User login
FDA accepts supplemental New Drug Application to expand lorcaserin label
The Food and Drug Administration has accepted a supplemental New Drug Application from Eisai to update the label for the weight-loss drug lorcaserin (Belviq) with long-term efficacy and safety data from the CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 trial.
In CAMELLIA-TIMI 61, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b/4 clinical trial, about 12,000 people who were overweight or obese and had cardiovascular disease or CVD risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes, received lorcaserin or placebo. In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine last fall, lorcaserin, a serotonin 2C receptor agonist, met the primary safety endpoint of noninferiority to placebo in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.14; P less than .001).
After meeting the primary endpoint, the trial investigators continued the study, assessing for a broader composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization caused by unstable angina, heart failure, or coronary revascularization. Although lorcaserin was not superior to placebo in this expanded study, it remained noninferior.
Lorcaserin is contraindicated in women who are pregnant and in patients hypersensitive to lorcaserin. The most common adverse events in patients without diabetes were headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, dry mouth, and constipation; in patients with diabetes, the most common adverse events were hypoglycemia, headache, back pain, cough, and fatigue.
“This sNDA file acceptance brings us one step closer to potentially incorporating data into our label based on the first completed large-scale cardiovascular outcomes trial for a weight loss agent,” Lynn Kramer, MD, chief clinical officer and chief medical officer of the Neurology Business Group at Eisai, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the Eisai website.
The Food and Drug Administration has accepted a supplemental New Drug Application from Eisai to update the label for the weight-loss drug lorcaserin (Belviq) with long-term efficacy and safety data from the CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 trial.
In CAMELLIA-TIMI 61, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b/4 clinical trial, about 12,000 people who were overweight or obese and had cardiovascular disease or CVD risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes, received lorcaserin or placebo. In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine last fall, lorcaserin, a serotonin 2C receptor agonist, met the primary safety endpoint of noninferiority to placebo in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.14; P less than .001).
After meeting the primary endpoint, the trial investigators continued the study, assessing for a broader composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization caused by unstable angina, heart failure, or coronary revascularization. Although lorcaserin was not superior to placebo in this expanded study, it remained noninferior.
Lorcaserin is contraindicated in women who are pregnant and in patients hypersensitive to lorcaserin. The most common adverse events in patients without diabetes were headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, dry mouth, and constipation; in patients with diabetes, the most common adverse events were hypoglycemia, headache, back pain, cough, and fatigue.
“This sNDA file acceptance brings us one step closer to potentially incorporating data into our label based on the first completed large-scale cardiovascular outcomes trial for a weight loss agent,” Lynn Kramer, MD, chief clinical officer and chief medical officer of the Neurology Business Group at Eisai, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the Eisai website.
The Food and Drug Administration has accepted a supplemental New Drug Application from Eisai to update the label for the weight-loss drug lorcaserin (Belviq) with long-term efficacy and safety data from the CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 trial.
In CAMELLIA-TIMI 61, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b/4 clinical trial, about 12,000 people who were overweight or obese and had cardiovascular disease or CVD risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes, received lorcaserin or placebo. In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine last fall, lorcaserin, a serotonin 2C receptor agonist, met the primary safety endpoint of noninferiority to placebo in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.14; P less than .001).
After meeting the primary endpoint, the trial investigators continued the study, assessing for a broader composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization caused by unstable angina, heart failure, or coronary revascularization. Although lorcaserin was not superior to placebo in this expanded study, it remained noninferior.
Lorcaserin is contraindicated in women who are pregnant and in patients hypersensitive to lorcaserin. The most common adverse events in patients without diabetes were headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, dry mouth, and constipation; in patients with diabetes, the most common adverse events were hypoglycemia, headache, back pain, cough, and fatigue.
“This sNDA file acceptance brings us one step closer to potentially incorporating data into our label based on the first completed large-scale cardiovascular outcomes trial for a weight loss agent,” Lynn Kramer, MD, chief clinical officer and chief medical officer of the Neurology Business Group at Eisai, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the Eisai website.
How Are Schizophrenic Patients Treated After Myocardial Infarction?
Patients with schizophrenia may not always get the cardiac treatment they should following a myocardial infarction (MI), according to researchers from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Studies have already established that patients with schizophrenia have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and that there is a strong correlation between MI and schizophrenia, the researchers say. Patients with schizophrenia also undergo fewer cardiac procedures compared with the general population. To try to find out why that might be, the researchers focused on the 4-stage process from initial admission following MI: offer of examination, acceptance of examination, offer of treatment, and acceptance of treatment.
Of 141 patients with a first MI, 47 also had a diagnosis of schizophrenia.
The researchers say their data show a “clear difference” between the 2 groups studied. Patients with schizophrenia were statistically significantly less likely to be offered and accept examination and to be offered and accept treatment than were the psychiatrically healthy controls. However, when the researchers analyzed each stage separately, none of the secondary results were statistically significant. Still they say, as a whole the stages contribute to the primary outcome of less cardiac treatment for these patients.
The researchers did find 2 significant differences between the 2 groups: Patients with schizophrenia were more likely to be smokers and have a lower familial predisposition to CVD. They also were less likely to be in treatment for diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension at the first MI, although that did not reach statistical significance. The 2 groups also differed in the treatments offered. Patients with schizophrenia were less often offered invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and more often offered exercise-ECG. In contrast, the controls were more likely to be offered CAG.
Without statistical significance, the researchers could not pinpoint whether physician bias, patients’ unwillingness to receive health care, or both were at the root of the discrepancies. They note that the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia “may be seen as a complication for postoperative care” and influence decisions about cardiac procedures. Those decisions may be based on “tacit assumptions rather than on standard guidelines based on medical outcomes,” the researchers add. Three patients in the study reported that they had previously visited the hospital complaining of typical chest pain but were sent home without examination. The researchers cite another study that found patients with schizophrenia receive care only when their symptoms are “severe enough.”
However, patients with schizophrenia also are known to be more likely to decline treatment, perhaps in part because they do not understand the importance of treatment, the researchers say.
The researchers suggest that the way patients are handled by the treating doctor “needs to be reformed.” It is important, they say, that health care providers are aware of the limits of dealing with a double-diagnosed patient and of the possibility of unintentional bias. A “more personalized approach,” they conclude, might make patients with schizophrenia more willing to cooperate with offers of treatment.
Patients with schizophrenia may not always get the cardiac treatment they should following a myocardial infarction (MI), according to researchers from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Studies have already established that patients with schizophrenia have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and that there is a strong correlation between MI and schizophrenia, the researchers say. Patients with schizophrenia also undergo fewer cardiac procedures compared with the general population. To try to find out why that might be, the researchers focused on the 4-stage process from initial admission following MI: offer of examination, acceptance of examination, offer of treatment, and acceptance of treatment.
Of 141 patients with a first MI, 47 also had a diagnosis of schizophrenia.
The researchers say their data show a “clear difference” between the 2 groups studied. Patients with schizophrenia were statistically significantly less likely to be offered and accept examination and to be offered and accept treatment than were the psychiatrically healthy controls. However, when the researchers analyzed each stage separately, none of the secondary results were statistically significant. Still they say, as a whole the stages contribute to the primary outcome of less cardiac treatment for these patients.
The researchers did find 2 significant differences between the 2 groups: Patients with schizophrenia were more likely to be smokers and have a lower familial predisposition to CVD. They also were less likely to be in treatment for diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension at the first MI, although that did not reach statistical significance. The 2 groups also differed in the treatments offered. Patients with schizophrenia were less often offered invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and more often offered exercise-ECG. In contrast, the controls were more likely to be offered CAG.
Without statistical significance, the researchers could not pinpoint whether physician bias, patients’ unwillingness to receive health care, or both were at the root of the discrepancies. They note that the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia “may be seen as a complication for postoperative care” and influence decisions about cardiac procedures. Those decisions may be based on “tacit assumptions rather than on standard guidelines based on medical outcomes,” the researchers add. Three patients in the study reported that they had previously visited the hospital complaining of typical chest pain but were sent home without examination. The researchers cite another study that found patients with schizophrenia receive care only when their symptoms are “severe enough.”
However, patients with schizophrenia also are known to be more likely to decline treatment, perhaps in part because they do not understand the importance of treatment, the researchers say.
The researchers suggest that the way patients are handled by the treating doctor “needs to be reformed.” It is important, they say, that health care providers are aware of the limits of dealing with a double-diagnosed patient and of the possibility of unintentional bias. A “more personalized approach,” they conclude, might make patients with schizophrenia more willing to cooperate with offers of treatment.
Patients with schizophrenia may not always get the cardiac treatment they should following a myocardial infarction (MI), according to researchers from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Studies have already established that patients with schizophrenia have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and that there is a strong correlation between MI and schizophrenia, the researchers say. Patients with schizophrenia also undergo fewer cardiac procedures compared with the general population. To try to find out why that might be, the researchers focused on the 4-stage process from initial admission following MI: offer of examination, acceptance of examination, offer of treatment, and acceptance of treatment.
Of 141 patients with a first MI, 47 also had a diagnosis of schizophrenia.
The researchers say their data show a “clear difference” between the 2 groups studied. Patients with schizophrenia were statistically significantly less likely to be offered and accept examination and to be offered and accept treatment than were the psychiatrically healthy controls. However, when the researchers analyzed each stage separately, none of the secondary results were statistically significant. Still they say, as a whole the stages contribute to the primary outcome of less cardiac treatment for these patients.
The researchers did find 2 significant differences between the 2 groups: Patients with schizophrenia were more likely to be smokers and have a lower familial predisposition to CVD. They also were less likely to be in treatment for diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension at the first MI, although that did not reach statistical significance. The 2 groups also differed in the treatments offered. Patients with schizophrenia were less often offered invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and more often offered exercise-ECG. In contrast, the controls were more likely to be offered CAG.
Without statistical significance, the researchers could not pinpoint whether physician bias, patients’ unwillingness to receive health care, or both were at the root of the discrepancies. They note that the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia “may be seen as a complication for postoperative care” and influence decisions about cardiac procedures. Those decisions may be based on “tacit assumptions rather than on standard guidelines based on medical outcomes,” the researchers add. Three patients in the study reported that they had previously visited the hospital complaining of typical chest pain but were sent home without examination. The researchers cite another study that found patients with schizophrenia receive care only when their symptoms are “severe enough.”
However, patients with schizophrenia also are known to be more likely to decline treatment, perhaps in part because they do not understand the importance of treatment, the researchers say.
The researchers suggest that the way patients are handled by the treating doctor “needs to be reformed.” It is important, they say, that health care providers are aware of the limits of dealing with a double-diagnosed patient and of the possibility of unintentional bias. A “more personalized approach,” they conclude, might make patients with schizophrenia more willing to cooperate with offers of treatment.
Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons appear safe for PAD treatment
Mortality after the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was not correlated with paclitaxel exposure, according to the results of a meta-analysis of 5-year outcomes, according to a report published online.
“Paclitaxel DCBs are safe and effective to treat the symptoms of [Rutherford classification categories] 2-4 femoropopliteal PAD,” according to Peter A. Schneider, MD, of Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, and his coauthors.
Their study analyzed data pooled from five clinical trials NCT01175850, NCT01566461, NCT01947478, NCT02118532, and NCT01609296, comprising 1,980 patients from a variety of ethnic populations with Rutherford classification 2-4 disease.
Among these patients, 1,837 received DCB and 143 received uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The mean age of the overall cohort was 68.5 years; 68.4% of patients were men. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. However, patients treated with a DCB were more likely to have critical limb ischemia, compared with PTA. DCB subjects were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus than were those treated with uncoated PTA. In addition, PTA patients who died were more likely to be active smokers than were DCB patients that died.
There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between DCB and PTA through 5 years (9.3% vs 11.2%, respectively, P = .399).
A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified paclitaxel dosage into three groups: low-dose, mid-dose, and upper-dose groups. Mean dosages for the three groups were 5,019, 10,008, and 19,978 mcg, respectively. The analysis showed no significant difference in mortality between groups, “demonstrating no direct impact of levels of nominal paclitaxel dose exposure at the index procedure and survival status in the DCB patients through 5 years (P = .700),” according to the authors.
Limitations of the study reported by the authors include the fact that pooling data from distinct trials has shortcomings. Some of data included had not yet undergone peer review, and PTA patients were included in only two randomized trials in a 2:1 ratio.
“The small numbers of PTA control patients (less than 10%) may not be representative of PTA patients in general and limits the strength of this analysis of mortality.” In addition, only patients with Rutherford classification 2-4 were included in these studies.
“Results from this independent patient-level meta-analysis show no difference in mortality between DCB and PTA at 5 years and no correlation between varying levels of paclitaxel exposure and mortality. ... Data transparency and additional analyses are needed to better understand how other factors influence long-term outcomes in this complex patient population,” the researchers concluded.
The study was funded by Medtronic, which provided the data for independent analysis to the Baim Institute for Clinical Research. Dr. Schneider is a member of the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific and is a consultant for Medtronic and other device companies. Coauthors had consulting, advisory board, or honoraria relationships with Medtronic and other device companies.
SOURCE: Schneider PA et al. JACC 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013.
Mortality after the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was not correlated with paclitaxel exposure, according to the results of a meta-analysis of 5-year outcomes, according to a report published online.
“Paclitaxel DCBs are safe and effective to treat the symptoms of [Rutherford classification categories] 2-4 femoropopliteal PAD,” according to Peter A. Schneider, MD, of Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, and his coauthors.
Their study analyzed data pooled from five clinical trials NCT01175850, NCT01566461, NCT01947478, NCT02118532, and NCT01609296, comprising 1,980 patients from a variety of ethnic populations with Rutherford classification 2-4 disease.
Among these patients, 1,837 received DCB and 143 received uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The mean age of the overall cohort was 68.5 years; 68.4% of patients were men. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. However, patients treated with a DCB were more likely to have critical limb ischemia, compared with PTA. DCB subjects were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus than were those treated with uncoated PTA. In addition, PTA patients who died were more likely to be active smokers than were DCB patients that died.
There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between DCB and PTA through 5 years (9.3% vs 11.2%, respectively, P = .399).
A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified paclitaxel dosage into three groups: low-dose, mid-dose, and upper-dose groups. Mean dosages for the three groups were 5,019, 10,008, and 19,978 mcg, respectively. The analysis showed no significant difference in mortality between groups, “demonstrating no direct impact of levels of nominal paclitaxel dose exposure at the index procedure and survival status in the DCB patients through 5 years (P = .700),” according to the authors.
Limitations of the study reported by the authors include the fact that pooling data from distinct trials has shortcomings. Some of data included had not yet undergone peer review, and PTA patients were included in only two randomized trials in a 2:1 ratio.
“The small numbers of PTA control patients (less than 10%) may not be representative of PTA patients in general and limits the strength of this analysis of mortality.” In addition, only patients with Rutherford classification 2-4 were included in these studies.
“Results from this independent patient-level meta-analysis show no difference in mortality between DCB and PTA at 5 years and no correlation between varying levels of paclitaxel exposure and mortality. ... Data transparency and additional analyses are needed to better understand how other factors influence long-term outcomes in this complex patient population,” the researchers concluded.
The study was funded by Medtronic, which provided the data for independent analysis to the Baim Institute for Clinical Research. Dr. Schneider is a member of the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific and is a consultant for Medtronic and other device companies. Coauthors had consulting, advisory board, or honoraria relationships with Medtronic and other device companies.
SOURCE: Schneider PA et al. JACC 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013.
Mortality after the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was not correlated with paclitaxel exposure, according to the results of a meta-analysis of 5-year outcomes, according to a report published online.
“Paclitaxel DCBs are safe and effective to treat the symptoms of [Rutherford classification categories] 2-4 femoropopliteal PAD,” according to Peter A. Schneider, MD, of Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, and his coauthors.
Their study analyzed data pooled from five clinical trials NCT01175850, NCT01566461, NCT01947478, NCT02118532, and NCT01609296, comprising 1,980 patients from a variety of ethnic populations with Rutherford classification 2-4 disease.
Among these patients, 1,837 received DCB and 143 received uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The mean age of the overall cohort was 68.5 years; 68.4% of patients were men. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. However, patients treated with a DCB were more likely to have critical limb ischemia, compared with PTA. DCB subjects were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus than were those treated with uncoated PTA. In addition, PTA patients who died were more likely to be active smokers than were DCB patients that died.
There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between DCB and PTA through 5 years (9.3% vs 11.2%, respectively, P = .399).
A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified paclitaxel dosage into three groups: low-dose, mid-dose, and upper-dose groups. Mean dosages for the three groups were 5,019, 10,008, and 19,978 mcg, respectively. The analysis showed no significant difference in mortality between groups, “demonstrating no direct impact of levels of nominal paclitaxel dose exposure at the index procedure and survival status in the DCB patients through 5 years (P = .700),” according to the authors.
Limitations of the study reported by the authors include the fact that pooling data from distinct trials has shortcomings. Some of data included had not yet undergone peer review, and PTA patients were included in only two randomized trials in a 2:1 ratio.
“The small numbers of PTA control patients (less than 10%) may not be representative of PTA patients in general and limits the strength of this analysis of mortality.” In addition, only patients with Rutherford classification 2-4 were included in these studies.
“Results from this independent patient-level meta-analysis show no difference in mortality between DCB and PTA at 5 years and no correlation between varying levels of paclitaxel exposure and mortality. ... Data transparency and additional analyses are needed to better understand how other factors influence long-term outcomes in this complex patient population,” the researchers concluded.
The study was funded by Medtronic, which provided the data for independent analysis to the Baim Institute for Clinical Research. Dr. Schneider is a member of the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific and is a consultant for Medtronic and other device companies. Coauthors had consulting, advisory board, or honoraria relationships with Medtronic and other device companies.
SOURCE: Schneider PA et al. JACC 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
FDA: Safety signal emerged with higher dose of tofacitinib in RA study
the Food and Drug Administration reported.
The trial’s Data Safety and Monitoring Board identified the signal in patients taking a 10-mg dose of tofacitinib twice daily, the FDA said in a safety announcement.
Pfizer, the trial’s sponsor, took “immediate action” to transition patients in the ongoing trial from the 10-mg, twice-daily dose to 5 mg twice daily, which is the approved dose for adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, the agency said. The 10-mg, twice-daily dose is approved only in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis. Xeljanz is also approved to treat psoriatic arthritis. The 11-mg, once-daily dose of Xeljanz XR that is approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis was not tested in the trial.
The ongoing study was designed to assess risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, and opportunistic infections with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice daily versus the risks in a control group treated with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, according to the statement.
Patients had to be 50 years of age or older and have at least one cardiovascular risk factor to be eligible for the study, which was required by the agency in 2012 when it approved tofacitinib, the statement says.
The FDA is reviewing trial data and working with Pfizer to better understand the safety signal, its effect on patients, and how tofacitinib should be used, Janet Woodcock, MD, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a news release. The trial will continue and is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.
“The agency will take appropriate action, as warranted, to ensure patients enrolled in this and other trials are protected and that health care professionals and clinical trial researchers understand the risks associated with this use,” she added.
Health care professionals should follow tofacitinib prescribing information, monitor patients for the signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism, and advise patients to seek medical attention immediately if they experience those signs and symptoms, according to the statement.
“We are communicating now, given the serious nature of the safety issue, to ensure that patients taking tofacitinib are aware that the FDA still believes the benefits of taking tofacitinib for its approved uses continue to outweigh the risks,” Dr. Woodcock said in the release.
While not approved in rheumatoid arthritis, the 10-mg, twice-daily dose of tofacitinib is approved in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis, the release says.
the Food and Drug Administration reported.
The trial’s Data Safety and Monitoring Board identified the signal in patients taking a 10-mg dose of tofacitinib twice daily, the FDA said in a safety announcement.
Pfizer, the trial’s sponsor, took “immediate action” to transition patients in the ongoing trial from the 10-mg, twice-daily dose to 5 mg twice daily, which is the approved dose for adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, the agency said. The 10-mg, twice-daily dose is approved only in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis. Xeljanz is also approved to treat psoriatic arthritis. The 11-mg, once-daily dose of Xeljanz XR that is approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis was not tested in the trial.
The ongoing study was designed to assess risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, and opportunistic infections with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice daily versus the risks in a control group treated with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, according to the statement.
Patients had to be 50 years of age or older and have at least one cardiovascular risk factor to be eligible for the study, which was required by the agency in 2012 when it approved tofacitinib, the statement says.
The FDA is reviewing trial data and working with Pfizer to better understand the safety signal, its effect on patients, and how tofacitinib should be used, Janet Woodcock, MD, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a news release. The trial will continue and is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.
“The agency will take appropriate action, as warranted, to ensure patients enrolled in this and other trials are protected and that health care professionals and clinical trial researchers understand the risks associated with this use,” she added.
Health care professionals should follow tofacitinib prescribing information, monitor patients for the signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism, and advise patients to seek medical attention immediately if they experience those signs and symptoms, according to the statement.
“We are communicating now, given the serious nature of the safety issue, to ensure that patients taking tofacitinib are aware that the FDA still believes the benefits of taking tofacitinib for its approved uses continue to outweigh the risks,” Dr. Woodcock said in the release.
While not approved in rheumatoid arthritis, the 10-mg, twice-daily dose of tofacitinib is approved in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis, the release says.
the Food and Drug Administration reported.
The trial’s Data Safety and Monitoring Board identified the signal in patients taking a 10-mg dose of tofacitinib twice daily, the FDA said in a safety announcement.
Pfizer, the trial’s sponsor, took “immediate action” to transition patients in the ongoing trial from the 10-mg, twice-daily dose to 5 mg twice daily, which is the approved dose for adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, the agency said. The 10-mg, twice-daily dose is approved only in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis. Xeljanz is also approved to treat psoriatic arthritis. The 11-mg, once-daily dose of Xeljanz XR that is approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis was not tested in the trial.
The ongoing study was designed to assess risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, and opportunistic infections with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice daily versus the risks in a control group treated with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, according to the statement.
Patients had to be 50 years of age or older and have at least one cardiovascular risk factor to be eligible for the study, which was required by the agency in 2012 when it approved tofacitinib, the statement says.
The FDA is reviewing trial data and working with Pfizer to better understand the safety signal, its effect on patients, and how tofacitinib should be used, Janet Woodcock, MD, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a news release. The trial will continue and is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.
“The agency will take appropriate action, as warranted, to ensure patients enrolled in this and other trials are protected and that health care professionals and clinical trial researchers understand the risks associated with this use,” she added.
Health care professionals should follow tofacitinib prescribing information, monitor patients for the signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism, and advise patients to seek medical attention immediately if they experience those signs and symptoms, according to the statement.
“We are communicating now, given the serious nature of the safety issue, to ensure that patients taking tofacitinib are aware that the FDA still believes the benefits of taking tofacitinib for its approved uses continue to outweigh the risks,” Dr. Woodcock said in the release.
While not approved in rheumatoid arthritis, the 10-mg, twice-daily dose of tofacitinib is approved in the dosing regimen for patients with ulcerative colitis, the release says.
AHA: Consider obesity as CVD risk factor in children
The American Heart Association has included obesity and severe obesity in its updated scientific statement outlining risk factors and considerations for cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients.
The scientific statement is an update to a 2006 American Heart Association (AHA) statement, adding details about obesity as an at-risk condition and severe obesity as a moderate-risk condition. Other additions include classifying type 2 diabetes as a high-risk condition and expanding on new risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients who received treatment for childhood cancer.
The AHA said the statement is aimed at pediatric cardiologists, primary care physicians, and subspecialists who care for at-risk pediatric patients, as well as providers who will care for these patients as they transition to adult life.
Obesity
In the AHA scientific statement, Sarah de Ferranti, MD, MPH, of Boston Children’s Hospital, chair of the writing group, and her colleagues, highlighted a 2016 study that identified a twofold to threefold higher risk of CVD-related mortality among patients who were overweight or obese, compared with patients of normal weight (Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39[11]:1996-2003).
Patients with obesity and severe obesity are at increased risk of aortic or coronary fatty streaks, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance, as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress, the AHA writing group noted.
They estimated that approximately 6% of U.S. children aged 2-19 years old are considered severely obese.
After identifying patients with obesity, the writing group said, a “multimodal and graduated approach to treatment” for these patients is generally warranted, with a focus on dietary and lifestyle changes, and use of pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery if indicated.
However, the authors said therapeutic life change modification “is limited in severe obesity because of small effect size and difficulty with sustainability,” while use of pharmacotherapy for treatment of pediatric obesity remains understudied and medications such as orlistat and metformin offer only modest weight loss.
Bariatric surgery, “the only treatment for severe pediatric obesity consistently associated with clinically meaningful and durable weight loss,” is not consistently offered to patients under 12 years old, they added.
Diabetes
The AHA statement also addresses risks from type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Children with T1D and T2D are at increased risk for dyslipidemia, hypertension, microalbuminuria, and obesity. Annual screening for these patients is indicated, and cardiovascular risk factor reduction can be achieved by managing hyperglycemia, controlling weight gain as a result of medication, and implementing therapeutic lifestyle changes, when possible.
Childhood cancer
As survival rates from childhood cancer have improved, there is a need to address the increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality (estimated at 8-10 times higher than the general population) as well as cancer relapse, according to the writing group.
Among patients recruited to the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, there was a 9-fold increase in cerebrovascular accident, 10-fold increased risk of coronary artery disease, and 15-fold increase in heart failure for childhood cancer survivors, compared with their siblings who were cancer free.
Cancer treatments such as radiation exposure are linked to increased rates of myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular abnormalities, and pericardial disease at a twofold to sixfold higher rate when administered at a greater than 1,500 centigray dose, compared to cancer survivors who did not receive radiation, the authors wrote.
Anthracycline treatment is associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy, while hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may increase the risk of CVD-related mortality from heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and rhythm disorders.
In treating childhood cancer survivors for CVD risk factors, “a low threshold should be used when considering the initiation of pharmacological agents because of the high risk of these youth,” and standard pharmacotherapies can be used, the authors said. “Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors should consider the cancer therapies the patient has received previously.”
In the AHA statement, Dr. de Ferranti and her colleagues also outlined epidemiology, screening, and treatment data for other cardiovascular risk factors such as familial hypercholesterolemia, Lipoprotein(a), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, congenital heart disease, Kawasaki disease, and heart transplantation.
Some members of the writing group reported research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, the Wisconsin Partnership Program, and the National Institutes of Health. One author reported unpaid consultancies with Novo Nordisk, Orexigen, and Vivus.
SOURCE: de Ferranti SD et al. Circulation. 2019 Feb 25. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618.
The American Heart Association has included obesity and severe obesity in its updated scientific statement outlining risk factors and considerations for cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients.
The scientific statement is an update to a 2006 American Heart Association (AHA) statement, adding details about obesity as an at-risk condition and severe obesity as a moderate-risk condition. Other additions include classifying type 2 diabetes as a high-risk condition and expanding on new risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients who received treatment for childhood cancer.
The AHA said the statement is aimed at pediatric cardiologists, primary care physicians, and subspecialists who care for at-risk pediatric patients, as well as providers who will care for these patients as they transition to adult life.
Obesity
In the AHA scientific statement, Sarah de Ferranti, MD, MPH, of Boston Children’s Hospital, chair of the writing group, and her colleagues, highlighted a 2016 study that identified a twofold to threefold higher risk of CVD-related mortality among patients who were overweight or obese, compared with patients of normal weight (Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39[11]:1996-2003).
Patients with obesity and severe obesity are at increased risk of aortic or coronary fatty streaks, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance, as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress, the AHA writing group noted.
They estimated that approximately 6% of U.S. children aged 2-19 years old are considered severely obese.
After identifying patients with obesity, the writing group said, a “multimodal and graduated approach to treatment” for these patients is generally warranted, with a focus on dietary and lifestyle changes, and use of pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery if indicated.
However, the authors said therapeutic life change modification “is limited in severe obesity because of small effect size and difficulty with sustainability,” while use of pharmacotherapy for treatment of pediatric obesity remains understudied and medications such as orlistat and metformin offer only modest weight loss.
Bariatric surgery, “the only treatment for severe pediatric obesity consistently associated with clinically meaningful and durable weight loss,” is not consistently offered to patients under 12 years old, they added.
Diabetes
The AHA statement also addresses risks from type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Children with T1D and T2D are at increased risk for dyslipidemia, hypertension, microalbuminuria, and obesity. Annual screening for these patients is indicated, and cardiovascular risk factor reduction can be achieved by managing hyperglycemia, controlling weight gain as a result of medication, and implementing therapeutic lifestyle changes, when possible.
Childhood cancer
As survival rates from childhood cancer have improved, there is a need to address the increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality (estimated at 8-10 times higher than the general population) as well as cancer relapse, according to the writing group.
Among patients recruited to the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, there was a 9-fold increase in cerebrovascular accident, 10-fold increased risk of coronary artery disease, and 15-fold increase in heart failure for childhood cancer survivors, compared with their siblings who were cancer free.
Cancer treatments such as radiation exposure are linked to increased rates of myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular abnormalities, and pericardial disease at a twofold to sixfold higher rate when administered at a greater than 1,500 centigray dose, compared to cancer survivors who did not receive radiation, the authors wrote.
Anthracycline treatment is associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy, while hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may increase the risk of CVD-related mortality from heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and rhythm disorders.
In treating childhood cancer survivors for CVD risk factors, “a low threshold should be used when considering the initiation of pharmacological agents because of the high risk of these youth,” and standard pharmacotherapies can be used, the authors said. “Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors should consider the cancer therapies the patient has received previously.”
In the AHA statement, Dr. de Ferranti and her colleagues also outlined epidemiology, screening, and treatment data for other cardiovascular risk factors such as familial hypercholesterolemia, Lipoprotein(a), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, congenital heart disease, Kawasaki disease, and heart transplantation.
Some members of the writing group reported research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, the Wisconsin Partnership Program, and the National Institutes of Health. One author reported unpaid consultancies with Novo Nordisk, Orexigen, and Vivus.
SOURCE: de Ferranti SD et al. Circulation. 2019 Feb 25. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618.
The American Heart Association has included obesity and severe obesity in its updated scientific statement outlining risk factors and considerations for cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients.
The scientific statement is an update to a 2006 American Heart Association (AHA) statement, adding details about obesity as an at-risk condition and severe obesity as a moderate-risk condition. Other additions include classifying type 2 diabetes as a high-risk condition and expanding on new risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients who received treatment for childhood cancer.
The AHA said the statement is aimed at pediatric cardiologists, primary care physicians, and subspecialists who care for at-risk pediatric patients, as well as providers who will care for these patients as they transition to adult life.
Obesity
In the AHA scientific statement, Sarah de Ferranti, MD, MPH, of Boston Children’s Hospital, chair of the writing group, and her colleagues, highlighted a 2016 study that identified a twofold to threefold higher risk of CVD-related mortality among patients who were overweight or obese, compared with patients of normal weight (Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39[11]:1996-2003).
Patients with obesity and severe obesity are at increased risk of aortic or coronary fatty streaks, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance, as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress, the AHA writing group noted.
They estimated that approximately 6% of U.S. children aged 2-19 years old are considered severely obese.
After identifying patients with obesity, the writing group said, a “multimodal and graduated approach to treatment” for these patients is generally warranted, with a focus on dietary and lifestyle changes, and use of pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery if indicated.
However, the authors said therapeutic life change modification “is limited in severe obesity because of small effect size and difficulty with sustainability,” while use of pharmacotherapy for treatment of pediatric obesity remains understudied and medications such as orlistat and metformin offer only modest weight loss.
Bariatric surgery, “the only treatment for severe pediatric obesity consistently associated with clinically meaningful and durable weight loss,” is not consistently offered to patients under 12 years old, they added.
Diabetes
The AHA statement also addresses risks from type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Children with T1D and T2D are at increased risk for dyslipidemia, hypertension, microalbuminuria, and obesity. Annual screening for these patients is indicated, and cardiovascular risk factor reduction can be achieved by managing hyperglycemia, controlling weight gain as a result of medication, and implementing therapeutic lifestyle changes, when possible.
Childhood cancer
As survival rates from childhood cancer have improved, there is a need to address the increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality (estimated at 8-10 times higher than the general population) as well as cancer relapse, according to the writing group.
Among patients recruited to the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, there was a 9-fold increase in cerebrovascular accident, 10-fold increased risk of coronary artery disease, and 15-fold increase in heart failure for childhood cancer survivors, compared with their siblings who were cancer free.
Cancer treatments such as radiation exposure are linked to increased rates of myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular abnormalities, and pericardial disease at a twofold to sixfold higher rate when administered at a greater than 1,500 centigray dose, compared to cancer survivors who did not receive radiation, the authors wrote.
Anthracycline treatment is associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy, while hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may increase the risk of CVD-related mortality from heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and rhythm disorders.
In treating childhood cancer survivors for CVD risk factors, “a low threshold should be used when considering the initiation of pharmacological agents because of the high risk of these youth,” and standard pharmacotherapies can be used, the authors said. “Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors should consider the cancer therapies the patient has received previously.”
In the AHA statement, Dr. de Ferranti and her colleagues also outlined epidemiology, screening, and treatment data for other cardiovascular risk factors such as familial hypercholesterolemia, Lipoprotein(a), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, congenital heart disease, Kawasaki disease, and heart transplantation.
Some members of the writing group reported research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, the Wisconsin Partnership Program, and the National Institutes of Health. One author reported unpaid consultancies with Novo Nordisk, Orexigen, and Vivus.
SOURCE: de Ferranti SD et al. Circulation. 2019 Feb 25. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618.
FROM CIRCULATION
Death data spur black-box warning for gout drug Uloric
, the Food and Drug Administration declared on Feb. 21. The agency is now mandating a black-box warning.
“Health care professionals should reserve Uloric for use only in patients who have failed or do not tolerate allopurinol,” the FDA announced. “Counsel patients about the cardiovascular risk with Uloric,” the agency suggested, and advise them to seek medical attention at once if they have cardiac symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, rapid or irregular heartbeat, or dizziness.
The FDA’s move comes a decade after it approved febuxostat as a gout treatment. As the FDA noted in its announcement, “the number of medicines to treat gout is limited, and there is an unmet need for treatments for this disease.”
Research has suggested that both febuxostat and allopurinol have similar efficacy. Some experts have recommended febuxostat as an alternative for patients who shouldn’t take allopurinol (Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;43[3]:367-75).
However, research has raised concerns about febuxostat’s cardiac risk. In its Feb. 21 statement, the FDA pointed to the findings of a 2010-2017 postmarket clinical trial of 6,190 patients with gout who were treated with febuxostat or allopurinol (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1200-10).
“In patients treated with Uloric, 15 deaths from heart-related causes were observed for every 1,000 patients treated for a year compared to 11 deaths from heart-related causes per 1,000 patients treated with allopurinol for a year,” the FDA said. “In addition, there were 26 deaths from any cause per 1,000 patients treated for a year with Uloric compared to 22 deaths per 1,000 patients treated for a year with allopurinol.”
, the Food and Drug Administration declared on Feb. 21. The agency is now mandating a black-box warning.
“Health care professionals should reserve Uloric for use only in patients who have failed or do not tolerate allopurinol,” the FDA announced. “Counsel patients about the cardiovascular risk with Uloric,” the agency suggested, and advise them to seek medical attention at once if they have cardiac symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, rapid or irregular heartbeat, or dizziness.
The FDA’s move comes a decade after it approved febuxostat as a gout treatment. As the FDA noted in its announcement, “the number of medicines to treat gout is limited, and there is an unmet need for treatments for this disease.”
Research has suggested that both febuxostat and allopurinol have similar efficacy. Some experts have recommended febuxostat as an alternative for patients who shouldn’t take allopurinol (Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;43[3]:367-75).
However, research has raised concerns about febuxostat’s cardiac risk. In its Feb. 21 statement, the FDA pointed to the findings of a 2010-2017 postmarket clinical trial of 6,190 patients with gout who were treated with febuxostat or allopurinol (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1200-10).
“In patients treated with Uloric, 15 deaths from heart-related causes were observed for every 1,000 patients treated for a year compared to 11 deaths from heart-related causes per 1,000 patients treated with allopurinol for a year,” the FDA said. “In addition, there were 26 deaths from any cause per 1,000 patients treated for a year with Uloric compared to 22 deaths per 1,000 patients treated for a year with allopurinol.”
, the Food and Drug Administration declared on Feb. 21. The agency is now mandating a black-box warning.
“Health care professionals should reserve Uloric for use only in patients who have failed or do not tolerate allopurinol,” the FDA announced. “Counsel patients about the cardiovascular risk with Uloric,” the agency suggested, and advise them to seek medical attention at once if they have cardiac symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, rapid or irregular heartbeat, or dizziness.
The FDA’s move comes a decade after it approved febuxostat as a gout treatment. As the FDA noted in its announcement, “the number of medicines to treat gout is limited, and there is an unmet need for treatments for this disease.”
Research has suggested that both febuxostat and allopurinol have similar efficacy. Some experts have recommended febuxostat as an alternative for patients who shouldn’t take allopurinol (Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;43[3]:367-75).
However, research has raised concerns about febuxostat’s cardiac risk. In its Feb. 21 statement, the FDA pointed to the findings of a 2010-2017 postmarket clinical trial of 6,190 patients with gout who were treated with febuxostat or allopurinol (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1200-10).
“In patients treated with Uloric, 15 deaths from heart-related causes were observed for every 1,000 patients treated for a year compared to 11 deaths from heart-related causes per 1,000 patients treated with allopurinol for a year,” the FDA said. “In addition, there were 26 deaths from any cause per 1,000 patients treated for a year with Uloric compared to 22 deaths per 1,000 patients treated for a year with allopurinol.”
Who is least adherent to statins, and more
This week in MDedge Cardiocast: Silent strokes are pretty common after noncardiac surgery, troubling news about nonadherence to statins, what cardiologists need to know about ARVC, and how gender inequality in medicine affects the health of ALL women.
This week in MDedge Cardiocast: Silent strokes are pretty common after noncardiac surgery, troubling news about nonadherence to statins, what cardiologists need to know about ARVC, and how gender inequality in medicine affects the health of ALL women.
This week in MDedge Cardiocast: Silent strokes are pretty common after noncardiac surgery, troubling news about nonadherence to statins, what cardiologists need to know about ARVC, and how gender inequality in medicine affects the health of ALL women.
Stroke endovascular therapy: The more you do, the better you do
HONOLULU – The well-documented link between higher procedure volumes and better procedure efficacy also applies to endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
in analysis of data from two different U.S. sources: the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the state of Florida, Sunil A. Sheth, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association.
The finding raises questions about how to best triage patients with an acute ischemic stroke, suggesting that, in at least some situations, patients might be better served being taken to a higher-volume center even if it’s not the closest, noted Dr. Sheth, The results also suggest that the findings in the trials proving the value of EST run primarily at large, tertiary care, referral centers might not be generalizable to all centers that start an endovascular program.
The study looked at data collected during 2006-2016 in Florida and during 2012-2016 in the NIS, and found that in both databases the rate of EST procedures performed showed steadily increasing use over time, with a sharp increase in the number of centers performing EST in 2015. Each of the two data sets also showed that better discharge outcomes occurred in patients treated at centers with the highest procedural volumes.
In the nationwide NIS data, for every 10 additional patients a center treated with EST annually, the incidence of a “good” hospital-discharge outcome (defined as either discharge home or to an acute rehabilitation hospital) rose by 30%, compared with lower-volume centers in a multivariate regression analysis, a statistically significant relationship, said Dr. Sheth, a neurologist at the University of Texas, Houston. This volume-outcome relationship held fairly constant through volumes up to about 50 EST cases annually. “The more the better,” he observed.
“The data suggest that EST outcomes are not always the same,” but right now most emergency medical service systems do not take EST case volume into account when deciding where to take an acute stroke patient, Dr. Sheth said in an interview. But he cautioned against an oversimplified focus on just EST case volume.
A link between volume and better outcomes “is easy to understand and not surprising. We see this relationship for a variety of procedures. The data suggest we need to consider procedure volumes. But volume is only part of makes for good outcomes; it’s not the only factor,” he stressed.
Dr. Sheth and his associates used data collected by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration on 3,890 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EST at 56 Florida hospitals and on 42,505 such patients in the NIS database treated at 2,260 U.S. hospitals. During the 11-year period for Florida data collection, the number of centers performing EST in the state rose steadily at an average rate of about four new centers per year. Although the number of EST procedures done also rose sharply, in general over time a higher percentage of patients underwent treatment at lower-volume centers. Similar patterns existed in the national data. The Florida data showed a statistically significant 10% improvement in good discharge outcomes for every 10 additional EST patients a center treated a year, consistent with the NIS data.
Concurrently with Dr. Sheth’s report, the results also appeared in an article published online (Stroke. 2019 Feb 6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023967).
Dr. Sheth reported no disclosures.
SOURCE: Sheth SA et al. ISC 2019, Abstract 002.
The idea that when centers perform more of a procedure, such as endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, they more often do it better is intuitively plausible, which helps makes these findings believable. It’s also a relationship we’ve already seen for other types of endovascular therapies. What this study did not address were other factors beyond case volume also might also make important contributions to outcome, such as the speed of treatment delivery.
Volume thresholds for endovascular stroke programs will come eventually, but for the time being our focus should be on insuring wide access to endovascular treatment.
Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, a neurologist and chief of staff for the San Francisco Veteran Affairs Health Care System, made these comments in an interview. He reported no disclosures.
The idea that when centers perform more of a procedure, such as endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, they more often do it better is intuitively plausible, which helps makes these findings believable. It’s also a relationship we’ve already seen for other types of endovascular therapies. What this study did not address were other factors beyond case volume also might also make important contributions to outcome, such as the speed of treatment delivery.
Volume thresholds for endovascular stroke programs will come eventually, but for the time being our focus should be on insuring wide access to endovascular treatment.
Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, a neurologist and chief of staff for the San Francisco Veteran Affairs Health Care System, made these comments in an interview. He reported no disclosures.
The idea that when centers perform more of a procedure, such as endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, they more often do it better is intuitively plausible, which helps makes these findings believable. It’s also a relationship we’ve already seen for other types of endovascular therapies. What this study did not address were other factors beyond case volume also might also make important contributions to outcome, such as the speed of treatment delivery.
Volume thresholds for endovascular stroke programs will come eventually, but for the time being our focus should be on insuring wide access to endovascular treatment.
Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, a neurologist and chief of staff for the San Francisco Veteran Affairs Health Care System, made these comments in an interview. He reported no disclosures.
HONOLULU – The well-documented link between higher procedure volumes and better procedure efficacy also applies to endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
in analysis of data from two different U.S. sources: the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the state of Florida, Sunil A. Sheth, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association.
The finding raises questions about how to best triage patients with an acute ischemic stroke, suggesting that, in at least some situations, patients might be better served being taken to a higher-volume center even if it’s not the closest, noted Dr. Sheth, The results also suggest that the findings in the trials proving the value of EST run primarily at large, tertiary care, referral centers might not be generalizable to all centers that start an endovascular program.
The study looked at data collected during 2006-2016 in Florida and during 2012-2016 in the NIS, and found that in both databases the rate of EST procedures performed showed steadily increasing use over time, with a sharp increase in the number of centers performing EST in 2015. Each of the two data sets also showed that better discharge outcomes occurred in patients treated at centers with the highest procedural volumes.
In the nationwide NIS data, for every 10 additional patients a center treated with EST annually, the incidence of a “good” hospital-discharge outcome (defined as either discharge home or to an acute rehabilitation hospital) rose by 30%, compared with lower-volume centers in a multivariate regression analysis, a statistically significant relationship, said Dr. Sheth, a neurologist at the University of Texas, Houston. This volume-outcome relationship held fairly constant through volumes up to about 50 EST cases annually. “The more the better,” he observed.
“The data suggest that EST outcomes are not always the same,” but right now most emergency medical service systems do not take EST case volume into account when deciding where to take an acute stroke patient, Dr. Sheth said in an interview. But he cautioned against an oversimplified focus on just EST case volume.
A link between volume and better outcomes “is easy to understand and not surprising. We see this relationship for a variety of procedures. The data suggest we need to consider procedure volumes. But volume is only part of makes for good outcomes; it’s not the only factor,” he stressed.
Dr. Sheth and his associates used data collected by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration on 3,890 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EST at 56 Florida hospitals and on 42,505 such patients in the NIS database treated at 2,260 U.S. hospitals. During the 11-year period for Florida data collection, the number of centers performing EST in the state rose steadily at an average rate of about four new centers per year. Although the number of EST procedures done also rose sharply, in general over time a higher percentage of patients underwent treatment at lower-volume centers. Similar patterns existed in the national data. The Florida data showed a statistically significant 10% improvement in good discharge outcomes for every 10 additional EST patients a center treated a year, consistent with the NIS data.
Concurrently with Dr. Sheth’s report, the results also appeared in an article published online (Stroke. 2019 Feb 6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023967).
Dr. Sheth reported no disclosures.
SOURCE: Sheth SA et al. ISC 2019, Abstract 002.
HONOLULU – The well-documented link between higher procedure volumes and better procedure efficacy also applies to endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
in analysis of data from two different U.S. sources: the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the state of Florida, Sunil A. Sheth, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association.
The finding raises questions about how to best triage patients with an acute ischemic stroke, suggesting that, in at least some situations, patients might be better served being taken to a higher-volume center even if it’s not the closest, noted Dr. Sheth, The results also suggest that the findings in the trials proving the value of EST run primarily at large, tertiary care, referral centers might not be generalizable to all centers that start an endovascular program.
The study looked at data collected during 2006-2016 in Florida and during 2012-2016 in the NIS, and found that in both databases the rate of EST procedures performed showed steadily increasing use over time, with a sharp increase in the number of centers performing EST in 2015. Each of the two data sets also showed that better discharge outcomes occurred in patients treated at centers with the highest procedural volumes.
In the nationwide NIS data, for every 10 additional patients a center treated with EST annually, the incidence of a “good” hospital-discharge outcome (defined as either discharge home or to an acute rehabilitation hospital) rose by 30%, compared with lower-volume centers in a multivariate regression analysis, a statistically significant relationship, said Dr. Sheth, a neurologist at the University of Texas, Houston. This volume-outcome relationship held fairly constant through volumes up to about 50 EST cases annually. “The more the better,” he observed.
“The data suggest that EST outcomes are not always the same,” but right now most emergency medical service systems do not take EST case volume into account when deciding where to take an acute stroke patient, Dr. Sheth said in an interview. But he cautioned against an oversimplified focus on just EST case volume.
A link between volume and better outcomes “is easy to understand and not surprising. We see this relationship for a variety of procedures. The data suggest we need to consider procedure volumes. But volume is only part of makes for good outcomes; it’s not the only factor,” he stressed.
Dr. Sheth and his associates used data collected by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration on 3,890 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EST at 56 Florida hospitals and on 42,505 such patients in the NIS database treated at 2,260 U.S. hospitals. During the 11-year period for Florida data collection, the number of centers performing EST in the state rose steadily at an average rate of about four new centers per year. Although the number of EST procedures done also rose sharply, in general over time a higher percentage of patients underwent treatment at lower-volume centers. Similar patterns existed in the national data. The Florida data showed a statistically significant 10% improvement in good discharge outcomes for every 10 additional EST patients a center treated a year, consistent with the NIS data.
Concurrently with Dr. Sheth’s report, the results also appeared in an article published online (Stroke. 2019 Feb 6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023967).
Dr. Sheth reported no disclosures.
SOURCE: Sheth SA et al. ISC 2019, Abstract 002.
REPORTING FROM ISC 2019
PAD tied to higher prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) were also more likely to have left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, according to a study published in the Journal of Cardiology.
The study enrolled 1,121 patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The mean age was 68 years and 56% of patients were men. A total of 200 patients (17.8%) had PAD; 33.0% of these had no symptoms, 54.5% had intermittent symptoms, and 12.5% had critical ischemia, according to Koji Yanaka, MD, and colleagues at the Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PAD was an independent predictor of LV diastolic dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; P = .01).
“The prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was higher in patients with PAD than those without PAD. These findings suggest that patients with PAD should be evaluated not only for LV systolic but also diastolic function in echocardiography,” the researchers concluded.
The authors reported that they had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Yanaka K et al. J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.011.
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) were also more likely to have left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, according to a study published in the Journal of Cardiology.
The study enrolled 1,121 patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The mean age was 68 years and 56% of patients were men. A total of 200 patients (17.8%) had PAD; 33.0% of these had no symptoms, 54.5% had intermittent symptoms, and 12.5% had critical ischemia, according to Koji Yanaka, MD, and colleagues at the Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PAD was an independent predictor of LV diastolic dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; P = .01).
“The prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was higher in patients with PAD than those without PAD. These findings suggest that patients with PAD should be evaluated not only for LV systolic but also diastolic function in echocardiography,” the researchers concluded.
The authors reported that they had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Yanaka K et al. J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.011.
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) were also more likely to have left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, according to a study published in the Journal of Cardiology.
The study enrolled 1,121 patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The mean age was 68 years and 56% of patients were men. A total of 200 patients (17.8%) had PAD; 33.0% of these had no symptoms, 54.5% had intermittent symptoms, and 12.5% had critical ischemia, according to Koji Yanaka, MD, and colleagues at the Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PAD was an independent predictor of LV diastolic dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; P = .01).
“The prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was higher in patients with PAD than those without PAD. These findings suggest that patients with PAD should be evaluated not only for LV systolic but also diastolic function in echocardiography,” the researchers concluded.
The authors reported that they had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Yanaka K et al. J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.011.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Sildenafil associated with persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates with early IUGR
LAS VEGAS – Increased rates of persistent neonatal pulmonary hypertension in neonates put the brakes on STRIDER, an international placebo-controlled study looking at sildenafil as a treatment for early-onset intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
The study’s independent data safety monitoring board halted STRIDER (Sildenafil Therapy in Dismal Prognosis Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction) last July, after an interim safety analysis identified possible fetal harm and no signal of benefit over placebo, Dr. Anouk Pels reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The late-breaking presentation at the meeting revealed the first outcome data details.
The board had “serious concerns that sildenafil may cause harm to newborn children. … Given the results , it is extremely unlikely that any benefit could be shown on the primary endpoint if the trial is continued to its completion,” said Dr. Pels of the University of Amsterdam. “Our recommendation is not to use sildenafil for this indication in pregnant women.”
Although the link remains as-yet unproven, pulmonary hypertension among sildenafil-exposed neonates is biologically plausible, she said. It could have been a symptomatic rebound response to the discontinuation of constant intrauterine sildenafil exposure – or it could have been a hint of something more profound. Like the genital vasculature, pulmonary vasculature is a target of the drug. Intrauterine exposure to sildenafil could theoretically alter its development.
“It’s possible that sildenafil may be causing structural changes in the pulmonary vasculature of fetuses. This needs to be explored further, and we will do so by performing additional analyses on autopsy data and placental histology.”
STRIDER involved 261 pregnant women diagnosed with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. They were randomized to sildenafil 25 mg or placebo three times daily until delivery or 32 weeks’ gestation. A safety analysis was conducted after every 50 patients were enrolled. The preplanned interim analysis was conducted after half of the cohort had been enrolled and received at least one dose of the study medication.
The primary outcome was a composite measure of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity at hospital discharge.
Gestational age at baseline was about 24.6 weeks, and the estimated fetal weight by ultrasound, 465 g. About 45% of pregnancies had evidence of a notching in the uterine artery. In about 42%, the pulsatility index of the umbilical artery was above the 95th percentile; the pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery was below the 5% percentile in about 70% of cases.
About a quarter of the women had a diagnosis of pregnancy-induced hypertension, and another quarter, preeclampsia. Women used the study medication for a mean of 22 days.
There were no significant between-group differences in maternal outcomes. Median gestational age at delivery was 28 weeks in both groups. About 10% in each group experienced new-onset pregnancy-induced hypertension; About a quarter of each group developed new-onset preeclampsia or HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count). There were no between-group differences in the number of maternal antihypertensives prescribed.
The primary combined outcome of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity occurred in 66 of the sildenafil-exposed neonates and 58 of the placebo-exposed infants (61% vs. 54%) – not a significant difference. Fetal death occurred in 23 and 29 pregnancies, respectively (21% and 27%); neonatal death occurred in 21 and 11, respectively (19% and 10%). Overall, fetal/neonatal mortality was similar between the sildenafil and placebo groups (41% and 37%, respectively).
Of the 64 sildenafil-exposed neonates who survived to hospital discharge, 22 exhibited clinically relevant morbidity. Of the 67 in the placebo-treated group who survived to hospital discharge, 18 had clinically relevant morbidity. Overall, 42 in the sildenafil group and 49 of the placebo group survived to hospital discharge without relevant morbidity.
There were a number of secondary outcomes, none exhibiting any significant between-group differences. These included the median weights of those who experienced intrauterine death (425 g and 350 g), median live birth weight (725 g and 783 g), intraventricular hemorrhage of grade II or IV (3% and 2%), periventricular hemorrhage grade II or higher (0%, both groups), necrotizing enterocolitis grade II or higher (7% and 8%), and at least one culture-proven or clinical infection (41% and 33%).
The significantly higher rates of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil-exposed neonates was the showstopper. Almost half of the 21 who died had proven pulmonary hypertension (10), as did 6 of the 64 who survived – an excess of 16 cases. Of proven cases, 11 were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There were also two cases of sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension and four cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. In the placebo-exposed group, pulmonary hypertension occurred in 3 of the 11 deaths and 1 of the 67 who survived. Of proven cases, two were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There was no sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension, but there were three cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. Some children had both persistent pulmonary hypertension and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
“While there was no difference in the primary outcomes or in overall mortality, there were more cases of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil group,” Dr. Pels said. “We can speculate on the cause, whether it was related to sildenafil and why, or whether it was simply chance. This is the reason we need to conduct more in-depth analyses of these data.”
Funding came from federal health agencies and universities in the countries where STRIDER was conducted, including New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Dr. Pels had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pels A et al. The Pregnancy Meeting, Late-Breaker 2.
LAS VEGAS – Increased rates of persistent neonatal pulmonary hypertension in neonates put the brakes on STRIDER, an international placebo-controlled study looking at sildenafil as a treatment for early-onset intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
The study’s independent data safety monitoring board halted STRIDER (Sildenafil Therapy in Dismal Prognosis Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction) last July, after an interim safety analysis identified possible fetal harm and no signal of benefit over placebo, Dr. Anouk Pels reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The late-breaking presentation at the meeting revealed the first outcome data details.
The board had “serious concerns that sildenafil may cause harm to newborn children. … Given the results , it is extremely unlikely that any benefit could be shown on the primary endpoint if the trial is continued to its completion,” said Dr. Pels of the University of Amsterdam. “Our recommendation is not to use sildenafil for this indication in pregnant women.”
Although the link remains as-yet unproven, pulmonary hypertension among sildenafil-exposed neonates is biologically plausible, she said. It could have been a symptomatic rebound response to the discontinuation of constant intrauterine sildenafil exposure – or it could have been a hint of something more profound. Like the genital vasculature, pulmonary vasculature is a target of the drug. Intrauterine exposure to sildenafil could theoretically alter its development.
“It’s possible that sildenafil may be causing structural changes in the pulmonary vasculature of fetuses. This needs to be explored further, and we will do so by performing additional analyses on autopsy data and placental histology.”
STRIDER involved 261 pregnant women diagnosed with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. They were randomized to sildenafil 25 mg or placebo three times daily until delivery or 32 weeks’ gestation. A safety analysis was conducted after every 50 patients were enrolled. The preplanned interim analysis was conducted after half of the cohort had been enrolled and received at least one dose of the study medication.
The primary outcome was a composite measure of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity at hospital discharge.
Gestational age at baseline was about 24.6 weeks, and the estimated fetal weight by ultrasound, 465 g. About 45% of pregnancies had evidence of a notching in the uterine artery. In about 42%, the pulsatility index of the umbilical artery was above the 95th percentile; the pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery was below the 5% percentile in about 70% of cases.
About a quarter of the women had a diagnosis of pregnancy-induced hypertension, and another quarter, preeclampsia. Women used the study medication for a mean of 22 days.
There were no significant between-group differences in maternal outcomes. Median gestational age at delivery was 28 weeks in both groups. About 10% in each group experienced new-onset pregnancy-induced hypertension; About a quarter of each group developed new-onset preeclampsia or HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count). There were no between-group differences in the number of maternal antihypertensives prescribed.
The primary combined outcome of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity occurred in 66 of the sildenafil-exposed neonates and 58 of the placebo-exposed infants (61% vs. 54%) – not a significant difference. Fetal death occurred in 23 and 29 pregnancies, respectively (21% and 27%); neonatal death occurred in 21 and 11, respectively (19% and 10%). Overall, fetal/neonatal mortality was similar between the sildenafil and placebo groups (41% and 37%, respectively).
Of the 64 sildenafil-exposed neonates who survived to hospital discharge, 22 exhibited clinically relevant morbidity. Of the 67 in the placebo-treated group who survived to hospital discharge, 18 had clinically relevant morbidity. Overall, 42 in the sildenafil group and 49 of the placebo group survived to hospital discharge without relevant morbidity.
There were a number of secondary outcomes, none exhibiting any significant between-group differences. These included the median weights of those who experienced intrauterine death (425 g and 350 g), median live birth weight (725 g and 783 g), intraventricular hemorrhage of grade II or IV (3% and 2%), periventricular hemorrhage grade II or higher (0%, both groups), necrotizing enterocolitis grade II or higher (7% and 8%), and at least one culture-proven or clinical infection (41% and 33%).
The significantly higher rates of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil-exposed neonates was the showstopper. Almost half of the 21 who died had proven pulmonary hypertension (10), as did 6 of the 64 who survived – an excess of 16 cases. Of proven cases, 11 were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There were also two cases of sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension and four cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. In the placebo-exposed group, pulmonary hypertension occurred in 3 of the 11 deaths and 1 of the 67 who survived. Of proven cases, two were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There was no sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension, but there were three cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. Some children had both persistent pulmonary hypertension and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
“While there was no difference in the primary outcomes or in overall mortality, there were more cases of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil group,” Dr. Pels said. “We can speculate on the cause, whether it was related to sildenafil and why, or whether it was simply chance. This is the reason we need to conduct more in-depth analyses of these data.”
Funding came from federal health agencies and universities in the countries where STRIDER was conducted, including New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Dr. Pels had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pels A et al. The Pregnancy Meeting, Late-Breaker 2.
LAS VEGAS – Increased rates of persistent neonatal pulmonary hypertension in neonates put the brakes on STRIDER, an international placebo-controlled study looking at sildenafil as a treatment for early-onset intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
The study’s independent data safety monitoring board halted STRIDER (Sildenafil Therapy in Dismal Prognosis Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction) last July, after an interim safety analysis identified possible fetal harm and no signal of benefit over placebo, Dr. Anouk Pels reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The late-breaking presentation at the meeting revealed the first outcome data details.
The board had “serious concerns that sildenafil may cause harm to newborn children. … Given the results , it is extremely unlikely that any benefit could be shown on the primary endpoint if the trial is continued to its completion,” said Dr. Pels of the University of Amsterdam. “Our recommendation is not to use sildenafil for this indication in pregnant women.”
Although the link remains as-yet unproven, pulmonary hypertension among sildenafil-exposed neonates is biologically plausible, she said. It could have been a symptomatic rebound response to the discontinuation of constant intrauterine sildenafil exposure – or it could have been a hint of something more profound. Like the genital vasculature, pulmonary vasculature is a target of the drug. Intrauterine exposure to sildenafil could theoretically alter its development.
“It’s possible that sildenafil may be causing structural changes in the pulmonary vasculature of fetuses. This needs to be explored further, and we will do so by performing additional analyses on autopsy data and placental histology.”
STRIDER involved 261 pregnant women diagnosed with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. They were randomized to sildenafil 25 mg or placebo three times daily until delivery or 32 weeks’ gestation. A safety analysis was conducted after every 50 patients were enrolled. The preplanned interim analysis was conducted after half of the cohort had been enrolled and received at least one dose of the study medication.
The primary outcome was a composite measure of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity at hospital discharge.
Gestational age at baseline was about 24.6 weeks, and the estimated fetal weight by ultrasound, 465 g. About 45% of pregnancies had evidence of a notching in the uterine artery. In about 42%, the pulsatility index of the umbilical artery was above the 95th percentile; the pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery was below the 5% percentile in about 70% of cases.
About a quarter of the women had a diagnosis of pregnancy-induced hypertension, and another quarter, preeclampsia. Women used the study medication for a mean of 22 days.
There were no significant between-group differences in maternal outcomes. Median gestational age at delivery was 28 weeks in both groups. About 10% in each group experienced new-onset pregnancy-induced hypertension; About a quarter of each group developed new-onset preeclampsia or HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count). There were no between-group differences in the number of maternal antihypertensives prescribed.
The primary combined outcome of neonatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity occurred in 66 of the sildenafil-exposed neonates and 58 of the placebo-exposed infants (61% vs. 54%) – not a significant difference. Fetal death occurred in 23 and 29 pregnancies, respectively (21% and 27%); neonatal death occurred in 21 and 11, respectively (19% and 10%). Overall, fetal/neonatal mortality was similar between the sildenafil and placebo groups (41% and 37%, respectively).
Of the 64 sildenafil-exposed neonates who survived to hospital discharge, 22 exhibited clinically relevant morbidity. Of the 67 in the placebo-treated group who survived to hospital discharge, 18 had clinically relevant morbidity. Overall, 42 in the sildenafil group and 49 of the placebo group survived to hospital discharge without relevant morbidity.
There were a number of secondary outcomes, none exhibiting any significant between-group differences. These included the median weights of those who experienced intrauterine death (425 g and 350 g), median live birth weight (725 g and 783 g), intraventricular hemorrhage of grade II or IV (3% and 2%), periventricular hemorrhage grade II or higher (0%, both groups), necrotizing enterocolitis grade II or higher (7% and 8%), and at least one culture-proven or clinical infection (41% and 33%).
The significantly higher rates of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil-exposed neonates was the showstopper. Almost half of the 21 who died had proven pulmonary hypertension (10), as did 6 of the 64 who survived – an excess of 16 cases. Of proven cases, 11 were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There were also two cases of sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension and four cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. In the placebo-exposed group, pulmonary hypertension occurred in 3 of the 11 deaths and 1 of the 67 who survived. Of proven cases, two were persistent pulmonary hypertension. There was no sepsis-associated pulmonary hypertension, but there were three cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with the disorder. Some children had both persistent pulmonary hypertension and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
“While there was no difference in the primary outcomes or in overall mortality, there were more cases of pulmonary hypertension in the sildenafil group,” Dr. Pels said. “We can speculate on the cause, whether it was related to sildenafil and why, or whether it was simply chance. This is the reason we need to conduct more in-depth analyses of these data.”
Funding came from federal health agencies and universities in the countries where STRIDER was conducted, including New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Dr. Pels had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pels A et al. The Pregnancy Meeting, Late-Breaker 2.
REPORTING FROM THE PREGNANCY MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: There were 16 cases of persistent pulmonary hypertension in the treated group and four in the placebo group.
Study details: The randomized study involved 261 pregnant women treated with sildenafil for early-onset intrauterine growth restriction.
Disclosures: Funding agencies and universities in the countries involved in the trial contributed to funding. Dr. Pels had no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Pels A et al. The Pregnancy Meeting, Late-Breaker 2.