User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
Mortality is high in pediatric superrefractory status epilepticus
BANGKOK – presented by Maggie Lo Yee Yau, MD, at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“Death in these children usually occurred within the first few days after admission to the pediatric ICU,” she said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
The study included 15 consecutive patients aged between 1 month and 17 years treated for superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) during 2011-2017 at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where Dr. Yau practices. Seven children died during their index hospital admission, with a median time to death of 8 days. Two more died within several years post discharge.
Morbidity was substantial: At follow-up 1 year after the index episode of SRSE, two patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 3, indicative of severe disability; three patients had moderate disability, with a GOS of 4; and two patients were in a vegetative state, with a GOS of 2, both of whom subsequently died of aspiration pneumonia. Only 1 of the 15 patients had a good recovery. Through 8 years of follow-up, all six survivors had epilepsy. Common nonneurologic deficits included a predisposition to a variety of infections.
By way of background, Dr. Yau noted that convulsive status epilepticus is the most common neurologic emergency in children, with an incidence of about 20 episodes per 100,000. Of affected children, 10%-40% develop refractory status, with reported mortality rates of 16%-43%. SRSE is a term reserved for persistent or recurrent seizures 24 hours or more after onset of general anesthesia for management of refractory status.
The impetus for Dr. Yau’s study was the dearth of data on SRSE in children. The literature consists of a few case series totaling well under 100 patients.
The Hong Kong case series included 15 patients with SRSE who had a median age of 7.9 years, only 1 of whom had preexisting epilepsy, a case of epileptic encephalopathy with severe developmental delay. Of the 15, 12 were boys. The patients were placed on a median of four antiepileptic drugs. Those who survived to discharge spent a median of 17.8 days under general anesthesia and 42.5 days in the pediatric ICU.
The SRSE etiologies included febrile infection–related epilepsy syndrome in two cases, four serious infections, four cases of autoimmune etiology, two cases of epileptic encephalopathy, one patient with hypoxia caused by severe croup, and two of unknown origin despite intensive work-up.
The four in-hospital deaths caused by acute cerebral edema occurred a median 6.5 days after admission. There were also two deaths because of uncontrolled sepsis and one because of intraventricular bleeding secondary to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura thought to have occurred as a complication of interactions between the numerous prescribed medications. All six children with an infectious or unknown etiology died in hospital, whereas none of those with an autoimmune etiology, epileptic encephalopathy, or hypoxia did. Duration of anesthesia did not predict mortality.
Other investigators have reported that younger age is associated with higher mortality, but that was not true in the Hong Kong experience. Neither of the two children aged less than 3 years died during their index hospitalization. All 7 deaths occurred in the 13 children age 3 years or older.
When asked whether she thought SRSE or the underlying disorder was the bigger contributor to mortality, Dr. Yau replied that she believes the prolonged refractory seizures may have worsened cerebral edema in some patients and thereby have been the cause of death.
She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study.
BANGKOK – presented by Maggie Lo Yee Yau, MD, at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“Death in these children usually occurred within the first few days after admission to the pediatric ICU,” she said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
The study included 15 consecutive patients aged between 1 month and 17 years treated for superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) during 2011-2017 at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where Dr. Yau practices. Seven children died during their index hospital admission, with a median time to death of 8 days. Two more died within several years post discharge.
Morbidity was substantial: At follow-up 1 year after the index episode of SRSE, two patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 3, indicative of severe disability; three patients had moderate disability, with a GOS of 4; and two patients were in a vegetative state, with a GOS of 2, both of whom subsequently died of aspiration pneumonia. Only 1 of the 15 patients had a good recovery. Through 8 years of follow-up, all six survivors had epilepsy. Common nonneurologic deficits included a predisposition to a variety of infections.
By way of background, Dr. Yau noted that convulsive status epilepticus is the most common neurologic emergency in children, with an incidence of about 20 episodes per 100,000. Of affected children, 10%-40% develop refractory status, with reported mortality rates of 16%-43%. SRSE is a term reserved for persistent or recurrent seizures 24 hours or more after onset of general anesthesia for management of refractory status.
The impetus for Dr. Yau’s study was the dearth of data on SRSE in children. The literature consists of a few case series totaling well under 100 patients.
The Hong Kong case series included 15 patients with SRSE who had a median age of 7.9 years, only 1 of whom had preexisting epilepsy, a case of epileptic encephalopathy with severe developmental delay. Of the 15, 12 were boys. The patients were placed on a median of four antiepileptic drugs. Those who survived to discharge spent a median of 17.8 days under general anesthesia and 42.5 days in the pediatric ICU.
The SRSE etiologies included febrile infection–related epilepsy syndrome in two cases, four serious infections, four cases of autoimmune etiology, two cases of epileptic encephalopathy, one patient with hypoxia caused by severe croup, and two of unknown origin despite intensive work-up.
The four in-hospital deaths caused by acute cerebral edema occurred a median 6.5 days after admission. There were also two deaths because of uncontrolled sepsis and one because of intraventricular bleeding secondary to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura thought to have occurred as a complication of interactions between the numerous prescribed medications. All six children with an infectious or unknown etiology died in hospital, whereas none of those with an autoimmune etiology, epileptic encephalopathy, or hypoxia did. Duration of anesthesia did not predict mortality.
Other investigators have reported that younger age is associated with higher mortality, but that was not true in the Hong Kong experience. Neither of the two children aged less than 3 years died during their index hospitalization. All 7 deaths occurred in the 13 children age 3 years or older.
When asked whether she thought SRSE or the underlying disorder was the bigger contributor to mortality, Dr. Yau replied that she believes the prolonged refractory seizures may have worsened cerebral edema in some patients and thereby have been the cause of death.
She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study.
BANGKOK – presented by Maggie Lo Yee Yau, MD, at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“Death in these children usually occurred within the first few days after admission to the pediatric ICU,” she said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
The study included 15 consecutive patients aged between 1 month and 17 years treated for superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) during 2011-2017 at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where Dr. Yau practices. Seven children died during their index hospital admission, with a median time to death of 8 days. Two more died within several years post discharge.
Morbidity was substantial: At follow-up 1 year after the index episode of SRSE, two patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 3, indicative of severe disability; three patients had moderate disability, with a GOS of 4; and two patients were in a vegetative state, with a GOS of 2, both of whom subsequently died of aspiration pneumonia. Only 1 of the 15 patients had a good recovery. Through 8 years of follow-up, all six survivors had epilepsy. Common nonneurologic deficits included a predisposition to a variety of infections.
By way of background, Dr. Yau noted that convulsive status epilepticus is the most common neurologic emergency in children, with an incidence of about 20 episodes per 100,000. Of affected children, 10%-40% develop refractory status, with reported mortality rates of 16%-43%. SRSE is a term reserved for persistent or recurrent seizures 24 hours or more after onset of general anesthesia for management of refractory status.
The impetus for Dr. Yau’s study was the dearth of data on SRSE in children. The literature consists of a few case series totaling well under 100 patients.
The Hong Kong case series included 15 patients with SRSE who had a median age of 7.9 years, only 1 of whom had preexisting epilepsy, a case of epileptic encephalopathy with severe developmental delay. Of the 15, 12 were boys. The patients were placed on a median of four antiepileptic drugs. Those who survived to discharge spent a median of 17.8 days under general anesthesia and 42.5 days in the pediatric ICU.
The SRSE etiologies included febrile infection–related epilepsy syndrome in two cases, four serious infections, four cases of autoimmune etiology, two cases of epileptic encephalopathy, one patient with hypoxia caused by severe croup, and two of unknown origin despite intensive work-up.
The four in-hospital deaths caused by acute cerebral edema occurred a median 6.5 days after admission. There were also two deaths because of uncontrolled sepsis and one because of intraventricular bleeding secondary to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura thought to have occurred as a complication of interactions between the numerous prescribed medications. All six children with an infectious or unknown etiology died in hospital, whereas none of those with an autoimmune etiology, epileptic encephalopathy, or hypoxia did. Duration of anesthesia did not predict mortality.
Other investigators have reported that younger age is associated with higher mortality, but that was not true in the Hong Kong experience. Neither of the two children aged less than 3 years died during their index hospitalization. All 7 deaths occurred in the 13 children age 3 years or older.
When asked whether she thought SRSE or the underlying disorder was the bigger contributor to mortality, Dr. Yau replied that she believes the prolonged refractory seizures may have worsened cerebral edema in some patients and thereby have been the cause of death.
She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study.
REPORTING FROM IEC 2019
Neonatal epileptic syndromes are surprisingly common
BANGKOK – Katherine B. Howell, MD, reported at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“This is an important finding. It’s a considerably larger number than might have been expected and likely has two contributing factors. Neonatal seizures were previously not considered epilepsy, so many previous studies excluded neonates and the conditions were underrecognized. And our large number of ictal EEGs allowed identification of ictal activation, which is a feature of EIMFS [epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures]. Without those ictal recordings, the diagnosis of EIMFS may not have been made,” according to Dr. Howell, a neurologist at the Royal Children’s Hospital and University of Melbourne.
She presented a population-based study of all infants born with severe epilepsies of infancy (SEI) during a 2-year period in the Australian state of Victoria, which is considered an ideal environment for epidemiologic studies because government-funded health care is available to all. SEI was defined as seizures beginning before age 18 months, occurring at a rate of at least one per day for 1 week or weekly for 1 month, refractory to adequate trials of at least two antiepileptic drugs, and accompanied by an epileptiform EEG abnormality. Her focus was on the electroclinical phenotypes of the affected children because of the high clinical utility of this information.
“Assigning an epileptic syndrome is highly useful for clinician-to-clinician communication of an infant’s phenotype. It guides investigation of etiology and possibly selection of optimal therapy, such as steroids in West syndrome. And it can inform prognosis,” Dr. Howell said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
She and her coinvestigators analyzed the detailed records of all 114 infants with SEI born during the study period. The incidence was 1 in 2,000 live births.
“Among infants with epilepsy, this patient group with SEI is most critical to better understand. Effective treatment is often not available, the seizure and developmental outcomes are frequently devastating, and the health burden massive,” the neurologist observed.
The full spectrum of SEI
With the help of ictal EEGs, home seizure recordings, MRI scans, and genomic testing, the investigators were able to classify more than 85% of the infants. About 64% had a prototypic syndrome at onset, such as West syndrome, which accounted for 33% of all SEI, or Dravet syndrome, which was diagnosed in 3%.
The prevalence of the prototypic neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes was notably higher than previously reported by others: EIMFS accounted for 9% of total SEI, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) for 7%, and early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) for 2%. This translated to an incidence of 1 in 28,000 live births for EIEE, 1 in 111,000 for EME, and 1 in 22,500 for EIMFS.
“While neither EIEE nor EIMFS are common, these incidences are actually not that much lower than the reported incidence of Dravet syndrome,” the neurologist pointed out.
About 36% of SEI didn’t fit into any of the prototypic syndromes. However, more than half of this subgroup, or 19% of total SEI, were prototypic syndrome like, a designation Dr. Howell and her coworkers used for cases that possessed most but not all of the well-recognized features of a particular prototypic syndrome; for example, West syndrome–like seizures but without hypsarrhythmia. Whether these prototypic syndrome-like SEI have etiologies and outcomes similar to or distinct from the prototypic syndromes remains a topic for further study.
SEI etiologies
A total of 14 patients had SEI because of an acquired syndrome attributed to brain injury, 31 were because of brain malformation, 21 involved single gene disorders, 9 were of chromosomal etiology, and 7 had a metabolic cause.
The key finding with regard to etiology was the glaring difference between children with West syndrome, its variants, or unifocal epilepsies as compared with the rest of the SEI patients. Those with West syndrome, a West syndrome–like designation, or unifocal epilepsies most commonly had a structural etiology for their SEI. Indeed, of the 52 children with West syndrome or a variant, 10 had an acquired brain injury as their etiology and 17 had a brain malformation. And of the 12 patients with unifocal SEI, 1 had a brain injury and 9 had brain malformations.
In contrast, children with neonatal or early infantile epileptic syndromes had predominantly genetic rather than structural etiologies. Of the 20 children with EIEE, EIMFS, or EME, none had brain injury as the etiology, only 1 had a brain malformation, but 9 had a single gene or chromosomal etiology.
Outcomes
“The outcome data highlight the extreme severity of SEI and the imperative for novel treatments: 16% mortality overall, so one in six was deceased by age 2 years. The infants who died after the neonatal period all had profound delays, and almost all had ongoing seizures until their death. Most survivors also had developmental delay, with severity ranging from mild to moderate in 49% to severe/profound in 41%. Just 10 of 114 children had normal development,” Dr. Howell reported.
However, there was a notable difference in outcomes between the various syndromes, and this information is highly relevant prognostically. Of the 20 children with neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes, 11 died and the other 9 had profound developmental delay. In contrast, the outlook was far better for children with West syndrome, West syndrome–like variants, or focal epilepsies: Among 64 affected patients, there were just 2 deaths, normal development in 9 patients, mild to moderate developmental delay in 34, and severe/profound delay in 19.
Dr. Howell reported having no financial conflicts regarding this study, which was supported by governmental research grants.
bjancin@mdedge.com
SOURCE: Howell KB et al. IEC 2019, Abstract P053.
BANGKOK – Katherine B. Howell, MD, reported at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“This is an important finding. It’s a considerably larger number than might have been expected and likely has two contributing factors. Neonatal seizures were previously not considered epilepsy, so many previous studies excluded neonates and the conditions were underrecognized. And our large number of ictal EEGs allowed identification of ictal activation, which is a feature of EIMFS [epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures]. Without those ictal recordings, the diagnosis of EIMFS may not have been made,” according to Dr. Howell, a neurologist at the Royal Children’s Hospital and University of Melbourne.
She presented a population-based study of all infants born with severe epilepsies of infancy (SEI) during a 2-year period in the Australian state of Victoria, which is considered an ideal environment for epidemiologic studies because government-funded health care is available to all. SEI was defined as seizures beginning before age 18 months, occurring at a rate of at least one per day for 1 week or weekly for 1 month, refractory to adequate trials of at least two antiepileptic drugs, and accompanied by an epileptiform EEG abnormality. Her focus was on the electroclinical phenotypes of the affected children because of the high clinical utility of this information.
“Assigning an epileptic syndrome is highly useful for clinician-to-clinician communication of an infant’s phenotype. It guides investigation of etiology and possibly selection of optimal therapy, such as steroids in West syndrome. And it can inform prognosis,” Dr. Howell said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
She and her coinvestigators analyzed the detailed records of all 114 infants with SEI born during the study period. The incidence was 1 in 2,000 live births.
“Among infants with epilepsy, this patient group with SEI is most critical to better understand. Effective treatment is often not available, the seizure and developmental outcomes are frequently devastating, and the health burden massive,” the neurologist observed.
The full spectrum of SEI
With the help of ictal EEGs, home seizure recordings, MRI scans, and genomic testing, the investigators were able to classify more than 85% of the infants. About 64% had a prototypic syndrome at onset, such as West syndrome, which accounted for 33% of all SEI, or Dravet syndrome, which was diagnosed in 3%.
The prevalence of the prototypic neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes was notably higher than previously reported by others: EIMFS accounted for 9% of total SEI, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) for 7%, and early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) for 2%. This translated to an incidence of 1 in 28,000 live births for EIEE, 1 in 111,000 for EME, and 1 in 22,500 for EIMFS.
“While neither EIEE nor EIMFS are common, these incidences are actually not that much lower than the reported incidence of Dravet syndrome,” the neurologist pointed out.
About 36% of SEI didn’t fit into any of the prototypic syndromes. However, more than half of this subgroup, or 19% of total SEI, were prototypic syndrome like, a designation Dr. Howell and her coworkers used for cases that possessed most but not all of the well-recognized features of a particular prototypic syndrome; for example, West syndrome–like seizures but without hypsarrhythmia. Whether these prototypic syndrome-like SEI have etiologies and outcomes similar to or distinct from the prototypic syndromes remains a topic for further study.
SEI etiologies
A total of 14 patients had SEI because of an acquired syndrome attributed to brain injury, 31 were because of brain malformation, 21 involved single gene disorders, 9 were of chromosomal etiology, and 7 had a metabolic cause.
The key finding with regard to etiology was the glaring difference between children with West syndrome, its variants, or unifocal epilepsies as compared with the rest of the SEI patients. Those with West syndrome, a West syndrome–like designation, or unifocal epilepsies most commonly had a structural etiology for their SEI. Indeed, of the 52 children with West syndrome or a variant, 10 had an acquired brain injury as their etiology and 17 had a brain malformation. And of the 12 patients with unifocal SEI, 1 had a brain injury and 9 had brain malformations.
In contrast, children with neonatal or early infantile epileptic syndromes had predominantly genetic rather than structural etiologies. Of the 20 children with EIEE, EIMFS, or EME, none had brain injury as the etiology, only 1 had a brain malformation, but 9 had a single gene or chromosomal etiology.
Outcomes
“The outcome data highlight the extreme severity of SEI and the imperative for novel treatments: 16% mortality overall, so one in six was deceased by age 2 years. The infants who died after the neonatal period all had profound delays, and almost all had ongoing seizures until their death. Most survivors also had developmental delay, with severity ranging from mild to moderate in 49% to severe/profound in 41%. Just 10 of 114 children had normal development,” Dr. Howell reported.
However, there was a notable difference in outcomes between the various syndromes, and this information is highly relevant prognostically. Of the 20 children with neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes, 11 died and the other 9 had profound developmental delay. In contrast, the outlook was far better for children with West syndrome, West syndrome–like variants, or focal epilepsies: Among 64 affected patients, there were just 2 deaths, normal development in 9 patients, mild to moderate developmental delay in 34, and severe/profound delay in 19.
Dr. Howell reported having no financial conflicts regarding this study, which was supported by governmental research grants.
bjancin@mdedge.com
SOURCE: Howell KB et al. IEC 2019, Abstract P053.
BANGKOK – Katherine B. Howell, MD, reported at the International Epilepsy Congress.
“This is an important finding. It’s a considerably larger number than might have been expected and likely has two contributing factors. Neonatal seizures were previously not considered epilepsy, so many previous studies excluded neonates and the conditions were underrecognized. And our large number of ictal EEGs allowed identification of ictal activation, which is a feature of EIMFS [epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures]. Without those ictal recordings, the diagnosis of EIMFS may not have been made,” according to Dr. Howell, a neurologist at the Royal Children’s Hospital and University of Melbourne.
She presented a population-based study of all infants born with severe epilepsies of infancy (SEI) during a 2-year period in the Australian state of Victoria, which is considered an ideal environment for epidemiologic studies because government-funded health care is available to all. SEI was defined as seizures beginning before age 18 months, occurring at a rate of at least one per day for 1 week or weekly for 1 month, refractory to adequate trials of at least two antiepileptic drugs, and accompanied by an epileptiform EEG abnormality. Her focus was on the electroclinical phenotypes of the affected children because of the high clinical utility of this information.
“Assigning an epileptic syndrome is highly useful for clinician-to-clinician communication of an infant’s phenotype. It guides investigation of etiology and possibly selection of optimal therapy, such as steroids in West syndrome. And it can inform prognosis,” Dr. Howell said at the congress sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
She and her coinvestigators analyzed the detailed records of all 114 infants with SEI born during the study period. The incidence was 1 in 2,000 live births.
“Among infants with epilepsy, this patient group with SEI is most critical to better understand. Effective treatment is often not available, the seizure and developmental outcomes are frequently devastating, and the health burden massive,” the neurologist observed.
The full spectrum of SEI
With the help of ictal EEGs, home seizure recordings, MRI scans, and genomic testing, the investigators were able to classify more than 85% of the infants. About 64% had a prototypic syndrome at onset, such as West syndrome, which accounted for 33% of all SEI, or Dravet syndrome, which was diagnosed in 3%.
The prevalence of the prototypic neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes was notably higher than previously reported by others: EIMFS accounted for 9% of total SEI, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) for 7%, and early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) for 2%. This translated to an incidence of 1 in 28,000 live births for EIEE, 1 in 111,000 for EME, and 1 in 22,500 for EIMFS.
“While neither EIEE nor EIMFS are common, these incidences are actually not that much lower than the reported incidence of Dravet syndrome,” the neurologist pointed out.
About 36% of SEI didn’t fit into any of the prototypic syndromes. However, more than half of this subgroup, or 19% of total SEI, were prototypic syndrome like, a designation Dr. Howell and her coworkers used for cases that possessed most but not all of the well-recognized features of a particular prototypic syndrome; for example, West syndrome–like seizures but without hypsarrhythmia. Whether these prototypic syndrome-like SEI have etiologies and outcomes similar to or distinct from the prototypic syndromes remains a topic for further study.
SEI etiologies
A total of 14 patients had SEI because of an acquired syndrome attributed to brain injury, 31 were because of brain malformation, 21 involved single gene disorders, 9 were of chromosomal etiology, and 7 had a metabolic cause.
The key finding with regard to etiology was the glaring difference between children with West syndrome, its variants, or unifocal epilepsies as compared with the rest of the SEI patients. Those with West syndrome, a West syndrome–like designation, or unifocal epilepsies most commonly had a structural etiology for their SEI. Indeed, of the 52 children with West syndrome or a variant, 10 had an acquired brain injury as their etiology and 17 had a brain malformation. And of the 12 patients with unifocal SEI, 1 had a brain injury and 9 had brain malformations.
In contrast, children with neonatal or early infantile epileptic syndromes had predominantly genetic rather than structural etiologies. Of the 20 children with EIEE, EIMFS, or EME, none had brain injury as the etiology, only 1 had a brain malformation, but 9 had a single gene or chromosomal etiology.
Outcomes
“The outcome data highlight the extreme severity of SEI and the imperative for novel treatments: 16% mortality overall, so one in six was deceased by age 2 years. The infants who died after the neonatal period all had profound delays, and almost all had ongoing seizures until their death. Most survivors also had developmental delay, with severity ranging from mild to moderate in 49% to severe/profound in 41%. Just 10 of 114 children had normal development,” Dr. Howell reported.
However, there was a notable difference in outcomes between the various syndromes, and this information is highly relevant prognostically. Of the 20 children with neonatal and early infantile epileptic syndromes, 11 died and the other 9 had profound developmental delay. In contrast, the outlook was far better for children with West syndrome, West syndrome–like variants, or focal epilepsies: Among 64 affected patients, there were just 2 deaths, normal development in 9 patients, mild to moderate developmental delay in 34, and severe/profound delay in 19.
Dr. Howell reported having no financial conflicts regarding this study, which was supported by governmental research grants.
bjancin@mdedge.com
SOURCE: Howell KB et al. IEC 2019, Abstract P053.
REPORTING FROM IEC 2019
Quarterly intravenous eptinezumab prevents migraine
PHILADELPHIA – An intravenous formulation of a calcitonin gene–related peptide inhibitor monoclonal antibody showed efficacy for preventing chronic migraine headaches for 3 months in a dose-ranging, phase 3 trial with 1,072 patients.
In a separate study with 669 patients, a single IV dose of the antibody, eptinezumab, also significantly reduced the incidence of episodic migraine headaches during 3 months of follow-up, compared with placebo. And in both the chronic and episodic migraine studies a similar 3-month effect resulted from a second IV dose of the humanized antibody that binds the calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) ligand, thereby blocking the pathway, Laszlo L. Mechtler, MD, and his associates reported in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society.
Eptinezumab follows the therapeutic approach already used by three Food and Drug Administration–approved monoclonal antibody drugs that cut migraine headache recurrences by blocking the CGRP pathway by binding either the peptide ligand or its receptor: erenumab-aooe (Aimovig), fremanezumab-vfrm (Ajovy), and galcanezumab-gnlm (Emgality). Eptinezumab differs from the three approved CGRP antibodies by using an IV route of administration – the other three are delivered by subcutaneous injection – and by a 3-month dosing interval. Both erenumab-aooe and galcanezumab-gnlm are labeled for monthly administration only, while fremanezumab-vfrm is labeled for both monthly and once every 3 months dosing schedules.
The PROMISE-1 (A Multicenter Assessment of ALD403 in Frequent Episodic Migraine) trial randomized 669 patients with episodic migraine (defined as 4-14 headache days/month with at least 4 classifiable as migraine headache days) at 87 centers mostly in the United States and with some in Georgia. The PROMISE-2 (Evaluation of ALD403 (Eptinezumab) in the Prevention of Chronic Migraine) trial randomized 1,072 patients with chronic migraine (defined as a history of 15-26 headache days/month and with at least 8 of the days involving a migraine headache) at any of 145 study sites, many in the United States, in several countries.
In PROMISE-1, patients could receive as many as four serial infusions every 3 months, and up to two serial infusions in PROMISE-2, but the primary endpoint in both studies was the change in monthly migraine count from baseline during the 3 months following the first dosage.
Among patients with chronic migraine in PROMISE-2, the average monthly migraine number fell by 8.2 migraine days/month, compared with an average 5.6 monthly migraine days drop from baseline among placebo patients, which was a statistically significant difference for the higher dosage of eptinezumab tested, 300 mg. A 100-mg dose linked with an average 7.7 migraine days/month reduction, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo patients, reported Dr. Mechtler, professor of neurology at the State University of New York at Buffalo and medical director of the Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, and his associates.
Among patients with episodic migraine in PROMISE-1, the 300-mg dosage cut monthly migraines by an average 4.3 migraine headache days/month, compared with 3.2 in the placebo group, a statistically significant difference. Among patients who received the 100-mg dosage, the average cut was 3.9 migraine headache days/month, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo controls.
The researchers included no safety findings in their report, but in an interview Dr. Mechtler said that eptinezumab showed an excellent safety profile that was consistent with what’s been previously reported for the approved agents from this class. He cited the safety of the drugs in the class as a major feature of their clinical utility.
PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2 were sponsored by Alder BioPharmaceuticals, the company developing eptinezumab. Dr. Mechtler has been a speaker on behalf of Allergan, Amgen/Novartis, Boston Biomedical, Promius, Avanir, and Teva, and he has received research funding from Allergan, Autonomic Technologies, Boston Biomedical, and Teva.
SOURCE: Mechtler LL et al. Headache. 2019 June;59[S1]:34, Abstract P12
PHILADELPHIA – An intravenous formulation of a calcitonin gene–related peptide inhibitor monoclonal antibody showed efficacy for preventing chronic migraine headaches for 3 months in a dose-ranging, phase 3 trial with 1,072 patients.
In a separate study with 669 patients, a single IV dose of the antibody, eptinezumab, also significantly reduced the incidence of episodic migraine headaches during 3 months of follow-up, compared with placebo. And in both the chronic and episodic migraine studies a similar 3-month effect resulted from a second IV dose of the humanized antibody that binds the calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) ligand, thereby blocking the pathway, Laszlo L. Mechtler, MD, and his associates reported in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society.
Eptinezumab follows the therapeutic approach already used by three Food and Drug Administration–approved monoclonal antibody drugs that cut migraine headache recurrences by blocking the CGRP pathway by binding either the peptide ligand or its receptor: erenumab-aooe (Aimovig), fremanezumab-vfrm (Ajovy), and galcanezumab-gnlm (Emgality). Eptinezumab differs from the three approved CGRP antibodies by using an IV route of administration – the other three are delivered by subcutaneous injection – and by a 3-month dosing interval. Both erenumab-aooe and galcanezumab-gnlm are labeled for monthly administration only, while fremanezumab-vfrm is labeled for both monthly and once every 3 months dosing schedules.
The PROMISE-1 (A Multicenter Assessment of ALD403 in Frequent Episodic Migraine) trial randomized 669 patients with episodic migraine (defined as 4-14 headache days/month with at least 4 classifiable as migraine headache days) at 87 centers mostly in the United States and with some in Georgia. The PROMISE-2 (Evaluation of ALD403 (Eptinezumab) in the Prevention of Chronic Migraine) trial randomized 1,072 patients with chronic migraine (defined as a history of 15-26 headache days/month and with at least 8 of the days involving a migraine headache) at any of 145 study sites, many in the United States, in several countries.
In PROMISE-1, patients could receive as many as four serial infusions every 3 months, and up to two serial infusions in PROMISE-2, but the primary endpoint in both studies was the change in monthly migraine count from baseline during the 3 months following the first dosage.
Among patients with chronic migraine in PROMISE-2, the average monthly migraine number fell by 8.2 migraine days/month, compared with an average 5.6 monthly migraine days drop from baseline among placebo patients, which was a statistically significant difference for the higher dosage of eptinezumab tested, 300 mg. A 100-mg dose linked with an average 7.7 migraine days/month reduction, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo patients, reported Dr. Mechtler, professor of neurology at the State University of New York at Buffalo and medical director of the Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, and his associates.
Among patients with episodic migraine in PROMISE-1, the 300-mg dosage cut monthly migraines by an average 4.3 migraine headache days/month, compared with 3.2 in the placebo group, a statistically significant difference. Among patients who received the 100-mg dosage, the average cut was 3.9 migraine headache days/month, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo controls.
The researchers included no safety findings in their report, but in an interview Dr. Mechtler said that eptinezumab showed an excellent safety profile that was consistent with what’s been previously reported for the approved agents from this class. He cited the safety of the drugs in the class as a major feature of their clinical utility.
PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2 were sponsored by Alder BioPharmaceuticals, the company developing eptinezumab. Dr. Mechtler has been a speaker on behalf of Allergan, Amgen/Novartis, Boston Biomedical, Promius, Avanir, and Teva, and he has received research funding from Allergan, Autonomic Technologies, Boston Biomedical, and Teva.
SOURCE: Mechtler LL et al. Headache. 2019 June;59[S1]:34, Abstract P12
PHILADELPHIA – An intravenous formulation of a calcitonin gene–related peptide inhibitor monoclonal antibody showed efficacy for preventing chronic migraine headaches for 3 months in a dose-ranging, phase 3 trial with 1,072 patients.
In a separate study with 669 patients, a single IV dose of the antibody, eptinezumab, also significantly reduced the incidence of episodic migraine headaches during 3 months of follow-up, compared with placebo. And in both the chronic and episodic migraine studies a similar 3-month effect resulted from a second IV dose of the humanized antibody that binds the calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) ligand, thereby blocking the pathway, Laszlo L. Mechtler, MD, and his associates reported in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society.
Eptinezumab follows the therapeutic approach already used by three Food and Drug Administration–approved monoclonal antibody drugs that cut migraine headache recurrences by blocking the CGRP pathway by binding either the peptide ligand or its receptor: erenumab-aooe (Aimovig), fremanezumab-vfrm (Ajovy), and galcanezumab-gnlm (Emgality). Eptinezumab differs from the three approved CGRP antibodies by using an IV route of administration – the other three are delivered by subcutaneous injection – and by a 3-month dosing interval. Both erenumab-aooe and galcanezumab-gnlm are labeled for monthly administration only, while fremanezumab-vfrm is labeled for both monthly and once every 3 months dosing schedules.
The PROMISE-1 (A Multicenter Assessment of ALD403 in Frequent Episodic Migraine) trial randomized 669 patients with episodic migraine (defined as 4-14 headache days/month with at least 4 classifiable as migraine headache days) at 87 centers mostly in the United States and with some in Georgia. The PROMISE-2 (Evaluation of ALD403 (Eptinezumab) in the Prevention of Chronic Migraine) trial randomized 1,072 patients with chronic migraine (defined as a history of 15-26 headache days/month and with at least 8 of the days involving a migraine headache) at any of 145 study sites, many in the United States, in several countries.
In PROMISE-1, patients could receive as many as four serial infusions every 3 months, and up to two serial infusions in PROMISE-2, but the primary endpoint in both studies was the change in monthly migraine count from baseline during the 3 months following the first dosage.
Among patients with chronic migraine in PROMISE-2, the average monthly migraine number fell by 8.2 migraine days/month, compared with an average 5.6 monthly migraine days drop from baseline among placebo patients, which was a statistically significant difference for the higher dosage of eptinezumab tested, 300 mg. A 100-mg dose linked with an average 7.7 migraine days/month reduction, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo patients, reported Dr. Mechtler, professor of neurology at the State University of New York at Buffalo and medical director of the Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, and his associates.
Among patients with episodic migraine in PROMISE-1, the 300-mg dosage cut monthly migraines by an average 4.3 migraine headache days/month, compared with 3.2 in the placebo group, a statistically significant difference. Among patients who received the 100-mg dosage, the average cut was 3.9 migraine headache days/month, also a statistically significant difference from the placebo controls.
The researchers included no safety findings in their report, but in an interview Dr. Mechtler said that eptinezumab showed an excellent safety profile that was consistent with what’s been previously reported for the approved agents from this class. He cited the safety of the drugs in the class as a major feature of their clinical utility.
PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2 were sponsored by Alder BioPharmaceuticals, the company developing eptinezumab. Dr. Mechtler has been a speaker on behalf of Allergan, Amgen/Novartis, Boston Biomedical, Promius, Avanir, and Teva, and he has received research funding from Allergan, Autonomic Technologies, Boston Biomedical, and Teva.
SOURCE: Mechtler LL et al. Headache. 2019 June;59[S1]:34, Abstract P12
REPORTING FROM AHS 2019
Epilepsy surgery outcome prediction seeks to gain ground
BANGKOK –
She and her colleagues have created and validated an online risk prediction tool that clinicians can use to predict a patient’s individualized likelihood of complete freedom from seizures 2 and 5 years after undergoing resective brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. The risk predictor, known as the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram, uses a handful of simple clinical characteristics – patient gender, pathologic cause of the seizures, the proposed type of epilepsy surgery, the presence or absence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, epilepsy duration, and preoperative seizure frequency – and spits out the patient’s predicted seizure outcome, she explained at the congress, sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
“The point here is that every patient is an individual. And to give people predictions based on 500- or 600-patient Kaplan-Meier-derived curves that just provide the average outcome for the whole cohort isn’t really going to give them what they need as far as their individualized chance of becoming seizure free,” said Dr. Jehi, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic.
Similarly, reliance solely upon clinical judgment is a minefield. Multiple biases prevent physicians from making objective medical predictions, she continued.
“We think of the process of medical decision-making and outcome prediction as being a process that is logical and rational, where the accumulation of knowledge improves the decisions that we make, and where past experience improves judgment, and where collective decisions are more reliable. This is what intuitively we all think. That’s why we think we are invincible as physicians. And to that I say, really? There is a wealth of literature that actually disproves each one of these points,” Dr. Jehi declared.
Outcomes of brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy have remained static for more than half a century: Ten years after surgery, roughly half of treated patients remain completely seizure free. The inability of clinicians to use advanced statistics to inform potential surgical candidates about their individualized chance of becoming seizure free has probably contributed to underutilization of epilepsy surgery, she added.
The Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram was developed through detailed analysis of the records of 846 patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at the Cleveland Clinic. The resultant nomogram was then validated in a cohort of 604 patients who had resective surgery at the Mayo Clinic and epilepsy surgery centers in Brazil, Italy, and France. In the development cohort, the rate of complete freedom from seizures was 57% at 2 years and 40% at 5 years. In the validation study, the nomogram had a concordance statistic of 0.60 for complete freedom from seizures, which is considered better than chance, but well below the 0.80 threshold defined as strong concordance (Lancet Neurol. 2015 Mar;14[3]:283-90).
However, in an era when personalized medicine has become a catch phrase, the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram has captured the attention of officials at the National Institutes of Health. Indeed, Dr. Jehi and her coworkers have received a $3.4 million, 5-year grant from the NIH to improve their risk prediction model by incorporating additional variables, including EEG data, MRI findings, family history, and genetic information. The enhanced risk calculator also will include a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will experience clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in response to epilepsy surgery, since that’s an important outcome even in the absence of 100% freedom from seizures.
Recently, Dr. Jehi and coworkers have developed and then externally validated nomograms to predict the individualized risk of clinically relevant postoperative naming decline after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in adults. A model based upon five variables – side of surgery, sex, education, age at epilepsy onset, and age at epilepsy surgery – performed very well, with a concordance statistic of 0.81. Moreover, a second nomogram predicting moderate to severe postoperative naming decline on the basis of just three variables – side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, and preoperative score on the Boston Naming Test – had a concordance statistic of 0.84 (Neurology. 2018 Dec 4;91[23]:e2144-e2152. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006629).
“Our future hopefully is one where there will always be room for gut feelings and intuition because we definitely need them. We want to honor them. But hopefully it is one where algorithms can help our guesses be more educated and where the science of algorithms and predictive modeling can help inform our outcome predictions and decision-making process,” she said.
The original Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram project was funded by the Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center. The postoperative naming decline nomograms project was funded by the NIH.
BANGKOK –
She and her colleagues have created and validated an online risk prediction tool that clinicians can use to predict a patient’s individualized likelihood of complete freedom from seizures 2 and 5 years after undergoing resective brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. The risk predictor, known as the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram, uses a handful of simple clinical characteristics – patient gender, pathologic cause of the seizures, the proposed type of epilepsy surgery, the presence or absence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, epilepsy duration, and preoperative seizure frequency – and spits out the patient’s predicted seizure outcome, she explained at the congress, sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
“The point here is that every patient is an individual. And to give people predictions based on 500- or 600-patient Kaplan-Meier-derived curves that just provide the average outcome for the whole cohort isn’t really going to give them what they need as far as their individualized chance of becoming seizure free,” said Dr. Jehi, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic.
Similarly, reliance solely upon clinical judgment is a minefield. Multiple biases prevent physicians from making objective medical predictions, she continued.
“We think of the process of medical decision-making and outcome prediction as being a process that is logical and rational, where the accumulation of knowledge improves the decisions that we make, and where past experience improves judgment, and where collective decisions are more reliable. This is what intuitively we all think. That’s why we think we are invincible as physicians. And to that I say, really? There is a wealth of literature that actually disproves each one of these points,” Dr. Jehi declared.
Outcomes of brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy have remained static for more than half a century: Ten years after surgery, roughly half of treated patients remain completely seizure free. The inability of clinicians to use advanced statistics to inform potential surgical candidates about their individualized chance of becoming seizure free has probably contributed to underutilization of epilepsy surgery, she added.
The Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram was developed through detailed analysis of the records of 846 patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at the Cleveland Clinic. The resultant nomogram was then validated in a cohort of 604 patients who had resective surgery at the Mayo Clinic and epilepsy surgery centers in Brazil, Italy, and France. In the development cohort, the rate of complete freedom from seizures was 57% at 2 years and 40% at 5 years. In the validation study, the nomogram had a concordance statistic of 0.60 for complete freedom from seizures, which is considered better than chance, but well below the 0.80 threshold defined as strong concordance (Lancet Neurol. 2015 Mar;14[3]:283-90).
However, in an era when personalized medicine has become a catch phrase, the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram has captured the attention of officials at the National Institutes of Health. Indeed, Dr. Jehi and her coworkers have received a $3.4 million, 5-year grant from the NIH to improve their risk prediction model by incorporating additional variables, including EEG data, MRI findings, family history, and genetic information. The enhanced risk calculator also will include a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will experience clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in response to epilepsy surgery, since that’s an important outcome even in the absence of 100% freedom from seizures.
Recently, Dr. Jehi and coworkers have developed and then externally validated nomograms to predict the individualized risk of clinically relevant postoperative naming decline after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in adults. A model based upon five variables – side of surgery, sex, education, age at epilepsy onset, and age at epilepsy surgery – performed very well, with a concordance statistic of 0.81. Moreover, a second nomogram predicting moderate to severe postoperative naming decline on the basis of just three variables – side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, and preoperative score on the Boston Naming Test – had a concordance statistic of 0.84 (Neurology. 2018 Dec 4;91[23]:e2144-e2152. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006629).
“Our future hopefully is one where there will always be room for gut feelings and intuition because we definitely need them. We want to honor them. But hopefully it is one where algorithms can help our guesses be more educated and where the science of algorithms and predictive modeling can help inform our outcome predictions and decision-making process,” she said.
The original Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram project was funded by the Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center. The postoperative naming decline nomograms project was funded by the NIH.
BANGKOK –
She and her colleagues have created and validated an online risk prediction tool that clinicians can use to predict a patient’s individualized likelihood of complete freedom from seizures 2 and 5 years after undergoing resective brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. The risk predictor, known as the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram, uses a handful of simple clinical characteristics – patient gender, pathologic cause of the seizures, the proposed type of epilepsy surgery, the presence or absence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, epilepsy duration, and preoperative seizure frequency – and spits out the patient’s predicted seizure outcome, she explained at the congress, sponsored by the International League Against Epilepsy.
“The point here is that every patient is an individual. And to give people predictions based on 500- or 600-patient Kaplan-Meier-derived curves that just provide the average outcome for the whole cohort isn’t really going to give them what they need as far as their individualized chance of becoming seizure free,” said Dr. Jehi, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic.
Similarly, reliance solely upon clinical judgment is a minefield. Multiple biases prevent physicians from making objective medical predictions, she continued.
“We think of the process of medical decision-making and outcome prediction as being a process that is logical and rational, where the accumulation of knowledge improves the decisions that we make, and where past experience improves judgment, and where collective decisions are more reliable. This is what intuitively we all think. That’s why we think we are invincible as physicians. And to that I say, really? There is a wealth of literature that actually disproves each one of these points,” Dr. Jehi declared.
Outcomes of brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy have remained static for more than half a century: Ten years after surgery, roughly half of treated patients remain completely seizure free. The inability of clinicians to use advanced statistics to inform potential surgical candidates about their individualized chance of becoming seizure free has probably contributed to underutilization of epilepsy surgery, she added.
The Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram was developed through detailed analysis of the records of 846 patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at the Cleveland Clinic. The resultant nomogram was then validated in a cohort of 604 patients who had resective surgery at the Mayo Clinic and epilepsy surgery centers in Brazil, Italy, and France. In the development cohort, the rate of complete freedom from seizures was 57% at 2 years and 40% at 5 years. In the validation study, the nomogram had a concordance statistic of 0.60 for complete freedom from seizures, which is considered better than chance, but well below the 0.80 threshold defined as strong concordance (Lancet Neurol. 2015 Mar;14[3]:283-90).
However, in an era when personalized medicine has become a catch phrase, the Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram has captured the attention of officials at the National Institutes of Health. Indeed, Dr. Jehi and her coworkers have received a $3.4 million, 5-year grant from the NIH to improve their risk prediction model by incorporating additional variables, including EEG data, MRI findings, family history, and genetic information. The enhanced risk calculator also will include a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will experience clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in response to epilepsy surgery, since that’s an important outcome even in the absence of 100% freedom from seizures.
Recently, Dr. Jehi and coworkers have developed and then externally validated nomograms to predict the individualized risk of clinically relevant postoperative naming decline after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in adults. A model based upon five variables – side of surgery, sex, education, age at epilepsy onset, and age at epilepsy surgery – performed very well, with a concordance statistic of 0.81. Moreover, a second nomogram predicting moderate to severe postoperative naming decline on the basis of just three variables – side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, and preoperative score on the Boston Naming Test – had a concordance statistic of 0.84 (Neurology. 2018 Dec 4;91[23]:e2144-e2152. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006629).
“Our future hopefully is one where there will always be room for gut feelings and intuition because we definitely need them. We want to honor them. But hopefully it is one where algorithms can help our guesses be more educated and where the science of algorithms and predictive modeling can help inform our outcome predictions and decision-making process,” she said.
The original Epilepsy Surgery Nomogram project was funded by the Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center. The postoperative naming decline nomograms project was funded by the NIH.
REPORTING FROM IEC 2019
Signals of gut microbiome interaction with experimental Alzheimer’s drug prompt new trial
LOS ANGELES – A single look at the gut microbiome of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) suggests an interaction between anti-inflammatory gut bacteria and long-term exposure to an investigational sigma 1 receptor agonist.
After up to 148 weeks treatment with Anavex 2-73, patients with stable or improved functional scores showed significantly higher levels of both Ruminococcaceae and Porphyromonadaceae, compared with patients who had declining function. Both bacterial families produce butyrate, an anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acid.
Conversely, poor response was associated with a low level of Verrucomicrobia, a mucin-degrading phylum thought to be important in gut homeostasis. These bacteria live mainly in the intestinal mucosa – the physical interface between the microbiome and the rest of the body.
The data, presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, represent the first microbiome measurements reported in a clinical trial of an investigational Alzheimer’s therapy. Because they come from a single sample taken from a small group in an extension study, without a baseline comparator, it’s impossible to know what these associations mean. But the findings are enough to nudge Anavex Life Sciences into adding microbiome changes to its new study of Anavex 2-73, according to Christopher Missling, PhD, president and chief executive officer of the company.
The study, ramping up now, aims to recruit 450 patients with mild AD. They will be randomized to high-dose or mid-dose Anavex 2-73 for 48 weeks. The primary outcomes are measures of cognition and function. Stool sampling at baseline and at the end of the study will be included as well, Dr. Missling said in an interview.
Anavex 2-73 is a sigma-1 receptor agonist. A chaperone protein, sigma-1 is activated in response to acute and chronic cellular stressors, several which are important in neurodegeneration. The sigma-1 receptor is found on neurons and glia in many areas of the central nervous system. It modulates several processes implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including glutamate and calcium activity, reaction to oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. There is some evidence that sigma-1 receptor activation can induce neuronal regrowth and functional recovery after stroke. It also appears to play a role in helping cells clear misfolded proteins – a pathway that makes it an attractive drug target in Alzheimer’s disease, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases with aberrant proteins, such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases.
Anavex 2-73’s phase 2 development started with a 5-week crossover trial of 32 patients. This was followed by a 52-week, open-label extension trial of 10, 20, 30, and 50 mg/day orally, in which each patient was titrated to the maximum tolerated dose. The main endpoints were change on the Mini Mental State Exam and change on the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) scale.
At 57 weeks, six patients had improved on the Mini Mental State Exam score: four with high plasma levels and two with low plasma levels, correlating to the dosage obtained. On the functional measure of activities of daily living, nine patients had improved, including five with high plasma levels, three with moderate levels, and one with a low level. One patient, with a moderate level, remained stable. The remaining 14 patients declined.
The company then enrolled 21 of the cohort in a 208-week extension trial, primarily because of patient request, Dr. Missling said. “They know they are doing better. Their families know they’re doing better. They did not want to give this up.”
Last fall, the company released 148-week functional and cognitive data confirming the initial findings: Patients with higher plasma levels (correlating with higher doses) declined about 2 points on the ADCS-ADL scale, compared with a mean decline of about 25 points among those with lower blood levels – an 88% difference in favor of treatment. Cognition scores showed a similar pattern, with the high-concentration group declining 64% less than the low-concentration group.
Sixteen patients consented to stool sampling. A sophisticated computer algorithm characterized the microbiome of each, measuring the relative abundance of phyla. Microbiome analysis wasn’t included as an endpoint in the original study design because, at that time, the idea of a connection between AD and the gut microbiome was barely on the research radar.
Things shifted dramatically in 2017, with a seminal paper finding that germ-free mice inoculated with stool from Parkinson’s patients developed Parkinson’s symptoms. This study was widely heralded as a breakthrough in the field – the first time any neurodegenerative disease had been conclusively linked to dysregulations in the human microbiome.
Last year, Vo Van Giau, PhD, of Gachon University, South Korea, and his colleagues published an extensive review of the data suggesting a similar link with Alzheimer’s disease.
Dr. Giau and his coauthors laid out a potential pathogenic pathway for this interaction.
“The microbiota is closely related to neurological dysfunction and plays a significant role in neuroinflammation through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Changes in the homeostatic state of the microbiota lead to increased intestinal permeability, which may promote the translocation of bacteria and endotoxins across the epithelial barrier, inducing an immunological response associated with the production of proinflammatory cytokines. The activation of both enteric neurons and glial cells may result in various neurological disorders,” including Alzheimer’s, he wrote.
Dr. Missling said this paper, and smaller studies appearing at Alzheimer’s meetings, prompted the company to add the stool sampling as a follow-up measure.
“It’s something of great interest, we think, and deserves to be investigated.”
SOURCE: Missling C et al. AAIC 2019, Abstract 32260.
LOS ANGELES – A single look at the gut microbiome of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) suggests an interaction between anti-inflammatory gut bacteria and long-term exposure to an investigational sigma 1 receptor agonist.
After up to 148 weeks treatment with Anavex 2-73, patients with stable or improved functional scores showed significantly higher levels of both Ruminococcaceae and Porphyromonadaceae, compared with patients who had declining function. Both bacterial families produce butyrate, an anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acid.
Conversely, poor response was associated with a low level of Verrucomicrobia, a mucin-degrading phylum thought to be important in gut homeostasis. These bacteria live mainly in the intestinal mucosa – the physical interface between the microbiome and the rest of the body.
The data, presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, represent the first microbiome measurements reported in a clinical trial of an investigational Alzheimer’s therapy. Because they come from a single sample taken from a small group in an extension study, without a baseline comparator, it’s impossible to know what these associations mean. But the findings are enough to nudge Anavex Life Sciences into adding microbiome changes to its new study of Anavex 2-73, according to Christopher Missling, PhD, president and chief executive officer of the company.
The study, ramping up now, aims to recruit 450 patients with mild AD. They will be randomized to high-dose or mid-dose Anavex 2-73 for 48 weeks. The primary outcomes are measures of cognition and function. Stool sampling at baseline and at the end of the study will be included as well, Dr. Missling said in an interview.
Anavex 2-73 is a sigma-1 receptor agonist. A chaperone protein, sigma-1 is activated in response to acute and chronic cellular stressors, several which are important in neurodegeneration. The sigma-1 receptor is found on neurons and glia in many areas of the central nervous system. It modulates several processes implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including glutamate and calcium activity, reaction to oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. There is some evidence that sigma-1 receptor activation can induce neuronal regrowth and functional recovery after stroke. It also appears to play a role in helping cells clear misfolded proteins – a pathway that makes it an attractive drug target in Alzheimer’s disease, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases with aberrant proteins, such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases.
Anavex 2-73’s phase 2 development started with a 5-week crossover trial of 32 patients. This was followed by a 52-week, open-label extension trial of 10, 20, 30, and 50 mg/day orally, in which each patient was titrated to the maximum tolerated dose. The main endpoints were change on the Mini Mental State Exam and change on the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) scale.
At 57 weeks, six patients had improved on the Mini Mental State Exam score: four with high plasma levels and two with low plasma levels, correlating to the dosage obtained. On the functional measure of activities of daily living, nine patients had improved, including five with high plasma levels, three with moderate levels, and one with a low level. One patient, with a moderate level, remained stable. The remaining 14 patients declined.
The company then enrolled 21 of the cohort in a 208-week extension trial, primarily because of patient request, Dr. Missling said. “They know they are doing better. Their families know they’re doing better. They did not want to give this up.”
Last fall, the company released 148-week functional and cognitive data confirming the initial findings: Patients with higher plasma levels (correlating with higher doses) declined about 2 points on the ADCS-ADL scale, compared with a mean decline of about 25 points among those with lower blood levels – an 88% difference in favor of treatment. Cognition scores showed a similar pattern, with the high-concentration group declining 64% less than the low-concentration group.
Sixteen patients consented to stool sampling. A sophisticated computer algorithm characterized the microbiome of each, measuring the relative abundance of phyla. Microbiome analysis wasn’t included as an endpoint in the original study design because, at that time, the idea of a connection between AD and the gut microbiome was barely on the research radar.
Things shifted dramatically in 2017, with a seminal paper finding that germ-free mice inoculated with stool from Parkinson’s patients developed Parkinson’s symptoms. This study was widely heralded as a breakthrough in the field – the first time any neurodegenerative disease had been conclusively linked to dysregulations in the human microbiome.
Last year, Vo Van Giau, PhD, of Gachon University, South Korea, and his colleagues published an extensive review of the data suggesting a similar link with Alzheimer’s disease.
Dr. Giau and his coauthors laid out a potential pathogenic pathway for this interaction.
“The microbiota is closely related to neurological dysfunction and plays a significant role in neuroinflammation through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Changes in the homeostatic state of the microbiota lead to increased intestinal permeability, which may promote the translocation of bacteria and endotoxins across the epithelial barrier, inducing an immunological response associated with the production of proinflammatory cytokines. The activation of both enteric neurons and glial cells may result in various neurological disorders,” including Alzheimer’s, he wrote.
Dr. Missling said this paper, and smaller studies appearing at Alzheimer’s meetings, prompted the company to add the stool sampling as a follow-up measure.
“It’s something of great interest, we think, and deserves to be investigated.”
SOURCE: Missling C et al. AAIC 2019, Abstract 32260.
LOS ANGELES – A single look at the gut microbiome of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) suggests an interaction between anti-inflammatory gut bacteria and long-term exposure to an investigational sigma 1 receptor agonist.
After up to 148 weeks treatment with Anavex 2-73, patients with stable or improved functional scores showed significantly higher levels of both Ruminococcaceae and Porphyromonadaceae, compared with patients who had declining function. Both bacterial families produce butyrate, an anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acid.
Conversely, poor response was associated with a low level of Verrucomicrobia, a mucin-degrading phylum thought to be important in gut homeostasis. These bacteria live mainly in the intestinal mucosa – the physical interface between the microbiome and the rest of the body.
The data, presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, represent the first microbiome measurements reported in a clinical trial of an investigational Alzheimer’s therapy. Because they come from a single sample taken from a small group in an extension study, without a baseline comparator, it’s impossible to know what these associations mean. But the findings are enough to nudge Anavex Life Sciences into adding microbiome changes to its new study of Anavex 2-73, according to Christopher Missling, PhD, president and chief executive officer of the company.
The study, ramping up now, aims to recruit 450 patients with mild AD. They will be randomized to high-dose or mid-dose Anavex 2-73 for 48 weeks. The primary outcomes are measures of cognition and function. Stool sampling at baseline and at the end of the study will be included as well, Dr. Missling said in an interview.
Anavex 2-73 is a sigma-1 receptor agonist. A chaperone protein, sigma-1 is activated in response to acute and chronic cellular stressors, several which are important in neurodegeneration. The sigma-1 receptor is found on neurons and glia in many areas of the central nervous system. It modulates several processes implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including glutamate and calcium activity, reaction to oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. There is some evidence that sigma-1 receptor activation can induce neuronal regrowth and functional recovery after stroke. It also appears to play a role in helping cells clear misfolded proteins – a pathway that makes it an attractive drug target in Alzheimer’s disease, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases with aberrant proteins, such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases.
Anavex 2-73’s phase 2 development started with a 5-week crossover trial of 32 patients. This was followed by a 52-week, open-label extension trial of 10, 20, 30, and 50 mg/day orally, in which each patient was titrated to the maximum tolerated dose. The main endpoints were change on the Mini Mental State Exam and change on the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) scale.
At 57 weeks, six patients had improved on the Mini Mental State Exam score: four with high plasma levels and two with low plasma levels, correlating to the dosage obtained. On the functional measure of activities of daily living, nine patients had improved, including five with high plasma levels, three with moderate levels, and one with a low level. One patient, with a moderate level, remained stable. The remaining 14 patients declined.
The company then enrolled 21 of the cohort in a 208-week extension trial, primarily because of patient request, Dr. Missling said. “They know they are doing better. Their families know they’re doing better. They did not want to give this up.”
Last fall, the company released 148-week functional and cognitive data confirming the initial findings: Patients with higher plasma levels (correlating with higher doses) declined about 2 points on the ADCS-ADL scale, compared with a mean decline of about 25 points among those with lower blood levels – an 88% difference in favor of treatment. Cognition scores showed a similar pattern, with the high-concentration group declining 64% less than the low-concentration group.
Sixteen patients consented to stool sampling. A sophisticated computer algorithm characterized the microbiome of each, measuring the relative abundance of phyla. Microbiome analysis wasn’t included as an endpoint in the original study design because, at that time, the idea of a connection between AD and the gut microbiome was barely on the research radar.
Things shifted dramatically in 2017, with a seminal paper finding that germ-free mice inoculated with stool from Parkinson’s patients developed Parkinson’s symptoms. This study was widely heralded as a breakthrough in the field – the first time any neurodegenerative disease had been conclusively linked to dysregulations in the human microbiome.
Last year, Vo Van Giau, PhD, of Gachon University, South Korea, and his colleagues published an extensive review of the data suggesting a similar link with Alzheimer’s disease.
Dr. Giau and his coauthors laid out a potential pathogenic pathway for this interaction.
“The microbiota is closely related to neurological dysfunction and plays a significant role in neuroinflammation through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Changes in the homeostatic state of the microbiota lead to increased intestinal permeability, which may promote the translocation of bacteria and endotoxins across the epithelial barrier, inducing an immunological response associated with the production of proinflammatory cytokines. The activation of both enteric neurons and glial cells may result in various neurological disorders,” including Alzheimer’s, he wrote.
Dr. Missling said this paper, and smaller studies appearing at Alzheimer’s meetings, prompted the company to add the stool sampling as a follow-up measure.
“It’s something of great interest, we think, and deserves to be investigated.”
SOURCE: Missling C et al. AAIC 2019, Abstract 32260.
REPORTING FROM AAIC 2019
Lancet joins movement to reject ‘manels’
The Lancet Group’s 18 medical journals have committed to ensuring that their editorial advisory boards include at least 50% female members by the end of 2019 as just one component of the diversity and gender parity initiative unveiled Aug. 8.
“The case for gender equity and diversity is clear: Teams that are diverse in terms of gender, ethnicity, and social background produce better health science, are more highly cited, generate a broader range of ideas and innovations, and better represent society,” group editors wrote in their comment (Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3). They emphasized the importance of increasing inclusion in science “across gender, ethnicity, geography, and other social categories.”
The Diversity Pledge states the group’s commitment “to increasing diversity and inclusion in research and publishing, and in particular to increasing the representation of women and colleagues from low-income and middle-income countries among our editorial advisers, peer reviewers, and authors.”
The No All-Male Panel Policy echoes a call from the National Institutes of Health for ending the “Manel Tradition,” as NIH Director Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, wrote in early June. Recognizing the need “to combat cultural forces that tolerate gender harassment and limit the advancement of women,” Dr. Collins pledged to decline speaking invitations if “attention to inclusiveness” is not clear in the event’s agenda.
Discussion of “manels” – all-male panels – and the decision to boycott them has been picking up speed in scientific, medical and even business circles over the past several years. The BBC highlighted a popular blog that shamed events with all-male panels in 2015, and a 2018 study more formally concluded that male scientists had considerably more opportunities to speak and present at the world’s largest geophysical conference.
One business and development leader even included space on his website to allow other leaders to pledge not to “serve on a panel of two people or more unless there is at least one woman on the panel, not including the chair.” More than 2,000 leaders from across the globe already have signed.
Six months ago, the Lancet published a special theme issue on women in science, medicine, and global health. The editors noted in the issue that women comprise fewer than a third of authors and reviewers in high-impact medical journals – just one example of the underrepresentation of women and people in color in medical publishing. The group is now revamping their systems to address the disparities.
“An upcoming update of our online submission system will have a field for self-selected gender, so we can better track representation across genders among authors, reviewers, editors, and editorial advisers, along with country of origin,” the editors wrote.
But they acknowledged that their efforts are just one piece of the academic ecosystem and called on others’ participation. “We encourage other publishers, journals, and members of the science community to contribute to these pledges.”
SOURCE: Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3.
The Lancet Group’s 18 medical journals have committed to ensuring that their editorial advisory boards include at least 50% female members by the end of 2019 as just one component of the diversity and gender parity initiative unveiled Aug. 8.
“The case for gender equity and diversity is clear: Teams that are diverse in terms of gender, ethnicity, and social background produce better health science, are more highly cited, generate a broader range of ideas and innovations, and better represent society,” group editors wrote in their comment (Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3). They emphasized the importance of increasing inclusion in science “across gender, ethnicity, geography, and other social categories.”
The Diversity Pledge states the group’s commitment “to increasing diversity and inclusion in research and publishing, and in particular to increasing the representation of women and colleagues from low-income and middle-income countries among our editorial advisers, peer reviewers, and authors.”
The No All-Male Panel Policy echoes a call from the National Institutes of Health for ending the “Manel Tradition,” as NIH Director Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, wrote in early June. Recognizing the need “to combat cultural forces that tolerate gender harassment and limit the advancement of women,” Dr. Collins pledged to decline speaking invitations if “attention to inclusiveness” is not clear in the event’s agenda.
Discussion of “manels” – all-male panels – and the decision to boycott them has been picking up speed in scientific, medical and even business circles over the past several years. The BBC highlighted a popular blog that shamed events with all-male panels in 2015, and a 2018 study more formally concluded that male scientists had considerably more opportunities to speak and present at the world’s largest geophysical conference.
One business and development leader even included space on his website to allow other leaders to pledge not to “serve on a panel of two people or more unless there is at least one woman on the panel, not including the chair.” More than 2,000 leaders from across the globe already have signed.
Six months ago, the Lancet published a special theme issue on women in science, medicine, and global health. The editors noted in the issue that women comprise fewer than a third of authors and reviewers in high-impact medical journals – just one example of the underrepresentation of women and people in color in medical publishing. The group is now revamping their systems to address the disparities.
“An upcoming update of our online submission system will have a field for self-selected gender, so we can better track representation across genders among authors, reviewers, editors, and editorial advisers, along with country of origin,” the editors wrote.
But they acknowledged that their efforts are just one piece of the academic ecosystem and called on others’ participation. “We encourage other publishers, journals, and members of the science community to contribute to these pledges.”
SOURCE: Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3.
The Lancet Group’s 18 medical journals have committed to ensuring that their editorial advisory boards include at least 50% female members by the end of 2019 as just one component of the diversity and gender parity initiative unveiled Aug. 8.
“The case for gender equity and diversity is clear: Teams that are diverse in terms of gender, ethnicity, and social background produce better health science, are more highly cited, generate a broader range of ideas and innovations, and better represent society,” group editors wrote in their comment (Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3). They emphasized the importance of increasing inclusion in science “across gender, ethnicity, geography, and other social categories.”
The Diversity Pledge states the group’s commitment “to increasing diversity and inclusion in research and publishing, and in particular to increasing the representation of women and colleagues from low-income and middle-income countries among our editorial advisers, peer reviewers, and authors.”
The No All-Male Panel Policy echoes a call from the National Institutes of Health for ending the “Manel Tradition,” as NIH Director Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, wrote in early June. Recognizing the need “to combat cultural forces that tolerate gender harassment and limit the advancement of women,” Dr. Collins pledged to decline speaking invitations if “attention to inclusiveness” is not clear in the event’s agenda.
Discussion of “manels” – all-male panels – and the decision to boycott them has been picking up speed in scientific, medical and even business circles over the past several years. The BBC highlighted a popular blog that shamed events with all-male panels in 2015, and a 2018 study more formally concluded that male scientists had considerably more opportunities to speak and present at the world’s largest geophysical conference.
One business and development leader even included space on his website to allow other leaders to pledge not to “serve on a panel of two people or more unless there is at least one woman on the panel, not including the chair.” More than 2,000 leaders from across the globe already have signed.
Six months ago, the Lancet published a special theme issue on women in science, medicine, and global health. The editors noted in the issue that women comprise fewer than a third of authors and reviewers in high-impact medical journals – just one example of the underrepresentation of women and people in color in medical publishing. The group is now revamping their systems to address the disparities.
“An upcoming update of our online submission system will have a field for self-selected gender, so we can better track representation across genders among authors, reviewers, editors, and editorial advisers, along with country of origin,” the editors wrote.
But they acknowledged that their efforts are just one piece of the academic ecosystem and called on others’ participation. “We encourage other publishers, journals, and members of the science community to contribute to these pledges.”
SOURCE: Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394:452-3.
FROM THE LANCET
Sleep disorder treatment tied to lower suicide attempt risk in veterans
in a large case-control matched study of patients in the Veterans Health Administration database.
However, treatment for sleep disorders was correlated to a reduced risk for suicide attempts.
Todd M. Bishop, PhD, of the Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua (N.Y.) VA Medical Center, and the department of psychiatry, University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center, and his colleagues wrote that suicide is the 10th most frequent cause of death in the United States, and “nowhere is the suicide rate more alarming than among military veterans, who after adjusting for age and gender, have an approximately 1.5 times greater risk for suicide as compared to the civilian population.”
Previous research has explored the link between sleep disturbances and suicide attempts. But less has been done to look at specific sleep problems, and little research has examined the role of sleep medicine interventions and suicide attempt risk.
The investigators conducted a study to establish the association between suicide attempts and specific sleep disorders, and to examine the correlation between sleep medicine treatment and suicide attempts. Their sample consisted of 60,102 veterans who had received care within the VHA between Oct. 1, 2012, and Sept. 20, 2014. Half of the sample had a documented suicide attempt in the medical record (n = 30,051) and half did not (n = 30,051). The overall sample was predominately male (87.1%) with a mean age of 48.6 years. More than half the sample identified as white (67.4%).
Suicide attempts, sleep disturbance, and medical and mental health comorbidities were identified via ICD codes and prescription records. The predominant sleep disorders studied were insomnia, sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD), and nightmares. The first suicide attempt in the study period was determined to be the index date for the case-control matching.
Overall, sleep disturbances were much more prevalent among cases than controls (insomnia, 46.2% vs. 12.6%), sleep-related breathing disorder (8.6% vs. 4.8%), and nightmares (7.1% vs. 1.6%). A logistic regression analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between specific sleep disorders and suicide attempts. Insomnia, nightmares, and SRBD were each associated with increased odds of a suicide attempt with the following odds ratios: insomnia (odds ratio, 5.62; 95% confidence interval, 5.39-5.86), nightmares (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.23-2.77), and sleep-related breathing disorder (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48).
A second model included known drivers of suicide attempts (PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, medical comorbidity, and obesity). But after controlling for these factors, neither nightmares (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.09) nor sleep-related breathing disorders (OR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.94) remained positively associated with suicide attempt, but the association of insomnia with suicide attempt was maintained (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.59).
The question of the impact of sleep medicine interventions on suicide attempts was studied with a third regression model adding the number of sleep medicine clinic visits in the 180 days prior to the suicide attempt index date as an independent variable. The variables in this model were limited to insomnia, SRBD, and nightmares. The investigators found that “for each sleep medicine clinic visit within the 6 months prior to index date the likelihood of suicide attempt is 11% less (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97).”
The limitations of the study include the lack of information on sleep treatment modalities or medications provided during the clinic visits, and the overlapping of sleep disturbance with other mental health conditions, such as alcohol dependence and PTSD. In addition, “some insomnia medications are labeled for risk of suicidal ideation and behavior, so there is some chance that the medications rather than insomnia itself were associated with the increased suicidal behavior,” the investigators wrote.
In addition to an analysis of specific types of sleep disorders associated with suicide attempts, the study showed that treatment of sleep disorders may have an important role in suicide prevention. The investigators concluded: “Identifying populations at risk for suicide prior to a first attempt is an important, but difficult task of suicide prevention. Prevention efforts can be aimed at modifiable risk factors that arise early on a patient’s trajectory toward a suicide attempt.”
The study was supported by the VISN 2 Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua VAMC. The authors had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bishop TM et al. Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 25. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.07.016.
in a large case-control matched study of patients in the Veterans Health Administration database.
However, treatment for sleep disorders was correlated to a reduced risk for suicide attempts.
Todd M. Bishop, PhD, of the Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua (N.Y.) VA Medical Center, and the department of psychiatry, University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center, and his colleagues wrote that suicide is the 10th most frequent cause of death in the United States, and “nowhere is the suicide rate more alarming than among military veterans, who after adjusting for age and gender, have an approximately 1.5 times greater risk for suicide as compared to the civilian population.”
Previous research has explored the link between sleep disturbances and suicide attempts. But less has been done to look at specific sleep problems, and little research has examined the role of sleep medicine interventions and suicide attempt risk.
The investigators conducted a study to establish the association between suicide attempts and specific sleep disorders, and to examine the correlation between sleep medicine treatment and suicide attempts. Their sample consisted of 60,102 veterans who had received care within the VHA between Oct. 1, 2012, and Sept. 20, 2014. Half of the sample had a documented suicide attempt in the medical record (n = 30,051) and half did not (n = 30,051). The overall sample was predominately male (87.1%) with a mean age of 48.6 years. More than half the sample identified as white (67.4%).
Suicide attempts, sleep disturbance, and medical and mental health comorbidities were identified via ICD codes and prescription records. The predominant sleep disorders studied were insomnia, sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD), and nightmares. The first suicide attempt in the study period was determined to be the index date for the case-control matching.
Overall, sleep disturbances were much more prevalent among cases than controls (insomnia, 46.2% vs. 12.6%), sleep-related breathing disorder (8.6% vs. 4.8%), and nightmares (7.1% vs. 1.6%). A logistic regression analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between specific sleep disorders and suicide attempts. Insomnia, nightmares, and SRBD were each associated with increased odds of a suicide attempt with the following odds ratios: insomnia (odds ratio, 5.62; 95% confidence interval, 5.39-5.86), nightmares (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.23-2.77), and sleep-related breathing disorder (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48).
A second model included known drivers of suicide attempts (PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, medical comorbidity, and obesity). But after controlling for these factors, neither nightmares (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.09) nor sleep-related breathing disorders (OR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.94) remained positively associated with suicide attempt, but the association of insomnia with suicide attempt was maintained (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.59).
The question of the impact of sleep medicine interventions on suicide attempts was studied with a third regression model adding the number of sleep medicine clinic visits in the 180 days prior to the suicide attempt index date as an independent variable. The variables in this model were limited to insomnia, SRBD, and nightmares. The investigators found that “for each sleep medicine clinic visit within the 6 months prior to index date the likelihood of suicide attempt is 11% less (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97).”
The limitations of the study include the lack of information on sleep treatment modalities or medications provided during the clinic visits, and the overlapping of sleep disturbance with other mental health conditions, such as alcohol dependence and PTSD. In addition, “some insomnia medications are labeled for risk of suicidal ideation and behavior, so there is some chance that the medications rather than insomnia itself were associated with the increased suicidal behavior,” the investigators wrote.
In addition to an analysis of specific types of sleep disorders associated with suicide attempts, the study showed that treatment of sleep disorders may have an important role in suicide prevention. The investigators concluded: “Identifying populations at risk for suicide prior to a first attempt is an important, but difficult task of suicide prevention. Prevention efforts can be aimed at modifiable risk factors that arise early on a patient’s trajectory toward a suicide attempt.”
The study was supported by the VISN 2 Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua VAMC. The authors had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bishop TM et al. Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 25. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.07.016.
in a large case-control matched study of patients in the Veterans Health Administration database.
However, treatment for sleep disorders was correlated to a reduced risk for suicide attempts.
Todd M. Bishop, PhD, of the Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua (N.Y.) VA Medical Center, and the department of psychiatry, University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center, and his colleagues wrote that suicide is the 10th most frequent cause of death in the United States, and “nowhere is the suicide rate more alarming than among military veterans, who after adjusting for age and gender, have an approximately 1.5 times greater risk for suicide as compared to the civilian population.”
Previous research has explored the link between sleep disturbances and suicide attempts. But less has been done to look at specific sleep problems, and little research has examined the role of sleep medicine interventions and suicide attempt risk.
The investigators conducted a study to establish the association between suicide attempts and specific sleep disorders, and to examine the correlation between sleep medicine treatment and suicide attempts. Their sample consisted of 60,102 veterans who had received care within the VHA between Oct. 1, 2012, and Sept. 20, 2014. Half of the sample had a documented suicide attempt in the medical record (n = 30,051) and half did not (n = 30,051). The overall sample was predominately male (87.1%) with a mean age of 48.6 years. More than half the sample identified as white (67.4%).
Suicide attempts, sleep disturbance, and medical and mental health comorbidities were identified via ICD codes and prescription records. The predominant sleep disorders studied were insomnia, sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD), and nightmares. The first suicide attempt in the study period was determined to be the index date for the case-control matching.
Overall, sleep disturbances were much more prevalent among cases than controls (insomnia, 46.2% vs. 12.6%), sleep-related breathing disorder (8.6% vs. 4.8%), and nightmares (7.1% vs. 1.6%). A logistic regression analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between specific sleep disorders and suicide attempts. Insomnia, nightmares, and SRBD were each associated with increased odds of a suicide attempt with the following odds ratios: insomnia (odds ratio, 5.62; 95% confidence interval, 5.39-5.86), nightmares (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.23-2.77), and sleep-related breathing disorder (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48).
A second model included known drivers of suicide attempts (PTSD, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, medical comorbidity, and obesity). But after controlling for these factors, neither nightmares (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.09) nor sleep-related breathing disorders (OR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.94) remained positively associated with suicide attempt, but the association of insomnia with suicide attempt was maintained (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.59).
The question of the impact of sleep medicine interventions on suicide attempts was studied with a third regression model adding the number of sleep medicine clinic visits in the 180 days prior to the suicide attempt index date as an independent variable. The variables in this model were limited to insomnia, SRBD, and nightmares. The investigators found that “for each sleep medicine clinic visit within the 6 months prior to index date the likelihood of suicide attempt is 11% less (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97).”
The limitations of the study include the lack of information on sleep treatment modalities or medications provided during the clinic visits, and the overlapping of sleep disturbance with other mental health conditions, such as alcohol dependence and PTSD. In addition, “some insomnia medications are labeled for risk of suicidal ideation and behavior, so there is some chance that the medications rather than insomnia itself were associated with the increased suicidal behavior,” the investigators wrote.
In addition to an analysis of specific types of sleep disorders associated with suicide attempts, the study showed that treatment of sleep disorders may have an important role in suicide prevention. The investigators concluded: “Identifying populations at risk for suicide prior to a first attempt is an important, but difficult task of suicide prevention. Prevention efforts can be aimed at modifiable risk factors that arise early on a patient’s trajectory toward a suicide attempt.”
The study was supported by the VISN 2 Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua VAMC. The authors had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bishop TM et al. Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 25. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.07.016.
REPORTING FROM SLEEP MEDICINE
Medical societies urge action to reduce gun violence
“With nearly 40,000 firearm-related deaths in 2017, the United States has reached a 20-year high, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” the authors noted in the call to action (Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 7. doi: 10.7326/M19-2441).
The recommendations “stem largely from the individual positions previously approved by our organizations and ongoing collaborative discussion among leaders,” wrote the authors, who included leaders of the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and American Psychiatric Association, as well as the American Public Health Association.
“Our organizations support a multifaceted public health approach to prevention of firearm injury and death similar to approaches that have successfully reduced the ill effects of tobacco use, motor vehicle accidents, and unintentional poisoning,” wrote Robert McLean, MD, president of the American College of Physicians, and colleagues. “While we recognize the significant political and philosophical differences about firearm ownership and regulation in the United States, we are committed to reaching out to bridge these differences to improve the health and safety of our patients, their families, and communities, while respecting the U.S. Constitution.”
The organizations specifically call for the following:
- Comprehensive criminal background checks for all firearm purchases and transfers between individuals, with limited exceptions.
- Research into the causes and consequences of firearm-related injury and death and the development and implementation of strategies to reduce these events.
- Extension of federal laws prohibiting access to firearms for domestic abusers to dating partners.
- The passage of child access prevention laws that hold accountable firearm owners who negligently store firearms under circumstances where minors could or do gain access to them.
- Improving access to mental health care for all individuals, while not broadly including all individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder in a category of individuals prohibited from purchasing firearms.
- Enactment of extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws, which allow a judge to temporarily remove firearms from those who might be at imminent risk for using them to harm themselves or others. ERPO laws should be enacted in a manner consistent with due process.
- Physicians can and must be able to counsel at-risk patients about mitigating firearms-associated risks in the home.
- High-capacity magazines and firearms with features designed to increase their rapid and extended killing capacity should be the subject of special scrutiny and regulation.
For more than 2 decades, the American College of Physicians “has advocated for the urgent need for impactful legislation that would reduce firearms-related injuries and deaths,” ACP officials said in a statement.
“We need to protect our patients, their families, and our communities across the country from needless injuries and deaths; it’s time for the [United States] to put firearms violence prevention at the forefront of the health care conversation,” Dr. McLean said in a statement.“We are committed to working with all stakeholders, and continuing to speak out, to address this public health threat.”
Leaders at the American Academy of Family Physicians concurred.
“We need to come together as a nation on this issue,” AAFP President John Cullen, MD, said in a statement. “Treating firearm injuries as a public health issue is an important first step. We did this for motor vehicle accidents and have seen a significant decrease in injuries. We didn’t try to remove cars, we made them safer ... Both sides of the debate should come together now and work on solutions—including safe storage laws, expanded background checks, research and improved access to mental health services—we can all agree on.”
Additional firearms-related health policy content that has been published in Annals of Internal Medicine is available at: http://annals.org/aim/pages/firearm-related-content.
“With nearly 40,000 firearm-related deaths in 2017, the United States has reached a 20-year high, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” the authors noted in the call to action (Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 7. doi: 10.7326/M19-2441).
The recommendations “stem largely from the individual positions previously approved by our organizations and ongoing collaborative discussion among leaders,” wrote the authors, who included leaders of the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and American Psychiatric Association, as well as the American Public Health Association.
“Our organizations support a multifaceted public health approach to prevention of firearm injury and death similar to approaches that have successfully reduced the ill effects of tobacco use, motor vehicle accidents, and unintentional poisoning,” wrote Robert McLean, MD, president of the American College of Physicians, and colleagues. “While we recognize the significant political and philosophical differences about firearm ownership and regulation in the United States, we are committed to reaching out to bridge these differences to improve the health and safety of our patients, their families, and communities, while respecting the U.S. Constitution.”
The organizations specifically call for the following:
- Comprehensive criminal background checks for all firearm purchases and transfers between individuals, with limited exceptions.
- Research into the causes and consequences of firearm-related injury and death and the development and implementation of strategies to reduce these events.
- Extension of federal laws prohibiting access to firearms for domestic abusers to dating partners.
- The passage of child access prevention laws that hold accountable firearm owners who negligently store firearms under circumstances where minors could or do gain access to them.
- Improving access to mental health care for all individuals, while not broadly including all individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder in a category of individuals prohibited from purchasing firearms.
- Enactment of extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws, which allow a judge to temporarily remove firearms from those who might be at imminent risk for using them to harm themselves or others. ERPO laws should be enacted in a manner consistent with due process.
- Physicians can and must be able to counsel at-risk patients about mitigating firearms-associated risks in the home.
- High-capacity magazines and firearms with features designed to increase their rapid and extended killing capacity should be the subject of special scrutiny and regulation.
For more than 2 decades, the American College of Physicians “has advocated for the urgent need for impactful legislation that would reduce firearms-related injuries and deaths,” ACP officials said in a statement.
“We need to protect our patients, their families, and our communities across the country from needless injuries and deaths; it’s time for the [United States] to put firearms violence prevention at the forefront of the health care conversation,” Dr. McLean said in a statement.“We are committed to working with all stakeholders, and continuing to speak out, to address this public health threat.”
Leaders at the American Academy of Family Physicians concurred.
“We need to come together as a nation on this issue,” AAFP President John Cullen, MD, said in a statement. “Treating firearm injuries as a public health issue is an important first step. We did this for motor vehicle accidents and have seen a significant decrease in injuries. We didn’t try to remove cars, we made them safer ... Both sides of the debate should come together now and work on solutions—including safe storage laws, expanded background checks, research and improved access to mental health services—we can all agree on.”
Additional firearms-related health policy content that has been published in Annals of Internal Medicine is available at: http://annals.org/aim/pages/firearm-related-content.
“With nearly 40,000 firearm-related deaths in 2017, the United States has reached a 20-year high, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” the authors noted in the call to action (Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 7. doi: 10.7326/M19-2441).
The recommendations “stem largely from the individual positions previously approved by our organizations and ongoing collaborative discussion among leaders,” wrote the authors, who included leaders of the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and American Psychiatric Association, as well as the American Public Health Association.
“Our organizations support a multifaceted public health approach to prevention of firearm injury and death similar to approaches that have successfully reduced the ill effects of tobacco use, motor vehicle accidents, and unintentional poisoning,” wrote Robert McLean, MD, president of the American College of Physicians, and colleagues. “While we recognize the significant political and philosophical differences about firearm ownership and regulation in the United States, we are committed to reaching out to bridge these differences to improve the health and safety of our patients, their families, and communities, while respecting the U.S. Constitution.”
The organizations specifically call for the following:
- Comprehensive criminal background checks for all firearm purchases and transfers between individuals, with limited exceptions.
- Research into the causes and consequences of firearm-related injury and death and the development and implementation of strategies to reduce these events.
- Extension of federal laws prohibiting access to firearms for domestic abusers to dating partners.
- The passage of child access prevention laws that hold accountable firearm owners who negligently store firearms under circumstances where minors could or do gain access to them.
- Improving access to mental health care for all individuals, while not broadly including all individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder in a category of individuals prohibited from purchasing firearms.
- Enactment of extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws, which allow a judge to temporarily remove firearms from those who might be at imminent risk for using them to harm themselves or others. ERPO laws should be enacted in a manner consistent with due process.
- Physicians can and must be able to counsel at-risk patients about mitigating firearms-associated risks in the home.
- High-capacity magazines and firearms with features designed to increase their rapid and extended killing capacity should be the subject of special scrutiny and regulation.
For more than 2 decades, the American College of Physicians “has advocated for the urgent need for impactful legislation that would reduce firearms-related injuries and deaths,” ACP officials said in a statement.
“We need to protect our patients, their families, and our communities across the country from needless injuries and deaths; it’s time for the [United States] to put firearms violence prevention at the forefront of the health care conversation,” Dr. McLean said in a statement.“We are committed to working with all stakeholders, and continuing to speak out, to address this public health threat.”
Leaders at the American Academy of Family Physicians concurred.
“We need to come together as a nation on this issue,” AAFP President John Cullen, MD, said in a statement. “Treating firearm injuries as a public health issue is an important first step. We did this for motor vehicle accidents and have seen a significant decrease in injuries. We didn’t try to remove cars, we made them safer ... Both sides of the debate should come together now and work on solutions—including safe storage laws, expanded background checks, research and improved access to mental health services—we can all agree on.”
Additional firearms-related health policy content that has been published in Annals of Internal Medicine is available at: http://annals.org/aim/pages/firearm-related-content.
FROM ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Sleep aids and dementia: Studies find both risks and benefits
LOS ANGELES – While a large number of older adults take prescription and nonprescription medications to help them sleep, the effect of these medications on dementia risk is unclear, with most researchers advocating a cautious and conservative approach to prescribing.
Research is increasingly revealing a bidirectional relationship between sleep and dementia. Poor sleep – especially from insomnia, sleep deprivation, or obstructive sleep apnea – is known to increase dementia risk. Dementias, meanwhile, are associated with serious circadian rhythm disturbances, leading to nighttime sleep loss and increasing the likelihood of institutionalization.
At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, researchers presented findings assessing the links between sleep medication use and dementia and also what agents or approaches might safely improve sleep in people with sleep disorders who are at risk for dementia or who have been diagnosed with dementia.
Sex- and race-based differences in risk
Yue Leng, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, reported a link between frequent sleep medication use and later dementia – but only in white adults. Dr. Leng presented findings from the National Institutes of Health–funded Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, which recruited 3,068 subjects aged 70-79 and followed them for 15 years. At baseline, 2.7% of African Americans and 7.7% of whites in the study reported taking sleep medications “often” or “almost always.”
Dr. Leng and her colleagues found that white subjects who reported taking sleep aids five or more times a month at baseline had a nearly 80% higher risk of developing dementia during the course of the study (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.66), compared with people who reported never taking sleep aids or taking them less frequently.
The researchers saw no between-sex differences for this finding, and adjusted for a variety of genetic and lifestyle confounders. Importantly, no significant increase in dementia risk was seen for black subjects, who made up more than one-third of the cohort.
Dr. Leng told the conference that the researchers could not explain why black participants did not see similarly increased dementia risk. Also, she noted, researchers did not have information on the specific sleep medications people used: benzodiazepines, antihistamines, antidepressants, or other types of drugs. Nonetheless, she told the conference, the findings ratified the cautious approach many dementia experts are already stressing.
“Do we really need to prescribe so many sleep meds to older adults who are already at risk for cognitive impairment?” Dr. Leng said, adding: “I am a big advocate of behavioral sleep interventions.” People with clinical sleep problems “should be referred to sleep centers” for a fuller assessment before medication is prescribed, she said.
Findings from another cohort study, meanwhile, suggest that there could be sex-related differences in how sleep aids affect dementia risk. Investigators at Utah State University in Logan used data from some 3,656 older adults in the Cache County Study on Memory and Aging, an NIH-backed cohort study of white adults in Utah without dementia at baseline who were followed for 12 years.
The investigators, led by doctoral student Elizabeth Vernon, found that men reporting use of sleep medication saw more than threefold higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease than did men who did not use sleep aids (HR, 3.604; P = .0001).
Women who did not report having sleep disturbance but used sleep-inducing medications were at nearly fourfold greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (HR, 3.916; P = .0001). Women who self-reported sleep disturbances at baseline, meanwhile, saw a reduction in Alzheimer’s risk of about one-third associated with the use of sleep medications.
Ms. Vernon told the conference that, despite the finding of risk reduction for this particular group of women, caution in prescribing sleep aids was warranted.
Common sleep drugs linked to cognitive aging
Chris Fox, MD, a researcher at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, and his colleagues demonstrated in 2018 that long-term exposure to anticholinergic drugs, a class that includes some antidepressants and antihistamines used to promote sleep, was associated with a higher risk of dementia, while use of benzodiazepines, a class of sedatives used commonly in older people as sleep aids, was not. (Whether benzodiazepine exposure relates to dementia remains controversial.)
At AAIC 2019, Dr. Fox presented findings from a study of 337 brains in a U.K. brain bank, of which 17% and 21% came from users of benzodiazepines and anticholinergic drugs, whose usage history was well documented. Dr. Fox and his colleagues found that, while neither anticholinergic nor benzodiazepine exposure was associated with brain pathology specific to that seen in Alzheimer’s disease, both classes of drugs were associated with “slight signals in neuronal loss” in one brain region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert. Dr. Fox described the drugs as causing “an increase in cognitive aging” which could bear on Alzheimer’s risk without being directly causative.
Newer sleep drugs may help Alzheimer’s patients
Scientists working for drug manufacturers presented findings on agents to counter the circadian rhythm disturbances seen in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Margaret Moline, PhD, of Eisai in Woodcliff Lake, N.J., showed some results from a phase 2, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study of the experimental agent lemborexant in 62 subjects aged 60-90 with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and sleep disturbances. (Lemborexant, an orexin receptor agonist that acts to regulate wakefulness, is being investigated in a broad range of sleep disorders.) Patients were randomized to one of four doses of lemborexant or placebo and wore a device for sleep monitoring. Nighttime activity indicating arousal was significantly lower for people in two dosage arms, 5 mg and 10 mg, compared with placebo, and treatment groups saw trends toward less sleep fragmentation and higher total sleep time, Dr. Moline told the conference.
Suvorexant (Belsomra), the only orexin receptor antagonist currently licensed as a sleep aid, is also being tested in people with Alzheimer’s disease. At AAIC 2019, Joseph Herring, MD, PhD, of Merck in Kenilworth, N.J., presented results from a placebo-controlled trial of 277 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and insomnia, and reported that treatment with 10 or 20 mg of suvorexant over 4 weeks was associated with about an extra half hour of total nightly sleep, with a 73-minute mean increase from baseline, compared with 45 minutes for patients receiving placebo (95% CI, 11-45; P less than .005).
Trazodone linked to slower cognitive decline
An inexpensive antidepressant used in low doses as a sleep aid, including in people with Alzheimer’s disease, was associated with a delay in cognitive decline in older adults, according to results from a retrospective study. Elissaios Karageorgiou, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and the Neurological Institute of Athens presented results derived from two cohorts: patients enrolled at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center and women enrolled in the Study for Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) in Women. The investigators were able to identify trazodone users in the studies (with two or more contiguous study visits reporting trazodone use) and match them with control patients from the same cohorts who did not use trazodone.
Trazodone was studied because previous research suggests it increases total sleep time in patients with Alzheimer’s disease without affecting next-day cognitive performance.
Trazodone-using patients in the UCSF cohort (n = 25) saw significantly less decline in Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores over 4 years, compared with nonusers (0.27 vs. 0.70 points per year; P = .023), an effect that remained statistically significant even after adjusting for sedative and stimulant use and the expected progression of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Importantly, the slower decline was seen only among subjects with sleep complaints at baseline and especially those whose sleep improved over time, suggesting that the cognitive benefit was mediated by improved sleep.
In the SOF cohort of 46 trazodone users matched with 148 nonusers, no significant protective or negative effect related to long-term trazodone use was found using the MMSE or the Trails Making Test. In this analysis, however, baseline and longitudinal sleep quality was not captured in the group-matching process, neither was the use of other medications. The patient group was slightly older, and all patients were women.
Dr. Karageorgiou said in an interview that the link between improved sleep, trazodone, and cognition needs to be validated in prospective intervention studies. Trazodone, he said, appears to work best in people with a specific type of insomnia characterized by cortical and behavioral hyperarousal, and its cognitive effect appears limited to people whose sleep improves with treatment. “You’re not going to see long-term cognitive benefits if it’s not improving your sleep,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “So, whether trazodone improves sleep or not in a patient after a few months can be an early indicator for the clinician to continue using it or suspend it, because it is unlikely to help their cognition otherwise.”
He stressed that physicians need to be broadly focused on improving sleep to help patients with, or at risk for, dementia by consolidating their sleep rhythms.
“Trazodone is not the magic bullet, and I don’t think we will ever have a magic bullet,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “Because when our brain degenerates, it’s not just one chemical, or one system, it’s many. And our body changes as well. The important thing is to help the patient consolidate their rhythms, whether through light therapy, daily exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or other evidence-based interventions and their combination. The same applies for a person with dementia as for the rest of us.”
None of the investigators outside of the industry-sponsored studies had relevant disclosures.
LOS ANGELES – While a large number of older adults take prescription and nonprescription medications to help them sleep, the effect of these medications on dementia risk is unclear, with most researchers advocating a cautious and conservative approach to prescribing.
Research is increasingly revealing a bidirectional relationship between sleep and dementia. Poor sleep – especially from insomnia, sleep deprivation, or obstructive sleep apnea – is known to increase dementia risk. Dementias, meanwhile, are associated with serious circadian rhythm disturbances, leading to nighttime sleep loss and increasing the likelihood of institutionalization.
At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, researchers presented findings assessing the links between sleep medication use and dementia and also what agents or approaches might safely improve sleep in people with sleep disorders who are at risk for dementia or who have been diagnosed with dementia.
Sex- and race-based differences in risk
Yue Leng, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, reported a link between frequent sleep medication use and later dementia – but only in white adults. Dr. Leng presented findings from the National Institutes of Health–funded Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, which recruited 3,068 subjects aged 70-79 and followed them for 15 years. At baseline, 2.7% of African Americans and 7.7% of whites in the study reported taking sleep medications “often” or “almost always.”
Dr. Leng and her colleagues found that white subjects who reported taking sleep aids five or more times a month at baseline had a nearly 80% higher risk of developing dementia during the course of the study (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.66), compared with people who reported never taking sleep aids or taking them less frequently.
The researchers saw no between-sex differences for this finding, and adjusted for a variety of genetic and lifestyle confounders. Importantly, no significant increase in dementia risk was seen for black subjects, who made up more than one-third of the cohort.
Dr. Leng told the conference that the researchers could not explain why black participants did not see similarly increased dementia risk. Also, she noted, researchers did not have information on the specific sleep medications people used: benzodiazepines, antihistamines, antidepressants, or other types of drugs. Nonetheless, she told the conference, the findings ratified the cautious approach many dementia experts are already stressing.
“Do we really need to prescribe so many sleep meds to older adults who are already at risk for cognitive impairment?” Dr. Leng said, adding: “I am a big advocate of behavioral sleep interventions.” People with clinical sleep problems “should be referred to sleep centers” for a fuller assessment before medication is prescribed, she said.
Findings from another cohort study, meanwhile, suggest that there could be sex-related differences in how sleep aids affect dementia risk. Investigators at Utah State University in Logan used data from some 3,656 older adults in the Cache County Study on Memory and Aging, an NIH-backed cohort study of white adults in Utah without dementia at baseline who were followed for 12 years.
The investigators, led by doctoral student Elizabeth Vernon, found that men reporting use of sleep medication saw more than threefold higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease than did men who did not use sleep aids (HR, 3.604; P = .0001).
Women who did not report having sleep disturbance but used sleep-inducing medications were at nearly fourfold greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (HR, 3.916; P = .0001). Women who self-reported sleep disturbances at baseline, meanwhile, saw a reduction in Alzheimer’s risk of about one-third associated with the use of sleep medications.
Ms. Vernon told the conference that, despite the finding of risk reduction for this particular group of women, caution in prescribing sleep aids was warranted.
Common sleep drugs linked to cognitive aging
Chris Fox, MD, a researcher at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, and his colleagues demonstrated in 2018 that long-term exposure to anticholinergic drugs, a class that includes some antidepressants and antihistamines used to promote sleep, was associated with a higher risk of dementia, while use of benzodiazepines, a class of sedatives used commonly in older people as sleep aids, was not. (Whether benzodiazepine exposure relates to dementia remains controversial.)
At AAIC 2019, Dr. Fox presented findings from a study of 337 brains in a U.K. brain bank, of which 17% and 21% came from users of benzodiazepines and anticholinergic drugs, whose usage history was well documented. Dr. Fox and his colleagues found that, while neither anticholinergic nor benzodiazepine exposure was associated with brain pathology specific to that seen in Alzheimer’s disease, both classes of drugs were associated with “slight signals in neuronal loss” in one brain region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert. Dr. Fox described the drugs as causing “an increase in cognitive aging” which could bear on Alzheimer’s risk without being directly causative.
Newer sleep drugs may help Alzheimer’s patients
Scientists working for drug manufacturers presented findings on agents to counter the circadian rhythm disturbances seen in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Margaret Moline, PhD, of Eisai in Woodcliff Lake, N.J., showed some results from a phase 2, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study of the experimental agent lemborexant in 62 subjects aged 60-90 with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and sleep disturbances. (Lemborexant, an orexin receptor agonist that acts to regulate wakefulness, is being investigated in a broad range of sleep disorders.) Patients were randomized to one of four doses of lemborexant or placebo and wore a device for sleep monitoring. Nighttime activity indicating arousal was significantly lower for people in two dosage arms, 5 mg and 10 mg, compared with placebo, and treatment groups saw trends toward less sleep fragmentation and higher total sleep time, Dr. Moline told the conference.
Suvorexant (Belsomra), the only orexin receptor antagonist currently licensed as a sleep aid, is also being tested in people with Alzheimer’s disease. At AAIC 2019, Joseph Herring, MD, PhD, of Merck in Kenilworth, N.J., presented results from a placebo-controlled trial of 277 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and insomnia, and reported that treatment with 10 or 20 mg of suvorexant over 4 weeks was associated with about an extra half hour of total nightly sleep, with a 73-minute mean increase from baseline, compared with 45 minutes for patients receiving placebo (95% CI, 11-45; P less than .005).
Trazodone linked to slower cognitive decline
An inexpensive antidepressant used in low doses as a sleep aid, including in people with Alzheimer’s disease, was associated with a delay in cognitive decline in older adults, according to results from a retrospective study. Elissaios Karageorgiou, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and the Neurological Institute of Athens presented results derived from two cohorts: patients enrolled at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center and women enrolled in the Study for Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) in Women. The investigators were able to identify trazodone users in the studies (with two or more contiguous study visits reporting trazodone use) and match them with control patients from the same cohorts who did not use trazodone.
Trazodone was studied because previous research suggests it increases total sleep time in patients with Alzheimer’s disease without affecting next-day cognitive performance.
Trazodone-using patients in the UCSF cohort (n = 25) saw significantly less decline in Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores over 4 years, compared with nonusers (0.27 vs. 0.70 points per year; P = .023), an effect that remained statistically significant even after adjusting for sedative and stimulant use and the expected progression of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Importantly, the slower decline was seen only among subjects with sleep complaints at baseline and especially those whose sleep improved over time, suggesting that the cognitive benefit was mediated by improved sleep.
In the SOF cohort of 46 trazodone users matched with 148 nonusers, no significant protective or negative effect related to long-term trazodone use was found using the MMSE or the Trails Making Test. In this analysis, however, baseline and longitudinal sleep quality was not captured in the group-matching process, neither was the use of other medications. The patient group was slightly older, and all patients were women.
Dr. Karageorgiou said in an interview that the link between improved sleep, trazodone, and cognition needs to be validated in prospective intervention studies. Trazodone, he said, appears to work best in people with a specific type of insomnia characterized by cortical and behavioral hyperarousal, and its cognitive effect appears limited to people whose sleep improves with treatment. “You’re not going to see long-term cognitive benefits if it’s not improving your sleep,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “So, whether trazodone improves sleep or not in a patient after a few months can be an early indicator for the clinician to continue using it or suspend it, because it is unlikely to help their cognition otherwise.”
He stressed that physicians need to be broadly focused on improving sleep to help patients with, or at risk for, dementia by consolidating their sleep rhythms.
“Trazodone is not the magic bullet, and I don’t think we will ever have a magic bullet,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “Because when our brain degenerates, it’s not just one chemical, or one system, it’s many. And our body changes as well. The important thing is to help the patient consolidate their rhythms, whether through light therapy, daily exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or other evidence-based interventions and their combination. The same applies for a person with dementia as for the rest of us.”
None of the investigators outside of the industry-sponsored studies had relevant disclosures.
LOS ANGELES – While a large number of older adults take prescription and nonprescription medications to help them sleep, the effect of these medications on dementia risk is unclear, with most researchers advocating a cautious and conservative approach to prescribing.
Research is increasingly revealing a bidirectional relationship between sleep and dementia. Poor sleep – especially from insomnia, sleep deprivation, or obstructive sleep apnea – is known to increase dementia risk. Dementias, meanwhile, are associated with serious circadian rhythm disturbances, leading to nighttime sleep loss and increasing the likelihood of institutionalization.
At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, researchers presented findings assessing the links between sleep medication use and dementia and also what agents or approaches might safely improve sleep in people with sleep disorders who are at risk for dementia or who have been diagnosed with dementia.
Sex- and race-based differences in risk
Yue Leng, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, reported a link between frequent sleep medication use and later dementia – but only in white adults. Dr. Leng presented findings from the National Institutes of Health–funded Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, which recruited 3,068 subjects aged 70-79 and followed them for 15 years. At baseline, 2.7% of African Americans and 7.7% of whites in the study reported taking sleep medications “often” or “almost always.”
Dr. Leng and her colleagues found that white subjects who reported taking sleep aids five or more times a month at baseline had a nearly 80% higher risk of developing dementia during the course of the study (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.66), compared with people who reported never taking sleep aids or taking them less frequently.
The researchers saw no between-sex differences for this finding, and adjusted for a variety of genetic and lifestyle confounders. Importantly, no significant increase in dementia risk was seen for black subjects, who made up more than one-third of the cohort.
Dr. Leng told the conference that the researchers could not explain why black participants did not see similarly increased dementia risk. Also, she noted, researchers did not have information on the specific sleep medications people used: benzodiazepines, antihistamines, antidepressants, or other types of drugs. Nonetheless, she told the conference, the findings ratified the cautious approach many dementia experts are already stressing.
“Do we really need to prescribe so many sleep meds to older adults who are already at risk for cognitive impairment?” Dr. Leng said, adding: “I am a big advocate of behavioral sleep interventions.” People with clinical sleep problems “should be referred to sleep centers” for a fuller assessment before medication is prescribed, she said.
Findings from another cohort study, meanwhile, suggest that there could be sex-related differences in how sleep aids affect dementia risk. Investigators at Utah State University in Logan used data from some 3,656 older adults in the Cache County Study on Memory and Aging, an NIH-backed cohort study of white adults in Utah without dementia at baseline who were followed for 12 years.
The investigators, led by doctoral student Elizabeth Vernon, found that men reporting use of sleep medication saw more than threefold higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease than did men who did not use sleep aids (HR, 3.604; P = .0001).
Women who did not report having sleep disturbance but used sleep-inducing medications were at nearly fourfold greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (HR, 3.916; P = .0001). Women who self-reported sleep disturbances at baseline, meanwhile, saw a reduction in Alzheimer’s risk of about one-third associated with the use of sleep medications.
Ms. Vernon told the conference that, despite the finding of risk reduction for this particular group of women, caution in prescribing sleep aids was warranted.
Common sleep drugs linked to cognitive aging
Chris Fox, MD, a researcher at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, and his colleagues demonstrated in 2018 that long-term exposure to anticholinergic drugs, a class that includes some antidepressants and antihistamines used to promote sleep, was associated with a higher risk of dementia, while use of benzodiazepines, a class of sedatives used commonly in older people as sleep aids, was not. (Whether benzodiazepine exposure relates to dementia remains controversial.)
At AAIC 2019, Dr. Fox presented findings from a study of 337 brains in a U.K. brain bank, of which 17% and 21% came from users of benzodiazepines and anticholinergic drugs, whose usage history was well documented. Dr. Fox and his colleagues found that, while neither anticholinergic nor benzodiazepine exposure was associated with brain pathology specific to that seen in Alzheimer’s disease, both classes of drugs were associated with “slight signals in neuronal loss” in one brain region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert. Dr. Fox described the drugs as causing “an increase in cognitive aging” which could bear on Alzheimer’s risk without being directly causative.
Newer sleep drugs may help Alzheimer’s patients
Scientists working for drug manufacturers presented findings on agents to counter the circadian rhythm disturbances seen in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Margaret Moline, PhD, of Eisai in Woodcliff Lake, N.J., showed some results from a phase 2, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study of the experimental agent lemborexant in 62 subjects aged 60-90 with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and sleep disturbances. (Lemborexant, an orexin receptor agonist that acts to regulate wakefulness, is being investigated in a broad range of sleep disorders.) Patients were randomized to one of four doses of lemborexant or placebo and wore a device for sleep monitoring. Nighttime activity indicating arousal was significantly lower for people in two dosage arms, 5 mg and 10 mg, compared with placebo, and treatment groups saw trends toward less sleep fragmentation and higher total sleep time, Dr. Moline told the conference.
Suvorexant (Belsomra), the only orexin receptor antagonist currently licensed as a sleep aid, is also being tested in people with Alzheimer’s disease. At AAIC 2019, Joseph Herring, MD, PhD, of Merck in Kenilworth, N.J., presented results from a placebo-controlled trial of 277 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and insomnia, and reported that treatment with 10 or 20 mg of suvorexant over 4 weeks was associated with about an extra half hour of total nightly sleep, with a 73-minute mean increase from baseline, compared with 45 minutes for patients receiving placebo (95% CI, 11-45; P less than .005).
Trazodone linked to slower cognitive decline
An inexpensive antidepressant used in low doses as a sleep aid, including in people with Alzheimer’s disease, was associated with a delay in cognitive decline in older adults, according to results from a retrospective study. Elissaios Karageorgiou, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and the Neurological Institute of Athens presented results derived from two cohorts: patients enrolled at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center and women enrolled in the Study for Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) in Women. The investigators were able to identify trazodone users in the studies (with two or more contiguous study visits reporting trazodone use) and match them with control patients from the same cohorts who did not use trazodone.
Trazodone was studied because previous research suggests it increases total sleep time in patients with Alzheimer’s disease without affecting next-day cognitive performance.
Trazodone-using patients in the UCSF cohort (n = 25) saw significantly less decline in Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores over 4 years, compared with nonusers (0.27 vs. 0.70 points per year; P = .023), an effect that remained statistically significant even after adjusting for sedative and stimulant use and the expected progression of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Importantly, the slower decline was seen only among subjects with sleep complaints at baseline and especially those whose sleep improved over time, suggesting that the cognitive benefit was mediated by improved sleep.
In the SOF cohort of 46 trazodone users matched with 148 nonusers, no significant protective or negative effect related to long-term trazodone use was found using the MMSE or the Trails Making Test. In this analysis, however, baseline and longitudinal sleep quality was not captured in the group-matching process, neither was the use of other medications. The patient group was slightly older, and all patients were women.
Dr. Karageorgiou said in an interview that the link between improved sleep, trazodone, and cognition needs to be validated in prospective intervention studies. Trazodone, he said, appears to work best in people with a specific type of insomnia characterized by cortical and behavioral hyperarousal, and its cognitive effect appears limited to people whose sleep improves with treatment. “You’re not going to see long-term cognitive benefits if it’s not improving your sleep,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “So, whether trazodone improves sleep or not in a patient after a few months can be an early indicator for the clinician to continue using it or suspend it, because it is unlikely to help their cognition otherwise.”
He stressed that physicians need to be broadly focused on improving sleep to help patients with, or at risk for, dementia by consolidating their sleep rhythms.
“Trazodone is not the magic bullet, and I don’t think we will ever have a magic bullet,” Dr. Karageorgiou said. “Because when our brain degenerates, it’s not just one chemical, or one system, it’s many. And our body changes as well. The important thing is to help the patient consolidate their rhythms, whether through light therapy, daily exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or other evidence-based interventions and their combination. The same applies for a person with dementia as for the rest of us.”
None of the investigators outside of the industry-sponsored studies had relevant disclosures.
REPORTING FROM AAIC 2019
Vaccination is not associated with increased risk of MS
(MS), according to an analysis published July 30 in Neurology. Although the results suggest that vaccination is associated with a lower likelihood of incident MS within the following 5 years, “these data alone do not allow for any conclusion regarding a possible protective effect of vaccinations regarding the development of MS,” wrote Alexander Hapfelmeier, PhD, of the Technical University of Munich and colleagues.
In recent years, researchers have proposed and investigated various potential environmental risk factors for the development of MS. Vaccination is one proposed environmental risk factor, but case reports and small studies have yielded conflicting results about its association with incident MS.
To examine this question more closely, Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues performed a systematic retrospective analysis of ambulatory claims data held by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. They reviewed the data to identify patients with new-onset MS and at least two ICD-10 diagnoses of the disorder. They next identified two control cohorts of participants diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases: Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. Finally, they randomly selected a third control cohort of patients without any of these diagnoses and matched them by age, sex, and district to patients with MS in a 5:1 ratio. Eligible participants were younger than 70 years.
Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues reviewed the incidence and frequency of vaccinations (such as those targeting tick-borne encephalitis, human papillomavirus, and influenza virus) in all cohorts. They created unconditional logistic regression models to assess the association between vaccination and MS. They also created separate models to contrast the MS cohort with each of the control cohorts.
The researchers included 12,262 patients with MS, 19,296 patients with Crohn’s disease, 112,292 patients with psoriasis, and 79,185 participants without these autoimmune diseases in their analysis. They found 456 participants with Crohn’s disease and psoriasis, 216 participants with MS and psoriasis, 48 participants with Crohn’s disease and MS, and 2 participants with Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, and MS. Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues allocated these participants to each of the respective cohorts and did not analyze them differently because of the comparatively small sample sizes.
The investigators analyzed the occurrence of vaccination in all participants during the 5 years before first diagnosis. Among patients who received vaccination, the odds ratio of MS was 0.870 in participants without autoimmune disease, 0.919 in participants with Crohn’s disease, and 0.973 in participants with psoriasis. Decreased risk of MS was most notable for vaccinations against influenza and tick-borne encephalitis. The results were consistent regardless of time frame, control cohort, and definition of MS.
The subjective definition of the MS cohort was a limitation of the study, but the authors addressed it by also using several strict definitions of that cohort. Another limitation is that the source data may reflect entry errors and incorrect coding.
A grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Competence Network MS supported the study. The authors had no conflicts that were relevant to the topic of the study.
SOURCE: Hapfelmeier A et al. Neurology. 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008012.
The analysis by Hapfelmeier et al. provides important evidence that vaccinations are not associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), said E. Ann Yeh, MD, a neurologist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, and Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Diego, in an accompanying editorial. On the contrary, the evidence supports a potential protective effect of vaccines on the risk of developing MS, they said.
“The reasons for this [finding] cannot be gleaned from this study and may range from biological to sociocultural/demographic reasons,” the authors added. “Infection, rather than vaccination, may be an MS trigger, or individuals obtaining vaccinations may be practicing other healthy behaviors protective for MS. These possibilities should be the subject of future studies.”
Until future studies are completed and their results published, the findings of Hapfelmeier et al. offer “strong evidence to share with worried patients and families when faced with the question of whether a vaccine in the recent or relatively distant past triggered the individual’s MS,” said Dr. Yeh and Dr. Graves.
The authors had various relationships with industry, including serving on advisory boards for and receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies.
The analysis by Hapfelmeier et al. provides important evidence that vaccinations are not associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), said E. Ann Yeh, MD, a neurologist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, and Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Diego, in an accompanying editorial. On the contrary, the evidence supports a potential protective effect of vaccines on the risk of developing MS, they said.
“The reasons for this [finding] cannot be gleaned from this study and may range from biological to sociocultural/demographic reasons,” the authors added. “Infection, rather than vaccination, may be an MS trigger, or individuals obtaining vaccinations may be practicing other healthy behaviors protective for MS. These possibilities should be the subject of future studies.”
Until future studies are completed and their results published, the findings of Hapfelmeier et al. offer “strong evidence to share with worried patients and families when faced with the question of whether a vaccine in the recent or relatively distant past triggered the individual’s MS,” said Dr. Yeh and Dr. Graves.
The authors had various relationships with industry, including serving on advisory boards for and receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies.
The analysis by Hapfelmeier et al. provides important evidence that vaccinations are not associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), said E. Ann Yeh, MD, a neurologist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, and Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Diego, in an accompanying editorial. On the contrary, the evidence supports a potential protective effect of vaccines on the risk of developing MS, they said.
“The reasons for this [finding] cannot be gleaned from this study and may range from biological to sociocultural/demographic reasons,” the authors added. “Infection, rather than vaccination, may be an MS trigger, or individuals obtaining vaccinations may be practicing other healthy behaviors protective for MS. These possibilities should be the subject of future studies.”
Until future studies are completed and their results published, the findings of Hapfelmeier et al. offer “strong evidence to share with worried patients and families when faced with the question of whether a vaccine in the recent or relatively distant past triggered the individual’s MS,” said Dr. Yeh and Dr. Graves.
The authors had various relationships with industry, including serving on advisory boards for and receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies.
(MS), according to an analysis published July 30 in Neurology. Although the results suggest that vaccination is associated with a lower likelihood of incident MS within the following 5 years, “these data alone do not allow for any conclusion regarding a possible protective effect of vaccinations regarding the development of MS,” wrote Alexander Hapfelmeier, PhD, of the Technical University of Munich and colleagues.
In recent years, researchers have proposed and investigated various potential environmental risk factors for the development of MS. Vaccination is one proposed environmental risk factor, but case reports and small studies have yielded conflicting results about its association with incident MS.
To examine this question more closely, Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues performed a systematic retrospective analysis of ambulatory claims data held by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. They reviewed the data to identify patients with new-onset MS and at least two ICD-10 diagnoses of the disorder. They next identified two control cohorts of participants diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases: Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. Finally, they randomly selected a third control cohort of patients without any of these diagnoses and matched them by age, sex, and district to patients with MS in a 5:1 ratio. Eligible participants were younger than 70 years.
Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues reviewed the incidence and frequency of vaccinations (such as those targeting tick-borne encephalitis, human papillomavirus, and influenza virus) in all cohorts. They created unconditional logistic regression models to assess the association between vaccination and MS. They also created separate models to contrast the MS cohort with each of the control cohorts.
The researchers included 12,262 patients with MS, 19,296 patients with Crohn’s disease, 112,292 patients with psoriasis, and 79,185 participants without these autoimmune diseases in their analysis. They found 456 participants with Crohn’s disease and psoriasis, 216 participants with MS and psoriasis, 48 participants with Crohn’s disease and MS, and 2 participants with Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, and MS. Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues allocated these participants to each of the respective cohorts and did not analyze them differently because of the comparatively small sample sizes.
The investigators analyzed the occurrence of vaccination in all participants during the 5 years before first diagnosis. Among patients who received vaccination, the odds ratio of MS was 0.870 in participants without autoimmune disease, 0.919 in participants with Crohn’s disease, and 0.973 in participants with psoriasis. Decreased risk of MS was most notable for vaccinations against influenza and tick-borne encephalitis. The results were consistent regardless of time frame, control cohort, and definition of MS.
The subjective definition of the MS cohort was a limitation of the study, but the authors addressed it by also using several strict definitions of that cohort. Another limitation is that the source data may reflect entry errors and incorrect coding.
A grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Competence Network MS supported the study. The authors had no conflicts that were relevant to the topic of the study.
SOURCE: Hapfelmeier A et al. Neurology. 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008012.
(MS), according to an analysis published July 30 in Neurology. Although the results suggest that vaccination is associated with a lower likelihood of incident MS within the following 5 years, “these data alone do not allow for any conclusion regarding a possible protective effect of vaccinations regarding the development of MS,” wrote Alexander Hapfelmeier, PhD, of the Technical University of Munich and colleagues.
In recent years, researchers have proposed and investigated various potential environmental risk factors for the development of MS. Vaccination is one proposed environmental risk factor, but case reports and small studies have yielded conflicting results about its association with incident MS.
To examine this question more closely, Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues performed a systematic retrospective analysis of ambulatory claims data held by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. They reviewed the data to identify patients with new-onset MS and at least two ICD-10 diagnoses of the disorder. They next identified two control cohorts of participants diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases: Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. Finally, they randomly selected a third control cohort of patients without any of these diagnoses and matched them by age, sex, and district to patients with MS in a 5:1 ratio. Eligible participants were younger than 70 years.
Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues reviewed the incidence and frequency of vaccinations (such as those targeting tick-borne encephalitis, human papillomavirus, and influenza virus) in all cohorts. They created unconditional logistic regression models to assess the association between vaccination and MS. They also created separate models to contrast the MS cohort with each of the control cohorts.
The researchers included 12,262 patients with MS, 19,296 patients with Crohn’s disease, 112,292 patients with psoriasis, and 79,185 participants without these autoimmune diseases in their analysis. They found 456 participants with Crohn’s disease and psoriasis, 216 participants with MS and psoriasis, 48 participants with Crohn’s disease and MS, and 2 participants with Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, and MS. Dr. Hapfelmeier and colleagues allocated these participants to each of the respective cohorts and did not analyze them differently because of the comparatively small sample sizes.
The investigators analyzed the occurrence of vaccination in all participants during the 5 years before first diagnosis. Among patients who received vaccination, the odds ratio of MS was 0.870 in participants without autoimmune disease, 0.919 in participants with Crohn’s disease, and 0.973 in participants with psoriasis. Decreased risk of MS was most notable for vaccinations against influenza and tick-borne encephalitis. The results were consistent regardless of time frame, control cohort, and definition of MS.
The subjective definition of the MS cohort was a limitation of the study, but the authors addressed it by also using several strict definitions of that cohort. Another limitation is that the source data may reflect entry errors and incorrect coding.
A grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Competence Network MS supported the study. The authors had no conflicts that were relevant to the topic of the study.
SOURCE: Hapfelmeier A et al. Neurology. 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008012.
FROM NEUROLOGY