Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/19/2019 - 13:18
Display Headline
Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing postoperative transfusions during direct anterior (DA) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

In this retrospective review, we analyzed 173 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral DA THA performed by 2 surgeons during a 1-year period. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on TXA use: 63 patients received TXA alone (TXA group), 49 patients received TXA in addition to a bipolar sealer (TXA + bipolar sealer group), and 61 patients received neither TXA nor a bipolar sealer (control group). Primary end points were the transfusion rate and estimated blood loss. Secondary end points were length of stay, postoperative drop in hemoglobin, and postoperative drain output.

Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). No significant difference in the rate of transfusion was found between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .99). Estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group. 

The use of TXA, with and without the concomitant use of a bipolar sealer, decreases intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements. The addition of a bipolar sealer, however, does not appear to provide any additional decrease in blood loss.

Historically, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have significant blood loss and required blood transfusions.1-3 Blood transfusions increase not only the risk of complications but also the cost of the procedure.4-9 Although less invasive techniques in hip surgery may decrease blood loss,10-12 intraoperative blood loss remains a concern. Optimization of anemia and blood conservation techniques include preoperative autologous blood donation, perioperative hemodilution, meticulous surgical hemostasis, and the use of antifibrinolytic agents.4,5,7,13,14 Antifibrinolytics are inexpensive and have been shown to reduce blood loss during THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).7,15-17

Continue to: Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog...

 

 

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, is one antifibrinolytic that has recently been adopted in total joint arthroplasty. TXA competitively inhibits the lysine binding site of plasminogen, inhibiting fibrinolysis and leading to clot stabilization.18-20 Because of its safety and low cost, TXA has been readily accepted. The bipolar sealer enhances surgical hemostasis by sealing vessels at the surgical site through radiofrequency ablation. In contrast to standard electrocautery, a bipolar sealer uses saline to maintain tissue temperatures at <100°C, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues.21 Many applications of a bipolar sealer have been reported in the fields of surgical oncology,21 pulmonary surgery,21 liver resection,22 THA23,24 and TKA,25,26 and spine surgery.27 We recently published our reduction in transfusion rates during direct anterior (DA) THA with use of a bipolar sealer.28

Although many studies have analyzed the use of TXA and a bipolar sealer with the posterior and lateral approaches to hip arthroplasty, there is a paucity of research analyzing its use in the DA approach. This study retrospectively reviews the effectiveness of TXA alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing allogeneic blood transfusions in DA THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative study evaluating the efficacy of TXA with and without a bipolar sealer in unilateral DA THA. The study included 173 patients who underwent standard DA THA performed by 2 surgeons in the period April 2013 to April 2014. Patient demographic information is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic Data

 

All

(N = 173)

TXA Only

(n = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Age (y)a

64.8 ± 10.5 (28.4-87.6)

66.9 ± 9.9 (47.2-87.6)

62.1 ± 11.0 (28.4-86.3)

64.7 ± 10.4 (38.3-85.8)

.31

.24

.03

Genderb

 

 

 

 

.99

0.95

.94

Male

82 (47.4%)

30 (47.6%)

23 (46.9%)

29 (47.5%)

 

 

 

Female

91 (52.6%)

33 (52.4%)

26 (53.1%)

32 (52.5%)

 

 

 

BMI (kg/m2)a

27.9 ± 4.4 (17.5-40.6)

27.8 ± 3.3 (21.6-35.9)

29.1 ± 5.3 (17.8-40.6)

27.0 ± 4.5 (17.5-39.8)

.16

.03

.13

Preoperative hemoglobin levela

13.6 ± 1.3 (10.5-17.2)

13.9 ± 1.2 (11.5-17.1)

13.5 ± 1.4 (10.5-16.6)

13.5 ± 1.2 (10.5-17.2)

.10

.98

.10

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TXA, tranexamic acid.

 

Three cohorts were created based on intraoperative blood loss management practices at the surgeon’s discretion. The first group included 63 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA but not a bipolar sealer. The second group included 49 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA and a bipolar sealer. The third (control) group included 61 patients who underwent DA THA without TXA or a bipolar sealer. Data for the control group were collected prospectively as a part of a randomized trial, which demonstrated a reduction in transfusion requirements and blood loss with the use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.28 All patients received a surgical hemovac suction drain, which was removed at 24 hours after surgery. All patients received 40 mg of enoxaparin daily for 2 weeks for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis starting the day after surgery.

All patients in the first 2 groups received 2 g of TXA administered intravenously in 2 doses: the first dose was given preoperatively, and the second dose was given immediately postoperatively in the recovery room. The bipolar sealer was utilized as needed perioperatively according to the manufacturer’s instructions to address specific bleeding targets. The common sites and steps of a DA THA, in which bleeding typically occurs, are:

  • The medial femoral circumflex artery during the approach to the capsule;
  • The anterior hip capsule vessels prior to capsulotomy;
  • The deep branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery and the nutrient vessels to the lesser trochanter encountered while exposing the medial neck and releasing the medial capsule;
  • The posterior-superior retinacular arteries encountered after femoral neck osteotomy and removal of the femoral head along the posterior capsule; and
  • The branch of the obturator artery encountered during exposure of the acetabular fovea.29-31

At the time of this study, the transfusion criteria included hemoglobin <8 g/dL in the presence of clinical symptoms.

Continue to: Primary outcome measures...

 

 

OUTCOME MEASURES AND DATA ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measures were transfusion requirements and estimated blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, length of stay, and postoperative drain output. Demographic and operative data were compared between groups to ensure that there were no statistically significant differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements. All data were recorded in a password encrypted file and subsequently transferred to the REDCap system (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A priori sample size calculation was performed on the basis of a prior study 28, which evaluated surgical blood loss reduction utilizing a bipolar sealer. This study suggested a sample size of 20 per group to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 1.5 (standard deviation (SD) = 1.5, α = 0.05, β = 0.20). Additionally, a general estimate for detecting a 1-unit change on an ordinal scale of 136 (SD = 1.0, α = 0.05, β = 0.20) resulted in the same number. We conservatively chose to include at least 24 patients in each study arm in the event of greater true variance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups. Differences between means were analyzed using 2-sided t tests. Comparison of categorical data was performed using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact probability test as indicated. Ordinal ranking scores were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to sex, age, body mass index, or preoperative hemoglobin level (Table 1). Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). A comparison of the transfusion rate between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group yielded no significant difference (P = .99). The estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group (P = .71) (Table 2).

Table 2. Patient-Related Outcomes

 

TXA Only

(N = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Patients Transfuseda

2 (3.2%)

1 (2.0%)

10 (16.4%)

.02

.02

.99

Hemoglobin Drop (g/dL)b = preoperative Hb-lowest Hb

3.5 ± 0.8

(1.8-6.3)

3.5 ± 1.1

(1.7-6.0)

4.3 ± 1.2

(2.0-7.5)

<.001

<.001

.60

Total Drain Output (mL)b

326.3 ± 197.5

(15-1050)

309.8 ± 196.3

(20-920)

473.6 ± 199.7

(90-960)

<.001

<.001

.58

Calculated Blood Loss (mL)b = 1000 x total Hb loss/preoperative Hb

1217.8 ± 335.8

(573.0-2514.4)

1289.5 ± 382.4

(536.1-2418.2)

1514.7 ± 467.9

(789.4-3451.1)

<.001

.005

.43

Estimated Blood Loss (mL)b

310.3 ± 182.5

(100-1400)

292.9 ± 130.8

(75-600)

404.9 ± 201.2

(150-1000)

.004

.003

.71

Length of Stay (d)a

2.2 ± 0.6

(1-4)

2.2 ± 0.9

(1-5)

2.6 ± 0.8

(1-5)

.004

.03

.78

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviation: TXA, tranexamic acid.

The total drain output was 326.3 mL ± 197.5 mL in the TXA group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), 309.8 mL ± 196.3 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), and 473.6 mL ± 199.7 mL in the control group (P = .58). The decrease in hemoglobin was 3.5 g/dL ± 0.8 g/dL in the TXA group (P < .001), 3.5 g/dL ± 1.1 g/dL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001), and 4.3 g/dL ± 1.2 g/dL in the control group (Table 2). The length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.6 days for the TXA group (P = .004) and 2.2 ± 0.9 days (P = .03) for the TXA + bipolar sealer group, and 2.6 ± 0.8 days in the control group (P = .78) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that the use of TXA alone provides a significant decrease in transfusion rates and estimated blood loss, a benefit which was not further increased with the addition of a bipolar sealer (Table 2). Many studies have demonstrated that TXA reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in patients undergoing THA and TKA.29 However, TXA’s acceptance as a more readily used hemostatic medication has been hindered by the theoretically increased risk of thromboembolism in susceptible, high-risk patients.32-35 In a 2012 meta-analysis conducted by Yang and colleagues,36 the use of TXA led to significantly less blood loss per patient and fewer transfusions without leading to an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Continue to: Similarly, the bipolar sealer...

 

 

Similarly, the bipolar sealer has been shown to decrease transfusion rates and stabilize perioperative hemoglobin levels.25-27 In this recent prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer during DA THA, we observed decreased intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.28 However, in a study conducted by Barsoum and colleagues37 evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer in THA with a posterior approach, there were no significant postoperative benefits in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, clinical evaluations, functionality, or health-related quality of life in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.

Although the results of our research are in line with those of previous publications, it is important to address 3 limitations within this study. First, only the control group in this study was enrolled prospectively; the remaining groups were reviewed retrospectively. Second, our adoption of TXA was recent; therefore, a confounding factor is that our surgeons had more experience in the anterior approach when using TXA. Third, the established transfusion threshold of <8 g/dl for this study led to more liberal use of transfusions. Since the conclusion of this study, we have adopted stricter transfusion criteria (hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL with clinical symptoms) which has led to even lower transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

In the reviewed patient population, TXA decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements following DA THA. However, the addition of a bipolar sealer did not provide an advantage. The results of this study do not support the routine use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.

References

1. Sehat KR, Evans R, Newman JH. How much blood is really lost in total knee and hip arthroplasty? Knee. 2000;7(3):151-155.

2. Toy PT, Kaplan EB, McVay PA, Lee SJ, Strauss RG, Stehling LC. Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group. Transfusion. 1992;32(1):63-67.

3. Pierson JL, Hannon TJ, Earles DR. A blood-conservation algorithm to reduce blood transfusions after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(7):1512-1518.

4. Gill JB, Rosenstein A. The use of antifibrinolytic agents in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6):869-873.

5. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, Mason JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):39-46. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24984.

6. Rajesparan K, Biant LC, Ahmad M, Field RE. The effect of an intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid on blood loss in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):776-783. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22393.

7. Hynes MC, Calder P, Rosenfeld P, Scott G. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during total hip arthroplasty: an observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(2):99-101. doi:10.1308/147870805X28118.

8. Earnshaw P. Blood conservation in orthopaedic surgery: the role of epoetin alfa. Int Orthop. 2001;25(5):273-278. doi:10.1007/s002640100261.

9. Kleinman S, Chan P, Robillard P. Risks associated with transfusion of cellular blood components in Canada. Transfus Med Rev. 2003;17(2):120-162. doi:10.1053/tmrv.2003.50009.

10. Lovell TP. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7 Suppl):64-68. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027.

11. Wojciechowski P, Kusz D, Kopeć K, Borowski M. Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9(1):1-7.

12. Rachbauer F, Krismer M. [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;20(3):239-251. doi:10.1007/s00064-008-1306-y.

13. Johansson T, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty saves blood and money: a randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):314-319.

14. Claeys MA, Vermeersch N, Haentjens P. Reduction of blood loss with tranexamic acid in primary total hip replacement surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(4):397-401.

15. Ido K, Neo M, Asada Y, et al. Reduction of blood loss using tranexamic acid in total knee and hip arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(9):518-520.

16. Benoni G, Fredin H, Knebel R, Nilsson P. Blood conservation with tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study in 40 primary operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):442-448. doi:10.1080/000164701753532754.

17. Ekbäck G, Axelsson K, Ryttberg L, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in total hip replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1124-1130.

18. Ralley FE, Berta D, Binns V, Howard J, Naudie DDR. One intraoperative dose of tranexamic acid for patients having primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(7):1905-1911. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1217-8.

19. Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(3):132-138.

20. Astedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;137:22-25.

21. Kirschbaum A, Kunz J, Steinfeldt T, Pehl A, Meyer C, Bartsch DK. Bipolar impedance-controlled sealing of the pulmonary artery with SealSafe G3 electric current: determination of bursting pressures in an ex vivo model. J Surg Res. 2014;192(2):611-615. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.014.

22. Romano F, Garancini M, Uggeri F, et al. Bleeding in hepatic surgery: sorting through methods to prevent it. HPB Surg. 2012;2012:169351. doi:10.1155/2012/169351.

23. Marulanda GA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125-131. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.2.125.

24. Rosenberg AG. Reducing blood loss in total joint surgery with a saline-coupled bipolar sealing technology. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):82-85. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.018.

25. Marulanda GA, Krebs VE, Bierbaum BE, et al. Haemostasis using a bipolar sealer in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(12):E179-E183.

26. Weeden SH, Schmidt RH, Isabell G. Haemostatic efficacy of a bipolar sealing device in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br Proceedings. 2009;91-B:45.

27. Gordon ZL, Son-Hing JP, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH. Bipolar sealer device reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(7):700-706. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829d5721.

28. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, randomized trial to evaluate efficacy of a bipolar sealer in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1953-1958. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.023.

29. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82(5):679-683. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10426.

30. Trueta J, Harrison MHM. The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1953;35-B(3):442-461.

31. Sevitt S, Thompson RG. The distribution and anastomoses of arteries supplying the

head and neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47-B:560-573. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.47B3.560.

32. Saleh A, Hebeish M, Farias-Kovac M, et al. Use of hemostatic agents in hip and knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2014;2(1):1-12. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00061.

33. Howes JP, Sharma V, Cohen AT. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):995-996.

34. Karkouti K. Is tranexamic acid indicated for total knee replacement surgery? Anesth Analg. 2000;91(1):244-245.

35. Graham ID, Alvarez G, Tetroe J, McAuley L, Laupacis A. Factors influencing the adoption of blood alternatives to minimize allogeneic transfusion: the perspective of eight Ontario hospitals. Can J Surg. 2002;45(2):132-140.

36. Yang ZG, Chen WP, Wu LD. Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(13):1153-1159. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00873.

37. Barsoum WK, Klika AK, Murray TG, Higuera C, Lee HH, Krebs VE. Prospective randomized evaluation of the need for blood transfusion during primary total hip arthroplasty with use of a bipolar sealer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(6):513-518. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00036.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Dabash is a Clinical Fellow, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Barksdale is a Resident, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Dr. McNamara is a Resident, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida. Dr. Patel is an Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida. Dr. Suarez is an Orthopaedic Surgeon, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.

Address correspondence to: Juan C. Suarez, MD, Baptist Health South Florida, 8940 North Kendall Dr, Suite 601E, Miami, FL 33176 (email, juansu@baptisthealth.net).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Dabash is a Clinical Fellow, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Barksdale is a Resident, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Dr. McNamara is a Resident, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida. Dr. Patel is an Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida. Dr. Suarez is an Orthopaedic Surgeon, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.

Address correspondence to: Juan C. Suarez, MD, Baptist Health South Florida, 8940 North Kendall Dr, Suite 601E, Miami, FL 33176 (email, juansu@baptisthealth.net).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Dabash is a Clinical Fellow, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Barksdale is a Resident, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Dr. McNamara is a Resident, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida. Dr. Patel is an Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida. Dr. Suarez is an Orthopaedic Surgeon, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.

Address correspondence to: Juan C. Suarez, MD, Baptist Health South Florida, 8940 North Kendall Dr, Suite 601E, Miami, FL 33176 (email, juansu@baptisthealth.net).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing postoperative transfusions during direct anterior (DA) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

In this retrospective review, we analyzed 173 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral DA THA performed by 2 surgeons during a 1-year period. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on TXA use: 63 patients received TXA alone (TXA group), 49 patients received TXA in addition to a bipolar sealer (TXA + bipolar sealer group), and 61 patients received neither TXA nor a bipolar sealer (control group). Primary end points were the transfusion rate and estimated blood loss. Secondary end points were length of stay, postoperative drop in hemoglobin, and postoperative drain output.

Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). No significant difference in the rate of transfusion was found between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .99). Estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group. 

The use of TXA, with and without the concomitant use of a bipolar sealer, decreases intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements. The addition of a bipolar sealer, however, does not appear to provide any additional decrease in blood loss.

Historically, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have significant blood loss and required blood transfusions.1-3 Blood transfusions increase not only the risk of complications but also the cost of the procedure.4-9 Although less invasive techniques in hip surgery may decrease blood loss,10-12 intraoperative blood loss remains a concern. Optimization of anemia and blood conservation techniques include preoperative autologous blood donation, perioperative hemodilution, meticulous surgical hemostasis, and the use of antifibrinolytic agents.4,5,7,13,14 Antifibrinolytics are inexpensive and have been shown to reduce blood loss during THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).7,15-17

Continue to: Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog...

 

 

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, is one antifibrinolytic that has recently been adopted in total joint arthroplasty. TXA competitively inhibits the lysine binding site of plasminogen, inhibiting fibrinolysis and leading to clot stabilization.18-20 Because of its safety and low cost, TXA has been readily accepted. The bipolar sealer enhances surgical hemostasis by sealing vessels at the surgical site through radiofrequency ablation. In contrast to standard electrocautery, a bipolar sealer uses saline to maintain tissue temperatures at <100°C, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues.21 Many applications of a bipolar sealer have been reported in the fields of surgical oncology,21 pulmonary surgery,21 liver resection,22 THA23,24 and TKA,25,26 and spine surgery.27 We recently published our reduction in transfusion rates during direct anterior (DA) THA with use of a bipolar sealer.28

Although many studies have analyzed the use of TXA and a bipolar sealer with the posterior and lateral approaches to hip arthroplasty, there is a paucity of research analyzing its use in the DA approach. This study retrospectively reviews the effectiveness of TXA alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing allogeneic blood transfusions in DA THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative study evaluating the efficacy of TXA with and without a bipolar sealer in unilateral DA THA. The study included 173 patients who underwent standard DA THA performed by 2 surgeons in the period April 2013 to April 2014. Patient demographic information is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic Data

 

All

(N = 173)

TXA Only

(n = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Age (y)a

64.8 ± 10.5 (28.4-87.6)

66.9 ± 9.9 (47.2-87.6)

62.1 ± 11.0 (28.4-86.3)

64.7 ± 10.4 (38.3-85.8)

.31

.24

.03

Genderb

 

 

 

 

.99

0.95

.94

Male

82 (47.4%)

30 (47.6%)

23 (46.9%)

29 (47.5%)

 

 

 

Female

91 (52.6%)

33 (52.4%)

26 (53.1%)

32 (52.5%)

 

 

 

BMI (kg/m2)a

27.9 ± 4.4 (17.5-40.6)

27.8 ± 3.3 (21.6-35.9)

29.1 ± 5.3 (17.8-40.6)

27.0 ± 4.5 (17.5-39.8)

.16

.03

.13

Preoperative hemoglobin levela

13.6 ± 1.3 (10.5-17.2)

13.9 ± 1.2 (11.5-17.1)

13.5 ± 1.4 (10.5-16.6)

13.5 ± 1.2 (10.5-17.2)

.10

.98

.10

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TXA, tranexamic acid.

 

Three cohorts were created based on intraoperative blood loss management practices at the surgeon’s discretion. The first group included 63 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA but not a bipolar sealer. The second group included 49 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA and a bipolar sealer. The third (control) group included 61 patients who underwent DA THA without TXA or a bipolar sealer. Data for the control group were collected prospectively as a part of a randomized trial, which demonstrated a reduction in transfusion requirements and blood loss with the use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.28 All patients received a surgical hemovac suction drain, which was removed at 24 hours after surgery. All patients received 40 mg of enoxaparin daily for 2 weeks for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis starting the day after surgery.

All patients in the first 2 groups received 2 g of TXA administered intravenously in 2 doses: the first dose was given preoperatively, and the second dose was given immediately postoperatively in the recovery room. The bipolar sealer was utilized as needed perioperatively according to the manufacturer’s instructions to address specific bleeding targets. The common sites and steps of a DA THA, in which bleeding typically occurs, are:

  • The medial femoral circumflex artery during the approach to the capsule;
  • The anterior hip capsule vessels prior to capsulotomy;
  • The deep branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery and the nutrient vessels to the lesser trochanter encountered while exposing the medial neck and releasing the medial capsule;
  • The posterior-superior retinacular arteries encountered after femoral neck osteotomy and removal of the femoral head along the posterior capsule; and
  • The branch of the obturator artery encountered during exposure of the acetabular fovea.29-31

At the time of this study, the transfusion criteria included hemoglobin <8 g/dL in the presence of clinical symptoms.

Continue to: Primary outcome measures...

 

 

OUTCOME MEASURES AND DATA ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measures were transfusion requirements and estimated blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, length of stay, and postoperative drain output. Demographic and operative data were compared between groups to ensure that there were no statistically significant differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements. All data were recorded in a password encrypted file and subsequently transferred to the REDCap system (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A priori sample size calculation was performed on the basis of a prior study 28, which evaluated surgical blood loss reduction utilizing a bipolar sealer. This study suggested a sample size of 20 per group to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 1.5 (standard deviation (SD) = 1.5, α = 0.05, β = 0.20). Additionally, a general estimate for detecting a 1-unit change on an ordinal scale of 136 (SD = 1.0, α = 0.05, β = 0.20) resulted in the same number. We conservatively chose to include at least 24 patients in each study arm in the event of greater true variance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups. Differences between means were analyzed using 2-sided t tests. Comparison of categorical data was performed using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact probability test as indicated. Ordinal ranking scores were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to sex, age, body mass index, or preoperative hemoglobin level (Table 1). Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). A comparison of the transfusion rate between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group yielded no significant difference (P = .99). The estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group (P = .71) (Table 2).

Table 2. Patient-Related Outcomes

 

TXA Only

(N = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Patients Transfuseda

2 (3.2%)

1 (2.0%)

10 (16.4%)

.02

.02

.99

Hemoglobin Drop (g/dL)b = preoperative Hb-lowest Hb

3.5 ± 0.8

(1.8-6.3)

3.5 ± 1.1

(1.7-6.0)

4.3 ± 1.2

(2.0-7.5)

<.001

<.001

.60

Total Drain Output (mL)b

326.3 ± 197.5

(15-1050)

309.8 ± 196.3

(20-920)

473.6 ± 199.7

(90-960)

<.001

<.001

.58

Calculated Blood Loss (mL)b = 1000 x total Hb loss/preoperative Hb

1217.8 ± 335.8

(573.0-2514.4)

1289.5 ± 382.4

(536.1-2418.2)

1514.7 ± 467.9

(789.4-3451.1)

<.001

.005

.43

Estimated Blood Loss (mL)b

310.3 ± 182.5

(100-1400)

292.9 ± 130.8

(75-600)

404.9 ± 201.2

(150-1000)

.004

.003

.71

Length of Stay (d)a

2.2 ± 0.6

(1-4)

2.2 ± 0.9

(1-5)

2.6 ± 0.8

(1-5)

.004

.03

.78

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviation: TXA, tranexamic acid.

The total drain output was 326.3 mL ± 197.5 mL in the TXA group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), 309.8 mL ± 196.3 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), and 473.6 mL ± 199.7 mL in the control group (P = .58). The decrease in hemoglobin was 3.5 g/dL ± 0.8 g/dL in the TXA group (P < .001), 3.5 g/dL ± 1.1 g/dL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001), and 4.3 g/dL ± 1.2 g/dL in the control group (Table 2). The length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.6 days for the TXA group (P = .004) and 2.2 ± 0.9 days (P = .03) for the TXA + bipolar sealer group, and 2.6 ± 0.8 days in the control group (P = .78) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that the use of TXA alone provides a significant decrease in transfusion rates and estimated blood loss, a benefit which was not further increased with the addition of a bipolar sealer (Table 2). Many studies have demonstrated that TXA reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in patients undergoing THA and TKA.29 However, TXA’s acceptance as a more readily used hemostatic medication has been hindered by the theoretically increased risk of thromboembolism in susceptible, high-risk patients.32-35 In a 2012 meta-analysis conducted by Yang and colleagues,36 the use of TXA led to significantly less blood loss per patient and fewer transfusions without leading to an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Continue to: Similarly, the bipolar sealer...

 

 

Similarly, the bipolar sealer has been shown to decrease transfusion rates and stabilize perioperative hemoglobin levels.25-27 In this recent prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer during DA THA, we observed decreased intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.28 However, in a study conducted by Barsoum and colleagues37 evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer in THA with a posterior approach, there were no significant postoperative benefits in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, clinical evaluations, functionality, or health-related quality of life in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.

Although the results of our research are in line with those of previous publications, it is important to address 3 limitations within this study. First, only the control group in this study was enrolled prospectively; the remaining groups were reviewed retrospectively. Second, our adoption of TXA was recent; therefore, a confounding factor is that our surgeons had more experience in the anterior approach when using TXA. Third, the established transfusion threshold of <8 g/dl for this study led to more liberal use of transfusions. Since the conclusion of this study, we have adopted stricter transfusion criteria (hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL with clinical symptoms) which has led to even lower transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

In the reviewed patient population, TXA decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements following DA THA. However, the addition of a bipolar sealer did not provide an advantage. The results of this study do not support the routine use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing postoperative transfusions during direct anterior (DA) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

In this retrospective review, we analyzed 173 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral DA THA performed by 2 surgeons during a 1-year period. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on TXA use: 63 patients received TXA alone (TXA group), 49 patients received TXA in addition to a bipolar sealer (TXA + bipolar sealer group), and 61 patients received neither TXA nor a bipolar sealer (control group). Primary end points were the transfusion rate and estimated blood loss. Secondary end points were length of stay, postoperative drop in hemoglobin, and postoperative drain output.

Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). No significant difference in the rate of transfusion was found between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .99). Estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group. 

The use of TXA, with and without the concomitant use of a bipolar sealer, decreases intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements. The addition of a bipolar sealer, however, does not appear to provide any additional decrease in blood loss.

Historically, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have significant blood loss and required blood transfusions.1-3 Blood transfusions increase not only the risk of complications but also the cost of the procedure.4-9 Although less invasive techniques in hip surgery may decrease blood loss,10-12 intraoperative blood loss remains a concern. Optimization of anemia and blood conservation techniques include preoperative autologous blood donation, perioperative hemodilution, meticulous surgical hemostasis, and the use of antifibrinolytic agents.4,5,7,13,14 Antifibrinolytics are inexpensive and have been shown to reduce blood loss during THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).7,15-17

Continue to: Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog...

 

 

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, is one antifibrinolytic that has recently been adopted in total joint arthroplasty. TXA competitively inhibits the lysine binding site of plasminogen, inhibiting fibrinolysis and leading to clot stabilization.18-20 Because of its safety and low cost, TXA has been readily accepted. The bipolar sealer enhances surgical hemostasis by sealing vessels at the surgical site through radiofrequency ablation. In contrast to standard electrocautery, a bipolar sealer uses saline to maintain tissue temperatures at <100°C, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues.21 Many applications of a bipolar sealer have been reported in the fields of surgical oncology,21 pulmonary surgery,21 liver resection,22 THA23,24 and TKA,25,26 and spine surgery.27 We recently published our reduction in transfusion rates during direct anterior (DA) THA with use of a bipolar sealer.28

Although many studies have analyzed the use of TXA and a bipolar sealer with the posterior and lateral approaches to hip arthroplasty, there is a paucity of research analyzing its use in the DA approach. This study retrospectively reviews the effectiveness of TXA alone and in conjunction with a bipolar sealer in reducing allogeneic blood transfusions in DA THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative study evaluating the efficacy of TXA with and without a bipolar sealer in unilateral DA THA. The study included 173 patients who underwent standard DA THA performed by 2 surgeons in the period April 2013 to April 2014. Patient demographic information is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic Data

 

All

(N = 173)

TXA Only

(n = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Age (y)a

64.8 ± 10.5 (28.4-87.6)

66.9 ± 9.9 (47.2-87.6)

62.1 ± 11.0 (28.4-86.3)

64.7 ± 10.4 (38.3-85.8)

.31

.24

.03

Genderb

 

 

 

 

.99

0.95

.94

Male

82 (47.4%)

30 (47.6%)

23 (46.9%)

29 (47.5%)

 

 

 

Female

91 (52.6%)

33 (52.4%)

26 (53.1%)

32 (52.5%)

 

 

 

BMI (kg/m2)a

27.9 ± 4.4 (17.5-40.6)

27.8 ± 3.3 (21.6-35.9)

29.1 ± 5.3 (17.8-40.6)

27.0 ± 4.5 (17.5-39.8)

.16

.03

.13

Preoperative hemoglobin levela

13.6 ± 1.3 (10.5-17.2)

13.9 ± 1.2 (11.5-17.1)

13.5 ± 1.4 (10.5-16.6)

13.5 ± 1.2 (10.5-17.2)

.10

.98

.10

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TXA, tranexamic acid.

 

Three cohorts were created based on intraoperative blood loss management practices at the surgeon’s discretion. The first group included 63 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA but not a bipolar sealer. The second group included 49 patients who underwent DA THA with TXA and a bipolar sealer. The third (control) group included 61 patients who underwent DA THA without TXA or a bipolar sealer. Data for the control group were collected prospectively as a part of a randomized trial, which demonstrated a reduction in transfusion requirements and blood loss with the use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.28 All patients received a surgical hemovac suction drain, which was removed at 24 hours after surgery. All patients received 40 mg of enoxaparin daily for 2 weeks for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis starting the day after surgery.

All patients in the first 2 groups received 2 g of TXA administered intravenously in 2 doses: the first dose was given preoperatively, and the second dose was given immediately postoperatively in the recovery room. The bipolar sealer was utilized as needed perioperatively according to the manufacturer’s instructions to address specific bleeding targets. The common sites and steps of a DA THA, in which bleeding typically occurs, are:

  • The medial femoral circumflex artery during the approach to the capsule;
  • The anterior hip capsule vessels prior to capsulotomy;
  • The deep branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery and the nutrient vessels to the lesser trochanter encountered while exposing the medial neck and releasing the medial capsule;
  • The posterior-superior retinacular arteries encountered after femoral neck osteotomy and removal of the femoral head along the posterior capsule; and
  • The branch of the obturator artery encountered during exposure of the acetabular fovea.29-31

At the time of this study, the transfusion criteria included hemoglobin <8 g/dL in the presence of clinical symptoms.

Continue to: Primary outcome measures...

 

 

OUTCOME MEASURES AND DATA ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measures were transfusion requirements and estimated blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, length of stay, and postoperative drain output. Demographic and operative data were compared between groups to ensure that there were no statistically significant differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements. All data were recorded in a password encrypted file and subsequently transferred to the REDCap system (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A priori sample size calculation was performed on the basis of a prior study 28, which evaluated surgical blood loss reduction utilizing a bipolar sealer. This study suggested a sample size of 20 per group to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 1.5 (standard deviation (SD) = 1.5, α = 0.05, β = 0.20). Additionally, a general estimate for detecting a 1-unit change on an ordinal scale of 136 (SD = 1.0, α = 0.05, β = 0.20) resulted in the same number. We conservatively chose to include at least 24 patients in each study arm in the event of greater true variance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups. Differences between means were analyzed using 2-sided t tests. Comparison of categorical data was performed using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact probability test as indicated. Ordinal ranking scores were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to sex, age, body mass index, or preoperative hemoglobin level (Table 1). Two patients in the TXA group and 10 patients in the control group were transfused (P = .02). In the TXA + bipolar sealer group, 1 patient was transfused (P = .02). A comparison of the transfusion rate between the TXA group and the TXA + bipolar sealer group yielded no significant difference (P = .99). The estimated blood loss was 310.3 mL ± 182.5 mL in the TXA group (P = .004), 292.9 mL ± 130.8 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P = .003), and 404.9 mL ± 201.2 mL in the control group (P = .71) (Table 2).

Table 2. Patient-Related Outcomes

 

TXA Only

(N = 63)

TXA + Bipolar Sealer

(n = 49)

Control

(n = 61)

P-value (TXA vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs Control)

P-value (TXA + Sealer vs TXA)

Patients Transfuseda

2 (3.2%)

1 (2.0%)

10 (16.4%)

.02

.02

.99

Hemoglobin Drop (g/dL)b = preoperative Hb-lowest Hb

3.5 ± 0.8

(1.8-6.3)

3.5 ± 1.1

(1.7-6.0)

4.3 ± 1.2

(2.0-7.5)

<.001

<.001

.60

Total Drain Output (mL)b

326.3 ± 197.5

(15-1050)

309.8 ± 196.3

(20-920)

473.6 ± 199.7

(90-960)

<.001

<.001

.58

Calculated Blood Loss (mL)b = 1000 x total Hb loss/preoperative Hb

1217.8 ± 335.8

(573.0-2514.4)

1289.5 ± 382.4

(536.1-2418.2)

1514.7 ± 467.9

(789.4-3451.1)

<.001

.005

.43

Estimated Blood Loss (mL)b

310.3 ± 182.5

(100-1400)

292.9 ± 130.8

(75-600)

404.9 ± 201.2

(150-1000)

.004

.003

.71

Length of Stay (d)a

2.2 ± 0.6

(1-4)

2.2 ± 0.9

(1-5)

2.6 ± 0.8

(1-5)

.004

.03

.78

aResult values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). bResult values are expressed as number of cases (percentage of column header population).

Abbreviation: TXA, tranexamic acid.

The total drain output was 326.3 mL ± 197.5 mL in the TXA group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), 309.8 mL ± 196.3 mL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001 for comparison with the control group), and 473.6 mL ± 199.7 mL in the control group (P = .58). The decrease in hemoglobin was 3.5 g/dL ± 0.8 g/dL in the TXA group (P < .001), 3.5 g/dL ± 1.1 g/dL in the TXA + bipolar sealer group (P < .001), and 4.3 g/dL ± 1.2 g/dL in the control group (Table 2). The length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.6 days for the TXA group (P = .004) and 2.2 ± 0.9 days (P = .03) for the TXA + bipolar sealer group, and 2.6 ± 0.8 days in the control group (P = .78) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that the use of TXA alone provides a significant decrease in transfusion rates and estimated blood loss, a benefit which was not further increased with the addition of a bipolar sealer (Table 2). Many studies have demonstrated that TXA reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in patients undergoing THA and TKA.29 However, TXA’s acceptance as a more readily used hemostatic medication has been hindered by the theoretically increased risk of thromboembolism in susceptible, high-risk patients.32-35 In a 2012 meta-analysis conducted by Yang and colleagues,36 the use of TXA led to significantly less blood loss per patient and fewer transfusions without leading to an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Continue to: Similarly, the bipolar sealer...

 

 

Similarly, the bipolar sealer has been shown to decrease transfusion rates and stabilize perioperative hemoglobin levels.25-27 In this recent prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer during DA THA, we observed decreased intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.28 However, in a study conducted by Barsoum and colleagues37 evaluating the use of a bipolar sealer in THA with a posterior approach, there were no significant postoperative benefits in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, clinical evaluations, functionality, or health-related quality of life in patients managed with a bipolar sealer.

Although the results of our research are in line with those of previous publications, it is important to address 3 limitations within this study. First, only the control group in this study was enrolled prospectively; the remaining groups were reviewed retrospectively. Second, our adoption of TXA was recent; therefore, a confounding factor is that our surgeons had more experience in the anterior approach when using TXA. Third, the established transfusion threshold of <8 g/dl for this study led to more liberal use of transfusions. Since the conclusion of this study, we have adopted stricter transfusion criteria (hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL with clinical symptoms) which has led to even lower transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

In the reviewed patient population, TXA decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements following DA THA. However, the addition of a bipolar sealer did not provide an advantage. The results of this study do not support the routine use of a bipolar sealer in DA THA.

References

1. Sehat KR, Evans R, Newman JH. How much blood is really lost in total knee and hip arthroplasty? Knee. 2000;7(3):151-155.

2. Toy PT, Kaplan EB, McVay PA, Lee SJ, Strauss RG, Stehling LC. Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group. Transfusion. 1992;32(1):63-67.

3. Pierson JL, Hannon TJ, Earles DR. A blood-conservation algorithm to reduce blood transfusions after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(7):1512-1518.

4. Gill JB, Rosenstein A. The use of antifibrinolytic agents in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6):869-873.

5. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, Mason JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):39-46. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24984.

6. Rajesparan K, Biant LC, Ahmad M, Field RE. The effect of an intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid on blood loss in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):776-783. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22393.

7. Hynes MC, Calder P, Rosenfeld P, Scott G. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during total hip arthroplasty: an observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(2):99-101. doi:10.1308/147870805X28118.

8. Earnshaw P. Blood conservation in orthopaedic surgery: the role of epoetin alfa. Int Orthop. 2001;25(5):273-278. doi:10.1007/s002640100261.

9. Kleinman S, Chan P, Robillard P. Risks associated with transfusion of cellular blood components in Canada. Transfus Med Rev. 2003;17(2):120-162. doi:10.1053/tmrv.2003.50009.

10. Lovell TP. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7 Suppl):64-68. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027.

11. Wojciechowski P, Kusz D, Kopeć K, Borowski M. Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9(1):1-7.

12. Rachbauer F, Krismer M. [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;20(3):239-251. doi:10.1007/s00064-008-1306-y.

13. Johansson T, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty saves blood and money: a randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):314-319.

14. Claeys MA, Vermeersch N, Haentjens P. Reduction of blood loss with tranexamic acid in primary total hip replacement surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(4):397-401.

15. Ido K, Neo M, Asada Y, et al. Reduction of blood loss using tranexamic acid in total knee and hip arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(9):518-520.

16. Benoni G, Fredin H, Knebel R, Nilsson P. Blood conservation with tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study in 40 primary operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):442-448. doi:10.1080/000164701753532754.

17. Ekbäck G, Axelsson K, Ryttberg L, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in total hip replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1124-1130.

18. Ralley FE, Berta D, Binns V, Howard J, Naudie DDR. One intraoperative dose of tranexamic acid for patients having primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(7):1905-1911. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1217-8.

19. Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(3):132-138.

20. Astedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;137:22-25.

21. Kirschbaum A, Kunz J, Steinfeldt T, Pehl A, Meyer C, Bartsch DK. Bipolar impedance-controlled sealing of the pulmonary artery with SealSafe G3 electric current: determination of bursting pressures in an ex vivo model. J Surg Res. 2014;192(2):611-615. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.014.

22. Romano F, Garancini M, Uggeri F, et al. Bleeding in hepatic surgery: sorting through methods to prevent it. HPB Surg. 2012;2012:169351. doi:10.1155/2012/169351.

23. Marulanda GA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125-131. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.2.125.

24. Rosenberg AG. Reducing blood loss in total joint surgery with a saline-coupled bipolar sealing technology. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):82-85. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.018.

25. Marulanda GA, Krebs VE, Bierbaum BE, et al. Haemostasis using a bipolar sealer in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(12):E179-E183.

26. Weeden SH, Schmidt RH, Isabell G. Haemostatic efficacy of a bipolar sealing device in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br Proceedings. 2009;91-B:45.

27. Gordon ZL, Son-Hing JP, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH. Bipolar sealer device reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(7):700-706. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829d5721.

28. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, randomized trial to evaluate efficacy of a bipolar sealer in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1953-1958. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.023.

29. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82(5):679-683. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10426.

30. Trueta J, Harrison MHM. The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1953;35-B(3):442-461.

31. Sevitt S, Thompson RG. The distribution and anastomoses of arteries supplying the

head and neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47-B:560-573. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.47B3.560.

32. Saleh A, Hebeish M, Farias-Kovac M, et al. Use of hemostatic agents in hip and knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2014;2(1):1-12. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00061.

33. Howes JP, Sharma V, Cohen AT. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):995-996.

34. Karkouti K. Is tranexamic acid indicated for total knee replacement surgery? Anesth Analg. 2000;91(1):244-245.

35. Graham ID, Alvarez G, Tetroe J, McAuley L, Laupacis A. Factors influencing the adoption of blood alternatives to minimize allogeneic transfusion: the perspective of eight Ontario hospitals. Can J Surg. 2002;45(2):132-140.

36. Yang ZG, Chen WP, Wu LD. Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(13):1153-1159. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00873.

37. Barsoum WK, Klika AK, Murray TG, Higuera C, Lee HH, Krebs VE. Prospective randomized evaluation of the need for blood transfusion during primary total hip arthroplasty with use of a bipolar sealer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(6):513-518. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00036.

References

1. Sehat KR, Evans R, Newman JH. How much blood is really lost in total knee and hip arthroplasty? Knee. 2000;7(3):151-155.

2. Toy PT, Kaplan EB, McVay PA, Lee SJ, Strauss RG, Stehling LC. Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group. Transfusion. 1992;32(1):63-67.

3. Pierson JL, Hannon TJ, Earles DR. A blood-conservation algorithm to reduce blood transfusions after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(7):1512-1518.

4. Gill JB, Rosenstein A. The use of antifibrinolytic agents in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6):869-873.

5. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, Mason JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):39-46. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24984.

6. Rajesparan K, Biant LC, Ahmad M, Field RE. The effect of an intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid on blood loss in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):776-783. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22393.

7. Hynes MC, Calder P, Rosenfeld P, Scott G. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during total hip arthroplasty: an observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(2):99-101. doi:10.1308/147870805X28118.

8. Earnshaw P. Blood conservation in orthopaedic surgery: the role of epoetin alfa. Int Orthop. 2001;25(5):273-278. doi:10.1007/s002640100261.

9. Kleinman S, Chan P, Robillard P. Risks associated with transfusion of cellular blood components in Canada. Transfus Med Rev. 2003;17(2):120-162. doi:10.1053/tmrv.2003.50009.

10. Lovell TP. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7 Suppl):64-68. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027.

11. Wojciechowski P, Kusz D, Kopeć K, Borowski M. Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9(1):1-7.

12. Rachbauer F, Krismer M. [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;20(3):239-251. doi:10.1007/s00064-008-1306-y.

13. Johansson T, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty saves blood and money: a randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):314-319.

14. Claeys MA, Vermeersch N, Haentjens P. Reduction of blood loss with tranexamic acid in primary total hip replacement surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(4):397-401.

15. Ido K, Neo M, Asada Y, et al. Reduction of blood loss using tranexamic acid in total knee and hip arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(9):518-520.

16. Benoni G, Fredin H, Knebel R, Nilsson P. Blood conservation with tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study in 40 primary operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):442-448. doi:10.1080/000164701753532754.

17. Ekbäck G, Axelsson K, Ryttberg L, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in total hip replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1124-1130.

18. Ralley FE, Berta D, Binns V, Howard J, Naudie DDR. One intraoperative dose of tranexamic acid for patients having primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(7):1905-1911. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1217-8.

19. Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(3):132-138.

20. Astedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;137:22-25.

21. Kirschbaum A, Kunz J, Steinfeldt T, Pehl A, Meyer C, Bartsch DK. Bipolar impedance-controlled sealing of the pulmonary artery with SealSafe G3 electric current: determination of bursting pressures in an ex vivo model. J Surg Res. 2014;192(2):611-615. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.014.

22. Romano F, Garancini M, Uggeri F, et al. Bleeding in hepatic surgery: sorting through methods to prevent it. HPB Surg. 2012;2012:169351. doi:10.1155/2012/169351.

23. Marulanda GA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125-131. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.2.125.

24. Rosenberg AG. Reducing blood loss in total joint surgery with a saline-coupled bipolar sealing technology. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):82-85. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.018.

25. Marulanda GA, Krebs VE, Bierbaum BE, et al. Haemostasis using a bipolar sealer in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(12):E179-E183.

26. Weeden SH, Schmidt RH, Isabell G. Haemostatic efficacy of a bipolar sealing device in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br Proceedings. 2009;91-B:45.

27. Gordon ZL, Son-Hing JP, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH. Bipolar sealer device reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(7):700-706. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829d5721.

28. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, randomized trial to evaluate efficacy of a bipolar sealer in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1953-1958. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.023.

29. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82(5):679-683. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10426.

30. Trueta J, Harrison MHM. The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1953;35-B(3):442-461.

31. Sevitt S, Thompson RG. The distribution and anastomoses of arteries supplying the

head and neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47-B:560-573. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.47B3.560.

32. Saleh A, Hebeish M, Farias-Kovac M, et al. Use of hemostatic agents in hip and knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2014;2(1):1-12. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00061.

33. Howes JP, Sharma V, Cohen AT. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):995-996.

34. Karkouti K. Is tranexamic acid indicated for total knee replacement surgery? Anesth Analg. 2000;91(1):244-245.

35. Graham ID, Alvarez G, Tetroe J, McAuley L, Laupacis A. Factors influencing the adoption of blood alternatives to minimize allogeneic transfusion: the perspective of eight Ontario hospitals. Can J Surg. 2002;45(2):132-140.

36. Yang ZG, Chen WP, Wu LD. Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(13):1153-1159. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00873.

37. Barsoum WK, Klika AK, Murray TG, Higuera C, Lee HH, Krebs VE. Prospective randomized evaluation of the need for blood transfusion during primary total hip arthroplasty with use of a bipolar sealer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(6):513-518. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00036.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
Display Headline
Blood Loss Reduction with Tranexamic Acid and a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
Sections
Inside the Article

TAKE-HOME POINTS

  • TXA reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in THA.
  • The bipolar sealer enhances surgical hemostasis by sealing vessels at the surgical site through radiofrequency ablation.
  • The use of TXA, with and without the concomitant use of a bipolar sealer, decreases intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements.
  • The addition of a bipolar sealer did not offer an advantage to transfusion requirements in anterior THA.
  • TXA should be used routinely in THA.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 03/25/2019 - 14:30
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 03/25/2019 - 14:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 03/25/2019 - 14:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Hyperpigmentation, paraparesis are signs of vitamin B12 deficiency

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

Vitamin B12 deficiency can cause skin hyperpigmentation and partial paralysis, but these issues can be easily treated early on with vitamin B12 shots, said Ashish Agarwal, MD, and his colleagues at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, India.

A 6-year-old boy, who had been previously healthy, presented with darkening of his hands and feet over a 4-month period. It also was noted that the skin on his palms and soles was thin and shiny. His walking gait had become abnormal in the previous 2 weeks; his legs were stiff when he walked, which caused him to fall and led to difficulty climbing stairs. The boy had no personal or family history of muscle issues or neurological issues. The boy’s personal history revealed that he ate a vegetarian diet.

A clinical diagnosis was made of megaloblastic anemia with subacute degeneration of the cord caused by vitamin B12 deficiency, a diagnosis not uncommon among vegetarians. The boy was started on daily intramuscular injections of B12 for 2 weeks, followed by weekly injections for a month. Monthly injections then were administered for the next 2 months. In the first few weeks, the hyperpigmentation began improving. At his 4-month follow-up, the boy was asymptomatic with reversal of the hyperpigmentation.

Dr. Agarwal and his associates concluded that skin darkening is an important clue toward underlying hematologic and neurologic manifestations of B12 deficiency.

SOURCE: Agarwal A et al. J Pediatr. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.073.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Vitamin B12 deficiency can cause skin hyperpigmentation and partial paralysis, but these issues can be easily treated early on with vitamin B12 shots, said Ashish Agarwal, MD, and his colleagues at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, India.

A 6-year-old boy, who had been previously healthy, presented with darkening of his hands and feet over a 4-month period. It also was noted that the skin on his palms and soles was thin and shiny. His walking gait had become abnormal in the previous 2 weeks; his legs were stiff when he walked, which caused him to fall and led to difficulty climbing stairs. The boy had no personal or family history of muscle issues or neurological issues. The boy’s personal history revealed that he ate a vegetarian diet.

A clinical diagnosis was made of megaloblastic anemia with subacute degeneration of the cord caused by vitamin B12 deficiency, a diagnosis not uncommon among vegetarians. The boy was started on daily intramuscular injections of B12 for 2 weeks, followed by weekly injections for a month. Monthly injections then were administered for the next 2 months. In the first few weeks, the hyperpigmentation began improving. At his 4-month follow-up, the boy was asymptomatic with reversal of the hyperpigmentation.

Dr. Agarwal and his associates concluded that skin darkening is an important clue toward underlying hematologic and neurologic manifestations of B12 deficiency.

SOURCE: Agarwal A et al. J Pediatr. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.073.

 

Vitamin B12 deficiency can cause skin hyperpigmentation and partial paralysis, but these issues can be easily treated early on with vitamin B12 shots, said Ashish Agarwal, MD, and his colleagues at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, India.

A 6-year-old boy, who had been previously healthy, presented with darkening of his hands and feet over a 4-month period. It also was noted that the skin on his palms and soles was thin and shiny. His walking gait had become abnormal in the previous 2 weeks; his legs were stiff when he walked, which caused him to fall and led to difficulty climbing stairs. The boy had no personal or family history of muscle issues or neurological issues. The boy’s personal history revealed that he ate a vegetarian diet.

A clinical diagnosis was made of megaloblastic anemia with subacute degeneration of the cord caused by vitamin B12 deficiency, a diagnosis not uncommon among vegetarians. The boy was started on daily intramuscular injections of B12 for 2 weeks, followed by weekly injections for a month. Monthly injections then were administered for the next 2 months. In the first few weeks, the hyperpigmentation began improving. At his 4-month follow-up, the boy was asymptomatic with reversal of the hyperpigmentation.

Dr. Agarwal and his associates concluded that skin darkening is an important clue toward underlying hematologic and neurologic manifestations of B12 deficiency.

SOURCE: Agarwal A et al. J Pediatr. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.073.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Diet

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

I’m about to embark on a controversial topic. Perhaps it’s safer to avoid, but I can’t put it off any longer. We need to talk about diet.

Discussing diet, like politics, religion, or salary, is best done just with oneself. Yet, I’m compelled to share what I’ve learned. First, I’m agnostic. I don’t believe you need to be vegan or paleo to be saved. I eat plant-based foods. I also eat things that eat plants. I’m sure you’d find a fine film of gluten in my kitchen. What I’ve learned is that for me, it doesn’t matter.

baibaz/iStock/Getty Images
You might approach diet in a strictly pragmatic way: food-as-fuel-to-burn to stay alive and see patients. You might also approach it as an essential component of a happy life, one where food is a core life pleasure and should be savored with others. As a pragmatist and an Italian-American, it is both for me.

The diet that I have found most helpful is one that depends upon the day of the week. Mondays through Thursdays, I fast. Specifically, I have little or nothing to eat from when I wake until dinner. As a busy dermatologist, that may seem draconian, but in fact it is easier than you might think. Patients are a constant all day, while hunger is fleeting. Got a craving at 10:15 a.m.? Easy. Walk in to see the next patient. Then repeat. Most days, this continues until 6:30 p.m. or so, when it’s time to head home. It’s not that hard, particularly when you don’t have anything in your office to eat except Dentyne Ice gum and green tea.

Now, this doesn’t always work. Why? Meetings. How do I manage fasting on those days? I don’t. If I know I have a lunch meeting scheduled, then I eat a healthy breakfast before I leave home, such as a protein smoothie or a bowl of hot oats with a dollop of Greek yogurt, sunflower seeds, walnuts, and berries. By eating a wholesome, well-balanced meal of fiber, carbs, lean protein, and good fats, I’m not starving before the meeting and am less likely to overeat. (That’s because I have also learned I’m not one of those enviable people who can simply say “no” to a crispy fish taco and guacamole if I’m hungry. I’m gonna eat it.) So, I avoid fasting and the inevitable frustration of breaking a fast on those days.

On days when I fast, I monitor how I feel. Fortunately, I have rarely felt hypoglycemic; except for that one Tuesday a couple of months ago. I had completed a long, hard early morning workout, and by mid-morning my hands were shaking and I felt nauseous. I quickly downed two RX bars and felt fine within minutes. Better for me, better for my patients.

Right now, intermittent fasting is working for me. Here’s my weekly plan:

 

 

Dr. Jeffrey Benabio
Mondays through Thursdays I fast. I have coffee with plant-based milk in the morning and don’t eat anything else until dinner. On those days, dinner is usually salad with a protein, most often fish, that is approximately 500 calories. Sometimes we have pasta or a curry, but they’re made from scratch with seasonal, whole foods. I avoid eating dinner after 8 p.m. as it tends to disrupt my sleep.

I don’t fast on Fridays or weekends or when I travel. I eat out rarely. On weekends, my wife and I shop at the local farmers’ and fish markets to prepare ourselves for a week of healthy eating. And on Sundays, we continue our treasured family tradition of Sunday supper, which is basted with nostalgia and drizzled liberally with comfort. Often it requires long preparation, which is part of the appeal, and short attention is paid to its nutritional value. That’s not the point of Sunday dinner. A delicious dunk of fresh Italian bread in grassy-green olive oil or fresh pasta doused with homemade tomato basil sauce is the best possible meal I can have to prepare for a long, hard week ahead.
 

Dr. Benabio is director of Healthcare Transformation and chief of dermatology at Kaiser Permanente San Diego. The opinions expressed in this column are his own and do not represent those of Kaiser Permanente. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at dermnews@mdedge.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

I’m about to embark on a controversial topic. Perhaps it’s safer to avoid, but I can’t put it off any longer. We need to talk about diet.

Discussing diet, like politics, religion, or salary, is best done just with oneself. Yet, I’m compelled to share what I’ve learned. First, I’m agnostic. I don’t believe you need to be vegan or paleo to be saved. I eat plant-based foods. I also eat things that eat plants. I’m sure you’d find a fine film of gluten in my kitchen. What I’ve learned is that for me, it doesn’t matter.

baibaz/iStock/Getty Images
You might approach diet in a strictly pragmatic way: food-as-fuel-to-burn to stay alive and see patients. You might also approach it as an essential component of a happy life, one where food is a core life pleasure and should be savored with others. As a pragmatist and an Italian-American, it is both for me.

The diet that I have found most helpful is one that depends upon the day of the week. Mondays through Thursdays, I fast. Specifically, I have little or nothing to eat from when I wake until dinner. As a busy dermatologist, that may seem draconian, but in fact it is easier than you might think. Patients are a constant all day, while hunger is fleeting. Got a craving at 10:15 a.m.? Easy. Walk in to see the next patient. Then repeat. Most days, this continues until 6:30 p.m. or so, when it’s time to head home. It’s not that hard, particularly when you don’t have anything in your office to eat except Dentyne Ice gum and green tea.

Now, this doesn’t always work. Why? Meetings. How do I manage fasting on those days? I don’t. If I know I have a lunch meeting scheduled, then I eat a healthy breakfast before I leave home, such as a protein smoothie or a bowl of hot oats with a dollop of Greek yogurt, sunflower seeds, walnuts, and berries. By eating a wholesome, well-balanced meal of fiber, carbs, lean protein, and good fats, I’m not starving before the meeting and am less likely to overeat. (That’s because I have also learned I’m not one of those enviable people who can simply say “no” to a crispy fish taco and guacamole if I’m hungry. I’m gonna eat it.) So, I avoid fasting and the inevitable frustration of breaking a fast on those days.

On days when I fast, I monitor how I feel. Fortunately, I have rarely felt hypoglycemic; except for that one Tuesday a couple of months ago. I had completed a long, hard early morning workout, and by mid-morning my hands were shaking and I felt nauseous. I quickly downed two RX bars and felt fine within minutes. Better for me, better for my patients.

Right now, intermittent fasting is working for me. Here’s my weekly plan:

 

 

Dr. Jeffrey Benabio
Mondays through Thursdays I fast. I have coffee with plant-based milk in the morning and don’t eat anything else until dinner. On those days, dinner is usually salad with a protein, most often fish, that is approximately 500 calories. Sometimes we have pasta or a curry, but they’re made from scratch with seasonal, whole foods. I avoid eating dinner after 8 p.m. as it tends to disrupt my sleep.

I don’t fast on Fridays or weekends or when I travel. I eat out rarely. On weekends, my wife and I shop at the local farmers’ and fish markets to prepare ourselves for a week of healthy eating. And on Sundays, we continue our treasured family tradition of Sunday supper, which is basted with nostalgia and drizzled liberally with comfort. Often it requires long preparation, which is part of the appeal, and short attention is paid to its nutritional value. That’s not the point of Sunday dinner. A delicious dunk of fresh Italian bread in grassy-green olive oil or fresh pasta doused with homemade tomato basil sauce is the best possible meal I can have to prepare for a long, hard week ahead.
 

Dr. Benabio is director of Healthcare Transformation and chief of dermatology at Kaiser Permanente San Diego. The opinions expressed in this column are his own and do not represent those of Kaiser Permanente. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at dermnews@mdedge.com.

 

I’m about to embark on a controversial topic. Perhaps it’s safer to avoid, but I can’t put it off any longer. We need to talk about diet.

Discussing diet, like politics, religion, or salary, is best done just with oneself. Yet, I’m compelled to share what I’ve learned. First, I’m agnostic. I don’t believe you need to be vegan or paleo to be saved. I eat plant-based foods. I also eat things that eat plants. I’m sure you’d find a fine film of gluten in my kitchen. What I’ve learned is that for me, it doesn’t matter.

baibaz/iStock/Getty Images
You might approach diet in a strictly pragmatic way: food-as-fuel-to-burn to stay alive and see patients. You might also approach it as an essential component of a happy life, one where food is a core life pleasure and should be savored with others. As a pragmatist and an Italian-American, it is both for me.

The diet that I have found most helpful is one that depends upon the day of the week. Mondays through Thursdays, I fast. Specifically, I have little or nothing to eat from when I wake until dinner. As a busy dermatologist, that may seem draconian, but in fact it is easier than you might think. Patients are a constant all day, while hunger is fleeting. Got a craving at 10:15 a.m.? Easy. Walk in to see the next patient. Then repeat. Most days, this continues until 6:30 p.m. or so, when it’s time to head home. It’s not that hard, particularly when you don’t have anything in your office to eat except Dentyne Ice gum and green tea.

Now, this doesn’t always work. Why? Meetings. How do I manage fasting on those days? I don’t. If I know I have a lunch meeting scheduled, then I eat a healthy breakfast before I leave home, such as a protein smoothie or a bowl of hot oats with a dollop of Greek yogurt, sunflower seeds, walnuts, and berries. By eating a wholesome, well-balanced meal of fiber, carbs, lean protein, and good fats, I’m not starving before the meeting and am less likely to overeat. (That’s because I have also learned I’m not one of those enviable people who can simply say “no” to a crispy fish taco and guacamole if I’m hungry. I’m gonna eat it.) So, I avoid fasting and the inevitable frustration of breaking a fast on those days.

On days when I fast, I monitor how I feel. Fortunately, I have rarely felt hypoglycemic; except for that one Tuesday a couple of months ago. I had completed a long, hard early morning workout, and by mid-morning my hands were shaking and I felt nauseous. I quickly downed two RX bars and felt fine within minutes. Better for me, better for my patients.

Right now, intermittent fasting is working for me. Here’s my weekly plan:

 

 

Dr. Jeffrey Benabio
Mondays through Thursdays I fast. I have coffee with plant-based milk in the morning and don’t eat anything else until dinner. On those days, dinner is usually salad with a protein, most often fish, that is approximately 500 calories. Sometimes we have pasta or a curry, but they’re made from scratch with seasonal, whole foods. I avoid eating dinner after 8 p.m. as it tends to disrupt my sleep.

I don’t fast on Fridays or weekends or when I travel. I eat out rarely. On weekends, my wife and I shop at the local farmers’ and fish markets to prepare ourselves for a week of healthy eating. And on Sundays, we continue our treasured family tradition of Sunday supper, which is basted with nostalgia and drizzled liberally with comfort. Often it requires long preparation, which is part of the appeal, and short attention is paid to its nutritional value. That’s not the point of Sunday dinner. A delicious dunk of fresh Italian bread in grassy-green olive oil or fresh pasta doused with homemade tomato basil sauce is the best possible meal I can have to prepare for a long, hard week ahead.
 

Dr. Benabio is director of Healthcare Transformation and chief of dermatology at Kaiser Permanente San Diego. The opinions expressed in this column are his own and do not represent those of Kaiser Permanente. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at dermnews@mdedge.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA approves epoetin alfa biosimilar to treat anemia

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit) as the first biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit), a treatment for anemia brought on by chronic kidney disease, chemotherapy, or use of zidovudine.

The biosimilar product is also approved to reduce the chance of red blood cell transfusion before and after surgery.

FDA’s approval, issued on May 15, is based on review of structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other safety and effectiveness information showing that the epoetin alfa-epbx is biosimilar to the reference product epoetin alfa. By approving epoetin alfa-epbx as a biosimilar, the FDA is saying that there are “no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency” from epoetin alfa.

The agency’s approval comes almost a year after the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 14-1 to support approval of the biosimilar. The FDA had rejected the application in 2017, citing manufacturing issues at a facility in Kansas, before ultimately approving the product in 2018.

The biosimilar product must be dispensed with a patient Medication Guide with information about uses and risks and carries a boxed warning about an increased risk of death, heart problems, stroke, and tumor growth or recurrence.

The biosimilar product is marketed by Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit) as the first biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit), a treatment for anemia brought on by chronic kidney disease, chemotherapy, or use of zidovudine.

The biosimilar product is also approved to reduce the chance of red blood cell transfusion before and after surgery.

FDA’s approval, issued on May 15, is based on review of structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other safety and effectiveness information showing that the epoetin alfa-epbx is biosimilar to the reference product epoetin alfa. By approving epoetin alfa-epbx as a biosimilar, the FDA is saying that there are “no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency” from epoetin alfa.

The agency’s approval comes almost a year after the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 14-1 to support approval of the biosimilar. The FDA had rejected the application in 2017, citing manufacturing issues at a facility in Kansas, before ultimately approving the product in 2018.

The biosimilar product must be dispensed with a patient Medication Guide with information about uses and risks and carries a boxed warning about an increased risk of death, heart problems, stroke, and tumor growth or recurrence.

The biosimilar product is marketed by Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit) as the first biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit), a treatment for anemia brought on by chronic kidney disease, chemotherapy, or use of zidovudine.

The biosimilar product is also approved to reduce the chance of red blood cell transfusion before and after surgery.

FDA’s approval, issued on May 15, is based on review of structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other safety and effectiveness information showing that the epoetin alfa-epbx is biosimilar to the reference product epoetin alfa. By approving epoetin alfa-epbx as a biosimilar, the FDA is saying that there are “no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency” from epoetin alfa.

The agency’s approval comes almost a year after the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 14-1 to support approval of the biosimilar. The FDA had rejected the application in 2017, citing manufacturing issues at a facility in Kansas, before ultimately approving the product in 2018.

The biosimilar product must be dispensed with a patient Medication Guide with information about uses and risks and carries a boxed warning about an increased risk of death, heart problems, stroke, and tumor growth or recurrence.

The biosimilar product is marketed by Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Babies exposed to SSRIs in utero have decreased LV size

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

In utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure is associated with decreased left ventricular size at birth, according to a small study presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

“Given the frequency of SSRI use during pregnancy and continued conflicting results regarding cardiac effects, it is an important area of study,” senior author Sarah Haskell, DO, said in an interview. Her group at the University of Iowa in Coralville, which includes first author Deidra Ansah, MD, previously demonstrated reduced ventricular size and cardiac function in sertraline-exposed animal models.

Dr. Sarah Haskell
Depression affects between 14% and 20% of pregnancies, and 10%-13% of pregnant women in the United States take SSRIs during pregnancy, making their impact on offspring development a hot topic. SSRIs are the most commonly prescribed therapy for depression.

Compared with unexposed newborns, SSRI-exposed infants had a 16% reduction in right ventricular (RV) diameter in diastole (P = .02) and a 22% reduction in left ventricular (LV) volume in systole (P = .02). They also had decreased LV lengths in diastole and systole (P = .045 and .004, respectively), but no impact was noted on cardiac function, as measured by shortening fraction.

“While cardiac function was appropriate on the initial echocardiogram, there were significant differences in cardiac dimensions,” said Dr. Haskell. “Whether these differences influence health and disease susceptibility requires further, longer-term studies.”

Her group plans to continue investigating the effects of SSRIs on cardiac development and also plans to study the offspring of women who are depressed but not on pharmacologic treatment to determine the effects of depression alone on cardiac size and function.

Dr. Haskell and her colleagues studied 21 term infants without and 20 term infants with exposure to in utero SSRIs who underwent standard echocardiograms including four-chamber and M-mode views within 48 hours of life. Exclusion criteria included prematurity, large or small for gestational age, any respiratory or cardiac support, and any major congenital malformations.

 

 


The mothers of exposed infants had higher depression scores compared with controls (P = .004), and had minimal to mild depression. Otherwise, they were similar in terms of age, weight, and likelihood of having chronic or gestational hypertension or diabetes. There also were no differences in maternal conditions or infant birth weight, body surface area or gestational age.

In the infants, no differences were seen in the occurrence of patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, or peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis.

This research was supported by the Department of Pediatric K12 Child Health Research Career Development Award, the Stead Family Department of Pediatrics at the University of Iowa, an NIH T32 grant, and the Children’s Miracle Network. The authors reported no financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

In utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure is associated with decreased left ventricular size at birth, according to a small study presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

“Given the frequency of SSRI use during pregnancy and continued conflicting results regarding cardiac effects, it is an important area of study,” senior author Sarah Haskell, DO, said in an interview. Her group at the University of Iowa in Coralville, which includes first author Deidra Ansah, MD, previously demonstrated reduced ventricular size and cardiac function in sertraline-exposed animal models.

Dr. Sarah Haskell
Depression affects between 14% and 20% of pregnancies, and 10%-13% of pregnant women in the United States take SSRIs during pregnancy, making their impact on offspring development a hot topic. SSRIs are the most commonly prescribed therapy for depression.

Compared with unexposed newborns, SSRI-exposed infants had a 16% reduction in right ventricular (RV) diameter in diastole (P = .02) and a 22% reduction in left ventricular (LV) volume in systole (P = .02). They also had decreased LV lengths in diastole and systole (P = .045 and .004, respectively), but no impact was noted on cardiac function, as measured by shortening fraction.

“While cardiac function was appropriate on the initial echocardiogram, there were significant differences in cardiac dimensions,” said Dr. Haskell. “Whether these differences influence health and disease susceptibility requires further, longer-term studies.”

Her group plans to continue investigating the effects of SSRIs on cardiac development and also plans to study the offspring of women who are depressed but not on pharmacologic treatment to determine the effects of depression alone on cardiac size and function.

Dr. Haskell and her colleagues studied 21 term infants without and 20 term infants with exposure to in utero SSRIs who underwent standard echocardiograms including four-chamber and M-mode views within 48 hours of life. Exclusion criteria included prematurity, large or small for gestational age, any respiratory or cardiac support, and any major congenital malformations.

 

 


The mothers of exposed infants had higher depression scores compared with controls (P = .004), and had minimal to mild depression. Otherwise, they were similar in terms of age, weight, and likelihood of having chronic or gestational hypertension or diabetes. There also were no differences in maternal conditions or infant birth weight, body surface area or gestational age.

In the infants, no differences were seen in the occurrence of patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, or peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis.

This research was supported by the Department of Pediatric K12 Child Health Research Career Development Award, the Stead Family Department of Pediatrics at the University of Iowa, an NIH T32 grant, and the Children’s Miracle Network. The authors reported no financial disclosures.

 

In utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure is associated with decreased left ventricular size at birth, according to a small study presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

“Given the frequency of SSRI use during pregnancy and continued conflicting results regarding cardiac effects, it is an important area of study,” senior author Sarah Haskell, DO, said in an interview. Her group at the University of Iowa in Coralville, which includes first author Deidra Ansah, MD, previously demonstrated reduced ventricular size and cardiac function in sertraline-exposed animal models.

Dr. Sarah Haskell
Depression affects between 14% and 20% of pregnancies, and 10%-13% of pregnant women in the United States take SSRIs during pregnancy, making their impact on offspring development a hot topic. SSRIs are the most commonly prescribed therapy for depression.

Compared with unexposed newborns, SSRI-exposed infants had a 16% reduction in right ventricular (RV) diameter in diastole (P = .02) and a 22% reduction in left ventricular (LV) volume in systole (P = .02). They also had decreased LV lengths in diastole and systole (P = .045 and .004, respectively), but no impact was noted on cardiac function, as measured by shortening fraction.

“While cardiac function was appropriate on the initial echocardiogram, there were significant differences in cardiac dimensions,” said Dr. Haskell. “Whether these differences influence health and disease susceptibility requires further, longer-term studies.”

Her group plans to continue investigating the effects of SSRIs on cardiac development and also plans to study the offspring of women who are depressed but not on pharmacologic treatment to determine the effects of depression alone on cardiac size and function.

Dr. Haskell and her colleagues studied 21 term infants without and 20 term infants with exposure to in utero SSRIs who underwent standard echocardiograms including four-chamber and M-mode views within 48 hours of life. Exclusion criteria included prematurity, large or small for gestational age, any respiratory or cardiac support, and any major congenital malformations.

 

 


The mothers of exposed infants had higher depression scores compared with controls (P = .004), and had minimal to mild depression. Otherwise, they were similar in terms of age, weight, and likelihood of having chronic or gestational hypertension or diabetes. There also were no differences in maternal conditions or infant birth weight, body surface area or gestational age.

In the infants, no differences were seen in the occurrence of patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, or peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis.

This research was supported by the Department of Pediatric K12 Child Health Research Career Development Award, the Stead Family Department of Pediatrics at the University of Iowa, an NIH T32 grant, and the Children’s Miracle Network. The authors reported no financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT PAS 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Babies exposed to SSRIs in utero have smaller hearts compared with babies not exposed to SSRIs.

Major finding: Compared with unexposed newborns, SSRI-exposed infants had a 16% reduction in right ventricular diameter in diastole (P = .02) and a 22% reduction in left ventricular volume in systole (P = .02).

Study details: A study of 20 babies exposed to SSRIs in utero and 21 not exposed.

Disclosures: This research was supported by the Department of Pediatric K12 Child Health Research Career Development Award, the Stead Family Department of Pediatrics at the University of Iowa, an NIH T32 grant, and the Children’s Miracle Network. The authors reported no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Surgery may be best option for hip impingement syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 03/13/2019 - 14:09

 

– Hip arthroscopic surgery produced better long-term results than did personalized hip physiotherapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in a randomized trial conduced across multiple U.K. centers.

At 12 months, respective International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were 58.8 and 49.7, a difference of 9.1 points before and 6.8 points after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P = .0093).

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Nadine Foster
“This difference was clinically important,” study investigator Nadine Foster, DPhil, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. The iHOT-33 is a patient-reported outcome measure that rates quality of life on a 0-100 scale, with 0 indicating no impairment and 100 the worst impairment. A difference of 6.1 is considered clinically significant.

“This trial shows that hip arthroscopic surgery and personalized hip therapy both improved hip-related quality of life for patients with FAI [femoroacetabular impingement] syndrome, but that the surgery did indeed produce a greater improvement at our primary time point of 12 months,” she added. Dr. Foster is professor of musculoskeletal health in primary care at Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, England, one of the 23 centers involved in the FASHIoN study in England, Wales, and Scotland.

“FAI is a very common cause of hip and groin pain in young adults, and it’s associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis,” Dr. Foster noted.

There are three types of FAI – pincer, cam, and combined. The pincer type of FAI is where there is “prominence or overcoverage of the rim of the acetabulum,” and the cam type is where there is a “bony prominence of the femoral head-neck junction,” she explained at the meeting sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The link to OA comes when the femur and acetabulum prematurely connect, usually during activity, causing damage to the labrum and articular cartilage in the long term. Thus, treating FAI is important, not just for relieving patient’s pain and joint stiffness.

 

 


Hip arthroscopic surgery has become an established way of treating FAI syndrome – more than 2,400 operations were performed in 2013 in the United Kingdom alone, Dr. Foster observed. The aim of surgery is to try to reshape the hip joint to prevent impingement, and resect, repair, or reconstruct any intra-articular damage that may be present.

“Physiotherapy aims to improve hip muscle control and strength, and to correct the abnormal movement patterns that we see in these patients,” Dr. Foster said. “Through that, we hope to prevent the premature contact that occurs in FAI syndrome and thereby improve symptoms, allowing patients to return to activities and prevent recurrence.”

Working with physiotherapists, physicians, and surgeons, Dr. Foster and her associates have previously developed a “best conservative care” intervention that they call personalized hip therapy (PHT), which involves the delivery and supervision of an individualized exercise program by experienced physiotherapists over a 3- to 6-month period, and which patients repeat at home (PM R. 2013 May;5[5]:418-26).

The aim of the UK FASHIoN trial was to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hip arthroscopy and PHT for FAI syndrome, as there was no robust clinical trial evidence to demonstrate a benefit of one over the other.

 

 


A total of 351 adults with hip and groin pain were randomized to either arthroscopic surgery (n = 173) or PHT (n = 178). The mean age of participants was 35 years, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of baseline demographics or type or duration of hip impingement.

While surgery was better in terms of patient outcomes, the study didn’t demonstrate its cost-effectiveness within the first 12 months, Dr. Foster observed. Cost-effectiveness, together with various other quality-of-life measurements, was a secondary endpoint of the study.

“Longer-term outcomes are required to establish whether improvement is sustained, and whether surgery is cost-effective at the longer time points for our health service,” she said.

Responding to a question about whether any of the patients in the study had radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis, Dr. Foster said that such patients had been excluded from the study.

 

 


“One of the hopes of the trial’s team is that, with the long-term follow-up, we might be able to get data at 5 and 10 years on things like hip osteoarthritis in these patients,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. Foster had no financial relationships or commercial interests to disclose.

SOURCE: Griffin DR et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S24-25. Abstract 28

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Hip arthroscopic surgery produced better long-term results than did personalized hip physiotherapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in a randomized trial conduced across multiple U.K. centers.

At 12 months, respective International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were 58.8 and 49.7, a difference of 9.1 points before and 6.8 points after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P = .0093).

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Nadine Foster
“This difference was clinically important,” study investigator Nadine Foster, DPhil, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. The iHOT-33 is a patient-reported outcome measure that rates quality of life on a 0-100 scale, with 0 indicating no impairment and 100 the worst impairment. A difference of 6.1 is considered clinically significant.

“This trial shows that hip arthroscopic surgery and personalized hip therapy both improved hip-related quality of life for patients with FAI [femoroacetabular impingement] syndrome, but that the surgery did indeed produce a greater improvement at our primary time point of 12 months,” she added. Dr. Foster is professor of musculoskeletal health in primary care at Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, England, one of the 23 centers involved in the FASHIoN study in England, Wales, and Scotland.

“FAI is a very common cause of hip and groin pain in young adults, and it’s associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis,” Dr. Foster noted.

There are three types of FAI – pincer, cam, and combined. The pincer type of FAI is where there is “prominence or overcoverage of the rim of the acetabulum,” and the cam type is where there is a “bony prominence of the femoral head-neck junction,” she explained at the meeting sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The link to OA comes when the femur and acetabulum prematurely connect, usually during activity, causing damage to the labrum and articular cartilage in the long term. Thus, treating FAI is important, not just for relieving patient’s pain and joint stiffness.

 

 


Hip arthroscopic surgery has become an established way of treating FAI syndrome – more than 2,400 operations were performed in 2013 in the United Kingdom alone, Dr. Foster observed. The aim of surgery is to try to reshape the hip joint to prevent impingement, and resect, repair, or reconstruct any intra-articular damage that may be present.

“Physiotherapy aims to improve hip muscle control and strength, and to correct the abnormal movement patterns that we see in these patients,” Dr. Foster said. “Through that, we hope to prevent the premature contact that occurs in FAI syndrome and thereby improve symptoms, allowing patients to return to activities and prevent recurrence.”

Working with physiotherapists, physicians, and surgeons, Dr. Foster and her associates have previously developed a “best conservative care” intervention that they call personalized hip therapy (PHT), which involves the delivery and supervision of an individualized exercise program by experienced physiotherapists over a 3- to 6-month period, and which patients repeat at home (PM R. 2013 May;5[5]:418-26).

The aim of the UK FASHIoN trial was to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hip arthroscopy and PHT for FAI syndrome, as there was no robust clinical trial evidence to demonstrate a benefit of one over the other.

 

 


A total of 351 adults with hip and groin pain were randomized to either arthroscopic surgery (n = 173) or PHT (n = 178). The mean age of participants was 35 years, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of baseline demographics or type or duration of hip impingement.

While surgery was better in terms of patient outcomes, the study didn’t demonstrate its cost-effectiveness within the first 12 months, Dr. Foster observed. Cost-effectiveness, together with various other quality-of-life measurements, was a secondary endpoint of the study.

“Longer-term outcomes are required to establish whether improvement is sustained, and whether surgery is cost-effective at the longer time points for our health service,” she said.

Responding to a question about whether any of the patients in the study had radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis, Dr. Foster said that such patients had been excluded from the study.

 

 


“One of the hopes of the trial’s team is that, with the long-term follow-up, we might be able to get data at 5 and 10 years on things like hip osteoarthritis in these patients,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. Foster had no financial relationships or commercial interests to disclose.

SOURCE: Griffin DR et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S24-25. Abstract 28

 

– Hip arthroscopic surgery produced better long-term results than did personalized hip physiotherapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in a randomized trial conduced across multiple U.K. centers.

At 12 months, respective International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were 58.8 and 49.7, a difference of 9.1 points before and 6.8 points after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P = .0093).

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Nadine Foster
“This difference was clinically important,” study investigator Nadine Foster, DPhil, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. The iHOT-33 is a patient-reported outcome measure that rates quality of life on a 0-100 scale, with 0 indicating no impairment and 100 the worst impairment. A difference of 6.1 is considered clinically significant.

“This trial shows that hip arthroscopic surgery and personalized hip therapy both improved hip-related quality of life for patients with FAI [femoroacetabular impingement] syndrome, but that the surgery did indeed produce a greater improvement at our primary time point of 12 months,” she added. Dr. Foster is professor of musculoskeletal health in primary care at Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, England, one of the 23 centers involved in the FASHIoN study in England, Wales, and Scotland.

“FAI is a very common cause of hip and groin pain in young adults, and it’s associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis,” Dr. Foster noted.

There are three types of FAI – pincer, cam, and combined. The pincer type of FAI is where there is “prominence or overcoverage of the rim of the acetabulum,” and the cam type is where there is a “bony prominence of the femoral head-neck junction,” she explained at the meeting sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The link to OA comes when the femur and acetabulum prematurely connect, usually during activity, causing damage to the labrum and articular cartilage in the long term. Thus, treating FAI is important, not just for relieving patient’s pain and joint stiffness.

 

 


Hip arthroscopic surgery has become an established way of treating FAI syndrome – more than 2,400 operations were performed in 2013 in the United Kingdom alone, Dr. Foster observed. The aim of surgery is to try to reshape the hip joint to prevent impingement, and resect, repair, or reconstruct any intra-articular damage that may be present.

“Physiotherapy aims to improve hip muscle control and strength, and to correct the abnormal movement patterns that we see in these patients,” Dr. Foster said. “Through that, we hope to prevent the premature contact that occurs in FAI syndrome and thereby improve symptoms, allowing patients to return to activities and prevent recurrence.”

Working with physiotherapists, physicians, and surgeons, Dr. Foster and her associates have previously developed a “best conservative care” intervention that they call personalized hip therapy (PHT), which involves the delivery and supervision of an individualized exercise program by experienced physiotherapists over a 3- to 6-month period, and which patients repeat at home (PM R. 2013 May;5[5]:418-26).

The aim of the UK FASHIoN trial was to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hip arthroscopy and PHT for FAI syndrome, as there was no robust clinical trial evidence to demonstrate a benefit of one over the other.

 

 


A total of 351 adults with hip and groin pain were randomized to either arthroscopic surgery (n = 173) or PHT (n = 178). The mean age of participants was 35 years, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of baseline demographics or type or duration of hip impingement.

While surgery was better in terms of patient outcomes, the study didn’t demonstrate its cost-effectiveness within the first 12 months, Dr. Foster observed. Cost-effectiveness, together with various other quality-of-life measurements, was a secondary endpoint of the study.

“Longer-term outcomes are required to establish whether improvement is sustained, and whether surgery is cost-effective at the longer time points for our health service,” she said.

Responding to a question about whether any of the patients in the study had radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis, Dr. Foster said that such patients had been excluded from the study.

 

 


“One of the hopes of the trial’s team is that, with the long-term follow-up, we might be able to get data at 5 and 10 years on things like hip osteoarthritis in these patients,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. Foster had no financial relationships or commercial interests to disclose.

SOURCE: Griffin DR et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S24-25. Abstract 28

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM OARSI 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Hip arthroscopy produced better results at 12 months than did the best conservative care.

Major finding: iHOT-33 scores at 12 months were 58.3 for surgery and 49.7 for personalized hip therapy (P = .0093)

Study details: Multicenter, randomized controlled UK FASHIoN trial of 351 adults with hip and groin pain.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. Foster had nothing to disclose.

Source: Griffin DR et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S24-25. Abstract 28.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Original research expands at AACE 2018

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:19

 

A growing focus of the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists is on clinical research.

This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.

mjbs2/Thinkstock
Boston
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.

Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.

That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.

Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

A growing focus of the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists is on clinical research.

This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.

mjbs2/Thinkstock
Boston
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.

Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.

That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.

Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
 

 

A growing focus of the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists is on clinical research.

This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.

mjbs2/Thinkstock
Boston
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.

Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.

That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.

Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM AACE 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 04/26/2019 - 11:30
Display Headline
Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting

ABSTRACT

Diaphyseal fractures of the distal humerus have a high rate of union when treated with a functional brace or an above-elbow cast (AEC). This study compares alignment of the humerus and motion of the elbow after functional brace or AEC treatment.

One-hundred and five consecutive patients with a closed, extra-articular fracture of the distal humeral diaphysis were identified in the orthopedic trauma databases of 3 hospitals between 2003 and 2012. Seventy-five patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months or with radiographic and clinical evidence of fracture union were included (51 treated with functional bracing and 24 treated with an AEC).

All of the fractures healed. The average arc of elbow flexion was 130° ± 9° in braced patients vs 127° ± 12° in casted patients. Four patients (8%) in the bracing group and 4 (17%) in the casting group lost >20° of elbow motion. The average varus angulation on radiographs was 17° ± 8° in braced and 13° ± 8° in casted patients, while the average posterior angulation was 9° ± 6° vs 7° ± 7°, respectively.

Closed extra-articular distal diaphyseal humerus fractures heal with both bracing and casting and there are no differences in average elbow motion or radiographic alignment.

Nonoperative treatment of closed fractures of the humeral shaft (AO/OTA [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association] type 12) with a functional brace or above-elbow cast (AEC) is associated with a high union rate, good motion, and good function. Advocates of casting believe that a brace cannot control fracture alignment as well as a cast that allows for immobilization and molding. Advocates of brace treatment are concerned that immobilization in a cast will cause elbow stiffness.1-11

Continue to: In our differing institutions...

 

 

In our differing institutions, there are advocates of each type of treatment, providing the opportunity for a comparison. This retrospective study compares brace and cast treatment. The working hypothesis was that there is no difference in elbow motion 6 months or more after fracture. We also compared radiographic alignment after union.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2012, consecutive adult patients treated for a nonpathological fracture of the diaphysis of the distal humerus at the orthopedic trauma service of 3 level 1 academic trauma centers were identified from prospectively collected trauma injury databases. Patients with vascular injury, ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded. The attending orthopedic surgeon chose the treatment method and evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow and radiographic union at the final ambulatory visit. We included patients followed to clinical and radiographic union with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. We also included patients with <6 months’ follow-up who demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm.

We identified 105 consecutive adult patients with a closed nonpathological extra-articular distal humeral shaft fracture (fracture of the distal humeral shaft with an AO/OTA type-12.A, 12.B, or 12.C pattern) treated with an AEC or a brace in our databases.12 Two patients in the brace group chose surgery to improve alignment within 3 weeks of injury and were excluded from the analysis. Twenty-eight patients had inadequate follow-up.

A total of 75 patients were included in the study. At the first and second institutions, 51 patients were treated with functional bracing with an average follow-up of 7 months. At the third institution, 24 patients were treated with an AEC with an average follow-up of 4 months. Seventeen out of 24 patients in the long arm casting group and 19 out of 51 patients in the bracing group, who were included since they had <6 months of follow-up, demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm. Differing methods of closed immobilization were the result of differing treatment algorithms at each institution.

The patients who were treated with a functional brace averaged 34 years of age (range, 18-90 years) and included 27 men and 24 women. The brace was removed at an average of 11.5 weeks (range, 8-18 weeks) after initial injury. Six patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, all of which fully recovered within an average of 4 months (range, 0.5-7 months). Sixteen patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 2 due to a fall from a greater height than standing, 16 in a motor-vehicle accident, 15 during a sport activity, and 2 were not specifically documented.

Continue to: Four patients had concomitant...

 

 

Four patients had concomitant injuries: one patient had a mid-shaft humeral fracture on the contralateral arm; a second had an ankle fracture; a third had an ankle fracture, acetabular fracture, a rib fracture, and pneumothorax; and the fourth had 2 rib fractures.

The patients who were treated with an AEC had an average age of 32 years (range,18-82 years) and included 14 men and 10 women. The cast was removed at an average of 4.2 weeks (range, 3-7 weeks) after the initial injury. Two patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, both of which fully recovered. Five patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 1 due to a fall from a height greater than standing, 7 during a motor-vehicle accident, 5 during a sport activity, and 6 were not documented. Two patients sustained concomitant injuries: one patient sustained a tibia-fibula fracture, and another patient sustained facial trauma.

The 2 groups were comparable in age and gender, as well as the injury mechanism (Table).

Table. Patient Demographics and Outcome Data

 

Functional Bracing (n = 51)

Long Arm Casting (n = 24)

Significance

(P < .05)

Sex

 

 

 

     Male

27 (54%)

14 (58%)

 

     Female

24 (46%)

10 (42%)

 

Average age (y)

34 (range, 18-90)

32 (range, 18-82)

 

Mechanism of injury

 

 

 

     Standing height

16 (31%)

5 (20%)

 

     Greater height

2 (4%)

1 (4%)

 

     Motor vehicle collision

16 (31%)

7 (29%)

 

     Sports activity

15 (29 %)

5 (21%)

 

     Other

2 (4%)

6 (25%)

 

Follow-up (months)

7 (range, 2-25)

4 (range, 2-15)

 

Elbow range of motion (degrees)

130 ± 9.4

127 ± 11.9

P = .26

Varus/valgus angulation (degrees)

17 ± 7.8 varus

13 ± 8.4 varus

P = .11

Anterior/posterior angulation (degrees)

9 ± 6.2 posterior

7 ± 7.5 posterior

P = .54

FUNCTIONAL BRACING TECHNIQUE

Upon presentation after injury, patients were immobilized in a coaptation splint (Figure 1A). Within 10 days, the arm was placed in a pre-manufactured polyethylene functional brace (Corflex) and the arm was supported with a simple sling. Patients were allowed to use the hand for light tasks and move the elbow, but most patients were not capable of active elbow flexion exercises until early healing was established 4 to 6 weeks after injury. Shoulder motion was discouraged until radiographic union. Patients started active, self-assisted elbow and shoulder stretching exercises, and weaned from the brace once radiographic union was confirmed between 6 and 10 weeks after injury (Figures 1B, 1C).

ABOVE-ELBOW CASE

Patients were also initially immobilized in a coaptation splint upon initial presentation. Within 7 days, an above-elbow fiberglass cast with neutral forearm rotation and 90° of elbow flexion was applied with a supracondylar mold, followed by radiographic imaging (Figure 2A). With the fractured arm dependent, a valgus mold was applied as the material hardened in order to align the fracture site and limit varus angulation.

Continue to: There were no shoulder...

 

 

There were no shoulder ROM restrictions. Casts were removed, skin checked, and replaced every week for 4 to 6 weeks. Casts were removed when callus was noted on radiographs. After cast removal, physician-taught active and active-assisted elbow stretching exercises were given to patients to be performed on a daily basis at home. Patients were followed until clinical and radiographic union and elbow ROM to within 10° of the injured arm (Figures 2B, 2C).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Alignment of the humerus (including varus-valgus alignment and apex anterior-posterior alignment) was measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as the angle between lines bisecting the humeral diaphysis proximal and distal to the fracture. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To statistically compare continuous variables with a normal distribution, t-tests were used; otherwise the Wilcoxon t-test was applied. The Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to statistically compare dichotomous variables, except when expected cell frequency was <5, in which case the Fisher exact test was used. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

RANGE OF MOTION AND RADIOGRAPHIC ALIGNMENT

The average range of elbow motion was 130° ± 9° after brace treatment and 127° ± 12° after cast treatment (P = .26). Four patients (8%) treated with a brace and 3 (12%) treated with a cast lost >20° of elbow motion.

All the fractures healed. The average varus angulation on the anteroposterior radiograph was 17° (range, 2°-26°) in braced patients and 13 (range, 5°-31°) in casted patients (P = .11). The average posterior angulation on the lateral radiograph was 9° (range, 0°-28°) in braced patients vs 7° (range, 2°-33°) in casted patients (P = .54).

Continue to: Two weeks after initiating brace...

 

 

COMPLICATIONS

Two weeks after initiating brace treatment, an obese patient suffered a rash with desquamation that necessitated discontinuation of the brace. However, the skin and fracture ultimately healed with a coaptation splint and sling support without additional complications. In the casting cohort, 2 patients returned to the emergency department after AEC placement because of swelling of the hand and pain in the cast. Both casts were removed and reapplied.

DISCUSSION

Fractures of the distal third of the humeral diaphysis heal without surgery. Fracture angulation and elbow stiffness are the concerns that lead to variations in nonoperative treatment.1-3 Advocates of casting believe they can get better alignment without losing elbow motion, and advocates of bracing feel that the brace is less cumbersome.1-3,5-8 We compared these treatments retrospectively and found them comparable.

This study should be considered in light of its limitations. Many patients were lost to follow-up in our urban trauma centers. We do not know if these patients did better, worse, or the same as the patients we were able to evaluate, but our opinion is that patients having problems were more likely to return. The evaluation time was relatively short, but motion can only improve in the longer-term. Two patients that were initially braced chose surgery, probably because either they or their surgeon were nervous about the radiographic appearance of the fracture. In our opinion, continued nonoperative treatment of these patients would not affect the findings.

Cast treatment of distal diaphyseal humerus fractures does not cause permanent elbow stiffness. This is confirmed by our results; as casted patients did not lose final ROM compared to the bracing cohort. These injuries are extra-articular and casted patients are transitioned to bracing once humeri have significant union demonstrated by the arm moving as a unit. To our knowledge, there is no other study that has evaluated casting for these fractures, but it may be that evidence of permanent stiffness with nonoperative treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the humerus [AO/OTA type 13] is misapplied to distal humeral shaft fractures [AO/OTA type 12].3,9,10,12 For brace treatment, Sarmiento and colleagues9 showed no significant elbow stiffness in a consecutive cohort of 69 patients, while Jawa and colleagues5 showed no increased elbow stiffness compared to plate fixation. Given the accumulated data,3,5,6,8,13 advocates of operative treatment for distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures12 can no longer site elbow stiffness as a disadvantage of nonoperative treatment, whether with cast or brace.

As shown in this study, patients that choose nonoperative treatment can expect their fracture to heal with an average of approximately 15° of varus angulation, as well as 2 others evaluating brace treatment.5,9 Some will heal with as much as 30° of varus angulation.5,9 The arm may look a little different, particularly in thin patients, but there is no evidence that this angulation affects function. The risks, discomforts, and inconveniences of surgery can be balanced with the ability of surgery to improve alignment and allow elbow motion a few weeks earlier. The aesthetics of the scar after surgery may not be better than the deformity after nonoperative treatment. Patients should be involved in these decisions.

Continue to: No cost comparison...

 

 

No cost comparison was done between these 2 treatment modalities. However, both casting and bracing offer substantially lower costs comparted to surgical treatment with high efficacy and less risk for the patient. In some billing environments, closed treatments of fractures are captured as “surgical interventions” with global periods included in the reimbursement. Both casting and bracing are relatively inexpensive with materials that are readily accessible in nearly any general or subspecialty orthopedic practice.

There is a passive implication that operative treatment of distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures affords better results and union for patients in the discussed literature. Our results demonstrate that the distal diaphyseal humerus has a natural anatomic and biologic propensity to heal with closed immobilization. Patients should be made aware that while operative treatments exist for this fracture pattern, nonoperative treatment modalities have proven to be efficacious using a variety of immobilization methods. Thus, patients that prefer nonoperative treatment of a distal third diaphyseal humerus fracture can choose between a cast or a brace with confidence of the efficacy of the nonoperative treatment.

References

1. McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz R, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1117-1159.

2. Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Talbot M. Fractures of the humeral shaft. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek C, eds. Skeletal Trauma. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier Company; 2009:1593-1622.

3. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):833-844. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030.

4. Balfour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(1):11-13. doi:10.2106/00004623-198264010-00002.

5. Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2343-2347. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00334.

6. Pehlivan O. Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(7):390-395. doi:10.1007/s00402-002-0403-x.

7. Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB. Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1157-1158. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c.

8. Sarmiento A, Horowitch A, Aboulafia A, Vangsness CT Jr. Functional bracing for comminuted extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):283-287.

9. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):596-601.

10. Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 2005;29(1):10-13. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8.

11. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(4):283-287.

12. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 Suppl):S1-S133.

13. Paris H, Tropiano P, Clouet D'orval B, Chaudet H, Poitout DG. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: systematic plate fixation. Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(4):346-359.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: Dr. Ring reports that he is a board or committee member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association; is on the editorial or governing board of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma; and receives intellectual property royalties from Skeletal Dynamics and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. The other authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Swellengrebel is an Attending Surgeon, Haaglanden Medical Centre (HMC), The Hague, The Netherlands. Dr. Saper is an Attending Surgeon, Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Centers, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Yi is a Radiology Resident, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Weening is an Attending Surgeon, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Dr. Ring is Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care and Professor of Surgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Dr. Jawa is an Attending Surgeon, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to: David Saper, MD, 850 Harrison Ave., Dowling 2 North, Boston MA, 02118 (tel, 617-638-8934; fax, 888-267-7761; email, Dave.saper@gmail.com).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting. Am J Orthop.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: Dr. Ring reports that he is a board or committee member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association; is on the editorial or governing board of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma; and receives intellectual property royalties from Skeletal Dynamics and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. The other authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Swellengrebel is an Attending Surgeon, Haaglanden Medical Centre (HMC), The Hague, The Netherlands. Dr. Saper is an Attending Surgeon, Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Centers, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Yi is a Radiology Resident, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Weening is an Attending Surgeon, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Dr. Ring is Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care and Professor of Surgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Dr. Jawa is an Attending Surgeon, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to: David Saper, MD, 850 Harrison Ave., Dowling 2 North, Boston MA, 02118 (tel, 617-638-8934; fax, 888-267-7761; email, Dave.saper@gmail.com).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting. Am J Orthop.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: Dr. Ring reports that he is a board or committee member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association; is on the editorial or governing board of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma; and receives intellectual property royalties from Skeletal Dynamics and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. The other authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Dr. Swellengrebel is an Attending Surgeon, Haaglanden Medical Centre (HMC), The Hague, The Netherlands. Dr. Saper is an Attending Surgeon, Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Centers, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Yi is a Radiology Resident, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Weening is an Attending Surgeon, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Dr. Ring is Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care and Professor of Surgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Dr. Jawa is an Attending Surgeon, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to: David Saper, MD, 850 Harrison Ave., Dowling 2 North, Boston MA, 02118 (tel, 617-638-8934; fax, 888-267-7761; email, Dave.saper@gmail.com).

Am J Orthop. 2018;47(5). Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2018. All rights reserved.

. Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting. Am J Orthop.

ABSTRACT

Diaphyseal fractures of the distal humerus have a high rate of union when treated with a functional brace or an above-elbow cast (AEC). This study compares alignment of the humerus and motion of the elbow after functional brace or AEC treatment.

One-hundred and five consecutive patients with a closed, extra-articular fracture of the distal humeral diaphysis were identified in the orthopedic trauma databases of 3 hospitals between 2003 and 2012. Seventy-five patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months or with radiographic and clinical evidence of fracture union were included (51 treated with functional bracing and 24 treated with an AEC).

All of the fractures healed. The average arc of elbow flexion was 130° ± 9° in braced patients vs 127° ± 12° in casted patients. Four patients (8%) in the bracing group and 4 (17%) in the casting group lost >20° of elbow motion. The average varus angulation on radiographs was 17° ± 8° in braced and 13° ± 8° in casted patients, while the average posterior angulation was 9° ± 6° vs 7° ± 7°, respectively.

Closed extra-articular distal diaphyseal humerus fractures heal with both bracing and casting and there are no differences in average elbow motion or radiographic alignment.

Nonoperative treatment of closed fractures of the humeral shaft (AO/OTA [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association] type 12) with a functional brace or above-elbow cast (AEC) is associated with a high union rate, good motion, and good function. Advocates of casting believe that a brace cannot control fracture alignment as well as a cast that allows for immobilization and molding. Advocates of brace treatment are concerned that immobilization in a cast will cause elbow stiffness.1-11

Continue to: In our differing institutions...

 

 

In our differing institutions, there are advocates of each type of treatment, providing the opportunity for a comparison. This retrospective study compares brace and cast treatment. The working hypothesis was that there is no difference in elbow motion 6 months or more after fracture. We also compared radiographic alignment after union.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2012, consecutive adult patients treated for a nonpathological fracture of the diaphysis of the distal humerus at the orthopedic trauma service of 3 level 1 academic trauma centers were identified from prospectively collected trauma injury databases. Patients with vascular injury, ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded. The attending orthopedic surgeon chose the treatment method and evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow and radiographic union at the final ambulatory visit. We included patients followed to clinical and radiographic union with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. We also included patients with <6 months’ follow-up who demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm.

We identified 105 consecutive adult patients with a closed nonpathological extra-articular distal humeral shaft fracture (fracture of the distal humeral shaft with an AO/OTA type-12.A, 12.B, or 12.C pattern) treated with an AEC or a brace in our databases.12 Two patients in the brace group chose surgery to improve alignment within 3 weeks of injury and were excluded from the analysis. Twenty-eight patients had inadequate follow-up.

A total of 75 patients were included in the study. At the first and second institutions, 51 patients were treated with functional bracing with an average follow-up of 7 months. At the third institution, 24 patients were treated with an AEC with an average follow-up of 4 months. Seventeen out of 24 patients in the long arm casting group and 19 out of 51 patients in the bracing group, who were included since they had <6 months of follow-up, demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm. Differing methods of closed immobilization were the result of differing treatment algorithms at each institution.

The patients who were treated with a functional brace averaged 34 years of age (range, 18-90 years) and included 27 men and 24 women. The brace was removed at an average of 11.5 weeks (range, 8-18 weeks) after initial injury. Six patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, all of which fully recovered within an average of 4 months (range, 0.5-7 months). Sixteen patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 2 due to a fall from a greater height than standing, 16 in a motor-vehicle accident, 15 during a sport activity, and 2 were not specifically documented.

Continue to: Four patients had concomitant...

 

 

Four patients had concomitant injuries: one patient had a mid-shaft humeral fracture on the contralateral arm; a second had an ankle fracture; a third had an ankle fracture, acetabular fracture, a rib fracture, and pneumothorax; and the fourth had 2 rib fractures.

The patients who were treated with an AEC had an average age of 32 years (range,18-82 years) and included 14 men and 10 women. The cast was removed at an average of 4.2 weeks (range, 3-7 weeks) after the initial injury. Two patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, both of which fully recovered. Five patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 1 due to a fall from a height greater than standing, 7 during a motor-vehicle accident, 5 during a sport activity, and 6 were not documented. Two patients sustained concomitant injuries: one patient sustained a tibia-fibula fracture, and another patient sustained facial trauma.

The 2 groups were comparable in age and gender, as well as the injury mechanism (Table).

Table. Patient Demographics and Outcome Data

 

Functional Bracing (n = 51)

Long Arm Casting (n = 24)

Significance

(P < .05)

Sex

 

 

 

     Male

27 (54%)

14 (58%)

 

     Female

24 (46%)

10 (42%)

 

Average age (y)

34 (range, 18-90)

32 (range, 18-82)

 

Mechanism of injury

 

 

 

     Standing height

16 (31%)

5 (20%)

 

     Greater height

2 (4%)

1 (4%)

 

     Motor vehicle collision

16 (31%)

7 (29%)

 

     Sports activity

15 (29 %)

5 (21%)

 

     Other

2 (4%)

6 (25%)

 

Follow-up (months)

7 (range, 2-25)

4 (range, 2-15)

 

Elbow range of motion (degrees)

130 ± 9.4

127 ± 11.9

P = .26

Varus/valgus angulation (degrees)

17 ± 7.8 varus

13 ± 8.4 varus

P = .11

Anterior/posterior angulation (degrees)

9 ± 6.2 posterior

7 ± 7.5 posterior

P = .54

FUNCTIONAL BRACING TECHNIQUE

Upon presentation after injury, patients were immobilized in a coaptation splint (Figure 1A). Within 10 days, the arm was placed in a pre-manufactured polyethylene functional brace (Corflex) and the arm was supported with a simple sling. Patients were allowed to use the hand for light tasks and move the elbow, but most patients were not capable of active elbow flexion exercises until early healing was established 4 to 6 weeks after injury. Shoulder motion was discouraged until radiographic union. Patients started active, self-assisted elbow and shoulder stretching exercises, and weaned from the brace once radiographic union was confirmed between 6 and 10 weeks after injury (Figures 1B, 1C).

ABOVE-ELBOW CASE

Patients were also initially immobilized in a coaptation splint upon initial presentation. Within 7 days, an above-elbow fiberglass cast with neutral forearm rotation and 90° of elbow flexion was applied with a supracondylar mold, followed by radiographic imaging (Figure 2A). With the fractured arm dependent, a valgus mold was applied as the material hardened in order to align the fracture site and limit varus angulation.

Continue to: There were no shoulder...

 

 

There were no shoulder ROM restrictions. Casts were removed, skin checked, and replaced every week for 4 to 6 weeks. Casts were removed when callus was noted on radiographs. After cast removal, physician-taught active and active-assisted elbow stretching exercises were given to patients to be performed on a daily basis at home. Patients were followed until clinical and radiographic union and elbow ROM to within 10° of the injured arm (Figures 2B, 2C).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Alignment of the humerus (including varus-valgus alignment and apex anterior-posterior alignment) was measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as the angle between lines bisecting the humeral diaphysis proximal and distal to the fracture. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To statistically compare continuous variables with a normal distribution, t-tests were used; otherwise the Wilcoxon t-test was applied. The Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to statistically compare dichotomous variables, except when expected cell frequency was <5, in which case the Fisher exact test was used. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

RANGE OF MOTION AND RADIOGRAPHIC ALIGNMENT

The average range of elbow motion was 130° ± 9° after brace treatment and 127° ± 12° after cast treatment (P = .26). Four patients (8%) treated with a brace and 3 (12%) treated with a cast lost >20° of elbow motion.

All the fractures healed. The average varus angulation on the anteroposterior radiograph was 17° (range, 2°-26°) in braced patients and 13 (range, 5°-31°) in casted patients (P = .11). The average posterior angulation on the lateral radiograph was 9° (range, 0°-28°) in braced patients vs 7° (range, 2°-33°) in casted patients (P = .54).

Continue to: Two weeks after initiating brace...

 

 

COMPLICATIONS

Two weeks after initiating brace treatment, an obese patient suffered a rash with desquamation that necessitated discontinuation of the brace. However, the skin and fracture ultimately healed with a coaptation splint and sling support without additional complications. In the casting cohort, 2 patients returned to the emergency department after AEC placement because of swelling of the hand and pain in the cast. Both casts were removed and reapplied.

DISCUSSION

Fractures of the distal third of the humeral diaphysis heal without surgery. Fracture angulation and elbow stiffness are the concerns that lead to variations in nonoperative treatment.1-3 Advocates of casting believe they can get better alignment without losing elbow motion, and advocates of bracing feel that the brace is less cumbersome.1-3,5-8 We compared these treatments retrospectively and found them comparable.

This study should be considered in light of its limitations. Many patients were lost to follow-up in our urban trauma centers. We do not know if these patients did better, worse, or the same as the patients we were able to evaluate, but our opinion is that patients having problems were more likely to return. The evaluation time was relatively short, but motion can only improve in the longer-term. Two patients that were initially braced chose surgery, probably because either they or their surgeon were nervous about the radiographic appearance of the fracture. In our opinion, continued nonoperative treatment of these patients would not affect the findings.

Cast treatment of distal diaphyseal humerus fractures does not cause permanent elbow stiffness. This is confirmed by our results; as casted patients did not lose final ROM compared to the bracing cohort. These injuries are extra-articular and casted patients are transitioned to bracing once humeri have significant union demonstrated by the arm moving as a unit. To our knowledge, there is no other study that has evaluated casting for these fractures, but it may be that evidence of permanent stiffness with nonoperative treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the humerus [AO/OTA type 13] is misapplied to distal humeral shaft fractures [AO/OTA type 12].3,9,10,12 For brace treatment, Sarmiento and colleagues9 showed no significant elbow stiffness in a consecutive cohort of 69 patients, while Jawa and colleagues5 showed no increased elbow stiffness compared to plate fixation. Given the accumulated data,3,5,6,8,13 advocates of operative treatment for distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures12 can no longer site elbow stiffness as a disadvantage of nonoperative treatment, whether with cast or brace.

As shown in this study, patients that choose nonoperative treatment can expect their fracture to heal with an average of approximately 15° of varus angulation, as well as 2 others evaluating brace treatment.5,9 Some will heal with as much as 30° of varus angulation.5,9 The arm may look a little different, particularly in thin patients, but there is no evidence that this angulation affects function. The risks, discomforts, and inconveniences of surgery can be balanced with the ability of surgery to improve alignment and allow elbow motion a few weeks earlier. The aesthetics of the scar after surgery may not be better than the deformity after nonoperative treatment. Patients should be involved in these decisions.

Continue to: No cost comparison...

 

 

No cost comparison was done between these 2 treatment modalities. However, both casting and bracing offer substantially lower costs comparted to surgical treatment with high efficacy and less risk for the patient. In some billing environments, closed treatments of fractures are captured as “surgical interventions” with global periods included in the reimbursement. Both casting and bracing are relatively inexpensive with materials that are readily accessible in nearly any general or subspecialty orthopedic practice.

There is a passive implication that operative treatment of distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures affords better results and union for patients in the discussed literature. Our results demonstrate that the distal diaphyseal humerus has a natural anatomic and biologic propensity to heal with closed immobilization. Patients should be made aware that while operative treatments exist for this fracture pattern, nonoperative treatment modalities have proven to be efficacious using a variety of immobilization methods. Thus, patients that prefer nonoperative treatment of a distal third diaphyseal humerus fracture can choose between a cast or a brace with confidence of the efficacy of the nonoperative treatment.

ABSTRACT

Diaphyseal fractures of the distal humerus have a high rate of union when treated with a functional brace or an above-elbow cast (AEC). This study compares alignment of the humerus and motion of the elbow after functional brace or AEC treatment.

One-hundred and five consecutive patients with a closed, extra-articular fracture of the distal humeral diaphysis were identified in the orthopedic trauma databases of 3 hospitals between 2003 and 2012. Seventy-five patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months or with radiographic and clinical evidence of fracture union were included (51 treated with functional bracing and 24 treated with an AEC).

All of the fractures healed. The average arc of elbow flexion was 130° ± 9° in braced patients vs 127° ± 12° in casted patients. Four patients (8%) in the bracing group and 4 (17%) in the casting group lost >20° of elbow motion. The average varus angulation on radiographs was 17° ± 8° in braced and 13° ± 8° in casted patients, while the average posterior angulation was 9° ± 6° vs 7° ± 7°, respectively.

Closed extra-articular distal diaphyseal humerus fractures heal with both bracing and casting and there are no differences in average elbow motion or radiographic alignment.

Nonoperative treatment of closed fractures of the humeral shaft (AO/OTA [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association] type 12) with a functional brace or above-elbow cast (AEC) is associated with a high union rate, good motion, and good function. Advocates of casting believe that a brace cannot control fracture alignment as well as a cast that allows for immobilization and molding. Advocates of brace treatment are concerned that immobilization in a cast will cause elbow stiffness.1-11

Continue to: In our differing institutions...

 

 

In our differing institutions, there are advocates of each type of treatment, providing the opportunity for a comparison. This retrospective study compares brace and cast treatment. The working hypothesis was that there is no difference in elbow motion 6 months or more after fracture. We also compared radiographic alignment after union.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2012, consecutive adult patients treated for a nonpathological fracture of the diaphysis of the distal humerus at the orthopedic trauma service of 3 level 1 academic trauma centers were identified from prospectively collected trauma injury databases. Patients with vascular injury, ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded. The attending orthopedic surgeon chose the treatment method and evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow and radiographic union at the final ambulatory visit. We included patients followed to clinical and radiographic union with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. We also included patients with <6 months’ follow-up who demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm.

We identified 105 consecutive adult patients with a closed nonpathological extra-articular distal humeral shaft fracture (fracture of the distal humeral shaft with an AO/OTA type-12.A, 12.B, or 12.C pattern) treated with an AEC or a brace in our databases.12 Two patients in the brace group chose surgery to improve alignment within 3 weeks of injury and were excluded from the analysis. Twenty-eight patients had inadequate follow-up.

A total of 75 patients were included in the study. At the first and second institutions, 51 patients were treated with functional bracing with an average follow-up of 7 months. At the third institution, 24 patients were treated with an AEC with an average follow-up of 4 months. Seventeen out of 24 patients in the long arm casting group and 19 out of 51 patients in the bracing group, who were included since they had <6 months of follow-up, demonstrated union and had elbow ROM within 10° of the uninjured arm. Differing methods of closed immobilization were the result of differing treatment algorithms at each institution.

The patients who were treated with a functional brace averaged 34 years of age (range, 18-90 years) and included 27 men and 24 women. The brace was removed at an average of 11.5 weeks (range, 8-18 weeks) after initial injury. Six patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, all of which fully recovered within an average of 4 months (range, 0.5-7 months). Sixteen patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 2 due to a fall from a greater height than standing, 16 in a motor-vehicle accident, 15 during a sport activity, and 2 were not specifically documented.

Continue to: Four patients had concomitant...

 

 

Four patients had concomitant injuries: one patient had a mid-shaft humeral fracture on the contralateral arm; a second had an ankle fracture; a third had an ankle fracture, acetabular fracture, a rib fracture, and pneumothorax; and the fourth had 2 rib fractures.

The patients who were treated with an AEC had an average age of 32 years (range,18-82 years) and included 14 men and 10 women. The cast was removed at an average of 4.2 weeks (range, 3-7 weeks) after the initial injury. Two patients had an injury-associated radial nerve palsy, both of which fully recovered. Five patients were injured due to a fall from standing height, 1 due to a fall from a height greater than standing, 7 during a motor-vehicle accident, 5 during a sport activity, and 6 were not documented. Two patients sustained concomitant injuries: one patient sustained a tibia-fibula fracture, and another patient sustained facial trauma.

The 2 groups were comparable in age and gender, as well as the injury mechanism (Table).

Table. Patient Demographics and Outcome Data

 

Functional Bracing (n = 51)

Long Arm Casting (n = 24)

Significance

(P < .05)

Sex

 

 

 

     Male

27 (54%)

14 (58%)

 

     Female

24 (46%)

10 (42%)

 

Average age (y)

34 (range, 18-90)

32 (range, 18-82)

 

Mechanism of injury

 

 

 

     Standing height

16 (31%)

5 (20%)

 

     Greater height

2 (4%)

1 (4%)

 

     Motor vehicle collision

16 (31%)

7 (29%)

 

     Sports activity

15 (29 %)

5 (21%)

 

     Other

2 (4%)

6 (25%)

 

Follow-up (months)

7 (range, 2-25)

4 (range, 2-15)

 

Elbow range of motion (degrees)

130 ± 9.4

127 ± 11.9

P = .26

Varus/valgus angulation (degrees)

17 ± 7.8 varus

13 ± 8.4 varus

P = .11

Anterior/posterior angulation (degrees)

9 ± 6.2 posterior

7 ± 7.5 posterior

P = .54

FUNCTIONAL BRACING TECHNIQUE

Upon presentation after injury, patients were immobilized in a coaptation splint (Figure 1A). Within 10 days, the arm was placed in a pre-manufactured polyethylene functional brace (Corflex) and the arm was supported with a simple sling. Patients were allowed to use the hand for light tasks and move the elbow, but most patients were not capable of active elbow flexion exercises until early healing was established 4 to 6 weeks after injury. Shoulder motion was discouraged until radiographic union. Patients started active, self-assisted elbow and shoulder stretching exercises, and weaned from the brace once radiographic union was confirmed between 6 and 10 weeks after injury (Figures 1B, 1C).

ABOVE-ELBOW CASE

Patients were also initially immobilized in a coaptation splint upon initial presentation. Within 7 days, an above-elbow fiberglass cast with neutral forearm rotation and 90° of elbow flexion was applied with a supracondylar mold, followed by radiographic imaging (Figure 2A). With the fractured arm dependent, a valgus mold was applied as the material hardened in order to align the fracture site and limit varus angulation.

Continue to: There were no shoulder...

 

 

There were no shoulder ROM restrictions. Casts were removed, skin checked, and replaced every week for 4 to 6 weeks. Casts were removed when callus was noted on radiographs. After cast removal, physician-taught active and active-assisted elbow stretching exercises were given to patients to be performed on a daily basis at home. Patients were followed until clinical and radiographic union and elbow ROM to within 10° of the injured arm (Figures 2B, 2C).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Alignment of the humerus (including varus-valgus alignment and apex anterior-posterior alignment) was measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as the angle between lines bisecting the humeral diaphysis proximal and distal to the fracture. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To statistically compare continuous variables with a normal distribution, t-tests were used; otherwise the Wilcoxon t-test was applied. The Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to statistically compare dichotomous variables, except when expected cell frequency was <5, in which case the Fisher exact test was used. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

RANGE OF MOTION AND RADIOGRAPHIC ALIGNMENT

The average range of elbow motion was 130° ± 9° after brace treatment and 127° ± 12° after cast treatment (P = .26). Four patients (8%) treated with a brace and 3 (12%) treated with a cast lost >20° of elbow motion.

All the fractures healed. The average varus angulation on the anteroposterior radiograph was 17° (range, 2°-26°) in braced patients and 13 (range, 5°-31°) in casted patients (P = .11). The average posterior angulation on the lateral radiograph was 9° (range, 0°-28°) in braced patients vs 7° (range, 2°-33°) in casted patients (P = .54).

Continue to: Two weeks after initiating brace...

 

 

COMPLICATIONS

Two weeks after initiating brace treatment, an obese patient suffered a rash with desquamation that necessitated discontinuation of the brace. However, the skin and fracture ultimately healed with a coaptation splint and sling support without additional complications. In the casting cohort, 2 patients returned to the emergency department after AEC placement because of swelling of the hand and pain in the cast. Both casts were removed and reapplied.

DISCUSSION

Fractures of the distal third of the humeral diaphysis heal without surgery. Fracture angulation and elbow stiffness are the concerns that lead to variations in nonoperative treatment.1-3 Advocates of casting believe they can get better alignment without losing elbow motion, and advocates of bracing feel that the brace is less cumbersome.1-3,5-8 We compared these treatments retrospectively and found them comparable.

This study should be considered in light of its limitations. Many patients were lost to follow-up in our urban trauma centers. We do not know if these patients did better, worse, or the same as the patients we were able to evaluate, but our opinion is that patients having problems were more likely to return. The evaluation time was relatively short, but motion can only improve in the longer-term. Two patients that were initially braced chose surgery, probably because either they or their surgeon were nervous about the radiographic appearance of the fracture. In our opinion, continued nonoperative treatment of these patients would not affect the findings.

Cast treatment of distal diaphyseal humerus fractures does not cause permanent elbow stiffness. This is confirmed by our results; as casted patients did not lose final ROM compared to the bracing cohort. These injuries are extra-articular and casted patients are transitioned to bracing once humeri have significant union demonstrated by the arm moving as a unit. To our knowledge, there is no other study that has evaluated casting for these fractures, but it may be that evidence of permanent stiffness with nonoperative treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the humerus [AO/OTA type 13] is misapplied to distal humeral shaft fractures [AO/OTA type 12].3,9,10,12 For brace treatment, Sarmiento and colleagues9 showed no significant elbow stiffness in a consecutive cohort of 69 patients, while Jawa and colleagues5 showed no increased elbow stiffness compared to plate fixation. Given the accumulated data,3,5,6,8,13 advocates of operative treatment for distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures12 can no longer site elbow stiffness as a disadvantage of nonoperative treatment, whether with cast or brace.

As shown in this study, patients that choose nonoperative treatment can expect their fracture to heal with an average of approximately 15° of varus angulation, as well as 2 others evaluating brace treatment.5,9 Some will heal with as much as 30° of varus angulation.5,9 The arm may look a little different, particularly in thin patients, but there is no evidence that this angulation affects function. The risks, discomforts, and inconveniences of surgery can be balanced with the ability of surgery to improve alignment and allow elbow motion a few weeks earlier. The aesthetics of the scar after surgery may not be better than the deformity after nonoperative treatment. Patients should be involved in these decisions.

Continue to: No cost comparison...

 

 

No cost comparison was done between these 2 treatment modalities. However, both casting and bracing offer substantially lower costs comparted to surgical treatment with high efficacy and less risk for the patient. In some billing environments, closed treatments of fractures are captured as “surgical interventions” with global periods included in the reimbursement. Both casting and bracing are relatively inexpensive with materials that are readily accessible in nearly any general or subspecialty orthopedic practice.

There is a passive implication that operative treatment of distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures affords better results and union for patients in the discussed literature. Our results demonstrate that the distal diaphyseal humerus has a natural anatomic and biologic propensity to heal with closed immobilization. Patients should be made aware that while operative treatments exist for this fracture pattern, nonoperative treatment modalities have proven to be efficacious using a variety of immobilization methods. Thus, patients that prefer nonoperative treatment of a distal third diaphyseal humerus fracture can choose between a cast or a brace with confidence of the efficacy of the nonoperative treatment.

References

1. McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz R, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1117-1159.

2. Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Talbot M. Fractures of the humeral shaft. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek C, eds. Skeletal Trauma. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier Company; 2009:1593-1622.

3. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):833-844. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030.

4. Balfour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(1):11-13. doi:10.2106/00004623-198264010-00002.

5. Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2343-2347. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00334.

6. Pehlivan O. Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(7):390-395. doi:10.1007/s00402-002-0403-x.

7. Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB. Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1157-1158. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c.

8. Sarmiento A, Horowitch A, Aboulafia A, Vangsness CT Jr. Functional bracing for comminuted extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):283-287.

9. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):596-601.

10. Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 2005;29(1):10-13. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8.

11. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(4):283-287.

12. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 Suppl):S1-S133.

13. Paris H, Tropiano P, Clouet D'orval B, Chaudet H, Poitout DG. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: systematic plate fixation. Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(4):346-359.

References

1. McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz R, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1117-1159.

2. Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Talbot M. Fractures of the humeral shaft. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek C, eds. Skeletal Trauma. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier Company; 2009:1593-1622.

3. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):833-844. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030.

4. Balfour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(1):11-13. doi:10.2106/00004623-198264010-00002.

5. Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2343-2347. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00334.

6. Pehlivan O. Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(7):390-395. doi:10.1007/s00402-002-0403-x.

7. Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB. Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1157-1158. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c.

8. Sarmiento A, Horowitch A, Aboulafia A, Vangsness CT Jr. Functional bracing for comminuted extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):283-287.

9. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):596-601.

10. Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 2005;29(1):10-13. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8.

11. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(4):283-287.

12. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 Suppl):S1-S133.

13. Paris H, Tropiano P, Clouet D'orval B, Chaudet H, Poitout DG. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: systematic plate fixation. Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(4):346-359.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting
Display Headline
Nonoperative Treatment of Closed Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Comparison of Functional Bracing and Above-Elbow Casting
Sections
Inside the Article

TAKE-HOME POINTS

  • Closed extra-articular distal diaphyseal humerus fractures heal predictably with both bracing and casting.
  • There are no differences in average elbow motion between bracing and casting of these fractures.
  • There are no differences in radiographic alignment between bracing and casting of these fractures.
  • The distal diaphyseal humerus has a natural anatomic and biologic propensity to heal with closed immobilization.
  • Patients preferring nonoperative treatment can choose between a cast or a brace with confidence of the efficacy of either treatment.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 03/26/2019 - 11:45
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 03/26/2019 - 11:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 03/26/2019 - 11:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Sprifermin moves FORWARD with sustained effects in osteoarthritis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

– At 3 years of follow-up, the cartilage-building effects of sprifermin appear to be sustained, according to further data to be released from the phase 2 FORWARD trial.

The difference from placebo in mean cartilage thickness at the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) at 3 years was 0.05 mm for a 100-mcg dose of sprifermin given every 6 months (P less than .0001), 0.02 mm for a 100-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .193), 0.01 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 6 months (P = .530), and –0.02 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .160).

“These data, 18 months after the last active injection, extend the results which we previously presented and assessed at 6 months after the last injection,” study investigator Marc Hochberg, MD, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

The prior 2-year findings, which were reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology in November 2017, showed statistically significant dose-dependent structural modification in TFJ cartilage. Furthermore, the increase in cartilage thickness was seen in both medial and lateral compartments of the TFJ, and in the central medial subregion of the TFJ.

Sprifermin is one of several drugs currently being investigated as a potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug, none of which are currently licensed for use. It is a novel human recombinant version of fibroblast growth factor 18 that has been shown to increase chondrocyte proliferation that results in overall extracellular matrix production and subsequent hyaline-line cartilage formation.

The study comprised 549 patients with symptomatic radiographic primary femorotibial knee OA who were aged 40-85 years. For inclusion, patients had to have Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3, with a medial minimum joint space width of 2.5 mm or more. In addition, patients had to have a history of OA pain for at least 6 months and either symptoms requiring pain medication or a pain score of 4-9 on the 10-point question 1 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Dr. Hochberg, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and public health and head of the division of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, noted that the current analysis at 3 years’ follow up had been prespecified and that the plan was to continue follow-up out to 5 years.

 

 


There was a statistically significant treatment effect and dose response effect seen in TFJ cartilage thickness.

“Although cartilage thickness declined in all treatment groups between years 2 and 3, the difference in cartilage thickness observed in year 2 with sprifermin at the highest dose [100 mcg every 6 months] versus placebo persisted through year 3,” Dr. Hochberg said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Marc Hochberg


As for secondary endpoints of thickness in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral cartilage, “there are significant differences between the higher-dose sprifermin group and the placebo group,” he said.

“Based on imaging, sprifermin appears to be effective at modifying structural changes in articular cartilage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with knee osteoarthritis, with an acceptable safety profile.”
 

 


Dr. Hochberg added that there was “marked symptomatic improvement” as shown by changes in WOMAC scores in all treatment groups including placebo. The improvement in total WOMAC scores by approximately 50% in all treatment groups by the second year was continued to the third year.

Adverse effects occurred with a similar frequency in the active treatment groups and the placebo group. They were also of a similar nature. The most commonly reported side effects involved the musculoskeletal system or were connective tissue disorders (e.g. arthralgia). Importantly, there was no difference in the frequency, severity, or nature of serious adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, or discontinuation due to adverse events with active versus placebo therapy, Dr. Hochberg said.

The percentages of patients completing the study to the second and third years were a respective 87.8% and 81.6% in the sprifermin groups and 80.6% and 75.9% in the placebo group.

Merck KGaA and EMD Serono Research Institute funded the study. Dr. Hochberg has received consulting fees from EMD Serono and multiple other companies developing treatments for OA.

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S26-27. Abstract 32

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– At 3 years of follow-up, the cartilage-building effects of sprifermin appear to be sustained, according to further data to be released from the phase 2 FORWARD trial.

The difference from placebo in mean cartilage thickness at the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) at 3 years was 0.05 mm for a 100-mcg dose of sprifermin given every 6 months (P less than .0001), 0.02 mm for a 100-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .193), 0.01 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 6 months (P = .530), and –0.02 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .160).

“These data, 18 months after the last active injection, extend the results which we previously presented and assessed at 6 months after the last injection,” study investigator Marc Hochberg, MD, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

The prior 2-year findings, which were reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology in November 2017, showed statistically significant dose-dependent structural modification in TFJ cartilage. Furthermore, the increase in cartilage thickness was seen in both medial and lateral compartments of the TFJ, and in the central medial subregion of the TFJ.

Sprifermin is one of several drugs currently being investigated as a potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug, none of which are currently licensed for use. It is a novel human recombinant version of fibroblast growth factor 18 that has been shown to increase chondrocyte proliferation that results in overall extracellular matrix production and subsequent hyaline-line cartilage formation.

The study comprised 549 patients with symptomatic radiographic primary femorotibial knee OA who were aged 40-85 years. For inclusion, patients had to have Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3, with a medial minimum joint space width of 2.5 mm or more. In addition, patients had to have a history of OA pain for at least 6 months and either symptoms requiring pain medication or a pain score of 4-9 on the 10-point question 1 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Dr. Hochberg, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and public health and head of the division of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, noted that the current analysis at 3 years’ follow up had been prespecified and that the plan was to continue follow-up out to 5 years.

 

 


There was a statistically significant treatment effect and dose response effect seen in TFJ cartilage thickness.

“Although cartilage thickness declined in all treatment groups between years 2 and 3, the difference in cartilage thickness observed in year 2 with sprifermin at the highest dose [100 mcg every 6 months] versus placebo persisted through year 3,” Dr. Hochberg said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Marc Hochberg


As for secondary endpoints of thickness in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral cartilage, “there are significant differences between the higher-dose sprifermin group and the placebo group,” he said.

“Based on imaging, sprifermin appears to be effective at modifying structural changes in articular cartilage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with knee osteoarthritis, with an acceptable safety profile.”
 

 


Dr. Hochberg added that there was “marked symptomatic improvement” as shown by changes in WOMAC scores in all treatment groups including placebo. The improvement in total WOMAC scores by approximately 50% in all treatment groups by the second year was continued to the third year.

Adverse effects occurred with a similar frequency in the active treatment groups and the placebo group. They were also of a similar nature. The most commonly reported side effects involved the musculoskeletal system or were connective tissue disorders (e.g. arthralgia). Importantly, there was no difference in the frequency, severity, or nature of serious adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, or discontinuation due to adverse events with active versus placebo therapy, Dr. Hochberg said.

The percentages of patients completing the study to the second and third years were a respective 87.8% and 81.6% in the sprifermin groups and 80.6% and 75.9% in the placebo group.

Merck KGaA and EMD Serono Research Institute funded the study. Dr. Hochberg has received consulting fees from EMD Serono and multiple other companies developing treatments for OA.

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S26-27. Abstract 32

 

– At 3 years of follow-up, the cartilage-building effects of sprifermin appear to be sustained, according to further data to be released from the phase 2 FORWARD trial.

The difference from placebo in mean cartilage thickness at the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) at 3 years was 0.05 mm for a 100-mcg dose of sprifermin given every 6 months (P less than .0001), 0.02 mm for a 100-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .193), 0.01 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 6 months (P = .530), and –0.02 mm for a 50-mcg dose given every 12 months (P = .160).

“These data, 18 months after the last active injection, extend the results which we previously presented and assessed at 6 months after the last injection,” study investigator Marc Hochberg, MD, said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

The prior 2-year findings, which were reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology in November 2017, showed statistically significant dose-dependent structural modification in TFJ cartilage. Furthermore, the increase in cartilage thickness was seen in both medial and lateral compartments of the TFJ, and in the central medial subregion of the TFJ.

Sprifermin is one of several drugs currently being investigated as a potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug, none of which are currently licensed for use. It is a novel human recombinant version of fibroblast growth factor 18 that has been shown to increase chondrocyte proliferation that results in overall extracellular matrix production and subsequent hyaline-line cartilage formation.

The study comprised 549 patients with symptomatic radiographic primary femorotibial knee OA who were aged 40-85 years. For inclusion, patients had to have Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3, with a medial minimum joint space width of 2.5 mm or more. In addition, patients had to have a history of OA pain for at least 6 months and either symptoms requiring pain medication or a pain score of 4-9 on the 10-point question 1 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Dr. Hochberg, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and public health and head of the division of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, noted that the current analysis at 3 years’ follow up had been prespecified and that the plan was to continue follow-up out to 5 years.

 

 


There was a statistically significant treatment effect and dose response effect seen in TFJ cartilage thickness.

“Although cartilage thickness declined in all treatment groups between years 2 and 3, the difference in cartilage thickness observed in year 2 with sprifermin at the highest dose [100 mcg every 6 months] versus placebo persisted through year 3,” Dr. Hochberg said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Marc Hochberg


As for secondary endpoints of thickness in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral cartilage, “there are significant differences between the higher-dose sprifermin group and the placebo group,” he said.

“Based on imaging, sprifermin appears to be effective at modifying structural changes in articular cartilage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with knee osteoarthritis, with an acceptable safety profile.”
 

 


Dr. Hochberg added that there was “marked symptomatic improvement” as shown by changes in WOMAC scores in all treatment groups including placebo. The improvement in total WOMAC scores by approximately 50% in all treatment groups by the second year was continued to the third year.

Adverse effects occurred with a similar frequency in the active treatment groups and the placebo group. They were also of a similar nature. The most commonly reported side effects involved the musculoskeletal system or were connective tissue disorders (e.g. arthralgia). Importantly, there was no difference in the frequency, severity, or nature of serious adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, or discontinuation due to adverse events with active versus placebo therapy, Dr. Hochberg said.

The percentages of patients completing the study to the second and third years were a respective 87.8% and 81.6% in the sprifermin groups and 80.6% and 75.9% in the placebo group.

Merck KGaA and EMD Serono Research Institute funded the study. Dr. Hochberg has received consulting fees from EMD Serono and multiple other companies developing treatments for OA.

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S26-27. Abstract 32

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM OARSI 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Phase 2 trial data show a sustained effect of the investigational drug sprifermin in knee osteoarthritis.

Major finding: The difference from placebo in mean cartilage thickness at the tibiofemoral joint at 3 years was 0.05 mm for the 100-mcg dose of sprifermin given every 6 months (P less than .0001).

Study details: Phase 2 study of 549 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with one of four intra-articular doses of sprifermin or placebo.

Disclosures: Merck KGaA and EMD Serono Research Institute funded the study. Dr. Hochberg has received consulting fees from EMD Serono and multiple other companies developing treatments for OA.

Source: Hochberg M et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018:26(1):S26-27. Abstract 32.
 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

ECT cost effective in treatment-resistant depression

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

Electroconvulsive therapy might be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant depression, results of a mathematical modeling analysis suggest.

The health-economic value of electroconvulsive therapy is most likely maximized when the intervention is tried after two failed lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy, authors of the analysis said in JAMA Psychiatry.

“Increasing use of ECT by offering it earlier in the course of treatment-resistant depression could greatly improve outcomes for this difficult-to-treat patient population,” wrote Eric L. Ross, a medical student at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

In clinical practice, patients with uncontrolled depression might not be offered electroconvulsive therapy for months or years, despite evidence from multiple studies that it is significantly more effective than pharmacotherapy in that setting, Mr. Ross and his coauthors in the university’s department of psychiatry wrote in their report.

One barrier to use of electroconvulsive therapy might be its cost, which they said can run in excess of $10,000 for initial therapy and maintenance treatments, compared with several hundred dollars for an antidepressant prescription.

However, data are limited showing the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in relation to that higher price tag. Accordingly, the investigators used a decision analytic model to simulate the clinical and economic effects of seven different electroconvulsive therapy treatment strategies, and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of each.

Over a 4-year horizon, treatment with electroconvulsive therapy would reduce time with uncontrolled depression from 50%, down to 32.9%-37.1%, depending on the treatment strategy, the investigators found.

 

 


It was 74%-78% likely that electroconvulsive therapy would be cost effective, they added, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, they said.

They found that third-line electroconvulsive therapy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $54,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Based on that, investigators projected that the third-line strategy would be cost effective, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

Although offering electroconvulsive therapy after two lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy maximized its health-economic value in this analysis, the treatment still would be cost effective in patients with three or more previous treatments, authors said.

Based on those findings, Mr. Ross and his coauthors said they would recommend that patients with major depressive disorder be offered ECT when two or more trials of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy have failed. That aligns with other recent recommendations, including 2017 Florida best practice guidelines that classify ECT as a level 3 treatment option, they said.

 

 


Mr. Ross and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that much of the input data used in the mathematical model is more than 10 years old. In addition, other novel interventions for treatment-resistant depression – such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation – were not evaluated.

The study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Services. The study authors had no conflicts of interest to report.

SOURCE: Ross EL et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768..

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Electroconvulsive therapy might be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant depression, results of a mathematical modeling analysis suggest.

The health-economic value of electroconvulsive therapy is most likely maximized when the intervention is tried after two failed lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy, authors of the analysis said in JAMA Psychiatry.

“Increasing use of ECT by offering it earlier in the course of treatment-resistant depression could greatly improve outcomes for this difficult-to-treat patient population,” wrote Eric L. Ross, a medical student at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

In clinical practice, patients with uncontrolled depression might not be offered electroconvulsive therapy for months or years, despite evidence from multiple studies that it is significantly more effective than pharmacotherapy in that setting, Mr. Ross and his coauthors in the university’s department of psychiatry wrote in their report.

One barrier to use of electroconvulsive therapy might be its cost, which they said can run in excess of $10,000 for initial therapy and maintenance treatments, compared with several hundred dollars for an antidepressant prescription.

However, data are limited showing the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in relation to that higher price tag. Accordingly, the investigators used a decision analytic model to simulate the clinical and economic effects of seven different electroconvulsive therapy treatment strategies, and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of each.

Over a 4-year horizon, treatment with electroconvulsive therapy would reduce time with uncontrolled depression from 50%, down to 32.9%-37.1%, depending on the treatment strategy, the investigators found.

 

 


It was 74%-78% likely that electroconvulsive therapy would be cost effective, they added, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, they said.

They found that third-line electroconvulsive therapy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $54,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Based on that, investigators projected that the third-line strategy would be cost effective, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

Although offering electroconvulsive therapy after two lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy maximized its health-economic value in this analysis, the treatment still would be cost effective in patients with three or more previous treatments, authors said.

Based on those findings, Mr. Ross and his coauthors said they would recommend that patients with major depressive disorder be offered ECT when two or more trials of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy have failed. That aligns with other recent recommendations, including 2017 Florida best practice guidelines that classify ECT as a level 3 treatment option, they said.

 

 


Mr. Ross and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that much of the input data used in the mathematical model is more than 10 years old. In addition, other novel interventions for treatment-resistant depression – such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation – were not evaluated.

The study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Services. The study authors had no conflicts of interest to report.

SOURCE: Ross EL et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768..

 

Electroconvulsive therapy might be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant depression, results of a mathematical modeling analysis suggest.

The health-economic value of electroconvulsive therapy is most likely maximized when the intervention is tried after two failed lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy, authors of the analysis said in JAMA Psychiatry.

“Increasing use of ECT by offering it earlier in the course of treatment-resistant depression could greatly improve outcomes for this difficult-to-treat patient population,” wrote Eric L. Ross, a medical student at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

In clinical practice, patients with uncontrolled depression might not be offered electroconvulsive therapy for months or years, despite evidence from multiple studies that it is significantly more effective than pharmacotherapy in that setting, Mr. Ross and his coauthors in the university’s department of psychiatry wrote in their report.

One barrier to use of electroconvulsive therapy might be its cost, which they said can run in excess of $10,000 for initial therapy and maintenance treatments, compared with several hundred dollars for an antidepressant prescription.

However, data are limited showing the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in relation to that higher price tag. Accordingly, the investigators used a decision analytic model to simulate the clinical and economic effects of seven different electroconvulsive therapy treatment strategies, and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of each.

Over a 4-year horizon, treatment with electroconvulsive therapy would reduce time with uncontrolled depression from 50%, down to 32.9%-37.1%, depending on the treatment strategy, the investigators found.

 

 


It was 74%-78% likely that electroconvulsive therapy would be cost effective, they added, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, they said.

They found that third-line electroconvulsive therapy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $54,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Based on that, investigators projected that the third-line strategy would be cost effective, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

Although offering electroconvulsive therapy after two lines of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy maximized its health-economic value in this analysis, the treatment still would be cost effective in patients with three or more previous treatments, authors said.

Based on those findings, Mr. Ross and his coauthors said they would recommend that patients with major depressive disorder be offered ECT when two or more trials of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy have failed. That aligns with other recent recommendations, including 2017 Florida best practice guidelines that classify ECT as a level 3 treatment option, they said.

 

 


Mr. Ross and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that much of the input data used in the mathematical model is more than 10 years old. In addition, other novel interventions for treatment-resistant depression – such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation – were not evaluated.

The study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Services. The study authors had no conflicts of interest to report.

SOURCE: Ross EL et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768..

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA Psychiatry

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) should be considered as a third-line treatment after two or more lines of pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy have failed.

Major finding: Third-line ECT had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $54,000/quality-adjusted life-year.

Study details: A simulation of depression treatment using a decision analytic model taking into account the efficacy, cost, and quality of life impact of ECT based on meta-analyses, randomized trials, and observational studies.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Services. Authors had no conflicts of interest to report.

Source: Ross EL et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica