User login
Clonal hematopoiesis increases risk for therapy-related cancers
Small pre-leukemic clones left behind after treatment for non-myeloid malignancies appear to increase the risk for therapy-related myelodysplasia or leukemia, report investigators in two studies.
An analysis of peripheral blood samples taken from patients at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and bone marrow samples taken at the time of a later therapy-related myeloid neoplasm diagnosis showed that 10 of 14 patients (71%) had clonal hematopoiesis before starting on cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, clonal hematopoiesis was detected in pre-treatment samples of only 17 of 54 controls (31%), reported Koichi Takahashi, MD, and colleagues from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“Preleukemic clonal hematopoiesis is common in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and before they have been exposed to treatment. Our results suggest that clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify patients with cancer who are at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 100–11).
In a separate study, investigators from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, found in a nested case-control study that patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms were more likely than controls to have clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and that the CHIP was often present before exposure to chemotherapy.
“We recorded a significantly higher prevalence of CHIP in individuals who developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) than in those who did not (controls); however, around 27% of individuals with CHIP did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, suggesting that this feature alone should not be used to determine a patient’s suitability for chemotherapy,” wrote Nancy K. Gillis, PharmD, and colleagues (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:112-21).
Risk factors examined
Dr. Takahashi and colleagues noted that previous studies have identified several treatment-related risk factors as being associated with therapy-related myeloid dysplasia or leukemia, including the use of alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation.
“By contrast, little is known about patient-specific risk factors. Older age was shown to increase the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Several germline polymorphisms have also been associated with this risk, but none have been validated. As such, no predictive biomarkers exist for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote.
They performed a retrospective case-control study comparing patients treated for a primary cancer at their center from 1997 through 2015 who subsequently developed a myeloid neoplasm with controls treated during the same period. Controls were age-matched patients treated with combination chemotherapy for lymphoma who did not develop a therapy-related myeloid malignancy after at least 5 years of follow-up.
In addition, the investigators further explored the association between clonal hematopoiesis and therapy-related cancers in an external cohort of patients with lymphoma treated in a randomized trial at their center from 1999 through 2001. That trial compared the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) with and without melatonin.
To detect clonal hematopoiesis in pre-treatment peripheral blood, the investigators used molecular barcode sequencing of 32 genes. They also used targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples from cases to investigate clonal evolution from clonal hematopoiesis to the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
As noted before, 10 of 14 cases had evidence of pre-treatment clonal hematopoiesis, compared with 17 of 54 controls. For both cases and controls, the cumulative incidence of therapy-related myeloid cancers after 5 years was significantly higher among those with baseline clonal hematopoiesis, at 30% vs. 7% for patients without it (P = .016).
Five of 74 patients in the external cohort (7%) went on to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and of this group, four (80%) had clonal hematopoiesis at baseline. In contrast, of the 69 patients who did not develop therapy-related cancers, 11 (16%) had baseline clonal hematopoiesis.
In a multivariate model using data from the external cohort, clonal hematopoiesis was significantly associated with risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P = .013).
Elderly patient study
Dr. Gillis and her colleagues conducted a nested, case-control, proof-of-concept study to compare the prevalence of CHIP between patients with cancer who later developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) and patients who did not (controls).
The cases were identified from an internal biobank of 123,357 patients, and included all patients who were diagnosed with a primary cancer, treated with chemotherapy, and subsequently developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. The patients had to be 70 or older at the time of either primary or therapy-related cancer diagnosis with peripheral blood or mononuclear samples collected before the diagnosis of the second cancer.
Controls were patients diagnosed with a primary malignancy at age 70 or older who had chemotherapy but did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Every case was matched with at least four controls selected for sex, primary tumor type, age at diagnosis, smoking status, chemotherapy drug class, and duration of follow up.
They used sequential targeted and whole-exome sequencing to assess clonal evolution in cases for whom paired CHIP and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples were available.
They identified a total of 13 cases and 56 controls. Among all patients, CHIP was seen in 23 (33%). In contrast, previous studies have shown a prevalence of CHIP among older patients without cancer of about 10%, the authors note in their article.
The prevalence of CHIP was significantly higher among cases than among controls, occurring in 8 of 13 cases (62%) vs 15 of 56 controls (27%; P = .024). The odds ratio for therapy-related neoplasms with CHIP was 5.75 (P = .013).
The most commonly mutated genes were TET2 and TP53 among cases, and TET2 among controls.
“The distribution of CHIP-related gene mutations differs between individuals with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and those without, suggesting that mutation-specific differences might exist in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm risk,” the investigators write.
Dr. Takahashi’s study was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, Red and Charline McCombs Institute for the Early Detection and Treatment of Cancer, The National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, and the MD Anderson MDS & AML Moon Shots Program. Dr. Gillis’ study was internally funded. Dr. Takahasi and colleagues reported no competing financial interests. Two of Dr. Gillis’ colleagues reported grants or fees from several drug companies.
The real importance of the work reported by Gillis and colleagues and Takahashi and colleagues will come when therapies exist that can effectively eradicate nascent clonal hematopoiesis, thereby preventing therapy-related myeloid neoplasm evolution in at-risk patients.
Although high-intensity treatments, such as anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, can eradicate myeloid clones, their effectiveness in clearing TP53-mutant cells is limited, and it is difficult to imagine intense approaches having a favorable risk–benefit balance in patients whose clonal hematopoiesis might never become a problem. Existing lower-intensity therapies for myeloid neoplasms such as DNA hypomethylating agents are not curative and often do not result in the reduction of VAF [variant allele frequencies] even when hematopoietic improvement occurs during therapy, so such agents would not be expected to eliminate pre-therapy-related myeloid neoplasm clones (although this hypothesis might still be worth testing, given that the emergence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm could at least be delayed – even if not entirely prevented – with azacitidine or decitabine).
More promising are strategies that change the bone marrow microenvironment or break the immune tolerance of abnormal clones, although the use of these approaches for myeloid neoplasia is still in the very early stages. Although no method yet exists to reliably eliminate the preleukemic clones that can give rise to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, identification of higher risk patients could still affect monitoring practices, such as the frequency of clinical assessments. Molecular genetic panels are expensive at present but are becoming less so. Because VAF assessment by next-generation sequencing is quantitative and proportional to clone size, serial assessment could identify patients whose mutant clones are large and expanding and who therefore warrant closer monitoring or enrollment in so-called preventive hematology trials.
David P. Steensma, MD, is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston. His remarks were excerpted from an accompanying editorial.
The real importance of the work reported by Gillis and colleagues and Takahashi and colleagues will come when therapies exist that can effectively eradicate nascent clonal hematopoiesis, thereby preventing therapy-related myeloid neoplasm evolution in at-risk patients.
Although high-intensity treatments, such as anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, can eradicate myeloid clones, their effectiveness in clearing TP53-mutant cells is limited, and it is difficult to imagine intense approaches having a favorable risk–benefit balance in patients whose clonal hematopoiesis might never become a problem. Existing lower-intensity therapies for myeloid neoplasms such as DNA hypomethylating agents are not curative and often do not result in the reduction of VAF [variant allele frequencies] even when hematopoietic improvement occurs during therapy, so such agents would not be expected to eliminate pre-therapy-related myeloid neoplasm clones (although this hypothesis might still be worth testing, given that the emergence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm could at least be delayed – even if not entirely prevented – with azacitidine or decitabine).
More promising are strategies that change the bone marrow microenvironment or break the immune tolerance of abnormal clones, although the use of these approaches for myeloid neoplasia is still in the very early stages. Although no method yet exists to reliably eliminate the preleukemic clones that can give rise to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, identification of higher risk patients could still affect monitoring practices, such as the frequency of clinical assessments. Molecular genetic panels are expensive at present but are becoming less so. Because VAF assessment by next-generation sequencing is quantitative and proportional to clone size, serial assessment could identify patients whose mutant clones are large and expanding and who therefore warrant closer monitoring or enrollment in so-called preventive hematology trials.
David P. Steensma, MD, is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston. His remarks were excerpted from an accompanying editorial.
The real importance of the work reported by Gillis and colleagues and Takahashi and colleagues will come when therapies exist that can effectively eradicate nascent clonal hematopoiesis, thereby preventing therapy-related myeloid neoplasm evolution in at-risk patients.
Although high-intensity treatments, such as anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, can eradicate myeloid clones, their effectiveness in clearing TP53-mutant cells is limited, and it is difficult to imagine intense approaches having a favorable risk–benefit balance in patients whose clonal hematopoiesis might never become a problem. Existing lower-intensity therapies for myeloid neoplasms such as DNA hypomethylating agents are not curative and often do not result in the reduction of VAF [variant allele frequencies] even when hematopoietic improvement occurs during therapy, so such agents would not be expected to eliminate pre-therapy-related myeloid neoplasm clones (although this hypothesis might still be worth testing, given that the emergence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm could at least be delayed – even if not entirely prevented – with azacitidine or decitabine).
More promising are strategies that change the bone marrow microenvironment or break the immune tolerance of abnormal clones, although the use of these approaches for myeloid neoplasia is still in the very early stages. Although no method yet exists to reliably eliminate the preleukemic clones that can give rise to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, identification of higher risk patients could still affect monitoring practices, such as the frequency of clinical assessments. Molecular genetic panels are expensive at present but are becoming less so. Because VAF assessment by next-generation sequencing is quantitative and proportional to clone size, serial assessment could identify patients whose mutant clones are large and expanding and who therefore warrant closer monitoring or enrollment in so-called preventive hematology trials.
David P. Steensma, MD, is with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston. His remarks were excerpted from an accompanying editorial.
Small pre-leukemic clones left behind after treatment for non-myeloid malignancies appear to increase the risk for therapy-related myelodysplasia or leukemia, report investigators in two studies.
An analysis of peripheral blood samples taken from patients at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and bone marrow samples taken at the time of a later therapy-related myeloid neoplasm diagnosis showed that 10 of 14 patients (71%) had clonal hematopoiesis before starting on cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, clonal hematopoiesis was detected in pre-treatment samples of only 17 of 54 controls (31%), reported Koichi Takahashi, MD, and colleagues from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“Preleukemic clonal hematopoiesis is common in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and before they have been exposed to treatment. Our results suggest that clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify patients with cancer who are at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 100–11).
In a separate study, investigators from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, found in a nested case-control study that patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms were more likely than controls to have clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and that the CHIP was often present before exposure to chemotherapy.
“We recorded a significantly higher prevalence of CHIP in individuals who developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) than in those who did not (controls); however, around 27% of individuals with CHIP did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, suggesting that this feature alone should not be used to determine a patient’s suitability for chemotherapy,” wrote Nancy K. Gillis, PharmD, and colleagues (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:112-21).
Risk factors examined
Dr. Takahashi and colleagues noted that previous studies have identified several treatment-related risk factors as being associated with therapy-related myeloid dysplasia or leukemia, including the use of alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation.
“By contrast, little is known about patient-specific risk factors. Older age was shown to increase the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Several germline polymorphisms have also been associated with this risk, but none have been validated. As such, no predictive biomarkers exist for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote.
They performed a retrospective case-control study comparing patients treated for a primary cancer at their center from 1997 through 2015 who subsequently developed a myeloid neoplasm with controls treated during the same period. Controls were age-matched patients treated with combination chemotherapy for lymphoma who did not develop a therapy-related myeloid malignancy after at least 5 years of follow-up.
In addition, the investigators further explored the association between clonal hematopoiesis and therapy-related cancers in an external cohort of patients with lymphoma treated in a randomized trial at their center from 1999 through 2001. That trial compared the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) with and without melatonin.
To detect clonal hematopoiesis in pre-treatment peripheral blood, the investigators used molecular barcode sequencing of 32 genes. They also used targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples from cases to investigate clonal evolution from clonal hematopoiesis to the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
As noted before, 10 of 14 cases had evidence of pre-treatment clonal hematopoiesis, compared with 17 of 54 controls. For both cases and controls, the cumulative incidence of therapy-related myeloid cancers after 5 years was significantly higher among those with baseline clonal hematopoiesis, at 30% vs. 7% for patients without it (P = .016).
Five of 74 patients in the external cohort (7%) went on to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and of this group, four (80%) had clonal hematopoiesis at baseline. In contrast, of the 69 patients who did not develop therapy-related cancers, 11 (16%) had baseline clonal hematopoiesis.
In a multivariate model using data from the external cohort, clonal hematopoiesis was significantly associated with risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P = .013).
Elderly patient study
Dr. Gillis and her colleagues conducted a nested, case-control, proof-of-concept study to compare the prevalence of CHIP between patients with cancer who later developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) and patients who did not (controls).
The cases were identified from an internal biobank of 123,357 patients, and included all patients who were diagnosed with a primary cancer, treated with chemotherapy, and subsequently developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. The patients had to be 70 or older at the time of either primary or therapy-related cancer diagnosis with peripheral blood or mononuclear samples collected before the diagnosis of the second cancer.
Controls were patients diagnosed with a primary malignancy at age 70 or older who had chemotherapy but did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Every case was matched with at least four controls selected for sex, primary tumor type, age at diagnosis, smoking status, chemotherapy drug class, and duration of follow up.
They used sequential targeted and whole-exome sequencing to assess clonal evolution in cases for whom paired CHIP and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples were available.
They identified a total of 13 cases and 56 controls. Among all patients, CHIP was seen in 23 (33%). In contrast, previous studies have shown a prevalence of CHIP among older patients without cancer of about 10%, the authors note in their article.
The prevalence of CHIP was significantly higher among cases than among controls, occurring in 8 of 13 cases (62%) vs 15 of 56 controls (27%; P = .024). The odds ratio for therapy-related neoplasms with CHIP was 5.75 (P = .013).
The most commonly mutated genes were TET2 and TP53 among cases, and TET2 among controls.
“The distribution of CHIP-related gene mutations differs between individuals with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and those without, suggesting that mutation-specific differences might exist in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm risk,” the investigators write.
Dr. Takahashi’s study was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, Red and Charline McCombs Institute for the Early Detection and Treatment of Cancer, The National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, and the MD Anderson MDS & AML Moon Shots Program. Dr. Gillis’ study was internally funded. Dr. Takahasi and colleagues reported no competing financial interests. Two of Dr. Gillis’ colleagues reported grants or fees from several drug companies.
Small pre-leukemic clones left behind after treatment for non-myeloid malignancies appear to increase the risk for therapy-related myelodysplasia or leukemia, report investigators in two studies.
An analysis of peripheral blood samples taken from patients at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and bone marrow samples taken at the time of a later therapy-related myeloid neoplasm diagnosis showed that 10 of 14 patients (71%) had clonal hematopoiesis before starting on cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, clonal hematopoiesis was detected in pre-treatment samples of only 17 of 54 controls (31%), reported Koichi Takahashi, MD, and colleagues from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“Preleukemic clonal hematopoiesis is common in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and before they have been exposed to treatment. Our results suggest that clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify patients with cancer who are at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 100–11).
In a separate study, investigators from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, found in a nested case-control study that patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms were more likely than controls to have clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and that the CHIP was often present before exposure to chemotherapy.
“We recorded a significantly higher prevalence of CHIP in individuals who developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) than in those who did not (controls); however, around 27% of individuals with CHIP did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, suggesting that this feature alone should not be used to determine a patient’s suitability for chemotherapy,” wrote Nancy K. Gillis, PharmD, and colleagues (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:112-21).
Risk factors examined
Dr. Takahashi and colleagues noted that previous studies have identified several treatment-related risk factors as being associated with therapy-related myeloid dysplasia or leukemia, including the use of alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation.
“By contrast, little is known about patient-specific risk factors. Older age was shown to increase the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Several germline polymorphisms have also been associated with this risk, but none have been validated. As such, no predictive biomarkers exist for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms,” they wrote.
They performed a retrospective case-control study comparing patients treated for a primary cancer at their center from 1997 through 2015 who subsequently developed a myeloid neoplasm with controls treated during the same period. Controls were age-matched patients treated with combination chemotherapy for lymphoma who did not develop a therapy-related myeloid malignancy after at least 5 years of follow-up.
In addition, the investigators further explored the association between clonal hematopoiesis and therapy-related cancers in an external cohort of patients with lymphoma treated in a randomized trial at their center from 1999 through 2001. That trial compared the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) with and without melatonin.
To detect clonal hematopoiesis in pre-treatment peripheral blood, the investigators used molecular barcode sequencing of 32 genes. They also used targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples from cases to investigate clonal evolution from clonal hematopoiesis to the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
As noted before, 10 of 14 cases had evidence of pre-treatment clonal hematopoiesis, compared with 17 of 54 controls. For both cases and controls, the cumulative incidence of therapy-related myeloid cancers after 5 years was significantly higher among those with baseline clonal hematopoiesis, at 30% vs. 7% for patients without it (P = .016).
Five of 74 patients in the external cohort (7%) went on to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and of this group, four (80%) had clonal hematopoiesis at baseline. In contrast, of the 69 patients who did not develop therapy-related cancers, 11 (16%) had baseline clonal hematopoiesis.
In a multivariate model using data from the external cohort, clonal hematopoiesis was significantly associated with risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P = .013).
Elderly patient study
Dr. Gillis and her colleagues conducted a nested, case-control, proof-of-concept study to compare the prevalence of CHIP between patients with cancer who later developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) and patients who did not (controls).
The cases were identified from an internal biobank of 123,357 patients, and included all patients who were diagnosed with a primary cancer, treated with chemotherapy, and subsequently developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. The patients had to be 70 or older at the time of either primary or therapy-related cancer diagnosis with peripheral blood or mononuclear samples collected before the diagnosis of the second cancer.
Controls were patients diagnosed with a primary malignancy at age 70 or older who had chemotherapy but did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Every case was matched with at least four controls selected for sex, primary tumor type, age at diagnosis, smoking status, chemotherapy drug class, and duration of follow up.
They used sequential targeted and whole-exome sequencing to assess clonal evolution in cases for whom paired CHIP and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples were available.
They identified a total of 13 cases and 56 controls. Among all patients, CHIP was seen in 23 (33%). In contrast, previous studies have shown a prevalence of CHIP among older patients without cancer of about 10%, the authors note in their article.
The prevalence of CHIP was significantly higher among cases than among controls, occurring in 8 of 13 cases (62%) vs 15 of 56 controls (27%; P = .024). The odds ratio for therapy-related neoplasms with CHIP was 5.75 (P = .013).
The most commonly mutated genes were TET2 and TP53 among cases, and TET2 among controls.
“The distribution of CHIP-related gene mutations differs between individuals with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and those without, suggesting that mutation-specific differences might exist in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm risk,” the investigators write.
Dr. Takahashi’s study was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, Red and Charline McCombs Institute for the Early Detection and Treatment of Cancer, The National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, and the MD Anderson MDS & AML Moon Shots Program. Dr. Gillis’ study was internally funded. Dr. Takahasi and colleagues reported no competing financial interests. Two of Dr. Gillis’ colleagues reported grants or fees from several drug companies.
FROM LANCET ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point: Pre-therapy clonal hematopoiesis is associated with increased risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
Major finding: In two studies, the incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms was higher among patients with clonal hematopoiesis at baseline.
Data source: Retrospective case-control studies.
Disclosures: Dr. Takahashi’s study was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, Red and Charline McCombs Institute for the Early Detection and Treatment of Cancer, The National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, and the MD Anderson MDS & AML Moon Shots Program. Dr. Gillis’ study was internally funded. Dr. Takahasi and colleagues reported no competing financial interests. Two of Dr. Gillis’ colleagues reported grants or fees from several drug companies.
Rituximab after ASCT boosted survival in mantle cell lymphoma
SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy every other month with rituximab significantly prolonged event-free and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, based on results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial.
After a median follow-up period of 50 months, 79% of the rituximab maintenance arm remained alive and free of progression, relapse, and severe infection, compared with 61% of the no-maintenance arm (P = .001), said Steven Le Gouill, MD, PhD, at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
This is the first study linking rituximab maintenance after ASCT to improved survival in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, said Dr. Le Gouill of Nantes University Hospital in Nantes, France.
The trial “demonstrates for the first time that rituximab maintenance after ASCT prolongs event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival” in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Le Gouill said. The findings confirm rituximab maintenance as “a new standard of care” in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, he concluded.
Prior research http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1200920#t=abstract supports maintenance therapy with rituximab rather than interferon alfa for older patients whose mantle cell lymphoma responded to induction with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), noted Dr. Le Gouill. To examine outcomes in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, he and his associates treated 299 individuals aged 65 years and younger (median age, 57 years) with standard induction consisting of 4 courses of rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and salt platinum (R-DHAP) every 21 days, followed by conditioning with rituximab plus BiCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (R-BEAM) and ASCT. Patients without at least a partial response to R-DHAP received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP-14 before ASCT. Patients then were randomized either to no maintenance or to infusions of 375 mg R per m2 every 2 months for 3 years.
A total of 53% of patients were mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) low risk, 27% were intermediate and 19% were high-risk. Rituximab maintenance was associated with a 60% lower risk of progression (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68; P = .0007) and a 50% lower risk of death (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98; P = .04).
The French Innovative Leukemia Organisation sponsored the trial. Dr. Le Gouill disclosed ties to Roche, Janssen-Cilag, and Celgene.
SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy every other month with rituximab significantly prolonged event-free and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, based on results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial.
After a median follow-up period of 50 months, 79% of the rituximab maintenance arm remained alive and free of progression, relapse, and severe infection, compared with 61% of the no-maintenance arm (P = .001), said Steven Le Gouill, MD, PhD, at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
This is the first study linking rituximab maintenance after ASCT to improved survival in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, said Dr. Le Gouill of Nantes University Hospital in Nantes, France.
The trial “demonstrates for the first time that rituximab maintenance after ASCT prolongs event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival” in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Le Gouill said. The findings confirm rituximab maintenance as “a new standard of care” in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, he concluded.
Prior research http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1200920#t=abstract supports maintenance therapy with rituximab rather than interferon alfa for older patients whose mantle cell lymphoma responded to induction with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), noted Dr. Le Gouill. To examine outcomes in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, he and his associates treated 299 individuals aged 65 years and younger (median age, 57 years) with standard induction consisting of 4 courses of rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and salt platinum (R-DHAP) every 21 days, followed by conditioning with rituximab plus BiCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (R-BEAM) and ASCT. Patients without at least a partial response to R-DHAP received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP-14 before ASCT. Patients then were randomized either to no maintenance or to infusions of 375 mg R per m2 every 2 months for 3 years.
A total of 53% of patients were mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) low risk, 27% were intermediate and 19% were high-risk. Rituximab maintenance was associated with a 60% lower risk of progression (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68; P = .0007) and a 50% lower risk of death (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98; P = .04).
The French Innovative Leukemia Organisation sponsored the trial. Dr. Le Gouill disclosed ties to Roche, Janssen-Cilag, and Celgene.
SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy every other month with rituximab significantly prolonged event-free and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, based on results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial.
After a median follow-up period of 50 months, 79% of the rituximab maintenance arm remained alive and free of progression, relapse, and severe infection, compared with 61% of the no-maintenance arm (P = .001), said Steven Le Gouill, MD, PhD, at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
This is the first study linking rituximab maintenance after ASCT to improved survival in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, said Dr. Le Gouill of Nantes University Hospital in Nantes, France.
The trial “demonstrates for the first time that rituximab maintenance after ASCT prolongs event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival” in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Le Gouill said. The findings confirm rituximab maintenance as “a new standard of care” in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, he concluded.
Prior research http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1200920#t=abstract supports maintenance therapy with rituximab rather than interferon alfa for older patients whose mantle cell lymphoma responded to induction with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), noted Dr. Le Gouill. To examine outcomes in younger patients with treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma, he and his associates treated 299 individuals aged 65 years and younger (median age, 57 years) with standard induction consisting of 4 courses of rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and salt platinum (R-DHAP) every 21 days, followed by conditioning with rituximab plus BiCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (R-BEAM) and ASCT. Patients without at least a partial response to R-DHAP received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP-14 before ASCT. Patients then were randomized either to no maintenance or to infusions of 375 mg R per m2 every 2 months for 3 years.
A total of 53% of patients were mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) low risk, 27% were intermediate and 19% were high-risk. Rituximab maintenance was associated with a 60% lower risk of progression (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68; P = .0007) and a 50% lower risk of death (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98; P = .04).
The French Innovative Leukemia Organisation sponsored the trial. Dr. Le Gouill disclosed ties to Roche, Janssen-Cilag, and Celgene.
AT ASH 2016
Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with rituximab after autologous stem cell transplantation was associated with significantly increased survival among younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Major finding: After a median follow-up time of 50 months, 79% of patients who received rituximab maintenance remained alive and free of progression, relapse, and severe infection, compared with 61% of those who received no maintenance therapy (P = .001).
Data source: A multicenter randomized phase 3 trial of 299 adults up to 65 years old with mantle cell lymphoma.
Disclosures: The French Innovative Leukemia Organisation sponsored the trial. Dr. Le Gouill disclosed ties to Roche, Janssen-Cilag, and Celgene.
President Trump hits ground running on ACA repeal
WASHINGTON – President Trump wasted no time in getting the executive branch’s wheels in motion toward repeal of the Affordable Care Act.
Within hours of being sworn in as the 45th president of the United States on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order that announced the incoming administration’s policy “to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
The order opens the door for federal agencies to tackle ACA provisions such as the individual mandate and its tax penalties for not carrying insurance, as well as other financial aspects of the ACA that impact patients, providers, insurers, and manufacturers.
The order directs the secretaries of HHS, the Treasury department, and the Labor department to “exercise all authority and discretion available to them to provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs.”
With this order, President Trump also set the stage for creating a framework to sell insurance products across state lines by directing secretaries with oversight of insurance markets to “encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare services and health insurance, with the goal of achieving and preserving maximum options for patients and consumers.”
Little action is expected on the executive order until secretaries are approved for HHS, Treasury, and Labor. Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is scheduled to appear before the Senate Finance Committee on Jan. 24.
WASHINGTON – President Trump wasted no time in getting the executive branch’s wheels in motion toward repeal of the Affordable Care Act.
Within hours of being sworn in as the 45th president of the United States on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order that announced the incoming administration’s policy “to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
The order opens the door for federal agencies to tackle ACA provisions such as the individual mandate and its tax penalties for not carrying insurance, as well as other financial aspects of the ACA that impact patients, providers, insurers, and manufacturers.
The order directs the secretaries of HHS, the Treasury department, and the Labor department to “exercise all authority and discretion available to them to provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs.”
With this order, President Trump also set the stage for creating a framework to sell insurance products across state lines by directing secretaries with oversight of insurance markets to “encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare services and health insurance, with the goal of achieving and preserving maximum options for patients and consumers.”
Little action is expected on the executive order until secretaries are approved for HHS, Treasury, and Labor. Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is scheduled to appear before the Senate Finance Committee on Jan. 24.
WASHINGTON – President Trump wasted no time in getting the executive branch’s wheels in motion toward repeal of the Affordable Care Act.
Within hours of being sworn in as the 45th president of the United States on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order that announced the incoming administration’s policy “to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
The order opens the door for federal agencies to tackle ACA provisions such as the individual mandate and its tax penalties for not carrying insurance, as well as other financial aspects of the ACA that impact patients, providers, insurers, and manufacturers.
The order directs the secretaries of HHS, the Treasury department, and the Labor department to “exercise all authority and discretion available to them to provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs.”
With this order, President Trump also set the stage for creating a framework to sell insurance products across state lines by directing secretaries with oversight of insurance markets to “encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare services and health insurance, with the goal of achieving and preserving maximum options for patients and consumers.”
Little action is expected on the executive order until secretaries are approved for HHS, Treasury, and Labor. Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is scheduled to appear before the Senate Finance Committee on Jan. 24.
Laser vaginal rejuvenation procedures
VIENNA – Vaginal rejuvenation is a major practice growth opportunity for dermatologists who have expertise with lasers, Peter Bjerring, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
The rejuvenation procedures involve heating the connective tissue of the vaginal wall to 40-42 C in order to stimulate tissue remodeling with formation of new collagen and elastic fibers. The evidence base for vaginal rejuvenation using a variety of noninvasive energy-based devices developed for vaginal use isn’t nearly as extensive as it is for skin rejuvenation using lasers. Research is beginning to increase for this indication, but current results are primarily limited to small single-arm studies based on self-reported improvements. Further, studies don’t compare outcomes vs another treatment, such as estrogen cream.
Despite the minimal evidence base for laser procedures, “feminine rejuvenation is becoming very popular. These are (women) who might present to a dermatologist or to a gynecologist,” observed Dr. Bjerring, medical director and head of the Skin and Laser Center at Malholm (Denmark) Hospital.
Minimally ablative or nonablative fractional laser therapy for vaginal rejuvenation requires no anesthesia and no downtime. The lasers being used for this purpose are similar to those already used most often for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation of the face and neck: fractional CO2 lasers at the 10,600-nm wavelength, such as the MonaLisa Touch or FemTouch, and 2,940-nm nonablative erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers such as the IntimaLase. A course of treatment with these devices typically consists of three, 15-minute sessions at 4- to 6-week intervals.
Dr. Bjerring noted that this mechanism of benefit has been demonstrated by Italian investigators who conducted a histologic study of the effects of microablative fractional CO2 laser therapy on ex vivo specimens of atrophic vaginal tissue obtained from women with vulvovaginal atrophy who underwent major surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
The investigators treated one side of the atrophic vaginal wall specimen with the microablative fractional CO2 laser and left the contralateral area untreated as a control. They documented that laser therapy restored the vaginal squamous stratified epithelium, with enhanced storage of glycogen in the epithelial cells and shedding of glycogen-rich cells at the epithelial surface. In the connective tissue, activated fibroblasts synthesized new collagen-laden extracellular matrix. All this was accomplished without damage to adjacent untreated tissue (Menopause 2015 Aug;22(8):845-9).
In a single-arm study performed by many of the same Italian investigators, 77 postmenopausal women underwent a course of fractional microablative CO2 laser therapy because they experienced painful sexual intercourse due to vulvovaginal atrophy. At 12 weeks of followup, the group reported significant improvement in sexual function and satisfaction with their sexual life as measured by the Short Form-12 and the Female Sexual Function Index. Self-rated scores of vaginal burning, dryness, and itching improved significantly, as did complaints of pain during intercourse or urination. At baseline, 20 of the 77 women were not sexually active due to the severity of their vulvovaginal atrophy; at followup, 17 of the 20 had reestablished sexual activity (Climacteric. 2015 Apr;18(2):219-25).
Dr. Bjerring also highlighted an American study, again single-arm, in which 27 women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause were examined at baseline and again 3 months after their third and final treatment with a fractional CO2 laser. At follow up, 26 of the 27 pronounced themselves satisfied or extremely satisfied with the results, with significant improvement in the same outcome measures used in the Italian study. At follow up, 25 of the women had an increase in comfortable dilator size (Menopause 2016 Oct;23(10):1102-7).
Dr. Bjerring reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
VIENNA – Vaginal rejuvenation is a major practice growth opportunity for dermatologists who have expertise with lasers, Peter Bjerring, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
The rejuvenation procedures involve heating the connective tissue of the vaginal wall to 40-42 C in order to stimulate tissue remodeling with formation of new collagen and elastic fibers. The evidence base for vaginal rejuvenation using a variety of noninvasive energy-based devices developed for vaginal use isn’t nearly as extensive as it is for skin rejuvenation using lasers. Research is beginning to increase for this indication, but current results are primarily limited to small single-arm studies based on self-reported improvements. Further, studies don’t compare outcomes vs another treatment, such as estrogen cream.
Despite the minimal evidence base for laser procedures, “feminine rejuvenation is becoming very popular. These are (women) who might present to a dermatologist or to a gynecologist,” observed Dr. Bjerring, medical director and head of the Skin and Laser Center at Malholm (Denmark) Hospital.
Minimally ablative or nonablative fractional laser therapy for vaginal rejuvenation requires no anesthesia and no downtime. The lasers being used for this purpose are similar to those already used most often for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation of the face and neck: fractional CO2 lasers at the 10,600-nm wavelength, such as the MonaLisa Touch or FemTouch, and 2,940-nm nonablative erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers such as the IntimaLase. A course of treatment with these devices typically consists of three, 15-minute sessions at 4- to 6-week intervals.
Dr. Bjerring noted that this mechanism of benefit has been demonstrated by Italian investigators who conducted a histologic study of the effects of microablative fractional CO2 laser therapy on ex vivo specimens of atrophic vaginal tissue obtained from women with vulvovaginal atrophy who underwent major surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
The investigators treated one side of the atrophic vaginal wall specimen with the microablative fractional CO2 laser and left the contralateral area untreated as a control. They documented that laser therapy restored the vaginal squamous stratified epithelium, with enhanced storage of glycogen in the epithelial cells and shedding of glycogen-rich cells at the epithelial surface. In the connective tissue, activated fibroblasts synthesized new collagen-laden extracellular matrix. All this was accomplished without damage to adjacent untreated tissue (Menopause 2015 Aug;22(8):845-9).
In a single-arm study performed by many of the same Italian investigators, 77 postmenopausal women underwent a course of fractional microablative CO2 laser therapy because they experienced painful sexual intercourse due to vulvovaginal atrophy. At 12 weeks of followup, the group reported significant improvement in sexual function and satisfaction with their sexual life as measured by the Short Form-12 and the Female Sexual Function Index. Self-rated scores of vaginal burning, dryness, and itching improved significantly, as did complaints of pain during intercourse or urination. At baseline, 20 of the 77 women were not sexually active due to the severity of their vulvovaginal atrophy; at followup, 17 of the 20 had reestablished sexual activity (Climacteric. 2015 Apr;18(2):219-25).
Dr. Bjerring also highlighted an American study, again single-arm, in which 27 women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause were examined at baseline and again 3 months after their third and final treatment with a fractional CO2 laser. At follow up, 26 of the 27 pronounced themselves satisfied or extremely satisfied with the results, with significant improvement in the same outcome measures used in the Italian study. At follow up, 25 of the women had an increase in comfortable dilator size (Menopause 2016 Oct;23(10):1102-7).
Dr. Bjerring reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
VIENNA – Vaginal rejuvenation is a major practice growth opportunity for dermatologists who have expertise with lasers, Peter Bjerring, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
The rejuvenation procedures involve heating the connective tissue of the vaginal wall to 40-42 C in order to stimulate tissue remodeling with formation of new collagen and elastic fibers. The evidence base for vaginal rejuvenation using a variety of noninvasive energy-based devices developed for vaginal use isn’t nearly as extensive as it is for skin rejuvenation using lasers. Research is beginning to increase for this indication, but current results are primarily limited to small single-arm studies based on self-reported improvements. Further, studies don’t compare outcomes vs another treatment, such as estrogen cream.
Despite the minimal evidence base for laser procedures, “feminine rejuvenation is becoming very popular. These are (women) who might present to a dermatologist or to a gynecologist,” observed Dr. Bjerring, medical director and head of the Skin and Laser Center at Malholm (Denmark) Hospital.
Minimally ablative or nonablative fractional laser therapy for vaginal rejuvenation requires no anesthesia and no downtime. The lasers being used for this purpose are similar to those already used most often for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation of the face and neck: fractional CO2 lasers at the 10,600-nm wavelength, such as the MonaLisa Touch or FemTouch, and 2,940-nm nonablative erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers such as the IntimaLase. A course of treatment with these devices typically consists of three, 15-minute sessions at 4- to 6-week intervals.
Dr. Bjerring noted that this mechanism of benefit has been demonstrated by Italian investigators who conducted a histologic study of the effects of microablative fractional CO2 laser therapy on ex vivo specimens of atrophic vaginal tissue obtained from women with vulvovaginal atrophy who underwent major surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
The investigators treated one side of the atrophic vaginal wall specimen with the microablative fractional CO2 laser and left the contralateral area untreated as a control. They documented that laser therapy restored the vaginal squamous stratified epithelium, with enhanced storage of glycogen in the epithelial cells and shedding of glycogen-rich cells at the epithelial surface. In the connective tissue, activated fibroblasts synthesized new collagen-laden extracellular matrix. All this was accomplished without damage to adjacent untreated tissue (Menopause 2015 Aug;22(8):845-9).
In a single-arm study performed by many of the same Italian investigators, 77 postmenopausal women underwent a course of fractional microablative CO2 laser therapy because they experienced painful sexual intercourse due to vulvovaginal atrophy. At 12 weeks of followup, the group reported significant improvement in sexual function and satisfaction with their sexual life as measured by the Short Form-12 and the Female Sexual Function Index. Self-rated scores of vaginal burning, dryness, and itching improved significantly, as did complaints of pain during intercourse or urination. At baseline, 20 of the 77 women were not sexually active due to the severity of their vulvovaginal atrophy; at followup, 17 of the 20 had reestablished sexual activity (Climacteric. 2015 Apr;18(2):219-25).
Dr. Bjerring also highlighted an American study, again single-arm, in which 27 women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause were examined at baseline and again 3 months after their third and final treatment with a fractional CO2 laser. At follow up, 26 of the 27 pronounced themselves satisfied or extremely satisfied with the results, with significant improvement in the same outcome measures used in the Italian study. At follow up, 25 of the women had an increase in comfortable dilator size (Menopause 2016 Oct;23(10):1102-7).
Dr. Bjerring reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE EADV CONGRESS
Curb AF recurrences through risk factor modification
SNOWMASS, COLO. – Overlooking the common modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation is missing out on an excellent opportunity to help curb the growing global pandemic of the arrhythmia, Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“My purpose here is a wake up call to improve screening for and treatment of modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation,” declared Dr. O’Gara, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Overweight/obesity: Investigators at the University of Adelaide (Australia) demonstrated in the LEGACY trial that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more reduced their AF symptom burden in a dose-response fashion as they shed excess pounds as part of an intensive weight management program. Those who shed at least 10% of their baseline body weight had a 46% rate of 5-year freedom from AF without resort to rhythm control medications or ablation procedures of 46%. With 3%-9% weight loss, the rate was 22%. And with 3% weight loss, it was 13%.
The best results came from sustained linear weight loss. Weight fluctuations of greater than 5% – the classic yoyo dieting pattern – partially offset the overall benefit of weight loss with respect to recurrent AF (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2159-69).
In a separate study, the same team of Australian investigators offered an opportunity to participate in a risk factor management program to patients with AF and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more who were undergoing radiofrequency ablation for their arrhythmia. Participants had significantly fewer repeat ablation procedures during followup and were also less likely to be on antiarrhythmic drugs than the patients who opted for usual care (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2222-31).
Alcohol: The ‘holiday heart’ syndrome is well known, but alcohol consumption beyond binging can increase risk for AF. Dr. O’Gara noted that in a recent review article entitled “Alcohol and Atrial Fibrillation: A Sobering Review,” investigators at the University of Melbourne showed that while the relationship between the number of standard drinks per week and risk of cardiovascular mortality is J-shaped, with a nadir at 14-21 drinks per week in men and fewer in women, the risk of developing AF is linear over time and appears to increase incrementally with every additional drink per week (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 13;68(23):2567-76).
Also, a prospective study of nearly 80,000 Swedes free from AF at baseline, coupled with a meta-analysis of seven prospective studies found that for each additional drink per day consumed the risk of developing AF rose over time by roughly a further 10% compared to that of teetotalers (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; Jul 22;64(3):281-9).
Physical inactivity: In the prospective Tromso Study, in which more than 20,000 Norwegian adults were followed for 20 years, leisure time physical activity displayed a J-shaped relationship with the risk of developing AF. Moderately active subjects were an adjusted 19% less likely to develop AF than those with low physical activity, while the risk in subjects who regularly engaged in vigorous physical activity was 37% higher than in the low-activity group (Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2307-13).
“This effect of moderate exercise might be due to the associated weight loss, improved endothelial function, better sleep, perhaps a better balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems,” Dr. O’Gara observed.
How much physical activity is right for patients with AF? Dr. O’Gara said one of the best reviews he’s seen came from the University of Adelaide group (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):457-9). They recommended a total of 120-200 minutes of exercise per week spread over three to five sessions. While the research base is strongest for moderate-intensity exercise, the Australians also noted the effectiveness and safety of a novel program of repeated 4-minute intervals of high-intensity exercise at 85%-95% of peak heart rate as demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial by investigators at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim. They showed this approach resulted in reduced time in AF and decreased AF symptoms coupled with improved quality of life and left atrial and ventricular function (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):466-73).
“I think you could look at this review and feel very confident that there is some evidence base to substantiate your strong recommendation that patients actively engage in exercise as treatment for their atrial fibrillation,” the cardiologist said.
Sleep apnea: Investigators at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston have demonstrated that effective treatment of sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with smaller atrial size and ventricular mass, lower blood pressure, and a significantly reduced risk of recurrent AF following an AF ablation procedure (J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000421).
“Sleep hygiene is one of the least attended aspects of cardiovascular health,” according to Dr. O’Gara. “We need to ask the partner or spouse, ‘How well does your partner sleep? Do you hear thrashing about, snoring, gagging, or notice restless legs?’ Heart failure folks are really tuned into this, but in the practice of seeing patients come into the emergency room with new-onset atrial fibrillation, it’s tenth on the list of five questions one would ask.”
Dr. O’Gara reported having no financial conflicts.
SNOWMASS, COLO. – Overlooking the common modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation is missing out on an excellent opportunity to help curb the growing global pandemic of the arrhythmia, Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“My purpose here is a wake up call to improve screening for and treatment of modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation,” declared Dr. O’Gara, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Overweight/obesity: Investigators at the University of Adelaide (Australia) demonstrated in the LEGACY trial that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more reduced their AF symptom burden in a dose-response fashion as they shed excess pounds as part of an intensive weight management program. Those who shed at least 10% of their baseline body weight had a 46% rate of 5-year freedom from AF without resort to rhythm control medications or ablation procedures of 46%. With 3%-9% weight loss, the rate was 22%. And with 3% weight loss, it was 13%.
The best results came from sustained linear weight loss. Weight fluctuations of greater than 5% – the classic yoyo dieting pattern – partially offset the overall benefit of weight loss with respect to recurrent AF (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2159-69).
In a separate study, the same team of Australian investigators offered an opportunity to participate in a risk factor management program to patients with AF and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more who were undergoing radiofrequency ablation for their arrhythmia. Participants had significantly fewer repeat ablation procedures during followup and were also less likely to be on antiarrhythmic drugs than the patients who opted for usual care (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2222-31).
Alcohol: The ‘holiday heart’ syndrome is well known, but alcohol consumption beyond binging can increase risk for AF. Dr. O’Gara noted that in a recent review article entitled “Alcohol and Atrial Fibrillation: A Sobering Review,” investigators at the University of Melbourne showed that while the relationship between the number of standard drinks per week and risk of cardiovascular mortality is J-shaped, with a nadir at 14-21 drinks per week in men and fewer in women, the risk of developing AF is linear over time and appears to increase incrementally with every additional drink per week (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 13;68(23):2567-76).
Also, a prospective study of nearly 80,000 Swedes free from AF at baseline, coupled with a meta-analysis of seven prospective studies found that for each additional drink per day consumed the risk of developing AF rose over time by roughly a further 10% compared to that of teetotalers (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; Jul 22;64(3):281-9).
Physical inactivity: In the prospective Tromso Study, in which more than 20,000 Norwegian adults were followed for 20 years, leisure time physical activity displayed a J-shaped relationship with the risk of developing AF. Moderately active subjects were an adjusted 19% less likely to develop AF than those with low physical activity, while the risk in subjects who regularly engaged in vigorous physical activity was 37% higher than in the low-activity group (Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2307-13).
“This effect of moderate exercise might be due to the associated weight loss, improved endothelial function, better sleep, perhaps a better balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems,” Dr. O’Gara observed.
How much physical activity is right for patients with AF? Dr. O’Gara said one of the best reviews he’s seen came from the University of Adelaide group (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):457-9). They recommended a total of 120-200 minutes of exercise per week spread over three to five sessions. While the research base is strongest for moderate-intensity exercise, the Australians also noted the effectiveness and safety of a novel program of repeated 4-minute intervals of high-intensity exercise at 85%-95% of peak heart rate as demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial by investigators at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim. They showed this approach resulted in reduced time in AF and decreased AF symptoms coupled with improved quality of life and left atrial and ventricular function (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):466-73).
“I think you could look at this review and feel very confident that there is some evidence base to substantiate your strong recommendation that patients actively engage in exercise as treatment for their atrial fibrillation,” the cardiologist said.
Sleep apnea: Investigators at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston have demonstrated that effective treatment of sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with smaller atrial size and ventricular mass, lower blood pressure, and a significantly reduced risk of recurrent AF following an AF ablation procedure (J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000421).
“Sleep hygiene is one of the least attended aspects of cardiovascular health,” according to Dr. O’Gara. “We need to ask the partner or spouse, ‘How well does your partner sleep? Do you hear thrashing about, snoring, gagging, or notice restless legs?’ Heart failure folks are really tuned into this, but in the practice of seeing patients come into the emergency room with new-onset atrial fibrillation, it’s tenth on the list of five questions one would ask.”
Dr. O’Gara reported having no financial conflicts.
SNOWMASS, COLO. – Overlooking the common modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation is missing out on an excellent opportunity to help curb the growing global pandemic of the arrhythmia, Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“My purpose here is a wake up call to improve screening for and treatment of modifiable risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation,” declared Dr. O’Gara, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Overweight/obesity: Investigators at the University of Adelaide (Australia) demonstrated in the LEGACY trial that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more reduced their AF symptom burden in a dose-response fashion as they shed excess pounds as part of an intensive weight management program. Those who shed at least 10% of their baseline body weight had a 46% rate of 5-year freedom from AF without resort to rhythm control medications or ablation procedures of 46%. With 3%-9% weight loss, the rate was 22%. And with 3% weight loss, it was 13%.
The best results came from sustained linear weight loss. Weight fluctuations of greater than 5% – the classic yoyo dieting pattern – partially offset the overall benefit of weight loss with respect to recurrent AF (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2159-69).
In a separate study, the same team of Australian investigators offered an opportunity to participate in a risk factor management program to patients with AF and a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more who were undergoing radiofrequency ablation for their arrhythmia. Participants had significantly fewer repeat ablation procedures during followup and were also less likely to be on antiarrhythmic drugs than the patients who opted for usual care (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2222-31).
Alcohol: The ‘holiday heart’ syndrome is well known, but alcohol consumption beyond binging can increase risk for AF. Dr. O’Gara noted that in a recent review article entitled “Alcohol and Atrial Fibrillation: A Sobering Review,” investigators at the University of Melbourne showed that while the relationship between the number of standard drinks per week and risk of cardiovascular mortality is J-shaped, with a nadir at 14-21 drinks per week in men and fewer in women, the risk of developing AF is linear over time and appears to increase incrementally with every additional drink per week (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 13;68(23):2567-76).
Also, a prospective study of nearly 80,000 Swedes free from AF at baseline, coupled with a meta-analysis of seven prospective studies found that for each additional drink per day consumed the risk of developing AF rose over time by roughly a further 10% compared to that of teetotalers (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; Jul 22;64(3):281-9).
Physical inactivity: In the prospective Tromso Study, in which more than 20,000 Norwegian adults were followed for 20 years, leisure time physical activity displayed a J-shaped relationship with the risk of developing AF. Moderately active subjects were an adjusted 19% less likely to develop AF than those with low physical activity, while the risk in subjects who regularly engaged in vigorous physical activity was 37% higher than in the low-activity group (Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2307-13).
“This effect of moderate exercise might be due to the associated weight loss, improved endothelial function, better sleep, perhaps a better balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems,” Dr. O’Gara observed.
How much physical activity is right for patients with AF? Dr. O’Gara said one of the best reviews he’s seen came from the University of Adelaide group (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):457-9). They recommended a total of 120-200 minutes of exercise per week spread over three to five sessions. While the research base is strongest for moderate-intensity exercise, the Australians also noted the effectiveness and safety of a novel program of repeated 4-minute intervals of high-intensity exercise at 85%-95% of peak heart rate as demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial by investigators at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim. They showed this approach resulted in reduced time in AF and decreased AF symptoms coupled with improved quality of life and left atrial and ventricular function (Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):466-73).
“I think you could look at this review and feel very confident that there is some evidence base to substantiate your strong recommendation that patients actively engage in exercise as treatment for their atrial fibrillation,” the cardiologist said.
Sleep apnea: Investigators at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston have demonstrated that effective treatment of sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with smaller atrial size and ventricular mass, lower blood pressure, and a significantly reduced risk of recurrent AF following an AF ablation procedure (J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000421).
“Sleep hygiene is one of the least attended aspects of cardiovascular health,” according to Dr. O’Gara. “We need to ask the partner or spouse, ‘How well does your partner sleep? Do you hear thrashing about, snoring, gagging, or notice restless legs?’ Heart failure folks are really tuned into this, but in the practice of seeing patients come into the emergency room with new-onset atrial fibrillation, it’s tenth on the list of five questions one would ask.”
Dr. O’Gara reported having no financial conflicts.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE CARDIOVASCULAR CONFERENCE AT SNOWMASS
Cardiac procedures tied to higher cancer risk in adult congenital heart disease
NEW ORLEANS – The greater the lifetime number of cardiac procedures entailing exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation, the higher the associated cancer risk in adults with congenital heart disease, Sarah Cohen, MD, reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.
This finding takes on added clinical import because the use of such procedures has increased markedly in patients with adult congenital heart disease, added Dr. Cohen of McGill University in Montreal.
She presented analyses of nearly 25,000 patients in the Quebec congenital heart disease database who were ages 18-64 with no history of cancer in January 1995; 602 of them were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up through 2009. Each was matched to four cancer-free controls in the database on the basis of age, sex, congenital heart disease severity, and calendar year.
Patients with a lifetime total of four or five cardiac procedures involving exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation were 1.7-fold more likely to be diagnosed with cancer during follow-up than were those with a history of no such procedures or just one. With a lifetime history of six or more of the procedures, the relative risk climbed to 2.2-fold.
Nearly 90% of the malignancies were genitourinary, respiratory, digestive, breast, or hematologic cancers.
Dr. Cohen and her coinvestigators also conducted a cohort study comparing the relative risk of developing cancer in 1,781 high-exposure Quebec adults in the database who had a lifetime history of four or more cardiac procedures involving radiation exposure to more than 20,000 others with a history of not more than one such procedure. The high-exposure group had a 3.3-fold greater rate of malignancy during follow-up.
In a separate study, Dr. Cohen’s McGill colleagues analyzed the Quebec database and documented the sharp rise over time in low-dose ionizing radiation cardiac procedures, including catheter-based diagnostic procedures, structural heart interventions, nuclear procedures, coronary interventions, computed tomography scans of the chest, coronary interventions, and insertion or repair of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In 1990, the rate was 18.5 such procedures per 1,000 patients per year. By 2005, it had nearly tripled to 51.9 per 1,000 per year. The age at first procedure dropped from 5 years to 9 months (Circulation 2016 Jan 5;133[1]:12-20).
Dr. Cohen reported having no financial disclosures.
NEW ORLEANS – The greater the lifetime number of cardiac procedures entailing exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation, the higher the associated cancer risk in adults with congenital heart disease, Sarah Cohen, MD, reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.
This finding takes on added clinical import because the use of such procedures has increased markedly in patients with adult congenital heart disease, added Dr. Cohen of McGill University in Montreal.
She presented analyses of nearly 25,000 patients in the Quebec congenital heart disease database who were ages 18-64 with no history of cancer in January 1995; 602 of them were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up through 2009. Each was matched to four cancer-free controls in the database on the basis of age, sex, congenital heart disease severity, and calendar year.
Patients with a lifetime total of four or five cardiac procedures involving exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation were 1.7-fold more likely to be diagnosed with cancer during follow-up than were those with a history of no such procedures or just one. With a lifetime history of six or more of the procedures, the relative risk climbed to 2.2-fold.
Nearly 90% of the malignancies were genitourinary, respiratory, digestive, breast, or hematologic cancers.
Dr. Cohen and her coinvestigators also conducted a cohort study comparing the relative risk of developing cancer in 1,781 high-exposure Quebec adults in the database who had a lifetime history of four or more cardiac procedures involving radiation exposure to more than 20,000 others with a history of not more than one such procedure. The high-exposure group had a 3.3-fold greater rate of malignancy during follow-up.
In a separate study, Dr. Cohen’s McGill colleagues analyzed the Quebec database and documented the sharp rise over time in low-dose ionizing radiation cardiac procedures, including catheter-based diagnostic procedures, structural heart interventions, nuclear procedures, coronary interventions, computed tomography scans of the chest, coronary interventions, and insertion or repair of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In 1990, the rate was 18.5 such procedures per 1,000 patients per year. By 2005, it had nearly tripled to 51.9 per 1,000 per year. The age at first procedure dropped from 5 years to 9 months (Circulation 2016 Jan 5;133[1]:12-20).
Dr. Cohen reported having no financial disclosures.
NEW ORLEANS – The greater the lifetime number of cardiac procedures entailing exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation, the higher the associated cancer risk in adults with congenital heart disease, Sarah Cohen, MD, reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.
This finding takes on added clinical import because the use of such procedures has increased markedly in patients with adult congenital heart disease, added Dr. Cohen of McGill University in Montreal.
She presented analyses of nearly 25,000 patients in the Quebec congenital heart disease database who were ages 18-64 with no history of cancer in January 1995; 602 of them were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up through 2009. Each was matched to four cancer-free controls in the database on the basis of age, sex, congenital heart disease severity, and calendar year.
Patients with a lifetime total of four or five cardiac procedures involving exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation were 1.7-fold more likely to be diagnosed with cancer during follow-up than were those with a history of no such procedures or just one. With a lifetime history of six or more of the procedures, the relative risk climbed to 2.2-fold.
Nearly 90% of the malignancies were genitourinary, respiratory, digestive, breast, or hematologic cancers.
Dr. Cohen and her coinvestigators also conducted a cohort study comparing the relative risk of developing cancer in 1,781 high-exposure Quebec adults in the database who had a lifetime history of four or more cardiac procedures involving radiation exposure to more than 20,000 others with a history of not more than one such procedure. The high-exposure group had a 3.3-fold greater rate of malignancy during follow-up.
In a separate study, Dr. Cohen’s McGill colleagues analyzed the Quebec database and documented the sharp rise over time in low-dose ionizing radiation cardiac procedures, including catheter-based diagnostic procedures, structural heart interventions, nuclear procedures, coronary interventions, computed tomography scans of the chest, coronary interventions, and insertion or repair of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In 1990, the rate was 18.5 such procedures per 1,000 patients per year. By 2005, it had nearly tripled to 51.9 per 1,000 per year. The age at first procedure dropped from 5 years to 9 months (Circulation 2016 Jan 5;133[1]:12-20).
Dr. Cohen reported having no financial disclosures.
AT THE AHA SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Adults with congenital heart disease who had a lifetime history of six or more cardiac procedures involving exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation were 2.2-fold more likely to develop cancer during follow-up than were those with not more than one such procedure.
Data source: This nested, case-control study included 602 adults with congenital heart disease who developed cancer, each matched to four controls who did not.
Disclosures: The study presenter reported having no financial disclosures.
Nivolumab safe, effective for salvage in advanced gastric cancer
SAN FRANCISCO – The human monoclonal IgG4 antibody nivolumab was safe and effective as a salvage treatment for patients in a randomized phase III trial who failed standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Nivolumab, which blocks the human programmed cell death-1 receptor, was superior to placebo with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate, Yoon-Koo Kang, MD, reported at the symposium sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.
For the study (ONO-4538), 493 patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and unresectable advanced or recurrent advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer who failed 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive placebo or nivolumab in a 2:1 ratio. Nivolumab treatment was associated with significantly improved median overall survival at the time of data cut-off 5.6 months after the last patient was randomized (5.32 months vs. 4.14 months with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.63), said Dr. Kang of Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
The overall survival rate at 12 months was 26.6% vs. 10.9%, respectively, he said.
The overall response rate was 11.2% vs. 0%, and median progression-free survival was 1.61 months vs. 1.45 months (hazard ratio, 0.60) with nivolumab vs. placebo, respectively.
“Median duration of response was 9.53 months,” he said.
Study subjects were adults aged 20 years or older who were enrolled from 49 centers in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The 330 patients in the nivolumab group received 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until toxicity became unacceptable or disease progressed. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.7% vs. 26.7% of nivolumab and placebo group patients, respectively, and grade 3 or greater events occurred in 11.5% vs. 5.5%, respectively.
Grade 3 or 4 events reported in more than 2% of patients were diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, pyrexia, and increased AST and ALT in the treatment group, and fatigue and decreased appetite in the placebo group. The rates of discontinuation of active treatment due to drug-related adverse events were similar at 2.7% and 2.5% in the groups, respectively, he said, noting that the safety profile was consistent with findings in prior studies involving patients with solid tumors.
The findings demonstrate a clinical benefit with nivolumab in pretreated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, and establish a strong basis for conducting additional studies of the drug in such patients, he concluded.
ONO-4538 was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Kang reported a consulting or advisory role with Lilly/ImClone, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, and research funding from Bayer, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech.
SAN FRANCISCO – The human monoclonal IgG4 antibody nivolumab was safe and effective as a salvage treatment for patients in a randomized phase III trial who failed standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Nivolumab, which blocks the human programmed cell death-1 receptor, was superior to placebo with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate, Yoon-Koo Kang, MD, reported at the symposium sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.
For the study (ONO-4538), 493 patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and unresectable advanced or recurrent advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer who failed 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive placebo or nivolumab in a 2:1 ratio. Nivolumab treatment was associated with significantly improved median overall survival at the time of data cut-off 5.6 months after the last patient was randomized (5.32 months vs. 4.14 months with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.63), said Dr. Kang of Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
The overall survival rate at 12 months was 26.6% vs. 10.9%, respectively, he said.
The overall response rate was 11.2% vs. 0%, and median progression-free survival was 1.61 months vs. 1.45 months (hazard ratio, 0.60) with nivolumab vs. placebo, respectively.
“Median duration of response was 9.53 months,” he said.
Study subjects were adults aged 20 years or older who were enrolled from 49 centers in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The 330 patients in the nivolumab group received 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until toxicity became unacceptable or disease progressed. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.7% vs. 26.7% of nivolumab and placebo group patients, respectively, and grade 3 or greater events occurred in 11.5% vs. 5.5%, respectively.
Grade 3 or 4 events reported in more than 2% of patients were diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, pyrexia, and increased AST and ALT in the treatment group, and fatigue and decreased appetite in the placebo group. The rates of discontinuation of active treatment due to drug-related adverse events were similar at 2.7% and 2.5% in the groups, respectively, he said, noting that the safety profile was consistent with findings in prior studies involving patients with solid tumors.
The findings demonstrate a clinical benefit with nivolumab in pretreated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, and establish a strong basis for conducting additional studies of the drug in such patients, he concluded.
ONO-4538 was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Kang reported a consulting or advisory role with Lilly/ImClone, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, and research funding from Bayer, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech.
SAN FRANCISCO – The human monoclonal IgG4 antibody nivolumab was safe and effective as a salvage treatment for patients in a randomized phase III trial who failed standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Nivolumab, which blocks the human programmed cell death-1 receptor, was superior to placebo with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate, Yoon-Koo Kang, MD, reported at the symposium sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.
For the study (ONO-4538), 493 patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and unresectable advanced or recurrent advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer who failed 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive placebo or nivolumab in a 2:1 ratio. Nivolumab treatment was associated with significantly improved median overall survival at the time of data cut-off 5.6 months after the last patient was randomized (5.32 months vs. 4.14 months with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.63), said Dr. Kang of Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
The overall survival rate at 12 months was 26.6% vs. 10.9%, respectively, he said.
The overall response rate was 11.2% vs. 0%, and median progression-free survival was 1.61 months vs. 1.45 months (hazard ratio, 0.60) with nivolumab vs. placebo, respectively.
“Median duration of response was 9.53 months,” he said.
Study subjects were adults aged 20 years or older who were enrolled from 49 centers in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The 330 patients in the nivolumab group received 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until toxicity became unacceptable or disease progressed. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.7% vs. 26.7% of nivolumab and placebo group patients, respectively, and grade 3 or greater events occurred in 11.5% vs. 5.5%, respectively.
Grade 3 or 4 events reported in more than 2% of patients were diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, pyrexia, and increased AST and ALT in the treatment group, and fatigue and decreased appetite in the placebo group. The rates of discontinuation of active treatment due to drug-related adverse events were similar at 2.7% and 2.5% in the groups, respectively, he said, noting that the safety profile was consistent with findings in prior studies involving patients with solid tumors.
The findings demonstrate a clinical benefit with nivolumab in pretreated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, and establish a strong basis for conducting additional studies of the drug in such patients, he concluded.
ONO-4538 was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Kang reported a consulting or advisory role with Lilly/ImClone, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, and research funding from Bayer, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech.
AT THE 2017 GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS SYMPOSIUM
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The overall survival rate at 12 months was 26.6% vs. 10.9% with nivolumab vs. placebo, respectively.
Data source: The randomized phase III ONO-4538 trial.
Disclosures: ONO-4538 was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Kang reported a consulting or advisory role with Lilly/ImClone, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, and research funding from Bayer, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech.
New report highlights gaps in knowledge on marijuana use
A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.
“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”
The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.
However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.
Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.
“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”
From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”
Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.
Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.
“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”
Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.
“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”
Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.
“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”
The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.
However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.
Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.
“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”
From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”
Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.
Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.
“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”
Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.
“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”
Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.
“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”
The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.
However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.
Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.
“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”
From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”
Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.
Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.
“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”
Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.
“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”
Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
FROM THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING AND MEDICINE
57% drop in central venous catheter–related infections after QI interventions
Quality improvement (QI) interventions related to the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) were, on average, associated with 57% fewer infections and $1.85 million in net savings to hospitals within 1-3 years of implementation, based on the results of a meta-analysis of data from 113 hospitals.
“Hospitals that have already attained very low infection rates (through the use of quality improvement checklists) would likely see smaller clinical benefits and savings than in the studies we have reviewed,” said Dr. Teryl Nuckols of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. “Nonetheless, we found that QI interventions can be associated with declines in CLABSI (central line-associated bloodstream infection) and/or CRBSI (catheter-related bloodstream infection) and net savings when checklists are already in use, and when hospitals have CLABSI rates as low as 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 CVC-days.”
Studies were eligible for the analysis if they reported or estimated the quality improvement intervention’s clinical effectiveness, measured or modeled its costs, compared alternatives to the intervention, and reported both program and infection-related costs.
Insertion checklists were examined in 12 studies, physician education in 11 studies, ultrasound-guided placement of catheters in 3 studies, all-inclusive catheter kits in 5 studies, sterile dressings in 5 studies, chlorhexidine gluconate sponge or antimicrobial dressing in 2 studies, and antimicrobial catheters in 2 studies.
Overall, the weighted mean incidence rate ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.51) and incremental net savings were $1.85 million (95% CI, $1.30 million to $2.40 million) per hospital over 3 years (2015 U.S. dollars). Each $100,000 increase in program cost was associated with $315,000 greater savings (95% CI, $166 000-$464 000; P less than .001). Infections and net costs declined when hospitals already used checklists or had baseline infection rates of 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. (doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6610)
Dr. Nuckols acknowledged that the price tag for achieving these savings “may be burdensome for hospitals with limited financial resources … wages and benefits account for two-thirds of all spending by hospitals, and a quarter of hospitals have had negative operating margins in recent years. We found that, for CLABSI- and CRBSI-prevention interventions, median program costs were about $270,000 per hospital over 3 years – but reached $500,000 to $750,000 in some studies.”
The researchers recommended that “future research should more thoroughly examine the relationships among hospital financial performance, economic investments in QI, and effects on quality of care.”
Quality improvement (QI) interventions related to the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) were, on average, associated with 57% fewer infections and $1.85 million in net savings to hospitals within 1-3 years of implementation, based on the results of a meta-analysis of data from 113 hospitals.
“Hospitals that have already attained very low infection rates (through the use of quality improvement checklists) would likely see smaller clinical benefits and savings than in the studies we have reviewed,” said Dr. Teryl Nuckols of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. “Nonetheless, we found that QI interventions can be associated with declines in CLABSI (central line-associated bloodstream infection) and/or CRBSI (catheter-related bloodstream infection) and net savings when checklists are already in use, and when hospitals have CLABSI rates as low as 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 CVC-days.”
Studies were eligible for the analysis if they reported or estimated the quality improvement intervention’s clinical effectiveness, measured or modeled its costs, compared alternatives to the intervention, and reported both program and infection-related costs.
Insertion checklists were examined in 12 studies, physician education in 11 studies, ultrasound-guided placement of catheters in 3 studies, all-inclusive catheter kits in 5 studies, sterile dressings in 5 studies, chlorhexidine gluconate sponge or antimicrobial dressing in 2 studies, and antimicrobial catheters in 2 studies.
Overall, the weighted mean incidence rate ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.51) and incremental net savings were $1.85 million (95% CI, $1.30 million to $2.40 million) per hospital over 3 years (2015 U.S. dollars). Each $100,000 increase in program cost was associated with $315,000 greater savings (95% CI, $166 000-$464 000; P less than .001). Infections and net costs declined when hospitals already used checklists or had baseline infection rates of 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. (doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6610)
Dr. Nuckols acknowledged that the price tag for achieving these savings “may be burdensome for hospitals with limited financial resources … wages and benefits account for two-thirds of all spending by hospitals, and a quarter of hospitals have had negative operating margins in recent years. We found that, for CLABSI- and CRBSI-prevention interventions, median program costs were about $270,000 per hospital over 3 years – but reached $500,000 to $750,000 in some studies.”
The researchers recommended that “future research should more thoroughly examine the relationships among hospital financial performance, economic investments in QI, and effects on quality of care.”
Quality improvement (QI) interventions related to the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) were, on average, associated with 57% fewer infections and $1.85 million in net savings to hospitals within 1-3 years of implementation, based on the results of a meta-analysis of data from 113 hospitals.
“Hospitals that have already attained very low infection rates (through the use of quality improvement checklists) would likely see smaller clinical benefits and savings than in the studies we have reviewed,” said Dr. Teryl Nuckols of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. “Nonetheless, we found that QI interventions can be associated with declines in CLABSI (central line-associated bloodstream infection) and/or CRBSI (catheter-related bloodstream infection) and net savings when checklists are already in use, and when hospitals have CLABSI rates as low as 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 CVC-days.”
Studies were eligible for the analysis if they reported or estimated the quality improvement intervention’s clinical effectiveness, measured or modeled its costs, compared alternatives to the intervention, and reported both program and infection-related costs.
Insertion checklists were examined in 12 studies, physician education in 11 studies, ultrasound-guided placement of catheters in 3 studies, all-inclusive catheter kits in 5 studies, sterile dressings in 5 studies, chlorhexidine gluconate sponge or antimicrobial dressing in 2 studies, and antimicrobial catheters in 2 studies.
Overall, the weighted mean incidence rate ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.51) and incremental net savings were $1.85 million (95% CI, $1.30 million to $2.40 million) per hospital over 3 years (2015 U.S. dollars). Each $100,000 increase in program cost was associated with $315,000 greater savings (95% CI, $166 000-$464 000; P less than .001). Infections and net costs declined when hospitals already used checklists or had baseline infection rates of 1.7-3.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. (doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6610)
Dr. Nuckols acknowledged that the price tag for achieving these savings “may be burdensome for hospitals with limited financial resources … wages and benefits account for two-thirds of all spending by hospitals, and a quarter of hospitals have had negative operating margins in recent years. We found that, for CLABSI- and CRBSI-prevention interventions, median program costs were about $270,000 per hospital over 3 years – but reached $500,000 to $750,000 in some studies.”
The researchers recommended that “future research should more thoroughly examine the relationships among hospital financial performance, economic investments in QI, and effects on quality of care.”
PET-directed induction therapy improves esophageal cancer outcomes
SAN FRANCISCO – The use of positron emission tomography to assess esophageal tumor response to induction chemotherapy and to guide a regimen change in those who failed to respond was associated with an improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients in a phase II randomized trial.
Of 257 patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas who were randomized after a baseline PET scan to receive induction chemotherapy with either modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) on days 1, 15, and 29, or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29, 39 patients and 49 patients, respectively, were found on a repeat PET scan performed between days 36 and 42 after initiation of therapy to be nonresponders. Those patients were switched to the alternative regimen during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Eligible subjects underwent surgical resection 6 weeks after CRT. The pCR rate after surgery among those who were switched because of initial nonresponse was 18%, compared with an expected rate of 5% based on data from prior studies in which chemotherapy was not changed in nonresponders. The rate was 26% in PET responders, Karyn A. Goodman, MD, reported at the symposium, sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology..
“Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is an accepted standard of care for patients with operable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but even with this aggressive approach, 5-year overall survival rates are on the order of 40%-50%, and most patients die of systemic disease. Optimal systemic therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers remains undefined, so better methods to identify effective therapies are needed,” she said.
Based on findings from the German, phase II, multicenter MUNICON trial, which showed that early PET responders to chemotherapy had significantly better event-free survival than did PET nonresponders (30 vs. 14 months), and that immediate surgical resection among those identified as nonresponders was also associated with improved outcomes, Dr. Goodman and her colleagues “set out to do CALGB 80803 [the current trial] to evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by PET imaging to direct further therapy … with the goal of improving treatment responses,” she said.
Among secondary CALGB 80803 endpoints was the PET response in the treatment arms.
The rate of response to induction chemotherapy was 57% in the FOLFOX group, and 50% in the CP group. The nonresponders were switched to the alternate regimen, and 84% of patients went on to surgery.
The overall pCR rate after surgery was 19% for those who switched from FOLFOX to CP, and 17% for those who switched from CP to FOLFOX.
“The efficacy criteria for changing therapy was met for both induction arms,” she said.
“Of note, patients who were PET responders who had induction and concurrent FOLFOX had a pCR rate of almost 38%. The pCR rate for patients who started on the induction FOLFOX arm was 31%, and for those who started on the induction CP arm it was 14%, and for all patients enrolled on the study, the pCR rate was 22.7%” she said.
PET scans are routinely used to guide therapy decisions in patients with lymphoma, but are only beginning to be explored for this purpose in solid tumors. CALGB 80803 is among the first to show the benefit of PET imaging in directing presurgery treatment decisions for esophageal cancer.
“We’ve shown that a short course of induction chemotherapy followed by early response assessment using PET imaging to determine whether to switch from ineffective therapy to alternative chemotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for PET nonresponders is feasible for esophageal and GEJ cancers,” she said, adding that the findings demonstrate a benefit with “a new paradigm of using metabolic imaging … to individualize multimodality therapy and improve outcomes in this poor-prognosis population.”
Further, while the study was not powered for a head-to-head comparison of FOLFOX and CP, the “very promising” 38% pCR rate with FOLFOX induction and concurrent therapy is hypothesis generating, she said.
“How these improvements in pCR translate into survival benefit will be determined with longer follow-up,” she added, noting in response to a question about whether these findings will change practice that “this is really the first step in the process. If we can improve outcomes by changing treatment early on, this should be standard of care, but we really do need to get survival outcome information.”
PET at baseline is already standard; adding another scan adds additional cost, but this potentially may be offset by the prevention of costly toxicities and other problems that have to be addressed, she said, concluding that “going forward, early-response assessment using PET imaging can be incorporated into studies to identify more effective new regimens for esophageal and GEJ cancers.”
During a preconference press cast on the findings, press cast moderator Nancy Baxter, MD, of ASCO said that PET scans may prove to be a valuable tool for fine-tuning the use of chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, and for maximizing the benefit of chemotherapy for each patient.
“This is heartening evidence for a new approach to treating a disease where innovation is sorely needed,” she said.
CALGB 80803 was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Goodman and Dr. Baxter reported having no disclosures.
SAN FRANCISCO – The use of positron emission tomography to assess esophageal tumor response to induction chemotherapy and to guide a regimen change in those who failed to respond was associated with an improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients in a phase II randomized trial.
Of 257 patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas who were randomized after a baseline PET scan to receive induction chemotherapy with either modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) on days 1, 15, and 29, or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29, 39 patients and 49 patients, respectively, were found on a repeat PET scan performed between days 36 and 42 after initiation of therapy to be nonresponders. Those patients were switched to the alternative regimen during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Eligible subjects underwent surgical resection 6 weeks after CRT. The pCR rate after surgery among those who were switched because of initial nonresponse was 18%, compared with an expected rate of 5% based on data from prior studies in which chemotherapy was not changed in nonresponders. The rate was 26% in PET responders, Karyn A. Goodman, MD, reported at the symposium, sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology..
“Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is an accepted standard of care for patients with operable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but even with this aggressive approach, 5-year overall survival rates are on the order of 40%-50%, and most patients die of systemic disease. Optimal systemic therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers remains undefined, so better methods to identify effective therapies are needed,” she said.
Based on findings from the German, phase II, multicenter MUNICON trial, which showed that early PET responders to chemotherapy had significantly better event-free survival than did PET nonresponders (30 vs. 14 months), and that immediate surgical resection among those identified as nonresponders was also associated with improved outcomes, Dr. Goodman and her colleagues “set out to do CALGB 80803 [the current trial] to evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by PET imaging to direct further therapy … with the goal of improving treatment responses,” she said.
Among secondary CALGB 80803 endpoints was the PET response in the treatment arms.
The rate of response to induction chemotherapy was 57% in the FOLFOX group, and 50% in the CP group. The nonresponders were switched to the alternate regimen, and 84% of patients went on to surgery.
The overall pCR rate after surgery was 19% for those who switched from FOLFOX to CP, and 17% for those who switched from CP to FOLFOX.
“The efficacy criteria for changing therapy was met for both induction arms,” she said.
“Of note, patients who were PET responders who had induction and concurrent FOLFOX had a pCR rate of almost 38%. The pCR rate for patients who started on the induction FOLFOX arm was 31%, and for those who started on the induction CP arm it was 14%, and for all patients enrolled on the study, the pCR rate was 22.7%” she said.
PET scans are routinely used to guide therapy decisions in patients with lymphoma, but are only beginning to be explored for this purpose in solid tumors. CALGB 80803 is among the first to show the benefit of PET imaging in directing presurgery treatment decisions for esophageal cancer.
“We’ve shown that a short course of induction chemotherapy followed by early response assessment using PET imaging to determine whether to switch from ineffective therapy to alternative chemotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for PET nonresponders is feasible for esophageal and GEJ cancers,” she said, adding that the findings demonstrate a benefit with “a new paradigm of using metabolic imaging … to individualize multimodality therapy and improve outcomes in this poor-prognosis population.”
Further, while the study was not powered for a head-to-head comparison of FOLFOX and CP, the “very promising” 38% pCR rate with FOLFOX induction and concurrent therapy is hypothesis generating, she said.
“How these improvements in pCR translate into survival benefit will be determined with longer follow-up,” she added, noting in response to a question about whether these findings will change practice that “this is really the first step in the process. If we can improve outcomes by changing treatment early on, this should be standard of care, but we really do need to get survival outcome information.”
PET at baseline is already standard; adding another scan adds additional cost, but this potentially may be offset by the prevention of costly toxicities and other problems that have to be addressed, she said, concluding that “going forward, early-response assessment using PET imaging can be incorporated into studies to identify more effective new regimens for esophageal and GEJ cancers.”
During a preconference press cast on the findings, press cast moderator Nancy Baxter, MD, of ASCO said that PET scans may prove to be a valuable tool for fine-tuning the use of chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, and for maximizing the benefit of chemotherapy for each patient.
“This is heartening evidence for a new approach to treating a disease where innovation is sorely needed,” she said.
CALGB 80803 was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Goodman and Dr. Baxter reported having no disclosures.
SAN FRANCISCO – The use of positron emission tomography to assess esophageal tumor response to induction chemotherapy and to guide a regimen change in those who failed to respond was associated with an improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients in a phase II randomized trial.
Of 257 patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas who were randomized after a baseline PET scan to receive induction chemotherapy with either modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) on days 1, 15, and 29, or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29, 39 patients and 49 patients, respectively, were found on a repeat PET scan performed between days 36 and 42 after initiation of therapy to be nonresponders. Those patients were switched to the alternative regimen during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Eligible subjects underwent surgical resection 6 weeks after CRT. The pCR rate after surgery among those who were switched because of initial nonresponse was 18%, compared with an expected rate of 5% based on data from prior studies in which chemotherapy was not changed in nonresponders. The rate was 26% in PET responders, Karyn A. Goodman, MD, reported at the symposium, sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology..
“Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is an accepted standard of care for patients with operable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but even with this aggressive approach, 5-year overall survival rates are on the order of 40%-50%, and most patients die of systemic disease. Optimal systemic therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers remains undefined, so better methods to identify effective therapies are needed,” she said.
Based on findings from the German, phase II, multicenter MUNICON trial, which showed that early PET responders to chemotherapy had significantly better event-free survival than did PET nonresponders (30 vs. 14 months), and that immediate surgical resection among those identified as nonresponders was also associated with improved outcomes, Dr. Goodman and her colleagues “set out to do CALGB 80803 [the current trial] to evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by PET imaging to direct further therapy … with the goal of improving treatment responses,” she said.
Among secondary CALGB 80803 endpoints was the PET response in the treatment arms.
The rate of response to induction chemotherapy was 57% in the FOLFOX group, and 50% in the CP group. The nonresponders were switched to the alternate regimen, and 84% of patients went on to surgery.
The overall pCR rate after surgery was 19% for those who switched from FOLFOX to CP, and 17% for those who switched from CP to FOLFOX.
“The efficacy criteria for changing therapy was met for both induction arms,” she said.
“Of note, patients who were PET responders who had induction and concurrent FOLFOX had a pCR rate of almost 38%. The pCR rate for patients who started on the induction FOLFOX arm was 31%, and for those who started on the induction CP arm it was 14%, and for all patients enrolled on the study, the pCR rate was 22.7%” she said.
PET scans are routinely used to guide therapy decisions in patients with lymphoma, but are only beginning to be explored for this purpose in solid tumors. CALGB 80803 is among the first to show the benefit of PET imaging in directing presurgery treatment decisions for esophageal cancer.
“We’ve shown that a short course of induction chemotherapy followed by early response assessment using PET imaging to determine whether to switch from ineffective therapy to alternative chemotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for PET nonresponders is feasible for esophageal and GEJ cancers,” she said, adding that the findings demonstrate a benefit with “a new paradigm of using metabolic imaging … to individualize multimodality therapy and improve outcomes in this poor-prognosis population.”
Further, while the study was not powered for a head-to-head comparison of FOLFOX and CP, the “very promising” 38% pCR rate with FOLFOX induction and concurrent therapy is hypothesis generating, she said.
“How these improvements in pCR translate into survival benefit will be determined with longer follow-up,” she added, noting in response to a question about whether these findings will change practice that “this is really the first step in the process. If we can improve outcomes by changing treatment early on, this should be standard of care, but we really do need to get survival outcome information.”
PET at baseline is already standard; adding another scan adds additional cost, but this potentially may be offset by the prevention of costly toxicities and other problems that have to be addressed, she said, concluding that “going forward, early-response assessment using PET imaging can be incorporated into studies to identify more effective new regimens for esophageal and GEJ cancers.”
During a preconference press cast on the findings, press cast moderator Nancy Baxter, MD, of ASCO said that PET scans may prove to be a valuable tool for fine-tuning the use of chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, and for maximizing the benefit of chemotherapy for each patient.
“This is heartening evidence for a new approach to treating a disease where innovation is sorely needed,” she said.
CALGB 80803 was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Goodman and Dr. Baxter reported having no disclosures.
AT THE 2017 GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS SYMPOSIUM
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The pathologic completer response rate among PET nonresponders who switched therapies was 18% vs. an expected rate of 5%.
Data source: The phase II randomized CALGB 80803 of 257 esophageal and GEJ cancer patients.
Disclosures: CALGB 80803 was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Goodman and Dr. Baxter reported having no disclosures.