to benefit from NSAIDs such as naproxen 5-20 mg/kg per day, although NSAIDs should be avoided if there is significant renal dysfunction or GI bleeding. Patients with severe abdominal pain or joint pain may be more likely to benefit from oral corticosteroids, particularly prednisone 1-2 mg/kg per day. A meta-analysis showed that corticosteroids significantly reduce the duration of symptoms if given early in the course of disease.¹⁵

The prognosis is usually excellent, except for a very small sample of the population (5%) that can develop end-stage renal disease. It is recommended that all children with HSP continue monitoring blood pressure and UA either weekly or biweekly for the first 2 months and then once a month for 6-12 months.¹⁶

First described in 1801 by a British physician, HSP is a common and usually self-limited disease for which our understanding has advanced greatly over the past 2 centuries, yet for which many important questions regarding pathophysiology remain unanswered. No diagnostic tests or treatments are needed for the majority of patients. Providers should include HSP in the differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained abdominal pain, renal dysfunction, or nonthrombocytopenic purpura.
 

Mr. Kusari is a medical student at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a practicing dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group in La Mesa, California. Dr. Matiz and Mr. Kusari said they had no relevant financial disclosures. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.

References

1. “Hurwitz Clinical Pediatric Dermatology: A Textbook of Skin Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence”, 5th ed. (New York: Elsevier, 2016).

2. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):976-8.

3. “Dermatology”, 3rd ed. (Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2012).

4. J Rheumatol. 2004 Nov;31(11):2295-9.

5. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 May;44(5):618-22.

6. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Mar;93(2):106-13.

7. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(8):1358-66.

8. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Feb;29(2):198-203.

9. Lancet. 2002 Oct 19;360(9341):1197-202.

10. Rhinology. 2015 Jun;53(2):99-106.

11. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166700.

12. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Jan;21(1):28-31.

13. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;33(8):1114-21.

14. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jul;65(7):936-41.

15. Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1079-87.

16. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Nov;95(11):877-82.

The patient was diagnosed with Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) based on clinical presentation of the lesions and associated symptoms of arthralgia and abdominal pain. Urinalysis was obtained and found to be unremarkable, at presentation and follow-up, and treatment with naproxen 5 mg/kg divided into two doses per day was started for pain relief. A prednisone taper starting at 1 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks also was started due to the presence of severe abdominal pain and bullae on exam. The patient was followed with regular urine studies and blood pressure checks for 2 months, and these also were within normal limits.

HSP, also known as anaphylactoid purpura and immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis, is a small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis characterized by the perivascular deposition of IgA1-based immune complexes in the walls of arterioles and postcapillary venules.¹The clinical picture of HSP is palpable purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis, and hematuria 1-2 weeks following an upper respiratory infection. In the vast majority of cases, the condition resolves spontaneously in 4-6 weeks and does not require any specific treatment,² although NSAIDs and systemic corticosteroids can be used for mild-to-moderate and severe pain, respectively.³

HSP is the most common vasculitis in children, with a peak incidence in boys under the age of 5 years. It occurs worldwide, more commonly among whites and Asians, less commonly among blacks, and recent studies from the Czech Republic,⁴ Taiwan,⁵ Spain,⁶ France,⁷ South Korea,⁸ and the United Kingdom⁹ have shown similar incidence rates of 10-20 per 100,000 children. HSP does occur in adults, but is less common, and is known to carry a worse prognosis – in particular, a higher risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. The disease is more commonly seen in winter months,¹ unsurprisingly as upper respiratory tract infections also are more common in these months.¹⁰
 

^Pathogenesis

The exact pathogenesis of HSP is the subject of ongoing investigation and continued controversy. Mutations and polymorphisms in mannose-binding lectin, interleukins 1 and 8, vascular endothelial growth factor, and alpha-1-antitrypsin have been associated with HSP.³ Immunoglobulin A (IgA) normally exists in two heavily glycosylated forms – IgA1 and IgA2. Abnormal glycosylation, particularly undergalactosylation, of IgA1, the predominant form of IgA in serum and mucosal secretions, has been linked to HSP.¹¹ HSP has been associated with group A streptococcal infections, Bartonella henselae (cat scratch fever) and numerous drugs,¹² although no definitive causal or mechanistic explanation has been identified.

Diagnosis

Two major diagnostic criteria for HSP are widely in use, one developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990¹³ and the other by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) in 2005.¹⁴ Both the ACR and EULAR criteria include acute abdominal pain, purpura, and microscopic evidence of vasculitis. Almost all patients with HSP have cutaneous purpura, and many of these patients have palpable purpura, which is pathognomonic of a leukocytoclastic vasculitis, but palpable purpura is not needed for diagnosis. The ACR criteria additionally include age of 20 years or younger, while the EULAR criteria include arthralgias and the presence of hematuria or proteinuria. Ancillary testing usually is not required to make the diagnosis, but when the diagnosis is not clear histopathologic analysis of a skin sample can identify leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Other laboratory studies that may be needed to rule out other conditions, as well as other organ involvement, include a complete blood count, which can be done to rule out thrombocytopenia as a cause of purpura, a metabolic panel, coagulation studies, occult blood test of stool, abdominal imaging, and urinalysis (UA), which can identify proteinuria or hematuria.

Abdominal pain in HSP is believed to be a result of vasculitis of the gastric, mesenteric, and/or colic vasculature. Bleeding from the inflamed vasculature rarely can lead to gross hematochezia, frank melena, or hematemesis. One serious, potential complication of HSP-related mesenteric vasculitis is intussusception, which is otherwise rare in children older than 2 years. Intussusception should be suspected if features of the classic triad of episodic abdominal pain, sausage-shaped abdominal mass, and currant jelly stool are present. Abdominal ultrasound can help to determine whether intussusception is present.

The purpura in HSP presents in waves or crops, and crops last 5-10 days each. Complete resolution takes 4-6 weeks. If biopsy is desired to confirm the diagnosis, it should be done on a lesion less than 24 hours old. This allows for identification of perivascular IgA on histopathology: beyond 24 hours, IgG and IgM also leak out, contributing to a less specific histopathologic picture.

Accurate diagnosis of HSP is important to guide therapy and anticipate potential complications. Wegener’s granulomatosis (A), also known as granulomatosis with polyangiitis, classically involves the upper and lower respiratory tract and the kidneys, leading to a presentation of epistaxis, cough, and hypertension. It occurs more commonly in adults than children. Finkelstein disease (B), also known as acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI), is characterized by the development of petechial, urticarial, or targetoid plaques over 24-48 hours with tender edema and fever in children aged less than 2 years. Unlike HSP, AHEI typically does not involve the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, or joints. Biopsy of skin lesions of AHEI reveals IgA deposition and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, leading some authors to consider it a closely related entity to HSP. Microscopic polyangiitis (D) is an uncommon pauci-immune vasculitis similar to Wegener’s granulomatosis, but lacking granulomas. It presents typically in the 5th decade of life with fever, fatigue, weight loss, and renal involvement. IgA nephropathy (E), also known as synpharyngitic nephritis and Berger disease, is less likely than HSP to cause a rash, joint pain, or abdominal pain. The nomenclature of HSP (whose alternate name is IgA vasculitis) reflects the multi-organ nature of HSP in comparison to IgA nephropathy, which is more likely to be limited to the kidneys.
 

Treatment

Aside from intussusception and renal disease, which may result from HSP, treatment is not typically required for HSP as it resolves spontaneously. Patients with significant arthralgias are likely to benefit from NSAIDs such as naproxen 5-20 mg/kg per day, although NSAIDs should be avoided if there is significant renal dysfunction or GI bleeding. Patients with severe abdominal pain or joint pain may be more likely to benefit from oral corticosteroids, particularly prednisone 1-2 mg/kg per day. A meta-analysis showed that corticosteroids significantly reduce the duration of symptoms if given early in the course of disease.¹⁵

The prognosis is usually excellent, except for a very small sample of the population (5%) that can develop end-stage renal disease. It is recommended that all children with HSP continue monitoring blood pressure and UA either weekly or biweekly for the first 2 months and then once a month for 6-12 months.¹⁶

First described in 1801 by a British physician, HSP is a common and usually self-limited disease for which our understanding has advanced greatly over the past 2 centuries, yet for which many important questions regarding pathophysiology remain unanswered. No diagnostic tests or treatments are needed for the majority of patients. Providers should include HSP in the differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained abdominal pain, renal dysfunction, or nonthrombocytopenic purpura.
 

Mr. Kusari is a medical student at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a practicing dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group in La Mesa, California. Dr. Matiz and Mr. Kusari said they had no relevant financial disclosures. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.

References

1. “Hurwitz Clinical Pediatric Dermatology: A Textbook of Skin Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence”, 5th ed. (New York: Elsevier, 2016).

2. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):976-8.

3. “Dermatology”, 3rd ed. (Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2012).

4. J Rheumatol. 2004 Nov;31(11):2295-9.

5. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 May;44(5):618-22.

6. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Mar;93(2):106-13.

7. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(8):1358-66.

8. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Feb;29(2):198-203.

9. Lancet. 2002 Oct 19;360(9341):1197-202.

10. Rhinology. 2015 Jun;53(2):99-106.

11. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166700.

12. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Jan;21(1):28-31.

13. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;33(8):1114-21.

14. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jul;65(7):936-41.

15. Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1079-87.

16. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Nov;95(11):877-82.

The patient was diagnosed with Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) based on clinical presentation of the lesions and associated symptoms of arthralgia and abdominal pain. Urinalysis was obtained and found to be unremarkable, at presentation and follow-up, and treatment with naproxen 5 mg/kg divided into two doses per day was started for pain relief. A prednisone taper starting at 1 mg/kg per day for 3 weeks also was started due to the presence of severe abdominal pain and bullae on exam. The patient was followed with regular urine studies and blood pressure checks for 2 months, and these also were within normal limits.

HSP, also known as anaphylactoid purpura and immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis, is a small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis characterized by the perivascular deposition of IgA1-based immune complexes in the walls of arterioles and postcapillary venules.¹The clinical picture of HSP is palpable purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis, and hematuria 1-2 weeks following an upper respiratory infection. In the vast majority of cases, the condition resolves spontaneously in 4-6 weeks and does not require any specific treatment,² although NSAIDs and systemic corticosteroids can be used for mild-to-moderate and severe pain, respectively.³

HSP is the most common vasculitis in children, with a peak incidence in boys under the age of 5 years. It occurs worldwide, more commonly among whites and Asians, less commonly among blacks, and recent studies from the Czech Republic,⁴ Taiwan,⁵ Spain,⁶ France,⁷ South Korea,⁸ and the United Kingdom⁹ have shown similar incidence rates of 10-20 per 100,000 children. HSP does occur in adults, but is less common, and is known to carry a worse prognosis – in particular, a higher risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. The disease is more commonly seen in winter months,¹ unsurprisingly as upper respiratory tract infections also are more common in these months.¹⁰
 

^Pathogenesis

The exact pathogenesis of HSP is the subject of ongoing investigation and continued controversy. Mutations and polymorphisms in mannose-binding lectin, interleukins 1 and 8, vascular endothelial growth factor, and alpha-1-antitrypsin have been associated with HSP.³ Immunoglobulin A (IgA) normally exists in two heavily glycosylated forms – IgA1 and IgA2. Abnormal glycosylation, particularly undergalactosylation, of IgA1, the predominant form of IgA in serum and mucosal secretions, has been linked to HSP.¹¹ HSP has been associated with group A streptococcal infections, Bartonella henselae (cat scratch fever) and numerous drugs,¹² although no definitive causal or mechanistic explanation has been identified.

Diagnosis

Two major diagnostic criteria for HSP are widely in use, one developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990¹³ and the other by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) in 2005.¹⁴ Both the ACR and EULAR criteria include acute abdominal pain, purpura, and microscopic evidence of vasculitis. Almost all patients with HSP have cutaneous purpura, and many of these patients have palpable purpura, which is pathognomonic of a leukocytoclastic vasculitis, but palpable purpura is not needed for diagnosis. The ACR criteria additionally include age of 20 years or younger, while the EULAR criteria include arthralgias and the presence of hematuria or proteinuria. Ancillary testing usually is not required to make the diagnosis, but when the diagnosis is not clear histopathologic analysis of a skin sample can identify leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Other laboratory studies that may be needed to rule out other conditions, as well as other organ involvement, include a complete blood count, which can be done to rule out thrombocytopenia as a cause of purpura, a metabolic panel, coagulation studies, occult blood test of stool, abdominal imaging, and urinalysis (UA), which can identify proteinuria or hematuria.

Abdominal pain in HSP is believed to be a result of vasculitis of the gastric, mesenteric, and/or colic vasculature. Bleeding from the inflamed vasculature rarely can lead to gross hematochezia, frank melena, or hematemesis. One serious, potential complication of HSP-related mesenteric vasculitis is intussusception, which is otherwise rare in children older than 2 years. Intussusception should be suspected if features of the classic triad of episodic abdominal pain, sausage-shaped abdominal mass, and currant jelly stool are present. Abdominal ultrasound can help to determine whether intussusception is present.

The purpura in HSP presents in waves or crops, and crops last 5-10 days each. Complete resolution takes 4-6 weeks. If biopsy is desired to confirm the diagnosis, it should be done on a lesion less than 24 hours old. This allows for identification of perivascular IgA on histopathology: beyond 24 hours, IgG and IgM also leak out, contributing to a less specific histopathologic picture.

Accurate diagnosis of HSP is important to guide therapy and anticipate potential complications. Wegener’s granulomatosis (A), also known as granulomatosis with polyangiitis, classically involves the upper and lower respiratory tract and the kidneys, leading to a presentation of epistaxis, cough, and hypertension. It occurs more commonly in adults than children. Finkelstein disease (B), also known as acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI), is characterized by the development of petechial, urticarial, or targetoid plaques over 24-48 hours with tender edema and fever in children aged less than 2 years. Unlike HSP, AHEI typically does not involve the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, or joints. Biopsy of skin lesions of AHEI reveals IgA deposition and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, leading some authors to consider it a closely related entity to HSP. Microscopic polyangiitis (D) is an uncommon pauci-immune vasculitis similar to Wegener’s granulomatosis, but lacking granulomas. It presents typically in the 5th decade of life with fever, fatigue, weight loss, and renal involvement. IgA nephropathy (E), also known as synpharyngitic nephritis and Berger disease, is less likely than HSP to cause a rash, joint pain, or abdominal pain. The nomenclature of HSP (whose alternate name is IgA vasculitis) reflects the multi-organ nature of HSP in comparison to IgA nephropathy, which is more likely to be limited to the kidneys.
 

Treatment

Aside from intussusception and renal disease, which may result from HSP, treatment is not typically required for HSP as it resolves spontaneously. Patients with significant arthralgias are likely to benefit from NSAIDs such as naproxen 5-20 mg/kg per day, although NSAIDs should be avoided if there is significant renal dysfunction or GI bleeding. Patients with severe abdominal pain or joint pain may be more likely to benefit from oral corticosteroids, particularly prednisone 1-2 mg/kg per day. A meta-analysis showed that corticosteroids significantly reduce the duration of symptoms if given early in the course of disease.¹⁵

The prognosis is usually excellent, except for a very small sample of the population (5%) that can develop end-stage renal disease. It is recommended that all children with HSP continue monitoring blood pressure and UA either weekly or biweekly for the first 2 months and then once a month for 6-12 months.¹⁶

First described in 1801 by a British physician, HSP is a common and usually self-limited disease for which our understanding has advanced greatly over the past 2 centuries, yet for which many important questions regarding pathophysiology remain unanswered. No diagnostic tests or treatments are needed for the majority of patients. Providers should include HSP in the differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained abdominal pain, renal dysfunction, or nonthrombocytopenic purpura.
 

Mr. Kusari is a medical student at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a practicing dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group in La Mesa, California. Dr. Matiz and Mr. Kusari said they had no relevant financial disclosures. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.

References

1. “Hurwitz Clinical Pediatric Dermatology: A Textbook of Skin Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence”, 5th ed. (New York: Elsevier, 2016).

2. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):976-8.

3. “Dermatology”, 3rd ed. (Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2012).

4. J Rheumatol. 2004 Nov;31(11):2295-9.

5. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 May;44(5):618-22.

6. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Mar;93(2):106-13.

7. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(8):1358-66.

8. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Feb;29(2):198-203.

9. Lancet. 2002 Oct 19;360(9341):1197-202.

10. Rhinology. 2015 Jun;53(2):99-106.

11. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166700.

12. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Jan;21(1):28-31.

13. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;33(8):1114-21.

14. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jul;65(7):936-41.

15. Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1079-87.

16. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Nov;95(11):877-82.

PARIS—McArdle’s sign, a rapidly reversible motor weakness induced by head flexion in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS), may facilitate diagnosis in certain clinical situations, according to a study presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. “McArdle’s sign, when defined as a greater than 10% neck flexion-induced reduction using isoinertial finger extension on a measurement device, is highly specific and moderately sensitive for a diagnosis of MS,” said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, and colleagues. Dr. Weinshenker is Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Weinshenker and colleagues quantified McArdle’s sign in finger extensors using a torque measuring device and assessed its specificity for MS. They enrolled 25 healthy controls and 76 patients with detectable finger extensor weakness, 52 with MS, 24 with other myelopathies, and five with peripheral nerve lesions. Patients were not selected for having McArdle’s sign. Dr. Weinshenker and his team evaluated McArdle’s sign blinded to diagnosis by measuring change in finger extensor strength in successive trials of head extension and flexion, first clinically and then with a torque measuring device. McArdle’s sign was clinically rated from zero (absent) to three (marked). In the quantitative measurement, the patient applied maximum extension strength of four fingers on a bar using isometric (against fixed object) and isoinertial (against a constant resistance) maneuvers. The researchers then averaged the percentage decrease in strength over four trials.

Baseline strength was similar in the three patient groups. The median clinical McArdle’s sign was one (range, zero to three) in patients with MS, zero (range, zero to two) in other myelopathies, zero (range, zero to one) in healthy controls, and zero in all patients with peripheral nerve lesions. The isometric and isoinertial maneuvers provided similar quantitative results, but the isoinertial maneuver had superior diagnostic performance. Head flexion resulted in 17% (± 17%) isoinertial strength reduction in patients with MS versus 1% (± 6%) in other myelopathies, 1% (± 5%) in healthy controls and -3% (± 10%) in patients with peripheral nerve lesions.

A multivariate regression analysis eliminated confounding by baseline strength. Receiver operator curves were generated to assess the diagnostic properties of the test; the area under the curve was 0.82 in patients with MS versus healthy controls and 0.83 in patients with MS versus other myelopathies for isoinertial testing. A 10% drop in strength with flexion was 100% specific and 62% sensitive for MS compared with other myelopathies and a 6% drop, 92% specific and 73% sensitive, for MS compared with healthy controls. Quantitative McArdle’s sign correlated with clinical McArdle’s sign by referring physician and technician (r = 0.58). McArdle’s sign correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = 0.41) and pyramidal score (r = 0.49) in patients with MS, but was evident in some patients in very early phases of MS and minor disability.

PARIS—McArdle’s sign, a rapidly reversible motor weakness induced by head flexion in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS), may facilitate diagnosis in certain clinical situations, according to a study presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. “McArdle’s sign, when defined as a greater than 10% neck flexion-induced reduction using isoinertial finger extension on a measurement device, is highly specific and moderately sensitive for a diagnosis of MS,” said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, and colleagues. Dr. Weinshenker is Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Weinshenker and colleagues quantified McArdle’s sign in finger extensors using a torque measuring device and assessed its specificity for MS. They enrolled 25 healthy controls and 76 patients with detectable finger extensor weakness, 52 with MS, 24 with other myelopathies, and five with peripheral nerve lesions. Patients were not selected for having McArdle’s sign. Dr. Weinshenker and his team evaluated McArdle’s sign blinded to diagnosis by measuring change in finger extensor strength in successive trials of head extension and flexion, first clinically and then with a torque measuring device. McArdle’s sign was clinically rated from zero (absent) to three (marked). In the quantitative measurement, the patient applied maximum extension strength of four fingers on a bar using isometric (against fixed object) and isoinertial (against a constant resistance) maneuvers. The researchers then averaged the percentage decrease in strength over four trials.

Baseline strength was similar in the three patient groups. The median clinical McArdle’s sign was one (range, zero to three) in patients with MS, zero (range, zero to two) in other myelopathies, zero (range, zero to one) in healthy controls, and zero in all patients with peripheral nerve lesions. The isometric and isoinertial maneuvers provided similar quantitative results, but the isoinertial maneuver had superior diagnostic performance. Head flexion resulted in 17% (± 17%) isoinertial strength reduction in patients with MS versus 1% (± 6%) in other myelopathies, 1% (± 5%) in healthy controls and -3% (± 10%) in patients with peripheral nerve lesions.

A multivariate regression analysis eliminated confounding by baseline strength. Receiver operator curves were generated to assess the diagnostic properties of the test; the area under the curve was 0.82 in patients with MS versus healthy controls and 0.83 in patients with MS versus other myelopathies for isoinertial testing. A 10% drop in strength with flexion was 100% specific and 62% sensitive for MS compared with other myelopathies and a 6% drop, 92% specific and 73% sensitive, for MS compared with healthy controls. Quantitative McArdle’s sign correlated with clinical McArdle’s sign by referring physician and technician (r = 0.58). McArdle’s sign correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = 0.41) and pyramidal score (r = 0.49) in patients with MS, but was evident in some patients in very early phases of MS and minor disability.

PARIS—McArdle’s sign, a rapidly reversible motor weakness induced by head flexion in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS), may facilitate diagnosis in certain clinical situations, according to a study presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. “McArdle’s sign, when defined as a greater than 10% neck flexion-induced reduction using isoinertial finger extension on a measurement device, is highly specific and moderately sensitive for a diagnosis of MS,” said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, and colleagues. Dr. Weinshenker is Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Weinshenker and colleagues quantified McArdle’s sign in finger extensors using a torque measuring device and assessed its specificity for MS. They enrolled 25 healthy controls and 76 patients with detectable finger extensor weakness, 52 with MS, 24 with other myelopathies, and five with peripheral nerve lesions. Patients were not selected for having McArdle’s sign. Dr. Weinshenker and his team evaluated McArdle’s sign blinded to diagnosis by measuring change in finger extensor strength in successive trials of head extension and flexion, first clinically and then with a torque measuring device. McArdle’s sign was clinically rated from zero (absent) to three (marked). In the quantitative measurement, the patient applied maximum extension strength of four fingers on a bar using isometric (against fixed object) and isoinertial (against a constant resistance) maneuvers. The researchers then averaged the percentage decrease in strength over four trials.

Baseline strength was similar in the three patient groups. The median clinical McArdle’s sign was one (range, zero to three) in patients with MS, zero (range, zero to two) in other myelopathies, zero (range, zero to one) in healthy controls, and zero in all patients with peripheral nerve lesions. The isometric and isoinertial maneuvers provided similar quantitative results, but the isoinertial maneuver had superior diagnostic performance. Head flexion resulted in 17% (± 17%) isoinertial strength reduction in patients with MS versus 1% (± 6%) in other myelopathies, 1% (± 5%) in healthy controls and -3% (± 10%) in patients with peripheral nerve lesions.

A multivariate regression analysis eliminated confounding by baseline strength. Receiver operator curves were generated to assess the diagnostic properties of the test; the area under the curve was 0.82 in patients with MS versus healthy controls and 0.83 in patients with MS versus other myelopathies for isoinertial testing. A 10% drop in strength with flexion was 100% specific and 62% sensitive for MS compared with other myelopathies and a 6% drop, 92% specific and 73% sensitive, for MS compared with healthy controls. Quantitative McArdle’s sign correlated with clinical McArdle’s sign by referring physician and technician (r = 0.58). McArdle’s sign correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = 0.41) and pyramidal score (r = 0.49) in patients with MS, but was evident in some patients in very early phases of MS and minor disability.

PARIS—It is possible to gauge the effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) by measuring serum levels of neurofilament light (NFL), according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. DMTs with greater efficacy appear to be associated with lower serum NFL concentrations.

NFL is a biomarker of axonal damage that has been measured primarily in CSF. In patients with MS, the CSF NFL concentration reflects disease activity and the efficacy of DMTs. Investigators recently developed an ultrasensitive immunoassay that can determine NFL levels in serum.

The investigators measured serum NFL concentrations using an in-house ultrasensitive single molecule array immunoassay. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation was less than 10%.

Median serum NFL concentration decreased significantly in treatment-naïve patients who initiated second-line DMTs (ie, from 22.7 ng/L to 18.5 ng/L) or escalated from a first-line to a second-line DMT (ie, from 17.9 ng/L to 12.6 ng/L). The median serum NFL concentration was stable in patients who switched between second-line DMTs (14.9 ng/L before the switch and 13.7 ng/L after the switch). Similarly, the median serum NFL concentration did not change significantly in patients who stayed untreated (40.7 ng/L at first measurement and 37.1 ng/L at second measurement), initiated first-line treatment (20.6 ng/L vs 25.5 ng/L), or switched between first-line DMTs (17.3 ng/L vs 16.7 ng/L).

“The goal of DMTs in MS is to reduce axonal degeneration,” said Dr. Nováková. “Repeated analysis of serum NFL may represent a new possibility to monitor this process and may provide objective support in treatment decisions.”

PARIS—It is possible to gauge the effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) by measuring serum levels of neurofilament light (NFL), according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. DMTs with greater efficacy appear to be associated with lower serum NFL concentrations.

NFL is a biomarker of axonal damage that has been measured primarily in CSF. In patients with MS, the CSF NFL concentration reflects disease activity and the efficacy of DMTs. Investigators recently developed an ultrasensitive immunoassay that can determine NFL levels in serum.

The investigators measured serum NFL concentrations using an in-house ultrasensitive single molecule array immunoassay. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation was less than 10%.

Median serum NFL concentration decreased significantly in treatment-naïve patients who initiated second-line DMTs (ie, from 22.7 ng/L to 18.5 ng/L) or escalated from a first-line to a second-line DMT (ie, from 17.9 ng/L to 12.6 ng/L). The median serum NFL concentration was stable in patients who switched between second-line DMTs (14.9 ng/L before the switch and 13.7 ng/L after the switch). Similarly, the median serum NFL concentration did not change significantly in patients who stayed untreated (40.7 ng/L at first measurement and 37.1 ng/L at second measurement), initiated first-line treatment (20.6 ng/L vs 25.5 ng/L), or switched between first-line DMTs (17.3 ng/L vs 16.7 ng/L).

“The goal of DMTs in MS is to reduce axonal degeneration,” said Dr. Nováková. “Repeated analysis of serum NFL may represent a new possibility to monitor this process and may provide objective support in treatment decisions.”

PARIS—It is possible to gauge the effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) by measuring serum levels of neurofilament light (NFL), according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. DMTs with greater efficacy appear to be associated with lower serum NFL concentrations.

NFL is a biomarker of axonal damage that has been measured primarily in CSF. In patients with MS, the CSF NFL concentration reflects disease activity and the efficacy of DMTs. Investigators recently developed an ultrasensitive immunoassay that can determine NFL levels in serum.

The investigators measured serum NFL concentrations using an in-house ultrasensitive single molecule array immunoassay. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation was less than 10%.

Median serum NFL concentration decreased significantly in treatment-naïve patients who initiated second-line DMTs (ie, from 22.7 ng/L to 18.5 ng/L) or escalated from a first-line to a second-line DMT (ie, from 17.9 ng/L to 12.6 ng/L). The median serum NFL concentration was stable in patients who switched between second-line DMTs (14.9 ng/L before the switch and 13.7 ng/L after the switch). Similarly, the median serum NFL concentration did not change significantly in patients who stayed untreated (40.7 ng/L at first measurement and 37.1 ng/L at second measurement), initiated first-line treatment (20.6 ng/L vs 25.5 ng/L), or switched between first-line DMTs (17.3 ng/L vs 16.7 ng/L).

“The goal of DMTs in MS is to reduce axonal degeneration,” said Dr. Nováková. “Repeated analysis of serum NFL may represent a new possibility to monitor this process and may provide objective support in treatment decisions.”

PARIS—A noninvasive test that assesses immunoglobulin (Ig) free light chains in saliva may detect immunopathologic changes in the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease state and evaluate response to treatment, according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. The technique has a specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 89% for diagnosing active MS, said lead author Esther Ganelin-Cohen, MD, PhD, Director of the Neuro-Immunology Clinic at Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel, on behalf of her research colleagues.

The complexity of MS requires different biomarkers to evaluate the various aspects of the disease. CSF analysis is commonly used, but the need for lumbar puncture makes CSF tests impractical for monitoring disease activity and response to treatment. In their search for noninvasive diagnostic methods, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues hypothesized that Ig free light chain analysis in saliva may help detect immunopathologic changes in patients with MS. This assumption relied on prior reports indicating changes in mucosal immunity in patients with MS, and on a growing body of evidence for a potential diagnostic role of free light chains in MS.

A new technique based on Western blot analysis was developed to study kappa (k) and lambda (λ) free light chain monomers and dimers in saliva. Normal saliva showed high proportion of dimeric free light chains compared to that in the serum. “This finding might be explained by structural peculiarities of Ig in saliva,” Dr. Ganelin-Cohen said. “In contrast to most serum Ig, saliva IgA2 molecules incorporate the dimeric (not monomeric) light chains that may require production of larger amounts of dimeric light chains by the B cells synthesizing IgA2.”

Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and her colleagues compared free light chain monomer and dimer patterns in the saliva of patients with MS with those in healthy subjects. The intensity of the immunoreactive free light chain was measured, and the free light chain indices accounting for the total free light chain level and for monomer/dimer ratios (k monomer/dimer index and λ monomer/dimer index) were computed.

Most patients with active MS showed abnormally high free light chain levels, or a high proportion of monomeric free light chains. The reasons for such pathologic free light chain changes in patients with active MS are not clear, but they might be due to peripheral B lymphocytes penetrating oral mucosa and producing larger amounts of monomeric free light chains. Statistical analysis of these indices showed significant differences not only between patients with active MS (n = 27) and healthy subjects (n = 28), but also between patients with active MS (n = 27) and those in remission (n = 58).

Cut-off values were established to distinguish a healthy state from the pathologic conditions in MS: total free light chain level index = 17, k monomer/dimer index = 4.0, λ monomer/dimer index = 2.4. Most patients with active MS showed free light chain indices above these cut-off values.

The high specificity and sensitivity of the technique for diagnosing active MS enable this test to become a new noninvasive complementary tool to evaluate MS, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues concluded.

PARIS—A noninvasive test that assesses immunoglobulin (Ig) free light chains in saliva may detect immunopathologic changes in the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease state and evaluate response to treatment, according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. The technique has a specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 89% for diagnosing active MS, said lead author Esther Ganelin-Cohen, MD, PhD, Director of the Neuro-Immunology Clinic at Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel, on behalf of her research colleagues.

The complexity of MS requires different biomarkers to evaluate the various aspects of the disease. CSF analysis is commonly used, but the need for lumbar puncture makes CSF tests impractical for monitoring disease activity and response to treatment. In their search for noninvasive diagnostic methods, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues hypothesized that Ig free light chain analysis in saliva may help detect immunopathologic changes in patients with MS. This assumption relied on prior reports indicating changes in mucosal immunity in patients with MS, and on a growing body of evidence for a potential diagnostic role of free light chains in MS.

A new technique based on Western blot analysis was developed to study kappa (k) and lambda (λ) free light chain monomers and dimers in saliva. Normal saliva showed high proportion of dimeric free light chains compared to that in the serum. “This finding might be explained by structural peculiarities of Ig in saliva,” Dr. Ganelin-Cohen said. “In contrast to most serum Ig, saliva IgA2 molecules incorporate the dimeric (not monomeric) light chains that may require production of larger amounts of dimeric light chains by the B cells synthesizing IgA2.”

Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and her colleagues compared free light chain monomer and dimer patterns in the saliva of patients with MS with those in healthy subjects. The intensity of the immunoreactive free light chain was measured, and the free light chain indices accounting for the total free light chain level and for monomer/dimer ratios (k monomer/dimer index and λ monomer/dimer index) were computed.

Most patients with active MS showed abnormally high free light chain levels, or a high proportion of monomeric free light chains. The reasons for such pathologic free light chain changes in patients with active MS are not clear, but they might be due to peripheral B lymphocytes penetrating oral mucosa and producing larger amounts of monomeric free light chains. Statistical analysis of these indices showed significant differences not only between patients with active MS (n = 27) and healthy subjects (n = 28), but also between patients with active MS (n = 27) and those in remission (n = 58).

Cut-off values were established to distinguish a healthy state from the pathologic conditions in MS: total free light chain level index = 17, k monomer/dimer index = 4.0, λ monomer/dimer index = 2.4. Most patients with active MS showed free light chain indices above these cut-off values.

The high specificity and sensitivity of the technique for diagnosing active MS enable this test to become a new noninvasive complementary tool to evaluate MS, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues concluded.

PARIS—A noninvasive test that assesses immunoglobulin (Ig) free light chains in saliva may detect immunopathologic changes in the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease state and evaluate response to treatment, according to research presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. The technique has a specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 89% for diagnosing active MS, said lead author Esther Ganelin-Cohen, MD, PhD, Director of the Neuro-Immunology Clinic at Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel, on behalf of her research colleagues.

The complexity of MS requires different biomarkers to evaluate the various aspects of the disease. CSF analysis is commonly used, but the need for lumbar puncture makes CSF tests impractical for monitoring disease activity and response to treatment. In their search for noninvasive diagnostic methods, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues hypothesized that Ig free light chain analysis in saliva may help detect immunopathologic changes in patients with MS. This assumption relied on prior reports indicating changes in mucosal immunity in patients with MS, and on a growing body of evidence for a potential diagnostic role of free light chains in MS.

A new technique based on Western blot analysis was developed to study kappa (k) and lambda (λ) free light chain monomers and dimers in saliva. Normal saliva showed high proportion of dimeric free light chains compared to that in the serum. “This finding might be explained by structural peculiarities of Ig in saliva,” Dr. Ganelin-Cohen said. “In contrast to most serum Ig, saliva IgA2 molecules incorporate the dimeric (not monomeric) light chains that may require production of larger amounts of dimeric light chains by the B cells synthesizing IgA2.”

Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and her colleagues compared free light chain monomer and dimer patterns in the saliva of patients with MS with those in healthy subjects. The intensity of the immunoreactive free light chain was measured, and the free light chain indices accounting for the total free light chain level and for monomer/dimer ratios (k monomer/dimer index and λ monomer/dimer index) were computed.

Most patients with active MS showed abnormally high free light chain levels, or a high proportion of monomeric free light chains. The reasons for such pathologic free light chain changes in patients with active MS are not clear, but they might be due to peripheral B lymphocytes penetrating oral mucosa and producing larger amounts of monomeric free light chains. Statistical analysis of these indices showed significant differences not only between patients with active MS (n = 27) and healthy subjects (n = 28), but also between patients with active MS (n = 27) and those in remission (n = 58).

Cut-off values were established to distinguish a healthy state from the pathologic conditions in MS: total free light chain level index = 17, k monomer/dimer index = 4.0, λ monomer/dimer index = 2.4. Most patients with active MS showed free light chain indices above these cut-off values.

The high specificity and sensitivity of the technique for diagnosing active MS enable this test to become a new noninvasive complementary tool to evaluate MS, Dr. Ganelin-Cohen and colleagues concluded.

Patients with cancer perceived physicians who did not use a computer as more compassionate, more professional, and better at communication, according to results of a randomized, video-based study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

In addition, the majority of patients said they would prefer having a doctor who communicated face to face (in other words, without aid of a computer) to be their provider, said Ali Haider, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Brian Jackson/iStockphoto

Patients with cancer perceived physicians who did not use a computer as more compassionate, more professional, and better at communication, according to results of a randomized, video-based study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

In addition, the majority of patients said they would prefer having a doctor who communicated face to face (in other words, without aid of a computer) to be their provider, said Ali Haider, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Brian Jackson/iStockphoto

Patients with cancer perceived physicians who did not use a computer as more compassionate, more professional, and better at communication, according to results of a randomized, video-based study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

In addition, the majority of patients said they would prefer having a doctor who communicated face to face (in other words, without aid of a computer) to be their provider, said Ali Haider, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Brian Jackson/iStockphoto

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

New tools to help minimize the risk of opioid-related adverse events are becoming more widely available, although providers are still struggling over how best to implement them.

A recent study by Shane Mueller, MSW, and Ingrid Binswanger, MD, at Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, for instance, found that doctors are frequently uncomfortable prescribing the opioid antagonist naloxone to counteract a potential overdose.¹

References

1. Mueller SR, Koester S, Glanz JM, et al. Attitudes toward naloxone prescribing in clinical settings: A qualitative study of patients prescribed high dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 March;32(3):277-83.
 

New tools to help minimize the risk of opioid-related adverse events are becoming more widely available, although providers are still struggling over how best to implement them.

A recent study by Shane Mueller, MSW, and Ingrid Binswanger, MD, at Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, for instance, found that doctors are frequently uncomfortable prescribing the opioid antagonist naloxone to counteract a potential overdose.¹

References

1. Mueller SR, Koester S, Glanz JM, et al. Attitudes toward naloxone prescribing in clinical settings: A qualitative study of patients prescribed high dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 March;32(3):277-83.
 

New tools to help minimize the risk of opioid-related adverse events are becoming more widely available, although providers are still struggling over how best to implement them.

A recent study by Shane Mueller, MSW, and Ingrid Binswanger, MD, at Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, for instance, found that doctors are frequently uncomfortable prescribing the opioid antagonist naloxone to counteract a potential overdose.¹

References

1. Mueller SR, Koester S, Glanz JM, et al. Attitudes toward naloxone prescribing in clinical settings: A qualitative study of patients prescribed high dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 March;32(3):277-83.
 

CHICAGO – “All that vomits is not necessarily GERD,” so distinguishing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) remains essential when doing a differential diagnosis. Fortunately, five questions backed by increasing evidence can help you make the call.

“Everyone in the room knows babies puke, and babies can puke a lot,” Barry K. Wershil, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The approach to diagnosing GERD is age specific. “Kids who puke tend to outgrow it over time. With development, 95% or more are no longer refluxing at 18 months of age.”

captain_galaxy/Thinkstock

Considerations backed by evidence

Unfortunately, symptoms alone do not always differentiate erosive versus nonerosive esophagitis, Dr. Wershil said, although recurrent vomiting, poor weight gain, anemia, feeding problems, and respiratory problems can be signs of complicated GERD.

He recommended the following five considerations to distinguish GERD from NERD:

• Is the patient exhibiting normal weight gain? If not, ask questions about how the child is being fed. Have the parents started diluting the formula because they think that will take care of the vomiting? Have they begun limiting the amount of formula after observing that the child throws up at 4 ounces but not at 2 ounces?
• Is the patient bleeding or anemic? Hematemesis is rarely the presentation of infants with GERD, but anemia may be.
• Does the patient have respiratory problems (for example, a history of aspiration, recurring wheezing, or cough)?
• Is the patient neurologically normal? If so, that can present a special class of patients in which vomiting may not be just normal infant vomiting.
• Is the patient older than 2 years? We expect 95% of children to outgrow reflux by 18 months, and most children who have physiological reflux will outgrow it by 2 years.

“Those five questions in 1983 had little evidence, but in 2017 there is more evidence that these are the questions to focus on,” Dr. Wershil said.
 

The role of diagnostic testing

Diagnostic testing, such as pH monitoring, impedance testing, and endoscopy, can be useful in specific situations but carry limitations for widespread use, Dr. Wershil said. “Each test has reasons and limitations.”

An upper GI tract series looks only for anatomic anomalies, for example. pH monitoring is still used in many centers, but in general, impedance monitoring has become more common because it can detect both acid and nonacid reflux: “You can get a very detailed analysis of events happening in the esophagus over time.” One caveat Dr. Wershil added is that, “in some instances, we’re unsure how to define this in the pediatric age ranges we treat.”

Endoscopy has a limited role for the rare patients with mucosal changes or erosive esophagitis, he added. Endoscopy is ordered to detect mucosal changes that confirm esophageal erosion. “In all the kids we scope with positive pH, we rarely find erosive esophagitis,” Dr. Wershil said. “What we find more often is NERD. That really represents more of what we see in our patient population.”

“I hope this information is a good starting point to understand the algorithms that get generated,” Dr. Wershil said.

He recommended an algorithm for gastroesophageal reflux prepared by the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (Pediatrics. 2013 May. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0421). “I think this information is really solidly grounded in evidence.”

Dr. Wershil is a consultant for Alexion Pharmaceuticals; is a member of the speakers bureau for Abbott Nutrition, Mead Johnson Nutrition, and Nutricia; and receives funding from the National Institutes of Health Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers.

CHICAGO – “All that vomits is not necessarily GERD,” so distinguishing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) remains essential when doing a differential diagnosis. Fortunately, five questions backed by increasing evidence can help you make the call.

“Everyone in the room knows babies puke, and babies can puke a lot,” Barry K. Wershil, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The approach to diagnosing GERD is age specific. “Kids who puke tend to outgrow it over time. With development, 95% or more are no longer refluxing at 18 months of age.”

captain_galaxy/Thinkstock

Considerations backed by evidence

Unfortunately, symptoms alone do not always differentiate erosive versus nonerosive esophagitis, Dr. Wershil said, although recurrent vomiting, poor weight gain, anemia, feeding problems, and respiratory problems can be signs of complicated GERD.

He recommended the following five considerations to distinguish GERD from NERD:

• Is the patient exhibiting normal weight gain? If not, ask questions about how the child is being fed. Have the parents started diluting the formula because they think that will take care of the vomiting? Have they begun limiting the amount of formula after observing that the child throws up at 4 ounces but not at 2 ounces?
• Is the patient bleeding or anemic? Hematemesis is rarely the presentation of infants with GERD, but anemia may be.
• Does the patient have respiratory problems (for example, a history of aspiration, recurring wheezing, or cough)?
• Is the patient neurologically normal? If so, that can present a special class of patients in which vomiting may not be just normal infant vomiting.
• Is the patient older than 2 years? We expect 95% of children to outgrow reflux by 18 months, and most children who have physiological reflux will outgrow it by 2 years.

“Those five questions in 1983 had little evidence, but in 2017 there is more evidence that these are the questions to focus on,” Dr. Wershil said.
 

The role of diagnostic testing

Diagnostic testing, such as pH monitoring, impedance testing, and endoscopy, can be useful in specific situations but carry limitations for widespread use, Dr. Wershil said. “Each test has reasons and limitations.”

An upper GI tract series looks only for anatomic anomalies, for example. pH monitoring is still used in many centers, but in general, impedance monitoring has become more common because it can detect both acid and nonacid reflux: “You can get a very detailed analysis of events happening in the esophagus over time.” One caveat Dr. Wershil added is that, “in some instances, we’re unsure how to define this in the pediatric age ranges we treat.”

Endoscopy has a limited role for the rare patients with mucosal changes or erosive esophagitis, he added. Endoscopy is ordered to detect mucosal changes that confirm esophageal erosion. “In all the kids we scope with positive pH, we rarely find erosive esophagitis,” Dr. Wershil said. “What we find more often is NERD. That really represents more of what we see in our patient population.”

“I hope this information is a good starting point to understand the algorithms that get generated,” Dr. Wershil said.

He recommended an algorithm for gastroesophageal reflux prepared by the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (Pediatrics. 2013 May. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0421). “I think this information is really solidly grounded in evidence.”

Dr. Wershil is a consultant for Alexion Pharmaceuticals; is a member of the speakers bureau for Abbott Nutrition, Mead Johnson Nutrition, and Nutricia; and receives funding from the National Institutes of Health Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers.

CHICAGO – “All that vomits is not necessarily GERD,” so distinguishing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) remains essential when doing a differential diagnosis. Fortunately, five questions backed by increasing evidence can help you make the call.

“Everyone in the room knows babies puke, and babies can puke a lot,” Barry K. Wershil, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The approach to diagnosing GERD is age specific. “Kids who puke tend to outgrow it over time. With development, 95% or more are no longer refluxing at 18 months of age.”

captain_galaxy/Thinkstock

Considerations backed by evidence

Unfortunately, symptoms alone do not always differentiate erosive versus nonerosive esophagitis, Dr. Wershil said, although recurrent vomiting, poor weight gain, anemia, feeding problems, and respiratory problems can be signs of complicated GERD.

He recommended the following five considerations to distinguish GERD from NERD:

• Is the patient exhibiting normal weight gain? If not, ask questions about how the child is being fed. Have the parents started diluting the formula because they think that will take care of the vomiting? Have they begun limiting the amount of formula after observing that the child throws up at 4 ounces but not at 2 ounces?
• Is the patient bleeding or anemic? Hematemesis is rarely the presentation of infants with GERD, but anemia may be.
• Does the patient have respiratory problems (for example, a history of aspiration, recurring wheezing, or cough)?
• Is the patient neurologically normal? If so, that can present a special class of patients in which vomiting may not be just normal infant vomiting.
• Is the patient older than 2 years? We expect 95% of children to outgrow reflux by 18 months, and most children who have physiological reflux will outgrow it by 2 years.

“Those five questions in 1983 had little evidence, but in 2017 there is more evidence that these are the questions to focus on,” Dr. Wershil said.
 

The role of diagnostic testing

Diagnostic testing, such as pH monitoring, impedance testing, and endoscopy, can be useful in specific situations but carry limitations for widespread use, Dr. Wershil said. “Each test has reasons and limitations.”

An upper GI tract series looks only for anatomic anomalies, for example. pH monitoring is still used in many centers, but in general, impedance monitoring has become more common because it can detect both acid and nonacid reflux: “You can get a very detailed analysis of events happening in the esophagus over time.” One caveat Dr. Wershil added is that, “in some instances, we’re unsure how to define this in the pediatric age ranges we treat.”

Endoscopy has a limited role for the rare patients with mucosal changes or erosive esophagitis, he added. Endoscopy is ordered to detect mucosal changes that confirm esophageal erosion. “In all the kids we scope with positive pH, we rarely find erosive esophagitis,” Dr. Wershil said. “What we find more often is NERD. That really represents more of what we see in our patient population.”

“I hope this information is a good starting point to understand the algorithms that get generated,” Dr. Wershil said.

He recommended an algorithm for gastroesophageal reflux prepared by the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (Pediatrics. 2013 May. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0421). “I think this information is really solidly grounded in evidence.”

Dr. Wershil is a consultant for Alexion Pharmaceuticals; is a member of the speakers bureau for Abbott Nutrition, Mead Johnson Nutrition, and Nutricia; and receives funding from the National Institutes of Health Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers.

Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had an increased risk of hospitalizations from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when compared with the general population in a Canadian retrospective, population-based cohort study.

The risk of COPD hospitalizations was 47% higher in individuals with RA. “This finding emphasizes the need to control inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis, not only to prevent joint damage, but also to prevent complications of systemic inflammation, including the development of comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases and COPD,” wrote Diane Lacaille, MD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her coauthors (Arthritis Care Res. 2017 Oct 19. doi: 10.1002/acr.23410).

Nick Piegari/Frontline Medical News

rhnews@frontlinemedcom.com

Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had an increased risk of hospitalizations from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when compared with the general population in a Canadian retrospective, population-based cohort study.

The risk of COPD hospitalizations was 47% higher in individuals with RA. “This finding emphasizes the need to control inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis, not only to prevent joint damage, but also to prevent complications of systemic inflammation, including the development of comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases and COPD,” wrote Diane Lacaille, MD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her coauthors (Arthritis Care Res. 2017 Oct 19. doi: 10.1002/acr.23410).

Nick Piegari/Frontline Medical News

rhnews@frontlinemedcom.com

Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had an increased risk of hospitalizations from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when compared with the general population in a Canadian retrospective, population-based cohort study.

The risk of COPD hospitalizations was 47% higher in individuals with RA. “This finding emphasizes the need to control inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis, not only to prevent joint damage, but also to prevent complications of systemic inflammation, including the development of comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases and COPD,” wrote Diane Lacaille, MD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her coauthors (Arthritis Care Res. 2017 Oct 19. doi: 10.1002/acr.23410).

Nick Piegari/Frontline Medical News

rhnews@frontlinemedcom.com

In memory of Anne Marie Regan, CPNP, senior research coordinator, Pediatric HIV Program, Boston City Hospital

Our first child with perinatal HIV presented in 1985 at age 4 weeks with failure to thrive, vomiting, diarrhea, and thrush. Over the next several years, the number of HIV-infected infants grew exponentially, and by 1991, we were caring for more than 50 infants and children at Boston City Hospital.

Dr. Pelton is chief of pediatric infectious diseases and coordinator of the maternal-child HIV program at Boston Medical Center. Ms. Moloney is a certified pediatric nurse practitioner in the division of pediatric infectious diseases. Dr. Pelton said he had no relevant financial disclosures, and Ms. Moloney is a speaker (on vaccines) for Sanofi Pasteur. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.

In memory of Anne Marie Regan, CPNP, senior research coordinator, Pediatric HIV Program, Boston City Hospital

Our first child with perinatal HIV presented in 1985 at age 4 weeks with failure to thrive, vomiting, diarrhea, and thrush. Over the next several years, the number of HIV-infected infants grew exponentially, and by 1991, we were caring for more than 50 infants and children at Boston City Hospital.

Dr. Pelton is chief of pediatric infectious diseases and coordinator of the maternal-child HIV program at Boston Medical Center. Ms. Moloney is a certified pediatric nurse practitioner in the division of pediatric infectious diseases. Dr. Pelton said he had no relevant financial disclosures, and Ms. Moloney is a speaker (on vaccines) for Sanofi Pasteur. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.

In memory of Anne Marie Regan, CPNP, senior research coordinator, Pediatric HIV Program, Boston City Hospital

Our first child with perinatal HIV presented in 1985 at age 4 weeks with failure to thrive, vomiting, diarrhea, and thrush. Over the next several years, the number of HIV-infected infants grew exponentially, and by 1991, we were caring for more than 50 infants and children at Boston City Hospital.

Dr. Pelton is chief of pediatric infectious diseases and coordinator of the maternal-child HIV program at Boston Medical Center. Ms. Moloney is a certified pediatric nurse practitioner in the division of pediatric infectious diseases. Dr. Pelton said he had no relevant financial disclosures, and Ms. Moloney is a speaker (on vaccines) for Sanofi Pasteur. Email them at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.